40
1 This is certified that the Project titled Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management Presented by: Mr. Jalil Ahmed Has been accepted towards fulfillments of the requirements for survey research in the department of Economics, LUAWMS University, Uthal. Research Assistant: Research Supervisor: Mr. G. Abbas Prof. Dr. Syed Manzoor Ahmed 4/24/2015

weaknesses of LUAWMS management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

1

This is certified that the

Project titled

Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management

Presented by:

Mr. Jalil Ahmed

Has been accepted towards fulfillments of the requirements for survey research in the department of

Economics, LUAWMS University, Uthal.

Research Assistant: Research Supervisor:

Mr. G. Abbas Prof. Dr. Syed Manzoor Ahmed

4/24/2015

Page 2: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

2

Acknowledgement

"In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful" I have taken efforts in this project. However, it

would not have been possible without the kind support and help of many individuals and

organizations. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to all of them.

I am highly indebted to Sir Abbas Baloch and Dr.Manzoor Ahmed Baloch for their guidance and

constant supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project & also for

their support in completing the project.

I would like to express my gratitude towards my parents & my class fellows for their kind co-

operation and encouragement which help me in completion of this project.I would like to express my

special gratitude and thanks to my teachers for giving me such attention and time.My thanks and

appreciations also go to my colleague in developing the project and people who have willingly

helped me out with their abilities.

Page 3: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

3

……………………………………………….

Dedication ……………………………………………….

I would like to dedicate this research reports to my parents that they always encouraged me and they

work hard on me to achieve my goals as they hoped on me. I am extremely thanks full to them that

they motivated me on educational fields to show my best skills and abilities to complete their dreams

into reality. I have enough words for them, just I pray that May ALLAH always blessed on them.

Page 4: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

4

Contents

Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................................................................. 2

1: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5

2: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6

3: Chapter ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7

Sampling frame: .......................................................................................................................................................... 10

4: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 11

Chi square test: ................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Correlation analysis: .......................................................................................................................................................... 18

5: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Tables.................................................................................................................................................................................. 19

Graphs ................................................................................................................................................................................. 27

6: Chapter ................................................................................................................................................................... 34

6.1: Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................ 34

6.2: Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................... 34

6.3 References ................................................................................................................................................................. 36

Questionnaire ................................................................................................................................................................. 37

Page 5: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

5

1: Chapter

Introduction

Institutional management;

Institutional management is the process of laying out plans and organizing available production

resources to run a successful organization. Institutional management can also be called strategic

financial management. Steps in institutional management generally include identifying the current

situation, identifying the desired situation and determining the steps necessary to get there. The idea

behind institutional management is to lay out a strategic plan that outlines concrete steps to

maximize company success. This process can improve business by allowing an analytical view of

how the business could best operate.

University management:

The university management system is responsible to maintain update and take actions to upgrade all

types of details such as student details, academic related reports, university details, course details,

curriculum, batch detail and other details of resource related .

Page 6: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

6

2: Chapter

2.1 Literature review:

Performance management system (M.com.Final) Human resources management study by

DDI, 1997.

Study by Wm.Schiemann And Associates in 1996.

The study by Eleni T.Stavrow, Christakis Charalambous and Stellios Spillotis.

Sharmistha Bhattacharjee and Santoshi Sengupta, 2011.

The article of Javed Iqbal, Samina Naz, Mahnaz Askam, Saba Arshad 2012.

The paper of Akua Asantewaa Aforo and Kodjo Asafo-Adjei Antwi, 2012.

The paper of Jawaria Andleeb Qureshi, Asad Shahjeham, Zia ur Rehman and Bilal Afsar

2010.

