Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TEAM-BASED LEARNING The Adventure with RSS 3001
Assessment and Evaluation in Recreation, Sport and Tourism
The Students
• 50 students
• 3rd and 4th year students
• First introduction to team-based learning
• Randomly assigned to 10 groups of 5 students
• Comfortable with the traditional lecture approach
• Not enthusiastic about group work
The Course
• Text Book with required readings
• 17 Chapters
• 5 RATs (Readiness Assessment Tests)
• 5 in-class exercises
• Research proposal
• Pecha Kucha style presentation (20 seconds, timed,
have to create storyboard and practice)
• Final exam
Grade Assignment Grade Weights and Percentages Grade Weights: Within Area of Total 1. Individual Performance (minimum
= 10% - Individual Readiness Assurance Tests (0-50% - Final Exam (50 -100%)
_____ %* _____ %* 100%
____ %
2. Team Performance (minimum =10%) -Team Readiness Assurance Tests - Article Review - Survey Critique - Proposal Critique - Proposal - Proposal Presentation
25% 20% 15% 10% 20% 10% 100%
____ %
3. Team Contribution (Evaluated by Peers – minimum =10%)
100%
____ %
100%
Individual Student Score
Student A
Within Area of Total
Weight Actual Total Weight Total
Individual Performance
- Individual Readiness Assurance Test 50% 64.7% 32.3% 50%
- Final Exam 50% 70.0% 35.0%
Total 100% 67.3% 33.7%
Team Performance
- Team Readiness Assurance Test 25% 97% 24.3%
- Article Review 20% 85.0% 17.0%
- Survey Critique 15% 90.0% 13.5%
- Proposal Critique 10% 100.0% 10.0% 30%
- Proposal 20% 85.0% 17.0%
- Proposal Presentation 10% 90.0% 9.0%
Total 100% 90.8% 27.2%
Team Contribution
- Peer Evaluation
Total 100% 84.4% 84.4% 20% 16.9%
Total Mark 77.8%
Readiness Assurance Test Individual Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total Score
test 1 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 0 2 0 4 4 48 80.0%
test 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 16 26.7%
test 3 4 4 0 0 3 0 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 2 41 68.3%
test 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 60 100.0%
test 5 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 1 29 48.3%
avg 64.7%
Team Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total Score
test 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 60 100%
test 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 1 55 92%
test 3 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 58 97%
test 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 60 100%
test 5 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 58 97%
Avg 97%
Readiness Assessment Test Scores (RATs)
Cumulative scores for 4 RATs
Individual member scores: Team Team Gain over
Team # Low Average High Score Best Member
1 148 173 245 277 32
2 199 223 241 294 53
3 185 222 264 288 24
4 173 187 208 266 58
5 131 200 272 257 -15
6 133 190 245 277 32
7 136 173 208 264 56
8 149 182 197 275 78
9 192 205 232 291 59
10 140 171 193 247 54
Average 158.6 192.6 230.5 273.6 43.1
17 % higher than the best team member
Comparison to previous year
2011 2012 (RATs)
Final Exam Final Mark Final Exam Final Mark
75.5 77.9 78.6 75.0
Evaluation
• Questions answered individually
• What could the instructor do that would help most to improve the course?
• Ways in which members have helped your team to be successful and identify the member(s) who are particularly good at each so you can share your perceptions with the team.
• What could members of your team have done that would have helped to improve your team’s performance?
• Questions answered by group
• What could the instructor do that would help most to improve the course?
• What helping behaviours have been most important to the success of your team?
• What things could members of your team have done that would help most to improve your team’s performance?
Comments
• #1 – Improvements instructor could make
• Nothing. I enjoyed the course. Thought it was helpful. Participating and talking to class member helped us learn more.
• Liked the course – it was nice to do work inside class rather than outside.
• Thought everything went smoothly.
• Let class pick group member.
• Teach before the RATs
• Make the exam a RAT
• Take attendance rather than have us do it because I do not like to mark team member absent.
• Explain the assignments better before decisions are made about assigning grade values.
Comments
• #2 – Behaviours that helped the team
• People came prepared
• Preparation before the RATs helped to improve results of team testing.
• Discussing the answers before the final RAT decision helped a lot.
• We all showed up, we did the required readings, we all got along and respected each others’ opinions.
• We can get along really well and our meetings are filled with laughter.
• Overall group understanding of concepts was really good.
Comments
• # 3 – What team members could do to improve team performance
• Better attendance
• Read the material more
• Even more preparation before class
• More input from all group members
• Stand up for what you think
• Respect everyone’s opinions
What I learned
• It takes organization
• It takes great record keeping
• It takes trust in the students and faith in the process
• Make sure they understand the assignments before assigning the marking values
• Should start early in a program and be in all years
• Not suited for all courses