West Corridor Monthly Progress Report - FasTracks · Monthly Progress Report Page i April 2009 ... WBS Work Breakdown Structure LIST OF ACRONYMS (Continued) Monthly Progress Report

West Corridor Monthly Progress Report April, 2009

Monthly Progress Report Page i April 2009

List of Acronyms ....................................................................................... ii

Project Update ......................................................................................... 1

Corridor Map ............................................................................................ 2

Project Description .................................................................................. 3

Discipline Summaries .............................................................................. 4

Utilities ......................................................................................... 4

ROW ............................................................................................. 5

Structural Construction .............................................................. 7

Civil Construction ........................................................................ 8

Systems ....................................................................................... 9

Quality Management ............................................................................. 10

Public Information ................................................................................. 11

Risk Management .................................................................................. 12

Summary ................................................................................... 12

Project Dashboard .................................................................... 13

Contingency Drawdown ............................................................ 14

Risk Register ............................................................................. 15

DBE Participation ................................................................................... 17

Cost ......................................................................................................... 18

Project Budget........................................................................................ 19

Summary ................................................................................... 19

Sources...................................................................................... 20

Budget vs. Commitment vs. Actual .......................................... 21

Major Contracts ........................................................................ 22

Detail ......................................................................................... 23

Cost Status Detail ..................................................................... 25

Allowances Status ..................................................................... 26

Concurrent Non-Projected Activities ..................................................... 28

Project Schedule .................................................................................... 35

Early Construction ..................................................................... 35

Construction .............................................................................. 37

Civil Construction ...................................................................... 40

LRV Vehicle Procurement ......................................................... 43

Early Construction Cost Curve .................................................. 44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Monthly Progress Report Page ii April 2009

CCD City and County of Denver

CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation

CEI Cost Effectiveness Threshold

CMGC Construction Manager/General Contractor

CNPA Concurrent Non Project Activity

COL City of Lakewood

CPUC Colorado Public Utilities Commission

CPV Central Platte Valley

CSP Construction Safety Program

DEA David Evans and Associates

DBE/SBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise/Small Business Enterprise

DTCG Denver Transit Construction Group

EA Environmental Assessment

EOL End of Line

FD Final Design

FDC Final Design Consultant

FFGA Full-Funding Grant Agreement

FMV Fair Market Value

FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact

FRA Federal Railroad Administration

FRSC Front Range Systems Consultant

FTA Federal Transit Administration

GMP Guaranteed Maximum Price

GSA Governmental Services Administration

IGA Inter-governmental Agreement

LONP Letter of No Prejudice

LRT Light Rail Transit

LRV Light Rail Vehicle

NFPA National Fire Prevention Association

NTP Notice to Proceed

OCS Overhead Contact System

PE Preliminary Engineering

PI Public Involvement

PIC Public Information Consultant

PSC Program Support Consultant

PMOC Project Management Oversight Contractor

PMP Project Management Plan

PPI Public-Private Initiative

QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control

QMC Quality Management Consultant

QMO Quality Management Oversight

QMP Quality Management Plan

QPRM Quarterly Progress Review Meeting

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Monthly Progress Report Page iii April 2009

RA Risk Assessment

RAMP Real Estate Acquisition and Management Plan

RFQ Request for Qualifications

RFP Request for Proposals

RFMP Rail Fleet Management Plan

ROCIP Rolling Owner’s Controlled Insurance Program

ROD Record of Decision

ROW Right of Way

RTD Regional Transportation District

SCC Standard Cost Categories

SCP Safety Certification Program

SSOA State Safety Oversight Agency

SSMP System Safety Management Plan

SSPP System Safety Program Plan

SSPS System Safety Program Standards

SSWG System Safety Working Group

TEM Technical Evaluation Memorandum

TOD Transit Orientated Development

TPC Transitional Period Construction

T-REX Transportation Expansion Project

UDFCD Urban Drainage Flood Control District

VE Value Engineering

WBS Work Breakdown Structure

LIST OF ACRONYMS (Continued)

Monthly Progress Report Page 1 April 2009

PROJECT UPDATE

DTCG and RTD are working on final negotiations of the Construction Services Agreement and intend to

sign a contract and issue Notice to Proceed by close of business, June 10, 2009.

