41
The Clinical Spectrum of DES The Clinical Spectrum of DES Thrombosis: Thrombosis: multifactorial multifactorial Causes, Causes, clinical Presentation, and clinical Presentation, and Recommended Treatment Strategies Recommended Treatment Strategies Ron Waksman MD, FACC, FSCAI Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) Georgetown University Associate Chief of Cardiology Washington Hospital Center Washington DC

The Clinical Spectrum of DES Thrombosis ... · Lymphocytes Neutrophils Eosinophils Very late inflammatory response in animal models may, in and of itself, create thrombosis. Inflammation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • The Clinical Spectrum of DES The Clinical Spectrum of DES Thrombosis: Thrombosis: multifactorialmultifactorial Causes, Causes, clinical Presentation, and clinical Presentation, and Recommended Treatment StrategiesRecommended Treatment Strategies

    Ron Waksman MD, FACC, FSCAIProfessor of Medicine (Cardiology) Georgetown UniversityAssociate Chief of Cardiology Washington Hospital CenterWashington DC

  • 1 month 1 year

    Acute≤1d

    Late > 1 mo < 1year

    Subacute>1d - ≤1mo

    Early < 1 mo Very Late > 1year

    0 day to 1 day Acute stent thrombosis>1 day to 1 month Subacute stent thrombosis>1 month to 1 year Late stent thrombosis

    > 1 year Very late stent thrombosis

    Time Frame of Stent ThrombosisTime Frame of Stent ThrombosisHow did we get here?How did we get here?

  • History of Stent Thrombosis MeasurementHistory of Stent Thrombosis MeasurementFrom Acute to Very LateFrom Acute to Very Late

    1991

    Acute < 24 hr

    Palmaz SchatzBenestentSTRESS

    1995 2000

    Early < 30 days

    DAPT STARSIVUS, High Pressure Balloon

    2006

    Late < 1 year

    DES EraProlonged antiplatelet therapy

    Present

    VLST ≥ 1 year

    FDA PanelARC Definitions

  • Procedure

    Stent ThrombosisStent ThrombosisPatient, Procedure, DevicePatient, Procedure, Device

    StentStentThrombosisThrombosis

    • Stent apposition• Flow/Runoff

    Patient• Higher Risk• AP Compliance

    Device•• Polymer Polymer • Drug

  • Stent Thrombosis is Multi-Factorial

    Stent Thrombosis

    LesionComplexity, disease• Long lesions• Small vessels• Multi-vessel• AMI/ ACS• Diabetics• Bifurcations

    Technical

    Operator:•Under expansion• Incomplete wall apposition•Poor technique

    PatientPremature AntiplateletDiscontinuation

    •Plavix® compliance•Upcoming surgery•Plavix®resistance/intolerance

    DES Injury & healing:• Strut thickness• Stent design

    (scaffolding/conformability)• Polymer• Drug and elution profile• Stent delivery system• Adequate or proper stent

    expansionModified from Honda and Fitzgerald, Circulation 2003:108, 2Kereiakes D., et. al Rev Cardiovasc Med: 2004; 5 (1): 9-15

  • Impact of premature thienopyridinediscontinuation: The PREMIER registry

    500 pts with AMI undergoing primary PCI with DES at 19 U.S. medical centers, alive and well at 30 days

    Spertus JA et al. Circulation 2006;113:2803-9.SpertusSpertus JA et al. Circulation 2006;113:2803JA et al. Circulation 2006;113:2803--9.9.

    68 (13.6%) were no longer taking 68 (13.6%) were no longer taking prescribed prescribed thienopyridinesthienopyridines at 30 daysat 30 days

    P

  • Milan/Siegburg ExperienceStent thrombosis after DES (SES or PES) occurred Stent thrombosis after DES (SES or PES) occurred

    in 29/2229 pts (1.3%) at 9 in 29/2229 pts (1.3%) at 9 mosmos (45% mortality)(45% mortality)

    CentroCentroCuoreCuoreColumbusColumbus

    UnstableUnstableanginaangina

    PriorPriorbrachyRxbrachyRx

    ThrombusThrombus DiabetesDiabetes UnprotUnprot..left mainleft main

    BifurcationBifurcation RenalRenalfailurefailure

    PrematurePrematurePlavixPlavix d/cd/c

    Several patient and lesion Several patient and lesion subgroups have an subgroups have an

    unacceptably high stent unacceptably high stent thrombosis rate! thrombosis rate!

