Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
6/16/2016
1
1 © 2016 TMIT
Welcome to
For resource downloads go to:
www.safetyleaders.org
New Oral Anticoagulants:
New Patient Safety Challenges
2 © 2016 TMIT
Charles Denham, MD Chairman, TMIT
TMIT High Performer Webinar
June 16, 2016
Welcome
3 © 2016 TMIT
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check:
o WebEx volume
o Computer volume
o External speaker volume
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check:
o WebEx volume
o Computer volume
With regard to webinar sound volume, please check:
o WebEx volume
4 © 2016 TMIT
If you are still having difficulty hearing the webinar:
Please click on Participants
If you are still having difficulty hearing the webinar:
Please click on Participants
Then the “Request Phone” button to receive a toll dial-in
6/16/2016
2
5 6
7 © 2016 TMIT
If you wish to follow us on Twitter,
go to: http://twitter.com/TMIT1
or use #safetyleaders hashtag
Also, go to:
www.facebook.com/SafetyLeaders
and related sites
8 © 2016 TMIT
TMIT Purpose Statement
Our Purpose:
We will measure our success by how we protect and enrich the lives of families…patients AND caregivers.
Our Mission:
To accelerate performance solutions that save lives, save money, and create value in the communities we serve and ventures we undertake.
6/16/2016
3
9 © 2016 TMIT
Alan K. Jacobson, MD, FACC, is a staff cardiologist and the Associate Chief of Staff for Research at the Loma Linda VA Medical Center in Southern
California. A native of Canada, Dr. Jacobson has been at Loma Linda since heading south in 1977 for medical school. In addition to practicing general
cardiology, Dr. Jacobson has a special interest in antithrombotic therapy. His business relationships include Industry Relationships: Boehringer
Ingelheim BMS & Pfizer, Janssen & Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi Aventis, and POC INR device manufacturers.
Jennifer Dingman realized, after her mother's death in 1995 due to errors in medical diagnoses and treatment, that there is little to no help available for
patients and their families in similar situations. This life-changing experience left her feeling vulnerable, and she decided to dedicate her life to help
prevent medical tragedies from happening to others. She has nothing to disclose.
Charles Denham, MD, is the Chairman of TMIT; a former TMIT education grantee of CareFusion and AORN with co-production by Discovery Channel for
Chasing Zero documentary and Toolbox including models; and an education grantee of GE with co-production by Discovery Channel for Surfing the
Healthcare Tsunami documentary and Toolbox, including models. HCC is a former contractor for GE and CareFusion, and a former contractor with
Siemens and Nanosonics, which produces a sterilization device, Trophon. HCC is a former contractor with Senior Care Centers. HCC is a former
contractor for ByoPlanet, a producer of sanitation devices for multiple industries. Dr. Denham is a collaborator with Professor Christensen.
Disclosure Statement The following panelists certify:
that unless otherwise noted below, each presenter provided full disclosure information; does not intend to discuss
an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device; and has no significant financial relationship(s) to
disclose. If unapproved uses of products are discussed, presenters are expected to disclose this to participants.
10 © 2016 TMIT
Speakers and Reactors
Alan Jacobson Jennifer Dingman Charles Denham
11 © 2016 TMIT
Voice of the Patient and Family
Jennifer Dingman
Founder, Persons United Limiting Substandards and
Errors in Healthcare (PULSE), Colorado Division
Co-founder, PULSE American Division
TMIT Patient Advocate Team Member
Pueblo, CO
TMIT High Performer Webinar
June 16, 2016
12 © 2016 TMIT
Charles Denham, MD
Chairman, TMIT
TMIT High Performer Webinar
June 16, 2016
In the News and Polling Highlights:
News Update and
May 2016 Webinar Polling
6/16/2016
4
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 13 © 2016 TMIT
Six Major Health IT Challenges Identified by The ONC in May 2016
Source: Graber, ML, Bailey, R, Johnston, D, ONC. Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations to Improve Safety Using Health IT, Revised Report. Health
IT Safety Center Road Map, RTI: May 2016. Available at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/task_9_report.pdf
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 14 © 2016 TMIT
Six Major Health IT Challenges Identified by The ONC in May 2016
Source: Graber, ML, Bailey, R, Johnston, D, ONC. Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations to Improve Safety Using Health IT,
Revised Report. Health IT Safety Center Road Map, RTI: May 2016.
