3
TIGER Workshop Series 1.Learning Goals: a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network. b.Inform CU-Boulder audience about the CIRTL Café. c.Disseminate CIRTL Pillars to a broad audience at CU-Boulder. d.Showcase CU-Boulder STEM faculty in teaching and learning workshops. CU-Boulder TIGER/CIRTL 2. Evaluation Strategies and Timelines (Fall 2008–Spring 2011): a. Workshop feedback forms: evaluate presenter/workshop/personal learning application b. Numbers of participants c. Numbers of STEM departments represented by participants 3. Evaluation Issues Arisen, Anticipated? a. None b. The collection of data gives us a good picture of our broad campus impact.

TIGER Workshop Series 1.Learning Goals: a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network. b.Inform CU-Boulder

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TIGER Workshop Series 1.Learning Goals: a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network. b.Inform CU-Boulder

TIGER Workshop Series

1.Learning Goals:a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network.b.Inform CU-Boulder audience about the CIRTL Café.c.Disseminate CIRTL Pillars to a broad audience at CU-Boulder.d.Showcase CU-Boulder STEM faculty in teaching and learning workshops.

CU-Boulder TIGER/CIRTL

2. Evaluation Strategies and Timelines (Fall 2008–Spring 2011):a. Workshop feedback forms: evaluate presenter/workshop/personal learning applicationb. Numbers of participantsc. Numbers of STEM departments represented by participants

3. Evaluation Issues Arisen, Anticipated?a. Noneb. The collection of data gives us a good picture of our broad campus impact.

PJ Bennett
Page 2: TIGER Workshop Series 1.Learning Goals: a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network. b.Inform CU-Boulder

CU-Boulder TIGER/CIRTL

2. Evaluation Strategies and Timelines:a. Determine (non)existence/number of courses: Fall 2008.b. Collect syllabi from existing courses: Fall 2008.c. Compare and contrast topics covered in existing courses: Spring 2009.d. Create model syllabus that integrates CIRTL pillars: Summer 2009

3. Evaluation Issues Arisen, Anticipated?a. Noneb. The analysis of departmental courses gives us a bird’s eye view of the depth/breadth/lack of STEM

departments’ focus on teaching in the discipline.c. The creation of a model course syllabus will allow us to communicate more effectively with those

STEM departments that lack a focus on teaching and learning issues.

Page 3: TIGER Workshop Series 1.Learning Goals: a.Continue Informing CU-Boulder audience of our participation in the national CIRTL Network. b.Inform CU-Boulder

Award Pedagogy Course Development Grants to STEM Departments

1.Learning Goals:a.To learn how to work with departments to assist in developing pedagogy courses.b.To create a pedagogy course that truly integrates the CIRTL pillars.c.To be able to create, implement, and study the new course.d.To integrate our CU-Boulder faculty in the DBER group with the CIRTL project as providers of feedback/consultation.e.To be able to reiterate and share the newly developed course with the CIRTL Network.

CU-Boulder TIGER/CIRTL

2. Evaluation Strategies and Timelines:a. Identify department and staff: Fall 2008b. Introduce participants to CIRTL Pillars, CIRTL Café and to the DBER group: Spring 2009.c. Create, implement, and study course: Summer 2009-Spring 2010.

3. Evaluation Issues Arisen, Anticipated?a. Must create addendum to the IRB to cover the course project research.b. Must collaborate with department to meet needs and expectations.