CLOSED,NPROSE

U.S. District CourtEastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14-mc-00876-NGG

Purisima v. Zheng et alAssigned to: Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis

Date Filed: 07/21/2014Date Terminated: 07/30/2014

Plaintiff

Anton Purisima represented by Anton Purisima390 9th AvenueNew York, NY 10001PRO SE

V.

Defendant

Eddie Zheng("Manager")

Defendant

Nafang Mo("President")

Defendant

People Republic of China (PRC) ("China")

Defendant

Wang Dang"Jack Wang" ("Ugly Gorilla")

Defendant

Sun Kai Liang"Sun Kai Liang" ("Jack Sun")

Defendant

Huang Zhen YuHuang Zhen Yu "HZY-THX"

Defendant

Wen Xin YuWen Xin Yu "Win XY Happy" "Win XY" ("Lao Wen")

Defendant

Gu ChunhuiGu Chun Hui, "Kandy Goo"

Defendant

Edward J. SnowdenNSA Contractor, ("The Leaker"), Edward Snowden

Defendant

Does 1-1.3 Billion

Date Filed # Docket Text

07/21/2014 1 MOTION for Leave to File a New Case by Anton Purisima. (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 07/24/2014)

07/21/2014 2 COMPLAINT against Gu Chunhui, Wang Dang, Does 1-1.3 Billion, Sun Kai Liang, Nafang Mo, People Republic of China(PRC) ("China"), Edward J. Snowden, Huang Zhen Yu, Wen Xin Yu, Eddie Zheng, filed by Anton Purisima. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 07/24/2014)

07/21/2014 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anton Purisima. (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 07/24/2014)

07/24/2014 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if allparties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil actionincluding a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of theconsent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also beaccessed at the following link:http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold yourconsent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties havesigned the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) (Entered: 07/24/2014)

07/30/2014 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's 1 request for leave to file a new action and accompanying 3 motion to proceed in forma pauperis areDENIED. The court's prior Order barring Plaintiff from filing future in forma pauperis complaints without first seeking thecourt's leave remains in effect. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 7/28/2014. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)(Entered: 07/30/2014)

PACER Service CenterTransaction Receipt

08/01/2014 18:16:27

PACER Login: ud0006 Client Code:

Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:14-mc-00876-NGG

Billable Pages: 2 Cost: 0.20

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 14 of 152 PageID #: 15

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 15 of 152 PageID #: 16

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 16 of 152 PageID #: 17

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 17 of 152 PageID #: 18

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 18 of 152 PageID #: 19

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 19 of 152 PageID #: 20

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 20 of 152 PageID #: 21

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 21 of 152 PageID #: 22

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 22 of 152 PageID #: 23

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 23 of 152 PageID #: 24

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 24 of 152 PageID #: 25

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 25 of 152 PageID #: 26

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 26 of 152 PageID #: 27

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 27 of 152 PageID #: 28

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 28 of 152 PageID #: 29

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 2 Filed 07/21/14 Page 29 of 152 PageID #: 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------)(

ANTON PURISIMA,

Plaintiff,

-against-

EDDIE ZHENG, NAFANG MO, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC), WANG DONG, SUN KAILIANG, WEN )(IN YU, HUANG ZHEN YU, HUANG ZHEN YU, GU CHUNHUI, EDWARD J. SNOWDEN, DOES 1-1.3 BILLION,

Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------------)( NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge.

ORDER

14-MC-876 (NGG)

On January 31, 2012, in response to the filing of multiple frivolous and duplicative

actions by Plaintiff Anton Purisima, this court barred Plaintiff from filing any new in forma

pauperis complaints in this court without first seeking the court's leave. See Purisima v. )(ilai,

No. 11-CV-5523 (NGG), 2012 WL 293772 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2012), reconsideration denied,

2012 WL 669045 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 29, 2012). On July 21, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Proposed

Complaint (Dkt. 2), accompanied by a request for leave to file a new action (Dkt. 1) and an

application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 3).

Plaintiff's request for leave fails to provide the court with any valid reason to allow the

proposed action to go forward. Plaintiff argues that the Proposed Complaint should be allowed

to proceed as it is "related" to his pending case, Purisima v. Tiffany Entertainment, et al., No. 09-

CV-3502 (NGG). To the extent that his Proposed Complaint reiterates substantially the same

allegations raised in his "underlying" action, the claims plainly are duplicative. Moreover, to the

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 5 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 161

extent that Plaintiff seeks to raise new claims, his allegations are rambling and baseless. For

instance, Plaintiff alleges that the People's Republic of China executed "Three (3) plus One (1)

Filipinos" as retaliation against Plaintiff. (Proposed Compl. at 32.) He further asserts that China

harvested the organs of the aforementioned individuals and "transferred these harvested organs

to waiting rich Chinese." (Id. at 33.) In addition, Plaintiffs Proposed Complaint includes a

letter directed to Edward Snowden, in which Plaintiff seeks damages for any and all actions that

Mr. Snowden is alleged to have taken against the United States and challenges Mr. Snowden to a

game of poker at a casino of Mr. Snowden's choosing. (Id. at 21-30.) Finally, Plaintiff seeks to

recover ten duodecillion dollars in damages (llL. at 56), which is a one followed by thirty-seven

zeroes and equates to roughly 5.8 x 1023 times the gross domestic product of the United States.

Plaintiffs allegations are frivolous and duplicative. Plaintiff demonstrates that neither

his lack of success in filing these submissions nor the warnings of this court will deter him from

filing frivolous and repetitive proceedings. See Purisima v. Xilai, et al., No. 11-CV-5523

(NGG), 2011WL6329831, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2011) (dismissing Plaintiffs claims as

frivolous and duplicative of his previous actions); Purisima v. Xilai, et al., No. 12-MC-748

(NGG) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2013) (denying Plaintiff leave to file duplicative suit); Purisima v.

Zemin, et al., No. 12-MC-755 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2013) (same).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Plaintiffs request for leave to file a new action and accompanying motion

to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED. The court's prior Order barring Plaintiff from filing

future in forma pauperis complaints without first seeking the court's leave remains in effect. The

Clerk of Court is directed to return without filing and without judicial order any future in forma

pauperis complaint submitted by Plaintiff that does not comply with the Court's filing injunction.

2

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 5 Filed 07/30/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 162

The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(3) that any appeal from this order

would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose

of an appeal. CoP.Peflge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this action

SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York July2C, 2014

\

3

foicttoLAS o. GARAUFI~ United States District Judge

s/Nicholas G. Garaufis

Case 1:14-mc-00876-NGG Document 5 Filed 07/30/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 163