Upload
lydang
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5/17/2016
1
REINVENTION: Property Redevelopment and Repositioning
Yaromir SteinerSteiner + Associates
RECon – Las Vegas22 May 2016
Presenter
Yaromir Steiner, CRX
- Past Trustee, ICSC- CEO, Steiner + Associates, Columbus, OH
Presenter
• Born in Istanbul, Turkey
• Educated in Toulouse, France
• Experience in the U.S. – Houston, New York, Miami, and Columbus, OH
1. Istanbul, Turkey
2. Toulouse, France
5. Miami, FL3. Houston, TX
4. New York, NY6. Columbus, OH
5/17/2016
2
Project Experience
Easton Town Center, Columbus, OH
Bayshore Town Center, Glendale, WI Zona Rosa, Kansas City, MO
The Greene, Beavercreek, OH
Peninsula Town Center, Hampton, VA Liberty Center, North Cincinnati, OH
CocoWalk, Miami, FL Centro Ybor, Tampa, FL Newport on the Levee, Newport, KY Newport Aquarium, Newport, KY
Adventure Aquarium, Camden, NJ Easton Gateway, Columbus, OH
In Summary: 5 Urban Infill Projects
Easton Town Center, Columbus, OH
Bayshore Town Center, Glendale, WI Zona Rosa, Kansas City, MO
The Greene, Beavercreek, OH
Peninsula Town Center, Hampton, VA Liberty Center, North Cincinnati, OH
CocoWalk, Miami, FL Centro Ybor, Tampa, FL Newport on the Levee, Newport, KY Newport Aquarium, Newport, KY
Adventure Aquarium, Camden, NJ Easton Gateway, Columbus, OH
In Summary: 2 Redevelopment Projects
Easton Town Center, Columbus, OH
Bayshore Town Center, Glendale, WI Zona Rosa, Kansas City, MO
The Greene, Beavercreek, OH
Peninsula Town Center, Hampton, VA Liberty Center, North Cincinnati, OH
CocoWalk, Miami, FL Centro Ybor, Tampa, FL Newport on the Levee, Newport, KY Newport Aquarium, Newport, KY
Adventure Aquarium, Camden, NJ Easton Gateway, Columbus, OH
5/17/2016
3
In Summary: 5 Green Field Projects
Easton Town Center, Columbus, OH
Bayshore Town Center, Glendale, WI Zona Rosa, Kansas City, MO
The Greene, Beavercreek, OH
Peninsula Town Center, Hampton, VA Liberty Center, North Cincinnati, OH
CocoWalk, Miami, FL Centro Ybor, Tampa, FL Newport on the Levee, Newport, KY Newport Aquarium, Newport, KY
Adventure Aquarium, Camden, NJ Easton Gateway, Columbus, OH
Presentation
This presentation is biased by our experience:
• Large repositioning projects: > 1,000,000 square feet;
• Suburban locations;
• Anchored by department stores;
• Public Private Partnerships with over 20% of costs funded publicly
Presentation
This presentation will focus and draw from common themes:
• The nature of the shopping trip and its impact on design;
• Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain;
- Increased storm water detention;
- Consideration of mixed-use;
- Legal structure for vertical integration;
- Parking analysis in mixed-use;
- Design guidelines
• Case Study – Bayshore Town Center (Glendale, WI)
5/17/2016
4
THE NATURE OF THE SHOPPING TRIP
AND ITS IMPACT ON DESIGN
Shopping Classification
Understanding the nature of the shopping trips and their impact on retail environments will allow us not only to address the transformation at a regional retail environment’s level but also to deal with retail environments at the level of neighborhoods,villages, and even streets.
The Greene Town Center, Beavercreek, OH Mashpee Commons, Mashpee, MA Park Avenue, Winter Park, FL
Shopping Classification
When repositioning retail, it is essential to understand the classification of the shopping environments based on the nature of the shopping transaction.
