The 130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal ... SEAC-I MOM.pdf · The proposal was considered under category l(a)-B2 of the schedule of EIA Notification 2006. ... Ta iltin Dadamar0

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2nd July, 2016

The 130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1st & 2" July, 2016 at Parishad Sabhagraha, Hall no. 2 & 3, 7th Floor, Main Building, Mantralava, Mumbai- 400 032.

The following members were present for the Committee meeting:

Shri. T. C. Benjamin Chairman 1' & 2"d July, 2016

Prof (Dr.) Bhaskar N. Thorat Member 2"d July. 2016

Shri. Chandrakant I. Sambutwad Member I' & 2'd July, 2016

Prof (Dr.) Ramesh Dod Member 1' July. 2016

Shri. D A Hiremath Member 1" & 2"d July. 2016

Shri. Madan M. Kulkarni Member rd July, 2016

Shri. Balbir H. Sehgal Member absent

Shri. M.B.Hajari Member Secretary l' & 2"d July, 2016

At the outset, the Chairman welcomed all Members present to the meeting. The Chairman expressed

concern about the high incidence of absence of some members. He pointed out that each member is

appointed in the Committee as an expert in a particular subject and their absence can adversely affect

the process of appraisal. It is necessary that all members make a conscious effort to remain present for

the meetings. He also pointed out that it was necessary to attend the meeting for the whole day and

not just half day. as some members are wont.

The Chairman appreciated the efforts of the Member Secretary and his staff for putting up the agenda

of the 130th meeting well in time.

Thereafter the items were taken up for discussion.

1 Confirmation of minutes of 129* meeting

The minutes of the 129th SEAC-1 meeting were confirmed unanimously.

Item no. I Minor Minerals (stone) Thane (01) 1129* compliance]

The proposal was considered under category l(a)-B2 of the schedule of EIA Notification 2006. The

brief information submitted by the PP and decision of the Committee are depicted below:

S. No.

Name of the Proponent, Mouz, Taluka, Land type

Gat No./ Survey No.

Area (ha)

Observation of the Committee Recommendations

I M/s. Sainath quarry 144/2 5.92

ha

The Committee went through the DMO's

report. in which she has submitted that

Deferred for report of

DMO regarding possibility

Page 1 of 61 Member Secretary

Chairma

Item no. 2 Minor Minerals (stone) Sindbuclurg (03)

The proposal was considered under category l(a)-B2 of the schedule of ER Notification 2006. The

brief information submitted by the PP and decision of the Committee are depicted below:

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on July 2016

Pave. Bhiw andi Tungareshwar Wild Life Sanctuary was of habitations and location

around 3 to 4m from the proposed quarry. of wild life sanctuary in the

The report was not supported by the vicinity of the proposed

certificate of the Forest Officer. The query

raised in the 129°1 meeting regarding

possibility of any habitations on the

western side of the quarry has also not

been addressed by the DMO.

quarry.

S. No.

Name of the Proponent, Mouz, Taluka, Land type

Gat No./ Survey No.

Area (ha)

Observation of the Committee Recommendations

Nanu Industries

Parme, Dodamarg

26(p),

33/1

4.90 The Committee deliberated on the

compliance of 129th meeting as follows:

1. The Senior Geologist, GSDA' s

characterizing the quarry area as 'Local

Run-off Zone' was discussed at length.

The PP accepted this decision of Senior

Geologist, GSDA. The PP further

accepted that the average slope of the

quarry face was around 30°.

2. The PP explained the various aspects of

the Action Plan to prevent landslides. The

Committee made the following

observations on the Action Plan: a) Post

excavation, the tension joints would be

decided on the basis of the fold

geometries and grouting will be done

accordingly. b) The retaining wall at the

top level should be so designed so as to

resist the forces acting on it. The retaining

wall should also have proper weep holes

to facilitate release of run-off. c) The

quarry will be characterized by benches of

height 10m x width 6m.

3. The collection of run-off and its storage

For the compliances the

item was deferred.

Page 2 of 61 Member Secretary Chairm

130th Meeting of Slate Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & 2nd July, 2016

in the stilling ponds was explained. PP submitted cross section of stilling pond. pre and post quarrying (Annexure 2.1.1) and Plan (Annexure 2.1.2). The Committee directed that the Plan and Cross section of stilling ponds should form a part of the Approved Mining Plan. The Approved Mining Plan, modified with the details of the stilling ponds need to be submitted by the PP.

4. The DMO submitted the correct demarcation of the lease area carried out by the TILR. This was accepted by the Committee.

5. The PP submitted that a STP of 2 CMD capacity for the treatment of domestic sewage shall be installed. The recycled water shall be used for dust suppression.

6. The PP submitted that the distance from quarry from where AAQS (with crusher) was carried out was 6m. A certificate of the laboratory in the regard was submitted.

7. The approved Mining Plan shows production of 2,88,000 Tonnes/year i.e. 70000 brass /year. The report submitted by the PP shows production of 22,500 brass/year. The PP submitted that actual production will be as per the Mining Plan and the quantum submitted by the PP was a typographic mistake. The Committee desired that quantum should be calculated correctly. Shri. Hiremath, Member volunteered to work out the quantum accurately, based on the data available in the Mining Plan.

2. M/s. Alcon industries

Talekhol, Dodamarg

372 (p) 1.60 The Committee deliberated on the

compliance of 129th meeting as follows:

1. The Senior Geologist, GSDA's characterizing the quarry area as 'Local Run-off Zone' was discussed at length. The PP accepted this decision of Senior Geologist, GSDA. The PP further

For the compliances the item was deferred.

Page 3 of 61 Member Secretary Chai

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee -1 held on 10 & 2°" July, 2016

accepted that the average slope of the quarry face was around 30°.

2. The PP explained the various aspects of the Action Plan to prevent landslides. The Committee made the following observations on the Action Plan: a) Post excavation, the tension joints would be decided on the basis of the fold geometrics and grouting will be done accordingly. b) The retaining wall at the top level should be so designed so as to resist the forces acting on it. The retaining wall should also have proper weep holes to facilitate release of run-off. c) The quarry will be characterized by benches of height 10m x width 6m.

3. The collection of run-off and its storage in the stilling ponds was explained. PP submitted cross section of stilling pond, pre and post quarrying (Annexure 2.2.1) and Plan (Annexure 2.2.2). The Committee directed that the Plan and Cross section of stilling ponds should form a part of the Approved Mining Plan. The Approved Mining Plan, modified with the details of the stilling ponds need to be submitted by the PP.

3. Phonda silica sand 165. 24.26 The PP submitted that the proposed Abeyance mine 166, 175 quarry was located in an ESA village as

per the Draft Notification of Western Phonda, Kankavali, Ghats dated 4th Sept. 2015. Therefore the

Committee decided to hold the proposal in abeyance till the Draft Notification was finalized.

Member Secretary Page 4 of 61

Chairman

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & t July. 2016

"A nnexure 2.1.1"

4 RV., SIrTWI\ k

fer-02•0•411FET Cum.m.(47 Ptak Par squaw-ft.

PARNIEY \ STONE \ \ QUA M'. Nativ INDUSTRIES surly*, ...PP Par ••

GEOLOGICAL SECTION SCALE - 1'1000

Noy, nr. sonny 70-4,7 PLATE Na La

C ROCS SP: CTION

ZS

(in N Page 5 of 61

Member Secretary Chai an

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on Is' & 2nd July. 2016

"Annexure 2.1.2"

1Y7C)10lea


NAME OF LESSEE :- PA/S ALCON DEVELOPERS

SURVEY NO 372/18 Part

Village

Taluka

District

State

Area

Talekhd

Dodamarg Sinffitarurg Maharashtra

r 60 ha

SURVEYED BY :-

Date of survey :- 17-10-2014

SCALE 1-1000

GEOLOGICAL SECTION ALONG A-B'

(Ref: Surface Plan)

i 111 SOIL •ND WE •THERE) ROCN

MEM gini illini.

alla II III 12111111ba.

IIIIMERD !!!EMIZEMBE1111111.■ ■ X X X /

7 / /

, x , X X x r X x

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 MD 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 310

PLATE NO.- 5

2013

190

1817

170

160

150

140

130

120

110

100

90

130'h Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2nd July, 2016

"Annexure 2.2.1"

(lY3)31LEjvc1


-IrChaiian

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2i" July, 2016

"Annexure 2.2.2"

SURFACE PLAN of 372/1B

e scea -11000

N Nv4

N

N

b...1/4„... 7.liNTESar

sa

, 7.

0

j E 71'01 43 8

47; 4 .4,/..„........, t— \-%- - , a 5 39'52 7

N 5CO3

111.11r4t, ■‘......--..W...4.-4-tt.----.gE

74 1 7 05'

N 4490

4,, -a.„‘,,, -...,..ta,,,,,-,%.,..._, „IN. • „a

tlt

-,-*-„, • N 4 -•••:.,____-=-

N 4

N 4931 AGA 7*

N 4900 4 Allibibba■

A IN C.

.71)ti

4.41111WV b.. „,,„14

M -

15 39 49 la 74 04 44 7e

N4880

\ \ ----C- - '''''- N k-

/ ) Inc

N Et

' '

5 ‘ 4. c°

44 "Wm T rn mrn mrn rn rn rn 2

way:18Th Iiii g $

0..-AA•N ROA.

PLATE NO 3 jjar WCW' =woo(

el

4,r— , 0 •

® LEASE AREA

AREA OUTSIDE THE LEASE

NAME 0.- LESSEE WE ALCON DEVELOPERS

SURVEY NO 3-2 le Pad

igiege 'ERA* Do=t Suite Nee 4fuo

Mean SOH&

'RC!

L

#

Ta iltin Dadamar0

SURVEIEC• EY SCALE 1103C

Dale of survey '7 -IC 2014 C 8 MJAIOX JO Sal*,

Item no. 3 Minor Minerals (stone) Ratnagiri (01) [new]

PP was absent hence deferred.

Item no. 4 Minor Minerals (stone) Nandurbar (01) (new]

PP was absent hence deferred.


130th Meeting of State Level Ex Appraisal

Item no. 5

M/s. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation and M/s. S. S. Services (ToR)

For common bio-medical waste treatment facility at the existing project site at R.S.no. 206, C.s.no. 29, resn no. 92-A, Kasba Bawada, Kolhapur

The PP gave a detailed presentation for their project of common bio-medical waste treatment facility at Kasba Bawada, Kolhapur. The Committee noted that the management of bio-medical waste was earlier carried out by M/s. Nature in Needs, which was not found working satisfactorily and therefore terminated. The said firm (M/s. Nature in Needs) approached NGT, which, vide order dated 5'h May. 2014, directed that M/s. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation might appoint a new agency after following the due procedure of tendering, till which time, the bio-medical waste management should be carried out by M/s. Nature in Needs. The proposal was considered under category 7(da)-B1 of schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

After detailed deliberations the Committee made the following observations:

I. Since the site is located in the heart of city it will be necessary to install state of the art incineration plant which will not create any health hazard by way of emissions dangerous to health. For this purpose proper controlled air emission using technology known as starved air incineration or two stage incineration or modular combustion shall be employed. Such incineration should be followed by venturi scrubber and packed bed absorption column. The stack height shall be calculated as per the prescribed protocols. The emission standards as prescribed in MoEF&CC Notification dated 28th March, 2016 shall be achieved for the various parameters. Disposal of ash shall be as prescribed in the above Notification.

2. PP shall provide the exhaustive list of registered medical institutes within the Corporation limits and compare it with the institutes registered with the agency. Reasons of non-inclusion for those institutes which are not yet affiliated shall be given. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation shall take special efforts to include institutes which are not yet taking part in bio-medical waste management and disposal scheme, in particular, clinics.

3. The EIA report should give detailed protocols for collection, transportation and disposal of bio-medical waste.

4. Ambient Air Quality Study shall include impact of HCI, Dioxins, Furans, Mercury and its compounds. Ambient Air Quality Study should be carried out in 8 stations within 10km radius of the location. out of which 5 stations shall be in the downwind direction.

5. Water balance should detail process-wise water requirement. 6. Quantitative Risk Assessment and mitigation measures for containment of Bio-medical waste

at the point of collection and transportation should be detailed. 7. Incineration of PVC may not be allowed.

Subject to the above observations (1-7) the Committee decided to approve ToR for preparation of EIA report.

Page 9 of 61 Member Secretary Chairman

130m Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2"" July, 2016

Item no. 6 M/s. STA-CO NUTRA PRODUCTS PVT LTD., Plot No D-208, MIDC Ranjangaon, Ta]. Shirur, Dist: Pune.

The brief information of the project as submitted by the PP is as follows:

1. Name of the Project M/s. STA-CO NUTRA PRODUCTS PVT.LTD. 2. Name, address, e-mail & contact

number of Proponent Name: M/s.STA-CO NUTRA PRODUCTS PVT.LTD (Pharma API Division) D-208 MIDC Ranjangaon, Tal-Shirur,

Dist., Pune, State Maharashtra Telephone number : +91-9860812268 Mobile number: +91-9923675006 Email ID: staco.npAgmail.com

3. Name, address, e-mail & contact number of Consultant

Saitech Research and Development Organisation,

4. Accreditation of consultant (NABET Accreditation)

Sr. No. 129 in List ' A' of O.M. of MoEF, Gol , New Delhi Dated 05/12/2014 (Court case subjudice)

5. New Project/Expansion in existing project/ Modernization/ Diversification in existing Project

New Project

6. If expansion/ Diversification, whether environmental clearance has been obtained for existing project (If yes, enclose a copy with compliance table)

NA

7. Activity schedule in the EIA Notification Category B of 5(f)

8. Area Details Total plot area (sq. m.): 600 Built up area (Sq. m.): 600

9. Name of the Notified Industrial area / MIDC Area

Ranjangaon , M.I.D.C), Taluka - Shirur, Dist- Pune.412208

10. TOR given by SEAC? (If yes then specify the meeting)

11. Estimated capital cost of the Project (including cost for land, building, plant and machinery separately)

Rs. 350 Latch

12. Location details of the project : Latitude 18° 47' 44.10"N Longitude 74° 06 '49 .22 " E Location: MIDC-Ranjangaon,Tal-Shirur.Dist-Pune

Elevation above Mean Sea Level (mtr.): 606 13. Distance from Protected Areas /

Critically Polluted areas / Eco-sensitive areas / inter-State boundaries

Not Applicable

14. Production details Sr. No Product Name Capacity (kg)/month

Azacitidine 150 kg Bortezomib

Carboplatin

(03116-tilut-.


