64
Tuesday, February 15, 2005 • Mechanical Testing (continued)

Tuesday, February 15, 2005 Mechanical Testing (continued)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • Tuesday, February 15, 2005 Mechanical Testing (continued)
  • Slide 3
  • Types of mechanical analysis Kinematics - just the connections Statics- forces without motion Dynamics- forces with motion Rigid versus deformable body FBDs F EL F BL F BR F ER
  • Slide 4
  • Mechanics of rigid versus deformable body Rigid body: Sum of forces in all directions Deformable body: Sum of differential stresses in all directions Continuum mechanics describes equilibrium
  • Slide 5
  • Loading Types Tension- compression Uniaxial/bi-axial Bending Torsion Shear Reaction Traction Friction
  • Slide 6
  • Cytomechanical forces: Gravitational: Muscle contraction: Contact: Buoyant: Hydraulic: (Static or dynamic) Pneumatic Fluid shear
  • Slide 7
  • Cell Deformation Most cells are constantly deformed in vivo by both internal and external forces. Experimental deformations can be done by poking, squishing, osmotic swelling, electrical/magnetic fields, drugs, etc. Comparative strain tolerance Unit : microstrain (
  • Slide 8
  • Elasticity (Stiffness) ut tensio sic vis Youngs Modulus: Stress over strain Shear Modulus: Related to Poisson Cells have both area and shear stiffness, mostly due to the cytoskeleton, although lipids contribute some. Comparative Stiffnesses Related to polymer cross-linking
  • Slide 9
  • Material Parameters Moduli: Youngs (E, K V ) area (K A ) shear (G), bending ( f, flexural, energy*length) (also p) Stiff versus compliant (E versus Y) Strength (UTS); Failure point Brittle versus ductile (Area under stress/strain) Incompressible/Compressible (Poisson, Hardness: Mohs scale: Talc= 1; Diamond = 10. To characterize cells- how do they respond to forces in their environment?
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Comparative Mechanical Properties Strain Steel Wood Bone Stress Cells Steel Wood Bone Cells Cellular pre-stress
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Elastic Behaviours < 1 < 0 E = K A = P/ A/A Unixaxial stress Pressure 1 2
  • Slide 15
  • Poissons Effect swelling Incompressible Means no volume change
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Tension a.Uniaxial tension, b. Flexure Both with orthogonal strain. Cells Are in nutrient broth and attached To substrate. b. Radial and biaxial tensions
  • Slide 18
  • Cell testing methods
  • Slide 19
  • Stretching Out-of-plane distension of circular substrates: A and B are kinematically driven, I.e. surface strain of culture ~ friction between platen & substrate. C and D are kinetically driven: surface strain ~ fluid interaction with substrate.
  • Slide 20
  • Compressing Hydrostatic Porous High pO 2 Anisotropic strain Friction: Nutrient block Hydrostatic loading (a) and platen abutment (b), with a 3D Cell arrangement, can be either Confined or without side support
  • Slide 21
  • Shear Shear Strain = tan( ) G tan F/A
  • Slide 22
  • Shear due to fluid flow i.e., for water = 0.01 Poise
  • Slide 23
  • Shear stress from flow in a pipe P 1 P 2 Shear rate
  • Slide 24
  • Slide 25
  • Shear stimuli to cells A cone-plate flow chamber, where kinematically controls shear rate (dU/dl). Fully developed viscous flows exist (thin) atop the culture surface: homogeneous shear stress.
  • Slide 26
  • Shear Stimuli Parallel plate flow chamber, Kinetically controlling shear Rate by P.
  • Slide 27
  • DI distribution in a single cell grouped by height for consecutive 3 min intervals with no flow, and immediately after flow onset. DI in individual 3D subimages increased in magnitude and variability just after flow onset; values correlated with height in the cell. Decreased variation was computed with continued flow.
  • Slide 28
  • Slide 29
  • Magnetic tweezers Wang et al, Science
  • Slide 30
  • Force produced is proportional to deflection of a stiff beam Tends to sink into cell. AFM best for pure elastic materials.
