96
Australian Attitudes to Nature 2017 Report prepared for WWF-Australia REPORT 2018

Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Australian Attitudes to Nature 2017Report prepared for WWF-Australia

REPORT

2018

Page 2: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

INDEX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3RESEARCH APPROACH 8HISTORICAL RESULTS 18ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOUR 20ATTITUDES TOWARDS WILDLIFE, NATURE AND TREES 24OCEAN AND REEF 33SUSTAINABLE FOOD 42CLIMATE CHANGE AND LOW CARBON FUTURE 49ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIONS 55POLITICS AND ENVIRONMENT 60CONTACT DETAILS 63APPENDIX - HISTORICAL RESULTS IN DETAIL 64

© N

ATU

RE

PL.

CO

M /

RO

LAN

D S

EIT

RE

/ W

WF

Page 3: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Executive Summary

© S

HU

TTE

RS

TOC

K /

DA

NG

DU

MR

ON

G /

WW

F

3

Page 4: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Executive Summary › Findings from the Roy Morgan Single Source historical data indicate that over the long term attitudes of Australians

towards the environment have changed in the backdrop of larger economic and political developments. During the GFC,with economic and financial issues taking precedence, in general, attitudes towards the environment softened. However,after the financial crisis ended, concern levels are again rising and Australians’ attitudes are also shifting in a way thatreflects a higher recognition of the environmental issue(s).

› Over the long term, Australians are less or equally concerned about the environment than they were in the year 2000. Thelast five years however, have clearly seen growing concerns around environmental issues.

› As on March 2017, 80% of Australians 14+ agree that if we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems(88% in Mar’03, 76% in Mar’13)

› 63% of Australians now agree that at heart they are an environmentalist at heart (compared to 55% in Mar’00 and 57% in Mar’13)› Only one quarter of all Australians think that threats to the environment are exaggerated (20% in Mar’00, 34% in Mar’13)

› Findings from the latest customized research conducted among Australians 18 years and above show that generallyAustralians are concerned about the pertinent environmental issues and their impact.

› Women in general are more concerned about environmental issues and their associated impacts

4

Page 5: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Executive Summary › Encouragingly, a high proportion of Australians (68%) believe that a healthy environment and a prosperous economy go

hand in hand, and 20% believe that the environment needs to be protected even if it impacts economic prosperity.

› Oceans and water are an integral part of the Aussie way of life. For Australians, protecting the oceans and marine life ingeneral, and specifically the Great Barrier Reef is the most important environmental issue.

› Nine out of ten agree that there is a need to do more to protect the suffering oceans and marine life› Very few (5%) hold the view that oceans are so large that it is unlikely for humans to cause lasting damage to them› A majority (65%) believes that the state of Australia’s oceans, waterways and coastal waters is still good, though declining - pointing

to the need for timely action. 16% believe that the state of Australia’s oceans and coastal waters is bad and getting worse› Plastic and chemical pollution followed by warming are seen as biggest threats to the oceans and coastal waters

› There is a high degree of concern around the state of the Great Barrier Reef among Australians:› Protecting the Great Barrier Reef is the most important environmental issue for Australians (94% finding it important)› 89% of Australians think that the Great Barrier Reef is the most important natural place to be protected› 42% think that compared to 10 years ago the overall state of the GBR is bad and getting worse› 44% of the Australians agree that the Great Barrier Reef is in terminal decline› 33% disagree that it can recover from coral bleaching› Coral bleaching followed by climate change are considered to be the two greatest threats to the Great Barrier Reef

5

Page 6: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Executive Summary › The next important environmental issues are reducing pollution, protecting Australia’s endangered animals, its forests and

trees.› 67% of Australians think that the state of Australia’s natural environment and wildlife is good but declining› 15% think that the natural environment and wildlife are already in a bad state and getting worse› 89% agree that there should be investment in restoring wildlife habitats and natural places that have become degraded› 81% agree that there is a need to be growing more trees (which is not happening right now) and that they are worried about future

generations growing up with lesser access to nature and wildlife than them› Introduced animals and weeds along with urban expansion are seen to be the biggest threats to natural environment and wildlife› Most Australians prefer introduction of stronger land clearing laws for protecting the wildlife and nature and will support action by

their state government to stop excessive land and clearing

› The reason most Australians believe it is important to protect oceans, wildlife and nature is because these are critical tomaintain the balance of nature and also there is a high consciousness that it is the responsibility of the current generationto leave these healthy for the future generations.

6

Page 7: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Executive Summary › Looking after farmland sustainably is also an important environmental concern for Australians.

› Almost two thirds of the population is aware of one or more the food certifications› 83% agree that the food that they eat should come from sustainable sources› 68% agree that locally grown food is better for the environment than imported food› 60% are willing to pay more for sustainable food› Australians see climate change, water pollution and food wastage to be the biggest threats to food sustainability

› Even though as many as 86% think that climate change is happening and many think that human activity is the cause,climate change is considered much less of a concern compared to other environmental issues.

› Australians are concerned about the impact of climate change with destruction of the Great Barrier Reef being their top mostconcern

› Other concerns are the impact on food supply with the droughts or floods and animal and plant species becoming extinct› 71% of the population agree that Australia should be the world leader in climate change solutions and 69% would want Australia to

act on climate change without waiting for the major emitters› There is high agreement on the risk to the planet from that coal and gas pollution and a majority agree that the federal government

should not allow new coal mines› Over 50% are in agreement with the introduction of a carbon price

7

Page 8: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Research Approach

© N

ATU

RE

PL

/ FR

ED

OLI

VIE

R/ W

WF

8

Page 9: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Research Objectives

BACKGROUND › The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is the leading Australian

conservation organisation, with a supporter base ofclose to 1 million Australians with a new Strategic Planfor 2017-2021.

› The Strategic Plan has several aims:› Positioning WWF as a thought leader on its conservation

priorities› Benchmarking and track changes in attitudes over time› Further improving on communication and campaigning› Positioning WWF as an innovator through interactive

research; and› Developing news media and supporter stories that show

a broad cross-section of Australians care about natureand want more action to protect it.

OBJECTIVES › This research is designed to support WWF’s strategic

goals by providing benchmark measures on currentAustralian attitudes.

› The research will inform communication campaigns andmedia opportunities to position WWF as a thoughtleader in conservation.

› The research aimed at measuring attitudes ofAustralians towards nature and environment,specifically:

› Wildlife, Nature and Trees› Oceans and Reef› Sustainable Food› Climate Change and Low Carbon Future

9

Page 10: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

HISTORICAL DATA (ENVIRONMENTAL INDEX)

› This document reports findings from the analysis of historic data available from Single Source

› The attitudinal statements analysed within the scope of this project are:› At heart I’m an environmentalist (from January 1998)› If we don’t act now we’ll never control our environmental problems (from April 2002)› Environmentally products are over-priced (from January 1998)› Threats to the environment are exaggerated (from October 1998)› I avoid staying in accommodation that does not have genuine environmental policies (from October 2000)› For my next holiday, I would like a total ecotourism experience (from October 2000)› The most important issue to you, which includes Global Warming and Climate Change

10

Page 11: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

HOW THE HISTORICAL DATA IS COLLECTEDThe data in this report is from the Roy Morgan Single Source survey as well as Roy Morgan CATIBus telephone surveys.

Roy Morgan Research Single Source has been designed to represent the ideal single source model. It provides an integrated understanding of consumers - what they are like, what they consume, what they buy, what they think, what they want, what they watch, read and listen to. In Australia, Roy Morgan Single Source incorporates approximately 50,000 predominantly face-to-face interviews nationwide each year, with people aged 14+. Interviews are conducted each week over the year. Around 15,000 self-completion surveys (Product Poll & Media Diaries) provide enriched detail of consumption habits and attitudes. The overriding benefit of Roy Morgan Single Source is the strategic insights it affords by the linkage of so many aspects.

Most of the data in this report is from the Single Source Product Poll where, amongst other questions, respondents are asked if they agree or disagree with the following statements relating to the environment: 1. If we don’t act now we’ll never control our environmental problems2. At heart I’m an environmentalist3. Threats to the environment are exaggerated4. ‘Environmentally friendly’ products are overpriced5. I avoid staying at accommodation that does not have genuine environmental policies6. For my next holiday, I’d really like a total ecotourism experience

11

Page 12: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

HOW THE HISTORICAL DATA IS COLLECTED (CONTD. )As well as the data from Roy Morgan Single Source, Roy Morgan regularly asks respondents through CATIBus what are some of the issues that face Australia and the world.

These include issues relating to the environment, the economy, government and human issues, terrorism and war, social issues, and more. An analysis of these statements is also part of the delivery for this project.

