The 1976 Articles Most Cited in 1976 and 1977.2. Physical Sciences

Number 17 April 23, 1979

We recently published a list of the1976 life sciences articles most cited in1976- 1977.1 In this second part of thereport, we cover the physical sciences.The list in Figure 1 shows some of the“hot” areas of research in 1976 and1977. And data from the 1978 ScienceCitation Index@ (SCP ) indicate thatmany continue to be hot. We havemade no attempt to reorder the listbecause of 1978 data. However, it isprovided to supplement data from1976-1977.

In studies of this kind it is necessaryto include citation data from two yearsdue to the chronological artifact of an-nual citation studies. Obviously, a paperpublished late in 1976 has a smallerchance of being cited before the year isout than a paper published early in1976. Many papers published in 1976received no citations that year, butenough in 1977 to appear on our list.

The typical 1976 paper published in ajournal covered by the SCZ would becited once or twice in 1976-1977.However, the least-cited paper on thislist received 26 citations, and the most-cited paper received 178. The averagepaper on the list received 42.4 citationsin 1976-77, of which 9.9 were in 1976and 32.5 in 1977. In 1978 there is a slightfalling-off to 29.8 citations. Thk declinereflects the intense activity in severalfields, especially particle physics. Manyof the papers of prime interest in 1976and 1977 have already been supersededby more recent work. In particle phys-ics, for example, 26 of the 33 articles

received fewer citations in 1978 than in1977.

While physics papers dominate thelist in Figure 1, this doesn’t meanphysics is more significant than theother disciplines represented. It simplyindicates that certain physics specialtieswere quite active in the period followingthe appearance of these papers in 1976.

The names of three 1978 Nobel prizewinners appear on the list. Co-a”uthorsof the paper with P. G. Wannier in theastronomy section are Amo A. Penziasand Robert W. Wifson, who receivedthe physics award for discovering thebackground radiation which was inter-preted as the remnant of the “big bang.”Their 1976 paper dealt with interstellarclouds. Also on the list is Peter Mit-chell, who won the chemistry prize forshowing how plants and animals convertnutrients into energy. Had we publishedthis study in the spring of 1977, asoriginally planned, the predictive valueof the list would have been more dra-matic.

Twenty-nine journals which pub-lished the 100 articles are shown inFigure 2. Physical Review Letters con-tributed 41 papers and Physics Letters Bseven. Thus, these two journals con-tributed about half of the papers.

These papers come from 86 institu-tions, shown in Figure 3, of which fifty-five are in the United States. Eight arelocated in the Federal Republic of Ger-many, and five in France. England andAustralia are represented by three in-stitutions; Israel and Japan by two. Den-

115

Figure 2. Journals rt!presen!ed cm the IIMof 1976physical science articles most cited in1976-1977. “The number in parcmlhwss isthe >mpac[ IlmpacI equal> the a,eragenumber of Cltatll)ll\ rtxm) d by

]9”5-[9-b tirtw!m In 19”- I The namht’r,at the ngh! IndIcaIe II(IW many papersfrcm] the journal are <m {he lI\t.

PIw. Re\. Lett. !h ~~1 41

Phy\. Le(t, B 13.241

J. An>. Chcnl. S<>c.(4.41) 6

Ph}s. Re\ f) (.3 0$) 6A\(r[lphys. J. i4.321 5

Phy\. Re\ B (3.04) 5AfIpl. Ply Let!. (.3 ?-l -1Scmncc (5.75) 3Acc<mnl Chem RIA t8. t,2) 2opt. Ct>mmun. 12.13) >

Acts Cryslall,,gr. SecI A II 82) IAppl. Oplic\ 11,65) 1Bl,lchen] ‘+Ic. I rans. (2.1 $1 1Chem. Phys. (2. ”21 IChem. f’hy,. Lett. O 21) 1Chem. Re\ (N.9XI IElectron. Le[t. (().79) 1J. Appl. Phy\, ( l.t)~) IJ. Chem Phys. (.3.22) IJ Electnm. Spectrow RelaI. Ph. 13.01) IJ. Org. Chem. 12.471 IJ. PIIV Chem. (2.051 IMcm. N<~tic.Roy. A\tr(,n. SW’ (2.7.?1 1Nature (4.96) 1Nut!. Phv\ B (2.82) IPhvs. Rep. 17.651 1s,,, J. Quant. E:lec!r. ,().51 I I

(K\an!f)\aya Elektr<m!kalPhys Rev C 11.971 1Svnthesi\-S[u[lgar[ 12.12) 1

mark, Sweden, Italy, Canada, Belgium,the IJSSR, Switzerland, and the Nether-lands are represented by one institutioneach.

All but one were originally publishedin English. The review paper on laserisotope separation by V. S. Letokhovand C. B. Moore was originally pub-lished in the Russian journal, Kvan-fovaya Elektronika and later appearedin the translation journal Soviet Jour-nal of Quantum Electronics, Note,however, that [his paper was co-au-thored by an American scientist. TheRussian version was cited 14 times in1976-1977 and 15 times in 1978. TheEnglish version was cited 28 times in1976- 1977 and22 timesin 1978. Part oneof this review article did not make theIist.z It was cited “only” 35 times in1976-1978.

Astronomy and astrophysics are thesubjects of nine papers on the list.Topics dealt with here include X-rayastrxmomy, black holes. and the com-position of the atmosphere of Mars.

Three papers concern “supergravity, ”an extension of general relativity, It isuncertain who coined [he term, butphysicists began using it ar<,und 1973. ]Supergravity is a mathematical con-struction which aims at a unified fieldtheory along the lines of general relativi-ty.

Field theory is the subject of eightpapers. Modem quantum field the~wv isthe study of the fundamental forces ofthe universe. It seeks to show how dif-ferent kinds of particles transf(mm andinteract. For example, the forces ofelectromagnetism arise from the ex-change of photons between chargedparticles. Physicists postulate thegraviton to explain gravity. The ultimategoal of field theory is to explain all theforces in the universe in terms of a sin-gle theoretical framework, or unifiedfield theory. So far physicists have nar-rowed the kinds of forces down to four:electromagnetism, gravitation, a strongnuclear interaction, and a weak nuclearinteraction. In June 1978, 20 physicistsfrom five institutions performed an ex-periment at the Stanford Linear Ac-celerator Center (SLAC) which pro-vided evidence supporting a theorywhich unifies electromagnetism and (heweak nuclear interaction. ~~ If thewhole theory is verified, it means that

all of the forces in the universe are theproduct of-—-at most—three basicforces, not four. So the SLAC experi-ment shows that progress has beenmade toward a unified field theory.{’

Field theory in solid state physics isthe subject of two papers. Solid statephysics is the study of the physical prop-erties of solid materials, particularlycrystals, glasses, and polymers. Fieldtheory is one approach which enablessolid state physicists to understand theproperties of crystals at the atomiclevel.

116

Figure 3. The institutional affiliations of authorson the list. shown with the num~r ~,fauthors from each institution,

Harvard Univ.MITUni\. California. BerkeleyFermi Accelerator Lab,. Batavia. ILUni\. PennsylvaniaLJni\. WisconsinStanford Llni\. SLACSUNY. Stony Brook. NYColumbia LJniv.Comelf Uni\.Brookhmen Nat. Lab.. Upton, NYCERN, SwitzerlandEnrico Fermi Inst.. Chicago. ILIBM Thomas J. Watson Res. Ctr..

