1
Schoolwide PBIS and RtII: A How to Guide
Jason A. Pedersen, Ph.D. Michael Boneshefski, M.Ed. Perri Rosen, M.Ed. Elizabeth Van Oss, M.Ed. Derry Township School District ASPP-‐PSU Fall Conference October 23, 2013 State College, PA
Session Outcomes • Describe Derry Township School District’s SWPBS/RtII approach
• Iden<fy key aspects of an RtII system for addressing behavior concern
• Iden<fy current data streams and understand how to develop new data streams and tools for implementa<on of data collec<on/analysis
• Iden<fy tools for the provision of Tiered support • Describe implementa<on strategies including strategies to address resistance
Starting points • Reviewed the district Mission statement, Vision, and Belief statement • Adopted promo<on of Resilience as the founda<on for SWPBS/RtII
• Provided professional development on Resilience and laid the groundwork for change from a more tradi<onal model to the new model
2
Mission Statement
Engaging all students every day to help them achieve their greatest poten<al as global ci<zens.
Vision
As parents, staff and community, we will cul<vate an extraordinary learning environment that expands the minds and nurtures success for every member of the school community.
Beliefs • Effec<ve collabora<on among home, community, and school is essen<al.
• Learning within the en<re school community is op<mal when: • All who enter feel physically and emo<onally safe and secure. • Healthy minds, bodies and spirits for all are valued and encouraged.
• All children are given meaningful encouragement, guidance, support, instruc<on and an opportunity to connect with at least one significant adult.
• High expecta<ons are held for all. • Opportuni<es for all to par<cipate are equal. • Clear, consistent rules are communicated and reinforced. • All stakeholders are responsible and accountable.
3
Beliefs • Systemic change is necessary for con<nuous improvement. • Rigor, relevance, and engagement in learning are paramount.
• Individual strengths are recognized and valued in order to foster students’ pursuit of dreams.
• Curriculum, instruc<on, and assessment decisions are based on research, evidence, and best prac<ces.
• Global ci<zens require competencies in problem-‐solving, communica<on skills, technology, and teamwork.
• Professional development and collabora<on is the founda<on for con<nuous growth.
Why Resilience? • DTSD has been moving and evolving in this direc<on for several years. • We have several components in place and need to coordinate them.
• State and Na<onal Standards regarding Interpersonal Skills are soon coming.
More about Resilience • Resilience is not all or nothing.
• You can be a liWle resilient. • You can be a lot resilient. • You can be resilient in some situa<ons, but not others.
(Reivich, K., 2010). • Consequently, it can be promoted, nurtured….TAUGHT!
4
Results… • From a meta-‐analysis to appear in Child Development (2011) by Durlak, J.A., Weissberg, R.P., Dymnicki, A.B., Taylor, R.D., & Schellinger, K.B.
• Involving 270,034 kindergarten through high school students.
• Students demonstrated significantly improved social and emo<onal skills, agtudes, behavior, and academic performance that reflected an 11-‐percen(le-‐point gain in achievement.
Myths vs. Truths • Don’t show emo<on. • All about the individual (can handle anything).
• Act fast & decisive. • Accomplishes superhuman feats.
• Grace under fire. • One size fits all.
• Feel it, Share it. • Reach out to others for support.
• Tolerates ambiguity (ok with ‘I don’t know.’)
• Ability to ‘bounce back’ & hit milestones.
• Muddling through. • Know individual strengths.
Risk vs. Protective Factors • Risk factors: individual and environmental factors that place one at a greater risk for nega<ve life outcomes.
• Protec<ve Factors: individual and environmental factors that mi<gate or reduce the likelihood of nega<ve life outcomes.
5
Risk Factors Internal • Anxiety • Low self-‐esteem • Academic failure • Ineffec<ve coping strategies
• Emo<onal dysregula<on • Poor social skills
Environmental • Harsh, inconsistent discipline in the family
• Unclear boundaries at school and/or home
• Exposure to violence, drugs, etc.
