Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Writing for Scholarly Publication
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
Summer 2009 Public Health Institute PHS 650-015
Course Syllabus 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
MWF, July 27, 29, 31 and TTh, August 4, 6 WARF 511
The Course:
This course is the study of the development of skills and opportunities that culminate in publishable works
in public health and other health science-related professional journals, area-specific journals, cross-
disciplinary journals, and other publications. The emphasis is placed on writing, editing, reviewing, and
other professional development skills that culminate in the publication of papers in peer-reviewed
professional journals and other publishing outlets. It is considered an important skill-development course for
professional growth and survival in the academic world or anyplace where written communication and
information dissemination are necessary job-related tasks.
2
About the Instructor:
Robert J. McDermott, Ph.D., FASHA, FAAHB, FAAHE, FRSH
Office hours 12:00 – 1:00 on class days and by appointment
E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Dr. McDermott is a member of 16 professional organizations and is a peer reviewer for 16 professional
journals in the fields of public health, health education, psychology and other social and behavioral
sciences, education, and social marketing, and is a member of the editorial board of several of these
journals. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Health Education, founder and Editor-in-
Chief of the Florida Public Health Review, Co-editor of Umwelt und Gesundheit Online (Environment and
Health Online) in Germany, Contributing Editor of the "Inside the Academy" column of the American
Journal of Health Behavior, Contributing Editor of the "Training Ideas" column of the Social Marketing
Quarterly, and Consulting Editor to Psychological Reports. He is the author or co-author of three textbooks
(each in multiple editions), and covering the period from 1980 to 2009, of approximately 60 book chapters,
225 articles in peer-reviewed professional journals, and 200+ abstracts, technical reports, non-peer-reviewed
papers, Internet publications, computer software, and other publications. He has taught courses and
workshops on writing for publication around the country for over 20 years.
Reference Textbooks for Your Consideration:
[Recommended Only] Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2006). How to Write and Publish A Scientific Paper, 6th
ed. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
[Recommended Only] Henson, K. T. (2005). Writing for Publication – Road to Academic Advancement.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
[Recommended Only] Katz, M. J. (2006). From Research to Manuscript: A Guide to Scientific Writing.
New York: Springer.
[Recommended Only] Strunk, W., Jr., & White, E.B. (1999). Elements of Style, 4th edition. Boston: Allyn
& Bacon. Also online at --http://www.bartleby.com/141.
Some handouts will be posted or provided. Students are encouraged to read from the extensive bibliography
and required to select some of these readings or others of their choosing to report on in class. In addition,
blinded manuscripts may be distributed for out-of-class and in-class review.
Topics:
Why write?
Preparing to write; reading to write; reading outside of your primary field; good and bad writing styles
Developing the habit to write while still in graduate school
Writing as a creative outlet and as an intellectual exercise
Writing as a means to clarify ideas in your head as well as to communicate thoughts to others
The role of writing in professional advancement
Outlets in your particular interest area of public health - forums for writing and breaking into print
Writing as a professional tool and benefit
Where ideas for writing come from and how they get from your head to the page
Writing articles vs. creating other written products (books, posters, abstracts)
Communicating with editors and reviewers and discovering what reviewers and editors look for
Publication manuals and styles
Sexist language and other real/perceived sources of bias
Authorship, co-authorship, order of authorship, and ethical considerations in publishing
3
Directing one's writing to the correct literacy level
Editing your own work and that of others
Dealing with writer‟s block
Other topics as requested by course participants
Grading and Assignment Expectations:
There are no exams for the course. Feedback will be provided throughout on writing and editing, and other
performance. In addition to attendance (50%), there are a few assignments: (1) letter to the editor of 400
words – 10%; (2) written editorial/commentary/viewpoint/position paper of 1000-1500 words – 30%; (3)
editing and other reviewing exercises – 10%. Plagiarism will be a topic of discussion during the course, but
please do not let it become an object of discussion as well. Ergo, written work should be entirely your own.
93-100 = A 90-92 = AB 84-89 = B 80-83 = BC
70-79 = C 60-69 = D 00-59 = F
Lecture Schedule and Assignment Due Dates:
Meeting 1: July 27 DUE (July 28 @ 12:00 noon): E-mail ([email protected]) a list of
5 or more questions that you would like to have discussed about writing,
publishing, life in academia, or related issues.
Meeting 2: July 29 DUE (July 29 @ 9:00 AM): Submit a draft of a 400-word letter to
the editor of a professional journal (name the journal) in your field that
takes issue with a particular article, practice, or editorial policy. In
addition to a copy that you keep for yourself, submit a hard copy (that
has your name and a pseudonym on it that you will use during the
course) to the instructor, and two hard copies containing just the
pseudonym (that will be reviewed by two peers in the class).
DUE (July 29 @ 9:00 AM): Seek out, print out or photocopy, and
submit the "Information for Authors" guidelines from 5 professional
journals in your particular field of interest in which you could conceivably
publish in the next year. Most of these may be available on-line.
Meeting 3: July 31 DUE (July 31 @ 9:00 AM): Submit peer-edited/reviewed letters with
name of reviewer.
DUE (July 31 @ 9:00 AM): Be prepared to summarize in ≤3 minutes
something from the bibliography or something from related literature of
your choosing. You will probably only have to do this once during the
course, although you are responsible for summarizing (~300 words) each
of five readings.
Meeting 4: August 4 DUE (August 4 @9:00 AM): First draft, 1000-word to 1500-word
editorial, commentary, or viewpoint/position paper (topic and journal of
your selection); same format as letter regarding copies.
Meeting 5: August 6 DUE (August 6 @ 9:00 AM): Submit your peer-edited and reviewed
4
editorial/commentary/position paper with name of reviewer
DUE (August 6 @ 9:00 AM): Revised letter to the editor (final version)
with edited copies attached.
DUE (August 6 @ 11:00 PM): Submit electronically summaries of five
readings (~300 word summary of each) to [email protected].
Conclusion: August 11 DUE (August 11 @ 11:00 PM): Submit the final version of the 1000- to
1500-word editorial/commentary/viewpoint/position paper (send
electronically to – [email protected]).
5
Bibliography – Writing for Scholarly Publication
Abby, M., Massey, M.D., Galandiuk, S., et al. (1994). Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate
medical manuscripts. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 105-107.
Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987). A proposal for more
informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106, 598-604.
AERA Council. (June/July 1985). AERA guidelines for eliminating race and sex bias in educational research
and evaluation. Educational Researcher, 16-17.
Ahmed, S.M., Maurana, C.A., Engle, J.A., Uddin, D.E., & Glaus, K.D. (1997). A method for assigning
authorship in multiauthored publications. Family Medicine, 29(1), 42-44.
Airhihenbuwa, C., Olsen, L.K., St. Pierre, R., & Wang, M. (1989). Race and gender: analysis of granting of
doctoral degrees. Health Education, 20, 4-7.
