UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) How to assess and ...Een-Minuut-Test, vorm A en B: Verantwoording en handleiding [One-minute-test, version A and B: Justification and manual]

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

How to assess and improve children's reading comprehension?

Muijselaar, M.M.L.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Muijselaar, M. M. L. (2016). How to assess and improve children's reading comprehension?.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 30 May 2020

https://dare.uva.nl/personal/pure/en/publications/how-to-assess-and-improve-childrens-reading-comprehension(14bfcfce-1704-4e5d-9e16-9b54433e2f23).html

503071-L-bw-Muijselaar503071-L-bw-Muijselaar503071-L-bw-Muijselaar503071-L-bw-Muijselaar

155

REFERENCES

Aarnoutse, C., & Kapinga, T. (2006). Begrijpend lezen [Reading comprehension].

Ridderkerk, The Netherlands: Onderwijs Advisering.

Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading

include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19, 933-958.

doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z

Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension

on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 263-283.

doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01413.x

Anthony, J. L., Williams, J. M., Durán, L. K., Laing Gillam, S., Liang, L., Aghara, R., …

Landry, S. H. (2011). Spanish phonological awareness: Dimensionality and

sequence of development during the preschool and kindergarten years. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 103, 857-876. doi:10.1037/a0025024

Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of

Experimental Psychology, 49, 5-28. doi:10.1080/713755608

Basaraba, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of

reading comprehension: Do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly

exist? Reading and Writing, 26, 349-379. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9372-9

Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies

contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading

Psychology, 29, 137-164. doi:10.1080/02702710801963951

Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation:

What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational

Psychology, 75, 189-201. doi:10.1348/000709904X22674


REFERENCES

156

Brand-Gruwel, S., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van den Bos, K. P. (1998). Improving text

comprehension strategies in reading and listening settings. Learning and

Instruction, 8, 63-81. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00002-9

Brown, R. L. (1989). Using covariance modeling for estimating reliability on scales with

ordered polytomous variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49,

385-398. doi:10.1177/0013164489492011

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A.

Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162).

Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Brus, B. Th., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1979). Een-Minuut-Test, vorm A en B: Verantwoording

en handleiding [One-minute-test, version A and B: Justification and manual]. Lisse,

The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. (2011). Generalized full-information item bifactor

analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 221-248. doi:10.1037/a0023350

Cain, K. (1999). Ways of reading: How knowledge and use of strategies are related to

reading comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 293-309.

doi:10.1348/026151099165285

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension

failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11, 489-503.

doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2014). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more

important for some aspects of comprehension? L'Année Psychologique, 114, 647-

662. doi:10.4074/S0003503314004035

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability:

Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component

skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42. doi:10.1037/0022-

0663.96.1.31


REFERENCES

157

Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M., & Madden, A. (2010). The impact

of a strategy-based intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling

adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 257-280.

doi:10.1037/a0018212

Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & de Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in

explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension

difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 246-251.

doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002

Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., de Beni, R., & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working

memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental

Child Psychology, 91, 45-66. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005

Carroll, J. B. (2003). The higher-stratum structure of cognitive abilities: Current evidence

supports g and about ten broad factors. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of

general intelligence, (pp. 5-22). Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon.

Catts, H., Adolf, S. M., Hogan, T. P., & Weismer, S. (2005). Are specific language

impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language and

Hearing Research, 48, 1378-1396. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/096)

CED-groep (2012). Algemene handleiding Nieuwsbegrip [Manual Nieuwsbegrip].

Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CED-groep.

Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX.: Harcourt

Brace.

Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order

models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189-225.

doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5

Chiu, M. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of

students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331-362.

doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1


REFERENCES

158

Cito (1992). CLIB-toetsen begrijpend lezen [CLIB-tests reading comprehension]. Arnhem,

The Netherlands: Cito.

Cito (2008). LOVS begrijpend lezen groep 6 [LOVS reading comprehension Grade 4].

Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Cito (2012). Eindtoets Basisonderwijs [Final test primary education]. Arnhem, The

Netherlands: Cito.

Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken

reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading

disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 55-73.

doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.836200

Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies:

What are we measuring? Metacognition Learning, 1, 229-247.

doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5

Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential

mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99,

311. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311

Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading

comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential

mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,

102, 687-700. doi: 10.1037/a0019452

Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's

metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,

131. doi:10.1037/a0019452

Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative

contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills

can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10,

277-299. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5


REFERENCES

159

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A

meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433.

doi:10.3758/BF03214546

Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9,

185-197. doi:10.1007/BF02288722

de Jong, P. F. (1999). Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modeling.

Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 198-211. doi:10.1080/10705519909540128

de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic

comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51-

77. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0601_03

de Koning, B. B., & van der Schoot, M. (2013). Becoming part of the story! Refueling the

interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educational

Psychology Review, 25, 261-287. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9222-6

Deno, S. L (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional

Children, 16, 99-104. doi: 10.1177/001440298505200303

Diakidoy, I. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship

between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing

grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26, 55-80. doi:10.1080/02702710590910584

Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle

Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Dunn, L. M., & Markwardt, F. C. (1970). Examiner’s manual: Peabody individual

achievement test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-

text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills

needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 515-

528. doi:10.1037/a0027182


REFERENCES

160

Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., &

Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on

reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of

Educational Research, 79, 262-300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998

Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2008).

Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: Different models for

different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230-253.

doi:10.1037/a0013219

Elosúa, M. R., & Ruiz, M. (2008). Absence of hardly pursued updating in a running

memory span task. Psychological Research, 72, 451-460. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-

0124-4

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological

Review, 102(2), 211-245.

Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of general outcome measures for predicting

secondary students’ performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62,

497-514. doi:10.1177/001440299606200602

Espin, C., Wallace, T., Lembke, E., Campbell, H., & Long, J. D. (2010). Creating a

progress-monitoring system in reading for middle-school students: Tracking

progress toward meeting high-stakes standards. Learning Disabilities Research and

Practice, 25, 60-75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00304.x

Evers, G. (2008) Programma voor berekening Cito LeesIndex voor het Basisonderwijs. P-

CLIB versie 3.0 [Program for calculating the Cito Reading Index in Primary

Education. P-CLIB version 3.0]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.

Feenstra, H., Kamphuis, F., Kleintjes, F., & Krom, R. (2010). Begrijpend lezen voor groep

3 tot en met 6. Wetenschappelijke verantwoording [Reading comprehension for

Grade 1 to 4. Scientific report]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.


REFERENCES

161

Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of

alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553-576.

doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6

Fogarty, M., Oslund, E., Simmons, D., Davis, J., Simmons, L., Anderson, L., ... & Roberts,

G. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of a multicomponent reading

comprehension intervention in middle schools: a focus on treatment

fidelity. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 425-449. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-

9270-6

Foorman, B. R., Koon, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015).

Examining general and specific factors in the dimensionality of oral language and

reading in 4th-10th grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 884-899.

doi:10.1037/edu0000026

Francis, D. J., Snow, C. E., August, D., Carlson, C. D., Miller, J., & Auglesias, A. (2006).

Measures of reading comprehension: A latent variable analysis of the diagnostic

assessment of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 301-322.

doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_6

García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to

identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the

relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84, 74-111.

doi:10.3102/0034654313499616

Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, C. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty?

Development and preliminary validation of a cloze test of reading comprehension.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 16-28. doi:10.1177/

0734282912451971

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Foertsch, J. A. (1999). Three models of discourse comprehension.

In S. Garrod, & M. J. Pickering (Eds.), Human language processing, (pp. 283-300).

East Sussex, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.


REFERENCES

162

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading

comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of

research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.

doi:10.3102/00346543071002279

Gibbons, R. D., Darrell Bock, R., Hedeker, D. R., Weiss, D. J., Segawa, E., Bhaumik, D.

K., . . . Stover, A. (2007). Full-information item bifactor analysis of graded response

data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 4-19.

doi:10.1177/0146621606289485

Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis.

Psychometrika, 57, 423-436. doi:10.1007/BF02295430

Goldman, S. R. (2012). Literacy: Learning and understanding content. The Future of

Children, 22(2), 89-116.

Goldman, S. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2015). Research on learning and instruction:

Implications for curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Education, 2, 33-41.

doi:10.1177/2372732215601866

Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S.

McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and

technologies, (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Graesser, A. C. (2015). Deeper learning with advances in discourse science and

technology. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 42-50.

doi:10.1177/2372732215600888

Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during

narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371.

