THE SOLARI REPORT

INTRODUCTION Welcome to The Solari Report. Today is Thursday, March 1, 2018 I am Catherine Austin Fitts and I am delighted that you could join us this evening. Heads up on Events Waiting lists on Uluru May 8-12 and 13-17 June 2 – San Francisco lunch – Hold that data Event for Dennis Kucinich in Ohio in early April – if interested, please let me know at askcatherine@solari.com 30 SECOND BREAK

THEME TONIGHT: Censorship in 1000 Forms

Last Week – we regularly deal with significant challenge: cyberwarfare, IP theft, mail, currier, whisper campaigns = $100,000 a year – all of that is money that would be reinvested to create a better performance for subscribers – instead being siphone d off

Site down – command decision to bring new one up – so delayed going live. Current schedule looks like it will take the weekend

MADE PUBLIC – NIMAN, MEYER, PENSION, ANNUAL WRAP UP

Great opportunity to introduce this content and the Solar i Report to your family and friends – send the links.

Friday – same time – significant number of Youtube channels – now include Richie Allen, Jerome Corsi – strikes against Infowars – my subscribers say many 2nd amendment

Change Terms

Then Demonitization

Now Strikes – make them censor themselves

Goal – censor alternative media

Rense – paypal, stripe

One of our donations this week- Richie Allen show

Also – Gun Owners of America – fighting the pushback

My interpretation – losing control of the narrative

Pushback on Parkland School Shooting

• Drugging kids • Mind control technology • Hollywood: video games and violent movies – Governor of Kentucky

Serious, serious push to suppress the independent media and double up on shriek o meter and mind control

Central Narrative = Central Control of $ Lose Control of Narrative – Lose Control of the $ Ziocons – big problem here – FBI too given what is happening at DOJ Vatican

Pilgrams Military Pension Funds – CAF Presentation Parkland School Shooting – great interview with Jon Rappoport on controlling the narrative and school shootings. Will go up next week. How the Money Works on Schools School Budgets Teachers Pension Funds

Broward County Public Schools $2.8 Billion annual revenues browardschools.com Broward County Public Schools, a public school district serving Broward County, Florida, is the sixth largest public school system in the nation. (2nd largest in Florida) During the 2016–2017 school year, Broward County Public Schools served 271,105 students enrolled in more than 310 schools and education centers. The district is headquartered in downtown Fort Lauderdale.More at Wikipedia

3.8 Billion Assets

1.6 Billion Debt

1.15 Billion Net Pension Fund Liability

113MM in annual food costs

77MM in annual interest expense

Who gets sales is BIG BUSINESS

Computers

On line systems

Software

Books

Facilities

Bonding and Lending

Banking

BIG PENSION FLOWs Privatization Gun Control – if they get it problem in terms of maintaining central control through force Trump and Gun Control

*** Spending more than $625 MILLION to beef up the Brady-NICS gun control database, barring more Americans from owning firearms.

*** Raising the minimum age to buy or possess a rifle, assuring that a 20-year-old single mother can’t defend her family from a home invader. This bill was just sponsored by Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ).

*** The infamous Toomey-Manchin expanded gun registration proposal that we narrowly defeated in 2013.

*** Gun Violence Confiscation Orders, allowing a family member, disgruntled ex-partner, or roommate to report you to a court and have your guns taken away -- ALL WITHOUT TRIAL OR DUE PROCESS.

*** Scrapping concealed carry reciprocity, which was a major campaign promise of Donald Trump.

Florida teachers reacted viscerally to news that they’ve been paying into a retirement fund that invests in gun companies, including the maker of an assault rifle used to kill 17 Parkland high school students and educators last week.

They demanded Wednesday night that the state agency that manages the fund divest of those stocks immediately.

The state pension plan for Florida teachers held 41,129 shares in American Outdoor Brands Co., formerly known as Smith & Wesson, as of Dec. 31, Bloomberg reported Tuesday. The company manufactured the AR-15 used in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting, according to local law enforcement.

Reference at Bloomberg – Sandy Hook – State Pension Fund – Cerebus Remington – Cerebus owns Dyncorp – apparently mercenary and sex slave trafficking is not a problem – however Remington is ESG Screen – failure to screen for the real deal - covert operations, crime – One of the reasons I started a screen – no one was doing. 2018 Campaign – very interest No strategy other than – more force, more mind control, double down

30 SECOND BREAK

MONEY & MARKETS

Spooked:

Interest Rates Military Budget – Deficits

Inflation

US DOLLAR INDEX

-1.39%

(91.83–90.55)

Fixed Income:

TLT

-6.20%

Closed year at 8.95%

IEF -3.06% Closed year at 2.55%

AGG -2.12%

2017 3.61%

JNK -0.95% Closed year at 6.01%

Equities:

SPY 1.79% 21.7%

XHB -8.40% 31.8%

VGK -0.86% 27%

EWG -1.79% 27.45

EFA -0.06% 25.10

FXI 2.27% 36.22

HAO 1.76% 37.51

EEM 1.91% 37.28

Commodities

$CRB 0.04%

(193.86-193.95)

GLD 1.09% 21.7

SLV -3.31% 5.82

–

OIL 3.82 % 3.32 30 SECOND BREAK STOCK MARKET CORRECTION – is it over or coming? Bull is still on WSJ – inflation Lots of news about good growth and wage growth – growth running below real inflation – SQUEEZE IS ON SHADOWSTATS GDP Revision from 2.6% to 2.5% Was Just a 0.01% Rounding Difference, from 2.55% to 2.54% Fortuitously - Quarter 2018 GDP Increasingly Looks Like a Contraction

Better Quality Economic Measures Still Show No Economic E xpansion Boosted by Public Spending, BIGGEST NEWS OF THE WEEK PUTIN’s PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS TO FEDERAL ASSEMBLY TODAY Worth studying – national security section of speech in the notes – full text up on Russia Office of President Website Saker’s Initial Assessent – No longer a US military option against Russi US response – Russia in violation of treaties (Unlikely) Putin in bluffing ( Doubt it) At the same time, we cannot forget about reliably ensuring its security.

Colleagues, The operation in Syria has proved the increased capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces. In recent years, a great deal has been done to improve the Army and the Navy. The Armed Forces now have 3.7 times more modern weapons. Over 300 new units of equipment were put into service. The strategic missile troops received 80 new intercontinental ballistic missiles, 102 submarine-launched ballistic missiles and three Borei nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. Twelve missile regiments have received the new Yars intercontinental ballistic missile. The number of long-range high-precision weapons carriers has increased by 12 times, while the number of guided cruise missiles increased by over 30 times. The Army, the Aerospace Forces and the Navy have grown significant stronger as well. Both Russia and the entire world know the names of our newest planes, submarines, anti-aircraft weapons, as well as land-based, airborne and sea-based guided missile systems. All of them are cutting-edge, high-tech weapons. A solid radar field to warn of a missile attack was created along Russia’s perimeter (it is very important). Huge holes appeared after the USSR disintegrated. All of them were repaired.