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on r & 2"d July. 2016

Cislpatin Decitabine Docetaxel Erlotinib HCL Gemcitabine HCL Irinotecan HCL Lapatinib Sorafenib Tosylate Paclitaxel Pemetrexed Disodium

15. Rain Water Harvesting (RWH)

As industry is proposed in MIDC, all facilities are provided and enhanced in future. Level of the Ground water table: 100 to 150 ft Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: NA Location of the RWH tank(s): NA Size, nos. of recharge pits and Quantity: 2" X 4 Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost)

16. Total Water Requirement Total water requirement: • Fresh water (CMD): & Source : 09, MIDC • Recycled water (CMD): Cooling & EIT' treated water Use of the water: Process (CMD) : 1.25 Washing (CMD) : 1.0 Cooling water (CMD) : 2.0 Boiler/ Steam generation : 2.0 Domestic (CMD) : 2.4 Gardening (CMD) : 0.5 Total : 9.15

17. Storm water drainage Industry is located in MIDC all facilities are provided and enhanced in future Natural water drainage pattern: quantity of storm water: Size of SWD:

18 Sewage generation and Treatment

Amount of sewage generation (CMD) — 2.3 Proposed treatment for the sewage: disposed through Treatment Capacity of Common treatment for sewage & industrial effluents--05 KLD

19 Effluent characteristic Sr. no

Parameters (pH, BOD, COD, heavy metal, etc)

Inlet effluent Characteristi c

Outlet effluent Characte ristics

Effluent discharge standards (CPCB /MPCB)

1 pH 6.00-7.00 5.5 — 9.0 5.5-9.0 2 Suspended

solids 200-300 < 100 <100

3 Total Dissolved solids

2000-6000 < 2100 <2100

4 Chemical oxygen Demand

3000-5000 <250 <250

5 Biochemical Oxygen demand

2500-3200 < 100 <30

6 Chlorides 600-1500 <600 < 600 7 Sulphates 600-1400 <1000 < 1000 8 Phosphate - <5 - 9 Oil & Grease <10 <10 <10

~CSfiirman Page 11 of 61 (00*3/41/1-1)

Member Secretary

130'h Meeting of State Level Ex- pert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1' & 2" j AIL 2016

20 ETP details Amount of effluent generation (CMD): 4.75 • Capacity of the ETP (CMD): 5.0 • Amount of treated effluent recycled (CMD):4.0 - Amount of water send to the CETP (CMD): NIL • Membership of the CETP (If require): If yes then attach the letter submit the letter: NA

21 Note on ETP technology to be used

Industrial effluent shall he treated in full fledge tertiary treatment ETP.

22 Disposal of the ETP sludge (If applicable)

Disposed as per MPCB guidelines.

23 Solid waste Management Hazardous Solid Waste : Sr. No.

Source Qty. Disposal Facility

I Residues & waste

750Kg/M CHWTSDF

1 ETP Sludge 50KeM

CHWTSDF

3 Empty HDPE Drum

25Nos./M Sale to authorized party

4 E-Waste 0.1 Kg/A Sale to authorized party

Non Hazardous Solid Waste : S. N o

Nature of solid waste

UOM Propo sed Qty

Disposal option

1 Canteen (Food) Waste

Kg D 5.50 Used for Gardening as a compost

2 Garden Waste Kg/D 2.00 Used for Gardening as a compost

Packing Material & Cardboards

Kg/D 10.00 Sale to Authorized re-processor

4 Glass Utensil Kg D 2.00 Sale to Authorized re-processor

24 Atmospheric Emissions (Flue gas characteristics SPM, SO2. NOx, CO, etc.)

Sr. No.

Pollutant Source of Emission

Emission rate (kg/hr)

Concentratio n in flue gas (g/m3)

1 SPM DG set and Boiler

--

2 SO2

NOX -- --

25 Stack emission Details: (All the stacks attached to process units, Boilers, captive power plant, D.G. Sets, Incinerator both for existing and proposed activity). Please indicate the specific section to which the stack is attached. e.g.: Process section. D.G. Set. Boiler. Power Plant incinerator

S. No

Source of Emission

Capa city

Type of Emissio n

Stack Heig ht (rn)

Stack Diamet er (m)

Fuel name & Quantity

I Boiler 300 502.

PM 12 0.270

Diesel & I5 Itrthr

/ DG set (standby)

25 KV A

PM. NOx. Sox

Adequ ate

Diesel

ttit Page 12 of 61

Member Secretary

Chair an

130th Meetins of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on Et & 2nd July. 2016

etc. Emission rate (kg/hr.) for each pollutant (SPM, 502, NOx)

26 Emission Standard Pollutants (SPM.S02,ect

Emission standard limit (mg/Nm3 )

MPCB consent (mg/Nm3)

SPM 150 150

27 Ambient Air Quality Data Pollutant Permissi ble Standard

Proposed Concentrati on (in ea/m3 )

Remarks

SPM (PM10) < 100 < 100 Within Limit RPM(PM2.5) < 60 < 60 _ Within Limit SO2 < 80 _ < 80 _ Within Limit NOx < 80 < 80 _ Within Limit CO < 04 < 04 _ Within Limit

28 Details of Fuel to be used: HSD (15 Lit./hr.) will be used as a fuel for Boiler and Diesel is used as a fuel for DG set

29 Energy Power supply: MIDC • Proposed power requirement: 35 KVA

DG sets: 25 KVA

Details of the non-conventional renewable energy proposed to be used : NA

30 Green Belt Development Green belt area (Sq. ft.): 2125.00 • Number and species of trees to be planted: 15 nos. • Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be Transplanted: NA

31 Details of Pollution Control Systems:

Sr. No.

Proposed to be Installed

1 Air Adequate Stack Heights 2 Water Septic tank for Sewage and ETP for

Effluent 3 Noise Green Belt Development with advanced

technoloey 4 _ Solid waste Proper storage system

32 Environmental Management plan Budgetary Allocation

• Capital cost (With break up): 12.5 L • O&M cost (With break up): 4.25 L

S. No

Particulars Capital cost

(Rs. Lakhs)

Recurring cost (Rs. Lakhs)

1. Air Pollution & Noise Control 1.0 0.20

2. Septic tanks & Soak pits 1.54 0.5

3. Wastewater Treatment 5.0 1.5

4. Environment Monitoring and Management 1.5

ef71 )1


I30th Meeting ofState Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on I' & 2"d July. 2016

5. Occupational Health & Safety 03

6. Green Belt 2 0.55

TOTAL 12.54 4.25 33 EIA Submitted (If yes

then submit the salient features)

• Period of data collected : March to May 2016 • Details of the primary data collection Le. location of the sample collection, number of visit. etc) • Details of the secondary data collection (i.e. Source and year of data): of data) : Indian Meteorological Department • Potential hazard and mitigation measures No potential hazards • Conclusion of the EIA study

34 Public hearing report (If public hearing conducted then submit the salient features)

NA

35 Air pollution, water pollution issues in the project area. If any

No issues

Previous consideration: The 124th Meeting held on 30th & 31" March, 2016

Decision: The PP gave a detailed presentation about their proposal to establish a new project to

manufacture pharmaceutical APIs and intermediates to the extent of 45 kg/Month. The Committee considered the project under 5(f) - B 1 category of EIA Notification, 2006.

After detailed discussion the Committee decided to approve ToR for preparation of EIA Report subject to the following conditions:

1. The ToR shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in the Model ToR prescribed by MOEF&CC in April, 2015.

2. The project will adopt a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. While there will be negligible

generation of process effluents, utility effluents will be treated in an ETP of suitable capacity

whose design shall be based on treatability studies of effluent generated and processes employed in the ETP.

3. The PP shall achieve 96% recovery of solvents and manner in which this will be achieved shall be detailed in the EIA report.

4. Stack height calculations shall be detailed in the DA report. 5. STP of 3 CMD capacity shall be installed for treatment of domestic waste water. 6. A separate chapter on Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation shall be provided.

Previous consideration: The 129th Meeting held on 16th, 17th & 18th June, 2016

Decision: The PP gave a detailed presentation of the EIA Report to establish a new project to

manufacture pharmaceutical APIs and intermediates to the extent of 150 kg/Month. The Committee considered the project under 5(f) - B1 category of EIA Notification, 2006.

After detailed discussion the Committee made the following observations:

I. The area where proposed project is to be located is restricted to the extent of 600 m2 [area correction in the EIA report which shows 645 m2]. In this limited area, PP will have to

/I:). 1)1P) L


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2nd July. 2016

provide 12 % of plot area for parking. PP shall provide sufficient marginal space for the

movement of vehicles in the emergency situation. 2. After going through the baseline studies, the Committee concluded that air, water, ground

water. surface water and noise parameters w ill remain within prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project.

3. To bring clarity about quantity of effluents, solvents and by-products which will be produced

in the processes. product wise material balance has to be submitted, on the basis of which the above aspects can be analyzed.

4. Risk Assessment should be more elaborate. It should be chemical based and material specific.

The storage of chemicals and precautionary measures shall be taken depending upon their

flammability and toxic nature. Possibility of off-site emergency should be analyzed. A diagram showing all hazard management facilities shall be given indicating location of fire

water tank, fire hydrants, assembly points and evacuation gates etc. 5. The Committee noted that the project will adopt a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. While

there will be negligible generation of process effluents, utility effluents will be subjected to

ETP of capacity 4.5 CMD which will be linked to the STP of size 2.5 CMD where the

supernatant from ETP will be treated along with sewage by aeration, settling and decantation. The sludge from ETP and STP will be sent to CHWTSDF.

For the compliance of point no. 3 the item is deferred.

Present consideration in the 130th meeting:

The Committee considered the project under 5(t) - B1 category of EIA Notification, 2006.

The Committee went through various compliance points raised in the 129th meeting and noted as follows:

1. The PP has indicated 72 m2 for parking and sufficient marginal space has been provided for movement of vehicles.

2. The product wise material balance indicates that the recovery of solvents shall be restricted to 85%.

3. There will not be any generation of by-products or process effluents. The scheme of effluent

management had already been indicated in the 129th meeting as given above. Though there will be negligent generation of process effluents. the Committee desired that the plant should

be run as a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. The Consent to Operate shall be given by the MPCB only after verifying this aspect.

4. The PP has carried out Risk Assessment and Risk Management Studies. The various facilities of hazard management were depicted in the diagram attached as Annexure 6.1.

The Committee went through the all aspects of Environmental Impact and noted that the baseline studies indicated that air, water, ground water, noise and soil parameters would remain well within

prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project. The Committee therefore decided to recommend the project for EC subject to the observations (1-4) above.

(0)1 \ 1'11 Page 15 of 61

Member Secretary Chairman

SITE PLAN

C SCHEDULE OF oPENots nz. ..r.coxnv. , 130A

ft I_

-

5P

STACO NLTRA PRODUC'S PvLLTD

M/s. Satellite Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (ToR)

Proposed APUBulk drug project [diluted Nitroglycerin 1000Icg/M, Timolol Maleate 9kWM, 2-(2-bromoethyl) benzaldehyde 80Icg/M] at plot no. B-40, MIDC Paithan, Paithan, District-Aurangabad.

Item no. 7

Member Secretary

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on l" & 2'1 July. 2016

"Annexure 6.1"

The Committee considered the project under 5(f) - 81 category of EIA Notification, 2006. The PP

gave a detailed presentation for ToR pertaining to their proposed project to replace their existing manufacturing of N1-14CI, NaCI & KCI (33 MT/M) by new products: diluted Nitroglycerin (1000kg/M). Timolol Maleate (9kg/M) and 2-(2-bromoethyl) Benzaldehyde (80kg/M) totaling to the

extent of 1089 kg/M. The PP contended that this transformation will not entail any increase in trade effluents.

After detailed deliberations the Committee made the following observations:

1. 33 % of the open area should be maintained for green belt and 12% of total plot area shall be reserved for parking.

2. The PP may give stage wise material balance, MSDS. and HAZOP study for each stage of manufacturing in the E1A report.

Page 16 of 61 Chairman

130th Meeting of State Level Ewen Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & 2fid July. 2016

3. A detailed water balance may be given. It is understood that plant kill be run as a Zero Liquid

Discharge Process. It \\ ill be necessary that no Bromine or Bromine compounds shall enter

into the effluent stream. Consent from MIDC regarding water shall be furnished.

4. The Ambient Air Quality Study should include VOCs & Br with other standard parameters.

Air monitoring station shall include at least I station at Jayakwadi Bird Sanctuary. Stack

height calculations shall be given. Air pollution controlling devices shall be provided to

achieve a TPM of less than 100 mg/Nm3 at the stack end.

5. Wood should not be used as fuel for the boilers and only briquettes shall be used.

6. Since the production involves use of hazardous materials only qualified persons shall be

employed and for handling these materials training to employees shall be given.

7. The certificate of Deputy Forest Officer. Aurangabad may be produced regarding distance of

the Jaykwadi Bird Sanctuary from the project site.

8. The ToR shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in the Model ToR prescribed

by MOEF&CC in April. 2015.

Subject to the above observations (1-8), the Committee decided to approve ToR for the preparation

of the EIA report.

Item no. 8 M/s. Nirbhay Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. Synthetic organic chemicals industry at N-95 + 96 + 96/1, MIDC Industrial area, Tarapur, Boisar Taluka & District Palghar

Previous consideration: The 128th MeetinE held on rd, 3" & e June, 2016

Decision: The PP gave a detailed presentation for ToR for their proposal to augment the capacity

from 100 MT/M to 400 MT/M of synthetic chemicals. The Committee considered the project under

category 5(0-B1 of the schedule of the EIA Notification 2006.

