Upload
rosamund-juliet-arnold
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Using Earth System Models to provide policy-relevant information
(Couples therapy for the uneasy marriage between science and policy)
Gavin SchmidtNASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and
Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University
QUEST/AIMES Edinburgh 2010
Scientists
Policymakers
We speak the same language but.... we frame issues very differently:
Scientists tend to focus on individual processes, abundance and concentrations
Policymakers focus on individual actions, emissions
Scientists are often single issue, Policymakers multi-tasking
i.e. air quality and climate and biodiversity and...
The Fundamental Issues
But isn't IPCC supposed to deal with this?
Secret definition of the IPCC:
Assessment of the science, by the scientists, for the scientists
Climate forcings 1750-2000(Scientists' viewpoint)
IPCC AR4 (2007)
(mostly same as TAR except for a 90º clockwise rotation)
But different forcings are linked!
Each industrial or agricultural activity has a different emission profile
Different emissions affect secondary forcings (ozone, sulphates) through atmospheric chemistry
Net climate forcing or air quality impacts may be very different
Forcings Forcings or Feedbacks Calculated
Climate processes
Some key atmospheric interactions
Impact on SO2 -> SO4
Key interactions
Competition for oxidants:
CH4 decreases OH and increases ozone
=> reduced oxidation of SO2
NOx increases OH and ozone
=> increased oxidation of CH4, SO2
SO2 decreases OH, decreases O3, nitrate
Competition for NH3 (btw sulphate and nitrate)
BC: direct affects (absorption) + semi-direct effects (local heating affecting clouds) + indirect impact on ice clouds
Shindell et al (Science, 2009)
Climate forcings 1750-2000(Emissions viewpoint)
Where do/will emissions come from?
Residential fossil fuel
Residential biofuel
Industry
Power
Biomass Burning
Transportation
NOx CO VOCs SO21995 2030 1995 2030 1995 2030 1995 2030
Global Emissions 1995 and 2030
Examples: Transportation
Surface On-road Transport (ORT) Cars, trucks, trains CO2, NOx, BC etc.
Ground level, domestically controlled Aviation
CO2, NOx, SO2, Contrails, water vapourUpper troposphere, international
ShippingBunker fuel high in SO2
very visible indirect effects (ship tracks)Oceanic, surface, international
Climate Impacts: On Road Transport and Power Generation (20 yr horizon)
Unger et al (2009, Atm. Env)
Future scenarios: 50% reduction ORT emissions
S1: (zero emission replacement source)S2: (current power generation mix)
20-yr horizon
Unger et al (2009, Atm. Env)
Temperature impacts of scenarios
Temperature (mK) Temperature (mK)
US only
Global
Zero-emission replacement Current power sector profile
20-yr horizonUnger et al (2009, Atm. Env)
Pollutant impacts Ozone Sulphate
Zero-emissionreplacement
Current PGreplacement
BC OC
Unger et al (2009, Atm. Env)
Summary
Surface transportation (US or Global) good target
Unambiguous reductions in climate forcing:
Regardless of replacement power source!
Some non-CO2 effects are more uncertain:
Indirect aerosol effects (incl. BC)
Projected reductions in temperatures across NH
Also reductions in Ozone and PM (BC)
Uncertainty in BC affects may impact results w.r.t. new diesel
CO2 CH4 (direct) Short lived species
Total-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Impact of 30% reduction in emissions in Asian and N. Amer-ican sectors
N. America domesticN. America surface transporta-tionN. America industry and power Asia domesticAsia transportAsia industry and power
Ra
dia
tive
Fo
rcin
g m
W/m
2
Climate forcings by sector(Policy viewpoint)
Shindell et al (2008)
On 20-yr timescale, inclusion of short-lived species (ozone, black carbon, sulphates) changes relative importance of sectorsN. Amer. transportation/Asian domestic better targets for reducing climate and air pollution effects
Regional impacts of sector-specific reductions
Can we identify win-win scenarios?
Yes!
1) Domestic use of coal and biomass in Asia
CO2, CO, SO2, soot => ozone, smog, health issues
Electrification (even using modern coal plants)
reduced CO2, reduced air pollution, reduced climate forcing, better health outcomes
2) Surface transportation in US/Europe
CO2, soot from diesel, NOx => ozone
Move to less driving/plug-in hybrids
reduce CO2, reduced air pollution
Conclusions
Models can provide key input to policy choicesSector specific simulations can give projections for air quality and climate and other impactOutside of current IPCC frameworkEmerging focus on short-term initialized decadal predictions untested and of unclear utility for policymakersImportant uncertainties remain:
Carbon cycle feedbacks, mixed phase aerosols
Ice sheet response (for sea level rise)
Regional impacts
Scientists
PolicymakersWe need to talk....