Working Together for Solutions

AGP – Agricultural Conference

21-23 June 2009 Harkány

How to react on challenges facing the pork industry todayHow to react on challenges facing the pork industry today??

The advantages of The advantages of HiPro HiPro soymeal for pork feedingsoymeal for pork feeding

Zsarnóczay Sándor, Pig-DATA Kft. – Danisco Animal Nutrition

TheThe HiPro soymeal’s HiPro soymeal’s advantages in advantages in

practicepractice

TheThe HiPro soymeal’s HiPro soymeal’s advantages in advantages in

practicepractice

NutrientsProcessing

(extraction)

Price

Production Results

The base for HiPro soymeal’s purchasing

Why the HiPro soymeal?• High Extraction Standard

• High raw protein (min. 47,5 %) and lysine (min. 2,98 %) rate

• Low fibre content (max. 3,3 %)

• High energy rate- (A)ME poultry: 2525 kcal/kg or 10.55 MJ/kg- ME pork: 3385 kcal/kg or 14.15 MJ/kg

• Optimized production technology- Ureas activity 0.01-0.2 pH growth - Protein solvability in 0,2 % KOH solution: 73–87 %- PDI

HiPro II. Diff.

Raw Protein, % 47,5 - 49 44-46 4

Raw Fat, % min. 0.5 0.5 0

Raw Fibre, % max. 3,3-3,5 7,0 3,5

Moisture Content, % max. 12,0 12,0 0

Regulations for Soymeal from the Regulations for Soymeal from the USAUSA’s’s National Oilseed Processors Association National Oilseed Processors Association

(NOPA)(NOPA)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Összesminta %

45 45,8 46,5 47,3 48 48,8 49,5 50,3 51

Nyersfehérje %

Raw Protein quantity in % in the 26357 HiPro sample

(analytic trial)

Average: 47,49 % , 1 SD 0,81

Comparison of Amino acid content of some Oilseed meals 44%

soymealHiPro

soymealCottonseed

mealCanola

Arginin 3.4 3.8 4.6 2.3 4.6 2 3.5

Lysine 2.9 3.2 1.7 2.3 1.8 1.7 1.7

Methionine 0.65 0.75 0.52 0.7 0.42 1.5 1.5

Cystin 0.67 0.74 0.64 0.47 0.73 0.7 0.7

Tryptophan 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5

Hystidin 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.1 1 1 1

Leucine 3.4 3.8 2.4 2.6 3.7 2.6 2.6

Isoleucine 2.5 2.6 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.1

Phenylalanine 2.2 2.7 2.2 1.5 2 2.2 2.2

Threonine 1.7 2 1.3 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.5

Valin 2.4 2.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.3

Sunflower meal

Peanut meal

Rapeseed meal

inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment

optimal temperature interval

Protein and Amino acid Digestibility

Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of

Anti-nutritive Substances

Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances

inefficient heat treatment excessive heat treatment

optimal temperature interval

Protein and Amino acid Digestibility

Quality Assurance: Effect of Heat Treatment on Protein and Amino acid Digestibility and on Concentration of

Anti-nutritive Substances

Concentration of Anti-nutritive Substances

Time: 25 - - - 20 ------------------ 5 2 -------- 1

Ureáz: .3 .02 - - - - - 0

0,2 % KOH: 70 85 - - 90

PDI: - - - 30 15 - -

The right extraction’s nutrition-preservative roleThe right extraction’s nutrition-preservative role

Inefficient Inefficient -- Anti-nutritive Anti-nutritive factorsfactorsHeat Treatment Heat Treatment tripsyn inhibitorstripsyn inhibitors

lelecctintins s lipoxygenlipoxygen

(Ure(Ureáz testáz test))

ExcessiveExcessive -- Proteins denature Proteins denature Heat Treatment Heat Treatment Lysine ruins Lysine ruins

(KOH test for protein solvability)(KOH test for protein solvability)

Summary of Recommended Soymeal Quality Control Procedures

TestTime Need

(min)Expertise needed Accuracy Good figure

Ureaz index 20 low average0,02 – 0,30

0,2 % KOH solvability

20low/

averageaverage 70-85% (70%)

PDI 10low/

averagegood

15-30% (< 45%)

TIA (Trypsin Inhibitor Activity)

> 24 hours high good < 5 mg/g

Colouring(cresol red)

<10 low weak 5,0–6,5 mg/g

Summary:

1. There is a wide variety of soya products available for the forage industry.

2. The characters of the soya are largely dependent on the country of origin and the used heat treatment technology.

3. The protein and amino acid digestibility and the concentration of anti-nutritive substances can be optimized with the right heat treatment.

4. With help of quality control procedures the heat treatment’s rate and the variability of nutritive substances can be established.