Design efforts are being completed for close out of stakeholder comments. ROW transfer IGAs are

being completed with the city and county of Denver and the City of Lakewood.

Public Utility Commission applications have been submitted for grade separations and at grade

crossings.

RTD, the City of Lakewood and GSA are finalizing design for the multi-modal center at the Denver

Federal Center site to include a surface lot of a thousand spaces, 16 bus bays, transition plaza to the

station and regional storm water detention.

Transitional Period Construction work is still in progress, with drainage work, box culverts, and two

steel bridge fabrications and on going utility relocations.


CORRIDOR MAP


PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The West Corridor is a 12.1 mile light rail alignment that begins at the relocation of an existing station

at the Auraria Higher Education Campus, a station on the existing C line that terminates at Denver

Union Station. It then proceeds south over the UP and BNSF consolidated mainline; turns due west

and proceeds along an old rail alignment across the Platte River and on to Associated Rail alignment

that was purchased by RTD and proceeds west through two parks and an open space that is in the

City and County of Denver. Continuing west, the corridor passes into the City of Lakewood through a

minor industrial area into three miles of a tight ROW with established residential neighborhoods on

each side and parallels 13th Avenue through Lakewood to Oak Street. The alignment continues west

through the Lakewood Industrial Park, turning south on to the old Remington Arms spur over US6 and

into the Denver Federal Center (DFC) proceeding south to a multimodal transfer station and then

north out of the DFC. The corridor then turns west in CDOT right-of-way south of US6 proceeding west

to the fly over at US6 at Indiana. From the flyover, the corridor continues on the north side of US6 in

CDOT ROW to the end-of-line at the Jefferson County Government Center.

The alignment gains ridership and provides mass transit for the citizens of the City and County of Den-

ver, the City of Lakewood, Jefferson County and the City of Golden. Its expected opening day daily rid-

ership in 2013 is 19,279 and 2030 daily ridership is 29,698. The West Corridor is double track from

the Auraria Station through the DFC station and single track past DFC to the Jefferson County Govern-

ment Center.

The West Corridor has many interesting attributes; twelve stations: the end-of line station at the Jeffer-

son County Government Center that has a ground and two level 700+ space parking structure; Red

Rocks Station, a walk–up that services Red Rocks Community College; a multi modal center at the

Denver Federal Center that has a combined 1,000 space surface and parking structure along with an

18 bus bay transfer facility; Oak Street Station with 100+ surface lot parking facility and a four bus

bay transfer facility; Garrison Street Station a neighborhood walk-up station; an elevated station at

Wadsworth Boulevard that has 1000 space four level parking structure; Lamar Street Station, a walk-

up station; Sheridan Boulevard Station with an 800 space three level parking structure; Perry Street

Station, a walk-up neighborhood station; Knox Court Station, a walk-up neighborhood station; Federal

Boulevard Station with a leased 1,900 space parking facility; and the relocated Auraria Station that

services the Auraria Higher Education Center, with 30,000 student enrollment. This is where the

West Corridor connects with the existing C&E Lines and continues on to Denver Union Station (DUS) -

a multi-modal regional station.

Other West Corridor attributes include its many bridges. Starting from the west there is a five span

LRT over US40; A top down accelerated bridge construction at I-70 – LRT under I-70; an eleven span

reverse curve LRT over US6 and Indiana intersection that moves the LRT from the north side of US6 to

the south side of US6; a top down construction LRT under Union Boulevard bridge; a unique tied-

basket handle arch bridge over US6; a single span LRT over Kipling Street; an LRT over Wadsworth

Boulevard, a three span bridge with a station on the bridge; a three span Sheridan Boulevard Bridge,

a state highway over the LRT; two LRT bridges over the Lakewood Gulch in an open space; the Fed-

eral Boulevard Bridge, a state highway over the LRT; the Decatur Street bridge, a structure over drain-

age improvements, the LRT bridge over the Gulch; the LRT over the Platte River Bridge and the finally

the LRT five span bridge over the heavy rail central main line. There are also three pedestrian bridges

that carry the public over the LRT through the open space and parks in the City and County of Denver.