Yorktown Heights, NYOak Ridge Nat. Lab., TNAkad, Sci.. Moscow. USSREcolc Normal Sup&ieure. ParisHar} ard College Observatory & Smithsonian

Aslrophys. Lab,Princeton Univ.Rockefeller Uni\., NYLlni\ HawaiiUniv. IllinoisUniv. OxfordUn i>. Sydney. AustraliaUni\, TexasYale Univ.Amer. Sci. & Engineering. Cambtidge. MAAmes Res, Cir., Moffett Field. CAAstron. Inst., Utrecht, NetherlandsBell Labs., Murray Hifl, NJBell Tel., Holmdei. NJCalifornia Inst. TechnoLChalmers Unir. Tech.. Goieborg. SwedenC[r. dEt udes Nucb?aires de Saclay. FranceClarkaon Coil. Tech., Potsdam. NYComing Glass Works, NYCSfRO. AustraliaDeutsches Elecworwm Symchrotmn,

Hamburg. FRGE. I. DuPonl Co., Wilmington, DEEcole P+tech., Palaiseau. FranceFlorida Slate [Jni~.General Elecwic Corp. Res. & Devel.,

Schenectady, NYGlynn Les Labs., Bodmin, Cornwall. EnglandGoddard Space & Flight Ctr.. Green trelt, MDGeorgia lnst, Technol.Hebrew Uni\.. IsraelINFN. Univ. Mifano, Itaf~Inst, Advanced Study, f%ncetonJohns Hopkins Univ.. Baltimore. MDLab. Accdl&ateur Lim$aire. Orsay, FranceLouisiana State Univ.Martin Marietta Corp., Den~er, COMax Planck Inst.. Munchen. FRGNASA Langley Res. Ctr., Hampton, VANationa[ fnst. Arthritis Metabol. & Digestive

Diseases. Bethesda. MDNa\al Res. Lab.. Washington. DCNippon Telegraph & Telephone Publ. Corp..

JapanPennsylvania State Univ.RWTH Phys. Inst.. Aachen. FRG

Is12II9876544333

3322

222222222I1II1111I11

11I1

f11I1I1[11111

11

111

Sandia Labs.. NM 1Science Applications, Inc., Alexandria, VA ISUNY, Buffalo. NY fTechnische Hc~hshule, Aachen, FRG iTech. Uni}.. Miinchen, FRG 1Tel-A\i\ [Ini,.. Israel fUni~. ~arhus, Denmark I[Jniv. Alberta, Canada IUni\. Cafifomia. Da>is 1Univ. Catifomia, Irvine 1Uni\. California. Li*ermore. CA 1(lni~. California, LOSAlamos IUni\. California. Los Angeles 1Clniv. College. London IUniv. Hamburg. FRG 1Univ. Kaiserslautern. FRG 1Uni\. Maryland 1lJni\, Michigan ILJniv. Mjrrnesota 1Univ. Miincherr, FRG 1Uni!. North Carolina [[Jniv, Paris-Sud. Omay. France 1Univ. Queensland. Australia 1Univ, Tokyo IUniv. Washington. Washington. DC 1VUB, Belgium 1Xerox Western Res. Ctr.. Webster. NY I

Eleven more papers are about sol-id state physics in general. Five ofthem concern a compound called tetra-thiafulvalene-tetracy anoquinodime-thane (TFF-TCNQ). TTF-TCNQ is anorganic semiconductor. Semiconduc-tors can act as both insulators and con-ductors of electricity. This “on-off” ca-pacity makes them potentially useful inelectrical components and computer

memory devices. Inorganic semicon-ductors, usually made of silicon orgermanium, cannot be synthesized fromcommonly available materials. TTF-TCNQ semiconductors can be. Thismakes it desirable to use organic com-pounds similar to TTF-TCNQ in a widerange of devices. Author Y. Tomkie-wicz tells us that TTF-TCNQ has not yetfound wide practical applications. Butlaboratory studies have created consid-erable excitement among physicists.T

About one-third of the papers on thelist, or 33 of them, deal with elementaryparticle physics. This branch of physicsis sometimes called “high energy phys-ics” or simply “particle physics, ” It isprimarily concerned with the quest for afundamental theory to explain the ex-istence, properties, and interactions ofthe various kinds of subatomic particles.

117

Theoretical models involving thehypothetical quarks have enabled physi-cists to explain the behavior of hundredsof known subatomic particles.However, nobody has yet detected aquark in isolation. High energy physi-cists are also searching for a simpletheory explaining the existence andbehavior of the quarks themselves. It isnoteworthy that the average number ofauthors on these papers is f4.4. Further-more, each paper involves about half adozen institutions.

Ten papers are about atomic andmolecular physics. These disciplines areconcerned with understanding the prop-erties and interactions of atoms andmolecules and with the practical tech-niques which exploit this understanding.

Two papers are in nuclear physics.This specialty has practical applicationsin weaponry, power, and medicine.

Lasers and fiber optics are the topicsof five papers. The many uses of lasersin communications, medicine, andother areas are well known. Opticalfibers, which conduct light alongselected paths, are afso useful to com-munications. Today they are beingwidely used in telephone communica-tions. The Soviet scientist Letokhov,co-author of the review on lasers men-tioned earlier, chose to publish hisother paper on lasers in English.

Two papers are in chemical physics.Seven papers concern physicalchemistry. Four of the physical chemis-try papers have possible applications tosolar energy conversion.

Three papers deal with inorganic ororganometallic chemistry. Organicchemistry is the topic of four morepapers. In general, papers in this groupare method papers. One is by R.Huisgen, who is not new to our biblio-metric studies. He is one of the 300most-cited authors whose work waspublished 1961-1976.8

We have put Nobelist Peter Mitchell’spaper at the end of the list under

Biophysics. We were unsure if thispaper belonged in the life or physicalsciences list. Some may quarrel with thedecision to put it on this list. However,when we contacted the author, Mitchellhimself expressed uncertainty about thearticle’s placement. Such borderlinecases indicate that even the dichotomybetween life and physical sciences maybreak down as a way of classifyingresearchers.

The most-cited paper on the list is byG. Goldhaber and 40 co-authors. Mostof the authors of this paper also co-authored the second most cited paperby I. Perruzzi and 39 others. Both ofthese papers report the results of ex-periments at the SLAC-LawrenceBerkeley Laboratory that confirmed thepredicted existence of a new subatomicparticle, the charmed meson.

Only six papers listed are reviews. Inthe life sciences group, one-fifth of thepapers were reviews. The meaning ofthis difference needs some thoughtfulstudy. Our list of 1975 physical sciencesarticles, which was also dominated byparticle physics, contained no reviews.~When discoveries were being made asrapidly as they were in particle physicsduring 1976, maybe it was not possibleto prepare meaningful reviews. None ofthe physical sciences reviews were inparticle physics, but rather in astrophys-ics, lasers and fiber optics, chemicalphysics, physical chemistry, and organicchemistry.

Since elementary particle physics wasvery active in 1976, we were curious tosee what the 1976 list would look likewithout the domination of these particlephysics papers. We found that the next33 most-cited items are nine morepapers in particle physics, seven in solidstate physics, five in astrophysics andastronomy, three in organic chemistry,two in physical chemistry, two in fieldtheory in solid state physics, and oneeach in nuclear physics, atomic andmolecular physics, chemical physics, in-

118

organic and organo-metallic chemistry, I intend to continue this series of an-and unified field theory. ‘nual studies which have now covered

As I noted in the earlier essay, we list the most-cited papers published inonly the 100 most cited papers because 1972-1976. We now have data for theof limitations of time, space, and ener- 1977 papers most-cited in 1977-1978 andgy. Nearly 200 physical sciences papers hope to report on them while they arepublished in 1976 received 20 or more still hot. I’m sure you’ll agree that acitations in 1976-1977. The articles on large number of the papers reported inthis list are not necessarily the most im- these studies qualify as “break-portant papers of 1976, but they are the throughs.” Most that are notones which had the most immediate im- breakthroughs are review papers thatpact on researchers. reflect fields that are hot. 0,973 ,s8

REFERENCES

1. Garfield E. The 1976 articles most cited in 1976 and 1977. 1. Life sciences.Current Contents ( 13):5-23, 26 March 1979.

2, Ldokbov V S & Moore C B. Laser isotope separation (review). Part 1.K tan, Elektr. .3:248-87, 1976. (So v. J. Quant. Electr. b: 129-50, 1976. )

3. Zumfno B. Supergravit y. Eigh]h Texas Spmp. Relntivis/ic A.rtrophys. 202: S$5-6, 1978.4. Prescott C Y, Atwood W B, CottreU R L A, De.%aebler H, GarrvbI E L, Gonidec A,

Miller R H, Rochemer L S, S-to T, Shesden D 1. SincJsdr C K, StebI S, Taylor R E. Ckmdenkn J E.Hughes V W, Sasso N, Schuler K P, Borghloe M G, Lubelsmeyer K & Jentschulce W. Parity non-conservation in elastic electron scattering, Ph.vs. Le/I. B 77:347-52, 1978.

