View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Using Student Response Using Student Response Systems Across Environments: Systems Across Environments:
See it in ActionSee it in Action
Patrick Artz – Bellevue UniversityPatrick Artz – Bellevue University
Daniel J. Gulchak – Arizona State University Daniel J. Gulchak – Arizona State University
Margie L. Johnson – Metropolitan Nashville Public SchoolMargie L. Johnson – Metropolitan Nashville Public School
Today’s AgendaToday’s Agenda
Audience SurveyAudience Survey
Benefits of “Clickers” Benefits of “Clickers”
Demo of Clickers in Higher EducationDemo of Clickers in Higher Education
Demo of Clickers in K-12Demo of Clickers in K-12
Questions, Answers, & Prizes!Questions, Answers, & Prizes!
I am ________ with SRS.I am ________ with SRS.
33%
33%
33%
Not Familiar. Familiar. Very Familiar.
1)1) Not Familiar.Not Familiar.
2)2) FamiliarFamiliar..
3)3) Very Familiar.Very Familiar.
What is your primary focus?What is your primary focus?
17%
17%
17%
17%
17%
17% 1)1) Elementary Education TeacherElementary Education Teacher
2)2) Secondary Education TeacherSecondary Education Teacher
3)3) Higher Education Instructor/FacultyHigher Education Instructor/Faculty
4)4) Technology Specialist/InstructorTechnology Specialist/Instructor
5)5) AdministratorAdministrator
6)6) Classroom Support or ITClassroom Support or IT
Why use clickers?Why use clickers?
The NET Gen - Today’s Students:The NET Gen - Today’s Students: At age 21 are defined by…At age 21 are defined by…
• 10,000 hours of video gaming10,000 hours of video gaming• 250,000 emails correspondences250,000 emails correspondences• 20,000 hours of TV watching20,000 hours of TV watching• 10,000 hours of cell phone conversations10,000 hours of cell phone conversations• 5,000 hours of reading5,000 hours of reading
Clickers in the classroom: Engaging the millennial learner Campus technology 2006
This is why SRS’s are a big “buzz” on campus today! This is why SRS’s are a big “buzz” on campus today! SRS’ play to Net Gen’s need to be connected.SRS’ play to Net Gen’s need to be connected.
How many hours of email were How many hours of email were reported by age 21?reported by age 21?
20,0
00
150,
000
200,
000
250,
000
500,
000
1 1 1111)1) 20,00020,000
2)2) 150,000150,000
3)3) 200,000200,000
4)4) 250,000250,000
5)5) 500,000500,000
What is the average attention span What is the average attention span of today’s students?of today’s students?
They
hav
e non
e!
7 m
inute
s
12
min
utes
21
min
utes
Unlim
ited?
0
1 1
2
1
1)1) They have none!They have none!
2)2) 7 minutes7 minutes
3)3) 12 minutes12 minutes
4)4) 21 minutes21 minutes
5)5) Unlimited?Unlimited?
Which of the following was Which of the following was notnot listed as a benefit of SRS?listed as a benefit of SRS?
Cre
ate
a dyn
amic
int..
.
Confir
m s
tuden
t und...
Tra
ck c
lass
es a
nd s
...
Colle
ct d
ata
that
allo
..
25% 25%25%25%1)1) Create a dynamic Create a dynamic interactive classroom.interactive classroom.
2)2) Confirm student Confirm student understandings.understandings.
3)3) Track classes and Track classes and student results.student results.
4)4) Collect data that allows Collect data that allows faculty to report findings faculty to report findings on use of technology in on use of technology in the classroom.the classroom.
Ask the AudienceAsk the Audience
Pop QuizPop Quiz
Comprehension Comprehension checkcheck
AttendanceAttendance
Opinion pollingOpinion polling
Concept reviewConcept review
Topics for Topics for discussiondiscussion
Priority rankingPriority ranking
Typical Applications of a SRS Typical Applications of a SRS During ClassDuring Class
SRS’s are flexible - allowing
Instructors to match Student
Response System
activities to their
presentation content, learning
objectives, and personal
teaching style.
Voting Voting
TestingTesting
Knowledge Knowledge retentionretention
Discussion startersDiscussion starters
Consensus-Consensus-building building
Anonymous Anonymous feedback / feedback / evaluationsevaluations
Meet Your Neighbor…Meet Your Neighbor…
Introduce yourself.Introduce yourself.
Discuss one challenge you see with SRS Discuss one challenge you see with SRS in your classroom.in your classroom.
Demo #1 – Higher EducationDemo #1 – Higher Education
College classCollege class 40-50 undergraduate students40-50 undergraduate students Turning Technologies, LLCTurning Technologies, LLC
Class Use
• Review content
• Polling / Opinion
• Check understanding
• Team competitions
Benefits
• Easy, intuitive, & quick
• Integrates into PowerPoint slides
• On the fly changes
• Great looking reports
23 Graphs and Reports23 Graphs and Reports
33%
21%
40%
6%
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
2
8
21
00
5
1015
20
25
5 % 10 % 15 % 20 %
Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4
Results easily export to Excel allowing you to combine results for entire semester or compare classes side-by-side.
Demo #2 – K - 12Demo #2 – K - 12
Classrooms Grades 3-12Classrooms Grades 3-12 Teacher Technology TrainingTeacher Technology Training eInstruction CPSeInstruction CPS
Class Use
• Review content
• Polling / Opinion
• FastGrade
• Team Activities
Benefits
• Easy, intuitive, & quick
• Integrates with PPT
•Team Activities
•Integrates with ExamView
Technology – Hardware SelectionTechnology – Hardware Selection
Many different Many different brandsbrands, not compatible, , not compatible,
& many don’t work in large classrooms!& many don’t work in large classrooms!• Is the device durable?
• Does the software support multiple types of input devices (IR, RF, Virtual)?
• Is the use of the input device a one time purchase or subscription model?
• How are the input devices registered to a student?
Do you want to try SRS after Do you want to try SRS after seeing this presentation?seeing this presentation?
50%50%
1) 2)
10
0 of 5
1)1) YesYes
2)2) NoNo
More Info . . .More Info . . .
PowerPoint available at NECC website and PowerPoint available at NECC website and http://http://academic2.bellevue.edu/~partz/srsacademic2.bellevue.edu/~partz/srs
[email protected]@mnps.org
[email protected]@bellevue.edu
[email protected]@asu.edu
Research & ReferencesResearch & ReferencesBeatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J., & Leonard, W.J (2006). Designing Beatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J., & Leonard, W.J (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of PhysicsAmerican Journal of Physics, 74, 31-39., 74, 31-39.
Hanley, J.T. & Jackson, P. (2006). Making it Click. Hanley, J.T. & Jackson, P. (2006). Making it Click. Technology & Technology & LearningLearning, 26, 38-40., 26, 38-40.
Hatch, J., Jensen, M., & Moor, R. (2005). Manna from Heaven or Hatch, J., Jensen, M., & Moor, R. (2005). Manna from Heaven or "Clickers" from Hell: Experiences with an Electronic Response "Clickers" from Hell: Experiences with an Electronic Response System. System. Journal of College Science TeachingJournal of College Science Teaching, 34, 36., 34, 36.
Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science TeachingComputers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21, 167-181., 21, 167-181.
Shapiro, J.A. (1997). Student response found feasible in large Shapiro, J.A. (1997). Student response found feasible in large science lecture hall. science lecture hall. Journal of College Science TeachingJournal of College Science Teaching, 26, 408-, 26, 408-412412..