8
Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant microsystem toward nanomedicine diagnosis and therapy in free-behavior animal Chih-Wei Chang a , Kuan-Chou Hou a , Li-Jung Shieh a , Sheng-Hsin Hung a , Jin-Chern Chiou a,b,a Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, No. 1001, University Road, Hsinchu City 30010, Taiwan b China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung City 40402, Taiwan article info Article history: Available online 29 June 2012 Keywords: Wireless powering Batteryless microsystem Coil antenna Low dropout regulator abstract In this paper, we present a wireless RF-powering electronics system approach for batteryless implantable biomedical microsystem with versatile sensors/actuators on laboratory animals toward diagnosis and therapy applications. Miniaturized spiral coils as a wireless power module with low-dropout (LDO) linear regulator circuit convert RF signal into DC voltage, provide a batteryless implantation for truly free- behavior monitoring without wire dragging. Presented design achieves low quiescent-current and Line/Load Regulation, high antenna/current efficiency with safety considerations including temperature and electromagnetic absorption issues to avoid damage to the implanted target volume of tissue. Related system performance measurements have been successfully completed to demonstrate the wireless pow- ering capabilities in desired implantable microsystems. Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Neuroscience engineering together with in vivo real time bio- medical information, such as neural activity, recorded by implant neural sensors and microsystems is ultimately crucial for nano- medicine and bio-logical researches to identify and develop treat- ments for brain disorders i.e. epilepsy. For such applications in animal model studies, microsystems that consist of neural sensors, amplifiers, data converters/operators and data transmission units are used to capture neural information from animals and transfer the data to a laptop for further analysis. Generally, at least two types of wire connection are required for powering and data transmission. Use of wire connection between animal and instrumentations can cause serious problem even lead to the death of implanted animal when wire drag happens. Swivels are sometimes used to solve the dragging, but the price can be an- other problem, the channel numbers are limited and the implanted laboratory animal still cannot behave in their nature condition be- cause the wires. Benefit to the rapid developments of wireless communication, many different kind of wireless solution, includ- ing Zigbee [1] and Bluetooth [2], have been commercialized and applied in animal studies. Batteries are common used to eliminate the problem of power wires. However, batteries dominate the size and the cost of the implant device and become less attractive when the implant devices get smaller and need to replace their batteries occasionally [3]. Therefore, the demand for developing continuous monitoring in long-term, real-time prosthetics in free-behavior im- planted animal is restricted by the capacity of the battery. A bio- medical system constructed by bio-potential sensors [4] and actuators with miniaturized powering device receiving RF-power from an external host is then highly desirable. Currently, there are various methods for wireless transfer of power to biomedical microsystems, including ultrasonic energy transmission [5], capacitive coupling [6] and inductive coupling. Ultrasonic energy harvest systems transfer the mechanical energy into the implant device through skin, but suffer from low energy conversion capability [7]. Capacitive coupling declares clean and quiet telemetry by using metal plates and skin tissue as capacitors [6], however, it can never be applied in animals that need to be monitored under freely moving status. Comparing to other two method, inductive link achieves more possibility to transfer energy through an open air field with reasonable transmission efficiency. In this paper, we present an inductive coupled wireless power- ing system which contains inductive coils and low-dropout regula- tor design for implant microsystem toward free-behavior animal applications. Section 2 describes the overall wireless powering structure in an implantable microsystem. The development of the inductive coupling coils and low dropout regulator is detailed in Sections 3 and 4, following with performance test of the proposed wireless powering system in Section 5. Section 6 summarizes this paper with a brief conclusion. 0038-1101/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2012.05.020 Corresponding author at: Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, No. 1001, University Road, Hsinchu City 30010, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 3 5712121x31881; fax: +886 5 5715998. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C.-W. Chang), hiho.ece94g@nctu. edu.tw (K.-C. Hou), [email protected] (L.-J. Shieh), [email protected] (S.-H. Hung), [email protected] (J.-C. Chiou). Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Solid-State Electronics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sse

Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Solid-State Electronics

journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate /sse

Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant microsystem towardnanomedicine diagnosis and therapy in free-behavior animal

Chih-Wei Chang a, Kuan-Chou Hou a, Li-Jung Shieh a, Sheng-Hsin Hung a, Jin-Chern Chiou a,b,⇑a Department of Electrical Engineering, National Chiao-Tung University, No. 1001, University Road, Hsinchu City 30010, Taiwanb China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung City 40402, Taiwan

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Available online 29 June 2012

Keywords:Wireless poweringBatteryless microsystemCoil antennaLow dropout regulator

0038-1101/$ - see front matter � 2012 Elsevier Ltd. Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2012.05.020

⇑ Corresponding author at: Department of ElecChiao-Tung University, No. 1001, University Road, HTel.: +886 3 5712121x31881; fax: +886 5 5715998.

E-mail addresses: [email protected] (C.-W.edu.tw (K.-C. Hou), [email protected] (L.-J. Shieh(S.-H. Hung), [email protected] (J.-C. Chiou).

a b s t r a c t

In this paper, we present a wireless RF-powering electronics system approach for batteryless implantablebiomedical microsystem with versatile sensors/actuators on laboratory animals toward diagnosis andtherapy applications. Miniaturized spiral coils as a wireless power module with low-dropout (LDO) linearregulator circuit convert RF signal into DC voltage, provide a batteryless implantation for truly free-behavior monitoring without wire dragging. Presented design achieves low quiescent-current andLine/Load Regulation, high antenna/current efficiency with safety considerations including temperatureand electromagnetic absorption issues to avoid damage to the implanted target volume of tissue. Relatedsystem performance measurements have been successfully completed to demonstrate the wireless pow-ering capabilities in desired implantable microsystems.

� 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Neuroscience engineering together with in vivo real time bio-medical information, such as neural activity, recorded by implantneural sensors and microsystems is ultimately crucial for nano-medicine and bio-logical researches to identify and develop treat-ments for brain disorders i.e. epilepsy. For such applications inanimal model studies, microsystems that consist of neural sensors,amplifiers, data converters/operators and data transmission unitsare used to capture neural information from animals and transferthe data to a laptop for further analysis.

Generally, at least two types of wire connection are required forpowering and data transmission. Use of wire connection betweenanimal and instrumentations can cause serious problem even leadto the death of implanted animal when wire drag happens. Swivelsare sometimes used to solve the dragging, but the price can be an-other problem, the channel numbers are limited and the implantedlaboratory animal still cannot behave in their nature condition be-cause the wires. Benefit to the rapid developments of wirelesscommunication, many different kind of wireless solution, includ-ing Zigbee [1] and Bluetooth [2], have been commercialized andapplied in animal studies. Batteries are common used to eliminate

ll rights reserved.

trical Engineering, Nationalsinchu City 30010, Taiwan.

Chang), hiho.ece94g@nctu.), [email protected]

the problem of power wires. However, batteries dominate the sizeand the cost of the implant device and become less attractive whenthe implant devices get smaller and need to replace their batteriesoccasionally [3]. Therefore, the demand for developing continuousmonitoring in long-term, real-time prosthetics in free-behavior im-planted animal is restricted by the capacity of the battery. A bio-medical system constructed by bio-potential sensors [4] andactuators with miniaturized powering device receiving RF-powerfrom an external host is then highly desirable.

Currently, there are various methods for wireless transfer ofpower to biomedical microsystems, including ultrasonic energytransmission [5], capacitive coupling [6] and inductive coupling.Ultrasonic energy harvest systems transfer the mechanical energyinto the implant device through skin, but suffer from low energyconversion capability [7]. Capacitive coupling declares clean andquiet telemetry by using metal plates and skin tissue as capacitors[6], however, it can never be applied in animals that need to bemonitored under freely moving status. Comparing to other twomethod, inductive link achieves more possibility to transfer energythrough an open air field with reasonable transmission efficiency.