Available at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/task_9_report.pdf
Safety issues have been identified at all phases
in the adoption and use of health IT. Because
this report is intended to help health care
organizations learn from other stakeholders and
set their own health IT safety goals and priorities,
in this section we organize findings across
sources’ reviews according to six areas related
to the safe use of health IT during adoption and
implementation. These six categories emerged
from the population of measures identified during
our research and proved useful for grouping the
identified goals, priorities, and recommendations
for further analysis.
6 Categories of Safety Issues
1. Leadership
2. Culture and Engagement
3. Planning and Readiness
4. Installation
5. Training and Proficiency
Support
6. Upgrades and Conversions
May, 2016
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 15 © 2016 TMIT
Six Major Health IT Challenges Identified by The ONC in May 2016
Source: Graber, ML, Bailey, R, Johnston, D, ONC. Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations to Improve Safety Using Health IT, Revised Report. Health
IT Safety Center Road Map, RTI: May 2016. Available at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/task_9_report.pdf
1. Leadership: Leadership involves establishing a vision for an organization and sharing that vision so that others will follow willingly; providing the
information, knowledge and methods to realize that vision; and coordinating and balancing the conflicting interests of all members and stakeholders.
2. Culture and Engagement: High-reliability organizations maintain a commitment to safety at all levels, from frontline providers to managers and
executives. This commitment establishes a culture of safety that helps ensure engagement, creates blame-free environments, and encourages
collaboration to address patient safety problems.
3. Planning and Readiness: “Assess your practice readiness” and “plan your approach” are steps 1 and 2 of ONC’s step-by-step
guide to EHR implementation. The assessment phase is a foundation for all other EHR implementation steps, and involves determining
if the practice is ready to make the change from paper records to EHRs or to upgrade to a new version. The planning phase clarifies
and prioritizes implementation tasks and helps ensure clear communication about tasks to the entire team involved with the change
process.
4. Installation: Step 4 of ONC’s guide to EHR implementation is “conduct training and implement an EHR system.” EHR
implementation involves the installation of the EHR system and associated activities, such as mock “go-live” and pilot testing.
Configuration and pilot testing must involve clinicians familiar with the workflows in clinical practice. The EHR implementation plan and
schedule are executed during this phase.
5. Training and Proficiency Support: Also part of Step 4 in ONC’s guide, EHR implementation involves the execution of a training plan that includes
practice-specific goals and needs. Proficiency support acknowledges that transitioning from paper records to an EHR, or incorporating new or
different health IT products into the user’s workflow, is an ongoing learning process. Providing recurring and ongoing learning opportunities (sometimes called retraining) supports users in achieving true proficiency with the health IT so they can more fully and efficiently use the system and
resolve questions that arise after initial use of new systems.
6. Upgrades and Conversions: Upgrades and conversions often present specific challenges that require change control processes, testing, and
specific attention to users so that they are thoroughly trained and supported in achieving proficiency on the new system
May, 2016
Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations to
Improve Safety Using Health IT
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 16 © 2016 TMIT
Six Major Health IT Challenges Identified by The ONC in May 2016
1: http://healthitanalytics.com/news/6-ehr-big-data-issues-impede-patient-safety-cut-quality
Source: Graber, ML, Bailey, R, Johnston, D, ONC. Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations to Improve Safety Using Health IT, Revised Report. Health IT Safety Center Road Map, RTI: May 2016. Available at https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/task_9_report.pdf
May, 2016
Goals and Priorities for Health Care Organizations
to Improve Safety Using Health IT
This framework, proposed
by the Institute of
Medicine (IOM), can guide
stakeholder efforts to
identify health IT risks and
change usage patterns that
may put patients in harm’s
way. 1
6/16/2016
5
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 17 © 2016 TMIT
Meaningful Use is dead. Long live something better! High Impact Care Hazards to Patients, Students, and Employees
Choking
Anaphylaxis
Cardiac Arrest
Opioid Overdose
Active Shooter
Transportation Accidents
Non-trans Accidents
Bullying
A Medical-Tactical Approach
undertaken by clinical and non-
clinical people can have
enormous impact on loss of life
and harm from very common
hazards:
• High Impact Care Hazards
are frequent, severe,
preventable, and
measurable.
• Lifeline Behaviors
undertaken by anyone can
save lives.