Page 7: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

7

3: Chapter

3.1 Background

Being the student of LUAWMS, it happened many time where I feel the need for change in attitude

of management personals towards the provision of quality education to the students. Honestly

speaking the available recent infrastructure of university is not enough and sufficient to meet the

need of modern education and unfortunately the management personals are not taking into their

account ever growing problems and issues of students such as educational and study related,

accommodation and hostel related, health and health related and so on. What I feel is how much

related to the feelings of others?, it was an ever stand by question in my mind. When I was subjected

to conduct a survey research and took the responsibility as an opportunity to explore this question,

suggest some remedies and stuck these into the sharing wall of knowledge.

LUAWMS is charted on 7th March, 2005 through Baluchistan Ordinance No. 1/2005 and inaugurated

by then-Prime Minister of Pakistan Mr. Shaukat Aziz on 30th March, 2005. It is further confirmed by

the Baluchistan Assembly vide Act No IX dated 16th June, 2010.

Lasbela University Of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences is situated on main R.C.D Highway

at Uthal, District Lasbela Baluchistan. Keeping in view the importance of more than 700 Km coastal

area of the province and highly cultivated land with suitable environment as well as high quality of

range lands, LUAWMS is well placed to provide highly skilled man power.

Vision

LUAWMS is a respectable seat of learning in Pakistan with special status in the fields of Marine,

Veterinary, Water, Agriculture Sciences and Social Sciences providing higher education, research,

training and consultancy services to the public and private sector, while ensuring availability of fully

qualified and skilled human resources to work at various tiers of their hierarchy. The students

passing out from LUAWMS will be equipped with knowledge, skill, confidence, enterprise built

around the latest developments for active participation in socioeconomic growth and uplift of their

respective communities.

Mission

Substantial contribution towards national economic growth and social development by providing

highly qualified and adequately skilled manpower, specially to the province of Baluchistan, in the

fields of emerging arts and sciences along with objective research in the related sectors.

Page 8: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

8

3.2 Methodology:

The data were collected through primary source from the Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water

and Marine Sciences and its basic research not an applied research and the collection of data is taken

from which I have gave in references I have faced difficulty to collecting data of chosen topic which

is Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management.

Page 9: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

9

3.3 Organizational structure:

The G.Blaochistan/Ch

ancellor

Vice-Chancellor

Additional Registrar

D.D. P&D

Deputy Controller Exam

Directer projects & Works

Director P&D

Additional treasurer

Deputy Registr

ar (Acad)

It Manager

Librarian

Assitant Engineer

Dy. Direct

or Procureme

nt

Page 10: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

10

Sampling frame:

3.4 Two stage sampling:

My target was LUAWMS University overall population is 1200 sample size is 84 and its 7.08% of

total population were taken randomly from each department

3.5 Coding lexicon:

Collected responses were coding after coding lexicon the data were filed in SPSS appropriate

statistical test were used after getting results the results were interpret and then it filed in word

document.

3.6 Objective of the study:

This survey outline some emerging fundamental factors that determine whether or not the LUAWMS

be an advantage in any given educational environment within the provincial boundaries.

The survey on ‘The LUAWMS Management System’ has the following objectives

1. To capture the student’s perception about the “LUAWMS Management System”.

2. To assess the impact of “LUAWMS Management System” for some extent.

3. To get some insight into the different effects “LUAWMS Management System”.

3.7 Study Research Question:

Weaknesses of LUAWMS Management

3.8 Hypothesis:

How university management effect university culture and how university management builds up

students?

Page 11: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

11

4: Chapter

4.1 Results and Discussions:

1: Table

Table.1. shows There are seventy six male and eight female students in our sample sizes eighty four

.Female ratios is less than male because of less admission in Lasbela University of agriculture, water

and marine sciences. These results can be seen through graph 1

1.1: table

Table.1.1 shows that In our sample of 84 students, a female and36 male students are F.Scqualified ,

thirty seven male and six female student are Bs/B.sc qualified and there are 3 male and a female

student having other qualification . The graph 1.1 also shows the detail discussed above. Graph.1.1

also presents the visual picture.

