Thursday June 7, Session 1 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a_2018_FINAL_Single...5 Thursday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. Thursday. and professional perspectives. In each case, aspects of the social context

1

Thursday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.T

hu

rsd

ay

.

Advancing Consumer ProtectionCRN: 25Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Susan Block Lieb, Fordham University School of Law

Description:This panel addresses issues of consumer protection, particularly in financial transactions. Panelists will discuss the role of fine print and disclosures in contracts, and regulations designed to protect consumers.

Presentations:Is the Fine Print Necessary?Lauren E. Willis, Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Regulating Consumer Credit in CanadaMicheline Gleixner, Université de Moncton, Faculty of Law

The Consumer Protection Arms RaceChristopher Bradley, University of Kentucky College of Law

The Image of the Consumer in the Swedish Consumer Credit RegulationAnn-Sofie Henrikson, Institution of Law

Primary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

After the Revolution: New Directions for Legal Research in EgyptCRN: 30Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Parlour Suite 3

Chair/Discussant(s): Mona Oraby, Amherst College

Description:This panel brings together four papers exploring the role of Egypt's post-revolutionary judiciary. Since 2011, Egyptian judges, lawyers, and legal activists have found themselves at the center of nearly every significant political event. These papers,

which are theoretically rigorous and draw on extensive field research, explore these developments in an empirically and theoretically rigorous way. They will be of interest to a wide range of researchers, including scholars of Egyptian politics, judicial politics, authoritarianism, and modern Islamic law. Several papers also address the special challenges involved in carrying out field research in contemporary Egypt, which will be of interest to scholars of the country in general.

Primary Keyword: Islam, Islamic Studies

Presentations:Administrative Courts and Judicial Independence in Postrevolutionary EgyptJeffrey Sachs, Simon Fraser University

Judicial Activism in the Field of Egyptian Shari‘a-Derived Family LawMonika Lindbekk, University of Oslo

Politics on Trial? Criminal Justice and Egypt’s Political Opposition Post-2013Kristel Tonstad

Aging and the LawCRN: 41Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair/Discussant(s): Elena Marchetti, Griffith University

Description:This session addresses aging in the law, from international human rights to innovation and improvement in guardianship, intergenerational ambivalence in elder law, socio-legal understandings of midlife and sexuality and intimate relationships. The papers focus on Brazil, Israel, England and Wales and the US, as well as considering international law.

Primary Keyword: Aging

Presentations:Age is in the Eye of the (beh)OlderRenana Keydar, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

From Guardianship to Supported Decision Making for Older Persons: The Israeli CaseMichael Schindler, Ashkelon Academic College and University of Bar-Ilan

Guardianship: From Rules to SystemsNina Kohn, Syracuse University College of Law

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 18:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

2

Thursday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Intergenerational Ambivalence and Elder Law: An Opening up of the Solidarity-Conflict ApproachJenny Julén Votinius, Faculty of Law, Lund University

Intimate Relationships Between Older People in Care Home Settings: Legal, Ethical and Practical IssuesJohn Williams, Aberystwyth University

The Elderly`s Legal Context in Brazil and in the World - A Comparative AnalysisGuilherme Niskier, Veiga de Almeida University

Artificial Intelligence, War, LawCRN: 23Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Sheraton Hall A

Chair(s):Markus Gunneflo, Lund University

Discussant(s): Ioannis Kalpouzos, The City Law School - City University

Description:This panel session is dedicated to inquiring into the converging fields of artificial intelligence, war and law. Bringing together international humanitarian, intellectual property, posthumanist and feminist legal thinking the panel aims to bring forth new questions, better descriptions, and above all an opportunity to think together about our lives and deaths in and with contemporary war and law.

Primary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Assessing Lawfulness in AI-Human Interaction under the Laws of WarGregor Noll, Lund University, Sweden

Posthumanitarian International Law and Practice of WarMatilda Arvidsson, University of Gothenburg

Technology, Dead Male Bodies and the Politics of Feminist Recognition: Theorizing the Gendered Logic of Algorithmic Protection and TargetingKristin Sandvik, University of Oslo

The Dark Web and AI – a Question of Jurisdiction and Legal SubjectivityMerima Bruncevic, Depart. of Law, Gothenburg University

Before the Courts and in the CourtsThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Yorkville East

Primary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Constitutional Feedback Loops: On the Dialogue between Judges and LegislatorsHilke Grootelaar, Utrecht University

Prosecuting PovertyWendy Bach, University of TN College of Law

We'll see you in Court: States v. the Trump AdministrationKaren Pita Loor, Boston University Law School

Citizenship, Gender, and SexualityCRN: 1 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Lara Goés, Superior School of War

Description:This Session aims to discuss relevant themes on minorities and rights, as well to include debates that focus on global and comparative perspectives.

Primary Keyword: Culture, Cultural RightsSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Feeling Progress: Queer Injury, Intimacy, and Identity in LawSenthorun Raj, Keele University

Gender Equality at the Davos Forum: Economic Participation and Justice in Comparative PerspectiveAna Luiza da Gama e Souza, Universidade Estácio de SáLara Goés, Superior School of War

Toward a Better Birth: Examining Regulatory Barriers to Improving Maternity CareElizabeth Kukura, Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law

3


hu

rsd

ay

.

Citizenship, Political Participation and their Challenges in Democratic societies todayThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:These papers address issues of education and civil engagement; neoliberalism and populist reasoning; political participation in urban centers; incarceration and disenfranchisement; and gendered discourses and legal consciousness. on immigration policy

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

Presentations:Neoliberal and Populist ReasonSteven Winter, Wayne State Univ Law Sch

Not Criminal(s): Family Members’ Understanding and Legal Consciousness on Immigration Detention and DeportationBlanca Ramirez, University of Southern California

Political participation in public equipment CUCA Network- Urban Centers of Culture, Art, Sports and ScienceErlon Oliveira, Centro Universitário Estacio do CearáAlexandre Barbalho, UECE

Comparative Human RightsCRN: 1Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEAC

Discussant(s): Edna Raquel Hogemann, UNESA

Description:This session examines legal development, constitutional law and human rights protection from the perspectives of both legal anthropology/sociology and comparative law in Asia and in the Americas. In particular, this session seeks to understand how political and historical paths, as well as global influences such as the universalization of human rights and democratic constitutional values, have shaped the formation and evolution of constitutional law and human rights protection in countries in Asia and the Americas.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Down with Whores’: Jack the Ripper’s Canonical VictimsPer Ystehede, University of Oslo

Human Rights, Normative Overlap and Violence in the Brazilian Western AmazonRodolfo Jacarandá, Federal Univ. of Rondônia - Brazil

Society’s Constitutions: Studying Non-State Constitutionalization as an Element of Theory of SocietyLasha Bregvadze, Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

The Case of Women Driving: Bridging the Gap Between Social Progress & Legal Reform in Saudi ArabiaBethany Alhaidari, NUIG - Irish Centre for Human Rights

Compliance, Transparency, and Tax PlanningCRN: 31 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Mirit Eyal-Cohen, University of Alabama

Description:Effective tax administrations requires balancing enforcement actions with respecting taxpayer privacy rights. This panel examines this issue and other tax enforcement and compliance considerations.

Primary Keyword: Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal Policies

Presentations:Comparative Statutory InterpretationKim Brooks, Dalhousie

Tax Avoidance and Corporate Governance: Duties and LiabilitiesAikaterini (Katerina) Pantazatou, University of Luxembourg

Tax Lawyers as Tax InsuranceHeather Field, UC Hastings College of the Law

The Transparency-Privacy WarsDiane Ring, Boston College Law SchoolShu-Yi Oei, Boston College Law School

4


hu

rsd

ay

Constitutions at the Crossroads: Brexit, the UK and IrelandThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair/Discussant(s): David Schneiderman, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto

Description:The United Kingdom and the Irish Republic have experienced gradual constitutional reorientation influenced by their EU membership. Ireland has realigned from an orientation towards the UK towards a more continental European perspective. In the UK, the judiciary and legal practice had undergone something of a similar process, which was bolstered by the 'domestication' of Human Rights Law and devolution. The collaboration between the UK and Irish states over the Good Friday Agreement has been particularly significant. Brexit means that the constitutional practices of both states are at the crossroads, or in a state of flux. Indeed the idea of a 'crossroads' may overstate the clarity of the choice faced by the UK. The panel sets Brexit's constitutional implications in historical and conceptual perspective across both islands.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Geographies of Law

Presentations:A Place Apart? Bringing together Constitutional Traditions in Ireland, North and SouthJohn Morison, Queen's University Belfast

Between Two Unions: Ireland’s Constitutional Position Post-BrexitStephen Coutts, Dublin City University

Schrodinger's Constitution: Territory, Power and the ‘Textbook Tradition’ in English Constitutional LawDaniel Wincott, Cardiff University

The Invention of Tradition? Popular Sovereignty and Scots ConstitutionalismAileen McHarg, University of Strathclyde

Contemporary African Constitutional Making and Matters: Protest, Religion, Identity and Affirmative ActionCRN: 13Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jonathan Klaaren, University of the Witwatersrand

Description:This sessions brings together several contemporary constitutional questions in Kenya and South Africa, two African jurisdictions with arguably significant shared constitutional cultures. The three issues covered for South Africa are all key flash points of contestation: affirmative action, protest, and religious schooling. The panel and discussion will explore how these issues reflect the direction of South Africa's constitutionalism. The Kenya covers the making and implementation of the Kenyan Constitution and thus provides a parallel to the more studied South African case. Together the panel explores features of constitutionalism in the British post-colonial context.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Presentations:A Critical Evaluation of the Constitution Making and Implementation Process in KenyaNkatha Kabira, University of Nairobi, School of Law

The Paradox of Affirmative Action in South Africa: Can Dignity be a Barrier to Equality?Ntombizozuko Dyani-Mhango, University of the WitwatersrandCharmika Samaradiwakera-Wijesundara, University of the Witwatersrand

Courts and Legal Decisionmaking in Realist PerspectiveCRN: 28 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Description:Once we step outside of formalist assumptions about how courts operate, empirical sociolegal studies has much to contribute beyond the usual studies of judges' politics. This panel showcases the richness of these alternative empirical approaches, from judges' reputational position, to the impact of individual judges' perspectives, to the almost invisible way courts take in non-legal institutional

5


hu

rsd

ay

.

and professional perspectives. In each case, aspects of the social context within which decisions are made matter more than judges' political alignments. That social context can include the particulars of individual judges' and courts' habitus, the impact of reputation within the state (democratic or otherwise), relationships between law and other institutions or professions, and much more. Panelists push back at empirical legal studies or judicial politics research that stays exclusively mired in tracking connections between formal law and judges' political affiliations, pointing the way to a richer conversation between such studies and other work on judges and courts from the empirical sociolegal studies field.

Primary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:How Legal Intermediaries Facilitate and Inhibit Social ChangeShauhin Talesh, UC Irvine

Judicial Reputation and Public Opinion: what is the role of judges in democracies?Diego Vasconcelos, Universidade Federal de Rondônia

Knowledge at the Crossroads: Constitutional Fact-Finding and The Treatment of Experiential Knowledge in Canada (AG) v. BedfordDana Phillips, Osgoode Hall Law School

Courts, judges, inequality, part ICRN: 43 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Archie Zariski, Athabasca University

Discussant(s): Dorcas Quek Anderson, Singapore Management University School of Law

Description:This session explores the role of judges and courts in non-adjudicative processes such as judicial mediation, judicial settlement conferencing, and judicial dispute resolution.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:A ‘Necessary Evil’? The Role of Legal Strategy on Drugs and Addiction in Producing StigmaKate Seear, Monash University

Beyond Diagnosis: Shifting Psychiatric Science and its Socio-legal RamificationsMartyn Pickersgill, University of Edinburgh

Civil Law Judge in Canada: From a Judicial to a Justicial Role.Jean-Francois Roberge, Université de Sherbrooke

Judicial Conflict Resolution in Italy, Israel and England and Wales: A Comparative Look on the Regulation of Judges' Settlement ActivitiesMichal Alberstein, Bar Ilan University

Current legal issues in Asia and the Americas IVCRN: 1 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Civic Ballroom N.

Chair/Discussant(s): Fernanda Duarte, UNESA e INCT/InEAC/PROPPI/UFF

Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to current trends in these regions relating to Corporate Law, Business and Trade . Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments,social groups or/and corporations and/or analyses of emerging trends in corporate law theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Presentations:Managing the Risks of Corporate Fraud: the Evidence from Hong Kong And SingaporeWai Wan, Singapore Management UniversityChristopher Chen, Singapore Management UniversitySay Goo, Hong Kong UniversityChongwu Xia, Xiamen University

Qualification and Treatment of Stock Market Offences at the Intersection of Two Legal FrameworksMarie Badrudin, Université de Montréal

The Elusive Meaning of “Fraud” in U.S. Federal Criminal Law: Mail Fraud and Securities FraudThomas Joo, University of California, Davis, School of Law

6


hu

rsd

ay

The Hybrid Logic of Executive Compensation of China’s National ChampionsLiwen Lin, University of British Columbia

Toothless Leviathan? A research on anticompetitive control mechanisms of the Brazilian market.Wagner Brito, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Discourse and Strategy in Judicial Decision MakingThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair/Discussant(s): Christopher Schmidt, Chicago-Kent College of Law

Description:Reflecting a methodological shift away from judicial behavior, this session pays close attention to the discourse used by judges in their opinions and oral argument and to the strategies employed by judges working in interaction with other branches of government. Textual analysis of a sample of U. S. Supreme Court decisions suggests how the meaning of "segregation" has changed since Brown v. Board of Education, while analysis of Justice Gorsuch's prose provides insight into his unique style. Discourse analysis is also used to examine a controversial sentencing decision in a recent California rape case. Other papers explore judicial deference to administrative agencies in the Ninth Circuit and, in a simulation, how aggressive strategies can maximize a court's influence over time.

Primary Keyword: Judges and Judging

Presentations:An Agent-Based Model of Judicial StrategyAlex Schwartz, The University of Hong Kong

How Can an Agency Lose?: A Study of U.S. Federal Appellate Reasoning about Administrative DiscretionBen Merriman, University of KansasKevin Campbell, University of Kansas - School of Public Affairs & Administration

Segregated in Law, Segregated in Fact: Desegregation’s Meanings at the Supreme CourtJames Biblarz, Harvard University

The Gorsuch Code: A Digital Analysis of Judicial Style and RhetoricNina Varsava, Stanford University

“A bridge that will probably never be crossed”: The discourse of accountability in Judge Persky’s sentencing decision of Brock Turner in The People v. Turner (2016)Ana-Maria Jerca, York University

Feminist Perspectives: Law, Home, and MarketThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Régine Tremblay, University of British Columbia

Description:This panel explores feminist struggles around the separation, but also the intersections, of family, market, and state. The topics vary-domestic violence intervention, labour, gender, discrimination, property rights, intersectional identities--but the papers are situated in rich examinations of how to conceptualize the interactions of different actors and institutions across society.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Presentations:Civil Protection Orders and Domestic Violence: The Impact of Formal and Informal Actors on These Legal DecisionsAlexa Bejinariu, University of Nevada, Las VegasEmily Troshynski, University of Nevada, Las VegasTerry Miethe, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Economic Households, Familial Labour - Legal Exceptionalism at the Crossroads of Households and Markets (Notes for a research agenda)Kerry Rittich, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law

The cohabiting carer and the home: a vulnerability perspectiveEllen Gordon-Bouvier, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK

International Crime, Criminal justice, and CorruptionCRN: 52 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. Paper Session

Room: Kent

Discussant(s): Rolando Garcia Miron, Stanford Law School

Description:The contemporary challenges of law and development are multiple. However, one particular topic remains constantly in the agenda: the erosion of the rule of law by political corruption and organized crime. Democracy is impoverished by the influence of money on governmental decision-making that may lead to the capture of

7


hu

rsd

ay

.

regulatory agencies, political parties, and the civil service. Likewise, democracy is threatened by a populist rhetoric that promises the complete elimination of corruption to voters. At the international level, the United Nations and the NGO Transparency International have denounced the externalities and the impact of bribery on economic inequality and poverty. At the local level, the fight against corruption seems elusive, leading some commentators to voice their skepticism and critical opinion on these initiatives.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:Anticorruption efforts in Latin America: A “glocal” narrative?Raquel de Mattos Pimenta, University of Sao PauloCatherine Greene, Yale Law School

Corruption, Legality and Political Support in Post-Soviet EurasiaWilliam Reisinger, The University of IowaVicki Claypool, The University of IowaMarina Zaloznaya, The University of Iowa

Humanitarian Claims: Governing through the International Criminal CourtSara Kendall, University of Kent

Internationalising criminal justice – Cambodia and the internationalMaria Elander, La Trobe UniversityRachel Hughes, University of Melbourne

Making Enemies: Military Justice, Civilian Protesters and “Treason Against the Homeland” in VenezuelaGiancarlo Fiorella, University of Toronto

International Law and Gendered InequalitiesCRN: 38 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Kathleen Lahey, Queen's University Faculty of Law

Description:Legal scholarship questioning the efficacy of international human rights law reveals the range of questions and contradictions that emerge when these interventions are invoked to address gendered inequalities at a national

level. At the heart of this critique is the ongoing tension between the "universal" and the "local." Empirical accounts exploring the impact of human rights based approaches illustrate their general inattentiveness to the intricacies of local patriarchies, and more problematically, their role in exacerbating them. These papers examine this phenomenon with reference to case studies in Brazil, Ireland, Canada, and Sudan.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:A comparative case study considering both Ireland’s and Canada’s attempts to address historical and gendered human rights abuses in the context of international human rights law.Helen Kehoe, National University of Ireland, Galway

CEDAW and BREXIT: The UK's Engagement with the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women - from 2017, onwardsAnn Mumford, King's College London

Eat This! Gender Inequality, Culture, and the Politics of FoodBita Amani, Queen's University, Faculty of Law

Gender and Taxation in Developing Countries -- The Roles of CEDAW, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, and the SDGsKathleen Lahey, Queen's University Faculty of Law

There are cells in Bangkok too: the contribution of gender studies for a reflection on the conformity of "universal" rules to the female incarceration in BrazilRaissa Carla Belintani de Souza, Universidade de São Paulo - USP

Law and the lived experience of refugees, migrants, and asylum seekers.CRN: 2 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session

Room: Yorkville West

Chair(s): Rebecca Hamlin, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Description:This panel explore the question of mismatch between law and the lived experience of refugees, migrants, and asylum seekers. The papers ask how refugees, migrants,

8


hu

rsd

ay

and asylum seekers literally and figuratively engage in trespass and boundary crossing, challenging legal categories and concepts along the way. The papers draw on case studies of migration experiences, reception contexts, and migrant claims-making in North America, Europe, Australasia, and the Middle East, and come from a variety of disciplinary and methodological approaches. Together, these papers highlight a consistent theme of disjuncture between the interests and ideas that are protected by law, and the motivations and experiences of those who seek legal protection.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Evaluating the Case: Settled and Unsettled Screening Mechanisms in Asylum AdjudicationsTalia Shiff, Northwestern University

Redemption: Asylum-Seeking on Religious Grounds in the Era of Probationary CitizenshipJaeeun Kim, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Refugee Rhetoric: Law's Sites of ResistanceJaya Ramji-Nogales, Temple Law School

The Migrant/Refugee Binary and the New Politics of AsylumRebecca Hamlin, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Law, Lawyers, and Social Movement ResilienceCRN: 21 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session

Room: Sheraton Hall C

Chair(s): Sameer Ashar, University of California, Irvine School of Law

Discussant(s): Deborah Weissman, University of North Carolina School of Law

Description:Effective social movements are resilient and adaptive as conditions change over time. This panel examines the role of law and lawyers in facilitating social movement resilience and adaptability. The papers on this panel draw on case studies from the immigrant rights, workers' rights, and criminal legal abolition movements in North America to suggest: (1) how law may limit and construct movement adaptation and aspiration; (2) how lawyers work with movement actors to confront challenges to mobilization; and (3) how lawyers work with movement actors to shape and/or facilitate advancement toward strategic goals and aspirations.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:"Community" Lawyering's Effect on Social Change: An Immigration Enforcement Case StudyChristine Cimini, Univ. of Washington School of Law

Community Immigrant DefenseSameer Ashar, Univ. of California, Irvine School of Law

Comprehensive Immigration Severity and the Challenges and Opportunities for Immigrants’ Rights MobilizationAnil Kalhan, Drexel University

Movement Lawyering: Building Legal Literacy and Passing the MicFay Faraday, Osgoode Hall Law School

Reshaping the Port Trucking Industry: The Challenge to MisclassificationScott Cummings, University of California, Los Angeles

Legal Challenges in Water Resources AccessThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session

Room: Leaside

Discussant(s): Talita Montezuma, Universidade de Brasília

Chair/Discussant(s): Gabriela Garcia Batista Lima Moraes Universidade de Brasília

Description:Water resources protection aims to guarantee access to water as a human right. It poses several challengers in practice since this access is limited to water shortages. Legally, the lack of more precise rules to deal with the interests and legal instruments dealing with water resources can preclude the access to water itself. In another hand, legal regimes that use public and private legal instruments may also be arranged to improve water resources protections. The session is focused on these reflections giving the empirical cases being studied within the research project "Water Resources in the face of climate change: the role of law in the implementation of adaptation measures" of the Research Group on Natural Resources law and Sustainability with funding from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil.

9


hu

rsd

ay

.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Integration and Water Conflicts in Brazil: Analysis of the São Marcos Hydrographic Basin CaseAndré Ferraço, Universidade de Brasília

Legal aspects of Payments for Environmental Services addressing water resources: an analysis of brazilian public and private arrangementsAna Caroline Machado da Silva, Universidade de Brasília

The challenge of low effectiveness of human access to water within the use of private legal instruments in water resources access and water crisis: the example of São Paulo - BrazilGabriela Garcia Batista Lima Moraes, Universidade de Brasília

The environmental issues of the use of water in large-scale mining projects: analysis of Brazilian legal instrumentsTalita Montezuma, Universidade de Brasília

The role of social participation and direct democracy in fresh and coastal waters integrated management: a comparative study between Brazil and FrancePaulo Spolidorio, University of Brasília - UnB

Modern Challenges in MediationThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:Mediation is a distinct category of dispute resolution. Its use has become more frequent as recourse to courts has become more expensive and difficult. This panel will investigate some modern challenges posed to mediation, including impartiality as a foundational value in mediation, the social impact of mediation as well as whether and how to create a safe setting for mediation in cases of family violence. This panel will also examine mediation as an exercise in self-determination, interrogating whether this approach to mediation can yield more agreements and greater durability of outcomes.

Primary Keyword: Disputes, Mediation, and Negotiation

Presentations:For Settlement: Impartiality as Justice in MediationBrian Pappas, Boise State University

Mediating Family Violence: Rising to the Feminist Challenge of Creating a Safe and Supported Mediation Process in Cases Involving Family ViolenceBecky Batagol, Faculty of Law, Monash UniversityRachael Field, Faculty of Law, Bond University

Self-Determination in Mediation: Resolving the Paradoxes and Rehumanizing Mediation EffectivenessAlysoun Boyle, University of Newcastle

Place, Identity, and MigrationCRN: 3Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Sara Ross, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:The disjuncture between the expected and the empirical varies in studies of law and society. Ethnographic, qualitative, and micro-level analyses tend to magnify this disjuncture through subverting familiar concepts and ideal-types with data derived from extended studies close to the ground. In that vein, the presenters of this panel examine homicide 'hot spots' in Canada, illiberal constitutionalism in Cambodia, eviction and the construction of ordinariness in Albania, the eclectic ingredients of national identity in Iraq, and the temporal displacements of audit culture in China. Together, they revel in the unexpected, confounding popular or received ideas to point toward new ways of seeing and understanding law, crime, and politics.

Primary Keyword: Ethnography

Presentations:A Legal Diaspora Comes Home: Biafran Lawyers in the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970)Samuel Fury Childs Daly, Duke University

Crime and Place: A Longitudinal Examination of Homicide Hot Spots in Toronto, OntarioVincent Harinam, University of Toronto

Forging Post-ISIS Iraqi National Identity: Beyond the Ethnic, Sectarian, and PoliticalRuba Ali Al-Hassani, Osgoode Hall Law School

10


hu

rsd

ay

Politics of Status and Legal InclusionCRN: 21 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Devyani Prabhat, University of Bristol Law School

Description:This panel explores legal inclusion and exclusion on various continents and a range of circumstances. These papers discuss how US law excludes undocumented students by rescinding DACA and shifts the perception of marijuana by including it as legal in some states. The papers also explain excluded groups can appeal to the law by claiming rights in Japan and in the European Union.

Primary Keyword: Rights and IdentitiesSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:From Outlaws to Consumers: The Evolution of Drug Culture and Rights Claiming in High Times MagazineJoseph Mello, DePaul University

Politics and the limits of legal integration – mobilizing for migrant rights within the EUClaire Sigsworth, Syracuse University

Shaping the Boundaries of Legitimate Claims for Compensation: Cases of Japanese War Orphans’ Litigation, Leprosy Litigation, and Abductees’ Compensation MovementHye Won Um, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Department of Political Science

Protect, Serve, and Deport: The Rise of Policing as Immigration EnforcementCRN: 2Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Elgin

Author(s): Amada Armenta, University of Pennsylvania

Chair(s): Shannon Gleeson, Cornell University

Reader(s):Ingrid Eagly, UCLA School of LawCharles Epp, University of KansasDoris Marie Provine, Arizona State UniversityEmily Ryo, USC Gould School of Law

Description:This session brings together an interdisciplinary panel to discuss Amada Armenta's Protect, Serve, and Deport: The Rise of Policing as Immigration Enforcement (University of California Press, 2017), which highlights the role of local law enforcement agencies in channeling Latino immigrants into the deportation regime. The book argues that the aggressive deployment of "order maintenance" policing strategies heighten Latino immigrant drivers' risk of arrest. Most research on immigration control focuses on formal law and policy, with little attention to how immigration control functions on the ground. A critical intervention, Protect, Serve, and Deport goes "inside" the state to examine how local law enforcement agencies amplify the effects of immigration law through their "colorblind" institutionalized practices.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Policing, Law Enforcement

Regulating the Internet: A Legal Precipice?CRN: 37Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Kim Barker, University of Stirling Olga Jurasz, Open University

Participant(s):Kim Barker, University of StirlingOlga Jurasz, Open UniversityTsachi Keren-Paz, Keele University, school of LawRhonson Salim, Open University & British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Description:The Internet can act as a force for good, but can also be used as a means of irrationality, obfuscation and abuse too. Scholarship has explored some of these issues in the context of rationality-based regulation but also in terms of human rights. As our dependence on the Internet grows, so too do questions, discussions, and arguments surrounding the future relationship the Internet has with the law. Behaviour can spread organically, presenting new challenges for platforms and regulators. Not only do individuals tend to trust opinions that are disseminated by influential actors, there are increasing patterns of users 'following the herd'. This roundtable brings together speakers working on issues 'at the edge' of the Internet, creating an open dialogue focusing on the direction of Internet regulation: towards a precipice or back to safety?

Primary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the Law

11


hu

rsd

ay

.

Religious and Cultural Challenges to State LawCRN: 48 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session

Room: Peel

Chair/Discussant(s): Christine Harrington, New York University

Description:The panel will explore religious, cultural and normative challenges posed by minority groups to formal legal systems in multicultural and pluri-legal societies.

Primary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Legal silencing of minority legal culture – the case of Roma in Swedish criminal courtsIda Nafstad, Lund University

Tempest in a tombstone: a cemetery project as harbinger of inclusion/exclusion in QuebecDia Dabby, University of OttawaLori G. Beaman, University of Ottawa

The Case of the Ancient Karaite Sect in Contemporary Israel: A Qualitative Study of Bidirectional Legal ChangeYael Plitmann, The University of California, Berkeley

Stereotyping, Race and Affirmative ActionThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session


Description:This panel addresses stereotypes, discussing what the harm it is that they create, and ways in which stereotypes - and in particular racial stereotypes - play into judgments and guide decisions in different areas of social life, including in trial juries. The panel also discusses the evolving meaning and role of diversity in American affirmative action law.

Primary Keyword: DiscriminationSecondary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:Diversity Gone Wrong: A Historical Inquiry Into the Evolving Meaning of Diversity from Bakke to FisherOfra Bloch, Yale Law School

Terror in the Justice System: Effects of Defendant Race and Religion on Juror Decision-Making in a Criminal TrialAndrew Woodard, Carleton University

The Puzzle of Profiling: Stereotypes and Social MeaningDelfina Beguerie, Yale Law School

Why is Stereotyping Wrong? Perspectives from American and Canadian LawLéa Brière-Godbout, University of Toronto

Supporting Disability: A Disability Lens on Health, Labor, Reproduction, and SexualityCRN: 40 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s): Rabia Belt, Stanford Law School

Description:Disability makes important interventions into regulatory approaches to health care, the provision of services, labor markets, reproductive rights, and tort law. This panel investigates particular instances of disability pushing against assumptions about bodies, labor, sexuality, and medicine, while at the same time demanding inclusion into services and support systems. Papers explore the commodification of disabled workers in labor markets, the provision of mental health services, ethical dilemmas in precision medicine, assumptions about disability in donor selection processes, and the right to sexuality in tort law.

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:Choosing Differently, Choosing Disability: Donor Selection Practices in Cross Border ReproductionRoxanne Mykitiuk, Osgoode Hall Law School, York Univ

Disability and Sexuality in Israeli Tort LawRina Budnitsky Pikkel, University of Haifa, Faculty of LawSagit Mor, University of Haifa

Labor on Sale: Disability as a Competitive Market ForceAndjela Kaur

Precision Medicine, Health Disparities and Disability InclusionMaya Sabatello, Columbia University

12


hu

rsd

ay

The Carceral ExperienceThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Description:Papers in this session focus on the conditions and social processes within prison walls. Topics include solitary confinement, collective work games, mobile phone use, and disciplinary sanctions.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:From “the Grill” to “Reflection Space” in Dominican prisons: Prisoner and staff perceptions of changing practices of punitive segregationJennifer Peirce, John Jay College of Criminal Justice & CUNY Graduate Center

The Dignity of Working Inmates: Prisoner Strategies and Workplace GamesMichael Gibson-Light, University of Arizona

The war on mobile phones behind bars in DenmarkLinda Kjær Minke, University of Southern Denmark

The “Golden Rule” of Prison Culture and the Norm of Reciprocity: Stories From Maximum Security PrisonsRebecca Trammell, Metropolitan State University of DenverMackenzie Rundle, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

You Snooze, You Lose: Correctional Officer and Inmate Perceptions of Inmate Rights and Privileges in Restricted Housing UnitsDanielle Rudes, George Mason University

The Complex Socio-Legal Landscapes in East Asian SocietiesCRN: 33Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.mPaper Session

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie University

Description:This is a session organised by CRN33 East Asian Law and Society. Its papers explore law and society issues in East Asian societies: China, Taiwan and Japan. They include factors that influence insurance misrepresentation litigation in Taiwan, contradictions in anti-domestic

violence efforts in China, regulation of prostitution in China, and medical injury compensation systems and patient safety initiatives in Japan, Taiwan, and the US.

Primary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Estimating Misrepresentation Litigation in Insurance Law in Taiwan: A Focus on Consumer Protection and TransparencyChun-Yaun Chen, Department of Risk Management and Insurance, National ChengChi University

Medical Injury Compensation Systems and Patient Safety Initiatives in Japan, Taiwan, and the USRob Leflar, University of Arkansas School of Law

Regulating Sex in China: The Implementation of Policing and Public Health Prostitution PoliciesMargaret Boittin, York University

Two Contradictions in China’s Efforts of Combatting Domestic ViolenceJue Jiang, McGill University

The Dynamics of JudgingCRN: 43 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Tania Sourdin, University of Newcastle

Discussant(s): Debbie De Girolamo, Queen Mary University of London

Description:This session explores the work of judges in action and their interactions with others in and out of the courtroom. The papers examine how litigants try to shape judicial responses, how judicial panels interact, the impact of psychodynamics on judicial work and how judges respond to the challenges of unrepresented litigants.


Presentations:Signaling the Swing: How External Actors Respond to (and Shape) Judicial LanguageDaniel Tagliarina, Utica College

13


hu

rsd

ay

.

The Case of Cool Rationality v Passions of the Litigants – Considering the psychodynamics of the courtroom; how understanding them better may contribute to Therapeutic JusticeRichard Cornes, Essex UniversityTania Sourdin, University of Newcastle

The Unrepresented "Accused Person" and the Responsive Judge in Kenya: Limits of the Adversarial SystemSarah Kinyanjui, University of Nairobi

“Do too many judicial cooks spoil the decision-making broth? Exploring how non-legal factors can influence judicial panel decision-making”Brian Barry, Dublin Institute of Technology

The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sCRN: 44 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University

Description:During the last half of the twentieth century, public interest lawyers and their clients sought to bring the Bill of Rights to bear on a variety of state institutions that once granted administrators broad discretion to govern however they saw fit. Scholars have most often studied the transformation of such institutions in isolation, focusing on specific developments in one area of law. This panel brings together scholars examining legal battles that reshaped prisons, schools, the military, and the relationship of disabled individuals to the welfare system. In so doing, it seeks to foster conversation that leads to a broader understanding of how postwar institutions and politics in the United States shifted and changed in response to legal challenges from below.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Ingraham v. Wright and the Racial Justice Challenge to Corporal Punishment in Public EducationKathryn Schumaker, University of Oklahoma

Rights "Run Amok": The Federal Courts and the "Problem" of Prison Litigation, 1964-1996Amanda Hughett, Baldy Center for Law & Social Policy, SUNY-Buffalo

Women Fighting Discrimination in the 1970s U.S. MilitaryHannah Ontiveros, Duke University

The Transnational Ordering of Criminal Justice (I)CRN: 36 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Civic Ballroom S.

Chair(s): Greg Shaffer, University of California Irvine School of Law

Discussant(s): Sally Engle Merry, New York University

Description:The development of criminal justice policy is usually analyzed in the context of political and legal processes taking place within nation states. However, under current conditions of globalization, domestic practices of criminalization, policing, prosecution and punishment increasingly interact with international processes of norm-diffusion. This panel applies the Transnational Legal Order (TLO) framework to analyze how the growing intensity and complexity of interactions between local, national, and international sites of criminal justice policymaking shape the production of legal norms and practices. Introducing findings from various fields of crime governance, we aim to map the emerging landscape of the transnational ordering of criminal justice, understand its formation and analyze its effects.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Dirty Money, Terrorism and Nuclear Proliferation: The Regulatory Advances and Stumbles of a Financial TLOTerence Halliday, American Bar FoundationPeter Reuter, University of Maryland

Transnational Criminal Law In a Globalised World: The Case of TraffickingPrabha Kotiswaran, King's College London

Transnational Legal Ordering and the War on DrugsEly Aaronson, University of Haifa

14


hu

rsd

ay

The War on Diversity III: Intersectionality, Ethics and Methods: Doing Feminist Research on Sexual and Gender-Based ViolenceCRN: 7, 12, 51 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Osgoode Ballroom West

Chair(s): Deborah White, Trent University

Participant(s):Dillon Black, University of OttawaSameena Mulla, Marquette UniversityApril Petillo, Kansas State UniversityAmber Powell, University of Minnesota

Description:Moving the Diversity Committee's War on Diversity series themes into applicable praxis, how does attention to category impact our work as sociolegal practitioners and scholars? This round table explores what it means to DO feminist research on sexual and gender-based violence. Examining the changes in feminist methodology and how scholars adapt, panelists feature research methods that incorporate intersectional ideas about who decides the ethical baseline standards used by ethics boards and grantmakers, honoring discretion when documenting criminal justice practices and where critiques of carceral feminism cause concern. Focused on interdisciplinary, multi-level scholarly perspectives, the round table attends to reflexivity both embodied and performed in the sociolegal sphere.

Primary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal MethodologySecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Improving the Quality of Transnational Regulation and Empowering Marginalized ActorsCRN: 5Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Discussant(s): Christine Parker, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne

Description:This panel asks whether and how competition, coordination, conflict and other interactive dynamics in transnational regulatory governance can be harnessed to enhance the quality of regulation and empower structurally weaker actors. Using examples from labour, social responsibility, forestry, indigenous peoples and sustainable supply chain management, the panel

investigates mechanisms, pathways and strategies by which actors can leverage transnational business governance interactions (TBGIs) to enhance regulatory capacities, ratchet up standards and advance the interests of equity-seeking groups. It also explores the structural conditions that influence such strategic action. The papers form part of a forthcoming book that presents new empirical, theoretical and strategic insight into these phenomena.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Presentations:Governance Interactions in Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementErrol Meidinger, SUNY Buffalo Law School/Baldy Center

Harnessing Transnational Governance Interactions to Enhance Regulatory Quality and Empower Weaker Actors: Implications for Theory and PracticeBurkard Eberlein, Schulich School of Business, York UniversityKenneth Abbott, Arizona State UniversityErrol Meidinger, SUNY Buffalo Law School/Baldy CenterStepan Wood, Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Interactive Strategies for Empowering Weaker Actors in Transnational Governance Contests: Organized Labour and the making of ISO 26000Stepan Wood, Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Vaccines, Protection and Challenges: Optimizing Disease PreventionCRN: 9 Thursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Sheraton Hall B

Chair/Discussant(s): Anna Kirkland, University of Michigan

Description:Vaccines are one of the great medical inventions of modern time, with large benefits and small risks. Nevertheless, immunization rates in several developed countries have declined in past decades. As a result, diseases that have been brought under control are coming back - for example, Europe is seeing a large measles outbreak with tens of deaths. Achieving sufficient vaccine coverage to prevent outbreaks faces challenges

15


hu

rsd

ay

.

from multiple directions. This panel will explore these challenges. It addresses parental hesitation, anti- vaccine misinformation and immunization of health workers. Its aim is to identify the challenges faced by policy makers, discuss current legal and policy tools, and present new solutions to this ongoing challenge.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Child Undervaccination, Stigma, and Public Support for Policies: Practical and Ethical IssuesRichard Carpiano, University of California, RiversideNicholas Fitz, Duke University

Increasing Vaccination Rates through Mandatory Education to SolidarityNili Karako-Eyal, School of law, College of Management

The Biases Behind Vaccine Injury StoriesDorit Reiss, UC Hastings College of the Law

Vaccination Policy and the State: A Comparative Study of the US and IsraelNadav Davidovitch, Ben Gurion University of the Negev

Violence in SocietyThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Description:The escalation of serious violence, militant policing and incarceration after WWII in the US is rooted in the proliferation of spaces cut off from investment, resources and opportunity along with the Political Crimes Exception in extradition and refugee law and the question of participant liability for the unintentional tort of negligence in ice hockey are all considered in this panel.

Primary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Debating Civilization and Barbarism: Courts, the Political Crimes Exception and the Legal History of ViolenceAmar Khoday, University of Manitoba

Participant Liability in Hockey: What is the Appropriate Standard of Care in Canada?Martine Dennie, University of Calgary

States of Emergency: The Permanent, the Pretextual, and the ImpliedMaureen Duffy, University of Calgary

Violence, Surveillance & Imprisonment as Localized State FailureRebecca Thorpe, University of Washington

We Don't Need No (Legal) Education? Foundational Questions for the Future of a DisciplineThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): David Sandomierski, Osgoode Hall Law School

Participant(s):Faisal Bhabha, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolKate Glover, Western University Faculty of LawThomas McMorrow, University of Ontario Institute of TechnologyAnna Su, University of Toronto

Description:This panel brings together a series of researchers and participants from a wide range of sites of legal education to stimulate a conversation about foundational questions. What is the purpose of legal education, and how does this purpose differ across different venues and modes? Given these various ends, what means for improving and attaining these ends are most appropriate? To expand the breadth of the conversation beyond the conventional discourse, this roundtable by design includes participants and researchers deploying diverse methodological approaches (theoretical, empirical, case-based, and ethnographic) to investigating the phenomenon of legal education in a diverse range of sites, including law school classrooms, clinical legal education, undergraduate legal education, public legal education, and graduate studies.

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Youth, Racism, and Criminal JusticeThursday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Description:The war on drugs, police in school, and legal reforms in the juvenile justice system come together in this session exploring critical race and legal procedure research.

16

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:Colorblind Policing in Schools: Student-Police Interactions and Legal SocializationAaron Kupchik, University of DelawareF. Chris Curran, University of Maryland Baltimore CountyBenjamin W. Fisher, University of LouisvilleSamantha Viano, Vanderbilt University

Measuring the Impact of Juvenile Defense Counsel in Delinquency CourtEmily Pelletier, Rider University

Pragmatics & Legal Language: Implications for Youthful DefendantsMel Greenlee, California Appellate Project

“Grudging Law”: The consequences of unenthusiastic criminal justice law reformSamantha Fairclough, University of Birmingham

Taking Baby Steps: How Patients and Fertility Clinics Collaborate in ConceptionCRN: 7Thursday Session 1A, 9:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader

Room: Elgin

Author and Chair: Jody Madeira, Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Reader(s):Susan Appleton, Washington University School of LawJune Carbone, University of MinnesotaRadhika Rao, University of California, Hastings College of Law

Description:Madeira's new book, Taking Baby Steps: How Patients and Fertility Clinics Collaborate in Conception (forthcoming U. California Press, 2017), takes readers inside the infertility experience, from dealing with infertility-related emotions through forming treatment relationships with reproductive medical professionals to confronting difficult

treatment decisions. Based on interviews with 130 patients, 90 medical professionals, and 276 online patient surveys, this book investigates how women, men, and their care providers negotiate infertility's rocky terrain to create life and build families-a journey across personal, medical, legal, and ethical minefields that can test mental and physical health, friendships and marriages, spirituality, and financial security.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Ethics, Bioethics and the Law

Access to JusticeThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Beyond the Right to Petition: Towards a Transnational Theory of the Wrongfulness of SLAPPsMarika Giles Samson, McGill University

Fee-Shifting Provisions in Mortgage ForeclosuresEric Zacks, Wayne State University Law School

Fee-shifting Statutes, National Markets, and Local RatesMaureen Carroll, University of Michigan Law School

Autonomy and Economic Disadvantage in the FamilyThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:The family situates distinctive relations of vulnerability, interdependence, and responsibility. This panel examines the implications of marriage and family law for such things as assignment of parenting duties, immigration status, social identity, and economic management.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Discrimination

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 1A9:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 210:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

17

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Aspiring to autonomy: theory and reality on separationAnna Heenan, University of Exeter

Immigration as an obstacle to family justice: when there is an immigration penalty for breaking a marriageSohoon Lee, University of Toronto

The recent migratory flows and Family Law: public order and the good customs as an exclusion and curtailment toolValéria Silva Galdino Cardin, UnicesumarTereza Rodrigues Vieira, UNIPARFlavia Francielle Silva, Centro Universitário Cesumar

What's mine is yours, and what's yours is mine? Couple finances in law and in practiceCharlotte Bendall, Birmingham Law School

Bodies and Practices in the Medico/Socio Legal BorderlandsCRN: 9Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): Laura Bisaillon, University of Toronto Scarborough Chris Sanders, Lakehead University

Description:In 2003, American sociologists Timmermans and Gabe urged us to explore how, and with what effect, medical and criminal-legal practices intersect. Inquiries at the "medico-legal borderland" make visible under-explored forms of social control, policy, professional practice, governance, discourse, subjectivity and experience. We invite social sciences and humanities perspectives exploring this contentious space with criticality and creativity, discussion of implications for people and their bodies, and an eye on alternatives. Borderland topics may include: migration and mobility, public and mental health, policing and surveillance, and ethics. We are particularly interested in spaces, sensibilities and social issues outside North America.

Primary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:Bodies and Practices in the Medico/Socio Legal BorderlandsNotisha Massaquoi, University of Toronto

Building Dialogue through Shared Findings: Meta-ethnography in the Medico-Legal BorderlandChris Sanders, Lakehead UniversityLaura Bisaillon, University of Toronto Scarborough

Excessive Punishments: Race, HIV Criminalization, and the Extreme Practices of Criminal Law in the HIV Medico-Legal BorderlandsEli Manning, Dalhouise University

Race, Punitiveness, and Partisanship: Regional Variation in Criminal Justice System Referrals to Substance Abuse Treatment FacilitiesAustin Jenkins, Northwestern University

"The Medical" and "the Legal": Tracing Porosity and Impenetrability in the Medico-Legal Borderlands of Knowledge Production in Involuntary Admission Cases in PolandAgnieszka Doll, Thompson Rivers University

Conceptions of the "Right to Work"CRN: 8Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.:Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Risa Lieberwitz, Cornell University

Description:This panel considers the "right to work" across jurisdictions. Three papers focus on Europe, where the "right to work" promises protections for vulnerable workers: two focus on whether and how the evolving right to work under the European Social Charter and the European Convention on Human Rights serves as a bulwark against neoliberal economic policies; a third considers possible tensions between the right to work and health and safety protections for workers. Finally, a fourth paper looks at the United States, where the "right to work" is an individual right not to financially support unions; this paper focuses on how this compelled speech theory has fared at the Supreme Court.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Presentations:Compelled Speech and the Deregulated Workplace in the Supreme Court’s 2017 TermCharlotte Garden, Seattle University School of Law

The new faces of the right to work as a fundamental right. Developments in international and regional legal systems - The European Convention on Human Rights (Joint paper)Sara Hungler, ELTE Faculty of Law, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

18

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Working Nature: Regulating Conflicting RightsAnia Zbyszewska, University of Warwick

Contesting Consent and Sexual Agency in Law and Society.CRN: 7 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Stacy Douglas, Carleton University

Discussant(s): Alexa Dodge, Carleton University Anne Groggel, Indiana University

Description:Consent has become the dividing line between sexually assaultive or harassing behaviour, and legally acceptable or benign behaviour. Along with consent, we find the notion of sexual agency, that is, the right of each individual to make their own choices regarding erotic activities. But what comprises consent, and how do certain kinds of consensual activity get placed beyond the pale such that sexual agency is eclipsed, and the activity in question is rendered 'non-consensual' regardless of the subjective perceptions of the participants? This panel grapples with the contingency of consent and sexual agency with regards to sex work, prostitution, catcalling, implied and advanced consent in BDSM, and a complainant's right to choose between consensual dispute resolution or adjudication in response to sexual violence experienced on campus.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Presentations:A Critique of the Anti-Catcalling MovementMaggie FitzGerald Murphy, Carleton UniversityUmmni Khan, Carleton University

Negotiating boundaries and negotiating consent: Theorizing consent oriented questions and discussions taking place on subreddits for kinkstersLauren Menzie, Carleton University

Re(de)fining ‘Prostitution’ and ‘Sex Work’: Attending to the Role of Consent in Constructing Problems and Imagining Legal ResponsesDebra Haak, Queen's University, Faculty of Law

The Return of the Sex Wars: Toward a Feminist Politics of Campus Peer Sexual ViolenceDaniel Del Gobbo, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Courts, Judges, Inequality, Part IICRN: 1Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Ricardo Perlingeiro, Estácio de Sá University; Fluminense Federal University

Discussant(s): Fernanda Duarte, UNESA e INCT/InEAC/PROPPI/UFF

Description:This session broadly covers judicial issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to courts, judges and judging in these areas. Examples might include discussions of the political role of judging; challenges faced by judges in relation to judicial independency, democracy, governments or social groups; judicial impartiality; judicial behavior; the psychological aspect of judicial decision making amongst others. Papers dealing with current empirical researches conducted in these regions are particularly encouraged.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Judicial Dissent at the Crossroads: Judicial Voting in Macau’s CourtsDenis De Castro Halis, Faculty of Law / Univ. of Macau

War on Drugs, War on the Poor: Recife (Brazil), 2001-2017Jean Daudelin, Carleton UniversityAntonio Gomez de Castro Neto, Federal Univ. of PernambucoJosé Luiz Ratton, Federal University of Pernambuco

When 5x4 is not a winning majority: judicial decision-making on unconstitutional constitutional amendmentsJairo Lima, University of Sao PauloRubens Beçak, University of Sao Paulo

19

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Disciplining Disability: Prisons, Policing, SchoolsCRN: 40 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair/Discussant(s): Katharina Heyer, University of Hawai'i

Description:This panel uses a disability lens to shed new light on the school to prison pipeline, the contention that prisons are the new asylums, the role of race in special education advocacy, sexual assault and policing, and the public response to mass shootings.

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:A Systems Theory Analysis for Ending the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Using Disability Rights Laws to Keep Children in Schools and Out of Courts, Jails, and PrisonsAndrea Kalvesmaki, University of Utah

Developing a Disability Legal Consciousness: Racism and Ableism in Special Education AdvocacyKatie Warden, University of Oregon

Disability, prisons and coercive control: challenging some problematic assertions about prisons forming ‘the new asylums’ for people with disabilitiesClaire Spivakovsky, Monash University

Mass Shootings and Mental Illness: Public Perceptions, Policy Responses, and Legal ActionSarah Jensen, Kenyon CollegeHelen Erler, Kenyon College

Sexual Assault Policing and Justice for People with Developmental DisabilitiesSandra Smele, York UniversityCurtis Fogel, Brock UniversityAndrea Quinlan, University of Waterloo

Equality, Difference and DiscriminationThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:A Comparative Study of Applicant's Voice in Disability Support Adjudication in CanadaSoren Frederiksen, York University School of Public Policy and Administration

Charting the Divide: Responses to the Consultation by the CRPD Committee to the Draft General Comment on Article 12Peter Bartlett, University of Nottingham

Exerting Power in the face of Powerlessness: Hegemonic Masculinity among Men Experiencing HomelessnessErin Dej, York University

Ethnicity, Gender and Diversity: Law and Justice on TVThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader

Room: Oxford

Author(s): Peter Robson, University of Strathclyde Jennifer Schulz, Faculty of Law, Univ. ofManitoba

Chair(s): Jennifer Schulz, Faculty of Law, Univ. ofManitoba

Reader(s):Christine Corcos, LSU Law CenterPeter Robson, University of StrathclydeJennifer Schulz, Faculty of Law, University of Manitoba

Description:Robson and Schulz have edited a second collection, Ethnicity, Gender & Diversity: Law & Justice on TV. The book focuses on gender, ethnicity, sexuality, age, class and ability and how they are portrayed on legal television shows in 11 different countries. Each contributing author analysed the same month, November 2017, to determine which legal shows were most viewed in her/his country, and how the shows handled issues of ethnicity, gender and diversity. In this interactive panel, contributing authors from the UK, Canada, Germany, Italy and the USA will share their empirical results and encourage active participation from attendees to discuss questions like: are the protagonists of the justice system still straight white males? Are minority actors most likely to play defendants? Are sexuality and disability hidden from view?

Primary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the LawSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

20

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Feminist Jurisprudence: Language and ControlThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s): Toby Goldbach, University of British Columbia Allard School of Law

Description:This panel explores critical feminist l perspectives and extends their insights into a range of areas: animal rights, knowledge generation and sharing, consumer laws, storytelling, health law, and social control.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:"Social Harmony" and Women's Biopower in China: Challenges and Strategies to ReformYing Wu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University/ University of Pennsylvania Law School

Law, patriarchy and women's oppression: Tales from the small screen - The Handmaid's TaleJill Marshall, Royal Holloway University of London

Telling Tails: The Promises and Pitfalls of Language and Narratives in Animal Advocacy EffortsAngela Lee, University of Ottawa

The Duty to Refer for Medical Assisted Dying: Conscientious Objection in ContextPatricia Peppin, Faculty of Law, Queen's University

The Skol Summer Muse Campaign: advancements and resistances in discussing sexist advertising in BrazilTamara Amoroso Gonçalves, University of Victoria

Fertile Ground: can the Law Offer Farm Workers Protection?CRN: 8Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Carleton

Chair(s): Vasanthi Venkatesh, University of Windsor Faculty of Law

Discussant(s): Manoj Dias-Abey, Queen's University, Canada

Participant(s):James Brudney, FordhamCathleen Caron, Justice in MotionManoj Dias-Abey, Queen's University, CanadaSarah Paoletti, University of Pennsylvania Law School

Description:Waged farm workers are a deeply disadvantaged population in the United States and Canada. Farm workers are excluded from many of the legal protections available to other workers, which is the result of powerful agricultural interests that maintain the farming sector's exceptionalism. Despite these challenges, farm worker movements and advocates make strategic use of the law to challenge farm workers' subordination.

This roundtable will bring together scholars and farm worker advocates to consider: how does exclusion from labour law protections affect the farm worker population; in the absence of labour law protections, how are farm worker movements and advocates using the law; do transnational and supply chain approaches to labour regulation show any promise; and what are the challenges of "cause lawyering" for farm workers?

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Freedom of Religion and the Right to PrivacyThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Description:The panel discusses two urgent and intertwined questions: the regulation of freedom of religion and religious discrimination, which are facing new challenges in an era of rising religious tensions; and the right to privacy which is under pressure amidst rising concerns for security and expanding surveillance in the private/commercial as well as public interest. In both cases contemporary developments, political and technological, poses new questions challenges and needs for redrawing the boundaries between the private and the public.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:Corner Store Law: A Narrative of Local Regulation by Non-State ActorsOpeyemi Akanbi, University of Pennsylvania

21

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Regulating Religion – The case of Kosher regulation in IsraelHanan Mandel, Ono Academic College

The demise or the rebirth of privacy: The Future of the right of privacy in Canada: Limiting data mining and brokering.Irma Spahiu, Osgoode Hall Law School

Theorizing religious discriminationIlias Trispiotis, University of Leeds

Gender, Law, and Development at the Crossroads.CRN: 23 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Ruth Buchanan, Osgoode Hall Law School

Discussant(s): Aziza Ahmed, Northeastern University School of Law

Description:Gender and Development debates used to be dominated by economists, and anthropologists. Now, however, law and lawyers play an increasingly central role. Major development institutions like the World Bank have foregrounded legal reform as part of their gender and development strategies, and there are a plethora of new rights databases and measures being created to chart legal progress. This panel asks when, how, and why law became this central to gender and development, and it reflects on the consequences. Papers consider the shifting role of law in debates about gender and mining; digital technologies; and food standards.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Presentations:Feminist uses of rights-based penal discourses in post-neoliberal Ecuador: is penal expansion always connected to neoliberalisation?Silvana Tapia Tapia, Universidad del Azuay

Fixing Illegality: Gender, Artisanal Mining and the Global Governance of Resource ExtractionDoris Buss, Carleton UniversityBlair Rutherford, Carleton University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology

Gender, Law, and Development: A Reappraisal.Kate Bedford, Birmingham Law School

Global Norms and National Goals: Development, Motherhood and the Regulation of Formula Milk in KenyaJohn Harrington, Cardiff University

The Exclusionary Politics of Inclusive Platforms: Gendering Digital HumanitarianismSerena Natile, King's College London and Kent Law School

Gender, Safety and the Law: Rethinking Private Space in Discourses of Justice in Europe and IndiaThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair(s): Svati Shah, University of Massachusetts, Amherst May-Len Skilbrei, University of Oslo

Discussant(s): Pratiksha Baxi, Center for the Study of Law and Governance

Description:In this panel, we aim to examine the boundary between 'public' and 'private' as it instantiates imaginary spaces of safety for women. A comparative frame between northern Europe and India allows us to investigate certain key points of elision between concepts of 'private space,' 'home,' and 'safety,' particularly with respect to laws and policies which govern women's sexuality and safety. These papers interrogate laws on sexual commerce, marriage, rape and domestic violence, in order to problematize the idea of 'repatriation,' preventative detention, and other carceral practices which enhance state power while conveying dubious benefits to their ostensible targets. In addition to geographic 'comparison,' then, we also look at rape, sexual violence and sex work in the same frame, in order to examine where and how interventions are crafted.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:An exploration of trends in prostitution governance in contemporary Europe: from a model-centric approach to context-sensitivityIsabel Crowhurst, University of EssexMay-Len Skilbrei, University of Oslo

Beyond Safety: Exploring the intersections of caste and indigeneity in sexual violence discourses in IndiaHimika Bhattacharya, Syracuse University

22

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Sexual politics in Contemporary EuropeMay-Len Skilbrei, University of Oslo

‘Repatriation’ as Safety: The Ideal of Home in Laws Regulating Sexual Commerce in IndiaSvati Shah, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Infrastructures as Regulation: Transnational Legal Technologies and Social-Ordering Power in Physical InfrastructuresCRN: 23Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Benedict Kingsbury, NYU School of Law Sally Engle Merry, New York University

Discussant(s): Luis Eslava, Kent Law School

Participant(s):Nahuel Maisley, New York University School of Law - Institute for International Law and JusticePaul Mertenskötter, New York University School of LawAlvaro Santos, Georgetown Law

Description:Infrastructures can have regulatory-type effects. These include requiring, preventing, channeling, enabling, and nudging particular human and social behavior. We focus on transnational physical infrastructures facilitating the flow of goods, services, people, money, data, information, and ideas over physical or virtual space. Infrastructures such as roads, ports, and fiber optic cables routinely enable, channel, and manage these flows; direct and divert them; isolate them from some, and stop them up for others. These transnational dimensions embed infrastructures-as-regulation in processes of globalization. This roundtable examines infrastructures exerting regulatory effects as constituting, reinforcing, or disrupting social orderings; and explores interactions between infrastructural, legal, and political orders at different scales

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Jury Processes: Inequality in Experiences of Jury Selection and DeliberationCRN: 4 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Nancy Marder, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law

Description:What implications do jurors' selection and deliberation experiences have for court outcomes, racial and socioeconomic inequalities in the justice system, and American democracy more broadly? This panel seeks to explore the extent to which jurors, as individuals, and juries, as groups, can assert their agency and identities to shape the jury selection and deliberation processes. Drawing together research produced by an inter-disciplinary group of socio-legal scholars and social scientists, this panel will explore inequality in jurors' experiences of the American justice system from multiple disciplinary and empirical vantage points. In so doing, this panel seeks to offer new insights into the role of the jury in reproducing inequality within and outside the courtroom.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay ParticipationSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Constructing Local Stereotypes in the Search for Fair and Impartial JurorsMatthew Clair, Harvard UniversityAlix Winter, Harvard University

Diversity's Impact on the Quality of Jury DeliberationsAmanda Bergold, University of Pennsylvania Law SchoolMargaret Kovera, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Giving Substance to the Impartial Jury MandateRichard Jolly, New York University School of Law

Information Seeking on Voir Dire: The Selective Deployment of Aggressive Questioning Techniques and Its Impact on Juror ResponsesBarbara O'Brien, Michigan State Univ. College of LawCatherine Grosso, Michigan State Univ. College of Law

Juries, Decisions and DefensesJenny Carroll, University of Alabama School of Law

The Anchoring Effects of Juror Responses to Questions During Jury SelectionJane Lilly Lopez, UC San Diego

23

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Latin AMigration, IndigeneityCRN: 34Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Rachel Sieder, CIESAS

Discussant(s): Liv Tønnessen, CMI

Description:This panel examines the struggles of indigenous peoples in Mexico, Guatemala and Colombia to secure justice and security, and ensure the justiciability of their constitutional and international collective rights to autonomy and individual human rights in contexts marked by continuums of racialized dispossession and violence. Situating our enquiries within an analysis of complex legal pluralities and multiple intersecting forms of structural, racial and gender violence, panel participants analyze the consequences of rights recognition for indigenous peoples in the Americas after multicultural neoliberalism. Particular attention will be paid to their engagements with dominant legal frames, including redefinitions of gendered and racial violence through intersectional perspectives, and contestations over the very nature of law itself.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Fiscal austerity and promotion of human rights: methodological alternatives to evaluate the enjoyment of the right to decent housing in the Brazilian caseCamilla Fernandes Moreira, Universidade de Brasília

Indigenous peoples, constitutional reform, and disputed sovereignties: Law and violence in GuatemalaRachel Sieder, CIESAS

Land reform in Colombia-Another unfulfilled promise?David F. Varela, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

“Indigenous Peoples, Violence(s) and Extractives in the Americas: Considerations through the lens of Time”Viviane Weitzner, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social (CIESAS)

Law in Vernacular Spaces: Afro/Indigenous Encounters, Contestations and ResponsesCRN: 23 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Jessika Eichler, Essex/ifa

Discussant(s): Mark Goodale, University of Lausanne

Description:Many current encounters between state-made laws or corporate regulations and local communities evolve around infrastructure, extractive or other projects that severely impact Afro descendent and indigenous peoples' lives and livelihoods. Yet, such encounters rarely go uncontested: Afro/indigenous communities, representatives and advisors have found multiple ways of responding to unilaterally drafted agreements, laws and policies. At the same time, said policies and their drafters need to be understood in the framework of neo-colonialism and neo-liberal global trends. This also affects Afro/indigenous representatives who re-negotiate conditions of fundamental importance to their (cultural) survival as individuals and peoples.Vernacular contexts thus offer unique spaces of opportunities where laws meet indigenous jurisprudence.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Indigenous Law

Presentations:Between Colonial Domination and Indigenous Resistance: Indigenous Appropriation and Reappropriation of a Violent Past into their Ever-Changing FuturePaulo Ilich Bacca, University of Kent

Could the Free, Prior and Informed Consent serve the self-determination of Indigenous Peoples in the context of mining projects?Zoé Boirin, University of Ottawa

Cultural Genocide in Tibet: The Failure of Article 8 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Protecting the Cultural Rights of TibetansJassi Sandhar, University of Bristol

Disentangling the Vernacular in the Andes: Indigenous Contestations in Community-State EncountersJessika Eichler, Essex/ifa

24

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Essentialization and Contestation in Law: Insights from Plurinational BoliviaAnnette Mehlhorn, Max-Planck-Institute for Anthropological Research

The Ethnic Focus in Implementing the Peace Agreement in Colombia: Tensions and inequalitiesManuel Gongora-Mera, Lateinamerika-Institut / Freie Universität Berlin

Law, Transgender Identities, and LGBTQ ActivismThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Description:This panel examines the contentious role of law in struggles for LGBTQ rights. Drawing on both historical and contemporary case examples, these papers address what activist movements stand to both lose and gain through the legitimating power of law, as well as the obstacles encountered when organizing in a heteronormative, cis-gendered social world. The topics of focus include a historical analysis of panics over cross-dressing in Early Modern England, the cultural significance of Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie as legal actors in struggles for same sex marriage, the legal consciousness of trans rights activists, the limitations of formal equality as a strategy for justice, and the legal barriers preventing transgendered individuals from obtaining identification documents required to self identify.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Can I See Some ID?: The Importance of Self-Attestation for Transgender PeopleJasper Katz, Temple University- Beasley School of Law

Historical Perspectives on the Transgender Wars: Cross-Dressing in Early Modern EnglandCarla Spivack, Oklahoma City Univ School of Law

Queer Legal Praxis and Queering the Legal Imagination: Bert and Ernie, Sesame Street's Queer Legal PioneersChris Ashford, Northumbria University

Transgender Legal Consciousness: How Trans People Conceptualize the Law and its LimitsKyla Bender-Baird, The Graduate Center, CUNY

Transnormative Times? Exploring Law Reform, Queer Rights and Trans Activism in CanadaElise Wohlbold, Carleton University

Lawyering, Cause Lawyering and Legal Campaigning in Southern AfricaCRN: 13Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair/Discussant(s): Dee Smythe, University of Cape Town

Description:This session deals with lawyering, cause lawyering and campaigning in Southern Africa, covering mainly South Africa and Zimbabwe.

Primary Keyword: Lawyers and Law FirmsSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Cause Lawyering and Political Transition in Zimbabwe, 1980-1995George Karekwaivanane, University of Edinburgh

Competition and Finance Lawyers Based in South Africa: Building the African State from the South?Jonathan Klaaren, University of the Witwatersrand

Linguistic Analysis of Oral Legal Discourse in Question/Answer dyads of Chief-Examination Lawyers/Witnesses: Ethiopia, Adama City Courtrooms in FocusEjarra Batu Balcha, Harambee University College

Material and Sensory Courtrooms: Performing the ‘Decline of Professionalism’ in Harare’s Magistrates’ CourtsSusanne Verheul, University of Oxford

The Juridified Popular Vision of ‘Revolution’ in Egypt and the Praxis of Activist Lawyers since the 2011 UprisingMohammad Afshary, University of Kent

Legal Education and the Legal Profession in Realist/Empirical PerspectivesThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Parlour Suite 7

Description:A new generation of empirical researchers studying legal education and profession is emerging both within the law-and-society community and within the legal academy. In 2018, the American Association of Law Schools started a new section entirely devoted to empirical research on legal education and the legal profession. Within the Law & Society Association, younger scholars are starting a

25

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

CRN devoted to research on legal education. The papers in this panel are testament to the fresh perspectives and questions this new generation are bringing to these time-honored topics. Panelists question the nature of interdisciplinarity itself, asking, for example, what place interdisciplinary research on legal education has within the broader umbrella of legal research performed by members of the legal academy. Along with this fruitful questioning come some constructive ideas for shifting interdisciplinary and trans-national exchanges, in keeping with the new legal realist goal of moving beyond critique. Is there a way, for example, to move those involved in rule-of-law projects to take better account of local contexts? Should scholarly movements that study law eschew politics and policy orientations? (Can they?) As U.S. law schools are pushed to produce students that are "practice ready," how can or should empirical research on practice be deployed to help them address this issue in more realistic ways? In general, how can both qualitative and quantitative research inform legal training and education?

Presentations:Middletown USA: A Qualitative Study of Solo and Small Firm PracticeAndrij Kowalsky, York University

Research at the Crossroads of Law and Education: A Taxonomy of Legal Education ResearchMelissa Castan, Law Faculty, Monash UniversityKate Galloway, Bond UniversityAlex Steel, University of New South Wales

The problems of policy-oriented research in law schools: a comparative and historical perspectiveYannick Ganne, Université de Strasbourg

Legal Histories of the British EmpireCRN: 15, 22, 44Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Mitra Sharafi, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Description:This panel brings together research on law and colonialism in Asia and Africa. In particular, its presenters examine the legal histories of west Africa, the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia under British rule. In some cases, these histories extend across the empire and beyond.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Legal History

Presentations:Protecting Soldiers and Morals? Legal Transformations and the Making of Gendered SovereigntyJack Jin Gary Lee, Oberlin College

Secularizing Islam: The Colonial Encounter and the Making of a British Islamic Law in Northern NigeriaRabiat Akande, Harvard Law School

The Lawless Europeans: law and order on Penang island, 1786-1807Hanisah Binte Abdullah Sani, University of Chicago

‘The Colonial Instrument of Legal Duality in Mesopotamia: Or how law underdeveloped Iraq, 1916-1933’Ali Hammoudi, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Measurement & Perspective: New Directions in the Sociology of Law EnforcementThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Aaron Roussell, Portland State University

Description:Policing is of paramount importance among people in dark poor communities. Our panel will critically examine policing by employing ethnographic, statistical, qualitative, and theoretical approaches to build a deeper understanding. Panelists will: examine how police exert "social productivity" by connecting neighborhoods to extra-local resources and mediating interactions between local residents; reconceptualize "crime" and attempt to measure it holistically to erase arbitrary distinctions between state and civilian crime/violence; examine the ways in which police officers define and embody "professional" conduct now that body worn cameras are a ubiquitous feature of public safety administration; and seek to expand the study of state violence by treating criminal justice practitioners as potential, active, or former criminals.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:A Crime Flatline? Conceptualizing and Measuring State ViolenceAaron Roussell, Portland State UniversityPaul Deppen III, Portland State UniversityMarisa Omori, University of MiamiLori Sexton, University of Missouri-Kansas City

26

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Carceral State Crime: Contextualizing & Measuring Police Crime in an Era of Hyper-PunishmentStephen Wulff, University of Minnesota

Exploring the Constraints of Racialized Police Officer Conduct Calculus in Light of Body-Worn Camera ImplementationErin Kerrison, University of California, BerkeleyJordan Hyatt, Drexel University

The Social Productivity of Policing: How Local Police Departments Function as Community OrganizationsForrest Stuart, University of Chicago

Navigating Executive Power in Immigration LawCRN: 2 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session

Room: Osgoode Ballroom East, Table 1

Facilitator(s): Deborah Weissman, University of North Carolina School of Law

Description:The political branches of the federal government are traditionally seen as the primary site for immigration policymaking in the U.S. As between Congress and the President, Presidential power has been ascendant during years of Congressional stalemate. These papers examine the pardon power and the use of executive orders as modern instances of the wielding presidential power in immigration law. Paper 1 highlights the institutional dynamics of federal-state sanctuary policies. Paper 2 highlights legislative-executive dynamics in the exercise of the pardon power on behalf of refugees.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Sanctuary Cities: How the Want to Make a Political Statement Has Undermined FederalismFrancis Bovio, Temple University Beasley School of Law

Use of the Parole Power by Presidents to Admit RefugeesMichael J Churgin, University of Texas School of Law

Perspectives on International Governance and EconomyCRN: 46 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Darren Rosenblum, Pace Law School

Discussant(s): Cristie Ford, University of British Columbia Faculty of Law

Description:In recent years, radical economic and political changes have begun to alter the globalized corporate landscape. This panel will critically interrogate these transformations.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:How Mass Politics Threatens Global Economic LawJide Nzelibe, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law

Plea Bargaining and Evidence: The Good, the Bad and the SharksThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:Evidence and decision-making on crime and victimization in Canada, USA, Argentina and the UK are the subjects explored in this panel.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Crossing Disciplinary Divides: Exploring the Potential of Criminological Data to Support and Shape the Approach of the Law to Similar Fact EvidenceMichelle Lawrence, UVic Law

Framing Charges and Using the Rules Regulating the Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence to Circumvent SafeguardsEmma Engleby, Northumbria UniversityRay Arthur, Northumbria University

Sharkfests in Criminal Justice: Plea Bargaining in a Group SettingKay Levine, Emory Law SchoolNancy King, Vanderbilt UniversityMarc Miller, University of ArizonaRonald Wright, Wake Forest University Law School

The Cross-Influence of Evidence: An Analysis of the Criminal Proceedings in TaiwanMong-Hwa Chin, National Chiao Tung University

27

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Privacy Law and the WorkplaceCRN: 7 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s) Ann Bartow, University of New Hampshire School of Law

Discussant(s): Irene Calboli, Texas A&M School of Law/ Singapore Management U Andrea Slane, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Description:Privacy is the subject of laws, regulations, norms and expectations. This "Privacy Law in the Workplace" paper session is concerned with the privacy rights and wrongs of employees and employers and addresses the questions: How much can an employer lawfully monitor it's workers on and off the job? And how much privacy can workers reasonably expect, at the workplace or at home?

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and SocietySecondary Keyword: Labor and Employment

Presentations:A Reasonable Woman's Expectation of PrivacyVictoria Schwartz, Pepperdine University School of Law

Employee Monitoring and the European Convention on Human RightsJacqui Lipton, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

If an Employee Tweets in the Woods, Can He Be Fired?Frederick Lane, Mathom Enterprises, LLC

Property RedistributionCRN: 49Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Bernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/American Bar Foundation

Description:Using empirical studies from various socio-legal contexts this panel examines the state expropriation of lands as well as the restorative processes engaged in by some states.

Primary Keyword: Rights and IdentitiesSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Adjournment, Engagement, Repossession: The Politics and Practices of Property of Ireland after the CrashNathan Coben, University of California, IrvineThe Land FixNate Ela, University of Wisconsin - Madison

Towards an empirically based reform of acquisitive prescription in the NetherlandsBjoern Hoops, University of GroningenLeon Verstappen, University of Groningen

Reforming Forensic Science and Medicine: Structure, Communication, and ReportingCRN: 37 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Peel

Chair/Discussant(s): Mehera San Roque, University of New South Wales

Participant(s):Emma Cunliffe, UBC Faculty of LawDavid Hamer, University of Sydney, Sydney Law SchoolKristy Martire, University of New South Wales PsychologyRachel Dioso-Villa, Griffith University

Description:Participants will discuss the institutional and structural dimensions of forensic science and medicine, and expert testimony within the criminal justice system. Topics will include the preparation and content of reports, the role of and potential for independent bodies such as criminal cases review commissions and judicial

28

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

science commissions, and barriers to law reform. The perspectives adopted on these topics will draw from work in psychology, law, scientific research, and sociology of science.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Rehabilitation and PunishmentThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Description:The papers in this session cover a range of topics related to the role of rehabilitation in the criminal justice system. Authors focus on correctional education, social services, and therapeutic alternatives, highlighting the complex relationship between rehabilitation and punishment.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Does Sentencing Juveniles as Adults Increase Recidivism?Miguel de Figueiredo, University of ConnecticutHarrison Dekker, University of Rhode IslandRenee LaMark Muir, Central Connecticut State University

Litigating Care: Poverty, Punishment, and Rehabilitation in US Criminal CourtsKatherine Hood, UC Berkeley

Rehabilitation, "who deserves it"? Courts’ representations on rehabilitation in sentencingMariana Raupp, Université Laval

The Bureaucratic Origins of Correctional Education in the United States: The Bureau of Prisons 1930-1965Bailey Socha, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey

Under the Punitive Aegis: Deviant Dependency and the Family Justice Center ModelVictoria Piehowski, University of Minnesota

Rule-Making and Regulatory AgenciesCRN: 5 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): Paula Chadderton, University of Canberra

Discussant(s): Christopher Arup, Business Law, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University

Description:This panel discusses a key question on the administrative state: the process of rule-making and regulatory agencies. The perspectives are wide-ranging and include rule-making across the banking industry and in federal agencies.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Banking on Burden Reduction: How the Global Financial Crisis Shaped Stakeholder Participation in Banking RegulationMercy DeMenno, Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy

How can regulatory agencies participate in the universalization for public services?Caroline Batista, UFRJ

Hudson Elisio Câmara Mendes Sampaio Universidades Federal Do Rio de JaneiroPublic Engagement with Agency RulemakingGlen Staszewski, Michigan State UniversityMichael Sant'Ambrogio, Michigan State University College of Law

Searching for social justice in European bank failures; the trivial case of self-placementIoannis Asimakopoulos, University of Luxembourg

Socializing and Norming: Institutional change in environmental monitoring and reporting in ChinaWanxin Li, City University of Hong Kong

29

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Service Delivery to Refugees and Migrant PopulationsCRN: 11 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair/Discussant(s): Gayla Ben-Arieh, Northwestern University

Description:The increased numbers of migrants on the move globally have brought with them an unprecedented level of use of information sharing between governments and non-governmental organizations as well as amongst migrants themselves. International media widely reported the use of social media by migrants to share migration information and tips both in the trek of Syrians through Europe in 2015 and, more recently, in Haitian migrants to Canada in summer, 2017. Migrants' use of sharing of information about themselves and their migration experience through social media has produced a large amounts of information about migrants and their migration experience.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Data mobility and personal information protection in the provision of humanitarian aid to migrants to Canada.Erica See, University of Ottawa

International Patient Dumping: Divided Power, Divided Justice.Jason Leggett, City University of New York Kingsborough

Law’s Invidious Creep: The Effect of Law and Policy on Access to Higher Education for Forced MigrantsBen Hudson, University of Lincoln

Social Media: Policies, Practices, and ComparisonsCRN: 45 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Bryna Bogoch, Bar Ilan University

Description:These papers address dilemmas regarding privacy and the right to reputation arising from social media, and present

and critique the various solutions that have been offered in different national contexts.

Primary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:"What’s in a Name?" Social Media’s Real Name Policies v.s. Users' Privacy and FreedomsShun-Ling Chen, Academia Sinica

Challenges in the Protection of Freedom of Speech and Expression and the Control of Criminality on Social MediaAbdulwasiu Yusuff, Obafemi Awolowo University

Prior Restraint and the New MediaMichal Tamir, The Academic Center of Law and ScienceAriel Bendor, Bar-Ilan

Twibel Wars in the “Wild West” of Social Media: A Comparative LensAlexandros Antoniou, University of Essex

State Violence, Banishment, Disappearance and ProtestThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Description:The papers in this panel address the intersections of state violence, protest and constitutional rights. The use of law to delegitimize and criminalise poor Black South African protesters, the use of cultural capital and legal consciousness to assert rights in police encounters, as well as the banishment of those offending against the 'moral community' in marginalized informal shack settlements in South Africa are covered.


Presentations:Disappearances and Clandestine Graves in Mexico: Killable Youth in Contemporary Systems of Mass ViolenceCesar Estrada Perez, The School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University

Police-Citizen Encounters, Legal Consciousness, and the Hidden Role of Cultural CapitalKatie Billings, University of Massachusetts, AmherstKathryne Young, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Precarious Penality on the Margins of the South African StateGail Super, University of Toronto

30

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

The Politics of Poverty and Race in South African Protest ActionEsther Gumboh, University of the Witwatersrand

Uses and Experiences of the Law at the Urban MarginsTommaso Bardelli, Yale University

Technologies, Techniques, and Technicalities in International Law and Human RightsCRN: 23Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Heidi Matthews, Osgoode Hall Law

Description:How do categories, technologies, and legal techniques shape what violence can be seen, recognized, and submitted to legal judgment? The papers on this panel present different perspectives on the relationship between law and technologies; between rights, visualities, and recognition; and between materialities, violence, and interpretation.

Primary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Attesting to the Insensible: Technologies of Law and Audio-visual Evidence of Police ViolenceDeniz Pınar Konuk, Carleton University

High-Altitude Legality: Aerial Bombardment, the Aerial Perspective, and Techniques of JurisdictionChristiane Wilke, Carleton University

The Calculus of Legality: Politics of the Proportionality Test in WarDelphine Dogot, Sciences Po

The Recognition of WarIoannis Kalpouzos, The City Law School - City University

Within and Without: Guantanamo Bay Detainees and the Creation of (il)Legal SubjectsSafiyah Rochelle, Carleton University

The Drawbacks of Policing ReformThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Alice Ristroph, Brooklyn Law School

Participant(s):Monica Bell, Yale Law SchoolBenjamin Levin, University of Colorado Law SchoolKate Levine, St. John's University School of LawScott Skinner-Thompson, University of Colorado Law School

Description:Spurred by public outcry over police killings of people of color & queer people, police reform has gained traction among activists, policy makers and scholars. But does that mean that the reformist interventions "get it right"? This roundtable considers the potential unintended consequences of police reform. In the rush to punish individual officers or fix abusive departments, are scholars and reformers inadvertently feeding the punitive state? Specifically, this roundtable addresses: (1) body cameras and their privacy implications; (2) policies regarding disciplinary records and their relationship to broader discussions about criminal records; and (3) critiques of police unions and their relationship to the labor movement. Fear of unintended consequences needn't stymie reform, but we should approach reform with open eyes.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

The New Contours of Socio-Economic Inequalities and the Limits of Rights-Based ApproachesThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Description:This panel explores the new contours of socio-economic inequalities across a wide variety of contexts, ranging from the United States, Russia and Latin America. It examines various approaches to inequality reduction centered on a rights-based approach to education.

Primary Keyword: Economic and Social RightsSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Presentations:Overcoming the limits of Legal Opportunity Structures: Explaining Variance in LGBTI Rights in Latin AmericaBruce Wilson, UCFCamila Gianella, University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute

31

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Pennies for Progress: A Fiscal Appproach to Education ReformAriel Martin, Temple University Beasley School of Law

The Populism & Nationalism of Immigration Law & Policy in the Age of Trump, Brexit & Fortress EuropeCRN: 2Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Robert Koulish, University of Maryland

Discussant(s): Ana Aliverti, Warwick Law School

Participant(s):Miranda Hallett, University of DaytonJeff Handmaker, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus UniversityRobert Koulish, University of MarylandDoris Marie Provine, Arizona State UniversityJuliet Stumpf, Lewis & Clark School of Law

Description:Over the past couple of years, migration control and its merger with crime control have been studied through the lens of "crimmigration". Whereas particular state responses vary, the social control strategies they share include the criminalization and securitization of people of color. State policies criminalize migrants and categorize them as threats to national security, which unleash exceptional extra-constitutional powers against them.

The panel will expand the focus on crime and immigration to include the ethno-nationalist and populist assertions of identity, race and sovereignty. It will examine how migration and state responses to it have helped drive and in turn have been driven by economic uncertainty and populist politics.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

The Power of Words in Law and GovernanceThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Primary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Fight-or-Flighting WordsAaron Caplan, Loyola Law School Los Angeles

On the Sabotaging of Rachel Jeantel's testimony: Linguistic Difference as a Resource in the Adversarial CourtroomPhilipp Angermeyer, York University

The Role of the Legal Profession under Authoritarianism: China, Nigeria, and RussiaThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Ethan Michelson, Indiana University

Discussant(s): Peter Solomon, University of Toronto

Description:This panel advances international comparative efforts to identify sources of variation in the relationship--both fraught and symbiotic--between lawyers and the state in authoritarian political contexts. In Russia, Hendley finds and explains a chasm in levels of support for the regime between lawyers working for the state and their counterparts in private practice. In Nigeria, Krishnan and Ajabe tell a story of lawyers who, under the military junta, by evading repression while providing robust pro bono counsel to political dissidents, planted the seeds for legal activism that blossomed following the democratic transition. Finally, papers by Stern and Liu and by Michelson report related findings from their empirical research on Chinese lawyers.

Primary Keyword: Lawyers and Law FirmsSecondary Keyword:Democracy, Governance and State Theory; Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions

Presentations:Legal Activism in the Face of Political Challenges: The Nigerian CaseJayanth Krishnan, Indiana University, BloomingtonKunle Ajagbe, Aidan Partners, LLP

Nature Versus Nurture: A Comparison of Russian Law Graduates Destined for State Service and for Private PracticeKathryn Hendley, University of Wisconsin

Political Activism and Repression in the Chinese Legal Profession: Evidence from Two SurveysEthan Michelson, Indiana University

The Good LawyerRachel Stern, University of California, BerkeleyLawrence J. Liu, UC Berkeley

32

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

The Socio-Legal Dimensions of ProcedureThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Description:At its best, the design of procedures in dispute resolution, resource allocation and public policy decisionmaking will be attentive to the socio-legal dimensions and consequences of these procedures. This panel will feature inquiries in the socio-legal dimensions of procedures across a wide spectrum of law and society, including the design of procedures in claims of abuse of office, in the design of constitutional courts, in the relationship between conflict and procedure and in the concept of truth in dispute resolution. This panel will also explore the use of child soldier testimony and accounts of personal trauma in international courts.


Presentations:Is Honesty the Best Policy?: An Empirical Investigation of the Concept of Truth in Medical Malpractice Dispute Resolution in TaiwanChih-Ming Liang, Graduate Institute of Health and Biotechnology Law, Taipei Medical University

Learning to Testify. Former Child Soldiers at the International Criminal Court (The Hague)Milena Jaksic, CNRS

On Narrative, Trauma and Testimony at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and Rwanda’s Gacaca CourtsJulia Viebach, University of Oxford

Struggle against Abuse of Office in Contemporary Russia: Courts VS Complaint MechanismElena Bogdanova, Centre for Independent Social

Research/University of Eastern FinlandThe Tit between Procedure and Dispute: the Dutch Objection ProcedureMarc Wever, University of GroningenBert Marseille, University of Groningen

Topics in Consumer Credit from Origination to DefaultCRN: 25 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Pamela Foohey, Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Description:This panel brings together a variety of topics regarding consumer credit and contracts, from the resurrection of unconscionability and land installment contracts, to applying lessons from products liability to consumer contracts, to outcomes in debt mediation, to whether insolvent consumers behave strategically.


Presentations:Contorting Boilerplate: A Common Law of “Product Liability” for “Defective” Consumer ContractsSusan Block Lieb, Fordham University School of LawEdward Janger, Brooklyn Law School

Determinants of Failure ... and Success in Personal Debt MediationJason Kilborn, John Marshall Law School

Strategic Behaviour Towards Consumer InsolvencyCatarina Frade, Fac. of Economics - Univ. of Coimbra

Unconscionability’s ResurrectionJacob Hale Russell, Rutgers Law School

What's old is new again: the resurgence of the land installment contractJudith Fox, Notre Dame Law School

Trafficking in PersonsCRN: 11 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Steven Bender, Seattle University School of Law

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Masters, Slaves and Human Trafficking Victims; Is the law ready to move on from the language of slavery?Elizabeth Faulkner, Staffordshire University

Rescued, untrusted, deported: The issue of credibility in the pre-identification of potential victims of human trafficking in ItalyNoemi Magugliani, National University of Ireland, Galway

33

Thursday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..T

hu

rsd

ay

Transnational Legal Ordering: Education, Rights, Courts, Political Actors, and Social LegitimacyThursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Description:Papers address transnational flows of students; rights protections and judicial networks; the concept of vulnerability in international institutions; the legitimacy of judges in post-conflict situations; political actors and private law conventions; and transparency of EU regulatory authorizations.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Political Actors and the Ratification of international Private Law ConventionsJohanna Hoekstra, University of Greenwich

Social legitimacy of judges in times of transition: the case of the Colombian Tribunal for Peace.Santiago Pardo, Stanford Law School

Sticky Floors, Springboards, Stairways & Slow Escalators Mobility Pathways and Preferences of International Students in U.S. Law SchoolsCarole Silver, Northwestern University Law SchoolSwethaa S. Ballakrishnen, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi

The Protection of Fundamental Rights in Europe: A Structured Network of National, Supranational, and International CourtsMichael Tolley, Northeastern University

Vulnerability in the Context of the Accountability of International Institutions: a Useful Concept or a New Empty Buzzword?Marjolein Schaap - Rubio Imbers, Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Unfree and Institutional LabourCRN: 8 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Lea VanderVelde, University of Iowa College of Lwa

Description:This salon examines labor issues in various institutional settings. One paper explores whether skilled labor programs in Arizona's prisons can serve a rehabilitative function by looking closely at the Wildland Firefighting Program. Another paper looks at how intercutting vectors such as free labor ideology, anti-immigrant sentiment, racial equality commitments, and laissez-faire influenced the passage of the Foran Act of 1885, which declared foreign labor contracts invalid with a few notable exceptions. A final paper focuses upon the employment status of foster carers in the English law.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:Protecting Favorites: Survival of The Fittest, Foreigners, and the Foran Act of 1885Avi Soifer, William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai'i

Recognising the Work of Creating a Family Life for Children: Foster Carers as Employees in English LawGemma Mitchell, University of East Anglia

Walking the Scarlet Line: The Implications of Engaging in Public Science on the Uptake of Sex Industry Research in the Policy RealmCRN: 6Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Tamara O'Doherty, Simon Fraser University

Description:There is an embedded conflict between policy, public, and academic science that may threaten the potential of sex industry related research to shape policy. If asked to lay the evidentiary foundation necessary for law reform, a researcher's public science activities -undertaken as commitment to ethical production of knowledge about the sex industry -can function to create a sufficient basis for an allegation of bias against the researcher, thereby reducing the value of the evidence and potentially dismissing the academic as an expert witnesses. This salon session explores whether it is possible (or desirable) to maintain sufficient objectivity to ensure that research findings and policy implications can be translated into law and policy reform while attending to public intellectualism and public discourse on such politicized issues.

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

34

Thursday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. T

hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Building a Participatory Approach Research Project on Sex Work: the Importance and Difficulties of this ApproachLaura Graham, Senior Lecturer at Northumbria University

Confessions of a Public Academic: A Conversational Journey through Professional, Public and Policy Science, and the Sex IndustryRaven Bowen, University of YorkChris Atchison, University of VictoriaTamara O'Doherty, Simon Fraser University

When the Levees Break – Re-Visioning Regulation of the Securities MarketsCRN: 46 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Code:Author Meets Reader

Room: Danforth

Author(s): Jena Martin, West Virginia University

Chair(s): Ellen Berrey, University of Toronto

Reader(s):Andre Cummings, John Marshall Law SchoolJoan Heminway, The University of TennesseeNicola Sharpe, University of Illinois College of Law

Description:Most people would agree that our securities regulation model is dysfunctional. The evolution of markets, advancements in technology, and the development of quantitative trading, have punched a multitude of new holes in the regulatory dike. Enforcement as we know it and the Dodd-Frank reforms are ineffective at plugging any one leak, let alone containing the flood of changes that have occurred in the industry in the last decade. This is primarily because the regulatory structure envisioned in the 1930s is completely out of sync with the financial markets that it was designed to control.

Our central premise? That there is a disaggregation between how investors purchase securities and how agencies are regulating them. Specifically, we discuss the shift from an investor-oriented paradigm (where people buy stock to invest in a company)

Primary Keyword: Financialization, Financial CapitalSecondary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and Transactions

Women, Justice and the Rule of Law: Perspectives from AfricaCRN: 32 Thursday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair/Discussant(s): Josephine Dawuni, Howard University

Description:This panel examines the multiple and intersecting junctures women occupy within the legal and human rights discourse across the continent of Africa. Recent debates have sought to de-center the concentration of extant scholarship on women in Africa as victims of human rights abuse by highlighting some of the important developments made across the continent. De-centering efforts have included mapping where progress has been made in women's ascent to judicial, legal and feminist legal activism. Papers in this panel explore the intersection of women's roles as actors within the legal and judicial spheres and the progress and challenges therein. Additionally, the panel explores the substantive issues on the role of women actors in addressing gender-based practices and norms through the law.

Primary Keyword: Gender and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law and Society

Presentations:Due Diligence and Violence Against Women; of Travelling Laws and the Unacknowledged Feminist Jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' RightsRuth Nekura, University of Cape Town

Exposure in the Appointment of Women Judges in South Africa: The Good, the Bad and the UglyTabeth Masengu, Ghent University and University of Cape Town

Intersectionality as Methodology in Postcolonial Feminists’ (re)Interpretations of law in Africa.Sylvia Bawa, York University

Vive la Diversité or A luta Continua? Achieving Gender parity on the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights.Josephine Dawuni, Howard University

Women's Access to Justice in a Pluralistic Ghanaian Legal SystemMaame Efua Addadzi-Koom, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology

35

Thursday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.T

hu

rsd

ay

THE ARC OF THE MORAL UNIVERSE IS LONG, BUT…Thursday Plenary Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Awards Ceremony & Keynote Address

Room: Osgoode Ballroom East

12:45: Welcome and land acknowledgement, Ojibway elder Wendy Phillips

1:00: Joint Awards Ceremony of the Canadian Law and Society Association and the Law and Society Association Description:

1:45: Keynote Address by Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella, Supreme Court of Canada

Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella was appointed in 2004 to the Supreme Court of Canada, becoming the first Jewish woman to sit on the Canadian Supreme Court bench.

She attended the University of Toronto, where she earned a B.A. and LL.B. She is also a graduate of the Royal Conservatory of Music in classical piano. She was called to the Ontario Bar in 1972 and practiced civil and criminal litigation until 1976 when she was appointed to the Ontario Family Court at the age of 29, the youngest and first pregnant person appointed to the judiciary in Canada. She was appointed to the Ontario Court of Appeal in 1992. She has written over 90 articles and written or co-edited four books.

She was the sole Commissioner of the 1984 federal Royal Commission on Equality in Employment, creating the term and concept of "employment equity". The theories of "equality" and "discrimination" she developed in her Report were adopted by the Supreme Court of Canada in its first decision dealing with equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1989. She also served as a commissioner on the Ontario Human Rights Commission; as a member of the Ontario Public Service Labour Relations Tribunal; as Co-Chair of the University of Toronto Academic Discipline Tribunal; as a member of the Premier's Advisory Committee on Confederation; and as Chair of the Study on Access to Legal Services by the Disabled.

Justice Abella has been active in Canadian judicial education, organizing the first judicial seminar in which all levels of the judiciary participated, the first judicial seminar in which persons outside the legal profession

were invited to participate, the first national education program for administrative tribunals, and the first national conference for Canada's female judges.

Justice Abella is a fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. She was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Medal in 2002 and she is the recipient of 38 honorary degrees.

Justice Abella was born in a Displaced Person's Camp in Stuttgart, Germany on July 1, 1946 to parents who survived the Holocaust. Her family came to Canada as refugees in 1950.

A Decade of Regulation & Governance: Looking Back, Looking ForwardThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel


Chair(s): Jodi Short, UC Hastings College of the Law

Discussant(s): Benjamin van Rooij, Univ. of California, Irvine

Participant(s):Steven Bernstein, University of TorontoBenjamin Cashore, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNai Rui Chng, University of GlasgowBridget Hutter, London School of Economics and Political ScienceKenneth Abbott, Arizona State UniversityFiona Haines, University of MelbourneRuthanne Huising, Emlyon Business SchoolPeter Mascini, Erasmus University RotterdamGreg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of LawSusan Silbey, MIT

Description:This panel will celebrate the first decade of the interdisciplinary journal Regulation & Governance by bringing together scholars whose work helped establish the journal as a leading voice in the fields of law, public policy, and political science. Scholars who have published influential articles in the journal will discuss their work and engage in a collective conversation about its meaning for the past, present, and future of regulation and governance scholarship.

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 42:45 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m .

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 3 Awards Ceremony & Keynote Address

12:45 p.m. - 2 :30 p.m .

36


hu

rsd

ay

Abortion in the Middle East and North AfricaCRN: 17 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair(s): Liv Tønnessen, CMI

Discussant(s): Rachel Sieder, CIESAS

Description:Most abortion laws in MENA are punitive, and legal and medical services are restricted. In several countries, cuts in government health expenditures and the emergence of conservative religiously-oriented parties, especially after the Arab Spring, have contributed to the restriction of public sexual and reproductive health services and to rethinking women's role and rights in society. The panel explores the political dynamics that drive, hamper and shape uses of criminal law to regulate abortion in MENA. The panel also discusses the effects of discourses and policies promoted by states, international agencies, local NGOs, political parties and Islamic organizations on medical practices and social norms shaping modern reproductive subjectivities in the region.

Primary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Abortion practices in Tunisia: between Islamic revival, women’s rights and medical managementIrene Maffi, University of Lausanne

Challenges and legal boundaries of abortion in Morocco: between local struggles and global reproductive rightsIrene Capelli, Independent researcher

Neoliberal health structuring, Rising Neoconservatism and Sexual/Reproductive Rights in TurkeyAyse Dayi, UNIL: Université de Lausanne

Alternative Visions of Justice and the Indigenous OffenderCRN: 34 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Description:Indigenous peoples suffer disproportionate levels of incarceration and criminalization globally. In this panel the papers will explore the different strategies being deployed

in carceral institutions to reimagine different paths and possibilities for Indigenous persons who are imprisoned or involved with the legal system.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous Law

Presentations:Building effective throughcare strategies for Indigenous offenders in AustraliaHilde Tubex, University Western Australia

Reimagining Life as an Australian Indigenous Offender in CustodyElena Marchetti, Griffith UniversityDebbie Bargallie, Griffith University

Assigned and Asserted: Refugee and Migrant IdentitiesCRN: 11 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair/Discussant(s): Ben Hudson, University of Lincoln

Description:This session explores many aspects of identity through the experiences of refugee and migrant populations.


