The Pricing Decision Process in Software-as-a-Service Companies …903095/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2016-02-13 · as ignoring all competition, is not a good strategy either since it leads

UPPSALA UNIVERSITET

Företagsekonomiska institutionen

Bachelor's Thesis, 15 credits

The Pricing Decision Process inSoftware-as-a-Service Companies

Supervisor: Susanne Åberg

Author: Susanna Wilczkowski

Abstract

This study examines various approaches used by companies providing software-as-a-service (SaaS) in a business-to-business (B2B) environment to find a pricing strategy. To be able to meet competition in a global market, a good pricing strategy is vital. Pricing is an important part of marketing, which must be congruent with the company's overall objectives. Strategic pricing is made up of different factors represented in the strategic pricing pyramid, which is based on a value-based approach. It is paramount to know your customers and their preferences when designing a pricing strategy and selecting pricing models, price metrics, market segmentation, bundling, and price levels. After having estimated how much value a product or service creates for a customer, this must be communicated to potential customers in order to convince them to purchase your offering. Choosing the right pricing strategy is not a onetimeoccurrence, but an on-going process. In this qualitative study, three case studies are performed to tie theory to real world practise.

2

Table of ContentsAbstract.......................................................................................................................... 21. Introduction................................................................................................................3

1.1 Background..........................................................................................................31.2 Problem Statement...............................................................................................41.3 Purpose.................................................................................................................51.4 Scope....................................................................................................................5

2 Theory......................................................................................................................... 62.1 Value Creation......................................................................................................6

2.1.1 Product Bundling...........................................................................................72.1.2 Market Segmentation....................................................................................7

2.2 Price Structure......................................................................................................72.2.1 Price Metrics..................................................................................................82.2.2 Pricing Models...............................................................................................8

2.3 Price and Value Communication.........................................................................102.4 Pricing Policy.......................................................................................................112.5 Price Level Strategies.........................................................................................112.6 The Software-as-a-Service Business Model.........................................................112.7 Pricing in a Business-to-Business Setting...........................................................112.8 The Pricing Decision Process in SaaS Companies for Business Markets..............12

2.8.1 Model to Select a Pricing Strategy...............................................................123 Methodology..............................................................................................................16

3.1 The Project's Objective and the Scientific Characteristics of the Study..............163.2 Scientific Approach.............................................................................................163.3 Method............................................................................................................... 173.4 Data Collection...................................................................................................17

3.4.1 Secondary Data...........................................................................................173.4.2 Primary Data...............................................................................................17

4 Results.......................................................................................................................194.1 Case A................................................................................................................ 19

4.1.1 Company Presentation................................................................................194.1.2 Price Model and Metric................................................................................194.1.3 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition...........................194.1.4 Value Assessment........................................................................................204.1.5 Pricing Strategy...........................................................................................20

4.2 Case B................................................................................................................214.2.1 Company Presentation................................................................................214.2.2 Price Model and Metric................................................................................214.2.3 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition...........................214.2.4 Value Assessment........................................................................................224.2.5 Pricing Strategy...........................................................................................22

4.3 Case C................................................................................................................234.3.1 Company Presentation................................................................................234.3.2 Price Model and Metric................................................................................234.3.3 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition...........................234.3.4 Value Assessment........................................................................................244.3.5 Pricing Strategy...........................................................................................24

5 Analysis.....................................................................................................................255.1 Price Model and Metric.......................................................................................255.2 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition..................................255.3 Value Assessment...............................................................................................265.4 Pricing Strategy..................................................................................................26

6 Conclusions............................................................................................................... 286.1 Further Research................................................................................................28

1

7 References.................................................................................................................298 Appendix - Interview Guide.......................................................................................31

2

1. IntroductionIn today's rapidly changing global market, pricing strategically has become vital for a business. Understanding the value the company's products or services create for the customers and developing a strategy containing all the stages of the strategic pricing pyramid is instrumental in gaining maximum profitability and long-term revenue.

1.1 Background

The global economic crisis from late 2007 to early 2010 stressed the need to focus more on pricing as companies were trying to maintain profitability. When economic conditions are bad, many turn toprice cutting as a quick way to ride out the storm without realising the possible long-term ramifications (Piercy et al., 2010). Lowering prices to hurt competition can seem like a good idea, but it tends to pricing below the optimal level and a loss of profit. However, overconfidence, such as ignoring all competition, is not a good strategy either since it leads to taking on larger risks than necessary (Hinterhuber, 2015). The increased competition during the crisis has made it imperative to make pricing decisions part of the company's strategy, instead of merely a tactical tool. Pricing has long been the most neglected part of marketing, despite the effect on profitability and the powerful strategic capability if applied satisfactory, and many marketers have failed to acknowledgethe connection between the pricing approach and the company's overall strategy. Strategic pricing has gone from accentuating seller concerns, such as costs, to meeting the customers' expectations ofvalue. It's essential to find new and better methods to create customer value as a response to the more competitive market (Piercy et al., 2010).

A pricing strategy serves to complement the company's product offering and sales strategy (Deeter & Jung, 2013). The objective of strategic pricing is profitability. Making a profit requires more thansimply choosing the right price level; which features to include in the product bundle, what to offer to different groups of customers, estimating the perceived value of the customer, purchasing terms, determining the right pricing model, and deciding on the optimal way to measure usage is also of great importance (Nagle et al., 2011). The five sets of choices, which the pricing decision consists of, are represented in the strategic pricing pyramid (Nagle et al., 2011).

Figure 1: The strategic pricing pyramid (p. 23, Nagle et al., 2011)

3

Another aspect of pricing is that customers tend to interpret the price as not only the costs related to the service but also as an indication of the service quality. There is only weak correlation between price and quality. When no or little information about the quality is available, customers rely more on the dependence that a higher price is a sign of a high quality service. A higher price can even lead to a higher demand. The perception of value is not always logic; customers can experience better performance after consuming an expensive energy drink as opposed to a cheaper one. This is another reason why service prices must be determined carefully; the price of a service must set the right level of expectations of quality and not only cover costs or match competitors (Hinterhuber, 2015). Pricing a product or service is a very complex decision, which necessitates the use of a model to be able to systematically find a working strategy (Deeter & Jung, 2013). It is not a single occurrence, it's an ongoing process (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

Sometimes a new kind of product or service requires the marketers to change the pricing strategy. The development of the internet and faster hardware has made it possible to provide software over the internet without the need for installation or owning the licence. This software distribution method is called software-as-a-service. The software is rented rather than purchased, which requiresa new set of price models. There is not a lot of literature about pricing in software-as-a-service companies, a market that is rapidly growing, which shows for the necessity of more scientific research. Most existing papers on software-as-a-service focuses on the technical part, although the most significant changes recently have been the design of business models in such companies (Luoma et al., 2012).

Since purchases between companies account for more than half of the economy in industrialized countries, it's significant to have an understanding of the business market and the similarities and differences between business-to-business and business-to-consumer marketing (Ellis, 2011). For every purchase by an individual consumer, there are often multiple underlying business-to-business transactions. As a result of that, a growing consumer market generally leads to a growing business market. Some companies aim their products exclusively toward the business market, while other target their products to private consumers as well. Although there are similarities, the two markets require different marketing approaches because of the vast differences in buying behaviour betweenconsumers and businesses (Hutt & Speh, 2010). The purchasing power of organizations is also, compared to consumers, much greater; inter-organizational buying and selling makes in fact a majorcontribution to most national economies (Ellis, 2011).