1.2: Table

Table.1.2 shows There are 10 male and 2 female students are from department of Agriculture, the

eight male and four female students are from department of DVM., 12 male students are from

department of Marine Sciences, only one female and11 male students are from department of

Economics, the only one female and eleven male students are from department of Education, 12

male student are from department of English and the twelve male student are from the department

of Water resource and management. As shown in the graph.1.2

1.3: Table

Table.1.3 shows There are total 84 respondents, there minimum value is 18 and maximum value is

twenty eight years old minimum and maximum respectively. The respondents are 22 years old on

average and the standard deviation of age is 2 years.

1.4: Table

Table.1.4 shows There are twenty four male and six female students in our sample sizes eighty four,

they response that staff’s behavior is good with students in university there are thirteen male students

response that staff’s behavior is best with students in university, there are twelve respondents

response that staff’s behavior is fair with students in university and there are 27 respondents response

that staff’s behavior is poor with students in university. These results can be seen through graph 1.4.

Page 12: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

12

1.5: Table

Table.1.5 shows that14 students agree with v/c performance and also agree with academic

management in university, the four respondents agree with v/c performance but strongly agree with

academic management in university,19 students agree with v/c performance but disagree with

academic management in university, 8 respondent agree with v/c performance but strongly agree

with academic management in university ,eleven students strongly agree with v/c performance but

agree with academic management in university, 3 respondents strongly agree with v/c performance

and also strongly agree with academic management in university,2 respondents strongly agree with

v/c performance but disagree with academic management in university, the only one student strongly

agrees with v/c performance but strongly disagree with academic management, four respondents

disagree with v/c performance but agree with academic management, 8 students disagree with v/c

performance and also disagree with academic management, 6 students disagree with v/c performance

but strongly disagree with academic management, the only one respondent strongly disagree with v/c

performance but agree with academic management , and 3 students strongly disagree with v/c

performance and also strongly disagree with academic management in university. And also there are

total 45, 17, 18, and 4 students are agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the VC

performance irrespective of Academic management VC performance. And also there are total 30, 7,

29, and 18 students are agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the Academic

management irrespective of VC performance. As shown in the graph 1.5.

1.6: Table

Table.1.6 shows In our sample thirty eight male and four female student are agree, thirteen male and

2 female respondents are strongly agree, 21 male and two female students are disagree ,no one

female but four male respondent are strongly disagree with the teaching method of teachers. The

Graph 1.6 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.

1.7: Table

The Table.8 shows that there are total 84 students there minimum level of satisfaction with teachers

cooperation is 20% that and the maximum is 100%.

On average there respondent’s level of satisfaction with teacher cooperation are 54% with the

standard deviation of 26%.

1.8: Table

The Table.9 shows that there are ten male and two female students, thirty seven male and two female

students, twenty three male and four female, and no female and six male student’s level of

satisfaction with teachers cooperation is 20%, 40%, 60% and 100%respectively. Graph.1.8 also

presents the visual picture.

Page 13: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

13

1.9: Table

Table.1.9 shows the response of respondents regarding university dress. In our sample

approximately 17%, 61%, 15% and 7%of the students said that students should wear the uniform ,

clothes, pent shirt and other dress in university respectively. These results can be seen through graph

1.9.

2: Table

Table.2 shows, the 32% and 68% of the total respondents said yes and no respectively that the

allotment at student hostel is strictly followed by the rules and regulation. Graph 2 also presents the

visual picture.

2.1: Table

Table.1.2 shows, There are seventeen male and a female student and 59 male and 7 female students

respond in yes and no respectively about the question that university administration is providing

entertainment facilities to students. The Graph 2.1 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed

below .

2.2: Table

Table.13 shows There are 26 male and a female, seven male and no female, 22 male and 3 female

and 21 male and 4 female students respond the question about library’s environment for study is

good, best, fair and poor respectively. . These results can be seen through graph 2.2.

