Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Unity in Diversity,ETDs at UNT :
and a look towards BibFrame
Ralph Hartsock and Daniel Gelaw Alemneh
University of North TexasTexas Music Library Association
University of North Texas, Denton, Texas
October 3, 2014
Panelists:
Ralph Hartsock Senior Music Catalog Librarian University of North Texas Libraries [email protected]
Daniel Alemneh Digital Curation Coordinator University of North Texas Libraries [email protected]
Objectives
• Compare 8 cases of ETD or dissertation treatment
• Offer models in RDA to remedy some of these
• Looks at certain aspects and pitfalls of BibFrame
Digital Projects versus Cataloging Objectives
Digital Projects
Metadata for each item Audio Center staff adds
metadata for sound recordings
Access to the PDF files Access to Recordings Local usage of audio
files
Cataloging
Metadata for international audience
Unification of all metadata, PDF files, recordings
Linkage between various files, audio or text
Variables includes UNT and other universities’ requirements for DMA. UNT seems to require more substantiation in recitals and a more academic thesis. The subject of the lecture unifies the final recital.
Osvaldo Lacerda's Sonata for flute and piano (1959): a performance guide with historical background of Brazilian genres embolada, seresta, and baião
Responsibility Marilia Gabriela do Nascimento Gimenes, B.M., M.M.
THESIS/DISS Publication Info Publication Info: Denton, Texas: University of North Texas, 2012
Copyright Notice Date Copyright Notice Date: ©2012 Series Series: NT dissertation, Music; 2012
Case number 1: UNT ETD
Case number 1: UNT ETD Permanent link is http://
iii.library.unt.edu/record=b4431151~S12
Advantages: Unified or integrated bibliographic record of the
document, all recitals, and the lecture recital. Topic has focus: Title created by student OCLC users may see the entirety of links, and
observe listed contents online, including contents of the audio recording itself.
Like other streamed recording, only those in the UNT community of users can listen to the audio.
Curation controlled by Digital Projects
Case number 1: UNT ETD
Limitation: OCLC record has access points only for the
document, not all the recordings.
Case number 1: UNT ETD
Michael C. Thursby Recital, a physical manifestation, with
printed abstract as accompanying material Advantage: OCLC access points to specific
pieces CDs available for local circulation RDAizing the record creates links
Case number 2: University of Northern Iowa
Michael C. Thursby RDAizing the record creates links
◦ Relationship designators:
composerauthorinstrumentalist sponsoring bodyContainer of (work)
Case number 2: University of Northern Iowa
Thesis by Anastasios Polis Thesis and six supplementary recordings,
including interviews and concerts Advantage: OCLC access to each
manifestation Disadvantage: None is linked
Case number 3: Ohio University
Thesis by Anastasios Polis RDAizing the record creates links, that are
reciprocal
The annotated thematic index is augmented by each recording.
Each recording augments the annotated thematic index.
Case number 3: Ohio University
[Tiffany Damicone recital] No paper dissertation with recital No lecture, no unifying text Title devised by cataloguer
Case number 4:Ohio State University
Juliana Yap Document only. No recitals in the library. No recitals online. Theme of unity, without performances Recitals did occur, but the programs and
recordings may reside within the Music Department.
Case number 5:West Virginia University
Isaac Bustos Four disjointed recitals But the program of the last recital is the
title of the lecture: Un Tiempo Fue Italica Famosa: A Synthesis of Joaquin Rodrigo’s Composition Styles
Minimal level cataloging given to these recordings
Contrived titles, less tangible; one could have been distinctive
Case number 6:University of Texas at Austin
Final recital of Isaac Bustos was titled
Name changes, even from a change in the manifestation of the same work
Barbara C. Phillips Farley Entered as Farley, Barbara C. Phillips. For
the 1991 dissertation Entered as Phillips-Farley, Barbara, ǂe
author. For the digitized 1991 dissertation
Case number 7:University of Iowa
Previous policy at UNT was to unite all manifestations of the dissertations.