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 18 © 2016 TMIT
In the News
Source: CNN website http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orlando-nightclub-shooting/
June 13, 2016
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 19 © 2016 TMIT
CNO claims hospital forced her out after she raised concerns about EMR
Source: Becker’s Hospital Review website
http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/cno-claims-hospital-forced-her-out-after-she-raised-concerns-about-emr.html
June 14, 2016
The lawsuit alleges the EMR system mixes
patients' records, so information in one
patient's chart moves to another patient's
chart. It also alleges the EMR has issues
tracking and updating patient medications
and does not display patient code status
information, which informs providers of
patients' desired medical interventions,
according to the report.
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 20 © 2016 TMIT
AHRQ: Hospitals that mess up are urged to fess up
Source: Becker’s Hospital Review website
http://www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/ahrq-hospitals-that-mess-up-are-urged-to-fess-up.html
June 13, 2016
Recently, the AHRQ published guidelines for hospitals to adopt that promote
honesty regarding mistakes. The idea behind the guidelines is that being open
and honest about mistakes and taking accountability can reduce hospital
liability and improve safety. The guidelines, called "Communication and
Optimal Resolution," or "Candor," aims to save hospitals from expensive
malpractice litigation fees while encouraging higher scrutiny of medical errors.
It is also designed to support patients, families and clinicians after a medical
error occurs, which can be traumatic for all parties. Candor was developed
with a $23 million federal research grant and was tested at 14 hospitals in
three health systems, according to the report.
6/16/2016
6
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 21 © 2016 TMIT
Making It Possible for Hospitals to Be Honest About Medical Errors
Source: Insurance Journal website
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2016/06/10/416553.htm
June 10, 2016
The biggest barrier to hospitals being more transparent is their legal departments,
[Helen Haskell] said. “These are people who are very vested in this process,” she said.
“When [Candor is] implemented well, hospitals save tons of money and what they’re
saving on is defense.”
Haskell said ending hospital secrecy is a prerequisite to making them safer for patients.
“Without disclosure, without accountability it never gets fixed,” she said.
Candor has its roots in that idea. Kraman was newly appointed chief of staff at the
Lexington VA when an internal review indicated that a patient’s death weeks before had
been caused by a medication error. The family had no idea. “We decided that we could
put it together in a dossier and hide it, and hope they never come back. We didn’t feel
comfortable doing that,” he said.
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 22 © 2016 TMIT
Source: KGVO website
http://newstalkkgvo.com/ex-va-manager-claims-retaliation-for-making-safety-report/
June 11, 2016
Dianne Scotten was the VA’s associate chief of inpatient care from March to
December 2014. Soon after her arrival, she reported to the VA’s Quality
Management Program that there was a dispute over whether a surgical towel
count had been completed during an operation.
Scotten’s attorney, Jill Gerdrum (JER-drum), says Associate Director for
Patient Care Services Norlynn Nelson then reprimanded Scotten, reassigned
her, cut off communications and effectively coerced her resignation.
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 23 © 2016 TMIT
Family Caregivers Become More Crucial as Elderly Population Grows
Source: The Wall Street Journal website
http://www.wsj.com/articles/family-caregivers-become-more-crucial-as-elderly-population-grows-1464946204
June 3, 2016
“Families have always been the backbone of our system for caring for people,”
said Kathy Greenlee, the assistant secretary for aging at the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services. “Really, if we didn’t have them, we couldn’t
afford as a country to monetize their care and we couldn’t replace,
frankly, the love they provide to family members.”
About 40 million U.S. family caregivers provided unpaid care, valued at $470
billion, to an adult with limitations in daily activities in 2013, according to AARP.
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 24 © 2016 TMIT
Improving Safety for Hospitalized Patients Much Progress but Many Challenges Remain
Source: The Journal of the American Medical Association website
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2528945
June 13, 2016
Improving safety has focused on hospitalized patients, but it is equally
important in other settings, particularly long-term care and ambulatory care.
The recent National Academy of Medicine report on diagnostic errors
found that the average US patient can expect to be harmed by a
diagnostic error at some point in his or her lifetime. To parallel the effort
that has been made to date on hospital safety, substantial effort is needed to
determine how to measure and reduce diagnostic errors and ensure that this
information is integrated into practice where it will translate into meaningful
benefits for patients.