1.2 Problem Statement

Pricing a product or a service is a multidimensional problem with variables within and outside the company. Since this study takes its setting in a global context, and with all three organizations in thecase study operating all over the world, the complexity increases. Pricing is an important part of marketing as well as the company's overall objectives. As stated above, making such a complex decision is impossible without a systematic approach. In this thesis, I present a model which is a methodical way to select a pricing strategy.

4

1.3 Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate the various pricing strategies used by companies providing software-as-a-service in a business-to-business environment, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each and identifying in which situations each strategy is most appropriate. In orderto determine how theory has been put into practice, a case study will be conducted. The comparisonbetween normative research and the empirical example will be made with regard to the variables in the strategic pricing pyramid that the pricing decision is based on.

The problem is presented in the following questions:

How do you find a pricing strategy for an SaaS company toward the business market? Are companies making pricing strategy decisions that correspond to the suggested model?

1.4 Scope

In this thesis, I will only study the pricing structure in companies providing software-as-a-service. Even if the company targets both business-to-business and business-to-consumer markets, I will exclusively investigate the marketing strategy toward the business market. Because of that, I will hereinafter use the word "customer" meaning a company as the buying party, as opposed to a consumer, which is a person.

5

2 TheorySuccessful pricing can't compensate for other badly performed strategies, but less successful pricingcan certainly make the result less profitable. It's therefore important that the pricing strategy is coherent with the organization's other objectives. Companies should work proactively with their strategies instead of reviewing them when they're suddenly not working as well anymore (Hutt & Speh, 2010). There is intrinsic value in acting before your competitors, since it makes them having to react to your actions, and not the other way around, which gives you the advantage (Deeter & Jung, 2013). The objective of strategic pricing isn't primarily to offer the lowest price, it is to price more profitably rather than making a larger number of sales. Setting a price based on what you think the customer is willing to pay is hard, buyers are seldom honest with how much they are actually willing to pay. The price should instead reflect what the product is really worth and the goals of marketing and sales when it comes to pricing is to communicate the true value of the product (Nagle et al., 2011). Hutt & Speh (2010) agrees that an understanding of how customers perceive value is of paramount importance in the pricing process.

The various factors in the term pricing were introduced in the strategic pricing pyramid above and will be discussed in detail below before the model to select a pricing strategy, that is desired in the complex process of pricing decision-making, will be presented.

2.1 Value Creation

Historically, the most common pricing approach has been cost-based pricing, where marketers calculate prices by covering the costs and adding a percentage profit. Basing the price of a product solely on the costs, fails to recognize the customers' perceptions of value and the competition, making it a less competitive strategy (Piercy et al., 2010). Due to the fact that unit costs change withvolume, cost-based pricing tends to overpricing in weak markets and underpricing in strong ones, which is the exact opposite of a good marketing strategy. Another problem with cost-based pricing, pointed out by Nagle et al. (2011), is that pricing also affects volume, making the outcome of a newly set price hard to predict. Realizing the disadvantages with cost-based pricing and that pricing needs to reflect market conditions and be based on other factors, many companies have moved the pricing decision-making from sales people to top management (Piercy et al., 2010).

Since the most important thing in business-to-business marketing is customer value, business marketers should make creating value a strategic goal (Hutt & Speh, 2010). However, there are some challenges when adopting a value-based pricing strategy. Understanding and influencing the customer's desired value, quantifying and communicating the value, and being able to capture valueplays a pivotal role in succeeding (Hinterhuber & Liozu, 2015). Customer value is the overall experience a customer gets when buying a product. It includes elements such as product quality, reliable delivery, and customer support. The customer shouldn't feel that they get what they pay for, they should experience that they get more than they pay for. That is, companies should offer higher quality as well as lower prices to stay competitive. There are two types of benefits that create value;core benefits and add-on benefits. Core benefits are minimum requirements that need to be fulfilled and that are expected by the customer. Add-on benefits, for instance flexible hours, contribute to theperceived value and differentiate the company. Recent studies show that benefits are more important to how business customers evaluate the service than pricing and costs (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

6

2.1.1 Product Bundling

In price negotiations between businesses, one way to create additional value to the customer can be to offer different packages of products. Instead of offering just a standard bundle of goods and services to all customers, it can make sense to remove some elements of the package to be able to lower the price and vice versa. Giving the customer a choice of individualizing the offering increases its perception of value from the company (Ellis, 2011).

Two companies with similar offerings may price their products differently since one competitor is perceived to offer more value. Economic value is the cost savings from choosing a particular competitor, whereas commodity and differentiation value is value assigned to product features that resemble or are different from the competitors' respectively. Organizational buyers are generally willing to pay more for differentiation value, since these features will be missing otherwise. The most well-performing business-to-business organizations create unique features which they also manage to show potential customers how valuable they are (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

2.1.2 Market Segmentation

Challenges of pricing a product or service are that customers value the products differently, are more or less price sensitive, have different preferences, and sometimes intend to use the product in different ways. Depending on how fast the customer needs the product, payment terms, and the amount of service and support required, the cost to serve different customers varies. If a company price its services equally to all customers, there is a tradeoff between volume and margin; some customers would be willing to pay much more while others find the price too high and choose not tobuy the product although a lower price would still render a profit. A solution to that problem is to use a segmented price structure (Nagle et al., 2011).

Segmentation means charging different groups of customers different amounts based on different bundles of the service. This does not necessarily mean that there is a correlation between the cost ofthe quality level of the offering and the price. The strategy is based on the assumption that different segments of customers expect different levels of quality and are more or less willing to pay a certainprice. An example of market segmentation pricing is a reduced price for students which gives reduced hours of use of the service (Wilson, et al., 2012). Demand, price sensitivity and potential profitability can vary significantly across market segments (Hutt & Speh, 2010). A good approach when segmenting the market is to categorize it based on needs, rather than on presumed price sensitivity (Hinterhuber, 2008).

2.2 Price Structure

Delivering value to customers as a strategic approach during economic decline and recovery calls for more creative ways of offering the product or service in terms of price models and metrics. One example of a strategy that shows a new way of thinking is payment-by-results for medicine; the British drug company Janssen-Cilag began to charge cancer patients only if the treatment worked. Another example is the à la carte pricing used by many airlines, meaning that the price of the ticket is usually quite low, but optional add-ons such as checking baggage and food on board are often charged extra. The price structure should be aligned with the perceived customer value instead of

7

based on the delivered product. (Piercy et al., 2010).

2.2.1 Price Metrics

The units by which the price of a product or service is measured are called price metrics. It's the definition of the terms of the business exchange; what will be received for a certain price (Nagle et al., 2011). The metrics can be categorized into usage, capacity, users, certain features available, a specific period of time, or customer segments. Different value metrics appeal to different customers,hence the company can create value by selecting the metric that the customer prefers. To keep customers, it's important to use metrics that displays to the customer how much value they're gettingfrom the service (Deeter & Jung, 2013). Many companies adopt price metrics by default or traditionand don't realize the importance of alignment with value. Using a better metric than your competitors leads to an advantage; a good price metric is easy to understand and measure across all market segments and is in line with how the customers experience the product value (Piercy et al., 2010).

