10
Thailand Core Country Team: Members Affiliations Ms. Piamchan Doungmanee National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA) Ms. Jirapa Trochim Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE) Mr. Lertchai Srianant Royal Irrigation Department (RID) Ms. Anupit Supnithadnaporn (Focal Point) Office of National Economic & Social Development Board (NESDB) Assoc. Prof. Niramol Thammasat University

Thailand

  • Upload
    roden

  • View
    28

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Thailand. Core Country Team:. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Water Project. Project Name: The Phitsanulok Left Irrigation System Project, Phase II Funding Source: Royal Thai Government Project Leader: Royal Irrigation Dept., Ministry of Agriculture & Agriculture Cooperatives - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Thailand

ThailandCore Country Team:

Members AffiliationsMs. Piamchan Doungmanee National Institute of Development

Administration (NIDA)

Ms. Jirapa Trochim Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE)

Mr. Lertchai Srianant Royal Irrigation Department (RID)

Ms. Anupit Supnithadnaporn(Focal Point)

Office of National Economic & Social Development Board (NESDB)

Assoc. Prof. Niramol Suthamakit (Mentor)

Thammasat University

Page 2: Thailand

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Water ProjectCost-Benefit Analysis: Water Project• Project Name: The Phitsanulok Left Irrigation

System Project, Phase II • Funding Source: Royal Thai Government• Project Leader: Royal Irrigation Dept., Ministry of

Agriculture & Agriculture Cooperatives• Project Status: Completed feasibility study in 2010• Total project investment: 323 million $ US• Project Objectives:

o Outputs: (1) Irrigation canals; (2) Drainage systems; (3) Dikes along Nan River

o Expected Outcomes: (1) Increase irrigation area and cropping frequency; (2) Provide water supply, (3) Protect and mitigate flood

04/20/23 2UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case

Page 3: Thailand

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Water ProjectCost-Benefit Analysis: Water Project

04/20/23 3UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case

Costs Existing Project w/o CC

Existing Project w/ CC – No Adaptation

Project w/ CC & Adaptation

Construction costs $ X1 $ X1 >> $ X1

Large main irrigation cannels

??

Small peripheral irrigation cannels

Drainage system

Dikes along Nan River

Maintenance costs $ X2 >> X2 >> $ X2

Compensation for land owner (expropriation)

$ X3 $ X3 >> $ X3 (more land needed)

Environmental impact mitigation costs

$ X4 $ X4 >> $ X4

Wetter Future Scenario

Page 4: Thailand

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Water ProjectCost-Benefit Analysis: Water Project

04/20/23 4UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case

Benefits Existing Project w/o CC

Existing Project w/ CC – No Adaptation

Project w/ CC & Adaptation

Crop Production Improvement

$ Y1 << $ Y1 $ Y1

Fruit Production Improvement

$ Y2 << $ Y2 $ Y2

Increased Ground Water $ Y3 << $ Y3 $ Y3

Increased Fishery $ Y4 ?? $ Y4 ?? Y4

Income from Tourism $ Y5 ?? $ 5 ?? Y5

Wetter Future Scenario

Page 5: Thailand

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Water ProjectCost-Benefit Analysis: Water Project

What next?What next?

•Consult with climate scientists

– Identify most likely climate scenario in the next 30

– 60 yrs at the project sites

•Consult with water resource engineers

– Identify proper alternatives for CC adaptation

– Get estimates of the costs of those alternatives

04/20/23 5UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case

Page 6: Thailand

Cost-Benefit Analysis in Agriculture

The economic cost-benefit analysis of alternative rice growing technique

Page 7: Thailand

• Title: The economic cost-benefit analysis of alternative rice growing technique

• Objective:– To evaluate the cost and benefit of alternative of rice

growing technique at the farm level• Geographic scope of the project: – Irrigated area in central region

• Actions on the ground/Alternatives:– Broadcasting– Manual parachuting – Rice transplanters

04/20/23 UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case 7

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Agriculture ProjectCost-Benefit Analysis: Agriculture Project

Page 8: Thailand

Parachuting vs Rice Transplanter

04/20/23 UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case 8

Page 9: Thailand

Cost-BenefitCosts Benefits

Material and other expenditure B1. Yield (output per rai)C1 Seed B2. Income generated from the investment

= (Price x Output) – (Expenditure)C2 Fertilizer B3. Environmental benefits from saving C3 Herbicide/insecticide - fertilizerC4 Fuel and electricity - herbicide/insecticide C5 Water - waterCost of labor in - greenhouse gases emissionC6 Land preparation B4. Health benefits from savingC7 Planting (transplanting using labor/machine and parachute)

- fertilizer

C8 Maintenance - herbicide/insecticide C9 Harvest Cost of equipment and investment C10 Equipment C11 Investment (e.g. land preparation) Land rent04/20/23 UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA:

Thailand Case 9

Page 10: Thailand

Next Step

• To explore possible government supporting measures– Low interest loan for buying transplanting

machine– Buying transplanting machine for community

04/20/23 UNDP-USAID Capacity Building on ECCA: Thailand Case 10