19
THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN COOPERATIVE AND COMPETITIVE LEARNING By: RIZA ZAUHATUL MUNIROH NIM 200832302 ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY 2012

THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT

OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KUDUS

IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

BETWEEN COOPERATIVE AND COMPETITIVE LEARNING

By:

RIZA ZAUHATUL MUNIROH

NIM 200832302

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY

2012

Page 2: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

ii

Page 3: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

iii

THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT

OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 1 KUDUS

IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2012/2013: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

BETWEEN COOPERATIVE AND COMPETITIVE LEARNING

SKRIPSI

Presented to the University of Muria Kudus

in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Completing the Sarjana Program

in English Education

By:

RIZA ZAUHATUL MUNIROH

NIM 200832302

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY

MURIA KUDUS UNIVERSITY

2012

Page 4: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

iv

MOTTO AND DEDICATION

MOTTO:

Never scared to be alone, since lonely is never.

Weakness and lonely are fools, and fools will only lead to mistakes and sins.

The true happiness is when you fully fill your heart with love until there is

no any single spot for hate.

DEDICATION:

To the Heroes in My Life,

“ Mr. Yono & Mrs. Khususiyah”

Page 5: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

v

ADVISORS’ APPROVAL

This is to certify that the Sarjana Skripsi of Riza Zauhatul Muniroh has been

approved by the thesis advisors for further approval by the examining committee.

Kudus, September 29 2012

Advisor I

Dr. A. Hilal Madjdi, M. Pd.

NIS. 0610713020001020

Advisor II

Diah Kurniati, S. Pd, M. Pd.

NIS. 06107010000011901

Acknowledged by the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Dean,

Drs. Susilo Raharjo, M. Pd.

NIP: 19560619-198503-1-002

Page 6: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

vi

EXAMINERS’ APPROVAL

This is to certify that the Skripsi of Riza Zauhatul Muniroh, NIM: 200832302 has

been approved by the Examining Committee as a requirement for the Sarjana

Degree in Teaching of ENGLISH as Foreign Language.

Kudus, September 29 2012

Thesis Examining Committee:

Dr. A. Hilal Madjdi, M. Pd. Chair person/ Member

NIS. 0610713020001020

Diah Kurniati, S. Pd., M. Pd. Member

NIS. 06107010000011901

Nuraeningsih, M. Pd. Member

NIS. 061071000001201

Ahsi Riyono, S. S., M. Hum., Member

NIS. 0610701000001160

Acknowledged by the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Dean,

Drs. Susilo Raharjo, M. Pd.

NIP: 19560619-198503-1-002

Page 7: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

For the very first, the researcher thanks to the Almighty, King of the

Universe, Allah SWT who always gives blessing, strength, and guardian to the

writer, so finally she is able to complete this skripsi. Secondly, the writer does not

forget to say Sholawat and Salam to the most glorious human in the world and

hereafter, Muhammad SAW, the true hero and idol.

Finishing this skripsi, the writer would like to express a great gratitude to:

1. My beloved parents who always give me love, prayer, and support.

2. My all family in Mayong, Pekalongan, and Pati.

3. Mr. Susilo Rahardjo, M. Pd. as the Dean of Teacher Training and Education

Faculty who has given the guidance for this last project

4. Mrs. Fitri Budi Suryani, SS, M. Pd. as the head of English Education

Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty for motivating and

supporting the writer.

5. Dr. A. Hilal Madjdi, the first advisor for his wise guidance and suggestion

from the first up to the last time of this skripsi completion.

6. Mrs. Diah Kurniati, S. Pd., M. Pd who has given constructive critics and

guidance in finishing this skripsi.

7. The chosen one whom I love and who love me for his pray, care, favor and

everything he dedicated to my success in the past and present of my lifetime,

Raden Panji Subrata.

