6
Current equalising transformer for current balance in parallel-connected 12-pulse converter F.T. Bennell, CEng, FIEE Indexing terms: Semiconductor devices and materials, Transformers, Circuit theory and design Abstract: There has been a serious problem of current out-of-balance in 12-pulse rectifiers between two 6-pulse groups. This has become par- ticularly pronounced with semiconductor rectifiers where 12-pulse operation is obtained by two phase-displaced 3-phase bridge rectifier circuits operating in parallel. A current equalising trans- former (CET) was introduced to overcome the problem. A new simpler variation of this has more recently been introduced and the paper describes this new variation and includes more complete and exact design current and voltage relationships than have previously been published. List of symbols E a = AC RMS voltage, line-to-line E pk = AC peak voltage, line-to-line I a = AC RMS current /,, = DC mean current V do = Ideal no-load DC voltage X c = Commutating reactance 1 Introduction 12-pulse rectifier operation is desirable for many applica- tions, to achieve a low value of ripple in the DC output and low value current harmonics drawn from the AC supply. This 12-pulse operation may be obtained by two 3-phase rectifier bridges displaced in phase by 30°, and connected either in series or in parallel. The simplest way of achieving the required phase displacement is to have a rectifier transformer with two secondary windings, one connected star, and the other delta. The choice between series or parallel connection is preferably decided by rela- tive costs and efficiencies, and on these criteria parallel bridges are extensively used. However there are two serious problems. The main problem is the current out-of-balance com- monly experienced between the bridges. This is a particu- lar problem when to minimise short-circuit current in relation to DC voltage regulation over the load range, the bridges are supplied from closely coupled transformer windings. There have been cases of this out-of-balance being as high as 3 to 1, and exceptionally 19 to 1, which are completely unacceptable if the rectifier is to be fully loaded and true 12-pulse operation is necessary. Paper 58O1B (P6/P4), first received 10th June and in revised form 3rd September 1987 The author is a rectifier consultant working from 68b Crockford Park Road, Addlestone, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2LU, United Kingdom These out-of-balances were partly due to the trans- former design being critical, but largely also due to dis- tortions of the AC supply voltage waveform, produced particularly by 6-pulse rectifier loading on the same system. This problem was experienced also in the mercury arc era, using quadruple zigzag connections for 12-pulse operation, where the out-of-balance was between the two 6-pulse groups each side of a 300 Hz* interphase transformer, the practice then was to avoid mixing 6-pulse and 12-pulse rectifiers on the same system. The second problem is to do with interphase trans- formers (IPTs), which enable paralleled circuit groups (that do not have at every instant equal voltages), to carry current together. Between parallel bridges, the con- ventional interphase transformer is required to be con- nected to DC terminals, and is therefore normally air cooled within the rectifier cubicle. The problem is noise, due to operation at 300 Hz. Various designs have been tried—cores built from laminations, wound round cores, cores on busbars, cores with conventional windings, low flux densities, noise barriers—but the problem remains. A solution to both these problems is the use of a current equalising transformer (CET). Put simply, this uses the principle that the primary and secondary wind- ings of a double-wound transformer maintain equal ampere-turns. The CET comprises a 3-limb core (or 3 single-phase cores) carrying two sets of windings, one in the AC connections of one rectifier bridge and the other in the AC connections of the other bridge. However, this principle is not directly applicable. There is a 30° phase shift between the currents in the two bridges. In the first method adopted to look after this factor, the windings associated with one bridge were interconnected between phases, to achieve a resultant phase disposition to correspond with that of the other bridge [2, 3]. This method was designed for adding the CET to an existing rectifier equipment, where the CET went in the line connections external to the main trans- former. Due to phase displacement between series wind- ings, the CET winding VA for one bridge circuit is increased by 15.5%. A new method [4] is to connect one set of windings within the delta secondary of the rectifier transformer as in Fig. 1. These windings are in phase with the star wind- ings, being together on common limbs. The advantages of this system are that there are only two windings per limb instead of three, there are fewer connections—none between phases, and the numbers of turns in the CET windings are increased by a factor of ^3, facilitating the choice of turns with the necessary ^ 3 relationship. (The * The frequencies referred to in this paper are all based on a supply frequency of 50 Hz IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988 85

transformador de pulsos

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pulsos

Citation preview

  • Current equalising transformer for current balancein parallel-connected 12-pulse converter

    F.T. Bennell, CEng, FIEE

    Indexing terms: Semiconductor devices and materials, Transformers, Circuit theory and design

    Abstract: There has been a serious problem ofcurrent out-of-balance in 12-pulse rectifiersbetween two 6-pulse groups. This has become par-ticularly pronounced with semiconductor rectifierswhere 12-pulse operation is obtained by twophase-displaced 3-phase bridge rectifier circuitsoperating in parallel. A current equalising trans-former (CET) was introduced to overcome theproblem. A new simpler variation of this has morerecently been introduced and the paper describesthis new variation and includes more completeand exact design current and voltage relationshipsthan have previously been published.