This report explores in detail the top 4 environmental attitudinal statements from Single Source by different demographics and geography, i.e., 1. If we don’t act now we’ll never control our environmental problems2. At heart I’m an environmentalist3. Threats to the environment are exaggerated4. ‘Environmentally friendly’ products are overpricedIt also provides an overview of all six attitudinal statements by time periods

This report is updated to reflect the data that has been collected in CATIbus (as a high level summary). This data has been delivered to WWF in an Excel report.

12

Page 13: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

BENCHMARK SURVEY - Methodology Overview

› Online self-completion survey› Average survey length = 26 minutes› Research carried out in compliance with ISO 20252 Market, Opinion & Social Research standards

› Australians aged 18+ years› Nationally representative sample with boosts in Brisbane, South East Queensland (excl. Brisbane)

and Western Sydney to allow for data to be read within these geographies

› Post weighted by region x age x gender ((based on data collected from Roy Morgan Single Source)› Further weighted by voting preference at 2016 Federal Election

› In field approximately 4 weeks› Field dates: Monday 13 November - Wednesday 6 December 2017

M E T H O D O L O G Y

TA R G E T A U D I E N C E

W E I G H T I N G

T I M I N G

S A M P L E S O U R C E & S I Z E› Sample sourced from Roy Morgan consumer panel› n=1810; Maximum sampling variance of ±2.30 at 95% confidence level› Response rate of 5.3% (completes ÷ [completes + incompletes + not started])

13

Page 14: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Questionnaire Overview

› Questionnaire designed collaboratively between WWF Australia and Roy Morgan Research› Themes include: awareness of issues, behavioural measures, attitudes and demographic data for analysis› Designed keeping in mind existing benchmarks that WWF would like to monitor and to accommodate tracking› Includes the following sections

› Overall Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours› Wildlife, Nature and Trees› Ocean and Reef› Sustainable Food› Climate Change and Low Carbon Future› Environmental Actions› Politics and Environment› Demographics› Introductions to each of the sections were carefully designed to ensure that they warm up respondents to the upcoming topic,

however, do not influence the way they respond.› Order of exposure for the first and last two sections kept consistent across all respondents, whilst order for the other sections was

rotated across respondents to minimize the impact of any order bias on the responses.

14

Page 15: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Sample Profile

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810;

49%

51%

12%

19%

26%

23%

20%

34%

26%

20%

8%

2%

11%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Male

Female

18-24

25-34

35-49

50-64

65+

NSW (incl. ACT)

Victoria

Queensland

SA/NT

Tasmania

Western Australia

SEX

AG

EST

ATE

0%

8%

3%

16%

71%

1%

41%

18%

59%

3%

2%

23%

7%

1%

5%

40%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Primary School

Some Secondary School

Intermediate/ Year 10

Leaving/ 5th Form/ Year 11/ Finished Tech/ Matric/ HSC/Tafe/ Year 12

Tertiary/ University

Prefer not to say

Full Time

Part Time

TOTAL EMPLOYED

Looking For Full Time Work

Looking For Part Time Work

Retired

Student

Non-worker

Home Duties

TOTAL NOT EMPLOYED

Prefer not to say

EDUC

ATIO

N LE

VEL

WOR

K ST

ATUS

15

Page 16: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Sample Profile

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; enrolled to vote n=1080 Only top 5 political parties shown PE3. Are you enrolled to vote at Federal or State elections? (single Response) PE4. Thinking back to the LAST Federal Election in 2016. Which party or candidate received your first preference at the LAST Federal Election? (Single Response) PE5. Thinking now about politics generally, which political party do you feel comes closest to representing your opinions? (Single Response)

ENROLLED TO VOTE AT FEDERAL OF STATE ELECTION VOTING PREFERENCE AT 2016 FEDERAL ELECTION POLITICAL PARTY WHICH REPRESENTS RESPONDENTS OPINIONS

Yes 83%

No 17%

35%

33%

10%

5%

3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Labor

Liberal National Party/ Liberal/ CLP'

The Greens

Can't Say

One Nation

22%

19%

18%

18%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Labor

Liberal Party

The Greens

Can't Say

One Nation

16

Page 17: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Results

© IA

N M

CC

ON

NE

L / W

WF-

AU

S

17

Page 18: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I avoid staying at accommodation that does not have genuine environmental policies

At heart I'm an environmentalist

‘Environmentally friendly’ products are overpriced

If we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems

Threats to the environment are exaggerated

For my next holiday, I'd really like a total ecotourism experience

RESULTS - H ISTORICAL DATA OVERALL TREND

18

Page 19: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

H ISTORICAL DATA OVERALL TRENDS

› The period of the GFC had one of the biggest impacts on attitudes to nature, with more Australians agreeing thatthreats to the environment are exaggerated and fewer agreeing that acting now will control environmental problems.This illustrates that in the backdrop of the financial crisis and other economic concerns taking precedence,environmental concerns take a backseat.

› This is also reflected in the trend of people agreeing with the statement I’m an environmentalist at heart - with a dropin the percentage of Australians agreeing with this (compared to pre-crisis period).

› However, a shift is observed in the post crisis period.› Recent years indicate that more Australians are concerned about the environment, with an increasing number now

agreeing that they are an environmentalist at heart (63%). There is also a growing sense of the urgency around takingaction – an increasing percentage agreeing that “if we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems”(81% now, grown sharply in last five years). Additionally, a lower percentage of the population now finds environmentalthreats to be exaggerated.

› While the above is encouraging, it must be noted that nearly 70% of the population find ‘environment friendly’products to be overpriced - higher now than in the last 19 years.

› Holiday intentions relating to the environment have decreased or stayed the same in the 19 years to March 2017,fewer than 20% of people agree with the statements ‘for my next holiday, I'd really like a total ecotourism experience’,and ‘I avoid staying at accommodation that does not have genuine environmental policies’.

19

Page 20: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Environmental Attitudesand Behaviour

© D

IAN

A SC

ALFA

TI /

WW

F-AU

S

20

Page 21: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Importance of Environmental Issues

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OEAB1: To begin with, tell us to what extent are the following issues important/ unimportant to you. How important are the following environmental issues? (5 point Scale: Very Important to Very Unimportant, Single Response)

Protecting Australia’s oceans and marine environment and specifically the Great Barrier Reef are the two most important environmental issues for Australians, with 95% of the general population stating considering it very important or important. Issues that follow are reducing pollution, protecting Australia’s endangered animals, and forests & trees. Climate change considered lower in importance when compared to other concerns.

63%

57%

56%

55%

54%

50%

49%

44%

38%

31%

38%

37%

38%

40%

37%

43%

33%

42%

5%

4%

6%

6%

5%

8%

6%

14%

15%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

3%

1%

4%

3%

2%

4%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Protecting The Great Barrier Reef

Protecting Australia's Oceans And Marine Environment

Protecting Australia's Endangered Animals

Protecting Australia's Forests And Trees

Reducing Pollution

Supporting Renewable Energy

Looking After Farmland Sustainably

Addressing Climate Change

Strengthening Environmental Protection Laws

Very Important Important Neither Important Nor Unimportant Unimportant Very Unimportant

21

Page 22: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Environment Economy Balance

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OEAB2. Which of the following statements best describes your view regarding a balance between the economy and the environment? (Single Response)

A majority of Australians believe in the environment-economy balance, with approximately two-thirds saying that a healthy, well protected environment and a prosperous economy go hand in hand. One-fifth are of the view that the environment needs to be protected even if it impacts economic prosperity. Only one-tenth of the population is of the view that in the pursuit of economic prosperity, the environment is going to suffer.

11%

20%

68%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

In order to have economic prosperity, the environment isgoing to suffer a bit

The environment needs to be protected even if it impactseconomic prosperity

A healthy, well protected environment and a prosperouseconomy go hand in hand

22

Page 23: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Important Places to be Protected

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OEAB3. Which of the following well-known natural places do you think are most important for Australia to protect? (Maximum 3 Selections)

Given the high concern around Australia’s oceans noted earlier, a majority of Australians (89%) think that the Great Barrier Reef is the most important natural place to be protected. This is followed by the Daintree rainforest and the Tasmanian forests - 39% and 38% respectively.

