View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Physics of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
Associate Professor Jamie NagleUniversity of Colorado, Boulder
18th National Nuclear Physics Summer SchoolLectures July 31-August 3, 2006
Lecture #2
Heavy Ion Experiments
Need 10,000,000,000,000 Kelvin Bunsen Burner
How to Access This Physics?
Neutron stars
Lattice QCD
RHIC
Big Bang
Only one chance…
Who wants to wait?…
Slide from Jeff Mitchell
Kinetic Energy Thermal Energy
Bevalac-LBL and SIS-GSI fixed target max. 2.2 GeV
AGS-BNL fixed targetmax. 4.8 GeV
SPS-CERN fixed targetmax. 17.3 GeV
TEVATRON-FNAL (fixed target p-A)max. 38.7 GeV
RHIC-BNL collidermax. 200.0 GeV
LHC-CERN collidermax. 2760.0 GeV
BRAHMS, PHENIX, PHOBOS, STAR
ALICE, ATLAS, CMS
NA35/49, NA44, NA38/50/51, NA45,NA52, NA57, WA80/98, WA97, …
E864/941, E802/859/866/917, E814/877,E858/878, E810/891, E896, E910 …
1992Au-Au
1994Pb-Pb
2000Au-Au
2007?Pb-Pb
Energy Frontier History
Bevalac-LBL2.2 GeV
AGS-BNL4.8 GeV
SPS-CERN17.3 GeV
TEVATRON-FNAL38.7 GeV
RHIC-BNL200.0 GeV
LHC-CERN 2760.0 GeV
Net Baryon Density ~ Potential B [MeV]
Tem
per
atu
re T
ch [
Me
V]
0
200
250
150
100
50
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
AGS
LBL/SIS
SPS
RHIC/LHCquark-gluon plasma
hadron gas
atomic nuclei
Many basic goals of the field have remained the same over the last 20 years. However, the character of the system created is a strong function of energy.Many new probes and theoretical handles are available at higher energies.
Nuclear FragmentationResonance ProductionStrangeness Near Threshold
Resonances DominateLarge Net Baryon DensityStrangeness Important
Charm Production Starts
Low Net Baryon DensityHard Parton Scattering
Beauty Production
Why Energy Matters?
RHIC is doing great !
STARHadronic Observables over a Large
AcceptanceEvent-by-Event Capabilities
Solenoidal magnetic fieldLarge coverage Time-Projection
ChamberSilicon Tracking, RICH, EMC, TOF
PHENIXElectrons, Muons, Photons and Hadrons
Measurement CapabilitiesFocus on Rare Probes: J/, high-pT
Two central spectrometers with tracking and electron/photon PID
Two forward muon spectrometers
BRAHMSHadron PID over broad rapidity
acceptance
Two conventional beam line spectrometers
Magnets, Tracking Chambers, TOF, RICH
PHOBOSCharged Hadrons in Central
SpectrometerNearly 4 coverage multiplicity counters
Silicon Multiplicity RingsMagnetic field, Silicon Strips, TOF
Ring Counters
Paddle Trigger Counter
Spectrometer
TOF
Octagon+Vertex
What Are Protons and Nuclei?
Structure of the Proton
Momentum transfer QQ22 = 0.1 GeV = 0.1 GeV22
QQ22 = 1.0 GeV = 1.0 GeV22
QQ22 = 20.0 GeV = 20.0 GeV22
Wavelength Wavelength = h/p = h/p
See the whole protonSee the whole proton
See the quark substructureSee the quark substructure
See many partons (quarks and gluons)See many partons (quarks and gluons)
Parton Distribution Functions
• Structure functions rise rapidly at low-x• More rapid for gluons than quarks
30!
valence
sea
Quarks Gluons
When protons are viewed at short wavelength, there is a large increase in low x gluons.
Is there a limit to the low x gluon density?
Limitless Gluons?