Albert, T. (2000). Writing for journals: A paradigm lost. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54,
642-643.
Ali, S.N., Young, H.C., & Ali, N.M. (1996). Determining the quality of publications and research for tenure or
promotion decisions: A preliminary checklist to assist. Library Review, 45(1), 39-53.
Alter, C., & Adkins, C. (2001). Improving the writing skills of social work students. Journal of Social Work
Education, 37(3), 493-505.
Altman, D.G., Chalmers, I., & Herxheimer, A. (1994). Is there a case for an international medical scientific
press council? Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 166-167.
Altman, D.G., & Goodman, S.N. (1994). Transfer of technology from statistical journals to the biomedical
literature. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 129-132.
Ancker, E.L.S. (2000). Frequency of selected arithmetic and reporting problems in medical manuscripts: A
descriptive study. American Medical Women‟s Association Journal, 15(3), 24-27.
Angell, M. (1986). Publish or perish: A proposal. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 262-262.
Angell, M. (2000). Investigators‟ responsibilities for human subjects in developing countries. New England
Journal of Medicine, 352(13), 967-968.
Angell, M., & Kassirer, J.P. (1991). The Ingelfinger rule revisited. New England Journal of Medicine, 325,
1371-1373.
Angell, M., Unger, R.D., & Wood, A.J.J. (2000). Disclosure of authors‟ conflicts of interest: A follow-up.
New England Journal of Medicine, 342(8), 586-587.
Ardito, S.C. (2000). Electronic articles: A battle for control and ownership of content. Online, 24(3), 84-86.
Armstrong, C.J., & Lonsdale, R.E. (2000). Scholarly monographs: Why would I want to publish electronically?
The Electronic Library, 18(1), 21-29.
Atkins, T, & Nelson, G. (2001). Plagiarism and the internet: Turning the tables. English Journal, March, 101-
104.
Baird, L.L. (1991). Publication productivity in doctoral research departments: interdisciplinary and
intradisciplinary factors. Research in Higher Education, 32(3), 303-318.
Balbach, E.D., & Glantz, S.A. (1995). Tobacco information in two grade school newsweeklies: a content
analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 85(12), 1650-1653.
Baldwin, A. (2001). Practical plagiarism prevention. The Teaching Professor, 15(5), 1,3.
Bates, T., Anić, A., Marušić, M., & Marušić, A. (2004). Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions –
comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 292(1), 86-88.
Benjaminson, P. (1990). Publishing without perishing. Thought and Action, 6(2), 27-119.
Bernhardt, J.M. (2004). Communication at the core of effective public health. American Journal of Public
Health, 94(12), 2051-2053.
Bero, L.A., Glantz, S.A., & Rennie, D. (1994). Publication bias and public health policy on environmental
tobacco smoke. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 133-136.
Blaszcynski, C., & Green, D.J. (1999). Strategies for writing quantitative and qualitative research articles.
Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 41(4), 204-211.
6
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E., Causino, N., & Louis, K. (2000). Participation of life-science faculty in research
relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734.
Boice, R. (1993). Writing blocks and tacit knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 64(1), 19-54.
Boice, R., & Jones, F. (1984). Why academicians don‟t write. Journal of Higher Education, 55(5), 567-582.
Boston University School of Public Health. (1994). Principles and procedures for determining authorship.
Boston: Author.
Bradford, M., Flanagin, A., Held, M., et al. (2000). Editors and owners of scientific journals. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 283(3), 335.
Bragadottir, H. (1998). Every nurse can be an author: On writing for publication. Nursing Forum, 33(4), 29-
31.
Brems, C., Lampman, C., & Johnson, M.E. (1995). Preparation of applications for academic positions in
psychology. American Psychologist, 50(7), 533-537.
Brennan, T.A. (1994). Buying editorials. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 673-675.
Broad, W.J. (1981). The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science, 211, 1137-1139.
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (1999). International reading strategies for IMRD articles. Written Communication,
16(3), 296-316.
Butler, D. (2003). Who will pay for open access? Nature, 425, 554-555.
Cabell, D.W.E. (1997-98). Cabell‟s Directory of Publishing Opportunities. Beaumont, TX: Cabell Publishers.
Caffarella, R.S., & Barnett, B.G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The
importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39-52.
Campbell, J. (1993). 10 ways to revitalize the editor‟s page. Folio: the Magazine for Magazine Management,
22(16), 43.
Campion, E.E., Curfman, G.D., & Drazen, J.M. (2000). Tracking the peer-review process. New England
Journal of Medicine, 343(20), 1485-14-86.
Campion, E.W., Anderson, K.R., & Drazen, J.M. (2001). A new Web site and a new policy. New England
Journal of Medicine, 344(22), 1710-1711.
Cates, W., Jr., Rosenberg, Z., & Raymond, E. When should the public be informed of the results of medical
research? Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(23), 2944-2945.
Chesebro, J.W. (1993). How to get published. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 373-382.
Cho, M.K., & Bero, L.A. (1994). Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the
medical literature. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 101-104.
Colaianni, L.A. (1994). Peer review in journals indexed in Index Medicus. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 272(2), 156-158.
Comer, D.R. (1995). Don't disparage the regional presenter's dedication to research. American Psychologist,
50(8), 726.
Corbett, E.P.J. (1992). The shame of the current standards for promotion and tenure. Journal of Advanced
Composition, 12(1), 111-116.
Corder, J.W. (1991). Academic jargon and soul-searching drivel. Rhetoric Review, 9(2), 314-326.
Cotton, P. (1993). Flaws documented, reforms debated at congress on journal peer review. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 263, 1317.
Crabtree, D., Wagner, D., & Antrim, L. (1989). Racial and gender composition of health education faculty in
higher education. Journal of Health Education, 20, 8-12.
Crase, D., & Rosato, F. (1989). Selected scholarly periodicals -- a profile. Journal of Physical Education,
Recreation and Dance, 60(9), 34-38.
Crase, D., & Rosato, F.D. (1992). Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals. Journal of
Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 63(7), 28-31.
Crew, L. (1987). Rhetorical beginnings: professional and amateur. College Composition and Communication,
38(3), 346-349.
Crichlow, R., Davies, S., & Winbush, N. (2004). Accessibility and accuracy of web page references in 5 major
medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(22), 2723-2724.
Davidhizar, R. (1999). Writing for publication in an RN to baccalaureate program: An exercise in critical
7
thinking. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 20(3), 146.
Davidoff, F., et al. (2001). Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 286(10), 1232-1234.
Day, R.A. (1998). How to write & publish a scientific paper, 5th edition. Westport, CT: Oryx Press.
DeAngelis, C.D. (2006). Thank you, JAMA peer reviewers and authors. Journal of the American Medical
Association. 295(10), 1171-1172.