In this paper, we present an inductive coupled wireless power-ing system which contains inductive coils and low-dropout regula-tor design for implant microsystem toward free-behavior animalapplications. Section 2 describes the overall wireless poweringstructure in an implantable microsystem. The development of theinductive coupling coils and low dropout regulator is detailed inSections 3 and 4, following with performance test of the proposedwireless powering system in Section 5. Section 6 summarizes thispaper with a brief conclusion.

Page 2: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed RF–DC wireless powering system which receives RF power from an external PA and provides system supplies to a conceptualimplant microsystem.

94 C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100

2. Wireless powering system structure

Fig. 1 displays the block diagram of microsystem with bio-sensors i.e. ExG, chemical or temperature sensors, and stimulationactuators i.e. drag delivery for nanomedicine diagnosis and ther-apy. Wireless transceiver in the microsystem transmits bio-infodata to and receives commands from an external host, while pro-posed RF–DC wireless powering system receives RF power froman external host and provides system supplies to the implantmicrosystem. The RF power produced by a Class-E amplifier is cou-pled into the receiving coil via a tuned LC network followed by afull-wave rectifier and low dropout (LDO) regulators to producestable system supplies [8]. The proposed wireless powering systemcan serve as an additional small module to be applied to differentmicrosystems. The schematic of wireless powering system can alsobe observed in Fig. 1. External component includes PA and RFpower transmission coil, on-broad components involves receivecoil, rectifier, smoothing capacitance and bias diode, and the on-chip component includes LDO regulator with band gap bias circuitand thermal protection circuitry.

In the inductive coupled power transmission design, the maincontribution to the power loss is the electromagnetic wave reflec-tion at the air-skin interface and heat dissipation effect inside thetissues [9]. Also, reliable transmission efficiency with enoughtransmission distance becomes one of the considerations. Low RFpowering frequency provides longer transmission distance but alsomakes receiver coil bigger. Furthermore, electromagnetic waveshows its absorption and reflection property by the skin tissuewhen frequency range is approximately higher 20 MHz and lowerthan 1 MHz, respectively. In this paper, 13.56 MHz radio frequencyis chosen because it is one of the ISM band and its low tissueabsorbability to avoid damage on animal tissue.

3. Inductive coupling spiral coils theory and design

3.1. Inductive link theory and design procedure

The radio frequency power is transmitted through coupled coils,which follows the electromagnetic induction of Faraday’s Law.Various approaches have been presented for inductive link

optimization in implantable electronics [10–12]. Fig. 2 illustratesa simplified inductive powering model [13,14]. L1 is the primarycoil driven by an ac source Vs, which is often an efficient class-Epower amplifier. L2, is the secondary coil that is integrated withthe implant electronics. M is the mutual inductance between twocoils. Coil windings have parasitic resistance and capacitance asso-ciated with them, which are represented by lumped elements Rs1

and Rs2. Capacitors Cs1 and C2 are added to form a pair of resonantLC-tank with L1 and L2, respectively.

Magnetic flux lines are formed around the primary coil as a re-sult of the flow of current though it and the voltage induced in thesecondary coil is due to the magnetic flux passing though. Theequivalent resistance Re, reflected back into the primary coil canbe expressed as:

Re ¼ðxMÞ2

Rs2RL¼ RACK2Q 1Q 2

RAC þ Q 22Rs2

� Rs1 ð1Þ

where K, Q1 and Q2 are the coupling coefficient and unloaded qual-ity factor of the two coils. The mutual inductance of two alignedcoils that having diameters r1 and r2, turns N1 and N2 and separatedby distance x is given by the following expression [15]:

M ¼ l0N1r21N2r2

2p

2ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðr2

2 þ x2Þ3q ð2Þ

where l0 = 4p � 10�9 H/cm. And the optimal transmission effi-ciency is readily found in the literature [16]:

gOPT ¼K2Q 1Q2

½1þ ð1þ K2Q1Q 2Þ1=2�2ð3Þ

The shared magnetic flux between coils results in a coupling coeffi-cient K, where 0 < K < 1, is given by:

K ¼ MffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiL1L2p ð4Þ

The coupling coefficient K is only determined by the coil dimen-sion (diameter and distance), and the quality factor is defined bythe coil structure and material. The related equation concludes thatoptimum powering efficiency increases as k2Q1Q2 increases [17].For high quality factor, low skin-effect, low resistance wires and

Page 3: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Fig. 2. (A) Inductive powering circuit model. (B) Equivalent circuit.