8. The best men and women in the big family of PMII Commissioner Sunan

Muria, PMII Branch Kudus, who are kindly coloring my days. My brothers

Page 8: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

viii

and sisters of BEM FKIP 2009/2010 (BF2), BEM FKIP 2010/2011,

2011/2012, and the newest 2012/2013 and all friends in English Education

Department who support me.

9. All lectures of English Education Department Teacher Training and

Education Faculty who have taught and educated the students well during

studying in University of Muria Kudus.

10. The Headmaster of SMP N 1 Kudus who has given permission to the

researcher to hold and do the research to his students as the sample.

11. Miss Nurul Azkya as the English teacher of SMP N 1 Kudus who kindly gave

permission, help and time supporting and facilitating this research, and the

eighth grade students who were willingly following the treatments.

Consciously, the researcher admits that this skripsi is far from perfectness

and has some weaknesses. Therefore, the researcher hopes constructive criticisms

and suggestions for better condition. Finally, in the name of Allah, and by the

deepest thanks to our God, the researcher pray wallahul muwafiq ilaa aqwamith

thariq, may Allah always guide us to the best way of our life in the world and

hereafter.

Kudus, September 20 2012

Riza Zauhatul Muniroh

Page 9: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

ix

ABSTRACT

Muniroh, Riza Zauhatul. 2012. The Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of

SMP N 1 Kudus Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013: A Comparative Study

between Cooperative and Competitive Learning. Skripsi. English Education

Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muria Kudus University.

Advisors: (i) Dr. A. Hilal Madjdi, M. Pd., (ii) Diah Kurniati, S. Pd., M. Pd.

Key words: cooperative learning, competitive learning, speaking recount text

achievement, eighth grade students of SMP N 1 Kudus

Experts mention that there are three patterns of human interaction:

competitive, cooperative, and individualistic. In the education world, cooperation

and competition also become models of students‟ learning. Cooperative learning

is seen as an effective way that gives positive effects to the students learning. this,

our national education curriculum is designed to such cooperative learning. Vice-

versa, competitive learning is argued to cause many negative effects to it.

However, the researcher finds that the condition of Indonesian school today tends

to keep applying competition. This gap leads the researcher initiate this study. On

the other hand, speaking is judged as the most demanded skill in mastering

English. Good speaking is not just the matter of producing oral language

continuously. However, genre-based speaking is important to produce systematic,

chronologic, and thematic speech. Hence, those can be found in recount as one

form of genres that becomes the learning material for junior high school students.

This research comparing cooperative and competitive learning on its effect

to the students‟ academic achievement is aimed to answer a question whether

there is or not a significant difference of speaking recount text achievement of the

eighth grade students of SMP N 1 Kudus in the academic year 2012/2013 between

structured in cooperative and competitive learning. In this quantitative

experimental research, the researcher applies the two learning models to two

homogenous groups of students as the treatment. The data are gotten from

students‟ score of the speaking test using picture-cued story telling procedure

administered to both groups.

The data analysis shows that the cooperative class performs better result

than the competitive class with the mean score of the experimental group, 80,7

and the standard deviation is 5,16. Otherwise, the mean score of the control group

is 74,8 and the standard deviation is 7,1. The t-test calculation finds that t-

observation (t0) is 3,58 while the t-table (tt) on the degree of freedom (df) 54 and

the level of significant 0,05 is 2,000.

Finally, by confirming the alternative hypothesis (Ha) and denying the null

hypothesis (H0), the researcher concludes that there is a significant difference of

speaking recount text achievement of the eighth grade students of SMP N 1 Kudus

in the academic year 2012/2013 between structured in cooperative and

competitive learning. Referring to this result, the researcher suggests, the English

teachers had better apply cooperative learning to enhance the students‟ academic

achievements since it gives them various benefits academically and socially.

Page 10: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

x

ABSTRAKSI

Muniroh, Riza Zauhatul. 2012. Prestasi dalam Berbicara ‘Recount Text’ Siswa

Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Kudus Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013: Sebuah Penelitian

Komparatif antara Pembelajaran Kerjasama dan Persaingan. Skripsi. Jurusan

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan, universitas

muria kudus. pembimbing: (i) Dr. A. Hilal Madjdi, M. Pd., (ii) Diah Kurniati, S.