    List of symbols

    Ea = AC RMS voltage, line-to-lineEpk = AC peak voltage, line-to-lineIa = AC RMS current/,, = DC mean currentVdo = Ideal no-load DC voltageXc = Commutating reactance

    1 Introduction

    12-pulse rectifier operation is desirable for many applica-tions, to achieve a low value of ripple in the DC outputand low value current harmonics drawn from the ACsupply. This 12-pulse operation may be obtained by two3-phase rectifier bridges displaced in phase by 30, andconnected either in series or in parallel. The simplest wayof achieving the required phase displacement is to have arectifier transformer with two secondary windings, oneconnected star, and the other delta. The choice betweenseries or parallel connection is preferably decided by rela-tive costs and efficiencies, and on these criteria parallelbridges are extensively used. However there are twoserious problems.

    The main problem is the current out-of-balance com-monly experienced between the bridges. This is a particu-lar problem when to minimise short-circuit current inrelation to DC voltage regulation over the load range,the bridges are supplied from closely coupled transformerwindings. There have been cases of this out-of-balancebeing as high as 3 to 1, and exceptionally 19 to 1, whichare completely unacceptable if the rectifier is to be fullyloaded and true 12-pulse operation is necessary.

    Paper 58O1B (P6/P4), first received 10th June and in revised form 3rdSeptember 1987The author is a rectifier consultant working from 68b Crockford ParkRoad, Addlestone, Weybridge, Surrey KT15 2LU, United Kingdom

    These out-of-balances were partly due to the trans-former design being critical, but largely also due to dis-tortions of the AC supply voltage waveform, producedparticularly by 6-pulse rectifier loading on the samesystem. This problem was experienced also in themercury arc era, using quadruple zigzag connections for12-pulse operation, where the out-of-balance wasbetween the two 6-pulse groups each side of a 300 Hz*interphase transformer, the practice then was to avoidmixing 6-pulse and 12-pulse rectifiers on the same system.

    The second problem is to do with interphase trans-formers (IPTs), which enable paralleled circuit groups(that do not have at every instant equal voltages), tocarry current together. Between parallel bridges, the con-ventional interphase transformer is required to be con-nected to DC terminals, and is therefore normally aircooled within the rectifier cubicle. The problem is noise,due to operation at 300 Hz. Various designs have beentriedcores built from laminations, wound round cores,cores on busbars, cores with conventional windings, lowflux densities, noise barriersbut the problem remains.

    A solution to both these problems is the use of acurrent equalising transformer (CET). Put simply, thisuses the principle that the primary and secondary wind-ings of a double-wound transformer maintain equalampere-turns. The CET comprises a 3-limb core (or 3single-phase cores) carrying two sets of windings, one inthe AC connections of one rectifier bridge and the otherin the AC connections of the other bridge.

    However, this principle is not directly applicable.There is a 30 phase shift between the currents in the twobridges. In the first method adopted to look after thisfactor, the windings associated with one bridge wereinterconnected between phases, to achieve a resultantphase disposition to correspond with that of the otherbridge [2, 3]. This method was designed for adding theCET to an existing rectifier equipment, where the CETwent in the line connections external to the main trans-former. Due to phase displacement between series wind-ings, the CET winding VA for one bridge circuit isincreased by 15.5%.

    A new method [4] is to connect one set of windingswithin the delta secondary of the rectifier transformer asin Fig. 1. These windings are in phase with the star wind-ings, being together on common limbs. The advantages ofthis system are that there are only two windings per limbinstead of three, there are fewer connectionsnonebetween phases, and the numbers of turns in the CETwindings are increased by a factor of ^ 3 , facilitating thechoice of turns with the necessary ^3 relationship. (The

    * The frequencies referred to in this paper are all based on a supplyfrequency of 50 Hz

    IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988 85

  • delta winding turns are J3 times those for the starwinding, and the current ^ 3 less for ampere-turn equal-ity.)