The Committee desired that in the absence of adequate capacity of the existing CETP. the plant

should be run as a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. The Committee felt that this would be possible by

deployment of RO and MEE and by certain process engineering. How ever PP requested for more time

to consider as Zero Liquid Discharge solution. A certificate from MIDC regarding the period for

completing the CETP and the effluents outfall pipeline to the sea may be produced by the PP. PP

requested for more time, hence deferred.

Present 1306 consideration:

The Committee considered the project under category 5(f)-B I of the schedule of the EIA Notification

2006. The PP submitted a letter from Tarapur Environment Protection Society stating that the new

CETP at Tarapur MIDC will start its operation on or around 15-20 February, 2017 after

commissioning. PP also submitted an undertaking that they would not exceed their present sanction

limit of 102 m3/day of treated industrial discharge, to the existing CETP at MIDC Tarapur till the new

CETP of 50 MLD capacity is commissioned and that they would utilize additional requirement of 778

m'/day only after commissioning the new CETP.


Chairman

130th Meeting ci State Level Evert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 2'd July, 2016

The Committee considered this submission of the PP. The Committee had desired in the 128w meeting

that in the absence of adequate capacity of existing CETP and uncertainty about commissioning of

new CETP the PP should go for certain process reengineering using RO & MEE to achieve Zero

Liquid Discharge as far as the present production was concerned. Through an undertaking given by

the PP. it has been agreed that the present discharge of 102 m3/day (maximum) to the existing CETP

will not be exceeded and to that extent the production will be limited by the PP. With this premise.

the Committee made the following observations:

1. 33 % of the open area should be maintained for green belt and 12% of total plot area shall be

reserved for parking.

2. Consent from MIDC for water requirement shall be furnished.

3. The PP shall ensure Zero Liquid Discharge System for the enhanced production of 300 MT/M

presently sought in the proposal. This will be achieved by process reengineering involving

RO & MEE. EIA Report shall bring out the impact of these effluent management systems to

show hov. the Zero Liquid Discharge is achieved.

4. The Committee would like to clearly convey that commissioning of CETP invariably implies

completion of outfall pipeline by MIDC as per the suggestion of National Institute of

Oceanography.

5. A separate chapter on Risk Assessment and Risk Management shall be given. A diagram

showing various hazard management facilities shall be included in the EIA Report.



After considering all aspects of environmental impact, the Committee decided to approve ToR for

preparation of EIA report subject to the consideration of points 1-6 above.

Item no. 9 M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Expansion on plot no. B-25, 5 star MIDC Shendra Aurangabad.

The PP gave a detailed presentation of their EIA report to manufacture therapeutic category APIs in

their existing plant premises at 5 star MIDC, Shendra. Aurangabad to the extent of 18.4 TPM. The

Committee considered the project under category 5(0-B1 of the schedule of the EIA Notification

2006.

The PP claimed that presently they were not manufacturing any synthetic organic chemicals but only

converting a biological plant source — latex extracted from the South American plant, "Cotton

Lachari" to a therapeutic grade product. "Crofelmar".

The PP also presented a letter from Joint Secretary. MoEFCC to substantiate the claim that the

existing activity does not require prior EC.


1. The baseline studies indicated that air, water, ground water, noise and soil parameters would

remain well within prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project.

2. The effluent management indicates segregation of effluents into high COD/BOD and low

COD/BOD components. Former will be subjected to RO and MEE and latter to a

conventional effluent treatment process. The Committee was concerned that the Bromine/ Br

ml tti Ltd Page 18 of 61 Member Secretary

Chaifflan

130th Mee 0 State Level E e raisal Committee - I held on l' s & rd Jul 2016

products should not be allowed to enter into the effluent stream. The PP promised to submit

an action plan to achieve this. The Committee noted that the project would run as a Zero

Liquid Discharge Process.

3. The Committee went through the water balance and found that nearly 360 CMD water was

additionally to be sourced from MIDC. The Committee was concerned about scarcity of water

in the area and therefore suggested that the entire water which was recycled. amounting to

283 CMD should be used for gardening (50CMD) and cooling (233 CMD), thereby saving of

90 CMD of MIDC water. Water balance may be revised in the light of this suggestion. Rain

water harvesting may be factored into the water balance.

4. The PP intends to use FO as fuel in the boilers. A study may be done to calculate the

emissions, control measures and stack height considering the particulate matter emission also.

In any case the PP should achieve a TPM of less than 100 mg/NM' at the stack end. The air

pollution controlling mechanisms may be detailed.

5. The Risk Assessment and Risk Management studies show that there is a possibility of off-site

emergency. Possibility of EDC/MDC leakages shall be considered and adequate detectors

may be installed. A diagram showing various hazard management facilities shall be

submitted.

6. The Committee is concerned about the solvent recovery. A table showing details of solvent

recovery may be submitted with details of vendors who will be procuring spent solvents from

PP and mode of disposal by the vendors.

All other aspects of Environmental Impact were found to be in order; however, for the compliance of

points 2-6 above, the item was deferred.

Item no. 10

Mts. Unichem Laboratories Ltd.

Expansion of manufacturing of APIs of capacity 821 MT/A at Plot no. T-47, 5

star Kagal MIDC, Kolhapur


1 Name of the project Unichem Laboratories Limited

2 Name , address, e-mail & contact number of proponent

Mr. Dinesh Sharma, T-47, 5 Star MIDC, Kagal, Kolhapur — 416236 State — Maharashtra Tel No — 0231 — 2305220 Email — dinesh.sharmataMnichemlabs.com

3 Name , address, e-mail & contact number of Consultant

Name: Mr. Prabhakar Sadekar.

4 Accreditation of Consultant (NABET accreditation)

QCI- NABET RAAC Meeting :- 71/2015, rd Dec. 2015

5

New Project/Expansion in existing project /Diversification in existing project

Expansion

6 If expansion/ Diversification, whether environmental clearance has

Yes. Environmental Clearance was accorded by MOEF to M/s Konduskar Laboratories Pvt. Ltd dated 25th March 2008. (J-11011/817/2007-1A 11 (I)). The entire manufacturing unit has been purchased by M/s Unichem Laboratories. Ltd.


Chaff an

I30th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on Er & 2nd July, 2016

been obtained for existing project (If yes, enclose a copy with compliance table)

dated 24th June 2015.

7 Activity schedule in the EIA notification

Schedule 5 (f) ,Project Category -B-1

8 Area Details

Area Details Existing (sq.m)

Proposed (sq.m)

Total (sq.m)

Total Plot Area 39525 39525

Actual Plot Area 35572.5 - 35572.5

Total Built Up Area

2968.77 30700.87 33669.64

Ground Coverage Area

1796.3 7700.0 9496.3

Green Belt Area 572 5341 5913

Parking Area 3589 3589

9 Name of Notified Industrial area/ MIDC

5 Star MIDC, Kagal, Kolhapur(Notified Industrial Area)

10 TOR given by SEAC? Additional TOR given by SEAC-1 in the 119th Meeting dated 15th & 16th January, 2016.

11

Estimated cost of the project

(Including cost for land, building, plant and machinery separately)

Parameters Existing

(Rs.)

Proposed (Rs.) Total

(Rs.) Total 6 1876.68 5036.32 6912.99

12 Location details of the project

- Latitude:- 16°3719.29"N - Longitude:- 74°21'5.75"E I Location: - T-47, 5 Star MIDC Kagal. Kolhapur - 416236 _ Elevation above Mean Sea Level (meters):- 581 m

13

Distance from protected area/ critically polluted area/ Eco sensitive area/ Interstate boundary

N.A. Project is in notified MIDC area

14 Raw materials (including process chemicals, catalysts & additives).

List of the Raw Materials is attached in the EIA report.

15 Production profile (tones / year):

Sr.No Product Name Existing (MT/A)

Proposed (MT/A)

Total (MT/A)

1 Phenylphrine Hydrochloride 11.88 13.12 25.00

2 Hydrochlorothiazide 50.00 50.00

3 Chlorothalidone 3.00 3.00

4 Dabigatran - 5.00 5.00

5 Solifenacin Succinate - 1.50 1.50

6 Tofacitinib Citrate 2.0 2.0

7 Labetelol hydrochloride 15.0 15.0

8 Bepotastin Besilate - 1.0 1.0

9 Apixaban - 1.5 1.5

10 Azhilsartan kamedoxomil 1.5 1.5

11 Fesoterodine fumarate 1.5 1.5

111"-))1Cti Page 20 of 61

Member Secretary

Chaff an

130"' Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on 1' & 2i° July. 2016

12 Lacosamide 1.5 1.5

13 Canaeliflozin 1.5 1.5

14 Rivastigmine 3.0 3.0

15 Montelukast Sodium - 25.0 25.0

16 Phthaloyl amlodipine 3.0 3.0

17 Divalproex sodium 60 60

18 Metronidazole 450 450

19 R & D Molecules 100 100

20 Citrizine Hydrochloride 25.00 25.00

21 Fenofibrate 35.00 35.00

22 Rivaraxaban 5.00 5.00

23 Pregabalin - 5.00 5.00

TOTAL 11.88 809.12 821.00

16 By Products NA

17 Process Details/Manufacturing Details

Procedure of the Manufacturing Process is attached in the EIA report.

18 Rain Water Harvesting (RWH)

Level of the Ground water table (During Monsoon season) — 3.46 m bgl Level of the Ground water table (During Post Monsoon season) — 1.63 m bgl

. ( Source Report On The Dynamic. Ground Water Resources Of Maharashtra,2011-12) Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity = 6 RWH Tank Location of the RWH tank(s) is near proposed utility building. Proposed plant-4, Existine plant-2, Future pump house & Proposed warehouse.

19 Total Water Requirement

Existing water requirement: 50 CMD Proposed water requirement: 551 CMD Total water requirement: 601 CMD

Source: 5 Star Kaeal MIDC.

10 Storm water drainage Natural water drainage pattern. Proper and separate storm water drains will be provided as per natural slope.

21 Sewage eeneration and Treatment

Sewage of approx 10 m3/day will be generated and it will get treated in anaerobic & aeration tank of the effluent treatment plant (ETP — Low TDS/COD).

22 Characters of effluent

Characteristics of Hieh COD/TDS

Parameters (pH. BOD. COD. etc)

Inlet effluent Charact- eristic

utiet effluent Outlet

Characteristic

Effluent Discharge Standards (CPCB/MPC B)

pH 6 to 8 5.5 to 9 5.5 to 9

BOD 3500 mg/L <30 m _. et _ <30 met

COD 20000 met < 250 met <150 mgt

TDS 100000 met < 2100 met <2100 met

(All the parameters are express in mg'L except pH)

23 ETP Details Amount of effluent generation (CMD): 300 CMD

Capacity of the ETP (Existing): 50 CMD

ith) ii/Uc\


Chairrfrgn

130th Meeting a State Level Ex ert A raisal Committee I held on I" & 2nd July 2016

Capacity of the ETP (Proposed) : 296 CMD Membership of the CETP (If require): 5 Star Kagal CETP Membership available for 350 CMD

24

Note on ETP technology to be used

For treatment of Low COD/TDS — Effluent treatment plant comprises of Collection Tank, Screen Chamber. O&G trap, Equalization tank (2nos.),Parabolic Screen. Flash Mixer, Clariflocculator, Buffer Tank, Upflow Anaerobic filter, Aeration Tank(2nos) , Secondary Clarifier (2nos), Chlorination Tank, PSF & ACF, Final Tank, Sludge Sump, Decanter &Sludge Drying Bed.

For treatment of High COD/TDS — Effluent treatment plant comprises of Collection Tank, Flash Mixer, Flocculator. Stripper Column. Multiple Effect Evaporator. Agitated Thin Film Dryer

25 Disposal of the ETP sludge (if applicable)

The Hazardous waste will be disposed to the CHWTSDF Ranjanaaon.

26 Solid Waste Management

Non Hazardous waste

Non Hazardous Waste (MT/M)

Existing Proposed Total

Glass Bottles, MS/SS scrap, Poly bags, Paper waste, MS/HDPE drums

8 MT/M 80 MT/M 88 MT/M

Hazardous waste

Hazardous Waste Generation (MT/A)

Existing (As per valid CTO)

Proposed Total

Wastes/residue containing oil

0.075 2.00 2.075

Spent Solvent 0.60 927 927.60 Distillation residue 1.8 10.00 11.8

Process Residues & wastes nil 725 725 Spent catalyst/Spent carbon nil 4.00 4.00

Date-expired discarded/ off- specification drugs

nil 4.00 4.00

Discarded containers/barrel/liners.

240.00 8000.00 8240.00

Flue gas cleaning residue nil 2.00 2.00

Toxic metal-containma residue from water purification

nil 1.00 1.00

Chemical sludge from waste water treatment

30 100 130

Filters and filter material which have organic fluid

nil 1.00 1.00

MEE Residue nil 18 MT/D 18 MT/D

27

Atmospheric Emissions (Flue gas characteristics SPM, SO2, NO„. CO, etc.)

Sr. No Pollutant Source of emission Wm')

Emission Rate (Kg/hr)

Concentration in flue gas

1 SO2 Boiler D.G Set

Production not Started 2 PM10 3 PM2.5 4 NOx

28

Stack emission Details: (All the stacks attached to process units, Boilers, Boilers, captive power plant.

Plant Section & Units

Stack No.

