18
DNA Damage Response between Pluripotent and Differentiated Cells from Ataxia Telangiectasia Subjects Lucy Lin Ronald P. Hart, Ph.D. Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Summer Undergraduate Research Program 2014

SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

DNA Damage Response between Pluripotent and Differentiated Cells from Ataxia Telangiectasia Subjects

Lucy LinRonald P. Hart, Ph.D.

Department of Cell Biology and NeuroscienceRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Summer Undergraduate Research Program 2014

Page 2: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Ataxia TelangiectasiaNeurodegenerative, inherited

disease caused by defect in ATM gene◦Causes tumor formation◦Impairs cerebellum◦Prevents repair of broken DNA

Kane, K.S. et al. 2002

Tumors from A-T

Page 3: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Cells that can be reprogrammed from adult somatic cells through transcription factors to become pluripotent

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Sigma-Aldrichhttp://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/stem-cell-

biology/ipsc.html

Page 4: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

G1-S G2

ATM Protein Activates Chk2

Becker, T. and Haferkamp, S., 2013 (Modified by Lucy Lin)

Page 5: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

SC1 Cells (control)◦ Both alleles of ATM

gene are normalCAR3 Cells (carrier)

◦ Deletion causing frameshift on one allele and one normal allele

Q3 Cells (A-T)◦ Compound

heterozygote: deletion causing frameshift on one allele and point mutation on other

Lazaropoulos, M., unpublished

CAR3 and Q3 ATM Allele Mutations

Page 6: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Protein Genotype

Protein Activity

ATM Mutations are Expressed in CAR3 and Q3 iPS Cell Lines

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

SC1 (Control) CAR3 (Carrier)Q3 (A-T)

iPS Cell LineN

orm

ali

ze

d I

n-

teg

rate

d D

en

sit

y

(AT

M B

an

d:B

eta

-A

cti

n B

an

d)

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

SC1 (Control) CAR3 (Carrier) Q3 (A-T)

iPS Cell Line

No

rma

lize

d I

nte

-g

rate

d D

en

sit

y

(53

BP

1 B

an

d:B

eta

-A

cti

n B

an

d)

Page 7: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Initial Hypothesis DNA damage response is

mediated by ATM in SC1 cells, while there is a lack of ATM mediation in CAR3 and Q3 cells

◦ In SC1 control iPS cells (ATM present): most number of puncta after radiation treatment

◦ In Q3 A-T case iPS cells (both ATM alleles are mutated): least number of puncta after radiation treatment

Page 8: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Introduce DNA damage to cells through ionizing radiation to investigate the effects on DNA damage repair capability in the SC1, CAR3, and Q3 iPSCs

DNA Damage Assay of iPSCs

Page 9: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

No Significant Difference in DNA Damage Response in iPSCs

SC1 (Control) CAR3 (Carrier)

Q3 (A-T)0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

No IrradiationIrradiation (1 Gy)

Mean

gH

2A

.X A

rea (

mic

rom

-ete

rs^

2)

p = 0.155

p = 0.311 p = 0.254

Page 10: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

ATR Protein Activates Chk1

G1-S G2

Becker, T. and Haferkamp, S., 2013 (Modified by Lucy Lin)

Page 11: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

ATR Protein is Expressed in iPS Cell Lines

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

SC1 (Control) CAR3 (Carrier)Q3 (A-T)

iPS Cell Line

Norm

alized

In

teg

rate

d

Den

sit

y

(ATR

Ban

d/B

eta

-Acti

n B

an

d)

Page 12: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

No Significant Change in gH2A.X Levels in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells

Figure 3C. Serrano et al. , 2011

Page 13: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

DNA damage response is mediated by ATR in pluripotent cells

Once differentiated, ATM mediates DNA damage response

New Hypothesis

Page 14: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

SC1 (Con-trol)

CAR3 (Carrier)

Q3 (A-T)0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

No Irradiation Irradiation (1 Gy)

GABA iN Cell Line

Are

a (

pix

els

) X

Mean

Gra

y

Valu

e

Changes in gH2A.X Expression in Control GABA Neurons

SC1 NI

SC1 IR

CAR3 NI

CAR3 IR

Q3 NI

Q3 IR

gH2A.X

Hoechst

NI = No irradiationIR = Irradiation

p = 7.75X10-

6

****

p = 0.092 p =

0.115

No Irradiation

Irradiation (1 Gy)

Page 15: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Inhibition of ATM in SC1-Derived Embryoid Body Cells Results in Little Change in gH2A.X Levels

Vehicle Control (DMSO)

ATM Inhibition

(KU-55933)

ATR Inhibition (AZ-20)

ATM and ATR

Inhibition

gH2A.X gH2A.XHoechst HoechstNo Irradiation Irradiation

Page 16: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

G1-S G2

ConclusionPluripotent cells: ATR mediates

DNA damage responseDifferentiated cells: ATM

mediates DNA damage response

Differentiated Cells

Pluripotent Cells

Becker, T. and Haferkamp, S., 2013 (Modified by Lucy Lin)

Page 17: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

Future StudiesMechanism by which ATR

mediation switches to ATM mediation during differentiation

Examine ATM and ATR inhibition in control SC1 and A-T Q3 iPSCs

Page 18: SURP 2014 Presentation - Lucy Lin

AcknowledgmentsRonald P. Hart, Ph.D.Alana Toro-Ramos, Eileen Oni, Angela Tiethof, Tom Pisano, Kunal Garg, Mavis Swerdel, Jennifer Moore, Ph.D.

Lourdes Serrano, Ph.D., Berta Vazquez, Ph.D.

Zhiping Pang, Ph.D., Heather McGowan

Joan Mordes, Program AssistantSURP Directors: Janet Alder, Ph.D., Michael Matise, Ph.D., Mladen-Roko Rasin, M.D., Ph.D.