The West Corridor is unique to RTD’s facilities in that the other LRT facilities are adjacent to major

highways or freight rail systems; the west corridor runs through (west to east) open land adjacent to

US6, into the Denver Federal Center, through Lakewood’s Industrial Park, through a tight corridor with

established neighborhoods on either side for three miles, open space, parks and finally industrial area

before reaching the Auraria Higher Education Center.


UTILITIES

Design Overview

RTD staff has prepared 205 work orders for utility relocations to be completed by the utility owners.

The estimated total number of utility owner work orders for this project is 245. The estimated total

number of dry utility work orders for this project is 185.

All known dry utilities requiring relocation design will be completed by June of 2009.

Construction

Xcel continues to relocate the overhead electric facilities located along 13th Avenue from Upham to

Sheridan. Xcel Energy-Electric will complete all known electric relocation construction by December of

2009 with the exception of electric construction that requires coordination with DTCG construction.

Xcel Energy-Gas Operations will complete all known gas relocation construction by August of 2009

with the exception of gas construction that requires coordination with DTCG construction.

Qwest is in phase two of the relocation construction which consists of the pulling of copper cable,

fiber optic cable and cold splicing of all copper and fiber optic facilities. Qwest Communication will

complete all known communications relocation construction by December of 2009 with the exception

of communication construction that requires construction coordination with DTCG and the relocation

along 13th Avenue from Independence to Wadsworth.

Comcast continues to relocate their overhead facilities along 13th Avenue from Independence to

Harlan. Comcast will complete all known relocation construction by July of 2009 if necessary to ac-

commodate the LRT construction.

Consolidated Mutual Water Company will complete all known utility relocation construction by

December 2009 with the exception of water line construction that requires construction coordination

with DTCG.

The project still has 6 towers to relocate that are located along the Lakewood Gulch between Decatur

and the Platte River which are currently in the design phase.

Level 3 will complete all known relocation construction by May of 2009 if necessary to accommodate

LRT construction.

Adesta will complete all known relocation construction by December of 2009 if necessary to accom-

modate LRT construction.

As of April 31, 2009 the project has completed 48 percent of the Dry Utility Relocation Construction

for the West Corridor.

FORCASTED WORK

ORDERS

TOTAL # WO

WRITTEN

TOTAL # NEGOTI-

ATED

WO DE-SIGNED

STARTED*

WO DESIGN

COMPLETE

WO CONSTRUCTION

START

WO CON-STRUCTION COMPLETE

% DESIGN

STARTED

% CONSTUC-

TION STARTED

185 170 136 136 114 88 79 74% 48%


RIGHT OF WAY This Month:

Property Acquisition and Relocation

Parcels Impacts (Total Acquisition) – Closing and/or Immediate Possession has occurred on nineteen

(19) of the properties. Final offer pending on the remaining total acquisition.

Parcels Impacts (Total Acquisition) – Relocation consultants are completing the determination of

eligibility for relocation assistance for tenants and/or owners related to parcels currently owned or

being acquired by RTD and assisting residents with eligibility for relocation benefits.

Parcel Impacts (Partial Acquisition) – Offers are being made to the property owners and relocation

assistance has been initiated. The negotiation process begins at the time the offer is made.

Provide information regarding project status and activities to property owners, legal representatives,

internal staff, and media, as required.

Appraisals and value findings to be submitted for approval prior to presenting the offer to the

owner(s).

Property Management

Consultant services are providing property management services for properties now owned by RTD.

Next Month:

RTD will continue appraisals and value findings for acquisitions.

RTD will continue offers and negotiations.

On-going scheduling discussion with internal and CMGC staff.


RIGHT OF WAY (Continued) Acquisition Tables

Areas of Concern

The appraisal process requires the appraiser to determine whether remainder parcels are considered

“uneconomic”. If the remainder is found uneconomic, additional relocations may result. We have

identified a handful of property with this potential for additional relocation. The properties are mostly

single family residential type lots.

If additional stake holder design wishes are considered, the schedule could be impacted.