Pd., M. Pd.

Key words: pembelajaran kerjasama, pembelajaran persaingan, berbicara „recount

text‟, siswa kelas VIII SMP N 1 Kudus

Para ahli menyebutkan, ada tiga pola interaksi manusia: persaingan,

kerjasama, dan individu. Dalam dunia pendidikan, kerjasama dan persaingan juga

menjadi model pembelajaran bagi siswa. Pembelajaran kerjasama dipandang

sebagai cara yang efektif yang memberikan banyak efek positif pada

pembelajaran siswa. Dalam hal ini, kurikulum pendidikan nasional kita didesain

menyerupai pembelajaran kooperatif. Sebaliknya, pembelajaran persaingan

dipandang menyebabkan banyak efek negatif. Akan tetapi, penulis menemukan

kenyataan bahwa sekolah di Indonesia sekarang ini masih menerapkan system

persaingan. Kesenjangan tersebut menuntun penulis menginisiasi riset ini. Di sisi

lain, berbicara dianggap sebagai keterampilan yang paling penting dalam

menguasai Bahasa Inggris. Berbicara yang baik bukan hanya soal memproduksi

bahasa lisan secara lancar. Akan tetapi, berbicara berbasis jenis text adalah

penting untuk menghasilkan bahasa lisan yang sistematis, kronoligis, dan tematis.

Ini dapat ditemukan dalam teks recount sebagai salah satu bentuk jenis teks yang

menjadi materi pembelajaran bagi siswa SMP.

Penelitian yang membandingkan pembelajaran kerjasama dan persaingan

dalam hal efeknya terhadap prestasi akademik siswa ini bertujuan untuk

menjawab pertanyaan apakah ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam prestasi

berbicara teks recount siswa kelas VIII SMP N 1 Kudus tahun ajaran 2012/2013

antara diajar menggunakan pembelajaran kerjasama dan persaingan. Dalam

penelitian eksperimen quantitatif ini, peneliti menerapkan kedua model

pembelajaran tersebut pada dua kelompok siswa yang homogen sebagai

perlakuan. Data penelitian diperoleh dari hasil test berbicara siswa menggunakan

prosedur bercerita dengan petunjuk gambar yang diterapkan pada kedua kelompok

di atas setelah menyelesaikan enam kali pertemuan pemberian perlakuan.

Analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kelompok eksperimen menampilkan

hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok

eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan baku 5,16. Sedangkan, skor rata-rata kelompok

control 74,8 dan simpangan baku 7,1. Penghitungan t-tes menemukan bahwa t-

observasi (t0) 3,58 sedangkan t-tabel (tt) pada derajad kebebasan (df) 54 dan level

ketepatan 0,05 adalah 2,000.

Akhirnya, dengan menerima hipotesis alternatif (Ha) dan menolak

hipotesis null (H0) peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan

dari prestasi berbicara teks recount siswa kelas VIII SMP N 1 Kudus tahun ajaran

Page 11: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xi

2012/2013 antara diajar menggunakan pembelajaran kerjasama dan persaingan.

Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, penulis menyarankan agar guru Bahasa Inggris

menerapkan pembelajaran kooperatif untuk meningkatkan prestasi akademik

siswa karena model pembelajaran ini memeberikan berbagai macam manfaat pada

pembelajaran siswa baik secara akademis maupun sosial.

Page 12: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVER……………………………………………………………………......

LOGO ……………………………………………………………………........

TITLE…………………………………………………………………………

MOTTO AND DEDICATION……………………………………………….

ADVISORS‟ APPROVAL..…………………………………………………..

EXAMINERS‟ APPROVAL..………………………………………………..

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………

ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………...

ABSTRAKSI……………………………………………………………….....

TABLE OF CONTENT………………………………………………………

LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………….

LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………...