Height from ground level WO

Internal diameter (top) (m)

Emission rate (Kg/hr)

Temp. of exhaust

(C) Boiler 1 50 m 0.73 130-140

:40 '41_, „- Page 22 of 61

Member Secretary Chairn

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on I t & 2"d July. 2016

D.G. Sets, Incinerator both for existing and proposed activity). Please indicate the specific section to which the stack is attached .e.g.: Process section. D.G.Set. Boiler. Power Plant. incinerator etc. Emission rete(l:2;hr.) for each pollutant (SPM. SO2. NQ etc. should be specified

Process Scrubber

5 II m 0.5 40-45

D.G Set 3 30 in 0.1 180-200

29 Emission Standard

Pollutants (SPM,S02,e tc

Emission standard limit (me/Nml)

Proposed limit (mg/Nm3)

MPCB consent (mfeNm')

SPM 150.0 me/xlm' not to exceed 150 me/N

.m3 150.0 me/Nm'

30 Ambient Air Quality Data

Pollutant Permissible standard

Proposed concentration (in ugim)

Remarks

PM io 100 fighn.

Not to exceed 100 ug/m3 As per NAAQM limit PM 2 5 60 µg/m' Not to exceed 60 fig/m3

SO2 80 p.g/m3 Not to exceed 80 µg/m'

NOx 80 µg/m' Not to exceed 80 pg/m3 CO 4 mg./m3 Not to exceed 4 mg/m3

31 Details of Fuel to be used:

Sr

n o

Fuel Daily Consumption (TPD/KLD) Calorif c value ( keels ' kg)

% .Ash

%Sulphu

Existing Propose d

Total

1 FO 8.6 MTD 6.2 MTD

14.8 MT/D

10000 0.2 4.5

2 HSD 50 Lit/D 800 Lit/D

800 LitD 11800 0.01 0.003

"Existing D.G set would be scraped of hence 50 litD of HSD would not be required.

32 Energy

Electricity Supplied by: MSEB

Power Requiremen t

Existing connected Load — 600 KW

Proposed connected Load — 9148 KW

Proposed connected Load — 9748 KW

Existing Demand 400 KVA

Proposed demand 5356 KVA

Proposed demand 5756 KVA

33 Green Belt Development Green Belt Area : - 5913 sq.m

34 Details of Pollution Control Systems

Sr. no

Components Proposed to be installed

Air Pollution

Appropriate stack will be attached of sufficient height i.e. 50m. 5 nos. of alkali scrubber will be installed to mitigate the impact of fumes/acid mist.

1 Water pollution

A full-fledged ETP will be provided with primary. secondary (anaerobic & aerobic) & tertiary treatment with capacity of 346 CMD. For the treatment of High COD/TDS effluent Stripper with MEE followed by ATM will be

Page 23 of 61 Member SecretarySecretary

Chair an

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 2ns July. 2016

provided.

Noise Pollution

Acoustic enclosure to D.G. Set will be provided to control Noise Pollution. Use of Personnel protective equipments like Ear Muff, Plugs etc. will be provided. Green belt will be provided to reduce noise pollution.

Hazardous Waste

Waste will be disposed off to CHWTSDF Ranjangaon

5

Environmental Management plan

plan O&M

cost (With break up): Budgetary Allocation

Sr. No

Component Recurring Cost per annum

(Rs.) Capital Cost (Rs.)

1 Air Pollution Control

30.000 100,000

2 Water Pollution Control

40.00,000 4.50,00.000

3 Noise Pollution Control

30.000 10.00.000

4 Environment Monitoring and Management

50.000

5 Reclamation borrow / mined area

6 Occupational Health 7.20.000

7 Green Belt 4.32,000 163.000

8 Solid Waste Management

10.00.000

9 Rain water harvesting

50000

Total (Rs.) 62.62.000/- 4.66.13.000/-

36 EIA Submitted (If yes then submit the salient features)

EIA was submitted online to the SEAC-1 dated 20-6-2016

37

Public hearing report (If public hearing conducted then submit the salient features)

NA

38

Air pollution. water pollution issues in the project area, If any

No issues

39

Storage of chemicals (inflammable /explosive/hazardous/toxic substances) Sr. No.

Name No. of storage tanks

Capacity Physical & Chemical composition

Maximum quantity of storage at any point of time

Source of supply

Means of Transport

1 Furnace Oil 2 40 KL Liquid 80 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

2 High Speed Diesel 2 20 KL Liquid 40 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

3 Acetone 1 25 Kt_ Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

4 Methanol 1 25 KL j Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

1 Ito cL

Member Secretary

Page 24 of 61

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1' & 2nd July. 2016

5 Toluene 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

6 n-Hexane 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

7 Ethanol 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

8 Acetic anhydride 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

9 Dichloromethane 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

10 Triethylamine 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

11 Isopropyl alcohol 1 25 KL, Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

12 Ethyl acetate 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

13 Acetonitrile 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

14 HCI 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

15 Sulphuric acid 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

16 Acetic acid 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

17 Caustic lye 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

18 Liquor Ammonia 1 25 KL Liquid 25 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

19 Ethylene Oxide 2 20 KL Liquid 40 KL Manufacturer / Trader

Appropriate Tankers

Previous consideration: The 119th Meeting held on 15th & 16th January, 2016

Decision: The Committee considered the project under 5 (0-BI category of EIA Notification 2006.

The PP gave a detailed presentation about their proposed expansion of APIs from present 11.88 MT/A

to 821 MT/A. In fact their earlier consent envisages only two products-

Benzhydrol

2. Phenylphrine Hydrochloride

666.74 MT/A of Benzhydrol is to be discontinued and Phenylphrine Hydrochloride is to be continued

with other new products. Prima facie the Committee noted that the production process will result in

highly non-biodegradable heavy metals in the effluent. The PP contented that CETP at Kagal M1DC,

Kolhapur has surplus capacity. the Committee took a note of this.


1. The EIA report shall give full justification of water requirement through a thorough study of

material balance.

2. Since fuel oil is being used in boilers, the stack height calculation and quality of the emissions

shall be worked out on the basis of the 3 tonne/hour boiler. TPM shall not exceed concentration of 100 mg/Nms.

'7;0;1' tijIiL

Member Secretary CHi- man Page 25 of 61

130'h Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on it & July. 2016 •

3. Effluent manaaement shall be based on Effluent Treatability Studies. The aqueous streams

shall be compulsorily subjected to pre-treatment to reduce COD to acceptable levels and to isolate

Lithium and Boron. After the pre-treatment the stream shall be led to MEE or ETP depending upon

salt content. Further streams shall be divided into 1.High COD/TDS-subjected to stripper followed by

MEE, 2. Low COD/ Low TDS — subjected to ETP, 3. High COD/ Low TDS- recovery of solvents.

4. PP shall achieve 95% of recovery of solvents like N-Propanol. Tetrahydrofuran and shall

achieve maximum possible recovery of Methylene Dichloride.

5. Efforts should be taken to recover costly metals like Lithium and Boron which can be reused

as metal catalysts after replenishing through catalyst re-processors.

6. Under no circumstance should Sodium Bromide be allowed to go to the aqueous streams of

effluents.

7. Ambient Air Quality studies should include, other than the parameters prescribed by MPCB.

Ammonia and VOCs.

8. Separate chapter on Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation shall be included in the EIA

Report.



After considering all aspects of environmental impact. the Committee decided to approve ToR for

preparation of EIA report subject to the consideration of points 1-9 above.

Present Consideration: 130th meeting

The Committee considered the project under 5 (0-B1 category of EIA Notification 2006. The PP gave

a detailed presentation of their proposed expansion of APIs from present 11.88 MT/A to 821 MT/A.

In fact, their earlier consent envisages only two products - 1. Benzhydrol. and 2. Phenylphrine

Hydrochloride. 666.74 MT/A of Benzhydrol is to be discontinued and Phenylphrine Hydrochloride is

to be continued with 21 other new products.


1. The baseline studies indicate that air, water. ground water. noise and soil parameters would

remain well w ithin prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project.

2. The PP should provide 4743 sq.m area for parking and 5913 sq.m for green belt, where trees

(non-fruit bearing) should be planted.

3. The Committee noted that the production process will result in highly non-biodegradable and

heavy metal loaded effluents. The PP contended that Kagal MIDC had surplus capacity to

accept the effluent load and the Committee took a note of it. The effluent management is done

by segregating the streams into high TDS. high COD/TDS and low COD/TDS streams. The

treatment protocol for these discrete streams is depicted in Annexure 10.1. The ETP of

capacity 346 CMD will take effluents from cooling tower blow down (98 CMD). Boiler Blow

Down (20 CMD). Reactor Washing (20 CMD), RO Reject / MGF/UF/DM (69 CMD),

condensate from ATFD (26). MEE Condensate (37.8 CMD) and domestic waste water

(10CMD) totally amounting to 280.8 CMD. After primary, secondary and tertiary levels, 253

CMD will be recycled which will be used for as makeup water for cooling water (97 CMD).

„ Lij


Char rman


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2"d July. 2016

gardening (29 CMD) and remaining 127 CMD will be discharged to Kagal CETP. The Committee went through the effluent treatment process and was satisfied with desired levels of COD. BOD and TDS will be achieved through the prescribed process.

4. The Committee was concerned about the isolation of Lithium and Boron which will be required for the production of Canagliflozin (1.5 MT/A). PP consented to drop the said product from product list and therefore isolation of Lithium and Boron was not required to be considered presently.

5. The PP proposes to recover more than 90% of the solvent from which 60% solvents will be recycled and remaining 30% sold to authorized vendors. It will be the responsibility of the PP to ensure that the vendors do not dispose of unspent solvents indiscriminately into the environment. The Committee was concerned about the use of Tetrahydrofuran as a solvent since it is difficult to be recovered, and the PP agreed to replace it with Methyl THF. Similarly Methylene Di-chloride may be used as only an exception for its ozone depleting nature and suitable replacement may be effected by the PP.

6. The Committee went through the details of emission management and considered all 3 boilers of capacity 5 TPH to be operated simultaneously warranting a common stack height of 55m. A TPM level of less than 100 mg/Nm3 shall be achieved. Furnace oil will be used as a fuel.

7. The PP has carried out elaborate study on Risk Assessment and Risk Management. As there is a contingency of off-site emergency, hazard management plan should be shared with the District Administration. Ammonia detectors will be necessary to be placed at suitable locations. SOPs for all hazardous materials should be prepared and displayed at the relevant locations. PESO guidelines should be followed. Raney Nickel should be handled with due caution. The details of hazard management facility is depicted in Annexure 10.2.

8. By way of resource conservation PP should install solar panels and provide solar energy based power for illuminating plant premises. Rain water harvesting shall be adopted.

The Committee went through the all aspects of Environmental Impact and was satisfied that the impact would be within prescribed limits. The Committee decided to recommend the project for EC subject to the observations (2-8) above.

Unichem Laboratories Ltd.

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & July. 2016

"Annexure 10.1"

f/ci;))11r-i-litt Page 28 of 61

Member Secretary

Chairman

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2nd July, 2016

"Annexure 10.2"

Item no. II Mts. Ria Organics Pvt. Ltd. (ToR) Synthetic organic chemicals industry at 13-26/2, MIDC Kurkumbh, Daund, Pune

The PP was absent hence deferred.

L Page 29 of 61

Member Secretary Ch an

130'h Medlin! of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on 1`' & 2Nd July. 2016

Item no. 12 M/s. Ambernath Organics Pvt. Ltd. Proposed Synthetic organics at plot no. 21/2. Dhatav MIDC Roha Raigad

The project was previously considered in the 851h, 105'h & 122" meetings. In the 122" meeting. it was

observed that the proposed Synthetic Organic Chemical industry was a red category industry proposed

in MIDC Dhatav, Taluka-Roha. District-Raigad. Dhatav Village has been declared as an Eco-sensitive

area in the Draft Notification of Western Ghats dated zl'h Sept. 2015. Therefore the Committee decided

to hold the proposal in abeyance till the Draft Notification was finalized.

Subsequently. the PP applied to the Central EAC to consider the project as 'A' category. The Member

Secretary. Central EAC pointed out that MoEFCC had transferred similar cases to SEIAA/SEAC

Maharashtra for consideration as a 'B' Category project till the Draft Notification was finalized.

The Committee deliberated on this advice and concluded that unless the MoEFCC gives clear

directives to appraise a project located in an area which appears as Ecologically Sensitive in the Draft

Notification for ESA villages in the Western Ghats, the Committee would much rather wait till the

said Notification is finalized. Hence deferred.

Item no. 13 Ws. Shri Chhatrapati Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd. Expansion &

Modernization of Sugar Unit of capacity 3500 TCD to 6500 TCD along with Co-

gen 18 MW at Bhavaninagar Tal Indapur Pune.

The brief information of the project as submitted by the PP:

1 Name of the Project "Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd."

2 Name, address, e-mail & contact number of Proponent

Name: Mr. G. M. Anarase (MD) Address: Gat. No. 48, 50. Bhawaninagar, Tal: Indapur Dist: Pune Pin Code-413 104 ( Maharashtra) Mobile number: 021-18266232 Email ID: scssklbireemail.com

3 Name of Consultant Name: S G M Corporate Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

4 Accreditation of consultant (NABET Accreditation)

Yes. Sr. No.146 as per list of NABET Accredited EIA consultant updated on June 2016

5 New Project / Expansion in existing project/ Modernization! Diversification in exiting project

Expansion cum modernization project Existing capacity- 3500 TCD- Sugar factory Proposed additional capacity- 3000 TCD- Sugar factory & 18 MW Co-gen(Bagasse based)

6 If expansion/ Diversification. whether environmental clearance has been obtained for existing project (If yes. enclose a copy with compliance table

NA

7 Activity schedule in the EIA Notification

Item No. 5 (j) and 1(d) as per the provision of Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF), New Delhi -ER Notification No S.O. 1533 (E)" dated 14.09.2006 amended on December 0E2009.


Chairman

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1' & 2" j July, 2016

8 Area Details Total Land avdlable with factory- 52.56 ha. Land for Integrated sugar plant- 34.57 ha.

Area details Existing (Sq. Mt.) Expansion (Sq. Mt.) Total (Sq. Mt.)