Each design change impacts the right of way process.

# of Parcel Impacts (Total Acquisition)

# of Parcels Certified

# of Appraisals In Process

# of Appraisals Completed

FMV Determinations

Acceptance Ready for Construction

20 20 0 20 20 19 15

# of Parcel Impacts (Owned by Government Entities)


IGAs are pending


52 52

# of Parcel Impacts (Partial Acquisition)


# of Appraisals or Value Findings in Process

# of Appraisals or Value Findings Completed

FMV Determinations or Value Findings Approved


243 243 140 103 95 0

TOTAL # of Parcel Impacts

TOTAL # of Parcels Certified

TOTAL # of Appraisals or Value Findings in Process

TOTAL # of Appraisals or Value Findings Completed

TOTAL # of FMV Determinations or Value Findings Approved

TOTAL # of Acceptance

TOTAL # Ready for Construc-tion

319 319 140 123 115 19 15

# of Parcel Impacts (Owned by Railroad Companies)


Agreements are pending


4 4


STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION

This Month:

Panel and backfill placement have been completed on C-2. Contractor continues to place pre-cast

MSE wall panels and backfill on the west side of the Kipling bridge. The MSE walls that are currently

under construction are B-17, B-19, and B-20. This work includes the wire retaining wall at abutment

#1 on the Kipling structure.

Steel members have been welded together for the pedestrian bridge super structures of Tennyson

and Hazel at Big R’s shop in Greeley Colorado.

The 6th avenue bridge fabrication continues at Fought in Oregon.

The fabrication has begun on the Platte River super structure in San Angelo, Texas. A pre-

construction quality meeting was held with the contractor and a representative from RTD.

Floor slab and walls have been completed on the Pike View pedestrian tunnel.

Next Month:

Continue MSE wall construction at the west approach to the Kipling structure.

Continue fabrication of the 6th avenue bridge at the steel shop in Oregon.

Completion and delivery to the project site of the pedestrian bridges for Tennyson and Hazel.

Continue construction of the Pike View pedestrian tunnel east of Kipling avenue.

Continue Fabrication of the Platte River bridge in San Angelo, Texas.

Areas of Concern:

None


CIVIL CONSTRUCTION This Month:

Lamar (» STA 1465+00) and Pierce (» 1452+00) Streets – Substantially completed correction of non-

conforming/deficient driveways, curb & gutter and walkways at these locations.

Jefferson County Government Center – Substantially completed installation of 8”/12” waterline with

hydrants, valves, and other appurtenances and removal of storm sewer scheduled for abandonment

at this location.

Lakewood Gulch (» STA 1551+00 to 1556+00) – Continued channel realignment activities in this

area. Primary activities initiated during the period: construction of Drop Structure 2; placement of soil

rip rap for new channel bottom/slopes; and construction of head/wing walls for 48” low flow RCP

pipe.

Knox Court (» STA 1567+00)

Completed relocation of 30” Denver Water Conduit No. 3.

Initiated construction of the new triple box culvert.

60” ADARC Pipeline (» STA 1209) – Initiated installation of pipeline segment under Union Blvd.

27” MWRD Sanitary Sewer (STA 1541 to 1555) – Completed removal of roadway pavement and

trackway within construction limits and staged pipe/materials in preparation for installation of new

sanitary sewer.

Design, planning, coordination, and permitting – Continue these activities for upcoming construction

of concrete box culverts (Lena Gulch, North Ave., and Richey Park) and demolition/site clearance of

miscellaneous acquired properties.

Next Month:

Lakewood Gulch (» STA 1551+00 to 1556+00) – Continue channel realignment activities in this area.

Knox Court (» STA 1567+00) – Continue construction of the new triple box culvert at this location.

60” ADARC Pipeline (» STA 1209) – Continue installation of pipeline segment under Union Blvd.

27” MWRD Sanitary Sewer (STA 1541 to 1555) – Initiate installation of new sanitary sewer piping and

manholes at this location.

Design, planning, coordination, and permitting – Continue these preparatory activities for upcoming

construction of concrete box culverts (Lena Gulch, North Ave., and Richey Park) and demolition/site

clearance of miscellaneous acquired properties.