Presentations:Constructions of the Single Male Migrant in Canadian Refugee LawMegan Gaucher, Carleton University

Experimenting with Refugee Credibility DeterminationsSean Rehaag, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolHilary Evans Cameron, Osgoode Hall Law School

Legal Seeds of Intolerance: Religious Laws and Rohingya Muslims in MyanmarRoman David, Lingnan University

Mass InfluxTally Amir, Harvard Law School

Toward a Human Centered Refugee Policy: Exploring How Asylum and Refugee Policy Ignore the Person at the International and Local Level in the United StatesSilas Allard, Emory University

37


hu

rsd

ay

Becoming an Effective Policy Advocate: How to Write an Op-EdCRN: 9 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mProfessional Development Panel

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Jules Netherland, Drug Policy Alliance

Description:In the age of "alternative facts" and "post truth," the role of academics in policy debates is more important than ever. Nicholas Kristof, an op ed writer for the New York Times, penned an opinion piece titled Professors, We Need You! In 2014, and little has changed. Nowhere is this the need for scientific evidence greater than in the world of public policy, where evidence is often missing from how policy gets made. Despite a robust research base and a plethora of talented scholars working on policy-relevant issues, there is still a disconnect between researchers and the world of policymakers.

Media can be a critical tool to bridge this divide. While few policymakers read peer reviewed journal articles, most read mainstream media, and op eds can be a particularly powerful tool for bringing important research into view. However, few researchers have ben trained in how to write an op ed or make their research accessible to a broad audience. This workshop will make the case for why researchers need to engage in public discourse and provide concrete tools for how to do so through an op ed. Participants will be given tips on how to structure an op ed, practice in crafting a "pitch" for their research, and strategies for developing relationships with reporters to help in placing pieces.

The workshop will be led by Jules Netherland, PhD, the director of the Office of Academic Engagement at the Drug Policy Alliance. Netherland has more than 25 years of experience in both policy and research and works to help scholars advance progressive policy reform.

Cause Lawyering: New Actors, New Strategies, New LocationsCRN: 21Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Irina Ceric, Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Description:This panel explores the complex relationships between social change and various legal actors, including cause lawyers, legal organizations, and social movements. Situating their work in the US, Canada, France, Ireland, and transnationally, the authors employ diverse methodological approaches to probe the operation of legal activism through studies of NGOs, human rights commissions, courts, movements, and lawyers across the ideological spectrum.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Canadian Cause Lawyering: Key Trends and Issues from an Empirical InvestigationBasil Alexander, Queen's University

Formalization or Spontaneity? Law at the Crossroads with Transnational Social Movement OrganizationsMark Hanna, Queen's University Belfast

Human Rights Commissions as Law Reformers?Liam Thornton, University College Dublin

Law as Collective ActionLiora Israël, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris

Martin Heidegger Meets Jay Sekulow: Understanding “Worldview” and its Implications for Christian Conservative Legal ActivismJason Whitehead, California State University, Long Beach

The Radical Nonprofit: How the State and Funders Shape the Radical Strategies of Nonprofit Organizations in France and the United StatesNicole Hirsch, University of Southern California

Constitutional Theory Development in Asia and the Americas IICRN: 1Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEAC

Description:Societies in Asia and the Americas may seem to have nothing in common given their particularities; however, many countries in these two regions share similar historical and political experiences (e.g. dictatorships,

38


hu

rsd

ay

revolutions, democratic mobilizations, civil rights or human rights problems, corruption etc.) and interact more and more pushed by economic and cultural globalization. Nevertheless these geographically diverse societies, although very different in their current legal and political cultures, may also share constitutional and democratic values. This session intends to bring together scholars engaged in studying the evolvement of constitutional features, either regarding constitutional law or constitutional theory, related to these regional foci.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Constitutionalism in the Kingdom of BhutanNima Dorji, Jigme Singye Wangchuck School of Law

Popular Constitutionalism and mechanisms of democratization of the decision making power in the new Latin American constitutionalismClaudia Maria Barbosa, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáSylvia Araujo, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná

The Recent Decision of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh Nullifying the Government’s Design to Curb the Independence of the Superior Judiciary and the Subsequent Scathing Attack on the Chief Justice: Addressing the Necessity to Prevent the Executive from becoming the Unlimited Master of the StateM Ehteshamul Bari, Deakin University

The State of Exception and Crisis Government: A Comparative Analysis of Mexico and ChileClaudia Heiss, Universidad de Chile

Crime, Crime Control, and Gendered ViolenceThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Primary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Anti-rape technologies and the evidentiary process: Exploring legal implications for victims and their casesDeborah White, Trent University

Femicide Legislation in Latin America: A ‘What’s the Problem Represented to be?’ Approach to Policy AnalysisMichelle Carrigan, University of GuelphMyrna Dawson, University of Guelph

Sexual Scripts, Consent and Victim Blame: a Study of the Impact of Gender on Young People’s PerceptionsDavid Gurnham, University of Southampton

“They treated me like a criminal”: Experiences of women charged with domestic violenceAnita Grace, Carleton University

Deadly VoyageCRN:11 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Linden

Chair(s): Rebecca Hamlin, Univ. of Massachusetts Amherst

Discussant(s): Steven Bender, Seattle University School of Law

Description:Migrants, the world over, have been compelled to make deadly voyages to escape harsh conditions in pursuit of a better life. Whether it is fatal journey made by "Boat People" to Australia; migrants desperately crossing the Mediterranean; Syrian refugees converging at the frontiers of Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq and Egypt; or unaccompanied minors from "Northern Triangle" nations trekking thousands of miles on to enter the United States via Mexico; their vulnerability is certain. Many fall prey to traffickers, smugglers, violence, exploitation and death. For instance, Amnesty International reports that, at the current rate of 2.7 deaths per every 100 people, 2017 promises to be the deadliest year for refugees crossing the Mediterranean.


Presentations:Anthropocene, Displacement and Dispossession: The Enigma of Environment Refugees in Law and PolicyNergis Canefe, York University

Cultivating Legal Culture and Civic Belonging for Resettled RefugeesMegan Ballard, Gonzaga School of Law

Environmental RefugeesTarini Mehta, Member of Parliament, Dinesh Trivedi

Statelessness and Vulnerability among Rohingya Women and Girls in Bangladeshi Refugee CampsYasmin Khan, University of Toronto

The Deadly Voyage Home for Deported MigrantsSteven Bender, Seattle University School of Law

39


hu

rsd

ay

Dealing with Over-indebtednessCRN: 25 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Lauren E. Willis, Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Description:Panelists will tackle issues of dealing with households' over-indebtedness from a range of perspectives.


Presentations:Brainscience Informed Coaching in Over IndebtednessNadja Jungmann, Hogeschool Utrecht

Causal Connections between Conduits of Credit and Suicide: A By-Product of Financial Inclusion?Shanthi Senthe, Faculty of Law - University of Windsor

Debt Relief for the Poorest Debtors: A Partial SolutionChrystin Ondersma, Rutgers School of Law Newark

The Financial Distress Research Project: One Year in the FieldDalie Jimenez, Univ. of California, Irvine School of LawD. James Greiner, Harvard Law SchoolLois Lupica, University of Maine School of Law

Dementia: A New Frontier in Criminal JusticeCRN: 41 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair/Discussant(s): Colleen Berryessa, University of Pennsylvania

Description:Dementia is one of the greatest societal challenges of the 21st century. An estimated 131.5 million people worldwide will have the condition by 2050. Given this number, it is expected that more people with dementia will be present at all stages of the criminal justice system. This multidisciplinary panel will explore several emerging concerns that dementia poses to courts, corrections, and care providers. A forensic psychiatrist will discuss older sexual offenders and risk factors such as dementia. An applied philosophy scholar will explore the ethical considerations of non-consensual sex between persons

with dementia. Legal scholars will discuss homicidal behaviour by persons with dementia; the impact of advanced age on judicial assessments of witnesses; and the consequences of prolonged incarceration on persons with dementia.

Primary Keyword: AgingSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Access to Early Release for Individuals with Dementia Incarcerated in Canada: Challenges and ConsequencesAdelina Iftene, Dalhousie University

Black and White? The Ethical Complexities of Dementia and Sexual ConsentAndria Bianchi, University of Waterloo

Elderly Sexual OffendersBrad Booth, University of Ottawa

The Vulnerable Killer: Homicidal Behaviour by Persons with DementiaHeather Campbell, Queen's University, Faculty of Law

Democracy Reframed: How May Law Improve Popular Participation?CRN: 52 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Kent

Chair(s): David Restrepo Amariles, HEC Paris

Discussant(s): Rolando Garcia Miron, Stanford Law School Nelson Camilo Sanchez, Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Description:Democracy became an ambition of many societies, social groups, and political organizations. However, as a polysemic concept, democracy may have multiple meanings. It may mean that governments should not rely on a strong president to establish its laws, a problem that Roberto Gargarella famously labelled as the "engine room of constitutionalism". For some, democracy should be oriented towards polyarchy, protecting political rights of minorities and various social groups. For others, the democratic principle prevents dictatorial regimes, prohibiting the military in the decision-making process. Yet, some consider that democracy implies an anti-establishment clause and the separation between the church and the state. Finally, some argue that democracy requires institutional stability and freedom of the people according to the rule of law.

40


hu

rsd

ay

Secondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Presentations:Conceptions of Freedom in the Use of the Open Public Space: The Foruen Enparantza in Oñati as an IllustrationRoberto Leopoldo Cruz Balbuena, International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Generals and Judges: Military Justice Meets the Rule of LawAndrew Reiter, Mount Holyoke CollegeBrett Kyle, University of Nebraska Omaha

Improving the Quality of Democracy: A Gender PerspectiveLeslye Obiora, University of ArizonaRebecca A. Chaisson, Southern University at New OrleansJane Eggers, Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana

Institucional Stability and ConstitutionalismLuciana Silveira Ardente, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

On Unchecked Institutional Leadership Empowerment: Analyzing Extraordinary Credits in Brazil from 2001 to 2016Victor Rodrigues, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Party Laws, Ethnic Accommodation, and Party Institutionalization: An Examination of Afghan Political Party LawsMohammad Bashir Mobasher, University of Washington

Religion in the public sphere: Rawls versus Sandel in the Brazilian House of RepresentativesVictor Rodrigues, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Economic Technologies of Governance: International, Legal, and Spatial Contexts and ConsequencesCRN: 23 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Luis Eslava, Kent Law School

Description:How have economic & financial rationalities and instruments come to shape the governance of international, legal, and

spatial fields? Can we identify specific "economic techniques and technologies of governance" such as economic sanctions, tax rules, and compensation mechanisms that (i) implicitly promote financial actors, activities, and rationalities or (ii) enable governments to coerce other actors into compliance or acquiescence? What are the contexts and consequences of their use across various legal and regulatory regimes and levels of governance? By exploring these questions across a variety of legal and regulatory regimes, it is our hope to better understand the specific ways that the often-observed larger rationalities of neoliberalism and financialization gain traction (and an appearance of neutrality) through local contexts.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Financialization, Financial Capital

Presentations:Damages for Collateral Damage: Monetary Compensation for Civilians in Asymmetric ConflictGilat Bachar, Stanford Law School

Legal Regime of Sanction: Banks and Disproportionate Collateral DamageHelyeh Doutaghi, Carleton University

Money as a System of Surveillance and ControlRohan Grey, Cornell Law School

Equality in the Changing Scandinavian Welfare StatesThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Kristin Sandvik, University of Oslo

Discussant(s): Malcolm Langford, University of Oslo

Description:This session aims at shedding light on current trends and tensions in the Scandinavian welfare states, frequently presented as champions of both equality and welfare. Yet, this depiction is facing increasing scrutiny and critique. How can we understand the multilayered system whereby legislation in fields such as labour law, social security law and social service law meet the general, cross-cutting legal principles of equality and non-discrimination law? What are the opportunities and obstacles for non-discrimination legislation as paths for change, as different legal fields and formats interact in the practice of public and private actors? Concepts of discrimination and equality are developing in tandem with changes in the economic, social and political landscapes, as perceptions of the proper shape and role of the welfare state evolves.


41


hu

rsd

ay

Secondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Activation Policy in England, Germany, and Norway - the Aim of Substantive EqualityJulia Kohler-Olsen, Oslo and Akershus Univ College, NorwayAina Aune Kane, UiT, Arctic University of Norway

Combating Disadvantage through Constitutionalisation of Equality and Non-discrimination?Vibeke Blaker Strand, University of Oslo

Equality from the Outside – Marginalization from the Swedish SocietyEva Schömer, Dep of Accounting and Logistics Law

Norwegian Equality and Anti-discrimination Reform in an Individualist and Market-Oriented ContextAnne Hellum, Department of Public and International Law

On Equality and Difference: Care Work as a Prohibited Ground of DiscriminationIngunn Ikdahl, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo

Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax OpinionsCRN: 7 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mAuthor Meets Reader (a.m.R) Session

Room: Huron

Author(s): Anthony Infanti, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Chair(s): Bridget Crawford, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

Reader(s):Alice Abreu, Temple University Beasley School of LawAnn Bartow, Univ. of New Hampshire School of LawSteve Johnson, Florida State University College of Law

Description:This session will center on a discussion of the 2017 publication of Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions by Cambridge University Press. This volume brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite tax decisions in which a feminist emphasis would have changed the outcome or the court's reasoning. The volume includes cases that implicate gender on their face (such as medical expense deductions for fertility treatment or gender confirmation surgery and special tax benefits for married individuals) as well as cases without an obvious connection to gender (such as the tax treatment of tribal lands and the business expense deduction). This book thus opens the way for a discussion of how viewpoint is a key

factor in all statutory interpretation cases.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal Policies

Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in Canada after the Adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: What's Changed?Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session


Participant(s):Janette Bulkan, University of British ColumbiaNelcy Lopez-Cuellar, University of Ontario

Description:In 2016, Canada withdrew the qualifications on its acceptance of UNDRIP, nine years after the Declaration was adopted by an overwhelming majority at the UN General Assembly. What impact has this formal and widely-announced change to the country's official stance had in practice on the recognition of indigenous peoples' right of FPIC – a right enshrined in several articles of the Declaration? The roundtable will explore this question through discussion of recent resource development initiatives, indigenous nations' invocations of the FPIC norm, Canadian court actions, and federal government policy decisions, along with related developments in international legal fora.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Gender and JudgingCRN: 32 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair(s): Josephine Dawuni, Howard University

Discussant(s): Monika Lindbekk, University of Oslo

Description:The session deals with gender questions in the judiciary and judicial proceedings, how gender influences careers in the judiciary, in how far gendered notions influence the judgments and if finally women judge better or differrently from men.

Primary Keyword: Gender and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

42


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Analysis of the application of the Maria da Penha law by the Labor Courts in BrazilBárbara Ferrito, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Gender, Leadership, and Other Social Dynamics in Scotland’s High Court of JusticiaryMelinda Gann Hall, Michigan State University

Sexist Accountings. An ethnography of inheritance planning and marital breakdown in France.Céline Bessiere, Université Paris-Dauphine

“I have a son at home and I have to explain to him”: the influence of identities on black women state judges’ behaviorTaneisha Means, Vassar College

How Do Courts and Local Agencies Handle Conflicts over Housing? A Comparative PerspectiveThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Frank Munger, New York Law School

Description:Housing provides a useful lens for understanding the linkages between legal institutions and inequalities, especially in urban areas. Who is entitled to land and decent housing? And through what kind of financing? How do local courts, city councils, and mediation address disputes over the production, habitability, and right to housing? These papers provide rich empirical data on case studies from England, Brazil, the U.S., India, Canada, and Nigeria.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and Urbanism

Presentations:Consent provisions in Mortgage Transaction under Land use Act in Nigeria: A Panecia to access to Mortgage LoanBabatunde Adetunji Oni, University of Lagos

Gentrification and the Challenges of Maintaining a Diverse Urban Neighbourhood: A Study of the Parkdale Neighbourhood Land TrustTanja Juric, York University

Housing Production in Bristol, UK: Findings from Ethnographic Research with Local GovernmentEdward Burtonshaw-Gunn, University of Bristol

Lead Poisoning Abatement Policy, Warrant of Habitability, and the Reproduction of Housing InstabilityMatthew McLeskey, University at Buffalo, SUNY

Mediation as Urban Intelligences: What Place for Access to Housing in Reflections on Dispute resolutions?Maria Tereza Fonseca Dias, Univ. Federal de Minas Gerais

Indigenous and Colonial Law in ConversationCRN: 34 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): Dayna Nadine Scott, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:The discussion of reconciliation between Indigenous peoples and the Crown in Canada, as the purpose of section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, largely focuses on its qualities and procedures in the context of colonial law. Of note is that scholars and courts have paid little attention to how Indigenous law defines reconciliation, and what comprehensive, negotiated reconciliation means for colonial jurisdiction in practice. The purpose of this panel is for Indigenous legal scholars and scholars engaged with colonial environmental law to explore the interaction between Indigenous and colonial law and the Indigenous legal, indeed reconciliation, mandate for the transformation of colonial legal relations.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Colonial Law's Awkward Reception of Reconciliation Agreements and Indigenous LawDeborah Curran, University of Victoria

Is Self-Determination Possible without Recognized Sovereignty?Sarah Morales, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, Common Law

Standards of ReconciliationVal Napoleon, University of Victoria

43


hu

rsd

ay

Influences on JudgingCRN: 43Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session



Discussant(s): Young Jung, UW-Law School / Chonbuk National University(Law School)

Description:It is now widely accepted that many judicial decisions are not inevitably determined by existing law. Personal, professional, and institutional factors may influence judges' decision making where choices among equally justifiable alternative outcomes must be made. This session explores some of those influences.


Presentations:A Special Meeting at a Professional Crossroads - Juvenile Court - Israel - 1950Nitzana Ben-David, Tel Aviv University

Dissenting Votes on the Brazilian Supreme CourtEvan Rosevear, University of TorontoIvar A. Hartmann, FGV Law School Rio de JaneiroDiego Werneck Arguelhes, Fundação Getulio Vargas Law School - Rio de Janeiro (FGV Direito Rio)

Free Expression and Judicial Decision-Making in the European Court of Human RightsThomas M Keck, Syracuse UniversityDamyre Benjamin, Syracuse UniversityErik Bleich, Middlebury CollegeParker Ferguson, Middlebury CollegeNeha Sharma, Middlebury CollegeClaire Sigsworth, Syracuse UniversityCaroline Snell, Middlebury College

Sentencing Indigenous Offenders: A Comparison of the Sentencing of Indigenous Manslaughter Offenders across CanadaAnna Johnson, University of Guelph

The Supreme Court of Japan in Transition: Judicial Review and Separate Opinion Writing After the Late Judicial ReformsTsukasa Mihira, Kyoto University

Infrastructures as Regulation: The Internet, Data Flows, and Global Digital OrderingCRN: 23 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s):Benedict Kingsbury, NYU School of LawSally Engle Merry, New York University

Participant(s):Gregoire Mallard, Graduate Institute of International and Development StudiesEden Medina, Indiana UniversityPaul Mertenskötter, New York University School of LawAnnelise Riles, Cornell Law SchoolThomas Streinz, IILJ / NYU School of Law

Description:Physical and informational infrastructures are increasingly enmeshed with (or stacked onto) digital infrastructures, associated flows of data and analytics, and new forms of digital power, competition, and control. This integration can change the ways infrastructures regulate, and how they might be legally regulatable. Digital infrastructures themselves have major regulatory effects, some of which are novel or have novel relations to legal technologies and practices. The ordering effects of digital technologies have long been conceptualized under the idea that "code is law", and are increasingly understood as regulatory, as with Google's processes to implement the European "right to be forgotten". This roundtable examines social ordering effects of the internet, digitalization, and data flows.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

International Migration Flows to Brazil: Legal Responses, Public Policies, and Broader ImplicationsThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jayesh Rathod, American University Washington College of Law

Description:In the current social and political moment, scholars and policymakers have paid considerable attention to how growing nationalism and economic anxiety have constricted migration pathways to the Global North. This panel seeks to deepen

44


hu

rsd

ay

and complicate our understanding of international migration trends by highlighting legal and policy responses adopted by a country in the Global South: Brazil. The panel will feature paper presentations by some of Brazil's leading migration scholars, and will address topics including new federal immigration legislation, humanitarian protection (including special measures for Haitian and Syrian migrants), criminalization, and innovations in state and local integration policies. The panel will also explore the broader implications of these developments on immigration politics and adjudication in the region.

Presentations:A Golden Door in the Global South? Brazil's New Immigration LawJayesh Rathod, American University Washington College of Law

Between Policy and Law: how Brazil is Treating Immigrants under the Humanitarian Protection ParadigmCarolina Claro, Universidade de Brasília

The Legal Framework and Public Policies and how Brazilian Federal Law and São Paulo Local Law Can Complement Each OtherJoao Guilherme Casagrande Martinelli Lima Granja Xavier da Silva, National School of Public Administration

Judges' Perspectives on Judicial Education (in Collaboration with the National Judicial Institute of Canada)CRN: 43 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mCode:Roundtable Session



Discussant(s): Toby Goldbach, University of British Columbia Allard School of Law

Participant(s):Honorable Kevin Burke, Minnesota District Court, 4th Judicial District, Hennepin CountyJeremy Fogel, Federal Judicial CenterC. Adèle Kent, National Judicial InstituteMarcia Turri, Federal Justice - Brazil

Description:Judges worldwide are faced with new challenges and opportunities. Some of these include the growing number of parties appearing in courts without legal representation, the movement to incorporate dispute and conflict resolution processes in judging practices, and the public desire for more

responsiveness, transparency, and accountability on the part of the judiciary. This panel will discuss how judicial education and training programs are meeting the needs of judges today as they respond to these trends.


Law and Religion in the US, Canada, and IsraelCRN: 30 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Catherine Warrick, Villanova University

Description:This panel will examine the intersection of law and religion in areas of civil rights, issue litigation, and the balance of religion-state rights in the US, Canada, and Israel.


Presentations:Conscientious Objection, Pragmatic Accommodation and Principled AdjudicationRichard Moon, University of Windsor

Constitutional Sanction and State Oversight of Religious Courts in Israel & the United States: Balancing Legal Pluralism and Civil RightsRabea Benhalim, University of Wisconsin Law School

Islamic Law in Prison: Inmates’ Use of Shari’a during IncarcerationCatherine Warrick, Villanova University

Law, Criminalization, and the Governance of Sexual Intimacy and IdentitiesThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Description:This panel examines the multiple intentions and effects of laws governing and criminalizing sexual activities, identities, and intimacy. In so doing, each paper interrogates the social context in which these legal interventions emerge, indicating a disparity between legal objectives and the realities of the 'problems' being governed. In drawing attention to this disconnect, each presentation explores the various ways in which legal regimes maintain the status quo and structural inequalities. The topics of focus include the criminalization of HIV non-disclosure, the impact of human rights laws on the sexual identities of Kurdish

45


hu

rsd

ay

women, transformations to European age of consent laws, and historical and contemporary case studies on the proliferation of sex trafficking laws in Interwar Europe and the United States.


Presentations:A Decolonial Feminist Analysis of the Movement Against Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking in the United StatesCarrie Baker, Smith College

Namus: Understanding Power and Sexual “Honour” among Kurds at Home and AbroadHasret Cetinkaya, National University of Ireland Galway

Viral affect: Legal regulation of HIV positive intimaciesSeran Gee, York University

Law, Land, and Traditional Authorities: African ContextsCRN: 13 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair/Discussant(s): Sindiso Mnisi Weeks, University of Massachusetts, Boston

Description:This session covers questions of land, displacement from land/territory, and of traditional justice.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law and Society

Presentations:Re-imagining Traditional Justice in South AfricaMisha Plagis, Freie Universität Berlin

Where Did the Spirits Go?: Legal Transformation of Peri-Urban Land in NigerThomas Kelley, University of North Carolina School of Law

Legal Status, Citizenship and Social ControlCRN: 2 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair/Discussant(s): Miranda Hallett, University of Dayton

Description:Immigration policies and enforcement regimes can serve as instruments of social control and social differentiation, separating persons into categories of belonging and exclusion, as well as marking bodies for the application of biopolitical power. This session examines the production of such regimes and their impacts on varied populations of transborder migrants. Papers in this session explore processes of labor market marginalization, securitization, legal violence and precarious status, "social death," criminalization, and even physical displacement. In conjunction, they reveal the ways in which immigration law regimes subject certain populations to intense social control, and construct differential hierarchies of citizenship vis-à-vis state power.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:Blocked at the Top: How Legal Status Constrains Labor Market Entry for Skilled MigrantsElizabeth Jacobs, University of Pennsylvania

Civil Death and the Wars at HomeTanya Monforte, McGill

Sidestepping Chinese Exclusion: the Immigration of Students, Merchants, and Exempted Classes after 1882Shengkai Xu, University at Buffalo, SUNY

System Embeddedness: How Immigrants Perceive the Risk of DeportationAsad Asad, Cornell University

Venezuelans in Brazil: Displacements and Ways of ResistanceFabricio Souza, Caritas RJ

Leveraging Social Science Expertise in Immigration Law and PolicyCRN: 2 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Ming Chen, University of Colorado Law School Emily Ryo, USC Gould School of Law

Participant(s):Laura Bisaillon, University of Toronto ScarboroughJennifer Chacon, Univ. of Calif., Irvine School of LawIngrid Eagly, UCLA School of LawShannon Gleeson, Cornell UniversityMarjorie Zatz, University of California, Merced

46


hu

rsd

ay

Description:This panel examines the use of social science evidence in immigration policy debates, emphasizing empirical assumptions that underlie wrongheaded policies. Panelists will present specific examples and discuss their policy implications. (1) policies distorting the factors driving migration that lead to use of family detention to deter unauthorized crossings; (2) targeting criminal aliens and gang members based on misperceptions of immigrant criminality and refugee/asylum seeker illegality; (3) regulation of immigrant workers that presume immigrant labor harms native-born workers; (4) erroneous reports of voter fraud that spawn policies suppressing immigrant political participation; and (5) mistaken interpretations of effects of integration and multiculturalism on social cohesion and citizen loyalty.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Markets in Governance and TechnologyCRN: 46 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session



Description:The rapid change in our economic structure thanks to technology affects fundamentals of how firms operate and govern themselves. This panel will explore some of these momentous changes happening in the corporate sector.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Blockchains and Business Enterprises in the Age of Private Ordering Aaron Wright, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

De Facto Shareholder PrimacyJeff Schwartz, Univ. of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law

Facebook, Risk, and Dual-Class StockSarah Haan, University of Idaho College of Law

Markets in Governance and TechnologyKristin Johnson, Seton Hall Law

Regtech, Compliance and Technology Judgment RuleNizan Packin, Baruch College

New Books in the Field: International Law and PoliticsCRN: 23 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session


Chair(s): Gerry Simpson, LSE

Participant(s):Noha Aboueldahab, Brookings Doha CenterGrietje Baars, City University LondonStacy Douglas, Carleton UniversityAeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv UniversityMazen Masri, City, University of LondonVasuki Nesiah, NYU GallatinNimer Sultany, SOAS

Description:Vasuki Nesiah et al. Bandung, Global History & International Law CUP 2017 John Reynolds, Empire, Emergency & International Law CUP 2017Stacy Douglas, Curating Community UMP 2017 Noha Aboueldahab, Transitional Justice in the Arab Region Hart 2017Onur Ulas Ince, Colonial Capitalism & the Dilemmas of Liberalism OUP 2017Mazen Masri, The Dynamics of Exclusionary Constitutionalism Hart 2017Nimer Sultany, Law & Revolution OUP 2017Aeyal Gross, The Writing on the Wall CUP 2017Usha Natarajan et al. TWAIL: On Praxis & the Intellectual Routledge 2017Ratna Kapur, Gender, Alterity & Human Rights Edward Elgar 2018Grietje Baars, Law, Capital & the Corporation Brill 2018Maria Elander, Figures of the Victim Routledge 2018Rose Sydney Parfitt, International Legal Reproduction CUP 2018

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

New Comparative Lay Participation ResearchCRN: 4 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: York

Chair/Discussant(s): Valerie Hans, Cornell Law School

47


hu

rsd

ay

Description:Around the globe, countries are experimenting with new ways to include lay participants in legal decision-making. Some countries have used traditional juries; others have used mixed courts (lay participants and professional judges working together); and other countries have gone back and forth between the two forms or experimented with other forms altogether (such as magistrates). This panel will present new research on new developments in countries as diverse as England and Wales, Norway, and Japan. This panel will also explore how we learn about different countries' use of lay participation--from such diverse sources as social science surveys to movies in popular culture.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay ParticipationSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:A Worldwide Perspective on Lay ParticipationSanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, Michigan State UniversityValerie Hans, Cornell Law School

Lay Magistrates in England and WalesStefan Machura, Bangor UniversityPenny Darbyshire, Kingston University London

Mythification of Jury Trials in Russian Legal Culture: Analysis of Judicial Practice, Legal and Sociological ResearchNikolai Kovalev, Wilfrid Laurier University

Questionable Judgment: Shifting Attitudes about Lay Participation in NorwayAnna Offit, Princeton

The Unexpected Sociopolitical Consequences of Lay Participation in Criminal Trials in JapanDimitri Vanoverbeke KU Leuven, Hiroshi Fukurai

University of California Santa CruzWhat Hollywood, U.S.A. Teaches the World (Incorrectly) about JuriesNancy Marder, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law

New Forms of Governance and Alternative Governance AreasCRN: 5 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Leaside

Chair(s): Eric Windholz, Monash University

Discussant(s): Toby Seddon, University of Manchester

Description:This panel addresses the expanding scope of the regulatory state in two respects: through an exploration of new and creative modes of governance; or through an exploration of new and alternative objects or fields of governance.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Algorithm-driven Business Conduct: Competition and collusionRob Nicholls, UNSW Business School

Regulating Supermarkets: The Competition for SpaceChristopher Arup, Business Law, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University

Sustainable Urban Development, Land-Use Planning and Private-Public PartnershipSenko Plicanic, School of Law

Theorizing Hybrid Accountability in Welfare Governance: When the Logics of Market, Bureaucracy and Professionalism InteractAvishai Benish, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Opening the Black Box: The Lived Experiences of International Courts and TribunalsThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Discussant(s): Alexandra Huneeus, University of Wisconsin

Description:Studies of judicial behavior typically focus on judicial votes and opinions. To fully understand judicial behavior, however requires opening up the 'black box' of the courts and examining the wide variety of behavior that judges (and other officials) engage in other than voting on and preparing opinions in individual cases. This panel will foreground a cross-section of these activities, including important judicial practices, networks, institutions, and initiatives across a wide variety of tribunals, including international, regional, and domestic courts as well as arbitral bodies. In so doing, the panelists seek to challenge traditional theoretical and empirical approaches to judicial behavior in ways that create spaces for analyzing heretofore overlooked actors, topics, and research questions.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

48


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Comparative International Judicial PracticesJeffrey Dunoff, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Governance Beyond Adjudication: International Courts’ Agency and EntrepreneurshipNicole De Silva, Concordia University

Mechanisms of Systemic Change in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Judgments: Swinging the Pendulum between Legitimacy and ImpactLucas Lixinski, University of New South Wales

The Rise of Judicial Self-Government in Europe: Forms and RationalesDavid Kosar, Masaryk University

Who Makes Inroads into Investment Arbitration? Appointment Procedures, Institutions, and GenderTaylor St John, PluriCourts, University of OsloDaniel Behn, PluriCourts, University of OsloMalcolm Langford, University of OsloRunar Lie, PluriCourts, University of Oslo

Physical and Mental Health in the Criminal Justice SystemThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Description:This panel is concerned with issues related to physical and mental health in the criminal justice system. Papers focus on the role of neuroscience in sentencing, mental health in prisons, criminal justice response to opioid addiction, and decisions about how to die in prison.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:A (European) right to die for prisoners?Angelika Reichstein, University of East Anglia, UK

It’s Always Miller Time: The Implications of Adult Developmental Neuropsychology for the Lawfulness of Long Prison SentencesEve Hanan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law

"They are Difficult to the Manage but they are also Mentally Ill”: Responses to Various Mental Disorders in Ontario PrisonsAlexandra Hunter, University of Toronto

Police Violence: Roots, Rebellion, & ReformThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Luis Daniel Gascon, University of San Francisco

Description:Public awareness about the nature and extent of police killings in the US has been on the rise, particularly since the outbreak of the Ferguson rebellion. Our panel will critically examine police violence by employing historical, archival, statistical, and theoretical approaches to build a deeper understanding of the impacts of police violence in dark poor communities. Panelists will: trace the historical trajectory of "officer friendly" programs in Los Angeles, CA; critically assess police killings in Denver, CO; chart new territory in understanding police violence by theoretically synthesizing macro, meso, and micro dynamics impacting police-citizen relations; and explore the societal roots of the creation of a Black symbolic assailant in contemporary policing.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Dead Canaries in the Coal Mine: The Symbolic Assailant RevisitedJeannine Bell, Indiana University Maurer School of Law — Bloomington

Police Violence Across the Racial-Spatial Divides in U.S. MunicipalitiesMalcolm Holmes, University of Wyoming

Thirty-five Years of Legalized Violence: Officer Involved Shootings in Denver, ColoradoRobert Duran, University of TennesseeOralia Loza, University of Texas - El Paso

Why Can’t We Be Friends?: A History of Community Policing in Black & Brown L.A.Luis Daniel Gascon, University of San Francisco

Property and Critical Race TheoryCRN: 12, 49 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Thomas Joo, University of California, Davis, School of Law

49


hu

rsd

ay

Description:This panel examines the intersection of race and critical race theory with real property holdings. Using a variety of empirical based methodologies from across disciplines the papers examine the implications of race in the socio-legal conceptualization of land as property.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:Eminent Domain in the City of AtlantaTanya Washington, Georgia State

Racial Discrimination Unveiled: Property Tax Assessments and the Fair Housing ActBernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/American Bar Foundation

Subsurface stratification: Social Inequalities in Oil and Gas Mineral-Rights ContractingDaniel Kluttz, University of California, Berkeley

The Intangible Life of Tangible Cultural Property: Decolonizing Heritage Determinations for a More Inclusive Safeguarding of Urban Cultural Property, Redefining Notions of “Value”, and “Whose” Heritage MattersSara Ross, Osgoode Hall Law School

Religious Rights and Religious LawThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Lisa Fishbayn Joffe, Brandeis University

Description:Academics from around the globe will engage with current trends in religious divorce in different geographic/national, religious, and legal contexts. With the theme of the conference being 'Law at the Crossroads' the panelists will look fittingly at multi-layered approaches to religious divorce based on significant and diverse primary research. This session will also explore what happens when individuals are at a crossroads between state and non-state legal orders, examining the role of legal pluralism and gender in religious divorce.

Primary Keyword: Religion and Law, Religious StudiesSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Bargaining the Shadows of Legal Pluralism: The Case of Jewish Divorce RefusalYael Machtinger, York University

From Revolution to Devolution: Decentralization as governance reform after the Arab uprisingsAsli Bali, UCLA School of Law

Religious Divorce in Massachusetts: Reflections on the work of the Boston Agunah Task ForceLisa Fishbayn Joffe, Brandeis University

State of Religious Minorities: An Empirical Analysis of Sectarianism in Egypt (2011-2017)Miray Philips, University of MinnesotaAmira Mikhail, Eshhad: The Center for The Protection of Minorities; International Refugee Assistance Project

Restrictions on Liberty in Health CareThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Bernadette McSherry, University of Melbourne

Discussant(s): Roxanne Mykitiuk, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Description:This session will explore the ways in which the right to liberty can presently be restricted across health care settings in Canada and Australia. How do those accessing aged care, mental health and disability services experience discrimination and barriers to having their human rights upheld and what supports may be put in place to address the situation?

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:'Support Reinvestment' - Shifting Mental Health Resources from Coercion to Rights-based SupportPiers Gooding, University of Melbourne

Can the abolition of compulsory mental health treatment be achieved through mental health law reform?Penelope Weller, RMIT University

Deprivation of liberty in health and social care: Canada’s simmering human rights crisis and lessons learned from the DoLSSheila Wildeman, Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law

Gender and Decision-Making Rights: The Unique and Under-explored Barriers that Women with Cognitive Disability Face in HealthcareAnna Arstein-Kerslake, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne

50


hu

rsd

ay

Reducing the use of restraint across health-care settings in Australia: a human rights perspectiveYvette Maker, University of MelbourneBernadette McSherry, University of Melbourne

Sex Work as Work: Crafting the FutureCRN: 6Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Frances M Shaver, Concordia University

Participant(s):Bettina Bouskila, Concordia UniversityJenn Clamen, Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law ReformHeather Jarvis, Safe Harbour Outreach Project (S.H.O.P.)

Description:This roundtable will focus on the future conditions of sex work. It will be an opportunity for academics, policy-makers, and activists to get together in an informal setting to develop strategies and plan mobilisations. Questions for the panellists to address include the following: 1) What are you, or your group, doing in preparation for the future of sex work and sex workers? 2) What are the main challenges you anticipate in your domain: Should we once again use the legal system? 3) What are the priorities for research and/or action that you would suggest - and why? 4) What suggestions do you have for greater collaboration among researchers, advocacy, and legal partners?

Primary Keyword: Sex Work

Technology, Privacy, Control, and SurveillanceThursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Description:Papers address digital communications surveillance; privacy for social media; online companies and social life; digital whistleblowing; body worn cameras and police exhaustion; revenge porn regulation

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Anticipating the Future, Assembling the Past: Constricting Constitutional Rights, Expanding Surveillance, and "Preventing" Terrorism in US v MohamudAnya Degenshein, Northwestern University

Beyond NTD: Distributive Justice and Strict Intermediaries Liability for Unauthorised Dissemination of Nude Images ("Revenge Porn").Tsachi Keren-Paz, Keele University, school of Law

Heart Monitors: Body-Worn Cameras and Police Emotional ExhaustionIan Adams, University of UtahSharon Mastracci, University of Utah

How Private is “Private”? The ECPA in the Era of Social Media and the Third-Party DoctrineChristopher Lin, Temple University Beasley School of Law

Online Companies as Providers of Democratic Life – Bridging the Democratic GapElettra Bietti, Harvard Law School

The Right to StrikeCRN: 8 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mRoundtable Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Benjamin Levin, University of Colorado Law School

Participant(s):Alex Gourevitch, Brown UniversityJames Pope, Rutgers Law School - NewarkAhmed White, Colorado Law School

Description:Strikes are essential if workers are to challenge the terms of exploitation in the workplace and achieve meaningful political reforms. However, strikes are also risky and rare. For some, this situation implicates the dysfunctional and illegitimate role that courts, legislatures, and administrative agencies have played in undermining workers' rights. Other scholars regard the lack of a functional right to strike as a reflection of the fact that effective strikes are bound to offend liberal norms of property and order. From this vantage, the path of effective reform around this issue cannot rely on courts, legislatures, and administrative agencies and must proceed elsewhere. This panel will debate these different perspectives while reflecting on how it bears on the future of labor in America.


51


hu

rsd

ay

The Transnational Ordering of Criminal Justice (II)CRN: 36 Thursday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.mPaper Session


Chair(s): Ely Aaronson, University of Haifa

Discussant(s): Joachim Savelsberg, University of Minnesota

Description:The development of criminal justice policy is usually analyzed in the context of political and legal processes taking place within nation states. However, under current conditions of globalization, domestic practices of criminalization, policing, prosecution and punishment increasingly interact with international processes of norm-diffusion. This panel applies the Transnational Legal Order (TLO) framework to analyze how the growing intensity and complexity of interactions between local, national, and international sites of criminal justice policymaking shape the production of legal norms and practices. Introducing findings from various fields of crime governance, we aim to map the emerging landscape of the transnational ordering of criminal justice, understand its formation and analyze its effects.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Expertise, Operational Contexts, and the Spaces Between Fields in International Criminal JusticeRon Levi, University of Toronto

Plea Bargaining in Global PerspectiveMaximo Langer, UCLA School of Law

Transnational Legal Ordering and the Death PenaltyStefanie Neumeier, University of Southern CaliforniaWayne Sandholtz, University of Southern California

Abolition in the 21st Century: Invitation to Law & SocietyCRN: 27 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Anjuli Verma, University of California, Berkeley

Description:Abolitionism presents as an invitation to Law & Society in the 21st century for the field to consider new questions from new voices and to reopen and reconsider core questions, particularly in the sociolegal study of punishment and penal change. While law and society scholarship traditionally invites us to decenter law in theory, canon, and method, "law" itself remains an open question for abolitionists. This session engages abolitionist thought as it cuts across multiple domains of law and society research, from legal history, legal change and mobilization, to normative jurisprudence and critical studies of race, law, and policing. Work from emerging and established scholars alike invites a reflection on the breadth and depth of stakes in reckoning with abolition as invitation and open question, past, present, and future.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Police Abolitionism: The Future, Present and Past of a Missing ConceptJonathan Simon, University of California-Berkeley

The Thirteenth Amendment Redux: Reading Against Its CriticsSora Han, UC Irvine

The Whole Damn System: Constructing an Abolitionist Theory of Legal ChangeAmanda Petersen, University of California, Irvine

The Work of Abolition: Dismantling the Criminal Justice Labor ForceMichelle Brown, Dept. of Sociology, Univ. of Tennessee

Alternative Disciplinary Perspectives for and on Sociolegal StudiesCRN: 28 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.mPaper Session


Description:Scholars affiliated with CRN 28 exploring dimensions of a new legal realism are converging on an exciting version of STS (science and technology studies) that applies specifically to the social science surrounding the study of law. Like researchers in the philosophy of science and STS, the presenters in this panel push us to reflect on the practices and paradigms that guide knowledge production within law-and-society and affiliated empirical legal studies fields.


Thursday June 7, Sess ion 54:45 p.m. - 6 :30 p.m .

52


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Comparative Law as a Generic Method of Legal Research: New Units Beyond State LawMathias Siems, Durham University

Negative Space in United States Habeas PracticeJane Eggers, Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana

The Identity of Sociology of Law: a Survey of the Sociolegal Community Members' Perceptions and BeliefsLucas Konzen, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)

Celebrating Frances Shaver’s research on the Recognition of Sex WorkCRN: 6Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s): Chris Bruckert, University of Ottawa

Description:This session will bring together researchers, policy-makers, and practitioners to celebrate Frances Shaver's sex work research. Inspired by Frances, sex work research has become more systematic and critical, legal responses have become more focused on rights, health, and safety, and sex workers and their allies have become more organised. This session will identify the issues currently facing sex work research, policy, and practice as a result of these changes and in light of Frances' contributions to the field. We invite speakers from research, policy, and practice domains to provide short (20 minutes) presentations regarding the major changes in their respective areas. These will be followed by a discussion of the implications for current conditions, a roundtable discussion, and reports


Presentations:Perceptions of Sex Work: Exploring the Narratives of Service ProvidersJohn Bryans, Concordia University

Perceptions of Sex Work: Exploring the Narratives of Service ProvidersFrances M Shaver, Concordia University

Reflections on the Critical Issues and New Directions in Sex Work Research from 2006-2017Cecilia Benoit, University of Victoria

Sex Work: From the Street to the Supreme CourtFrancine Tremblay, Concordia University

The Leading role of Frances Shaver’s work for Canadian Research on Sexual LabourDeborah Brock, York University

Confronting Violence, Protecting the VulnerableCRN: 2 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.mPaper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): Rupaleem Bhuyan, University of Toronto

Description:With an eye to the critical social action needed to confront the violent targeting of particular social groups, the papers in this session analyze diverse cases of vulnerability. From Rohingya displacement, to violence against trans women of color in the U.S., to unaccompanied minor children from Central America, to migrant labor exploitation in Brazil, each contributor speaks to both the reproduction of risks and the possibilities of legal protections. Through an exploration of violence and embodied risk faced by certain vulnerable groups, the authors move towards a praxis of social justice for the marginalized while examining the fraught and ambiguous contours of victimhood and criminalization.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Marginalization Within a Marginalized Group: A Holloistic Approach to Ending Violence Against Trans Women of ColorFaith Deredge, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

The Legal and Socio-economic Implications of the Ethnic Cleansing of Rohingyas in the Rakhine State of Myanmar and why it is Critical to Engage in the Peace Process and Post Conflict ResolutionRokhsana Khondker, Bangladesh Supreme Court & Khan Foundation

Unaccompanied Minors and Interior Security: Supporting Vulnerable Children to Prevent Gang Violence and RecruitmentShannon McGuire, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Constitutional Law and Legal Culture in Comparative Perspectives: Asia and the Americas IICRN: 1 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Yenny Andrea Celemin Caicedo, Univ. Jorge Tadeo

53


hu

rsd

ay

Discussant(s): Asya Ostroukh, University of the West Indies

Description:In this age of globalization, when economic ties between Asia and the America are gaining strength and momentum, it becomes a necessity to study their legal cultures comparatively. This is especially importante when developing economic relationships bring issues such as the rule of law and protection of human rights to the fore. This sessison examines legal development, constitutional law and legal cultures from the perspectives of both legal anthropology/sociology and comparative law. In particular, this session seeks to understand how political and historical paths, as well as global influences such as the universalization of human rights and democratic constitutional values, have shaped the formation and evolution of constitutional law and legal culture in countries in Asia and the Americas.


Presentations:Grinding Down the Edges of the Free Expression Right in Hong KongStuart Hargreaves, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Human Rights in the Perspective of a Transforming ConstitutionalismEdna Raquel Hogemann, UNESA

The Constitutionalization of International Law Through the Jurisprudential Analysis of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR). Gabriel Luís Massutti de Toledo Leme, Devry University - METROCa.m.P - Brasil

The Role of Legal Doctrine: a Comparison by Contrast between Brazilian and North American Legal CulturesFernanda Duarte, UNESA e INCT/InEAC/PROPPI/UFFRafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEAC

The Varieties of ConstitutionalismDavid Ritchie, Mercer University

Was Justice Antonin Scalia a Perfect Example of Ronald Dworkin’s Ideal Judge Hercules?Ryan Fortson, University of Alaska Anchorage

Critical Transnational Lawyering: The Experience of the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN)CRN: 23, 34 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel


Chair/Discussant(s): Ioannis Kalpouzos, The City Law School - City University

Participant(s):Gearóid O'Cuinn, Lancaster UniversityKate Grady, SOAS University of LondonIoannis Kalpouzos, The City Law School - City UniversityHeidi Matthews, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:The Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) is a recently created independent non-profit that aims to combine the expertise of legal academics and practitioners, as well as investigative journalists, to design innovative transnational legal actions. Inspired by a dissatisfaction with the shortcomings of theory as well as praxis, GLAN is interested in mobilising critical and socio-legal lawyering and exploiting the structures of transnational law to bring actions against the powerful actor benefiting from them. In the panel, we hope to address many interlocking questions that will be of benefit to an audience of lawyers, socio-legal scholars and scholars interested in how (international) law and legal scholarship can be activated to address transnational issues. We will discuss the theory behind and the practical challenges of specific projects – for example the collaboration with the Stanford International Human Rights Clinic in developing a communication to the International Criminal Court in relation to its practices of offshore detention of asylum seekers here and our development of a climate change human rights litigation here; both cases attempt to intervene in both scholarly debates (on what violence is the most grave; on how jurisdiction should be properly conceived) as well as mount clearly political litigation. The panel will also discuss the challenges in the creation and development of an interdisciplinary non-profit and independent organisation and the links between practice and the impact of (critical and socio-legal) scholarship. We will also address the developing of sustained relationships of clinical education and the use of clinical education for specific projects and educational experience in relation to the mobilisation of critical scholarship and the establishment of contacts with critical practitioners. The underlying research agenda is how a critical and socio-legal understanding of international law can be mobilised for politically meaningful transnational legal actions.

CRN33 Book Introduction SessionCRN: 33Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (a.m.R) Session


Author(s): Denis De Castro Halis, Fac of Law/Univ. of Macau Rieko Kage, University of Tokyo Kwai Ng, UCSD

Chair(s):Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie University

54


hu

rsd

ay

Hiroshi Fukurai, University of California Santa CruzSetsuo Miyazawa, Univ. of Calif. Hastings School of LawAoyama Gakuin University Law School

Reader(s):Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie UniversityHiroshi Fukurai, University of California Santa CruzRob Leflar, University of Arkansas School of LawEthan Michelson, Indiana UniversityRachel Stern, University of California, Berkeley

Description:CRN33 Book Introduction Session showcases the most engaging research and innovative activities of CRN33 scholars specialized in Asia. The books in this year's Book Introduction Session include:1. Yoshitaka Wada, Ilan Vertinsky & Lesley Jacobs, Global Health Law and Policy in Asia: Access to Public Health Issues (UBC Press, 2018)2. Frank Upham, The Great Property Fallacy: Theory, Reality, and Growth in Developing Countries (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018)3. Mary Elizabeth Gallagher, Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017)4. Kwai Ng, and Xin He, Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision Making in China (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017)5. Rostam J. Neuwirth, Alexander Svetlicinii, and Denis De Castro Halis, The BRICS-Lawyers' Guide to Global Cooperation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017)

Primary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Cutting-Edge Jury ResearchCRN: 4 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Mariam Abdulraheem-Mustapha, Faculty of Law, University of ilorin

Discussant(s): Valerie Hans, Cornell Law School

Description:This session includes presentations about cutting-edge issues in jury research. Papers take up novel questions, report new empirical findings, and propose innovative expansions of the jury. Three papers describe mock jury research on new issues that confront trial by jury, including jurors' attributions about criminal defendants and how they vary by race, how jurors respond to mitigation evidence, and the impact of attorney objections at trial. One paper takes up the possible employment

of juries rather than judges in juvenile proceedings. Another considers the potential use of cyberjuries in terrorism trials. Together, the papers speak to the operation and to the expansion of the contemporary jury.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay ParticipationSecondary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:Calls for Speculation: The Influence of Attorney Objections on Juror PerceptionsKrystia Reed, University of Nebraska-LincolnBrian Bornstein, University of Nebraska - Lincoln

Cyber Juries in the Age of TerrorDavid Tait, University of Western SydneyMeredith Rossner, London School of Economics and Political Science

Juries in Juvenile ProceedingsSuja Thomas, University of Illinois College of Law

Social Identity and Attributions: Investigating the Interaction of Juror and Defendant Race in CanadaEvelyn Maeder, Carleton UniversitySusan Yamamoto, Carleton University

The Language of Condemnation and Mercy: A Content Analysis of Mock Capital Jury DeliberationsShirin Bakhshay, UC Santa CruzCraig Haney, UC Santa CruzMona Lynch, UC IrvineJoanna Weill, The Behavioural Insights Team

Elder Care: New Responses to Old DilemmasCRN: 41 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair(s): Daphna Hacker, Tel Aviv University

Discussant(s): Alicia Kelly, Widener University School of Law

Description:The session will explore how nation's respond to needs of their aging populations, and the challenges they face in providing and incentivizing care for older adults. Speakers will discuss and evaluate policies from a diverse group of countries.

Primary Keyword: AgingSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

55


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Elderly care in Sweden: In the crossroad between value-laden concepts and claim rightsAnn-Christine Petersson Hjelm, Umea university

Perceptions of Value of Live-in Care for the ElderlyShiri Regev-Messalem, Bar Ilan University

Realising rights in residential homes.Alison Brammer, Keele University

The Legal Obligation to Support Aging Parents and Its DiscontentsLi-Ju Lee, Chung Yuan Christian University

Family JusticeThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Family relations set up complex interactions across social institutions and practices. This panel engages with the variety of family structures and explores in the context of, for example, surrogacy agreements, health law, co-parenting, and marriage reform, the impact of family law.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

Presentations:Allocating Parental Responsibility in a Post-Marital World, and the Meaning of RomanceRam Rivlin, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Law

Choice of Law For Surrogacy Agreements: Very Special Contracts Call for Very Special RulesSharon Shakargy, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

In Sickness and In Health: the Influence of State and Federal Health Insurance Coverage Mandates on Marriage of Young Adults in the USAJoanne McLaughlin, University at Buffalo, SUNY

Obergefell v Hodges: Lighting The Bluetouch Paper For Harmonisation Of The Law On Marriage Validity In The US?Lauren Clayton-Helm, Northumbria University

Femicide/Feminicidio in Comparative Perspective: Killing Women with Impunity in Mexico, Nicaragua, and TurkeyThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Myrna Dawson, University of Guelph

Description:This panel advances the conceptual and legal debate on the competing concepts of femicide (Russell 2001) and feminicidio (Lagarde 1999; Monárrez 2002) through a comparative analysis of Mexico, Nicaragua, and Turkey. The papers problematize the consequences of circumscribing state intervention; explicate the legal practices that result in impunity and inhibit women's access to justice; and illustrate how the explanatory framework of femicide/feminicidio is applicable to new geographic contexts. As such, the panel treats the concepts of femicide/feminicidio as a crossroads where numerous perspectives intersect, collide and enrich one another.

Primary Keyword: ViolenceSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Different languages, different names, same murder: Femicide/feminicidio in Turkey and MexicoSumru Atuk, The Graduate Center, CUNY

Femicidio vs Feminicidio: On the Transnational Travel and Competition of Feminist ConceptsPaulina Garcia Del Moral, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

Masculinity Defence and Impunity in Femicide in TurkeyEylem Umit Atilgan, Near East Univ Law Faculty, Cyprus

“If it’s Not Femicide, it’s Still Murder”: Contestations over Femicide in NicaraguaPamela Neumann, Tulane University

Gender in African Law & SocietyCRN: 13 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Moult Kelley, University of Cape Town

Description:This session explores a number of gender and gender related issues in African law and society. These include several different significant aspects of gendered experience in contemporary Africa (mainly Ghana, Nigeria, and Kenya): access by domestic workers to children, womens' political participation, and the "normalized" behaviour of queer, gay, and bisexual women. The session also covers the child welfare system, intercountry adoption, and gender sensitivity in primary education.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law and Society

56


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Actualising women's political participation under the Maputo Protocol as a means of achieving Agenda 2063: A closer look at Ghana and Kenya.Bright Sefah, African Union Commission

Inclusion of gender sensitivity into Nigeria primary education system: Implications for national development. (6649)Ngozi Chuma-umeh, Imo State UniversityAzubike Onuora-Oguno, University of Ilorin

“Behave like Women”: Lesbians, Bisexual and Queer Women in GhanaKuukuwa Andam, LL.M, Cornell University

Global Legal Education: Contemporary and Comparative PerspectivesThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, New York Univ. Abu Dhabi

Participant(s): Bryant Garth, UC Irvine Carole Silver, Northwestern University Law School

Description:Global research supplements and enriches perennial debates as to the meaning, limits, and opportunities for legal education in the U.S. For instance, across emerging economies, and even post the "JD crisis", law-schools are experimenting with and adapting different versions of the "global" – offering insights to local growth moderated by foreign influences. Beyond empirics, these developments have sparked theoretical interest among institutional scholars examining increasingly convergent concerns and parallels across globalizing jurisdictions. Similarly, at the individual level, this research has been important for unpacking larger debates about diversity, inclusion and reproduction of hierarchy. This roundtable seeks to critically engage with these global, imagined transplants by asking: how do they compare? and why do they even seek to?

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Judges' Perspectives on Judicial Education - continued (in collaboration with the National Judicial Institute of Canada)CRN: 43 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: York


Discussant(s): Toby Goldbach, University of British Columbia Allard School of Law

Participant(s):Honorable Kevin Burke, Minnesota District Court, 4th Judicial District, Hennepin CountyJeremy Fogel, Federal Judicial CenterC. Adèle Kent, National Judicial InstituteMarcia Turri, Federal Justice - Brazil

Description:Judges worldwide are faced with new challenges and opportunities. Some of these include the growing number of parties appearing in courts without legal representation, the movement to incorporate dispute and conflict resolution processes in judging practices, and the public desire for more responsiveness, transparency, and accountability on the part of the judiciary. This panel will discuss how judicial education and training programs are meeting the needs of judges today as they respond to these trends. This session is a continuation of the discussion.


Land, Law, and Jurisdiction - Working In and Around Law to Implement Indigenous Territorial AuthorityThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Nicole Schabus, TRU Law

Description:This panel brings together academics, activists, and community leaders involved in implementing Indigenous authority on Indigenous lands. Panelists will discuss their work with Secwepemc, Tsilhqot'in, St'at'imc, Nlaka'pamux, and Okanagan Nations in Interior British Columbia. Through litigation, title claims, pipeline resistance, and the resurgence of Indigenous political and legal systems, all of these nations are pursuing legal and non-legal avenues to assert their authority over their lands and resources. Panelists are looking for ways to support and operationalize their jurisdictional authority beyond the confines of Canadian law. They will discuss key issues the law must address in response to Indigenous jurisdiction, and reflect on their experiences of doing research on, in accordance with, and/or in practice of Indigenous authority.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State Formation

57


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Determining Access - Indigenous Governance over Lands and ResourcesNicole Schabus, TRU Law

Secwepemc Territorial Authority: Centering Jurisdiction in Decolonial StruggleEmma Feltes, University of British Columbia

The Power to Speak the Law: A study of Indigenous law in actionChris Albinati, Osgoode Hall Law School, York Univ.

Law and the Dynamics of Racial Inequality: Reproduction and ResistanceThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This session examines the dynamics of racial inequalities, the state, legal, and community based mechanisms that sustain them, and activist strategies for their disruption. The papers range from an intersectional analysis of white, working class women's activism opposing racial integration, the deployment of feminist strategies to disrupt state violence, the deployment of race as a technology in forensics and health care, and racism in the criminal justice system.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:Miami Heat: Institutional racism and the production of punishment “hotspots” in Miami-Dade’s criminal justice systemMarisa Omori, University of MiamiNick Petersen, University of Miami

On Making a Scene: State Violence, Racial Killjoys and the Staging of DiscontentMark Golub, Scripps College

The Technologies of RaceChristian Sundquist, Albany Law School

“The Women Are Worse Than The Men”: The Gendered Politics of White Backlash In South Philadelphia, 1971-1982Charlotte Rosen, Northwestern University

Law, Migration and Legal MeaningCRN: 2 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Amar Khoday, University of Manitoba

Discussant(s):Bethany Hastie, Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Participant(s):Shauna Labman, Univ. of Manitoba, Faculty of LawJamie Liew, University of OttawaAnna Purkey, St. Jerome's UniversitySule Tomkinson, Université Laval

Description:How is law, and the layering of distinct domestic and international laws, interpreted in different migration contexts? This roundtable will approach the issue of migration from the context of humanitarian, criminal and labour movements. Legal academics working in the field will discuss their role in public, media and government discussions of migration. The discussion will focus on how law is used, misused and sometimes muddied in the rhetorical positioning of migration policy.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the Law

Lawyers in the 21st CenturyThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair(s):Ole Hammerslev, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Law

Discussant(s):Harry Arthurs, York University

Description:This session presents some of the chapters of a forthcoming global comparison of lawyers, which is a 30 years follow up on Abel & Lewis' Lawyers in Society. Both projects examine lawyers comparatively, their histories and status and offer different approaches to understand lawyers. Since the original books globalisation and neoliberal structures have affected lawyers' work, organisation, education and demography. At one level, legal expertise and legal services become global, at another level transnational legal institutions and law develop and require new forms of legal expertise, while at a national level populations still need legal services. This session take such developments into consideration when examining how lawyers are affected by globalization and neoliberal structures in different nation-states.

Primary Keyword: Lawyers and Law FirmsSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

58


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:Comparative Sociology of Legal Professions, 1988-2018Rick Abel, UCLA School of Law

Legal Profession in Turkey: Origins and DevelopmentsSeda Kalem, Istanbul Bilgi University

Localization and Politicization: Lawyers in Taiwan and Hong Kong 1980s-2010sChing-Fang Hsu, University of Toronto

The Legal Profession in the Islamic Republic of IranReza Banakar, Lund University

Lawyers in the US Immigration CourtsCRN: 2Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair/Discussant(s): Katherine Abbott, University of New Hampshire

Participant(s):Katherine Abbott, University of New HampshireMaya Barak, University of Michigan-DearbornAustin Kocher, The Ohio State UniversityPauline White Meeusen, Univ. of California, Berkeley

Description:The immigration lawyer has not gotten much respect lately. In previous work examining lawyers throughout the US, they have ranked low in prestige amongst their peers. Amongst academic work as a whole, they have not received the attention that other legal advocates have. Yet their importance to the fair and just processing of immigration law remains paramount. This roundtable seeks to address the following questions: (1) what do we know about these lawyers, (2) what do we know about their work conditions, (3) what are their daily realities, and (4) what do we not know about these legal advocates. In addressing these questions in a roundtable discussion, we seek to better understand the immigration lawyer.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Lawyers, Cases and Judges Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Primary Keyword: Lawyers and Law FirmsSecondary Keyword: Judges and Judging

Presentations:Between Egalitarian and Prejudiced Decisions – the ambiguity of invoking Common Sense and Legal discretion in Rape VerdictsSolveig Laugerud, University of Oslo, Norway

Bring In The Friendly Hand: The Impact of the Plenary Power Doctrine on Immigration ReformAlan Kluegel, University of California-BerkeleyVasanthi Venkatesh, Univ. of Windsor Faculty of Law

Making Sense of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System – A Study on ProsecutorsBrendyn Johnson, University of Ottawa

Satan's Minions and True Believers: Religious Terms and Imagery in Attorney InterviewsKathleen Powell, Rutgers UniversityElizabeth Webster, Rutgers University School of Criminal JusticeSarah Lageson, Rutgers University - School of Criminal JusticeValerio Bacak, Rutgers University

Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: Taking Stock after a DecadeJulian Roberts

Legal and Institutional Responses to Gender and Sexual ViolenceCRN: 17 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This session explores the multitude of way that legal institutions respond to issues of gender and sexual violence, including school and campus-related issues, and social media influence.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Legal and Regulatory Responses to Campus Sexual ViolenceNeil Cobb, University of Manchester, UK

Sexual Assault on Campus: Rape Myths, “Regret Sex,” and RetaliationScott London, Randolph-Macon CollegeDenise Bissler, Randolph-Macon College

Speaking Out Online: Has Social Media Changed Responses to Sexual Violence?Tanya Serisier, School of Law, Birkbeck College

59


hu

rsd

ay

Legalities between Life and DeathCRN: 9 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Liz Chiarello, Saint Louis University

Description:The ability to communicate individual intent for death has become a significant part of end of life planning. Yet, how those empowered to manage these decisions understand their role is complex. Papers examine questions of advanced directives, living wills, organ donation intent, and forensic examination to analyze the complexities that inform end of life decision-making. Authors consider how these legal mechanisms inform patient outcome, what ethical protections are needed, how individuals might meaningfully participate in decision-making and consent, and how legal systems balance claims of individual autonomy and justice.


Presentations:Existing in the No Man’s Land Paradox. The Combined Euthanasia and Organ Donation Procedure: What Legal and Ethical Protection Do Those Existing Between Life and Death Have?Elizabeth Redrup, University of Southampton

The Biggest Life-and-Death Decision of Your Life….will be made by someone elseSusan Shapiro, American Bar Foundation

‘It’s all about Justice’: Bodies, Balance and Suspicious DeathsImogen Jones, University of Leeds

Life of the Law - Building Partnerships and Internationalizing the AirwavesThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Nancy Mullane, Life of the Law

Participant(s):Teddy Atim, Feinstein International Center, Tufts University and York University, CanadaAnnie Bunting, York UniversityNancy Mullane, Life of the Law

Description:Bridging the distinct worlds of journalism, scholarship and

advocacy, the podcast Life of the Law advances the research of scholars in the field of law and society by connecting reporters, editors and producers with scholars to produce engaging, critically curious stories about the law in peoples' lives. Throughout 2017, Life of the Law collaborated with the Conjugal Slavery in War Partnership to produce a 4-part series on Uganda, its decades-long conflict, and justice and reparations for survivors and communities. The series was funded in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).

Making Property LawCRN: 49Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): John Acevedo, Univ. of La Verne Law

Description:The conceptualization of what constitutes real property has changed over time as has the bundle of rights associated with property ownership. Using a variety of empirical case studies this panel examines the socio-legal conceptualization of real property.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Aliens, Citizens and the State Ownership Doctrine: A Social HistoryAllison Tirres, DePaul University College of Law

Making Property Law through Private ActionDebbie Becher, Barnard College, Columbia University

Property Law and the Postwar/Cold WarHendrik Hartog, Princeton University

Regulating the Risk of Debt: Asset Exemption Laws and Economic Insecurity Across US States 1986-2012Elizabeth C. Martin, The Ohio State University

Native Nations Caught in a Federal SystemCRN: 34Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): Michalyn Steele, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University

Discussant(s): Bethany Berger, Univ. of Connecticut Law School

60


hu

rsd

ay

Description:This session will explore, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, problems of legal pluralism arising from the intergovernmental relationships between Native Nations and the United States. The focus will be on American Indian Nations as the "third sovereigns" caught within the federal system of the United States. Topics will include the constitutional status of American Indian sovereignty with U.S. constitutional law, the ways in which Indian Nations seek to influence federal legislation, and the persistence and contributions of Tribal lawmaking institutions to American federalism. Together, the papers in this session will seek to shed new light on perennial problems of federal Indian law, which may well stand at a crossroads in the wake of a new presidential politics and new judicial appointments to the U.S. federal courts.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:Constitutionalizing the Third SovereignBethany Berger, University of Connecticut Law School

Legal Resilience: Inoculating Tribal InstitutionsMichalyn Steele, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University

Opposition as Influence: American Indian Advocacy Against Federal LegislationKirsten Carlson, Wayne State University Law School

Our Colonial ConstitutionSeth Davis, University of California, Irvine School of Law

Policing at a Crossroads: New Advances in Procedural JusticeThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:We highlight new research designed to measure or affect the degree to which police efforts toward procedural justice shape public perception and legitimacy. Our papers ask: can police initiatives to build public trust offset the impact of highly visible, negative police events or poor public perceptions? To what extent should police explicitly reckon with or acknowledge such events in their attempts at reconciliation? Do police efforts to explain their actions and give citizens voice impact the way adolescents come to engage with the law and their community? We present data from research in Brazil, Mexico, New York City, and a northeast American high school. Building on procedural justice research, we discuss how police can effectively and positively engage with communities as a whole.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:Citizen Engagement, Participation, and Trust in Public Safety in MexicoRodrigo Canales, Yale School of Management

Limits of Procedurally Democratic Processes and Citizens’ Involvement in Community PolicingCamila Gripp, Yale Law School

Procedural justice and juveniles: How School Resource Officers impact adolescent experiences of the lawYael Granot, Yale Law School

Reconciliation between authorities and communities: Examining contextual and psychological elements that shape community members’ perceptions of authorities’ intentions as sincereThomas O'Brien, Yale Law School

Regulating Firm Structure and MarketsCRN: 46 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent


Description:As the US and global economy changes, regulators and market actors have shifted their structures to respond to market changes. This panel will explore some of the new developments in regulating increasingly complex markets and firms.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:A Role for Securities Crowdfunding in U.S. Microfinance?Joan Heminway, The University of Tennessee

Interrupted Continuity: Corporate Spin-Off and Governance DisparityGeeyoung Min, Columbia Law SchoolYoung Ran (Christine) Kim, University of Utah, SJ Quinney College of Law

Investor ConfidenceKenneth Rosen, University of Alabama School of Law

Reexamining Competition in the Investment Fund IndustryCary Martin, DePaul University College of Law

61


hu

rsd

ay

The Limits of PartnershipChristine Hurt, Brigham Young University

Revisiting “Pension Fund Socialism”: The Promise and Perils of Pension Fund and FinancializationCRN: 8Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Simon Archer, Osgoode Hall Law School

Participant(s):Stephan Maher, York UniversityKevin Skerrett, Canadian Union of Public EmployeesJohanna Weststar, Western UniversityDavid Webber, Boston University School of Law

Description:The unravelling of the post-war 'class compromise' has put pension systems into question. One way the economic crises of the 1970s were resolved was an attack on trade unions & collective bargaining. Beyond aspirational works enjoining unions and the left to seize control of pension funds and wield them in the service of working people, systematic attempts to measure the achievements of union pension activism are missing from the litarature. Equally absent is any sustained scrutiny of the reasons pension funds and contemporary financial markets produce outcomes that are commonly detrimental to workers' interests. Consequently, the literature lacks an analysis of how and why these same forces limit attempts to harness pension fund investments to meet workers' needs. This panel will explore these questions.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Aging

Sex, Mass Media and the LawCRN: 7 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Sheraton Hall AChair(s): Ann Bartow,Univ. of New Hampshire School of Law Bridget Crawford, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

Discussant(s): Mary Anne Case, University of Chicago Victoria Schwartz, Pepperdine Univ. School of Law

Description:"Sex, Mass Media and the Law" features paper presentations that address issues of gender, race, sexuality and sexual identity in the mass media, including social media, and the ways in which they intersect with regulatory systems and the law.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:"Heiresses, Actresses and Grandmothers: Gender Profiling in the MSM"Ann Bartow, Univ. of New Hampshire School of Law

Mixed Motives: Freedom of Expression, Newsworthiness and the Commercial Exploitation of IdentityAndrea Slane, Univ. of Ontario Institute of Technology

Racial Reversion in Intellectual PropertyMargaret Chon, Seattle University School of Law

Regulating / Selling Sex in Nineteenth Century New YorkAmy Werbel, Fashion Institute of Technology

Sex, Media and the LawSusanna Fischer, The Catholic University of America

State and Regional Approaches to Immigration Law and PolicyCRN: 11 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair/Discussant(s): Steven Bender, Seattle Univ. School of Law

Description:This session explores the often complicated and varying approaches states take in regards to their immigration policies.


Presentations:Immigration flows and border management: the European borders externalization policies and the repercussion of the international refugee lawAna Carolina Matos, Universidade Federal do CearáTarin Cristino Mont'Alverne, Univ. Federal do Ceará

Integration as a Growing Component of European Asylum Law and Policies: Expanded Measures and Less EqualitySarah Ganty, Yale Law School and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Public Policies in Mexico challenged by the dynamic nature of migration.Perla Guarneros-Sánchez, La Trobe University. Melbourne, Australia.

62


hu

rsd

ay

The Institutional Foundations of Diverse Immigration to Canada and AustraliaJacob Thomas, UCLA

The Use of Soft Law in Humanitarianism: Towards a Nordic Brand of Refugee ResettlementAmanda Cellini, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)

Tax ExpendituresCRN: 31 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Kim Brooks, Dalhousie

Description:This panel considers the issue of tax expenditures, and how the tax system is sometimes used to fund spending programs.


Presentations:A Social Contract Perspective on "Normal" TaxationHenk Vording, Leiden University

Charities and Tax Avoidance in CanadaTamara Larre, University of Saskatchewan

Consumption Smoothing and the Home Mortgage Interest DeductionSloan Speck, University of Colorado Law School

In Defense of Intrapreneurship: Human Capital, Knowledge Spillover, and Innovation IncentivesMirit Eyal-Cohen, University of Alabama

Technological Innovation: Driverless Cars, AI, Smart Cities, Benefits Cards, CrowdfundingThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Description:Papers address regulation of driverless cars; tort liability and driverless cars; normative issues and artificial intelligence; service benefits cards for welfare; equity and smart cities; consumer protection and crowdfunding

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot

Presentations:A Model for Tort Liability in a Driverless Car World: Setting the Framework for the Upcoming TechnologyAntonio Davola, Yale Law School

Administrative Law and the Equity Principle under the Challenge of the Smart CityGrenfieth Sierra-Cadena, Universidad del Rosario

Cash as Resistance: A Case Study of the City Services Benefits CardKelsi Barkway, University of Alberta

Consumer Protection on the Internet and the Problem of Crowdfunding WebsitesJoao Longhi, Federal University of UberlandiaGuilherme Martins, Federal Univ. of Rio de Janeiro

Perspectives on Disability, Law and Autonomous VehiclesCatherine Easton, Lancaster University

The Intersection of Civil Rights and Labor RightsCRN: 8 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair: Charlotte Garden, Seattle Univ School of Law

Description:This panel considers the intersection of civil rights and labor rights in the US. Two papers have an historical focus: one analyzes how the Supreme Court's hostility to labor picketing stymied coalitions between civil rights organizations and unions, and the other focuses on former NLRB member Howard Jenkins Jr.'s fight againt workplace discrimination. Another paper reports encouraging results from a study of "ban the box" legislation. And a final paper considers legal responses to employer retaliation that chills black workers' protest.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:An Empirical Analysis of Banning the Box: Evidence from Chicago and DallasDallan Flake, Ohio Northern Univ. Pettit College of Law

Impossible Dream: Howard Jenkins, Jr., the National Labor Relations Board, and the Politics of RaceRoberto Corrada, Univ. of Denver Sturm College of Law

Judicial Hostility to Labor Protest and the Lost Promise of Labor-Civil Rights CoalitionsCatherine Fisk, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall

Retaliating Against Black Worker Protest With Incendiary SpeechMichael Green, Texas A&M University School of Law

63


hu

rsd

ay

The Ombudsman and Administrative Justice: From Promise to PerformanceThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair(s): Marc Hertogh, University of Groningen

Discussant(s): Naomi Creutzfeldt, University of Westmisnter

Description:The public sector ombudsman has become one of the most important administrative justice institutions in the world, and yet scholarship on the ombudsman is underdeveloped when compared to many other similar areas of law, political science and public administration. This international and interdisciplinary session will bring together leading scholars to discuss the state-of-the-art of ombudsman research, all of whom are authors in the Research Handbook on the Ombudsman (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018). Papers in the panel will showcase new empirical studies and competing theoretical explanations to examine critically important aspects of the ombudsman.

Primary Keyword: Disputes, Mediation, and NegotiationSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Administering Access to the Ombudsperson. A Case Study on the Austrian Ombudsman BoardAxel Pohn-Weidinger, University of Göttingen

Effectiveness and independence of the ombudsman's own motion investigations: a practitioner's perspectiveMaaike de Langen, Independent researcher

Ombuds Institutions: Strengthening Gender Equality, Women's Access to Justice and Protection and Promotion of Women's RightsLinda Reif, University of Alberta

Ombudsmen in PrisonsMatthew Groves, La Trobe University

The Past, Present and Future of Ombudsman ScholarshipRichard Kirkham, University of SheffieldMarc Hertogh,University of Groningen

The Tail Wagging the Dog: The regulation of the Ombudsman Institution and the need to watch the watchdogsAnita Stuhmcke, University of Technology Sydney

The Security-Development Nexus: the Motions, Mechanics and Everyday Renditions of the Global Legal OrderCRN: 23Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair/Discussant(s): Ana Aliverti, Warwick Law School

Description:The panel examines the security-development nexus in its relation to the motions, mechanics and everyday renditions of the global legal order. It is claimed that the nexus, by bringing human and citizen security to the fore, shifts away from the sovereignty security-centred focus of both post-conflict reconstruction and policing in times of 'peace' in the Global South. Others argue that by representing the poor as threats to peace and prosperity, the nexus advances security rather than development outcomes, and enables neo-punitive interventions to contain migrants, local gangs, etc. The panel goes a step ahead by examining how the world at large is being reconstructed, from the state to the 'criminals', in terms of a formula that promises harmony while collaborates with the expansion of a particular repressive political economic model.

Primary Keyword: ViolenceSecondary Keyword: War, and Armed Conflict

Presentations:Petty Criminals and the Petty State: Neo-punitivism, Neo-developmentalism, and inclusion in the Global SouthLuis Eslava, Kent Law SchoolLina Buchely, Universdad Icesi

Rethinking organised crime, collective violence and insecurity in contemporary Latin AmericaMarkus Schultze-Kraft, Universidad Icesi

Securing the Port Against the PoorJohanna del Pilar Cortes-Nieto, University of Warwick

The security and development nexus in the era of global climate changeM. Cecilia R. Oliveira, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies - IASS

Theorizing Law, Theorizing the Sociology of LawCRN: 27 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

64


hu

rsd

ay

Presentations:A Democracy of Expression: Free Speech as a Positive FreedomAndrew Kenyon, University of Melbourne

Appalachia Reconstructed: Law, the Environment, and Systemic Regional ReformNicholas Stump, WVU College of Law

Canons of Freedom: The state of nature, R v Big M and Conceptions of Freedom in CanadaBailey Fox, Osgoode Hall Law School

Transnational Legal Ordering and the Movement of Money and People: Foreign Investment, Central Banking, and MigrationCRN: 36 Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel presents theoretically grounded work on investment law, migration law, and central banking. These subject areas involve the creation and contestation of transnational legal orders governance. The panel addresses the import and export of norms and their limits.


Presentations:Explaining the shift to investment liberalisation: Institutional isomorphism and evolution in the investment treaty regimeJonathan Bonnitcha, University of NSW

Investment Law as a Window Into the Pluralism of Transnational Legal OrdersEdward Cohen, Westminster College

Money Constitutes: A Constitutional Typology for Central BankingMianzhi Francis Cao, Frankfurt Goethe University/Shanghai Jiao Tong University/Penn Law

Truth in Law and SocietyThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Binyamin Blum, University of California

Discussant(s): Monica Bell, Yale Law School

Description:The American legal and social systems share a reliance on truth. At its most basic level, truth founds the mutual trust that is supposed to cohere us into a productive participatory democracy. As a result, legal adjudication is understood as a truth-seeking enterprise. Yet, as current events reveal, truth is neither a simple nor perhaps a universal concept. The goal of this panel is to examine the relationship between law, society and truth and how this interplay may come to mediate our understanding of what is fact. It will explore ways in which truth and its counterpart, credibility, have varying definitions in culture and in law. What is the role of the law in establishing a shared conception of truth? What should that role be? Papers in this panel focus on these questions primarily in the areas of evidence and criminal law.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Presentations:Anatomy of a Mass Gang Trial: Truth Gives Way to NarrativeBabe Howell, CUNY School of Law

Arrests as GuiltAnna Roberts, Seattle University School of LawCredibility at LawJulia Simon-Kerr, The University of Connecticut School of Law

The Truth at TrialBennett Capers, Brooklyn Law School

Vulnerabilities across Borders: Gender, Childhood, Poverty and IncarcerationThursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Huron

Participant(s): Christopher Matera, U.C. Berkeley

Description:Almost 30 years after the international Convention on the Rights of the Child was passed, there is still an invisible social conflict spreading among different countries: the incarceration of pregnant women and/or mothers of young children and its devastating effects on childhood and families across borders. In fact, the incarceration of pregnant women and/or mothers of young children may result in babies being born within prisons, or young children remaining "in prison" with their mothers -as it is the case in Argentina, Brazil and Ukraine- or in homeless or poor young children growing up alone, detached from their parents, whether living with relatives, or in foster care institutions or with adoptive families -as it happens in the US-.

65


hu

rsd

ay Thursday June 7, Sess ion 5A

4:45 p.m. - 5 :30 p.m.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

Women at CourtCRN: 32Thursday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Céline Bessiere, Université Paris-Dauphine

Description:The session deals with gendered images and expectations of women at court in family and cirminal matters and particularly in cases of violence.

Primary Keyword: Gender and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Access to Justice for Women in Brazil: decisions based on stereotypes and gender bias in cases of domestic violence against womenJuliana Moyses, University of São PauloFabiana Cristina Severi, Universidade de São Paulo

Non-Traditional Parents Come to Family Court: Mapping the Headwinds of Gendered Expectations.Mark Leinauer, University of California, BerkeleyPolicies and Institutional Strategies of the Judiciary on the Improvement of Conditions towards the Access to Justice of Women in Violence Situation: a joint study with the State Coordination of Women of the State Courts in BrazilFabiana Cristina Severi, Universidade de São Paulo

Rethinking the role of mediation in domestic violenceStephani Gagliardi Amantini University of São PauloMaria Cecília de Araujo Asperti, Universidade de São Paulo / DIREITO GV

Searching for Truth in the Transitional Justice MovementCRN: 23 Thursday Session 5A, 4:45 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Maple East

Author(s): Jamie Rowen, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Chair(s): Mark Fathi Massoud, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz

Reader(s):Mark Drumbl, Washington and LeeZinaida Miller, Seton Hall UniversityRichard Ashby Wilson, Univ. of Connecticut School of Law.

Description:Searching for Truth in the Transitional Justice Movement examines calls for a truth commission to redress the brutal war in the former Yugoslavia, the decades long armed conflict in Colombia, and US detention policies in the war on terror. It focuses on truth commissions as a signature intervention of transitional justice, arguing that transitional justice as an idea around which a loosely structured movement emerged and professionalized, making truth commissions a standard response to mass violence. Through a detailed analysis of the emergence of the movement and three country case studies, this book explains the power of malleable legal ideas and interventions, as well as the different processes through which political actors translate new legal ideas into political action.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights. Secondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

The Forgotten Emancipator: James Mitchell Ashley and The Ideological Origins of ReconstructionCRN:8 Thursday Session 5A, 4:45 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (a.m.R) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Rebecca Zietlow, University of Toledo College of Law

66


hu

rsd

ay

Chair(s): Adelle Blackett, Faculty of Law, McGill University Reader(s):

Adelle Blackett, Faculty of Law, McGill UniversityLolita Buckner Inniss, SMU Dedman School of LawMark Graber, University of Maryland Carey School of LawJames Pope, Rutgers Law School - NewarkAhmed White, Colorado Law School

Description:Historian Eric Foner praises Rebecca Zeitlow's newly released book because it unearths the all but forgotten story of James Ashley, who played "a pivotal role in the pre-Civil war struggle against slavery, abolition during the war, and the battle for Black rights during Reconstruction". For law and society scholars, Zeitlow's work offers a core contribution to contemporary debates about the labour vision of the 13th and 14th Amendments. For CRN 8, the panel – deliberately framed to draw in panelists with expertise in the history of slavery, labour history, critical race theory and transnational law – offers the opportunity to rethink how historical marginalization influences the contemporary direction of a field that can no longer afford the luxury of focusing only or exclusively on a narrow understanding of "organized labour".

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Legal History

Blaming Mothers, American Law and the Risks to Children’s HealthCRN: 9Thursday Session 5B, 5:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Linda Fentiman, Pace University Law School

Chair(s): Dorit Reiss, UC Hastings College of the Law

Reader(s):Melissa Breger, Albany Law SchoolKaaryn Gustafson, UC Irvine School of LawEdith Kinney, San José State UniversityElizabeth Rapaport, University of New MexicoHadar Aviram, UC Hastings College of the Law

Description:Blaming Mothers explores how the law is used to target mothers, under a theory that they are a risk to their children's

health. It examines how unconscious race, class, and gender biases affect legal actors in deciding who, when and how to punish or coerce in the name of the law. The book covers a range of issues in which children are subjected to real or perceived harms, and where the law does or does not step in, drawing on a wealth of empirical and legal data. The book ends with a framework that offers concrete ways to protect children's health as alternative to scapegoating mothers (especially mothers from disadvantaged groups).

Primary Keyword: Class and InequalitySecondary Keyword: Gender and Judging

Thursday June 7, Sess ion 5B5:45 p.m. - 6 :30 p.m .

67

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Access to Justice : Judicial ProcessesFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:Different jurisdictions face different access challenges across levels of courts and types of disputes. Assumptions central to open access and concerns about efficient judicial functioning compete, fueling debate over procedural rules. This panel engages with this debate, across topic and jurisdiction, presenting a range of studies that inform thinking about the operation of courts

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Access to Justice in Brazil - From an institutional to a constitutive approachPaulo Alves da Silva, University of São Paulo

Appeal at a higher court in Dutch administrative law: massive use, dissatisfied usersBert Marseille, University of GroningenMarc Wever, University of Groningen

Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia: need an amendment?Theresia Anita Christiani, Univ. Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Rights, Security, and Access to the CourtsJonathan Hafetz, Seton Hall Law School

The Intra-Corpus Appellation System in Brazilian Supreme Court: The end of Motion for Panel Rehearing and the New Procedural OrderPedro Bourgeois Gomes, Faculdade Nacional de Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroLeonardo Fernandes de Sá, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Access to Justice and reform of the adjudicative processFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Description:The papers in this panel analyse a range of factors that influence and change the ways in which adjudicative bodies function.

Furthermore, they examine effects of innovation and reform of judicial procedures, including on access to justice.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Defense Lawyers in Lower Criminal Courts – Managerial and Therapeutic Models, Responsibility and the use of Structural ArgumentsMarianne Quirouette, University of Ottawa

Human Rights, Systemic Remedies and the Public InterestBruce Ryder, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Reform under racial innocence: Politics, capital punishment, and the limits of U.S. racial justice legislationEllen Donnelly, University of Delaware

Representation, Adjudication, and Expansion: A Bipartisan Approach to the Immigration Court BacklogEmily Welch, Temple University Beasley School

Reshaping the administration of justice in Canada: out of the courts, into the tribunalsSule Tomkinson, Université Laval

The Influence of Economic Evidence on Administrative Discretion: Empirical Evidence from the UK Utilities RegulationDespoina Mantzari, Univ. of Reading School of Law

Age in EmpireCRN: 22Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Mitra Sharafi, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

Description:This panel considers the forensic jurisprudence of age in the British Empire during the nineteenth and twentieth century. Exploring the racial, gendered and class logics that constructed the amorphous stages of human life--childhood, adolescence, maturity, and old age--it analyzes how diverging perceptions of age affected legal rights and responsibilities. "Maturity," often connected to different chronological ages, determined criminal and civil liability, the availability of certain penalties such as death and whipping, the capacity to testify, contract, work, consent to sex, or to marry. On the other end of the life cycle, "old age" affected a testator or a witness's competence, and the determination of whether a death was "natural." Though seemingly objective and precise, such categories proved deeply embedded culturally.

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 18:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

68

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y


Presentations:Ageless Juveniles and Perpetual Children in the Eyes of Colonial LawAlastair McClure, McGill University

Bones of Contention: Using Skeletal Maturity to Determine Criminal Responsibility in the British EmpireBinyamin Blum, University of California

Old Age and Law in the British EmpireCatherine Evans, University of Toronto

The Matter of Age: Sexual Crime, Forensic Evidence, and the Performance of Childhood in Colonial IndiaIshita Pande, Queen's University

Alternatives to ImprisonmentFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Description:Many reformers are interested in alternatives to imprisonment, such as restorative justice, diversion programs, and community supervision. To what extent are "alternatives" experienced as a one-to-one replacement for incarceration? What are the discursive, conceptual, and practical distinctions between therapeutic and punitive responses? The papers in this session shed light on these questions, focusing on non-custodial interventions, electronic monitoring, and therapeutic jurisprudence.


Presentations:All Roads Lead: Framing Moral Opposition and Alternatives to the Carceral State of MindDavid Green, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

How U.S. Judges Promote TJ and RJJéssica Traguetto Silva, University of BrasiliaTomas Aquino Guimaraes, University of Brasilia

Punitiveness, the Penological Discourse and Penal Reform in IsraelLeslie Sebba, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

The Chicken or the Egg? The Court-Probation Relationship and Implementation of Evidence-Based PracticesKimberly Kras, University of Massachusetts LowellFaye Taxman, George Mason University

The Technologization of Incarceration: Impacts of Electronic Monitoring on Individual LivelihoodsGabriela Kirk, Northwestern University

Argentine Juries: History, Initiation, Reactions, and DiffusionCRN: 4 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair/Discussant(s): Mar Jimeno-Bulnes, Universidad de Burgos

Description:Against the background of a civil law tradition, cultural diffusion and a 150 year old Constitutional promise brought the first twelve person lay jury trial to the province of Neuquén in Argentina in 2014. Jury trials increased and spread to the province of Buenos Aires and other provinces have passed legislation providing for jury trials. The panel will trace and explain the particular paths taken by the spread of jury trials. With new survey data from jurors, judges, and attorneys, the papers will provide the first systematic evidence on how jury trials have been received by the trial participants who have experienced this new way of deciding criminal cases. The panel will also consider the potential for diffusion beyond Argentina to other parts of Latin America, including Chile.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay Participation

Presentations:A New Jury System at Work: Data from Jurors, Judges, and Lawyers in Neuquén, ArgentinaValerie Hans, Cornell Law SchoolSidonie Porterie, Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales y Sociales (INECIP)Aldana Romano Bordagaray, Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales y Sociales (INECIP)

Evaluating the Implementation of Jury Trials in Buenos Aires: Judges, attorneys, and jurorsShari Diamond, Northwestern U Law School/American Bar FoundationSidonie Porterie, Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales y Sociales (INECIP)Aldana Romano Bordagaray, Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales y Sociales (INECIP)

The status of trial by jury in Latin America. Past and PresentAndrés Harfuch, Asociación Argentina de Juicio por JuradosJulian Alfie, Asociación Argentina de Juicio por JuradosFlorencia Ini,Asociacion Argentina de Juicio por JuradosVictoria Llorente, Asociacion Argentina de Juicio por Jurados

69

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Trial by Jury in Argentina: Ingredients for a Successful RecipeNatali Chizik, Asociación Argentina de Juicio por Jurados / Peter Allard School of Law

Citizenship, Minorities and Human Rights: Comparative Perspectives in American and Asian Societies IICRN: 1 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Ana Luiza da Gama e Souza, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Discussant(s):Lara Goés, Superior School of War

Description:This session covers legal and social issues related to the human rights debate, including discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by minorities considered as social groups or individuals related in Asia or/and the Americas.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Presentations:Comparative Legal Study on Indigenous People's Right to Land and Natural ResourcesYu-Yin Tu, Tamkang University

Dangerous Positions: Male Homosexuality in the New Penal Code of IranAryan Karimi, University of Alberta

Gender and Constitutions: A Cross-national Analysis of the Impact of Gender Provisions on Women’s EqualityPriscilla Lambert, Western Michigan UniversityDruscilla Scribner, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh

Misgendering Trans People in the Canadian Legal SystemDavid Isaac, University of Western Ontario

Complex Contracting and Firm OrganizationCRN: 46 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Joan Heminway, The Univ. of Tennessee

Description:As firms and markets change at an ever more rapid pace, contracts and contracting styles have changes as well. This panel

will explore how contracts govern firms and firm behavior and how market shifts affect contracting styles and enforceability.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:Consumers, "Seller-Advisors," and the Psychology of TrustKelli Alces Williams, Florida State University College of LawJustin Sevier, Florida State University College of Law

Enforcement Ambiguity in Complex DealsCathy Hwang, University of Utah, College of Law

Organizational "Contracts"Megan Shaner, University of Oklahoma

The University as CorporationLisa Nicholson, Univ. of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

Constitutional Theory Development in Asia and the Americas IIICRN: 1 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Fernanda Duarte, UNESA e INCT/InEAC/PROPPI/UFF

Discussant(s): Rubens Beçak, University of Sao Paulo

Description:Societies in Asia and the Americas may seem to have nothing in common given their particularities; however, many countries in these two regions share similar historical and political experiences (e.g. dictatorships, revolutions, democratic mobilizations, civil rights or human rights problems, corruption etc.) and interact more and more pushed by economic and cultural globalization. Nevertheless these geographically diverse societies, although very different in their current legal and political cultures, may also share constitutional and democratic values. This session intends to bring together scholars engaged in studying the evolvement of constitutional features, either regarding constitutional law or constitutional theory, related to these regional foci.


Presentations:Abusive Separation of Powers in IndiaShubhankar Dam, Univ. of Portsmouth School of Law

Popular constitutionalism in today's USA: Activist praxis, strategic necessity and structural changeBen Manski, University of California, Santa Barbara

70

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

What role do "Saving clauses" contained in Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutions Play in the Relationship between Law and Society?Asya Ostroukh, University of the West Indies

Crisis or Turning Point: Continuity and Rupture of the Taiwan’s Legal System and Social ChangesCRN: 33 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Disc.: Hiroshi Fukurai, Univ of California Santa Cruz

Description:This panel investigates the continuity and transformation of the legal system in Taiwan. From 1895 to present, the Empire of Japan and the Republic of China have respectively transplanted different modern legal systems to Taiwan. Throughout history, the laws of various periods in Taiwan have had both differences and similarities as well. Also, while these laws have influenced Taiwanese society, they were also shaped by the local people and events in Taiwan. Since martial law ended in 1987, Taiwan has gone through a series of dramatic changes, one of which is the legal transformation from the authoritarian rule to modern democracy.

This panel adopts the approach of law and society to analyze how modern laws have been introduced to Taiwan, and how they have been adapted to Taiwan through their interaction with Taiwanese society. This panel


Presentations:Money in Taiwanese politics: an analysis of the campaign finance reform in TaiwanPo Liang Chen, University of Washington School of Law

Running a Non- Profit Hospital for Money Making – Governance and Corruption Prevention in Taiwan's Medical FoundationsCarol Lin, National Chiao Tung University

The Evolution of the Meanings of Marriage in the Legal Practices of R.O.C.Hung-Meng Liang, National Chung Cheng University

The More, The Better? Applying Complexity Theory to Judicial Reform Evaluation: A Focus on Lay Participation Proposals in TaiwanKai-Ping Su, National Central University

Current Projects in Queer Theory of Law & the Global Political EconomyCRN: 23 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Huron

Chair(s): Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, New York University Abu Dhabi

Discussant(s): Alejandra Azuero Quijano, Harvard Law School- University of Chicago

Participant(s):Alejandra Azuero Quijano, Harvard Law School-University of ChicagoGrietje Baars, City University LondonAeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv UniversityVanja Hamzić, SOAS, University of London

Description:Ballakrishnen works on the unintended queerings of migrant households, where global political economy and imagination craft new meanings to commitment, care and intimacy. Azuero queers ICL history, exploring the rise of cyborg objects of punishment. Kapur adresses human rights, queer and the (im)possibility of freedom, through critiques of Indian LGBT rights decisions. Schramm, concerned about hegemonic silencing, discusses the first volume on LGBTQIA/queer studies of IL in French she co-edits. Baars queers marxist theory of ideology so as to understand/subvert corporate power in global society. Hamzić's work addresses silences of the 18c colonial archive in Louisiana, about the lifeworlds of enslaved gender-variant West Africans. Gross compares 'gay governance' with 'governance feminism' as practised by global institutions.

Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

71

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Ethnographies of International Law: Fields, Sites, and Spaces of International (Il)LegalitiesCRN: 23 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper SessionTime:

Room: Kent

Chair(s): Kristin Sandvik, University of Oslo

Discussant(s): Luis Eslava, Kent Law School

Description:The aim of this panel is to promote the use of multi-sited ethnography in international studies, initially by seeking understanding of the making and meaning of international (il)legalities under the banner of international law. While the notions of the 'international' and law are premised on assumptions of universality, this panel takes issue with alleged universals, exploring instead how these are embroiled in specific connections, situations and knowledges. What are the promises and pitfalls of researching 'unbounded' phenomena through ethnography? How does one 'ground' and 'access' the international?