Improving Safety for Hospitalized Patients
Much Progress but Many Challenges Remain
6/16/2016
7
Anonymous Polling Questions
I would like a Medical Tactical Certificate Course covering Anaphylaxis, Sudden
Cardiac Death, Choking, Opioid OD, and Injury Care for Active Shooter Events.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% 6%
18%
12%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; High Impact Care Hazards: Opioid OD, Anaphylaxis, Cardiac Arrest, Choking, and On-site Transportation Accidents – May 19, 2016
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
83% Agreed and 59% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed,
and 47% Very Strongly Agreed
47%
12%
6%
6/16/2016
8
Anonymous Polling Questions
I would like a webinar on Patient and Caregiver Safety
that could be offered to Non-clinical staff.
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% 5%
16%
11%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; High Impact Care Hazards: Opioid OD, Anaphylaxis, Cardiac Arrest, Choking, and On-site Transportation Accidents – May 19, 2016
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
90% Agreed and 69% Strongly or Very Strongly Agreed,
and 58% Very Strongly Agreed
58%
11%
30 © 2016
Opioid Addiction 2016 Facts and Figures
Centers for Disease Control.
Available at http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/heroin/infographic.html#responding.
© 2015 TMIT 31
HHS National Action Plan
for ADEs
August 2014
Source: [No authors listed.] National Action Plan for Adverse Drug Event Prevention. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health, Office of the Secretary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014 Aug. Available at
http://www.health.gov/hai/pdfs/ADE-Action-Plan-508c.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
© 2015 TMIT 32
Impact of ADEs
Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, et al. 'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. Available at
http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/30/4/581.full.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
Weiss AJ, Elixhauser A, Bae J, et al. Origin of Adverse Drug Events in U.S. Hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #158. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US); 2013 Jul. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb158.jsp. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003 Feb 4;138(3):161-7. Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, et al. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010 Sep;19(9):901-10. Available at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2932855/pdf/nihms224997.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
Budnitz DS, Pollock DA, Weidenbach KN, et al. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. JAMA 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1858-66. Available at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/5045/JOC60142.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
6/16/2016
9
© 2015 TMIT 33
Complex System
Source: [No authors listed.] National Action Plan for Adverse Drug Event Prevention. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health, Office of the Secretary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014 Aug. Available at
http://www.health.gov/hai/pdfs/ADE-Action-Plan-508c.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
© 2015 TMIT 34
Target High-Impact Preventable ADEs
Source: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. ADE Prevention: 201 Action Plan Conference.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of the Secretary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014 Oct 30.
Available at http://www.health.gov/hai/pdfs/2014-ADE-Action-Plan-Conference-Slides.pdf. Last accessed January 19, 2015.
© 2015 TMIT 35
Triple Threat
Implicated in 67% of all
Emergency Hospitalizations
Source: Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, et al. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med 2011 Nov
24;365(21):2002-12. Available at http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMsa1103053. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
ADE Prevention Federal Advisory Group
6/16/2016
10
© 2015 TMIT 37
Anticoagulation ADEs Common
…Yet Anticoagulants Still Underused © 2015 TMIT 38
Anticoagulation ADEs
Source: Budnitz DS, Pollock DA, Weidenbach KN, et al. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events. JAMA
2006 Oct 18;296(15):1858-66. Available at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/5045/JOC60142.pdf. Last accessed January 21, 2015.
