19
Valorisation of Municipal Organic Solid Waste Jakarta , 13 November 2014 Bart Verstappen Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Sandec: Water & Sanitation in Developing Countries

Valorisation of Municipal OrganicSolid Waste

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Valorisationof

Municipal Organic Solid Waste

Jakarta , 13 November 2014 Bart Verstappen

Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology

Sandec: Water & Sanitation in Developing Countries

www.sandec.ch

Subscribe to our printed newsletterfor free

Download publications Order hardcopies

Keep in touch

R&D Program “FORWARD”

From ORganic WAste to Recycling for Development

GoalR & D SCENARIOS that CREATE VALUEfrom ORGANIC REFUSE

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

JakartaSidoarjo

Of all generated MSW:

- 70-80% Organic

- 10 % to TPA

- 30 % (est.) recycling

- 50- 60 % burned

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

1. Costs avoided for society

- Pollution: land – water – air

- Infrastructure problems (e.g. flooding)

- Toxic & GHG emissions

- Handling costs without yield

- Transport cost without yield

- Landfill cost

- Disease vectors (insects, rats)

- Happiness reduction

- Quality of life

What VALUE organic from waste conversion?

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

- Avoided Costs

- Nutrients in OW

- Energy in OW

- Value in soil (erosion, water retention)

- Society benefits (salaries, investments)

TOTAL value creation from OW conversion

= REVENUE (products) - CAPEX - OPEX (conversion)

+BENEFITS & AVOIDED COSTS for SOCIETY (Government Role)

2. Financial revenue derived from:

What VALUE?

Market Approach

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

Business Scenario+

Pilot Facility

Current Waste Management System

Restrictions & Opportunities

MarketDemand

forConversion Products

TypeQuantity

Distributionof

Organic Refuse

Technologies

Windrow composting

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

INSECT

PROTEIN

EARTHWORM

PROTEIN

BIOCHAR

RDF

COMPOST BIOGAS

Windrow composting

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

BIOGAS – Competition

Windrow composting

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

BIOGAS – Challenges

- Best on-site direct usage of gas

- Case-specific design

- Feedstock uniformity (MSW)

- Feedstock logistics & costs

- Low tradability (compression)

- Feed in grid: competition cheaper fuels & administration

- Investment cost, pay-back time, maintenance issues

- Quality issues

- Operational guidance & support

Enabling environment

Understanding the enabling environment

Organic waste conversion business

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

ca.

18

mm

3 d

~14 d~10 d

~5 d

Lifecycle35% - 45% DM

~ 40% Protein ~ 30 % Lipids

Hermetia illucens = Black Soldier Fly = Friendly Fly

Valorising Municipal Organic WasteHermetia illucens = Black Soldier Fly = Friendly Fly

Larvae efficiency

Market Approach

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

Business Scenario+

Pilot Facility

Current Waste Management System

Restrictions & Opportunities

MarketDemand

forConversion Products

TypeQuantity

Distributionof

Organic Refuse

Designing a business model for ORGANIC WASTE conversion

Elements of the Business Canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2010).

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

Selected location for integrated pilot facility: a new modern market

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

1. Food court and street vendor area

2. Flats: 4 towers3. Mosque4. Food Processing Area

(On Going Process)5. Pet shop Area6. Playground Area7. Wholesale Building 8. Meeting Building9. Vegetables and Fruits

Building10.Nursery11.Parking Area12.Rice and Crops

Building13.Offices14.Warehouses15.Composting Area

16.Pre-processing Area17.Cold Storages18.Abattoir19.Fish Quarantine20.Warehouses (10X25)21.Warehouses (20X30)22.Offices23.Dry Port Commodities

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

Different approaches to growth or expansion

Requirements & Challenges

Valorising Municipal Organic Waste

- “Pure” & “clean” organic refuse - keep biowaste separated

- Functioning processing facilities and effective technologies

- Efficient and effective material handling

- Cost-effective logistics

- Market development and marketing

- Stakeholder support, public awareness

- Investors and operating partners

- Government stimuli, incentives and cooperation

- Level playing field with competing products (fuel, fertilizer)

- Law implementation (prohibition of burning waste)