A leap forward was made in the development of unmanned aircraft; the National Defence Control Centre was established; and the operational command of the far maritime zone was formed. The number of professional service members has increased by 2.4 times, and the availability of equipment in the Armed Forces grew from 70 percent to 95–100 percent. The years-long queue for permanent housing was eliminated, and the waiting period was cut by 83 percent. Now, on to the most important defence issue. I will speak about the newest systems of Russian strategic weapons that we are creating in response to the unilateral withdrawal of the United States of America from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the practical deployment of their missile defence systems both in the US and beyond their national borders. I would like to make a short journey into the recent past. Back in 2000, the US announced its withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. Russia was categorically against this. We saw the Soviet-US ABM Treaty signed in 1972 as the cornerstone of the international security system. Under this treaty, the parties had the right to deploy ballistic missile defence systems only in one of its regions. Russia deployed these systems around Moscow, and the US around its Grand Forks land-based ICBM base. Together with the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, the ABM Treaty not only created an atmosphere of trust but also prevented either party from recklessly using nuclear weapons, which would have endangered humankind, because the limited number of ballistic missile defence systems made the potential aggressor vulnerable to a response strike. We did our best to dissuade the Americans from withdrawing from the treaty. All in vain. The US pulled out of the treaty in 2002. Even after that we tried to develop constructive dialogue with the Americans. We proposed working together in this area to ease concerns and maintain the atmosphere of trust. At one point, I thought that a compromise was possible, but this was not to be. All our proposals, absolutely all of them, were rejected. And then we said that we would have to improve our modern strike systems to protect our security. In reply, the US said that it is not creating a global BMD system against Russia, which is free to do as it pleases, and that the US will presume that our actions are not spearheaded against the US. The reasons behind this position are obvious. After the collapse of the USSR, Russia, which was known as the Soviet Union or Soviet Russia abroad, lost 23.8 percent of its national territory, 48.5 percent of its population, 41 of the GDP, 39.4 percent of its industrial potential (nearly half of our potential, I would underscore), as well as 44.6 percent of its military capability due to the division of the Soviet Armed Forces among the former Soviet republics. The military equipment of the Russian army was becoming obsolete, and the Armed Forces were in a sorry state. A civil war was raging

in the Caucasus, and US inspectors oversaw the operation of our leading uranium enrichment plants. For a certain time, the question was not whether we would be able to develop a strategic weapon system – some wondered if our country would even be able to safely store and maintain the nuclear weapons that we inherited after the collapse of the USSR. Russia had outstanding debts, its economy could not function without loans from the IMF and the World Bank; the social sphere was impossible to sustain. Apparently, our partners got the impression that it was impossible in the foreseeable historical perspective for our country to revive its economy, industry, defence industry and Armed Forces to levels supporting the necessary strategic potential. And if that is the case, there is no point in reckoning with Russia’s opinion, it is necessary to further pursue ultimate unilateral military advantage in order to dictate the terms in every sphere in the future. Basically, this position, this logic, judging from the realities of that period, is understandable, and we ourselves are to blame. All these years, the entire 15 years since the withdrawal of the United States from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, we have consistently tried to reengage the American side in serious discussions, in reaching agreements in the sphere of strategic stability. We managed to accomplish some of these goals. In 2010, Russia and the US signed the New START treaty, containing measures for the further reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms. However, in light of the plans to build a global anti-ballistic missile system, which are still being carried out today, all agreements signed within the framework of New START are now gradually being devaluated, because while the number of carriers and weapons is being reduced, one of the parties, namely, the US, is permitting constant, uncontrolled growth of the number of anti-ballistic missiles, improving their quality, and creating new missile launching areas. If we do not do something, eventually this will result in the complete devaluation of Russia’s nuclear potential. Meaning that all of our missiles could simply be intercepted. Despite our numerous protests and pleas, the American machine has been set into motion, the conveyer belt is moving forward. There are new missile defence systems installed in Alaska and California; as a result of NATO’s expansion to the east, two new missile defence areas were created in Western Europe: one has already been created in Romania, while the deployment of the system in Poland is now almost complete. Their range will keep increasing; new launching areas are to be created in Japan and South Korea. The US global missile defence system also includes five cruisers and 30 destroyers, which, as far as we know, have been deployed to regions in close proximity to Russia’s borders. I am not exaggerating in the least; and this work proceeds apace.

So, what have we done, apart from protesting and warning? How will Russia respond to this challenge? This is how. During all these years since the unilateral US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, we have been working intensively on advanced equipment and arms, which allowed us to make a breakthrough in developing new models of strategic weapons. Let me recall that the United States is creating a global missile defence system primarily for countering strategic arms that follow ballistic trajectories. These weapons form the backbone of our nuclear deterrence forces, just as of other members of the nuclear club. As such, Russia has developed, and works continuously to perfect, highly effective but modestly priced systems to overcome missile defence. They are installed on all of our intercontinental ballistic missile complexes. In addition, we have embarked on the development of the next generation of missiles. For example, the Defence Ministry and enterprises of the missile and aerospace industry are in the active phase of testing a new missile system with a heavy intercontinental missile. We called it Sarmat. Sarmat will replace the Voevoda system made in the USSR. Its immense power was universally recognized. Our foreign colleagues even gave it a fairly threatening name. That said, the capabilities of the Sarmat missile are much higher. Weighing over 200 tonnes, it has a short boost phase, which makes it more difficult to intercept for missile defence systems. The range of the new heavy missile, the number and power of its combat blocs is bigger than Voevoda’s. Sarmat will be equipped with a broad range of powerful nuclear warheads, including hypersonic, and the most modern means of evading missile defence. The high degree of protection of missile launchers and significant energy capabilities the system offers will make it possible to use it in any conditions. Could you please show the video. (Video plays.) Voevoda’s range is 11,000 km while Sarmat has practically no range restrictions. As the video clips show, it can attack targets both via the North and South poles. Sarmat is a formidable missile and, owing to its characteristics, is untroubled by even the most advanced missile defence systems. But we did not stop at that. We started to develop new types of strategic arms that do not use ballistic trajectories at all when moving toward a target and, therefore, missile defence systems are useless against them, absolutely pointless. Allow me to elaborate on these weapons. Russia’s advanced arms are based on the cutting-edge, unique achievements of our scientists, designers and engineers. One of them is a small-scale