    Fig. 1 12-pulse rectifier circuit comprising parallel bridges and a CET

    2 Current equalising transformer

    It is found to be necessary for the CET to span com-pletely the instantaneous voltage differences between thetwo phase-displaced bridges, whether there is also a con-ventional IPT or not. The IPT therefore is omitted andthe situation is that the CET takes the place of an IPT.

    The CET is in the AC connections and can thereforebe oil-immersed and in the tank of the main transformer,Fig. 2. The noise of IPT's was not a serious problem

    when they were in the transformer tank of a mercury arcrectifier equipment, although there were then two muchlarger 150 Hz IPT's as well as the 300 Hz one. Also, andimportantly, the CET has no DC components of currentto experience out-of-balance and thus cause fluxsaturationa main factor in the cause of excessive IPTnoise. The noise is therefore reduced to a level that pre-sents no problem.

    In addition to the main advantages of the CET inrespect of current balance and noise, further interestingfeatures ensue.

    In the conventional parallel bridge system using anIPT, the transformer primary winding has a basic rating(i.e. excluding losses and magnetising current) of 1.01times the DC kW. However, the secondary windingshave the same kVA as for individual bridge circuits, i.e.1.05 times the DC kW. The reason for this is that thesecondary windings each carry 5th and 7th harmonics,but of opposite polarities so that they circulate on thesecondary side and do not appear in the primary.

    With the CET however, each individual bridge circuitoperates in a 12-pulse mode. The secondary windingkVA's therefore correspond to a factor of 1.01, the sameas for the primary. Elimination of the 5th and 7th harmo-nics of opposite polarities takes place in the CET as anatural result of current equalising.

    The current equalising effect combines two 120current pulses with a 30 displacement into a single 150pulse, with a reduced RMS value.

    As a result of the widened current pulses, the CETmust look after a wider range of AC voltages ( 75 to+ 75 from the peak, see Fig. 3) with greater voltage dif-ferences than an IPT has to look after (-60 to +60).Also it has to absorb the voltage differences individuallyin 3 phases. It is therefore larger in kVA than an IPT forthe same rectifier rating. However an IPT, having lowvoltage and a heavy current, is inherently uneconomic inthe use of material for itself and the busbar connectionsassociated with it. A comparison of alternative IPT andCET designs for a 12-pulse rectifier for a rating of 630 V1500 kW, is given in Table 1.

    Table 1 : Comparison between an IPT and a CETIPT CET

    Equivalent 50 Hz double-wound kVACooling mediumIron, kgCopper or aluminium, kg

    42 150Air Oil375 125

    28 (A1) 100 (Cu)

    Fig. 3 shows the effective AC voltages, i.e. where theAC voltages are involved in current-carrying as shown byheavy lines, for rectifier bridges with and without a CET.In combination with the relevant currents the AC/DCvoltage relationship can be determined (see Table 2).

    Table 2: AC/DC voltage relationship. Fig. 36

    Fig. 2 Transformer assembly for oil immersion including a CETThe main rectifier transformer is at the bottom, above it lengthwise is a buck/boost transformer associated with a separate regulating transformer, and cross-wise the CET

    Range

    Current, laJ f dtxl.xM/2n=VdE, RMS

    EO>L-L =0to15

    0.5360.2990.160

    1,Z.-/V = 0.577,

    15 to 45

    0.4640.5170.240

    / ,= 1.Xe = 0

    45 to 75

    0.2680.2990.080

    Sum

    0.4800.918 DC0.707 AC0.771

    86 IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988

  • Factors affecting current sharing Current relationships with a CETThe main transformer for parallel bridge operation withan IPT must be very carefully designed to avoid seriouscurrent imbalance even on a perfect supply system. Thefollowing factors are critical

    -75-

    XV

    x

    -75-

    30

    A

    X

    Fig. 3 Effective AC voltages at the main transformer fora Cconventional 3-phase rectifier bridgeb Parallel bridges with a CET for 12-pulse operation

    (a) The y/3 voltage relationship between the two sec-ondaries. A small discrepancy in voltage has a muchgreater effect on current.

    (b) The individual reactances, primary to each second-ary, must be closely equal, particularly if the secondariesare very closely coupled.

    (c) The copper losses of the two secondaries must beclosely equal.

    None of these restraints apply with a CET. Currentsharing is determined solely by the turns ratio of theCET. Transformer operation ensures that the ampere-turns of the two sets of windings on the CET must,within flux saturation limits, remain equal. Thus thetransformer can be to the most economic design and thedesign of the CET itself is not critical.

