8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
1/19
Georgianna Martin, Loyola University ChicagoSally Blechschmidt, Loyola University ChicagoGene Parker, University of Iowa
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
2/19
Session attendees will be able to:
Understand current literature on fraternity/sororitylife and intercultural competence
Reflect on research findings exploring the impact offraternity/sorority affiliation on college studentsdevelopment of intercultural competence
Identify practical applications of these researchfindings to their (a) work with fraternity/sororitymembers and (b) efforts to create culturallycompetent college students
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
3/19
What comes to mind when you hear thewords fraternities/sororities and
intercultural competence together?
In what ways, if any, have you observedfraternity/sorority members engaging ininterculturally competent behavior?
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
4/19
The majority of research on membership in fraternities/sororitiescovers topics such as alcohol use, sexual assault education, &hazing, while very little focused on learning outcomes associatedwith a college education (Molasso, 2005)
More specifically, limited research exists on the influence ofmembership on the educational outcome of interculturalcompetence
Membership in a fraternity/sorority associated with negativescores on students openness to diversity during the first year ofcollege (Pascarella, Edison, Nora, Hagedorn, & Terenzini,1996)
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
5/19
Another study found that fraternity/sororitymembership did not significantly advantage ordisadvantage students growth on interculturalcompetence in the first year of college (Martin,Hevel, Asel, & Pascarella, 2011)
Incongruent findings demonstrate the need tofurther study the unique effects offraternity/sorority membership on interculturalcompetence
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
6/19
To explore the impact of fraternity/sororitymembership on students development of
intercultural competence over four years ofcollege
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
7/19
1,263 undergraduate students from 11 four-yearinstitutions participating in the WNS between 2006and 2010 57.1% (n=721) identified as female
42.9% (n=542) identified as male 24.8% (n=313) identified as students of color
75.2% (n=950) identified as white 24.1% (n=304) reported membership in a fraternity (n=135)
or sorority (n=168) Of those students reporting membership in a
fraternity/sorority, 20.4% identified as students of color(n=62) and 79.6% identified as white students (n=242)
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
8/19
PRETEST DATA
Student backgroundcharacteristics
Student pre-college measure ofintercultural competence using:
(1) Miville-Guzman Universality
Diversity Scale (MGUDS)
(2) Openness to Diversity &Challenge Scale (ODC)
POSTTEST DATA
Data on students collegeexperiences using the NationalSurvey of Student Engagement(NSSE) and the WNS StudentExperiences Survey
Post-test data on studentsdevelopment of interculturalcompetence using the MGUDS &ODC
Wabash National Study Longitudinal, pretest-posttest design
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
9/19
DEPENDENT VARIABLE
Intercultural competence
operationalized throughtwo measures:
Miville-GuzmanUniversality-Diversity Scale(M-GUDS)
Openness toDiversity/Challenge (ODC)Scale
INDEPENDENT VARIABLE
Membership in a fraternity
or sorority
Item asked: Are you amember of a socialfraternity or sorority?
Coded: 1=Yes, 0=No
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
10/19
Sex
Race/Ethnicity
Parental Education
ACT (or equivalent)
High School Involvement
Precollege AcademicMotivation
High School BingeDrinking
Precollege Political Views
Institutional Type
Participation in CollegeAthletics
Living on Campus
# of Hours Worked on andoff Campus
College Binge Drinking
MGUDS or ODC pretests
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
11/19
Ordinary least squares regression (OLS)
Estimated the total effect of fraternity or sorority
affiliation on both measures of interculturalcompetence
Estimated the direct effect of fraternity or sorority
affiliation on intercultural competence
Additional analyses to explore the conditional effects offraternity/sorority membership
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
12/19
a Indicates variable has been standardized.b Model includes the following control variables: male (vs. female), students of color (vs. white), average parental education, ACT score, pre-college academic motivation, high school involvement, pre-college political views, high school binge drinking, pretest, and institutional type
(liberal arts college vs. other institutions)c Reference group is students who reported they did not binge drink.
Intercultural CompetenceMGUDS a
(n=1,263)
Intercultural CompetenceODC a
(n=1,263)
Independent Variables Total Effects b Direct Effects b Total Effects b Direct Effects b
Fraternity or Sorority Member -.010 .000 -.040 -.058
Live on Campus (vs. Lives Off Campus) .140 -.031
Hours Worked On Campus a .007 .008
Hours Worked Off Campus a .025 -.052
Athlete (vs. Not an Athlete) -.013 .112
College Binge Drinking c .015 .042
R2 .439 .443 .330 .335
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
13/19
Fraternity/sorority affiliation does not appear to have anysignificant unique impact on either measure ofintercultural competence over four years of college
No significant total effects on either measure (MGUDSb= .010 , ODC b=-.040)
No significant direct effects were found on eithermeasure (MGUDS b=.000 , ODC b=-.058)
No significant conditional effects by sex, race, orinstitutional type
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
14/19
Membership does not appear to have a significant impacton students development of intercultural competenceduring college
Findings suggest that regardless of a fraternity/sororitymembers sex, race, or type of institution attended, anydifferences in growth on intercultural competence were
likely due to chance not membership in afraternity/sorority
Can intercultural competence be measured accuratelywithout an understanding of the others perceptions?
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
15/19
No significant difference may be a better result than a
negative impact. However, fraternities/sororities are
organizations whose rhetoric purports to hold itsmembers to high standards. Should we expect more thana neutral finding?
Continued research and attention on the contribution offraternities/sororities to the educational mission of ourinstitutions is imperative.
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
16/19
As educators, what might these findings mean forour work with fraternity/sorority members?
To what standards should we be holdingfraternity/sorority members in regards tointercultural competence?
Given these findings and the limitations of thisresearch, how might educators obtain a moreaccurate measure of fraternity/sorority membersintercultural competence?
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
17/19
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
18/19
This research was supported by a generous grant from theCenter of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College to theCenter for Research on Undergraduate Education at TheUniversity of Iowa
8/2/2019 ACPA PowerPoint
19/19
Martin, G. L., Hevel, M. S., Asel, A. M., & Pascarella, E. T. (2011). New evidence on theeffects of fraternity and sorority affiliation during the first year of college. Journalof College Student Development, 52(5), 543-559.
Molasso, W. R. (2005). A content analysis of a decade of fraternity/sorority scholarshipin student affairs research journals. Oracle: The Research Journal of the Associationof Fraternity and Sorority Advisors, 1(1), 1-9. Retrieved fromhttp://home.gwu.edu/~billym/Docs/Research/Pubs/Oracle_vol1_iss1_Molasso.pdf
Pascarella, E. T., Edison, M., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L., & Terenzini, P. (1996). Influences
on students openness to diversity and challenge in the first year of college.Journalof Higher Education, 67(2), 174-195.