Gluon Saturation
Wavefunction of low x gluons overlap and the self-coupling gluons fuse, thus saturating the density of gluons in the initial state
probe rest frame
r/ggg
1 J.P Blaizot, A.H. Mueller, Nucl. Phys. B289, 847 (1987).
target rest frame
c ~1/x
Fluctuations from dipole increase and the unitary limit of the photon cross section in deep inelastic scattering is the equivalent to saturation.
Transverse size of the quark-antiquark cloudis determined by r ~ 1/Q ~ 2 10-14cm/ Q (GeV)
Saturation in the ProtonHERA deep inelastic scattering data has been interpreted in the context of gluon saturation models.
Lowest x data is at modest Q2 (should QCD+DGLAP work?)
Recent HERA running may not resolve these issues since machine changes limit the coverage at low-x.
Future Electron-Ion Collider at RHIC or HERA upgrade may be necessary.
K. Golec-Biernat, Wuesthoff, others
What about Nuclei?
x .1x .1
210T2px
s
Nucleon structure functions are known to be modified in nuclei.
Can be modeled as recombination effect due to high gluon density at low x (in the frame where the nucleus is moving fast).
x
Saturation?
shadowing
enhancement
EMC effect
Fermi Effect
RHIC probes
Gluon Number Density
Gluon number density:
g = A xGN(x,Q2)/R2
Gluon density depends on the nuclear overlap area
(R2 A2/3) and the momentum scale (Q2) since DGLAP evolution requires:
G(x, Q2) ~ ln (Q2 / QCD2)
HERA tests gluon density in the proton at very low x. RHIC can test similar gluon density at significantly higher x values. LHC heavy ion collisions probe even higher gluon densities.
Color Glass Condensate
Put many nucleons into a nucleus and Lorentz boost to the infinite momentum frame
Creates a 2-dimensional sheet of very high density color charges set by a saturation scale.
High density of gluons (saturation) allows for the simplification of Quantum Chromodynamics
Color fields can be described as classical wave solutions to the Yang-Mills equation
Experimental ComparisonsIn this saturation regime (sometimes termed the Color Glass Condensate), with one parameter (saturation scale Qs) defines the physics. In this classical approximation one can calculate the collision output distribution of gluons. If one assumes a mapping of partons to hadrons, one can compare with data.
42/
2
22
22211ln
sinh
cosh ys
QCD
ysy
opart
TT
es
Qy
eQe
s
scN
ypm
y
d
dN
Saturation Regime?
The agreement appears impressive, but at the lowest energy one is no where near the saturation condition. Also, when the particle yield is matched, the transverse energy per particle is a factor of 2 too large. Perhaps this is longitudinal work, but no detailed calculation accounts for this yet.
Lower x?For a 2 2 parton scattering process (LO), if both partons scatter at 90 degrees, then x1=x2= 2pT/Ecm
x1
x2 pT ~ 2 GeVEcm ~ 200 GeVx ~ 0.04
x1
x2
One can probe lower x values if x1 >> x2 and look at particles away from 90 degrees (forward rapidity).
Rapidity y=0 (x~0.01), y=2.0 (x~0.001), y=4.0 (x~0.0001) for pT ~ 2 GeV.
Suppression Factor R
In deuteron-Gold collisions, forward rapidity probes low x in the Gold nucleus. BRAHMS observes a suppression of particles that could be related to saturation of the gluon density in the Gold nucleus.
ddpdT
ddpNdpR
TNN
AA
TAA
TAA /
/)(
2
2
b
Participant
BinaryCollisions
R = 1 (binary collision scaling)
Suppression of forward hadrons generically consistent with saturation of low-x gluons.
Aud
AuAu
dAuAu
dAu
x ~ 10-3x ~ 10-2x ~ 10-1
Sup
pres
sion
Fac
tor
d+Gold Probes
Tagged photons and jets at forward angles will give precise information on x dependence of saturation effect.
PT is balanced by many gluons
“Mono-jet”
Dilute parton system
(deuteron)
Dense gluon field (Au)
MonoJets?
STAR Experiment
No MonoJets at y=2?
PHENIX has measured the correlation between y=2 hadrons and y=0 hadrons.
There appears to be no decrease in away side partners as predicted by saturation models.