heavy-duty nuclear energy unit that can be installed in a missile like our latest X-101 air-launched missile or the American Tomahawk missile – a similar type but with a range dozens of times longer, dozens, basically an unlimited range. It is a low-flying stealth missile carrying a nuclear warhead, with almost an unlimited range, unpredictable trajectory and ability to bypass interception boundaries. It is invincible against all existing and prospective missile defence and counter-air defence systems. I will repeat this several times today. In late 2017, Russia successfully launched its latest nuclear-powered missile at the Central training ground. During its flight, the nuclear-powered engine reached its design capacity and provided the necessary propulsion. Now that the missile launch and ground tests were successful, we can begin developing a completely new type of weapon, a strategic nuclear weapons system with a nuclear-powered missile. Roll the video, please. (Video plays.) You can see how the missile bypasses interceptors. As the range is unlimited, the missile can manoeuvre for as long as necessary. As you no doubt understand, no other country has developed anything like this. There will be something similar one day but by that time our guys will have come up with something even better. Now, we all know that the design and development of unmanned weapon systems is another common trend in the world. As concerns Russia, we have developed unmanned submersible vehicles that can move at great depths (I would say extreme depths) intercontinentally, at a speed multiple times higher than the speed of submarines, cutting-edge torpedoes and all kinds of surface vessels, including some of the fastest. It is really fantastic. They are quiet, highly manoeuvrable and have hardly any vulnerabilities for the enemy to exploit. There is simply nothing in the world capable of withstanding them. Unmanned underwater vehicles can carry either conventional or nuclear warheads, which enables them to engage various targets, including aircraft groups, coastal fortifications and infrastructure. In December 2017, an innovative nuclear power unit for this unmanned underwater vehicle completed a test cycle that lasted many years. The nuclear power unit is unique for its small size while offering an amazing power-weight ratio. It is a hundred times smaller than the units that power modern submarines, but is still more powerful and can switch into combat mode, that is to say, reach maximum capacity, 200 times faster. The tests that were conducted enabled us to begin developing a new type of strategic weapon that would carry massive nuclear ordnance. Please play the video. (Video plays.)

By the way, we have yet to choose names for these two new strategic weapons, the global-range cruise missile and the unmanned underwater vehicle. We are waiting for suggestions from the Defence Ministry. Countries with high research potential and advanced technology are known to be actively developing so-called hypersonic weapons. The speed of sound is usually measured in Mach numbers in honour of Austrian scientist Ernst Mach who is known for his research in this field. One Mach is equal to 1,062 kilometres per hour at an altitude of 11 kilometres. The speed of sound is Mach 1, speeds between Mach 1 and Mach 5 is called supersonic, and hypersonic is above Mach 5. Of course, this kind of weapon provides substantial advantages in an armed conflict. Military experts believe that it would be extremely powerful, and that its speed makes it invulnerable to current missile and air defence systems, since interceptor missiles are, simply put, not fast enough. In this regard, it is quite understandable why the leading armies of the world seek to possess such an ideal weapon. Friends, Russia already has such a weapon. The most important stage in the development of modern weapons systems was the creation of a high-precision hypersonic aircraft missile system; as you already know for sure, it is the only one of its kind in the world. Its tests have been successfully completed, and, moreover, on December 1 of last year, these systems began their trial service at the airfields of the Southern Military District. The unique flight characteristics of the high-speed carrier aircraft allow the missile to be delivered to the point of discharge within minutes. The missile flying at a hypersonic speed, 10 times faster than the speed of sound, can also manoeuvre at all phases of its flight trajectory, which also allows it to overcome all existing and, I think, prospective anti-aircraft and anti-missile defence systems, delivering nuclear and conventional warheads in a range of over 2,000 kilometres. We called this system Kinzhal (Dagger). Video, please. (Video plays.) But this is not all I have to say. A real technological breakthrough is the development of a strategic missile system with fundamentally new combat equipment – a gliding wing unit, which has also been successfully tested. I will say once again what we have repeatedly told our American and European partners who are NATO members: we will make the necessary efforts to neutralise the threats posed by the deployment of the US global missile defence system. We mentioned this during talks, and even said it publicly. Back in 2004, after the exercises of the strategic nuclear forces when the system was tested for the first time, I said the following at a meeting with the press (It is embarrassing to quote myself, but it is the right thing to say here):

So, I said: “As other countries increase the number and quality of their arms and military potential, Russia will also need to ensure it has new generation weapons and technology. In this respect, I am pleased to inform you that successfully completed experiments during these exercises enable us to confirm that in the near future, the Russian Armed Forces, the Strategic Missile Forces, will receive new hypersonic-speed, high-precision new weapons systems that can hit targets at inter-continental distance and can adjust their altitude and course as they travel. This is a very significant statement because no country in the world as of now has such arms in their military arsenal.” End of quote. Of course, every word has a meaning because we are talking about the possibility of bypassing interception boundaries. Why did we do all this? Why did we talk about it? As you can see, we made no secret of our plans and spoke openly about them, primarily to encourage our partners to hold talks. Let me repeat, this was in 2004. It is actually surprising that despite all the problems with the economy, finances and the defence industry, Russia has remained a major nuclear power. No, nobody really wanted to talk to us about the core of the problem, and nobody wanted to listen to us. So listen now. Unlike existing types of combat equipment, this system is capable of intercontinental flight at supersonic speeds in excess of Mach 20. As I said in 2004, in moving to its target, the missile’s gliding cruise bloc engages in intensive manoeuvring – both lateral (by several thousand km) and vertical. This is what makes it absolutely invulnerable to any air or missile defence system. The use of new composite materials has made it possible to enable the gliding cruise bloc to make a long-distance guided flight practically in conditions of plasma formation. It flies to its target like a meteorite, like a ball of fire. The temperature on its surface reaches 1,600–2,000 degrees Celsius but the cruise bloc is reliably guided. Play the video, please. (Video plays). For obvious reasons we cannot show the outer appearance of this system here. This is still very important. I hope everyone understands this. But let me assure you that we have all this and it is working well. Moreover, Russian industrial enterprises have embarked on the development of another new type of strategic weapon. We called it the Avangard. We are well aware that a number of other countries are developing advanced weapons with new physical properties. We have every reason to believe that we are one step ahead there as well – at any rate, in the most essential areas. We have achieved significant progress in laser weapons. It is not just a concept or a plan any more. It is not even in the early production stages. Since last year, our troops have been armed with laser weapons.