© 2015 TMIT 39
Outpatient Anticoagulation Management
40 © 2015 TMIT
Alan K. Jacobson, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine
Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Director, Anticoagulation Services
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Prior Anti-coag Presentations: • Feb 19, 2015
• April 21, 2015
6/16/2016
11
Anonymous Polling Questions
I am interested in a DEEP DIVE on Anticoagulation Best Practices &
Protocols
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
55%
12%
5%
41 © 2015 TMIT
18%
4% 3%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; An Old Problem: A New Focus – February 19, 2015
2% 1%
Anonymous Polling Questions
I am interested in joining a community of practice on Anticoagulation
Mgmt
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
27%
16% 14%
42 © 2015 TMIT
10% 11% 11%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; An Old Problem: A New Focus – February 19, 2015
2% 3% 1%
5%
Anonymous Polling Questions
I need help developing ROI Business Case for Anticoag Programs
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
24%
12% 9%
43 © 2015 TMIT
11% 9%
16%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; An Old Problem: A New Focus – February 19, 2015
3% 3% 6% 6%
Anonymous Polling Questions
My organization has Anticoagulation Expertise to share with others
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10% 11%
4%
10%
44 © 2015 TMIT
5%
12% 17%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; An Old Problem: A New Focus – February 19, 2015
16%
6% 7%
12%
6/16/2016
12
Anonymous Polling Questions
I am interested collaborating/connecting with my Community
Pharmacists
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
26%
9% 12%
45 © 2015 TMIT
6%
12% 13%
Source: TMIT High Performer Webinar Series; An Old Problem: A New Focus – February 19, 2015
7% 5%
3% 7%
46 © 2015 TMIT
Alan K. Jacobson, MD, FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine
Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Director, Anticoagulation Services
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
TMIT High Performer Webinar
June 16, 2016
New Oral Anticoagulants:
New Patient Safety Challenges
Anticoagulation ADEs –
An Old Problem: A New Focus
New Oral Anticoagulants:
New Patient Safety Challenges
Alan K. Jacobson, MD FACC Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Director, Anticoagulation Services
Cardiology Section
Loma Linda VA Medical Center
Loma Linda, CA
Disclosures
• Department of Veterans Affairs The information contained in this presentation does not represent any official
endorsement nor recommendation by the Department of Veterans Affairs but
represent the professional opinion of the presenter.
• Industry Relationships: • Boehringer Ingelheim
• BMS & Pfizer
• Janssen & Bayer
• Daiichi Sankyo
• Sanofi Aventis
• POC INR device manufacturers
6/16/2016
13
Outline
Background: Anticoagulation for AF Stroke Risk Reduction
HHS ADE Initiative
Are the “new” TSOACs the answer or simply a new challenge
Frequency of Major Bleeding
Case Fatality of Major Bleeding
Management of Novel Anticoagulant associated bleeds
Role of reversal agents
The future
Disturbed Flow
(left atrium)
Stroke Risk
Blood Flow in Atrial Fibrillation
4 mm. clot - occlude cerebral artery
1.9 2.3 2.1
0.9
Warfarin in Prospective AF Trials Intention-to-treat analysis
Control
Warfarin
AFASAK SPAF BAATAF CAFA SPINAF 825 504 922 490 896 p=0.03 p=0.01 p=0.002 p>0.2 p=0.001
8
6
4
2
0
Str
oke
Rat
e (%
/yea
r)
Adapted from Atwood, Albers, Herz 1993;18:27-38
4.6
3.0 3.6
4.3
person-years
p value
7.0
0.4
Severity of Stroke With AF
• 1061 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke
• 20.3% had AF
• Bedridden state
• With AF 41.2%
• Without AF 23.7%
• Odds ratio for bedridden state following stroke due to AF 2.23 (95% CI, 1.87-2.59; P<.0005)
• Bleeding into brain has even higher disability.
P<.0005
Dulli et al. Neuroepidemiology. 2003;22:118-123. AHA data, Framingham data
6/16/2016
14
0
20
40
60
80
100
INR
Incid
ence p
er
100 P
atient-
Years
Figure 3. INR-Specific Incidence of All Adverse Events (All Episodes of
Thromboembolism, All Major Bleeding Episodes, and Unclassified Stroke).
The dotted lines indicate the 95 percent confidence interval. Cannegeiter et al
National Action Plan for
Adverse Drug Event
Prevention
http://www.health.gov/hai/pdfs/ADE-Action-Plan-508c.pdf
6/16/2016
15
National Action Plan for
Adverse Drug Event Prevention
The three initial targets of the ADE Action Plan are:
Anticoagulants (primary ADE of concern:
bleeding)
Diabetes agents (primary ADE of concern:
hypoglycemia)
Opioids (primary ADE of concern: accidental
overdoses/oversedation /respiratory depression)
Limitations of Warfarin
Despite improved outcomes and fewer hemorrhagic events with better
INR control, warfarin still has several limitations:
• Narrow therapeutic index.
• Need for therapeutic monitoring.
• Dietary and drug interactions necessitate more frequent monitoring.
• High rate of adverse events, particularly in non-structured setting.
Almost half of the patients who would benefit, and
have no contraindications, DO NOT receive therapy.