5. Atwood W B, Cottrell R L A, DeStaebler H, Mitler R, Pessard H, Prescott C Y, Rochester L S,Taylor R E. Alguard M 1, ClendenLn 1. Conper P S. EhrUch R D, Hughes V W, Lubelt M S.hum G, Scbuler K P & Lubelsmeyer K. Search for parify violation in deep inelastic scattering ofpolarized electrons by unpolarized deuierons. Phys. Rev. D 18:2223-6, 1978.

6. SufJlvan W. New quarks stir debate on basic laws of nalure. NY Time$ 13 February 1979, p. Cl. 2.7. Tomkkewicz Y. Personal communication. 13 March 1979.8. Garfietd E. The 200 most-cited authors 1971-1976, including co-autbnrs at last. 1. How Ihe names were

selected. Currem Contt-nm (28}:5-17, 10 July 1978.9. -------------.1975 physical sciences articles highly cited in 1975. Curmn/ Con/t-nI.r ( 16):5-8, 19 April 1976. “

“Reprinted in: Garfield E. Essays of an information .vciemi.st.Philadelphia: 1S1 Press, 1977. Vol. 2, p, 457-60.

F@me 1: The 1976 physical sciences articles most-cited in 1976-1977. Citation counts for 19~8 also appearhere to supplement the earlier data. Au!hors’ af foliations follow each citation, Journals are oftenambiguous about addresses. When we could not tell which aulhor was a! which organization. wehave simply given the addresses withou! finking them 10 specific authors.

TotalCitations767778 BJbliograpJIJc Data

ASTROPHYSICS & ASTRONOMY

12 28 30 Cksrk D fJ1 & CasweU J L2. A study of galactic supernova remnants, based on Molonglo-Parkes observational data. Man. No[ic. Roy. A$Iron. Sm- 174:267-305, 1976.

(I) Llni*. Sydney. Sch. Phys.. NSW 2(KK, Austraha. (2 I CSIRO. h. Radwphy\ EppIng NSW 2121Australia.

7 31 40 code ,4 Dl, Dav& J2, Bless R Cl & BrowII R Hz. Empirical effective temperatures andbolometric corrections for early-rwe stars. A.Y(rr)p@$ J. 2LJ3:~17-34. 1976.

( 1t Ll”iv. Washmgt<m, Washhwn Ohwr+ atmy Mmtiw., WI (2) llm$ Sydney, Sch. Phv\ Cha!kw<mAslrw. fkpt.. Auwraha.

17 22 19 GriJIdJay Jl, Gm.sky H 1, Scbnopper H 1, Pmsfgnault D R2, Hehe 13, Brinkman A C3& ScMjver 13. Dkcovery of intense x-ray bursw from the globular cluster NGC 6624.Astrophys. J. 205: L127-30. 1976.

11)Harward Coil Observa!wy & SmKhstmian As!rophvs. Obser\alory. C1r. Aw(!phy$ Camhndge MA02138. (2) America” Sm. & Engmeermg. Cambridge. MA 02139. (3) Avr<w. Inst Space Rn Lab..Bcnel.xlaan 21, {I!recht. Netherlands

119

ASTROPHYSICS & ASTRONOMY (continued}

II 15 10 GdmfJay J & Gurksy H. Scat(er-ing m{xfel f(]r x-ray bursts massive black holes in globular

clusters. A.r(rophyr J. 205: L131-33, 1976.Har,ard L’<vII Ohwmat<,rv & \mtthwm,.in A,lr<,phw (lh\cr\at<,ry ( (r Aw(,pllv%

Vamhr!dge. MA 02)3H

)0 23 12 Lewfn W H G, DoIy 1, Clark G W, Rappaport S A, Bmdt H V D. Doxsey R,Heam D R. Hoffman J A, Jemigan I G, Li F K, Mayer W, McClfntock J.PrJmfni F & Rkhardson J. The discowxy of rapidly repeh(ive x-ray burst> from a newsource in Scorpi us. A.rtrr,ph.w. J 207: L95-9, 1976.

M1’1, DCIU Phv\ & Ctr ~pace Re, Camhndgc, MA 021 ?9.

16 16 I I Nier A O1. Hanson W B2. Seiff A3, McEfroy M B4, Spencer N W’s, Duckett R J6.KnJght T C D7 & Cook W S7. (l)mp[mitiun and structure of the Martian atmosphere:preliminary results from Viking 1. .Science 193:78fI-/J, 1976.

III 11.,, !vf, nnc,,, ta,Sc’h Phy, & A\ Ir<,” M,nneap,,l,\. MN 5Wi~ III (’nit ‘Tma\ ( IT SW.., 5.,[),11,, 7X W)!U) 131Am,, Ue\ (’I, M<,(re(t F,eld (’A w1)3> ,4, Ha,\ard Un,t c(, fd, !h &P1.ner.ry Phv, L’. m,hndge. MA 11213M (51 (;rnldwd \I).ce Fhghf [’tr Green hel! M[l 21)--1(h, NASA Lw, gley Rti, (’,,. , V,k, ”g P,,,,.,, OK Han, p[,, n VA 211t)$ !-, M,,,, ” Ww, <,, a (., ,,,,P () Box 1-9 [).”.., co w201

13 13 16 Owen T1 & Biemam K2. Composition of [he atm{mphere at the surface of Mar\.derection of Argon-3S and preliminary analysis. .!%wnce 193:801-3, 1976.

11) S[lNY Dcp[ Far!h & 5PEW. S., 5!,,,,, Br,,<,k. N} I IW4 121M1l Dep( Chc”,Camhr,dgc, MA 021.19

3 31 32 Ross J E1 & AfJer L H2. The chemical composir](m [If the wm.Sr,ence 191 1223-9, 1976.

IrI (1.,, Quwn,lamL Dqx Phy.. lJ. cen\l and Au, Iralua. 121 n“, \ Cahr,,r”m Lkp! A,!r,,.b), An@e\, CA 90024

15 20 2 I Wa”nier p G, kIZ& A A, Linke R A & WfJson R W. [w,t<)pe ahundance~ !n

interstellar molecular clouds, A.wrr,p/I,M J 204:26-42, 1976.Bell 7 ?Icph,,”e Lab, C’ra*k,wl Hdl Lab., H<>lrnciel, NJ o“” 13

SUPERGRAVITY

12 73 83 Deser S & Zumfno B. Consisten( supergravity.Ph.w. Le[t B 62:335-7, 1976.

CF.RN (;c. es.. 5=, t~ed.nd

12 68 M) Freedman D 21, van Nieuwenhuizen P[ & Fen-am S2. Pr[)grew !t)ward a lhe{)~ {If wper-gra~ily. Ph,vs Rei, .0 13:3214-8, 1976,

\ I I ‘I(INY rn.t Ihe<,rcf Phy\ S!<,nv Br<,,,k N} I 1-94. l:) Lab d. I>hywque Ihg<,r!quede r’t-, <,lc h<>rn,<,k $up; r,e,,rr ?4 rue Lh<>”,,,u,l, -WI I’Jr,\ (<cr.,, (). Erd”,.

3 29 29 Freedman D 21, van Nieuwenhuizen PI & Ferrma S2. Pr,)pertie$ of supergra~i[y [he,my’Phw Rev. 11. 14:912-4, 1976.

Irl ~[1NY, In\ I Ihc,, re;. Ph\, 5[<,nv Brook” NY I r-$t I? I [ .,h de Phv,, qw Th,, <,nqw ,1<I’tc,,le N<wnale Wpwe,, r? 24 wc Lh<wmc,,hd.-52.11 r,dr,.CVd<%ct. t,.”<,

FIELD THEORY

17 27 15 Appelqukt T1, Carazzone J2, Kkrberp,-Stem Hz & Roth M2. Infrared fin!tenew In YuIIg-Mdk theories. Phy.s kc, {e/( 36:76+-72, 1976,

( I I Yale 1’.!, [)cp! f>hm New ti~,m. [’1 ()+,52() ,2) Fern,, h,,, Accelc, a,,, r L.ihBaIa,,a IL M)$ll)

13 53 67 Giirsey F1 & SikivJe P2. f , as a uni!ersal gauge gr[mp. Ph,w KeI Le// 36 ‘“W, IY%.Ill Yale [l”, \ DqM Ph,,,. , New H.,,,, Cl 0(>$20 (?1 [1,),, Mar>lmd. Phv, Dep. (,, IIC3L.