    The factors determining the current distribution are(a) the 30 phase shift provided by the star and delta

    main transformer windings(b) the y/3 turns relationship between the CET wind-

    ings in series with the star secondary windings and theCET windings connected within the delta

    (c) the ampere-turn equivalence between the two setsof CET windingsThe current values for the first part of a cycle are derivedin Appendix 14.

    0.259

    Fig. 4 Transformer secondary voltage vectors for CET voltage wave-form analysis

    4.1 AC currentsApplying the analysis of current changes through a cycle,to an AC current waveform produces Fig. 5 which

    15 30 30 30 30 30 30

    0.464

    IO.536Id

    0.268

    Fig. 5 AC current waveform

    applies to each line current. The delta winding currentshave the same waveform but the values of the currentsteps are ^ 3 less. Each step has a duration of 30, includ-ing the maximum of 0.536 Id. As there are six of thesesteps per cycle from the star group, and six from thedelta, the contributions to the total DC current from

    IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988 87

  • each group have a castellated waveform, but the 30phase shift results in a constant DC current. Each of0.536 Id from one group is complimented by 0.464 Idfrom the other (see Fig. 6).

    Fig. 6 Combination of the current waveforms from the two bridges

    Following the usual rectifier theory practice, thecurrent waveforms are based and evaluated on a perfectlysmooth DC current, i.e. as with infinite DC inductance.With no DC inductance, the current blocks would havecosine crests between 15 and +15, with mean valuescorresponding to the step values stated in the precedingnotes. The difference this makes to the RMS value is only0.0053%, and rectangular current blocks can therefore beassumed for all cases. The mid-points on the currentsteps lie on a cosine curve.

    The RMS value of the AC current waveform calculatesat 0.379 Id which compares with 0.408 ld for a simple3-phase bridge circuit. The mean value is 0.333 Id and theform factor 1.137 compared with 1.225 for the simplebridge.

    5 Main transformer voltageThe DC voltage at any point is obtained by adding theAC voltages after weighting them according to theircurrent proportions, i.e. by multiplying them by 0.268,0.464 or 0.536 as appropriate (summing to a DC currentof 1).

    Referring to Fig. 4 and Table 4,

    AC voltage vector position

    (a) 'A' L to N at a maximum:(b) 'A' advanced 15:(c) 'A' advanced a further 15

    CalculatedDC voltage

    0.928 Epk0.896 0.928 E

    The DC voltage is found to comprise a series of cosinecrests between -15 and -I-15 (0.928 cos 15 = 0.896).

    The average DC voltage using 0.928 peak and thefamiliar (p/rc) sin (rc/p) relationship for 12-pulse operation= 0.928 (12/TT) sin (TC/12) = 0.918 Epk

    Conversely, Epk = VJ0.91S and Ea = 0.771 Vdo. Thiscompares with 0.74 for a bridge circuit with no CET. Thehigher AC voltage required is due to bringing in tocurrent-carrying service the lower AC voltages betweencos 60 and cos 75 (see Fig. 3).

    5.1 Main transformer secondary VAThe total main transformer secondary VA = 2^/3x 0.379 x 0.771 Id Vdo = 1.012 Id Vdo, which is exactly

    the same as for the primary of a conventional 12-pulserectifier transformer. Thus, the nett result of the saving incurrent rating and the small increase in AC voltagerequired is to reduce the transformer secondary VA inthe ratio 1.05 to 1.01.

    6 CET currentThe CET current ratings are as already determined forthe corresponding main transformer winding and linecurrents.

    6.1 CET voltagesThe voltages to be supported by the CET are the differ-ences between the individual line-to-line transformervoltages, and the corresponding mean DC voltages.Tables 3 and 4 give the relevant figures scaled to corre-

    Table 3: CET voltages derived from vector diagrams (Fig. 4)The AC voltages are weighted by their associated currents to obtainthe resultant DC voltage. An example of when 'A' line-to-neutralvoltage is at a maximum is given to show how the CET voltages arederived

    MaintransformerwindingabcABC

    WindingvoltagesEa+ 1-0.5-0.5+0.577-0.289-0.289

    Windingcurrent/+0.309-0.155-0.155+0.536-0.268-0.268

    formean Vd+0.309+0.0775+0.0775+0.309+0.0775+0.0775

    CETvoltagesAC to Vd-0.072+0.036+0.036+0.042-0.021-0.021

    0.928=VdThe CET voltages are the voltages needed to bring the AC termin-

    al voltages to Vd, e.g. for a, 0.928 - 1 = -0.072By CET transformer action the CET voltages for the star group are

    y/3 less than for the delta and of opposite polarity, e.g. -0.072 for a,therefore +0.042 for A

    The total Ea I for the mean Vd is identical for the star and deltagroups

    Table 4: CET voltages for A phase over a cycle. The samesequence of values is applicable to phases B and C and,with the J3 adjustment, to phases a, b and c, all with therelative dispositions indicated in Table 3.