5/17/2016
5
Shopping Classification
Is the transaction for goods and services “Need” based or “Want” based?“Need” “Want”
Shopping Classification“Need” based shopping transactions:
• Provide for objective and basic needs
• Use the first dollars of every household income
• They represent a decreasing percentage of the expenditures as the household income is higher
• The purchase decisions are driven primarily by rational criteria
• Require high frequency of visits to the retailers
Shopping Classification“Want” based shopping transactions:
• Provide for subjective and aspirational needs
• Funded from the discretionary dollars of the household income
• Highly variable between low and high income households
• The purchase decisions are driven primarily by aspirational criteria
• Lower frequency of visits than “need” based trips
5/17/2016
6
Shopping Classification
Classification of shopping transactions: Summary
Nature of Shopping Trip “Need” “Want”Type of Purchases Basic Aspirational
Decision Driver Objective & Rational Subjective & Aspirational
Household Dollars First Excess (discretionary)
Frequency of Visits Higher Lower
Example
Shopping Classification“Need” vs. “Want” based shopping environments:“Need” “Want”Florence Mall
Cincinnati, OH
Liberty Center
Kenwood Towne Centre
Regional Trade AreaLocal Trade Areas
Cincinnati, OH
Shopping Classification“Need” vs. “Want” based shopping environments:“Need” – Retailers that provide Value for Dollar “Want” – Experiential and Aspirational Retailers
5/17/2016
7
Shopping Classification“Need” vs. “Want” based shopping environments:“Need” “Want”Convenient Regional AccessConvenient Local Access
Shopping Classification“Need” vs. “Want” based shopping environments:“Need” “Want”Aspirational DesignFunctional Design
Shopping Classification
Classification of shopping environments: Summary
Nature of Shopping Trip “Need” “Want”Trade Area Local Regional
Retailers Value Driven Lifestyle Driven
Retailer Example
Access Local Regional
Design Functional Aspirational
5/17/2016
8
Shopping Classification“Need” based financial model:
• Rents primarily based on costs
• Longer term leases with options
• Better credit tenants
• Financially focused management
• Limited and predictable capital expenditures
• Portfolios of Kimco, Regency, Weingarten Realty
Typical Power Center
Shopping Classification“Want” based financial model:
• Rents primarily based on tenant sales
• Shorter leases with no options
• Lower credit tenants
• Experience delivery focused management
• Extensive and variable capital expenditures
• Portfolios of Taubman, Simon, GGP
The Greene Town Center
Shopping Classification
Classification of financial model: Summary
Driver of Shopping Trip “Need” “Want”Rent Base Cost Sales
Lease Terms Longer Shorter
Credit Stronger Weaker
Management Focus Financial Experience Delivery
Capital Needs Limited/Predictable Extensive/Variable
REIT Example Kimco Taubman
Financial Instrument Bonds Stocks
5/17/2016
9
Shopping Classification
Contribution to community value…..
• “Need” based shopping environments are a part of the basic amenities or infrastructure of a community: i.e. streets, sidewalks, utilities, sewers, garbage collection, etc.
• “Want” based shopping environments define and add value to a community and contribute to its economic development.
Shopping Classification - Conclusion
Conclusion:
• A successful mixed-use development (from a street to a regional project) must be conceived to be responsive to the ‘need’and‘want’ transactions of its trade area.
• The‘want’ retail environments that add significant value to a community must be conceived to be responsive to the changing existential aspirations of its customers.
• Whereas the ‘need’ retail, while not adding extra value, must be accommodated consistent with its functional requirements.
A Question That is Always Asked….
How do we integrate “Need” and “Want” uses in a single project?