Ongoing Patient Education
Ongoing QI
Direct Active Management
by Qualified Health Care Provider
Patient Scheduling
and Tracking
Accessible, Accurate, and
Frequent PT/INR
Testing
Patient-specific
Decision Support
and Interaction
Systematic Anticoagulation Management
“Enabling Technologies”
Ongoing Patient Education
Ongoing QI
Direct Active Management
by Qualified Health Care Provider
Patient Scheduling
and Tracking
Evaluation of kidney and
liver function
Drug reconciliation
Patient-specific
Decision Support
and Interaction
Systematic Anticoagulation Management
– Novel Anticoagulants
6/16/2016
16
Are the “new” TSOACs the Answer?
“Novel” Anticoagulants – 5 years old
• NOAC
• Novel Oral AntiCoagulant
• Non-vitamin K antagonist Oral AntiCoagulant
• DOAC
• Direct acting Oral AntiCoagulant
• TSOAC
• Target Specific Oral AntiCoagulant
Four Novel Agents
• Dabigatran / Pradaxa
• Rivaroxaban / Xarelto
• Apixaban / Eliquis
• Edoxaban / Savaysa
• All with generally comparable safety and
efficacy BUT each has multiple unique
characteristics and considerations
TSOAC Effectiveness
• Stroke Prevention in AF
• 19% reduction in stroke / systemic emboli
Ruff et al Lancet 2013 Hirschi and Kundi Vasa. 2014
6/16/2016
17
TSOAC Effectiveness
• Stroke Prevention in AF
• 19% reduction in stroke / systemic emboli
• 51% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke
Ruff et al Lancet 2013 Hirschi and Kundi Vasa. 2014
TSOAC Effectiveness
• Stroke Prevention in AF
• 19% reduction in stroke / systemic emboli
• 51% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke
• 52% reduction in intracranial bleeding
Ruff et al Lancet 2013 Hirschi and Kundi Vasa. 2014
TSOAC Effectiveness
• Stroke Prevention in AF
• 19% reduction in stroke / systemic emboli
• 51% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke
• 52% reduction in intracranial bleeding
• 10% reduction in all-cause mortality
Ruff et al Lancet 2013 Hirschi and Kundi Vasa. 2014
TSOAC Effectiveness
• Stroke Prevention in AF
• 19% reduction in stroke / systemic emboli
• 51% reduction in hemorrhagic stroke
• 52% reduction in intracranial bleeding
• 10% reduction in all-cause mortality
• VTE
• Comparable efficacy
• 40% reduction in major bleeding
Ruff et al Lancet 2013 Hirschi and Kundi Vasa. 2014
6/16/2016
18
Major Bleeding TSOAC vs. Warfarin
Incidence of major bleeds
• NOAC
• 43,050 patients
• 2,158 major bleeds (5.01%)
• VKA
• 29,911 patients
• 1,826 major bleeds (6.10%)
• 18% reduction in major bleeds
Caldeira et al Heart 2015; 101:1204-1211
Major Bleeding TSOAC vs. Warfarin
Incidence of fatal bleeds
• NOAC
• 43,050 patients
• 121 fatal bleeds (0.28%)
• VKA
• 29,911 patients
• 152 fatal bleeds (0.51%)
• NOACs associated with a 47% odds reduction in the
risk of fatal bleeding OR 0.53 95% CI 0.42-0.68
Caldeira et al Heart 2015; 101:1204-1211
Major Bleeding TSOAC vs. Warfarin
Case Fatality
• NOAC
• 2,158 major bleeds
• 121 fatal bleeds (5.61%)
• VKA
• 1,826 major bleeds
• 152 fatal bleeds (8.32%)
• NOACs associated with a 32% odds reduction in the
case fatality rate OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96
Caldeira et al Heart 2015; 101:1204-1211
Major Bleeding Case Fatality
• Meta-analysis of 12 studies
• Case-fatality rate for major bleeding:
• DOAC 7.57% (30% reduction)
• VKA (warfarin) 11.05%
• Fatal bleeding per 100 patient years:
• DOAC 0.16%
• VKA (warfarin) 0.32%
Crowther et al Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 2012-20
Mortality Outcome in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants …
6/16/2016
19
Bottom Line
• Major bleeding events are more frequent
with warfarin than with TSOACs
• A patient who has a major bleeding event
while on warfarin is more likely to die
from it than a patient on a TSOAC
• Even in the absence of a reversal agent
for the TSOAC !
Approach to TSOAC Associated Bleeding
Approach to TSOAC Associated Bleeding
• Find and fix the leak!
Approach to TSOAC Associated Bleeding
• Find and fix the leak!