• Poor peer associa<ons • Nega<ve school climate • Poverty • Neighborhood instability • Family stress
Protective Factors Internal • Op<mism • Emo<onal Awareness • Flexible thinking • Self-‐efficacy • Empathy
Environmental • Meaningful connec<on to an adult
• Realis<c, High Expecta<ons
• Clear Boundaries
Why bother teaching resilience? • Aim is to build effec<ve environments in which posi<ve behavior is more effec<ve than problem behavior.
(Florida’s Posi<ve Behavior Support Project, 2005)
• Children who are resilient are: • less likely to become depressed • more likely to reach appropriate milestones • less likely to become helpless • more likely to persist in problem solving • willing to take risks. (Reivich, K., 2010).
6
Why bother teaching resilience?
“If a child doesn’t know how to read, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to swim, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to mul(ply, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to drive, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to behave, we…
…teach? …punish?” “Why can’t we finish the last sentence as automa(cally
as we do the others?” Tom Herner (NASDE President ) Counterpoint 1998, p.2
Educators now recognize that some students DO NOT have the skills and behavioral repertories necessary to cope with the many academic and social expecta<ons in schools. (Florida’s Posi<ve Behavior Support Project, 2005)
*Our job is to help them acquire those skills.
Standards Aligned
(PA Standards Aligned System, 2010)
7
Where have we been? Tradi(onal Discipline Strategies • Focus on the student as the problem • Reac<ve in nature • Focus on topography, or form of behavior • Separa<on between instruc<on and behavioral issues
• Oriented toward short-‐term changes • Punishing students without a school-‐wide posi<ve support system results in increased aggression, vandalism, truancy, dropouts (Mayer & Sulzer-‐Azaroff, 1999)
(Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, 2005)
Why Haven’t the Traditional Strategies Been Effective? • They have not been aligned with:
• Expecta<ons • Clearly defined rules • A system for teaching expecta<ons and rules • A system for rewarding appropriate behaviors
(Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, 2005)
What it needs to look like… A Paradigm ShiF • Consistent language used for communica<ng behavioral expecta<ons
• COCOA skills infused into everything that we do (academics, hallways, etc.) –What do you already have in place?
• Standards based
• What are the student’s strengths?
• What are the protec(ve factors?
Build from there.
8
Where are we going? A Paradigm ShiF • Focus on the environment and instruc<onal strategies • Proac<ve in nature • Oriented toward long-‐term changes • Emphasis on student’s strengths
‘Flipping the Switch’ • What are the student’s strengths?
• What are the protec(ve factors?
Build from there.
Some ‘School Based’ Protective Factors • Meaningful connec<on to an adult. • Clear standards and expecta<ons for behavior. • Clear procedures & boundaries in all school segngs (e.g., classroom, hallway, cafeteria, etc.)
• Opportunity to make meaningful contribu<on.
9
Secon
d Step
Mor
al In
tellig
ence
/Mich
elle
Borb
a
Olweu
s Bull
ying P
reven
tion
Civil
ity/F
orni
Branding your principles • Easy to remember • Easy to reference • Easy to promote
DTSD Behavioral Expectations Fostering a sense of
Taking advantage of
Demonstra(ng
Assuming
Doing what it takes to be
successful in
Community Opportunity Ci<zenship Ownership Academics
10
Fleshing out the framework • Involve all staff in the opera<onaliza<on of the aspira<onal goals
C.O.C.O.A. How are we going to get there?
• Goals K-‐12:
• Begin introducing consistent expecta<ons across grades & segngs (accoun<ng for development).
• Develop ‘look fors’ across grade levels and segngs by end of Oct. • Consistent documenta<on of behaviors. (pilot of SSIS in elem.) • Begin to develop consistent adult expecta<ons for student/staff behaviors at every level, in every segng.
• Further develop staff understanding of Resilience. • Collect evidence of what we already have in place that relate to COCOA.
• Need workgroups at each level to opera(onalize COCOA.