DeAngelis, C.D. (2004). Duplicate publication, multiple problems. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 292(14), 1745-1746.
DeAngelis, C.D., & Musacchio, R.A. (2004). Access to JAMA. Journal of the American Medical Association,
29(3), 370-371.
DeBakey, L. (1976). The scientific journal: Editorial policies and practices. St. Louis: Mosby.
de Lacey, G., Record, C., & Wade, J. (1985). How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?
British Medical Journal, 291, 884-886.
Dellavalle, R.P., Hester, E.J., Hellig, L.F., et al. (2003). Going, going, gone: Lost internet references. Science,
302, 787-788.
Devereaux, P.J. (2001). Physician interpretations and textbook definitions of blinding terminology in
randomized control trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(15), 2000-2003.
Devine, K. (2001). Writing a paper that will get published. The Scientist, 15(7), 30-31.
Dickersin, K. (1997). How important is publication bias? AIDS Education and Prevention, 9(suppl. A), 15-
21.
Dies, R.R. (1993). Writing for publication: Overcoming common obstacles. International Journal of Group
Psychotherapy, 43(2), 243-249.
Dillon, D.R., et al. (1992). Article content and authorship trends in "The Reading Teacher" 1948-1991.
Reading Teacher, 45(5), 362-368.
Dixon, N., (2001). Writing for publication – a guide for new authors. International Journal of Quality in Health
Care, 5, 417-421.
Docherty, M., & Smith, R. (1999). The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. British Medical
Journal, 318, 1224-1225.
Doherty, C. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 285,(2), 165.
Doyle, E.I., & Coggin, C. Writing for publication in health education. American Journal of Health Studies.
Accessed July 23, 2008 at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CTG/is_2_19/ai_n6361766.
Drazen, J.M. (2000). Looking forward to serving you every week. New England Journal of Medicine,
343(1), 57-58.
Duncan, S.L.S. (1995). Writing for publication. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 32(2), 95-102.
Duncan, S.L.S. (1996). Thoughts on professional publication. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 33(4),
70-73.
Echikson, A.B. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 285(2), 164.
Editors of the Journal of the American Medical Association. (2000). Guidelines for AMA Web sites. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 283(12), 1602-1606.
Egger, M., Jüni, P., & Bartlett, C. (2001). Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized control trials.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(15), 1996-1999.
Ellis, J.A. (2003). Why should I review a paper for the American Journal of Public Health? American Journal
of Public Health, 93(4), 533-535.
Engstrom, C.M. (1999). Promoting the scholarly writing of female doctoral students in higher education
and student affairs graduate programs. NASPA Journal, 36(4), 262-277.
Evans, J.C. (1994) The art of writing successful research abstracts. Neonatal Network: The Journal of
Neonatal Nursing. 13(5), 49-52.
Everett, S.A., Casler, S., & Summers, J. (1994). Frequency of topics, institutions, and authors of four health
8
education journals: 1982-1992. The Health Educator, 26(1), 11-17.
Evjy, J.T. (2000). Editors and owners of scientific journals. Journal of the American Medical Association,
283(3), 335.
Fagan, W.T. (1990). To accept or reject: peer review. Journal of Educational Thought, 24(2), 103-113.
Ferrell, B.R. (1998). On writing abstracts. Oncology Nursing Forum,15(4), 515-516.
Feurer, I.D., Becker, G.J., Picus, D., Ramirez, E., Darcy, M.D., & Hicks, M.E. (1994). Evaluating peer
reviews -- pilot testing of a grading instrument. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 98-100.
Figgins, M.A., & Burbach, H.J. (1989). Preparing our students to publish: lessons learned. Innovative Higher
Education, 14(1), 15-23.
Fine, G.A. (1988). The ten commandments of writing. The American Sociologist, 19(2), 152-157.
Fine, M.A., & Kurdek, L.A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on
faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141-1147.
Fisher, M., Friedman, S.B., & Staruss, B. (1994). The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by
peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 143-146.
Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2002). Authorship for research groups. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 288, 3166-3168.
Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2003). Reply to Serwint, et al. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 289(17), 2212.
Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P.B., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2006). Update on JAMA‟s Conflict of Interest Policy.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(2), 220-221.
Fontanarosa, P.B., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2003). To JAMA peer reviewers and authors – thank you. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 289(6), 756.
Fontanarosa, P.B., Flanagin, A. (2000). Prepublication release of medical research. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 284(22), 2927-2929.
Fontanarosa, P.B., Flanagin, A., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2000). The Journal’s policy regarding release of
information to the public. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2929-2931.
Fontanarosa, P.B., & Flanagin, A. (2001). When should the public be informed of the results of medical
research? Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(23), 2945.
Fontanarosa, P.B., Flanagin, A., & DeAngelis, C.D. (2005). Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of
research and role of sponsors in funded studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 110-111.
Frank, E. (1994). Authors' criteria for selecting journals. Journal of the American Medical Association,
272(2), 163-164.
Franklin, U.M. (1993). Does scholarly publishing promote scholarship or scholars? Scholarly Publishing,
July, 248-252.
Freedman, M.P. (2004). A tale of plagiarism and a new paradigm. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 545-548.
Frischkorn, C. (1999). Style in advanced composition: Active students and passive voice. Teaching English
in the Two Year College, 26, 415-418.
Fuller, E.O. (1983). Preparing an abstract of a nursing study. Nursing Research, 32(8), 316-317.
Fulton, T. (1985). Writing for professional publication. Education Libraries, 10(1), 18-24.
Fyffe, T., & Rae, K. (1998). Writing partners: The pros and cons of co-authorship. Nursing Standard, 12(40),
32-33.
Gainen, J. (1993). A writing support program for junior women faculty. New Directions for Teaching and
Learning, 53, 91-100.
Garfield, E. (2002). Highly cited authors. The Scientist, 16(7), 10.
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 295(1), 90-93.
Garfunkel, J.M., Ulshen, M.H., Hamrick, H.J., & Lawson, E.E. (1994). Effect of institutional prestige on
reviewers' recommendations and editorial decisions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 137-138.
Gargiulo, R.M., et al. (1992). Writing for publication in early childhood education suggestions for the
beginning writer. Childhood Education, 68(3), 157-160.
Garner, J., Horwood, L., & Sullivan, S. (2001). The place of eprints in scholarly information delivery. Online
9
Information Review, 25(4), 250-256.
Gasparikova-Krasnec, M., & Ging, N. (1987). Experimental replication and professional cooperation.
American Psychologist, 42, 266-267.
Gay, J.T., & Edgil, A.E. (1989). When your manuscript is rejected. Nursing and Health Care, 10(8), 459-
461.
Gelman, S.R., & Gibelman, M. (1999). A quest for citations? An analysis of and commentary on the trend
toward multiple authorship. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(2), 203-213.