I do not want to reveal more details. It is not the time yet. But experts will understand that with such weaponry, Russia’s defence capacity has multiplied. Here is another short video. (Video plays.) Those interested in military equipment are welcome to suggest a name for this new weaponry, this cutting-edge system. Of course, we will be refining this state-of-the-art technology. Obviously, there is far more in development than I have mentioned today. But this is enough for now. I want to specifically emphasise that the newly developed strategic arms – in fact, new types of strategic weapons – are not the result of something left over from the Soviet Union. Of course, we relied on some ideas from our ingenious predecessors. But everything I have described today is the result of the last several years, the product of dozens of research organisations, design bureaus and institutes. Thousands, literally thousands of our experts, outstanding scientists, designers, engineers, passionate and talented workers have been working for years, quietly, humbly, selflessly, with total dedication. There are many young professionals among them. They are our true heroes, along with our military personnel who demonstrated the best qualities of the Russian army in combat. I want to address each of them right now and say that there will absolutely be awards, prizes and honorary titles but, because I have met many of you in person many times, I know you are not after awards. The most important thing is to reliably ensure the security of our country and our people. As President and on behalf of the Russian people, I want to say thank you very much for your hard work and its results. Our country needs them so much. As I have already said, all future military products are based on remarkable advances that can, should and will be used in high-technology civilian sectors. I would like to stress that only a country with the highest level of fundamental research and education, developed research, technology, industrial infrastructure and human resources can successfully develop unique and complex weapons of this kind. You can see that Russia has all these resources. We will expand this potential and focus on delivering on the ambitious goals our country has set itself in terms of economic, social and infrastructure development. Effective defence will serve as a guarantee of Russia’s long-term development. Let me reiterate that each of the armament systems I referred to is uniquely important. Even more importantly, taken together all these advances enable the Defence Ministry and General Staff to develop a comprehensive defence system, in which every piece of new military equipment will be assigned

a proper role. On top of strategic weapons that are currently on combat alert and benefit from regular updates, Russia will have a defence capability that would guarantee its security in the long term. Of course, there are many things that we have to do in terms of military construction, but one thing is already clear: Russia possesses a modern, high-technology army that is quite compact given the size of the territory, centred on the officer corps, who are dedicated to their country and are ready to sacrifice anything for its people. Sooner or later, other armies will also have the technology, the weapons, even the most advanced ones. But this does not worry us, since we already have it and will have even better armaments in the future. What matters is that they will never have people or officers like the Russian pilot Major Roman Filipov. I hope that everything that was said today would make any potential aggressor think twice, since unfriendly steps against Russia such as deploying missile defences and bringing NATO infrastructure closer to the Russian border become ineffective in military terms and entail unjustified costs, making them useless for those promoting these initiatives. It was our duty to inform our partners of what I said here today under the international commitments Russia had subscribed to. When the time comes, foreign and defence ministry experts will have many opportunities to discuss all these matters with them, if of course our partners so desire. For my part, I should note that we have conducted the work to reinforce Russia's defence capability within the current arms control agreements; we are not violating anything. I should specifically say that Russia's growing military strength is not a threat to anyone; we have never had any plans to use this potential for offensive, let alone aggressive goals. We are not threatening anyone, not going to attack anyone or take away anything from anyone with the threat of weapons. We do not need anything. Just the opposite. I deem it necessary to emphasise (and it is very important) that Russia's growing military power is a solid guarantee of global peace as this power preserves and will preserve strategic parity and the balance of forces in the world, which, as is known, have been and remain a key factor of international security after WWII and up to the present day. And to those who in the past 15 years have tried to accelerate an arms race and seek unilateral advantage against Russia, have introduced restrictions and sanctions that are illegal from the standpoint of international law aiming to restrain our nation's development, including in the military area, I will say this: everything you have tried to prevent through such a policy has already happened. No one has managed to restrain Russia. Now we have to be aware of this reality and be sure that everything I have said today is not a bluff ‒ and it is not a bluff, believe me ‒ and to give it a thought and dismiss those who live in the past and are unable to look into the future, to stop rocking the boat we are all in and which is called the Earth.

In this connection, I would like to note the following. We are greatly concerned by certain provisions of the revised nuclear posture review, which expand the opportunities for reducing and reduce the threshold for the use of nuclear arms. Behind closed doors, one may say anything to calm down anyone, but we read what is written. And what is written is that this strategy can be put into action in response to conventional arms attacks and even to a cyber-threat. I should note that our military doctrine says Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons solely in response to a nuclear attack, or an attack with other weapons of mass destruction against the country or its allies, or an act of aggression against us with the use of conventional weapons that threaten the very existence of the state. This all is very clear and specific. As such, I see it is my duty to announce the following. Any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies, weapons of short, medium or any range at all, will be considered as a nuclear attack on this country. Retaliation will be immediate, with all the attendant consequences. There should be no doubt about this whatsoever. There is no need to create more threats to the world. Instead, let us sit down at the negotiating table and devise together a new and relevant system of international security and sustainable development for human civilisation. We have been saying this all along. All these proposals are still valid. Russia is ready for this. Our policies will never be based on claims to exceptionalism. We protect our interests and respect the interests of other countries. We observe international law and believe in the inviolable central role of the UN. These are the principles and approaches that allow us to build strong, friendly and equal relations with the absolute majority of countries. Our comprehensive strategic partnership with the People’s Republic of China is one example. Russia and India also enjoy a special privileged strategic relationship. Our relations with many other countries in the world are entering a new dynamic stage. Russia is widely involved in international organisations. With our partners, we are advancing such associations and groups as the CSTO, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and BRICS. We are promoting a positive agenda at the UN, G20 and APEC. We are interested in normal and constructive cooperation with the United States and the European Union. We hope that common sense will prevail and our partners will opt for honest and equal work together. Even if our views clash on some issues, we still remain partners because we must work together to respond to the most complex challenges, ensure global security, and build the future world, which is becoming increasingly interconnected, with more and more dynamic integration processes. Russia and its partners in the Eurasian Economic Union seek to make it a globally competitive integration group. The EAEU’s agenda includes building a common market for electricity, oil, petroleum products and gas,

harmonising financial markets, and linking our customs authorities. We will also continue to work on a greater Eurasian partnership. Colleagues, this is a turning period for the entire world and those who are willing and able to change, those who are taking action and moving forward will take the lead. Russia and its people have expressed this will at every defining moment in our history. In just 30 years, we have undergone changes that took centuries in other countries. We will continue to confidently chart our own course, just as we always have. We will stick together, as we always have. Our unity is the most durable foundation for future progress. In the coming years, it is our goal to further strengthen this unity so that we are one team that understands that change is necessary and is ready to devote its energy, knowledge, experience and talent to achieving common goals. Challenges and big goals give special meaning to our lives. We must be bold in our plans and actions, take responsibility and initiative, and grow stronger, which means being of use to our families, children, the whole country; changing the world and our country for the better; and creating the Russia that we all dream about. Only then will the next decade and the entire 21st century undoubtedly be an age of outstanding triumphs for Russia and our shared success. I believe it will be so. Thank you. In his first five years, President Xi Jinping has seized control of economic policy, reasserted the Communist Party’s authority and sidelined potential rivals in an unprecedented anti-corruption campaign.

Now, he’s set to make the Xi era permanent.

In a two-week session starting Monday, China’s rubber-stamp parliament is expected to enact sweeping legislative changes that would allow Xi to rule indefinitely and give him greater control over the levers of money and power. The agenda includes repealing presidential term limits, creating a powerful new agency to police officials and possibly approving the biggest regulatory overhaul of the $43 trillion finance-and-insurance sector in 15 years. March 18 Russian elections – Putin win by large amount – six years Result – X Jinping in indefinitely – makes China very dangerous RUSSIA and CHINA financial partnerships discussed in Annual Wrap Up very serious economic competition. Leadership stability in China and Russia

US leadership and vision extremely insecure – Brand now very childish Mueller made it very embarrassing to be an American in Europe MUELLER Let’s be realistic: The Russian propaganda activities detailed in Robert Mueller’s indictment last week had less impact on the election than 20 seconds of cable TV coverage (pick a channel) of any of Mr. Trump’s rallies. ~Holman W. Jenkins, Jr University of IOWA Now if you are against GMOs you are a communist sympathizer YOU CAN NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP!!!!!! -

Click here if you are having trouble viewing this message.