    IakovouIakovou I et al. JAMA 2005;293:2126I et al. JAMA 2005;293:2126--21302130

  • Platelet Responsiveness and Thrombosis804 patients, 25 def/prob thromboses

    Variable Hazard Ratio(95% CI)P

    ClopidogrelNonresponsiveness 3.08 (1.32–7.16) 0.009

    Acute myocardial infarction 2.41 (1.04–5.63) 0.041

    Total stent length, mm 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.010

    LVEF per 1% increase 0.95 (0.92–0.98) 0.001

    Buonamici et al, JACC 2007

  • Predictors of Stent Thrombosis

    Up to 30 days SubacuteStent Technique

    Lesion complexity

    Long lesions

    Small vessels

    Bifurcations

    Pharmacologic

    Clopidogrel resistance

    Early discontinuation

    After 1 M late ST:Less based upon lesion complexity?

    Pharmacologic role less well-defined

    Largely off clopidogrel

    ? Slow endothelialization

    Genetics

    Polymer inflammation

    Athero Vulnerable Plaque

  • The Role of Stent Properties In Thrombosis

    Modular designMetal coverageStrut thicknessStrut shapeSurface smoothnessCoating materialsDrug properties

    Hara H et al. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:377-386.

  • Potential Inflammatory Reaction

    Suggested by early preclinical dataMay be related to the polymers, the drug coatings themselves, or perhaps both. Heightened activity of:Macrophages Multinucleated giant cells

    Lymphocytes NeutrophilsEosinophils

    Very late inflammatory response in animal models may, in and of itself, create thrombosis.

    Inflammation can cause positive remodeling of the artery, which results in stent malapposition

    Hara H et al. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:377-386.

  • Localized Hypersensitivity and Late DES Thrombosis

    Postmortem radio- and photomicrographs (A and B) showing 2 LCxsirolimus-eluting stents with dense surrounding inflammation

    VirmaniVirmani, R. et al. , R. et al. CirculationCirculation 2004;109:7012004;109:701--705705

  • Healing After Stent Implantation in HumansDifferences Between BMS and DES

    Joner M et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:193-202.Colombo A, Corbett SJ. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:203-205.

    P=0.001P=0.001

    P

  • Healing After DES Implantation in HumansImportance of Strut Coverage

    DES Lesions With Thrombus

    (n=28)

    DES Lesions Without Thrombus

    (n=34) P

    Duration, days 173 127 NS

    EEM (mm2) 17.2±4.6 13.2±5.2 0.002

    Stent area, mm2 7.5±2.0 6.7±3.2 0.02

    Plaque area, mm2 9.7±3.9 6.5±3.7 0.003

    Neointimal thickness, mm 0.074 0.11 0.05

    Fibrin score 2.4±1.3 1.2±1.1 0.002

    Endothelialization, % 40.5±29.8 80.0±25.2

  • Late Incomplete Apposition After DES Placement

    Drug Eluting Stent Group

    Struts may be potentially vulnerableBaseline Follow-up

  • Clinical Impact of Stent Clinical Impact of Stent ThrombosisThrombosis

  • 81 cases

    010

    2030

    4050

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0 1 2 3Years

    76 cases

    010

    2030

    4050

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0 1 2 3Years

    Bare Metal Stents Drug-Eluting Stents

    Definite Stent Thrombosis: BMS vs. DESDefinite Stent Thrombosis: BMS vs. DESThe Bern Experience 1995The Bern Experience 1995--20052005

  • Very Late Stent Thrombosis Very Late Stent Thrombosis Initial Cases and Discussion: Lancet 2004Initial Cases and Discussion: Lancet 2004

    McFadden EP et al. Lancet 2004; 364:1519–21

  • Day 4002001000 500300

    CYPHER

    TAXUS

    335 343 375 442

    Very Late Stent Thrombosis Very Late Stent Thrombosis Initial Cases and Discussion: DAPT PriorInitial Cases and Discussion: DAPT Prior

    McFadden EP et al. Lancet 2004; 364:1519–21

  • ARC Stent Thrombosis ARC Stent Thrombosis Impact of Impact of BrachytherapyBrachytherapy

    Mauri et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1020-1029. *Includes intervening TLR

  • Clinical Importance of Stent Thrombosis: Death and MI

    Author/Year BMS/DES ST Def Death or MI Death

    Cutlip 2001 BMS Angio or Clinical 70% 21%

    Heller 2001 BMS Angio + AMI 100% 17%

    Iakovou 2005 DES Angio or Clinical 45%

    Ong 2005 DES Angio & Clinical 100 25%

    Kuchulakanti 2006 DES Angio 31%

  • Clinical Outcome and Prognosis Clinical Outcome and Prognosis of Patients who Present with of Patients who Present with