Gibbs, W.W. (1995). Trends in scientific communication: lost science in the Third World. Scientific
American, 273(2), 92-99.
Gilbert, J.R., Williams, E.S., & Lundberg, G.D. (1994). Is there gender bias in JAMA's peer review process?
Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 139-142.
Glantz, S.A., & Bero, L.A. (1994). Inappropriate and appropriate selection of „peers‟ in grant review. Journal
of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 114-116.
Goff, L. (2000). Getting the word out. Computerworld, 34(39), 76.
Goldblatt, D. (1998). How to get a grant funded. British Medical Journal, 317(7173), 1647-1648.
Goldbort, R.C. (1998). Scientific writing: Three neglected aspects. Journal of Environmental Health, 60(8), 26-
29.
Golden, S.L. (1997). Secrets of successful grantsmanship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Goldman, K.D., & Schmalz, K.J. (2000). Making your (book) mark. Health Promotion Practice, 1(2), 116-
117.
Goldman, K.D., & Schmalz, K.J. (2000). „Op to it! Writing op-ed columns. Health Promotion Practice, 1(4),
302-304.
Goldrick, B.A., Larson, E., & Lyons, D. (1995). Conflict of interest in academia. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing
Scholarship, 27(1), 65-69.
Goldstein, H. (1998). On writing for publication. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human
Services, 79(5), 451-454.
Gopen, G.D., & Swan, J.A. (1990). The science of scientific writing. American Scientist, 78, 550-558.
Gosden, H. (1992). Research writing and NNSs: from the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2),
123-139.
Gould, J.C., Katzmarek, J.M., & Shaw, P.A. (2007). New domains – navigating the world of academic writing.
Phi Delta Kappan, 88(10), 776-780.
Gray, R.H., et al. (2000). The ethics of research in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine,
343(5), 361-362.
Gross, C.P., Steiner, C.A., Bass, E.B., & Powe, N.R. (2000). Relation between prepublication release of
clinical trial results and the practice of carotid endarterectomy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(22),
2886-2893.
Grosse, S.J. (1995). Formatting: Dress your content for success. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance, 66(8), 10-11.
Gup, T. (February 2, 2002). The only thing more humbling than writing. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
B10.
Halls, K.M. (1998). Six secrets to successful submissions. Writer‟s Digest, 78(9), 20-22.
Halperin, E.C., et al. (1992). Multiple authorship in two English-language journals in radiation oncology.
Academic Medicine, 67(12), 850-856.
Hamrick, M., & Crase, D. (1993). Analysis of the health education doctorate cohort, 1983-1989. Journal of
Health Education, 24, 73-80.
Happell, B. (2008). Conference presentations: a guide to writing the abstract. Nurse Researcher, 15, 79-87.
Hartley, J. (1999). From structured abstracts to structured articles: A modest proposal. Journal of Technical
Writing and Communication, 29(3), 255-270.
Hartley, J. (1999). Applying ergonomics to applied ergonomics: Using structured abstracts. Applied
Ergonomics, 30, 535-541.
Hartley, J. (1997). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? Learned Publishing,
10
10, 313-317.
Hartley, J., & Sydes, M. (1997). Are structured abstracts easier to read than traditional ones? Journal of
Research in Reading, 20, 122-136.
Hayashi, J. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical Association,
285(2), 164-165.
Haynes, R.B., et al. (1990). More informative abstracts revisited. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113, 69-76.
Heitzmann, R. (2008). Writing for publication in social studies education. The Social Studies, 99(1), 37-40.
Hayden, J. (2000). Writing for publication 101. Health Promotion Practice, 1(1), 21-25.
Henson, K.T. (1986). Writing for publication: playing to win. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(8), 602-604.
Henson, K.T. (1988). Writing for education journals. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(10), 752-754.
Henson, K.T. (1990). Writing for education journals. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(10), 800-803.
Henson, K.T. (1993). Writing for successful publication: Advice from editors. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(10),
799-804.
Henson, K.T. (1995). Writing for publication: Messages from editors. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(10), 801-803.
Henson, K.T. (1997). Writing for publication: Some perennial mistakes. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(10), 781-784.
Henson, K.T. (1999). Writing for professional journals. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 780-783.
Henson, K.T. (2001). Writing for professional journals: Paradoxes and promises. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(10),
765-768.
Henson, K.T. (2003). Writing for professional publication: Some myths and some truths. Phi Delta Kappan,
84(10), 788-791.
Henson, K.T. (2005). Writing for publication: A controlled art. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 772-776, 781.
Henson, K.T. (2007). Writing for publication: Steps to excellence. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(10), 781-786.
Henson, K.T. (1999). Writing for professional publication, 2nd
edition.. Needham Heights, Mass: Allyn &
Bacon.
Henson, K.T. (2005). Writing for Publication – Road to Academic Advancement. Boston, MA: Allyn &
Bacon, Inc.
Herrington, J. (1999). Bells and whistles are OK, but facts are better. Communication World, 16(4), 23-25.
Hewitt, J. (undated). Finding time to write. On-line http://poewar.com/articles/time.htm Last accessed January
8, 2006.
Hilgers, T.L., Hussey. E.L., & Stitt-Bergh, M. (1999). “As you‟re writing, you have these epiphanies.” Written
Communication, 16(3), 317-353.
Hiller, M.D., & Ritvo, R.A. (1991). Rethinking the promotion and tenure process. Journal of Allied Health,
20(2), 85-93.
Hoeffel, C. (1998). Journal impact factors. Allergy, 53, 1225.
Holm, K. (1996). 36 places to sell your writing. Writer‟s Digest, 76(12), 40-47.
Holtz, A.S. (2001). When should the public be informed of the results of medical research? Journal of the
American Medical Association, 286(23), 2944.
Horton, R. (1995). The rhetoric of research. British Medical Journal, 310, 985-987.
Horton, R. (1996). Ruling out Ingelfinger? Lancet, 9013(347), 1423-1425.
Horton, R. (2003). 21st -Century biomedical journals: Failures and futures. Lancet, 362, 1510-1512.
Horton, R., & Smith, R. (1996). Time to redefine authorship: A conference to do so. British Medical Journal,
312, 723.
Horton, R., & Smith, R. (1996). Signing up for authorship. Lancet, 347, 780.
Hunt, D.L., Jaeschke, R., & McKibbon, K.A. (2000). Users‟ guides to the medical literature XXI. Using
electronic health information resources in evidence-based practice. Journal of the American Medical Association,
283(14), 1875-1879.
Hunter, D.E., & Kuh, G.D. The "write wing": characteristics of prolific contributors to the higher education
literature. Journal of Higher Education, 58(4), 443-462.
Huston, P., & Moher, D. (1996). Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research. Lancet,
347, 1024-1026.
Huth, E.J. (1986). Abuses and uses of authorship. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104(2), 266-268.