    Vector position.degrees from A max.

    0153045607590

    105120135150165180195210225240255270285300315330345360

    vd

    0.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.9280.8960.928

    StarCET voltage+0.042+0.040-0.036-0.109+0.021+0.149

    0-0.149-0.021+0.109+0.036-0.040-0.042-0.040+0.036+0.109-0.021-0.149

    0+0.149+0.021-0.109-0.036+0.040+0.042

    spond to Epk = 1, and a total DC current Id of 1. The ACvoltages are weighted by their currents to determine themean DC voltage for each condition. The complete cycleof the CET voltage for each phase is shown in Fig. 7.

    Analysing Fig. 7, the waveform is built up of 60 sec-tions as for a 300 Hz IPT. The shapes are for practical

    IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988

  • purposes triangular. They comprise one cycle at a peakvalue of 0.149 Epk, one at a peak value of 0.109 Epk andone virtually omitted, but with a displacement of (0.04 to

    Fig. 7 CET voltage waveform and corresponding main AC voltage forone cycle

    0.042) Epk from zero. The maximum flux required is givenby the voltage/time integrals or can be derived fromthe average voltages. The average voltages for the 3parts, over their duration, are 0.0745 Epk, 0.545 Epk and0.041 Epk respectively, and the overall average, takinginto account the small differences in duration, is 0.05 Epk.Design may be based on the voltage/time integral havingthe peak value of 0.109 Epk and an average value of0.0545 Epk as this gives iron losses approximately equalto the total iron losses over an actual cycle (but note theeffect of transformer reactance, to follow). The equivalentRMS voltage for CET design is 1.11 x 0.0545 Epk =0.06 Epk.

    7 Transformer reactance

    The overlap of phases in commutation due to trans-former reactance adds areas to the basic CET voltages, asshown in the oscillographs in Fig. 8, taken from actual

    Fig. 8 Oscillographs of CET voltages for increasing commutating reac-tance up to xc = 18% at c

    equipment in operation. The volt/time areas addedincrease the CET voltage rating, and also the DC voltageregulation. The effect is similar to that of reactanceoverlap on IPT voltage waveforms and voltage regula-tion.

    Reactance produces DC voltage regulation. In conven-tional 12-pulse rectifier circuits supplied by closely

    coupled transformer windings, the percentage DC regula-tion is 0.259 times the percentage reactance. With theCET the commutation current steps for each bridge addup to 0.536 Id instead of 0.5 with conventional parallelbridge operation. The 0.259 factor therefore increases to0.277.

    The addition to the CET voltage rating due to trans-former reactance is equal to the DC voltage regulationdue to the reactance. The same volt/time areas areinvolved in both cases, and they both relate to averagevalues.

    At a reactance of about 18 to 20%, the additional com-mutation volt/time areas bring the CET basic triangularwaveform to rectangular form as Fig. 8(c). The voltage/time integral and the CET voltage rating are thenapproximately doubled.

    7.1 CET reactanceThe CET adds a little reactance to that of the main trans-former. Its own reactance between windings can beexpressed as a percentage of its own 50 Hz kVA calcu-lated as for a normal power transformer. To refer thispercentage to the main circuit kVA, to add it to the maintransformer percentage reactance, it is decreased ininverse proportion to the kVA. Typical values would be4%, decreased by a kVA ratio of 150 for the CET to1613 for the main transformer (to take the examplereferred to in Table 1), which equals 0.37% reactance,and times 0.277 = 0.1 % regulation.

    8 No-load voltage riseThere is a voltage rise at no-load, as there is then nomagnetising current available for the CET, and operationreverts to straightforward 12-pulse, as happens withan IPT. The no-load voltage is Epk {12/n) sin (TT/12) =0.9886 Epk. the light-load voltage, i.e. when the CET ismagnetised, is 0.928 Epk (12/TT) sin (TC/12) = 0.918 Epk, andthe no-load voltage rise is then 7.7%.