2.3: Table

There are sixteen male and a female student and 60 male and 7 female students respond in yes and

no respectively about the question that the university administration takes immediate action on study

related issues of the students. Graph 2.3 also presents the visual picture.

2.4: Table

Table.2.4 shows that 8 students agree with v/c performance and also agree with modern technology

used, the four respondents agree with v/c performance but strongly agree with modern technology

used, 26 students agree with v/c performance but disagree with modern technology used, 7

respondent agree with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used, 3

students strongly agree with v/c performance but agree with modern technology used , 1 respondent

strongly agree with v/c performance and also strongly agree with modern technology used, 9

respondents strongly agree with v/c performance but disagree with modern technology used, the four

students strongly agrees with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used in

Page 14: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

14

the university There are only two respondents disagree with v/c performance but agree with modern

technology used, 1 student disagree with v/c performance and also disagree with modern technology

used, 9 students disagree with v/c performance but strongly disagree with modern technology used, 6

students strongly disagree with VC performance and also strongly disagree with modern technology

used the two respondents strongly disagree with v/c performance but disagree with modern

technology used and 2 students strongly disagree with v/c performance and also strongly disagree

with modern technology used in the university. And also there are total 45, 17, 18, and 4 students are

agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the VC performance irrespective of

modern technology used in the university. And also there are total 13, 6, 46, and 19 students are

agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree with the modern technology used irrespective of

VC performance. The Graph 2.4 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.

2.5: Table

Table.2.5 shows that the 29% and 71% of the total respondents said yes and no respectively that they

have a computer lab in their departments. These results can be seen through graph 2.5.

2.6: Table

Table.2.6 shows that the average number of computers in their departmental computer lab are 8 with

standard deviation of 7 computers. The twenty computers, no computer and 20 computers are the

range, minimum and maximum computers in their departmental computer lab respectively.

2.7: Table

Table.11, the 45% and 55% of the total respondents said yes and no about the question that the

university is offering scholar ship to students respectively. Graph 2.7 also presents the visual picture.

2.8: Table

In our sample there are twenty six male and two female and 50 male and 6 female students out of

eighty four said yes and no that university is providing road map to students about their course

respectively. These results can be seen through graph 2.8.

2.9: Table

Table.2.9 shows that the approximately 15% and 85% of the total respondents said yes and no about

the question that there is health care facility in the university respectively. The Graph 2.9 presents the

visual of picture of detail discussed below.

3: Table

Table.3 shows that, In our sample there are seven male and a female and 69 male and 7 female

students out of eighty four said yes and no that there is checking system at the hostel mess. These

results can be seen through graph 3.

Page 15: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

15

3.1: Table

Table.3.1 shows that There are total 84 students, there minimum value is 3 it mean there are three

teachers in their department and maximum value is 60 it mean there are 60 teachers in their

department. Minimum and maximum respectively the department teachers are 13 on average and the

standard deviation of teachers is 8.

3.2: Table

Table.3.2 shows that There are total 84 respondents in my sample, there minimum value is 1 it mean

there is one class room and maximum value is 65 it mean there are 65 class rooms. Minimum and

maximum respectively the class rooms are 5 on average and the standard deviation of class rooms

are 8

3.3: Table

Table.3.3 shows that There are total 84 respondents, there minimum value is 1 it mean there is one

canteen in university and maximum value is 4 its mean there are four canteens in university.

Minimum and maximum respectively is 1 canteen on average and the standard deviation canteen is

.494.

3.4: Table

Table.3.4 shows that There are twenty five male and four female students in our sample sizes eighty

four they have a positive response that university is giving study trip the students there are fifty one

male and four female respondents they have a negative response that university is not giving study

trip the students. The Graph 3.4 presents the visual of picture of detail discussed below.

3.5: Table

Table.3.5 shows that There are total students are 84 in my sample, there minimum value is 0 it mean

there is no sports playing in university and maximum value is 8 it mean there are eight types of

sports are playing in university. Minimum and maximum respectively the types of sports are 2 on

average and the standard deviation of sports are 2.