11
Huth, E.J. (1986). Irresponsible authorship and wasteful publication. Annals of Internal Medicine, 104, 257-
259.
Huth, E.J. (1998). Writing and publishing in medicine, 3rd
edition. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Hyman, R. (1995). How to critique a published article. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 178-182.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1997). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted
to biomedical journals. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 36-47.
Jacobs, S.E. (1989). From syntax to genre: writers' use of definite constructions in fifteen editorials. Written
Communication, 6(4), 528-554.
Jaffe, S. (2002). Painlessly write the painful truth. The Scientist, 16(4), 44.
Jalongo, M.R., et al. (1989). Collaborative professional writing in teacher education. Journal of Industrial
Teacher Education, 27(1), 65-75.
Johnson, D. (2004). Plagiarism-proofing assignments. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 549-552.
Judson, H.F. (1994). Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 272(2), 92-94.
Juhl, N., & Norman, V.L. (1989). Writing an effective abstract. Applied Nursing Research, 2(4), 189-193.
Juska, J. (1999). The writing process goes to San Quentin. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(10), 759-762.
Justice, A.C., Berlin, J.A., Fletcher, S.W., et al. (1994). Do readers and peer reviewers agree on manuscript
quality? Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 117-119.
Kaplan, J.B., & Bennett, T. (2003). Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publication. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 289(20), 2709-2716. [Correction published JAMA 2003: 290(9), 1154]
Kaplan, R.B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L.D., Shiotani, Y., & Zimmerman, C.B. (1994). On
abstract writing. Text, 14(3), 401-426.
Kassirer, J.P. (1995). My years at the Journal -- so far. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(10), 654-655.
Kassirer, J.P. (2000). Financial indigestion. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2156-2157.
Kassirer, J.P. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 285(2), 165-166.
Kassirer, J.P. (2001). Why be a medical editor? Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(17), 2253.
Kassirer, J.P., & Angell, M. (1994). The Journal's policy on cost-effectiveness analyses. New England
Journal of Medicine, 331, 669-670.
Kassirer, J.P., & Angell, M. (1995). The Internet and the Journal. New England Journal of Medicine,
332(25), 1709-1710.
Kassirer, J.P., & Angell, M. (1995). Redundant publication: A reminder. New England Journal of Medicine,
333(7), 449-450.
Kassirer, J.P., & Campion, E.W. (1994). Peer review - crude and understudied, but indispensable. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 272(2), 96-97.
Kawano, T., et al. (1993). School psychology journals: relationships with related journal and external and
internal quality indices. Journal of School Psychology, 31(3), 407-424.
Keen, A. (2007). Writing for publication: Pressures, barriers and support strategies. Nurse Education
Today, 27, 382-388.
Kennedy, D. (2002). Tournaments, prizes – and us. Science, 295, 1193.
Kennedy, D. (2002). To publish or not to publish. Science, 295, 1793.
Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., & Pressley, M. (2005). How to publish in scholarly journals. Educational
Researcher, 34(8),14-20.
Krzyzanowska, M.K., Pintilie, M., & Tannock, I.F. (2003). Factors associated with failure to publish large
randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(4), 495-501.
Kuschner, W.G. (2000). Pressure to publish in the premedical years. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 283(3), 340.
Laband, D.N., & Piette, M.J. (1994). A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 272(2), 147-149.
Laflin, M.T., Glover, E.D., & McDermott, R.J. (2005). Publication ethics: An examination of authorship
practices. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29(5), 579-587.
12
LaPorte, R.E., & Hibbitts, B. (1996). Rights, wrongs, and journals in the age of cyberspace: “We all want to
change the world.” British Medical Journal, 313(7072), 1609-1611.
LaPorte, R.E., Merler, E., Akazawa, S., et al. (1995). The death of biomedical journals. British Medical
Journal, 310, 1387-1390.
Leatherman, C. (October 8, 1999). A university decides that its Ph.D.‟s should be able to talk to average Joes.
The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Larkin, M. (1999). Whose article is it anyway? Lancet, 354(9173), 136.
Ledford, J.R. (1997). Writing medical articles. The Writer, October, 19-21.
Leslie, L.Z. (1990). Peer review practices of mass communication scholarly journals. Evaluation Review,
14(2), 151-165.
Leslie, L.Z. (1992). Scholarly journal editors favor traditional publishing agendas. Journalism Educator,
46(4), 52-60.
Levine, J., Gussow, J.D., Hastings, D., & Eccher, A. (2003). Authors‟ financial relationships with the food and
beverage industry and their published positions on the fat substitute olestra. American Journal of Public Health, 93(4),
664-669.
Lief, P.D. (1995). The internet and the Journal. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(16), 1077.
Lindquist, R., (1993). Strategies for writing a competitive research abstract. Dimensions Critical Care
Nursing, 12(1), 46-53.
Lippert, J. (March 1992). Writing a publishable article. The Writer, 17-20.
Lock, S. (1986). A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
Lohia, G-S. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 285(2), 165.
Lok, C.K.W., Chan, M.T.V., & Martinson, I.M. (2001). Risk factors for citation errors in peer-reviewed
nursing journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(2), 223-229.
Lovell, R. (1988). How to write textbooks for fun if not for profit. Journalism Educator, 43(3), 34-35, 53.
Lundberg, G.D., & Flanagan, A. (1989). New requirements for authors: Signed statements of authorship
responsibility and financial disclosure. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 2003-2204.
Lundberg, G.D., & Glass, R.M. (1996). What does authorship mean in a peer-reviewed medical journal?
Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(1), 75.
Lutz, J.A. (1987). A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at the computer and
with pen and paper. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(4), 398-421.
Magnussen, L. (1997). Ensuring success: The faculty development plan. Nurse Educator, 22(6), 30-33.
Malekoff, A. (1999). A practitioner‟s journey to becoming a writer. Families in Society: The Journal of
Contemporary Human Services, 80(2), 190-195.
Marwick, C. (2000). Ensuring ethical Internet information. Journal of the American Medical Association,
283(13), 1677-1678.
Mason, P.M., Steagull, J.W., & Fabritius, M.M. (January/February 1992). Solving publication delays in
economics. Academe, 30-32.
Maxwell, S.E., & Cole, D.C. (1995). Tips for writing (and reading) methodological articles. Psychological
Bulletin, 118(2), 193-198.
McDermott, R.J. (2009). Getting published – what editors and reviewers seek from authors. American
Journal of Health Education, 40(1), 2-4.
McDermott, R.J. (2006). Reflections and ruminations: Transitioning the American Journal of Health
Education. American Journal of Health Education, 37(1), 2-5.
McLeod, S.H., & Emery L. (1988). When faculty write: a workshop for colleagues. College Composition and
Communication, 39(1), 65-67.