However, these predictions were for more forward rapidity (probing lower x) regions.
What do they have in common?
x
1. Scaling of the total p-p cross section
2. Growth of low x gluons in the proton
3. Shadowing of structurefunctions in nuclei
4. Particle production in nucleus-nucleus reactions
Saturation SummaryInteresting hints at non-linear saturation effects of partons in protons at HERA. Current HERA running does not focus on this physics, and facility will soon be shut down.Interesting hints in proton (deuteron) nucleus reactions at RHIC, but at a rather soft scale. Photon Jet or Jet Jet correlations that pin down x1 and x2 may shed more light.Key future is much larger x reach at high Q2 at the LHC, or with Deep Inelastic Scattering at future electron ion collider (EIC or eRHIC).
Collision Dynamics
RHIC = Gluon Collider
10,000 gluons, quarks, and antiquarks are made physical in the laboratory !
What is the nature of this ensemble of partons?
Can be dismissed with some basic General Relativity
metersc
GMRS49
2 102
metersR 1510
much less than
Planck length !
Even if it could form, it would evaporate by
Hawking Radiation in 10-83 seconds !
End of the World!
Start with Simpler SystemOPAL Event Display
Electron-Positron Annihilation
(Mueller 1983)
)/exp( sAsch BN
e+ e-
q
q
Quark radiates gluons and eventually forms hadrons in a jet cone.
QCD calculation of gluon multiplicity times a hadron scale factor gives excellent agreement with data.
e+e- qq hadron jets
Becattini et al., hep-ph/9701275
If we assume everything is produced statistically (phase space) or from thermal equilibrium, we get a reasonable description too.
Key feature is that strangeness is suppressed relative to its mass and energy.
Thermal / Statistical Model
pQCD versus Statistical ModelsEvent to Event fluctuations or within Event fluctuations can be discriminating. For example, some events have quark jets and some also have gluon jets.
Bjorken speculated that in the “interiors of large fireballs produced in very high-energy pp collisions, vacuum states of the strong interactions are produced with anomalous chiral order parameters.”
Tim
e
“Baked Alaska”
QGP in Proton Proton Reactions?
“High Energy Nuclear Events”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 570 (1950)
Groundwork for statistical approach to particle production in strong interactions:
“Since the interactions of the pion field are strong, we may expect that rapidly this energy will be distributed among the various degrees of freedom present in this volume according to statistical laws.”
Fermi (1950)
Significant extension of Fermi’s approach
Considers fundamental roles of– Hydrodynamic evolution– Entropy
“The defects of Fermi’s theory arise mainly because the expansion of the compound system is not correctly taken into account…(The) expansion of the system can be considered on the basis of relativistic hydrodynamics.”
Landau (1955)
Experiments (E735, UA1, others) observe substantially larger source volumes in high multiplicity pp (pp) events via particle correlations and boosted pt spectra.
Rad
i us
( fm
)
dNch/d (charged) dNch/d (charged)<
p t>
(G
e V/ c
)
k
p
QGP Signatures?
Strangeness is enhanced in high multiplicity pp events, but not up to statistical equilibrium.
Watch out for autocorrelations. Higher multiplicity events have gluon jets which have higher strangeness!
RHIC experiments can add a lot to these measurements.
Nch
pt (GeV/c)
dNch/dR
ati o
Rat
i o
K/
Experiment E735
Strangeness Enhancement
Thermal / Statistical Model
Again, the statistical model works, with a remaining strangeness suppression.
Multiplicity Scaling
Both the Landau model (thermal fireball) and the pQCD (radiated gluon counting) give very similar scaling of multiplicity versus energy (?)
• Higher energy density may be achieved in proton-proton, but the partonic re-interaction time scale of order 1 fm/c.
• It is difficult to select events with different geometries and avoid autocorrelations.
• We will see that probes with long paths through the medium are key.
We should not rule out pp reactions, but rather study the similarities and differences with AA reactions.
Why Heavy Ions?