Total plot area

3,46,289.5 3,46,289.5

Built up area

81,055.65 29,422.96 1,10,478.61

Green built area

57,182.08 -- 57182.08

9 Name of the Notified Industrial area / MIDC area

NA

10 TOR given by SEAC? (If yes then specify the meeting?

Yes, In 95th SEAC 1 meeting held on 31.1.2015

11 Estimated capital cost of the Project (including cost for land, building, plant and machinery separately)

Rs 19200 Lacs. (Existing -4215 + Proposed-14985)

12 Location details of the project :

Location: Factory is located at Gat. No. 48,50, Bhawaninagar. Tal: lndapur Dist: Pune Pin Code-413 104 ( Maharashtra) Elevation above Mean Sea Level -1822 ft

13 Distance from Protected Areas / Critically Polluted areas / Eco-sensitive areas / inter-State boundaries

NA

14 Raw materials (including process chemicals, Catalysts& additives). Raw

material 'Quantity

Total TCD

Source Of Materials

Mode of transportati on

Existin

g 3500 TCD

Expansion 3000 TCD

Sugar Factory

Sugar cane TPD

3500 3000 6500 From Member farmers

Through trucks & bullock carts

Lubricant(oi I & grease) kg/d

105.1 90 195.1 Supplied by outside parties

vehicle

In barrel/poly thene bags through Lime (TPD) 5.6 4.8 10.4

Sulphur (TPD)

1.75 1.5 3.25

Co-gen

Bagasse (TPD)

Season- 1557.12

1557.1 2

From sugar unit

Off- season-228

228

epJ tb,)t


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2id July 2016

15 Production details Product/ Byproduct

Quantity Total (TPD)

Existing (TPD) Proposed (TPD) Sugar Factory

Sugar 402.5 (11.5% Sugar Recovery)

356.50 ( 11.8% Sugar Recovery)

759

Molasses 141.66 124.00 265.66 Press Mud 141.66 124.00 265.66 Bagasse Generation

980.00 840.00 1820

Co-gen Electricity Season- 18 MW 18 MAW

Off-season- 6 MW 6 MW

16 Process details / manufacturing details

Manufacturing Process details are given in E1A


Level of the Ground water table: 70 — 80 m • Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: 150 m3; 3Nos. • Location of the RWH tank(s) : Ground • Size, no's of recharge pits and Quantity: NA

18 Total Water Requirement Total water requirement: • Fresh water (CMD)& Source : 1356.8 M3/day and source: Nira canal & Pune irrigation division • Recycled water (CMD): 545 CMD treated water from ETP & STP reuse for irrigation of sugarcane cultivation & gardening. - Condensate water after treatment will be recycled in process; thereby the fresh water requirement will be reduced by 600 cum/day.

Use of the water: Existing (CMD)

Proposed (CMD)

Total Quantity (CMD)

Domestic 25 20 45

Process 400 350 750

Cooling 100 100 200

Boiler 75 130 205

Floor washing 10 10 20

Cooling tower Make up water for Co-gen

- 136.80 136.80

Gardening & Irrigation

545(treated water from ETP)

Total 610 746.8 1356.8

19 Storm water drainage • Natural water drainage pattern: Storm water collection and conveyance arrangement through closed RCC pipeline has been provided in the premises. The storm water is discharged at lowest point in the premises of industry and through percolation and infiltration it enriches the ground water table. • Quantity of storm water: Rainfall in the area is about 579 mm. Most of the reeion comes under semi urban to rural category with well-developed infrastructure of paved roads and other industrial plots in adjacent premises. • Size of SWD: 250 x 300 mm.


Chairman

130th Meeting of Stale Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on r & rth July, 2016

20 Sewage eeneration and treatment Amount of sewage eeneration (CMD): 36 cum/day.

Proposed treatment for the sewage: STP Capacity of the STP (CMD) (If applicable): 40 CMD

21 Effluent characteristic ETP Characteristics

Sr. No.

Parameters Inlet Effluent Characteristic

Outlet Effluent Characteristic

Discharge

Effluent

Standards (CPCB / MPCB)

I pH 4-4.5 5.5-9 5.5-8.5

2 BOD 1000-1500 <100 100 mg/1

3 COD 2000-3000 <250 250 mg/I

4 TSS 400-500 <100 100 me/1

5 TDS 545-762 < 2100 2100 mg/1

STP Characteristics

Sr. No.

Parameters Inlet Effluent Characteristic

Outlet E Effluent Characteristic

Discharge

Standards

Effluent

(CPCB / MPCB)

I pH 7-8.5 7.0-7.5 5.5-8.5

2 BOD 200-350 <100 100 mg/1

3 COD 400-500 <100 250 mg/I

4 TSS 200-450 <50 100 mg/I

5 0 & G 10 <10 _ 10 mg/I

22 ETP details Amount of effluent generation (CMD): 509 CMD • Capacity of the ETP (CMD) : 600 M3 (Existing + proposed expansion) • Amount of treated effluent recycled (CMD): Treated water shall be used for irrigation purpose. • Membership of the CETP (If require): NA


ETP technology comprises- Primary treatment, Primary biological treatment, Secondary biological treatment. Sludge treatment The units of ETP are Screen chamber. 0 & G skimmer. Equalization tank, Primary clarifier, Bio tower. Aeration tank, Secondary clarifier, Sludge drying beds. Pressure sand & activated carbon filters


Shall be used as manure in own premises

25 Solid waste Management Non hazardous solid waste Unit Waste & Quantity,

TPD Treatment Disposal

I Canteen 0.250 Compost Own Garden 2 Colony 0.600 Compost Factory farm

3 Sugar Unit

ETP sludge

0.42 ETP sludge Own garden

Oil & grease

0.10 Flotation Technique

Mixed with Bagasse & burnt

4 Co-gen Units (sugar)

Bagasse ash

31.12 mixed with PMC

As soil conditioner

5 Co-gen Units (sugar) Off season

Bagasse Ash

4.56 mixed with PMC

As soil conditioner

0:4 tti Page 33 of 61

Member Secretary ChairtfFan

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2"d July 2016

Hazardous Solid waste Industrial Unit

Type of waste & their qtv.

Category Disposal

1 Sugar Unit Wastes/ residue

containing oil — As and when generated

.34.4

Would be

mixed with Bagasse & burnt in boiler

26 Atmospheric Emissions (Flue gas characteristics SPM, 502, NOx, CO, etc.) Sr.

No Pollutant

Source of Emission

Emission rate (kg/hr)

Concentration in flue gas (8/m3)

1 SPM

Boiler stack

6.63 Negligible

2 SO2 0.83 Negligible

3 NOx --

27 Stack emission Details: (All the stacks attached to process units, Boilers, captive power plant, D.G. Sets, Incinerator both for existing and proposed activity). Please indicate the specific section to which the stack is attached. e.g.: Process section, D.G. Set, Boiler, Power Plant, incinerator etc. Emission rate (kg/hr.) for each pollutant (SPM, SO2, NOx etc. should be specified

Existing stack details -

Plant Section & units

Stack No.

Height from ground level(m)

Internal Diameter (Top) (m)

Emission on Rate (m/s)

Temp. of Exhaust Gases

Boiler (22 & 35 TPH)

1 70 3 15 150°C

D.G set (500 KVA x 2) 2

3.0 m (above roof level)

1.5 05 120°C

Expansion stack details-


Stack No.

Height from ground level(m)

Internal Diameter (Top) (m)

Emission Rate (m/s) Gases

Temp. of Exhaust

Boiler (70 & 35 TPH)

1 76 2.5 20 150°C

D.G set (750 KVA x 2) 2

3.0 m (above roof level)

1.8 10 120°C

28 Emission Standard Sr. No.

Pollutant Emission Standard Limit (gg/Nm3)

MPCB Consent

1 SPM 500 150 mg/Nm3

2 SO2 80 960 Kg/day


Chairman

130'h Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on 1" & 2nd July. 2016

29 Ambient Air Quality Data

Sr. No.

Pollutant Permissible Standard (.

n ng/ 3 m)

Baseline

Concentration at project

site (in pg/m3)

Remarks

1 PM10 100 62.5 Within limit 2 PM2 5 60 30.5 Within limit 3 SO2 80 9.6 Within l mit 4 NOx 80 15.8 Within limit 5 CO 4 0.281 --

30 Details of Fuel to be used:

Sr. No

Fuel Daily Consumption (TPD/KLD)

Calorific value (K cals/kg)

% Ash

% Sulphur

1. Bagasse Season-1557.12 Off season- 228

2200 2 0.1

2. Agro waste 9572 2000 18 0.02

3. Diesel 0.480 10,200 0.1 0.6

31 Energy Power supply: • power requirement: During season- 7.30 MW

Off-season- 0.65 MW DG sets: • Number and capacity of DG set to be used: 500 KVA x 2 No & 750 KVA x 2 No

32 Green Belt Development • Green belt area: 57182.08 Sq Mt. • Number and species of trees to be planted: Existing-

Common Name Botanical Names Quantity

Neem Azadirachta indica 250

Mango Mangifera Indica 175

Yellow Gulmohar Peltophorum pterocarpum 75

Bahava Cassia fistula 87

Jambhul Syzigium cum ni 36 Mob Madhuca Longifolia 77

Total 700

Proposed- Common Name Botanical Names Quantity

Sita Ashok Saraca Asoka 700

Apta Bauhinia racemosa 223

Palas Butea monosperma 100

Kadamb Anthocephallus cadamba 190 Ber Ziziphus mauritiana 100

Shivan Gmelina arborea 240

Shirish Albizia lebbeck 347

Maharukh Ailanthus excelsa 375

Karanj Pongamia pinnata 380

Katesavar Bombax ceiba 250

Fish tail palm Caryota urens 195

;(79ThAYL-tilivi


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2"d July, 2016

Nandruk Ficus retusa 200

SonSon chafa Mi Michelia champaca 200

Total 3500

• Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be Transplanted: NA

33 Details of Pollution Control Systems:

Sr. No.

Aspect Existing Pollution Control system

Proposed to be installed

1 Air

Boiler stack- Stack height with 70 m, Multi cyclone system DG stack- stack height with 3m above roof level

Boiler stack- Stack height with 76 m, ESP system. Bag filter to existing Multicyclone system DG stack- stack height with 3m above roof level

2 Water ETP & Septic tank followed by soak pit

ETP &STP

3 Noise

The Methodologies of isolation & separation, covering, insulation etc. are adopted in existing unit. Moreover the workers are provided with PPE

Same practice as that under existing operations shall observed

4 Solid Waste

Canteen, colony waste- composting & use as manure ETP sludge- use as manure Bagasse ash- Mixed with PMC & use as a soil conditioner Oil & grease- Mix with Bagasse & burnt

Same practice as that under existing operations shall observed


• Capital cost (With break up): 1126.05 lacs O&M cost (With break up): 86.1 lacs

Sr. No.

Particulars Capital Cost (Lacs)

Recurring Cost per annum (Lacs)

1 Air Pollution Control 600 30

2 Effluent Treatment Facility 450 35

3 Noise Pollution Control 1.05 0.10

4 Environment Monitoring & Management

25 1

5 Occupational Health -- 5

6 Green Belt Development 35 5

7 Rain Water Harvesting 15 --

8 CSR activity 10

Total 1126.05 86.1

)1C


130'h Meeting of Slate Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on July. 2016

35 EIA Submitted (If yes then submit the salient features)

Yes, E1A submitted on 29.4.2016 Period of Study from Feb 2015- April 2015 Primary data collected by A Lab approved by MoEF : New Delhi Secondary data collected from Indian Metrological Department, District Census Handbook published by census of India 2011 & Survey of India.


Conducted on 19.11.2015. Received Public hearing proceedings vide MPCB letter no. MPCB/RLP/TB Venue: - M/s. Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.

A/P- Bhavaninagar Tal- Indapur Dist-Pune Date & Time: - 19.11.2015 11:00 AM. Panel:- 2 Members. Members of Public: 65 No Chairmanship: - Shri Suresh Jadhav (Addl. District Magistrate-Pune)

37 Air pollution, water pollution issues in the project area, If any

NA

38 Storage of chemicals (inflammable/explosive/hazard ous/toxic substances)-

NA

The PP gave a detailed presentation of the EIA report of their project to expand the sugar manufacturing capacity from 3500 TCD to 6500 TCD along with the installation of 18 MW of co-generation plant. The project was considered under category 5(j)-B1 [for sugar industry] and 1(d)-B1 [for co-gen] under the schedule of the EIA Notification 2006.ToR was approved in the 95th meeting of the SEAC.


1. The baseline studies indicates that air, water, ground water, surface water and noise parameters were within prescribed limits even after the expansion.

2. In the 129th meeting, the Committee had expressed its concern about the exploitation of ground water and surface water associated with the expansion. PP explained that water requirement would be reduced by use of drip irrigation and that almost 50% of the project area had already been covered by drip irrigation. Prima facie, the plant is nearly doubling its capacity: it is therefore necessary that, the water requirement will also be nearly doubled. The Committee conducted that it was necessary that the entire sugar cane area under the sugar factory be brought under drip irrigation within a period of 1 year. In the light of this decision, the PP submitted the resolution of Board of Directors dated 19.6.2016. wherein the Board of Directors resolved to ensure the remaining 7000 acres to be brought under drip irrigation within a year. The Committee took a note of this undertaking that the remaining 7000 acre will be brought under drip irrigation. The Committee directed that the PP should submit 2 monthly progress report to the Environment Deptt. regarding implementation of drip irrigation scheme.

3. The PP intends to deploy 2 boilers of 70 TPH and 35 TPH, in addition to the existing 22 TPH and 35 TPH all based on bagasse. The PP has worked out stack height calculations which were verified by the Committee. For the existing boiler 70m stack height and for proposed boiler 76m stack height will be required. The existing boilers shall deploy multicyclone (70% efficiency) followed by bag filter (95% efficiency) to achieve a TPM of 34.5 mg/Nm3 and the proposed boilers, an ESP (99% efficiency) to achieve a TPM of 23.5 mg/Nm3. MPCB shall verify that air pollution controlling equipments have been installed before granting Consent to Operate.


