16
The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth T. Boris, Ph.D., Director Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy The Urban Institute

The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Fundraising Effectiveness Project

AFG 11th Annual National Conference on

Association Foundations and Fundraising

May 9, 2013

Elizabeth T. Boris, Ph.D., Director

Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy

The Urban Institute

Page 2: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Fundraising Effectiveness Project

FEPGain

Loss

Net

Helping nonprofit organizations measure, compare, and maximize their annual growth in giving

http://www.afpnet.org/FEP [email protected]

Page 3: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Project Founding Sponsors

•Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP)

•Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy at The Urban Institute

Page 4: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

AFP Donor Software Workgroup

• DonorPerfect Fundraising Software• eTapestry (Blackbaud)• GiftWorks (Mission Research)• Metafile• MatchMaker FundRaising Software• PhilanthrAppeal (FundTrack Software)• The Raiser’s Edge ® (Blackbaud)• ROI Solutions• Sage Software• Telisma Fundraising/ Campus Management Corporation • Telosa Software (Exceed!)

Page 5: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Series1

$(1,500)

$(1,000)

$(500)

$-

$500

$1,000

$1,500 Gains= $1,129

Losses= $(1,128)

Net= $1

For every $100 gained in 2011, almost $100 was lost

Basic Fundraising Effectiveness Project concept:Growth in giving is the net of gains minus losses

$Millions

Page 6: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Series1

(2,000,000)

(1,500,000)

(1,000,000)

(500,000)

-

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

Gains= 1,325,542

Losses= (1,411,979)

Net= (86,437)

Gain/Loss Growth in Number of Donors

For every 100 donors gained in 2011, 107 donors were lost

Page 7: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Donor Retention By Overall Retention Rate (2009-2010)

70 and above 60-70 50-60 40-50 30-40 20-30 10-20 10 or below0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80% Chart Title

Page 8: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Overall Donor Retention Rates (2004-05 through 2009-10)

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60% Chart Title

Page 9: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

New and Repeat Donor Retention Rates (2009-2010)

70 and above 60-70 50-60 40-50 30-40 20-30 10-20 10 or below0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

New Repeat

Page 10: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Key Finding on Donor Retention:

• According to Adrian Sargeant, improving donor retention by 10% can improve “lifetime value” between 150 and 200%.

• Dr. Sargeant defines “lifetime value” as “a measure of how much a donor will be worth to an organization over the duration of the relationship.”

Page 11: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

• Only three fields for each gift transactiono Donor ID (anonomous)o Date of gift o Amount of gift

• 14 donor software firms have agreed in principleo Their combined clients are over 50,000 o Database to be housed at The Urban Institute

• Extensive growth-in-giving research possibilities

Significantly Expanded Research PossibilitiesWith the new gift-transaction data collection strategy

Page 12: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

• Trends over time• Gift ranges • Size (total amount raised, total revenue)• Nonprofit subsector (arts, education, etc.)• Region (based on first digit of zip code)• Age of fundraising program • Rate of growth (dollars and donors)

Performance indicators can be reported according to:

Page 13: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

• What is the potential for giving in the United States in terms of percentage of GDP? More than the current two percent?

• What are the barriers that for more than 40 years have stood in the way of contributions achieving a higher share of GDP? 

• What factors influence growth in giving?

• Can investing more money in fundraising result in corresponding increases in charitable giving? If so, how much investment would be necessary to move giving up to three percent of GDP or more?

• How much would the nonprofit sector need to invest in fundraising to reach its potential of X percent of GDP?

Growth-in-Giving Research QuestionsGoal: To increase giving as a percentage of GDP beyond two percent

Page 14: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Growing Future Donorsand other research questions…

Page 15: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

The Urban Institute

Resources on Donor Attrition and Donor Retention:

Tom Ahem and Simone Joyaux, Keep Your Donors: The Guide to Better Communications and Stronger Relationships, AFP Fund Development Series, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Joshua M. Birholz, Fundraising Analytics, John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Penelope Burke, Donor-Centered Fundraising, Burk & Associates, Ltd./Cygnus Applied Research, 2003. Ken Burnett, Relationship Fundraising: A Donor-Based Approach to the Business of Raising Money, 2nd Addition, Jossey-Bass, 2002. Adrian Sargeant, Elaine Jay, Building Donor Loyalty: The Fundraiser’s Guide to Increasing Lifetime Value, Jossey-Bass, 2004

Page 16: The Urban Institute Fundraising Effectiveness Project AFG 11 th Annual National Conference on Association Foundations and Fundraising May 9, 2013 Elizabeth

Elizabeth Boris, Ph.D., DirectorCenter on Nonprofits and PhilanthropyThe Urban [email protected]

If you would like to learn more or would like to consider participating in the new FEP Analytics Initiative, contactBill Levis, [email protected], 240-418-7984