2.2.2 Pricing Models

Pricing is a matter of balancing between acquiring customers easily and bringing up market share, and keeping prices high enough for the business to be profitable. The pricing model should also be simple enough so that the customers can understand it easily (Deeter & Jung, 2013). The four most common price models in SaaS companies are the freemium, the consumption, the tiered, and the perpetual licence model.

Freemium Model

The feature-based freemium model offers basic services for free, while charging for more advanced features. This business model stems from the fact that it's easier to get potential customers to try a service for free instead of having to spend a lot on marketing to persuade possibly interested customers to buy a licence before getting to try the service. The goal is, of course, that the offering will meet the customers' needs and that they will want to upgrade to a premium subscription. This strategy is also based on the assumption that customers tend to undervalue a service and allowing them to try the product without making any commitment will lower the barrier enough to sign up. Inagreement with this assumption, a good pricing strategy is to create an incentive to potential customers to try the service, thus giving them the opportunity to realize the value of it.

Freemium models are usually based on one of these four models:• Capacity-based freemium

When given free access to a certain capacity, such as storage space or number of users.• Feature-based freemium

A model that gives the customer the basic service for free, but without access to certain features.

• Time-based freemiumGives the customer a free trial of the service for a limited period of time.

• Use-based freemiumA less common model which allows certain groups of customers to use the service for free. Often targeted toward categories such as non-profit or educational.

8

At first, there may not seem to be any upsides to letting your customers use your service for free, however this could be a way to quickly gain market shares and the costs associated with having customers that are not paying for the service could be saved as an effect of needing to spend less on marketing. Another thing to gain from this model is data about why some of your customers choose to convert from freemium to premium users. Analysing this data helps to get an understanding of how your offering is valued by your customers and customer behaviour. If there are network effects associated with the service, if the service gets more valuable the more people use it, this should alsobe taken into account.

Creating a freemium model is about finding the right balance between offering too little, so that no one is interested in trying the service, and too much so that no one is motivated to upgrade (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

Figure 2: Spotify's freemium model (www.spotify.com)

Consumption ModelThe consumption model is a "pay-as-you-go" model, where the customer is charged based on usage.Since it provides a limited commitment for customers, this business model specifically attracts companies which don't have a great need or a big budget for the product at the moment, but anticipate a greater usage in the future. Flexibility is the number one value enhancing feature for theuser in this offering, which also turns out to be the downside for the service provider; making it hard to impossible to predict revenues. Common key metrics in the consumption model are number of users and average revenue per user (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

Figure 3: The consumption model, where there's a linear relationship between usage and price

9

Tiered ModelThe tiered model is a pricing structure that gives the customer a choice between a number of product bundles. This is, for instance, a common business model for mobile phone service and broadband providers, where the customers can select different plans depending on the number of call minutes or bandwidth they need. It is important that the company shows the customers that theycan offer a bundle of products that suits the customers both now and in the future, even though the customers' needs may vary. Compared to the consumption model, the tiered model is much more predictable when it comes to revenues. The average cost of acquisition is also lower and the more stable average selling prices make a lesser need for discounts in order to keep existing users. The key to a successful tiered model is to be able to package the right bundles of products and choosing the right price metric so that the user feels that (s)he is getting more value than paying for (Deeter &Jung, 2013).

Figure 4: The tiered model, which provides different options of product bundles and prices respectively

Perpetual Licence Model

A perpetual licence is a licence without an expiration date. This model has gone from being the most commonly used to being replaced almost altogether. The traditional structure is one payment plus maintenance and service fees. Generally, a licence was priced equivalently to three to five annual subscriptions. The high upfront costs, along with possible tax implications when buying a licence, make the perpetual licence model fairly uncommon today (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

2.3 Price and Value Communication

After having estimated how much value a product or service creates for a customer, this must be communicated to potential customers in order to convince them to purchase your offering. Customers can be difficult to reach, due to the increasing amount of advertising everywhere. A goodmethod to get the customers' attention can be to focus on informing potential customers about specific product features and benefits in accordance with customer needs, since this is what business customers value the most (Hinterhuber, 2008).

Setting a price based on the estimated value to the customer also has the advantage that it makes themarketers focus on the relationships with other businesses. Pursuing value-based strategies, thus differentiating through value creation, is to not focus on individual transactions, but to build a long-term relationship with customers based on value and low overall costs (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

10

2.4 Pricing Policy

Pricing is about managing the customers' expectations, thus it's important to build long-term relationships. A pricing policy has to be built on an understanding of what the customers value and how a change in a company's price structure affects future customer behaviour (Nagle et al., 2011). Setting prices in relation to the competition can be hard due to the fact that discounts are offered to business customers that are considerably lower than the official list prices. The details of price agreements made in the business-to-business market are not openly negotiated and are often highly confidential. It is therefore not really possible to know what the competitors are offering, which makes it harder to compete with. Hence, doing so comes with some uncertainty (Ellis, 2011). Even though individual price agreements between businesses are common, many requests for price exceptions points to the price structure being in need of a review (Nagle et al., 2011).

2.5 Price Level Strategies

Choosing a price level for a product or service can be done according to different strategies. While partially basing the price level decision on the competition, the marketer must also view the price from a customer's perspective (Hutt & Speh, 2010). Choosing to underprice the product can seem like a good idea sometimes, but low prices can be matched very easily so the long-term cost most often exceeds any long-term advantage. The goal should be to find the right combination of margin and market share in order to get maximum profitability. The most profitable price can sometimes differ considerably from the price levels of the competition, as is the fact with many luxury items. Strategic pricing means to maximize profit by making tradeoffs between price and volume (Nagle etal., 2011).

2.6 The Software-as-a-Service Business Model

Software-as-a-service is a business model where the service provider develops and delivers browserbased, standardized software and the customers outsource operating and maintenance of the software. Characterizing for the model is the possibility of high volumes and scalability (Luoma et al., 2012). For many years, the only way to buy software was to purchase a one time licence fee. It meant a high upfront cost and less flexibility. Each new user required a new licence and if a licence wasn't used to the maximum until it expired, money was wasted. The need for a different definition of price and usage emerged. More flexibility to the customer, as well as not having to spend time and money on technical aspects, made SaaS grow in popularity (Mathew & Nair, 2010).

2.7 Pricing in a Business-to-Business Setting

A lot of theory can be applied to both business and consumer markets, but there are fundamental differences in market demand, buyer-seller relationships, outside influences (such as economic, legal, and political), and buyer behaviour. The demand for products in the business market is derived from consumers' demands of something; the purchase of a car by a consumer is preceded bya chain of transactions of diverse products in the business market. Since the demand is derived, occurrences in the consumer market lead to consequences in the business market. Demand in business markets changes more and quicker, hence is subject to more fluctuation than in consumer markets. Demand elasticity refers to how price sensitive customers are and how much a change in price gives rise to a change in demand. Business market customers can loosely be categorized into

11

three groups; commercial enterprises, institutions, and governments. To get a complete picture of the business market, it's imperative to have a global market perspective (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

Business-to-business marketing should be seen as evolving relationships between companies rather than individual encounters (Piercy et al., 2010). Consumer marketing is almost always aimed at a large number of people, as opposed to the negotiation process in a business-to-business relationship which is much more personal. Marketers all have different personal objectives, work under differentconditions, and have different amounts of power, which explains the divergence between practice according to normative theories and actual procedure. Decision-making in business-to-business purchasing processes tend to be more complex than those dealing with business-to-consumer marketing. Typically, the former example includes more people and a large number of people who are not part of the decision-making process are still affected by its outcome. However, decisions made in the business buying process are usually more rational (Ellis, 2011). Businesses are less price sensitive than consumers and therefore, the perceived value of the purchase is of greater importance when deciding on a seller. Pricing in organizational markets are also more complex because an agreement over a price and its structure must be made to hold not for just one transaction, but for a longer period of time (Piercy et al., 2010).