Primary Keyword: EthnographySecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Contradiction and complexity between IR/IL and global political ethnographyJessica Larsen, Danish Institute for International Studies

Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court: Too much, too little or just the wrong kind?Leila Ullrich, University of Oxford

Multi-sited Ethnography and (in)Visibilities of International LawKjersti Lohne, University of OsloMaj Grasten, Copenhagen Business School

Opaque Transparency’: Ethnographic fieldwork and International Criminal JusticeSarah-Jane Koulen, Princeton University

Experientially Marked: Exploring the Intersections of Criminality Through Qualitative MethodsFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Kenneth Pass, Northwestern University

Description:This panel will bring together experts on intersectional perspectives of criminality to present cutting-edge work on rising incarceration and state surveillance in Canada and the United States. Qualitative methods are invaluable to understanding the social complexities of crime, incarceration, law, and surveillance that have piqued scholars for decades. Therefore, the panelists will position their work squarely within this intellectual tradition. Using interview, ethnographic, and archival methods, the panelists will present on rich empirical and theoretical findings from their field work across diverse institutional, organizational and community settings. Panel attendees will gain extensive insights on the intersections of criminality in everyday life and the ways in which being marked a criminal is lived and experienced.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Boundary Making with Science: Race, Sexuality, and the Modern Politics of Crime and DiseaseKenneth Pass, Northwestern University

Women Are Supposed to Do Right: Gender, Mass Incarceration, and Prisoner ReentryErica Banks, Northwestern University

‘Transformative Policing’ to ‘Symbolic Policing’: Electronic Policing and Crime Retrievability As Shaping Black Men’s Experiences with Police Surveillance TechnologiesBrandon Alston, Northwestern University

“To label someone a sex offender, you know, that’s for life”: Lived experiences of people classified as risks to public safety under community technologies of surveillanceAlexander McClelland, Concordia University

Extraordinary Jurisdictions and Overlapping Authorities: Justice, Violence and the Law 1CRN: 15 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Renisa Mawani, University of British Columbia

Discussant(s): Mariana Valverde, University of Toronto

Description:Jurisdictions are predominantly understood to be vectors of spatio-territorial sovereignty (and extraterritoriality),

72

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

hence questions of legal ordering dominate discussions of jurisdictional overlap, conflict, or suspension, thereby obscuring questions of violence. This panel investigates a range of colonial and postcolonial jurisdictions described as anomalous zones but which, we argue, play a central and often overlooked role in the corpus juri of jurisdictional thinking. Papers turn to extraordinary laws and designations- Armed Forces Special Powers Act in Kashmir (Duschinski) and Disturbed Areas in South Asia (Raman); legal de-territorialities such as sanctuaries (Mcbride) and inter Asian taxation regimes (Ramnath); legal orders in the Eastern Himalayas (Ray) and role of administrative discretion in India and Israel (Berda).

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Geographies of Law

Presentations:At the Frontiers of Colonial Jurisdiction in the Eastern HimalayasReeju Ray, York University

Jurisdictional Authority and Permanent Emergency in KashmirHaley Duschinski, Ohio University

Partners and Partitions: Wartime Tax Laws and Political Belonging in 1940s India and BurmaKalyani Ramnath, Princeton University

Routinization of Emergency, Bureaucratic Discretion and Temporality: Administrative stories from Israel and IndiaYael Berda, Harvard University

When the Law Has No Space: Three Kinds of Deterritorialized LawKeally McBride, University of San Francisco

“Bringing Rebels to Justice”: Violence and Jurisdiction of Disturbed AreasBhavani Raman, University of Toronto

Gendering Racial ViolenceCRN: 12 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair(s): Sherene Razack, UCLA

Discussant(s): Carmela Murdocca, York University

Description:This panel examines racial violence directed against Indigenous, Black, migrant and racialized peoples. We ask how to consider this violence within a framework that addresses how racial

violence is a gendered practice. From the shooting of Palestinian schoolgirls, the racial violence enacted against Muslims in the name of protecting Muslim women from honor killings, the police killing of a Navajo woman, the deaths of migrants in a detention centre through the denial of medical care, and other examples of racial violence by state officials, we consider how state practices of racial violence are organized through gender, maintaining the settler state's sovereignty through the installation of white, male subjects as authorized to enact violence against racial Others.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: Policing, Law Enforcement

Presentations:From Love to Justice: Families’ Interrogation of Racial State ViolenceNadine El-Enany, Birkbeck Law School

Protecting the Nation from "Honor Killings": the Construction of a ProblemLeti Volpp, UC Berkeley School of Law

Rifles to Rape: The Intimate Invasions of School Girl’s Spaces and BodiesNadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

What Must be Seen?: Considering Visuality in Gendered Anti-Black ViolenceStephanie Latty, OISE, University of Toronto

“I did have a fear and threat”: White male police officers and the shooting of Loreal Tsingine and Michael Eligon.Sherene Razack, UCLA

Human Rights in Asia and the Americas ICRN: 1 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Edna Raquel Hogemann, UNESA

Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas related to the human rights debate. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments, social groups or individuals, analyses of emerging trends in legal theory as they are related to human rights in Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems related to human rights and endemic to societies in either region. Papers dealing with issues of sexual orientation, family models, child´s protection and gender are particularly encouraged.

73

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and ChildrenSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:"Family Constellation": Solving Family Conflicts in Several Aspects in Brazil and CanadaAna Cristina Augusto Pinheiro, Univ. Estácio de Sá

Reconsidering the Interplay of Money and Adoption: Open “Kinship” Adoption as a New ParadigmPamela Laufer-Ukeles, Academic Center of Law & Science

The Contractual Construction of PolyamoryJohn Enman-Beech, University of Toronto

Human Rights in Asia and the Americas IICRN: 1Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Ronaldo Lucas da Silva, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Discussant(s): Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEAC

Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas related to the human rights debate. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments, social groups or individuals, analyses of emerging trends in legal theory as they are related to human rights in Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems related to human rights and endemic to societies in either region. Papers dealing with issues of immigration and refuge are particularly encouraged.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:An Organizational Framing Approach to the Study of Immigration Laws and Policies in a Presidentially Centric Governmental StructureMayra Feddersen, University of California, Berkeley

Notes on the juridical protection of Venezuelan migrants in Brazil: searching for alternatives to migratory policiesAna Paula Teixeira Delgado, Universidade Estácio de Sá

The Resolution 2272 (2016) from the Security Council and the United Nations Positioning Against Sexual Abuse and Exploitation by their Peacekeeping ForcesSarah Dayanna Lima, Centro Univer. Estácio do Ceará

“Encounters in the Middle of Nowhere: Migrant Detention and Migratory Legal Aid in Texas”Erin Routon, Cornell University

Immigrant Integration and Participation: the Importance of Local ContextCRN: 2 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jamie Longazel, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY

Description:Formalistic approaches to immigration laws and their impacts often elide the importance of local social and political context, and the crucial negotiations of status and belonging that occur there. This panel focuses attention on the power of place, demonstrating how locality matters in processes of marginalization, integration, and access for transnational migrants. Case studies from Brazil, the United States, and Spain explore the differential impact of local and state-level lawmaking, as well as exploring the gaps between policy and practice. In particular, this scholarship emphasizes the agency of migrants as they negotiate immigration law regimes, the importance of co-ethnic networks and community resources, and the "legal violence" of anti-immigrant rhetoric and laws.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Co-ethnic communities and educational and occupational participation of Asian and Latino undocumented youth in New York CitySofya Aptekar, University of Massachusetts BostonAmy Hsin, Queens College

Discrimination and prejudice in highly skilled migration to Brazil: exchange students at the University of São PauloCynthia Carneiro, Ribeirao Preto School of Law/University of Sao Paulo

Exploring how hostile state legal contexts influence Hispanics' decision to voteAngela Maria Paez Murcia, Universidad de La SabanaLinda Williams, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

The Dislocation of Immigrant Residential Membership: How Hostile Immigration Contexts Create Housing InstabilityJuan Pedroza, Stanford University

74

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Indigenous Identity and KnowledgeCRN: 34 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel considers the nature of Indigenous identity and its production and the manner in which language (and the intervention of the courts) is central to the means by which knowledge and rights are validated and confirmed.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Culture, And Cultural Rights

Presentations:History, lifestyle and the 'correct' evidence – Courts deciding on indigenous identityReetta Toivanen, Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Helsinki

Indigeneity in Production: The Bedouin in IsraelEmma Nyhan, European University Institute (EUI)

Where the streets have many names: A legal perspective on Ireland's bilingual naming of space and placeMegan Rae Blakely, Lancaster UniversityGearóid Ó Cuinn, Lancaster University

Indigenous Laws and Legal Traditions In and Out of CourtsCRN: 34 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): L. Jane McMillan, St. Francis Xavier

Description:This panel explores the tools, ontologies and activism of courts in Canada and New Zealand and the consequences of their engagement with Indigenous laws and legal traditions in response to colonial realities and inequalities before and after the law.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:"Nature Is My Thing": Mi' Kmaq Resource Stewardship and More Than Human Treaty ObligationsAndrew Costa, Carleton University

A historical perspective on Indigenous justice: From rupture to resilience and resurgence in Indigenous restorative justice practiceRomola Thumbadoo, Carleton University

Ipeelee and Sentencing Indigenous Offenders: Whose Moral Blameworthiness?Rebecca Shamai, Ontario Court of Justice

Māori Legal Traditions In and Out of New Zealand CourtsCarwyn Jones, Victoria University of Wellington

Reflections on R.v.Pauchay(2009) and the Gap Between Indigenous and Mainstream Approaches to the Moral Emotions in the Sentencing of OffendersRichard Weisman, York University

The Making of the Wagmatcook Court: Indigenous Justice in Nova Scotia, CanadaL. Jane McMillan, St. Francis Xavier

Informed Consent, Autonomy, and Regulation in HealthcareCRN: 9 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Carol Heimer, Northwestern University & American Bar Foundation

Description:Informed consent, which requires professionals to provide information, ensure comprehension, and respect autonomy for decisions, is the foundation of ethical biomedical research and treatment. Yet, how informed consent and autonomy can be assured is less clear. The papers on this panel explore how information is communicated, how individuals understand inform consent, and what it means for community organizations to meaningfully partner with medical researchers. Authors also consider how expectations for consent are or should be regulated in clinical settings, with biological materials taken from patients, and in research.


Presentations:Informed consent by medical mediation gives good effect to patient satisfactionToshimi Momo Nakanishi, Faculty of Medicine Yamagata University

75

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Informed Consent? The Blurred Boundary between Biomedical Researchers and Participants in the Citizen Science EraChuan-Feng Wu, Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica

Regulating Human Tissue: Exploring Commonality and DifferenceAnne-Maree Farrell, La Trobe University

Understandings of Informed Consent to Surgery: Analysing Judgments and Fitness to Practice DecisionsLouise Austin, University of Bristol

Institutions of International Economy: World Trade, Market Competition, Payment Systems and International Adjudication.CRN: 52 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Pedro Fortes, FGV LAW SCHOOL

Discussant(s): David Restrepo Amariles, HEC Paris

Description:The design of institutional rules of the game is strategic for the development of international economy. This session examines different aspects of law that contribute to the global economy by facilitating world trade, guaranteeing market competition, regulating payment systems, and establishing a comprehensive system for adjudication of disputes. The papers remind us that the "invisible hand of the economy" depends on a visible regulatory and legal arm that articulates the working rules for the relevant players in the international economy.

Primary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and LawSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Competition Law at the CrossroadsMing-Li Wang, National Central University

Payments systems beyond settlement: some legal realism about moneyJean Grosdidier, Harvard Law School

Words Matter: How WTO Rulings Handle ControversyKrzysztof Pelc, McGill

International Studies in Law's Many HistoriesFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Legal History

Presentations:Finding the Good Lawyer in the History of Australia’s Legal ProfessionSusan Bartie, University of Tasmania

From Ethnic Enclave to Political Power: How Law Constrained the Early Assent of Irish Catholics in American PoliticsKevin McMahon, Trinity College

The Witch-Hunt that Wasn't: Evaluating the Procedural Fairness of the Salem Witchcraft TrialsJohn Acevedo, University of La Verne, College of Law

Internet Sex Work: Law, Regulation, and RightsCRN: 6 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Ummni Khan, Carleton University

Description:The focus on the sex industry has often missed the significant migration online of escorts, independents and indeed the creation of new sex markets, namely webcamming. Whilst sociological analysis has begun to wake up to this change, scholars are only yet contemplating and researching the implications of the online sex markets. This panel brings together four papers to examine the diversity of sex markets and parties that are involved in online commercial sex, and debate some of the law related issues. The papers looks at both sex workers and customers, as well as law enforcers and the legal frameworks in which these activities now find themselves. We ask whether law is fit for purpose given the rapid changes and whether different models of regulation would be more appropriate, and address the vast range of issues that face sex workers.


Presentations:Beyond the Gaze: Law and the Modern Day sex IndustryJane Scoular, University of StrathclydeTeela Sanders, University of Leicester

76

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Exclusion, Banning, and Capping: Legal Issues in the Adult Erotic Webcam IndustryAngela Jones, Farminggale State University

Risking Safety and Rights: Online Sex Work, Crimes and ‘Blended Safety Repertories’.Teela Sanders, University of Leicester

What Clients Want and What Providers Need: Online Escort Marketing and Valuations of Market Niches in the U.S.Kate Hausbeck Korgan, University of Nevada

Judges and Their AudiencesCRN: 43 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session



Discussant(s): Richard Cornes, Essex University

Description:It is now recognized that judges may, and probably should, have a variety of audiences in mind when writing their decisions. The intended audience(s), among other factors, may influence the manner of justification employed and the style in which judgments are crafted. This session looks at decisions from a stylistic perspective and the reaction of the public audience of judges in one jurisdiction (Canada).

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the Law

Presentations:Measuring attitudes towards the Supreme Court of CanadaErin Crandall, Acadia University

Seeing Justification Differently: An Aesthetic Conception of Judgments of Proportionality in Constitutional AdjudicationGeoffrey Conrad, McGill University

The Concomitants of Legal Formalism in Israeli Supreme Court DecisionsBryna Bogoch, Bar Ilan UniversityMichal Alberstein, Bar Ilan University

Law and Socialization in Transgressive Behaviour and Norm-Implementation, and Mental Illness in the Justice SystemFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Description:This panel addresses the development of rule violating behaviour; mental illness in the justice system; and the implementation of norms in the welfare sector. Topics include the role of emotions in legal socialization and the development of transgressive behaviour; analysis of when radical thoughts and feelings shift to extremist behaviour and rejection of rules and the law; the role of social media on the construction of factitious illness in children in their care by people with MSBP; the consequences of genetic essentialist thinking toward mental disorders in the legal system, and the ways in which the provision of treatment for mental illness is complicated by making clinical services subservient to legal processes. The panel will also address how administrative norms influence the counselling and teaching of unaccompanied children and young migrants about sexual and reproductive health and rights and gender equality.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Genetic Essentialist Thinking Toward Offenders with Mental Disorders: Exacerbation of Stigma and Potential Influences on Judges' Punishment ViewsColleen Berryessa, University of Pennsylvania

Migration, sexuality and welfare professionals. Challenges between the expected and unexpected when encountering unaccompanied children and youthAnnika Staaf, Dep of Criminology

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and the Internet: The Influence of Social Media on the Construction of Factitious Illness by ProxyRosanna Langer, Laurentian University

The Impact and Influence of the Carceral State and Deinstitutionalization on the Institutional Care of the Mentally Ill: An Examination of the Psychiatric Treatment of Incompetent to Stand Trial Patients at a State HospitalRenee Mack, University of California Berkeley

The interplay of adolescent emotions in the combined cognitive and authority legal socialization modelEllen Cohn, University of New Hampshire

77

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Law Firms and Legal CareersFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Do Gender Regimes Matter? A Study of Early Legal Careers in France and SwitzerlandIsabel Boni-Le Goff, University of LausanneGregoire Mallard, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

The significance of legal tasks in large law firms: Work content, occupational resources, and stratificationChristine Riordan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Understanding highly complaint-prone lawyers: A qualitative analysis of tribunal orders about lawyers with frequent complaints in Victoria, AustraliaJennifer Moore, Univ. of New South Wales David Studdert, Stanford University Yamna Taouk, University of Melbourne Ron Paterson, University of Auckland Law SchoolMarie Bismark, University of Melbourne

Law in Times of Populism: A Transatlantic Perspective on the Destruction and Defense of Constitutionalism through LawFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Dimitry Kochenov, University of Groningen

Participant(s):Bojan Bugaric, University of Ljubljana, School of LawTomasz Koncewicz, University of GdanskKim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University

Description:A global wave of populism puts the relevance of law into a new perspective. There is a spectrum of success of the legal institutions in the face of the dangerous trend, from the success of the US judiciary in annulling Trump's discriminatory travel bans to the destruction of constitutionalism in contemporary Hungary committed seemingly in full accordance with the law and the Polish painful evaporation of the separation of powers in direct violation of the constitution of the country against the backdrop of the helplessness of the European Union's own 'integration through law' unable to change the course of affairs in either state. We focus on the lessons to draw from the empirical examples of the deployment of law and involvement of (populist) lawyers in the

context of the populist challenge of constitutionalism.


Law, Location, Place and SpaceFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair/Discussant(s): Amìr Korhani, University of Ottawa

Description:This session interrogates the relationships between law and location, place or space. The papers address the intersection of law and geography in the context of the internet, elections, augmented reality, autonomous vehicles and property, and consider a range of laws including tort law, property law, international law, electoral law, and privacy law.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of Law

Presentations:Autonomous Vehicles and the Ethics of Algorithmic DrivingElizabeth Judge, University of Ottawa

Code as Trespass; Code as Nuisance: Augmented Reality and Augmented Real Property TortsTenille Brown, University of OttawaElizabeth Judge, University of Ottawa

Creating Free Space: Appropriation and Partition in International LawAgnes Barr-Klouman, University of Ottawa

Locational Privacy and the Geoweb: Are individuals responsible for their own privacy?Laura Garcia, University of Ottawa

Political Geo-Targeting and the Informed VoterAmìr Korhani, University of OttawaElizabeth Judge, University of OttawaMichael Pal, University of Ottowa

Legal Responses to Diminished CapacityCRN: 41 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Alexander Boni-Saenz, Chicago-Kent College of Law

Description:This session will explore how the law, and lawyers, respond to the needs of individuals with diminished capacity. Topics

78

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

to be covered include health care decision-making for adults with diminished capacity, privacy rights of individuals with diminished capacity, and the challenges attorneys face in representing adults with diminished capacity.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Arguing with Apple?: Technology, Privacy and PaternalismRebecca Morgan, Stetson Law

Do Laws Impact Health Care Decision Making in Clinical Settings?David Godfrey, American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging

“Taking instructions from a client with cognitive decline in the shadow of abuse – the lawyer’s dilemma”Sue Field, Charles Sturt UniversityKaren Williams, Queensland Bar Association

LGBTQ and the State: How Law and Policy Shapes Rights and IdentitiesCRN: 17 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Description:This session explores the history and evolution of LGBTQ policy throughout the world. Including protection orders, gender identity, and same-sex marriage.


Presentations:A Re-Evaluation of the Method of Incrementalist Change to Achieve Same-Sex Marriage - A Comparative Study between the United States and EuropeFrances Hamilton, Northumbria University

Medical categories and gender identity rights: the role played by Brazilian public prosecutors when trans people require to change their documentsMatheus Caetano Tocantins, Universidade de São Paulo

Policy Diffusion in Protection Order Laws in the United StatesAndrea Barrick, Youngstown State UniversityJohn Kilwein, West Virginia University

Queering Canadian Legal History Using a Lesbian LensKaren Pearlston, Faculty of Law, Univ. of New Brunswick

The Origins of Gender Identity and Gender Expression in Anglo-American Legal DiscourseKyle Kirkup, University of Ottawa Faculty of Law (Common Law Section)

Organizing Social Security for Workers Outside Employment: a Worldwide ChallengeCRN: 8 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Leaside

Chair(s): Adelle Blackett, Faculty of Law, McGill University

Participant(s):Lucie Lamarche, Université du Québec a MontréalMarley Weiss, Univ. of Maryland Carey School of LawMies Westerveld, University of AmsterdamAnnamaria Westregard, Department of Business Law, School of Economics and Management, Lund University

Description:Assuring social protection has become a challenge. In the global South, the majority of workers work in the informal economy. In the global North, where the employment contract used to be standard, employment is less and less the dominant work relationship. As a result, social security systems dependent on employment have diminishing coverage. Some countries have responded by expanding employment-based social insurance to include those engaged in non-traditional forms of work, e.g., in the gig economy. Other countries are experimenting with pilot programs assuring a basic income to all. In the global South, innovative measures have been introduced to ensure social security coverage for the informal economy. This session will consider approaches from various countries to de-coupling social protection from formal employment relationships.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Recent Books in Reproductive RightsCRN: 7, 42 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session


Author(s): Carol Sanger, Columbia Law School

Chair(s): Susan Bandes, DePaul University College of Law

Reader(s):Michael Boucai, SUNY Buffalo Law SchoolElizabeth Sepper, Washington University School of LawClare Huntington, Fordham Law School

79

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Description:This panel focuses on two books that offer new insights into how abortion is experienced by women in the United States, and how abortion became central to U.S. politics. Law professor Carol Sanger’s About Abortion: Terminating Pregnancy in 21st Century America (Harvard University Press) is organized around three questions: Why is abortion so central to U.S. politics and culture? Why do so many women feel ashamed to talk about their experiences with abortion? And what is the difference between abortion secrecy and abortion privacy? Sanger argues that inability to talk about abortion is bad for women and detrimental to public debate. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction (University of California Press), by human rights activist Loretta Ross and historian Rickie Solinger, focuses on the intersection between reproductive rights and social justice.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Rights in Historical PerspectiveFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session



Presentations:Canada’s Efforts to Police & Legalize Cannabis, 1923-2018Michael Boudreau, St. Thomas University

Charlie Wing and the Alberta Liquor Control Board: Anti-Chinese Racism and the Liquor Laws in Post-Prohibition AlbertaSarah Hamill, School of Law, Trinity College Dublin

Law, Liberalism, and the Red ScareLaura Weinrib, University of Chicago

Policing Vice, 1776-1876David Thacher, University of Michigan

Protecting the Majority: Constitution as a BulwarkAviram Shahal, University of Michigan Law School

Socio Economic Rights and PropertyCRN: 49 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Debbie Becher, Barnard College, Columbia

Description:The ownership of property implicates a variety of economic rights, which enjoy varying degrees of legal protection. Using

case studies from around the world this panel engages in empirical examination of the interplay between society, property, and law.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Emergent realities in real property: the competing logics of material and virtual properties explored through Antiguan and Barbudan case-studies.Anne Bottomley, Kent Law School

Going Easy and Going After: Building Inspectors and the Selective Allocation of Code ViolationsRobin Bartram, Northwestern University

Lords of their Land: Landlord Behavior and Potential Rental Market Implications for Low and High-Income TenantsDoron Shiffer-Sebba, University of Pennsylvania

Nobody listens: telling tales of irresponsibility and abandonment in property ownershipHelen Carr, University of KentDavid Cowan, University of BristolEd Kirton-Darling, University of Kent

Property Rights, Global Market, and the Role of the StateXiaoqian Hu, Harvard Law School

The Fourteenth Amendment at 150: Understanding its Historical and Contemporary ImplicationsCRN: 44 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Franita Tolson, University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Discussant(s): Holning Lau, Univ. of North Carolina Sch of Law Maggie McKinley, Univ. of Pennsylvania Law School

Participant(s):Robin Effron, Brooklyn Law SchoolAtiba Ellis, West Virginia UniversityMark Graber, Univ. of Maryland Carey School of LawChristopher Green, Univ. of Mississippi School of LawKurt Lash, University of RichmondLori Ringhand, University of Georgia School of LawAndrew Siegel, Seattle University School of Law

Description:The 150th Anniversary of the Fourteenth Amendment presents

80

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

a timely opportunity for scholars to debate the history and contemporary implications of this groundbreaking provision. The Amendment has long been a repository for a significant number of constitutional rights and protections, with little agreement among scholars about the Amendment's scope and meaning. As a result, there is a voluminous scholarly literature debating a range of issues, from the meaning of due process and equal protection to the weighty disagreements over which interpretive methodology is most faithful to the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment. This roundtable will bring together a diverse group of scholars who will offer complimentary-and sometimes competing-views about how we should view one of the most consequential Amendments in our history.


The Interaction of Values, Discretion, and Statutes in Regulatory Enforcement and ComplianceCRN: 5 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Jodi Short, UC Hastings College of the Law

Discussant(s): Russell Mills, Bowling Green State University

Description:This session highlights new theoretical and empirical developments in regulatory enforcement and compliance research by examining the interaction of values, discretion, and statues in shaping enforcement and compliance regimes. This panel highlight enforcement and compliance regimes in a wide range of industries and contexts including long-term care, health and safety regulation, environmental regulation, and social security.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Constructing the Meaning of Law Through Peer-Office Interactions: Seeking Legitimacy of Regulatory EnforcementAyako Hirata, Okayama University

Regulating Religion – The case of Kosher regulation in IsraelHanan Mandel, Ono Academic College

Regulating the Gaming Industry Across Time and PlaceMelissa Rorie, University of Nevada Las VegasKarin van Wingerde, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Regulatory enforcement of social security in the Netherlands: a comparisonPaulien de Winter, Univerisity of Groningen

The Practice of Risk-Based Inspection in the Dutch Health and Safety Inspectorate: A Story of Non ComplianceKarin van Wingerde, Erasmus University RotterdamPeter Mascini, Erasmus University Rotterdam

The Role of Legal Rules in Reforming Long-Term Care in Ontario, CanadaPoland Lai, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

The Intersections of Trade, Environment and Investment in an Evolving World of Mega-Regions8:00 AM - 9:45 AMPaper Session


Description:This panel explores recent trends in international efforts to further trade, investment protection and environment protection in a world where regions play an increasingly contested role.

Primary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and LawSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:BNDES and social and environmental safeguards: a comparison analysis about agenda setting.Murilo Borsio Bataglia, Universidade de Brasília

Sovereignty at the Crossroads: Is there a Responsibility to Protect against Climate Change?Elizabeth Bruch, University of Washington Tacoma

The UK, Brexit, and the world: Legal implications, international obligations and environmental protectionAnnegret Engel, Cardiff University

Unraveling NAFTA & Weaving It Back Together Again, Better Than BeforeJeff Kleeger, FGCU

The Politics of Courts and Legal Culture: Indonesia’s Judiciary and the Legacy of Dan S LevFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Melissa Crouch, Univ. of New South Wales

81

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Description:This panel presents a series of related papers around the broader theme of legal culture and the role and function of courts in Indonesia. Twenty years on from Indonesia's democratic transition, and there has not yet been a thoroughly analysis of how and why Indonesia's courts have changed, and what this says about the contested concept of legal culture today. A true pioneer in this area is the late Professor Dan S Lev. His work was grounded in a socio-legal approach to the study of law, and his work spans an impressive range of themes related to courts, judges, lawyers and politics in Indonesia from the 1960s to 2000s. The three papers in this panel seek to reinvigorate and affirm the importance of Lev's work for the study of courts in Indonesia today.


Presentations:Incipient Institutions and the Judicialization of Labor Rights in Indonesia: Another Look at the Courts of Industrial RelationsWilliam Hurst, Northwestern University

Judges, Courts and Legal Culture in Indonesia: The Legacy of Dan S LevMelissa Crouch, University of New South Wales

Legal institutions as an approach: the theoretical importance of Dan Lev’s workAdriaan Bedner, Leiden University

The District Courts in IndonesiaDaniel Pascoe, City University of Hong Kong

The Regulation of Corruption, Finance and Extractive Industries: The Transnational ContextCRN: 36 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel uses the framework of transnational legal ordering and legal orders to assess developments of regulation regarding corruption, terrorist financing, and resource extraction, involving the international level and developments in different countries and localties in the Global South.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:'Risky-Business': The Unintended Consequences of Terrorism, Financial Transparency, and Risk.Anna Hanson, The Graduate Institute

Corruption Control, Law, and Development in Brazil's Carwash operationFabio de Sa e Silva, University of Oklahoma

The Rules of Creative Rule-Making: A Story of Performance and Power in Sierra Leone's Mining SectorDeval Desai, Harvard Law School

Understanding the Costs of Canada’s Access to Justice CrisisFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Herbert Kritzer, University of Minnesota Law School

Participant(s):Nicole Aylwin, Osgoode Hall Law School/Canadian Forum on Civil JusticeMatthew Dylag, Osgoode Hall Law School, York UniversityTrevor Farrow, Osgoode Hall Law School, York UniversityLesley Jacobs, York UniversityCatherine Piché, Université de MontréalNoel Semple, University of Windsor, Ontario

Description:Each year millions of Canadians face one or more legal problems. Though the justice system is served by a well-trained judiciary and capable legal professionals, myriad barriers exist for Canadians attempting to resolve their legal problems.

This roundtable session will bring together contributing authors from "The Cost and Value of Access to Justice" book (forthcoming 2018, UBC Press) to discuss the far-reaching impacts of Canada's access to justice problems in civil and family law contexts. The session will explore questions around scope and complexity of the access to justice crisis, legal needs and experiences of different groups, access to justice research, data gaps and measuring change, class actions as a tool to improve access to justice, the economic and social costs of justice and the price of an inaccessible justice system.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

82

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Using Feminist Perspectives to Reform Tort and Criminal LawCRN: 7 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair(s): Ann McGinley, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Description:This panel analyzes issues in tort and criminal law through theoretical and practical feminist lenses. Panelists will use feminist jurisprudential concepts to reexamine traditional tort cases that ignore the gendered issues in the cases, and to discuss legal and procedural issues that harm women in the law of intimate deception, sentencing of rapists, and attaining domestic violence protection orders. Panelists will also offer practical proposals to improve the procedural and substantive law in these areas, such as revising intimate deception law to align it with other deception laws, to mitigate the effect on sentencing of character letters containing rape myths, and to alter the personal service requirement for protection orders in domestic violence cases.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Increasing Access to Safety and Justice: Alternative Service in Domestic Violence CasesJane Stoever, Univ. of California, Irvine School of Law

Reforming the Law of Intimate DeceptionJill Hasday, University of Minnesota Law School

“He was always the sweetest to everyone”: Rape Myths and Character Letters in Sexual Assault CasesJoAnne Sweeny, University of LouisvilleLouis D. Brandeis School of LawAlyssa Lowery, University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law

Work Law Enforcement StrategiesCRN: 8 Friday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): Elizabeth Nisbet, John Jay College

Description:Labor standards are meaningless if they are not enforced, and this panel considers a range of enforcement strategies used by different jurisdictions. One paper focuses on an emerging locus of enforcement in the US: labor standards offices at the municipal level, while another re-considers the FLSA's collective

action provision. Another paper analyzes compliance with the Affordable Care Act's protections for lactating employees, finding that managers' own history of nursing is a key factor. A third paper looks at the use of professional versus lay labor court judges in different European countries. A fourth paper looks at the role of a constitutional right of association in improving working conditions.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Allies Already? How Proximity Affects Labor Law ComplianceElizabeth Hoffmann, Purdue University

Labour Law at a Crossroads? Collective Representation and the Contemporary WorkplaceBethany Hastie, Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Lay judges and professional judges in labour courts – the requirement of translation: a comparative view of France, Germany and Great BritainArmin Hoeland, Martin-Luther-University Halle-

Wittenberg, Faculty of Law and EconomicsThe Constraints and Affordances of Local Labor Law: How Staff of City Offices of Labor Standards Enforcement Use and Interpret LawHana Shepherd, Rutgers SociologyJanice Fine, Rutgers University

Working with Law to Disrupt Racial Hierarchies: Paradoxes and PossibilitiesFriday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Description:The paradoxes and possibilities of deploying law as an instrument for racial justice is a central theme of critical socio-legal research. Scholarship examining this topic draws attention to what can be achieved from working with law and within legal institutions, and the inevitable limitations of these strategies in instigating meaningful social change. These papers examine this issue in multiple and diverse contexts ranging from the racial diversification of law schools and the life trajectories of minority attorneys, the invocation of municipal law as a strategy for building independent black communities, and the possibilities of re-interpreting court decisions previously complicit or ineffectual in countering racial injustices to advocate for social justice.

Primary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

83

Friday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. F

rid

ay

Presentations:Incitement in the Era of Trump: The Law and Social Science of Hate Speech and Calls to ViolenceRichard Ashby Wilson, Univ of Connecticut School of Law

Law Graduates Ten Years into the Future: Higher Education, Qualitative Analysis, and Critical Race TheoryChantal Jones, University of California Los AngelesWalter Allen, University of California, Los Angeles

One-Way Mirror: Dual-Narcissism in the Cherokee CasesJohn-Paul (JP) Anderson, University of Washington

Perilous Ground: Black Municipal Incorporation in the U.S. SouthDanielle Purifoy, Duke University

The Paradox of Minority Attorney SatisfactionMilan Markovic, Texas A&M University School of Law

Discrimination Laundering: The Rise of Organizational Innocence and the Crisis of Equal Opportunity LawCRN: 12 Friday Session 1A, 8:00 a.m. - 8:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Danforth

Author(s): Tristin Green, Univ. of San Francisco School of LawChair(s): Catherine Albiston, University of California, Berkeley

Reader(s):Marie Mercat-Bruns, Sciences Po Law School, ParisNoah Zatz, UCLA School of LawStephanie Bornstein, University of Florida Levin College of the Law

Description:This AMR features Tristin Green's new book, Discrimination Laundering: The Rise of Organizational Innocence and the Crisis of Equal Opportunity Law (Cambridge U. Press 2017). Green blends sophisticated legal analysis with synthesis of current social science to show how law and organizations today are protecting organizations from responsibility for discrimination and the consequences for the future of race and sex equality in our workplaces. The book challenges us to think more deeply about how social science can and should inform the law and asks for changes in the law that will better incentivize organizational efforts that are likely to minimize discrimination, instead of inciting it. A group of law and society scholars from US and France will comment and engage with the audience

about key themes and questions raised by the book.

Primary Keyword: DiscriminationSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Blackwashing Homophobia: Violence and the Politics of Sexuality, Gender and RaceCRN: 13Friday Session 1B, 9:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Danforth

Author(s): Melanie Judge, Centre for Law and Society, University of Cape Town

Chair(s): Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY)

Reader(s):Libby Adler, Northeastern University School of LawNolundi Luwaya, University of Cape TownRuthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY)

Description:Blackwashing Homophobia critiques prevailing discourses through which violence and its queer targets are normatively understood, exploring the knowledge regimes in which multiple forms of othering are reproduced and resisted. With a focus on lesbian subjectivity and violence in South Africa, it examines the intersections of sexual, gender, race and class identities, and the contemporary politics of violence in a postcolonial context. As queers increasingly place their demands and desires for recognition and protection before the law and the state, the book explores, amongst other themes, how legal discourse operates both as both a tool of freedom and of its denial. Blackwashing Homophobia is a timely intervention for theorising homophobia-related violence, queer identities and political imaginaries in times of violence.


Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 1A8:00 a.m. - 8 :45 a.m .

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 1B9:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

84

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

"Speed Mentoring" - Navigating Graduate School as an Interdisciplinary Scholar

CRN: 2 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel


Chair(s):Hillary Mellinger, American University

Participant(s):Susan Bibler Coutin, University of California IrvineRebecca Hamlin, University of Massachusetts AmherstAudie Klotz, Syracuse UniversityJamie Longazel, John Jay College, CUNYDoris Marie Provine, Arizona State UniversityMaartje van der Woude, Leiden Law School

Description:This panel connects senior law and society scholars with graduate students who are seeking mentorship on a variety of topics that include publication advice, methodological best practices, dissertation advice (including narrowing the topic, forming a committee, and writing strategies), job market advice for doctoral candidates, and advice on how to maintain work/life balance. Scholars are all drawn from the fields of citizenship and migration studies, and so they will have particular knowledge related to that topic, but all are welcome.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)

Access to Civil Justice and Marginalized GroupsCRN: 12 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Tonya Brito, Univ. of Wisconsin Law School

Participant(s):Tonya Brito, University of Wisconsin Law SchoolLauren Sudeall Lucas, Georgia State Univ College of LawTanina Rostain, Georgetown Law Center

Description:Roundtable participants will address access to justice issues affecting marginalized groups, including people of color, LGBTQIA community, refugees, undocumented persons,

religious minorities, and the disabled. Although socio-legal scholarship examining issues of access to justice is experiencing a renaissance, the legal needs, perspectives and experiences of marginalized groups has been understudied. Discussion topics include: legal needs of marginalized groups; public interest law organizations' case selection policies and practices, and disparities in service provision; implicit bias and colorblind ideology; procedural and structural hurdles to accessing the legal system; use of technological innovation to enhance access to justice; and the relationship between access to justice and legal education.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Access to Justice: Vulnerable GroupsFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Description:Administration of justice faces challenge on a number of procedural and substantive fronts, all the more so when the individuals involved in the system have systemic vulnerabilities. This panel explores a range of issues key to substantive equality for individuals caught up in criminal and civil justice systems.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Presentations:Multiple Enclosures, No Clear Escape: Immigration Detainees in SegregationPetra Molnar, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

The Post-Legal Aid Era: Access to Justice, Self-Represented Litigants and the Family Justice System in England and WalesJess Mant, University of Leeds

Acoustics of Justice: Law, Listening and SoundFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Sean Mulcahy, Univ. of Warwick / Monash University

Discussant(s): Jake Goldenfein, Swinburne University of Technology

Participant(s):Kay Lalor, Manchester Metropolitan UniversityCarolyn McKay, University of Sydney Law SchoolSara Ramshaw, University of Victoria Faculty of LawMehera San Roque, University of New South Wales

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 210:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

85

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Description:While the 'visual turn' in socio-legal scholarship has generated a rich picture of the significance of the image for, and in, law, there has been comparatively little attention paid to the equally significant acoustic dimensions of law (Parker, Acoustic Jurisprudence, 2015). This Roundtable aims to (re)tune the eardrums to the acoustics of law, to emphasise the the significance of an awareness of the soundscapes of law and legal institutions for our understandings of justice, through both discussion and performance. Across a wide range of legal issues --including judicial decision-making, courtroom testimony, diversely-abled witnesses and participants, and the role of audio technologies and surveillance--the juridical soundscapes offered in this Roundtable will highlight the demand for better, more responsible listening, and hearings.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness,

Comparative Legal CulturesAgeism and the Human Rights of Older AdultsCRN: 41 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Israel (Issi) Doron, University of Haifa

Discussant(s): Nina Kohn, Syracuse University College of Law

Description:This session will explore the role of ageism in society and mechanisms for enforcing the rights of older adults.

Primary Keyword: AgingSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Active aging at European forums from the human rights perspectiveBarbara Mikołajczyk, University of Silesia

Do older European women have the right to sex? Ageism, Sexism, and the Case of Carvalho Pinto de Sousa Morais v. PortugalIsrael (Issi) Doron, University of Haifa

The intersections between age stereotyping and age discrimination in the case law of the European Court of Human RightsPaul De Hert, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)Paul Quinn, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

The Need for a New International Human Rights Instrument for Older Persons - the Case of the ECSR (European Committee of Social RightsBenny Spanier, Haifa University

Care, Privacy and IntimacyCRN: 7 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair(s): Wanda Wiegers, College of Law, University of Saskatchewan

Discussant(s): Carys Craig, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Description:This panel will examine conceptions of privacy, care, and intimacy in American experience and law. Traditional conceptions of privacy that center on boundaries and control are proving inadequate in light of technological change and new understandings can be informed by the value of intimacy. Linked as well to contested conceptions of privacy is a critique of policies that 'privatize' families in the US and an assessment of the damage experienced by families through their exposure to market forces and a lack of state support. The effects of the Affordable Care Act on child poverty will be examined as well as legal measures that could improve outcomes for children. Feminist histories of activism will also be explored in an effort to inform and ground a constitutional right to care under the Equal Protection clause

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

Presentations:Constitutional CaregivingArianne Renan Barzilay, Univ. of Haifa School of Law

Improving Outcomes in Child Poverty and Wellness in Appalachia in the “New Normal” Era: Infusing Empathy into LawJill Engle, Penn State Law

Reconnecting Privacy and IntimacyAyelet Blecher-Prigat, Sha'arei Mishpat Law School

The Privatized Family: Families, the Market, and the Collapse of the American DreamMaxine Eichner, UNC School of Law

Citizenship, Rights, and the Boundaries of the NationCRN: 2 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): John Park, UC Santa Barbara

86

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Description:Citizenship is viewed as belonging with a national community. Specific practices of Citizenship in the U.S. and abroad illustrate the perennial tension between belonging and exclusion in a nation-state and the fault lines introduced by ethnicity, international conflict, and globalization. More specifically, the papers examine the role of the Constitutional and courts in reinforcing or challenging local practices of citizenship around the world.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:Citizenship & Migration: Legal and Political Challenges in XXI centuryIryna Sofinska, National University "Lviv Polytechnic"

Citizenship in the Margins: A Comparative Study of the Membership Politics of the Urdu-speakers (Biharis) and the Rohingyas in BangladeshNabila Islam, McGill University/ University of California, Berkeley

Foreigners in French and American Constitutional Law: A Transatlantic Perspective on the Judicial Construction of Categories of Rights HoldersLouis Imbert, Sciences Po Law School

Redefining Citizenship in the European Arena: Breaking Nationality Bonds to Form Stronger UnionsJulia Bradshaw, Liverpool John Moores University

Civil Mediation Program Evaluation: A Mixed Method ApproachFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Suzanne Kaasa, Westat

Description:Court mediation programs are designed to resolve conflicts through a non-adversarial process. Mediation has risen in popularity due to high rates of participant satisfaction and preference over other alternative dispute resolution options such as arbitration; yet, research on civil mediation is scarce. National standards for civil mediation programs do exist; however, questions remain about the extent to which certain policies provide a fair and efficient process for diverse communities.

This session will cover evaluation methods and findings from a civil mediation court program, including its impact on case processing, outcomes, and stakeholder satisfaction. This session is intended both to share new findings related to civil mediation

and to create discussion among attendees of approaches to conducting evaluations of court programs.

Primary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute ResolutionSecondary Keyword: Disputes, Mediation, and Negotiation

Presentations:Evaluating Civil Mediation Program Policies and PracticesSuzanne Kaasa, WestatSarah Vidal, WestatMichele Harmon, Westat

Evaluating Civil Mediation Program Processes and OutcomesSarah Vidal, WestatMichele Harmon, WestatSuzanne Kaasa, Westat

Civil Rights and ESR in the United StatesFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Description:The papers in this salon session explore aspects of property rights and civil procedure in the United States.

Presentations:Citizenship and civil procedure: the decay of social protection in foreclosureWalker Kahn, UW-Madison

Property Rights, Guns & the Public Good: A Second Amendment CultureJoAnne Myers, Marist College

Cold War International LawCRN: 23 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair(s): Gerry Simpson, LSE

Discussant(s): Cait Storr, Melbourne Law School

Participant(s): Sara Kendall, University of Kent Gerry Simpson, LSE

Description:The Cold War was, of course, a material object (ICBMs, emergency hot-line telephones, shoes banging on tables) but the Cold War was also enacted – perhaps mainly understood

87

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

– as an ideological and cultural form, a central aspect of which was a juridical discourse with its own particular vocabularies, language, apparatus, imagery, metaphors and styles organised around at least four dyads: neutrality/enmity; cold strategic inter-imperial war/hot proxy wars of decolonisation; nuclear-ness and conventional war; and between secrecy and transparency. This panel will take a close look at these cold war international laws.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Legal History Comparative Family Court Practices in Cases Involving Domestic Violence, Child Abuse, and Parental Alienation: Empirical and Qualitative Research from the U.S. and CanadaFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Joan Meier, George Washington Univ. Law School

Description:This panel will bring together a leading scholars and experts in family court responses to domestic violence and child abuse from the United States and Canada. Professor Joan Meier will present her NIJ-funded empirical study of over 4,000 custody and visitation opinions in the U.S., examining courts' responses to abuse and parental alienation allegations. Key findings include confirmation of protective parents' reports that mothers who report child abuse very often lose custody to the alleged abuser, and that alienation is not a gender-neutral construct. Simon LaPierre and Patrick Ladouceur will describe their research into family courts' use of parental alienation labels to reject abuse claims in Canada, based on interviews with stakeholders. Professors Susan Boyd and Elizabeth Sheehy will discuss the sudden uptick in alienation claims in Canadian family courts since 20114, comparing courts' responses to these and to domestic violence claims, and discussing the ideology driving these developments.

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and ChildrenSecondary Keyword: Gender and JudgingPresentations:

What is Really Happening in Family Courts? A National Empirical Study of Courts' Responses to Domestic Violence, Child Abuse, and Parental Alienation ClaimsJoan Meier, George Washington University Law School

Parental Alienation and Domestic Violence in Canadian Family CourtSimon Lapierre, University of OttawaPatrick Ladouceur, University of Ottowa

Comparing claims of domestic violence and parental alienation: Continuing the ideological war against womenSusan Boyd, University of British ColumbiaElizabeth Sheehy, University of Ottowa

Corporate Crime and the Ethics of DisclosureCRN: 46 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Chair/Discussant(s): Cathy Hwang, Univ. of Utah, College of Law

Description:This panel will explore current issues in the ethical issues that surface in corporate governance, including whistleblowing, securities fraud, and disclosure regulation.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Contractual Restrictions on WhistleblowingJennifer Pacella, City University of New York

Disclosure-driven Corporate CrimeJ.S. Nelson, Villanova University

The Appropriate Role for State Criminal Prosecution of Securities Law ViolatorsWendy Couture, University of Idaho College of Law

Current Legal Issues in Asia and the Americas ICRN: 1 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Rubens Beçak, University of Sao Paulo

Discussant(s): Jairo Lima, University of Sao PauloDescription:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to current trends in these regions. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments or social groups, analyses of emerging trends in legal theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems endemic to societies in either region.

Primary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal InstitutionsSecondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

88

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Presentations:Poshumanism: redefining the human and non-human condition in a speakable and non - speakable world using Brazilian’s Constitution as a modelLucia Frota Pestana de Aguiar Silva, Univ Estácio de SáAndré Gustavo Corrêa de Andrade, UnivEstácio de Sá

Testing Public Agency Responses to Citizen Reports: A Field ExperimentSpencer Headworth, Purdue UniversityViridiana Rios, Purdue University

The Distance Between Us: Establishing Rural Remoteness as an Analogous Ground of DiscriminationMeghan Campbell, University of Birmingham

The Impact of State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts: An Analysis of the Interpretive Case LawLucien Dhooge, Georgia Institute of Technology

Current Legal Issues in Asia and the Americas VCRN: 1Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Ricardo Perlingeiro, Estácio de Sá University; Fluminense Federal University


Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to current trends in these regions. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments or social groups, analyses of emerging trends in legal theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems endemic to societies in either region.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:An alternative for the effectuation of human rights, in the light of regulatory agenciesLuiza Silva, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Deference Measurement: An analysis of the degree of mutability of Administrative Review decisions in the Brazilian National Transit System, using the Judicial Review as a parameter.Marcos Fernandes de Souza, Fed Univ of Rio de Janeiro

Policy Tug of War: A Socio-Legal Inquiry About Access to Health Via Litigation in BrazilFernanda Farina, University of Oxford

The characteristics of the Civil Registration System in Brazil: its importance in the implementation of public policies.Marcelo Tiziani, INDIVIDUAL

Data, Technology, and TransparencyFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Data protection, airlines and the transnational surveillance of EbolaGearóid Ó Cuinn, Lancaster University

Selective transparency and the authorisation of pesticides in the EUOlivia Hamlyn, University of Leicester

Technology and free thinking: is the law failing to think about our thoughts?Bethany Shiner, Middlesex University

What counts as proof?: Data, law-making and "peripheral mechanisms" in the information ageMarco Brydolf-Horwitz, University of Washington

Decolonising the Law School Curriculum & The Guerrilla Guides to Law TeachingCRN: 23 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel


Chair(s): Grietje Baars, City University London

Discussant(s): Kate Grady, SOAS University of London

Participant(s):Sameer Ashar, Univ. of California, Irvine School of LawCaitlin Barry, Villanova Univ Charles Widger Sch of LawIrina Ceric, Kwantlen Polytechnic UniversityKate Grady, SOAS University of LondonSarah Keenan, Birkbeck Law SchoolSarah Paoletti, University of Pennsylvania Law SchoolAnna Roberts, Seattle University School of Law

89

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Description:In US law schools, the Guerrilla Guides to Law Teaching are a collective effort to acknowledge and confront the present "movement moment" within the classroom. Guides' authors embrace this moment as an important opportunity to revisit methods and sources of teaching in the legal academy, and to generate creative approaches that break us out of traditional modes of thinking. In English universities, in response to the student-organised 'Why is my Curriculum White?' movement, teachers have gathered to 'decolonise the law school curriculum'. Both seek to incorporate historically marginalised voices, to explore the radical democratic opportunities in the classroom and to expand the kinds of conversations we're having with students--expanding the spectrum of ideas, and making more horizontal our interactions with students.

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Disparities in Healthcare AccessCRN: 9 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Ursula Castellano, Ohio University

Description:Access to healthcare has far reaching effects for communities. How individuals access resources often reflect the legal and organizational resources in their communities. Governments have to varying degrees aimed to address unequal access to preventative care, treatment, or mental health services, while individuals have made varying levels of claims to care. Overall, law has been ineffective in addressing healthcare inequality. Drawing on diverse examples, this panel examines the myriad ways social disparities in healthcare affect individuals, families, and communities, how claims to care are addressed, and how inequality continues to limit individual, familial, and community well-being-often for generations.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:Between a social right and its effectiveness: the question of health "judicialization" in Brazil's courtsMatheus Falcão, University of São PauloFernando Aith, University of São Paulo

Beyond justiciability: applying communitarianism in right to health litigation in Sub Saharan AfricaOmowamiwa Kolawole, University of Cape Town

Can Policies Mitigate Barriers to Healthcare among African Americans?Madelaine Tesori, Weber State UniversityMonica Williams, Weber State University

Challenges and Prospects of Litigating Reproductive and Sexual Rights and Health in Nigeria: Lessons From Comparative Foreign LawsAkinola Akintayo, University of Lagos

Mental Health and Suicide: At the Crossroad of A Static Law Crawling to TomorrowTitilayo Aderibigbe, School of Law & Security Studies, Babcock University, Ogun State

Enforcing Rights through Treaties, Constitutions and Procedural ReformCRN: 34 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel examines the role played by treaties, constitutions and principles grounded in international law in the rights asserted by Indigenous peoples in their relationship to nations and, by extension, the international community.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State Formation

Presentations:"Let's fight with words, paper and pencil": Celebrating a Peace Agreement in ColombiaSandra Brunnegger, University of Cambridge

Constitutionalising Self-determination of Indigenous PeoplesAlvaro Cordova Flores, McGill University

Interactions between the Precautionary Principle and indigenous Peoples' right to consultation: synergies and tensionsNicolas Ojeda Zavala, University of Edinburgh

Reconciliation and The Treaty Relationship: Can We Move Beyond Empty Rhetoric?Carole Blackburn, University of British Columbia

EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories in European JurisprudenceCRN: 44 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Maple West

90

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Author(s): Billie Davies, School of Public Affairs American Univ. Fernanda Nicola, American Univ. Washington College of Law

Chair(s): Bryant Garth, UC Irvine

Reader(s):Marija Bartl, University of AmsterdamRachel Cichowski, University of WashingtonPäivi Leino-Sandberg, University of HelsinkyTommaso Pavone, Princeton University

Description:The volume EU law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories in European Jurisprudence edited by Bill Davies and Fernanda G. Nicola offers 'thick' descriptions, contextual histories and critical narratives that engage with some of the leading decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). The stories help to reveal hidden legal and judicial dynamics, personal agency and sheer contingency involved in many of the CJEU decisions. These new dimensions discovered through archival research or interviews of lawyers, référendaires and judges allowed the authors re-opening many of the more or less well-known cases of European jurisprudence. EU law stories addresses some of the stories behind the scenes in European jurisprudence in order to explain how the decisions taken in Luxembourg have real impact on people in different Member States.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Experimental Approaches to Bias, Discrimination and HarmFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Description:The papers in this panel use experimental methods to understand opinion-formation and decision-making processes. Topics include how stereotypes are formed (for example regarding criminal personalities or sexual violence), the effects of demonstrative evidence in medical malpractice cases, the effects of racial bias in the housing market, and the effects of discrimination on labour market choices.


Presentations:Convictable Faces: Attributions of Future Criminality from High School Yearbook PhotographsCaisa Royer, Cornell University

Picturing Pain and SufferingNeal Feigenson, Quinnipiac University School of Law

Extraordinary Jurisdictions and Overlapping Authorities: Justice, Violence and the Law: Panel 2CRN: 15 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Elizabeth Kolsky, Villanova University

Discussant(s): Vasuki Nesiah, NYU Gallatin

Description:Jurisdictions are predominantly understood to be vectors of spatio-territorial sovereignty (and extraterritoriality), hence questions of legal ordering dominate discussions of jurisdictional overlap, conflict or suspension thereby sublimating the question of violence. This panel investigates colonial and post-colonial jurisdictions in South Asia and Africa described as anomalous zones but which, we argue, play a central and often overlooked role in the corpus juri of jurisdictional thinking. Papers focus on questions of federalism (Majumdar); Terror Trials (Lokaneeta); Patriot Act (Rajah); Sexual Impunity (Baxi) and Impunity in Counterinsurgency (Ghosh) and Civil Disturbance Special Tribunals (Chaturvedi) in a variety of sites to analyze the implications of fractured legal orders for those who seek justice from law.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:A View from the Gallows: Ken Saro-Wiwa, and the Contest for Jurisdictions and JusticeRuchi Chaturvedi, University of Cape Town

Central Bureau of Investigation versus Unknown: Crime, Impunity and Counter-Insurgency in a ‘Border Village’ in Indian Administered Jammu and KashmirShrimoyee Ghosh, Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society

Planetary Jurisdiction and Ordinary LawsJothie Rajah, American Bar Foundation

The Jurisdiction of Sexual Impunity: On Sexual Violence and Legal Pluralism in IndiaPratiksha Baxi, Center for the Study of Law and Governance

The Jurisdictions of Custody: Rule of Law and Terror Trials in Contemporary IndiaJinee Lokaneeta, Drew University

91

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Foreign Direct Investments from Below: Exploring Avenues and Methods of Subjugation and ResistanceCRN: 23 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Jimena Sierra-Camargo, Rosario University / King's College London

Description:Foreign Direct Investments have long been praised as the most effective way countries could attract capital and foster economic development. After catastrophic conducts and widely criticized violations of human dignity, the narrative has shifted to stress the importance of reforming the legal framework. Panellists recognise that most of these suggestions come from above, i.e. from men (mainly) in a suit sitting in international organisations, chambers of commerce, board of directors and elite universities. We thus ask, how would FDIs look like from below? Would reform and coexistence be feasible? Would there be the need for something else? We explore practices of subjugation and forms of resistance that challenge FDIs from above and rely, among others, on the visions of local communities, ecology and Third World Countries interest

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and SocietySecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Presentations:Between the Environment and Foreign Investment Protection: the Case of Santurbán in ICSID.Enrique Prieto Rios, Universidad del Rosario

Bioprospecting and Innovation: an Opportunity to the Biosimilar MedicinesDiana Bernal, Universidad del Rosario

How the TPP, the EU proposal for the TTIP and the CETA may modify the direction of the foreign investment system?Federico Suarez-Ricaurte, Externado de Colombia University / King's College London

Orientalize and Plunder: the 2009 Baguazo, 'Us' and 'Them' and the Ideological Construction of Foreign Direct Investments.Tomaso Ferrando, University of Bristol School of Law

Geographies of Law and Development: Mapping Movement of Workers, Flow of Capital, and Diffusion of NormsCRN: 52 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Rolando Garcia Miron, Stanford Law School

Discussant(s): David Restrepo Amariles, HEC Paris

Description:Max Weber's foundational puzzle on how British law influenced the industrial revolution sets the stage for our enquiries on the geographies and demographies of law and development. Importantly, this is a theoretical discussion on the methods, perspectives, and agenda of Law and Development. How may law shape capitalism? What is the adequate level of state intervention in the protection of property rights and economic resources: regulatory minimalist or state activism? How may normative pluralism influence our perspective of the contingent existence of States in human history? How may cities control the movement of workers and experiment with innovative laws to facilitate socio-economic development? The papers discuss important theoretical questions of law and development with some interesting empirical case studies for our reflection.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Imagining "Bossa Nova": Possibilities and Limits of Charter CitiesPedro Fortes, FGV LAW SCHOOL

Law, Governance, and Development in Resource-Rich Southern African StatesSara Ghebremusse, Peter A. Allard School of Law / Osgoode Hall Law School

Short history of the national law idea: the exception become ruleAndrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of Santander

History/Ideology/LawCRN: 44 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Dan Farbman, Boston College Law School

92

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Participant(s): Paulo Barrozo, Boston College Law SchoolCharles Barzun, University of VirginiaMaeve Glass, Columbia Law School

Description:In the emergence of modern legal history, the critical legal historians of the 1970s and 80s sought to show how legal ideas and practices were not neutral, but instead served to legitimate, rationalize, or naturalize the interests of some class or group. Their work was explosive, but like all explosions, what had once seemed radical soon became domesticated. The once fringe critical approach morphed into a conventional strategy, casually deployed everywhere from the law firm to the faculty workshop. Thus the normalization of ideological critique in the legal academy has engendered an odd kind of stasis which is nowhere as apparent as in the field of legal history. This roundtable is part of an ongoing conversation considering how historians and critics might intervene in this stasis to revive the potential of critical history.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Is it Worth Mediate Consumer Relations? Revisiting Alternative Means of Conflict Resolution in the Light of Efficiency.Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Daniel Arruda, FGV

Description:The present work aims to investigate alternatives to state jurisdiction based on the efficiency, or inefficiency, of alternative resolution in consumer relations. This is a special research program at Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) in Rio de Janeiro. The choice for consumer relations is therefore, that the Judiciary has become a Service of Consumer Service. Thus, we intend analyze the data of Consumidor.Gov - a portal that aims to serve as an interlocution between suppliers and consumers in order to promote the attempt to pre-process conflicts arising from consumer relations. The conclusions of the present study show that alternative means are not effective because the sample does not present the impacts of new legislative changes (new civil procedure code and new arbitration law).

Primary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:Learning form the alternatives: ADR as an example for court proceduresKars De Graaf, University of GroningenHerman Broring, University of GroningenBert Marseille, University of Groningen

The procedural justice dimension in the statutory mandate to achieve ‘just, quick and cheap resolution’Therese MacDermott, Macquarie University, Australia

Jury Systems Across the WorldFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair(s): Matthew Fox, University of Chicago/University of California, Los Angeles

Discussant(s): Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, Michigan State University

Description:This panel explores the development of the jury systems in Canada, the United States, and South Korea.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay Participation

Presentations:From Trial by Judge to Trial with Jury: a Legal Paradigm Change in Korea?Sang Hoon Han, Yonsei Univ./ Univ. of British ColumbiaYoori Seong, Chungbuk National University

Lay people and the Operation of Legal Consciousness: Accounts and Accountability in the Criminal Jury RoomMatthew Fox, Univ of Chicago/Univ of California, Los Angeles

Measuring the Effects of Deliberation on Jurors’ Attitudes toward Jury ParticipationLiana Pennington, Saint Anselm CollegeMatthew Dolliver, University of Alabama

The Effectiveness of Legal Safeguards in Improving Jurors’ Evaluation of Eyewitness EvidenceJennifer L. Beaudry, Swinburne Univ of Technology

Kinder, Gentler, More Benevolent: Interrogating the Myth of Canada's Liberal Settler ColonialismCRN: 34 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto

Discussant(s):Catherine Evans, University of TorontoMayana C. Slobodian, University of Toronto

93

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Description:"There are very few countries that can say for nearly 150 years they've had the same political system without any social breakdown, political upheaval or invasion. We are unique in that regard. We also have no history of colonialism. So we have all of the things that many people admire about the great powers, but none of the things that threaten or bother them about the great powers."- Prime Minister Stephen Harper, 2009

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Academic Uptake of Indigenous Laws: Decolonization or Recolonization?Karen Drake, Osgoode Hall Law School at York University

Canadian Colonialism: Conditions for a Just SocietyTeddy Harrison, University of Toronto

Settler voting rights and Indigenous self-determination in Canada’s North: A tale of three court casesAaron Spitzer, University of Bergen

The Queen's Red Children: Commissions, Law & Empire in CanadaMayana C. Slobodian, University of Toronto

Law and the People: Lawyers and Judges in American HistoryCRN: 44 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair(s): Joanna Grisinger, Northwestern University

Discussant(s): Gregory Ablavsky, Stanford Law School

Description:This panel examines the key role of lawyers and judges in American history. Kim and Wilkinson both discuss legal professionalization in early New York. Kim describes the political consequences of trained lawyers displacing lay magistrates in the 18th c. Wilkinson argues that medical confidentiality laws were developed by lawyers, not doctors-a consequence of lawyers reforming state evidence laws in the nineteenth century. Other papers explore the historical development of rights and privileges. Ingram examines how the Washington administration created executive privilege as constitutional argument. McDowell describes how 19th c. lawyers, judges, and laymen engaged with posse comitatus participation. Finally, Pfander explores how judges shifted from common law to constitutional law protections to protect citizens during wartime.


Presentations:"Safe and Proper to Disclose": The People, The President and Executive Privilege at the FoundingScott Ingram, High Point University

'Custodians of the Life of the Republic': The Law of Posse Comitatus, Delegated Sovereignty, and Masculine ObligationScott McDowell, University of Minnesota

Creating Confidentiality: The Origins of Physician-Patient Privilege in the United StatesMiles Wilkinson, University of Oregon

Living Dicey's Nightmare: The Rule of Law in Times of WarJames Pfander, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law

The Contest between High and Low Law in Pre-revolutionary New YorkSung Yup Kim, University of Louisiana at Lafayette

New Developments for American WorkersCRN: 8 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Rebecca Zietlow, University of Toledo College of Law

Description:This salon examines a number of recent developments for American workers. One paper studies the passage of minimum wage increases in a number of American cities to explore the relationship between multiple, overlapping levels of legal jurisdiction. Another paper seeks to understand how low-wage workers in Washington D.C. understand their mistreatment and legal rights. Yet another paper analyzes changing modes of labor organizing in the Trump-era, particularly the intersection of labor organizing and immigrant justice. A final paper considers whether a guaranteed jobs program can address the needs of working class Americans.


Presentations:Workers’ Rights and Wage Theft: Rights Consciousness and Disputing Among Low-Wage Workers in Washington, D.C.Matthew Fritz-Mauer, University of California, Irvine

94

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

New Forms of Worker Solidarity: Barriers and PossibilitiesCRN: 8 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Charlotte Garden, Seattle Univ. School of Law

Description:This panel focuses on emerging forms of worker solidarity. Presenters will consider organizing traditionally un-organized workers, emerging models of union organizing, or both. One paper focuses on union organizing in the creative sector, and another on what unions and shared governance have to offer university faculty in the US. A third paper seeks to explain the perception that customers lose out when workers organize. A fourth paper - an ethnography of new organizing partnerships in Chicago - considers an emerging "tripartism" in the US.


Presentations:Faculty Unionization, Shared Governance, and Academic Freedom: Can they be “Inextricably Linked”?Risa Lieberwitz, Cornell University

Organizing the State: An Empirical Study of Collaborative Labor and Employment Rights Initiatives in ChicagoCesar Rosado, IIT Chicago-Kent College of LawMichael Oswalt, Northern Illinois College of Law

Nudging, Co-governance, and Regulation of Private ActorsFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel addresses regulatory challenges arising from developments in the structure of the economy, such as the rapid growth of AirBnB in the housing market, and peer-to-peer (off-grid) trading in the energy market. It also discusses under which conditions it is legitimate for legislators to nudge people into making more prudent choices, for example with regard to pensions, or to use "insincere rules" for purposes of traffic regulation - and it discusses public participation in legislative processes and developments of models for co-governance.


Presentations:'Dismantling Lucas and Everything Else: The Modern Fifth Amendment Challenge to Home-Sharing Regulations'Daniel Breen, Brandeis University

Automatic Enrollment of Federal Public Workers in Complementary Pension Plan: Judicial Review of Libertarian Paternalism in BrazilThaís Luiz, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Collaborative Governance – Can it Bypass an Outdated Legal Framework?Varda Shiffer, The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute

Insincere EvidenceMichael Gilbert, University of Virginia

Pitching Scholarly Work to Public Audiences: Translational Research in ActionCRN: 9 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Jules Netherland, Drug Policy AllianceNazlee Maghsoudi, International Centre for Science in Drug Policy

Participant(s):Nicole Lemire Garlic, Temple UniversityJennifer Peirce, John Jay College of Criminal Justice & CUNY Graduate CenterMelissa Hamilton, University of Surrey School of LawLiz Chiarello, Saint Louis UniversityHadar Aviram, UC Hastings College of the LawRob Nicholls, UNSW Business SchoolAndjela Kaur, 2014Susan Silbey, MIT

Description:In a political climate in which expertise is devalued and "alternative facts" and "fake news" have become common catchphrases, sharing scholarly research with broad audiences is critical. Socio-legal scholars are increasingly heeding the call to engage in translational research, but face challenges determining where and how to pitch their work. The purpose of this workshop is to help scholars frame their work for public audiences by helping them to develop short, concise presentations that clearly convey the work's import and can be used to develop longer, publicly-oriented presentations like TED talks. The workshop will consist of a selected set of "Ignite" talks-five-minute long talks during which slides automatically advance-after which presenters will receive critiques from faculty liaisons working in the U.S. and Canada. These experts will then lead a general discussion centered on pitching work for

95

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

public audiences. The workshop will be led by Jules Netherland, Ph.D. who is the director of the Office of Academic Engagement at the Drug Policy Alliance and Nazlee Maghsoudi, BComm, MGA, Ph.D. Candidate who is the Knowledge Translation Manager at the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy.

Policing and Political Theory II CRN: 27 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Eric Miller, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Discussant(s): Benjamin Berger, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Description:Starting from the perspective of political theory, a new wave of criminal justice scholars have revived the long-dormant political question of how to justify the police within the apparatus of state punishment and state authority. The police gain their authority to intervene, including to deploy force, because of their role as state or municipal agents. In acting as the police, they act in their role as public officials authorized by the laws of the relevant jurisdiction that confer the legal power to act as they do.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law Enforcement

Presentations:Police Force and Police AuthorityEric Miller, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Policing NecessityFrançois Tanguay-Renaud, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Technology in Law Enforcement and Implications for Communities of ColorKami Chavis, Wake Forest University School of Law

The Ambiguity of "the" PoliceChristoph Burchard, Faculty of Law, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Prison Labor CRN: 8 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth


Description:This panel focuses on prison labor, with presenters bringing critical race and historical lenses to bear. One paper will sketch a broader outline of unfree labor in the US, arguing that the state has a range of punitive tools with which to compel work. Another paper considers penal agribusiness in Canada, arguing against prison slaughterhouse work. A third paper shows that black workers have historically been excluded from US labor reforms, and that this exclusion continues. A fourth paper illustrates why it is unhelpful to think of prisons as either public or private, drawing from the case of Isreal. The final paper considers how the 13th Amendment sets a floor for prison conditions, drawing on the case of Louisiana.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:(Un)Free Labor in the Carceral State: From Prison Labor to Traffic TicketsNoah Zatz, UCLA School of Law

Land, labour, animals: Penal agribusiness in Canadian prisonsKelly Struthers Montford, University of Alberta; University of Toronto

Slavery Revisited in Penal Plantation LaborAndrea Armstrong, Loyola University (New Orleans) College of Law

Still Hungry for the Fruits of Their Own Labor: The Long History of Black Laborers and Legal Reform in the United StatesKaaryn Gustafson, UC Irvine School of Law

The ILO’s Prohibition of Private Forced Prisoner Labor: A View from IsraelFaina Milman-Sivan, University of Haifa

Private Law and Transnational Legal OrderingCRN: 36 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Edward Cohen, Westminster College

Description:This panel addresses the role of private actors and private law from a transnational perspective. Papers address the role of non-state actors and the making non-state law, the role of digital companies in creating legal norms, corporate hybrids in transnational governance, lobbying in international lawmaking, and political actors in the making of private law conventions.

96

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:Corporate Hybrids and Public ResponsibilitySwati Srivastava, Humboldt State University

Innovative approaches to rights over plant genetic resources: the struggle for ownership and sustainabilityHanna Haile, McGill University, Faculty of Law

Pluralist International Lobbying LawMelissa (MJ) Durkee, University of Washington School of Law

The Duty to SabotageTamara Lave, University of Miami

Property Policy ImpactCRN: 49 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Esther Sullivan, Univ. of Colorado Denver

Description:Ownership of real property comes with a bundle of socio-legal-economic rights that have been recognized by governments to varying degrees. This panel examines the extent to which national and international policies impact and re-arrange the property holding regimes around the world.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Engineering Sustainable Socio-Environmental Systems through Property Rights? Comparing Capitalist Kenya and Socialist EthiopiaJames Krueger, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Farmers’ Value Perspectives in Multi-Level Governance: The Farmland Bank Program in Ishikawa Prefecture, JapanMaiko Nishi, Columbia University

Geographies of property and territory in struggles for communal land rights in the Eastern Cape, South AfricaDaniel Huizenga, York University

The Great Property Fallacy: Theory, Reality, and Growth in Developing CountriesFrank Upham, New York University

Psychology of Criminal Justice ActorsCRN: 4 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Eugene Borgida, University of Minnesota

Discussant(s): Shari Diamond, Northwestern U Law School/American Bar Foundation

Description:Psychological science examines the psychological bases of how people think, feel, and act, including the social nature of judgment and decision-making. When combined with sociolegal theories the discipline allows for the study of the effect of law woven through society and the effect of society woven throughout law. This panel features law, society, and psychological science perspectives on juries and jury decision-making. We explore the process by which lawyers question and select jurors. We also address jurors' responsiveness to certain information including battered spouse history, biological evidence, anger-based expressions among attorneys, and police-civilian fatalities. Together these talks address the systemic forces that shape who serves on juries and how these panels of peer decision-makers affect verdicts.

Primary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:Battered Spouse Syndrome Judgments: The Role of Imminent Harm PerceptionsColin Holloway, University of Nebraska, LincolnRichard Wiener, University of Nebraska

Closing with Emotion: Expressing Anger Helps Male Attorneys, but Hurts Female AttorneysJessica Salerno, Arizona State UniversityHannah Phalen, Arizona State UniversityRosa Reyes, Arizona State University

Lawyers and Jurors: Interrogating Voir Dire Strategies with Conversation AnalysisCatherine Grosso, Michigan State Univ. College of LawBarbara O'Brien, Michigan State Univ. College of Law

The Contradictory Effects of Biological Determinism on Judgments of WrongdoersNick Schweitzer, Arizona State University

Understanding Jurors’ Reluctance to Convict in Cases involving Police Officers who Kill Minority CiviliansJennifer Hunt, SUNY Buffalo State and Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy

97

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Race and Law in the International Context CRN: 12 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Laura Kwak, York University

Description:This panel explores topics of race and law throughout the world--specifically in Canada, Brazil. Sweden, Israel and Argentina.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Collect, shuffle and select: Constructing coherent sentence stories and ethnic/racial differentiation from courtroom interactionTorun Elsrud, Linnaeus University

Law and Racial Mediation: Role and Efficacy of Anti-Racism Law as Mediator of Racial Relations on Contemporary BrazilGislene Santos, Universidade de Sao Paulo

MP Douglas Jung, the Canadian Bill of Rights, and Citizenship Regulation: Legal Exclusion through Inclusion on the Canadian Racial LandscapeLaura Kwak, York University

Nothing LEFT - The Israeli Ashkenazi Left: A Story of HypocrisyClaris Harbon, McGill University

The Puzzle of Profiling: Stereotypes and Social MeaningDelfina Beguerie, Yale Law School

Reconstructing Property and Planning: Indigenous Jurisdiction and Challenges to Settler-Colonial Property Relations in Canada, Australia, and New ZealandFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair(s): Amar Bhatia, Osgoode Hall, York University

Discussant(s): Andrée Boisselle, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:This session examines challenges to settler colonial-property relations through assertions of Indigenous jurisdiction in the context of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Indigenous

environmental law, planning, and cultural heritage protection are explored to consider how property relations are being reconstructed to transform relations with land and place in both urban and rural contexts. The papers in this panel build on critical property theory, Indigenous legal theory, legal geography, and environmental justice scholarship to examine how state law and legal systems respond to such assertions in the context of private property, "public" space, and cultural heritage. In particular, the panelists critically consider existing structures for consultation and negotiation in light of assertions of Indigenous law and property relations.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Extracting Indigenous Environmental Jurisdiction: Aggregate Mineral Extraction, The Duty to Consult, and Indigenous Environmental Governance on Private Property in OntarioEstair Van Wagner, Osgoode Hall Law School

Historic Crossroads: Negotiating Indigenous Rights to Govern the Sea in the Northern Territory of AustraliaLauren Butterly, Australian National University

Planning, Culture, Tenure: Conceptions of Land as PropertyKate Galloway, Bond University

Property’s potential: Indigenous claims to “public” city spacesAlexandra Flynn, University of Toronto

Regulating Biomedical Research and TechnologyCRN: 9 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Susan Shapiro, American Bar Foundation

Description:This session examines the legal and ethical issues accompanying biomedical research. Authors explore issues that arise with increasingly complex systems of biomedical and pharmaceutical research, including biological samples, intellectual property claims tied to genetic information, and questions of regulation. With increasingly high stakes tied to academic research, authors consider how cases of research fraud and examine systems for managing academic misconduct. Questions of how to best balance legal regulation with academic autonomy are also explored.

98

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Fraud in researchNachman Ben-Yehuda, Hebrew UniversityAmalya Oliver-Lumerman, Hebrew University

Pharmaceuticalization and Intellectual Property Law in Biomedical Sector: Comparative Study of Gene Patent Policy and its Implication in the US, EU and KoreaChul Choi, Hankuk Univ. of Foreign Studies, Law School

Religion, Secularism and the Limits of FreedomFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Description:From culture to law, religion remains a contested, and under-theorized, subject in legal studies. This panel will illuminate the contours of religion as a category of analysis across a range of legal systems in which debates on religion put into stark relief the political work of secularism, freedom, and law.

Secondary Keyword: Religion and Law, Religious Studies

Presentations:An Analysis of Competing Conceptions of Religion in Israeli Supreme Court JurisprudenceDavid Zeligman, Emory University

Religious Freedom and LGBTQ Rights: A Post-Secular Understanding of the Culture WarsMark C. Modak-Truran, Mississippi College School of Law

Secularization is Done. Laicity is Not.Theófilo de Aquino, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Trinity Western University’s Community Covenant and Contemporary ContractsConnor Steele, University of Ottawa

Rethinking Foreign Interventions in the Twentieth Century: New Legal PerspectivesFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel explores critically legal and philosophical justifications for the use of force, which are linked to the responsibility and duty to protect the most vulnerable populations against threats of violence and extermination. In so doing, it reflects critically

on the role of the United Nations Security Council in authorizing foreign interventions.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: War, and Armed Conflict

Presentations:Comply to Buy: The Role of International Humanitarian Law in Justifying the Sale of ArmsDavid Hughes, University of Michigan

Enabling or Constraining? A Sociological Perspective on the Question of United Nations Security Council AccountabilityBen Murphy, School of Law & Social Justice, University of Liverpool

Using International Law and International Organizations to Build "Resilience": Successes and RisksCora True-Frost, Syracuse University College of Law

World Peace Through Law: the Origins of Global Governance in Legal Idealists’ Fight to End WarJoseph Conti, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Rights, Identities and LGBTQ-InclusionCRN: 17 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This session explores how LGBTQ inclusion has changed in a variety of contexts. This includes curriculum, public spaces, and religion.

Primary Keyword: Rights and IdentitiesSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Anti-Gay Curriculum LawsClifford Rosky, University of Utah

Disability, Dignity, and HIVJeff Kosbie, Northwestern University

Gender and ObjectivityDavid Cruz, USC Gould School of Law

Religious Belief and the Queer Classroom: Measuring the Impact of Religious Affiliation on LGBTQ-Inclusive Education PracticesDonn Short, University of Manitoba

99

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Sex Work at the Crossroads: New Books in the FieldCRN: 6 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Megan Rivers-Moore, Carleton University

Participant(s):Amber Dean, McMaster universityJulie Ham, University of Hong KongJulie Kaye, University of SaskatchewanMegan Rivers-Moore, Carleton University

Description:This panel aims to put recently published books on sex work in conversation. Each author will discuss their own book, but will be required to make links between their own work and the other books on the panel. The panel will highlight new trends and themes in cutting edge sex work research.


Terrorism and LawFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:Papers address responses to terrorism in terms of the murky crime of 'material support'; surveillance of dissent; post-9/11 terrorism trials; community policing; and suspicious transactions reporting

Primary Keyword: Terrorism, National Security

Presentations:Counter-Radicalization and Community Policing: the Lessons not LearnedFahad Ahmad, Carleton University

Legal Culture and the Rule of Law in the Context of Post-9/11 Terrorism TrialsMihaela Serban, Ramapo College of New JerseyFrancesca Laguardia, Montclair State University

Re-Defining the Situation: Self-Representation and Expressive Contestation in Criminal TrialsAsad Kiyani, University of Victoria

Risk, Financial Crime, and Real Estate: An Examination of Suspicious Transaction ReportingVanessa Iafolla, University of Waterloo

The Right to Have Rights: Contesting Precarious Legal Status in Scholarship and PracticeCRN: 2 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair(s):Miranda Hallett, University of Dayton

Participant(s):Sharry Aiken, Queen’s University Faculty of LawIdil Atak, Ryerson UniversityKathleen Sexsmith, Penn State UniversityErin Simpson, The Law Offices of Erin Simpson

Description:In this roundtable, we will engage with the praxis of immigrants' rights organizing today through dialogue between local activists and scholar-advocates. Participants will speak about their transformative work and share critiques of the legal and social exclusions faced by transnational migrants in Canada and in the Americas more broadly. We will explore the possibilities for collaboration between academics and social change leaders to foster "the right to have rights" (Arendt 1968). In the 21st century, a primary driver of inequality is legal exclusion from citizenship through immigration laws. These systems reproduce risks, costs, and suffering for many transnational migrants.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

The Rise and Fall of Family LawFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Robert Leckey, McGill Univ. Faculty of Law

Description:The panel will consider the historical contingencies and exceptionalism of the legal field of Family Law, It will consider its historical development as a distinct field of legal regulation, in both the English common law and the Quebec Civil Code. It will also consider the non-inevitablity of contemporary regulation, exploring questions of how familial relationships, particularly, the restructuring of financial and parenting relationships, could be regulated differently.

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and ChildrenSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Constituting Family and Employment in Nineteenth-Century English Legal ThoughtLuke Taylor, University of Toronto

100

Friday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. F

rida

y

Family Recoding: Relationships of Interdependency in Private LawRégine Tremblay, University of British Columbia

Office HouseworkMartha Ertman, University of Maryland Law School

The Role of Law in Promoting Markets and the Public InterestFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, New York University Abu Dhabi

Description:This session examines how diverse legal institutions can facilitate – and sometimes discourage – economic liberalism. Research presented here focuses on corporate governance and wealth management contracts in China, on "social value" procurement policy and (anti?) competitive business practices in Britain, and on the State as public service provider.

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:Austerity law: the revival of the social by UK local government?Richard Craven, University of Leicester

Redefining Normal CompetitionKonstantinos Stylianou, University of Leeds

The Business Action Of The Third Sector In The Way Of The State ManagementBruno Valverde Chahaira, Univ Federal de RondôniaMarta Beatriz Tanaka Ferdinandi, Cesumar University

What we do and do not know about standard form contracts? An empirical view of wealth management product agreements in ChinaQin Zhou, City University of Hong Kong, School of Law

The Role of Local Communities in Shaping Environmental PolicyFriday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Anna-Maria Marshall, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Description:This session examines local participation against mining in

Colombia, oil and gas projects in Africa, and energy extraction in Canada and the U. S. The papers raise important questions about limits on the role played by local communities, the efficacy of procedural mechanisms for achieving environmental justice, and the legitimacy of current regulatory processes. In addition, the papers address what conditions lead to the mobilization of local communities to actively resist environmental projects and what political strategies might be most effective to overcome environmental inequalities.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Local Communities, Community Development and Natural Resource ProjectsIbironke Odumosu-Ayanu, University of Saskatchewan

The Institutional Activation of Popular Consultations in Latin America: Environmental Protection through Political ParticipationDiana Rodriguez-Franco, Dejusticia (Center for Law, Justice and Society)

The Role of Movements and Legal Opportunities in Shaping Environmental Justice PolicyKay Jowers, Duke NIEPS & UNC-CH Sociology

The ‘Ideal’ Victim and the ‘Grateful’ Refugee: Challenging Representations of Victimhood and Culpability at the Crossroads of Refugee Law and International Criminal LawCRN: 23 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Frédéric Mégret, McGill University

Discussant(s): Mark Drumbl, Washington and Lee

Description:Representations of victims of mass crime and representations of refugees commonly share certain features. The innocence and dependence of victims and refugees is emphasized in a bid to redact messiness and complexity. 'Ideal' victim and 'grateful' refugee features are constructed to fit neatly within fixed categories assigned by law. Despite the assumptions built into such strict categorization, individual identities as victim, as perpetrator, as bystander, as migrant and as refugee tend to be fluid and, at times, overlapping. Struggles against imperialism and dominance and struggles for social, economic, and environmental justice are often at the heart of this fluidity and multiplicity. In this panel, we aim to explore these struggles, understand their disciplinary interaction, and tease out how they play out in practice.

101

Friday , 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m..F

rid

ay

Primary Keyword: Crime and VictimizationSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Producing ‘good’ citizens: Precariousness and the refugee as the subject of permanent visibility.Anne Neylon, University of Liverpool

The Construction of the ‘Ideal Victim’ and the ‘Grateful Refugee’Christine Schwobel-Patel, University of Liverpool

The Ideal PerpetratorVincent Dalpé, McGill University Faculty of Law

The Ideal Refugee – Vulnerable Victim or Resilient Agent?Stephanie Motz, University of Lucerne

The Victim-Perpetrator at the Intersection of International Criminal Law and Refugee Law: A Comment on the Perpetuation of False Binaries in Ezokola v. CanadaRandle DeFalco, University of Liverpool

Theoretical Perspectives on Work and RegulationCRN: 8 Friday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This comparative panel will discuss the transformation in work regulation in the twenty-first century. Panelists will consider the economic, social & legal dimensions of work contracts in an effort to develop a sociology of labour law, and question whether the "gig" economy is truly a transition from past work relationship. Panelists will discuss the evolution of labor law in France from primarily focusing on workers' rights and protecting against the arbitrary authority of the employer towards protecting companies and the legal security of business. Panelists will consider the development of legal doctrines governing agency work in the UK and the specific techniques that constitute and shape the doctrinal ambiguity of that law.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Contractual Limbo: A Doctrinal Genealogy of the British Law Relating to Agency WorkMoritz Neugebauer, University of Kent

Labor Law in France (1892-2017): A Historical SociologyLaurent Willemez, University Versailles

Access to Justice and Human Security: Cultural Contradictions in Rural South AfricaCRN: 13 Friday Session 2A, 10:00 a.m. - 10:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Davenport

Author(s): Sindiso Mnisi Weeks, Univ. of Massachusetts Boston

Chair(s): Penelope Andrews, Univ. of Cape Town Faculty of Law

Reader(s):Heinz Klug, Unversity of WinsconsinDee Smythe, University of Cape Town

Description:This Author meets Reader session will focus on the research and scholarship leading to the publication of Access to Justice and Human Security. Cultural Contradictions in Rural South Africa. The author, Sindiso Mnisi Weeks is Assistant Professor in Public Policy of Excluded Populations in the School for Global Inclusion and Social Development at the University of Massachusetts Boston, USA. She previously served as a senior researcher in the Centre for Law and Society at the University of Cape Town, where she worked on the Rural Women's Action Research Programme combining research, advocacy and policy work on women, property, governance and participation under customary law and the South African Constitution.engage with the author on her publication.

Secondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Authoritarian Legality in China--Laws, Workers and the StateCRN: 33 Friday Session 2B, 11:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: DavenportChair(s): Rachel Stern, University of California, Berkeley

Reader(s): Kathryn Hendley, University of WisconsinBenjamin Liebman, Columbia UniversitySida Liu, University of Toronto

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 2A10:00 a.m. - 10:45 a.m .

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 2B11:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

102

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Michael McCann, University of WashingtonEthan Michelson, Indiana University

Description:Authoritarian Legality in China (CUP, 2017) explores whether law can strengthen authoritarian rule. China has legislated some of the most protective workplace laws in the world, but who uses them? This book examines patterns of legal mobilization, and finds that workers with high levels of education are more likely to claim these new rights and be satisfied with the results. However, many others are disappointed with the gap between law on the books and law in reality, and reject the courtroom for the streets. Using workers' narratives, surveys, and case studies of protests, Gallagher argues that China's half-hearted attempt at rule of law construction undermines political stability. New workplace rights fuel workers' rising expectations, but a dysfunctional legal system drives many workers to strikes, demonstrations and violence.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Emergency, Bureaucracy and the Management of Populations: On "Living Emergency: Israel's Permit Regime in the Occupied West Bank"CRN: 15 Friday Session 2B, 11:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Maple West

Author(s): Yael Berda, Harvard University

Chair(s): Lisa Hajjar, University of California – Santa Barbara

Reader(s):Rawia Aburabia, Hebrew University of JerusalemNoura Erakat, George Mason UniversityLisa Hajjar, University of California – Santa BarbaraAlexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, Univ. of HaifaDarryl Li, University of Chicago

Description:The legal toolkit for the management and control of indigenous population developed and diffused in colonial states, creating a repertoire of technologies of rule. preventing freedom of movement and access to land, classification as threats to the state and the criminalization of entire civilian populations are principles of this administrative arsenal. Israel's permit regime in the Occupied West Bank is an exemplary remnant. In 1991, the Israeli government introduced emergency legislation canceling the general exit permit that allowed Palestinians to enter Israel. The directive, effective for one year, has been reissued annually ever since, turning the Occupied

Territories into a closed military zone. Today, Israel's permit regime for Palestinians is one of the world's most extreme and complex apparatuses for population management.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Terrorism, National Security

(In)visible International LawCRN: 23 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Sarah-Jane Koulen, Princeton University

Description:What do we see when we look at international law (IL) and its institutions? Surely, a desire to be visible. Commitments to ‘transparency’ and justice that is ‘seen to be done’ are invigorated by e.g. architecture, YouTube, art exhibitions, and films, which contribute to IL’s physical and virtual optic presence. Simultaneously, IL’s visibility is a means to obscure. Institutions and professionals cultivate authoritative distance, secrecy and anonymity. Physical walls, protected information, and controlled public presence advance the communication of selective messages. This panel explores the glitches in IL’s imagery; behind the façade, in between the aesthetic and the functional, the present and the evanescent, the visible and the invisible. The panel is the twin submission of ‘speaking international law’, sharing a multimodal take on IL.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:(In)visibility and the paradox of transparency at the International Criminal CourtJillian Dobson, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

(In)visible International: Power, Knowledge and Legitimacy in the Fight for Judicial ReformAnastasia Tataryn, University of Liverpool

Ephemeral Stars: Visions of International Criminal Judges and ProsecutorsImmi Tallgren, Centre for International Studies, London School of Economics

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 312:45 p.m. - 2 :30 p.m .

103

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Extraterritoriality and its Ontological Politics: How Geometry and Cartography came to encrypt International AuthorityNikolas Rajkovic, Tilburg Law School

International Law in Concrete – institutional architecture in Brussels and The HagueSofia Stolk, T.M.C. Asser InstituteRenske Vos, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Access to justice in Asia and the Americas ICRN: 1 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Discussant(s): Bruno Rezende, UNESA

Description:Considering the geographical boundaries of the CRN1, this session covers challenges to access to justice, considered broadly as the access that citizens have to dispute resolution systems including but not limited to courts, but also to civil and administrative processes that might impact on protecting rights. Papers might include discussions on access to justice on its two dimensions: procedural access and also substantive justice. Examples dealing with issues of effective access to justice, reductions in costs, legal aid services, access to lawyers and access to courts and the efficaciousness of a justice system in meeting the dispute resolution needs of its citizens are welcome.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Access to Justice in the Sphere of Labor Courts in Brazil - Free Legal Services BenefitsElaine Oliveira, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Access to Justice of the Poor in Brazil: Can we Hope in the Protagonism of the Supreme Brazilian Court?Ruy Walter Junior

The Guarantee of Access to Justice for the Poor and Vulnerable in BrazilGiselle Beran Medella D Almeida, Univ Estácio de Sá

The Right to Counsel in Housing Court: A Moral, Social, and Economic ImperativeJared Fink, Temple University Beasley School of Law

Animals, Law and SubjectivityFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Angela Harris, UC Davis

Description:This session interrogates law's anthropocentric endorsement of foundational cultural myths that exceptionalize (paradigmatic) humans over all other species. Focusing on more-than-human animals through the lens of feminist and other critical theory, the papers discuss the possibilities for contesting animals' property status and legal non-subjecthood. The papers critically address questions of violence and subjectivity and law's responsibility to our multi-species communities and the individual, often feminized, animals exploited therein. Highlighting recent pro-animal legal developments worldwide as well as the routine violence against animals in industrialized agriculture and otherwise, the papers explore the cultivation of just interspecies legal orders through an intersectional analysis of human exceptionalism.

Primary Keyword: ViolenceSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Connecting alienated labour: Should non-human animals have a right to work?Charlotte Blattner, Queen's University

Feminism and Veganism – Questions of JusticeHeather McLeod-Kilmuray, University of OttawaAngela Lee, University of Ottawa

Mother’s Milk: Law and Animal ParenthoodJessica Eisen, Harvard Law School

The Save Movement and Farmed Animal Suffering: Can the Law Bear Witness?Maneesha Deckha, University of Victoria

Art, Knowledge, and PropertyFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Art and the Law

Presentations:A Refugee Truth Commission: Doing Justice for State CrimeJennifer Balint, The University of Melbourne

104

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Exploring Reconciliatory Potential of International Criminal Law Through Creative MeansMarina Aksenova, IE University (Madrid, Spain)

Protection of contemporary art: a challenge for the lawAlejandra Molano Bustacara, Universidad de los Andes

Between Law and Society in Contemporary South AfricaCRN: 13 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Description:This panel engages with a range of contemporary Southern African research problems at the intersection of law and society. All of the projects seek to problematise and, in some cases, reconceptualise the role we ascribe to law in relation to intractable social and political issues, including child marriage, service delivery protests, violence against women, and criminal justice and traditional justice reform.

Primary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law & Society

Presentations:Rural Women's Land Rights: making claims at the crossroadsNolundi Luwaya, University of Cape Town

The 'Tools' of Reshaping the Law on on Child Marriage in Southern Africa: Reflecting on Law Reform, Campaigns, Policy Windows and Intractable ProblemsMoult Kelley, University of Cape Town

To find Quarrel in a Straw: Everyday Indignities and the Policing of Incivility in South AfricaDee Smythe, University of Cape Town

Understanding Protest in Constitutional South AfricaJameelah Omar, University of Cape Town

Comparative Farmworker Law in Asia: Can Human Rights Fulfill the Post-Colonial Promise?CRN: 26 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Carleton

Participant(s):Thiem Hai Bui, Institute for Legislative StudiesLeigha Crout, Cornell UniversityWallace Huang, Cornell Law School

Description:Some Asian States contrasted themselves with colonial regimes

with their visions for pulling landless rural workers out of poverty. Nevertheless, post-colonial reform and struggle in Asia rarely focused on improving the situation of farmworkers as a vulnerable group. As a result, farmworkers bore the brunt of globalization and developmentalist states. This failure of the post-colonial vision results from a regulatory "perfect storm:" farmworker legal protection sits at the intersection of agricultural exceptionalism, the shadow economy, and dis-regulated low-wage migration. The presenters are developing a collaborative research agenda through a series of papers examining the legal protection and extreme subordination of farmworkers in Asia with a goal of developing a human-rights-based discourse on the management of agricultural labor.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Competing Goals of Tax PolicyCRN: 31 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Anthony Infanti, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Description:Tax Policy serves many goals, including goals which are occasionally at odds with one another. The papers on this panel consider a variety of tax policy objectives and how the law serves those objectives.


Presentations:An Egalitarian Basic IncomeAri Glogower, The Ohio State University - Moritz College of Law

Hurricanes and the Uninsured: Another Blow to the Middle ClassNancy Shurtz, University of Oregon School of Law

Race and Residency: Tuition and State Taxes in the 1960sCamille Walsh, University of Washington Bothell

The Law and Political Economy of Tax Point TransfersRory Gillis, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

105

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Conditions of the Criminal System in Historical ContextCRN: 44 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Benjamin Levin, University of Colorado Law School

Discussant(s): Gabriel Chin, UC Davis School of Law

Description:This panel illuminates historical moments that have helped shape the contemporary criminal system. Sara Mayeux frames the Warren Court revolution as a state-building project in which stakeholders sought to use new rights to circumvent the limitations of American federalism. Sarah Seo examines the history of warrantless automobile stops, offering a new lens for debates over civil asset forfeiture and stop-and-frisk policies. Aya Gruber maps the discourse of gender crime, tracking the development of feminist criminal law reform. Thomas Frampton delves into the history of the non-unanimous criminal jury, and explores constitutional challenges that emerge from this examination. Ion Meyn examines how the development of procedure insulated "criminal haves" from the "civil haves," which facilitated inequality within each procedural forum.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:10 Angry Men: The Hidden Histories of Non-Unanimous Criminal VerdictsThomas Frampton, Harvard Law School

From the Automobile Exception to Stop-and-FrisksSarah Seo, University of Iowa College of Law

The Feminist War on CrimeAya Gruber, University of Colorado

The Haves and Have-Nots of ProcedureIon Meyn, University of Wisconsin Law School

The Warren Court in Historical Perspective: Criminal Procedure as a State-building ProjectSara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University

Constitutional Structure and Gender Equality: New Directions in U.S. and Canadian JurisprudenceCRN: 7 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Jennifer Koshan, Faculty of Law, U of C

Chair/Discussant(s): Deborah Dinner, Emory Univ. School of Law

Description:This panel examines hot topics in the constitutional jurisprudence of Canada and the United States, of urgent significance for gender equality. The panel asks how constitutional structure as well as substantive rights explicitly and implicitly shape the social experience of gender. The individual papers develop accounts of the relationship between gender and federalism in Canada; examine Canadian abortion jurisprudence in light of democratic theory; interrogate the constitutionality of a tax on feminine hygiene products; and analyze the regulation of transgender identity expression as speech.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence Secondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Presentations:Canadian Federalism and State MasculinitiesKerri Froc, University of New Brunswick

Is the Tampon Tax Constitutional?Bridget Crawford, Sch of Law, Pace University

Race, Gender and Reconciliation in Canadian LawCaroline Hodes, University of Lethbridge

Right to Reproductive Autonomy : Can abortion be limited in Canada ?Louise Langevin, Laval University

Teaching the Heckler’s Veto of Transgender StudentsDara Purvis, Penn State Law - University Park

Constructions of Victimhood in Legal ArenasFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session



Presentations:An Examination of Victim Characteristics in Death-Eligible CasesDana Radatz, Niagara UniversityTalia Harmon, Niagara UniversityDavid McCord, Drake University

Chronicles of Inequality: Black Felons, Black Victims and the Liberal Incognizant TrapItay Ravid, Stanford Law School

Of Specimens and the Forensic Body: Probing R v. Barton and a Failure of Forensic ScienceMarcus Sibley, Carleton University

106

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Domestic Work and Workers (IRC 43)CRN: 8 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Rebecca Zietlow, University of Toledo College of Law

Description:This panel considers the law governing domestic workers through a comparative and theoretical perspective. Sociological studies reveal that domestic workers are concerned about hours and scheduling. The panel will discuss the historical treatment of domestic workers in the US and Argentina and discuss initiatives to further their legal rights. Those initiatives include recent amendments to the law in Argentina governing domestic workers intended to ensure equality between the rights of domestic and other workers and local efforts in the United States to enhance domestic workers' rights. The panel will also consider the promise of sectoral bargaining for domestic workers under US law, who tend to work in informal relationships in the employers' homes and thus are unable to engage in collective bargaining with their employers.