Fig. 3. Fabricated receiving and external coils.

1 2 3 4 5

20

40

60

80

100

Fig. 4. Antenna efficiency characterization with PDMS encapsulation under condi-tions in air and tissue (pork).

Fig. 5. Block diagram of the proposed low-dropout linear regulator.

C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100 95

single layer spiral coil structure were utilized in this work. Also, tomaximize the coupling coefficient K, optimal values of geometry ofthe coils are obtained according to the expressions in [16]. Calcu-late RS2 and RS1 from desired rectifier performance and poweringspecification. Therefore, L1 and L2 can be designed and obtainedand realized by experimental measurements. Then, the resonancecapacitance CS1 and C2 can be found according to desired transmis-sion frequency.

3.2. Fabricated results and measurements

Fig. 3 shows the optical photographs of the fabricated receivingand external coils made by 24/16 AWG cupper wire with 1.5 cmand 4 cm in diameter. The inductance, parasitic resistance, para-sitic capacitance and resonate capacitance of the transmission coilare 15 lH, 11.5 X, 2.73 pF and 6.4 pF, while the receive coil exhib-its 521 nH, 16.7 X, 3.71 pF and 260.7 pF, respectively. The antenna

efficiency is characterized with PDMS coating as bio-protection inimplanted tissue. Measurement result under conditions in air/tis-sue (pork) and with/without PDMS encapsulation is illustrated inFig. 4, which results no obvious influence from packaging.

4. Low dropout regulator design

4.1. Circuit design

Fig. 5 illustrates the block diagram of the proposed low-dropoutlinear regulator. The architecture is modified from a typical low-dropout regulator topology [18] with power MOSFET and thermalprotection unit to enhance the driving current and avoid tempera-ture damage on tissue. The error amplifier amplifies the voltagedifference between the reference voltage and divided load voltageand switches the power MOSFET (PMOS). Output voltage is de-scribed as:

VOUT ¼ VREFR1 þ R2

R2

� �ð5Þ

Another design issue in the linear regulator is the stability prob-lem. According to bode plot analysis, the output capacitance and itsequivalent series resistance (ESR) decides the zero point to in-crease the phase margin. However, the ESR must be carefully de-signed in appropriate range to ensure the system stability.

Fig. 6 shows the circuit schematic of the error amplifier. MI27 isthe power MOSFET illustrated in Fig. 5. Also, stability is one of thedesign key points. In this design, ceramic capacitance with low ESRis used as output capacitance, which can cause low phase marginand lead into un-stable condition. Therefore, extra RC-compensa-tion is introduced to enhance the system stability. In Fig. 6, currentlimitation control by two Poly resistances which is inverse propor-tional to current. PIP capacitance I48 and resistor RI31 are used forMiller compensation. PIP capacitance MI44 and MI39 are used asinternal smoothing capacitances for spike rejection. MOS MI3 actsas output switch, which controlled by thermal protection circuit.

Fig. 7A shows the detailed schematic of a temperature-indepen-dent bandgap reference voltage generator (RVG) [19]. In Fig. 7A,

Page 4: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Fig. 6. Error amplifier circuit.

Fig. 7. (A) Bandgap voltage reference generator and (B) over-thermal protection circuit.