  • Slide 31
  • Ferromagnetic Bead - Integrin/matrix Beads can be functionalized by coating with RGD or de-functionalized by coating with AcLDL. Then beads can be put in with cells, allowed to attach. Cells are then fixed, then decorated with stained Abs for CSK proteins. Then compare stain intensity on cells Area of contact is uncontrolled
  • Slide 32
  • Proteins binding to RGD beads
  • Slide 33
  • Optical Tweezer
  • Slide 34
  • Slide 35
  • Slide 36
  • Large strains to RBCs with Optical Tweezers High resolution Refractivity of bead Trapping in the beam Limited force
  • Slide 37
  • Dao, Lim & Suresh. J. of Mech. & Physics of solids
  • Slide 38
  • Ordinary versus phase-contrast microscopy Light density Phase Interference
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Slide 41
  • Slide 42
  • Fluid shear and pressure: Blood flow forces
  • Slide 43
  • Microspheres DIC overlaid with Fluorescence Images from confocal laser-scanning microscope optical cross-sectioning of 15 m microspheres with dark red-fluorescent ring stain with a green-fluorescent stain throughout the bead. Left panel provides represents poor instrument alignment. Correct image registration has been achieved in the right panel, where the dark red ring is aligned with the green disk.
  • Slide 44
  • Microspheres in cells
  • Slide 45
  • Particle Tracking Heidemann: Trends in Cell Biology 14:160, 2004 Test both structure and function 5 nM, 33 ms resolution Like a flock Of birds
  • Slide 46
  • Stiffness from particle tracking Network stiffness by particle tracking Metamorph Software from Universal Imaging
  • Slide 47
  • In an ideal elastic material, the K.E. imparted by KT, moves the sphere, that is then subject to restoring force back to its original position. MSD = C, therefore D = C/ For a VE material, D not constant.
  • Slide 48
  • Nuclear lamin For a 1 micron sphere in lamin-poor regions, D ~ 0.21 m 2 /s, corresponding to = 2 X 10 -3 Pa-s.. In water, D ~ 0.44 m 2 /s, corresponding to = 1 X 10 -3 Pa-s
  • Slide 49
  • Slide 50
  • Actin red, microtubules green Heterogeneous distribution: the polymer solution is main determinant of mechanics.
  • Slide 51
  • Stiffness from thermal motion (a)-(c) Serial images of a 23 mm long relatively stiff fiber. There is little visible bending, consistent with a long persistence length, = 12.0 mm. (d)-(f) Serial images of a 20 mm long flexible fiber. There is marked bending and a short persistence length, =0.28 mm. The fibers undergo diffusional motion and are not adhering to a glass surface, rather are free in solution, a necessary condition for using statistical mechanics to obtain persistence lengths. The width of each frame is 25 mm. 0 22 42 Seconds 0 52 62 S
  • Slide 52
  • Video Tracking
  • Slide 53
  • Necturus erythrocytes loaded with fluo-4 (10 M) and exposed to UV light emitted from a mercury vapor bulb and filtered through a FITC cube (400 x). (A) Cells display little fluorescence under isosmotic conditions (n=6). (B) Addition of A23187 (0.5 M) to the extracellular medium increased fluorescence under isosmotic conditions (n=6). (C) Exposure to a hypotonic (0.5x) Ringer solution increased fluorescence compared to basal conditions (n=6). (D) A low Ca 2+ hypotonic Ringer solution (5 mM EGTA) did not display the level of fluorescence normally observed following hypotonic swelling (n=6). Light et al. Swelling RBCs control Ca ++ pore Hypo Hypo+ EGTA
  • Slide 54
  • Slide 55
  • Stimulation Protocols
  • Slide 56
  • Harmonic motion (undamped) Gel motion follows simple rules Model will predict dynamic and Static equilibrium. Natural Frequency
  • Slide 57
  • Damped Spring
  • Slide 58
  • Viscosity & Elasticity A complex material can be modeled as a purely viscous material combined with a purely elastic material, thus mathematically separating the viscosity of a material from its elasticity. A purely viscous component is a Newtonian fluid- it has no memory and no elasticity; it cannot deform as a solid. Cells generally behave as solid-liquid composites. V-E tools can quantify their behaviour, since the models separate viscosity from elasticity in a kind of finite element model.
  • Slide 59
  • Maxwell Model: Differential method For step input: d /dt=0
  • Slide 60
  • Maxwell model: Laplace Method Viscosity: Pascal-sec For a step input Mechanical Impedance. Compliance + Slipperiness = /E
  • Slide 61
  • Transform pairs f(t) F(s) Impulse (t) 1 Step 1/s e -at 1/(s+a)
  • Slide 62
  • Maxwell model: Simulink method Implicit parameters
  • Slide 63
  • Gel/cell Model Make a complete model and label all parameters Describe the output, relating what happens and why. What is the time constant? State the assumptions and simplifications
  • Slide 64
  • Classwork/Homework Add damping to your model of cytogel Describe how you can model thermal fluctuations in cell diameter, and list all the elements. List assumptions. Write the model equation for the above. Complete a simulink model of the above, and do all labelling, including all parameter values.
  • Slide 65