Presentations:Informing Policy Change: Hours, Scheduling and Rights Awareness for Direct Care Workers in the HomeElizabeth Nisbet, John Jay CollegeJennifer Craft Morgan, Georgia State University, Gerontology Institute

Serving in the Master's House: Legal Protection for In-Home Care Workers in the USRichard Michael Fischl, University of Connecticut School of Law

The Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: The Case of Domestic Workers in ArgentinaLorena Poblete, CIS-CONICET/IDES

Environmental Justice, Sustainable Development and the Social Pillar: Intersections and Critical PerspectivesCRN: 23 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Discussant(s): Dayna Nadine Scott, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:Sustainable development is now the overarching framework

for environmental governance and a potential alternative to the dominant economic development paradigm. It requres balancing of three pillars: economic, environmental and social. But what does social development mean? The social pillar intersects with human rights as many of the basic needs are expressed in rights language. This session will critically examine the complex interactions among different forms of injustices that intensify environmental injustice and the novel legal strategies that have been or can be deployed to combat these injustices. The papers seek to develop a more robust conception of environmental justice and its relationship to human rights and sustainable development through the social pillar of sustainable development.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Climate Change-related Ecohealth Considerations for EIA in Inuit TerritoriesKonstantia Koutouki, Université de Montréal

Relational Theory and International Law: Re-imagining tools for environmental and climate justiceSara Seck, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Resource Extraction, Environmental Justice, and the Rights of Women and GirlsPenelope Simons, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Common Law

Responsibility about environmental damage in Justice Court of São Paulo: an analysis from Iris Young’s concepts of political responsibility and guiltyRenata Elias, Universidade de São Paulo

Vulnerability, Climate Justice and Climate Displacement: The Future of Small Island States and their PeopleSumudu Atapattu, University of Wisconsin Law School

Examining the Implementation of Politicized Discourse(s) in LawCRN: 6 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Chris Bruckert, University of Ottawa

Description:This panel explores the imposition of normative narratives on sex workers through regulatory practices and other mechanisms in different national settings.

107

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)

Presentations:Not in My Backyard: Municipal Responses to the Decriminalization of Sex Work in New ZealandDana Hayward, Yale University

Sexualized Nationalism and Imperial Legacy in Benjamin Perrin’s 'Invisible Chains'Elya M Durisin, York University

The Socio-Legal Regulation of Sex Work in Mexico City, 2001-2016Oralia Gómez-Ramírez, University of British Columbia

From Farms to Action. When Food and Water Sovereignty meet the Law.CRN: 23 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Anna Chadwick, University of Glasgow Tomaso Ferrando, University of Bristol School of Law

Discussant(s):Laura Gutierrez Escobar, Universidad del RosarioMargherita Pieraccini, University of Bristol

Description:Since the triple-F crises, there has been urgent calls to reform the global food system. However, the narrative of 'feeding the World in 2050' – which is shared by international organizations and transnational businesses alike – is rooted in the assumptions of commodities exchange, productivism, global value chains, contract farming, exploitation of the commons and appropriation of indigenous knowledge. This panel explores geographies and forms of bottom-up resistance against the global commodification of food and water. India, Mexico, Guatemala, financial markets and the UNESCO Convention become spaces for mobilization and engagement, innovation and alternatives. If transnational law constructs food as a commodity, is it possible to build an alternative food system from within? Maybe, a food transition also requires a legal transition.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Presentations:Countering Commodification: Commodity Derivatives and Freedom of ContractAnna Chadwick, University of Glasgow

Financing Food Insecurity? Microfinance, Gender, and Agrarian Change in GuatemalaRyan Isakson, University of Toronto

Mezcal: The brave drink of gods and peoples in resistanceGerman Sandoval, Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas UNAM

Narratives of Water Dispossession Bottled Water: the struggle between human rights and commodificationDiego Bonetto, Sciences Po Law School

Global Corporate CrimeFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair(s): Joe McGrath, University College Dublin

Discussant(s): Michael Benson, University of Cincinnati

Description:This panel gathers together different perspectives and contradicting narratives on the supervision, criminalisation, and enforcement of corporate and financial obligations. It elaborates an architecture of over-criminalisation and under enforcement, of too much discretion and too little transparency, of stricter standards for imposing criminal liability standing in tension with increasingly influentiual procedures for settling corporate prosecutions altogether.

Presentations:A Common Regulatory Experience: Different Starting Points but a Shared DestinationJoe McGrath, University College Dublin

Culture and White Collar CrimeClaire Hill, University of Minnesota Law School

Punishing Privilege: An Empirical Analysis of Race, Gender, Status and Punishment for Federal White Collar Crimes in the USDeirdre Healy, University College Dublin

Situational Crime Prevention, Regulation, and the Problem of Controlling White-Collar and Corporate CrimeMichael Benson, University of Cincinnati

Indigenous Women and Gendered Racialised ViolenceCRN: 34 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


108

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Description:Integral to the colonial project of dispossession was the gendered, racialised violence that Indigenous women experienced. The presentations in this panel consider the continuities of such violence in the contemporary moment from a range of geographical and theoretical perspectives.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Intersections, Layers and Divergent Viewpoints on Indigenous Women's Rights: A Case of Tanzania.Miriam Zacharia Matinda, The University of Arizona James E Rogers College of Law

Parenthood, Punishment and the Ongoing Colonial Project: The Criminalisation of Indigenous Mothers' Parenting Practices in Aotearoa New ZealandFleur Te Aho, The University of AucklandJulia Tolmie, University of AucklandKatherine Doolin, University of Birmingham

The Politics of Redress and Racial Gendered Violence: The Case of Val-d'OrCarmela Murdocca, York University

Infectious Disease and LawCRN: 9 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair/Discussant(s): Trevor Hoppe, University at Albany, SUNY

Description:Governments have responsibility to address illness alongside the power to regulate individual behavior in the presence of infectious disease. How to best monitor disease, provide care, and limit risk remain complicated challenges for legal systems, particularly as they work within and across nation-states. This panel explores these issues as they relate to HIV/AIDS and antibiotic resistance. Addressing specifically questions of measurement, international collaboration, funding, and provision of care, these papers highlight the ways that policy can both address and amplify inequality.


Presentations:A Human Rights-Based Numeric Model for Analysis of Health Policies/ Prevention Programs for HIV/AIDS Infection Among Injecting Drug Users (IDUs)Ali Bahrani, University of Massachusetts-BostonKamiar Alaei, State University of New York- Albany

Addressing the Obstacles to an AIDS-Free GenerationSteven Johnston, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Can International Law be a Successful Tool Against Antimicrobial Resistance?A.M. Viens, University of Southampton

HIV, Human Rights and Cost-effectivenessSara Davis, NYU Center for Human Rights and Global Justice

Institutional Practices Shaping Citizenship and RightsCRN: 2 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Arjen Leerkes, WODC / Erasmus University

Description:The meaning of citizenship is being renegotiated in liberal democracies around the world. Much of this renegotiation occurs in bureaucratic and judicial institutions, rather than through conventional legal instruments such as the legislature. Case studies from the UK, Greece, Europe and Israel illustrate the role of nontraditional institutions that establish and sometimes alter the meaning of citizenship. Particular attention is paid to the citizenship status and rights claims of vulnerable immigrant groups in these ostensibly liberal nations, including minorities and other migrants who fall outside of protected migrant categories.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Belonging and State Practice: The Bureaucracy of Citizenship ApplicationsDevyani Prabhat, University of Bristol Law School

Citizens-Enemies: Israeli Military Courts and the Bureaucratic Designation of Dangerous PopulationsSmadar Ben-Natan, Tel-Aviv University

Realizing Rights: Examining the Implementation Lag in European Migration LawTobias Eule, University of Bern

109

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Institutions and TechnologiesCRN: 18 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Elena Brodeala, Yale Law School/European University Institute

Primary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute ResolutionSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:An Institutional Theoretic Path to the Argument of "Institutional Capacities"Maíra Almeida, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Contract Justice: Dissolving the Hostility Between Contractual Autonomy and VulnerabilityLyn Tjon Soei Len, University of New Hampshire

One size does not fit all: Impact of consumer vulnerability on online disclosure designJoasia Luzak, University of Exeter

The ANATEL's role in universalizing Internet accessSara Silva Raimundo, Federal Univ. of Rio de JaneiroDominique Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ

The Deficit of Public Reasoning in Commercial ArbitrationCornelis Baaij, Yale Law School

International Court Relations with National Courts and Other ActorsCRN: 36 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel empirically investigates how international courts interact with national courts and other actors in different regions and subject areas. Papers address the resistance of national courts to the European Court of Justice; environmental protection in three African regional courts; inter-court dialogue with the Interamerican Court of Human Rights on indeginous rights; and international criminal courts and their relation to different agents. This interaction can be viewed in terms of the dynamic transnational production and resistance to legal norms.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Secondary Keyword: Judges and Judging

Presentations:Cross-Border Legal Services between the U.S. and Mexico in the NAFTA (and NAFTA 2.0?) Era.Alberto Abad Suarez Avila, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas UNAM

Revisiting Judicial Empowerment in the European Union: Fallacies of Empowerment, Practices of ResistanceTommaso Pavone, Princeton University

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ judicial-dialogue: a Grounded Theory analysis on its indigenous peoples rights case lawBruno Pegorari, Getúlio Vargas Foundation School of Law

Law and Society Publishing at the Crossroads: A Roundtable on Past, Present and Future Challenges Encountered by Law and Society PublicationsCRN: 33 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel


Chair/Discussant(s): Rebecca O'Rourke, Cambridge Univ. Press

Participant(s):Carl Stychin, City University of LondonBenjamin Berger, Osgoode Hall Law School, York UniversityDavid Engel, University at Buffalo, SUNY, School of LawMarc Hertogh, University of GroningenLiora Israël, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, ParisJohn Harrington, Cardiff UniversityChristopher Schmidt, Chicago-Kent College of LawJeannine Bell, Indiana University Maurer School of Law — BloomingtonMargot Young, University of British ColumbiaSusan Sterett, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyNicola Glover-Thomas, University of Manchester

Description:This roundtable will bring together a panel of journal and book series editors to discuss the various challenges faced by law and society publications and how these might be overcome. The panel will cover a number of topics starting from a discussion of the fundamental challenges of publishing an interdisciplinary journal or book series and ways to encourage innovative scholarship. The panel will also cover day-to-day practical challenges encountered by editors including the quality of submissions, language editing and the role of peer reviewers. The panel will go on to discuss challenges inherent in the changing publishing environment such as Open Access, data

110

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

transparency and responsible content sharing. This panel aims for an open discussion and hopes for as much participation as possible from the audience.

Law, Lawyers and Demographic Trends in East AsiaFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Setsuo Miyazawa, University of California Hastings School of Law; Aoyama Gakuin University Law School

Discussant(s): Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie University

Description:The papers explore a diversity of issues related to the theme and include topics such as Chinese legal development assistance in developing countries, elders' rights to development and human dignity, the reform of the supervisory system in China, the prison pathways in the super-aging society in Japan, and the public trust gap between central and local governments in China and beyond.

Primary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Presentations:Aging Society at the Crossroads of Liberalism, Protectionism, Confucianism and State Paternalism: Socio-legal Construction of Elderhood as Childhood?Amy Huey-Ling Shee, National Chung Cheng University

Authoritarian Legality and Public (Dis)trust in Law: China and BeyondAlisha Kirchoff, Indiana University - BloomingtonEthan Michelson, Indiana University

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lawyer Disciplinary System in Japan: A Study on "Repeaters"Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie University

Japan's Evolving Legal ProfessionDaniel H. Foote, The University of Tokyo

Law at the Demographic Crossroads: Prison Pathways in a Super-Aging SocietyCarol Lawson, Australian National University

Lay Participation in Belgium, France, Spain, Canada, and Georgia: Exploring Similarities and DifferencesCRN: 4 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Nancy Marder, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law

Participant(s):Marie Comiskey, University of TorontoClaire Germain, Levin College of Law, Univ. of FloridaMar Jimeno-Bulnes, Universidad de BurgosNikolai Kovalev, Wilfrid Laurier University

Description:Lay participation holds significant attractions for democratic countries and those aspiring to democracy. These attractions help to explain why countries such as Belgium, France, Spain, Canada, and Georgia have introduced lay participation into their criminal justice systems. In some of these countries, lay participants serve on traditional juries, in which they work together to reach a verdict, and in other countries, lay participants served on mixed courts, in which they work with professional judges to reach a verdict. This round-table will explore the ways in which lay participants in each of these countries are used and will examine the similarities and differences. The goal of this round-table is to cut across borders and to find new connections in the role of the lay participant in the twenty-first century.

Primary Keyword: Lay Participation, Juries and Other Forms of Lay ParticipationSecondary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)

Legal Aesthetics, Legal MaterialitiesCRN: 22 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Pratiksha Baxi, Center for the Study of Law and Governance

Description:The panel explores the relationship between law and visuality at four intersecting yet incommensurable registers – the repressed aesthetic histories of constitutional law, the poetics of the aesthetic history of a court, the regulation of images of protests and the poetics of legal aesthetics as sensory and sensuous. In this exercise, the encounter between the legal and the aesthetic necessitates an asymmetrical form in which neither categories dominate. Instead the encounter suggests that the lines between aesthetic and the legal is constitutive of the legal regime which it seeks to 'represent', 'recall', 'regulate',

111

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

or 'effect'. Building on this understanding, the proposed panel seeks to interrogate the manifold ways in which these encounters are made possible in the everyday and compels us to the consider their role in mobilizing a p

Primary Keyword: Art and the LawSecondary Keyword: South Asia, South Asian Studies, South Asian Law and Society

Presentations:Evidence-Making and Claim-Making: How ‘Dossiers of Memory’ Challenge Enforced Disappearances in PakistanSalman Hussain, Max Planck Institute for Social

Anthropology, Law and Anthropology DepartmentLaw, History and Memory in the Calcutta High CourtRahela Khorakiwala, Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, New Delhi

Spatial Artefacts as Legal Artefact: An Observation from IndiaShailesh Kumar, Birkbeck, University of London

Speaking Nearby: Pictures and Words in the Constitution of IndiaMani Shekhar Singh, O P Jindal Global University

Visualising the Streets of Protests – Considering the Ban on Jantar MantarSwastee Ranjan, University of Sussex

Legal Geography IV:The space of (in)justice and migrants' rights in North and Central AmericaCRN: 35 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair/Discussant(s): Ariadna Estévez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Description:The session addresses Edward W. Soja's idea of spatial (in)justice, which contends that wealth and poverty are geographically distributed along the lines class, race and gender, and this characterizes the political organization of space. Through this, some peoples are subjected to "locational discrimination", that is, the deprivation of rights due to specific geographical location. The session presents six case studies of spatial injustice and locational discrimination in which violence forces people to flee and become migrants, migrants become trapped in spaces of violence and death. The cases address migration in the North America and Central American regions.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:Central American Children Seeking Asylum in Mexico: Identifying the Bare Life of Young Homo SacerElisa Ortega-Velazquez, UNAM

Centro American Migrants in the Border of South of Mexico: Spaces of Violence and “Without Law”Guillermo Castillo, IGg UNAM

Exploring the Arbitrariness of the Decision-Making in Asylum Seeking Process through the Subjectivity of Asylum Officers of COMARRocío Castillo, Universidad Iberoamericana

Inventing Home and Belonging in the Transnational Context of Migration in MexicoSara McKinnon, University of Wisconsin-Madison

The necropolitical Production of Forced Migration at the US-Mexico BorderAriadna Estévez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Life of the Law - Pitching Scholarship to Media (A Workshop)Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Cedar

Participant(s): Nancy Mullane, Life of the Law

Description:You've published years of research an now it's time to get it disseminated! To a wide audience!Get tips on best practices for reaching out to media to get tour scholarship in the news. Meet one-on-one with professional award-winning journalists and producers from Life of the Law. Come prepared to pitch your exciting scholarship for a possible story and they'll be ready to listen and provide individual feedback.

Methods CafeFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel


Participant(s): Susan Silbey, MITRonit Dinovitzer, University of TorontoRobert Nelson, American Bar Foundation/Northwestern UniversityLynn Mather, SUNY Buffalo Law SchoolLawrence Friedman, Stanford University Law SchoolJustin Richland, Univ of Chicago/American Bar FoundationMona Lynch, UC IrvineVictor Quintanilla, Indiana University

112

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Description:These tables will provide feedback on methods of empirical analysis by experienced socio-legal scholars. Each table will focus on a particular method or approach: qualitative research including interviewing and data analysis; participant observation and ethnography; surveys and quantitative data analysis; comparative approaches to sociolegal research; techniques of sociolegal history; empirical studies of race and empirical critical race theory; and different approaches to studying courts, trials, and judging. Discussion will emphasize strengths and limits of the approach, strategies for dealing with limitations, and best practices for using the method effectively. Participants will be invited to ask about methodological issues and engage in discussion about methodological challenges.

Susan Silbey: "The Promise and Pitfalls of Qualitative Data Analysis." This table describes approaches to research using qualitative methodology, considering their strengths and pitfalls. Potential topics include participant observation, conversational interviewing, and ethnographic approaches. Focus will be on building theory, basics of research design, and common strategies for dealing with limitations in these approaches.

Ronit Dinovitzer and Robert Nelson: "Surveys and Quantitative Data Analysis." What are the theoretical and methodological challenges and opportunities in taking a survey approach? Focus will be on techniques of survey design and analysis, as well as best practices for quantitative data analysis.

Lynn Mather: "Comparative Approaches to Socio-Legal Research." No matter your topic area, you are influenced by questions of the effect of place – localities, states, nations, regions - on experiences and outcomes. This table examines how to make questions of place explicit in research, asking how one should structure a comparative project. What are the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches?

Lawrence Friedman: "Techniques of Socio-Legal History." What can one learn from applying law and society insights and methods to historical data? How does one use historical data effectively? How can law and society research contribute to our understanding of the past, and how can understanding the past contribute to law and society research?

Mona Lynch and Victor Quintanilla: "Empirical Studies of Race and Empirical Critical Race Theory." How do empirical approaches generate, elaborate, and test theories of race, racism, and the law? What does it mean to take an empirical approach to Critical Race Theory? What are the specific challenges and promises of research designs that look at race and racism explicitly?

Justin Richland: "Discourse and Linguistic Analysis." Fields such as linguistic anthropology and sociolinguistics have

developed useful methods for studying language in context. These methods range from techniques for observing courtroom interactions through analysis of transcribed materials (including everything from daily conversation to highly structured oral arguments). Such linguistic techniques are also applicable to written texts – which are also produced and used in social contexts.

New Developments in Comparative Corporate GovernanceCRN: 46 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair/Discussant(s): Darren Rosenblum, Pace Law School

Description:As different jurisdictions find new approaches to handle crucial economic changes, studying and understanding these comparative contexts sheds light on all contexts of comparison.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Exploring the Merits of Industrial Democracy in Canada: Can Employees' Say enhance the Long-Term Sustainability of Companies?Alberto Salazar, Carleton University, Department of Law and Legal Studies

Financial Regulation: Bank Recovery and Resolution Regime in BrazilDaniel Arruda, FGV

Financial Restatements in Canada: Regulatory, Corporate Governance, and External ResponsesPoonam Puri, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

The Chinese Mandatory Bid Rule — Comparative and Empirical PerspectivesChao Wang, Chinese Univ of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law

The Judicial Approach to Business JudgmentAndrew Keay, School of Law, University of LeedsJoan Loughrey, University of Leeds

113

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Palestine, Indigeneity, Natural Resources, Life and International LawCRN: 23 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): Markus Gunneflo, Lund University

Description:This session discusses indigeneity, natural resources, life and international law in the context of Palestine from an interdisciplinary perspective.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State Formation

Presentations:Normalizing torture: How did torture become a systematic practice in the Palestinian Occupied Territories (OPT)Lina Saba-Habesch, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Outside the Law: A Critical Appraisal of Israel's Shoot-To-Kill PolicyNoura Erakat, George Mason UniversitySarah Ihmoud, Boston University

Pacifying Food (In)securityMia Tamarin, University of Kent

Policing and Political Theory ICRN: 27 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair/Discussant(s): Eric Miller, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Description:While the institution of punishment has received a great deal of attention from political theorists, the institution of the police and the activity of policing has received much less philosophical attention. However, a new generation of political theorists are working to develop theories of the police and policing that both identify the nature of the police and the normative character of policing on the street.


Presentations:Crime LicensesJoshua Bowers, University of Virginia School of Law

Plainclothes Policing and Judicial RegulationNirej Sekhon, Georgia State University College of Law

Risk Assessment and Evolving Technologies of Crime PreventionVincent Chiao, University of Toronto

The Constable's BlunderAlice Ristroph, Brooklyn Law School

The Constitution and Criminal ProcedureMalcolm Thorburn, University of Toronto

Toward a Normative Theory of Law EnforcementGabriel Mendlow, University of Michigan

Race, Gender, and RightsFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair/Discussant(s): Onur Bakiner, Seattle University

Description:This panel examines race and gender and how they collide with criminal law in conventional and unconventional ways.

Primary Keyword: Race and EthnicitySecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:Coercing Women’s Behavior: A Mandatory Pre-Abortion Ultrasound Viewing Law in ActionKatrina Kimport, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health

Crossroads of Law at the Agency Level: How Early Interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Intersected to Create Social ChangeJennifer Woodward, Middle Tennessee State University

Third World Rights Consciousness: Filipino Labor Activists in Two ErasMichael McCann, University of Washington

Understanding the Gap in Self-Reported Offending by Race: A Review and Critical AssessmentTracy Sohoni, Old Dominion UniversityErica Bower, Old Dominion UniversityGraham Ousey, College of William and Mary

114

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

White Deputies Draped in Blue: “Blue Lives Matter” and the Racial BribeJamie Longazel, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY

Race, Space, and Justice: Strategies and Challenges of Sustainable IntegrationFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Audrey McFarlane, University of Baltimore School of Law

Description:Racial segregation in housing, education and access to employment are silent, ever present realities. Complicating the issue further is that cities and suburbs are evolving. Gentrification is scattering the evidence of inequality and poverty to the peripheries of metropolitan regions and to the collective public consciousness. In the face of these complex realities, what are the best ways to address the consequences of segregation? Cities are laboratories of the variety of responses. This panel will explore the viability of a variety of strategies to create racially and economically sustainable communities: the solidarity economy, inclusionary zoning & leveraging cultural capital, charter schools, and mixed income housing.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:Gentrification and Urban Schools: A Story of Racial Segregation, Displacement and DissolutionErika Wilson, UNC SChool of Law

Impact Transaction: Incluzionary Zoning as a Model for Equitable Small Business DevelopmentPatience Crowder, Denver Law

The Properties of Integration: Mixed Income Housing as Discrimination ManagementAudrey McFarlane, Univ. of Baltimore School of Law

Towards A Solidarity Economy Approach to Community Economic DevelopmentRenee Hatcher, John Marshall Law School

Racial Inequality in the USCRN: 12 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair/Discussant(s): Matthew Patrick Shaw, Vanderbilt Peabody College

Description:This panel explores the intersection of race and immigration law, including the relationship between honor killings and the Muslim ban, sanctuary for undocumented immigrants, DREAMers, veterans, and the politics of private immigration detention centers.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)

Presentations:A DREAM Denied: The Effects of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) on Educational Attainment among Undocumented YouthMatthew Patrick Shaw, Vanderbilt Peabody College

Cognitive Biases, Racial Inequalities, and Students’ Rights to Due ProcessJason Nance, University of Florida Levin College of Law

Discarded Loyalty: The Deportation of Immigrant VeteransDeenesh Sohoni, College of William and Mary

The Wealth of Black FolkTerry Smith, DePaul University College of Law

Reflections on Vulnerability Theory: Retrospective/Prospective IFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Jen Hendry, University of Leeds

Discussant(s): Aziza Ahmed, Northeastern Univ. School of Law

Participant(s):Martha Albertson Fineman, Emory UniversityStu Marvel, Emory Law SchoolRachel Rebouche, Temple University Law SchoolMitchell Travis, University of Leeds

Description:This will be the first in a set of panels to review and discuss the scholarly impact of vulnerability theory. Vulnerability is understood as the universal and constant susceptibility to change, both positive and negative, in human physical and social wellbeing over the life course. It is human vulnerability and the dependency it inherently entails that compels the creation of institutions and relationships, from the family to

115

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

international regulatory structures. What does this reality mean for law and theories of justice? Participants will draw from various theoretical and doctrinal backgrounds to overview the development of vulnerability theory, and will reflect on its current application and possible steps for the future. Please join us for this retrospective and prospective discussion on rethinking the vulnerable subject of law.

Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Risk ClassificationFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Individuals are classified according to risk in all stages of the criminal justice process, from policing to pretrial, sentencing, imprisonment, release, and community supervision. This session asks, how is risk conceptualized, measured, assessed, managed, and deployed? Papers use a range of methodological approaches to study risk in international comparison, dangerous offender designations, immigration detainees, terrorist de-radicalization programs, pretrial reform, and big data.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Framing for ReleaseLauryn Gouldin, Syracuse University College of law

How Big Data is Reshaping Criminal RiskPaula Maurutto, University of Toronto

Indeterminate Sentencing at a Crossroads? An Analysis of R v Boutilier and its Impact on Designating Dangerousness in Canada.Alison Yule, Univ. of British Columbia Faculty of Law

National Context and the International Mobility of Ideas: Conceptions and Theories of Risk Across BordersKaitlyn Quinn, University of TorontoAshley Rubin, University of Toronto

Security, Politics, and the Law: Ethnographic, Critical, and Historical PerspectivesCRN: 50 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Discussant(s): Lisa Hajjar, Univ. of California – Santa Barbara

Description:This panel theorizes security as a set of discourses and practices that are intertwined with politics and the law and that are produced and contested not only within the security state but also globally and locally. What is the role of the law in shaping security? How does security circulate transnationally? What does it mean to live with and in a "security state"? What is the relationship between colonial histories of surveillance and the current "security moment"? How does security interact with other forms of control such as crime control? Bringing together different theoretical approaches and methodologies, we aim to open new conversations about security as a historical and current formation that shapes and is shaped by context-specific legal and political processes and that travels from the state to the context of everyday life.

Primary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictSecondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Presentations:Evidencing Conspiracy: Hearsay, National Security Fictions, and the Origins of al-Qa'idaDarryl Li, University of Chicago

Surveillance and a new militancy in (Indian) KashmirChitralekha Dhamija, Jawaharlal Nehru University

Suspected Lives: Toward a Comparative Ethnographic Approach to SecuritySilvia Pasquetti, Newcastle University

The “Legalisation” of State Violence and its Perverse EffectsLisa Stampnitzky, University of Sheffield

Socio-legal Perspectives on Agenda 2063 and the African UnionCRN: 13 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Fola Adeleke, University of Witwatersrand

Description:This panel comprises papers presenting socio-legal perspectives on the Agenda 2063 of the African Union.

Presentations:Challenges and Prospect of Realising the Agenda 2063 in Nigeria: Case Study of the Igbo and Yoruba Societies of NigeriaImam-Tamim, Muhammad Kamaldeen, Univ. of IlorinDibugwu Ogbonnanya, Abia State UUniversity

116

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rida

y

Equity or Pipe Dreams: Gender and Inclusive Development under the African Union’s Agenda 2063Charlotte Kabaseke, Wuhan University

Navigating Beyong the Crossroads: A Gendered Approach in Actualizing Agenda 2063Anuoluwapo Durokifa, Univ. of Fort Hare South AfricaEdwin Ijeoma, University of Fort Hare

Teaching to Transgress? The Dynamics of Law and Society in AfricaCRN: 13 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Elgin


Discussant(s): Leslye Obiora, University of Arizona

Participant(s):Raymond Atuguba, University of Ghana, LegonJonathan Klaaren, University of the WitwatersrandLeslye Obiora, University of ArizonaAzubike Onuora-Oguno, University of Ilorin

Description:Are there context-relevant methodologies for teaching and conducting research on law and society in Africa? Scholars on law and society have debated the applicability of the transplantation of western methods and theories in investigating, researching and teaching on issues pertaining to the African continent. This roundtable brings together leading scholars on law and society across the globe to interrogate existing debates on teaching and research on African issues. This roundtable aligns with the conference theme as it explores the multiple crossroads scholars and students of law and society in Africa constantly navigate. Panelists will explore questions on epistemological development, and suggests ways to move the agenda ahead.

Secondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

The Influence of Politics on Regulatory ProcessesCRN: 5 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair(s): Annemieke van den Dool, University of Amsterdam

Discussant(s): Justin Rex, Bowling Green State University

Description:This panel examines the scant, but emerging study of the

relationship between politics and regulatory processes and outcomes at a variety of levels including the state, national, and international levels. The authors will discuss a variety of political influences including the ability of interest groups to shape regulatory decision-making and outcomes in a variety of areas including law enforcement, aviation regulation, banking, and endangered species regulation.


Presentations:Good Partners or Unsafe Actors? Private Regulation of Aviation Safety Within Airline Code-Share AgreementsRussell Mills, Bowling Green State University

Implementing Regulatory Policy under Competing Interest Group PressureChristopher Carrigan, George Washington University

Markets, regulation and drug law reformToby Seddon, University of Manchester

The Complexity of Revolving Doors in Regulation: Evidence from the American StatesColin Provost, University College London

Whither Politics? Operationalizing Political Influences on Compliance and EnforcementJodi Short, UC Hastings College of the Law

The Present and Future of the Right to Health in an International PerspectiveFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Description:This panel explores recent domestic and international attempts at giving concrete meaning to the "right to health," by examining how local actors have seized international legal instruments to denounce public health scandals, act upon health emergencies, and increase the awareness of private and public actors on critical health issues. Examples are taken from a wide variety of regions, from the United States to Europe and Japan.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:Organ Trafficking, the Unaddressed Issue: Government’s Response in the Light of International LawMst Kanij Fatima, La Trobe University

117

Friday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Realizing the Right to Universal Health Care in MassachusettsApril Jakubec, University Massachusetts BostonGillian MacNaughton, University of Massachusetts

Boston, School for Global Inclusion and Social DevelopmentMariah McGill, Northeastern University School of Law

U.S. and Canadian Access to Justice I: Cross-national PerspectivesFriday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Alyx Mark, North Central CollegeRebecca Sandefur, Univ of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Discussant(s): Colleen Shanahan, Temple University Beasley School of Law

Description:In this session, panelists from American and Canadian institutions will discuss innovative research in the access to justice field, including scholarship on a variety of methods of civil legal services provision.


Presentations:Marketing Nonlawyer AssistanceElizabeth Chambliss, University of South Carolina School of Law

Studying the "New" Civil JudgesAnna Carpenter, University of Tulsa College of LawAlyx Mark, North Central CollegeColleen Shanahan, Temple University Beasley School of LawJessica Steinberg, George Washington University Law School

The Significance of Legal Information for Meaningful Access to Justice: Findings from a Three Year Longitudinal Study of 600 Canadians with Family or Rental Housing ProblemsLesley Jacobs, York University

What are the Benefits of Comparing the African-American Struggle in the United States to the Dalit Struggle in IndiaCRN: 12 Friday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Leaside

Chair(s): Kevin Brown, Maurer University, School of Law

Participant(s):Andrea Freeman, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa William S. Richardson School of LawDarrell Jackson, University of Wyoming College of LawLalit Khandare, Pacific UniversityLuis Fuentes Rowher, William S. Richardson School of Law

Description:As anyone who does comparative inequality scholarship quickly learns, oppression and subordination are local. They depend upon the history and experience of a particular group, at a particular time, in a particular place. When comparing the struggles of African-Americans with that of Dalits, we are looking at two different groups in societies with radically different histories and cultures. Despite the fact that we are dealing with different forms of oppression of different groups, there are a number of benefits that those committed to Dalit liberation and African-American liberation can derive from engaging in this cross-cultural dialogue about the nature of their different forms of oppression. Some of these benefits will occur to both groups, but due to the differences in the socially constructed nature of each group's oppression, it

Primary Keyword: DiscriminationSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

The BRICS-Lawyers’ Guide to Global CooperationCRN: 1 Friday Session 3A, 12:45 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Peel

Author(s): Denis De Castro Halis, Faculty of Law / Univ of MacauRostam J. Neuwirth, Univ of Macau, Faculty of LawAlexandr Svetlicinii, University of Macau

Reader(s):Fernanda Duarte, UNESA e INCT/InEAC/PROPPI/UFFRafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEACAsya Ostroukh, University of the West IndiesDavid Ritchie, Mercer University

Description:In the international trade and development arena, new and developing economies have created a block that is known as BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Initially conceived to drive global change through economic growth,

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 3A12:45 - 1:30

118

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

the financial crisis and reversal of fortunes of the BRICS nations have raised questions about their ability to have an impact on the governance of global affairs. This book explores the role of law in various areas of BRICS cooperation including: trade, investment, competition, intellectual property, energy, consumer protection, financial services, space exploration and legal education.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and Law

Innovation and the State: Finance, Regulation, and JusticeCRN: 5 Friday Session 3B, 1:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Peel

Author(s): Cristie Ford, University of British Columbia Faculty of Law

Reader(s): Saule Omarova, Cornell Law School Christine Parker, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne

Description:From social media to mortgage-backed securities, innovation carries both risk and opportunity. Groups of people win, and lose, when innovation changes the ground rules. Looking beyond formal politics, this new book by Cristie Ford argues that we need to recognize innovation, and financial innovation in particular, as a central challenge for regulation. Regulation is at the leading edge of politics and policy in ways that we have not yet fully grasped. Seemingly innocuous regulatory design choices have clear and profound practical ramifications for many of our most cherished social commitments. Innovation is a complex phenomenon that needs to be understood not only in technical terms, but also in human ones.


Access to Justice in Asia and the Americas IICRN: 1 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session



Description:Considering the geographical boundaries of the CRN1, this session covers challenges to access to justice, considered broadly as the access that citizens have to dispute resolution systems including but not limited to courts, but also to civil and administrative processes that might impact on protecting rights. Papers might include discussions on access to justice on its two dimensions: procedural access and also substantive justice. Examples dealing with issues of effective access to justice, reductions in costs, legal aid services, access to lawyers and access to courts and the efficaciousness of a justice system in meeting the dispute resolution needs of its citizens are welcome.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Disputes, Mediation, and Negotiation

Presentations:Independence and Impartiality in Latin American ArbitrationJuliana Perlingeiro, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Restorative Justice as an Instrument of a Citizens' Legal PracticeAna Claudia Pinheiro, Universidade Estácio de SáArthur Costa, Universidade Estácio de Sá

School Mediation as a Form of Facing and Preventing Conflicts Between Children and TeenagersClaudia Fleischhauer, Universidade Estácio de SáJuliana Araujo, Universidade Estácio de Sá

The Naming and Shaming of Vexatious LitigantsRabeea Assy, University of Haifa

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 3B1:45 p.m. - 2 :30 p.m.

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 42:45 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m.

119

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Challenges in Regulating the Algorithmic SocietyCRN: 37 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair(s): Andrew Selbst, Data & Society Research Institute

Discussant(s): Claudia Haupt, Yale Law School

Description:Algorithms are taking over society. Businesses use them to choose who to hire, lend to, or rent to. Governments rate public school teachers, employ predictive policing, and predict risk in bail, parole, and sentencing. Autonomous robots are being used in manufacturing, farming, war, food production, and soon, transportation. Algorithmic day trading dominates finance, and news feeds and search algorithms dominate our news consumption.

Algorithms are not neutral. Machines are tools that humans use outsource their decisions, and their use has consequences. While each of these sectors has its own regulatory difficulties, there are also similarities in the challenges posed by algorithms, machine learning, and artificial intelligence across domains. This session will discuss some of these challenges.

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart CityEllen Goodman, Rutgers University Law School

Bias In, Bias Out: Criminal Justice Risk Assessment and the Impossibility of Race-NeutralitySandra Mayson, University of Georgia School of Law

Machine Learning Versus Fault-Based LiabilityAndrew Selbst, Data & Society Research Institute

No Trust, Just Verify: Governance and Standards-Making in the "Fake News" DebateRobyn Caplan, Data & Society Research Institute, Rutgers University

The “What You Do, Not Who You Are” PrincipleKiel Brennan-Marquez, Georgetown Univ. Law Center

Challenging the Borders of Family and Family LawCRN: 7 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair(s): Janet Mosher, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Discussant(s): Ann Shalleck, American University Washington College of Law

Description:The papers for this panel critically interrogate the conceptual borders of 'family' and of 'family law', highlighting not only how these borders shape the research questions we frame and the education we offer our students, but their consequences for liberty, autonomy, and equality. The papers question which personal relationships are legally recognized and valued (e.g. who is recognized as a parent, or as extended family, when the state removes children from the care of same sex couples), and highlight how the narrow drawing of the domain of family law obscures the multiple forms of state intervention that regulate families (e.g. laws governing disability benefits, housing, food stamps, immigration, employment), constraining choice for some, while enabling it for others. An expansion of borders in conceptualizing family (law) is urged.

Primary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Presentations:Administering the FamilyClare Huntington, Fordham Law School

Freedom and Inequality in US Family LawTheresa Glennon, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Instrument Choice in Family Law: The Spousal Support Advisory GuidelinesJodi Lazare, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Invisible and Ignored: LGBT Parents in the Child Welfare SystemNancy Polikoff, American University Washington College of Law

New Frontiers in Family LawLaura Kessler, University of Utah

Climate Change: The Interaction of International Regimes and Market MechanismsFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair/Discussant(s): Fiona Haines, University of Melbourne

Description:Does the Paris Agreement hold great promise for multilateral climate cooperation or is it a "universalist illusion"? This session

120

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

explores that question from diverse angles. The Agreement rests on market mechanisms such as transfer of green technologies, which raises issues of patent law under TRIPS. The Agreement also rests on political support to achieve Nationally Determined Contributions and to even be accepted (witness the U.S. retreat). Moreover, what role do human rights in general and the particular needs of women (e.g. African Union Agenda 2063) play under the current international framework to address climate change?

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:"Compulsory Licensing" on Climate ChangeLivia Regina Batista, Universidade de Sao Paulo

Climate Change and Human Rights at The Crossroad—A Study on The Construction of Human Rights Approach to Climate ChangeChun-Yuan Lin, Chung-Yuan Christian University

Internationalizing Carbon Emissions Trading Through Linkage: The Contribution of Core Convergence CriteriaGerard Kelly, University of Liverpool

The Club Approach to Climate CooperationLing Chen, Centre for International Governance Innovation

The Law as a Shelter from the Storm: The Interface of Women and Climate Change Adaptation Law and Policy in the Era of Africa RenaissanceMichael Addaney, Research Institute of Environmental Law, Wuhan University

What We Talk About When We Talk About Energy: Upgrading America’s Energy Infrastructure to Combat Global Climate ChangeDevon Roberson, Temple University Beasley School of Law

Conjugal Slavery in War: Socio-legal Research on Aduc-tion for Forced Marriage in West and Central African Conflicts

Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Joel Quirk, University of Witwatersrand

Description:Abduction for forced labour and forced conjugal relations in war is not new: 'marriage by capture', slave raids, and kidnapping for conscription in conflict situations are documented across many historical periods and geographic locations. The papers in this panel bring together historical and contemporary research on abduction for forced marriage in Nigeria (Boko Haram), Sierra Leone, Uganda (LRA) and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Placing the contemporary phenomenon in historical context allows a critical examination of both marriage and access to justice. The session includes new work based on interviews and witness statements from victim survivors of abduction by insurgents.

Secondary Keyword: War and Armed Conflict

Presentations:A Historical Defence: ‘Historical’ Marriage by Kidnap as a Defence to Modern Day Forced MarriageEleanor Seymour, University of Birmingham

Access to Justice for the Victims of Sexual & Gender-based Violence in the Northeast, NigeriaUmar Umar, Development Research and Projects Centre

Belonging and Kinship: Children Born of War (CBoW) in Post Conflict Northern UgandaTeddy Atim, Feinstein International Center, Tufts University and York University, Canada

In Their Words: Recounting the Lived Experiences of Women and Girls in Armed Conflicts in Uganda and the DRCIzevbuwa Kehinde, Conjugal slavery in War Project, York University

They Told Me I was a Slave: Forced Marriage in Sierra Leone 1880-2012Sarah Delius, University of the Witwatersrand

Constitutional Theory Development in Asia and the America III CRN: 1 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Jairo Lima, University of Sao Paulo

Description:Societies in Asia and the Americas may seem to have nothing in common given their particularities; however, many countries in these two regions share similar historical and political experiences (e.g. dictatorships, revolutions, democratic mobilizations, civil rights or human rights problems, corruption

121

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

etc.) and interact more and more pushed by economic and cultural globalization. Nevertheless these geographically diverse societies, although very different in their current legal and political cultures, may also share constitutional and democratic values. This session intends to bring together scholars engaged in studying the evolvement of constitutional features, either regarding constitutional law or constitutional theory, related to these regional foci.


Presentations:Comparative Plenary PowersShalini Ray, University of Alabama School of Law

Laboratories of Democracy? State Constitutional Antecedents to Federal Constitutional RightsRobinson Woodward-Burns, Howard UniversityDavid Bateman, Cornell UniversityStephan Stohler, SUNY, University at Albany

Local referendums as devices for enhancing participatory democracyLeonardo Cofre, Universidad de Chile

Contesting the Indian Personal Law System: The Interplay between Law, Religion and GenderCRN: 22 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Sylvia Vatuk, University of Illinois-Chicago

Description:The personal law system in India is a contested yet dynamic field. Articulations of gender equality, religious autonomy and cultural identity and the agendas of multiple actors, including women's rights activists, religious community leaders and state institutions collide, intertwine and impact each other. This panel brings together papers to discuss issues of gender in the context of personal laws. The papers address questions such as: How has the Indian state negotiated, accommodated or resisted the competing claims? How has the Indian women's movement advocated for gender justice in this arena? How have Muslim women's networks carved out spaces in the sociolegal landscapes to challenge and reframe dominant ideas on gender and sexuality within Muslim marriages? And how have women's groups negotiated inter-religious marriages?

Primary Keyword: South Asia, South Asian Studies, South Asian Law and Society

Presentations:From Shah Bano to Shayra Bano: Accommodating and Navigating Personal Law, the Islamic Women’s Movement in India and the Indian Supreme CourtJhuma Sen, O. P. Jindal Global University

Legal Pluralism and the Governance of Inter-Religious Marriage in IndiaGopika Solanki, Carleton University

Litigating for Change: Feminist Legal Activism on Personal Laws in IndiaTanja Herklotz, Humboldt University Berlin

Negotiating Gender, Community and Citizenship: The Harmonization of Religious Family Laws in IndiaSaptarshi Mandal, Jindal Global Law School

Personal Law in India: Fact and FictionSachin Dhawan, Jindal Global Law School

Vying for a Gender Just Islamic Marriage Contract: Women’s Legal SpacesMengia Hong Tschalaer, City University of New York

Corporate Responsibility and Human RightsCRN: 46 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair/Discussant(s): Lisa Nicholson, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law

Description:This session explores the relationships between accountability, ethics, and compliance through the lens of corporations and corporate activity.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Corporate Accountability, Investment Arbitration and the Continuing Search for Justice for Victims of Corporate Human Rights Abuse: Urbaser et al. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26)Uche Ewelukwa, University of Arkansas School of Law

Duty of Care and Duty of Loyalty versus the Interests of Workers, Stakeholders and Creditors – under the Portuguese Legal FrameworkMarisa Dinis, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria

122

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Incentivizing legal compliance through a business case: when the state itself managerializes the lawLisa Buchter, Northwestern University/ Center for the Sociology of Organizations (Sciences Po Paris)

Is Corporate Governance Going to End Gun Violence?Anat Beck, NYU

Organizational Characteristics of U.S. Benefit Corporations: A National Empirical SnapshotEllen Berrey, University of Toronto

Criminal Justice in Asia and in the Americas IICRN: 1 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Helena Elias Pinto, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Discussant(s): Bruno Rezende, UNESA

Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to Criminal Justice in these regions. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments or social groups related to punishment, analyses of emerging trends in criminal legal theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems endemic to societies in either region regarding crime and punishment. Discussions related to International Criminal Justice are welcome as well.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:Innovation for the worse: Brazilian’s criminal legislative reform (1984-2017)Carolina Cutrupi Ferreira, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Making Prosecutors: Stories of Taiwan and BeyondShih Chun Chien, Stanford Law School

Miscarriages of Justice: Wrongful Conviction Cases in CanadaRegina Schuller, York UniversityKimberley Clow, Univ. of Ontario Inst. of Technology

Caroline Erentzen, York University

Who Judges? Designing New Jury Systems in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and SpainRieko Kage, University of Tokyo

Critical Approaches to Law and Contemplative ScienceFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Ruth Buchanan, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:Contemplative science is an important source of new knowledge. Its innovative methodology, emphasising first-person experiential perspectives, is transforming psychology and neuroscience, and prompting disciplines such as philosophy and ethics to revisit core tenets. Contemplative ideas, such as mindfulness, are increasingly influential within public policy processes. However, the implications for law, and socio-legal scholarship in particular, have not been systematically addressed. This panel fosters a critical dialogue between law and contemplative science, exploring how a contemplative approach potentially transforms deeply-held assumptions of legal discourse. How might a view of the subject as necessarily constituted through relationship lead both to different understandings of law, and innovative approaches to law and policy?

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Authorship and Interpretation: Contemplative Insights for Constitutional HermeneuticsBenjamin Berger, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Law in the Anthropocene: Reclaiming the Mindful Commons and the Attention Economy:Peter Doran, School of Law, Queens University Belfast

Towards a Relational Paradigm of Contemplative LawGavin Anderson, University of Glasgow

Deadly Force, Violence and Racial Inequality in PolicingFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Linden

Description:This session explores a variety of issues related to policing, including racial inequality, violence, and use of deadly force.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

123

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Presentations:Correctional Officer Training, Use of Force and The Reinforcement of Security and OrderAmy Klassen, University of Toronto

Exploring the Local Impact of Use of Deadly Force on Policing and Public TrustAnne Boustead, School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona

Policing, Violence and Visibility: An Ethnographic Analysis of Canadian Police Officer Experiences with Body Worn CamerasAmanda Glasbeek, York UniversityMariful Alam, York UniversityKatrin Roots, York University

Uncertain Chiefs, Skeptical Officers, and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in PolicingAndrew McCall, University of California, Berkeley

Decolonizing Law: Reflections on Strategies, Tactics and MethodsCRN: 23, 34 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Sujith Xavier, Faculty of Law University of Windsor

Discussant(s):Amar Bhatia, Osgoode Hall, York UniversityAmaya Alvez Marin, University of Concepción

Description:Law has played an active role in the dispossession and disenfranchisement of colonized people. Law and its various institutions are the means by which colonial, imperial, and settler colonial programs continue to be reinforced and sustained. This keynote event, co-hosted by the 'International Law and Politics' and 'Law and Indigeneity' CRNs, draws its momentum from the 'Decolonizing Law? Methods, Tactics & Strategies' conference, held at Windsor Law School in April 2018, on the territories of the Three Fires Confederacy of First Nations, comprised of the Ojibway, the Odawa, and the Pottawatomie (the territory that is now known as Canada). Exploring synergies and divergences relating to the meaning and scope of decolonization at the intersection of both Indigenous and Third World decolonial movements, the conference sought to transcend disciplinary boundaries and explore various conceptions of decolonization with scholars, writers, and activists working within and from the Global South and Indigenous communities. This special session brings together a group of participants and organizers to articulate and mediate on the possible teachings, lessons and reflections about the various decolonizations taking place at the intersection of both

Indigenous and Third World decolonial movements. Amaya Alvez, Amar Bhatia, Jeffery Hewitt and Sujith Xavier will begin by exploring some of the methods, tactics and strategies that were discussed at the conference in decolonizing law and its various institutions. They will then invite a group of panelists – Valerie Waboose, Paul D. Ocheje and Reem Bahdi – to reflect on the various strategies, tactics and methods they have used in their scholarship on decolonizing law.

Valarie Waboose, "Conducting Research from an Indigenous Lens"

Paul D. Ocheje, "Assailing the Colonial "Logic" of Laws and Constitutions: Sub-Saharan African States and the Prospects of Decolonization"

Reem Bahdi & Mudar Kassis, "Decolonizing Mastery and Gratitude? An Examination of the Aid Agency's everyday"

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Deconstructing Girlhood, Marriage and Humanitarian Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo and NigeriaFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Annie Bunting, York University

Description:Through original, qualitative and archival research, the papers in this panel explore colonial and contemporary debates about early marriage in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Nigeria; abduction for forced conjugal relations in the DRC and Nigeria; and the complexities of socio-legal interventions. The research presented interrogates the ways in which young women's sexuality is regulated not only through marriage and violence, but also through humanitarian intervention and justice mechanisms.

Secondary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictPresentations:

Access to Justice for Survivors of Sexual Violence in Conflict: Limitations and Potentials of Regional, National, and International InstitutionsHeather Tasker, York UniversityAnnie Bunting, York University

Alternative Narratives from Girls Associated with Armed Forces and GroupsSylvie Bodineau, Université Laval, Québec, Canada

124

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Child Marriage and AbductionLawan Balami, Develop. Research and Projects Center

De-constructing Girlhood, Development and Law: Examining Child Marriage in the Democratic Republic of CongoJen Katshunga, York University

Marriage and Slavery: Histories of Colonial Regulation and Activist Intervention in the CongoToni Smith, University of Birmingham

Wartime Forced Marriage and Spiritual Cleansing: Examining Experiences for formerly abducted girls in post-conflict Acholi region of UgandaAllen Kiconco, University of the Witwatersrand

Economic Life: Trust at a DistanceCRN: 44 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Errol Meidinger, SUNY Buffalo Law School/Baldy Center

Chair/Discussant(s): Susan Shapiro, American Bar Foundation

Description:This panel explores the legal dimensions of trust in economic life over geographic, economic, and social distance. We explore trust in divergent areas: in the 19th century U.S. economy, where lawyers built trust by working as agents; in Civil War Louisiana, where politicians sought to reenter the Union while compensating former slaveowners; in the small loan market of the early 20th century, where wage assignment developed trust between loan providers and working class borrowers; and, in a latter-day Ponzi scheme, in which the perpetrators bridged the legal, institutional, and cultural distances between their firm and its far-flung investors. Placing these diverse studies side-by-side offers new insights into the development of trust and the limitations that trust-based transaction at a distance places on its participants.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:Social Distance and Trust in a Recent Financial FraudCamilo Leslie, Tulane

Trust Me, I’m a Lawyer: Lawyers as Commercial Agents in Nineteenth Century AmericaJustin Simard, Northwestern University

Wage Assignments and the Problem of TrustAnne Fleming, Georgetown Law

“The Great Sacrifice They Have Made for the General Welfare”: White Louisianans Seek Compensation for Freed Slaves

Amanda Kleintop, American Bar Foundation

Emotions and Sexual OffendingCRN: 42 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Jennifer Kilty, University of Ottawa

Discussant(s): Hadar Aviram, UC Hastings College of the Law

Description:The papers on this panel examine an array of different avenues through which to consider the role of emotions in relation to the law as it is applied to specific criminal cases (in Canada, the US, and Australia) that involve different forms of sexual offending. Respectively, the five papers discuss how emotions structure judicial reasoning and legal argumentation as it occurs in criminal trials for those accused of sexual violence, the public and socio-legal construction of the chimeric sexual offender, mainstream media content and the tone of coverage in cases where the accused is on trial for HIV nondislosure, frontline counselling and labour in AIDS Service Organizations, and what a 'cold approach' to law can offer in terms of maintaining our 'critical capacities' to respond wisely and fairly to crimes of sexual offending.

Primary Keyword: Crime and VictimizationSecondary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:"Passion and Resentment" - Not at Work? The Church, Sexual Assault & Vicarious LiabilityJill Hunter, University of New South WalesPrue Vines, University of New South Wales

Counteracting Shame, Recognizing Desire: The Emotional Labour of Counselling HIV DisclosureJennifer Kilty, University of Ottawa

Emotional Storytelling: Sensational Media and the Creation of the HIV Sexual PredatorKatarina Bogosavljevic, University of OttawaJennifer Kilty, University of Ottawa

Offenders or Offending? Sex Crimes, Violence, and EmotionsRose Ricciardelli, Memorial University of Newfoundland

125

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Empirical Critical Race Theory (eCRT): Assessing the First Decade and Charting the Way ForwardCRN: 12 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Laura Gomez, UCLA Osagie Obasogie, University of California, Berkeley

Participant(s):Mario Barnes, University of California-IrvineMing Chen, University of Colorado Law SchoolKimani Paul-Emile, Fordham University Law SchoolVictor Quintanilla, Indiana University

Description:Since 2010 a group of scholars has gathered several times to explore how critical race theory and social science could be in deeper conversation with each other, as well as the ways in which that nexus might be challenging. We call our growing movement eCRT--Empirical Critical Race Theory. This roundtable convenes scholars from a range of disciplinary backgrounds, of varying levels of seniority, and with varying commitments to the project (e.g., founders, critics, accidental participants) to assess its contributions to date, to trouble the marriage between race theory and empiricism, to chart an agenda going forward, and to place eCRT within intellectual traditions including socio-legal studies, critical legal studies, and feminist legal theory. We invite anyone interested to join us, whether they have any prior connection to eCRT.

Primary Keyword: Race and EthnicitySecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Empirical Legal Scholarship on PolicingFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair(s): Ben Grunwald, Duke University School of Law

Discussant(s): Monica Bell, Yale Law School

Description:The papers in this session use a variety of empirical methods to explore the legal and institutional structures that regulate the conduct of police officers today. One paper introduces a novel dataset to challenge the conventional wisdom about the prevalence of violence in traffic stops. A second paper uses stop and frisk data to question the use of "high-crime areas" as a constitutional justification for investigative stops. A third paper conducts a systematic examination of the disciplinary appeals process in over 600 police departments across the country.

And the final paper examines the effects of the collective bargaining rights of police officers on a range of agency-level outcomes, including officer diversity, weaponization, and civilian complaints.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Addicted to WardlowBen Grunwald, Duke University School of LawJeffrey Fagan, Columbia Law School

Police Disciplinary AppealsStephen Rushin, Loyola Univ. Chicago School of LawRoutine Traffic Stops and Violence Against the PoliceJordan Woods, University of Arkansas School of Law

The Effect of Collective Bargaining Rights on Law Enforcement: A Quasi-Experimental StudyJohn Rappaport, University of Chicago Law SchoolRichard McAdams, University of Chicago

Empirical Methods of the Socio-Legal Study of PropertyCRN: 49 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session

Room: Kenora

Chair(s): John Acevedo, University of La Verne, College of Law

Discussant(s): Bernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/American Bar Foundation

Participant(s):John Acevedo, University of La Verne, College of LawBernadette Atuahene, IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law/American Bar FoundationDebbie Becher, Barnard College, Columbia UniversityThomas Joo, Univ. of California, Davis, School of Law

Description:This round table methods panel will explore different empirical methodological approaches to society, law, and property. Among the explored methodologies are archival, ethnographic, semi-structured interviews or focus groups, case studies, spacial analysis, and cultural ecology.

Primary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and UrbanismSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal MethodologyExclusions: Minorities and Vulnerable Populations in the Neo-

126

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Liberal Order2:45 PM - 4:30 PMPaper Session


Description:This panel explores how neo-liberal logics that have pushed states into cutting welfare spending and re-categorizing the recipients of welfare protection into worthy and unworthy subjects have reconfigured the role of states and law in the early twentieth century. Examples are taken from a broad range of regions, from the United States to Brazil and Japan.

Primary Keyword: Class and InequalitySecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Exclusion of the Homeless from Public Spaces in JapanKiyoshi Hasegawa, Tokyo Metropolitan University

Farm Bill to Table: How Pregnancy Influences Food Assistance ProgramsAnne McGlynn-Wright, University of Washington

Liberal Racialization: How Have the Political Legacies of the War Poverty Shaped Asian American and Latino Civic Mobilization?Jae Yeon Kim, UC Berkeley

Exhaustion at the CrossroadsCRN: 14 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): William Gallagher, Golden Gate University School of Law

Discussant(s): Peter Yu, Texas A&M School of Law

Description:The doctrine of exhaustion or first-sale doctrine of intellectual property law has gone through significant development in the course of time. Its contours look clear, nevertheless, several aspects of the doctrine are still on the move. The strengthening of globalization and international trade, the challenges of the digital all contribute to the emergence of brand new questions in all fields of intellectual property. The session aims to address these modern challenges in several fields of intellectual property and in multiple jurisdictions, especially in the North American and the European countries.

Primary Keyword: Intellectual Property, Culture, and Cultural Heritage

Secondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Exhaustion in Certified Global Food ChainsKatja Lindroos (Weckström), Univ. of Eastern Finland Law School

Free Movement of (Trademarked Goods) and the ASEAN Way: The Case for Consistent National Rules on International Trademark ExhaustionIrene Calboli, Texas A&M School of Law/Singapore Management U

Recent Developments of Copyright Exhaustion in the European UnionPéter Mezei, University of Szeged

Recognizing Users with Exhaustion DoctrineShubha Ghosh, Syracuse

The Internet of Things You Don’t OwnAaron Perzanowski, Case Western Reserve UniversityJason Schultz, NYU

Fiscal Tools and Policy OutcomesCRN: 31 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East,

Chair/Discussant(s): Shu-Yi Oei, Boston College Law School

Description:This panel considers a variety of fiscal tools designed to satisfy policy outcomes, focusing in particular on tax policy design matters.


Presentations:Electing into a Value-Added Tax: Survey Evidence from Ontario MicroentrepreneursEmily Satterthwaite, Univ. of Toronto Faculty of Law

Intergenerational Justice in the Post-Trump EraNeil Buchanan, The George Washington Univ. Law School

The Efficiency Case for an Exploitation Adjustment to Fair Market ValueAllison Christians, McGill University Faculty of Law

Value Added Tax and Cloud ComputingRifat Azam, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya; Wash U LawOrly Mazur, SMU Dedman School of Law

127

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

From the "Democratic Deficit" to a "Democratic Surplus": Constructing Administrative Democracy in EuropeFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Athanasios (Akis) Psygkas, University of Bristol

Reader(s):Peter Lindseth, University of Connecticut School of LawFernanda Nicola, American University Washington College of LawLorne Sossin, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:Challenging the conventional narrative that the European Union suffers from a democratic deficit, Athanasios Psygkas's book argues that EU mandates have enhanced the democratic accountability of national regulators by creating entry points for stakeholder participation.

Described as a "fascinating, original account of undoubted contemporary interest" (S. Rose-Ackerman), a "major contribution to comparative regulatory studies" (T. Prosser), the book informs understandings of regulation, state-society relations, and institutional design. It draws on extensive fieldwork, including interviews with agency officials, industry and consumer group representatives in Paris, Athens, Brussels, and London.

The panel of prominent scholars brings perspectives from comparative public law, sociology, European studies, political economy, and legal history.


Gender and Careers in the Legal AcademyFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair/Discussant(s): Tabeth Masengu, Ghent University and University of Cape Town

Description:The past fifteen years have shown an increase in empirical research and resulting publications on the professional situation of women in the field of law. The lives and careers of women in legal practice and the judiciary along with various related gender issues have been documented in many countries. Amongst these in particular the question whether the presence of women in this field has made and will continue to make a difference to its workings.

What yet needs and deserves a closer look is the situation

of women and gender in general in the legal academy. An international network of scholars (as yet informal) has now been set up for the purpose of a comparative study of women in the academy.

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Diversity in the Law School PipelineEmily Taylor Poppe, University of California, Irvine School of LawKim Weeden, Cornell University, Dept. of Sociology

Gender and careers in legal academy: the case of Quebec law professorsJulie Paquin, University of Ottawa

Internationalization, Domestication and the Transformation of Legal Education in Nigeria: 1962-2016Rebecca Badejogbin, Nigerian Law SchoolJosephine Dawuni, Howard University

Negotiating the Academy: Experiences of Women Law Teachers in KenyaSarah Kinyanjui, University of Nairobi

Immigration Detention Across Multiple National ContextsCRN: 2 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair/Discussant(s): Guillermo Cantor, American Immigration Council

Description:For many countries around the world, immigration detention has become a critical tool for border control and interior immigration enforcement. This session brings together new and innovative research on immigration detention in multiple national contexts, including Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. These studies investigate theoretical, empirical, and legal issues related to detention, including the role of legal actors involved in detention decisions, the experiences of prison officials who manage the detention facilities, group disparities in detention outcomes, criminalization of asylum-seekers through detention, and the effects of detention on migration preferences. The session will offer new insights on various aspects of immigration detention through a global lens.


128

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Secondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Across the Sloping Meadow Floor. An empirical analysis of pre-removal detention of deportable non-citizensJoan-Josep Vallbé, University of BarcelonaBarak Kalir, University of Amsterdam

Asylum, enforcement and detention in CanadaAlison Mountz, Wilfrid Laurier University

Enforcing crimmigration control: role perception and experiences of prison officers in the exclusion of unwanted migrantsLaura Rezzonico, University of NeuchâtelChristin Achermann, University of Neuchâtel

Inequalities in U.S. Immigration Detention: A National StudyIan Peacock, UCLA, Department of SociologyEmily Ryo, USC Gould School of Law

Pressuring detainees into leaving? Deterrence and perceived legitimacy in immigration detention centresArjen Leerkes, WODC / Erasmus UniversityFernando Chitarrini, Erasmus University

Innovation and Access to Justice: Addressing the Challenge of a Diverse Justice EcosystemFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s):Nicole Aylwin, Osgoode Hall Law School/Canadian Forum on Civil Justice

Discussant(s):Michele Leering, Queen's University Faculty of Law

Participant(s):Sarah Buhler, College of Law - Univ. of SaskatchewanNoel Semple, University of Windsor, OntarioMartha Simmons, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolSusan Ursel, Ursel Phillips Fellows Hopkinson LLP

Description:Globalization and technology are disrupting the legal profession and changing the way legal services are delivered and despite best efforts, the access to justice gap continues to grow in Canada. As a response to these drivers of change, innovation – as both a noun and a verb - has become a talisman poised to help us address the challenges pushing at the door of the legal profession.

This roundtable with bring together contributors to the Windsor

Yearbook of Access to Justice Special Edition: Access to Justice and Innovation to discuss how legal practitioners, academics and access to justice advocates are exploring how the theories, methods and tools of innovation can be applied to meet the complex access to justice challenges presenting in Canada.


IntersectionalityCRN: 7 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): Sital Kalantry, Cornell Law School

Discussant(s): Lisa Kelly, Queen's University, Faculty of Law

Description:Women's equality is a foundational principle in feminist legal theory. Though we have made significant gains, the papers in this panel demonstrate that we still have far to go in many spheres and regions around the world. There is a wide gap between the promise of the law to ensure equal representation in public offices in Italy and reality. Practices that are thought to be harmful persist in Nigeria notwithstanding bans on them. Though the analysis is more complicated, culture plays a role in explaining the differing role women play in the legal profession in Chile and Spain. To solve persistent and new problems, it may be fruitful to revisit history. Arguments made in favor of including women in public accommodations in the United States, for example, can productively inform modern debates about access to bathrooms.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Disciplining and Rehabilitating Native Girls: A Brief History of Four SystemsAddie Rolnick, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas - Willam S. Boyd School of Law

Gender and Masculinity in Professional Relationships in Law Offices: U.S. and AbroadAnn McGinley, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Harmful Cultural Practices against : Whither Law?Rhoda Karibi-Whyte Ige, University of Lagos, Akoka

Sex in PublicDeborah Dinner, Emory University School of LawElizabeth Sepper, Washington University School of Law

129

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Juvenile Justice ReformFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Description:Laws and social attitudes mix in challenging ways for children and young adults. These papers examine the effectiveness of regimes that aim to protect the well-being and rights of children. The range of topics is considerable but all papers engage with questions key to the social citizenship of children.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

Presentations:Ethical Duties Owed to a Child When Legal Advocacy Protects Legal Rights at the Expense of The Child's Good LifeGail Hammer, Gonzaga University School of Law

Evolving Standards: Juvenile Justice Reform Informed by Developmental Neurobiology and PsychologyPeter Elliot, Temple University Beasley School of Law

People's Attitudes Toward Children's Legal AgesHiroharu Saito, The University of Tokyo

U.S. Child Labor Laws in Agriculture: A Look at Tobacco FarmingCarla Cortavarria, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Law and Development Beyond Imperialism: Lessons from the Post-Colonial Critique of Colonial Encounters.CRN: 52 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Dufferin


Discussant(s):Andrés Botero Bernal, Industrial University of SantanderDiego Gil McCawley, Stanford Law School

Description:Law and Development literature includes the perspective beyond imperialism, examining the encounters between colonizers and the colonized through a post-colonial critique. The globalization of legal phenomenon normally involves the diffusion of normative rules, principles, and standards from the global north to the global south. The hierarchies of the world global order may be reproduced within the context of legal education, the legal profession, and laws in general. The post-

colonial critique may deconstruct the military rules, policing, property, possession, labor, and asylum.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Aboriginal Night Patrols: a Paradigm for Postcolonial Policing?

Harry Blagg, Law School, Univ of Western AustraliaThalia Anthony, University of Technology Sydney

Dehumanisation by Design: Asylum Support and the Legacies of EmpireKatie Bales, Bristol UniversityLucy Mayblin, University of Warwick

International Labor Standards versus Liberalization: Analysis of Brazil-China Relations in International Economic LawOlivia Pasqualeto, University of São PauloDouglas de Castro, Universidade Paulista

Revitalizing the Colonial Project: A Look at Dispossession, Urban Revitalization and Resistance on Toronto’s Present-Day Colonial LandscapeMathew Montevirgen, York University

Legal Geography V: Reassembling the Local and the Global, the Rural and the Urban, and Gendered GeographiesCRN: 35 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Juan Manuel Amaya-Castro, Universidad de los Andes

Discussant(s): Nicholas Blomley, Simon Fraser University Mariana Valverde, University of Toronto

Description:One way of understanding contemporary processes of global capitalism is by seeing them as operating through an urbanizing extension in which the rural is agro-industrialized and violently integrated into the global economic grid. Part of the flux of the rise of the megacities in the global south is the consequence of this process in which the urban and the rural are less and less distinct, in which personal geographies become more extensive, mobility more important, and economic independence more constitutive of people's identities. This panel explores the various legal and political dimensions of this ongoing reassembling by means of a focus a number of local and global instantiations and how people participate in the dynamics that shapes their existence.


130

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Secondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Housing is a Women’s Issue. Notes from a Feminist Legal Geography Perspective.Maria Victoria Castro, Universidad del NorteLina Buchely, Universdad Icesi

Problematising the Urban-Rural Distinction: Peace, Gender in a Global ColombiaJuan Manuel Amaya-Castro, Universidad de los Andes

Sex and the City. Notes from a Feminist Legal Geography PerspectiveLina Buchely, Universdad IcesiMaria Victoria Castro, Universidad del Norte

Neoliberal Confinements: Social Suffering in the Shadows of the Carceral StateCRN: 27 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): Alessandro De Giorgi, San Jose State University

Discussant(s):Michelle Brown, University of Tennessee

Participant(s):Jordan Camp, Barnard CollegeLisa Guenther, Vanderbilt UniversityChristina Heatherton, Trinity CollegeBrett Story, University of Toronto

Description:The goal of this roundtable is to critically explore some of the many forms of social suffering experienced by oppressed and disenfranchised populations in the shadows of the US carceral state. The contemporary prison crisis, along with current technocratic penal reform agendas, which appear to be dictated by fiscal concerns over the rising costs of the US carceral system rather than by any concern for the human rights of prisoners and their communities, constitutes the main theme of this roundtable. However, our goal is to extend our critical lens beyond the immediate consequences of mass incarceration on the social groups directly targeted by the penal arm of the state, in order to explore other forms of confinement, abandonment, and social death suffered by marginalized populations in a neoliberal society.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Prisons: Researching, Examining and ReformingCRN: 27 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Danielle Rudes, George Mason University

Description:We will look at prison administration, prisoners, prison policy, and prison working/living from a variety of perspectives and through a host of theoretical and conceptual lenses. The work is a deep dive in to carceral life while exploring some of the profound implications of mass incarceration practice and policy.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, SentencinglSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Community-Partnered Research, Isonomy, and the Carceral StateJanet Moore, University of Cincinnati College of Law

On Reflexivity in Carceral SpacesMelissa Barragan, University of California, IrvineDallas Augustine, University of California, IrvineEmma Conner, University of California, IrvineKelsie Chesnut, University of California, IrvineGabriela Gonzalez, University of California, IrvineKeramet Reiter, University of California, IrvineJustin Strong, University of California, Irvine

The Hole Choice: Purposive Placement in Solitary ConfinementDanielle Rudes, George Mason University

They Were Trash and Now They Are Treasure: Kentucky’s Shift from the Punitive to the Rehabilitative Model of Corrections, Symbolic Boundaries, and the New Value of Prisoners in an Old System.Jay Borchert, John Jay Col of Criminal Justice / CUNY

True Believers and Bad Actors: Toward A Different Understanding of Prison AdministratorsAshley Rubin, University of Toronto

What’s really happening in the punishment gap: Participatory action research on prisoners’ experiences of rehabilitation and punishmentKimberly Richman, University of San FranciscoLori Sexton, University of Missouri-Kansas City

“Human Rights Apply to All, Even Those Behind a Wall!”: Mobilizing Law at the Crossroads of Reform and Abolition in the Movement Against Solitary ConfinementEdith Kinney, San José State University

131

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Public Health and LawCRN: 9 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Corinne Schwarz, University of Kansas

Description:Laws to support public health aim to prevent illness, address risk, and promote community health. This panel examines how governments address public health through law, policy, and litigation. Using a range of health outcomes, targeted populations, and methodologies, panelists examine questions of the UK's challenges in tackling air pollution after Brexit; legal processes for witnessing over lethal cases of contaminated growth hormone in France; rates of gun violence in the US; and legal transformations in policy responses to homelessness in the US. These papers identify the processes, promises, and limitations of government regulation to promote community health.


Presentations:Creating a Federal Homeless Policy in the Reagan Era: Deinstitutionalization, Federalism, and Public PerceptionCharley Willison, University of Michigan

London T-Charge, Air Quality, and BREXIT: The Role of LawDr Mohammad Alramahi, University of Bedfordshire

Testifying in Court after a Public Heath Disaster. A study of Victims’ Normative Repertoire.Janine Barbot, INSERMNicolas Dodier, INSERM-EHESS

The Impact of Mass Shootings on Firearm Prevalence and Associated Firearm-related Morbidity and Mortality Risks.Hannah Laqueur, UC Davis

Queer theory and law 1CRN: 51 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair/Discussant(s): Alexander Kondakov, European University at St. Petersburg

Description:This is the first of two panels on queer theory and law, as part of the new queer/law CRN 51. Papers on this panel will address

the ADF approach to sexual violence in armed conflict; the legal recognition of multiple parents; lewdness law and LGBTQ; queer marxism and zemiology; queering family mediation; and SOGI participation in the legal profession.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Legal Recognition of Multiple Parents: Is Everything We Think About Families About to Change?Haim Abraham, University of Toronto

Lewdness Law and LGBTQ YouthLibby Adler, Northeastern University School of Law

Queer Marxism and Zemiology: emptying the closet of criminological imaginationAvi Boukli, The Open University

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Legal Profession: A National Study.Ellen Faulkner, Thompson Rivers University

The ADF approach to Sexual Violence in Armed ConflictTamsin Paige, UNSW Canberra @ ADFA

Race, Place and PolicingFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Description:This session focuses on race, discrimination and the intersection of legal geographies in policing practices.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:An exploration of how racial and ethnic minority status, neighborhood risk levels, informal social control and collective efficacy impact satisfaction with policeMonica Williams, Weber State UniversityAzenett Garza, Weber State University

Neighborhood Context and Policing in Proximity to Public HousingJessica Kalbfeld, New York University

Pseudo-consensual Police Searches in Los Angeles, 2008David Greenberg, New York UniversityLIly Khdjavi, Loyola Marymount University

Race Out-Of-Place and Criminal Justice ProcessingRachel Lautenschlager, University of Miami

132

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Rationales and (Dysfunctional) Implications of Legal RegulationsFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Description:The papers in this session address the underlying norms and rationales manifest in legal regulations, ranging from burial regulations and succession law to contract, competition and property law – and discuss how they in many cases give rise to malfunctions that need to be addressed.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:An analysis of the institutional behavior regarding subsidized loans, redemption of debts and state shareholding in private economic agents and the effects on the marketRafael Barros, UFRJ

Biologically Biased BeneficenceJeffrey Stake, Indiana Univ. Maurer School of Law

Contract Law at the Crossroads: Can Better Regulation of Unfair Terms in Boilerplate Encourage More Fruitful Exchange?Marcus Moore, University of Oxford

Odorless and Ordered: Legislating against filth in Victorian burial reformMonika Lemke, York University

Pharma Barons: The Pharmaceutical Industry and Corporate Law's Dangerous New "Race to the Bottom"Eugene McCarthy, University of Illinois, Springfield

We Almost Bought a Meth House: Meth-Contaminated Property and the Paucity of Legal ProtectionsWilliam Garriott, Drake University

The impacts of Decriminalization on the Male Sex Industry: Australasian PerspectivesCRN: 6 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Roundtable Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Victor Minichiello, University of New England

Participant(s):Lynzi Armstrong, Victoria University of WellingtonDenton Callander, University of New South WalesJohn Scott, Queensland University of Technology

Description:Despite being advocated by sex worker groups, many academics and adopted by Amnesty International, decrminalisation has only been legislated in two jurisdictions, twenty years after was first adopted. While sex industry policy has been vigorously debated with regard to female sex workers, often less consideration is given to how policies impact on male sex workers and their clients. This symposium draws together some of the leading sex work scholars in Australasia to discuss the effects of the decriminalisation of sex work on the male sex industry. Drawing on their recent research, panel members will describe how decriminalization has impacted on the structure and organisation of sex work and critically assess the impacts of the policy with reference to public health and crime.

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

The Socio-legal Analysis of the 2017 Landmark Marriage Equality Decision of the Constitutional Court in TaiwanFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair(s): David Law, The University of Hong Kong

Discussant(s): Michael Boucai, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Description:In May 2017, Taiwan's Constitutional Court delivered a landmark decision, which essentially legalizes same-sex marriage in Taiwan. It is the first Asian top court that endorses marriage equality, and this decision could make Taiwan the first Asian country that recognizes same-sex marriage. This panel would anatomize this case from sociopolitical perspectives. Specifically, Wen-Yu Chia points out that the Court rarely cites cite medical/scientific research explicitly. He then investigates how and why the Court resorted to external-knowledge from a more abstract, Systems Theory viewpoint. Hsiaowei Kuan argues that marriage equality movement in Taiwan views both legislation and litigation strategies as parallel, rather than mutually exclusive, paths to achieve its goal. Consonant with Chia's and Kuan's arguments, Chien-Chih Lin's paper analy

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Presentations:Court as Leveraging Power to Change Legislative Dynamics: The Adoption of Legal Mobilization in Taiwan’s Marriage Equality MovementHsiaowei Kuan, National Taipei University

Judicial Politics in the Same-sex Marriage Case of TaiwanChien-Chih Lin, Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica

133

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Resorting to Social Authority in Same-Sex Marriage Decision: A Case Study of Interpretation No. 748 of Taiwanese Constitutional CourtWen-Yu Chia, Taipei Medical University

“First in Asia! ”: Same-Sex Marriage and a Century-Old Cosmopolitan Nationalism in TaiwanYun-Ru Chen, National Taiwan Univ., College of Law

Transnational Labor LawCRN: 8 Friday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Peel

Chair/Discussant(s): Manoj Dias-Abey, Queen's University, Canada

Description:This panel considers the stress to regional welfare states caused by the global restructuring and transnational threats, and the growing backlash against global and regional governance posed by working class rage and resentment. Panelists will question whether labor law can withstand these pressures, and suggest alternative measures for protecting workers' rights, including the larger project of promoting democratic rights for all citizens to protect subordinate groups. Panelists will examine the extent to which tort law can protect workers' safety by studying the 2013 Rana Plaza garment factory collapse in Bangladesh. Panelists will also discuss the promise of corporate social responsibility (CSR) mechanisms for labor law enforcement and the use of non-standard employment on workers' rights.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Presentations:A Study on CSR: from the Perspective of Labor LawCheng Liu, Shanghai Normal University

Labour rights in an era of illiberal democracyHarry Arthurs, York University

The Rana Plaza Disaster Through Canadian Transnational Tort LawDavid Doorey, York University

The Usefulness of CSR Instruments for Improving Working Conditions in Transnational Firms: a Case Study in the Canadian Mining IndustryIsabelle Martin, University of MontrealMelanie Dufour-Poirier, University of MontrealFrancisco Villanueva, Universite du Quebec a Montreal

“Revisiting social regionalism in an era of discontent”Adelle Blackett, Faculty of Law, McGill University

Undergraduate Legal Studies: The Concept, the Association, and the FieldFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Professional Development Panel

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s):Jinee Lokaneeta, Drew University

Participant(s):Valerie Hans, Cornell Law SchoolRenee Cramer, Drake UniversityJonathan Gould, American UniversityMichael McCann, University of Washington

Description:This panel is focused on the field of Undergraduate Legal Studies and the relationship between the Consortium of Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs (CULJP) and the professional interdisciplinary legal studies associations such as Law and Society Association (LSA) and Law, Culture and the Humanities (LCH). The conversation will be on the concept of legal studies, assessing the relationship between these associations and the field of undergraduate legal education.

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law Students

Urban Sanctuary at the Crossroads – Borderwork and Urban Citizenship in a Transatlantic PerspectiveFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Nina Perkowski, Hamburg University

Discussant(s): Christine Hentschel, University of Hamburg, Criminology, Department of Social Sciences,

Description:What does the rise of sanctuary cities or solidarity cities in North America and Europe tell us about borderwork and citizenship in practice, as well as ambivalent struggles with and against the law? The panel brings together papers that address the politics and legal geography of urban solidarity in cities such as Hamburg, Toronto, Palermo, or Freiburg to ask how different actors rely on, rethink, stretch the limits of, or undermine the law through urban solidarity practices. Possible questions include: what understandings of solidarity are forged as diverse actors address urban spaces as terrains of struggle, what spatio-temporal tactics are used both by municipalities and activists and which (perhaps unlikely) alliances emerge? How do the practices of naming (solidarity, sanctuary, refuge, asylum) engage different legal repertoires,

134

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rida

y

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:A Philosophy of Cities of RefugeHelene Heuser, University of Hamburg - Faculty of Law

Conditionality and the Cultural Categories of Patchwork Social Citizenship: The access practices of public sector workers in Toronto-Sanctuary CityPatricia Landolt, University of Toronto

Sanctuary-City Policies and Practices in Canada and BeyondHarald Bauder, Ryerson UniversityIdil Atak, Ryerson UniversityGraham Hudson, Ryerson University, Toronto

The California Sanctuary Struggle Case at the Beginning of Donald Trump's Government.Paola Suarez, CISAN, UNAM

The legal technicalities of solidarityChristine Hentschel, University of Hamburg,

Criminology, Department of Social Sciences,Urban Solidarity Struggles With and Against the LawNina Perkowski, Hamburg University

Values in Law & SocietyFriday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.


Description:Law is shaped by values in society. By uncovering the dominant values at play, we can better understand why the law is what it is. On this panel, speakers will expose how values underpin social and legal arrangements, including the economy in China, correctional education for juveniles, labor and employment law, and the principal force behind American Empire. This panel will also probe the social and political values that lay beneath laws on and about disaster.


Presentations:Balancing Employment Protection Law and Labor Market Performance in ChinaWenwen Ding, University of Virginia

Ethnographic Analysis of Correctional Education to Juvenile Delinquents in Japan: Through the Comparison of Spanish Treatment Community and U.S. Teen CourtMasayoshi Koga, Chuo University

Is China a Market Economy, and Why does it Matter?Ming Du, Surrey University

From the "Democratic Deficit" to a "Democratic Surplus": Constructing Administrative Democracy in EuropeFriday Session 4A, 2:45 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s):Athanasios (Akis) Psygkas, University of Bristol

Reader(s):Peter Lindseth, University of Connecticut School of LawFernanda Nicola, American University Washington College of LawLorne Sossin, Osgoode Hall Law School

Description:Challenging the conventional narrative that the European Union suffers from a democratic deficit, Athanasios Psygkas's book argues that EU mandates have enhanced the democratic accountability of national regulators by creating entry points for stakeholder participation.Described as a "fascinating, original account of undoubted contemporary interest" (S. Rose-Ackerman), a "major contribution to comparative regulatory studies" (T. Prosser), the book informs understandings of regulation, state-society relations, and institutional design. It draws on extensive fieldwork, including interviews with agency officials, industry and consumer group representatives in Paris, Athens, Brussels, and London.The panel of prominent scholars brings perspectives from comparative public law, sociology, European studies, political economy, and legal history.


Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 4A2:45 p.m. - 3 :30 p.m.

135

Friday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m F

rid

ay

Incidental Racialization: Performative Assimilation in Law SchoolFriday Session 4B, 3:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Yung-Yi Diana Pan, City Univ of New York, Brooklyn College

Chair(s): John Bliss, Harvard Law School

Reader(s): Debra Schleef, University of Mary WashingtonDavid Wilkins, Harvard Law SchoolMeera Deo, Thomas Jefferson School of Law

Description:Diana Pan's 2017 book, Incidental Racialization: Performative Assimilation in Law School (Temple University Press), investigates how systemic racial inequalities are reproduced and sustained in law school. Based on interviews with over 100 law students, Pan examines how Latino/a and Asian American students navigate race, gender, and other identities as they undergo professional socialization processes. While the literature on legal education has increasingly considered race, gender, and other variables, Asian Americans and Latina/os have yet to receive substantial empirical attention. This book makes vital contributions to the literature on legal education by providing a systematic analysis of lived experiences of racial hierarchy and intersectionality.

Primary Keyword:Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword:Race and Ethnicity

Indigenizing the AcademyFriday Plenary Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Plenary Session


Chair(s): Patricia Barkaskas, Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Participant(s):Marcelle Burns, Univ. of New England School of LawLinda Te Aho, University of WaikatoChristine Zuni Cruz, Univ. of New Mexico School of LawVal Napoleon, University of Victoria

Description:In 2015, the Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission released 94 Calls to Action "in order to address the legacy of residential schools and advance the process of Canadian reconciliation". Call to Action 28 specifically calls for law schools to require education in indigenous rights, law and history. Law schools across Canada have responded to this challenge, as have legal educators in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. The panel will explore how, across a spectrum of pedagogical methods and content, the legal academy is adapting to instill an understanding of issues such as: Euro-centric teachings and the law; what decolonization means for the legal landscape; and, how we must transform legal education and practices.


Racism and the Criminal Justice System in Canada and the United StatesFriday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Plenary Session


Chair: Rashmee Singh, University of Waterloo

Participant(s):Jonathan Rudin, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolSarah Deer, University of KansasKatherine Beckett, University of WashingtonReuben Miller, University of Chicago

Description:Jonathan Rudin received his LLB and LLM from Osgood Hall Law School. He is currently the Program Director of Aboriginal Legal

Fr iday June 8, P lenary Sess ion 54:45 p.m. - 6 :30 p.m.

Fr iday June 8, Sess ion 4B3:45 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m.

136

Friday 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m F

rida

y

Services, which he helped establish in 1990. He has written and spoken widely on issues of Aboriginal Justice.

Sarah Deer is lawyer and professor of Women, Gender & Sexuality Studies at The University of Kansas. She is a 2014 MacArthur Fellow and the author of The Beginning and End of Rape: Confronting Sexual Violence in Native America, published in 2015.

Reuben Miller is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Service Administration at the University of Chicago. He has published extensively on issues of race, crime, punishment, and poverty.

Katherine Beckett is a Professor in the Department of Law, Societies, and Justice at the University of Washington. She is the author of numerous articles and three books on the topics of crime, punishment, race, and policing.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Surveillance and Big DataFriday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Plenary Session


Moderator(s): Sarah Brayne, University of Texas at Austin Greg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of Law

Participant(s):Lori Andrews, Chicago-Kent College of LawDanielle Citron, Univ. of Maryland Carey School of LawRonald Deibert, University of TorontoTimothy Wu, Columbia Law School

Description:Lori Andrews is a distinguished professor of law at Chicago-Kent and director of Illinois Tech's Institute for Science, Law and Technology. An internationally recognized expert on emerging technologies, her most recent book is I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy. She is the author of more than 150 articles on biotechnology, genetics and social networks.

Danielle Keats Citron is the Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law where she writes and teaches about information privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. Her book Hate Crimes in Cyberspace was published by Harvard University Press. She is an Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Center on Internet and Society and Yale Information Society Project.

Ronald J. Deibert is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University

of Toronto. The Citizen Lab undertakes interdisciplinary research at the intersection of global security, ICTs, and human rights. Deibert is the author of Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet (Random House: 2013), as well as numerous books, chapters, articles, and reports on Internet censorship, surveillance, and cyber security. In 2013, he was appointed to the Order of Ontario and awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee medal, for being "among the first to recognize and take measures to mitigate growing threats to communications rights, openness and security worldwide."

Tim Wu is a professor at Columbia Law School and author of "The Master Switch," "The Attention Merchants," and "Is the First Amendment Obsolete?" He previously worked, in the United States, at the White House and the Federal Trade Commission.

The Rising Wave of AuthoritarianismFriday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Plenary Session


Chair: Heinz Klug, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Participant(s):Yasmin Dawood, Faculty of Law, University of TorontoMenaka Guruswamy, Columbia Law SchoolAziz Huq, University of SchoolKim Lane Scheppele, Princeton UniversityCatalina Smulovitz, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella

Description:Human rights, the rule of law and a wave of constitution-making raised hopes that the twenty-first century would see the consolidation of democracy around the globe. Not two decades later the world is gripped by a rising wave of authoritarianism. While many new democracies are proving to be extremely fragile or thin, authoritarianism is permeating the politics of even the most established democracies, across Europe to India and the United States. This panel will generate a conversation between scholars who work across the range of new and old democracies and who have become increasingly concerned and engaged in tracking this rising wave of authoritarianism. Together, their work demonstrates the capacity of law and society scholarship to bring different approaches, regional and global understandings to bear on a problem whose growth threatens to produce a new era of authoritarianism and the danger this poses to international peace.

137

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

A Decade And A Crossroads: The Past, Present, And Future Of Veterans Treatment Courts In The United StatesSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Kent

Chair(s): Benjamin Pomerance, New York State Division of Veterans' Affairs

Participant(s): Julie Baldwin, Missouri State UniversityKristine Huskey, Univ. of Arizona James E Rogers College of LawBenjamin Pomerance, New York State Division of Veterans' AffairsStacey-Rae Simcox, Stetson Law School

Description:Ten years ago, the first Veterans Treatment Court in the United States opened its doors. Many observers initially found this model shocking: a pathway for military veterans to engage in court-ordered treatment in lieu of incarceration, focusing on their military experiences and linking them with experts-including fellow veterans-to help them on their journey back to civilian life.

Today, hundreds of Veterans Treatment Courts exist in the United States. Success stories from these courts abound. Still, significant questions remain, from due process and equal protection concerns to issues surrounding an overall lack of standardization and reliable data. This roundtable will assess the progress that Veterans Treatment Courts made during the past decade, and address the leading questions that will define these courts' futures.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Judges and Judging

Activism and ResistanceCRN: 34 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:In this panel the papers considers the experience of Indigenous communities when faced with attempts to diminish or

extinguish their rights and the range of strategies deployed by communities in response to these measures.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:Transferring Activism: How the Difficult Implementation of Land Reform Laws Developed Indigenous Rights Networks in MexicoJessica Price, Tulane University

Where Does the Funding Come From? An Assessment of the Indigenous Strategic Litigation in GuatemalaAna Isabel Braconnier, University of Texas at Austin

Agency, Atrocity and Transitional JusticeSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair(s): Cheryl Lawther, Queen's University Belfast

Discussant(s): Luke Moffett, Queen's University Belfast

Description:This panel session critically explores the role and place of agency in transitional justice. It draws on fieldwork in a range of contexts, including Cambodia, Colombia, Peru and Northern Ireland. Each of the papers draw on qualitative fieldwork with key stakeholders. The five papers consider the intersections between agency and transitional justice: the tension between victims' voice, agency and the politics of victimhood; the ways in which victims' voice and agency is or is not represented in sites of 'dark tourism'; the contest of reparations by and amongst victims; the role and value of 'quiet transitional justice'; and the challenges of Brexit in maintaining the Northern Ireland peace process. Collectively, this panel will contribute to a thicker understanding of what agency in transitional justice means.

Primary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictSecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Brexit and Northern Ireland: Human Rights in a Period of Political UpheavalAmanda Kramer, Queen's University Belfast

Voice, Agency and Blame: Constructing Victimhood in Transitional JusticeCheryl Lawther, Queen's University Belfast

Whose Voices are Heard? Victimhood and Dark Tourism in CambodiaRachel Killean, Queen's University Belfast

Saturday June 9, Sess ion 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m.

138

Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

‘Quiet’ Transitional Justice and the Past in Northern IrelandLauren Dempster, Queen's University Belfast

Atrocities, Truth and the Borders of International Human RightsSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Description:Atrocities, from disappearances to mass killings and the denial of self-determination continue to define the boundaries of international human rights. This panel explores these boundaries from periods of denial and supposed stagnation to the potential use of forensics, DNA and the Universal Periodic Review mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council to seek the truth and openly challenge seemingly intractable human rights questions.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Atrocity Justice during the Cold War: Revisiting the "Hibernation" ThesisMark Berlin, Marquette University

DNA and Privacy: Mexico’s disappeared during the war on drugs and the unfulfilled promise of truth.Diego Garcia Ricci, University of TorontoDenise Gonzalez Nunez, Iberoamericana University

Self-Determination, Secession, and the "Frozen Conflict" in Nagorno-KarabakhMilena Sterio, Cleveland State University

The Islamic Use of the Death Penalty within the Universal Periodic Review: Human Rights v State SovereigntyAmna Nazir, University of Birmingham/ Birmingham City University

The Search for the Disappeared in Peru: Collective Memory, Forensic Investigation, and Counter-State NarrativesJessica Roth, Ohio University

Authoritarian Legality and the Return of the Dual State: a Comparative DiscussionCRN: 20 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Sida Liu, University of Toronto Benjamin van Rooij, University of California, Irvine

Description:At a time of global democratic recession, authoritarian resurgence, and novel forms of resistance, this session will compare recent legal and political developments in Eurasian countries at various stages of rule of law reform and transition from 20th-century totalitarianism: the People's Republic of China and its Hong Kong SAR, Russia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. It will discuss if Fraenkel's account of the Dual State, as a system whose 'prerogative state' elements coexist with and undermine its normative state elements, can help us explain recent changes. Individual papers will discuss the effects, if any, of authoritarian resurgence on judicial reforms, wider rule of law reform efforts and civil society; the future of human rights advocacy and access to justice; and international and transnational dimensions of the return of the Dual State.

Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Authoritarian Constitutionalism in Putin's Russia: Pragmatic Constitutional Court in the Dual StateAlexei Trochev, Nazarbayev University

Capturing the Rule of Law: The Case of Hong KongAlvin Cheung, New York University School of Law

China's Dual State under Xi JinpingEva Pils, King's College London

China's recent legislation on civic organisations – another building block of authoritarian legality?Katja Levy, Freie Universitaet Berlin

Judicial discretion and fairness in Vietnam's high courtTrang (Mae) Nguyen, New York Univ. School of Law

Protest, Law, and Regime Type: the Rise and Fall of Authoritarian Legality in Greater ChinaHualing Fu, The University of Hong Kong

Children's Rights at the Boundaries of Public and PrivateSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jocelyn Stacey, University of Brititish Columbia, Allard School of Law

139

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Description:This panel takes up the complexities of public regulation of children across a range of contexts: education, health, guardianship, and access to justice. The papers explore lines drawn between public and private control as they impact the specific and diverse needs of children and youth.

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and ChildrenSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Keeping it in the Family: Minor Guardianship as Private Child ProtectionDeirdre Smith, University of Maine School of Law

The Guarantee of Access to the Justice for the Minor TransgenderMarta Beatriz Tanaka Ferdinandi, Cesumar UniversityValéria Silva Galdino Cardin, UnicesumarBruno Valverde Chahaira, Univ Federal de RondôniaTereza Rodrigues Vieira, UNIPAR

The Impact of State Policy on School Discipline Practices.Andrea Kalvesmaki, University of Utah

Too Cruel for School: Necessary School Discipline ReformNoelia Rivera-Calderón, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Cities and Human Rights Reimagined: from Unitary Actor to Local Arena?Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Barbara Oomen, University College Roosevelt (Utrecht University)

Discussant(s): Martha Davis, Northeastern Univ. School of Law

Description:Cities have recently come to be regarded as key actors in human rights innovation and implementation. However, apart from 'human rights cities' adopting this as a specific identity, they also form new arenas where local actors shape human rights discourse and law. This panel adopts an actor-oriented approach to open the black box of political invocation of human rights at the local level. Which actors invoke them and for what reasons? The contributions also draw attention to horizontal alliances closed locally (or through transnational city networks) and vertical partnerships in the context of multi-level governance. Finally, it addresses whether and why local actors advance human rights as a language, an ideology or as a branch of law and explores how these practices challenge established dichotomies of rights holders and duty bearers.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:Decoupling and Teaming Up: Transnational Refugee City Networks in Refugee Welcome and Integration in EuropeBarbara Oomen, University College Roosevelt (Utrecht University)

Global Assemblages of the Right to Adequate HousingMiha Marcenko, Asser Institute/University of Amsterdam

Ladies Swimwear: the Latest Test in Dealing with Multiculturalism? The Burkini Debate as a Challenge for Ensuring Freedom of Religion at the Local Level.Cathérine Van de Graaf, University of GhentTess Heirwegh, Ghent University

Pulling Human Rights Back In? Local Authorities, International Law and the Reception of Undocumented MigrantsMoritz Baumgärtel, Utrecht University

Reproduction of Human Rights Norms: Tracking Networks of Engagement in Amsterdam.Lisa Roodenburg, T.M.C. Asser Institute

Comparative Perspectives on Taxation ICRN: 31 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Diane Ring, Boston College Law School

Description:This panel considers taxation in a variety of national contexts, considering the ways that tax works in different political situations.