3.6: Table

Table.3.6 shows that There are total 84 respondents in my sample, there minimum value is 0 it mean

there is no hostel in university and maximum value is 5 it mean there are five hostels in university.

Page 16: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

16

Minimum and maximum respectively the hostels are 3 on average and the standard deviation of

hostel is 1.

Chi square test:

3.7: Table

The university take action on study related issues of students asked in question no. 14 with the

options for students to choose any one of two (Yes/No) and the satisfaction of students regarding the

academic management in the university in question no.5 with intensity of response of students

including different options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree). The Chi-square

test is applied on these two categorical questions formulated hypothesis and the complete test is

given below.

Null Hypothesis:

Ho: The student’s satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is not

associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.

Alternate hypothesis:

H1: The student’s satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is

associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.

Level of significance:

= 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

2 - Test is used.

2 =

2( )i i

i

o e

e

, where, 2 ~

2

( 1)( 1), (1),r c

Where io is thi observed frequency, ie is

thi expected frequency, r is number of rows and c be the

number of columns in table.

Critical region: If p-value (=0.05) then we reject oH , otherwise we do not reject

Page 17: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

17

Computations.

2 =16.270 r =4, c = 4, df =3 and P-value=0.001Conclusion; Asp-value<0.05, so we do not

oH and conclude that the student’s satisfaction level regarding the university academic

management is associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related

issues.

Conclusion: the P-value is less than the critical value at 1% and 5%

So we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. The students level of satisfaction regarding

management is highly associated with the university management action that are taken to promote

quality education.

3.8: Table

The modern technology that is used in the university to facilitate the student in their study, a question

was asked with the options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and strongly disagree). and the

satisfaction of students regarding the academic management in the university in question no.5 with

intensity of response of students including different options (agree, strongly agree, disagree and

strongly disagree).

The Chi-square test is applied on these two categorical questions formulated hypothesis and the

complete test is given below.

Null Hypothesis:

H0; the categories are independent.

Alternate hypothesis:

H1; the categories are dependent.

Level of significance:

= 0.05 is used.

Test Statistics:

2 - Test is used.

Page 18: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

18

2 =

2( )i i

i

o e

e

, where, 2 ~

2

( 1)( 1), (1),r c

Where io is thi observed frequency, ie is

thi expected frequency, r is number of rows and c be the

number of columns in table.

Critical region: If p-value (=0.05) then we reject oH , otherwise we do not reject

Computations.

2 =20.359 r =4, c = 4, df =9 and P-value=.016 Conclusion; Asp-value<0.05, so we do not oH

and conclude that the student’s satisfaction level regarding the university academic management is

associated with immediate actions taken by academic management on study related issues.

Conclusion: The P-value is less than 5% significance level ( α level).

So we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we conclude that level of satisfaction

of student to university management is associated with the modern technology used in the university

to facilitate students.

Correlation analysis:

3.9: Table

When you are providing sports facility that means you are distributing the health among people. The

health facilities and sports facility provided by the university asked in two different questions and the

correlation coefficient between these two variables observed significant both at 1% and 5% level of

significance.

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Page 19: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

