To Plate or Not to Plate

  • Upload
    crt0518

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    1/64

    Robert Southard, MDAssistant Professor of SurgeryBaylor College of Medicine

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    2/64

    I have received speaking and consultation fees from Synthes and BioMet

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    3/64

    30 yo man in MVC

    Multiple rib fractures

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    4/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    5/64

    30 yo man in MVC

    Multiple rib fractures

    Treated initially with epidural anesthesia

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    6/64

    30 yo man in MVC

    Multiple rib fractures

    Treated initially with epidural anesthesia

    Pain limited ability to cough/use IS

    Despite functioning epidural

    Offered ORIF

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    7/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    8/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    9/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    10/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    11/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    12/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    13/64

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    14/64

    100,000 patients admitted/year

    Present in 10% of trauma admissions

    Marker of significant blunt chest trauma

    Associated with underlying injuries

    Pulmonary contusion

    Solid organ injury

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    15/64

    Recognized as an injury pattern afterinvention of automobile

    Up to 80% mortality

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    16/64

    Fracture of 3 or more contiguous ribs in 2 ormore places

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    17/64

    Paradoxical movement of segment of chestwall

    http://ps.cnis.ca/wiki/images/5/57/Chapter_65_Image_10_Web_Size.jpg
  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    18/64

    Pulmonary Toilet

    Pain control

    Positive pressure ventilation

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    19/64

    Pulmonary Toilet

    Pain control

    Positive pressure ventilation

    Anatomic correction unnecessary

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    20/64

    1990

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    21/64

    2001

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    22/64

    2014

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    23/64

    High mortality prompted attempts at therapy

    Internal Pneumatic Support

    Tried and True

    Anatomic Fixation Technology Searching for an Indication

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    24/64

    High mortality prompted attempts at therapy

    Internal Pneumatic Support Avery E, et al. Severe crushing injuries of the chest; a new method

    of treatment with continuous hyperventilation by means ofintermittent positive endotracheal insufflation. Q Bull Northwest

    Univ Med Sch. 1955;29(4):3013

    Anatomic Fixation Jones T, Richardson E. Traction on the sternum in the treatment of

    multiple fractured ribs. Surg Gynec Obstet. 1926;42:283.

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    25/64

    Jones 1926 Traction applied with bulletforceps

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    26/64

    Jaslow 1946 Clothes hangerpercutaneously fixed to

    sternum

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    27/64

    Heroy 1951 Traction with clamp applied tosternum

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    28/64

    Schrire 1963 Cape Town Limpet

    Plunger applied externally

    Traction on metal cross-bar

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    29/64

    Constantinescu 1965 Easily placed T-hooksecured in chest

    External fixation

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    30/64

    Advantages

    Restores chest volume

    Improves respiratory mechanics

    Disadvantages

    Danger of placement

    Infection

    Mechanical failure

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    31/64

    Suturing Fractures

    Suture

    K wires

    Reported as part of other descriptionsLikely high rate of failure, though not reported

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    32/64

    Intramedullary fixation

    Klassen 1949 Medullary pegs

    Crutcher and Nolen 1956 Pins Paris 1975 IM struts

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    33/64

    Plates

    Labitzke 1980

    Titanium

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    34/64

    Restoration of chest volume beneficial

    Success of external fixation and ORIF

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    35/64

    Early fixation systems

    Case reports showed they could be effective

    Mechanical failures may not have been reported

    Difficulties with fixation of ribs

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    36/64

    Difficulties with fixation of ribs

    Thin walled

    Bicortical screws necessary Neurovascular bundle

    Plates wrapping around inferior border

    Fear of devascularization

    Possibility of nerve impingement

    Constant motion of ribs

    Failure using stiff plates

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    37/64

    Plates

    Casali 2005

    Judet plates Sanchez plates

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    38/64

    Acute Innovations

    Inion OTPS

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    39/64

    STRATOS

    Synthes MatrixRIB

    BioMet

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    40/64

    Is this a technology looking for an indication?

    Historically risk-benefit ratio favored internalpneumatic stabilization

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    41/64

    Tanaka, et al Trauma 2002

    37 Patients

    Randomized on Day 5 Repaired Ribs 4-10

    Pneumatic Stabilization Control

    Surgical Stabilization of Internal Pneumatic Stabilization? A Prospective Randomized Study of Management

    of Severe Flail Chest Patients. H. Tanaka et al. J Trauma. 2002 Apr; 52(4):727-32

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    42/64

    Tanaka, et al Trauma 2002

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    43/64

    Tanaka, et al Trauma 2002

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    44/64

    Tanaka, et al Trauma 2002

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    45/64

    Granetzny et al ICVTS 2005

    40 Patients

    Fixation at 24 to 36 hours after injury Used Kirschner wires

    Strapping and packing control

    Surgical versus conservative treatment of flail chest. Evaluation of the pulmonary status. A Granetzny et al.