Presentations:Re-Thinking Tax Professional Privilege in CanadaCarl MacArthur, University of Western Ontario

Structuring International Tax Rules to Maximize Voluntary Compliance and Minimize DistortionTheodore Seto, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

The Evolution of First Nation Taxation in Canada: From Exemption to Governance after Bastien Estate v CanadaBradley Bryan, Faculty of Law, University of Victoria

140


atu

rda

y

Constitutional Law and Legal Culture in Comparative Perspectives: Asia and the Americas IVCRN: 1 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Edna Raquel Hogemann, UNESA

Discussant(s): Lucia Frota Pestana de Aguiar Silva, Universidade Estácio de Sá


Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal CulturesSecondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Presentations:A Complex Representation of Law: A study of Legal Consciousness in Venezuela.Irene Torres-Arends, Universidad Central de Venezuela

Against Animal Ethics: Preliminaries for a Law of Animal LiberationAlejandro Lorite Escorihuela, Université du Québec à Montréal

Legal Subjectivity: Beyond the Exclusionary Figure of the HumanElisabeth Roy Trudel, Concordia University

Contracting in Traditional and Non-Traditional FormsSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:We enter into agreements virtually every day. Although agreements are not all treated the same in law and society, there are legal principles that attach to some of them, allowing

us to identify one or another as a legally binding contract. This panel will explore several questions in traditional and non-traditional forms of contracting. One present problem in the law of contract around the world concerns secondary ticketing, commonly referred to as "touting." Touting receives differential treatment and regulation across jurisdictions, but should it? Similarly, perennial questions abound about "boilerplate" contracts and the battle of forms, both of which are treated differently across jurisdictions. This panel will also investigate colonial practices in contracting that continue to reverberate to this day.


Presentations:Colonizing through Contract: The Settler Colonial Entanglements of Corporate Charters and Private Contracts in Dartmouth College v. WoodwardPaul Gutierrez, Brown University

Financing of Non-Bank Lenders: Financial Stability or Investor Protection?Ziang Ning, University of Virginia

Secondary ticketing and the law: a comparative review of regulatory practice in Canada, the USA, the UK and AustraliaGuy Osborn, Westminster Law School, London, UKMark James, Manchester Metropolitan University

Spinning a Tailored Story with Diegesis, Mimesis, and Contract "Boilerplate"Maria Ingram, Virginia Tech

Courts and Judging in Asia and the Americas IICRN: 1 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): David Ritchie, Mercer University

Description:This session broadly covers judicial issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to courts, judges and judging in these areas. Examples might include discussions of the political role of judging; challenges faced by judges in relation to judicial independency, democracy, governments or social groups; judicial impartiality; judicial behavior; the psychological aspect of judicial decision making; caseload managment; amongst others. Papers dealing with current empirical researches conducted in these regions are particularly encouraged.

Primary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil ProcedureSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

141

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Judicial case management in national systems and international courts: a comparative perspectiveLarissa Pochmann da Silva, UCAM/UNESA

Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in the Colombian constitutionalismYenny Andrea Celemin Caicedo, Univ Jorge Tadeo Lozano

Jurisdiction in the State Court of Rio de JaneiroInes da Trindade Chaves de Melo, UNESA

Participatory democracy as a mechanism for the emancipation of citizens. The figure of the Ombudsman in the solution of the service failuresFlavia Affonso, Fluminense Federal Univ; Advocacia-Geral da União

Social Security Litigation in Brazil and the Challenges of Access to Justice: a Comparative Analysis of the Administrative Justice System in the Common Law CountriesAlexandre Arruda, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Democratic Accountability in Question: Giving Citizens the Power to Hold States and Corporations AccountableSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel explores whether and how legal reforms concerning the right to information or the right to free speech have empowered citizens when they attempt to check the power of corporations and states in a variety of countries, from both the United States, Latin America and Africa.

Primary Keyword: Economic and Social RightsSecondary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)

Presentations:Look Who's Talking: A Computational Analysis of Supreme Court Free Speech OpinionsLawrence J. Liu, UC BerkeleyYan Fang, UC Berkeley

Realizing Development through Access to Information in the Private Sector: An African ExperimentRichard Peltz-Steele, University of Massachusetts

Dispute Resolution in East AsiaCRN: 10, 33 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Simcoe

Chair(s): Kay-Wah Chan, Macquarie University

Discussant(s): Daniel H. Foote, The University of Tokyo

Description:This is a session co-sponsored by CRN33 East Asian Law and Society and CRN10 Civil Justice and Disputing Behavior. It focuses on dispute resolution in East Asia. Issues covered include recent developments in Fukushima nuclear disaster litigation and international commercial arbitration in five jurisdictions with Chinese culture. The other papers are from a research project conducted in Japan on civil litigation behavior.

Primary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute ResolutionSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Presentations:Bringing Civil Action in Japan: The Case File Research of Civil Litigation BehaviorTakayuki Ii, Senshu University

How did the landscape in Japanese civil courts change in a decade?: Early findings from a nation-wide survey on civil litigation.Tomohiko Maeda, Meijo University

Preliminary Report on the Civil Litigation Research Project: An Empirical Study on the Attitude and Behavior of Civil Litigants and Their Lawyers in JapanShozo Ota, The University of Tokyo School of Law

Recent Developments in the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster LitigationEri Osaka, Toyo University

The Persistence of Culture? “Chinese-Style” International Commercial Arbitration in a World of Globalized Legal PracticeJoshua Karton, Queen's University Faculty of Law

East Asian Corporate Legal LandscapesCRN: 33 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Caslav Pejovic, Kyushu University

Discussant(s): Carol Lin, National Chiao Tung University

Description:This is a session organised by CRN33 East Asian Law and Society. Its papers discuss various corporate issues in Japan and China, the two largest economies in Asia. The papers discuss/analyse the role of "third-party committee" in prevention of corporate misconduct, Japanese judges' approach in cases on issuance

142


atu

rda

y

of shares, the purpose of incorporation in early 20th century Japan, and the standard of proof for corporate criminal liability in China, Japan and the US.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Presentations:Corporate Criminal Liability in the U.S., Japan and China: Analyzing the Divergence in Standards of CulpabilityYuan Qiao, Shenzhen University Law School/ China

University of Political Science and LawFor What Purpose the Company Incorporates - Cases of Japanese publishers in early 20th centuryTakashi Shimizu, The University of Tokyo

Sociological Analysis on the "Third-Party Committee" for Corporate Misconduct: On the Mechanism of Enforcing Soft LawKota Fukui, Osaka University

When Judges Don’t Want to Judge: An Example of Share Issuance Cases in JapanManabu Matsunaka, Nagoya University

Environmental Law, Marine Resources and Society: National and International ChallengesSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Fernanda Araujo, Universidade de Brasília / Aix-Marseille Université

Discussant(s):Raquel Lima, Universidade de Brasília

Description:When dealing with the protection of the marine environment, Law faces big challenges: little is known about sea life, there are fewer protected areas at sea than inland, fish resources are more overexploited than terrestrial ones. In addition, the specificities of marine and coastal ecosystems demand reflection on the adequacy of instruments traditionally used for the terrestrial regions. Considering this scenario, this session aims to discuss how environmental norms, whether nationals or internationals, influence the way people deal with marine resources, but also what economic or social consequences or failures they present. The aim is to disseminate knowledge about the most relevant problems as well as the proposals that seek to reshape the theory and practice of law regarding the goal of protecting the marine environment.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Certification and the Law of the Sea: challenges to achieve a sustainable fishing.Carolina Cesetti, University of Brasília

Environmental law crossing the roads of fishing coastal communities: issues from marine and coastal protected areasFernanda Araujo, Universidade de Brasília / Aix-Marseille Université

Environmental Licensing Process as an Instrument for a Sustainable Management: Contribution to the Brazilian's Marine Spatial PlanningRaquel Lima, Universidade de Brasília

Need for effective cooperation between UNCLOS States Parties to fill in legal gaps arising underthe legal provisions governing technology transfer in the context of Part XI of UNCLOS.Harvey Mpoto, Universidade de Brasília

Exploring Ethnographic MethodsCRN: 3 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Robert Werth, Rice University Andrea Ballestero, Rice University

Participant(s):Andrea Muehlebach, University of TorontoSally Engle Merry, New York University

Description:What is the promise of ethnography? What are its limitations? How do we maximize the analytic potential and empirical power of ethnographic methods? This panel brings together a group of experienced ethnographers at different career stages to answer these questions. Organized as a roundtable, this is panel will explore ethnography as a methodological approach ( including things like participant observation, interviews, archival research) while making explicit the different forms of empiricism that are at stake in law and society scholarship today. The session will include ample time for audience questions and discussion. Organized by the Ethnography, Law and Society Collaborative Research Network (CRN #3), this panel should be of interest for those that are already familiar with and those that are new to ethnography.

Primary Keyword: EthnographySecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

143

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Gender, Family, Healthcare and LawCRN: 9 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair/Discussant(s): Anna Kirkland, University of Michigan

Description:This panel brings together socio-legal work at the intersections of law, medicine, health, and reproduction, moving across time periods and sites. The papers interrogate the proper relationship of the law to the health and embodied lives of ordinary people across the lifespan from early conception to after death. Papers discuss the significance of domestic violence as a health problem as well as a legal wrong; abortion pill access and discourse as practiced in Canadian regulatory law; the legal entitlements of "future people" in the age of genetic medicine; and the legal and social phenomenon of bereaved parents attempting to use postmortem reproduction to create grandchildren after the death of an adult son.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Abortion Pills and Regulatory IdealsJoanna Erdman, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University

Re-imagining Accountability in Domestic Violence Cases: A Public Health-inspired Approach to Intervention and PreventionErin Scheick, George Washington University Law School

Respect, ritual, and recognition: Beyond the sensitive disposal of pregnancy remainsSheelagh McGuinness, BristolKarolina Kuberska, University of Birmingham

To be Continued: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Postmortem GrandparenthoodNofar Yakovi Gan-Or, Columbia Law School

Immigrants Mobilizing Against the StateCRN: 2 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Marjorie Zatz, University of California, Merced

Description:This panel explores various examples of immigrant mobilization against the state, including a comparison of civic participation

by non-citizens in the U.S. and Taiwan, a case study of legal mobilization by non-citizens in France, a story of mobilization in Colombia, and two explorations of non-citizen mobilization in the United States – the devolution of immigration enforcement and the DACA program for undocumented youth. Taken together, these various examples of non-citizen engagement in social movements can help illuminate the degree to which there are common features of immigration mobilization, and point to important contextual variables that help shape the form such mobilization takes.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Civil Participation of Non-Citizens and Performative Citizenship in the United States and Taiwan: A Comparative StudyHsiu-Yu Fan, Soochow University School of Law

Des femmes victimes du conflit armé et leurs processus d’organisation et de participation socio-politique à Medellin, ColombieCathalina Sanchez-Escobar, Univ Pontificia BolivarianaNatalia Andrea Salinas Arango, Univ Pontificia Bolivariana

Immigrant Litigants against the State. A social history of immigrants actions in the French highest administrative courtLaure Blevis, University of Paris Nanterre

Immigration Lawyering in an Era of EnforcementCRN: 2 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jayesh Rathod, American University Washington College of Law

Description:This panel examines the practice of lawyering in the particular context of the American immigration court system. The papers ask how the current political climate shapes the interactions between the various players involved in deportation proceedings. These players include law school immigration clinics, public defenders, and other models for providing representation to vulnerable non-citizens, especially those who are held in immigration detention facilities. Some papers consider the practical question of whether advocacy and pedagogical strategies should shift in response to recent enforcement approaches. Other papers are concerned with more theoretical questions about the legal meaning that is created in the spaces in which immigration law is practiced.

144


atu

rda

y

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Lawyering in Immigration CourtsEmily Ryo, USC Gould School of Law

Reshaping the Focus of Law School Clinics in the Shadow of Radical Regime Change: How to Rebalance Our Pedagogical Priorities with the Demands of Rapid ResponseVanessa Merton, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University

Transforming Deportation Defense: Lessons Learned from the Nation’s First Public Defender Program for Detained ImmigrantsTalia Peleg, CUNY School of LawRuben Loyo, Yale Law School

Keeping Us Safe: Histories of Local Governments and Local Courts Acquiring, Demanding, and Exercising Protective AuthorityCRN: 44 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Kathryn Schumaker, University of Oklahoma

Description:The papers on this panel each engage with the questions of how much and what kind of power local governments and local courts have in the present by reflecting on the answers to those questions in the past. Each of the four papers revolves around the exercise of local protective authority in novel ways, each driven by a sense of exigency and each resulting in innovative legal frameworks at the local level. In examining these histories, this panel proposes that the powers and limitations of local governments and local courts are more malleable than we think.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Presentations:

City Rights: The Consequences of Treating Cities as First Amendment AssociationsNikolas Bowie, Harvard Law School

Safe Houses, Safe Towns, Sanctuary CitiesDan Farbman, Boston College Law School

The Forgotten Family Court Origins of ProbationElizabeth Katz, Stanford Law School

Labor, Inequality, and Human Rights: Local Manifestations of Global ChallengesCRN: 8 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Alvaro Santos, Georgetown Law

Discussant(s): Karen Engle, University of Texas at Austin

Description:This interdisciplinary session will consider how the global movement of people, capital and goods troubles labor rights, using a close analysis of a variety of local contexts. Legal scholars, sociologists, and anthropologists will present research on the role of law and regulation in both producing and responding to inequalities in power and precarity between owners and workers, and among different classes of workers. In sites ranging from France, Taiwan, the U.K., Turkey, and Thailand, the papers explore a number of different legal frameworks that affect labor rights, directly and indirectly. In addition to labor and human rights law, those frameworks include immigration law, criminal law, insurance law, property law, and investment law.


Presentations:Fault and Prejudice: Industrial Disease, Amoral Regulation and the Limits of Compensatory JusticePascal Marichalar, French National Ctr for Scientific Research (CNRS)

Illegal Working, Migrants and Labour Exploitation in the UK: The Immigration Act 2016Judy Fudge, Kent Law School, University of Kent (UK)

Implementing Labor Rights for Home-based Workers in Thailand: Challenges and PossibilitiesKate Taylor, University of Texas at Austin School of LawShelley Marshall, RMIT

Law and Society Research on African IssuesSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Heinz Klug, Unversity of Winsconsin

Primary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law & Society

145

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Immorality and illegality: The use of 'good morals' in colonial and post-colonial African legal systemsMaya Berinzon, Virginia Tech

Suspicion or Trust: International Aid to Criminalize Female Genital Mutilation in SudanLiv Tønnessen, CMISamia Alnager, Independent Researcher

The Implementation of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) 2002 Judgment on the Bakassi Peninsula DisputeEric Elong Ebolo, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Women as Knowledge Architects: Feedback from the FieldRebecca A. Chaisson, Southern University at New OrleansLeslye Obiora, University of ArizonaJane Eggers, Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana

Legal Geography VI: Rethinking the space of law: criminalization and public spaceCRN: 35 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Luke McNamara, University of New South Wales

Discussant(s): Lisa Freeman, Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Description:Legal geographers have long been interested in the regulation of public space, emphasizing the adoption of a variety of spatial forms of regulation and control, particularly but not exclusively in relation to marginalized people. This series of papers attempts to push the research agenda forward. Through a series of empirically based projects from Canada, the US, and Australia on topics such as alcohol regulation, bail/probation, and dress codes, the papers unpack the historical roots of legal regulation, the historical dimensions of territory, the use of private actors in enhanced criminal surveillance, and the role of visuality in the governance of public space.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Australian Approaches to Administrative Governance, Crime Control and Zonal BanningIan Warren, Deakin University

Carving Judicial Territories: Conditions of Release over Space andTimeMarie-Eve Sylvestre, Faculty of Law - Univ of Ottawa

Scopic Relations as Spatial Relations as Legal RelationsDavid Delaney, Amherst CollegePäivi Rannila, University of Turku

The time of Territory: Bail, Probation, and the Spacetime of ‘Conditions of Release’.Nicholas Blomley, Simon Fraser UniversityMarie-Eve Sylvestre, Faculty of Law - University of Ottawa

“Jailers in the Community”: Responsibilizing Private Citizens as Third-Party PoliceNicole Myers, Simon Fraser University

Mobility, Migration, Nationality and Displaceability in the International Legal and Economic OrderCRN: 23 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Luis Eslava, Kent Law School

Description:Papers in this session discuss the nature, dynamics and challenges of mobility, migration, nationality and displaceability within the current international legal and economic order.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Between De-Legalisation and Hyper-Legalisation? On Law, Norms and Principles in the External Management of MigrationElaine Fahey, City Law School, City, Univ. of London

Mobile Capital, Migrant Labour: International Economic Law at the CrossroadsChristopher Boyd, University of Glasgow

The International Nationality Regime: From Imperial Past to Global ProspectsAudie Klotz, Syracuse University

The Legal Construction of Migrant Lives: Navigating Borders in Spaces of SuspensionVeronica Corcodel, Sciences Po Paris

146


atu

rda

y

Navigating Beyond the Crossroads: A Gendered Approach to Realizing AU Agenda 2063Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Egbewole Abdulwahab Olasupo, Univ. of Ilorin, Nigeria

Participant(s):Michael Addaney, Research Institute of Environmental Law, Wuhan UniversityNgozi Chuma-umeh, Imo State UniversityAdekilekun Mubarak, University of IlorinOlanike Odewale, American University of Nigeria, Yola, Adamawa, NigeriaBright Sefah, African Union Commission

Description:The African Union Agenda 2063 aspires for an "Africa whose development is people driven, relying on the potential offered by people, especially its women and youth and caring for children". Focusing on the role of women towards realizing the aspiration, the panel would examine the jurisprudence on various issues that affect women in Africa. For instance, what roles have women played in the constitution making process post colonial Africa? Have African women made any contribution to the political economy of Africa? Understanding the sociology of the African custom and practices would provide a basis to examine the jurisprudence on the role of women in the judiciary; access to justice of women with disability and the role of women in accessing socio economic benefits.

Secondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Prisons in Latin America ICRN: 27 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair(s): Maximo Sozzo, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

Description:In Latin America there has been an impressive growth in the imprisonment rates with varying degrees in different jurisdictions. In this context, prisons have become increasingly an object of inquiry by social researchers. These sessions seeks to discuss two central axes of these explorations in a interrelated way: mutations in power relations and the role of violence in the construction of order inside prisons and changes in the effects of incarceration both within and beyond the walls of the prison.


Presentations:Discretion and the Use of Power in Uruguayan Prisons: Analyzing Prison Officers Attitudes and OpinionsAna Vigna, Universidad de la República

Governance, Autonomy and Negotiation in Prisons in Latin America.Maximo Sozzo, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

Governance, power and order in two prisons in Pernambuco: the cases of Recife and CaruaruJosé Luiz Ratton, Federal University of PernambucoEduardo de Alencar, Federal Univ. of PernambucoPollyana Queiroz, FAVIP

Order and Violent Exchange in Nicaraguan Prison Governance ArrangementsJulienne Weegels, Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation

Queer Theory and Law 2CRN: 51 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Chair/Discussant(s): Tamsin Paige, UNSW Canberra @ ADFA

Description:This is the second of two panels on queer theory and law, as part of the new queer/law CRN 51. Papers on this panel will address: non-binary people and the limitations of the category 'X'; the regulation of sex on drugs; violence against LGBT individuals in Russia; religion and LGBTIQ rights in South Africa; and queer theory and extraterritoriality.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:From 'Chemsex' to Pharmacosexuality: Regulating Sex on DrugsAlex Dymock, Royal Holloway, University of LondonLeah Moyle, Griffith University

Queering extraterritoriality Ralph Wilde, UCL

The Right to Equality Versus the Right to Religious Freedom: A New Frontier Opens in the LGBTIQ Rights Struggle in South AfricaPierre De Vos, University of Cape Town

Violence Against LGBT Individuals in Russia: Obtaining Statistical DataAlexander Kondakov, European Univ. at St. Petersburg

147

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Remorse and Apology in the Construction of the ‘Ideal Defendant’: Cultural Expectations in Legal ProcessCRN: 42 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Richard Weisman, York University

Description:This session examines the ways the 'ideal' defendant is constructed in the criminal-penal process. It scrutinises the dual role of investigation about the individual defendant. On one hand, individualisation promises humane treatment. On the other, it requires the defendant to admit fully and sincerely the alleged offence, displaying the suitable posture of responsibility and sincere remorse. The court's normative constructions may take the form of overall judgements of the quality of a defendant (character or personality) or of the quality of acceptance of guilt and responsibility through expressions of remorse and apology. By examining both adversarial and inquisitorial regimes, similarities and contrasts can be drawn as to the way these cultural expectations are shaped by different conceptions of relations between state and citizen.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Court rituals and constructions of individual responsibility: understandings of guilt in the criminal processJackie Hodgson, Warwick University School of Law

Ritual Individualization and French Political Culture: Observations from the Cour d’AssisesStewart Field, Cardiff University School of Law and Politics

The role of the defendant in continental criminal procedures: dilemmas & contradictionsMojca M. Plesnicar, Institute of Criminology at the Faculty of Law Ljubljana

Socio-Legal Studies of South AsiaCRN: 22 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Marc Galanter, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Description:This panel showcases socio-legal research on South Asia--from gender and reproduction-related studies to work on child labor, the personal law system, and policing.

Primary Keyword: South Asia, South Asian Studies, South Asian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:"From here to nowhere": Sex Work Rights in the Era of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylactics (PrEP) in Sonagachhi, IndiaSimanti Dasgupta, University of Dayton

Indian personal law system - gaps and remedies.Anna Drwal, Jagiellonian University

Legal Knowledge and Compliance with Child Labor Law in India & NepalSusan L. Ostermann, University of Notre DameTushi Baul, University of Notre Dame

Mapping Violence in the Lives of Adivasi (Indigenous) Women: A Study from Jharkhand (India)Kriti Sharma, Stanford Law School

Paternity disputes and DNA testing in Indian courts: A feminist appraisalManpreet Dhillon, Jawaharlal Nehru University

Police unionism and “lawfare” in postcolonial IndiaBeatrice Jauregui, University of Toronto

Stakeholders, Trust and Corporate GovernanceCRN: 46 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Description:As Lynn Stout and others have demonstrated, firms have responsibilities that go far beyond shareholders. This panel will explore the shift to stakeholder interests, the meaning of those interests, and how trust plays a key role in governance.

Primary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and TransactionsSecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:Corporate Management & Communication of Environmental and Social Risks: Pressures are BuildingGill North, Deakin University

Proxy Advisors and Team ProductionEmily Winston, NYU

148


atu

rda

y

Proxy Services And The Rise of The Ethical ShareholderTamara Belinfanti, New York Law SchoolLynn Stout, Cornell Law School

The Law of Identity HarmSarah Dadush, Rutgers School of Law, Newark

The Role of Trust in Business Entity Law: Lessons from Islamic JurisprudenceRussell Powell, Seattle University

Talking Law and PoliticsSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Renee Cramer, Drake University

Discussant(s): Jeffrey Dudas, University of Connecticut

Description:This panel brings together an outstanding collection of scholars at a variety of points in their careers - all of whom consider the discursive conventions that underlie and animate the varied relations between law and politics in contemporary times. This panel is as wide-ranging as it is dynamic. Paper topics include the policing of protest politics in modern America (Passavant), the neo-liberal imperatives at the heart of the regulation of American midwives (Cramer), the legal dynamics of reparation movements in post-colonial Martinique (Fredette and Pool), the legal elaboration of family and sexuality in American popular culture (Burgess), and the contemporary media and scholarly fetishization of the rights and interests of the American "white working class" (Dudas).

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:"Fuck It": Despair and the Mythology of the American White Working ClassJeffrey Dudas, University of Connecticut

Policing Occupy and its ExcessesPaul Passavant, Hobart and William Smith Colleges

Pop Culture and Legal Transformation: The Construction of Family and Sexuality in ‘The Americans’Susan Burgess, Ohio University

Pro-Midwifery Legal Activism: Between Consciousness and Mobilization, the Tenuous Impact of ImplementationRenee Cramer, Drake University

The Legal Fight for Reparations on MartiniqueJennifer Fredette, North Central CollegeHeather Pool, Denison University

Taxation and Artificial IntelligenceCRN: 31 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair/Discussant(s): Heather Field, UC Hastings College of the Law

Description:This panel will consider issues related to tax that arise in the arena of artificial intelligence and technology.

Primary Keyword: Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal PoliciesSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Bundling/Unbundling Tax BasesHenry Ordower, Saint Louis University School of Law

I Robot, U Tax: Considering the Costs of AutomationRoberta Mann, University of Oregon School of Law

Income Tax issues relating to Crowdfunding in AustraliaFiona Martin, University of New South Wales, Australia

Technology, Innovation, & Social ChangeCRN: 14 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair(s): Shubha Ghosh, Syracuse

Discussant(s): William Gallagher, Golden Gate University School of Law

Description:Innovation is linked to technology but is defined not only by the attractions of new things. Changes in attitudes, social relations, and well-being fuel and are fueled by innovation. How can we reduce the complex dynamics of newness into measurable and assessable quantities? These scholars enter headfirst into these difficult questions, offering perspectives from within economics, sociology, and cultural theory and entangling how intellectual complexities can inform legal institutions and policies.

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot LawSecondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

149

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Dynamics of Industrial R&D and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Recent Survey Data from IndiaAshish Bharadwaj, Jindal Global Law School

Fair Dealing at Copyright's Crossroads: Towards Dialogism or Down the Path of Dueling Rights?Carys Craig, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Linking (IP) to Unfold Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility Derived from HarmAndrea Torres-Sarmiento, Universidad del Rosario

The Uses of IP MisuseDeepa Varadarajan, Georgia State University

The Jurisprudence of Art, Culture and PropertySaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Primary Keyword: Art and the Law

Presentations:Graffiti, Street Art, and the Purpose of Copyright LawPascale Chapdelaine, Univ. of Windsor, Faculty of Law

Singing the Law: The Musicality of Legal PerformanceSean Mulcahy, Univ. of Warwick / Monash University

Stealing Culture: The Intersection of Law and ArtDarrell Jackson, University of Wyoming College of LawNicole M Crawford, Univ. of Wyoming Art Museum

The International Right to Restitution of Cultural Property before the 1954 ConventionYue Zhang, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison Law School

Theatre as Jurisprudence: Investigating Race, Trauma and Whiteness in the Canadian Legal Imagination through Re: Munshi Singh and Two Plays on the Komagata MaruManpreet Dhaliwal,Centennial College

Transitional Justice, the Bounded Time of Political Transition, and Aesthetic SubversionTiffany MacLellan, Carleton University

The Mechanisms of Transnational Regulatory Governance: Contracts, Norms, and StandardsCRN: 5 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Colin Provost, University College London

Discussant(s): Matthew Amengual, MIT

Description:This panel examines the various mechanisms through which regulation and governance are coordinated at the transnational level. Specifically, the authors will discuss how formal and informal tools such as contracts, norms, and standards shape the behavior of actors and regulatory outcomes in a transnational setting.


Presentations:Exploiting the Globalization of Finance: Recognizing Norms that Preserve the Legality of Offshore Tax AvoidanceAngela Licata, McMaster University

International Investment Protection Regime as a transnational regulatory mechanismGustav Kalm, Columbia University

Private Transnational Contractual Regulation and its Intersection with Global Agri-food ChainsJacob Muirhead, University of McMaster

Transformative Local, National and Transnational Natural Resource GovernanceCRN: 23 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Phillip Paiement, Tilburg Law School

Discussant(s): Usha Natarajan, American University in Cairo

Description:This panel critically interrogates ways of imagining, enacting and actualizing more transformative models of natural resource governance to better promote human rights and realize redistributive justice. The papers address the South African mineral resource terrain; the fraught relationship between biofuels, food and sustainability; rights and the "resource curse" in rentier states; corporate governance and company-community conflicts in extractive zones; rights of informal waste pickers in South Africa; and land disputes and rights of tribal communities in India. By examining the many local, national and global sites where decisions pertaining to natural resources are made – including courts, corporate offices, local struggles and voluntary certification schemes – the papers point to numerous potential ways of transforming practices.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy,

150


atu

rda

y

Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:An examination of how the courts have dealt with contestations over the state’s attempts to transform South Africa’s mineral resources terrainJackie Dugard, University of the Witwatersrand

Corporate Law in the Human Rights Zone: Loyalty, Humanity and the Global FirmMalcolm Rogge, Harvard Law School

The Formalisation of South African Waste Pickers in a Globalised Recycling EconomyAllison Lindner, Kent Law School, University of Kent

U.S. and Canadian Access to Justice II: New Approaches and Research MethodologiesSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Alyx Mark, North Central College Rebecca Sandefur, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Discussant(s): Jessica Steinberg, George Washington Univ. Law School

Description:In this session, panelists from American and Canadian institutions will discuss innovative research in the access to justice field, including novel scholarship on methods to meet the legal needs of both consumers and communities, as well as on the application of methodological approaches to the field.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Access to (Legal) Information as Access to Justice: Case Study of Consumer Rights of Wireless ServicesMarina Pavlovic, University of OttawaMary Cavanagh, University of Ottawa

Exploring Action Research as an Enabler of Innovation in the Justice Sector: Tackling the Wicked Problem of Access to JusticeMichele Leering, Queen's University Faculty of Law

Legal Secondary ConsultationAlbert Currie, Canadian Forum on Civil Justice

Methodological Approaches for Studying the "New" Civil JudgesAlyx Mark, North Central College

Anna Carpenter, University of Tulsa College of LawColleen Shanahan, Temple Univ. Beasley School of LawJessica Steinberg, George Washington Univ. Law School

U.S. Deportation and Detention Beyond BordersSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Beth Caldwell, Southwestern Law School

Participant(s):Susan Bibler Coutin, University of California IrvineBeth Caldwell, Southwestern Law SchoolTobin Hansen, University of OregonYolanda Vazquez, Univ. of Cincinnati College of Law

Description:The United States has rapidly expanded its use of immigration detention in the past decade, currently detaining between 380,000 and 442,000 people annually. The expanded use of detention has gone hand in hand with an increased reliance on deportation, a practice that has become so widespread that many refer to current U.S. policy as a "mass deportation" effort. This roundtable brings together an inter-disciplinary group of scholars to discuss U.S. immigration enforcement in the current moment and its transnational effects. We will explore how U.S. detention and deportation policies reach outside the boundaries of the country, affecting individuals, families, communities and social structures outside of the United States.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Virtue, Freedom, Equality, Sovereignty: Theories of Law and JusticeSaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Spruce

Description:The papers in this session explore theories of law and justice from a variety of perspectives. Papers touch on technology, expression, natural low, and sovereignty.


Presentations:Freedom and Affordances of the NetChristoph B. Graber, University of Zurich, Faculty of Law

Realist Natural Law in a Sorld of ‘Alternative Facts’Gavin Byrne, Birmingham Law School, Univ. of Birmingham

151

Saturday 8:00 a.m.. - 9:45 a.m..S

atu

rda

y

Shallow Equality and Symbolic Jurisprudence: A Commentary on Legal Multilingualism in the World TodayJanny Leung, The University of Hong Kong

Sovereignty in the 21th CenturyEnrique Gonzalez, UNAM

Virtue Jurisprudence: Aristotelian Equity and Category of XunziChi-Shing Chen, National ChengChi University

Vulnerability Theory and Resilience: Retrospective/Prospective IISaturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s):Deborah Dinner, Emory University School of LawMartha Albertson Fineman, Emory University

Discussant(s):Hila Keren, Southwestern Law SchoolSuzanne Kim, Rutgers University School of Law, Newark

Participant(s):Kristin Bumiller, Amherst CollegeJonathan Fineman, Florida A&M Univ. College of LawLorna Fox O'Mahony, University of EssexFabrizia Pessoa Serafim, Emory UniversityLua Yuille, University of Kansas School of Law

Description:This will be the second in a set of panels to review and discuss the scholarly impact of vulnerability theory. Vulnerability is understood as the universal and constant susceptibility to change, both positive and negative, in human physical and social wellbeing over the life course. It is human vulnerability and the dependency it inherently entails that compels the creation of institutions and relationships, from the family to international regulatory structures. What does this reality mean for law and theories of justice? Participants will draw from various theoretical and doctrinal backgrounds to overview the development of vulnerability theory, with particular attention to questions of resilience and the responsive state. Please join us for this retrospective and prospective discussion on rethinking the vulnerable subject of law.

Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

“Not for Rent”: A Film Screening and Discussion of Housing Policy and Reentry into SocietyCRN: 27 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Linden

Chair(s): Monica Williams, Weber State University

Discussant(s): Sheri-Lynn Kurisu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Participant(s):Matt Duhamel, Metamora FilmsKimberly Kras, University of Massachusetts LowellSheri-Lynn Kurisu, Univ of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignBreanne Pleggenkuhle, Southern Illinois Univ CarbondaleBrianna Remster, Villanova University

Description:This session will include a viewing and discussion of a 50-minute documentary entitled "Not for Rent!" which chronicles the barriers that formerly incarcerated people face in finding housing in Utah, a state in which numerous cities have implemented "good landlord" programs that incentivize landlords to not rent to people with criminal backgrounds. These policies exacerbate problems with finding housing while also purporting to enhance public safety and revitalize communities. The panel discussion following the film will discuss the implications of these types of housing policies for understanding how communities, legislators, and formerly incarcerated people can work together to meet shared goals of public safety and strong communities with good quality of life.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and Urbanism

“Revenge Porn”, “Child Porn”, and Images of Sexual Violence: Non-consensual Intimate Image Sharing in CanadaCRN: 37 Saturday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair/Discussant(s): Andrea Slane, University of Ontario Institute of Technology

Description:This panel explores questions surrounding the legal, social, technological, and cultural impacts of young peoples' sexual image creation and distribution. The panel will highlight judicial

152

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

interpretations of the "private use exception" to Canada's Child Pornography laws and its new Intimate Images provisions; legal conceptions of consent, control, possession, privacy and harm associated with "child porn" and nonconsensual sharing of intimate images (NCIIS); individuation and value systems related to "intimate images"; as well how youth understand and navigate their sexual lives in our current legal, technological and cultural landscape.

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot LawSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Cyber Harm, “Real” Harm, Emotional Harm: Legal Conceptions of the Harm Caused by Non-Consensual Intimate Image SharingAlexa Dodge, Carleton University

Modernising the “Private Use Exception” to Canada’s Child Pornography Laws: Judging Privacy, Possession, and Exploitation in the Digital AgeLara Karaian, Carleton UniversityDillon Brady, Carleton University

“I Feel Like it Takes Something to Happen for People to Know About it or do Something About it Now”: Youth Navigating Sexuality in post-2013 Nova ScotiaEmily Lockhart, York University

Indigenous Courts, Self-determination and Criminal JusticeCRN: 34 Saturday Session 1B, 9:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session


Author(s): Valmaine Toki, University of Waikato

Reader(s): Elena Marchetti, Griffith University

Description:In New Zealand, Australia, Canada and other comparable jurisdictions, Indigenous peoples comprise a significantly disproportionate percentage of the prison population. Maori, who comprise 15% of New Zealand's population, make up 50% of its prisoners. For Maori women, the figure is 60%. This book explores how this might be alleviated. Taking seriously the rights to culture and to self-determination contained in the Treaty of Waitangi, and also in the UNDRIP, the book makes the case for an Indigenous court founded on Indigenous conceptions of

proper conduct, punishment, and behavior. More specifically, the book draws on contemporary notions of 'therapeutic jurisprudence' and 'restorative justice' in order to argue that such a court would offer an effective way to ameliorate the disproportionate incarceration of Indigenous peoples.


100 Years of Joseph Schumpeter’s "Crisis of the Tax State"CRN: 31 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Neil Buchanan, The George Washington Univ. Law School

Participant(s):Max Boada, Zeppelin UniversityDominic de Cogan, University of CambridgeAlfred Duncan, University of KentHooi May Hen, University of CambridgeMichael Littlewood, Auckland Law SchoolAnn Mumford, King's College London

Description:We approach the centenary of Schumpeter's Crisis of the Tax State. This essay is a fascinating record of a moment in history, but is also important for scholars for two reasons. First, it is full of memorable phrases such as the remark on fiscal history that 'He who knows how to listen to its message here discerns the thunder of world history more clearly than anywhere else'. Second, the idea that tax influences the survival and development of state and social institutions is destabilising for academic disciplines. It makes tax law difficult to separate from history, politics, economics and sociology, but has also inspired literatures in fiscal history, development and critical theory.Our round-table of scholars considers the question "what is the significance of this essay for tax academia" and draws on the text itself for inspiration.

Primary Keyword: Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal PoliciesSecondary Keyword: Democracy, Governance and State Theory;

Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions Accommodating Religious DiversitySaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Saturday June 10, Sess ion 1B9:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

Saturday June 10, Sess ion 210:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

153

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Chair(s): Ioanna Tourkochoriti, NUI Galway School of Law

Discussant(s): Caroline Mala Corbin, Univ. of Miami School of Law

Description:This session will explore recent cases that have stirred controversy involving issues of religious freedom. Speakers will discuss recent cases from all over the world on issues such as the professional rights of graduates of religious Law Schools in Canada, religious exemptions to laws of general applicability such as enforcing antidiscrimination law upon religious institutions (relevant recent cases from the US and the UK), social integration of religious minorities (in countries such as Portugal, Spain and Italy) and manifestation of religion in the workplace (relevant recent CJEU cases). The participants will comment on these cases from various jurisdictions from all over the world to see how different experiences can be mutually instructive for the solution of the relevant moral and political dilemmas.

Primary Keyword: Religion and Law, Religious StudiesSecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:Associational Rights and Professional Rights in Canada: Religious Professional Schools and Canada in the wake of the Trinity Western University Law School DecisionMohammad Fadel, University of Toronto

How can a comparative approach to accommodating religion be mutually instructive for European and American Courts?Ioanna Tourkochoriti, NUI Galway School of Law

Religious freedom in the case law of Portuguese, Spanish and Italian courtsPatrícia Jerónimo, Law School, Minho University

Religious Freedom in the Jurisprudence of the U.K. and U.S. Supreme Courts: the “Same-Sex Wedding Cake” CasesPeter Danchin, University of Maryland School of Law

The Muslim Face Veil in Comparative Perspective.Melanie Adrian, Carleton University

Adjudication and SentencingSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This session focuses on the courts. Papers examine the role prosecutors, plea bargains, and life without parole sentences play in youth and adult justice.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Are youth offenders getting the “worst of both worlds”? The legitimate construction of youth justice by the Brazilian Superior Court of JusticeEduardo Cornelius, York University

Decarceration, Local Politics, and the Struggle for Racial Equality in the American Penal SystemGarrick Percival, San José State University

Deterrence, Incapacitation, and the “New Death Penalty”: Examining the Crime Reducing Power of Life Without ParoleRoss Kleinstuber, University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownJeremiah Coldsmith, Univ of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

Angry White Men and the Alpha Male Blues: Shootings and Sexual HarassmentCRN: 17 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s):Palma Strand, Creighton University

Participant(s):Jacqueline Font-Guzman, Creighton UniversityPaul McGreal, Creighton UniversityPalma Strand, Creighton University

Description:White men's loss of status places the U.S. at a social and legal crossroads and links shootings and sexual harassment. We reframe these issues, connecting social science with conflict studies and law. White men are "just another demographic identity group," and there is a downside to privilege that makes loss of status hard to handle. We connect shootings and sexual harassment by analyzing recent news using the psychology of infrahumanization and moral disengagement. We apply Arendt's insight that power in jeopardy evokes violence, and we explore disrupting hegemonic masculinities and offering alternative narratives. We critique legal and sociological assumptions and beliefs that effective compliance and ethics programs will prevent, detect, and address sexual harassment. We then revisit shootings using the above perspectives.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

154

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

Comparative ConstitutionalismCRN: 1 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Rafael Mario Iorio Filho, Universidade Estácio de Sá e INCT-InEAC

Discussant(s): Denis De Castro Halis, Faculty of Law / University of Macau

Description:Societies in Asia and the Americas may seem to have nothing in common given their particularities; however, many countries in these two regions share similar historical and political experiences (e.g. dictatorships, revolutions, democratic mobilizations, civil rights or human rights problems, corruption etc.) and interact more and more pushed by economic and cultural globalization. Nevertheless these geographically diverse societies, although very different in their current legal and political cultures, may also share constitutional and democratic values. This session intends to bring together scholars engaged in studying the evolvement of constitutional features, either regarding constitutional law or constitutional theory, related to these regional foci.


Presentations:Judicial Resilience : The Cypriot Tale of Crisis and TransformationElena Kapardis, University of Birmingham

Media Law and Illiberal Democracy in the European UnionLucia Bellucci, Università degli Studi di Milano

Presidential Calls to Congress to Overrule Supreme Court DecisionsPaul Collins, University of Massachusetts AmherstMatthew Eshbaugh-Soha, University of North Texas

What is an Article V Convention?Matthew Steilen, University at Buffalo School of Law

Comparative Perspectives on Taxation IICRN: 31 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair: Emily Satterthwaite, Univ. of Toronto Faculty of Law

Description:This panel considers tax policy issues that arise in a variety of international contexts, and domestically in different countries.


Presentations:Constitutional Values and Civil Servant Recruitment: The Principles for Filling Revenue Service Positions in PolandKaja Gadowska, Jagiellonian University

Fiscal state aid and tax legitimacy linked to environmental - and energy taxationYvette Lind, Department of business and economic studies, University of Gävle

Gender equality and taxation in the European Union - a matter of tax fairnessÅsa Gunnarsson, Forum for Studies on Law and Society

The Taxation of Goods and Services in Brazil: The Canadian System as a Model? Melina Rocha Lukic, Fundacao Getulio Vargas - Direito Rio

Constitutionalism in ContextCRN: 33 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): David S Law, Washington University

Discussant(s):Malcolm Langford, University of OsloChien-Chih Lin, Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica

Description:This panel, drawn from the forthcoming volume Constitutionalism in Context (CUP 2018), offers context-rich and interdisciplinary perspectives on issues and jurisdictions at the cutting edge of the study of constitutionalism. The issues range from the performance of traditionally constitutional functions by transnational private regulation, to the proliferation of government institutions that fall outside the traditional separation of powers framework, to the bifurcation of citizenship and nationality in deeply divided societies, to transnational communication among judges, to the emergence of forms of judicial review that range from "soft" to "super-hard" and beyond.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

155

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Citizenship in ContextChristos Papastylianos, University of NicosiaAchilles Emilianides, University of Nicosia

Emergency Powers and Military Rule in AsiaVictor V. Ramraj, University of Victoria

Institutions Supporting Constitutional Democracy: Anti-Corruption Investigations in South AfricaMark Tushnet, Harvard University

Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in TaiwanDavid S Law, Washington UniversityWen Chen Chang, National Taiwan Univ College of Law

Transnational Judicial Communication: the European UnionElaine Mak, Utrecht University, School of Law, Economics and Governance

Transnational Private Regulation and Constitutional Law in Thailand: The Equator Principles as Surrogate Public LawThitinant Tengaumnuay, Chulalongkorn Univ, ThailandVictor V. Ramraj, University of Victoria

Crime and Sanction in BusinessSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel will focus on various aspects of crime and sanction in the business or financial context. Papers will examine a new approach to regulation in the aftermath of the financial crisis, the origins of corporate criminal law during the progressive era, efforts in the international arena to prevent bribery in business, the law and consequences of the Libor scandal, and dispossession of the homeless in connection with the financialization of a major municipality.


Presentations:Does the Time Fit the Crime? The Division of Responsibilities in the Legal Treatment of the Libor ScandalThomas Angeletti, CNRS

Recursivity and the Ongoing Evolution of International Legal Obligations to Prevent Bribery in BusinessElizabeth Acorn, Cornell University

The Missing Socio-Legal Context for Post-Crisis Financial RegulationRobert Weber, Georgia State University College of Law

Criminal Law: The Crisis and the ClassroomSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Chestnut West

Chair/Discussant(s):Alice Ristroph, Brooklyn Law School

Participant(s):Alice Ristroph, Brooklyn Law SchoolMario Barnes, University of California-IrvineKami Chavis, Wake Forest University School of LawEric Miller, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Description:American criminal justice has changed dramatically over the past half-century, and many observers now describe the system as one in crisis. Over the same time period, the basic structure and content of the substantive criminal law course taught in American law schools has barely changed at all, with the possible exception that rape may be taught more often than it used to be. With heavy emphasis on theories of punishment, common law doctrines, and homicide, the typical first-year substantive criminal law course can and often does omit in-depth discussions of drug crimes and the low-level offenses that make up the bulk of actual criminal dockets, racial disparities, prosecutorial discretion, the prevalence of guilty pleas, and other socio-legal realities of twenty-first century criminal justice practices. Are we teaching what we should be teaching? Could teachers of American criminal law draw inspiration from other academic fields, or from the criminal law curriculum in other countries? Might the path to criminal justice reform begin in, or at least run through, the classroom?

Emotion, Judging, and the Nature of Legal ReasoningCRN: 42 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Discussant(s): Neal Feigenson, Quinnipiac Univ. School of Law

Description:In some respects, the legal system has become increasingly willing to reexamine the notion that emotion is the enemy of reason. Yet the idea of judging as a purely cognitive endeavor persists. This panel considers the role of emotion in judging from several vantage points, including emotion's role in the cognitive process of judging, the strategies judges use to manage their own emotions, and the attitudes of judges (and other legal actors) toward their own emotions and the emotions

156

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

of others. The panel also recognizes the comparative dimension of these issues, exploring judicial attitudes toward emotion in several different cultures.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Law and Psychology

Presentations:Emotions and the Politics of Attention in Legal ReasoningEmily White, New York University School of Law

Epistemic ExceptionalismJames Dillon, Columbia Law School

Managing Judicial EmotionsSharyn Roach Anleu, Flinders UniversityKathy Mack, Law School, Flinders University

The importance of emotions in the daily professional life of judges: some insights from the biographies of Brazilian judgesAna Carolina Faria Silvestre, Faculdade de Direito do Sul de Minas

Why Should Harms to the Emotions Count?Hila Keren, Southwestern Law School

Examination of the Effects of 'Crime-Security Nexus' in CanadaCRN: 50 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Mariful Alam, York University

Description:The papers in this salon draw on Anna Pratt's concept of the 'crime-security nexus' as an analytical tool to discuss topics ranging from human trafficking, migration and political surveillance. For Pratt (2005), the crime/security nexus refers to two simultaneous processes: first, certain forms of criminality have been reconceptualised as threats to national security, and the second process radically reconfigures and extends the concept of national security "to include governmental concerns with public safety and the economy and to therefore encompass a host of 'true crimes' including, organized crime, drug trafficking, and prostitution. The concept offers a useful tool for socio-legal scholars to critically assess how the law (re)-produces mutually constituting relations of power, subjectivity,and identity in new and innovate ways.

Primary Keyword: Terrorism, National SecuritySecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:From Ideological Threats to Criminality and Terror: The Shifting Dynamics between Covert Political Surveillance and ResistanceMariful Alam, York University

The Operationalization of Canada’s ‘Human Trafficking Matrix’ and the Role of the ‘Crime-Security Nexus’Katrin Roots, York University

Genocide, Law, and Culture: Crossroads and Twisted PathsCRN: 21 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Sally Engle Merry, New York University

Description:The panel explores, through anthropological and sociological lenses, how law frames genocide, mass atrocities, and crimes against humanity. The focus is on cultural dimensions of legal interventions. Panelists address questions such as: How is the transmission of global genocide law to the level of nation states filtered through national cultures? How does the enforcement of genocide law generate cultural representations of mass violence? What do tribunals mean in terms of everyday life and practices? How might legal responses to genocide consider integral relations of natures and cultures that make group life possible? What are potential consequences for future violence or peace?

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Violence

Presentations:Culture and Genocide Law: Consequences and ConditionsJoachim Savelsberg, University of Minnesota

National Translations of the Global Crime of GenocideSuzy McElrath, University of Minnesota

Symbiotic Destruction: Law and Human/Other-Than-Human Relationality in GenocideAndrew Woolford, University of ManitobaWanda Hounslow, University of Manitoba

The Justice Facade: Trials of Transition in CambodiaAlexander Hinton, Rutgers University

157

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Environmental RightsSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jean Carmalt, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Description:This session explores issues related to human rights, environmental rights, and social movements, including climate change and movement mobilization.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Legislating Race: The Indian Child Welfare Act, The Multiethnic Placement Act & The Interethnic Adoption ProvisionsEmma Shakeshaft, Tulane University

Protesting while Incarcerated: Social Movement Mobilization Tactics as an Expression of Agency in Midwest U.S. Maximum-Security PrisonsSheri-Lynn Kurisu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Realizing the Right to Be Cold? Tracing the Impact of the 2005 Inuit Petition on Human Rights and Climate ChangeSebastien Jodoin, McGill UniversityArielle Corobow, McGill UniversityShannon Snow, McGill University

Indigenous Knowledge and ConceptsCRN: 34 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Description:This panel examines the growing movement that demands recognition for the articulation of, and practices in, Indigenous knowledge, law and institutions.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Culture, And Cultural Rights

Presentations:Reclaiming Resiliency: Resiliency as an Indigenous ConceptElizabeth Kronk Warner, Univ. of Kansas School of Law

The Empowerment of Rural Communities Around Forest Based on Local Wisdom (A Case Studies in West Bali National Park Indonesia)Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

International Law as Literary Genre: Literature, Politics and the Linguistic Crossroads of International LawCRN: 23 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Jacqueline Mowbray, University of Sydney

Description:There is now a large body of work which considers international law as a language. This panel seeks to push this insight further, by treating international law as a form of literary genre, and exploring some of the key features of that genre. It starts by considering practical questions: in which languages is international law 'written', and how does this shape the genre? How does the dominance of English affect international law's claims to universality, at the crossroads of different cultures? We then move out to consider broader questions, such as style, and the role of emotions in the life of international law; as well as more specific questions of technique: what tropes or devices are used in international legal discourse, and to what effect? And what are the political implications of these findings?

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Law and Literature

Presentations:Lingua Francas of Global Governance: Choice of Language in International LawJacqueline Mowbray, University of SydneySentimentalityGerry Simpson, LSE

The Language of Representation: Portraying China in International Economic LawLisa Toohey, Newcastle Law School

When Is Speech Law? Indigenous and Colonial Declarations at the League of NationsGenevieve Painter, McGill University, Faculty of Law

158

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

IP Across DisciplinesCRN: 14 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): William Gallagher, Golden Gate University School of Law

Discussant(s):Shubha Ghosh, SyracusePeter Yu, Texas A&M School of Law

Description:Judges, advocates, scholars--all have searched for boundaries across disciplines, the forms of intellectual property, and legal doctrines. However, too rigid a quest for formality counters the fluidity of innovation and its dynamics. These scholars explore different parts of the multi-dimensional boundaries, tearing down many walls, perhaps in preparation for new ones. Whether in neuroscience and trademarks, feminism and copyright, data protection, or patenting of behavior, the discussion will map how boundaries are contested and reshaped.

Primary Keyword:Intellectual Property, Culture, and Cultural Heritage

Presentations:Closing the Floodgates: The Need for a Uniform Data Breach Notification LawBrowne Lewis, Cleveland Marshall College of Law

Copyright's Male Gaze: Authorship and Inequality in a Panoptic WorldJohn Tehranian, Southwestern Law School

Prizes, Rewards and Innovation in the British Empire c.1750-1850Catherine Kelly, University of BristolRobert Burrell, University of Sheffield

The Statute of the Pan-African Intellectual Property Organization: A Human Rights PerspectiveEmmanuel Kolawole Oke, University of Edinburgh

Towards a New Relationship Between Trade Mark Law and PsychologyRobert Burrell, University of SheffieldKimberlee Weatherall, University of Sydney

Under the Influence of "He Who Must Not Be Named"U. Shen Goh, Osgoode Hall Law School

Jurisdictional Encounters and Demands for Justice in Natural Resource GovernanceCRN: 23 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Ileana Porras, University of Miami School of Law

Description:This panel examines questions of legal pluralism and justice in natural resource governance, especially the imperatives to acknowledge multiple laws, authorities and jurisdictional forms. The papers explore the relationship between forests rights, property and indigenous jurisdictions in India; legal pluralism in transnational struggles against fossil fuel extraction and circulation; indigenous rights, collective existence and international trade in the Arctic; decolonization, development, inequality and indigenous rights; and resilience and adaptive management of social-ecological systems. In doing so the papers envision more just, responsive and decolonial models for the transnational governance of natural resources.

Primary Keyword:Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword:Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:A Jurisdictional Reading of Struggles Against Fossil Fuel ExtractionJulia Dehm, La Trobe University School of Law

Occupy Law: Indigeneity in RightsRajshree Chandra, University of Delhi

Politics of Decolonization in Third and Fourth Worlds: Solidarity, Synergy and SustainabilityUsha Natarajan, American University in Cairo

Seal Hunting, Arctic Sovereignty, and Indigenous RightsMichael Fakhri, University of Oreogn

Towards a Theory of Just ResilienceMargherita Pieraccini, University of Bristol

159

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Law as Society? New Developments of Systems Theory with an Empirical EmphasisSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Edvaldo de Aguiar Portela Moita, University of Bielefeld / University of Brasília

Discussant(s): Luiz Felipe Rosa Ramos, University of São Paulo / University of Bielefeld / Yale University

Description:Niklas Luhmann's Social Systems Theory is one of the major contributions to sociology that provides a consistent theoretical framework to observe modern society as a world-encompassing system of communications. However, much criticism was addressed to its capacity of describing the world society, especially regarding the functional differentiation of Law, Politics and Economy not only in a theoretical level, but also in an empirical ground. This panel aims to gather research projects that are taking systems theory further by challenging its main assumptions as well as testing it in an empirical level. Some of the topics to be discussed are: the different effects of exclusion and globalization, the interaction between Law and Economics, the forms of risk and danger in social systems, and democratic engagements through International Courts.


Presentations:Antitrust and competition: from the environmental structure to the multivalued function.Luiz Felipe Rosa Ramos, University of São Paulo / University of Bielefeld / Yale University

Changing democracy: International Courts at a crossroad between legal and political forms of global democratic engagementCarina Calabria, University of Manchester

From exclusion to subinclusion: the debate in the light of systems theory and its further developmentsEdvaldo de Aguiar Portela Moita, University of Bielefeld / University of Brasília

Tensions between law and economy in the Housing Finance System: One approach from the systems theoryGabriel Ferreira da Fonseca, University of São Paulo

Law, Politics and Techniques: Trade, Investment, Competition and Governance in the International Legal and Economic OrderCRN: 23 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Chair/Discussant(s): Markus Gunneflo, Lund University

Description:This session explores different facets and challenges posed by the encounter of law, politics and techniques in the international legal and economic order. Attention is paid to the international trade system, the global investment and arbitration regime, the evolution of IP disciplines, the expansion of network technologies and transnational governance in local and global contexts.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Law in a time of 'planetary-scale computation'Jake Goldenfein, Swinburne University of Technology

Macunaíma Looking for a Place in the African Savanas: What lies Behind Brazil-Angola Trade and Investment Flows?Fabio Morosini, UFRGSMichelle Ratton Sanchez-Badin, FGV

Transnationalization of International ADR – Tensions and DevelopmentsShahla Ali, University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law

Law, Property, and HistoryCRN: 44 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): K-Sue Park, Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid

Description:This panel examines land dispossession in comparative historical perspective; individual papers examine the role of law in creating and extinguishing property rights.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

160

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Barker v. Harvey and the (Non-)Extinguishment of Native Title in CaliforniaWilliam Wood, Southwestern Law School

Land, law and apartheid’s legacy: the role of Communal Property Associations in South AfricaTara Weinberg, University of Michigan

“Constitutional Lion in the Path”: The Post–Fourteenth Amendment Halt to AnnexationsSam Erman, USC Gould School of Law

Legal Geography VIII: Making and Mapping the Legal Parameters of Public Space UseCRN: 35 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Nicholas Blomley, Simon Fraser University

Description:The concerns of socio-legal, criminal justice and legal geography scholars include the processes by which transgressive uses and appropriations of urban environments are constructed and policed. This series of papers attempts to make a contribution to this cross disciplinary research agenda. Drawing on studies from the Australia, the USA and Canada, on topics such as the policing of political protests, the 'PARK(ing) Day movement, social justice-inspired subversions of Airbnb and 'vernacular' crime-mapping, the papers in this panel explore the interplay between governmental logics of public space regulation and the manner in which legal claims to legitimacy are asserted by those who contest and resist these strictures and enact alternative visions of urban amenity and vitality.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Airbnb, a Platform for Social Justice?Nofar Sheffi, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Tel Aviv University

Criminalising Public Space Protest via Police Powers Innovations: Studies from AustraliaLuke McNamara, University of New South Wales

Sous les pavés, la plage! Remaking regulation in the streetAmelia Thorpe, UNSW

When the Map Makes the Territory: Vernacular Crime-mapping and Private-Law Governmentality of Public SpaceRichard Perry, UCB/SJSU

Legal Mobilization in the Global SouthCRN: 21 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Janice Gallagher, Rutgers University

Description:A robust literature has demonstrated the complicated and sometimes contradictory nature of legal consciousness and use of law. Yet we know relatively little about the mechanics of this relationship. What is the relationship between the ways in which actors understand the formal legal sphere and their choices about when and where to raise their grievances? When and why do actors perceive the legal system to be an efficacious forum in which to make rights claims? Why is it that in some contexts, individuals and social movements that express profound distrust of the law still turn to the formal legal system to make their claims? This panel explores these questions at different levels of analysis with distinct methodological approaches across the Global South.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal CulturesSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Constituting the Law: Legal Consciousness amongst Victims of ViolenceJanice Gallagher, Rutgers University

Denunciation in Transitional JusticeDaniel Blocq, Leiden Law School

Doing times: contemporary prison temporalitiesRafael Godoi, Universidade de São Paulo

Evaluating the Potential of Law in Development through the Lens of Legal Mobilization, and the Potential for Reflexive Legal LearningJeff Handmaker, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University

Searching for Justice in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: Building Legal Consciousness and its Meanings for Gender EqualityHolly Dunn, University of Minnesota

“We Want Freedom, and We Want Bread”: Legal Consciousness and Claims-Making in Post-Apartheid South AfricaWhitney Taylor, Cornell University

161

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Life of the Law - Pitching Scholarship to Media (A Workshop)Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Kent

Participant(s): Nancy Mullane, Life of the Law

Description:You've published years of research an now it's time to get it disseminated! To a wide audience!Get tips on best practices for reaching out to media to get tour scholarship in the news. Meet one-on-one with professional award-winning journalists and producers from Life of the Law. Come prepared to pitch your exciting scholarship for a possible story and they'll be ready to listen and provide individual feedback.

Managing Conflict in Law & SocietySaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:At its best, the state is structured to manage conflict internal to it. Conflict can involve all forms of difference among peoples, from racial to religious divisions, to power imbalances, to the conflict between adversaries of equal strength. This panel will explore example of each of these, including conflicts rooted in race and ethnicity, the choice to disregard orders coming down in the chain of command, narratives about the history of conquest and cooperation, dispute resolution in investor-state disagreements, and those conflicts pitting one right versus another.


Presentations:Educational Policy Reform in Post-Conflict Societies: The Impact of Curriculum and Pedagogy at the Crossroads of War and PeaceRuth Alminas, Fort Lewis College

Race, Coloniality, and the Redemptive Theologies of Pastoral Police PowerZahir Kolia, Lakehead University

The Concept of the Conflict – Human Right to Identity Versus State Right to it IntegralityMagdalena Butrymowicz, Pontifical University of John Paul II Krakow

Migrant Rights, Civic Engagement, and Transnational Advocacy: Examining the Multiplicity of Layers and Dynamic Influences on Immigrant RightsCRN: 2 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Deborah Weissman, University of North Carolina School of Law

Discussant(s): Shannon Gleeson, Cornell University

Description:This interdisciplinary panel will examine the social, legal, and political-economic systems and institutional mechanisms that motivate, facilitate, and otherwise support immigrants who seek to engage in civic life and exercise their rights. Panelists will focus on the interactions between migrants, civil society, and governmental entities at the local, regional, and transnational level. Presenters will discuss the varied practices of government institutions, social service agencies, and advocacy organizations of both the sending and receiving state.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:A Bridge to Membership: Diaspora Policies, Integration and Social Rights Beyond BordersAlexandra Délano Alonso, The New School

From Injuries to Constitutional Rights: Mobilization of Migrant Workers through Workers' CompensationVasanthi Venkatesh, Univ. of Windsor Faculty of Law

Mexico´s Consular Partnerships to Enforce Labor Standards for Immigrant Workers: Variation in Implementation Models across U.S. citiesShannon Gleeson, Cornell UniversityXóchitl Bada, University of Illinois at Chicago

States of Sanctuary: US Federal Migration Policy and Initiatives to Protect the Rights of Undocumented MigrantsBenjamin Bruce, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte

The Politics of Immigrant Rights: Between Political Geography and Transnational InterventionsDeborah Weissman, University of North Carolina School of Law

162

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

Migration in International Legal HistorySaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Umut Özsu, Carleton University

Participant(s):Sara Dehm, University of Technology, SydneyLeila Kawar, University of Massachusetts AmherstFrédéric Mégret, McGill UniversityChristopher Szabla, Cornell University

Description:The ongoing global "migration crisis" and debate about how legal and institutional mechanisms should address problems related to human movement raises questions about the history of the treatment of migration by means of transnational or international law and institutions. Elaborating on the conference theme of "Law at a Crossroads," this panel will bring together scholars from multiple countries and continents to offer a rare and novel interchange between the fields of international legal history and the history of migration to address the deep roots of difficulties addressing migration via international law today - with presentations focusing on the nineteenth century, early twentieth century and the interwar years, and the 1950s - as well as whether the same examples can serve as precedents for contemporary reform.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Legal History

Practicing Citizenship through Family ReunificationCRN: 2 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Rupaleem Bhuyan, University of Toronto

Description:This panel features papers from three national contexts--Mexico, the United States, and Canada-- to examine the strategies and legal options available to undocumented, irregular, and precarious migrants who seek access to permanent residence and the right to family reunification. The right to "family" (i.e. reuniting with family members through sponsoring their immigration) is constructed as a social entitlement of citizenship or permanent residence in many immigrant receiving countries. With growing numbers of precarious or irregularized long term residents, family reunification represents a contested practice where the boundaries of citizenship and belonging are negotiated.


Secondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:Migrant regularization after the Migration Law of 2011: An analysis of status regularization under family reunification in MexicoMargarita Pintin-Perez, El Colegio de la Frontera SurMartha Luz Rojas Wiesner, Ecosur

Sophia’s Choice – Family Unity or Economic Security? : The Temporary Foreign Workers Program, Interprovincial Legal Consciousness, and Family FragmentationEthel Tungohan, York University

Substantive Citizenship in an era of Precarious Migration: International Caregivers’ Claims to Permanent Residence in CanadaRupaleem Bhuyan, University of TorontoLorraine Valmadrid, University of TorontoPearlita Juan, Migrant Mothers ProjectNovabella L. Lopez, Migrant Mothers Project

U.S. "DREAMers" At the Crossroads: The Future of Undocumented Non-Citizens who Entered the Country as Children and Their FamiliesJanet Calvo, CUNY School of Law

Prisons in Latin America IICRN: 27 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Maximo Sozzo, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

Discussant(s): José Luiz Ratton, Federal University of Pernambuco

Description:In Latin America there has been an impressive growth in the imprisonment rates with varying degrees in different jurisdictions. In this context, prisons have become increasingly an object of inquiry by social researchers. These sessions seeks to discuss two central axes of these explorations in a interrelated way: mutations in power relations and the role of violence in the construction of order inside prisons and changes in the effects of incarceration both within and beyond the walls of the prison.


163

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Order and control after the riot. The impact of a large riot in the reconfiguration of control strategies in one prison in Argentina.Waldemar Claus, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

Power and order in a non-traditional prison. The case of Punta de Rieles prison in UruguayFernando Avila, Universidad Nacional del Litoral

The Mexican Penitentiary System: Poor Solutions to Big ProblemsElena Azaola, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiroes en Antropologia Socail

Psychology of Civil JusticeSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair(s): Jennifer Robbennolt, University of Illinois College of Law

Discussant(s): Victor Quintanilla, Indiana University

Description:Psychological science examines the psychological bases of how people think, feel, and act, including the social nature of judgment and decision-making. When combined with sociolegal theories the discipline allows for the study of the effect of law woven through society and the effect of society woven throughout law. This panel features law, society, and psychological science perspectives on the arena of civil justice. We explore how litigants (and judges themselves) consider the procedural justice of judges. We also discuss admissions of wrongdoing in settlement decisions, public comprehension of arbitration clauses, and perceived and experienced housing discrimination by lesbian and gay renters. Together, these talks address people's experience of civil harms and how they seek and experience restitution.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:An Empirical Study of Admissions in SEC SettlementsJennifer Robbennolt, Univ. of Illinois College of LawVerity Winship, University of Illinois College of Law

Arbitration Clauses: Comprehension and Implications for Informed ConsentRyan Thompson, University of Nebraska - LincolnRichard Wiener, University of Nebraska

Housing Discrimination against Lesbians and Gays: A Field TestRichard Wiener, University of NebraskaAlisha Caldwell Jimenez, Univ. of Nebraska-LincolnKatlyn Farnum, College of Saint RoseColin Holloway, University of Nebraska, LincolnTrace Vardsveen, University of Nebraska Lincoln

Procedural Justice and Perspectives of Judges and Litigants on Court ProceduresHilke Grootelaar, Utrecht UniversityKees van den Bos, Utrecht University

Punishing War Crimes: Experiences from the Last Thirty yearsSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Description:This panel explores recent experiments in international criminal law, in which victims of war crimes and crimes against humanity have sought justice through recourse to either special ad hoc tribunals (as in the case of the ex-Yugoslavia or Rwanda) or to the International Criminal Court. The panel explores the positions that states and victims adopted toward the process and outcomes associated with these various ways of administrating justice and settling conflicts.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Activating the Crime of Aggression: A Problem of Treaty InterpretationKatelyn Leonard, Western University Faculty of Law

Incorporating the Critical Turn in International Criminal Law Scholarship into TeachingPhilipp Kastner, University of Western Australia

Narratives, Human Rights Norms and the Local: Understanding the Construction of Legal Meaning around the Rwandan Gacaca CourtsBenjamin Thorne, University of Sussex

Of phantom crossroads and linear narratives: The International Criminal Court’s Study Group on Governance and the victory of managerialismRichard Clements, University of Cambridge

164

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

Queer Theory and Criminology: A RoundtableCRN: 51 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Leaside

Chair(s): Alex Dymock, Royal Holloway, University of London

Participant(s):Avi Boukli, The Open UniversityNicola Carr, University of NottinghamTanya Serisier, School of Law, Birkbeck College

Description:The development of a theoretical paradigm within criminology with an investment in thinking critically about sexuality and desire is long overdue, and over the past five years 'queer criminology' has gained prominence. Yet the implications of 'queering criminology' are still to be settled. Does the phrase imply, like feminist criminology before it, challenging core theoretical and methodological assumptions of criminology and forcing a reappraisal of categories such as social harm, or does it function primarily to enlarge the criminological gaze to include previously neglected populations? In this round table we ask a number of researchers with varying degrees of affinity or connection to queer criminology to reflect on its potential and limitations, and to consider the extent to which criminology has the capacity to be 'queered'.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Racializing BodiesCRN: 12 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Description:This panel examines the intersection of race and bodies by exploring racial preferences among gay men, images of women's bodies subject to police violence, artificial reproductive technologies, the effect of the USDA's School Lunchrooms on students of color, and racial degradation ceremonies.


Presentations:LGBT Relationships and Racial PreferencesRussell Robinson, UC Berkeley Law

Racial Degradation Under the LawNicole Gonzalez Van Cleve, Temple University

School Lunchrooms Violate Equal Protection: An eCRT AnalysisAndrea Freeman, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa William S. Richardson School of Law

Regulating Justice Technologies: Mug Shots, Body Cameras, Pedophile Hunters and Tweeting Criminal TrialsSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Description:These papers explore the technological and communication innovations that are transforming criminal investigations and changing the landscape of justice and law enforcement through social media.

Primary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:A Visual Sociology of Law: Mug Shot Distribution in the U.S.Sarah Lageson, Rutgers Univ. - School of Criminal JusticeAnna Banchik, University of Texas - Austin

Taking DataMichael Pollack, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

The Spirit of Technicity in Police ReformC.D. Christensen, University of California, Berkeley

Tweeting Criminal Trials: Access to Justice in the Digital AgeKate Puddister, University of GuelphTamara A. Small, University of Guelph

“Paedophile Hunting,” Criminal Procedure, and Human Rights: An English legal perspectiveJoe Purshouse, University of East Anglia

Regulation and ResistanceCRN: 6 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s): Raven Bowen, University of York

Description:Papers on this panel examine the structural and interactional manifestations of resistance to sex work regulation, critique the evidentiary basis of policy decisions and the effects of criminal

165

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

law enforcement, and relate sex workers' and sex worker activists experiences challenging dominant narratives about sex work.


Presentations:Amnesty International’s Support for the Decriminalization of Sex Work: Democracy and Bureaucracy in Human RightsLinda Veazey, Midwestern State UniversityRoni Kay O'Dell, Seton Hill University

On Harm, Sex, and ConsequencesI. India Thusi, University of Witwatersrand and The

Opportunity AgendaRacialized and Indigenous Sex Workers and the Canadian Sex Workers Rights MovementMenaka Raguparan, Carleton University

Sex Work Research as a Political Discourse: Advocacy as Knowledge Dissemination in Community-Based Participatory ResearchAnnaLise Trudell, Western University

Sex Worker Organising in Latin America: Toward a Comparative FrameworkMegan Rivers-Moore, Carleton University

Regulation, Control and Planning in Relation to Indigenous CommunitiesCRN: 34 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:IBAs and the Privatisation of Indigenous ConsultationKirsten Anker, McGill University

Regulation, Poverty Surveillance and Indigenous WelfareShelley Bielefeld, The Australian National University

Safeguarding Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Interests in Development Projects Financed by Multilateral Development Banks: Time to Cross Over to Employing the 'Vulnerability' Yardstick?Andria Naudé Fourie, Erasmus School of Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Regulatory Reform in BrazilSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Description:The panel will discuss different aspects of regulatory reform in the Brazilian context. Topics include Welfare and Social Security Reform with privatisation processes and reduction in established rights; American influences on Brazilian health law; changes in the opinions of the Brazilian Supreme Court regarding regulatory agencies' normative powers; and the possibility of capture of the Brazilian radio-communications regulator by international agents.


Presentations:Impact of Global Governance on Brazilian Regulation: Study of the Institutional Arrangement of the Radiocommunications SectorLeandro Carneiro, Camara dos Deputados

Regulation and Discretion: Tendencies in Brazilian Supreme Court Decision Regarding Regulatory Agencies Normative PowerMaria Tereza Fonseca Dias, Univ. Federal de Minas GeraisThiago Lopes Decat, Milton Campos Faculty of Law

Special Insured Rural Worker and Reform of Social Security in Brazil: The Systemic Effects of an Inadequate ArchitectureFatima Souza, FND/UFRJ

The Relativization of the Autonomy of the Regulatory Agencies by the Brazilian Executive BranchLuciana Silveira Ardente, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

The Strength of the Law and the Normative Power of Regulatory Agencies in Brazil: a Specific Study from the Comparative vVew of 'Law's Abnegation' in the USA and the Action of the Brazilian National Supplementary Health Agency (ANS)Luigi Bonizzato, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Right to HealthCRN: 47 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Gillian MacNaughton, University of Massachusetts Boston, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development

166

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:Chronic Diseases and Human Rights: Cancer Control and Patients’ Rights in JapanTokuko Munesue, Kanazawa University

Judicial Non-Interventionism on Right to Health as a Fundamental Right in Nigeria: Issues and ChallengesEgbewole Abdulwahab Olasupo, Univ. of Ilorin, Nigeria

Marketization of Health Care in North Korea and the Right to HealthJoo-Young Lee, Seoul National Univ Human Rights Center

The Evolution of the Right to Health on the Agenda of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human RightsGillian MacNaughton, University of Massachusetts Boston, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development

The Impact of SDG Target 3.8 - Universal Health Coverage - on Realizing the Right to Health in Kenya Esther Kamau, University of Massachusetts Boston, School for Global Inclusion and Social DevelopmentGillian MacNaughton, University of Massachusetts Boston, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development

Rights and Justice in South Asia and BeyondCRN: 22 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Chair/Discussant(s): Jayanth Krishnan, Indiana University, Bloomington

Description:This panel is grounded in studies of rights and justice in South Asia, but it also reaches beyond, addressing refugees and migration, possible applications of Tibetan dispute resolution in western contexts, and comparative work on violence and social movements in India and Mexico.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Improving Justice Experiences in Human Rights Cases: Drawing on Ideologies and Methods of the Tibetan Justice System in IndiaTamara Relis, London School of Economics, South Asia Centre

India’s Policy and Practice on Refugees: A Discussion on Citizenship Amendment Act 2016, IndiaNasreen Chowdhory, Delhi University

Transformative Violence in India and Mexico: Shaping Movements and NationsErica Marat, National Defense University

Sexual Assault: Consent and LawSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Parlour Suite 2

Description:No area of law is more fraught than the law of sexual assault. This panel engages with some of the questions central to effective prevention and prosecution of sexual violence.


Presentations:"Verbally, no, but physically yes" College Students' Meanings of Sexual ConsentAnne Groggel, Indiana University

Secondary Victimization or Misrecognition? Framing Aggrieved Persons' Status and Rights in Terms of Fraser's Concept of JusticeHildur Antonsdottir, Lund University

Women, Nation and Victimhood: Exploring the Meaning of 'Transformative' Reparations in CroatiaJosipa Saric, University of Kent

Social Enterprise Law: Trust, Public Benefit, and Capital MarketsCRN: 46 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Danforth

Author(s): Dana Brakman Reiser, Brooklyn Law School Steven Dean, Brooklyn Law School

Chair(s): Joan Heminway, The University of Tennessee

Reader(s):Tamara Belinfanti, New York Law SchoolSarah Dadush, Rutgers School of Law, NewarkJoan Heminway, The University of TennesseeAdam Parachin, Western UniversityAlicia Plerhoples, Georgetown University Law Center

Description:Social enterprises represent a new kind of venture, dedicated to pursuing profits for owners and benefits for society. Social Enterprise Law (Oxford 2017) argues that law can be a powerful tool to enable these businesses to access capital. The authors weave innovation in contract, corporate governance,

167

Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

atu

rda

y

crowdfunding, and tax law into powerful protections against entrepreneurs and investors sacrificing prosocial goals in the pursuit of profit. The book offers these proposals to stimulate legal creativity on behalf of mission-driven businesses. The panel will provide an opportunity for a diverse set of readers to begin this valuable sociolegal exercise. Corporate, securities, tax, and nonprofit law scholars will share their reactions to the book's insights, evaluate the promise of its proposals, and add their own ideas to the mix.

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and SocietySecondary Keyword: Corporate Law, Securities and Transactions

Terrortory: The Lawful Use of Fear and Violence to Construct Space, Race, and BelongingSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Jeremiah Chin, Arizona State University

Description:This salon inverts the popular definition of terrorism (the unlawful use of violence and intimidation for political ends) to consider how fear and violence are lawfully used to define ownership, race, indigenousness, and belonging, under a rubric we call "terrortory." To explore this concept we examine how possession and space are constructed by white supremacy, defined by race, and maintained through violence. The taking and dispossession of land through violence and fear are part of the founding doctrine of the United State which continues legally, socially, and culturally in the ways public, private, and government space is regulated, conceptualized, and discussed today. We use examples from different racial and spatial locations to identify how terrortory maps belonging in the U.S.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:A Hair-story of Violence: How lawful terror connects Indigenous peoples, land, and raceBryan Brayboy, Arizona State University

Monumental Antiblackness: Public Space, Confederate Symbols, and TerrortoryJeremiah Chin, Arizona State University

The Lawful Dispossession of Rights From the Border to BeyondNicholas Bustamante, Arizona State University

The Role of Experts and Citizens in Natural Disaster, Crisis, and Climate GovernanceCRN: 5 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Russell Mills, Bowling Green State University

Discussant(s): Fiona Haines, University of Melbourne

Description:This session examines the complex relationship between expertise and democratic participation in natural disaster, crisis, and climate governance. These papers draw on a diverse set of empirical and theoretical lenses to examine why and how certain actors have more powerful voices and roles in environmental governance and in response to crisis and natural disasters.


Presentations:"Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Regulatory Compliance Is So Difficult"Susan Silbey, MITGokce Basbug, Sungkyunkwan University

From Regulating Science to Regulating ScientistsRuthanne Huising, Emlyon Business School

Path Dependence, Abnormal Times & Missed Opportunities: Exploring factors that facilitate or constrain implementation of institutional reforms post catastrophic natural disastersKanksha Mahadevia Ghimire, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law; University of the South Pacific, School of Law (Vanuatu)

Toward a Populist Political Economy of Climate DisruptionDavid Driesen, Syracuse University College of Law

Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Workplace LawCRN: 8 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Luke Norris, Columbia Law School

Description:This panel explores various theoretical and empirical approaches to studying the relationship between work and the law. One paper uses the lens of 'labor republicanism' to study

168

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

the unique features of American trade unionism. Another paper draws on Habermasian theory and labor process theory to examine the effectiveness of regulation to prevent workplace harassment in Canada. Another applies notions of justice explicated by the environmental movement to study the plight of migrant workers in the United Arab Emirates working on so-called sustainable developments. Yet another paper studies whether labor laws assist or complicate the process of the professionalization of farming in the UK. A final paper seeks to understand the dynamics of labor exploitation through the empirical case of Polish migrant workers in the Nordic countries.


Presentations:Building Abu Dhabi’s Zero-Carbon City: Using a Capabilities Approach to Evaluate Environmental Justice for Migrant WorkersAsma Atique, Osgoode Hall Law School

Cultural Shifts in Traditional Workplaces: the Role of Labour Law in Professional FarmingPolly Lord, University of Exeter

From Occupational Discrimination to Severe Labour Exploitation - The Experiences of Polish Migrants in their Day-to-Day Work in Norway, Sweden and FinlandHanna Malik, University of Turku

Union Rights and Representation in the Shadow of Janus: Can “Labor Republicanism” Provide a Path Forward?Aaron Braun, CUNY Graduate Center

Workplace Harassment: System-level Responses of Legislation, Workplace Policies and ProceduresElizabeth Quinlan, University of saskatchewan

Theorizing the Limits of LawSaturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This session explores what, exactly, the limits of law are. Issues of vulnerability, power, social justice, philosophy, and scientific understanding.


Presentations:Curfew, legality, and the social control of the nightJonathan Goldberg-Hiller, University of Hawai`i,

Foucault: for lawyers?Deirdre McGowan, Dublin Institute of Technology

Law, Power and Vulnerabilities Across Borders: Constitutionalism and the PoorChristopher Matera, U.C. Berkeley

U.S./Canada Relations, Borders, and Human RightsCRN: 2 Saturday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Rebecca Hamlin, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Description:This panel explores the unique and fascinating relationship between the United States and Canada on the subject of human rights. Paper 1 examines dynamics relating to the concept of human rights at the physical and legal point of intersection between the U.S. and Canada – the border. Paper 2 takes a historical look at these interactions during the Great Depression of the 1930s. Paper 3 focuses on the particular case of the Canadian Omar Khadr, who was detained by the United States at Guantanamo Bay. Paper 4 takes a look at the issue of border agreements and their evolution. These four examples of U.S./Canada relations help illuminate the particular role each country plays in the politics of global human rights.

Primary Keyword: Citizenship (social as well as legal)Secondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Human Rights at the Canada-US BorderBenjamin Goold, University of British ColumbiaEfrat Arbel, University of British Columbia Allard School of Law

Migrants at the Crossroads: Redefining Immigration Law on the U.S.-Canada Border During the Great DepressionAshley Johnson Bavery, Eastern Michigan University

Positioning Citizenship at the Intersection of Childhood and Political Violence: Omar Khadr’s CaseMeral Tan, Carleton University

Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization11:00 AM - 11:45 AMAuthor Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Danforth

Saturday June 9. Sess ion 2B11:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

169

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.S

atu

rda

y

Author(s): Daphna Hacker, Tel Aviv University

Chair(s): Arianne Renan Barzilay, Univ. of Haifa School of Law

Reader(s):Susan Boyd, University of British ColumbiaSuzanne Kim, Rutgers University School of Law, NewarkCarol Sanger, Columbia Law School

Description:"Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization", by Prof. Daphna Hacker, published by Cambridge University Press on Augusts 2017, provides a first of its kind panoramic, yet detailed, view of the interrelations between globalization, borders, families, and the law. It demonstrates how the institution of the family can no longer be understood detached from globalization, and how, as such, it must escape the socio-legal methodological nationalism trap and be studied, instead, in the context of the international, regional, multinational, and parochial laws that govern it. Likewise, it shows how globalization cannot be fully understood without an in-depth investigation of the myriad ways in which families try to maneuver around the law – including family law, immigration law, labor law, and international law.

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and Children

(En)Countering Indigeneity and Culture in the LawSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel will explore the law's regulatory power at the intersection of cultural heritage and indigeneity.

Primary Keyword: Culture, Cultural RightsSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Presentations:Becoming Indigenous to Build a Reservation: The Washitaw De Dugdahmoundyah Religious Movement in Pursuit of Indigenous Legal AccommodationsSpencer Dew, Centenary College

Environmental Crime Protection of Illicit Mining in the Amazon: divergences between the Yanomami worldview and state actionsAlan Robson Ramos, UFRR - Univ. Federal de RoraimaFrancilene dos Santos Rodrigues, Univ. Federal de Roraima

Heritage is a Human Right: Righting Wrongs in Canadian Heritage PolicyErin Hogg, Simon Fraser UniversityChelsea Meloche, Simon Fraser UniversityGeorge Nicholas, Simon Fraser UniversityJohn Welch, Simon Fraser University

The Sui generis System of Plant Variety Protection Under the TRIPS Agreement: An Empty Promise for Developing CountriesKoffi Dogbevi, University of Wisconsin Law School

At the Crossroads of Law, Policy, and Reform: Teaching and Researching Sex Work, Prostitution, and TraffickingCRN: 6 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Edith Kinney, San José State University

Participant(s): Edith Kinney, San José State University Chrysanthi Leon, University of Delaware Jennifer Musto, Wellesley College Corey Shdaimah, University of Maryland

Description:This roundtable explores how research and teaching can help overcome "hurdles to broader understanding" regarding legal and policy reform efforts targeting sex work, prostitution, and trafficking. Drawing on research in global and local contexts, from the street to the courtroom to the classroom, the roundtable features authors in a new volume from Temple University Press - Challenging Perspectives on Street-based Sex Work - and researchers examining the experiences of exploitation and agency among migrant sex workers in the global north. The roundtable provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange and reflection on research, scholar-activism, and pedagogical considerations to navigate analyses of the sex trades at the crossroads of law, policy, and reform.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Sex Work

Before the Mast: Territoriality, Sovereignty, and JurisdictionCRN: 23 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair/Discussant(s): Eve Darian-Smith, Univ. of California Irvine

Saturday June 9, Sess ion 312:45 p.m. - 2 :30 p.m .

170

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Description:A mast is the tall post that carries the sails of a ship and the flags that signal the law by which a ship is governed. "Before the mast" refers to a common sailor's sleeping quarters below deck, but it may also be a legal proceeding at sea. A session of court presided over by the captain of a ship is also known as a "mast." Drawing materially and metaphorically on the term, this panel locates its concerns with territoriality and jurisdiction "before," in a time and place of transition and even confusion. The subjects of these relations of power are a diverse crew drawn to, from, and by colonial projects. Exploring how such a setting illuminates and enables different understandings of basic legal concepts, the papers on the panel critically interrogate how law is performed through property, contract, and across the so-called "free sea."


Presentations:Before the Law: The Standing of Hannah Arendt’s “the Right to Have Rights”Jennifer Culbert, Johns Hopkins University

From Historical Chains to Derivative Futures: Land Title Registries as Time Travel MachinesSarah Keenan, Birkbeck Law School

Signature, Event, Context: Freedom as a PerformativeRadhika Mongia, York University

The Free Sea: A Counter-Legal HistoryRenisa Mawani, University of British Columbia

Borders and Discretion ICRN: 2 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair(s): Karine Cote-Boucher, Universite de Montreal

Discussant(s): Sule Tomkinson, Université Laval

Description:Over the past few years, scholars have started to explore in more details the role of discretion in the context of borders and border control. Borders are now spreading to different sites, while in many countries, geopolitical borders remain important locations for deciding what can cross the border and who belongs. Given this expansion, border controls are increasingly outsourced to a range of private and public actors. As a result the reach of border control has expanded significantly. In this context, what is the role of discretion? If there are differences between geopolitical and internal bordering in terms of the

exercise of discretion, what does this mean for the experience of border crossing? What types of differential in- and exclusions are made possible by discretion in those different bordering sites?

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Border Guards’ use of Discretion: Performing the ‘Border Spectacle’ through Mundane WorkChristin Achermann, University of Neuchâtel

Immigration Consultants and Discretion: How Do Canadian Immigration Consultants Help Applicants Negotiate the Process of Border Crossing?Vic Satzewich, McMaster University

Race, Discretion and Policing MigrationAlpa Parmar, University of Oxford, Centre for Criminology

Sorting out Welfare: Crimmigration Practices and Abnormal Justice in NorwayHelene Gundhus, University of Oslo

Confronting the Past: Acknowledgement, Apology and ReparationSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair(s): Anna Bryson, Queens University Belfast

Discussant(s): Kieran McEvoy, Queens University Belfast

Description:Dealing with the consequences of mass atrocities and political violence has often been the purview of transitional justice mechanisms. These have usually manifest in legal processes of trials, institutional reforms and truth commissions. Yet there remain tension within societies between collective amnesia, top down narratives or denials of atrocities and addressing the political, social, cultural narratives of victimhood and violence in light of the individual, community and medical harm/consequences of such atrocities. This panel brings together a range of scholars from different disciplines to explore the role of acknowledgement, apologies and reparations in confronting the past. Drawing from field research in a number of contexts, these papers aim to provide conceptual and contextual lessons in framing and redressing mass atrocities.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Violence

171


atu

rda

y

Presentations:Apologies, Acknowledgement and Symbolic Reparations in Transitional JusticeKieran McEvoy, Queens University BelfastAnna Bryson, Queens University Belfast

Reparations, Historical Abuse and Structural Change in Consolidated DemocraciesJames Gallen, Dublin City University

Responding to Conflict-Related Sexual Violence: A Medico-Legal Approach to ReparationsSunneva Gilmore, Queen's University Belfast

Struggling for Justice: Victims and Reparations in Transitional SocietiesLuke Moffett, Queen's University BelfastAdriana Rudling, Queen's University Belfast

Constitutional Law and Legal Culture in Comparative Perspectives: Asia and the Americas ICRN: 1 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Denis De Castro Halis, Faculty of Law / University of Macau

Discussant(s): David Ritchie, Mercer University



Presentations:Process in Brazil and the United States: more different than a first analysis indicatesBruno Rezende, UNESACarolina Freitas, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Revealing the Concept of Brazilian Legal Culture - An Anthropological Approach.Cristina Lorio, ESTACIORonaldo Lucas da Silva, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Supreme Courts in Brazil and in USA: a brief analysis of the nomination of their justices.Helena Badr, Universidade Federal Fluminense

The Future Role of Comparative Law in Legal Education as Exemplified by the BRICS CountriesRostam J. Neuwirth, Univ. of Macau, Faculty of Law

Contemporary Slavery: Popular Rhetoric and Political PracticeSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Oxford

Author(s): Annie Bunting, York University Joel Quirk, University of Witwatersrand


Reader(s):Adelle Blackett, Faculty of Law, McGill UniversityJudy Fudge, Kent Law School, University of Kent (UK)Sally Engle Merry, New York UniversityKatrin Roots, York UniversityBarrington Walker, Queen's University

Description:This edited collection interrogates the fictive coherence of the modern slavery movement and argues for the disaggregation of causes currently included under the umbrella of contemporary slavery. Concerned with the political implications of the politics of exception and sensationalism, the authors argue for an ethical uncoupling of some movements for social change and for a critical examination of other practices associated with exploitative labour. The readers invited to engage with the themes and chapters of the book include experts in precarious and unfree labour; social movements and the politics of numbers; histories of slavery and racial state policy; and human trafficking. Just as the collection is interdisciplinary and international, we propose an interdisciplinary panel of readers from law, anthropology, history, social theory.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

172

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Coping with Low Income and High Debt: Perspectives from the UKCRN: 25 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Pamela Foohey, Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Description:This panel addresses issues of household debt in the United Kingdom from coping with overindebtedness to using insolvency laws.


Presentations:Breaking down debt: love, law and money at the end of an indebted relationshipSamuel Kirwan, University of Warwick

The Austere Creditor: Austerity, Bankruptcy Policy and a Tightening Social Safety NetJoseph Spooner, London School of Economics and Political Science

The New Poor Person's Bankruptcy: A comparative study in precarityIain Ramsay, University of KentJan-Ocko Heuer, Humboldt University Berlin

The power of Conversion: A Comparative Analysis of Personal Insolvency Laws in England and Wales and GermanyKatharina Möser, Birmingham Law School

Creating and Enforcing Environmental LawSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Lynn Mather, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Description:In drafting legislation to regulate natural resources, how do governments balance competing political and economic interests? And what role do historical, legal, and scientific influences play? This session analyzes the formation of law for carbon dioxide storage in Germany and South Korea, limited liability of nuclear operators in Japan, and international navigation of polar waters. The session also considers the results of environmental legislation through an investigation of creative sentencing in the Syncrude Dead Ducks case in Alberta, Canada.

Presentations:A Comparative Study between German Carbon Dioxide Permanent Storage Act and the Draft of South Korean Carbon Dioxide Storage ActMoon-Hyun Koh, Soongsil University

Creative Sentencing and the Syncrude Dead Ducks Case: What ever happened to the largest environmental creative sentence in Alberta's history?Janice Paskey, Mount Royal University

Reform of the Nuclear damage compensation system in Japan: Introduction of limited liability of Nuclear Operator?Shunichiro Koyanagi, Dokkyo University

Emotions, Human Rights, and Transitional JusticeCRN: 42 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Lee Marsons, University of Essex

Discussant(s): Jill Hunter, University of New South Wales

Description:This panel examines the role of emotion in several aspects of human rights work and in the dynamics of transitional justice. Questions include: what are the roles of sympathy for victims, fear of terrorism, moral outrage toward perpetrators, and respect and education toward the goals of human rights, in mobilizing against human rights abuses, and especially in creating robust, lasting movements for human rights? Similarly, what role do emotions like fear and sympathy play in creating effective transitional justice mechanisms?

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Presentations:Applying the Thin Sympathetic Hypothesis in Settler Colonial ContextsJoanna R Quinn, The University of Western Ontario

Emotional Labour that Lasts: Learning Sustainable Practices from Human Rights Work on Gender ViolenceEmily Rosser, University of Windsor

Exploring the Role of Empathy in Human Rights EducationAoife Duffy, Irish Centre for Human Rights

Studying the Penal State: Punishment, Affect and Public DiscourseTrishna Senapaty, Cornell University

173


atu

rda

y

The role of Emotions in Human Rights Proportionality Analysis before the United Kingdom Supreme CourtLee Marsons, University of Essex

Expanding the Boundaries of Family LawCRN: 7 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Alexander Boni-Saenz, Chicago-Kent College of Law

Description:Family law is changing. From a primary focus on marriage and intact families, today family law finds its boundaries challenged and stretched by a newer strands of scholarship. Building on this trend, this panel brings together cutting-edge works that explore the household's administration from various angles that depart from the tradition of family law. These viewpoints include both the intersection of family law with other legal fields and the examinations of family life in various points in time-not just at the entrance to and exit from marriage. Thus, The Law of Legacy exposes how several areas of law (property, trusts &estates, family law, trademark, and copyright) intersect to create and preserve this slippery but important thing we call a person's "legacy."


Presentations:ConsortingSarah Swan, Columbia University

Married by DefaultErez Aloni, Allard School of Law, Univ. of British Columbia

The Laws of LegacyAndrew Gilden, Willamette University College of Law

Finding and Thriving in a Tenure-Track Undergraduate-Focused JobSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Chestnut West

Chair/Discussant(s):Jean Carmalt, John Jay College of Criminal Justice

Participant(s):Jean Carmalt, John Jay College of Criminal JusticeAmelie Barras, York UniversityPaul Collins, University of Massachusetts AmherstRenee Cramer, Drake UniversityAaron Lorenz, Ramapo College

Description:Interdisciplinary legal studies education is a unique and vibrant field - and applying for jobs within it is different than applying for positions within more standard disciplinary homes at research-focused institutions. This panel includes faculty from undergraduate teaching-centered institutions who hire often in the fields related to law and society. The panel will offer reflections on, and advice for, the job market for these types of positions. We will discuss issues of diversity, cover letters, teaching portfolios, the 'job talk' and teaching demonstration, and the intangible things we look for when evaluating candidates to become our colleagues.