89%

39%

38%

32%

20%

18%

15%

14%

10%

4%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

The Great Barrier Reef

The Daintree rainforest

Tasmanian forests

Kakadu

Uluru

The Snowy Mountains

Ningaloo Reef

The Kimberley

Fraser Island

Don't know

None of these

23

Page 24: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes towards Wildlife, Nature and Trees

SHU

TTER

STO

CK

/ GU

NN

ERL

/ WW

F

24

Page 25: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

13%

67%

5%

15%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Good and gettingbetter

Good butdeclining

Bad but gettingbetter

Bad and gettingworse

State of Australia’s Natural Environment and Wildlife

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT1. The overall state of Australia's natural environment and wildlife, is… (Single Response)

Overall, 80% of Australians consider the natural environment and wildlife to be in a good state. However 67% believe that though good, it is declining. Males in general are more optimistic compared to females (15% of the males believe it is in a good state and getting better c.f. 11% females). The 65+ age group is also more optimistic (19% of those 65+ stating that the state of Australia’s natural environment and wildlife is good and getting better).

25

Page 26: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Reasons for Importance of Wildlife, Forests and Natural Places

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT2. Thinking about our wildlife, forests and natural places. In your opinion, which one of the following best describes why they are important? (Single Response)

Overall, the top reasons why Australians believe wildlife, forests and natural places are important are; that these are critical to maintaining the balance of nature, and that it is the responsibility of the current generation to leave the nature healthy for the future generations. For men, responsibility towards future generations is the most important reason while for women the criticality of maintaining the balance of nature is key.

35%

34%

20%

7%

2%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Critical to the balance of nature

Responsibil ity to leave nature healthy for future generations

Australia's wildlife and natural places are unique

Enjoying nature and the Aussie outdoors is part of our way of life

Critical to our tourism industry

Supporting industries that rely on natural resources

None of these

26

Page 27: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes to Australia’s Wildlife and Natural Environment

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT5. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? 1. We need to be growing more trees and plants than we’re cutting down, and right now that’s not happening, 2. I’m worried future generations of Australians will grow up with less access to nature and wildlife than we had, 3. I would like to see more native wildlife and thriving nature in my local area, 4. We should have more national parks and nature reserves across Australia, 5. We should invest in restoring wildlife habitats and natural places that have become degraded. (5 point Scale: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, Single Response)

As many as 89% of Australians agree that there should be investment in restoring wildlife habitats and natural places that have become degraded. Over 80% agree that there is a need to be growing more trees (which is not happening right now) and that they are worried about future generations growing up with lesser access to nature and wildlife than them. 77% would like to see more native wildlife and thriving nature in their local area, and 72% would like to have more national parks and nature reserves.

44%

38%

34%

33%

33%

45%

43%

48%

44%

40%

10%

14%

12%

20%

22%

1%

4%

4%

2%

4%

0%

1%

1%

1%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Invest in restoring wildlife habitats

Not growing more trees than cutting down

Worried about future generations having less access to nature andwildlife

More local native wildlife

More national parks and nature reserves

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

27

Page 28: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

74%

72%

56%

54%

42%

34%

28%

22%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Introduced animals and weeds

Urban expansion

Climate change

Water or air pollution

Disease

Bush-fire

Rural/farm development

Hunting

Something else

None of these

Threats to Australia’s Wildlife and Plants

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT3. And which, if any, of the following do you believe are a threat to Australia's wildlife and plants? (Multiple Responses) WNT4. Which one of the following is the biggest threat to Australia's wildlife and plants? (Single Response)

Most Australians view urban expansion, and introduced animals and weeds as threats to Australia’s wildlife and plants. This is followed by cliamet change which is believed to be a threat by 56% of Australians.

30%

33%

20%

5%

3%

4%

2%

1%

1%

1%

Threats to Australia’s Wildlife & Plants Biggest Threat

28

Page 29: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Native Animals Seen in the Wild or Ocean

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT7. In your lifetime, have you ever seen any of the following native animals in the wild or in the ocean in Australia (i.e. not in a zoo or in captivity)? (Multiple Responses)

More than half the population has seen one or more of cockatoos, wallabies, koalas, whales, turtles and penguins outside of a zoo or captivity – the cockatoo, wallaby and koala having been seen by over two-thirds of the population. As expected, this is higher for the 50 years plus segment.

89%

80%

72%

61%

59%

58%

41%

28%

23%

13%

12%

6%

2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Cockatoo

Wallaby

Koala

Whale

Turtle

Penguin

Shark

Cassowary

Quokka

Dugong

Bilby

Numbat

None of these

29

Page 30: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Iconic Species to be Protected

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT8. Environment groups, local communities and governments are working to protect Australian wildlife, but they have limited resources. Which one iconic wildlife species would you most like to see protected? (Single Response)

Generally considered as one of the most popular animals in Australia, koala gets the top spot when it comes to the iconic wildlife species that Australians would most like to see protected. The whale and bilby follow with an equal 30% of Australians wanting to see them protected the most.

53%

30%

30%

23%

19%

19%

17%

12%

11%

10%

9%

4%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Koala

Whale

Bilby

Turtle

Dugong

Quokka

Penguin

Numbat

Cassowary

Wallaby

Shark

Cockatoo

None of these

30

Page 31: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

34%

20%17%

13%9%

5%

17% 17% 19%16% 14% 12%13% 15%

18%15%

20%

14%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Introduce Stronger LandClearing Laws

Land Buying For NationalParks

Provide FinancialIncentives To Protect

Nature

Pay Indigenous RangersTo Manage Wildlife

Community Activites Develop New 'Eco-Labels'

First Second Third

Preferred Government Policies for Protecting Wildlife and Nature

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT9. If you had the choice, which three of the below government policies for protecting wildlife and nature would you adopt? Please rank in order from 1 to 3. 1. Provide financial incentives for landholders to protect nature on their land. 2. Fund community activities like tree planting days and bush regeneration. 3. Pay Indigenous rangergroups to manage important wildlife habitat for conservation. 4. Introduce strong laws to stop excessive tree clearing and forest destruction on private land. 5. Develop new ‘eco labels’,for example ‘tree friendly beef’, that reward farmers who produce food without harming wildlife. 6. Buy land that has high biodiversity and dedicate it as a national park or similar. 7.I don’t think we need any of these policies (Single)

‘Introducing stronger land clearing laws’ is the most preferred government policy amongst Australians with 34% ranking it as their first choice. The other favoured policies are to ‘buy land that has high biodiversity and dedicate it as a national park’ (ranked 1 by 20%) and ‘provide financial incentives for landholders to protect nature on their land’ (ranked 1 by 17%).

MEAN 1.67 1.90 2.03 2.06 2.24 2.30

31

Page 32: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Response to State Government Stopping Excessive Land and Tree Clearing

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT10. Would you support or oppose action by your State Government to stop excessive land and tree-clearing in your state? (5 Point Scale: Strongly Support to Strongly Oppose), Single Response

84% of Australians will either strongly support or support actions by state government to stop excessive land and tree-clearing. Only 5% will oppose such an action being taken by their state government while the remaining 11% will be indifferent.

44%

40%

11%

3% 2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Strongly support Support Neither supportnor oppose

Oppose Strongly oppose

32

Page 33: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Ocean and Reef

© W

WF-

AUS

/ CH

RIST

IAN

MIL

LER

33

Page 34: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

State of Australia’s Oceans, Waterways and Coastal Waters

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR1. The overall state of Australia's oceans, waterways and coastal waters, is… (Single Response)

76% of Australians believe the overall state of Australia’s oceans, waterways and coastal waters is in a good condition, albeit 65% think this is declining. 16% believe that the oceans and waterways are in a bad state and worsening. Males and individuals aged 35-49 years old have a relatively more positive view of the state of the oceans and waterways.

12%

65%

7%

16%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Good and gettingbetter

Good but declining Bad but gettingbetter

Bad and gettingworse

34

Page 35: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Reasons for Importance of Oceans, Coastal Waters and Great Barrier Reef

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR2. Thinking now about our oceans, coastal waters and the Great Barrier Reef. In your opinion, which one of the following best describes why oceans are important? (Single Response)

Similar to views on wildlife and trees, the top reasons for importance of oceans and coastal waters for the Australians are these being critical to maintain the balance of nature, followed by a responsibility to leave oceans healthy for future generations.

49%

24%

15%

5%

3%

2%

0%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Critical to the balance of nature

Responsibil ity to leave oceans healthy for future generations

Important to protect our unique marine life

Enjoying our oceans and coastal waters is part of our way of life

Critical to our tourism industry

Vital for the fishing industry

Supporting our shipping industry

None of these

35

Page 36: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes to Australia’s Oceans and Coastal Waters

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR5. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? 1. The oceans are so large, it is unlikely that humans will cause lasting damage to them. 2. Our oceans and marine life are suffering, we need to do more to protect them. 3. Enjoying the coast and the ocean is central to the Aussie way of life. 4. With time, the Great BarrierReef can recover from coral bleaching. 5. The Great Barrier Reef is in terminal decline. 6. More of Australia’s oceans should be dedicated as ‘marine parks’ (i.e. marine protected areas,similar to national parks on land). 5 Point Scale: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, Single Response)

Eight in ten Australians agree that oceans and water are an integral part of the Aussie way of life and nine out of ten agree that there is a need to do more to protect the suffering oceans and marine life. Eight in ten also disagree that the oceans are so large that it is unlikely that humans will cause lasting damage. Nearly three-quarters agree that more of Australia’s oceans should be marine parks.