    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;4(6):583-7

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    46/64

    Granetzny et al ICVTS 2005

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    47/64

    Marasco et al JACS 2013

    46 Patients

    Vent dependent with flail chest Fixation at day 4 to 5 (mean)

    Used Inion system biodegradable plates/screws

    Only fixed 1 fracture in flail segment

    Nonoperative management control

    Protocolized extubation criteria in both arms

    Prospective randomized controlled trial of operative rib fixation in traumatic flail chest. SF Marasco et al. J

    Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):924-32

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    48/64

    Marasco et al JACS 2013Outcomes Operative

    group (n = 23)Nonoperative group(n = 23)

    p Value

    Duration of IMVpostrandomization,

    h, mean SD

    151.8 83.1 181.0 130.2 0.37

    Total ICU stay, h,median (IQR)

    324 (238380) 448 (323647) 0.03

    Failed extubation,n (%)

    3 (13) 1 (4) 0.61

    Readmission toICU, n (%) 2/23 (9) 2/23 (9) 0.99

    Pneumonia, n (%) 11/23 (48) 17/23 (74) 0.07

    Duration ofhospital stay, d,median (IQR)

    20 (1828) 25 (1838) 0.24

    In hospital

    mortality, n

    0 1 0.87

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    49/64

    Marasco et al JACS 2013Outcomes Operative

    group (n = 23)Nonoperative group(n = 23)

    p Value

    Duration of IMVpostrandomization,

    h, mean SD

    151.8 83.1 181.0 130.2 0.37

    Total ICU stay, h,median (IQR)

    324 (238380) 448 (323647) 0.03

    Failed extubation,n (%)

    3 (13) 1 (4) 0.61

    Readmission toICU, n (%) 2/23 (9) 2/23 (9) 0.99

    Pneumonia, n (%) 11/23 (48) 17/23 (74) 0.07

    Duration ofhospital stay, d,median (IQR)

    20 (1828) 25 (1838) 0.24

    In hospital

    mortality, n

    0 1 0.87

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    50/64

    Marasco et al JACS 2013Outcomes Operative

    group (n = 23)Nonoperative group(n = 23)

    p Value

    Duration of IMVpostrandomization,

    h, mean SD

    151.8 83.1 181.0 130.2 0.37

    Total ICU stay, h,median (IQR)

    324 (238380) 448 (323647) 0.03

    Failed extubation,n (%)

    3 (13) 1 (4) 0.61

    Readmission toICU, n (%) 2/23 (9) 2/23 (9) 0.99

    Pneumonia, n (%) 11/23 (48) 17/23 (74) 0.07

    Duration ofhospital stay, d,median (IQR)

    20 (1828) 25 (1838) 0.24

    In hospital

    mortality, n

    0 1 0.87

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    51/64

    Marasco et al JACS 2013

    Cost Analysis

    Non-operative 5.17 more ICU days x $4,109/day

    $21,243

    Operative costs (OR time + Implants)

    $6,800

    Net savings

    $14,443

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    52/64

    Leinicke et al Annals of Surgery 2013

    Meta-analysis

    Identified 9 comparative trials

    Operative Management of Rib Fractures in the Setting of Flail Chest: A Systematic Review and Meta-

    Analysis. JA Leinicke et al. Ann Surg. 2013 Mar 18 (Epub)

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    53/64

    Leinicke et al Annals of Surgery 2013

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    54/64

    Leinicke et al Annals of Surgery 2013

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    55/64

    Leinicke et al Annals of Surgery 2013

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    56/64

    Leinicke et al Annals of Surgery 2013

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    57/64

    Not technology looking for an indication

    Evolution of technology over time

    Historically risk-benefit ratio favored internalpneumatic stabilization

    Recent advances may have shifted this balance

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    58/64

    Non-union

    Severely displaced fractures

    Failure of non-operative therapy

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    59/64

    Prospective study of 24 patients

    3 months or more after injury

    Resection of pseudoarthrosis, with plating ifdefect

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    60/64

    203 patients with rib fracture

    7% had flail segments

    Chronic pain in 22%

    Decreased functional status in 53%

    No identifiable injury characteristics predictive ofchronic pain

    The contribution of rib fractures to chronic pain and disability. Gordy S, Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R,

    Mayberry J. Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):659-62

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    61/64

    Nine case reports/series

    Low complication rate

    Many patients lost to follow up Patients reported decreased pain postoperatively

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    62/64

    Little data

    Delaying repair increases difficulty of case

    Further trials needed to identify who is likelyto fail non-operative therapy and benefit

    from ORIF

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    63/64

    Flail chest

    Yes

    Severely displaced fractures

    Not routinely, unless.

  • 8/11/2019 To Plate or Not to Plate

    64/64

    Failure of non-operative therapy

    Yes, but when????

    Non-union

    Maybe