Gendered Dimensions of Human Rights ViolationsSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:From reproductive health to femicide, the papers on this panel all explore the gendered dimensions of human rights. Covering a wide area, geographically and contextually -- from sexual violence in Pinochet's detention centers and femicide in Iraq and Nigeria to state interventions in reproductive health in Nordic countries -- including involuntary sterilizations, castrations and the Global Gag Rule (originally issued by the Reagan Administration in Mexico City) -- the panel highlights the gendered form and target of human rights violations in these contexts.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Shattering the Nordic Ideal? Involuntary Sterilizations and Castrations, Rights and ResponsibilitiesDaniela Alaattinoglu, European University Institute

Violence against Women by any Other Name - Conceptualizing Femicide as a Violation of Human Rights LawAngela Hefti, Yale Law School

How the Child Protection System Contributes to Poverty and Child NeglectSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Diane Redleaf, The Family Defense Center

Participant(s):Sarah Katz, Temple University Beasley School of LawDorothy Roberts, University of PennsylvaniaJane Spinak, Columbia Law School

174

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Richard Wexler, National Coalition for Child Protection ReformRuth Anne White

Description:The child protection system is supposed to protect children from abuse and neglect and promote children's well-being. But that system confuses poverty with neglect and impoverishes many families who are targets of its intervention. The system also diminishes children's prospects for self-sufficiency. This discussion, with housing and child welfare advocates and academics in child welfare and poverty law in the US, will focus on the respects in which the child protection system contributes to child and family poverty. Topics include how: child protection systems misidentify poverty; race, national origin, and class bias intensify the maltreatment of families; child abuse registers are employment blacklists; economic security issues facing children aging out of foster care; and how policies that criminalize poverty operate in child prote

Primary Keyword: Class and InequalitySecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Institutional Intersections: Exploring Relationships Between Law and Medicine ICRN: 9 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Liz Chiarello, Saint Louis University

Chair/Discussant(s): Jonathan Simon, University of California-Berkeley

Description:Socio-legal scholars are increasingly interested in the interplay between the fields of law and medicine. This panel aims to explore how cross-field encroachment blurs field boundaries and the implications it has on field logics and practices. Integrating micro- and macro-level analyses, we examine how professional work and clients' access to resources change as policies shift healthcare burdens to criminal justice agents and allocate criminal justice practices to healthcare providers. We consider how discrepancies between providers' actual and imagined legal environments shape their willingness to take risks, even when those risks may offer patient benefits. Finally, we address what happens when institutions "give up" or yield jurisdictional control to other institutions and how this process affects state power and control.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:At the Crossroads of Law and Medicine: Myths of Malpractice and Defensive Medicine in American ObstetricsLouise Roth, University of Arizona

Giving UpJessica Cooper, Princeton University

Law and Technology in Healthcare OrganizationsElizabeth Brennan, Brown UniversityMark Suchman, Brown University

Social Problems as Instigators of Field Change: How Attempts to Curb the Opioid Crisis Facilitate Change in Pharmacy and Law EnforcementLiz Chiarello, Saint Louis University

The Transformation of Jails into Hospitals in the Age of Routine Austerity and Progressive LawArmando Lara-Millan, UC Berkeley

International Crossroads: Legal Exchanges Across National BoundariesSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel explores how domestic courts and legislative bodies position themselves vis-à-vis international legal instruments and/or foreign jurisprudence when justifying decisions or enacting new laws. It analyzes the political conditions which make it possible and legitimate for such international legal crossroads to proliferate. It discusses examples from a wide range of cases, from the United States to Europe and Latin America.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Presentations:Adversarial Legalism and Tobacco Control in EuropeHolly Jarman, University of Michigan

Instant International Law Anticanon: U.N. Mass Tort Litigation MemosLesley Wexler, University of Illinois College of LawJennifer Robbennolt, Univ. of Illinois College of Law

The Dynamism of TreatiesYanbai Andrea Wang, Stanford Law School

175


atu

rda

y

Interrogating The Future of Workforce ManagementCRN: 8 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel engages with the consequences of the digital and knowledge-based economy on workers, governments, and corporations. Panelists will consider the flexibility paradigm that undergirds some of these transformations and ask how employment security and decent wages can be provided to workers. On the flip side, panelists will examine whether some of these changes, for example workforce analytics, have the potential to reduce occurrences of discrimination by limiting the biases of human decision-making. In cases where governments enter into data-sharing agreements with ridesharing companies, such as Uber, panelists examine whether governments understand the stakes of these arrangements. Finally, panelists look at what these changes mean for traditional conceptions of corporate governance, and how higher education shapes management.


Presentations:An Assessment of Labour Relations Education in Canadian Business SchoolsFiona McQuarrie, University of the Fraser Valley

Antidiscriminatory AlgorithmsStephanie Bornstein, University of Florida Levin College of the Law

Corporate Governance, Corporate Culture, and InnovationRalph Gill, University of Toronto

Data Deficits, Or the Invisible Value of Platform LaborDeepa Das Acevedo, University of Pennsylvania Law School

Rethinking the role of labour rights: considering new securities for workers in an increasingly digitised world of workMiriam Kullmann, Vienna Univ. of Economics and Business

It's All RelationalSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Anya Bernstein, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Description:The papers in this panel all explore aspects of relationship and relationality as phenomena of law and sociolegal research. The authors respond in different ways to classic understandings of legal subjects as independent and autonomous actors and of researchers as separate from and "above" the phenomena that they describe, even when purportedly immersed as ethnographers. Instead, the papers will explore marriage, family conflict, adoption, injury, mental illness, and undocumented immigrants in ways that depend on relational understandings of subjectivity and consciousness as well as of researcher and subject.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal CulturesSecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:How Emotion and Subjectivity Shape Legal Consciousness: Zìjǐrén in a Taiwanese Family ConflictHsiao-Tan Wang, National Chengchi Univ, Taipei

Field Sight and As-If BelongingsBarbara Yngvesson, Hampshire CollegeSusan Bibler Coutin, University of California Irvine

Legal Consciousness of the Chinese Filial Daughter: Family Relations, Marriage, and AutonomyQian Liu, University of Victoria

Moving from Individual to Social Responsibilization in Mental Health Courts ?Véronique Fortin, Universite de SherbrookeSue-Ann MacDonald, Université de Montréal

All Injuries Are RelationalDavid Engel, University at Buffalo, SUNY, School of Law

Law, Class and InequalitySaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Jonathan Bonnitcha, University of NSW

Description:This session explores, analyses and critiques class inequality, focusing on the poor and people of colour, from the ways in which poor subjects shape community legal thought and cultures to the potential for the judiciary to mediate ethnic fractionalization. Wealth stratification has increased in recent decades, further solidifying an existing caste system in the US, maintained in part through Contract. The 'intergenerational; cycle of dysfunction in urban ghettos' can be fixed.

176

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Presentations:From Contract to Status Chapter 3. A Realist View of Bargaining PowerDanielle Hart, Southwestern Law School

Imprisoning Black Babies: Liberal Child Welfare Policy's Role in Perpetuating the Cradle to Prison PipelineJames Dwyer, College of William & Mary

The Judiciary as a Consociational Solution to Ethnic FractionalizationChris Kendall, University of Puget Sound

The Takings Clause of Boyle HeightsYxta Murray, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles

Lawyers and Lawyering in Comparative Historical PerspectiveCRN: 44 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair/Discussant(s): Justin Simard, Northwestern University

Description:This comparative panel examines lawyers as key figures in crafting law, legal culture, and legal institutions.

Primary Keyword: Legal History Secondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Claire Palley, the U.K.’s First Female Law ProfessorFiona Cownie, Keele University

History of Turkish Legal Practice After the Empire: Prosecutors as Guardians of the RegimeMurat Burak Aydin, Max-Planck-Institut für europäische Rechtsgeschichte

Politics and the Bench: Frederick Haultain and the Royal Commissions of 1916Ken Leyton-Brown, University of Regina

Practicing God’s Law in a Secular World: The Lawyers of the Westboro Baptist Church, 1964-2011”Victoria Woeste, American Bar Foundation

Social Engineering and Social Entrepreneurs: Whether Methods of Social Change Have Changed for a Postmodern Legal CultureAaron Porter, Yale University

Legal Geography VII: The Spatialization of Law in Colonial and Post-Colonial French GuianaCRN: 35 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Jennifer Fredette, North Central College

Description:French overseas territories are governed by the exact same laws than the metropolis, though Congress may legislate original articles to the law if required by the "specificity" of these territories. In regards to French Guiana, besides the state law and its exemptions or additions, customary systems of law have been developed by the Amerindian and Maroon populations who navigate both systems even if the customary ones are not officially recognized within the French Republic. This panel explores the predicaments of the diversity of legal norms and practices as they relate to the construction of the geopolitical territory and the very construction of these territories by the peoples living in colonial and post-colonial French Guiana be they the indigenous populations or the transplanted political insurgents and prisoners of the French colonial empire in the 1930s. It will focus more specifically on questions related to birth registration, civil status, access to law and (im)mobilities.


Presentations:Civil Registration in Postcolonial French Guiana: The Legal and Customary Spatialization of the Maroni RiverCatherine Benoit, Connecticut College

Intermediaries of Justice and Alternatives to the Judge in St-Laurent du Maroni (French Guiana)Stéphanie Guyon, Université de Picardie Jules Verne

The Border as Home: Trans-border Dynamics in the lower MarowijneClémence Léobal, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales

Legal Institutions, Public Interest Lawyering, and Social MovementsCRN: 21 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair(s): Veena Dubal, University of California, Hastings

Discussant(s): Catherine Fisk, University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall

177


atu

rda

y

Description:This session uses empirical methodologies to examine the role of lawyering and legal institutions on contemporary and historical social movements for racial and economic equality. The traditional scholarship in this arena examines whether and how lawyers and litigation advance or undermine the goals of the movement. The papers in this panel use multiple methods-both qualitative and quantitative-to expand beyond this binary calculation. We investigate the specific impacts of lawyering and the use of legal institutions on democratic participation, the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement, the historical fight against racially restrictive covenants, and and feminist mobilization to re-shape the HIV/AIDS movement.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:"Dead But Not Disabled": A Feminist Legal Struggle for Recognition in the AIDS EpidemicAziza Ahmed, Northeastern University School of Law

Democracy, Civil Society, and Media Coverage of Public Interest LawCatherine Albiston, University of California, Berkeley

The System is Guilty: Law and Mobilization in the Movement for Black LivesGwendolyn Leachman,Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

“Sociological Gobbledygook” and Social-Change Litigation: Stretching Lawyer Identity in the Racially Restrictive Covenant CasesJohn Bliss, Harvard Law School

Litigation & Intellectual PropertyCRN: 14 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair(s): Shubha Ghosh, Syracuse

Disc.(s): William Gallagher, Golden Gate Univ. School of Law

Description:Is Intellectual Property like a box of chocolates? Is it dangerous to make such an analogy? These papers explore the textures of intellectual property litigation--its gooey goodness, its disorienting flavors. Scholars offer insights into the thorniness of legal doctrine as it raps around policies bubbling through the court system.

Primary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil ProcedureSecondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Chocolate Trademarks: Battle of the Bite?Kim Barker, University of Stirling

Cloudy With a Chance of Liability: Defending Cloud Service Providers Against Infringement Claims for Their Storage of Users’ Legitimately Obtained Copyrighted MaterialSarit K. Mizrahi, University of Ottawa

Copyright, Patent, and the Dangers of AnalogyMark Bartholomew, Univ. at Buffalo School of LawJohn Tehranian, Southwestern Law School

Patent infringements and enhanced damages in TaiwanLung-Sheng Chen, National Chung Hsing University

The Procedure of Patent EligibilityPaul Gugliuzza, Boston University School of Law

Litigation, Prosecutions, and Related Legal ProcessesSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington


Presentations:Hidden Decision Processes: Modeling plea bargains in rural New YorkReveka Shteynberg, University at Albany, SUNYAlissa Pollitz Worden, University at Albany, SUNY

The Infrequent Use of Securities Class Actions in Korea: Understanding the Reluctance of Plaintiffs' LawyersHai Jin Park, Stanford Law School

The Last Consumer-Protection Frontier: The Alabama Attorney General's Consumer Protection Division on the Front Lines of Fraud, from the 1970s to the 1990sAnna Johns Hrom, Duke University

The Prosecutor's Role in Exoneration CasesElizabeth Webster, Rutgers University School of Criminal Justice

Vying for Lead in the "Boys' Club": Exploring the Gender Gap in Multidistrict Litigation Leadership AppointmentsDana Alvare, University of Delaware & Temple University Beasley School of Law

178

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Mass IncarcerationSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Description:This panel seeks to understand variation in commitment to punishment, racial disproportionality, and the relationship between decarceration and crime.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Did the U.S. “War on Drugs” Create More Violent Crimes?John Lee, Northwestern University

Exporting Mass Imprisonment: Exploring the Growth of Incarceration Rates in South America.Isabel Arriagada, University of Minnesota

Justifying the Carceral State: Advocacy Frames and White Opposition to Criminal Justice ReformDenzel Avant, Northwestern UniversityKumar Ramanathan, Northwestern University

Mobilizing Localized Interests in State Penal Reforms: A Case Study of New Jersey Interest GroupsPaige Vaughn, University of Missouri - St. LouisMichael Campbell, University of Missouri, St. LouisPaige Vaughn, University of Missouri - St. Louis

The Place of Punishment in 21st Century America: Understanding the Geography and Persistence of Mass IncarcerationKatherine Beckett, University of WashingtonLindsey Beach, University of Washington

Mathematical Turn and Legal Indicators: What Can Law Learn From Mathematical Formulas, Justice in Numbers, and Algorithms?CRN: 52 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron


Discussant(s): Pedro Fortes, FGV Law School

Description:This panel examines the mathematical turn in law and the role of legal indicators for legal analysis. Mathematical formulas,

learning algorithms, and numerical indexes are now decisive for the understanding of law in contemporary society. Justice comes now in numbers, as evidenced by the omnipresence of indicators on legal certainty, corruption, and rule of law. These influences are perceived in various legal fields, including socio-economic rights, judicial reforms, healthcare, bankruptcy and anti-corruption efforts.

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and SocietySecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Legal Certainty Index and Development: Revisiting the Law and Finance ThesisDavid Restrepo Amariles, HEC ParisBruno Deffains, University Panthéon Assas (Paris 2)

Mathematical Turn, Legal Expertise and Political Conflict: Negotiating Judicial Reforms in Post-authoritarian Chile (1995-2000)Jeanne Hersant, Universidad de Playa AnchaMaria Azocar, University of Wisconsin Madison

Too Small to Succeed: Reorganization Bankruptcy As A Favorable Market-Exist Strategy For Small and Medium Size Enterprises (SMEs)Melike Arslan, Northwestern University

New Books in South Asian Legal StudiesCRN: 22 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Gopika Solanki, Carleton University

Participant(s):Mengia Hong Tschalaer, City University of New YorkSital Kalantry, Cornell Law SchoolPrakash Shah, Queen Mary University of LondonSylvia Vatuk, University of Illinois-Chicago

Description:This "New Books" panel features four new books in the field of South Asian Legal Studies; "Marriage and It's Discontents" (Sylvia Vatuk), "Western Foundations of the Caste System" (Prakash Shah et al eds.), "Women's Human Rights and Migration" (Sital Kalantry), and "Muslim Women's Quest for Justice" (Mengia Hong Tschalaer). Authors will speak on themes, issues, or approaches that connect or contrast their own book with at least one other book on the panel.

Secondary Keyword: South Asia, South Asian Studies, South Asian Law and Society

179


atu

rda

y

Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare StateSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Spruce

Author(s): Vanessa Barker, Stockholm University

Chair(s): Alessandro De Giorgi, San Jose State University

Reader(s):Magnus Hornqvist, Stockholm UniversityRon Levi, University of TorontoDoris Marie Provine, Arizona State UniversityJuliet Stumpf, Lewis & Clark School of LawMaartje van der Woude, Leiden Law School

Description:This international, multi-disciplinary panel discusses Vanessa Barker's Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State. As global migration, refugee crises, crime, and immigration place increasing pressure on States, Barker's new book offers a timely analysis of how the world's most robust welfare states confront these developments. Barker argues that states often reinforce State borders in ways that blur the boundary between immigration, crime, and criminal justice. The resulting set of 'crimmigration' policies and practices pose substantial questions for the future of successful welfare states. This AMR takes up this highly relevant and provocative issue by drawing on panelists from sociology, political science, criminology, and law, and includes scholars from the U.S., Canada, Sweden and the Netherlands.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Migration and Refugee Studies

Poverty, Development, and Economic and Social RightsCRN: 47 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Description:The papers in this session explore economic and social rights through the lens of poverty, education, employment, and development.


Presentations:Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and the Sustaining Peace Agenda: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – Bridging the Gap between Aspirations and ImplementationAmanda Cahill-Ripley, Lancaster University Law School

Biodiversity, traditional knowledge and patent rights: facts and contradictionsMarcos Vinicio Chein Feres, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora/PQ2CNPq

Poverty Alleviation and Women Access to Education a question of Incorporation By Exclusion?Azubike Onuora-Oguno, University of IlorinAnuoluwapo Durokifa, Univ. of Fort Hare South Africa

Precarious Employment and Unjustifiable Wealth Accumulation in Russia and the U.S.: A comparative analysis of vertical inequalitiesElena Taborda, University of Massachusetts BostonAleksey Romanov, Ural State University of Economics

Psychology of Criminal JusticeSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): Richard Wiener, University of Nebraska

Discussant(s): Avani Sood, University of California, Berkeley, School of Law

Description:Psychological science examines the psychological bases of how people think, feel, and act, including the social nature of judgment and decision-making. When combined with sociolegal theories the discipline allows for the study of the effect of law woven through society and the effect of society woven throughout law. This panel features law, society, and psychological science perspectives on criminal justice. We explore forces that shape decisions about credibility and punishment, including defendants' language, victims' nonverbal consent, and the retributive motivations of jurors. Further, we consider alternative sentencing options such as special verdict conditions and diversion programs. Together, these talks consider when decision-makers will seek more or less punitive outcomes in response to criminality.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Are all second chances created equal? Understanding the role of race in an early intervention juvenile programAlisha Caldwell Jimenez, Univ. of Nebraska-LincolnRichard Wiener, University of Nebraska

Evaluating Nonverbal Consent Arguments in Sexual Assault CasesTwila Wingrove, Appalachian State UniversityAndrew Monroe, Appalachian State University

180

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

Sentencing Reform and the Role of Retribution in Sentencing DecisionsTrace Vardsveen, University of Nebraska LincolnRichard Wiener, University of Nebraska

The Psychology of Special Verdicts in Criminal CasesAvani Sood, Univ. of California, Berkeley, School of LawThe Role of Ethnicity/Race and Language on Credibility Perceptions of OffendersJasmine Martinez, University of Nebraska-LincolnJon Amaste, University of Texas at El PasoRichard Wiener, University of Nebraska

Pushback, Backlash or Withdrawal? Forms of Resistance against International CourtsCRN: 36 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Greg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of Law

Discussant(s): Ran Hirschl, University of Toronto

Description:The current alteration of the national and international political climate that followed the economic and refugee crises, together with the re-shuffling of the geopolitical equilibrium and with the global rise of populism and protectionism, are often connected with a increasing number of attempts to undermine the authority and legitimacy of international courts. The panel explores the systemic, political, historical and institutional factors at the origins of the political pushback against international courts, together with the eventual responses that these institutions have developed to enhance/defend their challenged authority and legitimacy. The contributors provide empirical evidence from international courts in order to create a nuanced picture of the commonalities and differences of the experienced trajectories.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Limits of International Adjudication: Regional International Courts and MegapoliticsPola Cebulak, iCourts, University of CopenhagenSalvatore Caserta, iCourts- Center of Excellence for International Courts

Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?Mikael Madsen, iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts, University of Copenhagen

The Consensus Method of Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human RightsLucas Lixinski, University of New South Wales

The Illiberal Uses of Latin American Constitutional LawAlexandra Huneeus, University of Wisconsin

Reflections from Former Public Defenders: Merging Practice and Theory in Legal ScholarshipSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Elizabeth Jones, University of Louisville

Participant(s):Chaz Arnett, University of Pittsburgh School of LawAngela Harris, NAACP Legal Defense FundIrene Joe, UCLA School of LawThea Johnson, University of Maine School of Law

Description:This roundtable session includes perspectives from former public defenders who bring their experiences as practitioners to academia. These scholars will discuss how their current works aim to articulate how society should think about mass criminalization, detail what causes mass incarceration, and propose changes to current practices that could make criminal law practice reflect criminal law and criminal procedure theory a little more closely. The scholars use their unique experiences to inform the questions they seek to answer through their research. The session will also bring greater insight into how academics could use scholarship to inform current public defender practice.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Class and Inequality

Regulating Deviant Individuals, Organizational Cultures and Market PracticeCRN: 5 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Chair(s): Christopher Carrigan, George Washington University

Discussant(s): Nancy Reichman, University of Denver

Description:Regulatory solutions and modalities are commonly devised to control perceived deviant practices and harmful behavior. The papers in this panel examine a variety of regulatory and criminal justice approaches aimed at three levels of malfeasance: individuals (offending lawyers and white-collar offenders);

181


atu

rda

y

endemic criminogenic corporate cultures and corrupt public agencies, and market-level cartel practices. The perspectives are wide-ranging and include a focus on restorative justice, disciplinary sanctions, forensic ethnographers and alternative sanctions.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:Detoxing Corporate Culture: Assessing and changing deviant organizational valuesBenjamin van Rooij, University of California, IrvineAdam Fine, University of California, Irvine

Restorative Justice, White Collar Crime, and the 2008 Financial CrisisJustin Rex, Bowling Green State University

The Regulation of Legal Professionals in the Fight Against Money LaunderingKatie Benson, Lancaster University

Understanding "corruption" in regulatory agencies: The case of food inspection in Saudi ArabiaRobert Dingwall, Academy of Social Sciences (UK)Saad Al-Mutairi, Public Department of Environmental

Health, Municipality of Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaIan Connerton, School of Biosciences, Univ of Nottingham

Research and Criminal Justice Policy: How Our Research Methods and Practices Inform ReformSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel offers insights and innovations in research collaborations and research-policy relationships with law enforcement agencies, prisons, and the communities they serve.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law Students

Presentations:Disproportionate Minority Contact: Where Does the Bias Lie?Carrie Stone, Weber State UniversitySteiner Houston, Weber State UniversityMonica Williams, Weber State UniversityEric Young, Ogden City Police Department

The Collaborative Process: How Law Enforcement Agencies and Universities Research TogetherSteiner Houston, Weber State UniversityCarrie Stone, Weber State UniversityMonica Williams, Weber State University

The Texas Justice Initiative and Questions of Institutional Design in Transparency RegimesAmanda Woog, Quattrone Center at UPenn Law

Responsibility for Violations of International Human RightsSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Responsibility for the violation of human rights remains a contested arena in which distinctions between state of public responsibility, private responsibility and the role of human rights defenders is constantly in question. The papers on this panel bring new light to these debates by exploring the interaction of human rights, counter-terrorism, state security and state planning as different dimensions through which to understand the allocation of responsibility for continuing violations of human rights.


Presentations:A Deconstruction Of The Corporate Duty To Respect, Under The United Nations Guiding Principles On Business And Human RightsCiara Hackett, Queen's University Belfast

Misapplication of Legislation to Stop Defenders from Carrying Out their WorkAikaterini Christina Koula, Durham University

The Duty to Refrain: A Theory of State Accomplice Liability for Grave CrimesRachel Lopez, Drexel University

Settler Colonial StatesSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.:Paper Session


Description:The place of Indigenous communities within the body of the nation continues to challenge state policies and law. The participants in this panel consider the implications of

182

Saturday 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

multicultural policies for these communities and the move towards decolonizing praxis.

Presentations:Minority Cultural Practices and the 'Agency Dilemma': Insights from the Feminist LiteratureAnne Lavarone-Turcotte, McGill University

The Comprehensive Design of Multicultural and Intercultural Public Policies in Mexico: the Human Rights-Based Approach (HRBA) and the Theory of IntersectionalityJaneth Hernandez Flores, National Autonomous University of Mexico

The Uninvited Settler/Gaze: An Anti-colonial Approach to Socio-legal Research on Settler Violence Against Indigenous Peoples/NationsLeslie Thielen-Wilson, Nipissing University

Speaking International Law: Words and SoundsCRN: 23 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Lianne Boer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Discussant(s): Gregor Noll, Lund University, Sweden

Description:This panel seeks to pay close attention to the implements of international legal practice. The words we use, the routines we adopt, the institutional arrangements we rely on. Practice can relate to legal scholarship or being in a courtroom – in all papers, it is the everyday we are concerned with. Participants focus, for example, on the verbs assigned to 'international law' and on 'restatements' of customary law by expert bodies; all papers seek to scrutinize the mundane mechanisms that establish, challenge and maintain legal and political relations. By this attention for the previously unnoticed we seek to come up with a language to make the familiar, unfamiliar. This panel is the twin submission of the '(in)visibility of international law' panel. Together, these two seek to address international law as a multimodal phenomenon.

Primary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational LawSecondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:'International Law Needs...': on Verbs and Agency in International LawLianne Boer, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

For the First Time, AgainWouter Werner, Vu Amsterdam

Listen Closely What Silence can Tell us about International Law FormationElisabeth Schweiger, University of Groningen

UTC: colonial techniques in current timesGeoff Gordon, Asser Institute (UvA)

Taxation and InequalityCRN: 31 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair/Discussant(s): Tessa Davis, University of South Carolina School of Law

Description:Tax policy measures are often taken to address matters of social and economic inequality. This panel considers those measures, and whether and to what degree they are effective.

Primary Keyword:Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal Policies

Presentations:A Possible Social Security Law Policy for the Purpose of the Improvement of Social Exclusion of Non-regular Employees in JapanToshiyuki Kusumoto, University of Tokyo

The Cold of Tax JusticeGoldburn Maynard, University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law

The Federal Income Tax: Does It Contribute to Inequality Beyond the Top 1%?Nicholas Mirkay, University of Hawai'i at ManoaPalma Strand, Creighton University

The Return of Neo-Liberalism and South American Labour Laws: Old Wine in a New BottleRenan Bernardi Kalil, University of Sao PauloMauro Pucheta, University of Gloucestershire

Taxpayer Rights - To What End?CRN: 31 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): Alice Abreu, Temple University Beasley School of Law

183


atu

rda

y

Participant(s):Leslie Book, Villanova University Widger School of LawMichelle Lyon Drumbl, Washington and Lee University School of LawKeith Fogg, Harvard Law SchoolRichard Greenstein, Temple Univ Beasley School of Law

Description:When Congress codified the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (the "TBOR") in 2015 the tax bar largely shrugged, but that is a mistake. Section 7803(a)(3) actually refers to "taxpayer rights" and lists ten items. Therefore, despite the claims of its promoters that the 2015 legislation simply restates rights already provided by the Code, the codification of the TBOR has the power to transform the tax practice and the relationship between taxpayers and the IRS. In this panel we explain why.


Technologies of Identification, Surveillance and Prediction in the Governance of CrimeCRN: 3 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Robert Werth, Rice University

Description:Recent years have witnessed an array of new technologies, instruments and procedures for the governance of crime and (in)security, from police use of big data mining to predictive crime modeling and risk assessments. Such technologies rely on specific forms of knowledge and evidence, and can shape the subjectivities and decision-making of local actors in un/anticipated ways. This panel explores the deployment, operation and effects of shifting technologies of crime control. These papers examine how emergent technologies structure possibilities, promote particular objects/subjects and goals, and foster forms of accountability to different entities. Attending to actors' situated use of technologies, the papers contribute to our understanding of the role of security technologies in enabling new targets and forms of governance.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Consuming Security, Producing Dependency? Technologies of Prediction and the Mediation of Authority in Catalan PrisonsJohanna Romer, New York University

Identifying suspect subjects: Background checks, risk assessment instruments, and sociotechnical relationsRobert Werth, Rice UniversityBenjamin Fleury-Steiner, University of Delaware

Legal Implications of Big Data PolicingSarah Brayne, University of Texas at Austin

Making Things Count: On the Use of Technology to Support Accountability in Criminal Justice AgenciesKeith Guzik, University of Colorado Denver

The Technological Disruption of Lawyering, Legal Aid, and Social JusticeSaturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Description:Technology has a long history of disrupting industries, and the legal industry is no exception. The papers on this panel explore the impact of technological innovation on the legal profession, its bailiwicks, and what that means for the pursuit of legal and social justice.

Presentations:Law at the Crossroads: the Interaction between Law and Technology ----Will Smart Contracts Supplant Traditional Legal Contracts?Jiaying Jiang, Emory University

Robot Lawyering and Social JusticeMalcolm Langford, University of Oslo

Virtually ProfessionalClaudia Haupt, Yale Law School

The Time(s) of Law: Politics and Temporality in International LawCRN: 23 Saturday Session 3, 12:45 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Christoper Gevers, Univ. of KwaZulu-Natal

Description:Examining cases from the decolonization era to the present and relying on archival, literary, and legal sources, the panel asks how conceptions of temporality hold open or foreclose possibilities for political and legal ordering. The papers are preoccupied with the logics of time: those embedded in law or revolution, entrenched in tragedy or decolonization, inherent in reparations or international criminal law. Several of the papers interrogate the disparate effects of a focus on the past, on linearity, or on contemporaneity in international law. Others

184

Saturday 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. S

atu

rda

y

look at the relationships between memory and history that are construed and constructed through legal doctrines that seek repair, justice, or emancipation. Together, they endeavor to uncover the critical, hidden workings of time in shaping legal argument, legal order, and political vision.


Presentations:International Lawyers at the Crossroads and Tragedy's TimeAdil Hasan Khan, IHEID, Geneva

Out-of-joint: Temporalities of Reparations ClaimsVasuki Nesiah, NYU Gallatin

Producing Justice in Time: Temporality and Accountability in International LawZinaida Miller, Seton Hall University

Sweden and the Political Time of Third World SolidarityMarkus Gunneflo, Lund University

The Politics of Time in International Law: Expertise, Ordering, and Competing TemporalitiesMaj Grasten, Copenhagen Business School

Alternative Forms of Law and Justice under SocialismSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Peter Solomon, University of Toronto

Description:Papers in the session examine the ways that citizens in socialist societies both interacted with the Soviet justice system and used alternative rules, values, and authorities to the official system in order to achieve justice. Rhiannon Dowling explores the role that popular culture played in both informing citizens about the meaning of Socialist justice, and in eventually undermining the justice system by participating in and publicizing criminal investigations. Yana Skorobogatov's paper examines the Soviet employment of the death penalty, the attempts that the state made to subsume it within a more professionalized and de-politicized system of punishment, and the responses of citizens who had long learned to mistrust the Soviet legal system. Anna Lind-Guzik discusses Soviet samizdat and efforts to join the Universal Copyright Convention.

Primary Keyword: Central and Eastern Europe, Balkans, Russia, and Eurasian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:From Morality to Legality: Law, Procedure, and the Soviet Death Penalty during PerestroikaYana Skorobogatov, University of California-Berkeley

The Public as Prosecutor? Crime Narratives in the Soviet Media after StalinRhiannon Dowling, Harvard University

“A stab in the back of Russian literature”: human rights, samizdat and the 1973 Soviet accession to the Universal Copyright ConventionAnna Lind-Guzik, Historical Society of the New York Courts

Borders and Discretion IICRN: 2 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Maartje van der Woude, Leiden Law School

Discussant(s): Vanessa Barker, Stockholm University

Description:Over the past few years, scholars have started to explore in more details the role of discretion in the context of borders and border control. Borders are now spreading to different sites, while in many countries, geopolitical borders remain important locations for deciding what can cross the border and who belongs. Given this expansion, border controls are increasingly outsourced to a range of private and public actors. As a result the reach of border control has expanded significantly. In this context, what is the role of discretion? If there are differences between geopolitical and internal bordering in terms of the exercise of discretion, what does this mean for the experience of border crossing? What types of differential in- and exclusions are made possible by discretion in those different bordering sites?

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Discretion, Jurisdiction and Shiprider Patrols in the St. Lawrence RiverAnna Pratt, York UniversityJessica Templeman, York University

Saturday June 9, Sess ion 4 2 :45 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m .

185


atu

rda

y

Finding Discretionary “Pressure Points” in the Dutch and American Border Control SystemMaartje van der Woude, Leiden Law SchoolIrene Vega, UCLA

Technology driven crimmigration: Function creep and mission creep in Dutch migration controlTim Dekkers, Leiden University

The New Contours of Discretion in Border ControlKarine Cote-Boucher, Universite de MontrealMaartje van der Woude, Leiden Law School

Can Entrepreneurialism Advance Worker Interests?CRN: 8 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Stephen Lee, UC Irvine School of Law

Discussant(s): Noah Zatz, UCLA School of Law

Description:The "employee/independent contractor" distinction has long governed our nation's workplace laws. While "employees" are entitled to an array of rights constraining employer power, "independent contractors" are not. As a result, research agendas for many workplace scholars have focused on ways to expand the categories and types of workers entitled to protection as employees. But workers may sometimes view employee status as a disadvantage, for example, because it triggers immigration status restrictions and employer verification duties. The papers in this panel will revisit the employee/independent contractor dichotomy, reassess its ability to advance the interests of traditionally marginalized segments of the workforce, and explore the prospects for alternative frameworks for worker protection and collective action.

Primary Keyword: Labor and Employment

Presentations:A New Social Contract for a Future of Independent WorkCynthia Estlund, New York University

A Study of Ten Years of U.S. District Court Employee Misclassification DecisionsCharlotte Alexander, Georgia State University

Entrepreneurialism in the Age of Workplace EnforcementStephen Lee, UC Irvine School of Law

Legal Worker Identities & Resistance: How Workers Make Sense of The Employee-Independent Contractor Dichotomy in a Taxi to Uber EconomyVeena Dubal, University of California, Hastings

Worker Entrepreneurship and Collective ActionSanjukta Paul, Wayne State University Law School

China, International Law, and DevelopmentCRN: 33 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Moderator(s): Terence Halliday, American Bar Foundation


Description:Recently, China has established multi-lateral financial and security institutions that showcase China's capacity to influence international norms. In line with the LSA meeting's theme, this panel examines the crossroads of a globalizing China with international law. Much of China's increasing profile is driven by outbound investment and export of excess capacity. China has built a framework of bilateral investment treaties and free trade agreements. However, Chinese investors are enmeshed within the legal-regulatory regimes of host states. This panel examines how Chinese investment and trade impacts international law and the law of host states, the extent to which Chinese actors' behavior accords with international and domestic norms, and the implications for increasing outbound Chinese investment for liberal orders and human freedoms.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Presentations:China's Approach to International Economic Legal Order and Its ImplicationsHeng Wang, Faculty of Law, the Univ of New South Wales

Chinese FDI, Ralls and US National Security Review of Foreign InvestmentsJi Li, Rutgers Law School

Dispute Resolution, Law and Development, and Legal Elites in China's Outbound InvestmentMatthew Erie, Princeton University

Is China a Market Economy, and Why does it Matter for the Global Trade and Investment Regimes?Ming Du, Surrey University

186


atu

rda

y

The soft Mega-Regional order of the BRI: a four-level analysis of its regulatory structureMaria Adele Carrai, Princeton University

Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: New Approaches from the Social SciencesCRN: 21 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): Whitney Taylor, Cornell University

Discussant(s): Michael McCann, University of Washington

Description:Since the 1990s, articles and books on legal mobilization have increasingly appeared, and there has been substantial cross-fertilization with other fields such as social movement studies. However, a systematic theory-building effort is still missing. How have the various definitions of legal mobilization employed by existing studies impacted their findings? How should we define legal mobilization? How is it related to other social movement strategies such as lobbying or more disruptive tactics? How does legal mobilization relate to legal consciousness and the process of legal framing? Is legal mobilization a necessarily collective phenomenon? This panel aims at promoting dialogue around these questions with the hope of promoting a more conscious and systematic conceptualization of legal mobilization.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:"The Travelling Problem": The Concept of Legal Mobilization in Comparative ResearchLisa Vanhala, University College London

Conceptualizing Legal Mobilization: Current Trends, Emerging PathsEmilio Lehoucq, Northwestern UniversityWhitney Taylor, Cornell University

Legal Mobilization and AuthoritarianismLynette Chua, National University of Singapore

Leveraging Private Legal Power: The American Bureaucracy at WorkQuinn Mulroy, Northwestern University

Preaching to Convert, or to the Converted? Scholarly Networks & Capital in the Conservative Christian Legal MovementJoshua Wilson, University of DenverSeth Masket, University of Denver

Criminal Justice in Asia and in the AmericasCRN: 1 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth



Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to Criminal Justice in these regions. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments or social groups related to punishment, analyses of emerging trends in criminal legal theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems endemic to societies in either region regarding crime and punishment. Discussions related to International Criminal Justice are welcome as well.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:A critical look at globalization and transnational crimePatricy Justino, Universidade Estácio de Sá

Discrimination in the application of penalty. A social or financial question?Geraldo Rodrigues, UNESA

The Defense in International Legal Assistance in Criminal MattersViviane Dallasta Del Grossi, Defensoria Pública da União

The Price of Justice Questioning the Trust Fund for Victims of the International Criminal CourtRegina Rauxloh, University of Southampton, Law School

Decolonizing Law & ConstitutionalismCRN: 23 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Amaya Alvez, University of Concepcion

Discussant(s): Sujith Xavier, Faculty of Law University of Windsor

187


atu

rda

y

Participant(s):Amar Bhatia, Osgoode Hall, York UniversitySigna Daum Shanks, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolKaren Drake, Osgoode Hall Law School at York UniversityMazen Masri, City, University of LondonZoran Oklopcic, Carleton University

Description:Colonialism, imperialism, and settler colonialism continue to affect the lives of people around the world. Law and its various institutions are a central means by which colonial, imperial, and settler colonial programs continue to be reinforced and sustained. Law also has the potential to decolonize our respective communities and societies. There are recent and historical examples in which law has played a significant role in dismantling colonial and imperial structures set up during the process of colonization. Nevertheless, law has not been successful in completing the decolonial processes. Our roundtable builds on earlier meetings to discuss the meaning and scope of decolonization at the intersection of both Indigenous and Third World decolonial movements.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Indigenous Law

Democratic Institutions and ConstitutionalismSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session



Presentations:Constitutional law and transformation of frame of party pluralism : an analysis on the basis of the model of « Militant democracy » (K. Loewenstein). The Algerian case (1989-2016)Myriam Aït-Aoudia, Sciences Po Bordeaux

Some contributions from the Canadian Theory of Constitutional Dialogue to settle the political crisis in BrazilCamila Marques, PUCPRClaudia Maria Barbosa, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

Why the Brazilian Judiciary remains legitimate: an institutional analysis of the Superior Electoral Court (TSE)Tatiana Rodrigues Silveira, Universidade de BrasiliaEdson Guarido Filho, Universidade Positivo / IBEPES

Disabling Barriers: Social Movements, Disability History, and the LawCRN: 40 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Mark Weber, DePaul University College of Law

Description:Papers in this session examine the systemic barriers disabled people face as well as modes of resistance for transformative change through an interdisciplinary lens. Presenters explore how categories of race and disability have been constructed and reinforced by Canadian immigration policy; the role of law in addressing income inequality for people with disabilities; and failures to accommodate episodic disabilities and related self-care needs in employment. Finally, an overview is provided to explain the benefits of bridging legal theory, disability studies, and history as an approach to these and other issues. The works presented are part of Ravi Malhotra and Benjamin Isitt's new anthology, Disabling Barriers: Social Movements, Disability History, and the Law (UBC Press, 2017).

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Bringing History and Law to Disability Studies: Disabling Barriers in Multiple DisciplinesRavi Malhotra, University of Ottawa

Doing Battle with the Warrior-Worker: An Exploration of Episodic Disability and Accommodation in EmploymentOdelia Bay, Osgoode Hall Law School

Empowering Labour: Evaluating How Law Can Combat the Legacy of Income Inequality and Poverty Faced by People with DisabilitiesMegan Rusciano, Disability Rights Maryland

“Of Dark Type and Poor Physique”: Immigration Restriction and Eugenics Discourse in Canada, 1900-1930Jen Rinaldi, UOIT

Encounters, Practices and the Making of International LawCRN: 23 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Frédéric Mégret, McGill University

188


atu

rda

y

Description:How do quotidian encounters embodied in the practices of state and non-state actors make international law? This session explores interactions among diverse actors who operationalize, contest and redefine international law in three areas: humanitarianism, human rights and climate change. It considers how actors in those fields (eg NGOs, IOs, officials, consumers, lawyers) frame their doings as law, apart from abstract rules and doctrines. It asks how they construe themselves as legal subjects within legal spaces and, accordingly, how they constitute law beyond traditional sources. While such questions are theoretical, panelists discuss empirical studies examining communications, conditions of space and time, and materials in lawmaking. Their aim is to understand law as various embodied experiences, generated in encounters of the everyday.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Presentations:How the encounters of international humanitarian actors are shaped by struggles over ‘distinction’Rebecca Sutton, London School of Economics

International Law as 'Competent Performance': Practices of the Invisible College of Climate LawyersSarah Mason-Case, University of Toronto Faculty of Law

Where we encounter: the space of human rights obligationsWanshu Cong, McGill University Faculty of Law

Gender and Sexuality: Theory and Legal StrategiesSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Thomas M Keck, Syracuse University

Description:Across Africa homosexuality has become increasingly politicized and criminalized. Politicians and religious leaders have spoken out against "un-African" behavior, allegedly supported and exported by Western actors. The session examines this process from different angles, seeking to understand how politicization occurs, how it is reflected in and affects media discourse, and how it influences movement strategies and health-seeking behavior among sexual minorities. It aims to do so using quantitative and qualitative methods, ranging from case studies to large-N analysis of media articles. The authors are part of a large research project, based at the Center on Law and Social Transformation in Bergen, Norway, studying the legal and political determinants of politicization and criminalization of sexual and reproductive rights in Africa.


Presentations:Homosexuality and Politics in the News: Examining Media Discourse on Sexual Minorities in SenegalVegard Vibe, University of Bergen

LGBTI Strategies and Outcomes in Zambia – Identity, Rights and HealthIngvild Aagedal Skage, University of Bergen

Moral Universalism and IdentitarianismSamantha Godwin, Yale University

Politicisation of Sexuality and its Impact on Access to Healthcare for Sexual Minorities: A Kenyan PerspectiveNicholas Wasonga Orago, University of Nairobi, School of Law

Reforming by Re-Norming: How the Legal System has the Potential to Change a Toxic Culture of Domestic ViolenceMelissa Breger, Albany Law School

Grappling with DiscriminationCRN: 12 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Areto Imoukhuede. Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law

Description:Racial discrimination is a persistent reality in American life. This panel explores discrimination in its many forms and contexts, including affirmative action, school desegregation, jury selection, and colorism.

Primary Keyword: DiscriminationSecondary Keyword: Race, Critical Race Research

Presentations:Diversity as a Tool of DeradicalizationAsad Rahim, UC Berkeley

Liberal Equality and the Rebirth of Separate but EqualAreto Imoukhuede, Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law

School Desegregation’s Contested PastMichael Paris, College of Staten Island

Who Strikes Who?: An Empirical Analysis of Jury Selection in North Carolina Felony TrialsGregory Parks, Wake Forest University School of Law

189


atu

rda

y

How Legal Words Make Social WorldsCRN: 3 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Anya Bernstein, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Discussant(s): Jothie Rajah, American Bar Foundation

Description:This panel looks beyond the explicit objects of legal discourse to its hidden assumptions and social implications. Building on insights from semiotics and anthropology, we examine how legal language not only describes, but also creates, effects in the world. As empirical studies, these papers attend to the multifarious, even self-contradictory, qualities of those effects. We illuminate how bureaucratic interactions empower competing images of sovereignty; how evidentiary disputes have effects far beyond contesting factual claims; how document handling in supranational litigation reinforces applications of nation-specific legal norms; and how debates about legal meaning both obscure and propagate ideologies of political legitimacy. Our papers make a claim for putting semiotic ethnography at the heart of legal research.

Primary Keyword: EthnographySecondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Presentations:Documents as Nation-States: Nationalist Hermeneutics in a Transnational CourtJessica Greenberg, University of Illinois

Statutory Interpretation as Semiotic TheoryAnya Bernstein, SUNY Buffalo Law School

The Meaning of "Meaningful Tribal Consultation" : Juris-diction and the Empirics of Legal Language.Justin Richland, University of Chicago / American Bar Foundation

When Evidentiary Disputes are not about EvidenceJeffrey Kahn, University of California, Davis

Human Rights, Peace and Democracy Promotion: A Global AgendaSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Description:This panel explores how international efforts to strengthen the rule of law are articulated with the protection of human rights and the defense of a strong developmental agenda. Examples range from Latin America, Europe and Asia.

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, Internationl Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Regional Organizations as Democracy Enforcers: The Design of Suspension Clauses in the EU, OAS, and AUCassandra Emmons, Princeton University

The impact of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Supreme Federal Tribunal of BrazilCaroline de Lima Silva,Northwestern University/University of Copenhagen

The United Nations and Democracy Promotion. The Importance of Being EarnestValentina Volpe, Lille Catholic University

In the Shadow of Bedford: A Roundtable on Research and Advocacy in Post-PCEPA CanadaCRN: 6 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Emily Van der Meulen, Ryerson University

Chair/Discussant(s): Elya M Durisin, York University

Participant(s): Nora Butler Burke, Concordia UniversityChanelle Gallant, Migrant Sex Workers ProjectAndrea Krüsi, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDSElene Lam, Butterfly: Asian & Migrant Sex Workers Support NetworkHayli Millar, University of the Fraser ValleyBecki Ross, University of British Columbia

Description:This roundtable is comprised of a group of scholars and community activists (not mutually exclusive) who are contributors to a forthcoming edited volume on sex work in Canada. Facilitated by the book's editors, the goal of

190


atu

rda

y

the roundtable is to bridge research and advocacy related to Canada's new socio-legal prostitution regime called the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA). Topics include sex workers' resistance and organizing efforts, including alliance building; a critical analysis of Canada's human trafficking laws and the consequences of intersecting criminal and immigration law on migrant sex workers; and an exploration of the ways in which criminalizing clients and third parties can differentially affect sex workers, such as those engaged in street-based work.

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Indigenous Over-Incarceration and the Limits of 'Reconciliation': Canadian Criminal Justice at the CrossroadsCRN: 27 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Adriel Weaver, University of Toronto

Description:First officially diagnosed 50 years ago in a report to the federal government, the ever worsening over-incarceration of Indigenous people is one insidious symptom of ongoing settler-colonialism in Canada. This panel explores barriers and opportunities for transformative change in four of the many sites in which Indigenous people have experienced racialized colonialism in the justice system: community healing and wellness programs (Peggy Shaughnessy), social history reports (Jacquie Briggs), urban halfway houses (Katharina Maier), and pre-trial custody (Holly Pelvin).

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State Formation

Presentations:Halfway House Residency, Reentry, and Desistance: The Narratives of Indigenous Ex-PrisonersKatharina Helen Maier, University of Toronto

Implicating the state: the production and authorization of Indigenous people's social histories in Canada, from Indian Agents to Gladue Reports.Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto

Race and pre-trial release: Exploring the barriers to bail release for Indigenous accused people in Canada.Holly Pelvin, University of Alberta

Redpath Healing and Wellness: Resistance to ChangePeggy Shaughnessy, Trent University

Injustice and Law in East AsiaCRN: 33 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Denis De Castro Halis, Faculty of Law / University of Macau

Description:This session focuses on law and society issues concerning constitution, courts and judges in East Asia. Countries covered include China, Japan and South Korea. Its papers discuss and analyse constitutional amendments in South Korea, two recent developments concerning the Japanese imperial family, administrative litigation in China, and the use of technology in enhancing judicial transparency in China.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Judges and Judging

Presentations:Re-assigning Jurisdictions: Experiments in Administrative Litigation in ChinaYi Zhao, Grand Valley State University

Restless Reconciliation: Transnational Legal Redress for Wartime Forced LaborYukiko Koga, Hunter College - CUNY

The Democracy and Constitutional Amendment in Korea: 1948-2018Young Jung, UW-Law School / Chonbuk National University(Law School)Sun-Pil Eum, College of Law Hongik University

Institutional Intersections: Exploring Relationships Between Law and Medicine IICRN: 9 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair(s): Liz Chiarello, Saint Louis University Jonathan Simon, University of California-Berkeley

Discussant(s): Mark Suchman, Brown University

Description:This panel addresses intersections between criminal justice and healthcare fields as they manifest in historical context, cross-cultural settings, and daily practice. We explore social movements' role in reframing medical problems as criminal ones and mobilizing "soft" law to fight for healthcare rights. We consider how legal and political contexts have shaped

191


atu

rda

y

divergent national approaches to pain management in the U.S. and France. We address how legal and medical logics factor into mothers' decisions to sue their doctors for medical injury to their children. We examine how medicine and criminal justice agents collaborate to address shared problems in mental health courts. And we consider how shifting elderly prisoners from criminal justice into healthcare affects elderly people, their families, and their communities.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:Aging Out of Prison? Life "After" Mass Incarceration in Old AgeAnjuli Verma, University of California, BerkeleyJonathan Simon, University of California-Berkeley

Making HIV a CrimeTrevor Hoppe, University at Albany, SUNY

Mental Health Courts as Clinical Trials The Scientific Pursuit of Experimental JusticeUrsula Castellano, Ohio University

The Logics of Pain Policies: Law, Medicine, and the Right to Relief in the U.S. and FranceJane Pryma, Northwestern University

Transnational Legal Mobilization in Medicine: Specialized Post-Rape Medical Care and Reproductive Health in Humanitarian ContextsJaimie Morse, Northwestern University

International Coordination in Law & SocietySaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Description:Achieving global public goods often requires coordination across borders. Whether in business or criminal law, recovery or rebuilding efforts, and elsewhere in law and society, international coordination is either useful or necessary. This panel will explore settings where questions of international coordination features prominently, including the regulation of the international maritime community, the management of the global supply chain, the reception of and assistance to refugees, the administration and management of disaster relief, international investment and the duty to rescue during genocide.


Presentations:Duty to Rescue During Genocide and Other Mass Atrocities: Motivations and Conduct of “Upstanders”Zachary Kaufman, Stanford Law School

Law and inter-legalities in plural normative environments: recovery after natural disasterCaroline Compton, Yale University; Australian National University

Sociology of Global Supply Chain LawMuhammad Azeem Lahore University of Management Sciences

The International Safety Management (ISM) Code 2002: A failed attempt to regulate the safety culture of the international maritime community?Craig Laverick , Northumbria University

Interrogations and Adversarial Narratives: Shifting the Discourses and Interventions in Domestic and Sexualized Violence CasesSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Description:This selection of papers examines interrogation techniques, adversarial impacts, the politicization of honour-related violence and intervention training in the contexts of sexual and domestic violence.

Primary Keyword: Crime and VictimizationSecondary Keyword: Criminal Justice

Presentations:Empirical and Theoretical Reflections on Forty Years of Sexual and Domestic Violence Training Interventions with Law Enforcement OfficialsRose Corrigan, Drexel University

Why does American-style Police Interrogation Pose Special Risks for Women who have Experienced Domestic Violence?Janet Ainsworth, Seattle University

Involving Undergraduates in Research at Teaching-oriented InstitutionsSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Professional Development Panel

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Monica Williams,Weber State University

Discussant(s): Shannon Portillo, University of Kansas

192


atu

rda

y

Participant(s):Sydney Bannister, University of KansasMonica Williams, Weber State UniversityRuth Alminas, Fort Lewis CollegeDanielle Rudes, George Mason UniversityJamie Rowen, University of Massachusetts, AmherstMadelaine Tesori, Weber State University

Description:Faculty at teaching-oriented institutions often want to involve undergraduate students in research, but have few institutional supports to do so. This panel will showcase and discuss strategies for involving undergraduates in curricular and co-curricular research activities at teaching-oriented institutions. In the panel, faculty members and students will analyze the promises and limitations of various strategies of research involvement including research in the context of traditional coursework, assistantships, and university centers for community-based learning. By discussing these strategies, the panel will help faculty at a variety of teaching-oriented institutions successfully promote, encourage, and implement research activities for their students.


Legal Geography II: Territories, Extraterritorialities and BordersCRN: 35 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): David Delaney, Amherst College Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, Univ. of Haifa

Description:Extraterritoriality is a critical constituent of current legal infrastructure. We explore this particular way of governing, an expression of political power embedded in (symbolic) relation to law and space, rethink contemporary state formations and practices of occupation, transnationalisation and globalization within the history and remnants of imperial power and colonization. Rather than simply enlisting the sites, we are interested in extraterritorialities as a technique of governing, under which conditions is there a claim to (extra)territoriality, what are their various functions, what are the implications for the role of the state, responsibility, sovereignty and international law. How do visibility and invisibility, territory and extraterritoriality, inside and outside, claims and practices interact to enable particular governing.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:Extraterritoriality: A Modern Way of Governing?Tugba Basaran, CCLS Paris/ Harvard Law (2017-18)

Jurisdictional Borders as Forms of Friction: Territoriality, Control, Resistance and Negotiation.Amnon Reichman, Faculty of Law, University of Haifa

Mapping Border Violence in Brazil since 2000 Philip Jones, Carleton University

Jean Daudelin, Carleton University

Territorializing Piquhiit: Legal Difference and Outside Opportunities in a Normative System at Gjoa Haven, NunavutSean Robertson, University of AlbertaGita Ljubicic, Carleton Univ. - Geography & Env StudiesSimon Okpakok, Gjoa Haven Elders Committee

Toward a Critical Legal Geography of the Occupied Territories, the West Bank, 1967-2017Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, Univ. of Haifa

Legislation, Taxation, and PoliticsCRN: 31Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Goldburn Maynard, Univ. of Louisville Brandeis School of Law

Description:This panel explores issues around the making of tax law and the politics of tax design, as well political issues surrounding tax law more generally.

Primary Keyword:Taxation, Social Security, Fiscal Policies

Presentations:Can Congress Get Trump's Taxes?Andy Grewal, University of Iowa

Legal Architecture and the Tax Legislative ProcessShu-Yi Oei, Boston College Law SchoolLeigh Osofsky, University of Miami

Morrissey v. U.S. and the IRS's Stealth Attack on Reproductive ChoiceTessa Davis, University of South Carolina School of Law

Popular Narratives in the Making of Tax LawMontano Cabezas, McGill University Faculty of Law

Tax Exceptionalist RulemakingJames Puckett, Penn State Law

193


atu

rda

y

Novel Legal Forms in Health LawCRN: 9 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair/Discussant(s): John Harrington, Cardiff University

Description:Health law has moved far from physician liability within the legal form of tort litigation. This panel explores various legal forms that health lawyers now encounter, across several jurisdictions. One important question is the legal status of the entities that make up a health system: are they private companies, state, or 'third sector' enterprises, and what are the consequences for health? Another important legal form is human rights, and concepts of patient autonomy. As 'health' blends into 'well-being', can a legal framework based on 'rights' make sense? Third, how do federal legal forms determine health entitlements and claims? Do provinces, regions secure health rights in ways distinct from central/federal bodies, charged with fiscal discipline? How do forms of administrative law, such as judicial review, support health?

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Paradigmatic Shifts in Health Care: Body Enhancement and Regulatory Challenges in the UKNicola Glover-Thomas, University of Manchester

Right to Health Care in EU and Canada-Role of the Centre in Complex EntitiesTomislav Sokol, Zagreb School of Economics and Management

Social enterprises delivering health care services within the European context: legal aspects, their relations with public authorities and their contribution to ensure a fair and universal right to health.Alceste Santuari, University of Bologna

Termites of Solidarity in the House of AusterityScott Greer, University of MichiganEleanor Brooks, Edinburgh University

Now and Then, Here and There: Critical Perspectives on Diversity and the Profession from North America and the UKSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s):Renee Knake, University of Houston Law SchoolSteven Vaughan, University College London

Participant(s):Hannah Brenner, California Western School of LawRenee Knake, University of Houston Law SchoolMarc Mason, University of WestminsterAmy Salyzyn, University of Ottawa, Faculty of LawSteven Vaughan, University College LondonLeandra Zarnow, University of Houston

Description:This Roundtable reflects on contemporary and historical moments and challenges in relation to diversity and the profession, in North America and the UK. It covers ground from the women shortlisted for (but never appointed to) the US Supreme Court, to women's legal advocacy in the US and the development of feminist jurisprudence; from the interface between diversity and regulation in Canada, to the experiences of LGBT+ barristers in England & Wales, and the seeming preference of large law firms in the UK for gay lawyers over women lawyers. We use these examples and ideas as starting points for a critical debate on where we are in terms of diversity and the profession and what we can learn from the past to help inform the future.


Partisan Gerrymandering: Perspectives on District Drawing in a Polarized EraSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Joshua Sellers, Arizona State University - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Participant(s):Guy Charles, Duke Law SchoolLuis Fuentes-Rowher, Indiana University - BloomingtonJames Gardner, University at Buffalo School of LawMichael Kang, Emory Law SchoolFranita Tolson, University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Description:For the first time in over a decade, the Supreme Court, in Gill v. Whitford, is considering the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering. A decision announcing a standard for evaluating political gerrymanders would fundamentally reshape the decennial district-drawing process. Would such a decision portend a decline in political polarization as well? Would such a decision open up the possibility of other partisan-based constitutional challenges? Is judicial relief appropriate for what is an inherently political act? If the Court does not announce a standard, how serious a threat would that pose to our democracy? This roundtable will discuss these and other questions, placing them in the broader context of the "Law of Democracy."

194


atu

rda

y

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Protecting and Implementing International Human RightsSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Human rights advocacy and the formal legal development of international human rights law through treaties and national legislation have been the twin vectors for protecting and implementing international human rights. The papers on this panel all explore continuity and change in the history, practice and understandings of these different paths to address human rights violations.


Presentations:Collective Redress for Mass Human Rights Violations: Exploring the Synergies between Public and Private LawRhonson Salim, Open University & British Institute of

International and Comparative LawOlga Jurasz , Open University

Legislating Hate: Canada, the UN, and the Push to Ban Hate Speech, 1960 to 1970Jennifer Tunnicliffe, McMaster University

“Urgent Action” and Legal Justice: Changes and Continuity in Transnational Human Rights AdvocacyAnn Marie Clark, Purdue University

Psychology of Legal Judgment and Decision-MakingSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Tess M.S. Neal, Arizona State University

Description:Psychological science examines the psychological bases of how people think, feel, and act, including the social nature of judgment and decision-making. When combined with sociolegal theories the discipline allows for the study of the effect of law woven through society and the effect of society woven throughout law. This panel features law, society, and psychological science perspectives on legal judgment and decision-making. We explore how judges consider social

scientific data and how forensic experts confirm expectations of evidence. We also investigate the impact of guidelines or formal disorder criteria on sentencing decisions, as well as why adolescents accept plea bargains. Together, these talks address the forces that shape decisions made by and about legal actors.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tells Us About the Supreme Court’s Use of Social ScienceJonathan Feingold, UCLA, Office of Equity, Diversity and InclusionEvelyn Carter, Indiana University, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences

Psychologists’ Reasoning in Forensic Cases is Affected by Cognitive BiasesTess M.S. Neal, Arizona State University

What’s in a Name?: The Impact of Labeling DisordersCarly Giffin, University of California BerkeleyTania Lombrozo, University of California Berkeley

Punishment in Law & SocietySaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Description:The state imposes punishment for various harms, some criminal, others tortious and still others may be soft forms of punishment that come unattached to a legal sanction. This panel will highlight various questions and controversies arising out of punishment, defined broadly to include the role of public opinion in incarceration, parole board determinations, the elusiveness of an "impartial" jury, negligent conduct in and out of medicine, and punishment without conviction.


Presentations:Gross Negligence Manslaughter: A problem just for medicine?Danielle Griffiths, University of Sussex

If Words Could Kill-And Maybe They CanHillary Farber, University of Massachusetts School of Law

Mark of the Non-Conviction Record: Police Contact and Employment ExperiencesAngela Hick, The University of Toronto

195


atu

rda

y

Punitiveness, Policing, and Mass Incarceration: Revisiting Enns’ Analysis on the Role of Public Opinion in Influencing Changes in IncarcerationDemar F. Lewis IV, Yale UniversityJustin Jones, University of Michigan

Towards a Meaningful Opportunity to Obtain Release: An Examination of South Carolina Parole Board Decisions in 2006-2016Amelia Hritz, Cornell UniversityJohn Blume, Cornell Law School

Punitiveness, Emotion, and DiscourseSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Description:This panel focuses on the role of discourse, emotion, and punitiveness in punishment practices and reforms. Papers examine patterns in state killings and other violence, faith-based advocacy, and the relationship between pleasure, respect, horror, and suffering.


Presentations:Capital Punishment and its DeclineValerie West, John Jay College

Christian Conservatives and Prison Reform in the Age of Trump: Law, Politics, Policy, and FaithFran Buntman, George Washington University

Is China Exporting the Suspended Death Sentence?Tobias Smith, University of California, BerkeleyDaniel Pascoe, City University of Hong Kong

Pleasure in the sociology of punishmentMagnus Hornqvist, Stockholm University

Re-Constructing Character and Managing Resistance: Apology, Remorse and Norms in the Interpretation of Defendants and VictimsCRN: 42 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Discussant(s): Richard Weisman, York University

Description:Court-room processes and outcomes can be powerfully shaped by perceptions of defendants and victims that are themselves

structured by cultural expectations as to their proper place in proceedings. But such expectations may be built on stereotype or misperception, inaccessible to particular groups or simply differently understood as between judges, defendants and victims. One central question in shaping the perception of the defendants is how they assume responsibility, expressing remorse and apology for their acts. One central question for victims is simply how to resist their experience being reduced to a visual parade of their injuries.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Context: Culture, Sentencing and Plea Mitigation in Hong KongKevin Cheng, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Reassembling the Fractured Victim: putting the evidence of domestic violence survivors together to find the personRashmee Singh, University of Waterloo

Remorse and JudgingSusan Bandes, DePaul University College of Law

Rethinking Apology in Tort Litigation: Deficiencies in Comprehensiveness Undermine Remedial EffectivenessPeter Mascini, Erasmus University RotterdamJoost Leunissen, Southampton UniversityChris Reinders-Folmer, Erasmus University Rotterdam

Rights of Vulnerable PopulationsCRN: 47 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Description:The papers in this session explore different vulnerable populations, and their rights. Topics include children, and persons with disabilities.

Primary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:An Empirical Assessment of the Rights of Persons Living with Disability to Employment Opportunity in NigeriaMariam Abdulraheem-Mustapha, Faculty of Law, Univ. of ilorin

Children’s Rights Analysis of Australia’s Child Immunization PolicyNoam Peleg, UNSW

196


atu

rda

y

Investigating the Application of Subsidiarity Principle in Intercountry Adoption in NigeriaOlanike Odewale, American University of Nigeria, Yola, Adamawa, Nigeria

The 2030 Agenda: Understanding Economic and Social Rights for persons with disabilitiesAna Maria Sanchez Rodriguez, Maynooth University

Social Movements: IntersectionsSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Mehera San Roque, University of New South Wales

Description:Activist approaches to raising awareness of an expanded definition of violence against women in Brazil, the role of intermediaries, those who influence the interpretation of legal rules, in facilitating or inhibiting social change in France and the US, the role of law in the remarkable achievement of the gay rights movements, and the historical conditions that have contributed to enabling the '#metoo' campaign are all addressed in this panel.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Brazilian Women's Movements Framing Violence in Latin America: the Mobilization and Diffusion of a ConceptElaini C G da Silva, Cebrap

Keeping Rape on the Public Agenda: Mapping the Legacies of Anti-rape ActivismRachel Loney-Howes, La Trobe University

The Queer Case of the LGBT Movement: Rethinking Law and Social ChangeJustin O'Neill, University of California, Berkeley

State Crimes, War CrimesSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: War, and Armed Conflict

Presentations:A Legal Response to War Criminals: A Challenge from the Public SphereKatelyn Arac, Queen's University

Individuals Accused of International Crimes as Illegitimate Agents of TruthMina Rauschenbach, University of Lausanne/KU Leuven

Taming the Financial Markets: Innovation, Compliance Technologies and EnforcementCRN: 5 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Justin Rex, Bowling Green State University

Discussant(s): Benjamin van Rooij, University of California, Irvine

Description:This panel provides a mix of theoretical and empirical takes on a range of modes of governance in the financial markets – an essentially contested and challenging regulatory terrain. One part of the papers explores private initiatives of control such as duty of care claims for substandard financial products and regulatory compliance technologies devised by private firms. The other part tackles issues of public oversight of finance through the governing of financial innovation and enforcement actions for misconduct by national regulators.Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Financialization, Financial Capital

Presentations:Financial Innovation and Financial Regulation: Wit Capital to Fintech BridgesCaroline Bradley, University of Miami School of Law

Global Enforcement of Financial Regulation: An Empirical AssessmentRoy Gava, University of Geneva

Neither Admit nor Deny. Reproducing the Ambiguity of Securities Regulation through the Settlement Practice of the SECCsaba Győry, Institute of Legal Studies, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Towards a Better Resolution of Duty-of-Care Claims on Financial MarketsBonne van Hattum, University of Amsterdam

‘Tech Talks’: the Rise and Growth of Technology Solutions to ComplianceAleksandra Jordanoska, School of Law, University of Manchester

197


atu

rda

y

The Iraq War at 15: Legacies of Law and ResistanceCRN:23 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Gerry Simpson, LSE

Description:On 20th March 2003, combat forces from the United Kingdom, United States of America and other coalition nations invaded Iraq. Fifteen years on, the Iraq War still has resonance - as an event, a watershed, a moment of acute legal, social and political significance. This panel will examine that significance and the war's legacies of law and resistance, gathering together and connecting different international legal fields unified by this event. In doing so, the panel seeks to explore the diverse international legal matter that the 2003 Iraq War has left with us – the manner in which law has been made, and remade, by the conflict, the use of law as both a justification for and a site of resistance against the conflict, and the conflict as a catalyst for legal change.

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: War, and Armed Conflict

Presentations:International Crimes by British Forces in Iraq: the Law and Politics of AccountabilityKate Grady, SOAS University of London

International Law in Public Debate: After the DelugeMadelaine Chiam, La Trobe Law School, La Trobe University

Resistance Through International Law?: Rethinking the World Tribunal on IraqAyca Cubukcu, London School of Economics

The Legacies of Self-Determination in IraqCatriona Drew, SOAS University of London

United Nations Security Council Authorisation to Use Force in the Aftermath of IraqRussell Buchan, University of Sheffield

War Machine: Counterinsurgency, Iraq, and the Erosion of the Civilian/Combatant DistinctionHeidi Matthews, Osgoode Hall Law School

The Work of Discretion in Policing, Prosecution, and SentencingSaturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Aziza Ahmed, Northeastern Univ. School of Law

Description:In recent decades, criminal law scholars and advocates in the United States and Canada have focused increasing attention on the role of discretion in the criminal justice system. Some have emphasized the ways in which reforms aimed at reducing discretion may simply redistribute it within the system. Other advocates and commentators have highlighted the degree to which individual exercises of discretion in the criminal system are relatively immunized from review. Drawing on comparative perspectives and grounding the discussion in specific institutions such as the prison and the school, this salon will interrogate the work of discretion in the modern criminal law system. Our aim is to consider both the repressive and emancipatory potential of discretion in reforming or resisting the criminal law power of the state.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social Control

Presentations:Policing the SchoolLisa Kelly, Queen's University, Faculty of Law

The Obsessions and Oversights of Sentencing Reform Movements in Comparative PerspectiveLisa Kerr, New York University

The Reviewability of Police and Prosecutorial Discretionary Decisionmaking in Changing Institutional, Social, and Legal ContextsAlana Klein, McGill University School of Law

Transitional Justice and Social Change in Latin AmericaCRN: 52 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron


Discussant(s): Pedro Fortes, FGV LAW SCHOOL

Description:Countries transitioning from civil wars face several challenges to achieve peace and political stability. Transitional justice usually focuses on dealing with past atrocities. This panel explores some of those challenges that transitional justice interventions have overlooked by bringing together empirical papers that analyze

198


atu

rda

y

Latin American cases. First, it examines whether transitional justice policies have strengthened citizen confidence in the state in Guatemala. Then, it assesses the extent to which different countries have addressed social and economic dimensions of armed conflicts, such as the effective enjoyment of Economic and Social Rights of IDPs in Colombia and the accountability of economic actors.

Primary Keyword:Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword:International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Achieving Accountability of Economic Actors through Transitional Justice ProcessesSabine Michalowski, University of Essex

From Political Violence to Political Trust? Experimental Evidence on Transitional Justice from GuatemalaRisa Kitagawa, Columbia University

Social and Economic Dimensions of Armed Conflicts in Times of Transitions: Lessons from Latin AmericaDiana Guzman-Rodriguez, Stanford University

What Colombia´s 20 Years of Public Policies on Forced Displacement Can Tell Us About Transitional Justice and Social ChangeNelson Camilo Sanchez, Univ. Nacional de Colombia

Wealth Formation and Financial Security for Working Families Over the Life Cycle: Legal DimensionsCRN: 25 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Patricia McCoy, Boston College Law School

Description:U.S. policies toward savings strategies and wealth formation fail to adequately encourage savings over the lifecycle for lower- and moderate-income households. The continued emphasis on homeownership artificially tilts investment toward a volatile, illiquid, and undiversified asset class financed by debt that proved financially ruinous to numerous households after the 2008 financial crisis. In other respects, U.S. policies impede access by many lower-income workers to other important savings channels, often including workplace retirement plans. Still other savings vehicles available to lower-income workers are seriously underfunded. This panel analyzes the effectiveness of U.S. policies on wealth formation for lower- and moderate-income households and proposes improvements.


Presentations:Enhancing Retirement Savings for Low-Income IndividualsKathryn Moore, University of Kentucky

Healthcare Promises for Public EmployeesNatalya Shnitser, Boston College Law School

The U.S. Preoccupation With Homeownership: Rethinking Wealth–Building Strategies for Low- and Moderate-Income HouseholdsPatricia McCoy, Boston College Law School

[We] must go on. [We] can't go on. [We]'ll go on: Inclusion at the crossroadsCRN: 23 Saturday Session 4, 2:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Toni Williams, University of Kent

Description:Over the past 30 years, inclusionary policies have been favoured by international organisations and domestic governments to combat the effects of uneven development, austerity and crisis on marginalised people and to open up new markets for global corporations. But the revival of cultural and social borders, walls and other modes of dividing political and territorial spaces challenges fundamental assumptions of inclusion projects. Drawing on results of a British Academy-funded research partnership between the University of Kent and the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, this panel presents selected case studies from Europe, Latin America and the digital domain on the roles that law plays in mediating the inclusionary / exclusionary tensions of contemporary social policy.

Primary Keyword: Economic and Social RightsSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Presentations:Abusive Obiter Dicta: Judges against the Rule of LawThomas Bustamante, Univ. Federal de Minas Gerais

Dialogue and participation in the management of environmental constrains? the possibilities and limits in the Vila Acaba Mundo CaseMaria Fernanda Salcedo Repoêles, UFMG

Digital divide, digital inclusion and the hidden inconsistencies of global indicators: how Big Data can deepen the criticism against a universal discourse on knowledge commonsFabricio Bertini Pasquot Polido, UFMG

199


atu

rda

y

Re-imagining cities as spaces of care – a perspective from street homelessnessHelen Carr, University of KentMaria Fernanda Salcedo Repoêles, UFMG

Rights on Trial: How Employment Discrimination Law Perpetuates InequalitySaturday Session 4A, 2:45 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s):Ellen Berrey, University of TorontoRobert Nelson, American Bar Foundation/Northwestern UniversityLaura Nielsen, American Bar Foundation/ Northwestern U

Chair(s): Shannon Gleeson, Cornell University

Reader(s): Mario Barnes, University of California-Irvine

Lauren Edelman, University of California-BerkeleyCharles Epp, University of KansasShannon Gleeson, Cornell UniversityOsagie Obasogie, University of California, Berkeley

Description:Rights on Trial examines the relationship between rights, law, & hierarchy in the workplace through employment civil rights (ECR) litigation in the U.S. Using quantitative analysis of 1,788 cases & over 100 interviews with plaintiffs, defendants & their attorneys, we emphasize how workplace discrimination based on race, gender, age and disability persists. Litigation places plaintiffs at a disadvantage from the outset & though legal recourse is rare, plaintiffs who do file legal charges often experience substantial challenges. Rights on Trial analyzes the process of navigating litigation, including workplace conflict, management, difficulty securing legal representation and extensive personal loss – as a result of the case. It demonstrates how the process of litigating ECR reinscibes the very inequalities it was intended to remedy.

Primary Keyword: DiscriminationSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities, Social movements: intersections

Law and the Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic PerspectiveSaturday Session 4B, 3:45 p.m. - 4:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Anne Dailey, Univ. of Connecticut School of Law

Chair(s): Laura Rosenbury, Univ. of Florida Levin College of Law

Reader(s):Sora Han, UC IrvineLaura Rosenbury, Univ. of Florida Levin College of LawMarc Spindelman, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law

Description:In Law and the Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective (Yale Press, 2017), author Anne Dailey argues for the vital relevance of contemporary psychoanalysis to law, legal theory, and judging. She challenges basic legal assumptions about the autonomous, rational actor, offering a nuanced and humane perspective that furthers our legal system's highest ideals of individual fairness and systemic justice. The psychological perspective offered in this book complements much of the popular research on the mind taking place in the cognitive sciences as well as work being done in behavioral legal studies. Discussion of the book will consider how the gap between the lived reality of subjective experience and law's false portrait of the human mind leads to ineffective, unrealistic, and unjust legal rules and outcomes in multiple settings.

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Agency and the Public Defender InstitutionSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair/Discussant(s): Thea Johnson, University of Maine School of Law

Saturday June 8, Sess ion 4A2:45 p.m. - 3 :30 p.m .

Saturday June 8, Sess ion 4B3:45 p.m. - 4 :30 p.m .

Saturday June 8, Sess ion 54:45 p.m. - 6 :30 p.m .

200


atu

rda

y

Description:This session explores the different ways the public defender institution can positively impact the criminal justice crisis. The papers range from a discussion of institutional design to search and seizure jurisprudence. They authors all seek to develop a clearer idea of how the public defender can express its agency when its very nature is reactive to decisions by the government and other system actors.

Primary Keyword: Criminal JusticeSecondary Keyword: Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Digital Penology: Mass Correctional Surveillance as the Emperor's ClothesChaz Arnett, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

Law Enforcement PartnershipsEisha Jain, University of North Carolina School of Law

Revisiting Gerstein v. Pugh: The Need for Adversarial Probable Cause HearingsElizabeth Jones, University of Louisville

Too Many Masters: The Institutional Defender and Balancing the Funding Search with Client RightsIrene Joe, UCLA School of Law

A Common Quandary for New Common Law Legal SystemsCRN: 15 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair(s): Lee Cabatingan, University of California, Irvine

Discussant(s): Eve Darian-Smith, University of California Irvine

Description:Creating new legal systems is necessarily fraught with difficulty. The former colonies of Great Britain, moreover, face a further challenge following their break from the Privy Council, which served as the final court of appeal for each of its holdings and continues to have appellate jurisdiction over its dependent territories and several now-independent former colonies. Specifically, these postcolonial societies must reconcile the need to draw from the oft-exalted legacy of the common law tradition and an equally pressing desire to showcase the independence of autochthonous law and courts. This panel features papers from scholars in diverse disciplines whose work examines how nascent common law legal systems across Asia, Africa, the Pacific, and the Caribbean navigate this common quandary through various and creative means.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:Building a Brand: Proving the Value of the Caribbean Court of JusticeLee Cabatingan, University of California, Irvine

Political, Cultural and Linguistic Symbolism in Postcolonial Bruneian and Tongan LawRichard Powell, Nihon University

The Continuing Import of the Common Law to the Post-Colonies in Asia - Evidence from Hong Kong, Malaysia, and SingaporeKwai Ng, UCSDBrynna Jacobson, UCSD

Competing and Intersecting Conceptions of Global Governance: Epistemologies, Models, FrameworksCRN: 23 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:After conceptualizing "Global Governance" for a long time mostly from a theoretical perspective, we need to revisit these efforts in light of practice. While we look upon our meticulously crafted sand castles of "transnational law" and "transnational legal orders", or "global law", potentially being rendered irrelevant in light of forceful protest arising from the midst of a deeply felt sense of marginalization and exclusion, we are hard-pressed to work out the stakes and responsibilities of all this theoretical modelling and line-drawing. Focusing on the field of environmental regulatory governance, how can the research in transnational legal theory connect with political efforts in transnational advocacy?

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Legal Pluralism

Presentations:From power to authority: Legality and legitimacy in transnational lawJaye Ellis, McGill University

Legal Pluralism as a Framework for Theorising Public-Private Climate Finance 'Law'Megan Bowman, King's College London

Ontological Politics of Indigenous Peoples Rights over Territories and Natural Resources as Part of the Chilean Constituent Process (2016 - )Amaya Alvez, University of Concepcion

Stewardship: Global Governance for Ecological RestorationEmily Barritt, King's College London

201


atu

rda

y

Constitutional Law and Legal Culture in Comparative Perspectives: Asia and the Americas IIICRN: 1 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Young Jung, UW-Law School / Chonbuk National University(Law School)

Discussant(s): Lucia Frota Pestana de Aguiar Silva, Universidade Estácio de Sá



Presentations:BRICS Countries and Their Cooperation in the Field of Competition Law and Policy: A New Voice in International Antitrust?Alexandr Svetlicinii, University of Macau

North by North-West? Decolonizing (Constitutional) Law, Recolonizing Legal ImaginationZoran Oklopcic, Carleton University

The Neo-constitutionalism of Brazil: Rethinking the Appropriation of Indeterminate Concepts by the CourtsDaniel Puerari, UNESAVanele César, UVABárbara Baptista, UVA

The New Brazilian Judicial Precedent System: a Comparative Study Between Civil and Common Law Tradition Countries.Nilo Rafael Baptista de Mello, UNESA-RJ

Contextualizing and Problematizing (Cr)immigration Decisions.CRN: 2 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Linden

Chair(s): Maartje van der Woude, Leiden Law School

Discussant(s): Juliet Stumpf, Lewis & Clark School of Law Marjorie Zatz, University of California, Merced

Description:This panel brings together junior scholars working on a better understanding of the rationales behind and consequences of decisions made in the context of migration control. As the various contributions will illustrate, such an understanding requires paying attention to historical, organizational, cultural and national factors and developments. The authors will be presenting empirical data and/ or theoretical conceptualizations taken from their research on the US, Australia, Poland and the German/Austrian border region.

Primary Keyword: Migration and Refugee StudiesSecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Discretionary Decision-Making: Adjudication of Asylum ApplicationsHillary Mellinger, American University

Human Rights and the Commodified Confinement of the Crimmigrant Other: Australia’s Offshore and Privatized Immigration Detention Centers on Nauru from a Holistic Human Rights PerspectivePatrick van Berlo, Leiden Law School

Political Meanings of National Belonging: Tracing the Evolution of ‘Polskość’ in the III Republic of PolandMaryla Klajn, Leiden University

Subsidiary Protection, Intra-Schengen Border Checks, and the Production of "Illegality" along the German-Austrian BorderNeske Baerwaldt, Leiden University (Van Vollenhoven Institute for Law, Governance and Society)

“Please Forgive Me, I am a Good Man, a Good Husband, a Good Father”: The Construction of Masculinity in Deportation HearingsDylan Farrell-Bryan, University of Pennsylvania

202


atu

rda

y

Criminal RecordsCRN: 27 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This session focuses on the role of criminal records in labor markets and civil society. Papers focus on the proliferation of background checks, records disclosure regimes, licensing decisions, and the challenges of finding work with a record.


Presentations:"$40 to Make Sure": Common Sense Risk Management and the Proliferation of Criminal Background ChecksDavid McElhattan, Northwestern University

Criminal Records Disclosure Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Policy FrameworksAlessandro Corda, Queen's Univ. Belfast School of Law

Working Around the Law: Navigating Legal Barriers to Good Work During ReentryDallas Augustine, University of California, Irvine

Domestic Violence Law at the CrossroadsCRN: 7 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair(s): Joanna Birenbaum, Osgoode Hall Law school

Discussant(s): Deepa Mattoo, Barbara Schlifer Clinic

Description:Domestic violence cases present unique challenges due to complex power dynamics, structural inequalities, and because victims, offenders and children must often navigate intersecting legal systems to resolve multiple issues flowing from domestic violence. Criminal, family, housing, and immigration laws and systems have differing objectives and standards, and victims may face contradictory messages about the expectations courts have for their conduct in the face of domestic violence. Varying forums for resolving domestic violence issues may lead to disparate and conflicting outcomes for litigants, and may impair the safety of victims and children. Our panel will discuss the challenges women face when they engage intersecting legal systems to respond to domestic violence, and explore how feminist theory might be useful in addressing them.


Secondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Immigration, Criminal, and Family LawJanet Mosher, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Domestic Violence Law at the Crossroads: Exploring the Tensions in Feminist Legal TheoryJennifer Koshan, Faculty of Law, U of C

The Intersection of Domestic Violence and Residency Tenancy LawJonnette Watson Hamilton,Faculty of Law, University of Calgary

Ecological Roots of Indigenous JurisprudenceCRN:34 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Kenora

Chair(s): Kirsten Anker, McGill University

Participant(s): Kirsten Anker, McGill UniversityCaleb Behn, Centre for International Governance and InnovationSa'ke'j Henderson, Native Law Centre of CanadaShiri Pasternak, Ryerson University

Description:This session explores the many ways in which Indigenous laws and jurisprudence can be articulated with, in, and through places and their unique ecologies. Finding expression as natural law (Borrows), grounded normativity (Coulthard), or legal traditions developing out ecological forces (Henderson & Battiste), the land as the source of the law challenges anthropocentric and "posited" conceptions of law and jurisprudence. How are Indigenous communities continuing to practice place-based law? What have been their experiences in translating them for the purpose of engaging with various legal and political institutions? How are settlers and immigrants interpolated by these laws of the lands in which they now live?

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

203


atu

rda

y

Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development: How Can Law Protect Nature?CRN: 52 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron


Discussant(s): Diego Gil McCawley, Stanford Law School

Description:This session investigates an important conception of development, based on the sustainable relationship between human beings and the natural environment. Traditionally, socio-economic development is predominantly anthropocentric and not biocentric and the idea of sustainable development contributes with a more comprehensive perspective of development that is centred on the ecosystem and not only on human development. The papers explore the sustainability and the necessity of protecting the environment, focusing on the role of different legal instruments (contracts, zoning, and investment law, for instance).

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and Urbanism

Presentations:Incorporating Environmental Values into the International Investment Law: Examining the role of investment tribunal in environmental considerationsHaniehalsadat Aboutorabifard, Osgoode Hall Law School

So, Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? The Human Face of NatureJovita de LOATCH, Ronin InstituteSustainability and the Move from Corporate Governance to Governance Through ContractJaakko Salminen, University of Turku

The Legal Reserve Area Rule: an In-Depth Evaluative AnalysisMaria Tereza Leopardi Mello, UFRJ

Towards Urban Planning for Climate Change in ColombiaDilia Lozano Suarez, Universidad de los Andes

Expanding, Interpreting and Translating Human Rights in Regional Human Rights CourtsSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:The papers on this panel explore how regional human rights courts, and especially the European Court of Human Rights, have become sites for developing and contesting the scope and nature of human rights. From labor rights to property, regional courts have been called upon to expand or contract the application and definition of rights.


Presentations:A Labor Rights Revolution at the European Court of Human Rights? Expansion of Human Rights from BelowFiliz Kahraman, Georgetown University

Connecting with Place: Stories of Location in Regional Case Law on the Human Right to PropertyLaura Dehaibi, McGill University

The “living instrument doctrine” in the interpretation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: open texture and the clarification of meaning.Joanna Osiejewicz, University of Zielona Gora

Gender-based Violence and the Law in Latin AmericaSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Discussant(s): Lina Maria Cespedes, Universidad del Rosario

Description:This session presents five articles from legal scholars in Mexico, Colombia and Canada and is organized around the discussion of high profile cases of violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in Latin America. In particular, the papers focus on how the judges' perception ofthe defendants affects legal decisions and narratives.

Primary Keyword: Gender and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Presentations:Addressing violence against non-normative sexualities during war: what can ad hoc tribunals do?Maria Davila, Universidad de los Andes

204


atu

rda

y

Interpellation and self-identification: the effects of legalizing identities Maria Mercedes Gomez, Saint Mary's University

On the importance of specific legal instruments for Gender Based Violence: revisiting the debate between hate and biased crimes over Colombian legal and judicial decisions.Samuel Escobar, Universidad del Rosario

Getting past the "Pimp": Management in the Sex IndustryCRN: 6 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Menaka Raguparan, Carleton University

Description:This panel examines the work, regulation and identities of individuals who facilitate, coordinate, or supervise (third parties) sex workers' labour.


Presentations:Escort and Massage Business Managers Views of Prostitution Law and Law Enforcement in CanadaRachel Phillips, University of VictoriaLauren Casey, University of British ColumbiaBill McCarthy, University of California - Davis

Managing Sex Work and Criminalization: Third Parties in the Incall/Outcall SectorTuulia Law, York University

Pathways in and out of Third Party WorkChris Bruckert, University of Ottawa

Sex Worker Owned, Operated or Organized?: Global Comparisons of Worker-involved BusinessesBarb Brents, University of Nevada - Las Vegas

Implicit BiasCRN: 12 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Gregory Parks, Wake Forest University School of Law

Description:The role of the subconscious has played a growing role in how legal scholars think about the law. This panel explores the role of implicit biases in our perception of whiteness as well as

prosecutorial bias and perceptions of white innocence. It also tackles the exclusion of evidence from trials and the broader behavioral realism initiative.


Presentations:Intra-racial Racialization – Unpacking Whiteness in Anti-discrimination TheoryLihi Yona, Columbia Law School

Prosecutorial Bias in Homicide Sentencing OutcomesKat Albrecht, Northwestern University

Race on the Brain: What Implicit Bias Gets Wrong About the Struggle for Social JusticeJonathan Kahn, Mitchell Hamline School of Laq

The Danger of an Alert Jury?: Keeping Unconscious Bias UnconsciousJonathan Markovitz, American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties

“White Innocence” – Perpetuating Racial Hierarchy through Remedies Doctrine and the Importance of a More Diverse JudiciaryDavid Simson, UCLA School of Law

Inclusion, Exclusion, and Belonging in the Criminal Justice SystemSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Description:This panel raises questions of inclusion, exclusion, and belonging in the criminal justice system. Papers focus on immigration enforcement, hidden sentences, civil death, and boundary maintenance and economic activities within prisons.


Presentations:Enacting Sub-national Immigration Policy and the Socio-demographic Impact in Seven StatesIsabel Anadon, University of Wisconsin-Madison

The Prison as an Abject and Uncanny Social Institution: A Narratological Study of Incorporation and Haunting in Autobiographical Prison Accounts.Tea Fredriksson, Criminology, Stockholm University

The Privilege of Punishing: The Social Functions of Punishment in America's Hidden Penal SystemJoshua Kaiser, Dartmouth College

205


atu

rda

y

Indigenous Relationships to LandCRN: 34 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Despite the fact that the rights of Indigenous peoples to their traditional lands and waters has been given belated and limited recognition in numerous jurisdictions, the resource wealth of these lands has meant that there continues to be disputation and conflict between Indigenous communities, corporations and national governments. This panel deals with specific examples of the theoretical and juridical issues that arise from such conflicts.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous LawSecondary Keyword: Culture, And Cultural Rights

Presentations:De facto Crown sovereignty and the proceduralization of the Crown fiduciary duty owed to Aboriginal PeoplesRyan Beaton, University of Victoria, Canada

Hosts and parasites: Land claims and hospitality in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia and Leanne Simpson's "jiibay or andizooke"Christina Turner, University of Toronto

International Aspects of Taxation ISaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Henry Ordower, Saint Louis University School of Law

Description:International taxation raises difficult question regarding the allocation of the right to tax and cooperation among states. The Papers on this Panel Address these and other Questions in International Tax.

Presentations:Making Use Taxes Work: Experimental Evidence and AnalysisDavid Gamage, Indiana University, Maurer School of Law

Pass-through in International Tax: The Case of Private Equity FundsYoung Ran (Christine) Kim, University of Utah, SJ Quinney College of Law

International Investment Law in Context: Political Economy, Challenges, and New PerspectivesSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Cedar

Author(s): Fabio Morosini, UFRGS Jonathan Bonnitcha, University of NSW


Reader(s):Florian Hoffmann, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)Benedict Kingsbury, NYU School of LawSonia Rolland, Northeastern University School of LawDavid Schneiderman, Faculty of Law, University of TorontoLisa Toohey, Newcastle Law School

Description:The session will discuss two innovative publications on the field of International investment law: (1) Reconceptualizing International Investment Law from the Global South by Cambridge University Press; and (2) The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime by Oxford University Press. Both books provide inter-disciplinary perspectives on of the investment treaty regime and its challenges. While the latter provides inter-disciplinary perspectives on the investment treaty regime and its challenges, the former explores alternatives responses originating from the Global South.

Primary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and LawSecondary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and Governance

Judges, Conflict, and Dispute ResolutionCRN: 43 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe


Discussant(s): Bryan Clark, University of Strathclyde

Description:This session explores the role of judges and courts in non-adjudicative processes such as judicial mediation, judicial settlement conferencing, and judicial dispute resolution.


206


atu

rda

y

Presentations:Court-Provided Settlement Assistance: A Role for Judges or a Role for Others?Donna Stienstra, Federal Judicial Center

Judicial Dispute Resolution in Canada at the CrossroadsArchie Zariski, Athabasca University

The Convergence of ADR and ODR within the Courts: The Impact on Access to JusticeDorcas Quek Anderson, Singapore Management University School of Law

Justice and PerceptionSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:Law is about rules, and it can also be about perception-how we perceive the rules, how we perceive the victim and the wrongdoer, and how we perceive the dispute resolution process itself. This panel will examine several ways in which perception clarifies, complicates or perhaps even distorts our view of justice beginning with an inquiry into how we conceive the role victims in comparative perspective, how we represent childhood trauma, the relationship between law and poetry, our conceptions of consent, our evaluation and treatment of deviant cultures as well as images of alternative justice.


Presentations:Conceiving the Role of Victims in Criminal Processes across Legal TraditionsMarie Manikis, McGill University

Lessons from Utopia: Exploring Alternative Justice in Speculative FictionTamera Burnett, Osgoode Hall Law School

Law and Legal Education: From Empires to SilosSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Description:This panel will bring together a diverse set of papers exploring the hopes and possibilities for legal education amid a past of colonial encounters and a present of silo-istic organization in modern university settings.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal CulturesSecondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:Innovation and multidisciplinary perspectives in legal education: an empirical investigation of silos in Australian law schoolsAngela Melville, Flinders UniversityArmstrong Angel, Macquarie UniversityAmy Barrow, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Ordinary Citizens: The Hope for International Criminal Justice in AfricaMiriam Abaya, Temple Univ. Beasley School of Law

Questions and criticisms of the idea of a legal transplant of legal clinics through the reform of legal education in Colombia: improvement of legal education or imposition of a model of American colonial character?Gustavo Higuita, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

The Colonial Control of Legal Knowledge: the Case Study of CubaRicardo Pelegrin Taboada, Florida International University

Legal Constructions on Television and in the Print MediaCRN: 45 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair/Discussant(s): Itay Ravid, Stanford Law School

Description:This session deals with the socio-legal implications of television and print media's portrayal of court decisions about contested social issues and the perpetrators and victims of crime. The papers include a study of the portrayal of male victims of sexual assault, the criminal woman, international court decisions and the legal messages in medical dramas.

Primary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:A televised social problem construction? Pushing back against the invisibility of the male sexual assault victim in American CrimeDimitris Akrivos, Canterbury Christ Church University

Legal Visions: The Art and Science of the Medical DramaMarilyn Terzic, Université du Québec à Montréal

Public Attention for International Courts: The Salience and Portrayal of CJEU Decisions in the MediaJulian Dederke, Swiss Fed Inst of Tech (ETH Zurich)

207


atu

rda

y

Legal Geography I: Law, Space and ShelterCRN: 35 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): David Delaney, Amherst College Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, Univ. of Haifa

Description:This panel focuses on a wide range of spatio-legal tactics that are deployed in efforts to affect housing and shelter in an array of different contexts.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Housing, Land Use, Urban Studies, Law and Urbanism

Presentations:Geography of Power & the LawHadeel Abu Hussein, National University of Ireland

It’s not perfect but it’s all we got: local law & activism in gentrifying cities.Lisa Freeman, Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Litigation and Dispute ResolutionCRN: 10 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair/Discussant(s): Herbert Kritzer, University of Minnesota Law School

Description:This session of CRN10 is about litigation and DR. Prof. Krell's piece asks whether early victories on contested issues generate later victories. Prof. Banchik's paper examines whether the character of those involved in personal injury litigation affects the outcome of claims in the UK. Prof. Morris' paper will examine the spread of McDonaldization to the sphere of civil justice. Prof. Goldschmidt's paper will collect federal case law reviewing required, permissible, and impermissible forms of SRL assistance. Prof. Adediran focuses on the Ontario police complaints system, and analyze judicial review decisions to understand how the court attempts to oversee the overseers. Prof. Anzola's aim is to find out what does it mean to be a good lawyer by asking them directly.

Primary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute ResolutionSecondary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil Procedure

Presentations:Analysis of Federal Case Law to Determine Required, Permissible, and Impermissible Forms of Judicial Assistance to Self-Represented LitigantsJona Goldschmidt, Loyola University Chicago

Hitting For The Cycle: Judges, Litigants, and the Persistence of Early WinsReid Krell, University of Alabama

Humanity in Tort: Does Personality Affect Personal Injury Litigation?Richard Lewis, Cardiff University

The McDonaldization of Civil JusticeAnnette Morris, Cardiff University

The Power and Limits of Judicial Review: Analyzing the Interaction between the Court and the Police Complaints System in Producing 'Accountability'Jihyun Kwon, University of Toronto

New Frontiers in Technology and Household FinanceCRN: 25 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Joseph Spooner, London School of Economics and Political Science

Description:Panelists will assess the use of technology to help households deal with their finances. Panelists will discuss how technology can facilitate loans, decision-making, and dispute resolution, among other uses of technology.


Presentations:Are online dispute resolution in Brazil the answer?Rafaela Carvalho, Fundação Getulio VargasCarina Quirino, UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Automated Decision-making and Relational Justice: Credit and Justice for Low-income PeopleFreya Kodar, University of Victoria, Faculty of LawPatricia Cochran, University of Victoria, Faculty of Law

One way or another: comparative research into alternatives to foreclosures of residential propertyIrene Visser, Univ of Groningen, Faculty of Law

Quantifying SuitabilityVijay Raghavan, Independent

208


atu

rda

y

Regulating BitCreditChristopher Odinet, Southern University Law Center

New Perspectives on Law and Political Economy ISaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Veena Dubal, University of California, Hastings

Discussant(s): Calvin Morrill, University of California-Berkeley

Description:The past decade has seen growing interest in a reinvigorated project of Law & Political Economy (L&PE) beyond the Law & Economics (L&E) paradigm. For example, there are new organizations (e.g., APPEAL and ClassCrits), new L&PE classes, a new casebook, and an L&PE journal project.

This session is the first of two that seek to initiate a conversation with Law & Society (L&S) in the spirit of earlier calls for "a framework for understanding law and the economy that draws upon the major tenets of L&S scholarship yet ventures into territory normally occupied by those in L&E" (Edelman 2004), as well as recent calls for "more, not fewer, accounts of how law can improve economic justice and economic policy" (McCluskey, Pasquale & Taub 2016). Papers will focus on how L&PE can contribute to legal scholarship, teaching, and advocacy.


Presentations:Law and Political Economy: Developing the FieldAngela Harris, UC Davis

Law, Economics and Equality: Defining the Pie, Not Dividing ItMartha McCluskey, SUNY Buffalo Law School

The Invisible College of Political Economists of LawJames Varellas, University of California, Berkeley

What is “Law and Political Economy”?Amy Kapczynski, Yale Law School

Personhood: Embryos, Ethics, and Genetic ResourcesCRN: 29 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s) Michele Goodwin, University of California - Irvine School of Law

Description:Technology outpaces law. The result is law's inability to grapple with the complex, changing norms resulting from technology's societal impacts. No where is this more true than in the human biological realm and the creating of children and families through the uses biotechnologies, such as in vitro fertilization. These papers address this brave new world, exploring foundational legal concepts such as property, "knowledge commons," "universal regard," in relation to new applications of genetic resources.


