Upload
claire-francis
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Towards a New Consensus
Analyzing Bolivian Poverty Reduction Strategies
“It is fair to say that nobody really believes in the Washington Consensus anymore.”
From: “Goodbye Washington Consensus,
Hello Washington Confusion?”
Dani RodrikHarvard UniversityJanuary 2006
Long wave: depressive phase
• Lower growth• Increased unemployment• Regressive redistribution• Decaying “techno-economic paradigm,” or
“mode of regulation” (“Fordism”)• Laissez-faire, Washington Consensus
policies• “Real business cycles” types of economic
theory
Long wave: expansive phase
• Higher growth
• Increased employment
• Progressive redistribution
• Consolidated techno-economic paradigm
• Policy optimism, New Consensus
• (Post-)Keynesian, (post-)structuralist theory
Changed focus
From policy deconstructionism:
• Deregulation
• Decontrol
• Denationalization
Changed focus
To policy constructivism:
• Policy sovereignty
• Structural change
• Social justice (economic ethics, distributive justice)
New focusNew instruments
Indebtedness policy Policy sovereignty
Investment policy Structural change
Income distribution policy Social justice
Indebtedness policy:regulation of financial flows
From :
Cycles of massive inflows and euphoria
followed by
capital flight and debt crises
To:
Desendeudamiento and
regulation of international capital flows
Foreign saving = trade deficit = a knowable variable
t
Investment policy:output structure matters
Structure matters• Natural resource exports = low growth• Primary specialization = high inequality• Employment intensity = poverty reduction
elasticity of growth
Investment policy
ttt xdx
11
Income distribution policy:tax and expenditure reform
• Increasing inequality in most countries during the low growth phase
• Latin America: Most unequal income distribution, low tax/GDP ratio, regressive tax reforms
Income distribution policy
ttt xVy
New Consensus model
Income distribution
Investment efficiency
Saving propensity
Saving propensities
Public investment allocation
Private investment allocation
Public income
s
Private saving
Public saving
Sectoral investment
Private incomes Gross
outputs
Incomedistribution
policy
Investmentpolicy
Indebtednesspolicy
Foreigndebt
tXtV
gtz
t
Base scenario: Estrategia Boliviana de Reducción de la Pobreza
(Poverty reduction 200-2015: 5.7 points, from 50.3 percent to 44.6)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Mill
ions
of
boliv
iano
s
1. Food staples agriculture 2. Exports crops agriculture 3. Petroleum, gas and mining 4. Big industry
5. Small and medium industry 6. Petroleum processing 7. Construction 8. Commerce
9. Transport 10. Infrastructure and services 11. Public administration 12. Finances
Poverty minimizing structural change(Poverty reduction 2000-2015: 10 points, from 50.3 to 40.3 percent)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Mill
ions
of
boliv
iano
s
1. Food staples agriculture 2. Exports crops agriculture 3. Petroleum, gas and mining 4. Big industry
5. Small and medium industry 6. Petroleum processing 7. Construction 8. Commerce
9. Transport 10. Infrastructure and services 11. Public administration 12. Finances
Redistribution policies• Millennium tax [and expenditure] reform: Tax rate 8.1 percent (4.6 percent of GDP)• Rawlsian tax reform: Tax rate 16.7 percent (9.5 percent of GDP)• Undercollection: 3.6 percent of GDP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Per
cent
age
1. EBRP 2. Millennium investment policy 3. Millennium tax reform 4. Millenium employment strategy 5. Rawlsian tax reform
Millennium employment strategy
Employment maximizing investment strategy
• Strong similarity with poverty minimization
Similar GDP and poverty reduction
Similar changes in output structure
Stronger focus on Food staples agriculture (weaker on Small industry)
• Confirmed cross-country by World Bank study (Perry et al. 2006)