2.8 The Pricing Decision Process in SaaS Companies for Business Markets

Pricing a product or service is a multidimensional decision. Variables such as demand, cost, profit, relationships, competition, and customer usage patterns are all significant in a company's marketing strategy (Hutt & Speh, 2010). Trying different strategies is a necessary process when deciding the optimal way to price the company's products. However, the experimenting should be performed using logic and a framework that enables the marketer to systematically find the best strategy. With the vast quantity of data available, the method used to collect data and perform the analysis is more important than ever. Being able to quickly understand your customers and making decisions based on that insight, gives a competitive edge over other companies (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

Even though decision models are used during the process, the decision is still made by individuals or groups of individuals and is not always made in a completely rational way. According to Iyer, et al. (2015), some pitfalls that occur are unjustifiable risk avoidance, inflexibility, lack of knowledge, overconfidence, and choosing improper objectives. The complexity of the decision aid itself can lead to a less than optimal price strategy in business-to-business markets. Even though a model is used, the decision-maker must still have enough knowledge about the model and pricing to be able to get a valid result, otherwise poor decisions will be made regardless of the method (Iyer, et al., 2015).

2.8.1 Model to Select a Pricing Strategy

This model is a combination of two models, one for business-to-business markets by Hutt & Speh (2010) and one aimed at software-as-a-service companies by Deeter & Jung (2013), which concur theoretically. This combined model is therefore applicable to the scope of the thesis. The variables in the model, which are the same factors presented in the strategic pricing pyramid above, constitutethe pricing strategy.

12

1. Set strategic pricing objectivesThe marketer needs to base the pricing strategy on the organization's overall objectives and then consider specific pricing goals. Although other potential pricing goals exist, the three main ones are:

• To reach a target return on investment (ROI)

• To achieve a market-share goal

• To meet competition

Each pricing strategy is of course unique, since each company is unique and faces different kinds ofchallenges. Different strategies focus on achieving the goals in different orders and emphasise different variables (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

2. Estimate demand and the price elasticity of demand

Demand, profitability, and sensitivity to price can vary remarkably between market segments. Whenmaking the estimation, marketers should start by assessing how much value the customer gets from the product or service, instead of intuitively focus only on costs (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

The steps to determine the demand are

i. Define the market segments and identify what customers in each segment values (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

The company should try to segment the customer base to find opportunities to differentiate the prices. Variables such as searching costs (or switching costs) for the customers, variances in price sensitivity, and different levels of transaction costs could point to an opportunity to segment the market. High search costs indicate that a tiered pricing model is the best choice, while a low reservation price (what a customer is willing to pay for the service) indicates that a freemium or tiered model is a good idea. For special transaction costs, a good model to choose is tiered pricing (Deeter & Jung, 2013). Finding out what each segment of customers values as well as the needs and problems of the customer and how the company's services can address those problems is, according to Hutt and Speh (2010), best done by using exploratory methods such as in-depth interviews.

ii. Analyse the impact of the company's services on the customer's business model.

By quantifying the impact, an estimation of the perceived value of the customer is gained (Hutt & Speh, 2010). Assessing the perceived customer value is the same as evaluating the customer's ROI. The return depends on variables such as increased revenue, efficiency gains, reduced errors, time savings and cost savings, that are gained when choosing a particular company offering (Deeter & Jung, 2013). Proposed methodologies for assessing value to customers are interviewing experts within the company, focus groups consisting of customers, customer surveys, and customer interviews during usage. The most reliable estimation of customer value is obtained by using multiple assessment tools concurrently (Hinterhuber, 2008). If the customer and the company are not in agreement on how much a service is worth, this must be taken into consideration when a pricing model is selected. When the customer values the offering to be of less value than the company, a freemium model or a discounted trial period is the best way to go. This is a more likely scenario when a product is new to the market. If the customer assesses its ROI to be higher, the company should adjust the ceiling price and offer a tiered or perpetual model. Other considerations

13

are the customer's network effects and price sensitivity. After having estimated the customer's ROI, a price ceiling can be set. If the customer's demand for the service varies a lot, a consumption pricing model will best cater these potential users. A tiered model may also do, but can be less likely to suit customers who are not sure about their future need for the offering. If the demand is constant, a subscription or perpetual pricing model may be ideal (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

iii. Compare the company's services to those of competitors to learn which features are unique.

Make an estimation on how valuable the company's unique selling points (USPs) are to the customer. It's how customers assess the value of the company's offering that determines if the pricing strategy is working (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

Factors that determine the price elasticity, which measures to which degree customers are sensitive to price changes, are switching costs, the importance of the product, and the value it renders to the customer. It's a scientific fact that fully satisfied customers are less price sensitive, compared to those who are satisfied at a medium level (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

3. Determine Costs and their Relationship to Volume

One way to get a competitive advantage is to use the target costing approach. First, the company determines and targets the most profitable market segments. The business marketer then decides what should be offered to succeed in each segment, given a preset target price and volume level. After having established the target selling price and target profit margins, the acceptable cost is determined. That is, for a preferred margin to be obtained, a specified cost level must not be exceeded. The marketer has to know which costs are relevant in the pricing decision process and how they vary over time and with volume. Pricing objectives, competition, and demand are also variables to take into consideration. Target costs determine the profitability of both single products and the whole company (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

In order for the business to be economically viable, a price floor also needs to be determined. If the expenses associated with acquiring a new customer exceed the revenues rendered from the same customer, the obvious choice would be not to waste marketing efforts. When doing the estimations, the cost related to making the service available and working to non-paying customers using freemium models and the calculated conversion income must also be included (Deeter & Jung, 2013).

4. Examine Competitors' Prices and StrategiesA company can gain advantage over a competitor not only in terms of pricing but also by factors such as reputation, expertise, reliability, among other things. Another way to differentiate an offering can thus be through better support and service or by target marketing. To examine the cost structure and strategy of its competitors, the marketer can use public records, such as annual reports.The estimations are then used to predict the response of a competitor (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

14

5. Develop a pricing strategy Understanding and having made an assessment of all the variables that the pricing decision process depends on, the marketer has the information needed to develop a pricing strategy. Designing a pricing strategy is not a single occurrence, it's an ongoing process (Hutt & Speh, 2010).

15

3 MethodologyI have chosen to conduct a qualitative case study since the project's objectives are to get a better understanding of in which situations different pricing strategies are optimal and the relationships between the variables in the pricing decision process and the chosen pricing strategy. The tool used in this normative research is the pricing strategy model. The source of the primary data is telephone interviews and, in some cases, follow-up email correspondence.