31%

45%

30%

1%

50%

45%

41%

4%

17%

8%

20%

10%

1%

2%

6%

36%

1%

1%

2%

49%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

The coast and ocean is central to the Aussie way of life

Need to do more to protect suffering oceans and marine life

More of Australia's oceans should be marine parks

Oceans are so large unlikely humans will cause lasting damage

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

36

Page 37: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

85%

71%

58%

48%

46%

45%

41%

41%

24%

2%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Plastic pollution

Chemical pollution that runs off farms into waterways

Warming of the ocean's waters due to climate change

Dredging the sea-bed for ship access

Drilling for oil and gas

Commercial Fishing

Shipping of coal, oil and gas.

Mining and burning of coal

Tourism developments

Something else

None of these

Threats to Australia’s Oceans and Coastal Waters

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR3. Which, if any, of the following do you believe are a threat to Australia's oceans and coastal waters? (Multiple Response) OR4. Which one of the following is the biggest threat to Australia's oceans and coastal waters? (Single Response)

Most Australians see plastic and chemical pollution followed by warming as threats to the oceans and coastal waters (85%, 71% and 58% respectively) – plastic pollution and warming of the ocean’s waters are seen as the two biggest threats.

31%

15%

30%

4%

6%

5%

3%

4%

2%

1%

Biggest Threat

2%

Threats to Australia’s Oceans & Coastal Waters

37

Page 38: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes to the Great Barrier Reef

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR5. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? 5 Point Scale: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, Single Response)

44% of the Australians agree that the Great Barrier Reef is in terminal decline, while one-fifth disagree; over one-third neither agree nor disagree. With respect to the reef’s recovery from coral bleaching, Australians appear to be divided - one third agree that it can recover, another third disagree and the remaining third are undecided.

6%

11%

27%

33%

34%

35%

26%

17%

7%

4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

The Great Barrier Reef can recover from coral bleaching

The Great Barrier Reef is in terminal decline

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

38

Page 39: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

State of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR7. Thinking now specifically about the Great Barrier Reef. The overall state of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, compared to the past 10 years, is… (Single Response)

Clearly, there are varying views that Australians share with respect to the Great Barrier Reef. A majority (84%) think that the state of the reef is declining for sure. Within these, half believe that it is still in a good state while the other half thinks that it is bad and getting worse. Interestingly, amongst those whose first preference at the 2016 Federal elections was the LNP, 62% think that the reef is overall in a good state.

6%

42%

10%

42%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Good and gettingbetter

Good butdeclining

Bad but gettingbetter

Bad and gettingworse

39

Page 40: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Value of the Great Barrier Reef

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR8. If you had to describe why you value the Great Barrier Reef, which of the following would you say is closest to your view: (Single Response)

59% of Australians described the Great Barrier Reef as having environmental value to them - with the reef encompassing a unique and special array of fish species and wildlife . A little under one third of Australians cited the global value of the reef as to why they value it.

59%

29%

7%

2%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Its environmental value - being home to fish species and specialwildlife like turtles, dugong, dolphin and whales

Its global value - it's one of the wonders of the world

Its economic value - it provides over 69,000 Australian jobs intourism

Its special personal value to me

I don't know

40

Page 41: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Threats to the Great Barrier Reef

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; OR9. Which of the following do you think are the two greatest threats to the Reef? (Maximum 2 Selections)

Coral bleaching followed by climate change are perceived to be the two greatest threats to the Great Barrier Reef amongst the general population (50% and 42% respectively).

50%

42%

25%

16%

16%

15%

8%

8%

6%

5%

2%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Coral bleaching

Climate change

Crown of thorns starfish

Acidification of the ocean

Industrialisation

Dredging the sea-bed for ship access

Commercial shipping

Tourism

Farming

Storms and cyclones

Fishing

None of these

41

Page 42: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Sustainable Food

© K

ERRY

TRA

PNEL

L / W

WF-

AUS

42

Page 43: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Awareness of Food Certifications

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF1. Thinking now about sustainable food. Before today, had you heard of any of the following certifications for food? (Multiple Responses)

A good number of Australians are aware of the food certifications, with Fair Trade and ACO being the ones that most Australians are aware of (61% each). Rainforest Alliance follows, with more than half of the general population aware of this certification.

23%

53%

12%

10% 1%

61%

61%

43

Page 44: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes to Food Sustainability in Australia

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF4. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? 1. What I east is about my body and has nothing to do with the natural world or the environment. 2. Australian grown food is better for the environment than imported food. 3. I want the food I eat to come from sustainable sources. 4. I’m willing to pay more for sustainably produced food. (5 Point Scale: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, Single Response)

A high proportion of Australians claim to be conscious about sustainable food with 84% strongly agreeing or agreeing that food they eat should come from sustainable sources. Around 7 out of 10 Australians think Australian grown food is better for the environment than imported food. However, when it comes to paying more for sustainable food, only 6 in 10 say they are willing to pay more for it.

30%

28%

16%

5%

53%

40%

44%

17%

14%

27%

27%

29%

2%

5%

9%

35%

1%

1%

3%

14%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Food I eat should come from sustainable sources

Australian grown food is better for the environment thanimported food

Willing to pay more for sustainable food

What I eat is about my body

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

44

Page 45: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Threats to Food Sustainability in Australia

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF2. Which, if any, of the following do you believe are a threat to food sustainability in Australia? (Multiple Responses) SF3. Which one of the following is the biggest a threat to food sustainability in Australia? (Single Response)

The top three perceived threats to food sustainability in Australia are climate change and water pollution (both 57%) and food wastage (53%). Climate change is seen to be the biggest threat by one third of the general population (34%), followed by food wastage (18%).

Threats to Food Sustainability in Australia

34%

13%

18%

5%

5%

7%

3%

2%

1%

4%

7%

Biggest Threat

57%

57%

53%

37%

33%

30%

28%

15%

9%

6%

5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Climate change

Water pollution

Food wastage

Tree clearing for agriculture or cattle

Commercial fishing

Industrial scale farming

Pollution from farms

Difficult to find and buy sustainable food

Eating red meat

Something else

None of these

45

Page 46: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF5. When you are shopping for food, how much do you worry about the effect on the environment for each of the following products on a scale of 0-10 (where 0 is not at all worried, and 10 is very worried)? Single Response

Coming to food products, Australians are most worried about palm oil, with almost every second Australian being worried (44%), and a further 26% stating they do not eat palm oil. The next most concerning food product for Australians is wild seafood (39% of Australians are worried about its effects on the environment). The food products with least level of worry were vegetables and other plant foods, and sugar (44% of Australians stating they were not worried about either).

44%

39%

32%

28%

25%

24%

24%

22%

18%

14%

25%

32%

33%

27%

34%

32%

33%

31%

16%

19%

34%

31%

28%

41%

44%

31%

44%

26%

16%

3%

8%

20%

14%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Palm Oil

Wild Seafood

Poultry and Eggs

Beef

Farmed Seafood

Australian Grown Food

Vegetables

Pork

Sugar

Total Very Worried Total Ambivalent Total Not Worried I Don't Eat This Product

Concern Around Effects of Food Products on the Environment

46

Page 47: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Importance of Sustainable Food Labels

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF6. On a scale of 0-10, when shopping for food, how important is it for the following products to have a sustainable food label? Single Response

More than half of Australians consider it very important or important that wild seafood, poultry & eggs and Australian grown food have sustainable food label. The least important food category is sugar, with only 35% considering a sustainable food label important when shopping for it.

55%

53%

53%

46%

45%

46%

43%

40%

35%

16%

23%

25%

19%

14%

27%

29%

27%

29%

15%

21%

22%

17%

14%

26%

21%

21%

30%

14%

2%

18%

27%

7%

13%

6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Wild seafood

Poultry and eggs

Australian grown food

Farmed seafood

Palm oil

Vegetables and other plant foods

Beef

Pork

Sugar

Total Important Total Ambivalent Total Not Important I Don't Eat This Product

47

Page 48: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Environment Friendly Eating Choices

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; SF7. Which of the following actions do you think are environmentally-friendly? Multiple Responses SF8. And which, if any, of these actions have you taken in the last ten years? Multiple Responses

Most Australians consider eating locally produced food to be an environment friendly choice (65%) and have made this choice in the last 10 years (58%). Eating a balanced diet follows with 42% considering it as an environment friendly choice and over half having made this choice in the last ten years. Eating organic food and less red meat are seen as environment friendly choices by almost one-third of Australians.