Advantage: expediency, allowing one to simply change local system, III
Disadvantages: Manifestations are not reflected in OCLC
Interlibrary Loan may bypass UNT, even though there is an available copy, but in long term, digital will prevail.
Solution: RDA allows linkages such as “Reproduction of” or “Reproduced as”.
Case number 8:Unity for the sake of expediency
The virtuoso clarinet: arrangements from nineteenth-century opera: a lecture recital, together with three recitals of selected works of B. Bartók, J. Brahms, E. Carter, B. Crusell, M. Clyne, C. Debussy, P. Hindemith, R. Schumann, G. Tartini, R. Vaughan Williams, and C. Whittenberg By John William Petersen
Publication Info: 1977
Series: NT dissertation, Music; 1977
Location Call Number Status
WILLIS LL MICROFORMS Film F1252 LIB USE ONLY
REMOTE STORAGE (click to request) ML948 .P48 1977 AVAILABLE
Archives Remote Storage 379 N81d no.1252 DIGI PROJECTS
More Item Details Author/Creator John William Petersen
Subjects Clarinet music — History and criticism
Arrangement (Music)
Opera
Notes Text of a lecture-recital performed July 25, 1977; accompanied by recordings of the recital and 3 other recitals, performed November 26, 1973, November 11, 1974, and August 12, 1976.
Includes printed programs of the recitals.
Microfilm of typescript. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms International, 1978. -- 1 reel ; 35 mm.
Another copy is ML948.P48 1966
Thesis--North Texas State University, December, 1977.
Bibliography: leaves 18-19.
Physical Description
ix, 19 leaves: music; 28 cm. & phonotapes (4 reels. 7 1/2 ips. 1/4-track. stereo. 7 in.)
OCLC Number 3968163
Conclusions
Streaming Audio available only at UNT
Audio discs or streaming audio available locally.
UNT Practice treats lecture as unifying element/title
Bibliographic record resembles a kit with accompanying material
Links are made. Audio contents available
to view. Better long term
management.
Other models Leave disjointed
performances, unlinked
Ignore the performance altogether
Require contrived titles, with less tangibility
BibFrame
• http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/ • Bibliographic Framework Initiative• Initiated by the Library of Congress,
BIBFRAME provides a foundation for the future of bibliographic description, both on the web, and in the broader networked world.
Bibframe page
Bibframe features
RDA/FRBR versus BibFrame
Currently in MaRC Similar to Dublin core
RDA / FRBR
Work Expression Manifestation Item
Bibliographic Framework (BibFrame)
Creative Work Instance Authority Annotation
MARC vs. Bibframe
MARC Format Bibframe
382 is machine readable field for Medium of Performance
If the musicMediumNote, equals 382, then the number of performers may not be usable
If it is musicMedium, then the Note would be for textual reading.
Certain MARC fields have not had a parallel BF field: 347 (Digital characteristics)
Christopher Lamb: Blueline concerto as authority <bf:Work rdf:about="http://bibframe.examples.org/work2”> <bf:workTitle> <bf:Title> <bf:titleValue> Blueline concerto</bf:titleValue> </bf:Title> </bf:workTitle> <bf:creator> <bf:Authority> <bf:authorizedAccessPoint> Lamb, Christopher,
1989-</bf:authorizedAccessPoint> </bf:Authority> </bf:creator> <bf:hasInstance
rdf:resource=”http://bibframe.examples.org/instance1”/> </bf:Work>
BibFrame
<bf:Instance rdf:about="http://bibframe.examples.org/instance1"> <bf:instanceTitle> <bf:Title> <bf:titleValue> Blueline concerto </bf:titleValue> </bf:Title> </bf:instanceTitle> <bf:doi> ARK: ark:/67531/metadc283800 </bf:doi> <bf:instanceOf
rdf:resource=”http://bibframe.examples.org/work2”/> </bf:Instance> DOI = Digital Object Identifier Derived from BIBFRAME Relationships Draft Specification — 25 April
2014 http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe-relationships.html
BibFrame
Visits from 200+ Countries: http://digital.library.unt.edu/explore/collections/UNTETD/browse/