3.1 The Project's Objective and the Scientific Characteristics of the Study

A project's objective is related to the types of questions asked in the study. The objectives that applyto this thesis are understanding and prediction. Understanding helps the researcher interpret various phenomena and give them meaning. Prediction serves to enable the identification of a relationship between factors and using that to gain knowledge about a previously unknown factor (Sellstedt, 2002).

Research can be described by different scientific characteristics depending on the kind of knowledge that is sought in that particular field. In this study, there are two kinds of research aims. The first is theoretical-empirical knowledge, which clarifies relationships between variables and is studied when working on the objectives understanding and prediction. It answers questions like: "How do companies price their products?" (p. 73 Sellstedt, 2002) The second is technical and strategic knowledge. Strategic actions can be described as actions based on rational decisions with the purpose to succeed in some respect. This kind of knowledge gives the answer to questions like: "Do companies really price their products according to the neoclassical pricing theory?" (p. 76 Sellstedt, 2002)

3.2 Scientific Approach

A practical problem is a situation where there exists an idea about a possible change to a more desirable situation. What characterizes a practical problem is the normative dimension and the implication of a possible different, better state. When research involves a practical application of science, it's called applied research (Sellstedt, 2002).

Since the aim of this project is to solve a practical problem, a normative approach is used. Normative research is chosen when dealing with applied research and decision making in companies and organizations to find an optimal solution in a problematic situation. The tools used to do so can be rules, standards, models, or algorithms. These tools help the researcher to get an outside, and hopefully unbiased, point of view when analysing the problem (Sellstedt, 2002). In thisstudy, the decision making tool will be the model presented above.

16

3.3 Method

Since one of the main objectives of this study is understanding, a qualitative method is chosen. The goal of qualitative research is insight and knowledge, rather than quantifiable results (Bell, 2004). Qualitative research means that the result and conclusions are derived from qualitative analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative methods are based on interpretations. This can cause a problem since the reality can be looked at from different perspectives, all of which can be plausible (Lundahl & Skärvad, 2003).

3.4 Data Collection

The process of obtaining information in a methodical way with the purpose to answer research questions in a study is called data collection. The procedure is the same, regardless of study field.Accurate data collection is crucial for the sake of the integrity of research. Failure to do so may leadto an inability to answer the research questions properly and the inability to repeat and validate theresearch (Sellstedt, 2002).

3.4.1 Secondary Data

The collection and analysing of existing research material is called secondary research. It is usually the first step in scientific research and is often, as well as in this case, a literary review. Sources such as books, papers, and articles have been used to find background and context data and to present the model, upon which this study is based. A primary source is considered to be more reliable than a secondary one, and so on. Since only documents that have been considered to be of scientific importance have been selected, the degree of validity and reliability of that material is regarded as already established. To insure that the sources are in fact reliable, triangulation of data have been used (Harvard University, 2015).

3.4.2 Primary Data

Primary data are a collection of information gathered firsthand by the researcher. Various methods, such as surveys, questionnaires, or observations can serve as a means to gather such data. I have chosen to conduct interviews, since the information I want to obtain is of a qualitative type. The kind of interview most suited in this case is a semi-structured interview, which means that the questions are not set in stone, but based on a list of key points which the interviewer covers in a methodical way. Semi-structured interviews are primarily used when the objective is to understand the relationships between variables. The questions asked in each interview are not identical and there's room for supplementary questions. This gives the interviewee the chance to speak rather freely and the interviewer has the opportunity to adjust the questions based on previous answers (Harvard University, 2015).

The three selected SaaS companies provide services in different sectors; travel management, communication/information storage, and finance. They are of different sizes, were founded between1989 and 1998 and their headquarters are situated in different countries. What they have in commonis that they provide software-as-a-service toward the global business market. They have been selected because I find it more relevant to compare and contrast SaaS companies in different sectorsso that they are not in competition with each other and therefore don't affect each other directly. I

17

have chosen companies that are independent of each other to increase the credibility of the study.

After an introductory email to the companies' customer services, I got a response from one of the marketers at each company. The interviews have been carried out by phone. The interviews lasted for 45 minutes to 90 minutes, and in case B and C, a follow-up email with more extensive answers to some questions was received after the interviewee had made some further research. The respondents are all marketers with a long, 20 plus years, experience and who have been with their current companies for 7-17 years. The purpose of the interviews was to get a picture of if and how the companies use the decision variables in the pricing strategy model to base their pricing strategies on, how they gather the information needed, what they chose to analyse, and by whom theanalysing was done.

Because of the sensitive nature of the questions regarding competition, the only way to be able to ask questions about a company's strategy or individual agreements was by conducting the interviews anonymously. This approach, and the chosen structure of the interviews, is to give the interviewee the best possible circumstances to speak freely and not having to withhold or alter information. It gives credibility to the information and also minimizes tendencies of the sources. There's no reason to believe that there's been any dependence between the information gathered from the three respondents, since none of the interviewees have had any knowledge of the others being interviewed; there's been total anonymity within the project as well.

18

4 ResultsTo tie theory to real world practise, three case studies have been conducted.

4.1 Case A

4.1.1 Company Presentation

This case investigates a company which provides solutions within business travel and expense management. Employees can book flights, hotels, and rental cars through the software via any device and get paperwork such as expense reports automatically filled out. E-receipts and images ofreceipts can be uploaded and attached to the expense file, and the information can be matched to credit card data. The program also handles currency conversions, car-mileage allowances, and different forms of taxes. The company's customers range from small businesses to businesses of Fortune 500 size. Company A was founded in 1993, has over 20 000 clients all over the world and has its headquarter in Bellevue, USA. The interviewee is head of marketing and has been with the company for the past 17 years.

4.1.2 Price Model and Metric

Company A wants to provide a travel and expense management solution to customers with all kinds of needs under all sorts of conditions. It offers four different plans with different bundles. The two cheapest plans come with a 30 day "test drive", that is, a free trial period. This price model is a combination of a time-based freemium, for two of the pricing plans, and a tiered model. Each plan comes with an increasing number of features and is aimed at companies according to size; from small businesses to large enterprises.

The price metric used is per user and month. The fee per user is the same for each plan, although thenumber of features increases. This metric is chosen so that every segment should feel that they get roughly the same value relative to the price. If there was just a fee per month, large enterprises, withlots more users, would perceive much greater value for the service than small businesses with only a few users. The additional value the enterprise would receive would be lost to the service provider if the fee wasn't increasing as the number of users increases. This metric also works well because generally, large enterprises are less price sensitive than small companies.

4.1.3 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition

The company targets its services to businesses of all sizes, and segments the customers into groups of company size (number of users and/or number of expense reports per month), since it feels that the biggest difference in need between companies depends on the size. Price sensitivity is often negatively correlated with the size of the company, hence the price increases with the number of users. The fee for the plan with the least amount of features is much lower than the most expensive plan, so that a big range of customers, even the more price sensitive ones, can find a suiting subscription. Discounts are also available on an individual basis.