LIST OF APPENDICES……………………………………………………...

Page

i

ii

iii

iv

v

vi

vii

ix

x

xii

xvi

xvii

xviii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Research………………………………………………..

1.2 Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………..

1.3 Objective of the Research…………………………………………………..

1.4 Significance of the Research……………………………………………….

1.5 Limitation of the Research…………………………………………………

1.6 Operational Definition ………………………………………………….....

CHAPTER II REVIEW TO RELATED LITERATURE AND

HYPOTHESIS

2.1 Speaking as One of Language Skill………………………………………..

1

7

8

8

9

10

12

Page 13: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xiii

2.1.1 Types of Speaking………………………………...……………………...

2.1.2 Testing Speaking Skill……………………………………………………

2.2 Recount Text……………………………………………………………….

2.3 Cooperative Learning………………………………………………………

2.3.1 Theories Underlying Cooperative Learning……………………………...

2.3.1.1 Ausubel‟s Theory: Meaningful Learning………………………..…….

2.3.1.2 Piaget‟s Theory: Cognitive Development……………………………...

2.3.1.3 Vygotskys‟s Theory: Sociocultural…………………………………….

2.3.2 Cooperative learning in the Classroom…………………………………..

2.3.2.1 Methods of Cooperative Learning………...……………………………

2.3.2.2 Techniques of cooperative learning…………………………..………..

2.3.3 Problems in Applying Cooperative Learning……………..……………..

2.4 Competitive Learning…...………………………………………………….

2.4.1 Theories Underlying Competitive Learning: Darwin‟s Evolution Theory

2.4.2 Competitive Learning in the Classroom………………………………….

2.4.2.1 Methods of Competitive Learning……………………………………..

2.4.3 Problems in Applying Competitive Learning…………………………….

2.5 Review of Previous Research……………………………………………....

2.6 Theoretical Framework……………………………………………………..

2.7 Hypothesis………………………………………………………………….

CHAPTER III METHOD OF THE RESEARCH

3.1 Design of the Research…………………………………………………......

3.2 Population and Sample…………………………………………………......

14

16

18

20

21

21

22

23

24

25

27

29

30

30

32

32

34

35

37

38

40

43

Page 14: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xiv

3.3 Instrument of the Research…………………………………………………

3.3.1 Test……………………………………………………………………….

3.3.2 Validity and Reliability…………………………………………………..

3.4 Data Collection …………………………………………………………….

3.5 Data Analysis……………………………………………………………….

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING

4.1 Finding of the Research…………………………………………………….

4.1.1 The Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth

Grade Students in Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Cooperative Learning…………………………………………………….

4.1.2 The Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth

Grade Students in Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Competitive Learning…………………………………….........................

4.1.3 The Significant Difference of the Achievement of Speaking Recount

Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Student in the Academic Year

2012/2013 between Structured in Cooperative and Competitive

Learning……………………………………………………………….....

4.2 Hypothesis Testing………………………………………………………..

CHAPTER V DISCUSSION

5.1 The Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth

Grade Students in Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Cooperative Learning………………………………………………………

5.2 The Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth

45

45

48

49

50

53

53

55

57

58

60

Page 15: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xv

Grade Students in Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Competitive Learning……………………………………………………...

5.3 The Significant Difference of the Achievement of Speaking Recount Text

of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Student in the Academic Year

2012/2013 between Structured in Cooperative and Competitive Learning.

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

6.1 Conclusion…………….……………….…………………………………...

6.2 Suggestion…………….……………….……………….…………..………

BIBLIOGRAPHY…………….……………….…………………...………...

APPENDICES…………….……………….…………………..…………......

STATEMENT………………………………………………………………..

CURRICULUM VITAE…………….……………….……………………...

63

65

69

70

71

73

114

115

Page 16: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xvi

LIST OF TABLES

Table

Table 2.1

Table 3.1

Table 3.2

Table 3.3

Table 4.1

Table 4.2

Table 4.3

Table 4.4

Table 4.5

Table 5.1

Theoretical Framework of The Research: Points of the

Comparison between Cooperative and Competitive

Learning………………………………………………………

The First Daily Test Mean Scores of the Classes of SMP N 1

Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the Academic Year

2012/2013…………………………………………………….