PRINCIPLE STAFF STUDENTS COMMUNITY • Greeting every student at
the door • Smiling, acknowledging
people when you pass them
• Work collaboratively
• Greet teachers as you enter the classroom
• Smile, acknowledge, say hello when you pass others in the hall
• CAF – “Leave no trace” • Encourage & support others in words
& actions OPPORTUNITY • Serve on committees or
work groups • Commit to continued
learning • Seek the support you
need
• Get involved - clubs, activities, committees, service
• Use time to your advantage (Flex, Tutoring, Extra practice, Study Hall)
CITIZENSHIP • Make meaningful contributions in team, faculty, department meetings
• Follow through on community expectations/goals
• Reinforce expectations w/kids & each other
• Reinforce expectations with each other • Make a meaningful contribution
(SERVE) • Follow through on the community’s
expectations • Have every team, class or grade adopt
a project
OWNERSHIP • Commit to doing your part (share the load)
• Ask for what you need – seek clarification, seek understanding; seek help/support
• Share your strengths • Keep DTSD Beautiful! –
if you see trash pick it up
• Be responsible for: Ø Your actions, work, materials,
and learning • Take initiative • Keep DTSD Beautiful! – if you see
trash pick it up
ACADEMICS • Develop units/lessons that align with agreed upon course standards
• Provide clear learning targets/expectations
• Complete work/assignments in and out of class
• Show PRIDE in work done by focusing on QUALITY
• PUSH yourself to succeed and exceed;
11
Embedding C.O.C.O.A. into Content Curriculum • Language Arts and Reading
• Character analysis • Examples and non-‐examples of behaviors
that characterize classroom expecta<ons • Story mapping
• Iden<fica<on of segng, characters, problem(s), and resolu<ons • Crea<ve wri<ng
• “What If” stories, new endings to stories, journal entries on selected topics
(Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, 2005)
Guidelines for Handling Problem Behaviors • Hierarchy for rule viola<ons • Rule viola<on reasonable and logical • Consequences preplanned and posted • Consequences for rule viola<on explained and regularly reviewed
• Consequences are delivered consistently and in a <mely manner
• Tie it back to the expecta<ons
(Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, 2005)
Guidelines for teaching behavioral expectations
Teach Like You Teach Academics:
1. Define in terms that students will understand
2. List cri<cal aWributes 3. Provide examples and non-‐examples 4. Enhance concept development 5. Check for understanding
6. Extend concept development 7. Acknowledge efforts 8. Re-‐teach and restructure teaching
(Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project, 2005)
12
Helping staff get a handle on it
• CHAMPS (Safe & Civil Schools)
• hWp://www.browardpreven<on.org/resources/preven<on-‐curriculum-‐infusion/champs/champs-‐dvd-‐k-‐5
(Spr
ick,
R.,
2009
)
Data Collection • Why collect data?
• Provides informa<on about school, grade level, and class trends
• Allows for iden<fica<on of students who may require addi<onal support
• Make data-‐based <er placement decisions
Criteria for Data Collection Measures
• Serve as an indicator of student performance • Can be administered efficiently to large groups of students
• Can be administered more than once in a school year
• Data can be disaggregated by group and skill • Must be sensi<ve to small increments of growth • Good Psychometric proper<es
13
Sources of Data: OfMice Disciplinary Referrals Strengths
• Familiar to staff, used on a regular basis, occur naturally (Irvin et al., 2006; Sugai & Horner, 2002).
• Valid measure of school climate (Irvin et. al., 2006)
• Can be used to iden<fy students in need of support (McIntosh et al., 2009)
Limita(ons
• Miss students who do not act out
• Does not incorporate posi<ve behaviors
• Inconsistent repor<ng of concerns
Sources of Data: Behavior Screeners
• Brief measures of behavior completed for all students
• Should be administered once teachers have had the chance to get to know their students.
• Provide a picture of school climate
Sources of Data: Behavior Screeners
• Examples
• Systema<c Screening of behavior disorders (SSBD) • Early screening project (ESP) • Student risk screening scale (SRSS) • Strengths and difficul<es ques<onnaire (SDQ) • BASC-‐ Behavior and emo<onal screening system (BESS) • Social skills improvement system-‐ performance screening guide (SSIS-‐PSG)
• Strengths and Limita<ons of Behavior Screeners.
14
Sources of Data: Observation • Direct Behavior Ra<ngs (University of Connec<cut, 2013)
• Func<onal Behavior Assessment • Other observa<on Systems
Sources of Data: School-‐wide Analysis
• School-‐wide Evalua<on Tool • Benchmarks of quality • Checklists and self assessment
How can the process of a mul<-‐gated assessment for behavior enhance the data that is collected?