19

There aren't that many companies providing exactly the same service as Company A, but it's a global market and new companies offering travel management services to other businesses emerge all the time, hence the company makes sure to get as much information about competition as possible, mostly via people “in the business”. Company A finds it a good strategy to be prepared and have a proactive approach to rising competition. Selecting a tiered pricing model is a big part ofthat approach, since it gives more customers the possibility to find a suiting plan for their needs from the same company.

4.1.4 Value Assessment

The company feels that its customers appreciate the value of its services. It regularly sends out customer satisfaction surveys to find out how well the company delivers and uses the data to analyze and make improvements. Other methods were used before, but the company found that satisfaction surveys are the best way to get to the core of what the customer is actually experiencing. The surveys don't only give the answer to what customers think about the existing offer, but also provide valuable ideas about potential changes. Sometimes a new product feature is derived from multiple customers asking about it. The surveys also give data about different customer segments; how much the service is used, which features each segment requests, the price sensitivity within the segment and whether or not customers have been thinking about changing their plans. Conversion data are also used to find out what makes customers choose to continue using Company A's services. Potential customers are reached mostly by online campaigns and phone calls by the sales department. The ability to keep all of the customer's travel data in one placeand save everything electronically is the biggest selling point that is communicated to potential customers.

4.1.5 Pricing Strategy

Company A has a fairly large market-share right now and is not looking to expand very much. It considers the current pricing strategy to be working well. Suggestions have been made to make some changes to the plans, especially having a free trial period for all the plans, but nothing will be changed at the moment or in the near future. The company tries to simulate different scenarios to see if a change is a good idea in terms of profit and found in this case that it is not. This analysis is based on factors such as economy, competition, market-share, and how the company estimates that existing and potential customers will react upon the change. The company's chosen pricing strategy is regularly evaluated and there's a clear connection between the company's objectives and pricing strategies. All decision-making in the company is very much influenced by the underlying goals, notjust pricing decisions, and everyone at the company is therefore involved in achieving these objectives. A big part of the major pricing decisions is made in meetings where people from different parts of the organization, such as the sales department as well as top management, are represented, which makes the whole company involved in the process. There hasn't been any major difficulties when making the decisions, but to know what level of risk that is reasonable is always hard.

20

4.2 Case B


Company B offers all-in-one project management software to facilitate organization, collaboration, visualization, and sharing of documents. These secure and scalable project planning tools help to keep track of a project and knowing who does what and when. Company B was founded in 1998, has over a million users in over 150 countries and is headquarted in Stockholm, Sweden. The software is available in seven different languages. The respondent works with the marketing team and is also member of the board. He has worked at the company for 12 years.


After a 14-day free trial, the customer can choose between different packages for different prices per month and user. One package is the possibility for large businesses and enterprises to customize their own plan to an agreed upon price. This pricing model is also a combination of a time-based freemium and tiered model, where the choice of putting together your own bundle, by choosing between a number of add-on features, makes the model extra flexible. Subscription terms range from 1 to 24 months and the monthly rate decreases with longer commitments and/or more users in the account.

The price metric used is per month and user, which makes a big difference in fee depending on the size of the company. The reason given for charging per user is that every individual account takes up resources and the company doesn't see a problem with having to pay more if the customers have more employees since a discount per user is given when needing several accounts. Hence, it's considered to be a good deal even for larger businesses and the company doesn't find the pricing model to be discouraging to organizations with many employees. Communication with customers and conversion rates second that opinion.


The marketing segmentation pricing strategy used is according to Company B working well. The company doesn't advertise to certain customer segments individually, it feels like it has something to offer to all kinds of organizations. Hence the “segmentation” is customers choosing different plans based on need and price sensitivity, obviously with the help of customer service sometimes, but it's not part of the company's strategy to specifically aim its services to a certain group of customers. It sees the current price model as a good way to serve a lot of customers with various needs. No general discounts are given, but individual agreements are possible and quite common.

The company is naturally updated on what their competitors are doing and their pricing strategies were taken into account when choosing its own. It was, however, more important to adjust the company's own strategy to its competitors when the service was just out on the market; while gaining market shares, more customers have realised the value of the offering and other companies' prices are less important since the customers are happy with the service they're getting. The competition seems stable for now, but you never know when new or existing competitors gain

21

market-share quickly, hence Company B has that in mind and reevaluates its strategies accordingly.


It's the company's perception that customers value the service they are getting, since a lot of customers choose to upgrade their plans and keep buying the service year after year. The number of complaints and support cases is also low. Pleasing conversion rates are indeed a good testament to content customers, but the company have continuous communication with customers, both existing and potential, to find out what they would like the company to offer. This is mostly done by phone calls by the sales department. Company B has a bigger sales team than most other companies of the same size, since it feels that that's a good way to communicate. Talking directly to a client, instead of via email, permits the company to get direct feedback regarding everything from price to deliverytimes and many clients also share their experiences with competitive companies, giving Company Ba chance to offer a better deal. Company B doesn't target a specific customer segment in its value assessment, but feels that every customer and project is different and therefore treats its customers as “individuals” rather than grouping them into segments.

Importing and exporting data is very easy and using the service is pretty self-explanatory, so the company estimates that there aren't really any extra costs associated with learning the system for new customers. That, and the fact that Company B focuses on presenting all the time-saving and convenient features of its service to potential customers, make a lot of organizations try the service. Since the conversion rates are at a good level and getting better, the company finds this strategy to be working.


Company B is very pleased with its pricing strategy right now and are not planning to do any major changes. The objective is to keep market-share and a decent revenue growth is expected each coming year. The strategy renders maximum profit according to analyses, and feedback shows that customers are happy with what they find to be an easy to understand and flexible price model. The marketers and the other teams in the company are working well together, but maybe the overall strategy of the company should be emphasised more when making all kinds of strategic decisions. Perhaps reminders about the company's main objectives in day-to-day operations would make sure everyone has the same goals in mind. Individual deals are made on sales level, but tactical decisionsare made by marketers and strategical questions are handled by management. The reason for this is, according to the respondent, that different kinds of information are needed in the three cases and that the teams are experts at different things, hence the divided job responsibilities. The company had some difficulties with designing the pricing strategy until they worked out a system concerning the data needed. When all data were organized and accessed by the people who needed it, there was no problem using the information.

22

4.3 Case C


Company C was founded in 1989 and offers services in accounting. The software gives solutions to balance sheet reconciliation, financial close processes, and transaction matching. The headquarter issituated in Oslo, Norway, but have customers all over the world. The marketer, who has been interviewed, has been with the company for seven years but says it feels longer since he immediately felt at home in the company. The members of the marketing team work very well together and with the rest of the teams in the company, which creates a great working environment and a tight-knit organization.


Company C calls its pricing model a “pay-as-you-grow” model. That is, there are different subscription fees for different product bundles. Customers get a 30 day free trial and can then choose between four different plans. The plans include different amounts of features, but are also limited to different maximum numbers of legal entities, balance accounts and users. The company considers itself to be very flexible when it comes to the terms of using the service, and individual agreements are sometimes possible. This pricing model is also a combination of a time-based freemium and tiered model.

The price metric is to charge per user and month, but the plans also have a maximum amount of users linked to it which means that a larger number of users leads to a bigger fee per user. A more expensive plan gives, obviously, the customer more features, but can also be a must if the customer simply wants to add more accounts. Company C explains that the case of a customer just wanting toadd more users shouldn't be a deal breaker, since an individual agreement can always be had.