Areas of Concern

Inadequate attention by CM/GC to stormwater management and erosion control issues for Lakewood

Gulch channel realignment and Knox Court triple box culvert work areas.


SYSTEMS

Due to a third-party encroachment on an easement belonging to Xcel Energy, the location of Traction

Power Substation 60 will change. It had been RTD’s intent to simply move TPSS 60 to the other side

of the alignment, a location which would have minimized site redesign costs. However, RTD has been

advised by the GSA that this site will not be made available. For this reason, RTD has initiated a re-

design of the TPSS site plan, ductbank and DC feeder system which will allow the placement of TPSS

60 west of the Federal Center Station. Xcel Energy has agreed assist RTD in recouping costs associ-

ated with this move from the encroaching party.

Work continues on the review of signals submittals for the project. The QMO database system used

for submittal review and tracking has undergone considerable improvement over the past few

months, and now provides a means for paperless submittal and review. Most signals submittals are

referred to the signals design contractor for review. Hardware items which are presently used on the

RTD system are granted automatic approval when the construction contractor provides proof of the

previous approval.

Changes which allow the use of hard-drawn copper contact wire (in place of the previously specified

bronze alloy) have been made to all drawings and specifications.


QUALITY MANAGEMENT

This Month:

The RTD FasTracks team has implemented a systematic quality management oversight (QMO)

program based on the FTA Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidelines, and the international

standard for quality systems, ISO 9001. RTD’s Quality Management system is described in the RTD

FasTracks Quality Assurance Program Plan. Specific processes are further described in the Quality

Management Oversight Program Manual, and accompanying procedures.

The weekly Quality Team meetings and verification inspections of the contractor’s early construction

work continued in April in accordance with the RTD Quality Management Oversight Program Manual;

results of RTD verification inspections are communicated to the contractor, and tracked within RTD’s

Quality Management Oversight database to ensure any non-conformances are corrected to RTD’s

satisfaction and closed.

Kumar and Associates continued split sampling/testing of concrete and soil backfill and

embankment. They are also auditing material testing data entered into the Quality Records

Database (QRD) for the project.

RTD Quality staff met on April 24th and discussed possible statistical analysis to be performed for

elements of the project. It was agreed statistical analysis will include air entrainment and

compressive strength for concrete as well as wall backfill compaction and soil proctor selection.

DTCG completed their internal review of an updated Quality Management Plan and provided the

document to RTD for review on April 27th. This new plan is intended to replace the currently

approved Quality Management Plan.

RTD Quality Oversight staff visited the Evraz rail production facility on April 30th. No concerns were

discovered and a report was prepared detailing observations and recommendations resulting from

the visit.

RTD and DTCG scheduled training for stakeholders to introduce the quality management systems

being used on the West Corridor LRT Project.

Next Month:

Conduct RTD Quality Philosophy training with stakeholders.

Complete RTD review of DTCG’s updated Quality Management Plan.

Areas of Concern:

None


PUBLIC INFORMATION

This Month

April 2 – Beth Jacobs High School

April 7 – RTD Board Tour of West Corridor

April 9 – Lakewood Interdepartmental Work Group

April 10 –Stakeholders Partnering meeting

April 10 – Lakewood Noise Wall Meeting

April 14 – Presentation Golden Optimist Club

April 14 – Small Stakeholders monthly meeting

April 21 – Distribute Public Meeting Notices Mountainside Estates

April 21 – Distribute Door Hangers – 12th Avenue Construction

April 23 – Administration Tour of West Corridor

April 24 – PI Orientation for DTCG Employees

April 27 – Meeting with Bill Spriggs – art opportunities

Next Month

May 6 – Presentation Mountainside Estates Public Meeting

May 6 – Presentation Federal Blvd Beautification Committee

May 7 – Lakewood Interdepartmental Work Group

May 8 – Elected Officials Briefing

May 12 – Small Stakeholders monthly meeting

May 15 – AACE Tour of West Corridor

May 19- Presentation Green Mountain Optimist Club

May 20 – Presentation Sun Valley Neighborhood


RISK MANAGEMENT SUMMARY In collaboration with he FTA and PMOC , RTD has established a Risk Management Program which

includes implementing the Risk Management Plan (RMP) and Contingency Management Plan (CMP).