96 C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100

the PNP BJT QI16 and QI17 act as negative- and positive-TC voltagedevices produce a temperature independent voltage difference tothe operational amplifier. A resistor RI18 is used to adjust the out-put VREF. PIP capacitance MI31 and resistor RI2 are used for Millercompensation. MI5 and MI6 act as a startup for quicker response.MI4 is an extra gain stage for higher PSRR. MI20 is used for extraESD protection, while the PIP capacitance MI3 used as a filter andbias. Fig. 7B illustrates the thermal protection circuit schematic.The over-temperature protection (OTP) design is used to avoidthermal damage on tissue due to the high temperature (>40 �C)caused by the operating circuit. In Fig. 7B, RI3 is a ROND resistorin tsmc 0.35 lm process, which has high temperature coefficient(PTC1 = 1.51e � 3). When T raise, voltage drop on RI3 increase, thenturn-on MI14, increase current flow passing MI14, turn-on MI15, pulldown OTP. Hysteresis functions when temperature drop downlower than 40 �C, MI14 will not off immediately due to the currentprovided by BJT QI2. Until the temperature is lower enough, say<37 �C, voltage drop on RI3 decrease, current decrease, MI14 turn-off, MI15 off, OTP pull high.

4.2. Fabricated results and measurements

The LDO regulator chip is fabricated via TSMC 0.35um 2P4 Mprocess. The die size is 1.42 � 0.95 mm2. Fig. 8A shows the optical

microphotograph. Fig. 8B is the test result of the power supplyrejection ratio. The measured PSRR is around 70.883 dB and0.165 dB at 10 kHz and 13.56 MHz, respectively. Comparing tothe simulation result of PSRR (�81.44 dB), the main difference isthat simulation consists of only pure capacitance, but in practice,parasitic inductance does exist in the output ceramic capacitance,which decreases the high frequency performance in PSRR.

The stability test of the LDO regulator displays the ripple andnoise on the output voltage level under different current loading.Fig. 9A output stability observation under IOUT = 200 mA. Resultshows that the maximal noise level is lower than 3–4 mV. Low rip-ple and noise performance is one of the great property of linearregulator. Fig. 9B present the output ripple caused by a currentloading from 0 mA to 200 mA. Output transient behaves a 308–264 mV spike, say 17–14% variance in output voltage, under thecondition VIN from 3 V to 6 V, respectively. The output transientperformance can be easily improved by increase the quiescent cur-rent but also increase the power consumption. Fig. 9C illustratesthe output ripple observation under a sudden maximal currentloading. The maximal output current varies under different VIN

condition. Result shows that the peak of the spike is less than300 mV. Line transient is the output current ripple caused by theinput voltage variance. Fig. 9D shows the spike observation underloading current 200 mA with VIN variance from 2.6 V to 6 V. The

Page 5: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Fig. 8. (A) Optical microphotograph of the fabricated chip (B) PSRR.

Fig. 9. (A) Stability test @ IOUT = 200 mA (B) load transient test IOUT = 0–200 mA @ VIN = 3 V (C) ripple observation @ load 0–252 mA (D) output spike @ VIN = 2.6–6 V.

C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100 97

overall Line Regulation performance is between 1.5 and 4.5 mV,cause 0.0833–0.25% variance in output current.

Table 1 shows the measured Load/Line Regulation Result. Notethat when the IOUT = 200 mA under VIN from 5 V to 6 V, the systemis thermal shutdown due to the over thermal protection (OTP).Generally speaking, the Load Regulation is between 0.5 and5 mV, which is around 0.0278–0.278% variance in output voltage.Table 2 summarizes the measured performance of the presentedLDO regulator comparing to other works.

Presented chip shows low drop out voltage, wide input rangewith reasonable quiescent current. Additionally, thermal-protection (<40 �C) design is also included in the present linearregulator to avoid damage in implanted target for implant device

applications. Some equations used for specification comparisonare listed below:

VDrop ¼ Vin � VOUT @ IOUT MAX ð6Þ

Ieff ¼IOUT MAX

IIN MAX þ IQð7Þ

5. Wireless powering system performance

After the fabrication of spiral coils and LDO regulator chip, PCBlevel integration is utilized for system performance characteriza-

Page 6: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Table 1Load/Line Regulation Test Result.