McMasters, K.M. (2000). Disclosure of authors‟ conflicts of interest – a follow-up. New England Journal of
Medicine, 343(2), 146.
McNab, W.L. (1994). Pursuing promotion and tenure in higher education: questions, answers, and
suggestions. The Health Educator, 26(1), 25-28.
Meadow, C.T., et al. (1990). Evaluation of scientific information: peer review and the impact of
13
information technology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 213-230.
Mendelson, M. (1987). Teaching the abstract as an introduction to technical writing. Technical Writing
Teacher, 14(1), 1-10.
Messner, R.L., & Gardner, S.S. (2007). Writing for publication: It‟s a matter of personal style. Journal of
the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 4(1), 1-7.
Miech, E.J., Nave, B., & Mosteller, F. (2005). The 20,000 article problem: How a structured abstract can help
practitioners sort out educational research. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 396-400.
Miller, A.C., Serzan, S.L. (1984). Criteria for identifying a refereed journal. Journal of Higher Education,
55(6), 673-699.
Mitka, M. (2000). Whose news is it, anyway? Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(8), 992.
Moher, D., Dulberg, C.S., & Wells, G.A. (1994). Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in
randomized control trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 122-124.
Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., & Altman, D. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for
improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association,
285(15), 1987-1991.
Moher, D., Jones, A., & Lepage, L. (2001). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of
randomized trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(15), 1992-1995.
Mokuau, N., et al. (1993). Development of knowledge by undergraduate program directors. Journal of Social
Work Education, 29(2), 160-170.
Monaghan, P. (March 29, 1989). Some fields are reassessing the value of the traditional doctoral dissertation.
Chronicle of Higher Education, 35(29), A1, 16.
Mooney C.J. (March 25, 1992). Syracuse seeks a balance between teaching and research. Chronicle of
Higher Education, 38(29), A1, 14-16.
Mooney, D.K. (1995). Requests for convention manuscripts: on-site versus letter response rates. American
Psychologist, 50(8), 727-728.
Morris, D.B. (1998). Getting published: Coming through with the “write” stuff. Awhonn Lifelines, 2(3), 59-61.
Morse, J.M. (1998). Fragmenting theory: Publishing parts of the whole. Qualitative Health Research, 8(1), 5-
6.
Morton, L.P. (1992). Producing publishable press releases: A research perspective. Public Relations
Quarterly, 37(4), 9-13,
Moxley, J.M. (1992). Publish, don't perish. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Murdaugh, C. (1988). Writing a research abstract. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 3(3), 29-31.
Nakayama, T., Fukuhara, S., Tsutani, K., & Yamazaki, S. (2003). Comparison between impact factors and
citations in evidence-based practice guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(6), 755-756.
Needleman, H.L. (1992). Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of
scientific integrity. Pediatrics, 90, 977-981.
Newell, S., & Price, J.H. (1983). Promotion, merit and tenure decisions for college health education faculty.
Health Education, 14(3), 12-15.
Nicoloff, L.K., & Forrest, L. (1988). Gender issues in research and publication. Journal of College Student
Development, 29(6), 521-528.
Nida, E.A. (1992). Sociolinguistic implications of academic writing. Language in Society, 21(3), 477-485.
Nigg, H.N., & Radulescu, G. (1994). Scientific misconduct in environmental science and toxicology. Journal
of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 168-170.
Nist, S.L. (1988). Reading research and reviewers -- a commentary. Reading Research and Instruction, 27(3),
77-79.
Noble, K.A. (1989). Publish or perish: what 23 journal editors have to say. Studies in Higher Education,
14(1), 97-102.
Northridge, M.E., McLeory, K.R., Haviland, M.L., Johnson, N.J., & Benjamin, G.C. (2005). Editorial
independence at the journal. American Journal of Public Health, 95(3), 377-379.
Northridge, M.E., McLeroy, K.R., & Haviland, M.L. (2004). Essential tensions in the journal. American
Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 11-13.
14
Northridge, M.E., & Susser, M. (1994). Editorial: The paper route for submissions to the Journal. American
Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 717-718.
Northridge, M.E., & Susser, M. (1994). Annotation: Seven fatal flaws in submitted manuscripts. American
Journal of Public Health, 84(5), 718-719.
Nylenna, M., Riis, P., & Karlsson, Y. (1994). Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts -- effects
of referee characteristics and publication language. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 149-151.
Oberst, M. (1994). Functional abstracts. Research in Nursing and Health, 17(1), 1.
Olbrisch, M.E. (1995) Reciprocity of professional obligations. American Psychologist, 50(8), 727.
Oleson, K.C., & Arkin, R.M. (1996). Reviewing and evaluating a research article. In: F.T.L. Leong & J.T.
Austin (Eds.) The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants. Thousand
Oaks, Calif: SAGE, pp. 40-55.
Ogletree, R.J., Glover, R.B., & Hu, P. (1997). Characteristics of selected health education journals. Journal of
Health Education, 28(4), 224-229.
Oliver, R.T. (1986). The professor as writer. Communication Education, 35(2), 186-192.
Ottenbacher, K.J., & Stull, G.A. (1992). Rethinking the promotion and tenure process: a response to Hill and
Ritvo. Journal of Allied Health, 21(1), 1-5.
Partridge, B.L. (1999). Plagiarism and authorship. Anesthesiology, 91(1), 324.
Peters, J.L., Sutton, A.J., Jones, D.R., Abrams, K.R., & Rushton, L. (2006). Comparison of two methods to
detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(6), 676-680.
Pierach, C.A. (2001). Free meals from the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 285(2), 165.
Pitkin, R.M., & Branagan, M.A., (1998). Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific
instructions? A randomized control trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 267-268.
Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A., & Burmeister, L.F. (1999). Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research
articles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 1110-1111.
Pitkin, R.M., Branagan, M.A., & Burmeister, L.F. (2000). Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve
abstract quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(4), 481.
Price, J.H., & Forouzesh, M. (1982). Those who present and publish most often in selected health education
conferences and journals. Eta Sigma Gamman, 14, 24-26.
Price, J.H., & Robinson, K.L. (1999). Perception of quality of journals related to health education.
Psychological Reports, 84, 259-266.
Price, J.H., Dake, J.A., & Islam, R. (2001). Selected ethical issues in research and publication: Perceptions of
health education faculty. Health Education & Behavior, 28(1), 51-64.
Price, J.H., & Jeffrey, J.D., Jr. (2006). Journal impact factor: Bibliometrics and the Journal of School Health.
Journal of School Health, 76(4), 123-125.
Raymond, J.C. (1993). I-dropping and androgyny: the authorial "I" in scholarly writing. College Composition
and Communication, 44, 478-483.
Reid, J.C., Kardash, C.A.M., Robinson, R.D., & Scholes, R. Comprehension in patient literature: The
importance of text and reader characteristics. Health Communication, 6(4), 327-335.