15
Data Analysis Teaming: Preparation
• Prepare Data Display • Staff Training • Determine who to invite • Determine Frequency and Dura<on • Assign Roles
Data Analysis Teaming • Understand impact of PBIS framework on all students’ behavior
• Iden<fy individual students in need of addi<onal supports
• Select strategies/interven<ons to address problem areas and skill deficits
• Address logis<cal issues that may arise
Data Analysis Teaming Structure • Tier 1
• Data review • Goal segng • Genera<on and selec<on of strategies
• Planning and suppor<ng interven<on implementa<on
• Tiers 2 & 3 • Data review • Goal segng • Selec<on of strategies & interven<on packages
• Progress monitoring planning
• Planning and suppor<ng interven<on implementa<on
16
SIRF – B: Tier 1
(Kovaleski & Pedersen, in press)
Tier 1 Data Review • Review data for groups of students • Individual student data should not be reviewed • ODRS, behavior screeners • Data should inform the segng of a goal for the next mee<ng
School Level
(SW
IS, 2
013)
17
School Level
(TR
EN
DS
, 201
3)
Tier 1 – Supports and Strategies • Strategies selected should help students reach goal by the next universal screening
• Keep the discussion focused on procedures that target the specific behavior
• Strategies should be aligned with the school’s PBIS framework
• 3 ques<ons to ask when selec<ng a strategy: • Is there a strong research base for this strategy? • Do we have the necessary materials to implement this strategy? • Can this strategy easily be implemented in the classrooms?
(Kovaleski & Pedersen, in press)
(Kovaleski & Pedersen, 2008)
Tier 1 or Universal Supports • Environmental redesign • Clearly defined and consistently enforced rules and expecta<ons
• Reinforcement system to acknowledge posi<ve behaviors • Classroom management strategies (e.g., CHAMPS) • Quality instruc<on that promotes ac<ve student engagement • Social skills curriculum (e.g., Second Step) • Targeted classroom lessons based on need
18
SIRF – B: Tier 2
(Kovaleski & Pedersen, in press)
Tier 2 Data Review • Review individual student data
• Iden<fy similar behavioral needs to create groups
• Data should be used to set goals for student groups
Class level
(TR
EN
DS
, 201
3)
19
Class Level
SSIS Ra<ngs
Tier 2 or Targeted Supports • Standard protocol interven<ons
• Check-‐in, Check-‐out
• Behavioral contrac<ng
• Social skills groups
SIRF – B: Tier 3
(Kovaleski & Pedersen, in press)
20
Tier 3 Data Review • Iden<fy individual students with most significant needs
• Review drill down data of the student’s behaviors
• Func<onal behavioral assessment used for severe behavioral needs
• Data should inform goal-‐segng for individual students
Tier 3 or Intensive/Individual Supports • Individualized strategies for each student
• Behavior interven<on plan
• Referral to outside services (e.g., counseling, wraparound)
RtII for Behavior -‐ Proactive in Nature
Tier 3:Intensive Interventions FBA/BIP
Referral to outside agency
Tier I: Benchmark and School Wide Interventions
C.O.C.O.A. Olweus Bullying Prevention
Second Step Advisory (HMS)
HIP
Tier 2: Strategic and Targeted Interventions
Classroom lesson Classroom based intervention
Small group HIP
Slide modified from PATTAN ppt. on RTI, November 2, 2005
EEL Taking into account individual needs & circumstances.
21
InMluences on Teacher Resistance
• Teaching efficacy • AWribu<onal theory • Change theory
(Morin, 2001)
Potential Barriers to Implementation Related to Staff Buy-‐In
• Lack of administra<ve direc<on and leadership • Skep<cism that the universal interven<on is needed*
• Hopelessness about change • Philosophical differences* • Staff feel disenfranchised from each other, the administrator, or the mission of the school
(Lohrmann et al., 2008)
Transforming Teacher/Staff Resistance • Coach administra<ve direc<on and leadership • Build a case for change • Show staff that change is possible • Find a conceptual common ground • Make people feel a part of the interven<on effort
(Lohrmann et al., 2008)
22
Overcoming Resistance • U<lize a “func<on-‐based approach”
• Select strategies that match the reason for resistance
(Lohrmann et al., 2008)
Examples at DTSD Concern #1 –
“This model does not support the goal of developing character and intrinsic mo<va<on because students are mo<vated by the tangible payoff.”