With these strategies. the West Corridor Risk Management Team (RMT) has developed procedures to

identify, analyze, implement mitigation, and manage risk.

The Contingency Drawdown Chart on the following page, shows the West Corridor has spent $4.1M (9%)

of the total project contingency account of $44,282,416, which includes $1,520,000 of CNPA

contingency. Currently the West Corridor is 63% above the minimum contingency requirement of

$24,698,630, and within the appropriate contingency limits.

The Risk Register, on page 25, shows that the West Corridor has identified 20 Risks.

* Based on likelihood to occur, cost impact, schedule impact

Newly Identified Risks

There are no new risks to the West Corridor this month

Focused Risks

The RMT continues to focus it’s efforts on ROW Risk, both as a schedule impact (SCC60-6) and as a cost

impact (SCC60-08). Meetings are held weekly to monitor progress and mitigate where possible any slips

to the schedule. The contractor is kept up to date on any schedule changes to utilize any work-arounds

in the construction process.

Geotechnical investigation in the BYL area will begin in May 2009. RMT will then have better information

to assess the potential risk for Hazmat in the area (SCC 40-25)

Risks Mitigated

T&C-27 Stormwater /drainage issues impact the DFC Parking Facility: This risk has been removed from

the Risk Register. The scope of the work will be included in the WC Project and is being included in the

DFC Parking Facility Change Order to be issued to DTCG.

# of Low Risk # of Medium Risk # of High Risk

5 11 4

Quarterly Progress Report Page 13 April 2009

RISK MANAGEMENT — PROJECT DASHBOARD

Quarterly Progress Report Page 14 April 2009

RISK MANAGEMENT — CONTINGENCY DRAWDOWN

In collaboration with the FTA and PMOC , RTD is designing a Risk Management Program which includes

the Risk Management Plan (RMP) and Contingency Management Plan (CMP) . Part of this management

includes the Risk Register and the Contingency Drawdown Chart to display the cumulative contingency

maximum/minimum range drawdown, as the project progresses. These tools provide for the close

management of risk and adherence to the West Corridor Budget.

The West Corridor is maintaining the allowable contingency at 56% above the minimum contingency.


RISK MANAGEMENT — RISK REGISTER


RISK MANAGEMENT — RISK REGISTER (Continued)


DBE PARTICIPATION

Firm DBE Goal Actual for

April 2009

David Evans & Associates 21% 17%

FRSC 10% 12%

Denver Transit Construction

Group (DTCG) 13% Pre-Construction 13%

Denver Transit Construction

Group (DTCG) 18% Construction 9%


COST SUMMARY

As of April 2009, the status of Change Control is as follows:

Change Orders executed in the month ending April 2009 with costs in excess of $100,000.

Pending Changes in review in the month of April 2009 with costs in excess of $100,000.

Note: Executed construction change orders (CCO) are primarily for GMP work scope

prior to full NTP.