1. Initial Nuclei Collide
2. Partons are Freed from Nuclear Wavefunction
3. Partons interact and potentially form a Quark-Gluon Plasma
4. System expands and cools off
5. System Hadronizes and further Re-Scatters
6. Hadrons and Leptons stream towards our detectors
Heavy Ion Time Evolution
0 fm/c
2 fm/c
7 fm/c
>7 fm/c
Diagram from Peter Steinberg
Collision Characterization
Zero Degree Calorimeter
Spectators
Binary collisions
The impact parameter determines the number of nucleons that participate in the collision.
Participants = 2 x 197 - Spectators
Spectators
Participating nucleons
nn
np
pp
Participants
Out of a maximum energy of 39.4 TeV in central Gold Gold reactions, 26 TeV is made available for heating the system.
26 TeV of Available Energy !
Bjorken Energy Density• At t=tform, the hatched volume contains all particles w/ b<dz/tform:
• At y=b||=0, E=mT, thus:
• We can equate dN<mT> & dET and have:
Two nuclei pass through one another leaving a region of produced particles
between them.
)0@(; ||||
yddydy
dN
t
dz
d
dN
t
dzdN
formform
At
m
dy
tdN
Adz
mdN
V
Et
form
TformTform
)(
)(
dy
tdE
Att formT
formformBJ
)(1)(
Energy Density
R2
2c
dy
dE
cRT
Bj 22
112
PHENIX: Central Au-Au yields
GeVd
dET 25030
Energy density far above transition value predicted by lattice.
We start out with a system completely out of equilibrium and lots of kinetic energy.
We can try to use the Grand Canonical Ensemble to calculate the abundances of all the final measured particles.
1
1/)(
kTs sen
Depends on Temperature and Chemical Potential.
Fermions or Bosons
Grand Canonical Ensemble
2 2
3
3 ( ) /
1
2 1Bi i p m T
d pN g V
e
My system.
Infinite heat bath with which my system can exchange energy and particles, hence we have a temperature and chemical potential.
Grand Canonical Ensemble
Heavy Ions GCE
Works very well again, but now almost no additional suppression of strangeness.
Consider canonical ensemble in smaller systems?
Statistical Model using Grand Canonical Ensemble
One can use the GCE even when energy and other quantum numbers are conserved. The temperature and chemical potentials simply reflect characteristics of the system. Fluctuation calculations are not valid.
If the volume of the system is large, GCE is appropriate. For small volumes, you must conserve quantum numbers (for example strangeness) in every event !
Thus the Canonical Ensemble is relevant. In the CE, strangeness is suppressed for very small volumes and reaches the GCE limit for large volumes. Volume (fm3)
Canonical Ensemble
Hadronic rescattering can equilibrate overall strangeness (ie. K+, K-, ) in 10-100 fm/c and strange antibaryons () in over 1000 fm/c !
Heavy Ion collision lifetime is of order 10-15 fm/c before free streaming.
Quark-gluon plasma may equilibrate all strange particles in 3-6 fm/c !
Strangeness Enhancement
“A particularly striking aspect of this apparent ‘chemical equilibrium’ at the quark-hadron transition temperature is the observed enhancement of hadrons containing strange quark relative to proton-included collisions.
Since the hadron abundances appear to be frozen in at the point of hadron formation, this enhancement signals a new and faster strangeness-producing process before or during hadronization, involving intense rescattering among quarks and gluons.”
Becattini et al hep-ph/0011322, hep-ph/0002267
RHIC
dduu
sss
2
factor ~2
Strangeness Suppression
The enhancement of total strangeness appears quite similar at AGS, SPS, and now RHIC !
This challenges any model QGP model for enhancement. All systems are approaching something that looks statistically equilibrated, and we already see this trend in proton induced collisions.
Strange Patterns
Strangeness Enhancement
NA57 (open)STAR (filled)
Collision Dynamic Summary
- Depositing majority of kinetic energy into new medium
- Energy density appears above phase transition value
- Energy is distributed into particle production statistically including equivalent strangeness production
- No sharp global feature distinct from smaller hadron collisions, but instead gradual changes