Examples at DTSD Concern #2 –
“School-‐wide Posi<ve Behavior Support is not appropriate for students with behavioral, social, and emo<onal challenges. These students require more intensive interven<on and/or a
behavior plan.”
23
Examples at DTSD Concern #3 –
“Students should be recognized for the development of posi<ve habits rather than for a ‘once and done’ posi<ve
behavior.”
Examples at DTSD Concern #4 –
“Providing <ckets/coupons to every child invalidates the program.”
Questions?
24
Contact: • Jason A. Pedersen, Ph.D.
• [email protected] • 717-‐531-‐2277 x5405
• Michael Boneshefski, M.Ed. • [email protected]
• Perri Rosen, M.Ed. • [email protected]
• Elizabeth Van Oss, M.Ed. • [email protected]
References • Florida’s Posi<ve Behavior Support Project. (2005). Various powerpoints. • Goldstein, S. & Brooks, R. (2007). Understanding and Managing Children’s Classroom Behavior: CreaDng Sustainable,
Resilient Classrooms. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. • Goldstein, S. & Brooks, R. (2005). Handbook of Resilience in Children. • Henderson, N. & Milstein, M. (2003). Resiliency in Schools. • Irvin, L. K., Horner, R. H., Ingram, K., Todd, A. W., Sugai, G., Sampson, N. K., & Boland, J. B. (2006). Using office discipline
referral data for decision making about student behavior in elementary and middle schools: An empirical evalua<on of validity. Journal of PosiDve Behavior IntervenDons, 8, 10-‐23.
• Kovaleski, J. F. & Pedersen, J. A. (2008). Best prac<ces in data analysis teaming. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best pracDces in school psychology V. Washington DC: Na<onal Associa<on of School Psychologists
• Kovaleski, J. F. & Pedersen, J. A. (in press). Best prac<ces in data-‐analysis teaming. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best pracDces in school psychology VI. Washington DC: Na<onal Associa<on of School Psychologists.
• Lohrmann, S., Forman, S., Mar<n, S., & Palmieri, M. (2008). Understanding school personnel’s resistance to adop<ng Schoolwide Posi<ve Behavior Support at a universal level of interven<on. Journal of PosiDve Behavior IntervenDons, 10(4), 256-‐269.
• McIntosh, K., Campbell, A. L., Russell Carter, D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Concurrent validity of office discipline referrals and cut points used in schoolwide posi<ve behavior support. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 100-‐113.
• Morin, J.E. (2001). Winning over the resistant teacher. Journal of PosiDve Behavior IntervenDons, 3(1), 62-‐64. • PBISApps (2013, October 21). SWIS suite. Retrieved from hWps://www.pbisapps.org/Applica<ons/Pages/SWIS-‐Suite.aspx • Pennsylvania Department of Educ<on. (2009). Promo<ng Student Success Through Resiliency. PDE Online Course. • Pennsylvania Standards Aligned System. (2010). Graphic. • Reivich, K. (2010). Resilience: Ingredient List. Fishful Thinking. • Reivich, K. (2010). Resilience: Myths vs. Truths. Fishful Thinking. • Sprick, R. (2009). CHAMPS: A ProacDve & PosiDve Approach to Classroom Management. Pacific Northwest Publishing, Inc.
Eugene, Oregon. • Sprick, R. (2013). TRENDS. Pacific Northwest Publishing, Inc. Eugene, Oregon.
hWps://pacificnwpublish.com/trends/index.html • Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (2002). The evolu<on of discipline prac<ces: School-‐wide posi<ve behavior supports. Child and
Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23-‐50. • University of Connec<cut. (2013, August 12). Direct behavior raDng. Retrieved from hWp://
www.directbehaviorra<ngs.com/cms/