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on / & 2nd July. 2016

4. The PP may create storage facility of 200m' capacity for storing fly ash for 7 days. 5. The Committee analyzed the generation/ utilization of bagasse and noted that the sugar

manufacturing shall generate 2.912 lakh MTA of bagasse as against a requirement of 2.52 MTA lakh (in crushing season) and 0.57 lakh MTA (off season), adding up to a total requirement of 3.09 MTA of bagasse. The Committee noted that the generation and requirement of bagasse were almost balanced, but insisted that all the boilers shall be run on bagasse generated in the plant itself and that under no circumstance fuel other than bagasse should be used.

6. The PP intends to increase the storage capacity for molasses by 10000 MT, to have a total storage capacity of 35000MT. The PP proposes to dispose of 6600 MT of molasses to distilleries situated within 50km of the factory. The Committee noted this and desired that under no circumstance shall molasses be discharged into the surrounding environment, which contingency shall result in cancellation of the EC.

7. The Committee went through the calculation of dyke wall geometrics and concluded that the size of dyke wall should be 56.6mx56.6mx1.5m for existing molasses tanks and 77.5m x77.5m x1.5 m for the proposed tanks. An extra area of 6000 sq.m has to be provided by PP either from existing plant area or from surrounding area for the proposed molasses tanks.

8. The PP submitted fire water calculation and it shows that the requirement of water will be 227 m3. The PP should provide fire water tank of 300 kI and pump of flow rate 136 m3/hr minimum. A diagram showing various hazard management facilities is depicted in the Annexure 13.1.

The Committee went through the all aspects of Environmental Impact and was satisfied that the impact would be within prescribed limits if the above prescriptions are faithfully followed. Therefore. the Committee decided to recommend the project for EC subject to the observations (1-8) above.

(p)V i tt j Li., Page 38 of 61


Item no. 14 M/s. Trichem Life sciences Ltd. Expansion in existing premises for manufacturing API and IC at plot no K-57, MIDC Tarapur, Pal. hat.

"Annexure 13.1"

YO SO SAFETY WATER PIPE LINE FOR FIRE •

PROTECTKM

LOCATION PLAN (EXISTING 3500 TCD +MODERNIZEDTO 6SDOTCD

18 MIN BAGASSE BASED CO GENERATOR PROJECT)

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee -1 held on r & 2"d July. 2016

The PP gave a detailed presentation of their project to expand manufacturing of APIs from 17.4 MT/IS\ to 143.8 MT/* The Committee considered the project under 5 (0-B1 category of EIA Notification 2006.


1. The following raw materials are not recommended for the process:

i. Nitromethane (CH3NO2) ii. Chloroform (CHCI3)

ii. Anthranilic Acid (C6H4(NH2)(CO2H))

iv. Sodium Methoxide (CH3ONa)

PP may suggest suitable alternatives to these raw materials.

2. PP intends to consume nearly 1.5 FSI. The Committee desired to see the elevation drawings

of the building so that aspects of floor height, location of staircases, and location of various hazard management facilities can be identified and understood.

0nIted Page 39 of 61 Member Secretary Chai n

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2"d Julv, 2016

3. The plant w ill be run as a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. The effluent management envisage the segregation of the total effluent of 28.31 CMD into high COD/TDS and low COD/TDS. The former will be treated through stripper, MEE and ATFD and latter will be subjected to the ETP. Domestic effluent will be sent to aeration tank of ETP. The Committee noted that PP also intends to deploy pre-treatment with H202, a details of which have not been furnished. A detailed scheme of effluent management shall be shown through a flow diagram. The Committee desired that Piperazine should be consumed fully and shall not be sent to the ETP.

4. 90% recovery of solvents shall be achieved. Details of recovery of solvents (solvent wise) should be tabulated and shown.

5. The PP intends to scrap the existing boiler of 600 kg/hr and deploy a new boiler of 1 TPH. Stack height of 30 meter shall be provided for the new Boiler which would use FO as a fuel. Stack height of 8.4 meter shall be provided for D.G Set of capacity 200KVA.

6. Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation studies were carried out by the PP. The Committee felt that hazard analysis for Epichlorohydrine has not been dealt with. Also contingencies of leakages of Chlorine and Sulphur need to be addressed. There is a contingency of off-site emergency and hazard management plan shall be shared with the District Administration.

The Committee went through the all aspects of Environmental Impact and noted that the baseline studies indicated that air, water, ground water, noise and soil parameters would remain well within prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project. For the compliance of observations (1-6) above the item was deferred.

Item no. 15 M/s. aSai Vishwa Speciality Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Mnf. Of bulk drugs of capacity 8375 MT/M at plot no N-6, Village Kasap, Addl MIDC Patalganga, Raigad.


I Name of the Project M/s. Asai Vishwa Specialty Chemicals Pvt.Ltd. 2 Name, address, e-mail &

contact number of Proponent

Name: Dr. Archis Yawalkar Address: Plot No. N-6 Addl. Patalganga MIDC.Village Kasap.Tal.- Panvel Dist.-Thane Telephone number : 022-41276501 Mobile number:- 9920410867 Email ID: draayleasaivishwa.com

3 Name of Consultant M/s S G M Corporate Consultant Pvt Ltd.

4 Accreditation of consultant (NABET Accreditation)

Yes

5 New Project / Expansion in existing project/ ModernizationfDiversifica lion in existing project

New Project

6 If Expansion/ Diversification, whether environmental clearance

NA

((•jil , Page 40 of 61

Member Secretary

Chairman

130th Meetin o State Level Exert A eraisal Committee - I held on Et & 211th Jul 2016

has been obtained for existing project (If yes, enclose a copy with compliance table)

7 Activity schedule in the ER Notification

5 (1) B As per EIA Notification 14th September 2006 and amendment in r December - 2009

8 Area Details Total plot area: 2390 Sq. mt. Built up area : 2000 Sq. mt. Green Belt Area : 395 Sq. mt. Open Area : 1195 Sq. mt. Parking Area : 287 Sq. mt.

9 Name of the Notified Industrial area/MIDC area

Plot No. N— 6, Addl. Patalganga MIDC, Tal.- Panvel Dist. — Raigad

10 TOR given by SEAC? (If yeas then specify the meeting)

Yes , in 115th meeting on 03/12/16.

11 Estimated capital cost of the Project (including cost for land, building, plant and machinery separately)

Rs. 8.50 Crs.

12 Location details of the project :

Latitude : 18°51'52.45"N Longitude: 73° 09' 45.79- E Location: Addl Patalganga MIDC

13 Distance from Protected Areas / Critically Polluted areas / Eco-sensitive areas / inter-State boundaries

NA

14 Production details # Product Name Capacity Existing Product

1 Assemble of Aerosol Valves 3,00,000 pcs/M

2 Filing and packing of Aerosol products 1.00,000 pcs/M

Proposed Product Capacity in MT/Month

1. Dorzolamide & its intermediates as 0.2 1.1 2-Bromothiophene 1.4 1.2 6-methy1-5,6-dihydro-4H-thieno[2.3-b]thiopyran-

4-one (Racemic DKS or Chiral DKS)

0.3

1.3 6-methyl-4-oxo-5,6-dihydro-4H-thieno[2.3- b]thiopyran-2-sulfonamide(Racemic or Chiral DZM5)

0.25

1.4 N-[(6-methyl-7,7-dioxido-2-sulfamoy1-5,6- dihydro-4H-thieno[2,3-b] thiopyran-4- yl]acetamide (Racemic or Chiral DZM7)

0.2

2. Brinzolamide & its intermediates as 0.05 2.1 2,5-Dichlorothiophene 0.45 2.2 2.5-Dichloro-3-acetylthiophene 0.45

0(t) tej vt,.


130th Meeting Qf State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on Er & 2nd Julv, 2016

2.3 3-(bromoacetyl)-5-chlorothiophene-2- sulfonamide (BZ3)

0.125

2.4 (4S)-4-hydroxy-2-(3-methoxypropy1)-3.4- dihydro-2H-thieno[3.2-e] [1.2]thiazine-6- sulfonamide 1,1-dioxide (BZ7)

0.045

3. 5-Chlorothiophene-2-carboxylic acid 0.1 4. Glimepiride & its intermediates as 0.3 4.1 3-ethyl-4-methyl-2-oxo-N-[2-(4-

sulfamoylphenyDethyl]-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrole-1-carboxamide (Glimepiride Sulfonamide)

0.3

5. Ezetemibe 0.05 6. Olmesartan 0.45 7. Clopidogrel & its intermediates as 1.250 7.1 6,7-dihydrothieno[3.2-c]pyridin-5(4H)-

yl(phenyl)acetonitrile 0.65

7.2 2-(6,7-dihydrothieno[3.2-c]pyridin-5(41-1)-y1)-2- phenylacetamide

0.60

8. Montelukast & its intermediates 0.25 8.1 1- {3-[(E)-2-(7-chloroquinol in-2-

ypethenyl]pheny1}-3-hydroxy-3-phenyl propyl benzoate

0.1

8.2 1-{3-[(E)-2-(7-chloroquinolin-2- yl)ethenyl]pheny11-342-(2-hydroxypropan-2- yOphenyl]-1-phenylpropan-l-ol

0.075

9. Atorvastatin & its intermediates 0.45 9.1 4-Methyl-3-oxo-N-phenyl-2-(phenylmethylene)

pentamide 0.18

9.2 4-Fluoro-[2-methyl-l-oxopropyl]-2-oxo-N- diphenyl benzene butane amide

0.15

Total : 8.375 MT/M


Level of the Ground water table: 20 Mt Size and no of RWH tank(s) and Quantity: 10 cum Location of the RWH tank(s): 10 cum Size, nos of recharge pits and Quantity: -NA Budgetary allocation (Capital cost and O&M cost):1.5 Lac.

16 Total Water Requirement Total water requirement 23.5 CMD Fresh water (CMD): 23.5 CMD & Source: MIDC Recycled water (CMD): 0 Use of the water: Domestic (CMD) : 2.0 CMD Process (CMD):14.5 CMD Cooling water (CMD):6.0 CMD DM Water (CMD): Nil Dust Suppression (CMD): Nil Cleaning (CMD): Included in Process water Green belt (CMD): 1.0 CMD Others (CMD): Nil

17 Storm water drainage Quantity of storm water : 0.3 cum/sec

QlitC j


---)LiaCha an

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee -1 held on & 2nd Julv. 2016

Size of SWD: 300 x 400 mm 18 Sewage generation and

treatment Amount of sewage generation (CMD): 1.5 CMD Treatment for the sewage: Septic Tank & over flow diverted into ETP

19 Effluent characteristic

# Parameters Inlet Treate d

Unit

pH 5 - 9 7 - 7.5 COD 3500 175 Mg/lit BOD 1450 45 Mg/lit Suspended solids 345 40 Mg/lit Oil & Grease 5 - 7 traces Mg/lit

20 ETP details Amount of effluent generation- 15.0 CMD Capacity of the ETP (CMD): 25 CMD Amount of treated effluent recycled (CMD):Nil Amount of water send to the CETP (CMD): 13.5 CMD Membership of the CETP (If require): Yes


ETP comprising of Primary ;Secondary up to Tertiary treatment


300 Kg/Month disposed to CHWTSDF at Taloja

23 Solid waste Management #. Source Qty (TPM)

Form (Sludge / Dry / Slurry etc.)

Compositi on

1 Waste Lube Oil 10 Ltrs/M Oil waste Oil 2 ETP sludge 0.3 MT/M Sludge Chemical 3 Distillation

Residue 0.75 MT/day

Liquid Chemical

4 Spent Solvent 1000 Litr/M

Liquid Chemicals

If waste(s) contain any hazardous/toxic substance/radioactive materials or heavy metals then provide quantity, disposal data and proposed precautionary measures. What are the possibilities of recovery and recycling of wastes :Nil Possible users of solid waste : nil Method of disposal of solid waste : Sent to CHWTSDF.

24 Atmospheric Emissions (Flue gas characteristics (SPM, SO2, NOx, CO. etc.)

Sr. No.

Pollutant Source Of Emission

Emission Rate (kg/Mg//hr)

Concentration in flue gas (g/m3)

1 TPM Boiler & DG Set 67 mg/Nm3 Below the limit 2 SO2 Boiler & DG Set 78 kg/day Below the limit

le07) tbi Page 43 of 61


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & 2nd July, 2016

25 Stack emission Details: (All the stacks attached to process units. Boilers. captive power plant, D.G. Sets, Incinerator both for existing and proposed activity). Please indicate the specific section to which the stack is attached. e.g.: Process section, D.G. Set, Boiler, Power Plant, incinerator etc.


Stac k No.

Height From ground level (m)

Internal Diameter (Top)(M)

Emissi on Rate m/s

Temp. of Exhaust Gases

Boiler 1 15 mtr 0.15 m 36 150 °C DG Set (125 KVA)

1 3.50 mtr 0.15 m 12 125 °C

Scrubber 3 3 mtr 0.15 8 Ambient

26 Emission Standard Sr. No.

Pollutant Emission Standard Limit

(PgiNm3)

MPCB Consent limit (mg/Nm3)

1 SPM 500 150 mg/Nm3 2 SO2 80 36 kg/day 3 NOx 80 - 4 CO 02

27 Ambient Air Quality Data Sr. No.

Pollutant (SPM, SOx)

Permissibl e Standard ( pg/m3)

Proposed Concentratio n (in pg/m3)

Remarks

1 SPM 500 0.30 Within limit 2 SO2 80 0.10 Within limit 3 NOx 80 0.80 Within limit 4 Hcl/Acid Mist 35 Traces Within limit 5 Ammonia 10 Traces Within limit

28 Details of Fuel to be used: S r

Fuel Daily Fuel Consumption (TPD/KLD)

Calorific value (Kcals/kg)

Ash Sulphur

1 LDO 1000 Litr/Day 10,700 0.03 0.50 2 HSD 300 Liter/day 10,500 0.03 0.5

Source of fuel : Local Mode of transportation of fuel to site: By Truck/Tanker

29 Energy Power supply : Total Power Requirement - 375 KVA Number and capacity DG sets to be used : 125 KVA Capacity

30 Green Belt Development Green belt area (Sq. m.): 395 Sq. M. Number and species of trees to be planted: Various types of Trees and Ornamental Plants will be planted Number, size, age and species of trees to be cut, trees to be transplanted —NA

31 Details of Pollution Control Systems: Sr. No. Particular Pollution Control System

1 Air Full-fledged Chimney and

"fin) t Page 44 of 61

Member Secretary Chair an

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & 2 July, 2016

Scrubber 2 Water ETP 3 Noise Acoustic enclosures 4 Solid Waste Directly send to CHWTSDF


Capital cost : 70.5 Lacs 0 & M cost : Rs 17.5 Lacs Per Annum

Sr. No.