19

5: Chapter

Tables

1: Table

gender

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Male 76 90.5 90.5 90.5

female 8 9.5 9.5 100.0

Total 84 100.0 100.0

1.1: Table

Qualification

Total F.Sc B.Sc/Bs Other

Gender male 36 37 3 76

female 1 6 1 8

Total 37 43 4 84

1.2: Table

Department

Total Agri D.v.m Marine Eco E.d.u Eng W.r.m

Gender male 10 8 12 11 11 12 12 76

female 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 8

Total 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 84

Page 20: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

20

1.3: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Age 84 10 18 28 22 2

Valid N (list wise) 84

1.4: Table

Staff and student

Total Good Best Fair Poor

Gender male 24 13 12 27 76

female 6 0 2 0 8

Total 30 13 14 27 84

1.5: Table

Academic management

Total

Agree

Strongly

agree Disagree

Strongly

disagree

V/c

perform

Agree 14 4 19 8 45

Strongly agree 11 3 2 1 17

Disagree 4 0 8 6 18

Strongly

disagree

1 0 0 3 4

Total 30 7 29 18 84

1.6: Table

Teaching method

Total

Agree Strongly agree Disagree

Strongly

disagree

Gender male 38 13 21 4 76

female 4 2 2 0 8

Total 42 15 23 4 84

Page 21: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

21

1.7: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

% 84 80 20 100 54 26

Valid (list wise) 84

1.8: Table

Percent %

Total 20 40 80 100

Gender male 10 37 23 6 76

female 2 2 4 0 8

Total 12 39 27 6 84

1.9: Table

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Uniform 14 17 17 17

Clothes 51 61 61 77

Pent shirt 13 15.5 15.5 93

Other 6 7 7 100

Total 84 100 100

2: Table

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Yes 27 32.1 32.1 32.1

No 57 68 68 100.0

Total 84 100.0 100.0

Page 22: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

22

2.1: Table

Entertain

Total Yes No

Gender male 17 59 76

female 1 7 8

Total 18 66 84

2.2: Table

Library environment

Total Good Best Fair Poor

Gender male 26 7 22 21 76

female 1 0 3 4 8

Total 27 7 25 25 84

2.3: Table

Issues

Total Yes No

Gender male 16 60 76

female 1 7 8

Total 17 67 84

Page 23: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

23

2.4: Table

Facilitating technology

Total

Agree Strongly agree Disagree

Strongly

disagree

V/c

perform

Agree 8 4 26 7 45

Strongly agree 3 1 9 4 17

Disagree 2 1 9 6 18

Strongly disagree 0 0 2 2 4

Total 13 6 46 19 84

2.5: Table

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Yes 24 28.6 28.6 28.6

No 60 71.4 71.4 100.0

Total 84 100.0 100.0

2.6: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Computer

available

84 20 0 20 8 7

Valid N (list wise) 84

2.7: Table

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Yes 38 45.2 45.2 45.2

No 46 54.8 54.8 100.0

Total 84 100.0 100.0

Page 24: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

24

2.8: Table

Roadmap

Total Yes No

Gender male 26 50 76

female 2 6 8

Total 28 56 84

2.9: Table

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid Yes 13 15 15 15

No 71 85 85 100

Total 84 100.0 100

3: Table

Mess checking

Total Yes No

Gender male 7 69 76

female 1 7 8

Total 8 76 84

3.1: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Department

teacher

84 57 3 60 13 8

Valid N (list wise) 84

Page 25: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

25

3.2: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

class room 84 64 1 65 5 8

Valid N (list wise) 84

3.3: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Canteen 84 3 1 4 1 .494

Valid N (list wise) 84

3.4: Table

Study trip

Total Yes No

Gender male 25 51 76

female 4 4 8

Total 29 55 84

3.5: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Sports 84 8 0 8 2 2

Valid N (list wise) 84

3.6: Table

N Range Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Hostels 84 5 0 5 3 1

Valid N (list wise) 84

Page 26: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

26

3.7: Table

Chi-Square Tests

Value Df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 16.270a 3 .001

Likelihood Ratio 16.985 3 .001

Linear-by-Linear

Association

4.338 1 .037

N of Valid Cases 84

3.8: Table

Chi-Square Tests

Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 20.359a 9 .016

Likelihood Ratio 22.737 9 .007

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.227 1 .004

N of Valid Cases 84

3.9: Table

Correlations

Health.fec Sports

Health.fec Pearson Correlation 1 .426**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 84 84

Sports Pearson Correlation .426** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000

