46
The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Metagenomic Metagenomic Characterization of Viruses within Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic Microbial Samples Aquatic Microbial Samples Shannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Shannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Karla B. Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Karla B. Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller, Granger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller, Granger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig Venter Venter

Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

  • Upload
    wyman

  • View
    36

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Metagenomic Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic Microbial Samples - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: MetagenomicMetagenomic Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic

Microbial SamplesMicrobial SamplesShannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Karla B. Shannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Karla B.

Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller, Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller, Granger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig VenterGranger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig Venter

Page 2: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and

Microbiologists?

• Enormous # and diversity of microorganisms,

• Difficult to culture and study in the lab, etc.

Venter’s answers,

• Whole Genome Shotgun Sequencing,• computationally derived metabolisms…

http://biocyc.org/

Page 3: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

http://camera.calit2.net/metagenomics/what-is-metagenomics.php

Page 4: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 5: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Discoverynth

1,500 liters of water

• 1.045 x 109 new bp of non-redundant sequence,• >1,800 new “species”,• ~148 new bacterial phylotypes,• 1.2 x 106 new protein sequences,

– ~70,000 novel (no match in the database),

• etc."We chose the Sargasso seas because it was supposed to be a marine " says Venter wryly. "The assumption was low diversity there because of the desert, extremely low nutrients.” - Venter (Bio-IT World, 4/16/04)

Page 6: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 1S1

Page 7: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 8: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Points to Ponder

What about Unitigs, and the assembly of an environmental sample?

All data went to Genbank.

J. Craig Venter

Page 9: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 2

Page 10: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 3

Page 11: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 5

Page 12: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Close-up

Page 13: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 6Table 1

Page 14: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 15: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 16: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: MetagenomicMetagenomic Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic Characterization of Viruses within Aquatic

Microbial SamplesMicrobial Samples

Shannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Karla B. Shannon J. Williamson, Douglas B. Rusch, Shibu Yooseph, Aaron L. Halpern, Karla B. Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller, Heidelberg, John I. Glass, Cynthia Andrews-Pfannkoch, Douglas Fadrosh, Christopher S. Miller,

Granger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig VenterGranger Sutton, Marvin Frazier, J. Craig Venter

Page 17: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Detection of Viruses in the OceanProblems

• Large viruses (0.1 µm–0.22 µm) get caught in the filters because of their size and geometric shape,

• Small free living phages flow through the filter,

• When filtrating large volumes, biomass accumulates on the filter and viruses get caught,

• Most viruses found within the aquatic microbial communities studies seemed to be in the lytic infection cycle.

Page 18: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Lytic vs Lysogenic

viral DNA isincorporated intothe host genome.

Page 19: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Methods• Cruise the world• Collect 90-200 L of seawater from each of 37 different stations• Record pH, salinity, temperature, etc. of water

First:

Page 20: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Methods• Pass water through 2.0, 0.8, 0.1 µm filters,

• Store at -20°C until shipment from next port.

Page 21: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Sequencing Preparation

Page 22: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

• End sequence each insert– Average of 822 bp sequenced per end

Sequencing

www.pasteur.fr/recherche/genopole/PF8/equipement_en.htmlnopole/PF8/equipement_en.html

Page 23: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

• Same procedure as in humans, Drosophila, dogs, etc.

Metagenomic Assembly

Unitigs using 98% or 94% homology for overlap

Scaffolding

Consensus sequence

Page 24: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

New uses for shotgun sequencing and assembly;• Multiple organisms at once,

• Likely novel organisms.

Metagenomic Assembly

Problems?• Mate-pair data relied on more heavily, since overlap coverage is low or unknown,

• Need verification of assembly somehow?