VIN (V) 2.6 3.3 4.2 5.0 6.0 Line Regulation

IOUT = 0 mA VOUT (V) 1.828 1.8285 1.829 1.8295 1.8285 1.5 mVIOUT = 50 mA 1.828 1.829 1.83 1.8305 1.8305 2.5 mVIOUT = 100 mA 1.828 1.83 1.831 1.8325 1.8325 4.5 mVIOUT = 200 mA 1.8285 1.8315 1.834 OTP OTP NA

Load Regulation 0.5 mV 3 mV 5 mV NA NA

Table 2Summary of LDO regulator performance.

[20] [21] [22] This workYear 2006 2008 2010 2011Technology (lm) 0.13 0.18 0.35 0.35Input voltage (V) 3–4.5 NA 2–4.5 2.6–6Output voltage (V) 2.8 1.2 1.8 1.8Dropout voltage (V) 0.199 0.2 0.2 0.125Current efficiency (%) NA 99.9 NA 99Output current (mA) 150 200 200 0–200Quiescent current (lA) 114 20 30 45Current limit (mA) NA NA NA 252Line regulation (mV) 1.5 NA 6 4.5Load regulation (mV) 17.4 NA 0.09 5PSRR (dB) 67@20 K 45@20 K NA 71@10 KThermal protection No No No Yes (<40 �C)

Fig. 10. Fabricated full system with power amplifier, transmission coil, receivingcoil and LDO regulator.

Fig. 11. Temperature raise test under 37 �C with maximal output current for 1hr.

98 C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100

tion. To generate the RF powering, a power amplifier module usingcommercial chips is used to amplify the 13.56 MHz signal from asignal generator. Fig. 10 shows the fabricated wireless poweringsystem, the class-E power amplifier and receive module. Fig. 11illustrates the temperature raise test under 37 �C environmentaltemperature, which is used to simulate the practical implant envi-ronmental condition with maximal output current (200 mA) for1hr. Result shows that less than 2 �C raise is observed thus meetthe implantation requirement [23,24].

Fig. 12 shows observation on the output performance of receivecoil, rectifier and LDO chip by applying 13.56 M Hz signal to theFig. 12A and B display the received power on receiving coil, the rec-tifier output and the LDO output when input signal on E-classamplifier is 2.5 V and 6.8 V, while related output current is 0 mA

and 200 mA, respectively. The maximal output ripple is around50 mV due to the low PSRR performance at 13.56 M Hz. However,the ripple can be reduced down to less than 20 mV is extra 0.1 lFceramic capacitance is added at the LDO output. Fig. 12C shows theLoad Regulation under current loading varies from 100 mA to200 mA. The Transient voltage is about 400 mV in peak. Table 3shows the result of measured Load Regulation of the full system.Finally, the calculated specific absorption rate (SAR) is 0.27 W/kg,which is in the basic restriction of IEEE standard C95.1 (0.4 W/kg).

In ideal case, the quiescent current must be as low as possibleduring zero-to-low loading, because it amounts to a significantportion of the total drain current from the supply. However, inthe other hand, the quiescent current of the circuit also determi-nates the response speed of the amplifier. Error amplifier comparesthe reference voltage between feedback voltage and operates thepass element for different loading condition. Low quiescent currentcan lead to slow response in pass element control. In this paper, theLoad Regulation achieves 0.5 mV under the condition of 2.6 V inputvoltage, which is comparable to other systems. From the applica-tion point of view, the current load of an implant microsystemfor neural signal recording is relative stable. Therefore, the quies-cent current of our design can be reduced to small loading varia-tion condition. Another possible method for improving thesystem is to apply additional buffer between error amplifier andthe pass device. Under the condition of very low quiescent biascurrent amplifier design, the objective of the buffer is to drivethe power pass device quickly with minimal power. The buffermust produce low output impedance because the large pass devicepresents large parasitic capacitance. Also, higher slew rate currentsof the buffer is required to quickly charge and discharge the para-sitic capacitance of pass device. Additionally, the buffer should ex-hibit high input impedance to decrease the loading effects in erroramplifier, which may limit the loop gain and bandwidth of the reg-ulator. Clearly, adding additional buffer may increase the complex-ity of the system. Related studies will be consider as our next steps.