TYPES OF CHANGES AMOUNT

· Design Work Orders: 0

· Design Change Orders (DCO): 20

· Design Pending Change Orders: 0

· Construction Work Orders: 0

· Construction Change Orders (CCO): 30

· Construction Pending Change Orders: 16

· Systems Work Orders: 0

· Systems Change Orders (SCO): 1

· Systems Pending Change Orders: 1

PCN DESCRIPTION

CCO#22 Kipling Earthwork—Early Const. $ 315,105.20

CCO#27 MSE Wall Arch. Option 2 $ 501,238.76

CCO# Early Const. for Walls D43 & D70 $ 141,612.93

CCO# Jeffco Water Main Modification $ 163,020.44

CCO#50 Full Civil Const. Award (nte) $ 346,246,968.00

SCO#02 Systems IFC Design Changes $ 2,654,106.45

PCN DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

CCO#35 Meza Additional Bridge Work $ 261,835

DCO#20 Complete IFC Design, Design During Const. $ 2,660,802


PROJECT BUDGET — SUMMARY


PROJECT BUDGET — Sources

$3

,55

4,6

20

$1

,74

6,6

44

$0

$1

3,0

77

,20

6

$0

$1

4,6

20

,02

4

$0

$3

,53

2,4

96

$9

50

,00

0$

9,7

77

,25

7$

0$

0

$2

,06

4,4

56

$0

$2

,02

9,0

00

$0

$2

,65

6,3

98

$5

70

,00

0

$1

57

,70

3,1

64

$5

7,9

59

,04

0$

2,0

00

,00

0

$1

28

,41

4,2

64

$7

8,5

63

,61

6

$5

4,8

51

,47

6

$7

1,1

50

,09

0$

85

,89

0,1

26

$1

6,4

78

,41

6

10

Gu

ide

way

&

Trac

k El

em

en

ts2

0 S

tati

on

s, S

top

s,

Term

inal

s3

0 S

up

po

rt F

acili

ties

40

Sit

ew

ork

&

Spe

cial

Co

ndi

tion

s5

0 S

yste

ms

60

RO

W, L

and

, Ex

isti

ng

Imp

rove

men

ts

70

Ve

hic

les

80

Pro

fess

ion

al

Serv

ice

s9

0 U

nal

loca

ted

Co

nti

nge

ncy

Pro

ject

Bu

dge

t So

urc

es

CN

PA

RTD

Bu

dge

tC

NP

A b

y O

the

rs B

ud

get

(YO

E$)

Bas

elin

e B

ud

get


PROJECT BUDGET — BUDGET VS COMMITMENT VS ACTUAL

$0

$5

0,0

00

,00

0

$1

00

,00

0,0

00

$1

50

,00

0,0

00

$2

00

,00

0,0

00

$2

50

,00

0,0

00

(YO

E$)

Bas

elin

e B

ud

get

CN

PA

by

Oth

ers

Bu

dge

t

CN

PA

RTD

Bu

dge

t

Allo

cate

d C

on

tin

gen

cy

Ap

pro

ved

Ch

ange

s

Ap

pro

ved

Bu

dge

t (B

UD

)

Ap

pro

pri

ate

d/

Fun

de

d

Co

mm

itte

d t

o D

ate

% C

om

mit

ted

Act

ual

to D

ate

Est.

at

Co

mp

leti

on

(EA

C)


PROJECT BUDGET — MAJOR CONTRACTS


PROJECT BUDGET — DETAIL


PROJECT BUDGET — DETAIL (Continued)


PROJECT BUDGET — COST STATUS DETAIL

157.7

0

57.9

6

2.0

0

128.4

1

78.5

6

54.8

5

71.1

5

85.8

9

16.4

8

653.0

1

56.8

2

$0.0

0$100.0

0$200.0

0$300.0

0$400.0

0$500.0

0$600.0

0$700.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

tota

l

100

Millions

70006 W

C F

edera

l Pro

ject -Cost

Deta

il b

y S

CC

Actu

al

to D

ate

Appro

ved b

udget

Dis

pla

yed

in M

illio

ns


PROJECT BUDGET — ALLOWANCES STATUS

SC

C

Description

C

onting

ency

Allo

cation

D

TC

G B

id

Allo

wances

Bud

get

Actu

als

R

em

ain

ing

40.0

8

Gra

ffiti R

em

oval

150,0

00.0

0

150,0

00.0

0

40.0

8

Tem

pora

ry E

asem

ents

500,0

00.0

0

500,0

00.0

0

1,0

00,0

00.0

0

40.0

8

Part

nerin

g

150,0

00.0

0

150,0

00.0

0

300,0

00.0

0

40.0

4

En

v.

& A

rch.