65%

42%

32%30%

22%

14%

6%

14%

58% 58%

36%

20%

10%

3%

20%

5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Locallyproduced food

Balanced diet Less red meat Organic food Vegetarian diet Vegan diet More seafood None of these

Environment-friendly eating choices Environment-friendly eating choices made in the last 10 years

48

Page 49: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Climate Change and Low Carbon Future

PHO

TO B

Y H

ENG

STRE

AM /

UN

SPLA

SH

49

Page 50: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes To Climate Change

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; LCF1. Moving on to our planet’s climate, do you think that climate change is happening? (Single Response) LCF2. And which of the following, best describes your thoughts about climate change? (Single Response)

An initial question asking about the existence of climate change suggests that roughly nine in ten people (86%) think climate change is happening. A higher proportion of the younger age group agree that climate change is happening (95% of 18-24 year olds and 90% of 25-34 year olds. Nearly two-thirds think that humans are largely causing the climate change, with under three-tenths thinking of climate change as a natural fluctuation in the Earth’s temperature.

IS CLIMATE CHANGE HAPPENING?

65%

28%

4%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

I think that climate change is happening, and I think that humansare largely causing it

I think that climate change is happening, but it's just a naturalfluctuation in Earth's temperatures

I don't think that climate change is happening

I have no idea whether climate change is happening or not

Yes, 86%

No, 14%

50

Page 51: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Concern About Impacts of Climate Change

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; LCF3. How concerned are you about the following impacts of climate change? (Single Response Per Statement)

The number one climate change concern amongst the general population is the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef, with around 9 out of 10 indicating they are concerned (86%). Amongst other concerns are droughts and flooding affecting food supply (84% being very concerned or fairly concerned) and animal and plant species becoming extinct (82% being very concerned or fairly concerned). The impact that worries Australians the least is famine and war with 68% being concerned.

50%

46%

44%

43%

41%

40%

39%

37%

35%

35%

34%

36%

36%

40%

35%

37%

37%

39%

42%

39%

35%

34%

9%

12%

11%

13%

16%

17%

16%

14%

18%

18%

22%

3%

4%

4%

6%

5%

4%

5%

5%

7%

8%

7%

2%

2%

2%

2%

1%

2%

2%

2%

2%

4%

3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Destruction of The Great Barrier Reef

Animal and plant species becoming extinct

Droughts and flooding affecting food supply

Melting of the polar ice caps

Heatwaves and extremely hot days

More bushfires

Water shortages

More extreme weather

Rising sea levels threatening coastal communities

More refugees and displaced people

Famine and war

Very concerned Fairly concerned Not very concerned Not at all concerned I don't know

51

Page 52: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Attitudes to Specific Climate Change Aspects

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; LCF4. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? 1. There should be a carbon price (that is, people, governments and businesses should pay for producing greenhouse pollution. 2. The low-carbon technology sector will deliver jobs and economic growth. 3. Fossil fuels provide stable growth and cheaper prices. 4. Australia should make as much renewable energy as possible from sun and wind. 5. Pollution from burning coal and gas is putting our planet at risk. 6. The federal government should not allow any new coal mines to be built in Australia. 7. Solar and wind power is too expensive and unreliable to be Australia’s main source of electricity. 8. Australia should be a world leader in finding solutions to climate change. 9. Tackling climate change creates opportunities for new jobs and investment in clean energy (e.g. solar, wind, geothermal). 10. Australia shouldn’t act on climate change until other major emitters like the USA and China do.5 Point Scale: Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree, Single Response)

Around 9 in 10 Australians agree that Australia should make renewable energy from sun and wind (87%). Over two-thirds of the population thinks that Australia should be the world leader in climate change solutions (71%), should act on climate change without waiting for action by the major emitters (69%), and agree that coal and gas pollution is putting our planet at risk (69%). A little over half of Australians agree that the federal government should not allow new coal mines (52%), and that there should be an introduction of carbon price (55%).

57%

42%

37%

35%

31%

26%

24%

10%

8%

7%

29%

29%

41%

34%

21%

29%

37%

16%

25%

10%

8%

19%

15%

20%

26%

22%

30%

21%

34%

14%

4%

6%

4%

7%

15%

14%

6%

30%

21%

29%

2%

4%

3%

5%

7%

10%

3%

22%

12%

40%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Australia should make renewable energy from sun and wind

Australia should be a world leader in climate change solutions

Tackling climate change creates opportunities for new jobs and investments

Coal and gas pollution is putting our planet at risk

The federal government should not allow new coal mines

Introduction of a carbon price

Low-carbon technology sector will deliver jobs and economic growth

Solar and wind power too expensive and unreliable to be main source of electricity

Fossil fuels provide growth and cheaper prices

Australia shouldn't act on climate change until major emitters do

Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree Nor Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

52

Page 53: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Energy Policy Priorities

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; LCF5. Government energy policy attempts to minimise costs, ensure reliability and reduce emissions. Do you think one of these should be prioritised over the others? (Single Response)

38% of the general population do not think it is necessary to prioritise between costs, reliability and reduction of emissions and that they can all be achieved. The remaining population is split equally on this - 20% would like to prioritize the reliability of energy supply, another 20% would prioritise reducing carbon emissions and 18% would like to prioritise keeping costs of energy down.

38%

20%

20%

18%

4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

We do not need to prioritise - all can be achieved

Maintaining the reliability of energy supply should beprioritised

Keeping the cost of energy down should be prioritised

Reducing carbon emissions should be prioritised

Don't know

53

Page 54: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Energy Source Preferences

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; LCF6. Please order the following energy sources for Australia from your most preferred to least preferred.

Solar is a clear preference amongst Australians as an energy source, with almost three-quarters of Australians ranking this source highest (73%). Wind follows with half the population ranking this at the top (52%). Geothermal, coal, and tidal are the least preferred energy sources (8%, 8%, and 6% ranked 1-2) amongst Australians.

1.93

3.14

3.67

5.95

5.09

4.80

6.24

5.18

MEAN

73%

52%

20%

8%

12%

6%

14%

8%

14%

24%

46%

34%

21%

32%

9%

11%

7%

13%

26%

36%

37%

33%

23%

17%

2%

7%

3%

17%

26%

26%

50%

60%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Solar

Wind

Hydro (dams)

Geothermal

Gas

Tidal/Wave

Nuclear

Coal

Ranked 1-2 Ranked 3-4 Ranked 5-6 Ranked 7-8

54

Page 55: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Environmental Actions

© S

IMO

N S

CO

TT P

HO

TO /

WW

F-AU

S

55

Page 56: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Nature Related Activities Undertaken

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; WNT6. Which, if any, of the following activities have you taken part in during the last two years? (Multiple Responses)

Three-quarters of Australians have visited a national park or nature reserve (75%) whilst one-half of Australians (57%) have planted a native plant in their garden; However, only 8% have been involved in an organised tree planting day.

75%

57%

34%

33%

15%

11%

8%

7%

9%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Visited a national park or nature reserve

Planting a native plant in your garden

Providing natural food sources for natives birds and animals

Stopped using insecticides in your garden

Placing a bell on your cat's collar to warn birds

Putting up a nest box in your yard for birds or possums

Being involved in an organised tree planting day

Something else

None

56

Page 57: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Actions Taken Regularly to Help the Environment

Base (EA1): Australians 18+, n= 1810; Base (EA2): Australians 18+, undertaking the particular behaviour regularly (as identified in EA1) EA1. Which of the following behaviours do you do on a regular basis? (Multiple Responses) EA2. Which of these reasons (environmental, financial, health or government/law) best describes why you engage in these behaviours? (Single Response per statement)

A majority (86%) of Australians are recycling/composting as much household waste as possible to help the environment. Around two thirds indicate that they would rather fix things than replace them (68%), have reduced water usage in their household (66%), and/or buy products that are made locally when possible (63%). Environmental and financial reasons are largely driving Australians to undertake these activities.