Particular Recurring Cost per annum (Lacs)

Capital Cost (Lacs)

1 Air Pollution Control 04 08 2 Water Pollution Control 07 42 3 Noise Pollution Control 01 05 4 Environment Monitoring 02 -- 5 Occupational Health 02 10 6 Green Belt 0.5 1.5 7 Rain Water Harvesting 0.5 2.5 8 Solid waste management 0.5 1.0

Total 17.5 70.5 33 EIA Submitted (If yes

then submit the salient features)

Yes


NA

35 Air pollution, water pollution issues in the project area. If any

No Any

36. Storage of chemicals (inflammable/explosive/hazardous/toxic substances):Hazardous chemical

Name of

Chemicals

MOC Capacity

Liters

Remark Safety Feature

Acetone Drum 950 • Flame-proof light fittings provided. • Nitrogen blanketing. • Work permit system followed • All tanks provided with Lightening arrestor • Firefighting equipment provided as PPE used at the time of materia

handling. • Eye wash provided and first Aid box Will be provided in propose(

plant. • Earthling-bonding provided for static charge. • Drum handling trolley use for drum handling. • Identification Labels and symbols are provided on drums. • NFPA labels provided on tank farm. • Caution note provided. • Dyke wall provided for above ground storage tank.

Ethanol Drum 30

Ethyl acetate Drum 60

Heptane Drum 250

Is° Propyl

Alcohol

Drum 400

Methanol Drum 850

Page 45 of 61 Member Secretary ChaiM an

130" Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2nd July, 2016

" t-Butanol Drum 300 • Level gauge provided. • Double drain valve provided • Tanker unloading procedure. spark arrester on the silencer and

earthling facility are provided. • PPE's will be provided.

Toluene Drum 975

9 Xylene Drum 70

The PP gave a presentation of the EIA report for the manufacturing of bulk drugs of capacity 8.375 MT/M at their plot in the additional MIDC Patalganga. The project was considered under category 5ffi-B1 of the schedule of the ER Notification 2006.


1. The project site is presently vacant. The PP explained that there were no cross drainages across the property. Storm water management should ensure that the run-off from the plant premises is suitably lead into the CETP and not allowed to enter water bodies around the plant.

2. The effluent management envisages pre-treatment with H202 to reduce refractory organic compounds to bio-assimilatory COD. After pre-treatment, effluent will be sent to ETP. The PP intends to reduce COD from 3500mg/lit to 1000mg/lit and BOD from 1450 mg/lit to 600 mg/lit through this process. The Committee desires that this should be verified by the MPCB after commissioning of the project.

3. The solvent THF should be replaced by Methyl THF. More than 90% solvent recovery should be achieved. Unrecovered solvents shall be sold only to the vendors authorized by MPCB.

4. PP shall be deploying boiler of capacity 0.8 TPH; considering the small size of boiler, stack height shall be as prescribed by the CPCB. The TPM concentration at stack end should not exceed 100mg/Nm3.

5. PP should adopt rain water harvesting and a rainwater tank of 10 m3 shall be provided in the premises. Solar energy shall be harvested for illumination of plant premises.

6. A diagram showing various hazard management facilities is depicted as Annexure 15.1. Storage of hazardous chemicals should be done carefully with provision of gas detectors. These facilities shall be verified by MPCB before granting Consent to Operate.

The Committee went through the all aspects of Environmental Impact and noted that the baseline studies indicated that air, water, ground water, noise and soil parameters would remain well within prescribed limits even after commissioning of the project. The Committee therefore decided to recommend the project for EC subject to the observations (1-6) above.

g;))., cti Page 46 of 61


130'h Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2"d July, 2016

"Annexure 111"

Discussion item 1 Discussion on site visit reports:

1. M/s. Rajuri Steel Pvt. Ltd.

The Committee went through the site visit report (Annexure C) of M/s. Rajuri Steel Pvt. Ltd., Jalna presented by Shri. C.I.Sambutwad. The calculations submitted by the PP shows that the

total water availability considering the average rainfall of the region at the rate of 680mm/year would be 75600 m3 as against the requirement of 59000m3. The report and the observations may be taken up during the time of appraisal.

t'd L Page 47 of 61

115- Member Secretary Chairman

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on r & 2nd July, 2016

"Annexure C"

Visit report: M/s. 124tri Steel Pvt. Ltd. Zaino

Date- 21.6.2016

Pursuant to the decision taken by the SEAC-/ in its 128* meeting regarding verification of water storage capacity claimed by the PP, Stift C.I.Sambutwad, Member SEAC-I visited the water storage site of MIs. Rajuri Steel Pvt. Ltd. at F-12, Additional ?AMC Jalna on 21.6.2016.

VaitiRLSELthsigkerkal

During the discussion following Officers aid PP representatives were present:

L SRO Una, MPCB 2. Field Officer, MPCB 3. Junior Engineer, MIDC Jahn 4. PP Director

The Executive Engineer, MIDC was not present but his representative Junior Engineer was present. He couldn't able to answer about the consent. He said that information will be given with one hour but he had not submitted the information.

Visit to the sits:

Representative of PP shown two earthen buds on their private land. The distance between the two buds is 100m. The length of each bund is more than 200m with still way. The average height of the bund is 6m. The PP submitted that the average depth for storage of water is seems to be 2 to 2.5m. So there are two storages of 200m x 100m and 200m x 100m. There are two wells of 15m diameter in each submerges. The drawing of earthen bund, its catchment area and discharge calculations, 3 years rainfall data were submitted by the PP during site visit are enclosed herewith, in which the average rainfall of Jalna is around 680mm.

Member, SEAL-I

2. MIs. 1ndychem industries

The Committee went through the visit report (Annexure D) of the sub-committee. The Committee noted the observations of the sub-committee that since the PP was not willing to achieve ZLD, it would be difficult to consider the project for EC. The visit report may be taken up at the time of appraisal.

Page 48 of 61

#11—Ab Member Secretary

Chairman

T.C.Berklatnin Bhaskar Thorat

130" Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on Et & 2"d Julv, 2016

"Annexure D"

Visit report: M/s. Indycheon Industries, MIDC Taloja

Date- 23.6.2016

Pursuant to the decision taken in the 129* meeting, the sub-committee comprising of following members visited the site on 23.6.2016:

I. Shri. T.C.Benjamin, Chairman Prof.(Dr.) lithaskor Thorat, Member

M. Prof. (Dr.) Ramesh Dod, Member

The sub-committee made the following observations:

1. The proposed project involves manufacturing of synthetic organic dyes to the extent of 155 MT/M comprising of powder dyes, liquid dyes 6 blending of dyes. The sub-committee observed that the PP had obtained Consent to Operate for mixing and blending of dyestuff in year 2014.

2. The sub-committee observed that The PP has already constructed factory building, two reactors and ETP within factory premises. The PP explained that these developments were carried out for mixing and blending activities only and not for present proposal which requires EC.

3. The project will generate 25 at of liquid effluents. PP intends to send the effluents to CETP. However, SRO AVM informed that capacity of CETP is saturated and it cannot accept any more hydraulic load. PP produced no objection certificate from MD of CETP Association dated 2.62016 stating that there is no objection to accept additional quantity of 25 CIADa _ rin CELThe SR9LAWCS should investigate how such certificate is given and silQ. clarification Is) MD of CETP Association for further discussion. The sub-committee pointed out that new industries or expansion of inckistries should not be allowed in the MIDCs where the CETPs are saturated. Therefore the PP is advised to go for a Zero Liquid Discharge Process. PP finds practical difficulties for Zero Liquid Discharge Process. Under these cat-instances it will be difficult to recommend the project for EC.

qv) tit')


Chairman

130th Meetin_ o State Level Ex ert A• raisal Committee -1 held on & 2nd July. 2016

Discussion item 2 List of Irrigation Projects which were held up on account of alleged

violation and where proposed directions were withdrawn

This Committee had, during the course of the past 2 years. referred 65 cases of Irrigation projects to

Environment Deptt. to verify the issue of violation of Environment (Protection) Act 1986 riw EIA Notification 2006. The said list of 65 cases is given in Annexure E.

The Committee noted that the Principal Secretary. Environment Deptt., GoM had issued proposed directions to PPs of these projects and obtained their reply. On the basis of these replies the Principal

Secretary, Environment Deptt. GoM vide letters dated 22.2.2016 had concluded that there were no

cases of violations as prescribed in the EIA Notification 2006 (amended in 2014) and had withdrawn

the proposed directions. The Committee noted that the above mentioned Notification 25.6.2014

prescribes that 'B' category projects (less than 2000 ha Cultural Command Area) are not required to obtain prior EC from the SEIAA, subject to the provision that General Conditions shall apply.

Principal Secretary, Environment Deptt has verified in each of 65 cases mentioned above that Cultural

Command Area of the concerned projects is less than 2000 ha.

The Committee deliberated on the issue at length and decided that in the light of conclusion drawn by Principal Secretary, Environment Deptt., GoM, the projects shown in Annexure C (65 in total) may be delisted since they do not require prior EC under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.


130th Meeting of Stale Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on l' t & 2nd July. 2016

"Annexure E"

List of irrigation Projects which were held up on account of alleged violation and where Proposed Directions were withdrawn

Sr. No

Name and address of Proponent Proposal and its location

1 The Executive Engineer, Ws Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur (Karanjgaon MI Project) Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed ICaranjgaon M. I. Project located at Village Karajgaon, Tal. Chandur Bazaar,

Dist. Amravati.

2 The Executive Engineer, Ws Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur (Waghadi Barrage Project) Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Waghadi Barrage Project located on Village Waghadi, Tal Daryapur, Dist Amaravati.

3 The Executive Engineer, MJs Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur (Pak River Project) Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Pak River Project located on Village Warud, Tal Warud, Dist Amaravati.

4 M/s Vidarbba Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan. Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Ukali, Ukali Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist-Washim

5 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Tanka, Tanka Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist-Washim


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Songavhan, Songavhan Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist- Washim

7 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur L, .„,,_,;::} .--Lait,tenganga

Proposed construction of barrage river at Dhilli, Dhilli

"1-Cirman Member Secretary Page 51 of 61

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on I" & 2nd July. 2016

Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist-Washim


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Jaypur, Jaypur Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Warud, Warud Barrage, Tal. Risod Dist-Washim

10 M/s Vidarbba Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur

Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Jumada, Jumada Barrage, Tat. Washim Dist- Washim

Sinrhan Bhavan, Irrigation Dwat talent, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Kokalgaon, Kokalgaon Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Adgaon, Adgalon Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist- Washim

13 Nth Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Ganeshpur, Ganeshpur Barrage, TM. Washim Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of barrage at Penganga river at Rajgaon, Rajgaon Barrage, Tal. Washim Dist- Washim

15 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur

Proposed Wai storage M.I. Tank, Village Wai, Tal. Murtijapur

4 Chairman Member Secretary

Page 52 of 61

130" Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & July. 2016

•

Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines , Nagpur 440 001

16 MIs Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Kawathe Barrage (Storage) project village Kawathe, Taq. Balapur, Akola

17

•

M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Naya Andura (Karanja Ranjapur) Storage M.I. Tank project village Naya Andura Taq. Balapur Akola

18

6

M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Sukali Storage M.I. tank project village Sukali Taq. Akola Dist- Akola


Proposed Shahapur L.M. I tank project village Shahapur, Taq. Akot Dist- Akola

20 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bbavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Darn Kawthal M.I. Tank Tal. Mangrulpir, Dist- Washim

21 MA Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed Earth work of Darn Jogaldari (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Mangrulpir, Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Dastapur (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Mangrulpir, Washim

23 Mis Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur

Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Swasin M.I. Tank Tal. Mangrulpir, Dist- Washim


p

130th Meeting of State Level Expert A praisal Committee -1 held on 1" & 2nd July. 2016


24 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpnr Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Darn Kasola (Storage) M.I. Tank Tat. Mangrulpir, Dist-Washim


Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Shelu Khurd (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Washim, Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Chorad (storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Washim, Dist-Washim

27 Ws Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpnr Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Jam= Sonwal (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Washim, Dist- Washim

28 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. NaffPur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Sarsi Both 2 (Storage) M.I. Tank Tel. Mangrulpir, Dist- Washim


Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Bramha (storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Washim, Dist-Washim

30 Ws Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Shaven, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Darn Hiwara (Khurd) (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Manora, Dist- Washim

31 M/s Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpnr

Proposed construction of Earth work of Dam Chanhai (storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Mangrulpir, Dist-Washim


Chai n

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on lst & 2nd July 2016



Proposed construction of Earth work of Baggi (storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Karanja, Dist- Washitn


Proposed construction of Earth work of Belmandal (Storage) M.I. Tank Tal. Karanja, Dist- Washim

34 Ws Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corp. Nagpur Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001

Proposed construction of Earth work of Khadaki (storage), M.I. Tank Tal Malegaon, that-Washim

35 M/s. Amravati litigation Division ion : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Aniravati, Upper Wardba colony, Panchawati, Aniravati, Maharashtra, India 444 603 tn Office - 0721-2662148 Fax: 0721-2662315

Proposed construction of Earthen dam,Spill way Tail channel, Diversion weir feeder channel and Head regulator of ChandosWathoda at Village Chandas Tal Warud

36 51/s. Vidarbha irrigation Dev. Corp. Nagpnr : SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749;2560347, 2565309 Email: vielc@dataone in,[email protected]