    Early versus Late Stent ThrombosisEarly versus Late Stent Thrombosis

    Gilles Gilles LemesleLemesle, Laurent , Laurent BonelloBonello, Axel de , Axel de LabriolleLabriolle, Tina Pinto , Tina Pinto SlottowSlottow, , Rebecca Rebecca TorgusonTorguson, Kimberly , Kimberly KaneshigeKaneshige, , ZhenyiZhenyi XueXue, William O , William O SuddathSuddath, ,

    Lowell F Lowell F SatlerSatler, Kenneth M Kent, Joseph Lindsay, Augusto D , Kenneth M Kent, Joseph Lindsay, Augusto D PichardPichard, and Ron Waksman., and Ron Waksman.

    Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USAWashington Hospital Center, Washington DC, USA

  • Methods: Retrospective study

    Between 2003 and 2007 91 patients

    with definite ST

    Early ST(n=51)

    Late or Very Late ST(n=40)

    Follow-up at 1 year after the first ST episodePrimary endpoint: composite criterion of

    Death - Recurrent MI - Recurrent ST

    Late ST (n=14)Very late ST (n=26)

  • • The median [interquartiles] occurrence time of ST after the initial PCI was:

    – 6 days [3-9.5] in the early ST group

    – 494.5 days [241-763.5] in the late ST group.

    Median occurrence time of ST

  • Primary endpoint Death-Recurrent MI-Recurrent ST At 1 year after the first ST episode

    Log Rank, p=0.029

    30%

    52.9%

    Early ST groupLate ST group

  • Treatment and prevention Treatment and prevention StrategiesStrategies

  • Impact of thrombus aspiration use for Impact of thrombus aspiration use for the treatment of stent thrombosis the treatment of stent thrombosis on early patient outcome.on early patient outcome.

    Between 2003 and 2008, 91 consecutive Between 2003 and 2008, 91 consecutive patients presenting with a definite ST were patients presenting with a definite ST were included in this analysis included in this analysis

    Angiographic Success Event free survival:Death-MI-Recurrent ST

  • Independent predictors of the Independent predictors of the composite criteria Deathcomposite criteria Death--MIMI--Recurrent Recurrent ST at 30 days.ST at 30 days.

    Hazard RatioHR 95% CI

    p value

    Clinical presentation as acute MI

    2.5 1.4 - 4.40.002

    Cardiogenicshock

    4.8 2.0 - 11.3

  • HighHigh--Pressure Balloons Pressure Balloons Early work showed ST after 30 daysEarly work showed ST after 30 days

    Colombo et al. Circulation.1995;91:1676;

    1.4% (n=5) ST rate with in 6 months with n=2 1.4% (n=5) ST rate with in 6 months with n=2 after 2 months after 2 months

  • Early Stent ThrombosisEarly Stent ThrombosisEarly BMS Experience: With and Without AnticoagulationEarly BMS Experience: With and Without Anticoagulation

    .6% stent thrombosis rate by 30 days .6% stent thrombosis rate by 30 days combination of combination of ticlopidineticlopidine and aspirinand aspirin

  • Balancing ST and TLR Balancing ST and TLR Threshold for Risk of VLSTThreshold for Risk of VLST

    0.14% Absolute 0.14% Absolute DifferenceDifference

    Not every patient should get DES

  • Independent Angiographic and Procedural Predictors of Stent Thrombosis by Multivariate

    AnalysisWashington Hospital Center Study

    Procedural Predictor Odds ratio Confidence interval P-value

    Left anterior descending artery 1.65 1.0-2.8 0.08

    Proximal 1.74 1.0-3.0 0.05

    Reference vessel diameter 0.51 0.2-1.1 0.08

    Drug Eluting Stent 1.86 1.0-3.5 0.06

    Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance

    0.42 0.2-0.7 0.002

    Pre-dilatation 1.5 0.9-2.6 0.16

    Ron Waksman, MD, Presented at CRT 2007

  • 12 Months Outcomes

    IVUS(n=884)