5. It is practical to use one of the presented tests in the factory, and the achieved results should be used for the recipe's composition. The base for the GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) could be developed with the help of these tests, too.

Better quality Protein Carriers -even though their price per ton is

higher- reward the ambitious and good thinking professional who

does not only want to “produce” a broiler but also a profit.

- Dr. Németh Boldizsár -

Main Ingredients Parameters of HiPro and II. class soymeal (%)

Ingredient Parameters II. Class soymeal HiPro soymeal

Dry Component 88 88

ME poultry MJ/kg 9,82 10,55

ME pork MJ/kg 13,46 14,15

Raw Protein 44-46 47,5 min.

Raw Fibre 5,60 3,30 max.

Lysine 2,80 2,98 min.

Methionine 0,62 0,67

Threonine 1,72 1,87

Tryptophan 0,74 0,74

Calcium 0,29 0,27

Whole Phosphor 0,27 0,27

Potassium 2,00 1,98

Soymeal Energy levels

HiPro II. class Difference

Poultry

(A)ME MJ/kg10,55 9,82 0,73

Pork

ME MJ/kg14,15 13,46 0,69

How to count?

Counting with real figures on base of ideal digestibility

Figures of digestible lysine, threonine, methionine and tryptophan.

Why is it more practical to calculate on base of digestibility?

• Amino acids of different ingredients are utilized differently.

• E.g. lysine of soymeal is 85-91% digestible… (meat powder only 70-75%!)

• The “traditional” formula does not take this into account.

• The traditionally formed forage’s expected efficiency is not good enough…

• The comparison of ingredients on base of digestibility is much more objective. Production and expenses of forage formed this way are more efficient…

Real ideal digestibility of main amino-acids of HiPro, II.class soymeal, barley, wheat and corn (%)– monogastric livestock

% Raw protein

Lysine Methionine Threonine Tryptophan

HiPro 89,10 91,50 91,95 87,70 91,50

II. class 86,50 88,90 90,60 85,25 87,00

Barley 79,70 76,95 84,75 77,80 79,65

Wheat 88,40 75,95 83,95 76,30 81,20

Corn 86,20 78,85 90,65 82,35 82,00

Pork and Broiler requirements – using the previous data, and recommended

by the sources shown below: On base of ideal digestibility

NRC, Degussa, INRA, AFZ, ITCF, ADISSEO, Ajinomoto, AmiPig és

SwinePro

MIN. -

MAX.

ME

Kcal/(MJ)/kg

Raw Fibre

%

Raw Protein

%

Digestible

Lysine

%

Digestible

Methionine

%

Digestible Threonin

%

Digestible Tryptophan

%

Broiler starter

3150

(13,17)

Max.

3,0

Min.

21,5

Min.

1,10

Min.

0,45

Min.

0,69

Min.

0,17

Broiler Grower

3200

(13,38)

Max.

3,5

Min.

20,0

Min.

0,98

Min.

0,37

Min.

0,64

Min.

0,16

Broiler Finisher

3250

(13,59)

Max.

3,8

Min.

18,0

Min.

0,86

Min.

0,35

Min.

0,57

Min.

0,15

Pork starter I.

Under 10 kg

3400

(14,21)

Max.

3,0

Min.

23,5

Min.

1,30

Min.

0,50

Min.

0,75

Min.

0,28

Pork starter II. 10-19 kg

3350

(14,00)

Max.

3,3

Min.

22,0

Min.

1,20

Min.

0,45

Min.

0,70

Min.

0,25

Pork starter III. 20-30 kg

3300

(13,80)

Max.

3,6

Min.

20,5

Min.

1,10

Min.

0,40

Min.

0,67

Min.

0,21

88% 88% solid content solid content ,,on base of feeding with ready-made forageon base of feeding with ready-made forage (DEGUSSA+AVENTIS, (DEGUSSA+AVENTIS, 2001)2001)

What can we establish?

• The HiPro soymeal is more efficient ingredient (even though it is more expensive), compared to the II. class soymeal.

• By using the HiPro soymeal the recipe’s fibre content is lower, therefore it is more likely that better digestibility of the forage could be guaranteed; and the raw protein does not limit either(!).

• That means, that for production of 1 kg livestock forage expenses could be lower !

What lesson to draw?

• In each case in the recipes the HiPro replaced the II. class soymeal, if we did not limit the raw protein.

• The HiPro had a higher proportion in recipes even in the case of raw protein limitation.

• In any case the HiPro is a more profitable digestible amino-acid source than the II. class soymeal.

Summary:• Today every single penny(!) is important for

breeders!

• It was proved that –in most of the cases – usage of a more expensive ingredients could be more profitable than similar but cheaper ingredients!

• The HiPro soymeal is not only more profitable, but it is a more digestible forage for animals, too!

Thank You for Your Attention!