Behaviours Undertaken Regularly Reasons for Undertaking These Behaviours 90%

28%

59%

46%

27%

83%

28%

39%

60%

27%

24%

56%

81%

87%

91%

2%

63%

36%

11%

71%

2%

23%

58%

19%

5%

48%

38%

2%

2%

2%

2%

7%

2%

2%

3%

4%

8%

3%

24%

2%

13%

2%

9%

5%

26%

4%

13%

8%

2%

19%

12%

36%

4%

63%

3%

2%

2%

5%

Recycle/composting

Fixed things rather than replace them

Reduced water usage around house and garden

Buying local products where possible

Reduced gas/electricity usage around the house

Switched to environmentally friendly products

Usually walk/cycle/carpool/take public transport

Installed a solar hot water system or solar panels

Installed a rainwater tank

Changed diet

Reduced amount of air travel

Switched electricity retailer to a renewable energy supplier

Taken part in an environmental political campaign

Contacted a government member about climate change

Buy carbon-offsets to reduce carbon footprint

Environmental Financial Health Government Mandated/ Legal Other reasons

86%68%

66%63%

61%53%

37%32%31%

25%17%

14%11%

6%5%

1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Recycle/composting

Fixed things rather than replace them

Reduced water usage around house and garden

Buying local products where possible

Reduced gas/electricity usage around the house

Switched to environmentally friendly products

Usually walk/cycle/carpool/take public transport

Installed a solar hot water system or solar panels

Installed a rainwater tank

Changed diet

Reduced amount of air travel

Switched electricity retailer to a renewable energy supplier

Taken part in an environmental political campaign

Contacted a government member about climate change

Buy carbon-offsets to reduce carbon footprint

None of these

57

Page 58: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Actions Likely to be Undertaken in Near Future

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; EA3. Which, if any, of these are you likely to start doing in the near future? (Multiple Responses)

Actions Being taken regularly

Likely to be undertaken in future

Switch my electricity retailer to a renewable energy supplier 14% 20% Install a solar hot water system, or solar panels, in my house 32% 19% Reduce the amount of gas and/or electricity I use around the house 61% 15% Switch to products that are more environmentally friendly 53% 15% Install a rainwater tank on my property 31% 13% Walk/cycle/carpool/take public transport 37% 11% Buy products that are made locally where possible 63% 11% Reduce the amount of water I use around the house and garden 66% 10% Try to fix things rather than replace them 68% 9% Change my diet (e.g. vegetarian/vegan/less meat/seasonal food) 25% 7% Contact a Government member about climate change 6% 5% Buy carbon-offsets to reduce my carbon footprint 5% 5% Take part in a political campaign about an environmental issue 11% 4% Recycle/compost as much household waste as possible 86% 4% Reduce my amount of air travel 17% 4% None of these 1% 28%

The actions Australians are most likely to undertake in the near future are switching electricity retailer to a renewable energy supplier (20%), and installing a solar hot water system or solar panels in their house (19%). 15% are also likely to reduce the amount of gas and electricity they use or switch to products that are more environmentally friendly. However, nearly 3 in 10 (28%) of the population are not likely to take up any of these actions in the near future.

58

Page 59: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Status of Donation to Environmental Charity

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; EA4. Many environmental charities rely on donations to fund their work. Which of the following best describes you in this regard? (Single Response)

73% of Australians indicate they haven’t donated to any environmental charity, with 39% indicating that even though they haven’t donated yet, they might do so in the future.

39%

35%

27%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

I have not donated to anenvironmental charity, but Imight donate in the future

I have not donated to anenvironmental charity, and do

not intend to donate in the future

I have donated to anenvironmental charity

59

Page 60: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Politics and Environment

© D

IAN

A SC

ALFA

TI /

WW

F-AU

S

60

Page 61: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Influence of Environment on Voting in Next Elections

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; PE1. How much influence will the environment have on how you vote in the next election? (Single Response)

The environment will have the strongest influence on voting intention at the federal election, with 55% of Australians indicating it will have either a strong or very strong influence on their decision. The likely influence slightly drops for state and local level elections (to 53% and 45% respectively).

21% 20% 18%

35% 33%27%

26% 26%31%

7% 8% 9%

5% 6% 8%7% 7% 7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Federal election State election Local election

Very Strong Influence Strong Influence Neither Strong Nor Weak Influence

Weak Influence Very Weak Influence Can't Say

61

Page 62: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Federal Government Spending Allocation

Base: Australians 18+, n= 1810; PE2. If you had $100 million of taxpayer funds to allocate these areas of Federal government spending, how would you allocate it?

Australians would like the highest allocation of taxpayer funds to be made towards healthcare, followed closely by education. Spending on environment takes third place and is followed by social welfare & government support and then defence.

23.6 Education

11.8 Defence

24.7 Health Care

15.3 Social Welfare & Government Support

17.6 Environment

7.0 Other Areas

62

Page 63: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

PLEASE DIRECT ALL QUERIES TONeha BaggaProject DirectorRoy Morgan ResearchTonic House 386 Flinders Lane Melbourne 3000

Telephone: (03) 9629 6888Direct: (03) 9224 [email protected]

www.roymorgan.com

ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management SystemsISO 20252:2012 Market, Opinion and Social Research

© T

ANYA

VER

NES

/ W

WF-

AUS,

CO

VER:

© W

WF

/ JA

MES

MO

RG

AN

63

Page 64: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Appendix - Historical Results in Detail

© D

EJAN

STO

JAN

OVI

C

64

Page 65: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I F W E D O N ’ T A C T N O W, W E ’ L L N E V E RC O N T R O L O U R E N V I R O N M E N TA L P R O B L E M S

1

65

Page 66: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N M A R C H 2 0 1 7 , 8 1 . 3 % O F A U S T R A L I A N S 1 4 + A G R E E T H AT ‘ I F W E D O N ’ T A C T N OW,W E ’ L L N E V E R C O N T RO L O U R E N V I RO N M E N TA L P RO B L E M S .’

If we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems

Proportion of Australians agreeing with this statement decreased during the Global Financial Crisis, from 88.8% in September 2007 to a low

of 73.1% in March 2012

From March 2012 the trend increased, reaching 81.3% in March 2017, an increase of

8.2% over a five year period, inching towards pre GFC

levels of agreement

66

Page 67: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 2 0 1 7 , G R E E N A N D A L P VOT E RS A R E S I G N I F I C A N T LY M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E T H AT W EM U S T A C T N OW. W O M E N A N D C I T Y D W E L L E RS A R E A L S O M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E

All are statistically significant using a one-tail test at the 95 percentile when compared to the total population.

81.3% of Australians agree with the statement that if we don’t act now we will never control our environmental problems. But there are key demographic groups that feel more strongly than the average:

85.7% of women (vs 76.7% of men)

83.8% of Western Australians

83.5% of people with a diploma or degree

82.4% of people living in a capital city

(vs 79.2% of country areas)

86.9% of semi-professionals

84.0% of semi-skilled workers

84.5% of people aged 25-34 (vs 74.6% of people aged 65+)

96.0% of Greens voters

89.5% of ALP voters

vs 69.5% of Liberal/National Party voters

67

Page 68: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 2 0 0 2 , 9 0 . 8 % O F WO M E N V S 8 6 . 8 % O F M E N A G R E E D T H AT W E M U S T A C T N OW TO C O N T RO L O U R E N V I RO N M E N TA L P RO B L E M S , I N 2 0 1 7 , T H E R E I S A 9 % P O I N T D I F F E R E N C E .

When Roy Morgan first asked Australians in June 2002 if they agreed or disagreed with the statement “If we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems”, a similar percentage of Australian men and women agreed that we needed to act.

This started to diverge from June 2007, with less men thinking it is as important to act now. As of March 2017, a significantly higher proportion of women agree with this, in comparison to men.

68

Page 69: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

While each state experienced a fall in people agreeing with this statement during the GFC, since mid 2012, it has picked back up. South Australia and Queensland had the largest fall since 2002 of 9.5% and 9.1% respectively, while Tasmania experienced the lowest percentage point of all states at 69.7% in September 2012.

AT 8 4 % , W ES T E R N A U S T R A L I A H A S T H E H I G H ES T P E R C E N TA G E O F P EO P L E W H O A G R E EW I T H T H E S TAT E M E N T ‘ I F W E D O N ’ T A C T N OW W E ’ L L N E V E R C O N T RO L O U R E N V I RO N M E N TA L P RO B L E M S ’ ; Q U E E N S L A N D H A S T H E LOW ES T.

69

Page 70: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Australians aged 18-34 have historically had the highest agreement on the urgent need to act. In the last 5 years, there are also more 35-64 year olds who agree with this statement following the GFC. In the last 5 years, 50-64 year olds had the highest percentage increase, from 74.1% to 82.5%.

The gap between the percentage of 65+ olds and others that existed within the decade starting 2004 appears to be narrowing from 2015 onwards.