Page 7: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

Fig. 12. (A) Output ripple observation under VIN = 2.5 V, IOUT = 0 mA (B) VIN = 6.8 V, IOUT = 200 mA (C) Load Regulation under IOUT = 100–200 mA.

Table 3Measured Load Regulation of the system.

Current VOUT

IOUT = 0 mA 1.828 VIOUT = 50 mA 1.827 VIOUT = 100 mA 1.826 VIOUT = 150 mA 1.823 VIOUT = 200 mA 1.820 VLoad Regulation 8 mV

C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100 99

To summarize, the spiral coils as a wireless power module ispresented in power management for batteryless medical instru-mentation applications. The coil and circuit design, fabricationand system implementation are exhaustively discussed in this sec-tion. Finally, practical measurement result provides the detailedperformance characterization of the presented wireless powermodule.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, we present a wireless RF-powering electronics ap-proach for implantable biomedical applications on laboratory ani-mals. Miniaturized spiral coils as a wireless power module withlow-dropout linear regulator circuit convert RF signal into DC volt-age, provide a batteryless implantation for truly free-behaviormonitoring without wire dragging. Carefully designed inductivecoupling coils provide wireless power transmission with 0.83 cou-pling coefficient and high antenna efficiency. The proposed LDOregulator achieves 45 lA quiescent-current, 4.5/5 mV Line/LoadRegulation, 71 dB PSRR with thermal protection to avoid damageto the implanted tissue. The full system exhibits less than 20 mVripple output and maximal 400 mV transient peak voltage undercurrent load varies from 100 mA to 200 mA. Related system perfor-mance measurements have been successfully completed to dem-onstrate the wireless powering capabilities under safety issuesconsiderations (temperature and SAR) in desired implantablemicrosystems.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Ministry of Economic Af-fairs, Taiwan, under Contract Number 98-EC-17-A-07-S1-011,and National Science Council, Taiwan, under Contract Number99-2218-E-039-001, 99-2220-E-009-019, 99-2220-E-009-072, 99-2220-E-009-002 and in part by Taiwan Department of Health Clin-ical Trial and Research Center of Excellence under Contract Num-ber DOH99-TD-B-111-004 and Number DOH99-TD-C-111-005.This work was supported in part by the UST-UCSD International

Center of Excellence in Advanced Bio-engineering sponsored bythe Taiwan National Science Council I-RiCE Program under GrantNumber NSC-99-2911-I-009-101. The authors would like to thankNational Chip Implementation Center (CIC) for chip fabrication.

References

[1] Young CP, Liang SF, Chang DW, Liao YC, Shaw FZ, Hsieh CH. A portable wirelessonline closed-loop seizure controller in freely moving rats. IEEE Trans InstrumMeas 2011;60:513–21.

[2] Deadwyler SA, Hampson RE, Collins V. A wireless recording system thatutilizes Bluetooth technology to transmit neural activity in freely movinganimals. J Neurosci Methods 2009;182:195–204.

[3] Denisov A, Yeatman E. Ultrasonic vs inductive power delivery for miniaturebiomedical implants. Body Sensor Networks (BSNs). In: Internationalconference on 2010; 2010. p. 84–9.

[4] Chang CW, Chiou JC. Development of a three dimensional neural sensingdevice by a stacking method. Sensors-Basel 2010;10:4238–52.

[5] Towe BC, Larson PJ, Gulick DW. Wireless ultrasound-powered biotelemetry forimplants. Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2009 EMBC 2009. In:Annual international conference of the IEEE; 2009. p. 5421–4.