The Speaking Test Scoring Categories According to Brown

(2004)………………………………………………………….

Score Criteria of KKM of SMP N 1 Kudus for English Subject

The Score of the Test Measuring the Achievement of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Cooperative Learning………………………………………….

The Frequency Distribution of the Score of the Test

Measuring the Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of

SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the Academic Year

2012/2013 when Structured in Cooperative Learning………...

The Score of the Test Measuring the Achievement of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Competitive Learning………………………………………….

Frequency Distribution of the Score of the Test Measuring the

Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus

Eighth Grade Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when

Structured in Competitive Learning…………………………...

The Summary of the Analyzes of Test Score of Speaking

Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eight Grade Students in the

Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in Cooperative

and Competitive Learning………………………………..........

The Points of Significant Differences of Cooperative and

Competitive Learning Found during the Learning Process…...

Page

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

Page 17: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xvii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure

Figure 2.1

Figure 3.1

Figure 4.1

Figure 4.2

Tabesh Competitive Method…………………………………..

Experimental Research Design using Control Group without

Pre-Test………………………………………………………..

The Bar Diagram of the Achievement of Speaking Recount

Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the

Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in Cooperative

Learning……………………………………………………….

The Bar Diagram of the Achievement of Speaking Recount

Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the

Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in Competitive

Learning……………………………………………………….

Page

37

47

49

50

Page 18: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xviii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Lesson Plan Teaching Speaking Recount Text through

Cooperative Learning For Odd Semester of the Eighth

Grade Students of SMP N 1 Kudus in the Academic Year

2012/2013…………………………………………………..

Lesson Plan Teaching Speaking Recount Text through

Competitive Learning For Odd Semester of the Eighth

Grade Students of SMP N 1 Kudus in the Academic Year

2012/2013…………………………………………………..

Data of the Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured

in Cooperative Learning Taken by the

Researcher……………………………………………….....

Data of the Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured

in Competitive Learning Taken by the Researcher………...

Data of the Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured

in Cooperative Learning Taken by the English Teacher…...

Data of the Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of

Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade

Students in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured

in Competitive Learning Taken by the English Teacher…...

Data of the Final Scores of the Speaking Recount Text

Achievements of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students

in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Cooperative Learning ……………………………………...

Data of the Final Scores of the Speaking Recount Text

Achievements of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students

in the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Competitive Learning……………………………………...

Recapitulation of the Test Scores Measuring the

Achievements of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1

Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the Academic Year

2012/2013 when Structured in Cooperative

Learning…………………………………………………….

Recapitulation of the Test Scores Measuring the

Achievements of Speaking Recount Text of SMP N 1

Page

73

85

93

95

97

99

101

103

105

Page 19: THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SPEAKING RECOUNT TEXT OF THE … · 2013-06-27 · hasil yang lebih baik dari pada kelompok control dengan nilai rata-tara kelompok eksperimen 80,7 dan simpangan

xix

11

12

13

14

Kudus Eighth Grade Students in the Academic Year

2012/2013 when Structured in Competitive

Learning…….........................................................................

The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the

Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of Speaking

Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students in

the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Cooperative

Learning…………………………………………………….

The Calculation of Mean and Standard Deviation of the

Test Scores Measuring the Achievements of Speaking

Recount Text of SMP N 1 Kudus Eighth Grade Students in

the Academic Year 2012/2013 when Structured in

Competitive

Learning…………………………………………………….

The T-Test of the Mean Scores of the Test Measuring the

Achievement of Speaking Recount Text of the Eighth

Grade Students of SMP N 1 Kudus in the Academic Year

2012/2013 Structured in Cooperative and Competitive

Learning…………………………………………………….

The Value of t-table for Any Number Degree of Freedom...

106

107

109

111

113