Summit Conservation · AUTHOR(S) Chris Goodman September 2014 Alison Austin November 2015 EDITED Freja MacDougall November 2016 Summit Conservation Project Report (2014-2015)

AUTHOR(S)

Chris Goodman

September 2014

Alison Austin

November 2015

EDITED

Freja MacDougall

November 2016

Summit Conservation Project Report (2014-2015)

LP.A6

Nevis Landscape Partnership are a Heritage Lottery Funded environmental collective delivering a

programme of nineteen projects between 2014 - 2019. The Nevis Partnership are the host

organisation for this programme. The Heritage Lottery Fund contribute funding to all nineteen

projects.

Project Funder(s)

LP.A1 Ben Nevis Mountain Path Scottish Natural Heritage

Highlands and Islands Enterprise

sportscotland

LP.A2 Pinewood Restoration Forestry Commission Scotland

LP.A3 Future Forests Scottish Natural Heritage

LP.A4 North Face Survey Scottish Natural Heritage

LP.A5 Dun Deardail Excavation Forestry Commission Scotland

LP.A6 Summit Conservation John Muir Trust

Ordnance Survey

LP.A7 Erosion & Minimal Impact Scottish Natural Heritage

LP.B1 Community Engagement Scottish Natural Heritage

Friends of Nevis

LP.B2 Dun Deardail; Vitrification & Outreach Forestry Commission Scotland

LP.C1 Polldubh Paths Friends of Nevis


Scottish Mountaineering Trust

LP.C2 Riverside All-Ability Path & Bridge Highland Council


sportscotland

Scottish Rural Development Programme

LP.C3 North Face Path Highlands and Islands Enterprise

SSE Sustainable Development Fund

LP.C4 Nevis Geology Map & Guide Lochaber Geopark

British Geological Survey

LP.C5 Outlandia London Fieldworks

LP.C6 Interpretation, Installation, Information Scottish Natural Heritage

Highland Council

LP.C7 Celebrating the Wild Scottish Natural Heritage

Highland Mountain Culture Association

LP.C8 Ben Nevis Film+ Heritage Lottery Fund

LP.C9 Nevis Landscape Partnership Website Scottish Natural Heritage

Highland Council

LP.D1 Nevis Training Programme Scottish Natural Heritage

Summit Conservation

Year 1 Report (2014)

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

REPAIR WORK

MATERIALS

TENDER; PROCESS & DOCUMENTS

IMPORTANT DATES

CHOSEN CONTRACTOR

WORK UNDERTAKEN & FINAL COST

PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR

APPENDICES

Summit Conservation


INTRODUCTION

Ben Nevis is Britain’s highest mountain and receives a considerable number of visitors each

year. Most visitors approach the summit via the old pony path which zig-zags up the hill

after the red burn. While some substantial sections of pitching have been constructed at

corners 1 and 2 in recent years there are still further small scale repairs required on the

upper section to help consolidate this busy path and loose surface.

REPAIR WORK

2 X CROSS-DRAINS

3 X WATER BARS

2 X ANCHOR BARS

BLOCKING

5 METRES REVETMENT

6 METRES PITCHING

These repairs have been identified as required to help slow down the steady process of

surface erosion where heavy rainfall or snow melt washes away path material.

NN 14722 71527

Four metres of pitching with a water bar is required shortly after Corner 1 where the gradient

increases slightly. Here the path is quite rough and the pitching on Corner 1 continues to

get covered in loose scree which steadily works its wat down the path. Pitching this short

section will help gain the height, shed surface water and slow down the migration of path

material.

NN 14768 71559

There looks to be the remains of an old water bar which is now defunct between Corner 1

& Corner 2. This water bar needs to be removed and rebuilt approximately one-metre further

up the path with additional stone to span the path. Two metres of pitching is also required

a short distance below the bar to help gain height. This will further help reduce the migration

of path material above Corner 1.

NN 14896 71669

There is a section of revetment which supports the path edge and discourages short-cutting

between the zig-zags between Corner 1 & Corner 2. There are signs that some path users

are still taking this shortcut though and the revetment needs extending a further three metres

downhill and two metres uphill to block the start of this braid.

Summit Conservation


REPAIR WORK (CONT’D)

Between Corner 2 & Corner 3 there are two old, defunct water bars where water seeps onto

the path from the slope above. The path has widened here considerably and the remains of

the water bars now sit high and block the inside line of the path. These two water bars need

re-building as cross-drains spanning the width of the path with an anchor bar constructed

approximately one metre below the cross-drains. The cross-drains need to be set lower into

the path with the treads at path level and with drain dimensions to allow substantial through

flow. The treads of the anchor bars should also sit at path level and will serve to hold the

path material below the drain and help prevent the migration of path material which will

result in the drain sitting high and becoming an obstruction. Blocking of the outside edge is

also required along an approximately 50m stretch at this section to help reduce the path

width and protect the outside edge. Weathered stone should be dug in in natural looking

clusters to contain path users on a narrower inside line.

NN15118 71319

Before Corner 3, the gradient increases slightly at a couple of points just before the bend

and there is surface water on the path. A water bar is required to help shed the surface

water and protect the slightly steeper path below.