F O R T H E L A S T 1 5 Y EA RS , O L D E R A U S T R A L I A N S H AV E H A D L ES S U R G E N C Y TO A C T TOC O N T RO L E N V I RO N M E N TA L P RO B L E M S

70

Page 71: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

In July 2007, the percentage of Liberal/National Party supporters who agreed with the statement “If we don’t act now, we’ll never control our environmental problems” dropped substantially (reaching a low of 56.8% in March 2012) and it has not recovered (currently sitting at 69.5%), while almost 90% and above Green and ALP voters continue to agree.

This trend could be a reflection of either voters leaving the Liberal/National Party due to their position on the environment or it could be that once the issue became political, voters followed their respective parties’ policies.

P R I O R TO 2 0 0 7 , VOT E RS O F M A J O R PA RT I ES A L L A G R E E D O N A N U R G E N T N E E D TO A C T TOC O N T RO L E N V I RO N M E N TA L P RO B L E M S . T H I S C H A N G E D I N J U LY 2 0 0 7 .

71

Page 72: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

AT H E A R T I ’ M A N E N V I R O N M E N TA L I S T

2

72

Page 73: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

At heart I'm an environmentalist

I N M A R C H 2 0 1 7 , 6 3 . 1 % O F A U S T R A L I A N S 1 4 + A G R E E T H AT ‘AT H EA RT I ’ M A NE N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T.’

In December 1998, 53.3% of Australians 14+

agreed. This rose to 68.8% in

September 2001.

After the September 11 attacks, no change

was observed until mid 2005.

Agreement levels dropped slightly

during the Global Financial Crisis (from 88.8% in September

2007 to a low of 73.1% in March 2012).

Agreement levels dropped in light of the backlash to the Carbon Tax introduction (60.9% in June 2012 to 57.1% in March 2013), when the LNP in opposition was campaigning to repeal the Carbon Tax. Since 2013, there has been an increase in proportion of Australians agreeing to being environmentalists at heart (63%

now)

73

Page 74: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 2 0 1 7 , A L P A N D G R E E N VOT E RS A R E S I G N I F I C A N T LY M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E T H AT T H E Y A R E E N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T S AT H EA RT. W O M E N A N D D EG R E E H O L D E RS A R E A L S O M O R E L I K E LYTO A G R E E , A S A R E T H O S E A G E D 5 0 - 6 4 A N D T H O S E W H O A R E R E T I R E D.

69.4% of people who have retired.

65.6% of professionals/managers

69.4% of people aged 50-64 (vs 51.1% of people aged 18-24)

All are statistically significant using a one-tail test at the 95 percentile when compared to the total population.

63.1% of Australians agree with the statement that at heart they are environmentalists. But there are key demographic groups that feel more strongly than the average:

65.4% of women (vs 60.8% of men)

66.9% of Victorians (vs. 60.7% of New South

Welshman)

69.9% of people with a diploma or degree

86.8% of Greens voters

68.3% of ALP voters

vs 55.0% of Liberal/National Party voters

74

Page 75: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

When Roy Morgan first asked Australians in December 1998 if they agreed or disagreed with the statement “At heart I’m an environmentalist”, about 4 percent more women than men agreed that they were (55.3%). This gap started to close from 1998 to September 2001, with more men agreeing to the statement. The gap has diverged since September 2014 and up until March 2017, the gap remains 4 percentage points.

I N 1 9 9 8 , 5 5 . 3 % O F WO M E N V S 5 1 . 1 % O F M E N A G R E E D T H AT AT H EA RT I ’ M A N E N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T; S I M I L A R G A P E X I S T S N OW, E V E N T H O U G H B OT H G E N D E RS A R E ATH I G H E R L E V E L S O F A G R E E M E N T.

75

Page 76: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

F O R T H E L A S T 1 9 Y EA RS O L D E R A U S T R A L I A N S ( T H O S E A G E D 5 0 - 6 4 A N D 6 5 + ) H AV E I D E N T I F I E D M O R E W I T H B E I N G E N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T S . T H E L A S T C O U P L E O F Y EA RS S E EYO U N G E R C O H O RT S A L S O E X P R ES S I N G H I G H E R A G R E E M E N T ( 2 5 - 3 4 I N PA RT I C U L A R ) .

Australians aged 65+ increased 20% over the last 19 years, and 50-64 increased 14% over the same period. These high rates increased rapidly until September 2001. This is quite interesting as the same older age groups had the higher incidence of agreeing that threats were exaggerated and products are overpriced. Australians aged 25-34 have increased in their agreement with the statement, increasing above 35-49 year olds over certain points in December 2014 at 61% and June 2016 at 64%.

76

Page 77: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Tasmania has had the largest increase over the past 19 years in percentage of people agreeing with the statement, followed by Victoria. The percentage of Tasmanians agreeing with the statement increased 14.6 percentage points from 46.4% to 61.0%, while Victoria increased 13.4 percentage points, from 53.5% to 66.9%.

Although Tasmania has had the largest increase, it continues to have the lowest levels of agreement across states, along with NSW.

AT 6 7 % , V I C TO R I A H A S T H E H I G H ES T P E R C E N TA G E O F P EO P L E W H O A G R E E W I T H T H ES TAT E M E N T ‘AT H EA RT I ’ M A N E N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T ’, N S W H A S T H E LOW ES T.

77

Page 78: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

M O R E VOT E RS F O R T H E G R E E N S PA RT Y C O N S I D E R T H E M S E LV ES TO B E A N E N V I RO N M E N TA L I S T. T H E A L P A N D L N P T R A C K E D S I M I L A R LY U N T I L T H E G F C

Once the issue became a political issue, voters followed party policies. From September 2001 to early 2007, Liberal/National Party and ALP voters were quite similar. In June 2007, the percentage of Liberal/National Party supporters who agreed with the statement “At heart I’m an environmentalist” began to drop, falling from 65.6% to 50.4% in September 2015, while Green and ALP voters have continued to agree at a higher percentage. Currently 55.o% of LNP voters agree with the statement in March 2017.

78

Page 79: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

T H R E AT S T O T H E E N V I R O N M E N TA R E E X A G G E R AT E D

3

79

Page 80: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Threats to the environment are exaggerated

2 5 . 8 % O F A U S T R A L I A N S 1 4 + A G R E E T H AT “ T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N T A R EE X A G G E R AT E D ” I N M A R C H 2 0 1 7 C O M PA R E D TO 2 1 . 6 % I N D EC E M B E R 1 9 9 8 .

Both the GFC and the Anti-Carbon Tax campaigns saw more Australians findings environmental threats to be exaggerated. Agreement levels rose

during the Global Financial Crisis, from 22.3% in June 2007 to 36.7% in

March 2012.

Currently the trend is heading towards pre-GFC levels, with one fourth of the Australians

finding these threats to be over exaggerated.

80

Page 81: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

33.4% of people who have retired.

28.7% of home owners (vs. 23.7% of renters)

35.0% of people aged 65+ (vs 20.7% of people aged 25-34)

All are statistically significant using a one-tail test at the 95 percentile when compared to the total population.

25.8% of Australians agree with the statement that threats to the environment are exaggerated. But there are key demographic groups that feel more strongly than the average:

30.6% of men (vs 21.0% of

women)

29.0% of Queenslanders (vs. 22.0% of Western

Australians)

29.5% of skilled workers (vs. 14.6% of semi-

professionals)

45.5% of National Party voters

40.3% of Liberal Party voters

vs 17.8% of ALP voters and 3.6% of Greens voters

I N 2 0 1 7 , L I B E R A L A N D N AT I O N A L PA RT Y VOT E RS A R E S I G N I F I C A N T LY M O R E L I K E LY TOA G R E E T H AT T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N T A R E E X A G G E R AT E D. M E N A N D S K I L L E D WO R K E RS A R E A L S O M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E

81

Page 82: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 1 9 9 8 , 2 4 . 8 % O F M E N V S 1 8 . 4 % O F WO M E N A G R E E D T H AT T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N T A R E E X A G G E R AT E D. F RO M 2 0 0 7 P EO P L E A G R E E I N G W I T H T H E S TAT E M E N TI N C R EA S E D U N T I L M A R C H 2 0 1 2 , A S AT T I T U D ES B EG A N TO C H A N G E BA C K .

Men have consistently agreed with the statement more than women in the last 19 years.

When Roy Morgan first asked Australians in October 1998 if they agreed or disagreed with the statement “Threats to the environment are exaggerated”, 6.4% more men than women agreed that they were. After reaching a peak in March 2012 with 31.8% of women and 41.8% of men in December 2011 agreeing with the statement, the agreement levels have since decreased; 30.6% of men and 21.0% of women agreeing in March 2017.