Reidenberg, M. (2001). Releasing the grip of big pharma. Lancet, 358, 664.
Relman, A.S. (1977). Publish or perish -- or both. New England Journal of Medicine, 297, 724-725.
Renard, L. (1999-2000). Cut and paste 101: Plagiarism and the net. Educational Leadership, Dec 1999-Jan
2000, 38-42.
Rennie, D. (1986). Guarding the guardians: A conference on editorial peer review. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 256, 2391-2392.
Rennie, D. (1990). Editorial peer review in biomedical publications: The first international congress. Journal
of the American Medical Association, 263, 1317.
Rennie, D. (1993). More peering in peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 2856-
2858.
Rennie, D. (1994). The second international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 272(2), 91.
15
Rennie, D. (2000). Editors and owners – stretching reputation too far. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 282, 783-784.
Rennie, D. (2000). Editors and owners of scientific journals. Journal of the American Medical Association,
283(3), 336.
Rennie, D. (2001). CONSORT revised – improving the reporting of randomized trials. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 285(15), 2006-2007.
Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! authorship! guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(6), 469-471.
Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). The second international congress on peer review in biomedical
publication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 91.
Reys, B.J., & Reys, R.E. (2006). The development and publication of elementary mathematics textbooks: Let
the buyer beware. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(5), 377-383.
Richardson, L. (1997). Skirting a pleated text: De-Disciplining an academic life. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3),
295-299.
Rienzi, B.M., & Allen, M.J. (1994). Poster presenters: send us your papers. American Psychologist, 49(8),
681-682.
Roberts, J.C., Fletcher, R.H., & Fletcher, S.W. (1994). Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of
articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 119-121.
Rochon, P.A., Gurwitz, J.H., Cheung, M., et al. (1994). Evaluating the quality of articles published in
journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 272(2), 108-113.
Rogers, B. (1990). Writing abstracts. AAOHN Journal, 38(1), 40.
Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 183-192.
Ross, A. (1987). Tenure or the great chain of being: Academic life and the wheel of fortune. Change, 19(4),
54-55.
Ross, J.S., Gross, C.P., Desai, M.M., et al. (2006). Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(14), 1675-1680.
Ross, J.S., Hill, K.P., Egilman, D.S., Krumholz, H.M. (2008).Guest authorship and ghostwriting in
publications related to Rofecoxib. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(15), 1800-1812.
Ross, S.M., & Morrison, G.R. (1993). How to get research articles published in professional journals.
TechTrends, 38(2), 29-33.
Rothman, K.J. (1993). Conflict of interest: the new McCarthyism in science. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 269, 2782-2784.
Ruben, D.H. (1989). Bibliotherapy: practical considerations when writing for substance abuse readers.
Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 34(2), 70-78.
Rubinsetin, E. (1995). Punctuated equilibrium in scientific publishing. Science, 268, 1415.
Ryan, J.J.C.H. (1998). Student plagiarism in an online world. ASEE Prism Magazine, [On-line
http://www.asee.org/prism/december/html/student_plagiarism_in_an_onlin.htm] Last accessed January 8, 2006.
Sawyer, T.H. (1993). Organizing and developing your ideas. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance, 64(8), 11-12.
Schapiro, D.W., Wenger, N.S., & Schapiro, M.F. (1994). The contributions of authors to multiauthored
biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(6), 438-442.
Scherer, R.W., Dickersin, K., & Langenberg, P. (1994). Full publication of results initially presented in
abstracts. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 158-162.
Schneider, K.N. (2001). FindSame.com: A powerful tool for detecting plagiarism. The Teaching Professor,
15(1), 3,6.
Schockmel, R.B. (1996). The premise of copyright, assaults on fair use, and royalty use fees. The Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 22, 15-25.
Schoonmaker, D. (1995). You just worry about the words – let your computer do the formatting while you
concentrate on the writing. Writer‟s Digest, 75(9), 60-62.
16
Schroter, S., Tite, L., Hutchings, A., & Black, N. (2006). Differences in review quality and recommendations
for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 295, 314-317.
Schulman, K., Sulmasy, D.P., & Roney, D. (1994). Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major
medical journals. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 154-156.
Schulz, K.F., Chalmers, I., Grimes, D.A., & Altman, D.G. (1994). Assessing the quality of randomization
from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 272(2), 125-128.
Schwinn, D.A., DeLong, E.R., & Shafer, S.L. (1998). Writing successful research proposals for medical
science. Anesthesiology, 88(6), 1660-1666.
Scott, J.C. (2001). Using the process approach to improve scholarly writing. Delta Pi Epsilon, 43(2), 57-66.
Sechrist, W., & Governali, J.F. (1981). Selected publications for professional health educators. Journal of
School Health, 51, 471-474.
Serwint, J.R., Feigelman, S., & Dumont-Driscoll, M. (2003). Listing contributions of investigators in research
groups. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(17), 2212.
Sharp, D.W. (1991). Fraud -- the journal's role concerning fraudulent research. Investigative Radiology,
26(6), 586-589.
Sheikh, A. (2000). Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: Reflections on the troubled
question of authorship. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26, 422-426.
Siebers, R., & Holt, S. (2000). Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals. Lancet, 356, 1445.
Sikula, J.P. (1979). Writing for publication. Educational Horizons, Winter, 97-104.
Silbergeld, E.K. (1995). Annotation: protection of the public interest, allegations of scientific misconduct, and
the Needleman case. American Journal of Public Health, 85(2), 165-166.
Silver, G.A. (1995). Editor's note. American Journal of Public Health, 85(2), 167.
Simon Rosser, B.R., Rugg, D.L., & Ross, M.W. (2001). Increasing research and evaluation productivity: Tips
for successful writing retreats. Health Promotion Practice, 2(1), 9-13.
Siwek, J. (1995). Buying editorials. New England Journal of Medicine, 332(3), 194.
Smith, E. (October 16, 1997). The tenure labyrinth. Black Issues in Higher Education, 14(17, 120.
Squires, B.P. (1993). Preparing manuscripts for publication: General pointers. Canadian Medical Association
Journal, 149(1), 25-26.
Staats, P.S. (2004). Notice of duplicate publication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(14),
1681.
Standler, R.B. (1999). Technical writing. [On-line http://www.rbs0.com/tw.htm] Last accessed January 8,
2006.
Steinberg, E.P. (1995). Cost-effectiveness analyses. New England Journal of Medicine, 332(2), 123.
Sternberg, R.J. (1992). How to win acceptances by psychology journals: 21 tips for better writing. APS
Observer, September, 12-13, 18.
Sternberg, R.J. (1993). For the article writer: how to win acceptances by psychology journals. American
Journal of Mental Retardation, 97(6) 709-712.
Stevenson, J. (2000). National Library of Medicine to help consumers use online health data. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 283(13), 1675-1676.