Park, MI) 20”42

3 36 39 Jackiw R & Rebbi C. C[)nfc)rmal properfitx of a Yang-Mills pwud[)parficlr.

Ph,vs ReI D 14.517-23, 1976.Mll Lah ~UCk,i, 5.,. & Oq,I Ph,, (’a”, t,,, dgc MA (121IV

12 16 14 Jackiw R & Rebbi C. Spin from is(]spin !n a gauge the[mIPh.w Rev. Le// 31.1 I 16-9 197(1

M1’1 Lab Wuclear 5<, & r)cpr l]h,, [wnhndgc, MA 021 Iv

3 52 97 Jackiw R & Rebbi C. Vacuum periodiclty in a Y ang-Mdl\ qua”(um the(my

Phy.v R,>.. L,,(I 37:172-5, 1976.

MIT. Lab. Nucle.ir %’! & Dq,I Phy. c’~”, hr,dge MA ()?1.19

O 3[ 61 ‘t Hooft G. C(>mputatwn (>f the quantum erfect\ due t,, a r<,ur-dimensiwml pxud, )parIIclcPh,v,r Rc, t D 14:3432-50, 1976. ti~r,dd11111,I>hb, Lah [“,In,rw,dw. MA O?r w

3 57 65 ‘t Hooft G. Symmetry break!ng through Bell-Jackm an(,rnali.es,

Ph,w. R{,,. .Le// 378-11, 1976. Har\.ird [I.,, Ph., L,, h (’.I,,, h,,d~r MA (1?118

13 1’7 19 Yao Y P. Infrared problem in n[Jn-Ahelian gauge (Ile(wv.Phy\ R(,,. L,,[/ 36:653-6, 1976,

[1”,, M,. h,#. ” tar,,,,,,, Ra,, d.,lt Lab Dq,, Pt,,. A,,,, Art><,, M[ 4HI(K4

120

FIELD THEORY IN SOLID STATE PHYSICS17 23 20 Bm’zin E & Zbrrs-Justin J. Renormalization of the noniinear o model in 2 + c dimensions—

application 1~ the Heisenberg fe~omagnels. PhY.~.Rev. Le~f. 36:691-4, 1976.Ctr d’Etudes Nucleairm de Saclay. Ser>. Phy\. The’onq. e.’31193G,[-Sur-Y\c!w. France.

10 16 18 JJaJperin B J1, HoJsenbergP C!*2& SfggfaE D3. Rencmnaiizatimr-gmuptreatment of !hecrkical dynamics of superfluid helium, the isotropic antiferromagnet, and lhe easy-planeferromagnet. Phys Rev. B 13:1299-328, 1976.

1t I Bell Labs.. Murray Hill. NJ 07974. !21 Tech. Unn Mtinchen. Phys. DepI.. 8046 Garch,ng. FRG(3 I Har\ard Un,v.. D.pI. Phys Camfmdgc. MA 02t38.

SOLID STATE PHYSICS

IS 29 35

2 25 37

14 23 24

II 22 27

16 21 14

11 27 19

12 33 9

2X3J7

13 19 33

03290

]5 22 16

Bak P & Emery V J. Theory of the structural phase transformations in tetrathiaful-valene-tetracyanoqu inodimethane (TTF-TCNQ). Plry.r. Re u. Left. 36:978-82, 1976.

Brookbaven Nat, Lab.. Upton, NY 11913

Cheffkowaky J R & Cohen M L. Nonlocal pseudopotential calculations for the electronicstructure of eleven diamond and zinc-blende semiconductors.Phys. Rev. B 14:556-82, 1976.

Ltm+. California, Dept. Phys., Berkekv, CA 9472o. Unit. Catifumm. MaIerials & Molecular R... DnLawrence Berkeley Lab., Berketcy, CA 94720.

Etenrad S. Systematic study of the transition in tetrathiafulvalene-tetracyanoquinodi-methane (TTF-TCNQ). Phys. Rev. B 13:2254-61. 1976,

JBM Thomas 1. Wamon Rcs. Ctr.. Yorktown Hevghts. NY [0598.

Harris A B, Lubensky T C & Cben J H. Critical properties of spin-glasses.Phy$. Rev, L.@i. 36:415-8, 1976. l’niv. Pen.syl>ania, DepI Phys.. Philadelphia, PA t 9174

Kirkpatrick S. Percolation phenomena in higher dimensions: approach to the mean-fieldlimit. Phys. Rev, Left, 36:69-72, f 976.

IBM Thomas J. Watson Res. Ctr.. Yorkk)wn Heights. NY 10598.

Lkhacb A. Theory of photmmission from Jocafized absorbate levels.Phys. Rev. B 13:544-55, 1976.0.,$. Pcmrsylvania, Dep( Phys.. Philadelphia. PA 19174.

Mook H A] & Wataon C R2. Neutron inelastic scattering study of tetrathiafulvakne-tetracyanoquino&methane (lTF-TCNQ ). Phys Re>,. Lett. 36:801-3. 1976.

O*k Ridge Nat. Lab., Oak RidBe, TN 37830 ( 1) S,,bd State Di$.. 12) Chem. DI\.

Pouget J Pi, Kbmma S K1, Denoyer Fl, Com%s R1, Garf[o A F2 & Heeger A J2.X-ray observation of 2k F and 4kF scattering in tetrathiafulvalene-tetracyamrquino-dimethane (’ITF-TCNQ). Phys. Rev. Le(t. 37:437-40, 1976.

I1) U“tv. Paris-Sud. Lab. Phys. Soltd.s, 91405 Orsay, France. (2) [1.i*. Pe”nsy[. anua. Lrept Phy.Lab. Res. Strucmre Matter, Philadelphia. PA 19174

Rke M Jt, Bishop A R2. Krumhmrsl J A2 & Tmifhrger S E2. Weakly pinned Fri)hhchcharge-density-wave condensates: a new, nonJinear, current-carrying elementary excita-tion. Phys. Rev. Left, 36:432-5, 1976.

~I I Xerox Webster Rm. Cm, Web$[ cr. NY J4N!L. (2 I Cornell Oni,.. Lab. A(om. & Sof\d SIaIe Phys.,Ithaca, NY 14B53.

Shannon R D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distancesin haiides and chalcogenides. A cm Crys(a//ogr. See/. A 32:751-67. 1976.

E. J. DUPO”I de Nemcxm & Co.. Central Rcs. & Dc, elopment Dept.. ExpI1. Slat, <,., Wdm,”gt< ,”,DE !9898.

Tomkfcrdcz Y, Taranko A R & Torance J B. Roks of the donor and acceptor chainsin the metal-insulator transition in TTF-TCNQ (tetrathiaf ulvalene-tetracy anoqui m,.dimethane). Ptrys. Rev. Le[t. 36:75J-4, 1976.

[BM Thomas J. Walsun Res. Clr., York! own He,ghts, NY [0598.

ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS (Experfrnental)4 32 29 Anderson H L, Bbrrradwaj V K, Booth N E, Fine R M, Franck W R, Gordon B A,

JJeiaterberg R H, Hicks R G, Kkk T B W, Kirkbride G I, LonmLs W A, Matis H S,Mo L W, Myrtanthopordos L C, Pfpkfn F M, Pordes S H, Quirk T W,Shamfxoom W D, Skuja A, Verbey L J, WfJlfams W SC, Wilson R & Wright S C.Measurement of nucleon structure function in muon scattering at 147 GeV/c.Phys. Rev. Left. 37:4-7, 1976.

Enrico Fermi Inst., Urn+ Chlcag,,, Chwago, IL hWJ37 Harvard [1.,. Htgh E“ergv Phy, Lab DepIPhys.. Cambridge. MA 0213ti Umv 10,.,,,., Dept. Phys.. [rbana, [L hltiol. (In,.. O.kmf DtpI.Nuclear Phys.. Oxford OX I 3RH, England.