Presentations:A “Knowledge Commons” Framework for the Governance of Genetic Resources and Traditional KnowledgeAman Gebru, Cardozo Law School, Yeshiva University

Genetic Patents and NGOs: Exploring how NGOs and civil action agencies engage with the patent system.Louise Hatherall, University of Bristol

In vitro Embryo, Actual Property vs Potential PersonalitySahar Karimi, University of Calgary, Faculty of LawAbbas Karimi, University of Tehran, Faculty of Law

Promoting Equality at WorkCRN: 8 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair/Discussant(s): Stephanie Bornstein, University of Florida Levin College of the Law

Description:This panel features a range of speakers who engage with the issue of discrimination in the workplace. Panelists will consider several forms of discrimination, from age and racial discrimination to gender violence. Drawing on insights from a range of disciplines such as cognitive psychology, and both empirical and theoretical work, panelists will critically examine various workplace structures that either impede or facilitate more inclusive workplace. Panelists will also consider the broader legal and policy setting.

Primary Keyword: Labor and EmploymentSecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:Accountability as a Workplace De-biasing Strategy: An Empirical ExaminationJamillah Bowman Williams, Georgetown Law Center

209


atu

rda

y

Should Age Discrimination Be an Integral Part of Employment Discrimination Law?Lilach Lurie, Tel Aviv University

The Headwinds and Tailwinds of Workplace EqualityBrad Areheart, University of Tennessee College of Law

Public and Private Policing: Public Perceptions, Satisfaction and LegitimacySaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Description:This exciting panel explores perceptions of public and private policing from a variety of lens including Police Liaison Teams in the UK, policing satisfaction in high risk neighbourhoods, legitimacy issues in Finland, and public service motivations of part time / full time police.


Presentations:An Assessment of Police Legitimacy Across Different Demographic GroupsMinni Peltonen, University of Turku

Exploring Public Service Motivations of Part-Time and Full-Time Private PoliceCullen Merritt, IUPUISheila Kennedy, IUPUIMatt Kienapple, IUPUI

Who pays for public policing? Exploring the shifting boundaries of provision for public policing.Jennifer Healy, University of Leeds

Re-imagining Legal Spaces: Contesting Law’s Narratives from Within and WithoutCRN: 48 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair(s): Smadar Ben-Natan, Tel-Aviv University

Discussant(s): Janine Ubink, Leiden Law School

Description:From classical studies examining the hierarchical coexistence of colonial and indigenous law to more recent discussions of 'global legal pluralism,' legal pluralism has challenged the assumed authority of the state as law's producer and gatekeeper. This session takes up a broad definition of legal

pluralism-a recognition of the increased porosity between legal regimes at every scale-to question who has the power to narrate the law. In doing so, it brings together a post-modern interest in discourse as well as a geographical examination of the material effects of law. The fragmentation of legal narratives disrupts the notion of a "fixedness" in these legal discourses; re-imagining each in their political self is, these papers argue, a critical step in challenging the determinacy of law, negotiating space and achieving forms of autonomy.

Primary Keyword: Legal PluralismSecondary Keyword: Geographies of Law

Presentations:Self-determination in the Shadow of Law: The Case of the Indigenous Samaritan Jews in PalestineZeina Jallad, Columbia Law School

The effect of permanence in South Asian customary legal systems; law, resistance and marginality in the Chakma communities of Bangladesh and India.Margaret O'Brien, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London

The Politics of MemoryKathleen Cavanaugh, National University of Ireland, Irish Centre for Human Rights

Women’s land ownership and the fixity of customary law: “exceptional” histories of rights, equality, and propertyEmily Hong, Cornell University

Recent Socio-Legal Books on Eastern Europe and Former Soviet UnionCRN: 20 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Peel

Author(s):Barbara Havelkova, University of OxfordMarina Zaloznaya, The University of Iowa

Chair(s):Peter Solomon, University of Toronto

Reader(s):Matthew Light, University of TorontoErica Marat, National Defense University

Description:Havelkova's "Gender Equality in Law: Uncovering the Legacies of Czech State Socialism" (Hart Publishing/Bloomsbury, 2017) and Zaloznaya's "The Politics of Bureaucratic Corruption in Post-Transitional Eastern Europe" (Cambridge University Press,

210


atu

rda

y

2017) tackle core questions in law & society tradition with empirical rigor that is unusual for studies of politically-unstable regions. Havelkova's focus falls on interaction between legal and gender orders in Czechia, where the skepticism of legislators has undermined gender equality law. Zaloznaya's book reveals the impact of post-Soviet political processes on how ordinary Ukrainians and Belorussians navigate the corruption economies of universities. Together, these books offer important correctives to over-simplified portrayals of law and legality outside the developed West.

Primary Keyword: Central and Eastern Europe, Balkans, Russia, and Eurasian Law and SocietySecondary Keyword: Democracy, Governance and State Theory; Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions

Regulating Labor Markets To Protect Minimum Labor StandardsCRN: 8, 43 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair/Discussant(s): Ruth Dukes, University of Glasgow

Description:This panel considers the regulatory environment that impacts upon work relations, including anti-trust laws, franchising arrangements, retirement, and maritime law. Panelists will consider whether anti-trust law presents an impediment to wide-reaching collective representation for independent contractors, and whether it can be reimagined to avoid adverse effects that platform markets can create in labour markets. Additionally, drawing on empirical research, panelists critique the distinction drawn between direct and indirect control in pending US legislation to expand the scope of joint employment liability. Moving beyond North America, panelists will also consider international law involving abandonment of ships - and seafarers.


Presentations:Abandonment of Ships: a Case Study on Seafarers’ Rights and RemediesDesai Shan, University of OttawaGang Chen, Wuhan University of Technology

Platform Effects on Labor MarketsHiba Hafiz, University of Chicago Law School

We All Laugh at Guilded Butterflies. The Shadow of Antitrust Law on the Collective Negotiation of Fair Fees for Self-Employed WorkersMarco Biasi, University of Milan

Regulation and Power: Social Movements Contestation from ‘the Bottom’ and Responsiveness from ‘the Top’CRN: 5 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Bonne van Hattum, University of Amsterdam

Description:Political power and regulatory governance interact in complex ways, and this panel examines these exchanges in a two-fold manner. First, as a mobilising effort to influence regulatory regimes from relatively powerless social movements and consumer groups, through a discussion of: responses by firms to social contestation and protests against mining in Australia and Brazil; labelling and the democratic capacity of political consumerism, and implementation of indigenous peoples' rights to lands in ensuring extractive resource governance. Second, the panel discusses the interaction power-regulation as a decisive imposition of regulatory solutions from a powerful political top through examining the responsiveness of lawmaking to societal needs in China.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Buying Stability: The Distributive Outcomes of Private Politics in the Bolivian Mining IndustryMatthew Amengual, MIT

Labelling as a Regulatory Governance Pathway in the Food System: A Critical Evaluation of the Democratic Capacity of Political Consumerism in the Food SystemChristine Parker, Melbourne Law School, Univ of Melbourne

Lawmaking in China: Responsiveness to society?Annemieke van den Dool, University of Amsterdam

Making Sense of the Social Licence: a Critical Analysis of Protests around Coal Seam Gas in AustraliaFiona Haines, University of MelbourneSara Bice, University of MelbourneHelen Sullivan, ANU

Roundtable on Law at the Intersection of Reproductive Justice and LGBTQ RightsCRN: 7 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Dufferin

Chair(s): Courtney Joslin, UC Davis School of Law

211


atu

rda

y

Participant(s):Caroline Mala Corbin, Univ. of Miami School of LawSuzanne Kim, Rutgers University School of Law, NewarkMaya Manian, Univ. of San Francisco School of LawKimberly Mutcherson, Rutgers Law SchoolDouglas NeJaime, Yale Law School

Description:This roundtable explores connections and disconnections between reproductive justice and LGBTQ rights movements and current challenges they face. How have these movements related to each other in recent decades? How do current attacks on LGBTQ rights overlap with those on reproductive freedom? How do claims of religious freedom impact reproductive and LGBTQ rights? What are needs of LGBTQ youth and families to access reproductive health care? How do claims of reproductive autonomy relate to access to ART? What role do invocations of "biology" and "nature" play in justifying limits on LGBTQ protections and on reproductive rights? What can each movement learn from the other in advocacy and strategy? Speakers will draw from constitutional law, family law, health care law, religious freedom, sexual rights, and racial justice.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Sexual Consent on Campus: Title IX, University Policy, and Student ResponsesSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Laura Nielsen, American Bar Foundation/ Northwestern U

Description:This panel examines sexual consent, sexual assault, and Title IX policies on university campuses from a variety of methodological and theoretical perspectives. Collectively, these papers ask how universities are responding to changes in Title IX policies, how students react to these policies, and how students understand and explain sexual consent and unwanted sexual interactions. The panel explores the roles of gendered norms, sexual scripts, campus climate, and university policies in students' legal consciousness and use of Title IX.Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Crime and Victimization

Presentations:Affirmative Consent Policies and the Threat of PunishmentJustine Tinkler, University of GeorgiaMalissa Alinor, University of GeorgiaJody Clay-Warner, University of Georgia

Perceptions of Harm and Culpability of Victims of Campus Sexual AssaultEmma Tsurkov, Stanford UniversityMichele Dauber, Stanford

Policy and Practice During Sex: How Title IX Policies Affect Consent on CampusStefan Vogler, Northwestern UniversityLaura Nielsen, American Bar Foundation/ Northwestern U

The Diffusion of Title IX Sexual Harassment Complaints among U.S. Colleges and UniversitiesCelene Reynolds, Yale University

Social Movements, Law and Liberal ImaginationsCRN: 23 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Amar Bhatia, Osgoode Hall, York University

Description:Considerable attention has been devoted to examining the ideas of law and rights informing contemporary social movements. But glaring challenges remain in how critical scholarship takes up social movement engagements with law and rights. Whether in the context of the myriad struggles of people of the Third World, movement-based radical legal collectives in the US and Canada, or spaces in between, real opportunity exists for deepening social movement and law analysis. This salon, organized around an engagement with Radha D'Souza on her forthcoming book 'What's Wrong With Rights? Social Movements, Law and Liberal Imaginations', promises to pursue alternative ways of envisioning social movement and activist engagements with law.

Primary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, and Legal MobilizationSecondary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State Formation

Presentations:Law-ing from Below: Activist Legal Collectives in Canada and the US, 1999-presentIrina Ceric, Kwantlen Polytechnic University

Social Movements and the Law-Politics Divide: The Case of Migrant JusticeAdrian Smith, Carleton University

What's Wrong With Rights?Radha D'Souza, University of Westminster

212


atu

rda

y

Street Level Sovereignty: Ethnographic, Constitutive, and Jurisprudential ConsiderationsSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Davenport

Chair(s): John Brigham, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Participant(s):Susan Ball, College Art Association (Emerita)Eliana Patricia Blanco, Centro de Estudos Sociais, Univ. Coimbra, PortugalAaron Lorenz, Ramapo CollegeMargaret Mott, Marlboro College

Description:All of the participants have participated in the project Street-Level Sovereignty which explores the intersection of space and law. The project draws from Michael Lipsky's book Street-Level Bureaucracy but seeks to apply the concept to jurisprudential, constitutive, and ethnographic issues.

Primary Keyword: Geographies of LawSecondary Keyword: Constitutional Law and Constitutionalism

Surveillance, Race, and the LawSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Amanda Glasbeek, York University

Description:This salon session interrogates the complex ways in which surveillance, race, and the law intersect. Tied to examinations of legal cases, popular plays and literary texts, papers in this session examine the diverse ways in which racialized persons can oscillate between being both the objects and subjects of surveillance. Papers also consider how racialized watchers might appropriate the surveillance apparatus, or employ subversive visual practices to complicate the hierarchical, top-down logic and gaze of surveillance, in order to reveal different ways of imagining law and justice.

Primary Keyword: Race, Critical Race ResearchSecondary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:Police contact cards: Documenting contact and thinking through skinTimothy Bryan, York University

Race and displacement in the uses of home surveillanceLily Cho, York University

Vernacular staging of surveillance and law in 'The Octoroon'Anita Lam, York University

The Backlash against Human Rights in Russia and Eastern Europe: From Non-Compliance to Law as ResistanceSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Salon Session


Facilitator(s): Mikael Madsen, iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts, University of Copenhagen

Description:Russia, Ukraine, and other post-soviet countries increasingly resist human rights norms. The governments of these countries often cherry-pick which judgments of the European Court of Human Rights to implement. Besides a failure to comply with European human rights norms, domestic authorities have rapidly passed a string of repressive legislation to curtail nongovernmental organizations, the freedom of the media, and the freedom of information. This panel examines and compares how this political backlash has played out in various countries in the post-soviet space and how lawyers have responded to it. We ask two questions: first, why have these countries resorted to a political backlash against European human rights norms, and second, how have activist lawyers used legal mobilization strategies during this backlash?

Primary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:Between the West and the East: Explaining (Non)Compliance with Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in Russia and Eastern EuropeAusra Padskocimaite, Uppsala University

No Truths Left to Report: Cause-lawyers, Trolls, and The Backlash against the Freedom of Information in Russia's Surveillance StateFreek van der Vet, University of Helsinki, Erik Castrén Institute of

International Law and Human RightsThe Challenges and Opportunities of Comparative Health LawCRN: 9 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s):Elizabeth Sepper, Washington University School of Law

213


atu

rda

y

Description:Most of the papers in this panel are part of a forthcoming OUP publication on comparative health law. Its research design involves contributors providing a comparative perspective in paired chapters. Each pair of chapters works from a review of the core moral, legal and scientific principles for the topic at hand, and develops a critical-analytical comparative examination of how lawmakers in different jurisdictions have balanced the different principles in shaping legal rules. This panel explores the reflexive practice that sits behind that critical-analytical process. What can we learn from how the diverse contexts in which health law is played out (state, nation state, federation, 'sui generis' polity, regional human rights organisation) affect how we, as scholars and teachers of health law, define, analyse and deploy our field.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

Presentations:Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies and National Margin of Appreciation at the European Law Level: Concerns and ChallengesJoaquin Cayon-De las Cuevas, FMV-IDIVAL/University of Cantabria

Medical Devices vs Medicinal Products: What is the Impact of the Recent European Regulatory Changes?Aurelie Mahalatchimy, CNRS-DICE-CERIC-Aix-Marseille Université; University of Sussex

Precision Medicine – Patients’ Rights at a Crossroad?Mette Hartlev, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen

The "Where" and "When" of Health Law: How Context Shapes Health LawTamara Hervey, the University of Sheffield

The Constitution of the Environmental EmergencySaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Spruce

Author(s): Jocelyn Stacey, University of British Columbia, Allard School of Law

Chair(s): Margot Young, University of British Columbia

Reader(s):David Dyzenhaus, University of Toronto, Faculty of LawDayna Nadine Scott, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolMargot Young, University of British Columbia

Description:This panel brings together constitutional, administrative, and environmental law scholars to discuss The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency. This recent book argues that environmental issues constitute an ongoing emergency for the purpose of theorising the relationship between law, legality, and environmental governance. The book illustrates how the rule of law can and ought to infuse all public environmental decision-making from forest governance to controversial oil pipeline approvals to industrial wind turbine development. It envisions an environmental jurisprudence that is deliberative, reasoned, and always mindful of our vulnerability to catastrophic environmental harm.

Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Victims in/and the Criminal Justice SystemSaturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West


Presentations:Hate Crime Victimization in Canada: Insight from the 2016 General Social SurveyCaroline Erentzen, York UniversityRegina Schuller, York University

If it Bleeds, it Leads: Media Coverage and Police Homicide Investigation Clearance RatesZach Sommers, Northwestern University

Mutualizing Sexualized Violence: An Analysis of the Ghomeshi TrialLinda Coates, Okanagan CollegeKim Richards, Okanagan Colelge

The Right to Violate Crime Victims’ Rights – A Constitutional ReviewMichal Tamir, The Academic center of Law and Science

Uncertainty and Hope in the Shadow of Trauma: Sex Trafficking Victims’ Post-Trafficking Experiences in the NetherlandsRachel Wechsler, NYU School of Law, Univ. of Oxford

214


atu

rda

y

What We Know, and Need to Know, about Access to Justice in Canada – Sponsored by the Access to Justice Centre for Excellence at the University of Victoria (UVic ACE)Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Kensington

Chair(s):Andrew Pilliar, Thompson Rivers University

Participant(s):M. Jerry McHale, University of VictoriaRebecca Sandefur, University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignNoel Semple, University of Windsor, Ontario

Description:Access to justice research has been described as experiencing a "renaissance" in the United States in recent years. In Canada, a similar phenomenon is – arguably – also taking place, but against a different social and institutional backdrop. This panel draws on Rebecca Sandefur's 2016 article "What We Know and Need to Know about 'Access to Justice' Research" [(2016) 67 S Car L Rev 193], but focuses evaluative and critical questions on Canada. The panel includes members of a multi-jurisdictional collaboration working on how to assess the state of access to justice efforts across Canada, but also includes outside commentators. This roundtable discussion will build on existing efforts, but will also provide an opportunity to step back and critically examine those efforts.

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Methodology, Socio-legal Methodology

“Patent Politics” by Shobita Parthasarathy and “Reinventing Hoodia” by Laura FosterCRN: 14 Saturday Session 5, 4:45 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Leaside

Author(s): Laura Foster, Indiana University Shobita Parthasarathy, University of Michigan

Chair(s): William Gallagher, Golden Gate Univ. School of Law

Reader(s):Andrea Ballestero,Rice UniversityWilliam Gallagher, Golden Gate Univ. School of LawKeith Guzik, University of Colorado DenverAnna Kirkland, University of MichiganOsagie Obasogie, University of California, Berkeley

Description:Patent Politics by Shobita Parthasarathy (Univ of Chicago, 2017) and Reinventing Hoodia by Laura Foster (Univ of Washington, 2017) both show how patent systems are deeply political and social. In Patent Politics, Parthasarathy compares battles over patents on animals, stem cells, human genes, and plants in the U.S. and Europe, to reveal how political culture, ideology, and history shape patent system politics. In Reinventing Hoodia, Foster argues that while patent law is inherently racialized, gendered, and Western, it offered ways for San peoples, South African scientists, and Hoodia growers to make unequal claims for belonging in South Africa. At the crossroads of law, science, politics, and the market, both books reveal how patents construct and reinforce whose bodies, knowledges, and values come to matter most in society.

Primary Keyword: Intellectual Property, Culture, and Cultural HeritageSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

215

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Brazilian Socio-Legal Studies ISunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Discussant(s): Fabio de Sa e Silva, University of Oklahoma

Description:This session focuses on Brazilian legal phenomena. Our goal is to discuss, among other thematics:(a) the peculiar features of the Brazilian legal system, comparing them to the other national systems when possible (b) the processes of legal professionalization recruitment in Brazil and its impact on politics and on judicial decision making; (c) the explanation of judicial decision making and judicial behavior in Brazil; (d) symbolics and semiotics of the courts, of the magistracy itself and of the judicial sentencing; (e) the new roles of a judge in a democratic political order and its obstacles; (f) the relationship between the judicial branch and the organs of state and the civil society. We also aim to explore the current theories on courts and judgeship and the pros and cons of using them in the understanding of Brazilian legal reality

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:An Alternative Model of Conflict Resolution? The Case of Restorative Justice in BrazilJuliana Tonche, University of Sao Paulo

Distinguishing Drug Users from Drug Traffickers: Empirical Evidence from the Brazilian-Uruguayan Border AreaAlexandre Dos Santos Cunha, IPEA

Intersectionality and Public Policies: What are the Approaches in the Field of study of Law and Policies AnalysisAna Claudia Farranha, Univ. de Brasília - Faculdade de DireitoEvandro Duarte, University of Brasilia (UnB)

Les coûts sociaux des peines en milieu ouvert au Brésil selon les femmes judiciariséesCarmen Fullin, FGV-SP Brazil /UOttawa Canada

Comparative Intellectual Property Across Cultures and TraditionsSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Kensington

Description:From historical inquiries in intellectual property to contemporary problems of intellectual property in contexts of crisis, conflict and civil war, this panel will offer an interdisciplinary inquiry into intellectual property, and the identification an preservation of cultural heritage

Primary Keyword: Intellectual Property, Culture, and Cultural Heritage

Presentations:Art Traffic and Dark Networks: Answering Islamic State's Online Exploitation of Syria's Cultural HeritageBeatriz Brown, University of Pennsylvania Law School

Authorship and the community: creation dynamics in Mexican indigenous communities and the logics of intellectual propertyLucero Ibarra Rojas, CIDE

Hidden Gems in the Marks-Rethinking Trademark Law Protection for Geographical Indications in the U.S.Si-Yu Chen, Stanford Law School

Intellectual Property and Roman Law: Revisiting the Question of Ancient RootsLaura R. Ford, Bard College

Constituting Masculinity, Race, Sexuality and ReproductionSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Description:This panel argues that feminists in Argentina disrupted the definition of sexuality and reproduction at the same time as defining the law, that the civil rights movement in the US influenced the creation of new Family and Medical Leave policies, that I was same sex couples who sought to marry in states most hostile to marriage equality rights that sought those rights, and provides insights into the prevention of hyper-incarceration of black male emerging adults.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Constituting Families: Marriage Equality Activism and the Role of the StateEllen Andersen, University of Vermont

Sunday June 10, Sess ion 18:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

216

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

From Civil Rights to Social Policy: The Political Development of Family and Medical Leave Policy in the United States, 1964-1993Kumar Ramanathan, Northwestern University

Current legal issues in Asia and the Americas IIICRN: 1Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Ronaldo Lucas da Silva, Universidade Estácio de Sá


Description:This session covers legal and social issues in Asia and the Americas. The focus will be on work related to current trends in these regions. Examples might include discussions of contemporary political or legal challenges faced by governments or social groups, analyses of emerging trends in legal theory as they are related to Asia or the Americas, and/or projects that concentrate on particular legal or social problems endemic to societies in either region.

Primary Keyword:Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword:Legal Structure, Legal Institutions

Presentations:Institutional Dialogues: An Analysis of Complementary Institutional Capacities as a Mechanism of Interpretation and Opposition to the Social DumpingDaniele Gabrich Gueiros, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

The institutional capacities as a ground of the Administrative StateCarlos Bolonha, Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroMaíra Almeida, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

The Internet is not a Public Park: A Critique of Packingham v. North CarolinaChris Demaske, UWT/SIAS

Demands for Law in AfricaCRN: 13 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair/Discussant(s): Heinz Klug, Unversity of Winsconsin

Description:Across the African continent, citizens are demanding law. They demand more police, more courts, and systems of law that are legible to local cultural or religious practice. Yet, such demands are not necessarily or always for the liberal legal systems often pushed by international legal advisers or the procedural systems designed by their countries' own constitution writers. The papers on this panel collectively consider the content of demands for law being made across the African continent, the means through which citizens make those demands, and what the effects of those demands are. Put differently, the papers consider how citizens' demands will shape the future of African law and how that future may run counter to the expectations of legal scholars and practitioners.

Secondary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:"We Request a Good Relation": Marital Status and Everyday Legal Mobilization in Post-Apartheid South AfricaMichael Yarbrough, John Jay College (CUNY)

Champions of Shari'a: How Women Are Demanding Islamic Law in SomaliaMark Fathi Massoud, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz

Democratic Citizenship and Sexual Consent in South Africa's Sexual Offences ActShantel Marekera, Arizona State University

Law-Making and State-Making as Vigilantism in South AfricaNicholas Rush Smith, CUNY - City College

States of Uncertainty: Complementarity and Contradiction in Sub-Saharan African Rule of Law InstitutionsSarah Dreier, University of Washington

Disorderly Conduct: Law and AmbivalenceCRN: 3 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Spruce

Chair/Discussant(s): Andrea Ballestero, Rice University

Description:The conceptual connection between "law" and "order" is so tacit in American popular discourse that the implementation of the former is almost unfailingly viewed as a prerequisite for the realization of the latter. But the certainty and predictability afforded by the institutionalization of legal processes and norms should not elide the ways law shapes-and is shaped by-disorder, uncertainty, and contradiction. The papers of

217

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

this panel look critically at the inputs and outcomes of legal practices and processes. The papers examine disputes about free religious practice in the United States, the formation of legal consciousness in China, the doubts of Indian sex workers, the impacts of cash transfers on women in Argentina and the gendered disjuncture between law and 'law on the ground' with a French vice squad.


Presentations:Ethnography of police dispute mediation in rural China: examining the intersection of law and morality in familial conflict.Liisa Kohonen, London Sch of Economics and Political Science

Gender Empowerment and Social Policy: An Institutional Ethnography Approach to Conditional Cash TransfersMelisa Handl, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law

How does the vice squad construct its target populations? The interplay of gender and emotions in the management of sexual illegalisms by the police in FranceGwénaëlle Mainsant, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) - Laboratory : IRISSO

Pity the Bakers: Disputing Free Exercise in the Era of Same-Sex MarriageJenna Reinbold, Colgate University

From Spirit to Letter in the Culture of LawSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Description:Across a range of legal phenomenon-marijuana legislation, under-age drinking, fashion, juries and apologies-this panel will explore the cultural production of law, as the law both regulates and distorts.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:A Socio-Legal Content Analysis of Marijuana Legislation in the Western Hemisphere: A Crossroad on What Has Changed and What RemainsGabriel Ferreyra, Texas A&M University--Corpus Christi

Apologies in Civil Proceedings - A Quest for Convergence of Two Trends in the Western Legal TraditionWannes Vandenbussche, KU Leuven - Yale Law School

Law and the (self)making of responsible jurors: Lay participants before, with, against or beyond the law?Santiago Abel Amietta, Middlesex University

Worn by Clothing? Constructing Identities in Dress and LawRosie Taylor-Harding, University of Leeds

Global Lawmakers: International Organizations in the Crafting of World MarketsSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Linden

Author(s):Susan Block Lieb, Fordham University School of LawTerence Halliday, American Bar Foundation

Chair(s):Greg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of Law

Reader(s):Joseph Conti, University of Wisconsin, MadisonEve Darian-Smith, University of California IrvineMelissa (MJ) Durkee, Univ of Washington School of LawGregoire Mallard, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies

Description:Global lawmaking by international organizations (IOs) shapes world trade and national economies. Who makes that law and who benefits affects all states and all market players. GLOBAL LAWMAKERS offers the first sociolegal study of commercial lawmaking inside the UN. It shows who makes law for the world, how they make it, and who comes out ahead. Centered on a decade-long ethnography of the UN Commission on International Trade Law, the book lifts the veil over three episodes of lawmaking since 2000. It reveals dynamics of competition and cooperation, within and between IOs, including the UN, World Bank and IMF. GLOBAL LAWMAKERS presents an original sociolegal theory of the processes that generate law for the world as actors in social ecologies of IOs maneuver to construct transnational legal orders that shape world markets.

Primary Keyword: Economy, International Trade, Global Economy and LawSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Helping Struggling HouseholdsCRN: 25 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

218

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Chair/Discussant(s): Robert Lawless, University of Illinois College of Law

Description:From financial counseling to universal basic income, programs seek to help struggling households deal with their financial issues. Panelists will discuss how ideas and programs to help households can succeed and can fail.

Primary Keyword:Economic and Social Rights

Presentations:Contrasting Ideas of Deservingness: Ill and Injured Canadians in the Personal Bankruptcy System & Public Income Support ProgramsAnna Lund, University of Alberta

Eligible Non-participation in Canadian Social Welfare ProgramsStephanie Ben-Ishai, Osgoode Hall Law SchoolSaul Schwartz, Carleton, Universal Basic Income & Financial InclusionMatthew Bruckner, Howard University School of Law

High Costs and/of/inTeaching Law: Pedagogy and Reform in Today's Legal AcademySunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:From diversity to debt to sexual harrassment, the legal academy struggles to balance its commitment to education with obligation to the profession. In a climate of increasing attention on inequality, sexual harrassment, and the lack of diversity in higher education, this panel offers a set of interventions on problems that touch the lives of those committed to excellence in pedagogy and research in the law.

Presentations:A Faustian Bargain? The Role of Debt in Law Students’ Career ChoicesAnna Raup-Kounovsky, University of California, IrvineSteven Boutcher, University of Massachusetts, AmherstCarroll Seron, Univ. of California, Irvine

Improving Diversity in Legal AcademiaMeera Deo, Thomas Jefferson School of Law

Law School Deans & Co-Deans: A Look at Position Tenure, Job Requirements, and Job SatisfactionRachel Montgomery, American Bar Foundation/AccessLex Institute

Sex and Power in Academia: Regulating Boundaries between Faculty and StudentsShauna Fisher, West Virginia University

Inequality and Opportunity in the Careers of American Lawyers: The After the JD StudySunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Code:Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Chair/Discussant(s): Robert Nelson, American Bar Foundation/Northwestern University

Description:This panel brings together papers on the After the JD Study of Lawyer Careers, which collected data on a national sample of lawyers who passed the bar in 2000. The research team is working on a culminating book for the project using a social capital framework to analyze how race, gender, and class influence the trajectories of lawyers' careers. Some of the key processes the papers will analyze are how pre-career and early career endowments shape opportunities after entering the profession, how gender inequality is reflected in the careers of non-mothers as well as mothers, the gendered determinants of becoming a part-time practitioner, how legal employers treat women and people of color differently and thus produce differential rates of attrition by race and gender, and the worklives of lawyers who work in solo practice and small firms.


Presentations:Anti-Equality Machines: Racial and Ethnic Variation in Moves within, between, and away from Law FirmsVitor Martins Dias, Indiana University-BloomingtonEthan Michelson, Indiana University

How Did I Get Here? Pathways from Early to Mid-Career Practice Settings in the Legal ProfessionMeghan Dawe, American Bar FoundationRobert Nelson, American Bar Foundation/Northwestern University

Inventing legal niches: pathways of solo and small firm lawyersBryant Garth, UC IrvineJoyce Sterling, Univ. of Denver Sturm College of Law

Social Capital and the Making of Lawyers’ Careers: Social Background, Law School Status, and First JobRobert Nelson, American Bar Foundation/Northwestern University

Understanding the Motherhood Penalty in the Legal Profession: A longitudinal analysisRonit Dinovitzer, University of Toronto

219

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

International Legal Theory and History: Eurocentrism, Indigenity, Development and Radical ThoughtCRN: 23 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Rose Parfitt, Kent Law School

Description:This session examines the limits and possibilities of international legal theory and history, including the challenge of Eurocentrism, the potential of indigenity, the ongoing mutations of the development project and the value of radical thought.

Primary Keyword:International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword:Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Presentations:A right to democracy in international law: Problems and possibilitiesGlenn Patmore, University of Melbourne

Localising the International: Comparative International Law and the Challenge of EurocentrismMiriam Bak McKenna, Lund University

The Deceptive DyadJason Beckett, American University in Cairo

The Influence of the Indigenous Peoples’ Movement from Latin America on the Lawmaking Process of the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous PeoplesCarmen Mestizo-Castillo, University of Arizona

Towards a (Radical) Anthropology of International Law’s Historiography: Revisiting the Salamancan Encounter with AmeríndiaFlorian Hoffmann, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)Bethania Assy, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)

Investigating Theoretical and Normative Dimensions of Legal PluralismCRN: 48 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Bertram Turner, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Description:The panel will discuss theoretical and normative challenges to legal pluralism in contemporary societies.


Presentations:A Moral Reading of Legal PluralismJen Hendry, University of LeedsAlex Green, Hong Kong University

Anthropology of law in infrastructural designsBertram Turner, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology

Global legal pluralism and Rawlsian ideal theoryVictor M. Muniz-Fraticelli, McGill University

Le pluralisme juridique : une proposition de cadre théorique pour les ADR - Legal pluralism: A Proposal for a Theoretical Framework for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)Sèdjro Hountohotegbè, Université de Sherbrooke

Judges, Courts and TechnologyCRN: 43 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Richard Cornes, Essex University

Discussant(s): Claire de Than, City University, London, School of Law and Institute of Law, Jersey

Description:This session explores how judges and courts are being affected by technological innovations in courts and how they are using technology to carry out their role more efficiently and effectively. It also raises the question whether advanced technology may substitute for some of the roles and functions of judges.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:Open Justice at the Crossroads: Superior Courts and the Need for Open Access to their Archival RecordsAndrew Henderson, Australian National University / University of Canberra

Seeing Justice: Courts & New Technology - a New Practitioner/Theory DialogueDavid Marrani, Institute of LawRuben Arturo Sanchez Valencia, Mexico

220

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

The Human Judge – Judicial Responsiveness in the Technological AgeTania Sourdin, University of NewcastleRichard Cornes, Essex University

Justice Denied: Challenges and Legal Impediments towards Accountability in Post-war Sri LankaSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Maple West

Chair(s): Harini Sivalingam, York University

Participant(s): Harini Sivalingam, York University

Description:This roundtable discussion will identify the prevailing legal, social and political impediments towards achieving justice and accountability in post-war Sri Lanka. While the erosion of rule of law has been pervasive throughout Sri Lanka's colonial and postcolonial history, during the armed conflict between the Sri Lankan government and Tamil separatists, impunity reached unprecedented levels. During the armed conflict widespread violations of international humanitarian law, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide took place throughout the island nation. The aim of this roundtable is to gather insights on possible avenues to engage and mobilize around issues of justice and accountability for, survivors, victims and their families, incorporating a variety of perspectives from legal, policy, and grassroots community mobilization.

Primary Keyword: War, and Armed ConflictSecondary Keyword: South Asia, South Asian Studies, South Asian Law and Society

Justice, Rights, and Equality ReframedSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Margot Young, University of British Columbia

Description:These papers take up, in various combinations and contexts, key jurisprudential concepts critical to legal reform. Examined will be the fate of feminism in the era of Trump, evolution of notions of justice and rights, the relevance of choice, and the importance of gender equality in the legal profession.


Presentations:Claims of Justice and RightsJuan Samuel Santos Castro, Pontificia Univ. Javeriana

Judicial map reforms in Europe: following the rationalization or rethinking a new conception of justiceDavide Carnevali, Research Institute on Judicial Systems - National Research Council of Italy

Law Enforcement Procedures, Lawyers, Suspects' Rights and Wrongful ConvictionsSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Description:These papers examine the need for procedural reform in policing and lawyering in order to protect the rights of accused through the lens of race, class and colonialism.

Primary Keyword: Policing, Law EnforcementSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Mapping the Brady Process: Typologies, Causes, and Consequences of Brady Violations in Erroneous ConvictionsSamantha Senn, American UniversityHolly Champagne, American UniversityBelen Lowrey, American UniversityLoralys McDaniel, American UniversityJonathan Gould, American University

PACE, suspects’ rights and the case for the defence: ineffective lawyering, police impropriety and the efficacy of legal protections’Roxanna Dehaghani, University of LeicesterDan Newman, Cardiff University

The Intersection of Deception: Examining Language Designed to Deceive in Police Interview and Scam InteractionElisabeth Carter, University of Roehampton

The Role of Race in Medical Manslaughter Cases in England and WalesMelinee Kazarian, The University of Southampton

Wrongful Convictions and the Purpose of the Criminal Justice SystemNicholas Frayn, Peking University School of Transnational Law

221

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Legal EducationSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session



Presentations:Accelerated Law School Admissions and (Neo)Liberal Arts EducationDarren Botello-Samson, Pittsburg State University

Foundations of a Critical Sociological Analysis of International Legal Institutions: Negativity and Politics in the Methodology of International Legal Studies in BrazilArthur Roberto Capella Giannattasio, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie

How About Women of Color in the Legal Profession? An Intersectional Examination of Job Satisfaction Outcomes in the Legal ProfessionElizabeth (Ferrufino) Bodamer, Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Law Schools as a Space for ReconciliationKylie Lingard, University of Wollongong

Legal Geography III: Representations and Material FormsCRN: 35 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, University of Haifa

Description:A significant dynamic in the mutual constitutivity of the spatial and the legal is the contestation of spatial representations and their realization in material form. This panel examines this dynamic across a range of diverse contexts.

Primary Keyword:Geographies of Law

Presentations:Drawing the world law map. Law at the crossroads of sociology, geopolitics, comparative analysis and economic geography. Dessiner la carte mondiale du droit. Le droit à la croisée des chemins avec la sociologie, la géopolitique, l'analyse comparative et l'économie géographique.Hugues Bouthinon-Dumas, ESSEC Business School

Federalism, Subsidiarity and Toronto’s Ward Boundary ReviewAlexandra Flynn, University of Toronto

Gender, Land, and Federalism: Price Hess and the Dynamics of Ownership in US 1930s FederalismLaura Hatcher, Southeast Missouri State University

Legal Theories and Legal Legitimacy: Emotions, Regulation and GovernanceSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.:Paper Session


Description:In this panel Brazilian legal reform papers intersect with sociolegal theories exploring proprietorial emotions and Durkheimian utilitarianism.


Secondary Keyword: Law and Social-Political Theory

Presentations:How much Durkheim is in Jonathan's Haid Durkheimian utilitarianism?Maciej Juzaszek, Jagiellonian University

The Englishman’s Castle: the use of Force in Defence of the HomeJohn Stannard, Queens University Belfast

The Lobby Regulation In Brazil Legislative BranchRafael Fernandez Fingergut, Federal Univ. of Rio de JaneiroMicael da Costa Brito, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Market, Banking, Labor, Trademark Laws and Democratic Sovereignty in East AsiaCRN: 33Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.:Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Daniel Rosen, Chuo University Law School

Description:This session examines the presumption of China's free market economy, progressive reforms in labor rights in Taiwan, lay adjudication of sexual crime in Japan, and legal evaluation of rhetorically offensive trademark used in Asian market.


222

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Presentations:From Market Abuse in the Banking Law Context to Creating Monopolies: Towards Actual Application of the Anti-Monopoly Law of China 2007Jing Wang, Univ. of Huddersfield / Bangor Univ.

Pressure Points: What Trademark Restrictions Say about Asia/Pacific SocietiesDaniel Rosen, Chuo University Law School

Taiwan’s Labor Law Reform 2011— Moving from State-Regulated Union Policy to Collective Bargaining Regime?Bo-Shone Fu, National Chungcheng University

More Harm than Good: Critical Approaches to Public and Private ViolenceCRN: 7 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.:Paper Session


Chair(s): Michael Boucai, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Discussant(s): Rachel Rebouche, Temple University Law School

Description:This panel features bold proposals to rethink how law, law reformers, and the media do and should address harm. Professor Abrams suggests that, in crucial respects, the trope of a "crisis" of sexual assault is actually undermining efforts eliminate such conduct. Professor Kohn examines the problems and opportunities presented by the public's suspiciously keen interest in "celebrity domestic violence." Revisiting the notorious sterilization case of Buck v. Bell (1927), Professor Pearson explores whether a reconstructed parens patriae doctrine could protect the reproductive rights of vulnerable populations. Finally, coining the term "offender-less harms," Professor Godsoe asks whether, all things considered, society should forgo criminal punishment of a range of undeniably injurious behaviors.

Primary Keyword: ViolenceSecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Presentations:Critiquing the Crisis Framing of Modern Sexual Assault ResponsesJamie Abrams, University of Louisville

Just Like You and Me? Domestic Violence in the Lives of the Rich and FamousLaurie Kohn, GW Law

Offenderless HarmsCynthia Godsoe, Brooklyn Law School

Navigating Beyond the Crossroads: A Gendered Approach to Realizing AU Agenda 2063Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: York


Discussant(s): Mariam Abdulraheem-Mustapha, Faculty of Law, University of ilorin

Participant(s):Imam-Tamim, Muhammad Kamaldeen, Univ. of IlorinAkinola Akintayo, University of LagosAshwanee Budoo, Centre for Human Rights, Univ. of PretoriaChianaraekpere Ike, University of Washington School of LawDavid Nnanna C Ikpo, Centre for Human Rights, University of PretoriaDumenu Yvonne, University of Energy and Natural Resources, SunyaniSatang Nabaneh, Centre for Human Rights

Description:The session would seek to question the challenges that confront gender empowerment and enhancement in Africa. The African Union Agenda 2063 aspires for an "African whose development is people driven, relying on the potentials offered by people, especially its women and youths and caring for children. The panel will focus more on the role of women in realization of the AU Agenda. It would examine the emerging jurisprudence on various issues pertaining to women. It would examine the role of women in political governance, leadership and access to justice.


Offensive Comments, Bullying, Disobedience, and Assault: The Difference the Media MakesCRN: 45 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron

Chair/Discussant(s): William Haltom, University of Puget Sound

Description:This sessions deals with the implications of the media's framing of various issues: the non-implementation and resistance to court decisions, school bullying, and the regulation of offensive comments in social media. The papers includes a variety of methodologies, including case studies, quantitative

223

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

content analysis, public opinion surveys and experimental manipulations.

Primary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the LawSecondary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:"I Hope You're Somewhere Praying": When the Legal System Fails to Remedy Wrongs- A Case Study of the Kesha v. Dr. Luke Court BattleEmma Babler, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Defying the Supreme Court: The Impact of Overt Resistance to Obergefell v. HodgesMichael Zilis, University of KentuckyAlexander Borne, University of Kentucky

The Crown Prosecution Guidelines and Grossly Offensive Comments: an Analysis.Laura Bliss, Edge Hill University

“We Have these Wonderful photographs of our Two New Felons”: Criminal Justice System Responses to School Bullying.Robert Brooks, Worcester State UniversityJeffery Cohen, University of Washington - Tacoma

Power Imbalance and Dispute Resolution: Abuse, Consumer, and HarassmentCRN: 10 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kenora

Chair/Discussant(s): Daniel H. Foote, The University of Tokyo

Description:This session of CRN10 is about Dispute Resolution and Power Imbalance. Prof. Boutros' paper considers if governments continue to marginalize abused groups even after acknowledging historical abuse. Prof. Redfern's paper presents the findings of three case studies of lawsuits brought against school districts for failing to protect students from employee sexual misconduct. Prof. Creutzfeldt's research provides an overview of the project on National Energy Ombudsman Network in the 6 participating countries. Prof. Edelman examines four legal systems and their approach to resolving disputes related to child sexual abuse by clergy in two Catholic dioceses. Prof. Vayo examines conversations with union adjunct faculty at small state universities to explore when they claim their 'rights.'


Presentations:Access to Justice for Vulnerable and Energy Poor Consumers in the European Energy MarketNaomi Creutzfeldt, University of WestmisnterChris Gill, University of Glasgow

Governmental Class Actions: Modifying Behaviour Towards Marginalized GroupsHassan Ahmad, University of Toronto

Legal Systems and the Catholic Abuse Scandal in Ballarat and GallupMeredith Edelman, Australian National University

Subalterns in the Academe: A Status Conscious view of Dispute Resolution and Rights Claiming by Adjunct Faculty MembersAmber Vayo, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Using Tort Litigation to Change Organizational Behavior: School Employee Sexual MisconductCharol Shakeshaft, Virginia Commonwealth University

Regulating Climate Change: Litigation and Governance StrategiesSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Sumudu Atapattu, University of Wisconsin Law School

Description:Climate change poses serious challenges for policy-makers at almost every level of governance, spanning from local efforts to adapt to flooding to international treaty development and litigation campaigns. In this panel, the IRC on Climate Change presents papers that analyze this array of strategies for governing large-scale environmental problems.

Primary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate ChangeSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Climate Change, Rights and International CourtsRachel Cichowski, University of Washington

Environmental NGOs Litigation in a Multilevel System of GovernanceLuz Muñoz, University of Barcelona

Knowledge Claims and Governing Climate ChangeAnna-Maria Marshall, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignSusan Sterett, Univ. of Maryland, Baltimore County

224

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

The Evolution of Litigation Campaigns: the Case of the Coal-Plant CampaignCharles Epp, University of KansasKevin Campbell, University of Kansas - School of Public Affairs & Administration

Regulating Sports, Culture and LanguageCRN: 5 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:The papers in this panel investigate the legal regulation of sports, culture and language. They discuss harms - such as racial discrimination, misogyny and addiction - that can arise from physical and online sports, cultural activities and language choice when unregulated or poorly regulated - as well as questions related to how the nature of these activities are affected when law "crosses the touchline".

Primary Keyword: Law and PsychologySecondary Keyword: Culture, And Cultural Rights

Presentations:Online Fantasy Sports, Gambling and Canadian LawCurtis Fogel, Brock University

Shifting Federal Guidelines Regarding US "Speak English Only in the Workplace" Rules: 2002-2016Keith Walters, Portland State University

Tradition or Discrimination? ---A Different Perspective on the Grand SumoKoji Higashikawa, Kanazawa University

Regulatory Designs, Instruments and Networks of ActorsSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Jacob Muirhead, University of McMaster

Discussant(s): Christine Parker, University of Melbourne

Description:This panel provides a range of perspectives on the choice of regulatory design and networks of actors as the fibre of regulatory regimes. The focus on regulatory designs is on the regulatory complexity and coherence in anti-money laundering regimes, and on the choosing appropriate degrees of consumer and public health protection. The focus on modalities of regulatory actors networks is on the intersections of international-national in the circular economy, and on the intersections of public-private in food safety and whistleblowing.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Economy, Business and Society

Presentations:Challenges and Opportunities in the Regulatory Governance of Circular Economy- the Case of Food WasteSevasti Chatzopoulou, Roskilde University

One Size Does not Always Fit All - Coherence in Multi-faceted Regulatory Regimes: an Analysis of Australia's Anti-money Laundering Regulatory RegimePaula Chadderton, University of Canberra

Protecting the Market, Not the Whistleblower: Whistleblowing as a Mode of New GovernanceIoannis Kampourakis, Free University of Berlin

Public-Private Collaboration in Food Safety Governance: Opinions, Experiences and ChallengesTetty Havinga, Radboud University

Striking the Right Balance in Consumer Protection: Australia - Role Model or Nanny State?Eric Windholz, Monash University

Release, Reentry, and Community SupervisionSunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This session focuses on community supervision following a conditional sentence or release from prison or jail. Papers discuss the challenges of living under and administering community supervision in Canada and the United States, highlighting issues such as legal debt, public assistance, and residence.


Presentations:Access to Justice in Detention in Quebec, Canada - Notes on the few number of requests for a temporary absence in preparation for conditional releaseJoao Velloso, University of OttawaChloé Leclerc, Université de MontréalMarion Vacheret, Université de Montréal

Behind the Eight Ball: How criminal justice debt impairs successful reentry from prison and jail”Kimberly Spencer-Suarez, Columbia University

225

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Reentry Policy and Place: Considering the Differential Reentry Experiences of Prisoners Returning to Urban and Rural ResidencesBreanne Pleggenkuhle, Southern Illinois University CarbondaleKimberly Kras, University of Massachusetts Lowell

The Runaround: Punishment, Welfare, and Poverty Survival After PrisonJohn Halushka, San Jose State University

Sex Workers' Access to JusticeCRN: 6 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair/Discussant(s): Tamara O'Doherty, Simon Fraser University

Description:This panel investigates the soft law and extra-legal interventions that engender civic and social exclusion.

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:A Public Health Perspective on Social Justice and the Decriminalisation of Sex work in New ZealandGillian Abel, University of Otago

Barriers to Justice for Migrant and Immigrant Sex Workers: A Community-Led Research ProjectJulie Ham, University of Hong KongKimberly Mackenzie, SWAN Vancouver

Specialized Prostitution Courts, Penal Welfarism, and the Production of Market CitizenshipRashmee Singh,University of Waterloo

Terrorism: Political Rhetoric, Extreme Vetting: State of EmergencySunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:Papers address political rhetoric of terrorism; extreme vetting; the declaration of states of emergency; threat assessments of lone terrorists; terrorism sting operations; security/liberty tradeoffs and the expansion of anti-alien measures

Primary Keyword: Terrorism, National SecuritySecondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Another Form of American Exceptionalism? A Comparative Analysis of Terrorism Sting Operations in the US and AbroadJesse Norris, State University of New York at Fredonia

Explaining Security/Liberty Trade-offs: The Legal Expansion of Anti- Alien Measures to U.S. CitizensDaria Vaisman, John Jay College/Graduate Center, CUNY

The Terrorist Threat at a Crossroads: Presidential Rhetoric, Islamophobia and LawGabriel Rubin, Montclair State University

Threat Assessment of Lone-Actor TerroristsMelissa Hamilton, University of Surrey School of Law

Visa Censorship and the Origins of Extreme Vetting in the United StatesJulia Rose Kraut, New-York Historical Society

The Architecture of State Building: Supreme Courts, Constitutional Law, Judicial Politics, and DemocracyCRN: 52 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Diego Gil McCawley, Stanford Law School

Discussant(s): Pedro Fortes, FGV Law School

Description:Constitutionalism, democracy, and the rule of law are important aspects of the literature on law and development. However, the promises of constitutional law, democratic regimes, and institutional rules of the game are not always delivered to contemporary societies. This panel investigates the role of supreme courts, constitutional law, judicial politics, and democracy over state building and development of rule of law. After World War II, various national states in Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia followed the model of democratic regimes and a rule of law guaranteed by stronger constitutional courts. The papers investigate entrenchment clauses, electoral regimes, and judicial ideologies, separation of powers, and judicial reform.

Primary Keyword: Constitutional Law and ConstitutionalismSecondary Keyword: Democracy, Governance and State Theory; Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions

Presentations:Do Constitutional Entrenchment Clauses Matter? A Study on Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Review in Europe (1945–2016)Michael Hein, University of Göttingen

226

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Enhancing or Constraining Democratic Elections? A Comparative Study of Constitutional Courts in Madagascar and Senegal and their Interventions into Electoral Matters (1992-2012)Charlotte Heyl, German Ins of Global and Area Studies

Judicial Reform in Mexico: Reassessing the 1994 Constitutional Reform of the Supreme CourtRolando Garcia Miron, Stanford Law School

Justice Barroso's Ambivalent DemocracyDaniel Vargas, FGV Direito RioVictor Rodrigues, Fundação Getúlio Vargas

Strategical Action and Time Control in the Brazilian Supreme Court: a case study on the decision to remove the Chamber of Deputies’ President from officeRafael Nunes, University of São Paulo/ Yale Law School

The Challenges of the Disability Rights Movement: Access and Accommodations at a CrossroadCRN: 40 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair/Discussant(s): Sagit Mor, University of Haifa

Description:This panel explores some of the most fundamental challenges that the disability rights movement currently faces. The disability rights movement introduced new legal concepts, such as access and accommodations, aspired to cultivate a rights consciousness among disabled people, and attempted to make the public sphere open, inclusive and supportive of disability rights. The papers in this panel raise important questions regarding public suspicion towards disability rights, the making of governmental programs accessible, the conceptual and practical differences between accommodation and modification, the impact of urban environment on the formation of disability rights consciousness and resistance, the challenges of disability representation in disability awareness campaigns, and the construction of disability-based claims by workers.

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Rights and Identities

Presentations:Accommodation and Modification: Does the Difference in Terms Matter?Leslie Francis, University of Utah

Becoming a ‘Deserving’ Rights-Holder: The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Politics of RespectabilityPaul Durlak, University at Buffalo, SUNY

French Disability Rights at the Crossroads: Defective Urban Accessibility and its Impact on Rights ConsciousnessAnne Revillard, Sciences Po, OSC-LIEPP

The Cost of Disability Rights: Public Suspicion and the Disability ConDoron Dorfman, Stanford Law School

What Does “Program Accessibility” Demand, and What Does Social Research Have to Say About It?Mark Weber, DePaul University College of Law

“I’m Not your Inspiration, Thank You Very Much!” Disability Stereotypes, Cultural Competence, and the UN CRPD’s Public Awareness Mandate.Katharina Heyer, University of Hawai'i

The Conjuncture of Memory and History in International Law: The Implications of Spain’s Historical Memory LawCRN: 23 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Qudsia Mirza, Birkbeck College, University of London

Description:The 2007 Spanish Historical Memory Law offered reparation and recognition to victims of atrocities of the civil war and the Franco regime. Unlike other attempts to address historical atrocity, this law did not provide for truth-telling or criminal accountability. Despite these limitations, it did seek to transform Spanish political culture. However, the wounds of the Franco era are burned deep into Spanish society. This roundtable will discuss how the conjunction of history and memory operates in such intractable situations of injustice. . The conjunction between history and memory involved in the Spanish transition to democracy will be explored in relation to other examples, particularly those of the explored in relation to other examples, particularly those of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Primary Keyword:International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International PoliticsSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

227

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

The Crossroads of Reproductive Health and SurveillanceCRN: 9 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Alesha Doan, University of Kansas

Description:This panel addresses the relationship between reproductive health (including rights, access, and decision making) and state power. State power is embedded within the political, medical, and social institutions that control and regulate the reproductive health of individuals.Under the guise of protection and increased safety, many states have created a climate where only certain claims for reproductive access are honored-claims that perpetuate the status quo and disproportionately marginalize individuals along lines of race, class, and sexual orientation. Presenters highlight the complexity of individuals' experiences within these institutions and how their desires may contradict state powers that see them as incapable of making socially-acceptable decisions or as unruly subjects to be surveilled and regulated via laws and policy.


Presentations:Managing Women’s Bodies for Their Own Good: Gender Paternalism and Woman-Protective Antiabortion LawsShoshanna Ehrlich, University of Massachusetts Boston

Native Women and Reproductive Health: The Unconstitutionality of the Hyde AmendmentSarah Deer, University of Kansas

Of and Above the Law: Discretion in Criminalizing PregnancyGrace Howard, University of Southern Indiana

State Neglect and Reproductive Health: Charitable Service Provision as Object LessonSara Matthiesen, George Washington University

The Role of State-Sponsored Trauma in the Reproductive Health Lives of Women with Justice InvolvementMegha Ramaswamy, University of Kansas Medical Center

“Reining in the Profit Driven Abortion-Industry”: Stigma and Surveillance of Medical Providers in State Antiabortion PolicyAlesha Doan, University of KansasCorinne Schwarz, University of Kansas

The Dual Flow of Latin American International Human Rights Law. Crossroads between social movement practice and Global Law TheoryCRN: 23 Sunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Jimena Sierra-Camargo, Rosario University / King's College London

Discussant(s): Paulo Ilich Bacca, University of Kent Federico Suarez-Ricaurte, Externado de Colombia University / King's College London

Participant(s):Carolina Bejarano Martínez, Universidad de los AndesJoaquin Garzon, Universidad de los AndesPablo Gomez-Pinilla, National Autonomous University of MexicoMiguel Rabago Dorbecker, Universidad de los Andes

Description:The discussion in which we wish to engage is the circulation of theory between different social movements' practices (subaltern dialogue) and the ways in which they influence the grand scheme of Global Law Theory (subaltern influence over the elite). Such discussion is centered on the uses of Human Rights discourses in Afro Colombian land struggles in Cartagena and Buenaventura, as well as the forced disappearance victim's movement in Mexico. Combining both the legal theorization of social movements as actors in Global Law and their concrete legal practices, a new approach or Dual Flow can be observed. Both of these perspectives are analyzed in their contradictions and their complementarities. ¿Are these theories basically naming post factual uses of Human Rights Law? Or ¿What is the extent to which they have shaped these uses?

Primary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human RightsSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

The Possibilities and Limits of TechnologySunday Session 1, 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Description:The digital revolution has raised new and in some cases as--yet unresolved questions for law and society. This panel will bring together several of these questions for a discussion on the possibilities and limits of technology. Subjects will include data localization policies and their implications for the Internet, pharmaceutical data policy in food and drug administration, the perpetration of violence online, as well as broader subjects

228

Sunday 8:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

about technology in international law, namely with respect to the use of remote weapons, and about the relationship between technology and free thinking.

Primary Keyword: Technology, Technological Innovation, Robot Law

Presentations:'Narratives of precision at the crossroads of international law and technology: an examination of the implicit interpretations of international humanitarian law within the use of remote weaponsMax Brookman-Byrne, University of Lincoln

A Genealogy of Transparency: Pharmaceutical Data Policy & Practice at the United States’ Food and Drug Administration, 1966–2017Matthew Herder, Dalhousie University

The Internet as Legal Frontier Zone: Naturalizing Violence Online through Spatial ImaginationsRachel Brydolf-Horwitz, University of British Columbia

What Does It Take to Build the Great Wall of Data? ----An Analysis of China’s Data Localization Policies and Its Implications to Global InternetChing-Yi Liu, National Taiwan UniversityWeiping Li, University of Maryland

Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass IncarcerationCRN: 9, 27 Sunday Session 1A, 8:00 a.m. - 8:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Dufferin

Author(s): Allison McKim , Bard College

Chair(s): Robert Werth, Rice University

Reader(s):Erin Kerrison, University of California, BerkeleyArmando Lara-Millan, UC BerkeleyRobert Werth, Rice University

Description:After decades of prison expansion, officials are challenging mass incarceration. Most reformers point to one main solution to decarcerate and stem opioid use: addiction treatment. In this book, Allison McKim gives an ethnographic account of two

rehab programs for women, one in the penal system and one in the private healthcare system. In them, she finds two very different ways of defining and treating addiction. By situating rehab in the governing strategies of the punitive turn, McKim shows how treatment reflects its race, class, and gender politics. Her study reveals a two-tiered system where addiction is a racialized and gendered category that has reorganized the relationship of punishment to welfare provision. McKim argues that the framework of addiction stigmatizes criminalized women, expands penal power, and furthers inequality.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Gender and Sexuality

Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab SpringCRN: 23 Sunday Session 1B, 9:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m.Author Meets Reader (AMR) Session

Room: Dufferin

Author(s): Nimer Sultany, SOAS

Chair(s): Mazen Masri, City, University of London

Reader(s):Mohammad Fadel, University of TorontoLisa Hajjar, University of California – Santa BarbaraMazen Masri, City, University of London

Description:Taking the Arab Spring as its case study, the book (published by Oxford University Press, November 2017) explores the role of law and constitutions during societal upheavals, and critically evaluates the different trajectories they could follow in a revolutionary setting. The book is a novel and comprehensive examination of the constitutional order that preceded and followed the Arab Spring in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Morocco, Jordan, Algeria, Oman, and Bahrain. It also provides the first thorough discussion of the trials of former regime officials in Egypt and Tunisia. Drawing on a wide range of primary sources, the book illustrates the contradictory roles of law and constitutions, and urges a rethinking of major categories in political, legal, and constitutional theory in light of the Arab Spring.Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheorySecondary Keyword: Democracy, Governance and State Theory;

Sunday June 10, Sess ion 1A8:00 a.m. - 8 :45 a.m .

Sunday June 10, Sess ion 1B9:00 a.m. - 9 :45 a.m .

229

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions Access to Justice in Asia and the Americas IIICRN: 1 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session




Description:Considering the geographical boundaries of the CRN1, this session covers challenges to access to justice, considered broadly as the access that citizens have to dispute resolution systems including but not limited to courts, but also to civil and administrative processes that might impact on protecting rights. Papers might include discussions on courts and litigation, as well as access to justice on its two dimensions: procedural access and also substantive justice.

Primary Keyword: Courts, Trials, Litigation, and Civil ProcedureSecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:A Difference in Deference: A New Approach to Understanding Judicial Deference to Bureaucratic Interpretations of Administrative LawRachel MacMaster, Syracuse University

Dispute Prevention Processes from a Civil Procedure StandpointVéronique Fraser, Université de Sherbrooke

Majoritarian Precedent: The Case of Heightened Pleading Standards for DefendantsBrian Soucek, UC Davis School of Law

Qualifications to Ensure Compliance with the Principle of Legality in Administrative ImplementationRicardo Perlingeiro, Estácio de Sá University; Fluminense Federal University

The Imperfect Relationship between Legal Procedures and OutcomesDenise Meyerson, Macquarie University

The Technological Access to Justice in the Network Society: Sharing (IN)JusticeAna Carolina Reis Paes Leme, Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisAdriana Goulart de Sena Orsini, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Accountability for Counter-TerrorismSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Peel

Chair(s): Victor V. Ramraj, University of Victoria

Discussant(s): Jessie Blackbourn, University of Oxford

Description:Accountability for counter-terrorism has not kept pace with the creation of counter-terrorism laws, institutions and practices since 9/11. It appears to remain in a remarkably unsophisticated state; there currently exists a patchwork of accountability that, depending on the jurisdiction, includes parliamentary committees, ad hoc inquiries, inspectors-general, independent reviewers, oversight commissioners, and internal review mechanisms within government, the military, and state bureaucracy. Each such body typically oversees only some aspect of counter-terrorism. Accountability is thus incomplete and inconsistent. This panel explores the current state of accountability for counter-terrorism in Australia, Canada, and the UK. In doing so it highlights the challenges faced across all three jurisdictions.

Primary Keyword: Terrorism, National Security

Presentations:Accountability through the Criminal TrialNicola McGarrity, University of New South Wales

Canada's Terrorism Prosecutions and the Use of Social Scientific and Expert Evidence: An empirical studyMichael Nesbitt, University of Calgary, Faculty of Law

National Security Accountability Reform: The Day AfterCraig Forcese, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law

The Changing Accountability Landscape in Canada for National SecurityKent Roach, University of Toronto

Understanding Counter-Terrorism ReviewJessie Blackbourn, University of OxfordLydia Morgan, University of BirminghamFiona de Londras, University of Birmingham

Sunday June 10, Sess ion 210:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m .

230

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Beyond Western-centrism in Comparative LawCRN: 36 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Linden

Chair/Discussant(s): Alessandro Corda, Queen's University Belfast School of Law

Participant(s):Salvatore Caserta, iCourts- Center of Excellence for International CourtsCynthia Farid, University of Wisconsin Law SchoolAndra le Roux-Kemp, School of Law, City University of Hong Kong

Description:Twenty years ago Ugo Mattei famously wrote that Western legal tradition "cannot be the foundation of a classification of legal systems that aim to cover the whole world." Nonetheless, comparative law scholarship is still largely dominated by Western legal thought and classifications, especially along the lines of the common law–civil law divide. The tendency to overlook other legal traditions and cultures persists to this day. This roundtable brings together scholars interested in non-western legal systems who pay particular attention to the understanding of local values, norms, and legal cultures. The aim is to have a thought-provoking conversation on the challenges and potential for comparative law research arising from work on legal systems and cultures that defy the dominant civil law-common law narrative.

Primary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal CulturesSecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Brazilian Sociolegal Studies 2CRN: 7 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Wentworth

Chair(s): José Roberto Xavier, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Discussant(s): Mariana Raupp, Université Laval

Description:This session focuses on Brazilian legal phenomena. Our goal is to analyze and discuss, among other thematics: (a) the peculiar features of the Brazilian legal system, comparing them to the other national systems when possible; (b) the processes of legal

professionalization recruitment in Brazil and its impact on politics and on judicial decision making; (c) the explanation of judicial decision making and judicial behavior in Brazil; (d) symbolics and semiotics of the courts, of the magistracy itself and of the judicial sentencing; (e) the new roles of a judge in a democratic political order and its obstacles; (f) therelationship between the judicial branch and the organs of state and the civil society.We also aim to explore the current theories on courts and judgeship and the pros and cons of using them in the understanding of the Brazil

Primary Keyword: Access to JusticeSecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:How New Political Movements Manufacture "Human Rights" in BrazilCaroline Caldas, Federal University Fluminense

Labor Arbitration in Brazil: a Sociolegal StudyAna Carolina Chasin, Unifesp - Federal University of São Paulo

The Emergence of Empirical Legal Research in Brazil: an OverviewJosé Roberto Xavier, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

What is the plan? Exploring New Research Questions and Approaches for the Access to Justice Agenda in a Scenario of Increasing Inequalities.Maria Cecília de Araujo Asperti, Universidade de São Paulo / DIREITO GVDaniela Gabbay, FGV Direito SPSusana Henriques da Costa, USP

Workplace Bullying Cases in Brazil Contextualized through Problematic Working Conditions: Individual Solutions for Collective Issues?Julia Gitahy da Paixão, University of Ottawa

Constructing the Legal FamilySunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Daphna Hacker, Tel Aviv University

Discussant(s): Nancy Polikoff, American University Washington College of Law

Description:This session explores new familial terrains and the ways they challenge the law lagging behind. Reproduction technologies, including gamete transfers and surrogacy; same-sex relations

231

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

and separations; and cross-border families, bring about new legal questions in relation to the right to marry and to live in the same territory; the right not to marry; the right of step-siblings to maintain contact with one another; the legal meaning of the tie between a non-genetic parent and the child; the legal protection needed for surrogates, and more. Hence, this session provides an opportunity to revisit the basic normative bases of marriage and parenthood and to reconstruct our legal visions in light of current familial plurality.

Primary Keyword: Family, Youth, and ChildrenSecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Presentations:A Logical Step Forward: Extending Voluntary Acknowledgments of Parentage to Female Same-Sex Couples who Conceive Using Sperm Provided in Compliance with Donor Non-Paternity LawsJessica Feinberg, Mercer University School of Law

Disintegrating MarriageKaiponanea Matsumura, Arizona State University - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Marriage and the ConstitutionMichael Boucai, SUNY Buffalo Law School

Regulating Markets for Gestational Care: Comparative Perspectives on Surrogacy in the United States and IndiaSital Kalantry, Cornell Law School

Siblings in Less-Traditional Families: Relationships Deserving of Legal RecognitionRuth Zafran, IDC Herzliya Israel, Berkeley Law,

Critical Approaches to Mental and Legal CapacityCRN: 40 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Carleton

Chair(s): Beverley Clough, University of Leeds

Discussant(s): Leslie Francis, University of Utah

Description:The ideas of mental and legal capacity have traditionally been intertwined in several areas of the law. The twinning of legal and mental capacity has proved most controversial in relation to guardianship and other forms of substitute decision-making. A robust legal critique of both mental and legal capacity (individually and in connection with one another) continues to develop, informed by the continuing debate around the interpretation and implementation of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The papers in this session contribute to that critical literature, examining the past, present and future of mental and legal capacity from diverse theoretical and empirically informed perspectives.

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Human Rights, International Human Rights

Presentations:"Asking the Woman Question": Re-engaging Feminist Theory and Contemporary Irish Mental Health and Capacity LawClaire Murray, University College Cork

"Vulnerability is being Incapable in a Context you Can’t Handle": Rethinking Guardianship as a Re-calibration of the Relationship between Context and Self (Relational Autonomy and Vulnerability Theory (Making it Real) II)Margaret Hall, Thompson Rivers Univ Faculty of Law

A Retreat from Mental Capacity? Everyday Decision-Making by People with Intellectual DisabilitiesRosie Harding, University of Birmingham

Developing Supportive Environments; Critical Realism and RelationalityAmanda Keeling, University of Leeds

New Legal Landscapes: Exploring the Boundaries of Mental Capacity LawBeverley Clough, University of Leeds

Relational Vulnerability Theory (Making It Real I): What role for coherence?Lise Barry, Macquarie Law School

Development of the Legal Profession: Judges, Prosecutors, and LawyersCRN: 52 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Simcoe

Chair(s): Pedro Fortes, FGV LAW SCHOOL

Discussant(s): David Restrepo Amariles, HEC Paris Darren Rosenblum, Pace Law School

Description:The development of the legal profession is a really important part of the literature on law and development. On one hand, there are the possibilities and limitations of legal education in providing sources for expert legal knowledge in contemporary lawyering. On the other hand, the globalization of the legal profession promotes the diffusion on legal institutions that

232

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

poses challenges to judges, lawyers, public prosecutors, and defenders. This panel investigates the legal profession, including the rites of passage to become a judge or an advocate, the transformations of their work, and the new ethical dilemmas of lawyers in the emerging democracies.

Primary Keyword: Judges and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Lawyers and Law Firms

Presentations:Becoming a Judge in RussiaAryna Dzmitryieva, European University in St. Petersburg

Globalization and the Dominance of Foreign Corporate Lawyers in MyanmarArm Tungnirun, Harvard Law School

Mapping Human Rights Advocates in Colombia (2000-2017): Diversification, Professionalization and the Expansion of Human RightsTatiana Alfonso Sierra, University of Wisconsin-Madison/ITAM-MéxicoLina María Arroyave Velásquez, Universidad EAFIT

Enacting Bankruptcy Laws: Lessons from the Past and PresentCRN: 25 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Danforth

Chair/Discussant(s): Dalie Jimenez, University of California, Irvine School of Law

Description:Panelists will discuss personal insolvency laws in the United States, India, South Africa, and Canada.


Presentations:Anticipating the Function and Impact of India's New Personal Insolvency and Bankruptcy regimeAdam Feibelman, Tulane Law School

Canadian Insolvency Law at the Crossroads: Federalism and Farm Debt during the Great DepressionVirginia Torrie, University of Manitoba, Faculty of Law

Life in the SweatboxPamela Foohey, Indiana Univ. Maurer School of LawRobert Lawless, University of Illinois College of LawKatherine Porter, University of California IrvineDeborah Thorne, Ohio University

South Africa’s Proposed Debt Forgiveness Programme for Certain Classes of Over-Indebted DebtorsMichelle Kelly-Louw, University of South Africa

What Does "Local" Mean in ‘Local Legal CultureRobert Lawless, University of Illinois College of LawAngela Littwin, University of Texas School of Law

Exploring the Boundaries of Medical (Mis)behaviourCRN: 9 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Suzanne Ost, Lancaster University

Discussant(s): Alexandra Mullock, University of Manchester, UK

Description:Doctors are expected to provide care without judging, exploiting or harming patients, but they are humans with their own personally-held beliefs, weaknesses and (even) psychopathies which they bring to the doctor-patient relationship. Papers in this panel explore the boundaries of medical (mis)behaviour and issues of professional autonomy, freedom and discretion. Problems may arise when decisions or choices that doctors make lead to a refusal to treat a patient as the patient has requested, and tensions within the doctor-patient relationship may thus be exposed. In more extreme examples of doctor/patient discord, the doctor might harm patients, either by failing to treat appropriately or even by exploiting or intentionally harming patients.

Primary Keyword: Ethics, Bioethics and the LawSecondary Keyword: Health and Medicine

Presentations:Accommodating Conscientious Refusal in Health Care PracticeSara Fovargue, Lancaster UniversityMary Neal, Strathclyde University

Claims of Conscience and the Interests of PatientsStephen Smith, Cardiff University

Rogue Surgeons and the Criminal lawAlexandra Mullock, University of Manchester, UK

What counts as Exploitation in the Doctor-Patient Relationship?’Suzanne Ost, Lancaster UniversityHazel Biggs, University of Southampton

233

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Family Law and Feminist OpinionsCRN: 7 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut East

Chair(s): Rachel Rebouche, Temple University Law School

Discussant(s):Susan Appleton, Washington University School of LawMaya Manian, University of San Francisco School of Law

Participant(s):Mary Anne Case, University of ChicagoMartha Ertman, University of Maryland Law SchoolMelanie Jacobs, MSU College of LawAlicia Kelly, Widener University School of LawSeema Mohapatra, Indiana McKinney School of LawZvi Triger, Striks School of Law, The College of Management Academic StudiesJessica Dixon Weaver, SMU Dedman School of Law

Description:This roundtable will discuss the process and value of rewriting iconic US family law cases. Participants are authors of rewritten opinions or commentators on an original decision. They are experts in family law and feminist legal theory as well as in related fields, such as contracts, civil procedure, constitutional law, and health law. Among the questions participants will consider are: What is the value of collaboration among scholars in reconsidering opinions from a feminist perspective, and how do authors define a 'feminist' judgment? What pedagogical, scholarly, or other purposes does the author hope to achieve? What role should a commentary play in assessing a reconceived judgment's intervention in the field or in a contemporary debate? How can a reimagined judicial opinion ensure rigor in authors' historical accounts?

Primary Keyword: Gender and JudgingSecondary Keyword: Feminist Jurisprudence

Feminist Theory & Civil Procedure RoundtableCRN: 7 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Chestnut West

Chair(s): Elizabeth Schneider, Brooklyn School of Law

Discussant(s): Suja Thomas, University of Illinois College of Law

Participant(s):Brooke Coleman, Seattle University School of LawPortia Pedro, YaleElizabeth Schneider, Brooklyn School of LawElizabeth Thornburg, SMU Dedman School of Law

Description:Civil procedure and feminist scholarship has begun to emerge as a vibrant and growing field. The seminal scholars who tirelessly continued the work they started decades ago have now been joined by a new group. Together, these scholars shed light on the broad collection of challenges women confront in our state and federal legal systems.

At this roundtable, we will celebrate (and critique) the foundational work of the past. In addition, building on and inspired by this past work, we will reflect on the progress of the past twenty years. We will also discuss how that progress-while important-is nowhere near complete.


Gender and Sexuality in Social MovementsCRN: 21 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Davenport

Chair/Discussant(s): Michael Yarbrough, John Jay College (CUNY)

Description:Social movements take many forms--this panel explores how gender and sexuality inform different social movements.


Presentations:Cities for CEDAW: Realizing International Law Through Local PoliticsRebecca Sanders, University of CincinnatiAnne Runyan, University of Cincinnati

Queer Migrant Movement Formations in Arizona: The Paradoxical Implications of Legal Rights LossesErin Mayo-Adam, Hunter College, CUNY

Sylvia Rivera and Contests over Political IdentificationLisa Beard, UC Riverside

Talking Title IX: Activist and Administrative ResponsesJamie Huff, Bridgewater State UniversitySarah Hampson, University of Washington Tacoma

234

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Historicizing PunishmentSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Oxford

Description:Papers in this session take an historical approach to the study of punishment. They examine topics including capital punishment, carceral policy, political culture, and prison privatization in settings ranging from nineteenth century Scotland, the postwar American South, 1970s Ireland, to the American aughts.

Primary Keyword: Punishment, Prison Studies, Sentencing, and Formal Social ControlSecondary Keyword: Legal History

Presentations:Custody, Community Control, and Participatory DemocracyChristopher Berk, University of Virginia

From Penal History to Penal HistoriographyJohann Koehler, University of California, Berkeley

Pastoral Penality: Exploring imprisonment and political culture in 1970s IrelandLouise Brangan, University of Edinburgh

Racial Capitalism, Brown v. Board of Education, and Southern Carceral PolicyKirstine Taylor, Ohio University

The Irish in Scotland: Murder, Capital Punishment, and the Irish as Other in Scotland from 1864 to 1914Lynsey Black, University College Dublin

International Law as an Instrument to Promote Human Rights or Predatory Control?CRN: 33 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kent

Chair(s): Setsuo Miyazawa, Univ. of Calif Hastings School of Law; Aoyama Gakuin University Law School

Discussant(s): Hiroshi Fukurai, Univ. of California Santa Cruz

Description:This session showcases the most recent development in international law, as it is applied to East Asian countries and regions.

Primary Keyword: East Asia, East Asian Studies, East Asian Law and Society

Secondary Keyword: International Law, International Organizations, Regional Institutions, Non-state Actors, and International Politics

Presentations:Fourth World Approaches to International Law (FWAIL): A ManifestoHiroshi Fukurai, University of California Santa Cruz

Socialization of International Human Rights Law ―A case study of Racial Discrimination and Hate Speech Dissolution Act in JapanAyako Hatano, The University of Tokyo/ New York University

What Affect Employers’ Decisions to Appeal the Employment Lawsuit to Intermediate Court in China?Zhenxing Ke, Indiana University Bloomington, Maurer Law School

International Studies of Law and JusticeCRN: 48 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Elgin

Chair/Discussant(s): Janine Ubink, Leiden Law School

Description:The panel will discuss contested notions of justice and authority in legally pluralistic societies in Asia and Africa.


Presentations:Custom, capitalism and democracy: a South African case studyJanine Ubink, Leiden Law School

Ideologies and methods of the Tibetan justice system: A catalyst to rethinking justice processes in the WestTamara Relis, London School of Economics, South Asia Centre

Investing in Law: China, Brazil, India, and the Future of the World Trading SystemCRN: 36 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Jayanth Krishnan, Indiana University, Bloomington

235

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Discussant(s): Joseph Conti, University of Wisconsin, Madison Benedict Kingsbury, NYU School of Law

Description:The panel addresses how government and private lawyers in China, India and Brazil organized themselves over time to try to shape international trade law, and in particular the law of the World Trade Organization. It will address three questions: (i) how have these countries invested in trade-related legal capacity to take on the US and EU at the WTO and defend their interests, involving public-private partnerships; (ii) in doing so, how did they change internally; and (iii) in consequence of their engagement and successes, what are the implications for the trade legal order itself as the US threatens to withdraw from it. The papers will comprise a book on these three countries' experiences. They will trace and compare proceses of transnational legal ordering involving them and the international trade law order. The build from field work.


Presentations:Brazil’s "Three-Pillar" Model and the Transnational Shaping of the Trade Legal OrderMichelle Ratton Sanchez-Badin, FGVGreg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of Law

Comparing Legal Capacity Building for Trade in Brazil, China, and India: Similarities, Differences, and How they MatterGreg Shaffer, Univ. of California Irvine School of Law

From Investor to Owner? China and WTO LawHenry Gao, SMU/Shift

Investing in Law: India's Engagement with the World Trading SystemJames Nedumpara, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade

Law, Colonialism, and Marxist ThoughtCRN: 23 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Dufferin

Description:This session focuses the intersection of law, colonialism, and Marxist-informed analysis. Themes include: law, capitalism, and the making of the colonial state; law and the "primitive accumulation" debate; and labour and law in the settler-colonial context.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-Colonialism

Secondary Keyword: Democracy, Governance and State Theory; Transitions to Democracy and Revolutions

Presentations:Colonialism, Labour, and the Compulsion ConundrumSusan Brophy, St. Jerome's University

Grabbing Land Legally--A Marxian AnalysisUmut Özsu, Carleton University

Property as a Site of Colonial Contestation: The Legal Form and the Legality of Anti-Colonial ProtestHonor Brabazon, University of Toronto

To Break Our Chains and Form a Free People": Race, Nation, and Haiti's Imperial Constitution of 1805Philip Kaisary, Carleton University

Legal Geography IX: Thinking Through Legal GeographyCRN: 35 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Professional Development Panel

Room: Kenora

Chair(s): Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar, Law School, Univ. of Haifa

Participant(s):Nicholas Blomley, Simon Fraser UniversityDavid Delaney, Amherst CollegeLisa Freeman, Kwantlen Polytechnic UniversityAntonia Layard, University of Bristol

Description:Following up on last year's robust discussion of the question "What's Legal Geography Good For?" in Mexico City this roundtable offers an opportunity to explore what it means to 'think through' legal geography. We mean this in at least two senses. First, what actual differences are made when socio-legal scholars approach distinctively legal questions through the lenses or interpretive frameworks that socio-spatial modes of inquiry make available? What becomes discernable or interesting that might otherwise be obscure? Second, where might these analytical-interpretive practices lead? What are the present horizons of legal geography as a collective endeavor? Is there a 'beyond' present ways of thinking and doing legal geography?


Medicalization, Rights, and the LawSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session

Room: Spruce

236

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Chair/Discussant(s): Craig Konnoth, University of Pennsylvania Law School

Participant(s):Dayna Bowen Matthew, Univ. of Virginia Law SchoolCraig Konnoth, Univ. of Pennsylvania Law SchoolKimani Paul-Emile, Fordham University Law School

Description:" It examines whether medicalization is a discourse for good or evil. If so, what kinds of problems have been medicalized and how? How can we replace or dilute medicalization discourse, and when? How is the discourse coopted? What kinds of medicalization discourse exist?

Mental Health as ProxyCRN: 29 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple West

Chair/Discussant(s): Michele Goodwin, UC Irvine School of Law

Description:This session urges a rethinking of what constitutes mental illness and what does not. These questions become all the more urgent in a society bent on the medicalizaiton of conditions, experiences and harms, resulting in both over inclusion of mental illness in legal disputes as well as under-inclusiveness.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Disabilities

Presentations:Medicalization of Social Problems: Is Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) a Disease?Faraasa Lawrence, Carleton UniversityNorbert Ebisike, Cheyney University

Mental Health, Risk and Canadian PenitentiariesPatrick Dwyer, York University

“Its like everyone’s trying to put pills in you:” Pharmacological violence and harmful mental health services inside a California Juvenile Detention CenterJerry Flores, University Of TorontoKati Barahona-Lopez, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz

New Frontiers of Financial RegulationCRN: 5 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Kensington

Discussant(s): Cristie Ford, Univ of British Columbia Fac. of Law

Description:This panel discusses emerging trends in the regulation of financial markets and the provision of financial services. The papers tackle a broad range of issues in a difficult and complex regulatory field. These encompass constitutive regulatory issues such as the legitimacy problems with financial regulation, through to the challenges of prudential regulation in the guise of guarantor of last resort and enhanced prudential regulation, and, finally, the risks brought by innovative financial technologies.

Primary Keyword: Regulation, Reform, and GovernanceSecondary Keyword: Financialization, Financial Capital

Presentations:Fintech's ThreatsRory VanLoo, Boston University

Guarantor of Last ResortKathryn Judge, Columbia Law School

The Puzzles of Financial RegulationDavid Zaring, The Wharton School

New Horizon in Alternative Dispute ResolutionCRN: 10 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Maple East

Chair/Discussant(s): Shozo Ota, Univ. of Tokyo School of Law

Description:This session of CRN10 is about a new trend in ADR. Prof. Debbie focuses on the use of ADR processes in the Max Stern Art Restitution Project on looted cultural properties. Prof. Wing' paper contributes to the creation of ethical principles for online dispute resolution (ODR) systems. Prof. Kaneko introduces the application of Cyber-promotion technology of sales to the consumer in Japan, and analyzes the legal problem and the disputes resolution thereof. Prof. Katz describes the result of juridical studies on Indonesian legal readiness to implement online dispute resolution (ODR). Prof. Ndhlovu argues that the development of dispute resolution law induces a change of paradigm: from an institutional conception of justice, based on the theory of legal positivism, to a pluralistic conception of justice and its access.


237

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

Presentations:ADR and the resolution of cultural property disputes: Lessons to be learned from the work of the Max Stern Art Restitution ProjectDebbie De Girolamo, Queen Mary University of London

Cyber-Technology In Sales Promotion And The Consumer’s Legal ProtectionHironao Kaneko, Tokyo Institute of Technology

La place des modes de prévention et règlement des différends dans la Justice du 21ème siècle : étude comparée Québec/France Translation in english : The place of Dispute Resolution Processes in civil Justice of 21st century : comparative study between Quebec and FranceAdeline Audrerie, Université de Sherbrooke (Canada) / Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (France)

Lack of/Access to Justice Magnified: Ethics, AI and Online Dispute Resolution Systems DesignLeah Wing, University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Online Dispute Resolution Usage For Business Dispute In Indonesia: A ChallengeElisabeth Sundari, Law Graduate Programme, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

New Perspectives on Law and Political Economy IISunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): James Varellas, University of California, Berkeley

Discussant(s): Margaret Somers, University of Michigan

Description:The past decade has seen growing interest in a reinvigorated project of Law & Political Economy (L&PE) beyond the Law & Economics (L&E) paradigm. For example, there are new organizations (e.g., APPEAL and ClassCrits), new L&PE classes, a new casebook, and an L&PE journal project.

This session is the second of two that seek to initiate a conversation with Law & Society (L&S) in the spirit of earlier calls for "a framework for understanding law and the economy that draws upon the major tenets of L&S scholarship yet ventures into territory normally occupied by those in L&E" (Edelman 2004), as well as recent calls for "more, not fewer, accounts of how law can improve economic justice and economic policy" (McCluskey, Pasquale & Taub 2016). Papers will focus on how a reinvigorated L&PE project can contribute to social science research.


Presentations:Conceptualizing Law in the Social SciencesJason Jackson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for AmericaNancy MacLean, Duke University

The Where, When and What of Law in Global Wealth ChainsDuncan Wigan, Copenhagen Business School

Towards a Sociology of ContractGreta Krippner, University of MichiganLuis Flores, University of Michigan

New Research in Legal TheorySunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Primary Keyword: Law and Social-Political TheoryLegal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Dark Matter in the LawCarolina Núñez, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University

Policing and Accountability in Comparative PerspectiveSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Lester Spence, Johns Hopkins University

Description:Policing is an essential component of modern political systems and, often, the most visible and powerful aspect of the state that is encountered by citizens. As such, police agencies are lightening rods for criticism – for not doing enough to protect citizens, and/or for engaging in too much (and therefore illegitimate) force. This panel brings together a group of young scholars on the forefront of scholarly research on policing and accountability through their examinations of U.S., Britain, Brazil and Argentina. Their specific focus is the mechanisms through which, and contexts within, people are able to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions (or inactions). This panel aims to help us understand when, how, and with what consequences that accountability occurs.


238

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Secondary Keyword: Race and Ethnicity

Presentations:Descriptive Representation and Political Power: Explaining Racial Inequalities in PolicingLaurel Eckhouse, University of Denver

Police, Politics, and Demobilization: Exploring Policy Feedback Effects in BritainAyobami Laniyonu, UCLA; American Bar Foundation

Resilience or Repression? Approaches to Participatory Security in Two Latin American CitiesYanilda Gonzalez, University of Chicago

Policing and Punishment: Pretrial Detentions, Managing Mentally Ill, Custody and Release ConundrumsSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:A dynamic panel exploring policing practices, incarceration and release policies and processes in Canada and the USA.


Presentations:A Return to Dangerousness: Techniques, Practices, and Opinions in Canadian Intensive Supervision ProgramsGarrett Lecoq, Carleton UniversityDale Ballucci, Western University

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the War on Informed Criminal Justice PolicyMatt Barno, University of California, Irvine

Hybridized Justice: The Collision of Care and Control in Managing the Mentally IllNatalie A. Pifer, University of Rhode Island

Pretrial Detention in the U.S.: Is the Process Still the Punishment?Steven Dow, Michigan State University School of Criminal Justice

Race and Politics in the Texas Shadow Carceral State: County Level Variation in the Collection of Legal Financial ObligationsIlya Slavinski, University of Texas- Austin

"Arrest, Arrest, Arrest": Statutory Safeguards Under Pressure in Police CustodyRichard Martin, London School of Economics

Public Legal EducationSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Roundtable Session


Chair(s): Samuel Kirwan, University of Warwick

Participant(s):Edgar Cahn, UDC David A. Clarke School of LawLois Gander, University of AlbertaJulie Mathews, Community Legal Education OntairoTara Mulqueen, Warwick UniversityMaria Angelica Prada, CIJUS - Universidad de los AndesJeff Surtees, Centre for Public Legal Education AlbertaLisa Wintersteiger, Law for Life and Birkbeck College

Description:This session focuses on the legal interventions of actors at the 'margins' of formal legal systems, as they seek to respond to situations of need and deprivation that have arisen in the context of 'austerity' neoliberalism. The policies of neoliberal austerity have led to a rising tide of evictions, stops in income through either benefit delays and sanctions or irregular working patterns, and intensifying household debt. In this context we are interested in the role played by law within frameworks of mutual solidarity, dependency and obligation developed and maintained to sustain life, and how law, particularly in the context of public legal education, can be a both a practical resource and a means of politicising these circumstances.

Primary Keyword: Legal Education, Legal Education Reform, and Law StudentsSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Re-Politicizing the Environmental Governance of Natural Resource Extraction from Grassroots MovementsCRN: 23 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Cedar

Chair(s): Julia Dehm, La Trobe University School of Law

Discussant(s): David Szablowski, York University

Description:This panel brings together research experiences from Peru and Colombia to compare and contrast the ways in which the discourse of new extractivism operates in contemporary South America. Papers in this session will discuss how the governance of natural resource extraction is enacted in the region, how it creates tensions and spheres of social contestation and also, the role of law in facilitating its permeability under a liberal environmental framework. From a diversity of theoretical lenses that include critical legal approaches to environmental

239

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

law and post-colonialism, the panel will put special focus on the instrumental institutionalization of rights and legal mechanisms of environmental governance aimed to territorial ordering, mitigation of environmental impacts, participatory spaces to decision and prior consultation.

Primary Keyword: Indigenous People, Colonialism, and State FormationSecondary Keyword: Environment, Natural Resources, Energy, Sustainability, Water, and Climate Change

Presentations:Challenging Hegemonic Perspectives of Territorial Ordering in Peru: Citizen’s Resistance to Extractivism as a Counter-Territorial Governance from BelowAdy Chinchay, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Free Trade Agreements, the governance of agrobiodiversity and agricultural extractivism in ColombiaLaura Gutierrez Escobar, Universidad del Rosario

From Gender Blindness to Gender Blinking: The Gender Perspective in the Environmental Governance of Extractive Activities in PeruAreli Valencia, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru

Marmato: Another Chronicle of a Foretold Tragedy. The Dispute of the Territory between Artisanal Miners and Canadian Mining Corporations in the Framework of the Narrow Margins of the Prior ConsultationJimena Sierra-Camargo, Rosario University / King's College London

Oil Fields: Oil palm plantations and post-conflict agrarian change on the Middle Magdalena River (Colombia)Daniel Tubb, UNB Fredericton

Re-politicizing Participation or Reframing State Governance? Beyond Indigenous’ Prior Consultation and Environmental ParticipationRoger Merino, Universidad del Pacífico (Lima, Perú)

Reforms to Courts, the Judiciary and the Role of JudgesCRN: 43 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Huron


Discussant(s): Sharyn Roach Anleu, Flinders University

Description:This session presents diverse changes and reforms that affect courts, the judiciary, and the role of judges. The papers question whether the changes accomplish their desired effect, and explore how judges respond to them. The jurisdictions examined are Brazil, Canada, Pakistan, Portugal, and the United States.


Presentations:Brazilian dilemma: controlling judges and public prosecutorsMaria Laura de Souza Coutinho, Direito GV

Redefining the Judiciary’s Territories: the Portuguese caseEliana Patrícia Branco, Centro de Estudos Sociais, Univ. Coimbra

The Politics of Changing Judicial Selection and Retention MethodsHerbert Kritzer, University of Minnesota Law School

Regulating Patient Safety: Law, Ethics and SocietySunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Joan Gilmour, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

Discussant(s): Oliver Quick, University of Bristol

Description:This session will explore how ensuring and enhancing patient safety poses considerable challenges for law, regulation and ethics. This includes the tension between individual and systems approaches to understanding safety lapses, the impact of open disclosure and qualified privilege laws, and the promise of alternative administrative systems for managing claims. It will also consider the shifting role of the state in the governance of healthcare and the problem of regulating safety and quality in the private care sector, particularly with the development of advanced health technologies.

Primary Keyword: Health and MedicineSecondary Keyword: Civil Justice, Adjudication, and Dispute Resolution

Presentations:Patient Safety and Shifts in Regulatory ResponsesJoan Gilmour, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University

240

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Patient Safety Incidents and Protection of Quality Assurance Activities: Legislative and Jurisprudential Responses in CanadaLouise Belanger-Hardy, University of Ottawa - Faculty of Law

Regulating the Privately-Financed Health Care SectorColleen Flood, University of Ottawa

Who’s Watching Whom? Failures of Administrative Protections for Hospital PatientsElaine Gibson, Dalhousie Health Law Institute

Will the legal duty of candour in healthcare work?Oliver Quick, University of Bristol

Regulation and Control: Narratives, Privacy, Legitimacy, and PowerCRN: 45 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Forest Hill

Chair/Discussant(s): Michal Tamir, The Academic Center of Law and Science

Description:The papers in this session address the role of discourse and narratives in constructing social and legal concepts, which affect relationships of power, notions of privacy, and attributions of legitimacy. The papers span a variety of legal fields, including family law, criminal law, environmental law, and communication law.

Primary Keyword: Public Opinion, Social Media and the LawSecondary Keyword: Popular Culture, Media and the Law

Presentations:Consumption, Authenticity, and Adventure: Tourism, Eating Meat, and the LawSabrina Tremblay-Huet, University of Sherbrooke

How parents Conceive of the Notion of Privacy: An Exploration of the Private and the Public, and of Individual and Family PrivacyClaire Bessant, Northumbria University

Information quantification and legitimacy accounts in Brazilian Justice SystemPaulo Afonso Ritter Gomes, Universidade PositivoEdson Guarido Filho, Universidade Positivo / IBEPES

Self-Regulation of the Communicational Field in the Voting Processes: a Legal-Political Response to the Problem of Electoral NeutralityJuan Esteban Sanchez Cifuentes, Univ. de BrasíliaCatalina Maria Gutierrez Gongora, Univ. de Brasília

The Multiplication of Criminality: Discriminatory legal practices in Arizona human trafficking policyMolly Dunn, Arizona State University

Reproductive Rights: Courts, Law, and PolicySunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper SessionRoom: Parlour Suite 8

Description:The debate over reproductive technology and reproductive rights is varied and interdisciplinary. This panel looks at the implications of various metrics along which disadvantage and discrimination are distributed-such as class, gender, ability, sexual orientation, age-on policy and law as they impact different aspects of reproduction. The papers will explore such issues as abortion, prenatal care, and contraception.

Presentations:An Undue Burden: An Analysis of Access to Judicial Bypass for Pennsylvania MinorsKimya Forouzan, Temple University Law & Public Policy Program

Conscientious objection to sexual and reproductive health practices in Colombia and Spain: a feminist critique on judicial balancing constitutional rightsSonia Ariza Navarrete, European University Institute

Getting it Right in Hellerstedt: The Implications for Abortion Regulation and JurisprudenceVicki Toscano, Nova Southeastern University

The role of Misoprostol in the abortion debateCarmeliza Rosario, UiB/CMI - Centre on Law and

Social Transformation / COWI MozambiqueLiv Tønnessen, CMI

Seeking Access to Justice in Disability ControversiesCRN: 40 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Leaside

Chair/Discussant(s): Freya Kodar, University of Victoria, Faculty of Law

Description:Article 13 of the CRPD, which guarantees the right of access to justice, has raised awareness in the disability community of the potential to vindicate rights through the courts and other decision-making processes. Yet, despite this guarantee, barriers to access to justice persist due to the legal and social framings of issues and outcomes. This panel will examine

241

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

some of the contemporary issues of access to justice faced by persons with disabilities. Issues addressed include seeking redress for institutional abuse, often through the use of class actions; dealing with matters relating to competence; and the challenge of obtaining legal aid.

Primary Keyword: DisabilitiesSecondary Keyword: Access to Justice

Presentations:Can We Advance Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities Through the Class Action?Aloke Chatterjee, University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Law

Crossroads: The intersection of Deaf people and the justice systemDebra Russell, University of British ColumbiaPatrick Boudreault, Gallaudet UniversityCathy Chovaz, Western University Kings College

Disability, Access to Justice and Resources: How Can We Move Forward Without Legal Aid?Laverne Jacobs, Windsor Law

Law and the Dignity of RiskAlexander Boni-Saenz, Chicago-Kent College of Law

Supported Decision-Making and International Law: The Missing Link Protecting Women with Disabilities from Sexual ViolenceStephen Meyers, University of WashingtonMegan McCloskey, University of Washington

With Access and Justice for AllSagit Mor, University of Haifa

Southern Africa’s Constitutional Moments: Constitution-Making from Decolonization to Liberation:CRN: 13 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Rosedale

Chair/Discussant(s): Penelope Andrews, University of Cape Town Faculty of Law

Description:This panel will explore Southern Africa's constitutional moments through the lens of decolonization and liberation. The goal is to open-up a discussion on the meaning of the repeated constitutional moments across Southern Africa in view of their impact on politics, culture, social movement formation, accountability and democratic consolidation. Just as constitutional negotiations take place at the cross roads of

conflict and peace it is our contention that It is in the cross currents of constitution-making and constitutional politics that the hopes of law and social transformation meet. Despite these hopes disappointment at these constitutional settlements leaves each new generation questioning the nature and potential of their inherited constitutional orders.