Page 25: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Metagenomic Assembly

Page 26: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Taxonomic Assignment

Page 27: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Quantitative PCR

Quantifying genes in environmental samples;

• from station to station?• versus one another?

http://w

ww

.invitrogen.com/

content.cfm?

pageid=10037

Page 28: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 29: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

• Genes clustered and compared to NCBI– Sequence alignments, not just domains

• Phylogeny trees generated– Multiple sequence alignments CLUSTALW– Used only long, fairly homologous samples

• PHYLIP used to build trees– Based on difference matrix

Clustering and Phylogeny

Page 30: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Phylogenetic Analyses

Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of all GOS and publicly available psbA(A) and psbD(B) sequences. BS indicates bootstrap values. GOS and public viral sequences are colored aqua and pink respectively. GOS and public prokaryotic sequences are navy blue and lime green respectively.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001456.g002

Page 31: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees of all GOS and publicly available pstS(A) and talC(B) sequences. BS indicates bootstrap values. GOS and public viral sequences are colored aqua and pink respectively. GOS and public prokaryotic sequences are navy blue and lime green respectively. GOS eukaryotic sequences are colored yellow.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001456.g003

Page 32: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Identification of Viral Sequences

• Data from microbial fraction of water samples was examined

• Looked for viral sequences by comparison to the NCBI non-redundant protein database

• 154,662 viral peptide sequences were identified

• Approximately 3% of predicted proteins were identified as viral sequences

• Number of viral sequences thought to be largely underestimated

Page 33: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Classification through Protein Clustering

• Of 154,662 viral peptide sequences, 117,123 or 76% fell within 380 protein clusters containing at least 20 proteins

• Remaining sequences fell within clusters containing less than 20 proteins

• Average cluster size contained 258 peptide sequences

Page 34: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 35: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 36: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?
Page 37: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

All viral gene families were positively correlated with water temperature

Some viral gene families were correlated with salinity, water depth, and calculated trophic status indices

Different environmental pressures may influence acquisition of these genes by viruses

Table S7 shows the correlations between viral gene families and environmental parameters

Page 38: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Neighbor Functional Linkage Analysis

• Used to verify that they were on viral instead of pro-viral regions of bacterial genomes

• Proportion of viral same-scaffold ORFs range from 32% to 92% for the metabolic gene families studied

• Occurrence of viral neighbors on same scaffolds as host-derived viral genes supports hypothesis that sources of the sequences are viruses rather than bacterial

Page 39: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Viruses with Metabolic Genes

• Through lateral gene transfer, metabolic genes can be acquired from the host

• Acquisition, retention, and expression of metabolic genes may increase fitness

• Key metabolic processes and pathways running during infection allows maximum replication

• Previous studies on host-derived metabolic viral genes has been on the photosynthesis genes psbA and psbD of a cyanophage

• Previous studies did not focus on abundance or distribution of these genes in the oceans

Page 40: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Host-Derived Metabolic Gene Families

• In aquatic viral communities sampled, host-derived genes were found widely distributed in significant proportions

• Quantitative PCR of the these genes confirmed high abundance

• Not known if these genes were expressed at the time of sampling

• Unlikely to see these genes in high abundance if they:– Were not expressed– Did not have a fitness advantage

Page 41: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

“Suggests that viruses may play a more substantial role in

environmentally relevant metabolic processes than previously

recognized such as the conversion of light to energy, photoadaptation, phosphate acquisition, and carbon

metabolism”

Page 42: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Discussion

• Most studies have focused on the filtered viral fraction of the data

• This is the first study to focus on the viral components in the microbial fraction of the data

• Strong evidence for abundance and distribution of environmentally important host-derived viral gene families

• Distribution patterns of host-derived viral families over environmental gradients

• Evidence of interactions between bacteriophage and host organisms

Page 43: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Potential Evolutionary Viral-Host Relationships

• The study of the cyanophage found that the host-derived genes undergo higher mutation rates than their cyanobacterial nucleotide counterpart

• After phage acquisition, the genes could diversify

• Mutated viral genes could form gene reservoirs for the host

• Through horizontal gene transfer, viruses could promote diversity and distribution

Page 44: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Prochlorococcus –P-SSM4-like Phage

• Prochlorococcus is one of the most widespread picophytoplankton in the ocean

• P-SSM4-like phage may influence the abundance, diversity, and distribution of Prochlorococcus

• Statistically significant relationship between the Prochlorococcus and the P-SSM4-like phage

Page 45: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Metagenomic Viral-Microbial Interactions

• This study of viral-microbial association between communities was coincidental

• Horizontal transfer of metabolic genes

• More studies necessary on the viral-microbial diversity and genetic complement– Community relationships– Evolutionary relationships

Page 46: Why so hard for Classical Marine Biologists and Microbiologists?

Any Questions?