[6] Sodagar AM, Amiri P. Capacitive coupling for power and data telemetry toimplantable biomedical microsystems. I IEEE Embs C Neur E; 2009. 404–7.

[7] Zhu Y, Moheimani SOR, Yuce MR. Ultrasonic energy transmission andconversion using a 2-D MEMS resonator. IEEE Electron Device Lett2010;31:374–6.

[8] Chang C-W, Hou K-C, Shieh L-J, Hung S-H, Chiou J-C. Wireless poweringelectronics and spiral coils for implant microsystem toward nanomedicinediagnosis and therapy in free-behavior animal. In: Nanoelectronics conference(INEC), 2011 IEEE 4th international; 2011. p. 1–2.

[9] Vaillancourt P, Djemouai A, Harvey JF, Sawan M. EM radiation behavior uponbiological tissues in a radio-frequency power transfer link for a cortical visualimplant. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference of theIEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, vol. 19. Pts 1–6; 1997. p.2499–502.

[10] Kendir GA, Liu WT, Wang GX, Sivaprakasam M, Bashirullah R, Humayun MS,et al. An optimal design methodology for inductive power link with class-Eamplifier. IEEE Trans Circuits – I 2005;52:857–66.

[11] Jow UM, Ghovanloo M. Design and optimization of printed spiral coils forefficient transcutaneous inductive power transmission. IEEE Trans Biomed CircS 2007;1:193–202.

[12] Poon ASY, O’Driscoll S, Meng TH. Optimal frequency for wireless powertransmission into dispersive tissue. IEEE Trans Antenn Propag2010;58:1739–50.

[13] Ko W, Liang S, Fung C. Design of radio-frequency powered coils for implantinstruments. Med Biol Eng Comput 1977;15:634–40.

[14] Jow UM, Ghovanloo M. Modeling and optimization of printed spiral coils in air,saline, and muscle tissue environments. IEEE Trans Biomed Circ S2009;3:339–47.

[15] Finkenzeller K. RFID handbook – fundamentals and applications in contactlesssmart cards and identification. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2003.

[16] Harrison RR. Designing efficient inductive power links for implantable devices.IEEE Int Symp Circ S; 2007. p. 2080–3.

[17] Kurs A, Karalis A, Moffatt R, Joannopoulos JD, Fisher P, Soljacic M. Wirelesspower transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. Science2007;317:83–6.

[18] Rincon-Mora GA, Allen PE. A low-voltage, low quiescent current, low drop-outregulator. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE J 1998;33:36–44.

[19] Razavi B. Design of analog cmos integrated circuits; 2001.[20] Wong K, Evans D. A 150 mA low noise, high PSRR low-dropout linear regulator

in 0.13 mu m technology for RF SoC applications. Proc Eur Solid-State2006:532–5.

Page 8: Wireless powering electronics and spiral coils for implant

100 C.-W. Chang et al. / Solid-State Electronics 77 (2012) 93–100

[21] Liang-Guo S, Zu-Shu Y, Xing Z, Yuan-Fu Z, Ming G. A fast-response low-dropoutregulator based on power-efficient low-voltage buffer. In: Circuits andsystems, 2008 MWSCAS 2008 51st midwest, Symposium; 2008. p. 546–9.

[22] Chun-Yu H, Chih-Yu Y, Ke-Horng C. A low-dropout regulator with smooth peakcurrent control topology for overcurrent protection. Power Electron, IEEETrans 2010;25:1386–94.

[23] Wise KD, Sodagar AM, Yao Y, Gulari MN, Perlin GE, Najafi K. Microelectrodes,microelectronics, and implantable neural microsystems. P IEEE2008;96:1184–202.

[24] Seese TM, Harasaki H, Saidel GM, Davies CR. Characterization of tissuemorphology, angiogenesis, and temperature in the adaptive response ofmuscle tissue to chronic heating. Lab Invest 1998;78:1553–62.