Segmentation isn't really part of Company C's pricing strategy, although bigger businesses tend to choose a plan that allows for more users, accounts and legal entities. The grouping of customers into different plans is mostly based on size. The company believes that its price model is so flexible that it's easy enough for customers to change plans if they need to, that segmentation isn't as relevant as in companies with price models where customers don't have the ability to switch plans very often. When asked, the company replies that segmentation would perhaps be a good idea to consider in the future, especially if the level of competition heightens even more. Discounts are sometimes offered, especially to reward loyal customers.

Company C keeps itself updated about its competitors by specialist literature such as magazines andof course, media in general. Things can change abruptly in a market like this, and Company C finds it best to be as updated as possible in order to not having to be surprised. Since the company is part of a highly competitive market, there may be reason to modify the pricing strategy at least partly. However, the company has in mind that when facing high levels of competition, it's easy to make changes in all parts of the organization when it's sometimes better to just work harder, keeping the

23

existing business structure. Too many or too fast reorganizations make it harder for the customers toperceive the value of the product. Part of marketing is to make it easy for the customer to choose your company, not to make unnecessary complications. That will only make the company lose market shares.


Company C stresses the important role of customer satisfaction throughout its agenda, which it feelsis paying back in the form of a large part of long-term customers. The effort to create long-lasting customer relationships creates value for the customer, and the company works hard to keep those mutually beneficial exchanges by showing the customers how valuable they are to the company. Customer care is shown by special offers and campaigns targeted to the biggest and most long-term customers. Surveys on the homepage as well as conversion data show what customers value. Conversion rates from the free trial period to one of the charged plans are at a stable level and the company finds it important to reward long-lasting customers. Company C also makes sure it's easy to reach by providing toll-free telephone numbers all over the world, encouraging customers to get in touch, and uses this connection to get insight and an understanding of how customers perceive the overall service from the company. One thing that customers often point out is that they value thesubscription flexibility and the speed and ease with which they can switch plans with the help of customer service. The software is considered very easy to use, 90% of all customers don't need support to use the service, and user-friendliness is a big selling point for the company. Potential customers are often reached by advertising by mail, where specific features and the stressing of flexible agreements are the biggest selling points.


Since Company C is part of a highly competitive market, it's constantly reevaluating its pricing strategy to not lose market-shares. As stated above, however, the company is determined to not make any premature decisions. Every bigger pricing decision is made with the main objectives in mind. The company's main focus is to have satisfied customers, so it's considered very important that everyone in the company works toward the same goals. The company often has team building and other activities to remind the coworkers of why their jobs are so important as well as to developthe operative parts of the strategy further. The interviewee says that the organization feels smaller than it is, due to the familiar atmosphere, which also makes decision-making rather uncomplicated and including of all members of the organization. Compared to other companies, many decisions, such as pricing, are made at a lower level, although people from management and other teams are often involved in the process. The company has managed to avoid all major pitfalls when making the pricing decisions, although risk assessment is probably the hardest factor to manage.

24

5 Analysis

5.1 Price Model and Metric

When doing research about different SaaS companies within different business areas and their pricing models, it appears as though the most frequently used model is time-based freemium along with a tiered model. The freemium model is a way to persuade possibly interested customers to try the service and then convince them to sign up for a subscription, which is of higher possibility if thebarrier to try the service is very low in terms of price (as well as time). Looking at the three cases presented above, this seems to be working well. Even though money is spent on offering the servicefor free over a period of time, the conversion rates are high enough to cover the costs and even make this model a very profitable one.

According to theory, the tiered pricing model is a good choice in situations where the search costs are high, the reservation price low, there are special transaction costs, if the customer's demand for the service varies, and the customer assesses the value of the service to be higher than the price. If the customer's demand for the service varies, a consumption pricing model is also a good choice and the freemium model is ideal when the reservation price is low and when customers assess the service value to be less than the price. Hence, the pricing decision framework favours the tiered model, which can be seen in this case study since all three companies use it. Company C has the least simple price model, with the most conditions linked to each plan, but claims to be very flexiblewhen it comes to switching plans and individual agreements. If it's more flexible than the other companies is of course hard to tell, but it's claimed that that is one of the company's selling points. Aprice model has to be easy enough for a customer to understand, so if Company C at any point findsthe model not to be working very well, maybe looking over the many conditions associated with its plans is a good idea.

The inherent uncertainty of the consumption model may make the marketers less likely to use it. Of course, a long notice period makes the model less risky to the service provider, but may not attract as many new customers.

The price metric used by all three companies is to charge per user and month, although with some variation regarding maximum number of users associated with a certain plan and subscription terms. As Company A explained, this dual metric is a way to capture the additional value larger businesses receive when only charging per time period. Another explanation to this metric is cost-based and stems from the fact that a larger number of users in fact uses up more of the resources. The first motive corresponds better with theory and the companies have chosen different ways of charging a growing number of users; in one case the fee per user increases and in one, the fee is constant. If it's defensible to charge more per user as the number of users increases, would have to do with network effects as well.

5.2 Market Segmentation, Price Sensitivity, and Competition

The segmentation strategies in the different cases vary, but all three companies think that they are working well and that they are able to create value to their customers of choice. Company A segments in terms of company size and, by extension, price sensitivity, which is a theoretic reason

25

to segment the market. Two of the companies don't use market segmentation at all. It may be a goodidea, according to theory, to at least find the most profitable segment and optimize a plan in regard to that group of customers. However, the companies' plans are all tiered plans, with different plans offering different features, and categorizing the market based on customer needs is a good approach. All the companies agreed to individual discounts to certain customers, usually those with a need for many service features as well as those with many users, but none of them offers general discounts toa certain group of customers.

The three companies face different amounts of competition and need to act upon that fact. Theory states that a company shouldn't base its pricing strategy on competition, but completely ignoring competitors is to take on unnecessary risks. All three companies deal with this balancing act by thinking long-term. The companies all have different ways of keeping updated about their competitors, one method being to simply ask your and other companies' clients. Sudden changes in the market is in their minds and they are all prepared for increased competition and/or an economic downturn. The intrinsic value in being proactive is part of their strategies and the global perspectiveis present throughout their mindsets.

5.3 Value Assessment

All of the companies are well aware of the importance of customer satisfaction and make an effort to show their customers how much their services are worth to them and how much they are valued as customers. Conversion rates and a large part of long-term customers also indicates that the companies in fact have valuable offerings and that the prices correspond with the customers' expectations. Company A uses surveys and Company B and C phone calls as their primary source of information about existing customers. The companies use these means of communication to find out what customers think of their services, how much they use it, what they value more and less, as well as general opinions about the company and its offerings. They use this information to estimate how much value their services create for the customer and to base their pricing strategies on. In the case of Company A, the communication with customers sometimes leads to new product features being developed, due to demand. Other ways to measure customer satisfaction is through conversion rates, complaints, and support cases. All three companies use multiple communication channels and data sources, as recommended by the model.

Of course, the services provided are not going to appeal to all, but all three companies feel that they reach out to a lot of potential customers and manage to convince them of the advantages of their offerings. They all focus on their unique selling points and the benefits of choosing their offerings, which is what business customers value the most.