Gruwel, S., & Aarnoutse, C. A. J. (1995). Vragenlijst: Begrijpend lezen en Tets: Zoek de

fouten [Questionnaire: Reading comprehension and error detection task]. Nijmegen,

The Netherlands: Berkhout.

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1984). A unifying model for the structure of intellectual abilities.

Intelligence, 8, 179-203. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(84)90008-4


REFERENCES

163

Gustafsson, J.-E. (2002). Measurement from a hierarchical point of view. In H. I. Braun, D.

N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and

educational measurement (pp. 73-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Åberg-Bengtsson, L. (2010). Unidimensionality and interpretability of

psychological instruments. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological

constructs: Advances in model-based approaches (pp. 97-121). Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., . . .

Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through

concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403-

423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403

Hagaman, J. L., Casey, K. J., & Reid, R. (2012). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on

the reading comprehension of young students. Remedial and Special Education, 33,

110-123. doi:10.1177/0741932510364548

Hagaman, J. L., & Reid, R. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading

comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial

and Special Education, 29, 222-234. doi:10.1177/0741932507311638

Hayduck, L. A. (1996). LISREL issues, debates, and strategies. Baltimore, MD: Johns

Hopkins University Press.

Hintze, J. M., & Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic

accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM an high-stakes testing. School

Psychology Review, 34(3), 372-386.

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing,

2, 127-160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799

Hoover, H. D., Heironymus, A. N., Frisbie, D. A., & Dunbar, S. B. (1996). Iowa Test of

Basic Skills. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.


REFERENCES

164

Hosp, M. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Using CBM as an indicator of decoding, word reading,

and comprehension: Do the relations change with grade? School Psychology

Review, 34(1), 9-26.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure

analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation

Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118

Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary

in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral

comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281-300.

doi:10.1080/10888430802132279

Keenan, J. M., & Meenan, C. E. (2014). Test differences in diagnosing reading

comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 125-135.

doi:10.1177/0022219412439326

Kendeou, P., & Papadopoulos, T. (2012). The use of CBM-Maze in Greek: A closer look at

what it measures. In C. Espin, K. McMaster, & S. Rose (Eds.), A measure of

success: The influence of curriculum-based measurement on education, (pp.

329-339). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading

comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22, 354-367.

doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.001

Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of

reading comprehension: Implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities

Research and Practice, 29, 10-16. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12025

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-

integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182


REFERENCES

165

Kintsch, W. (2012). Psychological models of reading comprehension and their implications

for assessment. In J. P. Sabatini, E. R. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up:

Advances in how we assess reading ability, (pp. 21-38). Plymouth, United Kingdom:

Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and

production. Psychological Review, 85(1), 363-394.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New

York, NY: Guilford Press.

Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension

strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second

language. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 275-293.

Kordes, J., Bolsinova, M, Limpens, G., & Stolwijk, R. (2013). Resultaten PISA-2012.

Praktische kennis en vaardigheden van 15-jarigen. Nederlandse uitkomsten van het

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) op het gebied van

wiskunde, natuurwetenschappen en leesvaardigheid in het jaar 2012 [Results PISA-

2012. Practical knowledge and skills of 15-year-olds. Dutch results of the

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) on Mathematics, Natural

Sciences and Reading in 2012]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: CITO.

Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading

strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different

educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 187-204. doi:10.1111/1467-

9817.00141

Language and Reading Research Consortium (2015a). Learning to read: Should we keep

things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 151-169. doi: 10.1002/rrq.99

Language and Reading Research Consortium (2015b). The dimensionality of language

ability in young children. Child Development, 86, 1948-1965.

doi:10.1111/cdev.12450


REFERENCES

166

Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire

most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern

Language Review, 59, 567-587. doi:10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567

LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability

and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815-852,

doi:10.1177/1094428106296642

Lembke, E., Conoyer, S., Hosp, J., Espin, C. A., Hosp, M., & Poch, A. (in press). Getting

more form your maze: Examining differences in distractors. Reading and Writing

Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties.

Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The

Guildford Press.

MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-

MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.

McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of

comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297-384.

doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2

Malecki, C. K., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). Children’s social behaviors as predictors of

academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly,

17(1), 1-23.