1 33 45 Anderson K Jl, Henry G G1, McDomrJd K T1, Pfkher J E1, Rosenberg E 11,Branamr J G2, Sanders G H2, Smith A J S2, & Thafer I J2. Inclusive y-pair productionat 150 GeV by n+ mesons and protons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37:799-S02. 1976.

(1) Enrico Fermi Jnst., Univ. Chicago. Ch,cagm IL 60637. {2) Princeton [l”i~.. Jmcph Henry LabsPrincemn, NJ 08540.

121

ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS (Expedmemal) {C033~?=4!)

22 24 16 A

II

12 41 14 B

(1

1332852

H

578349

H

M4115B

(1

17 33 20

0 35 18

13 22 36

3Y327

demon K J1, JJemy G G’, McDodd K T1, PMmr J E1, Roamhsrg E 11,Wmamrr J G2, S*?S G Hz. %fth A J S2 & Thder J 12. production of muon pairsby l.W-GeVlc 11+ and protons. Phys. Rev. lAt. 36:237-40.1976.I Enrico Fermi Imt.. lhm. Chicago Chicago. IL MMW. 12I Princeton 1hiversily. Jowph Henry Lafm..Pnnce[oII, NJ 06S43.

&& B Cl, BartJau J F1, Bodek A1, Brow K W1. Brwhbdz D1, JrIcqrieJFt. Lee J1,Mentst F S1, Scftdll F J1, Statte L1, Su:er H1. F~h H EZ & Km@k G2. Investigationsof neutrino interactions with 2 muons in the fired stale.phyS. ikv. htf. 36:939-41, 1976.

) Caldumsa Instuutr of Technology. Pasadena. CA ~1125. 121Fermi Na! Acccl.rm,r Lab..Bam.m IL @sIO.

envemrd A, CUne D, Ma.wing F. Ford W, lby R. Ling T Y, Mmm A K,Mede.r D D, RubMa C, StefamskJ R, Sralak L & Wanderer P. Evidence for parity non-cons.ervalion in the weak neutral current. Phys. Rev. Le// .37:1039-42, 1976.

arvardDno Dept. Phys.. Cambridge. MA 02138. [inn Pennsylvama, DepI. Phy$ Philadelphia.PA 191’74.[lni~. Wisconsin. Dcpt. Phys.. Madison. WI S3Xlb Fermi Nai Accelerm,w f-ahBata*!a. IL 60S10.

ewarmti A. Clime D, Ford W, Imfay R, Lfng T Y: Mann A K, Reader D D.RtMAa C, Stefsmskf R. %dak L & WamderarP. Me&surement of the ratio

%(GP + *P + + X]/o=(; ~+ N-p + X) at high energy.

Phy$. Rev. LeIt. 37:189-92, 1976.mvard M!i}.. DcpI. Phy$.. Cam bmd&!e.MA 02124. Unit. Pcnnql}anm, LkpI. Phys., Pbda&4phvaPA 19174. Unit. Wisconsin. Dcp( Phys., Madmm. WI 5J71ft. Ferrm N.!. Accelerah, r Lab..Bata$ia. IL &3510.

:lketackau J1, Dexb HI, Haserr F J1, Kiacrz W1, Lamke D1, MwJIo Jl, PoJd Ml,WeerIS H 1, Wekh L1, Bertmnd-Cor@mas G Hz, MuJkerrs Hz, Sacton J2,Van Dozrbrck W2, GctiJy D C3, DamJlchrko J3, JJafdt D3, LJoret A3, Matteuzzi C3,I%3trssetP3, Mykle6+Mt K3, PattJson J B M3, Pe?kbrs D H3, PJttuck @, Rmmmo F3,Wacksmnth H3, Bfor@eJ A4, BrJsson V4, Degmnge B4, Francokr T’4, JJagummrer M4,KJuberg L4, Nguye2t-Kbrrc U4, PetJau ~. RorrweI A4, Vur Dam ~. Aidrovandf As,JJdfotti E5, Borrettl S5, Caval!J DS, Fiodnl E5, PullJa A5. RnJffer M5, AubeII L@,Bkam I@. ChorrrrefL M6, Heussa ~, Jafke M6, Jawwau L6, Longnemare d,Lutz A IW6, Pascaud ~, VbJJe J ~, Bulhxk F W7. Jonas T W7, Mkhette A G7 &Mysn G7. Observation of muon-neu!rino reactions producing a positron and a strangeparticle. Phy~ Le[I. B 60:207-10, 1976.I Technmche H#whscbulc Phys. 1.s1 D.51(X) Aachen, FRG !21 V (1 B, (1 I B. I“Ic’r-Un)b [ml. High Energms Brussels. B+um. (31 CERN. Genoa, Sw,lmrland. 14} Jxmlc Polyk. hLab Phy$ Nuckatrc Haute\ Energm., Palawau. France. (5 I INFN, (in, \ Mdam,, I.t F,.ica.Mdam,. Jtalv. I(I) Lah Ac’c&kwr Lmc!airc, (hay, France, 1-1 [Inn C,dl,, Lond#m. England

JJramJem6urg G W, CuncgJa R K, Cs4rnror-a R J, Davfar M, DumwoodJe W M,LashMkf T A, LeJth D W G S, Matthews J A J, Wafdmr P, W5JffmmsS H &WLmkekmnmnF C. Observation of two strangeness-one axial-vector mesons.Phys. Rev. LeII. 36:703-6, 1976,

Stanford 11.i~., SIa”ford Lmcar Acceleral,,r Cm.. SIa”f,,rd, CA 9005.

Bratmachwekg W1, Marryri H Ul, Sander H G], SchmJIz D1, SIurra WI, Walfrafi WI,Cords D2, Feka R2, Fdes R2, Gadermazm E2, GhfJa_ B2, Hult$chlg HI, JOOSp2,Koch W2, K&z U2, Krehbief Hz, Jbcbdck D2, M.~mI W A?, Mofieh K C2,

1Petmtren P2, R6mer 02, Riiscb R2, Wf3k B J@, Wolf G , Grfndhrmmer G3,LudwJg J3, M- K H3, Poelz G3, Rbrgel J3, Samwbarg K~, ScIw&ker P3.DeBoer W4, Buschfaom G4, Gmw5eraori B4. Koithatw R4, Lferf H4, Obedack H4,Scfdfwa M4, Ctrko SS. Suds T$, Totsuka Y5 & Yammka S5. Evidence for weakly decay-ing new hadrons in e ~e— collisions abose .4 GeV ems, Phys. Left B 63:471-6, 1976.

II I RWTW Pby, lm., D-511X) Awbo,, tRG. 12) L)E.\Y. Deut,chc, Elek, r,, nc”-Synchr,,, r,>”.Hamburg. FRti (31 [l”I\ Hamh.q, J“\t. Expemnt.n#i+lphywk, Hamburg. FRG. (4! Max Plam’k I“wPhy,. & A,lr,>phy,. hlii”chm FRG. 1?! 1)”,. T,>ky,,. I,,kyw, Japan.

Grmu A S1, Ch&mg I Hi. KycLg T Fl, Lf K Kl, Mazrrr P 01, Mockett P Ml,JLahm D Cl, Baker W F2, Eaytly D P2, GkacrmreW G2, KoeMer P F M2,PretzJ K P2, Rubbmekir R2, Wetmmrm A AZ, Cool R L3 & Fsckler 03. Total cross sec-tions of n i K f p and ~ on protons and deuterorrs belween 23 and 280 GeV c.Phys. Le/I. B hl :303-8, f976.

,1) Br, x,kha, cn %a, Lab [Ip, c,n. NY II V7.I ,2, Ferm, Na, Lab.. J3JIM,,a, IL (4)510131R{,ckcleller [Ire,,, New Y,wk. NY I(KJ21.

Cf3rke D. Eirtenbq A, Kozrmeckl W, Mann A K, Reader D D, Rufrbka C,SImft J, Sufak L & WJIJ!mrMH H. Observation of elastic antineutrint,-pr{]t(,”wamxing. Phys. Rev. Leff. 37:64S-51 , 1976.

Har, wd Un,, ,, Dcp,, Phys,, C’amhndge MA 02138 lln, \ f%”\yI\~”#3. DeJM. Pby+ Pb]ladclph,.i.llA 19174. [in, \ W,w, m\,”, Dept. Phy, Mad,,,,., WI $J7W,.