    No IVUS(n=884)

    p

    Major adverse cardiac events 128 (14.5%) 143 (16.2%) 0.32

    Death 50 (5.7%) 62 (7.1%) 0.23

    Cardiac death 16 (1.9%) 24 (2.8%) 0.18

    Q-wave myocardial infarction 18 (2.1%) 26 (3.1%) 0.21

    Target vessel revascularization 73 (8.5%) 77 (9.1%) 0.69

    Target lesion revascularization 43 (5.1%) 61 (7.2%) 0.06

    Definite stent thrombosis 6 (0.7%) 18 (2.0%) 0.014

    Probable stent thrombosis 35 (4.0%) 51 (5.8%) 0.08

    Late definite stent thrombosis 2 (0.2%) 6 (0.7%) 0.29

    Roy et al European heart Journal 2008

  • ARC Stent ThrombosisARC Stent Thrombosis SPIRIT IISPIRIT II

    Definite and Probable XIENCE V

    223 patientsn (%)

    TAXUS 77 patients

    n (%)

    Acute stent thrombosis (%) (1Y) 2 (1.0) 1 (1.5)

    Total stent thrombosis (%) 2 (1.0) 2 (2.9)

    p=NS * Same patient

    One new stent thrombosis in the TAXUS arm between 2 years and 3 years, none in the XIENCE V arm

  • Cumulative Incidence Rates of ARC Stent Cumulative Incidence Rates of ARC Stent Thromboses (Definite/Probable)Thromboses (Definite/Probable) SPIRIT IISPIRIT II

    1-year HRNA [NA]p=0.089

    2-year HR0.68 [0.06, 7.55]

    p=0.76

    3-year HR0.35 [0.05, 2.46]

    p=0.27

    XIENCE VTAXUS

    ARC

    Ste

    nt T

    hrom

    bosi

    s (%

    )

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Time Post Index Procedure (Months)0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36

    1.3%

    0.0% 1.3%

    0.4%1.3%

    0.9%

    2.8%

    0.9%

    1.9%

  • 0.0%

    0.5%

    1.0%

    1.5%

    2.0%

    2.5%

    3.0%

    0 360 720 1080 1440

    AR

    C (D

    ef/P

    rob

    Endeavor 2064 1251 1216 636

    No. at Risk

    Cypher 863 848 823 788 Taxus 1351 1300 1117 715

    1 Year 2 Years 3 YearsPooled Data

    Xience 959 868 NA NA

    4 Years

    Mauri et al. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1020-1029.Endeavor: Mauri et al. TCT. 2007.Xience: Spirit II at ACC and Spirt III at PCR

    Days

    Endeavor Safety AnalysisEndeavor Safety AnalysisARC Definite and Probable ST to 4 yearsARC Definite and Probable ST to 4 years

  • DES Safety: Lessons LearnedDES Safety: Lessons Learned

    1 year data not sufficient to evaluate DES1 year data not sufficient to evaluate DESDivergence with BMS appeared at 2 yearsDivergence with BMS appeared at 2 years

    BMS assumption of no very late ST was BMS assumption of no very late ST was incorrectincorrect

    RCT in simple subjects may not be sufficient RCT in simple subjects may not be sufficient to evaluate safetyto evaluate safety

    Sample sizes of 1Sample sizes of 1--2000 subjects not 2000 subjects not sufficient to detect small relative differencessufficient to detect small relative differences

  • All ComerDual APT >3 to 200 International Sites

    Randomization 1:1

    EndeavorN=4400

    Clinical Follow-up30d 6mo 4 yr3yr3yr30mo24mo 5 yr

    Primary Endpoint: ARC Definite or Probable Stent Thrombosis at 3 years

    Main Secondary Endpoints:Death or Cardiac death combined all non-fatal MI as well as the number of patients with large non-fatal MIClinical Follow up and Dual Antiplatelet Monitoring::At 30 days, and every 6 months until 3 years, than each year until 5 years

    CypherN=4400

    12mo 18mo

    PROTECT PROTECT International RCT Designed to Estimate VLST (>1 year)International RCT Designed to Estimate VLST (>1 year)

    Over 3500 Patients Currently EnrolledOver 3500 Patients Currently EnrolledOver 3500 Patients Currently Enrolled

  • Recommended Treatment StrategiesRecommended Treatment StrategiesAspiration avoid a new DESAspiration avoid a new DES

    Increase use of IVUS guided PCI Increase use of IVUS guided PCI

    High pressure, avoid geographic missHigh pressure, avoid geographic miss

    Improve patient Compliance for DAPTImprove patient Compliance for DAPT

    Never stop aspirinNever stop aspirin

    Check responsiveness to DAPTCheck responsiveness to DAPT

    Selective use of DES / New Generations?Selective use of DES / New Generations?