Stevenson, J. (2001). Biomedical journals ponder the failures and remedies of peer review. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 286(23), 2931-2932.
Stith, S.M., Jester, S.B., & Linn, J.L. (1992). Student-faculty collaborative research. Family Relations, 41(4),
470-474.
Strunk, W., Jr., & White, E.B. (1999). Elements of style, 4th edition. New York: Macmillan. (Also available
on-line [http://www.bartleby.com/141] last accessed September 14, 2007).
Susser, M., & Northridge, M.E. (1996). Editor's note: reviewing for the journal. American Journal of Public
Health, 86(2), 161.
Susser, M., & Yankauer, A. (1993). Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and
editorial decisions. American Journal of Public Health, 83(6), 792-793.
17
Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4(2),
175-191.
Swanson, E.A., McCloskey, J.C., & Bodensteiner, A. (1991). Publishing opportunities for nurses: a
comparison of 92 U.S. nursing journals. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 33-38.
Sweitzer, B.J., & Cullen, D.J. (1994). How well does a journal's peer review process function? Journal of the
American Medical Association, 272(2), 152-153.
Tanselle, G.T. (1996). Reflections on scholarly editing. Raritan, 16, 52-64.
Taubes, G. (1993). Peer review goes under the microscope. Science, 262, 25-26.
Tasker, M. (1999). “Tell me about it”: On the agony and ecstasy of writing for publication. Families in Society:
The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 80(6), 649.
Thatcher, S.G. (March 3, 1995). The crisis in scholarly communication. Chronicle of Higher Education, B1-
B2.
Thomas, S. (1991). Research fraud – when the pressure to publish manifests. Tennessee Nurse, February, 17-
18.
Thurston, T. (1999). New questions for the new media: Scholarly writing and online publishing. American
Quarterly, 51(2), 250-253.
Torraco, R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource
Development Review, 4, 356-367.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Firestone, W.A., Hoy, W.K. & Johnson, S.M. (2000). The write stuff: A study of
productive scholars in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 358-390
Tye, L. (July 26, 1999). Medical journal‟s top editor is fired: Dispute over marketing policies cited. Boston
Globe, A1.
Vanchieri, C. (1993). Peer review out to the test: Credibility at stake. Journal of the National Cancer
Institute, 85, 1632-1633.
Vaughn, D.K. (1991). Abstracts and summaries: Some clarifying distinctions. Technical Writing Teacher,
18(2), 132-141.
Voelker, R. (2000). Publishers debate future of online journals. Journal of the American Medical Association,
284(8), 943-944.
Von Elm, E., Pglia, G., Walder, B., & Tramèr, M.R. (2004). Different patterns of duplicate publication – an
analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(8), 974-980.
Wachs, J.E. (1996). From idea to publication: The secrets of publishing. American Association of
Occupational Health Nurses, 44(6), 273-277.
Wadman, M. (1998). US research safety system „in jeopardy.‟ Nature, 393, 610.
Waehler, C.A., & Welch, A.A. (1995). Preferences about APA posters. American Psychologist, 50(8), 727.
Waller, P.R., & Ropka, M.E. (1993). Disseminating research: Writing abstracts. Journal of the Association
of Nurses in AIDs Care, 4(1), 58-63.
Walter, G., & Bloch, S. (2001). Publishing ethics in psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of
Psychiatry, 35, 26-35.
Waser, N.M. (1992). Writing an effective manuscript review. BioScience, 42(8), 621-623.
Watkins, E.C., Jr., et al. (1993). Institutional and personal sources of manuscripts in the "Journal of Vocational
Behavior" revisited; the first generation of publication activity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(2), 209-220.
Watts, T.D. (1989). Notes on writing for journals in the health education field: a review essay. Journal of
Alcohol and Drug Education, 35(1), 42-44.
Webber, C. (2001). Publishing your research findings. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 37(3), 122-125.
Webster, R.E., et al. (1993). Publication productivity in selected school psychology journals: 1985-1991.
Psychology in the Schools, 30(2), 136-142.
Wechsler, H.S. (1990). Publishing a journal article. Thought and Action, 6(2), 5-26.
West, L.J. (1992). How to write a research report for journal publication. Journal of Education for
Business, 67(3), 132-136.
Wheeler, J.O. (1996). Writing abstracts. Urban Geography, 17(4), 283-285.
White, H. (1993). Scholarly publication, academic libraries, and the assumption that these processes are
18
really under management control. College and Research Libraries, 54(4), 293-301.
White, M.S. (2001). Electronic access to scientific journals: Problems, problems. Econtent, 24(10), 66-67.
Whitely, W.P., Rennie, D., & Hafner, A.W. (1994). The scientific community‟s response to evidence of
fraudulent publication: The Robert Slutsky Case. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 170-173.
Whitfield, R., & Peters, J. (2000). Quality in scholarly publishing. Managing Service Quality, 10(3), 151-155.
Wibker, M. (1999). The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 281(12), 1129-1130.
Widmer, L.D. (1998). Getting publications to pay. Writer‟s Digest, 78(8), 32-33.
Wilkinson, J. (1995). How to conduct a literature review. Nursing Standard, 10(9), 28-30.
Wilson, R. (July 21, 2000). How a week in the mountains can jump-start a dissertation. The Chronicle of
Higher Education, A10.
Winker, M.A., (1999). The need for concrete improvement in abstract quality. Journal of the American
Medical Association, 281, 1129-1130.
Winker, M.A. (2003). JAMA online – new features, new functions. Journal of the American Medical
Association, 290(1), 1081-110.
Winker, M.A., Flanagin, A., Chi-Lum, B., et al. (2000). Guidelines for medical and health information sites on
the Internet. – principles governing AMA Web sites. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(12), 1600-1601.
Winston, R.B., Jr. (1985). A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research
publications. Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 515-518.
Witkin, S. (2000). Writing social work. Social Work, 45(5), 390-394.
Wolcott, H.F. (2002). Writing up qualitative research…better. Qualitative Health Research, 12(1), 91-1003.
Wolfgang, A.P., et al. (1993). Faculty ratings of journals in pharmacy administration. American Journal of
Pharmaceutical Education, 57(1), 34-38.
Woodford, F.P. (1967). Sounder thinking through clearer writing. Science, 156(3776), 743-745.
Woodford, F. P., Ed. (1986). Scientific writing for graduate students: A manual on the teaching of scientific
writing. Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors.
Young, J.R. (2001). The cat and mouse game of plagiarism detection. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 6,
A26-A27.
Young, R.J., Joynt, G.M., & Gomersall, C.D. (1995). Notice of redundant publication: transesophageal
echocardiography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the aorta. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(7), 457.
Zeiger, M. (2000). Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. 2nd
edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Zinsser, W.K. (1994). On writing well, 5th edition. New York: Harper-Collins.
Last updated: July 19, 2009