122

4 37 30 C&e D, Errtemberg A, Koraxwekf W, Mmm A K, Reader D P, Rnkbh C.Strak J. %3%kL & WJIJfams H H. Observa[km of elastic ❑eutrino-protonscattering. Phys. Rev, Ldf. 37:252-5, 1976,

HarvardUniv.. Dept. Phys., Cambridge, MA 0213S. Unw. Pcnmylwsnia. Dept. Phys., Philadelphia, PA[9174. Univ. Wisconsin. DepI. Phys., Madison, W1 S3706.

29149 76 Gofdfssber G. Flame FM, AfsrzrmG S, Aiam M S, JJoymskfA M. BrefdmrfmcbM.CuftJrers W C, f3rJtmwakyW, Cooper S C, DaVoe R G. DorfarIJ M,J%JdmsmG 1, FrfadbergC E. Fryberger D, Hanson G, lame 1, Joknsoo A D,Kadykl A. Laraea RR, Liike D. fith V, Lyda HLMatJmaa RJ, Mombotrse CC,NgmyeaH K, PatemortJ M, Per3M L, Peraszi J, PkxoJtt M, J%oT P, Rapftfh P,Rkhter B. Sadmdet B. Seh&dfet R H, Sckwktem R F. SfegrfatJ, Tanerrfrmrm W,TrJJ@ G H, Vanrmcci F, WMrakerJ S & Wke J E. Observation in e *C— mmihifa-don of a narroiv state at 1S65 MeV/c2 decaying to Kn and Kmm.Phys. Rev. Lett. 37;25$9, 1976.

Univ. Cafifomia, Lawrence Berkeley Lab., Dept. Phys., Berkeley. CA 94720. Stanlord Univ..S!anford Linear Accelerator Cm.. Stanford, CA 94305.

i3 30 i2 Hom D Cl, Ledermmn L Ml, PIUS H PI, Snyder H Dl, Weka J Ml, Yok J Kl,AFpaJJ A2, BrowII B C2, Brown C N2. kurea W R2, Yamanmrekf@ &x D M3. Obsemation of high-mass dilepton pairs in hadrtm collisions at 400 GeVPhys, Rev. Lett. 36;1236-9,,1976.,

Columbia Univ., New York. NY lL1327, Femm Nal. Accelerator Lab.. BsIati, IL 60510.SUNY. Stony Brook. NY tt794,

3 7i 4S Knapp B1. be Wt. J.eung Pi. Srrdtk S Dl, Wfjangcn At, Kes~r ~. Ymmt @.BrortatefrIJ3, Coferoao R3, GlmddbtgG3, Goodmrrrr M3, Gormky M3. M~ R3,O’JJaQoU T3, SamacirIo J3, Wattenb.arg A3, Bfnkfey M4, Gafnes 14 & Pe+e ~.Observation of a narrow antibaryon state at 2.26 GeV/c2.fiys. Rev. kt. 37:&32-5, 1976.

( I) Columbia Univ.. New York. NY IC027. (2) Univ. Hawaii. Honolulu, HI 98622, (3 I Univ.Illinoir, Urbana, .% 61&tl. (4) Fermi NXI. Accelerator Lab,, Batavia, IL M510.

1 67 5S Pad ML, FeJdastamG J, AfrnrmaG S, Afam M S, JJoytrmklA M, Brekferrbscb M,Bolos F, Chkrowky W. Dorfatr 1, FrJedJMrgC E, Gofdtabar G, JJaoaonG, HeBe F B.Juos IA, JLrcdykJA, LaraairRR. Lkke A M,lake D, Lufu BA. Jatk V,Msdaras R J. Mombasa C C, Ng.yeii H K, Paterson J M, Fernzrl J, Ffccoio M,Pierre FM, Prm T P, Rapfdh P, Rfchfer B, %dorsfatB, Sckwfttem R F,Tnomtbmm W, TrS&rgG H, Varmoccf F, Wbfother J S & Wk J E. properties ofanomsdous~ eventsproduced in e+ e- annihdation.Phys. Lat.if63:4W70, 1976.

Univ. Cafifomia. Lawrence Berkeley Lab.. Berkeley. CA 94720. Stanford Univ., Smnlord LinearAccelerator Ctr., Sta.ford. CA 94335.

12 ifB51 Perwzll, PJccoJoM, FeJdmaIIG]. NgtayenH K. Wbs J L AJsrrmIsG S, AJnmM S,by8dd A M. Bref&nback M. carftfrm W C, Ckfmowrky W, DeVoe R G,Dorfao J M, FfaberG E, Frledberg C E, FryfrmgerD, Gnfdfmhm G, Hanson G,Jams 1A, J&nrorI A D, Kadyk I A, Larsen R R, L&e D. Liith V,Lyoeb HUMstdams RJ, MoreborsaeCC, PateraonJNLPesf ML+ PJarreFM,Pmt T P, Ra@dSrP, R3chtezB, ScbJmfJarR H, SefmritremR F. SSegrfstI.TaoesLwms W, TrifJ@JG H, Vammcrf F & WMtaker I S. Observation of a narrowcharged state at i 876 MeV/c2 decaying to an exotic combination of Km.Phys. Rev. &tt. 37:569-71.1976.

.Manford Univ., Stanford Linear Accelerator CM., Smnford, CA 94M15. Univ. CafifomLa.Lawrence Berkeky Lab., DcpI. Phys.. Berkeley. CA 94720.

3 37 39 Rekres F, Gom H S & Sobei H W. Detection of tc-c scattering.PfIys. Rev, Lat. 37:315-8, 1976.

Univ. Cdifomis. Dept. Phys., Irvine. CA 92717

21 27 12 SJcgrJrt J, Abrams G S, BoymrM A M, Bmfdenbaeh M, Bufoe F, Chiuowsky W.Feldmas G J, FrfedbargC E. Fryherger D, Gofdhaber G. Jhw+EoOG, H@* D L.Jams J. Jean-Mark B. Kadyk J A, ho RR, Liike D. Liith V, Lyieb H L.Madams R. Morefroase C C, Nguyen H K. PatemomJ M. Perf ML. Perarzsf1.PJerreF M, PkoBo M, Pnn T P. Repldk P. Rkkter B. Sadtmfet B, SeJmvittemR F.Tan4rmmr W, T- G H. Vemrmxf F, Wbftaker J S, WJ&aJmrmiF C 4 Wba J E.Observation of a reannance at 4.4 GeV and additional structurr near 4. I GeV in e+ e-anrtifdfation. Phys. Rev. Leil. 36:70@3. 1976.

Stanford Univ.. Linear Accekmtor Cm., Smn(o rd.CA 9430S. [ Iniv. Cdifomis. f.swrncw Berkek>hb.. Dept. Phys.. Berkeley. CA 947X3.

10 19 15 .%rydarH Dl, Hcm D c1, Lederman L Ml. Pam H PI. Webs J MJ. lob J K1.AJWJ J Al, Brown B C2, Brown C N2. lmtm W R~, YassmmwM TZ*_DM3.Production of v (3103) and V’ (3700) in p-Re colfisims at 400 GeV.

Phys. Rev. Lat. 26141$S. 1976.(1)Columbia Univ.. New York. NY W327. (2) Fermi Nat.Accelerator Lab., &Iatia. IL &3510.

(3) SUNY, S1OIIYBrook. NY 11974.

123

ELEMENTARY PARTKIE PHYSI= bP=’J==@ (co*wMJ)10 18 7 von Km@ Ji, FV W’. ~ U1+ - Dl, JQvekm U J1, M.ePPll. kh R Hi,

J?eeder D D1. Bm&ro-G&3mJ AZ. JJowmtJ?2. LyzrcbG2, MacrJ=wrfl,sdm% Fl, %vemmr M L2, JJsJrJtD2, 3Jar’fReJG3, WecWs=fk JJ3.Cesca R3,- Jl Parker S 14. Perms M4. Pe~ V4 & %SSS= V4. 06aervation of P-e + K.”events produced by a neutrino beam. Phyf. Rev. .MI. 36:71@ 13, 1976.

tI I Univ. Wiscmtsiri, D@. Phys.. Madwn WI 53706 (2) Univ. California. Lawrcncc BerkeleyLab.. Bcrkdey. CA 94720. (3I CERN. 1211Geneva 2-3.Swilmrftrnd. (4) Univ. Hawaii.Dcpl. Pbys. Homdufu. HI 96822.