N 84 84

Page 27: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

27

Graphs

1: Fig

1.1: Fig

1.2: Fig

76

8

male female

Frequency

Frequency

F.Sc B.Sc/Bs Other

Qualification

36 37

316

1

Gender male

Gender female

108

1211 11

12 12

24

01 1

0 0

Agri D.v.m Marine Eco E.d.u Eng W.r.m

Department

Gender male

Gender female

Page 28: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

28

1.4: Fig

1.5: Fig

1.6: Fig

Good Best Fair Poor

Staff and student

24

13 12

27

6

02

0

Gender male

Gender female

14

4

19

8

11

32

1

4

0

86

10 0

3

Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree

A.M

V/c perform Agree

V/c perform Strongly agree

V/c perform Disagree

V/c perform Strongly disagree

38

13

21

442 2

0

Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree

Teaching method

Gender male

Gender female

Page 29: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

29

1.8: Fig

1.9: Fig

2: Fig

20 40 80 100

%

10

37

23

62 2

40

Gender male

Gender female

14

51

13 6

84

Uniform Clothes Pent shirt Other Total

Frequency

Frequency

27

57

Yes No

Valid

Frequency

Frequency

Page 30: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

30

2.1: Fig

2.2: Fig

2.3: Fig

17

59

17

Yes No

Entertain

Gender male

Gender female

Good Best Fair Poor

Library environment

26

7

22 21

1 03 4

Gender male

Gender female

16

60

17

Yes No

Issues

Gender male

Gender female

Page 31: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

31

2.4: Fig

2.5: Fig

2.7: Fig

84

26

73

1

9

42 1

96

0 02 2

Agree Strongly agree Disagree Strongly disagree

Facilitating technology

V/c perform Agree

V/c perform Strongly agree

V/c perform Disagree

V/c perform Strongly disagree

24

60

Yes No

Valid

Frequency

Frequency

3846

Yes No

Valid

Frequency

Frequency

Page 32: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

32

2.8 Fig

2.9: Fig

3: Fig

13

71

Yes No

Valid

Frequency

Frequency

7

69

17

Yes No

Mess checking

Gender male

Gender female

Yes No

Roadmap

26

50

26

Gender male

Gender female

Page 33: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

33

3.4: Fig

25

51

4 4

Yes No

Study trip

Gender male

Gender female

Page 34: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

34

6: Chapter

6.1: Conclusion

The survey research pointed out that the students are not satisfied with the academic management

and behavior of our staff members with students management of LUAWMS. They did not cooperate

with students on their problem matters, the students are discouraged from management and polices

of the university. The mostly students preferred to wear uniforms in the university but unfortunately

university management is very weak in this regard. Students are not feeling satisfaction in the

existing hostel atmospheres due to bad management. And there is no any environment for sports and

other activities. Students are getting problems in computer’s lab due to lack of attention to provide

good facilities for students because students could not use internet in the computers labs that’s way

they were feeling uneasy from the staff management. Most important things are that mess system is

very bad and food provisions are not clean and safe for health that’s why students getting sick’s in

different diseases also. The students whenever got emergency, the ambulance mostly not provided by

the transport section of the university. In the university there is no hospital and even well functioning

dispensary. There is no any scholarship program of university in its own for the students. No road

map is provided by the teachers that are way students were getting problems in their studies. The last

but not least problem, the staff is not up to the required strength in the LUAWMS, Uthal University.

6.2: Recommendations

Administrator, coordinators and even classroom teachers should be asked to help determining

whether the university should invest in to improve the quality of education.

The VC and the responsible for academic should make new rules and regulations for

development of the university and hence implement them into university.

Academic members should make good behaviors with students to create a friendly

environment for education in the university.

Staff members should cooperate with students problem matters.

University management should conduct a survey in the all departments to remove the mistake

and misunderstanding problems among students and staff members to create a good

environment in the university.

LUAWMS management should provide the standard accommodation to the students and

mess system specially that is critically low standard, due to this students get sick’s in various

diseases.