Mitig

ation

1,0

00,0

00.0

0

1,1

93,5

07.0

0

153,0

84.3

6

2,0

40,4

22.6

4

40.0

3

Sub

ex. R

em

. W

alls

& C

ais

sons

4,0

00,0

00.0

0

4,1

75,6

87.0

0

141,4

13.3

6

8,0

34,2

73.6

4

10.0

2

Wate

r T

aps F

ees

250,0

00.0

0

250,0

00.0

0

40.0

1

Build

ing D

em

olit

ion

1,0

00,0

00.0

0 1

,00

0,0

00.0

0

968,7

95.2

9

1,0

31,2

04.7

1

40.0

6

Fence G

roun

din

g

80,0

00.0

0

80,0

00.0

0

40.0

8

Tra

ffic

Schedu

le I

ncentive

0.0

0

40.0

8

Railr

oad

Fla

gg

ing

200,0

00.0

0

200,0

00.0

0

10.0

8

LR

T S

hutd

ow

ns

0.0

0

80.0

6

Perm

its &

Lic

enses

1,2

00,0

00.0

0

1,2

00,0

00.0

0

7,3

30,0

00.0

0 1

,65

0,0

00.0

0 6

,56

9,1

94.0

0 1

,26

3,2

93.0

1 1

4,2

85,9

00.9

9


PROJECT BUDGET — ALLOWANCES STATUS (Continued)

0.0

0

1,0

00

,00

0.0

0

2,0

00

,00

0.0

0

3,0

00

,00

0.0

0

4,0

00

,00

0.0

0

5,0

00

,00

0.0

0

6,0

00

,00

0.0

0

7,0

00

,00

0.0

0

8,0

00

,00

0.0

0

9,0

00

,00

0.0

0

Graffiti Removal

Temporary Easements

Partnering

Env. & Arch. Mitigation

Subex. Rem. Walls & Caissons

Water Taps Fees

Building Demolition

Fence Grounding

Traffic Schedule Incentive

Railroad Flagging

LRT Shutdowns

Permits & Licenses

40

.08

40

.08

40

.08

40

.04

40

.03

10

.02

40

.01

40

.06

40

.08

40

.08

10

.08

80

.06

Co

nti

ng

en

cy

All

oc

ati

on

DT

CG

Bid

All

ow

an

ce

s

Bu

dg

et

Ac

tua

ls

Re

ma

inin

g


CONCURRENT NON-PROJECT ACTIVITIES — STATUS DETAIL


CONCURRENT NON-PROJECT ACTIVITIES — (CONTINUED)



$3.5

5

$1.7

5

$0.0

0

$13.0

8

$0.0

0

$14.6

2

$0.0

0

$3.5

3

$0.0

0

$0.9

5

$37.4

8

$0.0

0

$0.0

0$5.0

0$10.0

0$15.0

0$20.0

0$25.0

0$30.0

0$35.0

0$40.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

90

tota

l

100

Millions

70027 C

NPA

by R

TD

-Cost

Deta

il b

y S

CC

Appro

ved b

udget

Actu

al

to D

ate

Dis

pla

yed

in M

illio

ns







2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

18000000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

90

tota

l

100

70028 C

NPA

by O

thers

-Cost

Deta

il b

y S

CC

Appro

ved b

udget

Actu

al

to D

ate

Invoic

e to D

ate

Receiv

ed to d

ate


PROJECT SCHEDULE — SUMMARY Completed Work This Month:

Tree Removal for Early Work Areas 30Apr09

On Going Work:

Pedestrian Bridges:

Dry Gulch West: remaining work Water proofing /Epoxy Coating, forecast finish 6May09

Dry Gulch East: Remaining work, Install Drop Structure #4, forecast finish 4May09

Tennyson and Hazel: Will complete when the concrete deck is poured 12May09

Kipling Walls will complete 23Jul09

Gulch Grading and Channelization forecast finish 17Aug09

Work Started This Month:

60” Agricultural Ditch at Union start date: 13Apr09, forecast finish 6Aug09

Knox Box Culvert: started 06Apr09, forecast finish 09Oct09

GSA Security Fencing started 8Apr09, forecast finish 18May09

WC Earned Value to date: 24.o6%

Forecast for DTCG’s Schedule: 29Jun09


PROJECT SCHEDULE


PROJECT SCHEDULE — (Continued)

















Documents

West Corridor Monthly Progress Report - FasTracks · Monthly Progress Report Page i April 2009 ... WBS Work Breakdown Structure LIST OF ACRONYMS (Continued) Monthly Progress Report