    9 Rectifier diode ratingThe 12-pulse operation of the individual bridges resultsin the rectifier diode current rating being improved fromthat corresponding to 120 rectangular current pulses, tothe approximate equivalent for diode rating of 180 halfsine waves. (Strictly, 150 plus the angle of commutationoverlap.)

    10 Example and performanceFig. 2 illustrates a transformer assembly incorporating aCET for 12-pulse parallel bridge operation. It includesalso a buck/boost transformer, supplied from a separatevoltage regulating transformer, to provide a range ofoutput voltages over which the CET maintains equalbridge currents.

    Tests and operation in service have confirmed the per-formance, the following result being typical.

    Current values in the secondary line connections:Without a CET but with an IPT: Star 35 A Delta

    230 AWith a CET but without an IPT: Star 250 A Delta

    250 A

    11 Conclusions

    The CET described in the paper has been shown, both intheory and in practice, to overcome completely the

    IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pi. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988 89

  • current balance problem between parallel phase-displaced 3-phase rectifier bridges supplied from closelycoupled transformer windings. This also allows 12-pulserectifiers to be used on a supply having substantial6-pulse rectifier loading.

    The assurance of current balance allows the equipmentto be loaded up to its full rated value.

    The elimination of the IPT gets rid of a source ofobjectionable noise and provides a saving to offset thecost of the CET.

    12 Acknowledgments

    Early work leading to UK Patent GB 2001486 wascarried out in conjunction with M.H.F. Garnham at theWimbledon works of Foster Transformers Ltd.

    Thanks are due to Bonar Brentford Electric Ltd. inproviding equipment and facilities for the further devel-opment and performance demonstrations on which thecontent of this paper is based, and for permitting thepublication of the photograph in Fig. 2.

    13 References1 BENNELL, F.T.: 'Current balance in 12-pulse rectifiers comprising

    parallel bridges'. IEE Conf. Publ. 154, 1977, pp. 66-692 BENNELL, F.T.: 'Rectifiers for railway traction substations', IEE

    Proc. B, 1979, pp. 22-263 UK Patent GB 2001486, 3.2.824 UK Patent GB 2113927, 9.5.85

    14 Appendix

    Fig. 4 shows the voltage vectors for the transformer starand delta secondary windings for the first part of a cycle.

    (a) A star line-to-neutral voltage at a maximum.A winding current is at a maximum and it is sharedequally by windings B and C. For convenient propor-

    tioning, values of 2, 1 and 1 respectively are assigned. Thecurrent in delta winding a on the same core limb aswinding A is, by the CET ^/3 turns ratio 2/^3, and inwindings b and c a half this, i.e. 1/^/3. The delta line cur-rents become ^/3 for a and c and zero for b (b and cwinding currents being equal). Thus, during these condi-tions which apply while A is between 15 and +15from its maximum position, the proportions of DCcurrent provided by the star and delta groups are 2and J3, respectively. For a total DC current ld of1, 2/(2 + y/3) = 0.536 Id is provided by the star groupthrough A; by 1/(2 + V3) = 0.268 /,, each from B and C;and 7 3 / ( 2 + V3) = -4 6 4 l& from the del ta g r o uP 'by 2/^3(2 + 73) = 0.309 ld from a, plus 1/^/3(2 + J3) =0.155 /,, through b and c.

    (b) A star line-to-neutral voltage advanced 15.The current in star winding B and line B (and therefore indelta winding b) ceases. Star windings A and C by seriesconnection now carry 0.464 Id and by the 7 3 relationshipdelta windings a and c each carry 0.268 / d , addingtogether to 0.536 Id. Thus, the star windings now con-tribute 0.464 Id and the delta windings 0.536 ld.

    (c) A now at plus 30. The current proportions remainas for (b) and continue the same to plus 45.

    (d) At 45 star winding B begins to carry current again.The current in A and B windings is now 0.268 Id, 0.536 Idin C and 0.536 Id total from the star group. In the deltagroup, the current proportions are 0.155 Id in a and b,0.309 Id in c and 0.464 Id total.

    At 75 current in A ceases.At 90 the voltage reverses.At 105 the current in A reappears in reverse flow at

    0.268 Id.Continuing this procedure for a complete cycle pro-

    duces a current waveform for the star connection asshown in Fig. 5, and for the delta windings the samevalues reduced by y/3.

    90 IEE PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 135, Pt. B, No. 2, MARCH 1988