LUAWMS should hired new lectures in the different departments because the existing staff is

less of required strength.

Page 35: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

35

LUAWMS managements should maintain and upgrade the computers labs, as the students

will be facilitated from the modern learning of knowledge.

LUAWMS management should alert their securities in the hostel as the students did not feel

satisfactions in the hostel as well as it should be here.

Staff members should create a study environments in the university than all students could be

participate their precious times in the library.

VC should make a new helpline numbers or any type of box. Where all students could be feel

easy to convey their problem messages directly to him.

VC should hired a new inspection team to monitory on the classes and other issues which are

existing among staff members and students.

Page 36: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

36

6.3 References

www.luawms.edu.pk

www.businessdictionary.com/defination

Gillani, B.B.(2003). Learning theories and the design of e-learning environments. Lanham,

MD: University Press of America.

Collis, B., & Moonen, J.(2001). Flexible learning in a digital world. London: Kogan Page.

Slaughter CA. Bright but demanding future for core facilities. J Biomol Tech 2005;16:167-

169

Haley RA. Framework for managing core facilities within the research enterprise. J Biomol

Tech 2009;20:226-230

Hobbs, D. (2005, October). Training and Development in Australia, 14-16. Understanding

learning management system.

Page 37: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

37

Weakness of LUAWMS

Management A survey in LUAWMS

university Uthal

By Jalil Ahmed

Questionnaire

Your Ideas are very important for my research please cooperate.

1) What is your gender?

a) Male b) Female

2) Qualification?

a) F.sc b) B.sc/B.s

b) M.phil d) Other

3) What is your Department?

a) Agriculture b) D.v.m

c) Marine d) Economics

e) Education f) English

g) W.R.M

4) what is your age?

………………

5 ) You Satisfy Academic Management in Luawms?

a) Agree b) Disagree

b) Strongly agree d) Strongly disagree

6.) How is the cooperation b/w Staff and Students?

a) Good b) Fair

c) Best d) Poor

7) you satisfy with V/C performance in Luawms.

a) Agree b) dis agree

c) Strongly agree d) Strongly Disagree

Page 38: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

38

8) Do you satisfy with lecturers teaching method?

a) Strongly Agree b) Agree

c) Strongly disagree d) Disagree

9) How much teachers cooperate with students?

a) 20% b) 40%

c) 80% d) 100%

10) Students should wear………….. in University.

a) Uniform b) Clothes

c) Pent shirt d) Other

11) Are you satisfy with rules and regulation regarding hostel allotment being implemented?

a) Yes

b) No

12) University administration is also facilitating entertaining environment.

a) Yes

b) No

13) How Luawms library environment like?

a) Good b) Fair

c) Satisfactory d) Excellent

14) Does university academic takes action immediately on issues related students?

a) Yes

b) No

15) university facilitate students with modern technology.

a) Strongly Agree b) Agree

c) Strongly disagree d) Disagree

16) Is there computer lab in your department?

a) Yes

b) No

Page 39: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

39

17) How many computers available in your department computer lab?

a) 5 b) 10

c) 15 d) 20

18) Does university offering scholarship to students?

a) Yes

b) No

19) Does university provide road map to students about their course?

a) Yes

b) No

20) Is there health facility in LUAWMS?

a) Yes

b) No

21) Is there any checking system in hostel mess?

a) Yes

b) No

22) How many teachers do you have in department?

……………………………………..

23) How many class rooms do you have in department?

………………………………………

24) How many canteens are in the university?

a) 1 b) 2

c) 3 d) 4

25) Does the university give study trip to the students?

a) Yes

b) No

26) How many types of sports are playing in LUAWMS University?

…………………………………….

Page 40: weaknesses of LUAWMS management

40

27) How many hostels does University has?

…………………………………….

28) What are your feelings about LUAWMS University? (Optional )

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………

Thank you very much for sharing your ideas.