MEMORANDUM TO: Boards on Agriculture Assembly, Human Sciences, and Veterinary Medicine

Council for Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching (CARET)

Other Interested Individuals

FROM: Eddie G. Gouge

Senior Associate Director, Federal Relations -- Food and Agricultural Sciences,

Executive Director, Council for Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching,

and, Executive Director, Board on Human Sciences

DATE: February 27, 2018

RE: Russian Found Meddling in America's Food Systems

Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy, Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) at the U.

S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), has asked me to forward to you some information about

Russian meddling in America's food systems as reported in the Des Moines Register.

You've heard of the Russians hacking our computer systems and meddling in our elections.

Now they're meddling in our food systems according to work done by faculty at Iowa State

University.

What’s next?

To read the article and see the videos, click here.

Please do not hesitate to contact me whenever I can be of any assistance.

More cover-up questions The curious murder of Seth Rich poses questions that just won’t stay under the official rug

The Murder of Seth Rich Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times more > By James A. Lyons - - Thursday, March 1, 2018

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

With the clearly unethical and most likely criminal behavior of the upper management levels of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) exposed by Chairman Devin Nunes of the House Intelligence Committee, there are two complementary areas that have been conveniently swept under the rug.

The first deals with the murder of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) staffer Seth Rich, and the second deals with the alleged hacking of the DNC server by Russia. Both should be of prime interest to special counsel Robert Mueller, but do not hold your breath.

The facts that we know of in the murder of the DNC staffer, Seth Rich, was that he was gunned

down blocks from his home on July 10, 2016. Washington Metro police detectives claim that Mr. Rich was a robbery victim, which is strange since after being shot twice in the back, he was still wearing a $2,000 gold necklace and watch. He still had his wallet, key and phone. Clearly, he was not a victim of robbery.

This has all the earmarks of a targeted hit job. However, strangely no one has been charged with this horrific crime, and what is more intriguing is that no law enforcement agency is even investigating this murder. According to other open sources, Metro police were told by their “higher ups” that if they spoke about the case, they will be immediately terminated. It has been claimed that this order came down from very high up the “food chain,” well beyond the D.C. mayor’s office. Interesting.

One more unexplained twist is that on July 10, 2016, the same day Seth Rich was murdered, an FBI agent’s car was burglarized in the same vicinity. Included in the FBI equipment stolen was a 40 caliber Glock 22. D.C. Metro police issued a press release, declaring that the theft of the FBI agent’s car occurred between 5 and 7 a.m. Two weeks later, the FBI changed the time of the theft to between 12 a.m. and 2 a.m. Was the FBI gun used to shoot Seth Rich? Neither the FBI nor the Metro police will discuss.

Another aspect that needs to be uncovered is the FBI’s “denial” that its cyber experts who share space with the D.C. Metro police department at Cleveland Avenue in the District, assisted in accessing data on Mr. Rich’s laptop. Not likely. Data on the laptop revealed that Mr. Rich downloaded thousands of DNC emails and was in touch with Wikileaks. The file with evidence of what was on Mr. Rich’s laptop sits with the FBI in a co-shared space with the D.C. police department. According to Ed Butowsky, an acquaintance of the family, in his discussions with Joel and Mary Rich, they confirmed that their son transmitted the DNC emails to Wikileaks.

Since then, the DNC hired a “spokesperson,” Brad Burman, a known hatchet man to basically cut off any further communications with Mr. Rich’s parents. Interestingly, it is well known in the intelligence circles that Seth Rich and his brother, Aaron Rich, downloaded the DNC emails and was paid by Wikileaks for that information.

While Wikileaks doesn’t expose sources, Julian Assange gave a clear clue during an Aug. 9, 2016 interview on Dutch television when he implied that Mr. Rich was killed because he was the Wikileaks source of the DNC emails. Mr. Assange offered a $20,000 reward leading to the arrest of Mr. Rich’s killers. Also, why hasn’t Aaron Rich been interviewed, and where is he?

With regard to the alleged Russian hacking of the DNC server, Mr. Assange also offered information to the Trump administration to prove Russia didn’t hack the DNC server, as the DNC claimed. Mr. Assange also met with Orange Country Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, and gave him information to present to the Trump administration to prove no one hacked the DNC server.

However, with the Obama holdovers in key positions, it is not surprising that no one from the Trump administration would meet with the congressman or Mr. Assange. New Zealand tech expert Kim DotCom said he has proof that both he and Seth Rich were involved in passing the emails to Wikileaks, but he has been ignored as well.

The FBI opened an investigation into the theft of the DNC emails in July 2016. However, the FBI has not inspected the DNC server because the DNC won’t give permission. Is the FBI an extension of the DNC? That’s why we have subpoenas. Instead, the FBI relied on an assessment by a cyber security firm, Crowd Strike, hired by the Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC’s law firm Perkins Coie as proof that Russia was the hacker. Incompetence is an understatement.

Corruption at the highest levels of the DOJ/FBI is clear.

The Trump administration must take charge and get a competent attorney general to pursue these crimes.

• James A. Lyons, Jr., a retired U.S. Navy admiral, was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Trump to slap 25% tariff on steel imports

US equity indices fall but steelmakers rally after move to counter Chinese dumping

DOW DOWN 400 points – not happy – rumours now of both mcmaster and cohn leaving

EO list of 13 individuals up to over 1,000 pages

Posted on Thursday the 22nd of February 2018, by Kerry Lear : Staff Writer

Background Check Yourself Enter a Name & Search for Free! View Background Check

Instantly. checkpeople.com

 

WILL TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ALLOW STUDENTS TO

FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY? SMART ELECTION MOVE

Perhaps the best lesson a student can learn is that if you borrow money, you have to pay it back In December, it was reported by the Wall Street Journal that 4.6

million Americans are behind on their federal student loan payments. The total student debt is now at $1.4 trillion, which is more than double it was a decade ago. With that in mind, the Trump Administration announced this week that it is considering changing a current federal law that makes it difficult for those filing for bankruptcy to erase their student loan debt. "A decades-old federal law prevents Americans from discharging student debt in bankruptcy court unless they prove to a judge’s satisfaction that they face an “undue hardship,” such a stringent standard that few borrowers even try," writes the WSJ. "The Trump administration can’t change the law without congressional approval. But it can decide how aggressively to fight a borrower’s request to cancel loans in court. The government, the nation’s primary student lender, has traditionally fought such efforts, since any failure to repay loans comes at a cost to taxpayers." The 1976 law requires borrowers to prove in court that they have experienced an “undue hardship” to get their student loan debt erased, but Congress has never defined the term. These cases have been settled based on what the judges perceived the term to mean. There have been very few cases where borrowers’ student loans were expunged in their bankruptcy claims. WSJ reports that only 500 individuals out of the 766,000 bankruptcy cases were able to erase these loans last year. Not to mention, these cases can be expensive since they are often over a span of a few years. Also, the majority of those filing can't afford sophisticated representation. On Tuesday, the Education Department announced that it would take into account the public’s input on if the policy needs a change. Student advocates have been lobbying to change the law to better protect borrowers for years.

