14
1 TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST TO CITIES 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 202.879.4022 [email protected] www.spiegelmcd.c om by Tillman L. Lay 2011 National League of Cities Congressional City Conference ITC Steering Committee Meeting March 13, 2011

TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST TO CITIES

  • Upload
    elwyn

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036. 202.879.4022 [email protected]. www.spiegelmcd.com. TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST TO CITIES. 2011 National League of Cities Congressional City Conference ITC Steering Committee Meeting March 13, 2011. by Tillman L. Lay. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

1

TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST TO CITIES

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036

[email protected]

www.spiegelmcd.com

by

Tillman L. Lay

2011 National League of CitiesCongressional City ConferenceITC Steering Committee Meeting

March 13, 2011

Page 2: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

2

RIGHT-OF-WAY ISSUES

I. RIGHT-OF-WAY ISSUES.

A. FCC Level 3 proceeding.

B. Forthcoming FCC NOI on ROW Issues – likely adopted at April 7 meeting.

Likely to be very unfavorable to local governments.

C. FCC’s proposed “ROW Task Force” in NBP has been supplanted by industry-dominated Technical Advisory Committee.

Page 3: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

3

TELECOM TAX-RELATED ISSUES

II. TELECOM TAX-RELATED ISSUES.A. More GOP-dominated Congress increases the risk of enactment of

federal legislation preempting state and local telecom tax authority.

B. Possible legislation -

1. Making ITFA permanent.

2. Cell tax moratorium legislation.

3. Digital goods and services tax “fairness” legislation.

4. More general telecom tax “reform” legislation.

5. SSTP legislation.

6. DBS tax preemption legislation.

7. BAT legislation.

Page 4: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

4

FCC CELL TOWER “SHOT CLOCK”

RULING

III. WIRELESS SITING

A. Appeal of FCC “Shot Clock” Ruling pending in 5th Circuit.

Argument likely in Spring 2011.

Decision by year-end.

B. Outcome is important not only for local zoning authority, but also for §253 ROW authority. If FCC’s cell tower “shot clock” ruling is allowed to stand, that opens the door wider for adverse ruling in Level 3 proceeding and forthcoming FCC ROW NOI proceeding.

C. Forthcoming Hutchison wireless legislation may couple D Block reallocation to public safety (good) with further preemption of local cell siting authority (bad).

Page 5: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

5

D-BLOCK

IV.700 MHz PUBLIC SAFETY BROADBAND.

A. THE FCC.

Current law provides for D-block re-auction, but FCC will wait for Congress.

Pending FCC rulemaking on 700 MHz Interoperability and Technical Requirements.

B. THE HILL.

Possible reallocation of D-block to public safety … or not.

Funding remains a question mark.

Page 6: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

6

PEG ISSUES

V. PEG ISSUES.

A. The FCC.

ACM Petition (DN 09-13)

Comcast – NBCU merger conditions (see above).

Page 7: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

7

PEG ISSUES (cont’d)

B. The Hill.

CAP Act redux – bill would:

► Allow PEG fees to be used for any PEG-related purposes without being offset against the 5% franchise fee.

► Require PEG channels to be carried in the same manner, functionality, accessibility and quality as local broadcast channels.

► Require the FCC to study the effect that new state video franchise laws have had on PEG channels, and require operators to provide the greater of (i) the support required under those new state laws, or (ii) the support historically provided to PEG under local franchising.

► Make cable television-related laws and regulations applicable to all landline video service providers.

Page 8: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

8

VI.NET NEUTRALITY/OPEN INTERNET.

A. FCC Rulemaking (DN 09-191).

1. Order adopted at 12/21/10 FCC open meeting.

2. Requirements:

a) For Landline - Transparency. No blocking of lawful content and connection of

non-harmful devices.

Net Neutrality/Open Internet

Page 9: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

9

Net Neutrality/Open Internet (cont’d)

No unreasonable discrimination (much is buried in “unreasonable”).

Allow reasonable network management (case-by-case), including usage-based pricing.

b) For Wireless - Transparency. No blocking.

3. FCC relied on Title I (ancillary) authority rather than reclassification under Title II (a shift from the FCC’s initial “3rd Way’’ proposal).

4. Two GOP Commissioners dissented.

Page 10: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

10

Net Neutrality/Open Internet (cont’d)

B. Court Appeal.

Certain.

C. The Hill.

Oversight hearings.

Resolution overturning ruling has been introduced; passage possible, but veto almost certain.

House-passed Continuing Resolution would de-fund FCC efforts to enforce or implement the Ruling; what Senate will do is unclear.

Legislation overturning FCC decision and amending Act has been introduced; enactment prospects less clear.

Page 11: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

11

COMCAST – NBCU MERGER

VII. COMCAST – NBCU MERGER (DN 10-56).

A. FCC Approved with Conditions on 1/20/11.

B. PEG conditions – less than what PEG interests sought, but more than what Comcast offered.

► Absent a locality’s consent, Comcast won’t migrate PEG to digital until system goes all digital.

► If moved to digital, PEG must be carried on a tier that reaches 85% of subscribers.

Page 12: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

12

COMCAST – NBCU MERGER (cont’d)

► Comcast cannot implement a change in PEG that results in material degradation of signal quality or viewer reception of PEG vis-à-vis broadcast channels.

► Comcast will conduct PEG VOD/Online trials in 5 markets (Fresno, CA; Hialeah, FL; Peterborough, NH; Philadelphia, PA; and Houston, TX).

Other conditions.

► Competing MVPD and ISP access to Comcast/NBCU programming.

► Online video.► Unaffiliated programmer access to Comcast platforms.

Page 13: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

13

FCC POLE ATTACHMENT PROCEEDING

VIII. FCC POLE ATTACHMENT PROCEEDING (DNs 07-245 & 09-51).

A. FCC’s proposed rules largely pro-attacher, anti-pole owner.

Risk of adverse spillover effect on muni utilities.

Muni broadband attachment concerns.

FCC will adopt order at April 7 meeting.

B. Possible legislation (federal and state).

Page 14: TELECOM ISSUES OF INTEREST  TO CITIES

Questions?

Tillman L. Lay

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20036

202.879.4022

[email protected]

www.spiegelmcd.com

14