Primary Keyword: Colonialism and Post-ColonialismSecondary Keyword: Africa, African Studies, African Law and Society

Presentations:Beyond the Constitutional Text: The Role of the Judiciary in Zimbabwe’s Constitutional Moments 1980-2013David Hofisi, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Constitutional Hopes and Imagined Alternatives: Contextualizing the Demand for Decolonization in Post-apartheid South AfricaHeinz Klug, Unversity of Winsconsin

Liberation Revisited – Constitutional Event or Continuing Ideal?Sanele Sibanda, Wits School of Law

Stigma & (Mis)representations: Implications for Work and Policy DevelopmentCRN: 6Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Tuulia Law, York University

Description:Papers in this panel examine the role and effects of stigma in the different workplace and regulatory contexts.

Primary Keyword: Sex WorkSecondary Keyword: Discrimination

Presentations:A critical analysis of unwanted sexual attention and care work in nursing homesAlisa Grigorovich, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoPia Kontos, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - UHN

A person like any other?: Perceptions and experiences of stigma and discrimination among sex workers in New ZealandLynzi Armstrong, Victoria University of Wellington

242

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Commodified BDSM services: Professional Dominatrices’ views on the criminalization of their work.Kathleen Cherrington, York universityTamara O'Doherty, Simon Fraser University

“Whore” Stigma, Criminality, and Public Policy MakingCheryl Auger, U of T

Taking the Law into their Own Hands: Everyday Legal Actors and ArtifactsCRN: 3 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Andrea Ballestero, Rice University

Description:What is a legal actor? And what are legal artifacts? Scholarly concern with formal legal institutions often obscures genres of legal engagement that occur beyond, below, and through recognized legal spaces. The presenters of this panel instead actively pursue the striking diversity and contingency of legal practices, objects, and identities. Their papers-on supply chain managers, public notary under civil law systems, the role of documents in conservation efforts, the legal tactics of property title-seeking residents in a Bolivian city, and juvenile correctional education in Japan and Spain-chart the legal dimension as a multifaceted plane emergent in the quotidian efforts and aspirations of people who might not (always) see themselves as engaged in legal work.


Presentations:Law at the Crossroads of Supply ChainJérôme Pistola, Les Délices des 7 ValléesSafia Kherbouche, Lille 2 University

Paper Captains, Covered Tracks: Documents as Instruments of Power in Regulating Global FisheriesJen Telesca, Pratt Institute

The Public Notary in Rural Colombia: Rethinking the Private/Public Divide in Places of LawmakingSergio Latorre, Universidad del Norte

“It was a total war”. Individual struggles and collective clashes in the search of land property titles in El Alto, BoliviaJorge Derpic, University of Georgia

The Construction of Islamic Law in Changing Legal SystemsCRN: 30 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: Norfolk Room

Chair/Discussant(s): Onur Bakiner, Seattle University

Description:Islamic law is one form of state law in several Muslim-majority and non-Muslim majority countries alike. As such, it is the subject of both legislation and judicial interpretation, passed into law by legislators not necessarily versed in Islamic law rulings often applied by Muslim judges and non-Muslim judges alike. Moreover, its implementation invites popular views about its symbolic value for rule of law, continuity, and change or reform This proposed panel will interrogate the symbolic meaning of sharīʿa in terms of how it is constructed by judges in and outside of Muslim majority countries, as well as how Muslim citizens subject to it perceive it.


Presentations:Between Domestic Symbolism and Globalism: Religion and the Rule of Law in the Arab GulfDavid Mednicoff, University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Beyond an Impasse: Rule of Law and the Kenyan Kadhis’ CourtsSusan Hirsch, George Mason University

Transmutations of the Sharīʿa: Pseudo-Ḥanafīs and Legal Reform in the 20th Century EgyptSamy Ayoub, The University of Texas at Austin

Women’s Activism in Pakistan and the Use of ‘New’ Methodologies in Islamic LawQudsia Mirza, Birkbeck College, University of London

The League of Nations and its Legacies: Law, Imperialism, LabourCRN: 23 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair/Discussant(s): Gerry Simpson, LSE

Description:This panel revisits the history and contemporary legacies of the League of Nations. Therefore, we interrogate multiple aspects of the work of the League, including the production of knowledge about labour migration, the failed attempt to codify the laws of state responsibility, the administration of C Mandates and their road to independence, the multifaceted, disciplinary statism of the League,the impact of the work of the League on the principle of distinction and, finally, the synergies between the Permanent Court of International Justice and ethnic nationalism in the Balkans. Overall, our papers challenge the image of the

243

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.S

un

da

y

League both as irrelevant to the contemporary international legal order, but also as the helpless victim of interwar power politics.


Secondary Keyword: Legal History

Presentations:Codification and the League of Nations: Past and PresentKathryn Greenman, University of Amsterdam

Global Migration Governance as Policy KnowledgeLeila Kawar, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Redrawing the Laws of War through International Organisations: the legacy of the League of NationsLuis Paulo Bogliolo, University of Melbourne

The Process of International League-al ReproductionRose Parfitt, Kent Law School

"Re-collecting the C Mandates: Imperialism and International Law from the Margins"Cait Storr, Melbourne Law School

"The State to which a community is racially akin": the League of Nations and the nationalisation of the BalkansNtina Tzouvala, Melbourne Law School

Translating International Human RightsSunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:How human rights are conceived, understood and shaped is now understood to be in part the product of their translation in different contexts. The papers on this panel approach human rights from different perspectives but all demonstrate how the work of translation continues to define the very existence and nature of particular human rights.


Presentations:Faith-based Activists at the United Nations Human Rights Council: Professional Translators?Amelie Barras, York University

On Articulating a Right to Science: The Role(s) of Law and Society ScholarshipJohn Dale, George Mason UniversityMark Frezzo, University of Mississippi

Rights, Duties, and the Civic Struggles to Define "We"Christopher Roberts, Univ. of Minnesota Law School

Translating “Human Rights-Compliant Counterterrorism”: Competing Versions of Human Rights and the Marginalization of the Critique of TerrorismJayson Lamchek, National University of Singapore

Transnational Regulatory Regimes, Transnational Law and Social JusticeCRN: 23 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Chair(s): Tomaso Ferrando, University of Bristol School of Law

Discussant(s): Emily Barritt, King's College London

Description:This panel explores transnational regulatory regimes in different industry sectors, including but not limited to, garments, food, and resource extraction, with a particular focus on the social justice dimension of their governance architectures. In light of the continuing proliferation of TRG and its transformative immersion into landscapes that have been eroded by neo-liberal exploitation and stripped of public/social support systems, there is an urgent need to hold the hybrid regulatory infrastructures accountable as regards their public responsibility. Building on longstanding and perennially frustrating attempts at giving "CSR" (corporate social responsibility") sufficient muscle, efforts to conceptualize and to develop structures of "SCA" (Supply Chain Accountability) promise a phase of re-invigoration and effective innovation.

Primary Keyword: Economy, Business and SocietySecondary Keyword: Transnational Legal Orders, Transnational Law

Presentations:Aboriginal Land Rights in the Western Pilbara Iron Ore Project, Australia: Transnational Contracts Regulating Tensions between Aboriginal and Investor Rights to Land, Sovereignty and Access to JusticeKinnari Bhatt, Kings College London

Resource Extraction, Indigeneity and the Diffusion of FPIC Norms into Private GovernancePhillip Paiement, Tilburg Law School

244

Sunday 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. S

un

da

y

Situating Batwa social exclusion within African narratives of indigeneityMorag Goodwin, Tilburg Law School

Social Justice or Environmental Justice? The case study of the Kenyan Water Tower Protection and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation ProgrammeEmily Webster, King's College London

“Sticking to their guns” – the international community’s failure to see the potential of Islamic feminism for the promotion of women’s right in post-conflict Muslim statesFarnush Ghadery, King's College London

Violence: Its Many Forms and ContextsCRN: 21 Sunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session

Room: York

Chair/Discussant(s): Janice Gallagher, Rutgers University

Description:This panel explores various forms of violence in a range of contexts: sexual violence in US schools, physical violence by police in France, and the violence of collective dismissal by private companies in Brazil. These panelists also discuss how some forms of violence, such as the death penalty in the US, has declined in recent years, while other forms of violence have increasingly intersected with "sacred" institutions such as athletes' observation of the national anthem and Native Americans' Standing Rock Water.

Primary Keyword: ViolenceSecondary Keyword: Social Movements, Social Issues, Legal Mobilization

Presentations:Legal mobilization against police violence and racial discrimination in FranceMagda Boutros, Northwestern University

Sexual Violence in US K-12 Schools: Looking for legal remedies in a changing legal contextNan Stein, Wellesley College

Syndical Movement, Collective Negotiation and Collective Dismissal as an act of violence of the companies’ private power: A Case StudyThais Gabrich Gueiros Pinheiro, Universidade Federal FluminenseDaniele Gabrich Gueiros, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Women in Law & SocietySunday Session 2, 10:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m.Paper Session


Description:This panel will examine different dimensions of women in law and society, including women in the process of constitutional creation, women and polygamous marriage in Israel, women in tort and criminal law. Panelists will also explore the promise and limits of constitutionalizing gender parity in politics and the use of labor law to give women a greater role in African development. The panel will also inquire into the implications of Brexit for the Convention of the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women in the United Kingdom.

Primary Keyword: Gender and SexualitySecondary Keyword: Legal Culture, Legal Consciousness, Comparative Legal Cultures

Presentations:Gendered Labour Laws: Empowering Women to Become Major Players in the Socio-economic Development of a Rising AfricaYvonne Claire Dumenu, University of Energy and Natural Resources

Psychiatric Injury and the Hysterical WomanImogen Goold, University of OxfordCatherine Kelly, University of Bristol

The Constitutional Recognition of Gender Parity and Violence against Women in Politics: Progress and Challenges for Indigenous Women in ChiapasSofía Judith Pérez Barrera, Postgraduate in Political and Social Sciences, National Autonomous University of Mexico. FCPYS,UNAM

Trapped Between National Boundaries and Patriarchal Structures: Palestinian Bedouin Women and Polygamous Marriage in IsraelRawia Aburabia, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Where are All the Women Tax Lawyers?Ann O'Connell, Law School, University of Melbourne

Women and Constitution-making in Post-communist RomaniaElena Brodeala, Yale Law School/European University InstituteSilvia Suteu, University College London

245

Participant IndexIn

de

x

To email a participant, please use the “contact me” link available on the Online Program Guide.

Author Index

AAaronson, Ely 13, 51Abaya, Miriam 206Abbott, Katherine 58Abbott, Kenneth 14, 35Abdulraheem-Mustapha, Mariam 54, 195, 222Abel, Gillian 225Abella, Rosalie Silberman 35Abel, Rick 58Ablavsky, Gregory 93Aboueldahab, Noha 46Aboutorabifard, Haniehalsadat 203Abraham, Haim 131Abrams, Jamie 222Abreu, Alice 41, 182Aburabia, Rawia 102, 244Acevedo, Deepa Das 175Acevedo, John 59, 75, 125Achermann, Christin 128, 170Acorn, Elizabeth 155Adams, Ian 50Addadzi-Koom, Maame Efua 34Addaney, Michael 120, 146Adeleke, Fola 115Aderibigb, Titilayo 89Adler, Libby 83, 131Adrian, Melanie 153Affonso, Flavia 141Afshary, Mohammad 24Ahmad, Hassan 223Ahma, Fahad 99Ahmed, Aziza 21, 114, 177, 197Aho, Fleur Te 108Aho, Linda Te 135Aiken, Sharry 99Ainsworth, Janet 191Aït-Aoudia, Myriam 187Aith, Fernando 89Ajagbe, Kunle 31Akanbi, Opeyemi 20Akande, Rabiat 25Akintayo, Akinola 89, 222Akrivos, Dimitris 206Aksenova, Marina 104Alaattinoglu, Daniela 173Alaei, Kamiar 108Alam, Mariful 123, 156Alberstein, Michal 5, 76Albinati, Chris 57Albiston, Catherine 83, 177Albrecht, Kat 204Alencar, Eduardo de 146Alexander, Basil 37Alexander, Charlotte 185Alfie, Julian 68

Alfonso Sierra, Tatiana 232Alhaidari, Bethany 3Al-Hassani, Ruba Ali 9Alinor, Malissa 211Ali, Shahla 159Aliverti, Ana 31, 63Allard, Silas 36Allen, Walter 83Almeida, Giselle Beran Medella D 103Almeida, Maíra 109, 216Alminas, Ruth 161, 192Al-Mutairi, Saad 181Alnager, Samia 145Aloni, Erez 173Alonso, Alexandra Délano 161Alramahi, Mohammad 131Alston, Brandon 71Alvare, Dana 177Alvez, Amaya 186, 200Amani, Bita 7Amariles, David Restrepo 75, 91, 129, 178, 203, 231Amaste, Jon 180Amaya-Castro, Juan Manuel 129, 130Amengual, Matthew 149, 210Amiett, Santiago Abel 217Amir, Tally 36Anadon, Isabel 204Andam, Kuukuwa 56Andersen, Ellen 215Anderson, Dorcas Quek 5, 206Anderson, Gavin 122Anderson, John-Paul (JP) 83Andrew, Lori 136Andrews, Penelope 101, 241Angel, Armstrong 206Angeletti, Thomas 155Angermeyer, Philipp 31Anker, Kirsten 165, 202Anleu, Sharyn Roach 156, 239Anthony, Thalia 129Antoniou, Alexandros 29Antonsdottir, Hildur 166Appleton, Susan 16, 233Aptekar, Sofya 73Aquino, Theófilo de 98Arac, Katelyn 196Arango, Natalia Andrea Salinas 143Araujo, Fernanda 142Araujo, Juliana 118Araujo, Sylvia 38Arbel, Efrat 168Archer, Simon 61Ardente, Luciana Silveira 40, 165Areheart, Brad 209Arguelhes, Diego Werneck 43Armenta, Amada 10Armstrong, Andrea 95

246

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Armstrong, Lynzi 132, 241Arnett, Chaz 180, 200Arriagada, Isabel 178Arroyave Velásquez, Lina María 232Arruda, Alexandre 141Arruda, Daniel 92, 112Arslan, Melike 178Arstein-Kerslake, Anna 49Arthur, Ray 26Arthurs, Harry 57, 133Arup, Christopher 28, 47Arvidsson, Matilda 2Asad, Asad 45Ashar, Sameer 8Ashford, Chris 24Asimakopoulos, Ioannis 28Asperti, Maria Cecília de Araujo 65, 230Assy, Bethania 219Assy, Rabeea 118Atak, Idil 99, 134Atapattu, Sumudu 106, 223Atchison, Chris 34Atilgan, Eylem Umit 55Atim, Teddy 59, 120Atique, Asma 168Atuahene, Bernadette 27, 49, 125Atuguba, Raymond 116Atuk, Sumru 55Audrerie, Adeline 237Auger, Cheryl 242Augustine, Dallas 130, 202Austin, Louise 75Avant, Denzel 178Avila, Alberto Abad Suarez 109Avila, Fernando 163Aviram, Hadar 66, 94, 124Aydin, Murat Burak 176Aylwin, Nicole 81, 128Ayoub, Samy 242Azam, Rifat 126Azaola, Elena 163Azeem, Muhammad 191Azocar, Maria 178

BBaaij, Cornelis 109Baars, Grietje 46, 70Babler, Emma 223Bacak, Valerio 58Bacca, Paulo Ilich 23, 227Bachar, Gilat 40Bach, Wendy 2Bada, Xóchitl 161Badejogbin, Rebecca 127Badr, Helena 171Badrudin, Marie 5Baerwaldt, Neske 201

Bahrani, Ali 108Baker, Carrie 45Bakhshay, Shirin 54Bakiner, Onur 113, 242Balami, Lawan 124Balcha, Ejarra Batu 24Baldwin, Julie 137Bales, Katie 129Bali, Asli 49Balint, Jennifer 103Ballakrishnen, Swethaa S. 33, 56, 70, 100Ballard, Megan 38Ballestero, Andrea 142, 214, 216, 242Ball, Susan 212Ballucci, Dale 238Banakar, Reza 58Banchik, Anna 164Bandes, Susan 78, 195Banks, Erica 71Bannister, Sydney 192Baptista, Bárbara 201Barahona-Lopez, Kati 236Barak, Maya 58Barbosa, Claudia Maria 38, 187Barbot, Janine 131Bardelli, Tommaso 30Bargallie, Debbie 36Bari, M Ehteshamul 38Barkaskas, Patricia 135Barker, Kim 10, 177Barker, Vanessa 179, 184Barkway, Kelsi 62Barnes, Mario 125, 155, 199Barno, Matt 238Barragan, Melissa 130Barras, Amelie 173, 243Barrera, Sofía Judith Pérez 244Barrick, Andrea 78Barritt, Emily 200, 243Barros, Rafael 132Barrow, Amy 206Barrozo, Paulo 92Barry, Brian 13Barry, Lise 231Bartholomew, Mark 177Bartie, Susan 75Bartlett, Peter 19Bartl, Marija 90Bartow, Ann 27, 41, 61Bartram, Robin 79Barzilay, Arianne Renan 85, 169Barzun, Charles 92Basaran, Tugba 192Basbug, Gokce 167Bataglia, Murilo Borsio 80Batagol, Becky 9Bateman, David 121

247

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Batista, Caroline 28Batista, Livia Regina 120Bauder, Harald 134Baul, Tushi 147Baumgärtel, Moritz 139Bavery, Ashley Johnson 168Bawa, Sylvia 34Baxi, Pratiksha 21, 90, 110Bay, Odelia 187Beach, Lindsey 178Beaman, Lori G. 11Beard, Lisa 233Beaton, Ryan 205Beaudry, Jennifer L. 92Beçak, Rubens 18, 69Becher, Debbie 59, 79, 125Beck, Anat 122Beckett, Jason 219Beckett, Katherine 135, 178Bedford, Kate 21Bedner, Adriaan 81Beguerie, Delfina 11, 97Behn, Caleb 202Behn, Daniel 48Bejarano Martínez, Carolina 227Bejinariu, Alexa 6Belanger-Hardy, Louise 240Belinfanti, Tamara 148, 166Bell, Jeannine 48, 109Bell, Monica 30, 64, 125Bellucci, Lucia 154Belt, Rabia 11Ben-Arieh, Gayla 29Bendall, Charlotte 17Ben-David, Nitzana 43Bender-Baird, Kyla 24Bender, Steven 32, 38, 61Benhalim, Rabea 44Ben-Ishai, Stephanie 218Benish, Avishai 47Benjamin, Damyre 43Ben-Natan, Smadar 108, 209Benoit, Catherine 176Benoit, Cecilia 52Benson, Katie 181Benson, Michael 107Ben-Yehuda, Nachman 98Berda, Yael 72, 102Berger, Benjamin 95, 109, 122Berger, Bethany 59, 60Berinzon, Maya 145Berk, Christopher 234Berlin, Mark 138Berlo, Patrick van 201Bernal, Andrés Botero 91, 129Bernal, Diana 91Bernstein, Anya 175, 189

Bernstein, Steven 35Berrey, Ellen 34, 122, 199Berryessa, Colleen 39, 76Bessant, Claire 240Bessiere, Céline 42, 65Bhabha, Faisal 15Bharadwaj, Ashish 149Bhatia, Amar 97, 123, 187, 211Bhattacharya, Himika 21Bhatt, Kinnari 243Bhuyan, Rupaleem 52, 162Bianchi, Andria 39Biasi, Marco 210Biblarz, James 6Bice, Sara 210Bielefeld, Shelley 165Bietti, Elettra 50Biggs, Hazel 232Billings, Katie 29Birenbaum, Joanna 202Bisaillon, Laura 17, 45Bismark, Marie 77Bissler, Denise 58Blackbourn, Jessie 229Blackburn, Carole 89Black, Dillon 14Blackett, Adelle 66, 78, 95, 133, 171Black, Lynsey 234Blagg, Harry 129Blakely, Megan Rae 74Blanco, Eliana Patricia 212Blattner, Charlotte 103Blecher-Prigat, Ayelet 85Bleich, Erik 43Blevis, Laure 143Bliss, John 135, 177Bliss, Laura 223Bloch, Ofra 11Blocq, Daniel 160Blomley, Nicholas 129, 145, 160, 235Blum, Binyamin 64, 68Blume, John 195Boada, Max 152Bodamer, Elizabeth (Ferrufino) 221Bodineau, Sylvie 123Boer, Lianne 182Bogdanova, Elena 32Bogliolo, Luis Paulo 243Bogoch, Bryna 29, 76Bogosavljevic, Katarina 124Boirin, Zoé 23Boisselle, Andrée 97Boittin, Margaret 12Bolonha, Carlos 216Bonetto, Diego 107Boni-Saenz, Alexander 77, 173, 241Bonizzato, Luigi 165

248

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Bonnitcha, Jonathan 64, 175, 205Book, Leslie 183Booth, Brad 39Bordagaray, Aldana Romano 68Borgida, Eugene 96Borne, Alexander 223Bornstein, Brian 54Bornstein, Stephanie 83, 175, 208Bos, Kees van den 163Botello-Samson, Darren 221Bottomley, Anne 79Boucai, Michael 78, 132, 222, 231Boudreault, Patrick 241Boudreau, Michael 79Boukli, Avi 131, 164Bouskila, Bettina 50Boustead, Anne 123Boutcher, Steven 218Bouthinon-Dumas, Hugues 221Boutros, Magda 244Bovio, Francis 26Bowen, Raven 34, 164Bower, Erica 113Bowers, Joshua 113Bowie, Nikolas 144Bowman, Megan 200Boyd, Christopher 145Boyd, Susan 169Boyle, Alysoun 9Brabazon, Honor 235Braconnier, Ana Isabel 137Bradley, Caroline 196Bradley, Christopher 1Bradshaw, Julia 86Brady, Dillon 152Brammer, Alison 55Branco, Eliana Patrícia 239Brangan, Louise 234Braun, Aaron 168Brayboy, Bryan 167Brayne, Sarah 136, 183Breen, Daniel 94Breger, Melissa 66, 188Bregvadze, Lasha 3Brennan, Elizabeth 174Brennan-Marquez, Kiel 119Brenner, Hannah 193Brents, Barb 204Brière-Godbout, Léa 11Briggs, Jacqueline 92, 190Brigham, John 212Brito, Micael da Costa 221Brito, Tonya 84Brito, Wagner 6Brock, Deborah 52Brodeala, Elena 109, 244Brookman-Byrne, Max 228

Brooks, Eleanor 193Brooks, Kim 3, 62Brooks, Robert 223Brophy, Susan 235Broring, Herman 92Brown, Beatriz 215Brown, Kevin 117Brown, Michelle 51, 130Brown, Tenille 77Bruce, Benjamin 161Bruch, Elizabeth 80Bruckert, Chris 52, 106, 204Bruckner, Matthew 218Brudney, James 20Bruncevic, Merima 2Brunnegger, Sandra 89Bryan, Bradley 139Bryans, John 52Bryan, Timothy 212Brydolf-Horwitz, Rachel 228Bryson, Anna 170, 171Buchanan, Neil 126, 152Buchanan, Ruth 21, 122Buchan, Russell 197Buchely, Lina 63, 130Buchter, Lisa 122Budoo, Ashwanee 222Bugari, Bojan 77Buhler, Sarah 128Bui, Thiem Hai 104Bulkan, Janette 41Bumiller, Kristin 151Bunting, Annie 59, 123, 171Buntman, Fran 195Burchard, Christoph 95Burgess, Susan 148Burke, Kevin 44, 56Burke, Nora Butler 189Burnett, Tamera 206Burns, Marcelle 135Burrell, Robert 158Burtonshaw-Gunn, Edward 42Buss, Doris 21Bustacara, Alejandra Molano 104Bustamante, Nicholas 167Bustamante, Thomas 198Butrymowicz, Magdalena 161Butterly, Lauren 97Byrne, Gavin 150

CCabatingan, Lee 200Cabezas, Montano 192Cahill-Ripley, Amanda 179Cahn, Edgar 238Caicedo, Yenny Andrea Celemin 52, 141Calabria, Carina 159

249

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Calboli, Irene 126Caldas, Caroline 230Caldwell, Beth 150Callander, Denton 132Calvo, Janet 162Cameron, Hilary Evans 36Camilo Sanchez, Nelson 39Campbell, Heather 39Campbell, Kevin 6, 224Campbell, Michael 178Camp, Jordan 130Canales, Rodrigo 60Canefe, Nergis 38Cantor, Guillermo 127Cao, Mianzhi Francis 64Capelli, Irene 36Capers, Bennett 64Caplan, Aaron 31Caplan, Robyn 119Carbone, June 16Cardin, Valéria Silva Galdino 17, 139Carlson, Kirsten 60Carmalt, Jean 157, 173Carneiro, Cynthia 73Carneiro, Leandro 165Carnevali, Davide 220Caron, Cathleen 20Carpenter, Anna 117, 150Carpiano, Richard 15Carrai, Maria Adele 186Carr, Helen 79, 199Carrigan, Christopher 116, 180Carrigan, Michelle 38Carr, Nicola 164Carroll, Jenny 22Carroll, Maureen 16Carter, Elisabeth 220Carter, Evelyn 194Case, Mary Anne 61, 233Caserta, Salvatore 180, 230Casey, Lauren 204Cashore, Benjamin 35Castan, Melissa 25Castellano, Ursula 89, 191Castillo, Guillermo 111Castillo, Rocío 111Castro, Douglas de 129Castro, Maria Victoria 130Cavanagh, Mary 150Cavanaugh, Kathleen 209Cayon-De las Cuevas, Joaquin 213Cebulak, Pola 180Cellini, Amanda 62Ceric, Irina 37, 211César, Vanele 201Cesetti, Carolina 142Cespedes, Lina Maria 203

Cetinkaya, Hasret 45Chacon, Jennifer 45Chadderton, Paula 28, 224Chadwick, Anna 107Chahaira, Bruno Valverde 100, 139Chaisson, Rebecca A. 40, 145Chamblis, Elizabeth 117Champagne, Holly 220Chandra, Rajshree 158Chang, Wen Chen 155Chan, Kay-Wah 12, 53, 54, 110, 141Chapdelaine, Pascale 149Charles, Guy 193Chasin, Ana Carolina 230Chatterjee, Aloke 241Chaturvedi, Ruchi 90Chatzopoulou, Sevasti 224Chavis, Kami 95, 155Chen, Chi-Shing 151Chen, Christopher 5Chen, Chun-Yaun 12Chen, Gang 210Cheng, Kevin 195Chen, Ling 120Chen, Lung-Sheng 177Chen, Ming 45, 125Chen, Po Liang 70Chen, Shun-Ling 29Chen, Si-Yu 215Chen, Yun-Ru 133Cherrington, Kathleen 242Chesnut, Kelsie 130Cheung, Alvin 138Chiam, Madelaine 197Chiao, Vincent 113Chiarello, Liz 59, 94, 174, 190Chia, Wen-Yu 133Chien, Shih Chun 122Chinchay, Ady 239Chin, Gabriel 105Chin, Jeremiah 167Chin, Mong-Hwa 26Chitarrini, Fernando 128Chizik, Natali 69Chng, Nai Rui 35Cho, Chul 98Cho, Lily 212Chon, Margaret 61Chovaz, Cathy 241Chowdhory, Nasreen 166Christensen, C.D. 164Christiani, Theresia Anita 67Christians, Allison 126Chua, Lynette 186Chuma-umeh, Ngozi 56, 146Churgin, Michael J 26Cichowski, Rachel 90, 223

250

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Cifuentes, Juan Esteban Sanchez 240Cimini, Christine 8Citron, Danielle 136Clair, Matthew 22Clamen, Jenn 50Clark, Ann Marie 194Clark, Bryan 205Claro, Carolina 44Claus, Waldemar 163Claypool, Vicki 7Clayton-Helm, Lauren 55Clay-Warner, Jody 211Clements, Richard 163Cleve, Nicole Gonzalez Van 164Clough, Beverley 231Clow, Kimberley 122Coates, Linda 213Cobb, Neil 58Cochran, Patricia 207Cofre, Leonardo 121Cogan, Dominic de 152Cohen, Edward 64, 95Cohen, Jeffery 223Cohn, Ellen 76Coldsmith, Jeremiah 153Coleman, Brooke 233Collins, Paul 154, 173Comiskey, Marie 110Compton, Caroline 191Cong, Wanshu 188Conner, Emma 130Connerton, Ian 181Conrad, Geoffrey 76Conti, Joseph 98, 217, 235Cooper, Jessica 174Corbin, Caroline Mala 153, 211Corcodel, Veronica 145Corcos, Christine 19Corda, Alessandro 202, 230Cornelius, Eduardo 153Cornes, Richard 13, 76, 219, 220Corobow, Arielle 157Corrada, Roberto 62Corrigan, Rose 191Cortavarria, Carla 129Cortes-Nieto, Johanna del Pilar 63Costa, Andrew 74Costa, Arthur 118Costa, Susana Henriques da 230Cote-Boucher, Karine 170Coutin, Susan Bibler 84, 150, 175Coutts, Stephen 4Cowan, David 79Cownie, Fiona 176Craig, Carys 85, 149Cramer, Renee 133, 148, 173Crandall, Erin 76

Craven, Richard 100Crawford, Bridget 41, 61, 105Crawford, Nicole M 149Creutzfeldt, Naomi 63Crouch, Melissa 81Crouc, Melissa 80Crout, Leigha 104Crowder, Patience 114Crowhurst, Isabel 21Cruz Balbuena, Roberto Leopoldo 40Cruz, Christine Zuni 135Cruz, David 98Cubukcu, Ayca 197Culbert, Jennifer 170Cummings, Andre 34Cummings, Scott 8Cunha, Alexandre Dos Santos 215Cunliffe, Emma 27Curran, Deborah 42Curran, F. Chris 16Currie, Albert 150

DDabby, Dia 11Dadush, Sarah 148, 166Dailey, Anne 199Dale, John 243Dalpé, Vincent 101Daly, Samuel Fury Childs 9Dam, Shubhankar 69Danchin, Peter 153Darbyshire, Penny 47Darian-Smith, Eve 169, 200, 217Dasgupta, Simanti 147Dauber, Michele 211Daudelin, Jean 18, 192Davidovitch, Nadav 15David, Roman 36Davies, Billie 90Davila, Maria 203Davis, Martha 139Davis, Sara 108Davis, Seth 60Davis, Tessa 182, 192Davola, Antonio 62Dawe, Meghan 218Dawood, Yasmin 136Dawson, Myrna 38, 55Dawuni, Josephine 34, 41, 116, 127, 222Dayi, Ayse 36Dean, Amber 99Dean, Steven 166Decat, Thiago Lopes 165Deckha, Maneesha 103Dederke, Julian 206Deer, Sarah 135, 227DeFalco, Randle 101

251

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Deffains, Bruno 178Degenshein, Anya 50De Giorgi, Alessandro 130De Girolamo, Debbie 12Dehaghani, Roxanna 220Dehaibi, Laura 203Dehm, Julia 158, 238Dehm, Sara 162Deibert, Ronald 136Dej, Erin 19Dekker, Harrison 28Dekkers, Tim 185Delaney, David 145, 192, 207, 235Delgado, Ana Paula Teixeira 73Delius, Sarah 120Demaske, Chris 216DeMenno, Mercy 28Dempster, Lauren 138Dennie, Martine 15Deo, Meera 135, 218Deppen III, Paul 25Deredge, Faith 52Derpic, Jorge 242Desai, Deval 81Dew, Spencer 169Dhaliwal, Manpreet 149Dhamija, Chitralekha 115Dhawan, Sachin 121Dhillon, Manpreet 147Diamond, Shari 68, 96Dias-Abey, Manoj 20, 133Dias, Maria Tereza Fonseca 42, 165Dias, Vitor Martins 218Dillon, James 156Dingwall, Robert 181Ding, Wenwen 134Dinis, Marisa 121Dinner, Deborah 105, 128, 151Dinovitzer, Ronit 111, 218Dioso-Villa, Rachel 27Doan, Alesha 227Dobson, Jillian 102Dodge, Alexa 18, 152Dodier, Nicolas 131Dogbevi, Koffi 169Dogot, Delphine 30Doll, Agnieszka 17Dolliver, Matthew 92Donnelly, Ellen 67Dool, Annemieke van den 116, 210Doolin, Katherine 108Doorey, David 133Doran, Peter 122Dorfman, Doron 226Dorji, Nima 38Doron, Israel (Issi) 85Douglas, Stacy 18, 46

Doutaghi, Helyeh 40Dowling, Rhiannon 184Dow, Steven 238Drake, Karen 93, 187Dreier, Sarah 216Drew, Catriona 197Driesen, David 167Drumbl, Mark 65, 100Drumbl, Michelle Lyon 183Drwal, Anna 147D'Souza, Radha 211Duarte, Evandro 215Duarte, Fernanda 5, 18, 53, 69, 117, 118, 186, 216,

229Dubal, Veena 176, 185, 208Dudas, Jeffrey 148Duffy, Aoife 172Duffy, Maureen 15Dufour-Poirier, Melanie 133Dugard, Jackie 150Duhamel, Matt 151Dukes, Ruth 210Dumenu, Yvonne Claire 244Du, Ming 134, 185Duncan, Alfred 152Dunn, Holly 160Dunn, Molly 240Dunoff, Jeffrey 48Duran, Robert 48Durisin, Elya M 107, 189Durkee, Melissa (MJ) 96, 217Durlak, Paul 226Durokifa, Anuoluwapo 116, 179Duschinski, Haley 72Dwyer, James 176Dwyer, Patrick 236Dyani-Mhango, Ntombizozuko 4Dylag, Matthew 81Dymock, Alex 146, 164Dyzenhaus, David 213Dzmitryieva, Aryna 232

EEagly, Ingrid 10, 45Easton, Catherine 62Eberlein, Burkard 14Ebisike, Norbert 236Ebolo, Eric Elong 145Eckhouse, Laurel 238Edelman, Lauren 199Edelman, Meredith 223Effron, Robin 79Eggers, Jane 40, 52, 145Ehrlich, Shoshanna 227Eichler, Jessika 23Eichner, Maxine 85Eisen, Jessica 103

252

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Ela, Nate 27Elander, Maria 7El-Enany, Nadine 72Elias, Renata 106Elliot, Peter 129Ellis, Atiba 79Ellis, Jaye 200Elsrud, Torun 97Emilianides, Achilles 155Emmons, Cassandra 189Engel, Annegret 80Engel, David 109, 175Engleby, Emma 26Engle, Jill 85Engle, Karen 144Enman-Beech, John 73Epp, Charles 10, 199, 224Erakat, Noura 102, 113Erdman, Joanna 143Erentzen, Caroline 122, 213Erie, Matthew 185Erler, Helen 19Erman, Sam 160Ertma, Martha 100Ertman, Martha 233Escobar, Laura Gutierrez 107Escobar, Samuel 204Escorihuela, Alejandro Lorite 140Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew 154Eslava, Luis 22, 40, 63, 71, 145Estévez, Ariadna 111Estlund, Cynthia 185Estrada Perez, Cesar 29Eule, Tobias 108Eum, Sun-Pil 190Evans, Catherine 68, 92Ewelukwa, Uche 121Eyal-Cohen, Mirit 3, 62

FFadel, Mohammad 153, 228Fagan, Jeffrey 125Fahey, Elaine 145Fairclough, Samantha 16Fakhri, Michael 158Falcão, Matheus 89Fang, Yan 141Fan, Hsiu-Yu 143Faraday, Fay 8Farber, Hillary 194Farbman, Dan 144Farid, Cynthia 230Farnum, Katlyn 163Farranha, Ana Claudia 215Farrell, Anne-Maree 75Farrell-Bryan, Dylan 201Farrow, Trevor 81

Fatima, Mst Kanij 116Faulkner, Elizabeth 32Faulkner, Ellen 131Feddersen, Mayra 73Feibelman, Adam 232Feigenson, Neal 90, 155Feinberg, Jessica 231Feltes, Emma 57Fentiman, Linda 66Ferdinandi, Marta Beatriz Tanaka 100, 139Feres, Marcos Vinicio Chein 179Ferguson, Parker 43Ferraço, André 9Ferrando, Tomaso 91, 107, 243Ferreira, Carolina Cutrupi 122Ferreyra, Gabriel 217Ferrito, Bárbara 42Field, Heather 3, 148Field, Rachael 9Field, Stewart 147Fiel, Sue 78Figueiredo, Miguel de 28Filho, Edson Guarido 187, 240Filho, Rafael Mario Iorio 3, 37, 53, 117, 154, 186, 229Fine, Adam 181Fine, Janice 82Fineman, Jonathan 151Fineman, Martha Albertson 114, 151Fingergut, Rafael Fernandez 221Fink, Jared 103Fiorella, Giancarlo 7Fischer, Susanna 61Fischl, Richard Michael 106Fisher, Benjamin W. 16Fisher, Shauna 218Fisk, Catherine 62, 176Fitz, Nicholas 15Flake, Dallan 62Fleischhauer, Claudia 118Fleming, Anne 124Fleury-Steiner, Benjamin 183Flood, Colleen 240Flores, Alvaro Cordova 89Flores, Janeth Hernandez 182Flores, Jerry 236Flores, Luis 237Flynn, Alexandra 97, 221Fogel, Curtis 19, 224Fogel, Jeremy 44, 56Fogg, Keith 183Fonseca, Gabriel Ferreira da 159Font-Guzman, Jacqueline 153Foohey, Pamela 32, 172, 232Foote, Daniel H. 110, 141, 223Forcese, Craig 229Ford, Cristie 26, 118, 236Ford, Laura R. 215

253

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Forouzan, Kimya 240Fortes, Pedro 75, 91, 178, 197, 225, 231Fortin, Véronique 175Fortson, Ryan 53Foster, Laura 214Fourie, Andria Naudé 165Fovargue, Sara 232Fox, Bailey 64Fox, Judith 32Fox, Matthew 92Frade, Catarina 32Frampton, Thomas 105Francis, Leslie 226, 231Fraser, Véronique 229Frayn, Nicholas 220Frederiksen, Soren 19Fredette, Jennifer 148, 176Fredriksson, Tea 204Freeman, Andrea 117, 164Freeman, Lisa 145, 207, 235Freitas, Carolina 171Frezzo, Mark 243Friedman, Lawrence 111Fritz-Mauer, Matthew 93Froc, Kerri 105Fu, Bo-Shone 222Fudge, Judy 144, 171Fuentes-Rowher, Luis 193Fu, Hualing 138Fukui, Kota 142Fukurai, Hiroshi 54, 70, 234Fullin, Carmen 215

GGabbay, Daniela 230Gadowska, Kaja 154Gakuin, Aoyama 54, 234Galanter, Marc 147Gallaghe, Janice 160Gallagher, Janice 160, 244Gallagher, William 126, 148, 158, 177, 214Gallant, Chanelle 189Gallen, James 171Galloway, Kate 25, 97Gamage, David 205Gander, Lois 238Ganne, Yannick 25Gan-Or, Nofar Yakovi 143Ganty, Sarah 61Gao, Henry 235Garcia, Laura 77Garcia Miron, Rolando 6, 39, 226Garden, Charlotte 17, 62, 94Gardner, James 193Garlic, Nicole Lemire 94Garriott, William 132Garth, Bryant 56, 90, 218

Garza, Azenett 131Garzon, Joaquin 227Gascon, Luis Daniel 48Gaucher, Megan 36Gava, Roy 196Gebru, Aman 208Gee, Seran 45Germain, Claire 110Gevers, Christoper 183Ghadery, Farnush 244Ghebremusse, Sara 91Ghimire, Kanksha Mahadevia 167Ghosh, Shrimoyee 90Ghosh, Shubha 126, 148, 158, 177Gianella, Camila 30Giannattasio, Arthur Roberto Capella 221Gibson, Elaine 240Gibson-Light, Michael 12Giffin, Carly 194Gilber, Michael 94Gilden, Andrew 173Gill, Chris 223Gillis, Rory 104Gill, Ralph 175Gilmore, Sunneva 171Gilmour, Joan 239Giorgi, Alessandro De 179Girolamo, Debbie De 237Glasbeek, Amanda 123, 212Glass, Maeve 92Gleeson, Shannon 10, 45, 161, 199Gleixner, Micheline 1Glennon, Theresa 119Glogower, Ari 104Glover, Kate 15Glover-Thomas, Nicola 109, 193Gobbo, Daniel Del 18Godfrey, David 78Godoi, Rafael 160Godsoe, Cynthia 222Godwin, Samantha 188Goés, Lara 2, 69Goff, Isabel Boni-Le 77Goh, U. Shen 158Goldbach, Toby 20, 44, 56Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan 168Goldenfein, Jake 84, 159Goldschmidt, Jona 207Golub, Mark 57Gome, Paulo Afonso Ritter 240Gomes, Pedro Bourgeois 67Gomez, Laura 125Gomez, Maria Mercedes 204Gomez-Pinilla, Pablo 227Gómez-Ramírez, Oralia 107Gonçalves, Tamara Amoroso 20Gongora, Catalina Maria Gutierrez 240

254

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Gongora-Mera, Manuel 24Gonzalez, Enrique 151Gonzalez, Gabriela 130Gonzalez, Yanilda 238Goodale, Mark 23Gooding, Piers 49Goodman, Ellen 119Goodwin, Michele 208, 236Goodwin, Morag 244Goold, Imogen 244Goo, Say 5Gordon-Bouvier, Ellen 6Gordon, Geoff 182Gouldi, Lauryn 115Gould, Jonathan 133, 220Gourevitch, Alex 50Graaf, Cathérine Van de 139Graaf, Kars De 92Graber, Christoph B. 150Graber, Mark 66, 79Grace, Anita 38Grady, Kate 53, 197Graham, Laura 34Granot, Yael 60Grasten, Maj 71, 184Green, Alex 219Greenberg, David 131Greenberg, Jessica 189Green, Christopher 79Green, David 68Greene, Catherine 7Greenlee, Mel 16Greenman, Kathryn 243Green, Michael 62Greenstein, Richard 183Green, Tristin 83Greer, Scott 193Greiner, D. James 39Grewal, Andy 192Grey, Rohan 40Griffiths, Danielle 194Gripp, Camila 60Grisinger, Joanna 93Groggel, Anne 18, 166Grootelaar, Hilke 2, 163Grosdidier, Jean 75Gross, Aeyal 46, 70Grossi, Viviane Dallasta Del 186Grosso, Catherine 22, 96Groves, Matthew 63Gruber, Aya 105Grunwald, Ben 125Guarneros-Sánchez, Perla 61Gueiros, Daniele Gabrich 216, 244Guenther, Lisa 130Gugliuzza, Paul 177Guimaraes, Tomas Aquino 68

Gumboh, Esther 30Gundhus, Helene 170Gunnarsson, Åsa 154Gunneflo, Markus 2, 113, 159, 184Gurnham, David 38Guruswamy, Menaka 136Gustafson, Kaaryn 66, 95Gutierrez Escobar, Laura 239Gutierrez, Paul 140Guyon, Stéphanie 176Guzik, Keith 183, 214Guzman-Rodriguez, Diana 198Győry, Csaba 196

HHaak, Debra 18Haan, Sarah 46Hacker, Daphna 54, 169, 230Hackett, Ciara 181Hafetz, Jonathan 67Hafiz, Hiba 210Haile, Hanna 96Haines, Fiona 35, 119, 167, 210Hajjar, Lisa 102, 115, 228Halis, Denis De Castro 18, 53, 117, 154, 171, 190Hallett, Miranda 31, 45, 99Halliday, Terence 13, 185, 217Hall, Margaret 231Hall, Melinda Gann 42Haltom, William 222Halushka, John 225Hamer, David 27Hamill, Sarah 79Hamilton, Frances 78Hamilton, Jonnette Watson 202Hamilton, Melissa 94, 225Ham, Julie 99, 225Hamlin, Rebecca 7, 8, 38, 84, 168Hammer, Gail 129Hammerslev, Ole 57Hammoudi, Ali 25Hampson, Sarah 233Hamzić, Vanja 70Hanan, Eve 48Handl, Melisa 217Handmaker, Jeff 31, 160Haney, Craig 54Hanna, Mark 37Han, Sang Hoon 92Hansen, Tobin 150Hanson, Anna 81Han, Sora 51, 199Hans, Valerie 46, 47, 54, 68, 133Harbon, Claris 97Harding, Rosie 231Harfuch, Andrés 68Hargreaves, Stuart 53

255

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Harinam, Vincent 9Harmon, Michele 86Harmon, Talia 105Harrington, Christine 11Harrington, John 21, 109, 193Harris, Angela 103, 180, 208Harrison, Teddy 93Hart, Danielle 176Hartlev, Mette 213Hartmann, Ivar A. 43Hartog, Hendrik 59Hasday, Jill 82Hasegawa, Kiyoshi 126Hastie, Bethany 57, 82Hatano, Ayako 234Hatcher, Laura 221Hatcher, Renee 114Hatherall, Louise 208Hattum, Bonne van 196, 210Haupt, Claudia 119, 183Havelkova, Barbara 209Havinga, Tetty 224Hayward, Dana 107Healy, Deirdre 107Healy, Jennifer 209Heatherton, Christina 130Heenan, Anna 17Hefti, Angela 173Heimer, Carol 74Hein, Michael 225Heirwegh, Tess 139Heiss, Claudia 38Hellum, Anne 41Heminway, Joan 34, 60, 69, 166Henderson, Andrew 219Henderson, Sa'ke'j 202Hendley, Kathryn 31, 101Hendry, Jen 114Hen, Hooi May 152Henrikson, Ann-Sofie 1Hentschel, Christine 133, 134Herder, Matthew 228Herklotz, Tanja 121Hersant, Jeanne 178Hertogh, Marc 63, 109Hert, Paul De 85Hervey, Tamara 213Heuer, Jan-Ocko 172Heuser, Helene 134Heyer, Katharina 19, 226Heyl, Charlotte 226Hick, Angela 194Higashikawa, Koji 224Higuita, Gustavo 206Hill, Claire 107Hinton, Alexander 156Hirata, Ayako 80

Hirschl, Ran 180Hirsch, Nicole 37Hirsch, Susan 242Hjelm, Ann-Christine Petersson 55Hodes, Caroline 105Hodgson, Jackie 147Hoekstra, Johanna 33Hoeland, Armin 82Hoffmann, Elizabeth 82Hoffmann, Florian 205, 219Hofisi, David 241Hogemann, Edna Raquel 3, 53, 72, 140Hogg, Erin 169Holloway, Colin 96, 163Holmes, Malcolm 48Hong, Emily 209Hood, Katherine 28Hoops, Bjoern 27Hoppe, Trevor 108, 191Hornqvist, Magnus 179, 195Hounslow, Wanda 156Hountohotegbè, Sèdjro 219Houston, Steiner 181Housto, Steiner 181Howar, Grace 227Howell, Babe 64Hritz, Amelia 195Hrom, Anna Johns 177Hsin, Amy 73Hsu, Ching-Fang 58Huang, Wallace 104Hudson, Ben 29, 36Hudson, Graham 134Huff, Jamie 233Hughes, David 98Hughes, Rachel 7Hughett, Amanda 13Huising, Ruthanne 35, 167Huizenga, Daniel 96Huneeus, Alexandra 47, 180Hungler, Sara 17Hunter, Alexandra 48Hunter, Jill 124, 172Huntington, Clare 78, 119Hunt, Jennifer 96Huq, Aziz 136Hurst, William 81Hurt, Christine 61Huskey, Kristine 137Hussain, Salman 111Hussein, Hadeel Abu 207Hutter, Bridget 35Hu, Xiaoqian 79Hwang, Cathy 69Hyatt, Jordan 26

I

256

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Iafolla, Vanessa 99Iften, Adelina 39Ige, Rhoda Karibi-Whyte 128Ihmoud, Sarah 113Ii, Takayuki 141Ijeoma, Edwin 116Ikdahl, Ingunn 41Ike, Chianaraekpere 222Ikpo, David Nnanna C 222Imam-Tamim 115, 222Imbert, Louis 86Imoukhuede, Areto 188Infanti, Anthony 41, 104Ingram, Maria 140Ingram, Scott 93Ini, Florencia 68Inniss, Lolita Buckner 66Isaac, David 69Isakson, Ryan 107Islam, Nabila 86Israë, Liora 109Israël, Liora 37Ivkovich, Sanja Kutnjak 47, 92

JJacarandá, Rodolfo 3Jackson, Darrell 117, 149Jackson, Jason 237Jacobs, Elizabeth 45Jacobs, Laverne 241Jacobs, Lesley 81, 117Jacobs, Melanie 233Jacobson, Brynna 200Jain, Eisha 200Jaksic, Milena 32Jakube, April 117Jallad, Zeina 209James, Mark 140Janger, Edward 32Jarman, Holly 174Jarvis, Heather 50Jauregui, Beatrice 147Jenkins, Austin 17Jensen, Sarah 19Jerca, Ana-Maria 6Jerónimo, Patrícia 153Jiang, Jiaying 183Jiang, Jue 12Jimenez, Alisha Caldwell 163, 179Jimenez, Dalie 39, 232Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar 68, 110Jodoin, Sebastien 157Joe, Irene 180, 200Joffe, Lisa Fishbayn 49Johnson, Anna 43Johnson, Brendyn 58Johnson, Kristin 46

Johnson, Steve 41Johnson, Thea 180, 199Johnston, Steven 108Jolly, Richard 22Jones, Angela 76Jones, Carwyn 74Jones, Chantal 83Jones, Elizabeth 180, 200Jones, Imogen 59Jones, Justin 195Jones, Philip 192Joo, Thomas 5, 48, 125Jordanoska, Aleksandra 196Joslin, Courtney 210Jower, Kay 100Juan, Pearlita 162Judge, Elizabeth 77Judge, Kathryn 236Judge, Melanie 83Jungmann, Nadja 39Jung, Young 43, 190, 201Junior, Ruy Walter 103Jurasz, Olga 10, 194Juric, Tanja 42Justino, Patricy 186Juzaszek, Maciej 221

KKaasa, Suzanne 86Kabaseke, Charlotte 116Kabira, Nkatha 4Kage, Rieko 53, 122Kahn, Jonathan 204Kahn, Walker 86Kahraman, Filiz 203Kaisary, Philip 235Kaiser, Joshua 204Kalantry, Sital 128, 178, 231Kalbfeld, Jessica 131Kalem, Seda 58Kalhan, Anil 8Kalil, Renan Bernardi 182Kalir, Barak 128Kalm, Gustav 149Kalpouzo, Ioannis 53Kalpouzos, Ioannis 2, 30, 53Kalvesmak, Andrea 19Kalvesmaki, Andrea 139Kamau, Esther 166Kampourakis, Ioannis 224Kane, Aina Aune 41Kaneko, Hironao 237Kang, Michael 193Kapardis, Elena 154Kapczynski, Amy 208Karaian, Lara 152Karako-Eyal, Nili 15

257

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Karekwaivanane, George 24Karimi, Abbas 208Karimi, Aryan 69Karimi, Sahar 208Karton, Joshua 141Kastne, Philipp 163Katshunga, Jen 124Katz, Elizabeth 144Katz, Jasper 24Katz, Sarah 173Kaufman, Zachary 191Kaur, Andjela 11, 94Kawar, Leila 162, 243Kaye, Julie 99Kazarian, Melinee 220Keay, Andrew 112Keck, Thomas M 43, 188Kedar, Alexandre (Sandy) 102, 192, 207, 221, 235Keeling, Amanda 231Keenan, Sarah 170Kehinde, Izevbuwa 120Kehoe, Helen 7Kelley, Moult 55, 104Kelley, Thomas 45Kelly, Alicia 54, 233Kelly, Catherine 158, 244Kelly, Gerard 120Kelly, Lisa 128, 197Kelly-Louw, Michelle 232Kendall, Chris 176Kendall, Sara 7, 86Kennedy, Sheila 209Kent, C. Adèle 44, 56Kenyon, Andrew 64Keren, Hila 151, 156Keren-Pa, Tsachi 50Keren-Paz, Tsachi 10Kerrison, Erin 26, 228Kerr, Lisa 197Kessler, Laura 119Keydar, Renana 1Ke, Zhenxing 234Khan, Adil Hasan 184Khandare, Lalit 117Khan, Ummni 18, 75Khan, Yasmin 38Khdjavi, LIly 131Kherbouche, Safia 242Khoday, Amar 15, 57Khondker, Rokhsana 52Khorakiwala, Rahela 111Kiconco, Allen 124Kienapple, Matt 209Kilborn, Jason 32Killean, Rachel 137Kilty, Jennifer 124Kilwein, John 78

Kim, Jaeeun 8Kim, Jae Yeon 126Kimport, Katrina 113Kim, Sung Yup 93Kim, Suzanne 151, 169, 211Kim, Young Ran (Christine) 60, 205King, Nancy 26Kingsbury, Benedict 22, 43, 205, 235Kinney, Edith 66, 130, 169Kinyanjui, Sarah 13, 127Kirchoff, Alisha 110Kirk, Gabriela 68Kirkham, Richard 63Kirkland, Anna 14, 143, 214Kirkup, Kyle 78Kirton-Darling, Ed 79Kirwan, Samuel 172, 238Kitagawa, Risa 198Kiyani, Asad 99Klaaren, Jonathan 4, 24, 116Klajn, Maryla 201Klassen, Amy 123Kleeger, Jeff 80Klein, Alana 197Kleinstuber, Ross 153Kleintop, Amanda 124Klotz, Audie 84, 145Kluegel, Alan 58Klug, Heinz 101, 136, 144, 216, 241Kluttz, Daniel 49Knake, Renee 193Kochenov, Dimitry 77Kocher, Austin 58Kodar, Freya 207, 240Koehler, Johann 234Koga, Masayoshi 134Koga, Yukiko 190Kohler-Olsen, Julia 41Koh, Moon-Hyun 172Kohn, Laurie 222Kohn, Nina 1, 85Kohonen, Liisa 217Kolawole, Omowamiwa 89Kolia, Zahir 161Kolsky, Elizabeth 90Koncewicz, Tomasz 77Kondakov, Alexander 131, 146Konnoth, Craig 236Kontos, Pia 241Konuk, Deniz Pınar 30Konzen, Lucas 52Korgan, Kate Hausbeck 76Korhani, Amìr 77Kosar, David 48Kosbie, Jeff 98Koshan, Jennifer 105, 202Kotiswaran, Prabha 13

258

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Koula, Aikaterini Christina 181Koulen, Sarah-Jane 71, 102Koulish, Robert 31Koutouk, Konstantia 106Kovalev, Nikolai 47, 110Kovera, Margaret 22Kowalsky, Andrij 25Koyanagi, Shunichiro 172Kramer, Amanda 137Kras, Kimberly 68, 151, 225Kraut, Julia Rose 225Krell, Reid 207Krippner, Greta 237Krishnan, Jayanth 31, 166, 234Kritzer, Herbert 81, 207, 239Krueger, James 96Krüsi, Andrea 189Kuan, Hsiaowei 132Kuberska, Karolina 143Kukura, Elizabeth 2Kullmann, Miriam 175Kumar, Shailesh 111Kupchik, Aaron 16Kurisu, Sheri-Lynn 151, 157Kusumoto, Toshiyuki 182Kwak, Laura 97Kwon, Jihyun 207Kyle, Brett 40

LLabman, Shauna 57Lageson, Sarah 58, 164Laguardia, Francesca 99Lahey, Kathleen 7Lai, Poland 80Lalor, Kay 84Lam, Anita 212Lamarche, Lucie 78Lambert, Priscilla 69Lamchek, Jayson 243Lam, Elene 189Landolt, Patricia 134Lane, Frederick 27Langen, Maaike de 63Langer, Maximo 51Langer, Rosanna 76Langevin, Louise 105Langford, Malcolm 40, 48, 154, 183Laniyonu, Ayobami 238Laqueur, Hannah 131Lara-Millan, Armando 174, 228Larre, Tamara 62Larsen, Jessica 71Lash, Kurt 79Latorre, Sergio 242Latty, Stephanie 72Laufer-Ukeles, Pamela 73

Laugerud, Solveig 58Lau, Holning 79Lautenschlager, Rachel 131Lavarone-Turcotte, Anne 182Laverick, Craig 191Lave, Tamara 96Law, David 132Law, David S 154, 155Lawless, Robert 218, 232Lawrence, Faraasa 236Lawrence, Michelle 26Lawson, Carol 110Lawther, Cheryl 137Law, Tuulia 204, 241Layard, Antonia 235Lazare, Jodi 119Leachman, Gwendolyn 177Leckey, Robert 99Leclerc, Chloé 224Lecoq, Garrett 238Lee, Angela 20, 103Lee, Jack Jin Gary 25Lee, John 178Lee, Joo-Young 166Lee, Li-Ju 55Leering, Michele 128, 150Leerkes, Arjen 108, 128Lee, Sohoon 17Lee, Stephen 185Leflar, Rob 12, 54Leggett, ason 29Lehoucq, Emilio 186Leino-Sandberg, Päivi 90Leme, Ana Carolina Reis Paes 229Leme, Gabriel Luís Massutti de Toledo 53Lemke, Monika 132Len, Lyn Tjon Soei 109Léobal, Clémence 176Leonard, Katelyn 163Leon, Chrysanthi 169Leslie, Camilo 124Leung, Janny 151Leunissen, Joost 195Leuven, KU 47Levin, Benjamin 30, 50, 105Levine, Kate 30Levine, Kay 26Levi, Ron 51, 179Levy, Katja 138Lewis, Browne 158Lewis, Demar F. 195Lewis, Richard 207Leyton-Brown, Ken 176Liang, Chih-Ming 32Liang, Hung-Meng 70Licata, Angela 149Li, Darryl 102, 115

259

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Lieberwitz, Risa 17, 94Liebman, Benjamin 101Lieb, Susan Block 1, 32, 217Lie, Runar 48Liew, Jamie 57Light, Matthew 209Li, Ji 185Lima, Jairo 18, 120Lima, Joao Guilherme Casagrande Martinelli 44Lima, Raquel 142Lima, Sarah Dayanna 73Lin, Carol 70, 141Lin, Chien-Chih 132, 154Lin, Christopher 50Lin, Chun-Yuan 120Lindbekk, Monika 1, 41Lind-Guzik, Anna 184Lindner, Allison 150Lindroos (Weckström), Katja 126Lindseth, Peter 127, 134Lind, Yvette 154Lingard, Kylie 221Lin, Liwen 6Lipton, Jacqui 27Littlewood, Michael 152Littwin, Angela 232Liu, Cheng 133Liu, Ching-Yi 228Liu, Lawrence J. 31, 141Liu, Qian 175Liu, Sida 101, 138Li, Wanxin 28Li, Weiping 228Lixinski, Lucas 48, 180Ljubicic, Gita 192Llorente, Victoria 68Lockhart, Emily 152Lohne, Kjersti 71Lokaneeta, Jinee 90, 133Lombrozo, Tania 194London, Scott 58Londras, Fiona de 229Loney-Howes, Rachel 196Longazel, Jamie 73, 84, 114Longhi, Joao 62Loor, Karen Pita 2Lopez-Cuellar, Nelcy 41Lopez, Jane Lilly 22Lopez, Novabella L. 162Lopez, Rachel 181Lord, Polly 168Lorenz, Aaron 173, 212Lorio, Cristina 171Loughrey, Joan 112Lowery, Alyssa 82Lowrey, Belen 220Loyo, Ruben 144

Loza, Oralia 48Lucas, Lauren Sudeall 84Lui, Thaís 94Lukic, Melina Rocha 154Lund, Anna 218Lupica, Lois 39Lurie, Lilach 209Luwaya, Nolundi 83, 104Luzak, Joasia 109Lynch, Mona 54, 111

MMacArthur, Carl 139MacDermott, Therese 92MacDonald, Sue-Ann 175Machtinger, Yael 49Machura, Stefan 47Mackenzie, Kimberly 225Mack, Kathy 156Mack, Renee 76MacLean, Nancy 237MacLellan, Tiffany 149MacMaster, Rachel 229MacNaughton, Gillian 117, 165, 166Madeira, Jody 16Madsen, Mikael 180, 212Maeda, Tomohiko 141Maeder, Evelyn 54Maffi, Irene 36Maghsoudi, Nazlee 94Magugliani, Noemi 32Mahalatchimy, Aurelie 213Maher, Stephan 61Maier, Katharina Helen 190Mainsant, Gwénaëlle 217Maisley, Nahuel 22Mak, Elaine 155Maker, Yvette 50Malhotra, Ravi 187Malik, Hanna 168Mallard, Gregoire 43, 77, 217Mandal, Saptarshi 121Mandel, Hanan 21, 80Manian, Maya 211, 233Manikis, Marie 206Manning, Eli 17Mann, Roberta 148Manski, Ben 69Mant, Jess 84Mantzari, Despoina 67Marat, Erica 166, 209Marcenko, Miha 139Marchetti, Elena 1, 36, 152Marder, Nancy 22, 47, 110Marekera, Shantel 216Marichala, Pascal 144Marin, Amaya Alvez 123

260

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Mark, Alyx 117, 150Markovic, Milan 83Markovitz, Jonathan 204Marques, Camila 187Marrani, David 219Marseille, Bert 32, 67, 92Marshall, Anna-Maria 100, 223Marshall, Jill 20Marsons, Lee 172, 173Martin, Ariel 31Martin, Cary 60Martin, Elizabeth C. 59Martinez, Jasmine 180Martin, Fiona 148Martin, Isabelle 133Martin, Jena 34Martin, Richard 238Martins, Guilherme 62Martire, Kristy 27Marvel, Stu 114Mascini, Peter 35, 80, 195Masengu, Tabeth 34, 127Masket, Seth 186Mason-Case, Sarah 188Mason, Marc 193Masri, Mazen 46, 187, 228Massaquoi, Notisha 17Massoud, Mark Fathi 65, 216Mastracci, Sharon 50Matera, Christopher 64, 168Mather, Lynn 111, 172Mathews, Julie 238Matinda, Miriam Zacharia 108Matos, Ana Carolina 61Matsumura, Kaiponanea 231Matsunaka, Manabu 142Matthew, Dayna Bowen 236Matthews, Heidi 30, 53, 197Matthiesen, Sara 227Mattoo, Deepa 202Maurutto, Paula 115Mawani, Renisa 71, 170Mayblin, Lucy 129Mayeux, Sara 13, 105Maynard, Goldburn 182, 192Mayo-Adam, Erin 233Mayson, Sandra 119Mazur, Orly 126McAdams, Richard 125McBride, Keally 72McCall, Andrew 123McCann, Michael 102, 113, 133, 186McCarthy, Bill 204McCarthy, Eugene 132McCawley, Diego Gil 129, 203, 225McClelland, Alexander 71McCloskey, Megan 241

McClure, Alastair 68McCluskey, Martha 208McCord, David 105McCoy, Patricia 198McDaniel, Loralys 220McDowell, Scott 93McElhattan, David 202McElrath, Suzy 156McEvoy, Kieran 170, 171McFarlane, Audrey 114McGarrity, Nicola 229McGill, Mariah 117McGinley, Ann 82, 128McGlynn-Wright, Anne 126McGowan, Deirdre 168McGrath, Joe 107McGreal, Paul 153McGuinness, Sheelagh 143McGuire, Shannon 52McHale, M. Jerry 214McHarg, Aileen 4McKay, Carolyn 84McKenna, Miriam Bak 219McKim, Allison 228McKinley, Maggie 79McKinnon, Sara 111McLaughlin, Joanne 55McLeskey, Matthew 42McMahon, Kevin 75McMillan, L. Jane 74McMorrow, Thomas 15McNamara, Luke 145, 160McQuarrie, Fiona 175McSherry, Bernadette 49, 50Means, Taneisha 42Medina, Eden 43Mednicoff, David 242Meeusen, Pauline White 58Mégret, Frédéric 100, 162, 187Mehlhorn, Annette 24Mehta, Tarini 38Meidinger, Errol 14, 124Mellinger, Hillary 84, 201Mello, Joseph 10Mello, Maria Tereza Leopardi 203Mello, Nilo Rafael Baptista de 201Meloche, Chelsea 169Melo, Ines da Trindade Chaves de 141Melville, Angela 206Mendlow, Gabriel 113Menzie, Lauren 18Mercat-Bruns, Marie 83Merino, Roger 239Merriman, Ben 6Merritt, Cullen 209Merry, Sally Engle 13, 22, 43, 142, 156, 171Mertenskötter, Paul 22, 43

261

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Merton, Vanessa 144Mestizo-Castillo, Carmen 219Meulen, Emily Van der 189Meyerson, Denise 229Meyers, Stephen 241Meyn, Ion 105Mezei, Péter 126Michalowski, Sabine 198Michelson, Ethan 31, 54, 102, 110, 218Miethe, Terry 6Mihira, Tsukasa 43Mikhail, Amira 49Mikołajczyk, Barbara 85Millar, Hayli 189Miller, Eric 95, 113, 155Miller, Marc 26Miller, Reuben 135Miller, Zinaida 65, 184Mills, Russell 80, 116, 167Milman-Sivan, Faina 95Min, Geeyoung 60Minichiello, Victor 132Minke, Linda Kjær 12Mirkay, Nicholas 182Miron, Rolando Garcia 91, 178, 197Mirza, Qudsia 226, 242Mitchell, Gemma 33Miyazawa, Setsuo 54, 110, 234Mizrahi, Sarit K. 177Mobasher, Mohammad Bashir 40Modak-Truran, Mark C. 98Moffett, Luke 137, 171Mohapatra, Seema 233Moita, Edvaldo de Aguiar Portela 159Molnar, Petra 84Monforte, Tanya 45Mongia, Radhika 170Monroe, Andrew 179Mont'Alverne, Tarin Cristino 61Montevirgen, Mathew 129Montezuma, Talita 8, 9Montfor, Kelly Struthers 95Montgomery, Rachel 218Moon, Richard 44Moore, Janet 130Moore, Jennifer 77Moore, Kathryn 198Moore, Marcus 132Moraes, Gabriela Garcia Batista Lima 8, 9Morales, Sarah 42Moral, Paulina Garcia Del 55Moreira, Camilla Fernandes 23Morgan, Jennifer Craft 106Morgan, Lydia 229Morgan, Rebecca 78Morison, John 4Morosini, Fabio 159, 205

Morrill, Calvin 208Morris, Annette 207Mor, Sagit 11, 226, 241Morse, Jaimie 191Möser, Katharina 172Mosher, Janet 119, 202Mott, Margaret 212Motz, Stephanie 101Mountz, Alison 128Mowbray, Jacqueline 157Moyle, Leah 146Moyses, Juliana 65Mpoto, Harvey 142Muehlebach, Andrea 142Muirhead, Jacob 224Muirhea, Jacob 149Muir, Renee LaMark 28Mulcahy, Sean 84, 149Mullane, Nancy 59, 111, 161Mulla, Sameena 14Mullock, Alexandra 232Mulqueen, Tara 238Mulroy, Quinn 186Mumford, Ann 7, 152Munesue, Tokuko 166Munger, Frank 42Muniz-Fraticelli, Victor M. 219Muñoz, Luz 223Murcia, Angela Maria Paez 73Murdocca, Carmela 72, 108Murphy, Ben 98Murray, Claire 231Murray, Yxta 176Musto, Jennifer 169Mutcherson, Kimberly 211Myers, JoAnne 86Myers, Nicole 145Mykitiuk, Roxanne 11, 49

NNabaneh, Satang 222Nafstad, Ida 11Nakanishi, Toshimi Momo 74Nance, Jason 114Napoleon, Val 42, 135Natarajan, Usha 149, 158Natile, Serena 21Navarrete, Sonia Ariza 240Nazir, Amna 138Neal, Mary 232Neal, Tess M.S. 194Nedumpara, James 235NeJaime, Douglas 211Nekura, Ruth 34Nelson, Robert 111, 199, 218Nesbitt, Michael 229Nesiah, Vasuki 46, 90, 184

262

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Netherland, Jules 37, 94Neto, Antonio Gomez de Castro 18Neugebauer, Moritz 101Neuman, Pamela 55Neumeier, Stefanie 51Neuwirth, Rostam J. 117, 171Newman, Dan 220Neylon, Anne 101Ng, Kwai 53, 200Nguyen, Trang (Mae) 138Nicholas, George 169Nicholls, Rob 47, 94Nicholson, Lisa 69, 121Nicola, Fernanda 90, 127, 134Nielsen, Laura 199, 211Ning, Ziang 140Nisbet, Elizabeth 82, 106Nishi, Maiko 96Niskier, Guilherme 2Noll, Gregor 2, 182Norris, Jesse 225Norris, Luke 167North, Gill 147Nunes, Rafael 226Núñez, Carolina 237Nunez, Denise Gonzalez 138Nyhan, Emma 74Nzelibe, Jide 26

OObasogie, Osagie 125, 199, 214Obiora, Leslye 116, 145Obior, Leslye 40O'Brien, Barbara 22, 96O'Brien, Margaret 209O'Brien, Thomas 60O'Connell, Ann 244O'Cuinn, Gearóid 53Ó Cuinn, Gearóid 74O'Del, Roni Kay 165Odewale, Olanike 146, 196Odinet, Christopher 208O'Doherty, Tamara 33, 34, 225, 242Odumosu-Ayanu, Ibironke 100Oei, Shu-Yi 3, 126, 192Offit, Anna 47Ogbonnanya, Dibugwu 115Oke, Emmanuel Kolawole 158Oklopcic, Zoran 187, 201Okpakok, Simon 192Olasupo, Egbewole Abdulwahab 146, 166Oliveira, Dominique 109Oliveira, Elaine 103Oliveira, Erlon 3Oliveira, M. Cecilia R. 63Oliver-Lumerman, Amalya 98O'Mahony, Lorna Fox 151

Omar, Jameelah 104Omarova, Saule 118Omori, Marisa 25, 57Ondersma, Chrystin 39O'Neill, Justin 196Oni, Babatunde Adetunji 42Ontiveros, Hannah 13Onuora-Oguno, Azubike 56, 116, 179Oomen, Barbara 139Oraby, Mona 1Orago, Nicholas Wasonga 188Ordower, Henry 148, 205O'Rourke, Rebecca 109Orsini, Adriana Goulart de Sena 229Ortega-Velazquez, Elisa 111Osaka, Eri 141Osborn, Guy 140Osiejewicz, Joanna 203Osofsky, Leigh 192Ostermann, Susan L. 147Ostroukh, Asya 53, 70, 117Ost, Suzanne 232Oswalt, Michael 94Ota, Shozo 141, 236Ousey, Graham 113Özsu, Umut 235

PPackin, Nizan 46Padskocimaite, Ausra 212Paiement, Phillip 149, 243Paige, Tamsin 131, 146Painter, Genevieve 157Paixão, Julia Gitahy da 230Pal, Michael 77Pande, Ishita 68Pantazatou, Aikaterini (Katerina) 3Pan, Yung-Yi Diana 135Paoletti, Sarah 20Pappas, Brian 9Paquin, Julie 127Parachin, Adam 166Pardo, Santiago 33Parfitt, Rose 219, 243Paris, Michael 188Parker, Christine 14, 118, 210, 224Park, Hai Jin 177Park, John 85Park, K-Sue 159Parks, Gregory 188, 204Parmar, Alpa 170Parthasarathy, Shobita 214Pascoe, Daniel 81, 195Paskey, Janice 172Pasqualeto, Olivia 129Pasquetti, Silvia 115Passavant, Paul 148

263

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Pass, Kenneth 71Pasternak, Shiri 202Paterson, Ron 77Patmore, Glenn 219Paul-Emile, Kimani 125, 236Paul, Sanjukta 185Pavlovic, Marina 150Pavone, Tommaso 90, 109Peacock, Ian 128Pearlston, Karen 78Pedro, Portia 233Pedroza, Juan 73Pegorari, Bruno 109Peirce, Jennifer 12, 94Pejovic, Caslav 141Pelc, Krzysztof 75Peleg, Noam 195Peleg, Talia 144Pelletier, Emily 16Peltonen, Minni 209Peltz-Steele, Richard 141Pelvin, Holly 190Pennington, Liana 92Peppin, Patricia 20Percival, Garrick 153Perkowski, Nina 133, 134Perlingeiro, Juliana 118Perlingeiro, Ricardo 18, 229Perry, Richard 160Perzanowski, Aaron 126Petersen, Amanda 51Petersen, Nick 57Petillo, April 14Pfander, James 93Phalen, Hannah 96Philips, Miray 49Phillips, Dana 5Phillips, Rachel 204Phillips, Wendy 35Piché, Catherine 81Pickersgill, Martyn 5Piehowski, Victoria 28Pieraccini, Margherita 107, 158Pifer, Natalie A. 238Pikkel, Rina Budnitsky 11Pilliar, Andrew 214Pils, Eva 138Pimenta, Raquel de Mattos 7Pinheiro, Ana Claudia 118Pinheiro, Ana Cristina Augusto 73Pinheiro, Thais Gabrich Gueiros 244Pintin-Perez, Margarita 162Pinto, Helena Elias 122Pistola, Jérôme 242Plagis, Misha 45Pleggenkuhle, Breanne 151, 225Plerhoples, Alicia 166

Plesnicar, Mojca M. 147Plicanic, Senko 47Plitmann, Yael 11Poblete, Lorena 106Pohn-Weidinger, Axel 63Polido, Fabricio Bertini Pasquot 198Polikoff, Nancy 119, 230Pollack, Michael 164Pomerance, Benjamin 137Pool, Heather 148Pope, James 50, 66Poppe, Emily Taylor 127Porras, Ileana 158Porter, Aaron 176Porterie, Sidonie 68Porter, Katherine 232Portillo, Shannon 191Powell, Amber 14Powell, Kathleen 58Powell, Richard 200Powell, Russell 148Prabhat, Devyani 10, 108Prada, Maria Angelica 238Pratt, Anna 184Pric, Jessica 137Provine, Doris Marie 10, 31, 84, 179Provost, Colin 116, 149Pryma, Jane 191Psygkas, Athanasios (Akis) 127, 134Pucheta, Mauro 182Puckett, James 192Puddister, Kate 164Puerari, Daniel 201Purifoy, Danielle 83Puri, Poonam 112Purkey, Anna 57Purshouse, Joe 164Purvis, Dara 105

QQiao, Yuan 142Quick, Oliver 239, 240Quijano, Alejandra Azuero 70Quinlan, Andrea 19Quinlan, Elizabeth 168Quinn, Joanna R 172Quinn, Kaitlyn 115Quinn, Paul 85Quintanilla, Victor 111, 125, 163Quirino, Carina 207Quirk, Joel 171Quirouette, Marianne 67

RRabago Dorbecker, Miguel 227Radatz, Dana 105Raghavan, Vijay 207Raguparan, Menaka 165, 204

264

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Rahim, Asad 188Rajah, Jothie 90, 189Rajkovic, Nikolas 103Raj, Senthorun 2Ramanathan, Kumar 178, 216Raman, Bhavani 72Ramaswamy, Megha 227Ramirez, Blanca 3Ramji-Nogales, Jaya 8Ramnath, Kalyani 72Ramos, Alan Robson 169Ramos, Luiz Felipe Rosa 159Ramraj, Victor V. 155, 229Ramsay, Iain 172Ramshaw, Sara 84Ranjan, Swastee 111Rannila, Päivi 145Rao, Radhika 16Rapaport, Elizabeth 66Rappaport, John 125Rathod, Jayesh 43, 44, 143Ratton, José Luiz 18, 146, 162Raup-Kounovsky, Anna 218Raupp, Mariana 28, 230Rauschenbach, Mina 196Rauxloh, Regina 186Ravid, Itay 105, 206Ray, Reeju 72Ray, Shalini 121Razack, Sherene 72Rebouche, Rachel 114, 222, 233Redleaf, Diane 173Redrup, Elizabeth 59Reed, Krystia 54Regev-Messalem, Shiri 55Reichman, Amnon 192Reichman, Nancy 180Reichstein, Angelika 48Reif, Linda 63Reinbold, Jenna 217Reinders-Folmer, Chris 195Reiser, Dana Brakman 166Reisinger, William 7Reiss, Dorit 15, 66Reiter, Andrew 40Reiter, Keramet 130Relis, Tamara 166, 234Remster, Brianna 151Repoêles, Maria Fernanda Salcedo 198, 199Restrepo Amariles, David 39Reuter, Peter 13Revillard, Anne 226Rex, Justin 116, 181, 196Reyes, Rosa 96Reynolds, Celene 211Rezende, Bruno 103, 122, 171Rezzonico, Laura 128

Ricciardelli, Rose 124Richards, Kim 213Richland, Justin 111, 189Richman, Kimberly 130Riles, Annelise 43Rinaldi, Jen 187Ring, Diane 3, 139Ringhand, Lori 79Riordan, Christine 77Rios, Enrique Prieto 91Ristroph, Alice 30, 113, 155Ritchie, David 53, 117, 140, 171Rittich, Kerry 6Rivera-Calderón, Noelia 139Rivers-Moore, Megan 99, 165Rivlin, Ram 55Roach, Kent 229Robbennolt, Jennifer 163, 174Roberge, Jean-Francois 5Roberson, Devon 120Roberts, Christopher 243Roberts, Dorothy 173Roberts, Julian 58Robertson, Sean 192Robinson, Russell 164Robson, Peter 19Robson, Ruthann 83Rochelle, Safiyah 30Rodrigues, Francilene dos Santos 169Rodrigues, Geraldo 186Rodrigues, Victor 40, 226Rodriguez, Ana Maria Sanchez 196Rodriguez-Franco, Diana 100Rogge, Malcolm 150Rojas, Lucero Ibarra 215Rolland, Sonia 205Rolnick, Addie 128Romanov, Aleksey 179Romer, Johanna 183Roodenburg, Lisa 139Rooij, Benjamin van 138, 181, 196Roots, Katrin 123, 156, 171Roque, Mehera San 84, 196Rosado, Cesar 94Rosario, Carmeliza 240Rose, Kenneth 60Rosenblum, Darren 26, 46, 60, 112, 231Rosenbury, Laura 199Rosen, Charlotte 57Rosen, Daniel 221, 222Rosevear, Evan 43Rosky, Clifford 98Ross, Becki 189Rosser, Emily 172Rossner, Meredith 54Ross, Sara 9, 49Rostain, Tanina 84

265

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Roth, Jessica 138Roth, Louise 174Roussell, Aaron 25Routon, Erin 73Roux-Kemp, Andra le 230Rowen, Jamie 65, 192Rowher, Luis Fuentes 117Royer, Caisa 90Rubin, Ashley 115, 130Rubin, Gabriel 225Rudes, Danielle 12, 130, 192Rudin, Jonathan 135Rudling, Adriana 171Rundle, Mackenzie 12Runggandini, Caritas Woro Murdiati 157Runyan, Anne 233Rusciano, Megan 187Russell, Debra 241Russell, Jacob Hale 32Rutherford, Blair 21Ryder, Bruce 67Ryo, Emily 10, 45, 128, 144

SSaba-Habesch, Lina 113Sabatello, Maya 11Sachs, Jeffrey 1Saito, Hiroharu 129Salazar, Alberto 112Sá, Leonardo Fernandes de 67Salerno, Jessica 96Salim, Rhonson 10, 194Salminen, Jaakko 203Salyzyn, Amy 193Samaradiwakera-Wijesundara, Charmika 4Samson, Marika Giles 16Sanchez-Badin, Michelle Ratton 159, 235Sanchez-Escobar, Cathalina 143Sanchez, Nelson Camilo 198Sanchez Valencia, Ruben Arturo 219Sandefur, Rebecca 117, 150, 214Sanders, Chris 17Sanders, Rebecca 233Sanders, Teela 75, 76Sandhar, Jassi 23Sandholtz, Wayne 51Sandomierski, David 15Sandoval, German 107Sandvik, Kristin 2, 40, 71Sanger, Carol 78, 169Sani, Hanisah Binte Abdullah 25San Roque, Mehera 27Sant'Ambrogio, Michael 28Santos, Alvaro 22, 144Santos, Gislene 97Santos, Juan Samuel 220Santuari, Alceste 193

Sarah 166Saric, Josipa 166Satterthwaite, Emily 126, 154Satzewich, Vic 170Savelsberg, Joachim 51, 156Schaap, Marjolein 33Schabus, Nicole 56, 57Scheick, Erin 143Scheppele, Kim Lane 77, 136Schindler, Michael 1Schleef, Debra 135Schmidt, Christopher 6, 109Schneider, Elizabeth 233Schneiderman, David 4, 205Schömer, Eva 41Schuller, Regina 122, 213Schultze-Kraft, Markus 63Schultz, Jason 126Schulz, Jennifer 19Schumaker, Kathryn 13, 144Schwartz, Alex 6Schwartz, Jeff 46Schwartz, Saul 218Schwartz, Victoria 27, 61Schwarz, Corinne 131, 227Schweiger, Elisabeth 182Schweitzer, Nick 96Schwobel-Patel, Christine 101Scott, Dayna Nadine 42, 106, 213Scott, John 132Scoular, Jane 75Scribner, Druscilla 69Sebba, Leslie 68Seck, Sara 106Seddon, Toby 47, 116Seear, Kate 5See, Erica 29Sefah, Bright 56, 146Sekho, Nirej 113Selbst, Andrew 119Sellers, Joshua 193Semple, Noel 81, 128, 214Senapaty, Trishna 172Sen, Jhuma 121Senn, Samantha 220Senthe, Shanthi 39Seong, Yoori 92Seo, Sarah 105Sepper, Elizabeth 78, 128, 212Serafim, Fabrizia Pessoa 151Serban, Mihaela 99Serisier, Tanya 58, 164Seron, Carroll 218Seto, Theodore 139Severi, Fabiana Cristina 65Sevier, Justin 69Sexsmith, Kathleen 99

266

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Sexton, Lori 25, 130Seymour, Eleanor 120Shaffer, Greg 13, 35, 136, 180, 185, 205, 217, 235Shahal, Aviram 79Shah, Prakash 178Shah, Svati 21, 22Shakargy, Sharon 55Shakeshaft, Charol 223Shakeshaft, Emma 157Shalhoub-Kevorkian, Nadera 72Shalleck, Ann 119Shamai, Rebecca 74Shanahan, Colleen 117, 150Shan, Desai 210Shaner, Megan 69Shanks, Signa Daum 187Shapiro, Susan 59, 97, 124Sharafi, Mitra 25, 67Sharma, Kriti 147Sharma, Neha 43Sharpe, Nicola 34Shaughnessy, Peggy 190Shaver, Frances M 50, 52Shaw, Matthew Patrick 114Shdaimah, Corey 169Shee, Amy Huey-Ling 110Sheffi, Nofar 160Shepherd, Hana 82Shiffer-Sebba, Doron 79Shiffer, Varda 94Shiff, Talia 8Shimizu, Takashi 142Shnitser, Natalya 198Shor, Donn 98Short, Jodi 35, 80, 116Shteynberg, Reveka 177Shurtz, Nancy 104Sibanda, Sanele 241Sibley, Marcus 105Sieder, Rachel 23, 36Siegel, Andrew 79Siems, Mathias 52Sierra-Cadena, Grenfieth 62Sierra-Camargo, Jimena 91, 227, 239Sigsworth, Claire 10, 43Silbey, Susan 35, 94, 111, 167Silva, Ana Caroline Machado da 9Silva, Caroline de Lima 189Silva, Elaini C G da 196Silva, Fabio de Sa e 81, 215Silva, Flavia Francielle 17Silva, Jéssica Traguetto 68Silva, Larissa Pochmann da 141Silva, Lucia Frota Pestana de Aguiar 140, 201Silva, Nicole De 48Silva, Paulo Alves da 67Silva, Ronaldo Lucas da 171, 216

Silveira, Tatiana Rodrigues 187Silver, Carole 33, 56Silvestre, Ana Carolina Faria 156Simard, Justin 124, 176Simcox, Stacey-Rae 137Simmons, Martha 128Simon, Jonathan 51, 174, 190, 191Simon-Kerr, Julia 64Simons, Penelope 106Simpson, Erin 99Simpson, Gerry 46, 86, 157, 197, 242Simson, David 204Singh, Mani Shekhar 111Singh, Rashmee 135, 195, 225Sivalingam, Harini 220Skage, Ingvild Aagedal 188Skerrett, Kevin 61Skilbrei, May-Len 21, 22Skinner-Thompson, Scott 30Skorobogatov, Yana 184Slane, Andrea 61, 151Slavinski, Ilya 238Slobodian, Mayana C. 92, 93Small, Tamara A. 164Smele, Sandra 19Smith, Adrian 211Smith, Deirdre 139Smith, Nicholas Rush 216Smith, Stephen 232Smith, Toni 124Smit, Terry 114Smulovitz, Catalina 136Smythe, Dee 24, 101, 104Snell, Caroline 43Snow, Shannon 157Socha, Bailey 28Sofinska, Iryna 86Sohoni, Deenesh 114Sohoni, Tracy 113Soifer, Avi 33Sokol, Tomislav 193Solanki, Gopika 121, 178Solomon, Peter 31, 184, 209Somers, Margaret 237Sommers, Zach 213Sood, Avani 179Sossin, Lorne 127, 134Soucek, Brian 229Sourdin, Tania 12, 13, 44, 56, 220, 239Souza, Ana Luiza da Gama e 2, 69Souza, Fabricio 45Souza, Fatima 165Souza, Maria Laura de 239Souza, Raissa Carla Belintani de 7Sozzo, Maximo 146, 162Spahiu, Irma 21Spanier, Benny 85

267

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Speck, Sloan 62Spence, Lester 237Spencer-Suarez, Kimberly 224Spinak, Jane 173Spindelman, Marc 199Spitzer, Aaron 93Spivack, Carla 24Spivakovsky, Claire 19Spolidorio, Paulo 9Spooner, Joseph 172, 207Srivastava, Swati 96Staaf, Annika 76Stacey, Jocelyn 138, 213Stake, Jeffrey 132Stampnitzky, Lisa 115Stannard, John 221Staszewski, Glen 28Steel, Alex 25Steel, Connor 98Steele, Michalyn 59, 60Steilen, Matthew 154Steinberg, Jessica 117, 150Stein, Nan 244Sterett, Susan 109, 223Sterio, Milena 138Sterling, Joyce 218Stern, Rachel 31, 54, 101Stienstra, Donna 206St John, Taylor 48Stoever, Jane 82Stohler, Stephan 121Stolk, Sofia 103Stone, Carrie 181Storr, Cait 86, 243Story, Brett 130Stout, Lynn 148Strand, Palma 153, 182Strand, Vibeke Blaker 41Streinz, Thomas 43Strong, Justin 130Stuart, Forrest 26Studdert, David 77Stuhmcke, Anita 63Stumpf, Juliet 31, 179, 201Stump, Nicholas 64Stychin, Carl 109Stylianou, Konstantinos 100Su, Anna 15Suarez, Dilia Lozano 203Suarez, Paola 134Suarez-Ricaurte, Federico 91, 227Suchman, Mark 174, 190Su, Kai-Ping 70Sullivan, Esther 96Sullivan, Helen 210Sultan, Nimer 46Sultany, Nimer 228

Sundari, Elisabeth 237Sundquist, Christian 57Super, Gail 29Surtees, Jeff 238Suteu, Silvia 244Sutton, Rebecca 188Svetlicinii, Alexandr 117, 201Swan, Sarah 173Sweeny, JoAnne 82Sylvestre, Marie-Eve 145Szabla, Christopher 162Szablowski, David 238

TTaboada, Ricardo Pelegrin 206Taborda, Elena 179Tagliarina, Daniel 12Tait, David 54Talesh, Shauhin 5Tallgren, Immi 102Tamarin, Mia 113Tamir, Michal 29, 213, 240Tanguay-Renaud, François 95Tan, Meral 168Taouk, Yamna 77Tapia, Silvana Tapia 21Tasker, Heather 123Tataryn, Anastasia 102Taxman, Faye 68Taylor-Harding, Rosie 217Taylor, Kate 144Taylor, Kirstine 234Taylor, Luke 99Taylor, Whitney 160, 186Tehranian, John 158, 177Telesca, Jen 242Templeman, Jessica 184Tengaumnuay, Thitinant 155Terzic, Marilyn 206Tesori, Madelaine 89, 192Thacher, David 79Than, Claire de 219Thielen-Wilson, Leslie 182Thomas, Jacob 62Thomas, Suja 54, 233Thompson, Ryan 163Thorburn, Malcolm 113Thornburg, Elizabeth 233Thorne, Benjamin 163Thorne, Deborah 232Thornton, Liam 37Thorpe, Amelia 160Thorpe, Rebecca 15Thumbadoo, Romola 74Thusi, I. India 165Tinkler, Justine 211Tirres, Allison 59

268

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Tocantins, Matheus Caetano 78Toivanen, Reetta 74Toki, Valmaine 152Tolley, Michael 33Tolmie, Julia 108Tolso, Franita 193Tolson, Franita 79Tomkinson, Sule 57, 170Tonche, Juliana 215Tønnessen, Liv 23, 36, 145, 240Tonstad, Kristel 1Toohey, Lisa 157, 205Torres-Arends, Irene 140Torres-Sarmiento, Andrea 149Torrie, Virginia 232Toscano, Vicki 240Tourkochoriti, Ioanna 153Trammell, Rebecca 12Travis, Mitchell 114Tremblay, Francine 52Tremblay-Huet, Sabrina 240Tremblay, Régine 6, 100Triger, Zvi 233Trispiotis, Ilias 21Trochev, Alexei 138Troshynski, Emily 6Trudel, Elisabeth Roy 140Trudell, AnnaLise 165True-Frost, Cora 98Tschalaer, Mengia Hong 121, 178Tsurkov, Emma 211Tubb, Daniel 239Tubex, Hilde 36Tungnirun, Arm 232Tungohan, Ethel 162Tunnicliffe, Jennifer 194Turner, Bertram 219Turner, Christina 205Turri, Marcia 44, 56Tushnet, Mark 155Tu, Yu-Yin 69Tzouvala, Ntina 243

UUbink, Janine 209, 234Ullrich, Leila 71Umar, Umar 120Um, Hye Won 10Upham, Frank 96Ursel, Susan 128

VVacheret, Marion 224Vaisman, Daria 225Valencia, Areli 239Vallbé, Joan-Josep 128Valmadrid, Lorraine 162Valverde, Mariana 71

Vandenbussche, Wannes 217VanderVelde, Lea 33van der Vet, Freek 212Vanhala, Lisa 186VanLoo, Rory 236Varadarajan, Deepa 149Vardsveen, Trace 163, 180Varela, David F. 23Varellas, James 208, 237Varsava, Nina 6Vasconcelos, Diego 5Vatuk, Sylvia 121, 178Vaughan, Steven 193Vaughn, Paige 178Vayo, Amber 223Vazquez, Yolanda 150Veazey, Linda 165Vega, Irene 185Velloso, Joao 224Venkatesh, Vasanthi 20, 58, 161Verheul, Susanne 24Verma, Anjuli 51, 191Verstappen, Leon 27Viano, Samantha 16Vibe, Vegard 188Vidal, Sarah 86Viebach, Julia 32Vieira, Tereza Rodrigues 17, 139Viens, A.M. 108Vigna, Ana 146Villanueva, Francisco 133Visser, Irene 207Vogler, Stefan 211Volpe, Valentina 189Volpp, Leti 72Vording, Henk 62Vos, Pierre De 146Vos, Renske 103Votinius, Jenny Julén 2

WWagner, Estair Van 97Walker, Barrington 171Walsh, Camille 104Walters, Keith 224Wang, Chao 112Wang, Heng 185Wang, Hsiao-Tan 175Wang, Jing 222Wang, Ming-Li 75Wang, Yanbai Andrea 174Wan, Wai 5Warden, Katie 19Warner, Elizabeth Kronk 157Warren, Ian 145Warrick, Catherine 44Washington, Tanya 49

269

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Weatherall, Kimberlee 158Weaver, Adriel 190Weaver, Jessica Dixon 233Webber, David 61Weber, Mark 187, 226Weber, Robert 155Webster, Elizabeth 58, 177Webster, Emily 244Wechsler, Rachel 213Weeden, Kim 127Weegels, Julienne 146Weeks, Sindiso Mnisi 45, 101Weill, Joanna 54Weinberg, Tara 160Weinrib, Laura 79Weisman, Richard 74, 147, 195Weissman, Deborah 8, 26, 161Weiss, Marley 78Weitzner, Viviane 23Welch, Emily 67Welch, John 169Weller, Penelope 49Werbel, Amy 61Werner, Wouter 182Werth, Robert 142, 183, 228Westerveld, Mies 78Westregard, Annamaria 78Weststar, Johanna 61West, Valerie 195Wever, Marc 32, 67Wexler, Lesley 174Wexler, Richard 174White, Ahmed 50, 66White, Deborah 14, 38White, Emily 156Whitehead, Jason 37White, Ruth Anne 174Wiegers, Wanda 85Wiene, Richard 180Wiener, Richard 96, 163, 179, 180Wiesner, Martha Luz Rojas 162Wigan, Duncan 237Wildeman, Sheila 49Wilde, Ralph 146Wilke, Christiane 30Wilkins, David 135Wilkinson, Miles 93Willemez, Laurent 101Williams, Jamillah Bowman 208Williams, John 2Williams, Karen 78Williams, Kelli Alces 69Williams, Linda 73Williams, Monica 89, 131, 151, 181, 191, 192Williams, Toni 198Willis, Lauren E. 1, 39Willison, Charley 131

Wilson, Bruce 30Wilson, Erika 114Wilson, Joshua 186Wilson, Richard Ashby 65, 83Wincott, Daniel 4Windholz, Eric 47, 224Wingerde, Karin van 80Wing, Leah 237Wingrove, Twila 179Winship, Verity 163Winston, Emily 147Winter, Alix 22Winter, Paulien de 80Wintersteiger, Lisa 238Winter, Steven 3Woeste, Victoria 176Wohlbold, Elise 24Woodard, Andrew 11Woods, Jordan 125Wood, Stepan 14Woodward-Burns, Robinson 121Woodward, Jennifer 113Wood, William 160Woog, Amanda 181Woolford, Andrew 156Worden, Alissa Pollitz 177Woude, Maartje van der 84, 179, 184, 185, 201Wright, Aaron 46Wright, Ronald 26Wu, Chuan-Feng 75Wulff, Stephen 26Wu, Timothy 136Wu, Ying 20

XXavier, José Roberto 230Xavier, Sujith 123, 186Xia, Chongwu 5Xu, Shengkai 45

YYamamoto, Susan 54Yarbrough, Michael 216, 233Yngvesson, Barbara 175Yona, Lihi 204Young, Eric 181Young, Kathryne 29Young, Margot 109, 213, 220Ystehede, Per 3Yuille, Lua 151Yule, Alison 115Yu, Peter 126, 158Yusuff, Abdulwasiu 29Yvonne, Dumenu 222

ZZacks, Eric 16Zafran, Ruth 231

270

Participant IndexIn

de

x


Zaloznaya, Marina 7, 209Zaring, David 236Zariski, Archie 5, 43, 76, 205, 206Zarnow, Leandra 193Zatz, Marjorie 45, 143, 201Zatz, Noah 83, 95, 185Zavala, Nicolas Ojeda 89Zbyszewska, Ania 18Zeligma, David 98Zhang, Yue 149Zhao, Yi 190Zhou, Qin 100Zietlow, Rebecca 65, 93, 106Zilis, Michael 223