5/17/2016
10
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
• ACCESS - “Need” requires local access, “Want” depends on scale of project
Peninsula Town Center Bayshore Town Center
- Non-retail uses are generally enhanced by “want” retail
- Retail should always be studied as a single use independent of non-retail uses
• FEASIBILITY – The process is similar
• FOOD venues are different in “Need” and “Want” environments.“Need” – fast, casual, and convenient “Want” – celebratory and special occasions
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
• PARKING criteria differs…….“Need” – Requires adjacent parking & functional “Want” – Pleasant parking experience; pedestrian walkability
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
5/17/2016
11
• AESTHETICS differ“Need” – Environment attractiveness is a ‘nice to have’ but not necessary; functionality and low maintenance is key
“Want” – Environment and architecture MUST be attractive and aspirational
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
• NON-RETAIL USES are impacted differently.“Need” – Functionally EnhancedUses that enhance are mostly high
frequency lifestyle uses (i.e. grocery, convenience, take-out)
“Want” – Lifestyle EnhancedResidential, hospitality, and office uses are always enhanced by ‘want’ uses.
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
Integrating “Need” and “Want” Retail: Summary
Deciding How to Integrate “Need” and “Want” Based Retail
Shopping Classification “Need” “Want”Access Convenient & Local Regional
FeasibilityIndependent of
non-retail uses
Independent of
non-retail uses
Food Venues Quick Casual Celebratory
Parking Functional Pleasant
Environment Attractiveness Nice to Have Essential
Non-Retail Uses Functionally Enhanced Lifestyle Enhanced
5/17/2016
12
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of Mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
Peninsula Town Center BEFORE (Coliseum Mall)
Technical Considerations: clearing site and eminent domain
Peninsula Town Center AFTER
Hampton, VA
5/17/2016
13
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of Mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
Storm water management regulations have evolved over the last decade and will continue to do so.
• For example, in 2003, Ohio EPA implemented new requirements for post-construction storm water management for projects disturbing > 1-acre of land
• Regulations attempt to detain storm water runoff for protection of stream channels, stream erosion control, and improved water quality
• Prescribed best management practices consist of storage of storm water runoff, in addition to that required by local detention/retention regulations
• Estimates of this additional storage volume vary between 1,400 cubic feet/acre for high density residential projects to 2,200 cubic feet/acre for commercial projects
• Additional costs for an underground storage scenario can be estimated between $10,000 - $15,000/acre
Technical Considerations: increased storm water detention
Storm water management regulations have evolved over the last decade and will continue to do so.
• Redevelopment or expansion of projects begun prior to 2003 are not exempt and must comply with these new regulations by implementing post-construction water quality management practices
• Storm water regulations will continue to evolve and future regulations may require:
- post-development runoff volumes be reduced to pre-development levels
- official testing and reporting of storm water quality
- new and innovative best management practices
Technical Considerations: increased storm water detention
5/17/2016
14
Storage Under Garage, Easton
Technical Considerations: increased storm water detention
Pervious Pavers, Easton Gateway
Roof Garden, Liberty CenterPool at Unity Chapel, Liberty Center
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
Advantages of mixed-use development:
- The mixing of uses:
o retail
o hospitality
o office
o residential
o civic
creates a symbiotic and synergistic environment
Technical Considerations: consideration of mixed-use
5/17/2016
15
Synergy/SynergisticThe creation of a whole that is greater than the simple sum of its parts.
Technical Considerations: consideration of mixed-use
Symbiosis/SymbioticA relationship of mutual benefit or dependence.
Technical Considerations: consideration of mixed-use
Bayshore Town Center
The Greene
Fenlon Square, EastonEaston
EastonLiberty Center
Synergistic
• The most common benefit is infrastructure sharing:- common areas- parking- utility- infrastructure
Technical Considerations: consideration of mixed-use
Example: A public park can benefit restaurants, residential, office, retail, community events, etc.