“The department will review the data collected to determine whether there is any need to modify how undue-hardship claims by student loan borrowers in bankruptcy are evaluated,” said the Education Department. However, this could make it more difficult for Americans to borrow and would evidently make it even more difficult for the Department of Education to collect the debt owed. "The Education Department already struggles to collect on student debt and recent reports suggest that government lending to college and graduate students could soon become an immense drain on federal coffers. As of Sept. 30, 22% of Americans with federal student loans hadn’t made a payment in at least a year," writes WSJ. The costs for universities and college are at an all-time high and the majority of Americans take out loans to help cover these expenses. The Trump Administration is aiming to cut the significant federal funding that is being funneled into student loans in the latest proposed budget plan. This plan would increase monthly payments, but reduce the length of time to get loan forgiveness– along with eliminating the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program for those working full-time in qualifying public service positions. The budget also proposed to put an end to subsidized student loans. This would mean the interest would start accruing once the loans were taken out versus after they finish school. While the current federal loan program will cost taxpayers $170 billion over the next ten years. Author's note: Although we can understand that those filing bankruptcy are in a dire position, this can’t be solved without giving away taxpayers’ money. Unfortunately, the student loan program has encouraged much higher tuitions at universities. Student often have difficulty realizing what burden this will be when they

graduate. Also, the schools don't worry about what the students can pay, since they can always get loans. Pence PRIVATE SPACE INITIATIVE AND ADVISORY COUNCIL More in 1st Quarter Wrap Up on the Space Based Economy  I find it interesting that the resignation of Jacob Zuma, the death of the opposition leader of Zimbabwe M. Tsvangirai and the resignation of the president of Ethiopia all occured within 24 hours and within the time period of the Munich Security Conference that took place last week. Even though the whole country of South Africa prayed for Zuma's resignation he gave no indication he would step down any time soon. And then all of a sudden even one of the Guptas was arrested that night. It is so unreal this would happen and that the Guptas would not have been protected by some kind of deal or argreement. So it looks to me that 'someone' higher up had a made a decision. And possibly at the Security Conference. Zuma apparently received lots of money from Russia promissing them to have them build nuclear power plants in exchange for the Russians having a military station here in RSA. I guess he owes them something if that is not happening now.

South Africa – what is going on Leadership turned over at time of Munich Security Conference – top down orders White farmers being slaughtered – land stolen Enormous crisis on the way – when they finish killing the white farmers – kill the economy – lawlessness and killing the producers always does JP Morgan is the correspondent banker Watch Hotel Rwanda – this could only happen if top of financial community wants this happen What is the plan – no idea – keeping an eye - collapse SF so industrial ag can control the land?

Hero This Week

The Solari Team – working together – doing a great job. Outstanding spiritual warfare warriors. Great people. We have a rule – families first –

carrying major responsibility taking care of family and dealing with extreme childishness that you deal with when you tell the truth – they do it because each one loves helping people and enjoy intelligence – the free and inspired

life.

Hats off to them – rose to grab the trapeeze 30 SECOND BREAK

Let’s Go to the Movies

No movies – 2 +1 Video in interview this week

INTERVIEW

BILL NIMAN AND HARRY BLAZER – Why bill is doing a testing tool

MARVELOUS TIME IN NETHERLANDS AND SEEING THOMAS

If we are going to preserve and grow Western culture – need to network Europe and US – strong ties of those who are committed to freedom and

western values

“We have to pierce the tunnels of loneliness with the conviction that there are other people and one has to trust that one is led to them.” ~ Thomas Meyer

Last week, Robert Dupper and I drove from the Netherlands to Basel to film Thomas Meyer for a wide-ranging conversation about the Future of Europe.

Thomas is the head of Perseus Publishing, which publishes The Present Age. He has joined me twice before on the Solari Report – last summer for a discussion of how to confront evil – and the year before to introduce us to Rudolf Steiner.

This was an intimate conversation – we spoke about how to build a global network of people who understand reality and share a spiritual commitment to provide leadership and to nurture Western culture and values during changing times.

The full video interview will be posted here on Thursday at 6pm ET.

My Money & Markets will be posted here late Thursday evening. I will discuss what is happening the latest developments in financial markets, geopolitical new and accelerating actions by the national security state. E-mail your questions for Ask Catherine to askcatherine[at]solari[dot]com.

30 SECOND BREAK

ASK CATHERINE

Hi Catherine, I just listened again to your discussion with Jason while in San Diego. I wonder if the portable lab you mentioned would be able to tell you, through its testing, what effects you have been - or are - getting from the use of the Blu-shield and the QRS. It was a great discussion, and I will probably listen to many times more. (I was also impressed with HBlazer’s interview with Don Huber. Thank you so much for all the helpful/healthful information,

Catherine,

After a long hiatus, it’s good to be back in the Solari family – I am a recent “re-subscriber!”! I have missed the unique and in-depth review of money and markets, politics and everything in between including the amazing line-up of interesting and thought provoking guests. I am excited for this week’s interview with Bill Niman. I will never forget your exhortation from years ago “if you don’t know your farmer, you shouldn’t eat it.” Living in the heart of Montana’s best beef and lamb country, that’s much easier to do than when I previously lived in Texas.

In fact, because of conversations with one of Sweet Grass County’s great natural beef producers (Roger and Betsy Indreland, Indreland Ranch and Crazy Peak Montana Premium Beef https://www.indrelandranch.com/ ), I was introduced to the revolutionary (at least in terms of “modern ag”) concepts of Nicole Masters an agro-ecologist specializing in the science of soil health and regenerative agriculture – essentially using biology to tend the “livestock” in the soil to take care of the livestock above the soil (https://www.integritysoils.co.nz/). Two weeks ago, I had the opportunity to attend Nicole’s Soil Masterclass in Bozeman, MT. Key concepts include the power of photosynthesis to charge soils, the interplay of soil bacteria, fungi, protozoa and nematodes, weeds as indicators and, of course, the magic power of worms!