ELEMENTARY PAR’HCLE PHYSICS [Th-Y)

2 36 25 AEmfRlrtC H. Qtdgg C. Smock R E & Sdh J. Neutrinqmoton efaxtic scattering:implications for weak-interectimr modefs. Phys. Rev. D 14:17M-98. 1976.

Fcnm Nat Acceleramr Lab., P.O. B..Iz WI, Batavia. IL b05 10.

4 37 1 I J3anp V 1 & Nsmopow4ss D V2. Neutral currents and new qoarks.Phys. I&tI. B 6%168-74, 1976.

11) lfnn. Wisconsin Phys. Dept., Madison. WI 5370b. (2) Ecolc Nonnalc Sup&icurc Lab. Phys.Tfmor., 7523t Paris Ccdex 05. France.

1 29 15 RamdtR M. Geor@ H & %!ffzer D. Can asymptotic freedom explain the neutrinoanomalies? Phys. Rev. btt. 37:13136, 1976.

Hanard Unm.. Dcpt. Phys., Lyman Lab,, C’mbridg.. MA 0213S.

10 S9 20 ?3em@tR M. Etidence for new quarks and new crrrrenis.Phys. Rev. LeYt. 36:11636.1976.

Hamard U.,*.. Dept. Phys., Lyman Lab.. Cambridge. MA 0212+.

16 17 23 Chew G F & RosenzweJg C. Asymptotic planari! y: an S-malrix basis for the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka rule. Nut/. Phys. B. 104:29@l16. 1976.

Llnw. Cahftirnin. Lawrence Lterkeley Lab., Dept. Pbys.. Berkcky. CA 4472L.

12 46 15 DeR&j&s A. GerIrgl H & GbsJkow S L. J.rcharm found?Phys. Rev. L&v:. 37:298-401, 1976.

Hanard lJniv.. Dept. Phys., Lyman Lab., Cambridge. MA 0212%

16 29 31 EJchtea E, GoMrJed K, Kbs6&a T, km K D & YamT M. Interplay of confinement

and decay in the specfrum of chm’nronium. Phys. Rev. Lefl. 36:500-4, f976.Cornell Unit., Lab. Nuclear Studies. Ithaca. NY 14R53.

2 28 48 Gcwgi H A PdJwer H D. Freedom at moderete energicx masses in colordynamics. PSr.w. Rev. D. 141829-48, 1976.

Hamard Ilnit., DcpI Phys., Lyman Lab.. Cambridge.MA 02138.16 32 22 Gemgl H & PoJJtzer H D. Precocious scshng, rescafhg, and / xcafing.

Phys. Rev. Lett. 36: 128f -4, 1976.Hamard Univ Depl. Phys.. Lyman Lab.. Cambridge. MA 02138.

!! 2S 17 Lnme K1 & Ekhten E2. Charm threshold in electron-positron annihilation.Phw Rev LeI/. 37:477-80, 1976.

, I IC,, rndl I ,,,, Lab, ?+,, ctearSlud, e,. I,h. ca. NY 1.4?!53.1211“.1 Ad\a”ccd 51UCIY,Princch,nNJ (M40

17 18 7 PJ S Y & .%ride A 1. Leptonicdecay dkmibmimrs for heavy-lepton pairs produced bycolliding beams. P/tys. Rev. Lc/I. 36:1-4. 1976.

Rockcleller Urn,., DepI. Phys., New Ymrk, NY 10321.

36 54 56 Sfverx D. Bmdsky S J & JJ!rmheisbacler R. Lerge transver-w momentum processes.

Phys. Rep. —Rev, SecI. Phys. Left C 23:1-121, 1976.Stanl,,rd { 1“,... %anft,rd Lmeat Accelrmlc>r C1r.. Scmdord. CA 94.W5.

ATOMIC & MOLECULAR PHYSICS

t) 51 44 Bahd p E Gl, B~~& M Wl, RA* G J\, ~ p G HI, ~=~e D @.2,

Fortson E N2, Lewb L L2 & Lkrdald E G2. Search for parity mm-conservingoptical rotation in atomic bknruth. Nafurc 2fA:528-9, 1976.

( I I O#h,nt [lnt,., Oare”d,tn Lab., Oxl,>rd, UK {21 [Ini\ Washing!t,n. DepI. Phys.,Wmh,”gllm, DC.

8 32 36 Davessporr J W. Ultraviolet phcrtoionizetion cross-sections for N and CO.PI(,w. Rev. Let[. 3694$9.1976.

(In!,. Pwmsyit area, DepI. Phys.. Philadelphia, PA 19174.

4 27 37 Gw&msrmmr01 & Ltmdqvkat B 12.3. Exchange and correlation in atoms. molecules,and xolidr by the spin-density -funcf ionaf forrmrfism. Phys. Rev. 8. 13:4274-98. 1976.

{IIC-balmm-, (l.,,. Tcchn, d., fret. Thc,,rcl. Pbys.. S-402 21)(hIetnwg, Sweden {2) ~’t~.tl [In,,..Lab. Atom & S(!IICIStare Phys Maicrml. Sci Ctr Ilhaca. NY 14S50 (3 I [lnm. ~arhus.UK-MUX) ~arhu\ C, [)enmark

124

7 30 26 h-” JJ MI & Bloembergen N2. Excitation of po[yafomic molecules by radiation.Opt. Commun. 17;254-8, 1976.

(I\ MIT, LInC,,In Lab Lexm$t<m, MA 021-3 <21Har, arcf (’n,\ ,. Do. Engmewmg & Applied Ph\.Cambridge. MA 0? 138.

2 28 16 Letokhov V S & Makarov A A, ‘“Leakage” effec! as an exciting mechanism of highvibrational levels of polyatomic molecules by a strong quasi-rexonant laser IRfield. OpI. Commun. 17:2.5@3. 197b.

,Acad S.,. 115SR. Inst. .Spectroscopv, Akadc-mg<m?d<?k.115SR.

5 37 37 Letokfro? V S! & Moore C B2. Laser isotope separation (review) Par! 2.

S<),. J Quant. Elecfr. 6:259-76, 1976.~I I Acad, SO, [ISSR. Inst. .specwoscopv. Aksdemg,,rod,,k LJSSR (2 I [Inn Cdtfornm

Berkeley. CA 94”?0I~ 14 12 J,evfne R D, Bemsteln R B, Kahana P. ProcaccSn I & Upchrrrch E T. Surprisal

analysis and probability matrices for rotational energy transfer.J. Chem. Ph.rs. 64:7%8437, 1976.

Hchrew I’m,.. Dept. Phy\ Chem., lcmsalmn, l.rael. L1n,\. Texas. D.+%. Chem & Phv\..Auwan, TX “8”12,

7 2b 15 Lyman J L & RockwowJ S D. Enrichment of boron, carbon, and silicon iso[opes bymultiple-photon absorption of 10.6 pm laser radiation. J App/, Ph,w 47:59%01. 19-6.

1 n,, Caltl<,rnia.LtM Alam~m Sctemnf. Lab P () Btm 16+.! L,>. Alan?<>.. NM 8’W$.

8 3.$ .lI Messmer R Pi. Kmrdxon S Jil, Johnson K Hz, Dhmnd J B2 & Yang C Y2.Molecular-orbital studies of transition- and noble-metal clusters by [he self -cons ls[ent-field-Xa scattered-waw method. Ph.vs. Rev. B. 13:1396-1415. 1976,

( I , GE C,,rpi,m{e Re. & L3.,el,,pmen,. .schene<fadv. NY 12301 <2+ MIT, Dcp[ Ma[ertJl S<, &

E.* Cambmtgc. MA 02139

15 32 “b Scofield J H. Hartree-Slater subshell photoioniza[ion cross-sec[ions at 1245 and 1487 eV.