Everything else is ancillary.
6/16/2016
20
Managing Bleeding Complications in
Patients Treated with DOACs
• Initial Assessment
• Hemodynamic stability
• Source of bleeding
• Time since last dose of anticoagulant
• Which anticoagulant?
• Renal function
• Interacting medications
• Risk Stratify
Adapted from McMaster and Boehringer Canada
Managing Bleeding Complications in
Patients Treated with DOACs
• Minor Bleeding
• Local hemostatic measures
• Consider anticoagulant withdrawal based on
balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks
Adapted from McMaster and Boehringer Canada
Managing Bleeding Complications in
Patients Treated with DOACs
• Moderate Bleeding
• General measures
• Anticoagulant withdrawal
• Mechanical compression
• Monitor hemodynamic status
• Volume replacement
• Definitive interventions
• Blood Product Transfusions
• RBC if anemic
• FFP or platelets
Adapted from McMaster and Boehringer Canada
Managing Bleeding Complications in
Patients Treated with DOACs
• Life-Threatening Bleeding
• Everything that is being done for moderate
• Intensive care setting, hemodynamic support
• Nonspecific antidotes
• 4 factor PCC
• Activated PCC
• Specific reversal
• Idarucizumab, andexanet
• Adjunctive Therapie
• Desmopressin, antifibrinolytics, charcoal
Adapted from McMaster and Boehringer Canada
6/16/2016
21
What to consider before reversal?
• Is a DOAC present?
• WHEN WAS THE LAST DOSE?
• Does it need to be reversed?
• If so, with specific or nonspecific reversal?
Limitations of Reversal Agents
• Reversal agents can only eliminate the
anticoagulant contribution to the bleeding
problem. They rarely stop the bleeding
because they do not fix the problem.
• Most deaths from major bleeding occur in
patients NOT on anticoagulants or other
“blood thinners”.
Do we really need reversal agents?
• Annual rate of major bleeding remains at
2-3% in the AF population.
• Even with NOACS, annual rate of
intracranial hemorrhage is 0.1-0.5% in the
AF population
• Some patients may require reversal
because of trauma or need for urgent
surgery.
The Future of Reversal
• The coming years will be exciting as we
continue to refine our management of
these TSOACs (new indications, lab
measurement) and explore the boundaries
of reversal.
• And, there are already “novel” classes of
anticoagulants on the horizon.
• (anti FXII or FXI)
6/16/2016
22
TMIT = ACTION
• What actions do we need to consider for
managing TSOAC associated bleeding?
• Educate patients
• Facilitate local policies and expertise to
provide predictable systematic evaluation
and management of these events
Even with the new TSOACs,
Safe and Effective Anticoagulation
STILL
Requires Competent Management
INCLUDING Education
Casual use of any anticoagulant will yield suboptimal
clinical outcomes.
THESE ARE NOT CASUAL USE DRUGS!!!
Questions?
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 88 © 2015 TMIT
Polling Questions
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
I am interested in joining a community of practice on Anticoagulation Mgmt
I am interested in a DEEP DIVE on Anticoagulation Best Practices & Protocols
including the NEW Medications
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
6/16/2016
23
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 89 © 2015 TMIT
Polling Questions
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
My organization has Anticoagulation Expertise to share with others
I need help developing ROI Business Case for Anticoag Programs
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 90 © 2015 TMIT
Polling Questions
Free Text Entry
The topics in Anticoagulation Management I need help with are:
I am interested collaborating/connecting with my Community Pharmacists
Very
Strongly
Agree
10
Strongly
Agree
9
Agree
8
Agree
7
Very
Strongly
Disagree
1
Disagree
3
Strongly
Disagree
2
Neutral
6
Neutral
5
Negative to
Neutral
4
© 2006 HCC, Inc. CD000000-0000XX 91 © 2015 TMIT
Polling Questions
Free Text Entry
New topics of any area I need help with are:
92 © 2016 TMIT
Speakers and Reactors
Alan Jacobson Jennifer Dingman Charles Denham
6/16/2016
24
93 © 2016 TMIT
Voice of the Patient and Family
Jennifer Dingman
Founder, Persons United Limiting Substandards and
Errors in Healthcare (PULSE), Colorado Division
Co-founder, PULSE American Division
TMIT Patient Advocate Team Member
Pueblo, CO
TMIT High Performer Webinar
June 16, 2016