5.4 Pricing Strategy

The most important strategic pricing objectives for all companies right now seem to be to keep market-share, where Company C is perhaps struggling more than the others because of higher competition. None of the companies, however, had any plans to cut prices just to keep up with competition. All companies make pricing decisions with a different degree of congruence with the marketing strategy as a whole and the overall company objectives and don't find it equally

26

important to do so. Two of the three companies are actively working to improve or maintain this mindset, while the third one is more new to the idea of making it part of every day business. However, all three companies have a clear vision of the desired result of their strategies, and feel that they are working methodically to reach set goals.

Decisions about the pricing strategy are done in different parts of the organizations and all three feelthat they have motivation to assign the responsibility the way they do. Company A and C have multiple teams working together on the pricing strategy, whereas Company B has divided up the responsibilities. In all cases, though, people from sales and up to top management are involved in the process. All the variables in the model are taken into consideration when deciding on a pricing strategy, but not by the same people in the case of Company B. All companies regularly evaluate thestrategy and make it the ongoing process that theory suggests. All three companies also avoided the major pitfalls when designing their strategies, however there are always minor difficulties which need attention. Risk seems to be the hardest issue for two of the companies to manage.

27

6 ConclusionsThe companies in the case study have used a freemium model to attract new customers and a tiered model to keep existing customers, giving the customers the opportunity to change their pricing plans and product bundles if their needs change. The dual metric to charge per month and user has been chosen by all three companies, which is a way to capture the additional value offered to larger companies compared to only charging per time period. Although this is not the ideal pricing strategyfor all companies, it seems, according to the price decision framework, to be a good choice in many cases. When researching this case study, it was hard to find SaaS companies that weren't using that same mix of pricing models and price metrics in their strategies.

All the companies make decisions about their pricing strategy based on the factors in the proposed model. They have chosen different methods for making assessments and communicating with customers, but the purpose and result have been similar. The decision-making is the responsibility of people with different positions in the three companies.

None of the companies are new to the market, the companies were founded between 1989 and 1998,and they provide services in different sectors from headquarters in different parts of the world. Yet there are surprisingly many similarities between their pricing strategies.

The companies do seem to make pricing strategy decisions that mostly correspond to theory and aresuggested in the pricing decision model. They have also developed methods for data collection and analysis that seem to be working well. Despite the many differences between the companies, the choice of the same pricing model and metric is in accordance with theory, which makes the result ofthe empirical study plausible.

6.1 Further Research

As further research, I would recommend to make case studies about SaaS companies that use other price models and metrics than those investigated in this study to see what the motivations would be to make those choices. I also propose a quantitative study to find the proportions of SaaS companiesthat use a certain model and metric. As stated above, the pricing decision model finds that a tiered price model is the optimal model in most situations, but it says nothing about how often these situations occur and therefore nothing about how often it is a suitable choice.

28

7 References

Bell, J. (2004). Introduktion till forskningsmetodik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Deeter, B. & Jung, R. (2013). Software as a Service Pricing Strategies. White paper. Bessemer Venture Partners.Available: http://www.bvp.com/blog/software-service-pricing-strategies-white-paper-releasedAccessed: 2015-05-06

Ellis, N. (2011). Business-to-Business Marketing - Relationships, Networks & Strategies. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Harvard University. (2015). Research Methods: Some notes to orient you

Available: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic851950.files/Research%20Methods_Some%20Notes.pdf Accessed: 2015-05-06

Hinterhuber, A. (2008). Customer value-based pricing strategies: why companies resist. Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 41-50.Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756660810887079Accessed: 2015-05-06

Hinterhuber, A. (2015). Violations of rational choice principles in pricing decisions. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 47, pp. 65–74.

Hinterhuber, A. & Liozu, S. M. (2015). Editorial — Behavioral and psychological aspects of b2b pricing. Industrial Marketing Management, vol.. 47, pp. 4-5.

Hutt, M. D. & Speh, T. W. (2010). Business Marketing Management: B2B. Tenth Ed. South-Western: Cengage Learning.

Iyer, G. R., Xiao, S H., Sharma, A. & Nicholson, M. (2015). Behavioral issues in price setting in business-to-business marketing: A framework for analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 47, pp. 6–16.

Larsson, S. (2005). Om kvalitet i kvalitativa studier. Nordisk Pedagogik, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16-35.

Available: liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:245080

Accessed: 2015-05-06

29

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756660810887079

http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic851950.files/Research%20Methods_Some%20Notes.pdf

http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic851950.files/Research%20Methods_Some%20Notes.pdf

Lundahl, U. & Skärvad, P. (2003). Utredningsmetodik för samhällsvetare och ekonomer. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Luoma, E., Rönkkö, M. & Tyrväinen, P. (2012). Current Software-as-a-Service Business Models: Evidence from Finland. In Cusumano, M. A., Iyer, B. & Venkatraman, N. (ed.), Software Business: Third International Conference, ICSOB 2012 (vol. 114, pp. 181-194). Cambridge, MA, USA, June 18-20.

Mathew, M. & Nair, S. (2010). Pricing SaaS models: Perception. Journal of Services Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51-68.

Nagle, T T., Hogan, J. E. & Zale, J. (2011). The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing. A guide to growing more profitably. Fifth ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Piercy, N. F., Cravens, D. W. & Lane, N. (2010). Thinking strategically about pricing decisions. Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 38-48.

Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756661011076309

Accessed: 2015-05-06

Sellstedt, B. (2002). Metodologi för företagsekonomer - Ett försök till positionsbestämning. (No 2002:7). Stockholm: Handelshögskolan.Available: http://swoba.hhs.se/hastba/abs/hastba2002_007.htm Accessed: 2015-05-06

Spotify's home page - Example of a freemium model Available: www.spotify.comAccessed: 2015-05-06

Wilson, A. et al. (2012). Services Marketing Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education (UK) Limited.

30

http://www.spotify.com/

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756661011076309

8 Appendix - Interview Guide

The interviews were conducted under these premises:

These questions are only regarding the pricing strategy used toward the business market, not towardprivate consumers. Neither the company name nor the name of the interviewee will be shown in the thesis.

What is your position at this company? How long have you worked at the company? How long have you worked in marketing?

Which price model do you use? Which price metric do you use? Reasons? How are different customers of different sizes and needs affected by the model and metric?

Do you use market segmentation? If yes – what is the grouping based on? To whom do you target your service? Do you take customers' price sensitivity into account? Do you offer any discounts? What is the competition like in your market? How do you get information about your competitors? How do you act upon that information?

Is it your impression that your customers value your service? How do you get information about your customers' opinions? What kind of information does that method give you? What USP do you communicate to potential customers? How do you communicate that? Is it your perception that youradvertising is targeted to the right set of potential customers and the most suitable USPs are communicated?

Where is your company at today? Future plans and objectives? Competition possibly staying the same or changing? Is the current pricing strategy working well? Is it reevaluated regularly? Some things working well/not so well? Is there a clear connection between the company's objectives and pricing strategies? At what level in the organization does the pricing decision-making take place? Have any pitfalls occurred while designing the pricing strategy?

31

Documents

The Pricing Decision Process in Software-as-a-Service Companies …903095/FULLTEXT01.pdf · 2016-02-13 · as ignoring all competition, is not a good strategy either since it leads