Gaiwal (storage) M. I.Tank Construction of Earth Work of Darn Head Regulator Waste weir Approach & tail channel and allied structures near Village GaiwalTaq.KarnajaWashim

37 M I s. Vidarbha Irrigation Dev. Corp. Nagpnr : SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcAdataone.in,[email protected]

Construction of Earth Work of Dam Head Regulator Waste weir Approach & tail channel and allied structures near Village Yeola Taq.KamajaWashim

38 M/s. Vidarbha Irrigation Dev. Corp. Nagpur SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidaMdataone.in,adminavidc.in

: ParvaKohar M I Tank Construction of Earth Work of Dam Head Regulator Waste weir Approach & tail channel and allied structures near Village ParvaKoharTaqXamajaWashim Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir,

39 %Mad LMI Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Amravati,


130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on I" & 2nd July, 2016

Upper Wardha colony, Panchawati, Amravati, Maharashtra, India 444 603 cewrdat .Se in Office - 0721-2662148 Fax: 0721-2662315

40 Wadiliaitala LMI Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Amravati, Upper Wardha colony, Panchawati, Amravati, Maharashtra, India 444 603 ceividannein Office - 0721-2662148 Fax: 0721-2662315

41 Koyali LIKI Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Anravati, Upper Wardha colony, ninchawati, Anuavati, Maharashtra, India 444 603

Office - 0721-2662148 Far 07214662315

42 amiable& LMI Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Ammvati, Upper Wraith& colony, Panchawati, Amravati, Maharashtra, India 444603 gmelligallirdliEmt Office - 0721-2662148 Fax 07214662315

43 Mairaideb(Storage) LMI Tank : Chief Fitter Water Resources Development Anuavati, Upper Ward)** colony, Panchawati, Ammvali, Maharashtra, India 444 603 gliSIEllillligki Office - 0721-2662148 Fax 0721-2662315

44 Mirzapor(Storne) MI Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resources Development Amravati, Upper Wardha colony, Panchawati, Anuavati, Maharashtra, India 444 603 ceviedaroteclataonein

Office -0721-2682148 Fax: 0721-2662315

45 11.alussa(Storage) Ml Tank : Chief Engineer, Water Resoumes Development Amravati, Upper Wardha colony, Panchawati, Amnia* Maharashtra, India 444 603 cevordambadataone in Office -'0721-2682148 Fax 0221-2662315

approach and tail channel and allied structures, Tq.Risod, Dist. Washim

Construction of earth work of darn, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structures, Tq.Risod. Dist Washim

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structures, Tq.Risod, Dist. Washim

Construction of earth work of dam. head regulator, west weir. approach and tail channel and allied structures. Tqadalegaon, Dist. Washim

Construction of earth work of darn, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structures, Tq.Malegaort, Dist Washim

Construction of earth work of dam, had regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structures, TqMalegaori, Dist Washim

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, net weir. approach and tail channel and allied struenues, TqA4alegaon. Dist. WasluM

(79


Chairman

1306 Meeting of Stale Level Expert Appraisal Committee - I held on & 2"" July, 2016

46 Item:03 M/s. Buldhana Irrigation Division. SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcigdataone.in,adminavidc.in

Proposed construction of earthen'. dam, waste weir & allied work of Warwand M.1 storage tank. Tal Buldhana, Buldhana

47 Item:04 M/s. Buldbana Irrigation Division: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: yitakkgannesinAmillgaiskjn

Proposed construction of earthen dam, waste weir & allied work of Dongarshewali M.I storage tank. Tal ChikaliBuldhana

48 Itent:05 M/s. Buldhana Irrigation Division: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone; (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcfgdataonSachningyidc.in

Proposed construction of earthen dam, waste weir & allied work of Rahera M.I storage tank. Tal MotalaBuldhana

49 Itent:06 Wit. Baidbana Irrigation Division: Sinchmillhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: videtadataone.in,adminavidc.in

Proposed construction of =them dam, waste weir & allied work of Borichedi M.I storage tank. Tal LonarBuldhana

50 itesn:07 Ws. Buldhana Irrigation Division: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcfthdataorte.irbadminevidc.in

Proposed construction of earthern dam, waste weir & allied work of Hirdav M.I storage tank. Tal LonarBuldhana.

51 Item:09 Ws. Blikihans Irrigation Division: Sinr-hanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712)2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcadataone.imadminQvidOn

Proposed construction of earthen dam, bead regulator waste weir & allied work of Lonveadi M.I storage tank. TM NanduraBuidhana.

52 Item:I0Wara (Jab) LMI Project: SinchanShavan, litigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcadataone.intadminfavidc,in

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structurres. Tq.Washim, Dist. Washim

53 Item:11Pangrabandi LMI Tank: SinchanShavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcadataone.iikadminevidc.in

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structurres. Tg.Malegaon, Dist. Washim.

54 Item:12Arakebinehrria LMI Project: SinchanEthavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidc@dataonsin,atirnitt&idc.in

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structurres. TgMangrulpir, Dist. Washim.


Chairman

130'h Meeting qf State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on & 2"d July, 2016

55 Item:14 Palaskhed MI Tank: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcadataone.imdmina.vidc.in

Construction of earth work of dam, head regulator, west weir, approach and tail channel and allied structurres.Tq.Risod, Dist. Washim

56 Item:15 DHAMANI (Storage )M.LTank:, SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: videdataone.in,adminavidc: ,

Construction of Earth WORK OF Dam ,Head Regulator, Waste weir, Approach & Tail channel and allied structure Tq. Karnaja Distt. WASHIM

57 Item:17 GONDEGAON (Storage ) ALLTank: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email:

Construction of Earth WORK OF Dam ,Head Regulator, Waste weir, Approach & Tail channel and allied structure Tq.Manora, WASHIM

58 Item no. 39 Vidarblia 1rrigadon Development HIRABAMBAI M I TANK, Construction of earthen dant, Waste Weir, Tail Channel & Head Regulator, Tq.Dhami

Corp. Nagpur: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcdadataone.in.admintkvidc.in

59 Item so. 41 Vldarbba Irriptios Development Kamm Nala Project, Tortharni, Amman. Construction amid= dam, spilhvay, Tail Charm& • Head Regulator of Kawara Nth (LW) Project Comd area 1330 ha

Corp. Namur:. SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcgdataone.in,adminpvidc.in

60 item so. 42 Vidarbha 1rrigadoa Dev. Corp Kupta (Storage) M I Tank,

Tn. %MOM Washint. Construction of eat work dam, Head Regulator, waste weir, Approach & Tail Channel and allied ;works.

Nagpar, Amravati Region Sinchanahavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Magpie 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcedataone.in,admintavIdclo

61 Magna Vidarbba Irrigation Dev.Corp Nagpar, Amravati Region SinclumBlutvan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcfsdataone.in.admi0eq4cain

Kiniched (Storage) M I Tank, TqlCaranja, Dist. Washim. Construction of earthvvork dam, Head Regulator,veasteweir,Approach & Tail Chrumel&auied structures

62 item so. 47 Vidarbha Irrigation Dev.Corp. Wadgaoa (Storage) M I Tank, TqlCaranja, Dist. Washim. Consauction of art work dam, Head Regulator, waste weir, Approach & Tail Channel and allied structures.

Nagpur, Amravad Region: SinchanBhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur 440 001 Phone: (0091-712) 2560749, 2560347, 2565309 Email: vidcodataone1n.adminevidc.in

63 Tke Managing Director, M/a Minor Irrigation Division, Vidbarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Sinchan Shaven, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur — 440 001.

proposed Ar-ICacheri Lager Mmor Irrigation Project in Mama District of Maharashtra

Cc,/ Lein


The Managing Director, Mis Minor Irrigation Division, Vidharbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Sinchan Bhavan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur — 440 001.

The Managing Director, My Minor Irrigation Division, Vidharbba Irrigation Development Corporation, Sinchan Mayan, Irrigation Department, Civil Lines, Nagpur — 440 001.

65

64 proposed Lower Dnyanganga_ll larger Minor Irrigation Project in Buldhana District of Maharashtra

for proposed Alewadi Larger Minor Irrigation Project in Buldhana District of Maharashtra.

Discussion item 3 Proposed site visits


130m Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held on 1" & 2nd July, 2016

The Committee decided to visit the following sites scheduled as follows:

On 6.7.2016- M/s. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Shendra MIDC, Aurangabad

On 7.7.2016- M/s. Satellite Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Paithan MIDC, Aurangabad

Following members will visit the sites:

1. Shri. T. C. Benjamin. Chairman 2. Prof. (Dr.) Ramesh Dod, Member 3. Shri. Madan Kulkarni. Member 4. Shri. C. I. Sambutwad, Member

130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee - 1 held 0I1 & 2i" July, 2016

"Annexure A"

The Specific and General conditions applicable for Minin0 of Stone:

Specific conditions:

1. Provisions stipulated in Maharashtra Minor Minerals Extraction (development and Regulation) Rules 2013 shall be strictly adhered to.

2. District Collector and District Mining officer will be held responsible personally for non-compliance of the conditions stipulated in the Environmental clearance and shall be liable for legal action under Environment (Protection) Act of 1986.

3. District Collector will take bank guarantee of Rs. 2.00,000/- OR upto 2% of the annual royalty, whichever is higher, for the given lease from the lease holder to ensure the compliance of the conditions stipulated. In case of violation of stipulated conditions by project proponent bank guarantee so obtained shall be forfeited and legal action under the law should be initiated against such project proponent.

4. It shall be ensured that there is no fauna dependent on the areas close to mining for its nesting.

5. To prevent dust / particulate matter pollution, the lease holder shall take up tree plantation in an area 10 m from the boundary of the leased area and also on either side of the road leading to the quarry from the already surfaced road.

6. District Collector and Project proponent to ensure that there is no violation of the Supreme Court order given in related matters.

7. District Collector shall prepare closure plan and get it approved by the competent authority for all abandoned mines in the District.

General conditions: 1. Precise mining area will be jointly demarcated at site by officials of Mining/Revenue

department prior to mining operations for all proposals under consideration. Such site plan, duly verified by competent authority shall be submitted to Environment Department.

2. All necessary statutory clearances shall be obtained before start of mining operations. 3. Mining / loading shall be limited to day hours' time only. The quarrying / loading shall not

be done during night hours. 4. No mining shall be carried out in the safety zone of any bridge and/or embankment. 5. No mining shall be carried out in the vicinity of natural/ manmade archeological sites. 6. The lease holder shall obtain necessary prior permission of the competent authorities for

drawl of requisite quantity of water (surface water and groundwater), if required for the project.

7. Waste water, if any, shall be properly collected and treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed by MoEF/CPCB.

8. No wildlife habitat will be infringed. 9. Where, the quarrying is in a hilly terrain hill cutting shall be allowed only in the recharge

zone to be identified by the officials of GSDA. 10. Environmental clearance is subject to obtaining clearance under the Wildlife (Protection)

Act, 1972 from the competent authority, if applicable to this project. 11. Green belt development shall be carried out considering CPCB guidelines including

selection of plant species in consultation with the local DFO/Horticulture Officer. 12. Parking of vehicles should not be made on public places. 13. Transportation of materials shall be done by covering the trucks / tractors with tarpaulin or

other suitable mechanism so that no spillage of mineral/dust takes place. 14. Appropriate mitigation measures shall be taken to prevent any kind of pollution in

consultation with the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. It shall be ensured that there is no leakage of oil and grease from the vehicles used for transportation.

15. Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through the covered trucks only and the vehicles carrying

Chaff Page 60 of 61

Member Secretary

130" Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee -1 held on 1" & 2nd July. 2016

the mineral shall not be overloaded. 16. Special Measures shall be adopted to prevent the nearby settlements from the impacts of

mining activities. Maintenance of roads through which transportation of minor minerals is to be undertaken, shall be carried-out regularly.

17. Dispensary facilities for first-aid shall be provided at site. 18. Occupational health surveillance program of the workers should be undertaken

periodically. 19. Provision shall be made for housing the workers at site, if required, with all necessary

infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, safe drinking water, medical health care and sanitation etc.

20. Ambient air quality will be monitored at the site and the nearest habitation in the months of January. April and November. Ambient air quality at the boundary of the precise mining area shall conform to the norms prescribed by MoEF, 001.

21. Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels to the limits prescribed by CPCB. 22. An Environmental Audit shall be annually carried out during the operational phase and be

submitted to the Environment Department. 23. Digital processing of the entire lease area in the district using remote sensing technique

shall be done regularly once in three years for monitoring and report submitted to the Environment Department. The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise expenditure on environmental protection measures shall be reported to the Regional Office, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Bhopal.

24. Revenue Authorities shall submit within 3 months their policy of (i) Standard operating process/ procedure to bring into focus any infringement/deviation /violation of environmental norms /conditions, (ii) Hierarchical system or Administrative order to deal with environmental issues and to ensure compliance of EC conditions and (iii) System of reporting of non-compliance /violation of environmental norms to the District collector.

25. The Mining officer shall submit six monthly reports in hard and soft copy on the status of compliance of the stipulated environmental clearance conditions including results of monitored data (both in hard & soft copies) to the Environment Department, and the District Collector and the respective Regional Office of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board.

26. Any change in mining area, khasra /Gat numbers, entailing capacity addition with change in process and or mining technology, modernization and scope of working shall again require prior Environmental Clearance as per provisions of EIA Notification, 2006 (as amended).

27. SEAC-I has appraised the proposals on the basis of information submitted by concerned District Mining Officer. Mining Officer shall submit the list of blocks satisfying conditions stipulated above to Revenue & Environment dept. The list of blocks and conditions stipulated above shall be made available in public domain. It should be published in two local language newspapers and displayed at each block where mining operation is proposed. District mining officer should ensure this and submit compliance report to Environment department with approval from Collector.

=0=

n:Alu-J1-21-)

r1/4-3 Member Secretary Chairman

Page 61 of 61

Documents

The 130th Meeting of State Level Expert Appraisal ... SEAC-I MOM.pdf · The proposal was considered under category l(a)-B2 of the schedule of EIA Notification 2006. ... Ta iltin Dadamar0