While native to New Zealand, Masters is working her magic at farms and ranches across the western United States and Canada. Using Masters’ techniques, local producers are seeing significant improvements to and increased carrying capacity of both irrigated and dryland pastures, increased resilience and productivity, reduced needs for inputs and reduced costs. After a number of years of biologically active management in this county, the soils are visibly changing – the dark carbon-rich layer is

thickening (compared to control and almost non-existent in native soils), roots are thicker and penetrating deeper and the worms are back! According to Masters, for every 1% increase in carbon in an average loam soil there is a corresponding increase in water retention capacity of 27,000 gallons/AC. In the semi-arid West, that information is truly mana from heaven.

I apologize in advance for the length of this introduction. I believe Nicole Masters would be an excellent Solari guest, and would encourage you to investigate her work and to reach out to her at . I believe Nicole would be an excellent resource for your subscribers interested in using proven methods to return soils to a state of remarkable health and productivity. I have attached a copy of Nicole’s CV for your perusal. If your schedule permits, I would also encourage you to attend Nicole’s Soil Masterclass.

If you are ever near or travelling through Sweet Grass County Montana (Big Timber), please give me a call and I will arrange a range tour for you.

Dear Catherine, Thank you for the many enlightening posts on your website. You've helped me appreciate beauty and culture ever more deeply. But I'm still grappling with how to interact and respond to my local circle, especially folks at my church, who now are jumping on the anti-gun bandwagon with even more fervor (if that's possible) than they had in opposing Trump's election and subsequent presidency. They buy the mainstream story (about the recent school shooting) of the lone troubled gunman and see the solution as banning guns. I don't want to argue with good people and their good intentions. It seems like arguing will get us nowhere but into a state of chaos. Last time I asked you a question along these lines, you said that "transparency" would help. Please share your thoughts or views on how we can bring positive energy to such a challenging situation, especially in our own personal circles. Again, thank you so much for all you do to help your subscribers and make the world a better place!

PRAY FOR THEM

PRAY THE DEERS CRY Respond truthfully if they ask

Recommend they want Richard Dolan’s False Flag – or arrange a showing with a Pot Luck dinner

Always 1 or 2 good DVDs Try to find ways of giving them energy in a manner that gives you energy

Are you familiar with his World Affairs Brief? Opinion?

Yes – am not current. Read his early work on locations and have not followed since.

I believe this is important! Could this be the LOCAL bridge to the missing $21 Trillion? A game

changer!

Video: Midge Mathis, Karen Stewart, Ramola D: TI & Whistleblower Surveillance Blacklist

Watchlist Targets

See 1:22, 1:35 (money laundering, rico, 911 victims!, Wells Fargo), 1:43, 1:47 - NSA,

Catholic Church! 1:49 websites to search.

!! Midge Mathis has found 911 victims who had contracts taken out on them before 911,

and BEFORE they died!

The problem is, counties are getting wise to this and are locking up the information. This

searching needs to be done ASAP before the information disappears - just like the DOD

disappeared their financials from Dr. Mark Skidmore.

Midge Mathis is now working full time to do the class action lawsuit

at https://www.targetedjustice.com/

THERE ARE BITS AND PIECES. $21 TRILLION INVOLVES EVERYTHING

READ PENSION FUND ARTICLE

FYI Catherine: http://whitehatsreport.com/2018/01/29/1400/

Catherine,

I recall listening to one you your video’s about missing trillions.

In it you describe the existence of two groups of globalists; the Pilgrims and the Ziocons.

With the Satanist Ziocons being exposed and forced to resign, do you think that the Pilgrims are alive and well and avoiding the spotlight?

Also, on February 2nd, you tweeted the following:

This Week on Money & Markets: Forget the Memo - get the real story. Congress authorizing no warrant surveillance, failure to comply with black budget to cover up $21 T missing and $1.5 trillion for nuclear weapons. Fascism won big in January.

Do you think there is a possibility that Trump is a Pilgrim and that we, the few people that care about the Constitution, are being flanked by the Pilgrims while we are distracted waiting for all the pedophile Satanists to be arrested?

May God’s blessings be with you,

CAN WE SEE MILITARY VS ZICON

Interested developments with Kelly arranging to pull Kushner’s security and Police recommending indictment of Netanyahu – Military making sure the

Ziocons can not start a war.

Have you seen this - a bit long the last 10 minutes is very good. I think this is THE local bridge to

the missing $21 Trillion. It's a game changer! Couldn't you just see mothers and grandmothers

searching their counties?

Midge Mathis, Karen Stewart, Ramola D: TI & Whistleblower Surveillance Blacklist Watchlist

Targets

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxO7F0qf3q4

Hi Catherine: I am honored to be able to contact you. Below is a direct quote from Seth. It reveals why the cabal are so intent on keeping us convinced war, disaster and doom are our reality. It also reveals how we neutralize their program: concentrate only on the positive and the constructive and the healthful, and never on the opposite. Stay strong. We need you. Seth: Now  I  have  told  you  time  and  time  again,  my  friends,  that  you  construct  your  physical  universe  and  your  private  environment  in  line  with  your  inner  expectations,  for  they  mirror  perfectly  the  deepest  areas  of  your  own  inner  reality.

This  is  perhaps  the  closest  I  can  come  in  handing  you  anything  that  approaches  basic  truth.    All  of  our  material  follows  from  this,  and  any  other  information  contained  in  the  material  follows  and  flows  out  of  this  primary  statement.

I  do  not  speak  symbolically,  but  quite  literally.

When  you  find  yourselves  therefore  noticing  more  and  more  the  inequalities,  the  disasters  and  the  shames  that  come  within  your  sphere  of  perception,  you  add  to  their  existence.    This  may  confound  what  common  sense  may  tell  you.    However,  concentration  reinforces  the  quality  which  is  concentrated  upon.

When  you  are  concentrating  upon  destructive  elements,  you  lose  on  two  points.    You  reinforce  the  destructive  qualities  by  the  very  act  of  concentrating  upon  them,  and  you  rob  yourselves  of  the  constructive  qualities  that  you  could  be  concentrating  upon,  and  therefore  that  you  could  be  reinforcing.

For  an  example,  we  will  take  your  friend  and  her  tumor.    The  tumor  was  formed  by  inner  concentration.    She  feared  a  tumor  so  strongly  that  subconsciously  she  focused  her  energies  in  those  directions.    It  existed  in  her  mind  long  before  it  was  physically  constructed.

Had  she  concentrated  upon  constructive  elements,  upon  positive  and  not  negative  qualities,  not  only  would  the  tumor  itself  be  nonexistent,  but  she  would  have  constructed  a  positive  element  in  its  stead.    A  spiritual  growth,  for  example.

All  of  these  matters,  you  see,  and  many  more,  from  the  considerations  of  health  and  the  formation  of  destructive  ulcers  and  tumors,  to  the  construction  of  any  simple  object,  to  the  construction  of  an  apparition…all  of  these  are  in  one  way  or  another  connected  with  inner  focus  and  concentration.

You  will  in  all  cases  attempt  to  construct  as  physical  reality  your  inner  conception  of  what  reality  is.    Your  physical  environment  and  conditions  are  a  mirror  of  your  own  basic  conceptions  of  reality.    If  the  environment  changes  it  is  because  your  inner  conceptions  have  changed,  and  no  smallest  alteration  is  made  within  physical  reality,  that  has  not  first  been  made  within  the  inner  self.