Liberty Center
5/17/2016
16
Symbiotic
• Retail is mostly justified independent of other uses
• Whereas retail significantly increases the feasibility of other uses
Technical Considerations: consideration of mixed-use
Liberty Center Easton The Greene
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of Mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
• Mixed-use often requires integration of multiple uses in single buildings
• Very often office, apartments, entertainment, hotels over retail
Bayshore Town Center, Glendale, WICityCentre, Houston, TXAmericana at Brand, Glendale, CA
5/17/2016
17
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
Liberty Center
hotel
office
residential
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
Example: Office integration at Liberty Center
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
Example: Office integration at Liberty Center
5/17/2016
18
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
Example: Office integration at Liberty Center
officeoffice
retailretail
Technical Considerations: legal structure for vertical integration
Vertical integration transaction:
• Sale (no capital gain!) or contribution of parcel to third party developer
• CC&R (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) Agreement
• Development and Use Agreement
• 99-year master lease of the retail condominium
• Purchase options of the retail condominium
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of Mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
5/17/2016
19
Technical Considerations: parking analysis in mixed-use
• In mixed-use environments the parking calculations must take into account both the timing of the parking needs and the potential for sharing.
• In our “biased” experience the global number varies between 4 and 5 spaces per 1,000sqft.
Technical Considerations: parking analysis in mixed-use
TPS Parking Requirements
Timing and Proximity Shared Parking RequirementsFor large scale (>500,000sf) retail dominated mixed-use projects
Retail
Free-standing (not sharing) 4.00/1000 sf
In-line (integrated) tenants 3.75/1000 sf
Anchors (greater than 30,000 sf) 3.25/1000 sf
Restaurant
Free-standing (not sharing) 13.0/1000 sf
In-line (integrated) restaurants 12.0/1000 sf
Fast food (free-standing) 8.0/1000 sf
Food Court and other impulse food tenants 0.0/1000 sf
Entertainment
Night Clubs or similar assembly (not shared) 20.0/1000 sf
In-line (integrated) 10.0/1000 sf
Cinema
Free-standing 1/3 seats
Integrated 1/4 seats
PARTIAL EXCERPT OF
STEINER PARKING
GUIDELINES
PARTIAL EXCERPT OF
STEINER PARKING
GUIDELINES
Technical Considerations: parking analysis in mixed-use
5/17/2016
20
Technical considerations:
- Clearing the site and eminent domain
- Increased storm water detention
- Consideration of Mixed-use
- Legal structure for vertical integration
- Parking analysis in mixed-use
- Design guidelines
Technical Considerations
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• Negative space geometrics is the primary consideration
• The furnishing of the negative space is the next most important consideration
• All restaurant venues must be planned with outdoor (3-4 season) seating
• Streets with parallel parking are ideal
• Plan for community event spaces: outdoor and/or indoor
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• Negative space geometrics is the primary consideration
5/17/2016
21
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• The furnishing of the negative space is the next most important consideration
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• All restaurant venues must be planned with outdoor (3-4 season) seating
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• Streets with parallel parking are ideal
5/17/2016
22
Technical Considerations: design guidelines
Place making is critical if “want” based retail uses are integrated:
• Plan for community event spaces: outdoor and/or indoor
CASE STUDY:
BAYSHORE TOWN CENTER
Glendale (Milwaukee), WI
Case Study: Bayshore Town Center
Bayshore Town Center is a redevelopment of a traditional enclosed shopping mall into a mixed-use town center:
• Consisting of over 1.2 million square feet (111,480 sq m) of retail, office, and residential space• Part new construction and part renovation• Project required extensive environmental remediation and faced a complicated land assembly process
BEFORE:• Traditional enclosed mall• 550,000 leasable square feet of retail
AFTER:• Mixed-use town center• 1.2 million square feet of retail, office, entertainment, and residential
5/17/2016
23
Case Study: Bayshore Town Center
Site Plan
Case Study: Bayshore Town Center
Case Study: Bayshore Town Center
5/17/2016
24
Case Study: Bayshore Town Center
THANK YOU
Yaromir SteinerSteiner + [email protected]
Please Complete Your Evaluation Now.
1. Take Out Your Smartphone or Tablet
2. Go to survey.icsc.org/2016RECON
3. Select this course: Reinvention: Property Redevelopment and Repositioning
Course Evaluation