Marcotte, A. M., & Hintze, J. M. (2009). Incremental and predictive utility of formative

assessment methods of reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 27,

315-335. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.003

Mason, L. H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal

questioning: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling

readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283. doi:10.1037/0022-

0663.96.2.283

Maul, A. (2013). Method effects and the meaning of measurement. Frontiers in

Psychology, 4, 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00169


REFERENCES

167

McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Technical Manual. Woodcock-Johnson III.

Itasca, IL: Riverside.

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22,

276-282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031

McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading

comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content

approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218-253. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1

McMaster, K. L., Espin, C. A., & van den Broek, P. (2014). Making connections: Linking

cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of

struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 17-24.

doi:10.1111/ldrp.12026

McMaster, K. L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P.,

…Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading

intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences,

22, 100-111. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017

Mehta, P. D., Foorman, B. R., Branum-Martin, L., & Patrick Taylor, W. (2005). Literacy as

a unidimensional multilevel construct: Validation, sources of influence, and

implications in a longitudinal study in grades 1-4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9,

85-116. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_1

Miller, A. C., Davis, N., Gilbert, J. K., Cho, S., Toste, J. R., Street, J., & Cutting, L. E.

(2014). Novel approaches to examine passage, student, and question effects on

reading comprehension. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 25-35.

doi:10.1111/ldrp.12027

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The

unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex

"frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.

doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734


REFERENCES

168

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of

reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249-259.

doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249

Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the

central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 111-121. doi:10.1111/j.2044-

8295.1990.tb02349.x

Muijselaar, M. M. L., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). The effects of updating ability and

knowledge of reading strategies on reading comprehension. Learning and Individual

Differences, 43, 111-117. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.011

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001

international report: lEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools

in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. Seventh edition. Los Angeles,

CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during

reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131-157. doi:10.1080/01638539809545042

Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and

utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational

Psychology, 67, 359-370. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x

Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading.

Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136-145.

National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

(US) (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An

evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its

implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of

Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.


REFERENCES

169

Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers:

Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91-

121. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.529219

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002). Manual for the PISA

2000 database. Paris, France: OECD Publications.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering

and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., de Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and

updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29, 344-354.

doi:10.3758/BF03194929

Palladino, P., & Jarrold, C. (2008). Do updating tasks involve updating? Evidence from

comparisons with immediate serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 61, 392-399. doi:10.1080/17470210701664989

Papadopoulos, T. C., Kendeou, P., & Shiakalli, M. (2014). Reading comprehension tests

and poor readers: How test processing demands result in different profiles. L’Année

Psychologique, 114, 726-752. doi:10.4074/S0003503314004060

Papadopoulos, T. C., Kendeou, P., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Investigating the factor

structure and measurement invariance of phonological abilities in a sufficiently

transparent language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 321-336.

doi:10.1037/a0026446

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension.

Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22-37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Pierce, R. L., McMaster, K. L., & Deno, S. L. (2010). The effects of using different

procedures to score maze measures. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,

25, 151-160. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00313.x

Quinn, J. M., Wagner, R. K., Petscher, Y., & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations

between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A latent change score

modeling study. Child Development, 86, 159-175. doi:10.1111/cdev.12292


REFERENCES

170

Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative

view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 276-279.

doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00380.x

Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007).

Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for

research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312.

doi:10.1080/10888430701530417

Raven, J. C. (1960). Guide to the standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D and E.

Londen, United Kingdom: HK Lewis.

Rodríguez, C., van den Boer, M., Jiménez, J. E., & de Jong, P. F. (2015). Developmental

changes in the relations between RAN, phonological awareness, and reading in

Spanish children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19, 273-288.

doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1025271

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research.

Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.

Sabatini, J. P., O’Reilly, T., Halderman, L. K., & Bruce, K. (2014). Integrating scenario-

based and component reading skill measures to understand the reading behavior of

struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 29, 36-43.

doi:10.1111/ldrp.12028

Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in

comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 107-

117. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00441.x

Schaerlaekens, A., Kohnstamm, D., & Lejaegere, M. (1999). Streeflijst woordenschat voor

zesjarigen [Vocabulary target list for six-year-olds]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets

and Zeitlinger.

Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader's think-aloud

protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and

Instruction, 16, 549-568. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.004


REFERENCES

171

Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody picture vocabulary test-III-NL. Amsterdam, The

Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publisher.

Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions.

Psychometrika, 22, 53-61. doi:10.1007/bf02289209

Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2010). E-prime, Version 2.0.8.90

[Computer Software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.

Schünemann, N., Spörer, N., & Brunstein, J. C. (2013). Integrating self-regulation in

whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–mediator analysis of incremental

effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational

Psychology, 38, 289-305. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.002

Shanahan, T. (2014). How and how not to prepare students for the new tests. The Reading

Teacher, 68, 184-188. doi:10.1002/trtr.1315

Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for

curriculum based measurement of reading growth. The Journal of Special

Education, 34, 164-172. doi: 10.1177/002246690003400305

Snijders, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and

advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage

Publishers.

Solis, M., Ciullo, S., Vaughn, S., Pyle, N., Hassaram, B., & Leroux, A. (2012). Reading

comprehension interventions for middle school students with learning disabilities: A

synthesis of 30 years of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 327-340.

doi:10.1177/0022219411402691

Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for

implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and

Instruction, 16, 57-71. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006

Spearritt, D. (1972). Identification of sub-skills of reading comprehension by maximum

likelihood factor analysis. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1972, i-24.

doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1972.tb00192.x


REFERENCES

172

Spear-Swerling, L. (2004). Fourth graders’ performance on a state-mandated assessment

involving two different measures of reading comprehension. Reading Psychology,

25, 121-148. doi:10.1080/02702710490435727

Spörer, N., & Brunstein, J. C. (2009). Fostering the reading comprehension of secondary

school students through peer-assisted learning: Effects on strategy knowledge,

strategy use, and task performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34,

289-297. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.004

Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students' reading

comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching.

Learning and Instruction, 19, 272-286. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003

Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Sáez, L. (2006). Do different components of working

memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning

Disabilities, 39(3), 252-269.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston:

Allyn and Bacon.

Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading comprehension education in fifteen countries: An

empirical study. International studies in evaluation III. Uppsala, Sweden: Almqvist

and Wiksell.

Tichá, R., Espin, C. A., & Wayman, M. M. (2009). Reading progress monitoring for

secondary-school students: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to growth of reading

aloud and maze selection measures. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice,

24, 132-142. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00287.x

Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but

complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of

Research in Reading, 32, 383-401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x


REFERENCES

173

Undheim, J. O., & Gustafsson, J. (1987). The hierarchical organization of cognitive

abilities: Restoring general intelligence through the use of linear structural relations

(LISREL). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 149-171.

doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2202_2

van den Boer, M., van Bergen, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2014). Underlying skills of oral and

silent reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 128, 138-151.

doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.008

van den Bos, K. P., lutje Spelberg, H. C., Scheepstra, A. J. M., & de Vries, J. R. (1994). De

Klepel: Een test voor de leesvaardigheid van pseudowoorden [The Klepel: A test

for the reading skills of pseudowords]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and

Zeitlinger.

van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J. S., Butler, J., White, M. J., & Lorch,

E. P. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. Stahl

& S. Paris (eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment, (pp. 107-

139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “Landscape” view

of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable

memory representation. In B. K. Britton, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of

understanding text, (pp. 165-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential

questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and

timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521-529. doi:10.1037//0022-

0663.93.3.521

van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model

of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In

H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (eds.), The construction of mental

representations during reading, (pp. 71-98). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology

Press.


REFERENCES

174

van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York,

NY: Academic Press.

van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., de Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007).

Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A

longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 99, 477-491. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.477

van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in

children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35,

427-449. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.001

Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. (2008). Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and

development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 293-301. doi: 10.1002/acp.1417

Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading

comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407-423.

doi:10.1002/acp.1414

Verhoeven, L. T. W., & Vermeer, A. R. (1986). Taaltoets allochtone kinderen [Language

proficiency test for foreign children]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.

Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa

statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363.

Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation

models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological

Science, 6(5), 292-297.

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension

and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:10.1037/0033-

2909.123.2.162

Documents

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) How to assess and ...Een-Minuut-Test, vorm A en B: Verantwoording en handleiding [One-minute-test, version A and B: Justification and manual]