J. Electron $pec-(msc. Rela[, Ph. 8: 12+37. 1976.1’.8, Cahforma. Lawrence La\cnmwe Lah Lnvm,<m. CA 94550.

NUCLEAR PHYSICS

9 25 33 Bonche P, Koonirr S & Negele J W. One-dimensi{mal nuclear dynamics I“ the time.

dependen[ Hartree-Fock approximation. PAYS Rev C. 13:1226-58. 1976.Mai..+chuw{, lnw Techm,l., Lab Nuclear SCI & Dqx Phvs.. Cam fmdge. MA ()?I.W

23 43 lb Gentry R vI, CahiJJT A2.3, Fletcher N RJ. Kaufmamr H C3, Medsker L R3,Nelson J W3 & FTocchfni R G2. Evidence for primordial superheavy elements.Phys. Rev. LeI/. 37:11-5, 1976.

II I Ook Ridge NaI Lab.. Chem DN Oak Ridge. TN 3“8.M 1?! Iln,i Cahr<!r. i.. DeptPhy... Cr<wker Nuck.ar Lab.. Da$t. CA 95hr6 ,31 Fkmda state [n,,. Crqm Octan,,{& Phy, Tmliahaswe, FL 32305

LASERS & FIBER OPTICS

16 15 18 Bumham RI, Harris N W2 & D jeu N2. Xenon fluoride laser excitation by transverseelectric dkcharge. App/. Phys. Lett. 2R:86-7, 1976,

11) Scicncc Appricalions Inc., Alexandria. VA 22202. (21 Na>al Res. Lab.. Washington. DC 203~5

9 27 26 Hoffman J M, Hays A K & Rixone G C. High-power uv noble-gas-halide lasers.Appf. Phys. Left. 28:538-9, 1976.

Sandta Labs.. Albuquerque. NM 87! r5.

4 33 43 HorJgucJd M. Spectral losses of low-OH-content optical fibres.Elecnwn. Left. 12:31@l 1, 1976.

Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Pub!. Corp.. [barakl E[cctr. Communication La b.. Tokal JbarakL, Japan

3 28 22 Hsieh J J, Rod J A & DormeJJy J P. Room-temperature cw operation of GaInAsP/

lnP double-heterostructure diode lasers emitting at 1.1 Y.App/, Phys. U(( 28:709-11, 1976.

MIT, Lmcol” Lab., Lexington, MA 02173.

8 26 33 Olslmnsky R & Keck D B. Pulse broadening in graded-index optical fibers.App/. of7fics 15:483-91, 1976.

Cummg Glass Works, Cmmng. NY 14830

CHEMICAL PHYSICS

11 19 10 McGuire P. Validity of the coupled states approximation for molecular collisions.Chem. Phys. 13:81-94, 1976.

Ll”i\ Kaisemla”tem, Fachbercich physik. 675 JLaisemla”tem, FRG,

5 33 14 Mukamel S & Jortrrer J. A model for isotope separation via molecular multiphotcmphotodkociation. Chem. Phys. Let[. 40:1 SW6, 1976.

Tel-A%i\ Mu.. Depl. Chem.. Tet-Avt%. Israer.

125

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY

5 29 23 EJJfsA B, KaJaer S W & Wrighton M S. Visible fight to electrical energyconwmsion. Stable cadmium sulfide and cadmium selenide phuloelectrodm in aqueouselectrolytes. J. Am. Chem So<. 98:1635-7, 1976.

MIT, Depl Chem Camtwidgc. MA 02139.

12 20 18 Houk K N. The photochernishy and spectroscopy of fly-unsaturated carborryl compourrds.Chem. Rev. 76:1-74, 1976.

Lmm,a.a Slale [1.m DepI Chem Bat<>. Rouge. LA 7VN337 26 30 Lin C T & Sutfn N. Quenching of the luminescence of the h’is(2,2’-blpyri~[ne)

complexes of ruthenium (11) and osmium (11). Kinetic considerations and phologalyaniceffects. 1. Phys. Chem. 80:97-105, 1976.

Br,,okhavc. Nal Lab Chem. Dept Upk, n,NY 11973.

10 29 23 Mavrokles J G. Kafalss J A & Koleaar D F. Phomelectrcdysis of water in cells withSrTi03 anodes. Appl. Ph.v.r.l-err. 28:241-3, 1976

MIT. Lmcol. Labs.. Lcxmgton, MA 02173.

7 36 28 Sprintsdudk G, Sprfntschnik H W, KJrsch P P & Whitten D G. Pho\ochemicalcleavage of water: a system for solar energy conversion using monolayer-houndtransition metal complexes. J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 9&2337-& 1976.

[1.B,, North Car<,li”a.Dep(, Chem.. Chapel H{ll, NC’ 27514.

14 26 17 Wrfghton M S, Morse D L, Effk A B, Gfmley D S & AbraJramson H B.Photuassisted electrolysis of water by ultraviolet irradiation of an antimony dopedstannic oxide electrode. J, Amer. Chem. SO< 98:44-8, 1976.

MIT. Chem Depr Camfmdge, MA 02139.

7 33 39 Yamdagni R & Kebarie P. Gas-phase basicities and proton affinities of compoundsbetween wafer and ammonia and substi[uled benzenes from a continmms ladder ofproton transfer equilibria measurements. J. Amer. Chem. Sot. 98:1320-4, 1976.

I III,,. Alh,fia, Chem. I)ept Fdnl<,n k,”, Alher!a. Canada rh{i 2F 1.

INORGANIC & ORGANO-METALLIC CHEMISTRY

17 18 17 House H 0. Ose of lithium organ ocuprate addhions as models fur an elect r,m-tramferprocess, Account Chem. Res. 9:59-67, 1976.

Georgta lm. Tech”ol Sch. Chem., Atlanta. GA .303.32.

2 27 11 Kesmodel L L, Stafr P C, Baetzold R C & Somorjai G A. Surface structure and b,mdingof aceiylene (o the platinum ( I I 1) surface. Ph,vs. Rev JJZI. 361316-9. 1976,

[l”,\ Cahf<,r”ta, Berkeley. CA 9472(1. ( 1I MaIermls & M,,lec Ret Di, Lawrence Berkeley Lsh!21 J)epl Ch,m.

6 27 26 Vaaka L. Dioxygen-me[al complexes: loward a unified $iew.Accounr. Chem. Re.,. ~:175-83, 1976.

Clarkwm CO1l. ‘Techmd f)ep[ Chem P,!(, dam, NY 1.W76

ORGANIC CHEMISTRY

11 33 31 Gokel G W 1 & Dumt H D2. Principles and synthetic appbcalions in crow” etherchemistry. Synrhesis-Srulrgart 1976: 168-&J, 1976,

( I I Pennsylvania Slate [In,.., Dept. Chem., [Int%erwty Pk, PA 16fK)2. (21 SIINY, DepI. Chmm.Buffalo, NY 14214.

15 35 53 Hukgen R. The concerted nature of 1,3-dlpolar cycload~!tions and the question of di-

radical intermediates. J, O%. Chem, 41:403-19, 197(r,Dni>. M.nchen, Inst organ Chem., 8 M;nchc” 2, FRG.

i 29 27 Koreeda M1, Moore P Dl, Yagi H2, Yeh H J2 & Jerfna D M2. AIkylatiun of polyguanylicacid at the 2-amino group and phosphate by the potent mutagen ( I )-7/1,8a-dihydroxy-9/J, lf3f3-epoxy-7,8,9, lC-tetrahydrobenzo(a )pyrene.J Am. Chem. Srrc. 98:672@2, 1976.

II ) Johns Hopkins [in,\ f)ep!. Chen,.. Bal!!m<,re, MD 2121fl (2 I NJAMDD, NIH, Lab. ChcmBelhesda, MD 2UO14.

I S 16 15 McGirrnk J, Katz T J & Hurwitz S. Selectivity in the olefin metathesis ofunsymmetrically substituted ethylenes. J. Am. Chem. SOc 98:605-6. 1976.

Columbm U.!\ Depl. Chem New York, NY 10327

BIOPHYSICS

3 44 35 MltcheU P. Vectorial chemistry and the molecuhar mechanics {,f chemimm,,[ic coupling:p<,wer transmission by pr(,, icity. Bi(,chem SII< Irnr!.\ 4:39’+430 1976.

(;l, n,) UC, lab, Jl<,dn,,”, C’<,, ”*CII PL30 4A(I (1K

126