From  The  Early  Sessions,  Book  6  of  the  Seth  Material;  pp.  114-­‐115.Session  253.

NOT A FAN OF CHANNELED MATERIAL – NEVER KNOW HOW

MUCH IS COMING FROM LANGLEY SINCE THEY DO HAVE THAT TECHNOLOGY

DO BELIEVE POWER OF INTENTION, FAITH AND THOUGHTS IS SIGNIFICANT – Listen to interview with Bill Tiller and Lynne McTaggart

Dear Catherine, I thought you might appreciate this. I heard the re-broadcast today, Feb. 17, and was deeply moved. Hearts, Addi Ryan Werner hosts the program and we learn some powerful messages from choir members. https://www.cpr.org/news/story/the-spirituals-project-slave-era-songs The Spirituals Project Choir - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_veCVZzRMOI Denver University page for Spirituals Project choir includes short clip of choir director speaking. http://portfolio.du.edu/tsp

VERY BEAUTIFUL - REPOSTED

30 SECOND BREAK

CLOSING

Diving into the nuts and bolts of power…..

Mar 08 Reforming Our Voting Systems with Dr. Laura Pressley

Mar 15 The Lies & Damned Lies of School Shootings with Jon Rappoport

Marc

Until next week…

Please remember, don’t worry about whether or not there is a conspiracy. If you are not in a conspiracy, then you need to start one. Good night and good luck.

Appendix

I  do  my  best  not  to  send  my  friends  political  messages  these  days,  and  I  hope  that  you  won’t  consider  this  political,  either,  except  in  the  sense  that  it  affects  all  of  us.      Today  I  found  that  I  was  unable  to  post  any  comments  nor  upload  any  images  on  Facebook.    When  I  attempted  to  do  so,  a  transparent  grey  screen  blocks  my  attempt.    There  is  an  “X”  in  upper  right-­‐hand  corner  to  close  the  box.    When  I  do  that,  the  screen  goes  away  but  the  page  resolves  to  “Top  Story”  (and  NOT  “Most  Recent,”  which  is  my  preference)  and  “my”  box  for  “Make  a  Post”  disappears.

I  was  able  to  go  to  another  website  and  compare  notes  with  other  groups  there.    It  seems  that  all  of  us  are  being  blocked.    In  other  words,  Facebook  is  blocking  anyone  who  has  ever  questioned  any  politically-­‐correct  narrative.

And  you  may  not  be  aware  that  hundreds  of  Youtube  and  Twitter  and  other  social-­‐media  sites  have  also  been  banned  this  week,  as  well.

FREE  SPEECH  ON  THE  INTERNET  IS  UNDER  ATTACK!

*  *  *  *  *

Most  of  you  who  are  receiving  this  don’t  really  use  Facebook,  Youtube  or  have  an  online  presence,  so  I  doubt  you  are  aware  of  this.    It  will  not  be  covered  in  mainstream  news.

Further,  most  of  you  are  anti-­‐Trump  and  may  even  feel  “Good!    I  don’t  agree  with  those  people  and  their  ideas.”

But  I  would  ask  you  this  simple  question,  one  that  has  been  used  for  time  immemorial  for  vetting  issues  such  as  these:  “HOW  WOULD  I  FEEL  IF  IT  WERE  MY  OPINION  OR  FREEDOM  OF  SPEECH  THAT  WAS  BEING  BLOCKED,  BANNED  OR  DEMONETIZED?”

Despite  any  disagreements  we  might  have  regarding  politics  or  President  Trump  or  politically-­‐correct  speech  and  not  questioning  the  official  narrative,  I  would  like  to  believe  that  my  friends  DO,  in  fact,  support  the  very  critical  FIRST  Amendment  (and  first  for  a  reason!)  of  our  Bill  of  Rights.    I  am  hoping  that  you  will  be  as  appalled  as  I  am  at  this  blatant  suppression  of  free  exchange  online.    THIS  IS  NOT  BOLSHEVIK  USSR,  AND  SHOULD  NOT  BE  OPERATING  AS  SUCH!

I  have  emailed,  phoned  and  snail-­‐mailed  the  White  House.    I  encourage  you  to  do  the  same  if  you  feel  strongly  about  the  First  Amendment.

But  I  also  know  that  most  of  you  will  not  feel  personally  threatened  by  this  turn  of  events  because  it  does  not  affect  you,  personally.    I  merely  want  to  make  you  aware  it  is  happening,  and  hopefully  to  have  you  think,  long  and  hard,  about  the  implications  for  our  Republic.

Thank  you  for  reading  this  far,

Shari  ^i^

          TO: Boards on Agriculture Assembly, Human Sciences, and Veterinary Medicine Council for Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching (CARET) Other Interested Individuals FROM: Eddie G. Gouge Senior Associate Director, Federal Relations -- Food and Agricultural Sciences, Executive Director, Council for Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching, and, Executive Director, Board on Human Sciences DATE: February 27, 2018 RE: Russian Found Meddling in America's Food Systems Dr. Sonny Ramaswamy, Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) at the U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), has asked me to forward to you some information about Russian meddling in America's food systems as reported in the Des Moines Register. You've heard of the Russians hacking our computer systems and meddling in our elections. Now they're meddling in our food systems according to work done by faculty at Iowa State University. What’s next? To read the article and see the videos, click here. Please do not hesitate to contact me whenever I can be of any assistance.         Well,  it's  odd  and  interesting  to  me  that  you  say  that:  I  would  agree  and  have  long  thought  this,  i.e.,  that  the  emphasis  on  piano  as  being  at  the  center  of  the  keyboard  world  is  subliminally  deliberate...  the  romantic  era  and  the  disappearance  of  Christianity.      

Wait  till  you  read  Feb  27th's  blogs  and  tidbits...!    Jos    

 From:  Catherine  Austin  Fitts  <catherine@solari.com>  Sent:  Sunday,  February  25,  2018  9:37  AM  To:  Joseph  Farrell  Subject:  Re:  ....AT  LAST!!!  ON  THE  RIGHT  INSTRUMENT!        Wow      the  intimate  impact  of  this  music  is  so  much  more  powerful  that  it  is  shocking  to  realize  that  I  have  never  heard  this  before  .  This  is  a  physically  healing  and  uplifing  experience    Getting  rid  of  organs  is  a  plan.  This  is  too  supportive  of  moving  peoples  intelligence  into  a  higher  mind.      On  2/24/18  11:29  PM,  Joseph  Farrell  wrote:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c6APlKcse8  

                 

 The classic PE playbook is to buy a company with borrowed money, take out enormous loans, and pocket the proceeds. According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, from 2013 to 2017 PE firms received $100 billion in debt-funded payouts, while PE-owned companies defaulted on $49.2 billion worth of loans.