82

Page 83: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

6 5 + A U S T R A L I A N S H AV E C O N S I S T E N T LY F O U N D T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N T TO B EE X A G G E R AT E D, M O R E T H A N A N Y OT H E R A G E G RO U P S .

A higher proportion of older Australians (50+) agree with this statement than other age groups. However, during the GFC and Anti-Carbon Tax campaign, all age groups saw an increase in the percentage of people who agreed with this statement.

People aged 14-17 had large fluctuations through the period, with peaks in March 2006 to March 2007 and in June 2010 and then a drop in March 2017 at 19.1%. The percentage of 18-24 year olds who agreed increased 5% from 17.3% to 22.3%, close to where it had been two years prior at 25.0%.

83

Page 84: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Victoria went from having the lowest percentage who agree with the statement in 1998 at 17.4% to the third highest in 2017 at 24.2%.

Each state experienced a similar trend increase over December 1998 to September 2007, with Tasmania consistently having the highest percentage who agree. From 2007 to 2011, with a few fluctuations, Queensland overtook to be at the top, with 29.0% agreeing currently.

A H I G H E R P RO P O RT I O N O F Q U E E N S L A N D E RS A G R E E T H AT T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N TA R E E X A G G E R AT E D T H A N A N Y OT H E R S TAT E – 2 9 % V S T H E N AT I O N A L AV E R A G E O F 2 6 %

84

Page 85: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

A higher proportion of LNP voters began to agree with the statement during the GFC, from 29.5% in June 2007 to 53.1% in March 2012. Greens and ALP voters also rose slightly but this reversed after 2012 to lower levels in March 2017 than in 1998.

The LNP is beginning to return to lower levels, but it is still higher than any of the major parties, currently 40.6% of LNP voters agree with the statement.

P R I O R TO 2 0 0 7 , VOT E RS O F T H E M A J O R PA RT I ES H A D S I M I L A R V I E W S O N W H E T H E R T H R EAT S W E R E E X A G G E R AT E D. T H I S C H A N G E D D R A M AT I C A L LY W I T H L N P VOT E RS A F T E R T H EG F C - N OW T WO I N F I V E B E L I E V E T H R EAT S TO T H E E N V I RO N M E N T A R E E X A G G E R AT E D.

85

Page 86: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

‘ E N V I R O N M E N TA L LY F R I E N D LY ’P R O D U C T S A R E O V E R P R I C E D

4

86

Page 87: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

‘Environmentally friendly’ products are overpriced

I N M A R C H 2 0 1 7 , 6 8 . 1 % O F A U S T R A L I A N S 1 4 + A G R E E T H AT “ ‘ E N V I RO N M E N TA L LY F R I E N D LY ’ P RO D U C T S A R E OV E R P R I C E D ” C O M PA R E D TO 5 8 . 1 % I N D EC E M B E R 1 9 9 8 .

A slight increase in agreement levels observed

on this statement during the GFC (not as dramatic, as on some of the other attitudes)

From the end of the GFC through to March 2017, the trend has

been fairly consistent, without being majorly affected by the introduction of the Carbon Tax

and Tony Abbott’s election win in September 2013.

87

Page 88: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

71.9% of people who have retired.

69.9% of renters (vs. 66.3% of paying off

home)

73.0% of people aged 65+ (vs 62.0% of people aged 14-17)

All are statistically significant using a one-tail test at the 95 percentile when compared to the total population.

68.1% of Australians agree with the statement that ‘environmentally friendly’ products are overpriced. But there are key demographic groups that feel more strongly than the average:

69.3% of men (vs 66.3% of

women)

70.9% of Queenslanders (vs. 66.5% of New South

Welshman)

71.0% of semi-skilled workers

(vs. 57.1% of professionals)

73.2% of National Party voters

72.4% of Liberal Party voters

vs 67.1% of ALP voters and 45.7% of Greens voters

I N 2 0 1 7 , L I B E R A L A N D N AT I O N A L PA RT Y VOT E RS A R E S I G N I F I C A N T LY M O R E L I K E LY TOA G R E E T H AT E N V I RO N M E N TA L LY F R I E N D LY P RO D U C T S A R E OV E R P R I C E D. 6 5 + A N D Q U E E N S L A N D E RS A R E A L S O M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E

88

Page 89: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

In October 1998, 6.3% more women than men agreed with the statement “‘Environmentally friendly’ products are overpriced”. Since 1998, both men and women’s attitudes have grown more and more alike, with now slightly more men than women agreeing with the statement.

I N 1 9 9 8 , 6 1 . 2 % O F WO M E N V S 5 4 . 9 % O F M E N A G R E E D T H AT E N V I RO N M E N TA L LY F R I E N D LY P RO D U C T S A R E OV E R P R I C E D. O V E R 1 9 Y EA RS , A N I N C R EA S I N G N U M B E R O F M E NA N D WO M E N A G R E E , A LT H O U G H T H E R E H A S B E E N A S H A R P E R I N C R EA S E A M O N G M E N

89

Page 90: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 1 9 9 9 , A N EQ UA L P RO P O RT I O N O F L A B O R VOT E RS A N D L N P VOT E RS A G R E E D T H AT E N V I RO N M E N TA L LY F R I E N D LY P RO D U C T S A R E OV E R P R I C E D. O V E R T I M E , M O R E O F B OT HG RO U P S A G R E E , A LT H O U G H S L I G H T LY M O R E L N P VOT E RS A G R E E V S . A L P )

LNP voters have steadied their agreement levels, but continue to be higher than any of the major parties, currently 72.5% of LNP voters agree with the statement.

90

Page 91: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I S S U E O F M O S T I M P O R TA N C E

91

Page 92: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N M A R C H 2 0 1 7 , 1 6 . 4 % O F A U S T R A L I A N S 1 4 + A G R E E T H AT G L O B A L WA R M I N G A N D C L I M AT E C H A N G E SA R E I S S U E S O F M O S T I M P O R TA N C E C O M PA R E D T O 9 . 5 % I N M A R C H 2 0 0 6 .

92

Page 93: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

ISSUE OF MOST IMPORTANCE› Australians 14+ are asked in Single Source which three issues are most important to them. These issues include:

› Global warming and climate change› Managing the economy› Improving education› Reducing unemployment› Improving health services and hospitals› Defence and national security

93

Page 94: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

I N 2 0 1 7 , S E M I- P RO F ES S I O N A L S , A B Q U I N T I L E , A N D U N I V E RS I T Y S T U D E N T S A N D G R A D UAT ES A R E S I G N I F I C A N T LY M O R E L I K E LY TO A G R E E T H AT G LO BA L WA R M I N G A N DC L I M AT E C H A N G E I S T H E I S S U E O F M O S T I M P O RTA N C E TO T H E M .

All are statistically significant using a one-tail test at the 95 percentile when compared to the total population.

16.5% of Australians agree with the statement that Global Warming and climate change is one of the three most important issues to them. But there are key demographic groups that feel more strongly than the average:

26.0% of AB Quintile

(vs 9.3% of FG Quintile)

19.4% of Victorians

24.6% of people with some/now at university

and 21.7% of people with a diploma or degree

17.4% of people living in a capital city

(vs 14.9% of country areas)

27.9% of semi-professionals and

25.3% of professionals

20.6% of people aged 18-24 (vs 15.0% of people aged 65+)

59.9% of Greens voters

23.8% of ALP voters

vs 14.0% of Liberal/National Party voters

94

Page 95: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

Queensland and Western Australia had the lowest proportion of those who agreed with the statement, with Queensland deceasing from 12% to 11% when the question was first asked in 2006.

A H I G H E R P RO P O RT I O N O F V I C TO R I A N S A G R E E T H AT G LO BA L WA R M I N G A N D C L I M AT EC H A N G E A R E I S S U ES O F M O S T I M P O RTA N C E T H A N A N Y OT H E R S TAT E – 1 7 % V S T H E N AT I O N A L AV E R A G E O F 1 4 %

95

Page 96: Wildlife & Environmental Conservation Organisation - WWF ... · Australian attitudes. › The research will inform communication campaigns and media opportunities to position WWF

G R E E N S VOT E RS H AV E I N C R EA S E D I N T H E I R A G R E E M E N T T H AT G LO BA L WA R M I N G A N DC L I M AT E C H A N G E A R E T H E I S S U ES O F M O S T I M P O RTA N C E

LNP voters have steadied their agreement levels, but continue to be higher than any of the major parties, currently 72.5% of LNP voters agree with the statement.

96