NN15494 71541

Between Corner 5 & Corner 6 is the start of one of the short cuts which takes a direct line

down towards Corner 2 and the red burn. Blocking is required to help discourage use of

the short cut which is leading to loss of vegetation and soils lower down on this steeper

direct line. Weathered stone needs to be dug into the lower path edge to act as an

obstruction to the short cut and keep people on the path.

MATERIALS

All stone is to be sourced on site and a winch will be necessary for moving stone safely on

ground above this busy path. Use of a winch and method for safe collection of large

weathered stone should be accounted for in the risk assessment.

TENDER [PROCESS]

Quotes were invited from experienced local contractors (Stonescape, Mamores Trail &

Conservation and Martin McCrorie) and evaluated on a “Cost:Quality” ratio of 40:60.

Given the high end, heavily built and formal nature of the work required contractors were

requested to submit a short description and/or photos of similar work they have undertaken

along with brief details of their experience in order to assess the quality component.

Summit Conservation


TENDER [DOCUMENTS]

COMPLETED BILL OF QUANTITIES WITH TOTAL PRICE FOR THE WORKS

DETAILS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

DETAILS OF AVAILABILITY TO UNDERTAKE WORKS IN THE DESIRED TIMESCALE

PRE-TENDER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

RISK ASSESSMENT

COPY OF PUBLIC LIABILITY COVER

SIGNED TENDER RECONCILIATION DOCUMENT

Contractors were required to submit all the above as part of their tender application.

IMPORTANT DATES

SITE VISIT 30/07/2014

DEADLINE FOR TENDERS 18/08/2014

CONTRACT AWARDED 18/08/2014 (WEEK COMMENCING)

EARLIEST CONTRACT START DATE As soon as contract awarded and relevant

paperwork received.

CONTRACT TO BE COMPLETED BY END OF 2014

Contractors should aim to complete work by the end of

September due to the increased likelihood of snowfall affecting

work after this.

CHOSEN CONTRACTOR

Mamores Trail & Conservation and Martin McCrorie both declined to tender due to other

commitments and inability to complete the work in the required timescales. Stonescape

submitted a good tender and price for the work and as an experienced contractor who has

worked on Ben Nevis in the past their tender was accepted.

Summit Conservation



Stonescape started work on 20th

August 2014 and the path work component of the contract

was completed on the 30th

of September. Chris Goodman undertook a site visit with

Stonescape on the 22nd

of September to check on the quality of the work undertaken and

issue any variation orders necessary. An additional two and a half metres of pitching were

required along with extensions to the cross drains, a further six metres of blocking and two

more days of work for extending an existing water bar and discouraging use of a further

braid. The cost of this additional work was £1,584.50 (£1,901.40 including VAT) bringing

the total for the contract works to £10,979.50 (£13,175.40 incl. VAT), this includes the cost

of producing the summit project plan too.


Chris Goodman

Footpath Project Officer

John Muir Trust

Tower House

Station Road

Pitlochry

PH16 5AN

07880291126

[email protected]

Summit Conservation


APPENDICES

IMAGES (BEFORE & AFTER)

BILL OF QUANTITIES

GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

Summit Conservation


IMAGES (BEFORE & AFTER)

(1) Pitching shortly after C1.

(2) Water bar between C1 & C2.

(3) Revetment between C1 & C2 extended to deter short-cutting.

(4) Between C1 & C2, defunct water bar converted into cross-drain and extended.

(5) New water bar before C3.

1

2

3

4

5

Summit Conservation


BILL OF QUANTITIES

ITEM

WORK TO BE CARRIED OUT

UNIT(S)

QUANTITY

PITCHING

CONSTRUCT STONE PITCHING APPROXIMATELY 2000-2500MM WIDE USING ON-SITE WEATHERED

STONE. THESE SECTIONS REQUIRE A CONTINUOUS STONE SURFACE WITH LARGE LEVEL TREADS AND

STONE OF MINIMUM DEPTH 300MM WITH NO RUNNING JOINS. THE STONES SHOULD BE CLOSE

FITTING AND PROVIDE A COMFORTABLE WALKING SURFACE. THE PATH TRAY WILL NEED DIGGING OUT

TO ENSURE STONES SIT ON SOLID FOUNDATIONS. EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHOULD EITHER BE USED

FOR PACKING ALL GAPS IN THE PITCHING AND SURFACING THE PATH WHERE NECESSARY OR COVERED

OVER WITH TURF TO FORM LANDSCAPED MOUNDS. THE FINISHED PITCHING MUST NOT SIT PROUD

OF THE SURROUNDING EDGES AND THE FIRST STEP SHOULD HAVE A MAXIMUM STEP HEIGHT OF 50MM.

M

6

WATER BAR

CONSTRUCT NEW WATER BAR, APPROX 4-5M LONG, USING ON SITE MATERIALS. WATER BARS SHOULD

BE CONSTRUCTED ONTO A HARD BASE USING SUITABLE WEATHERED STONE SO THAT ALL EXPOSED

FACES OF THE FINISHED WATER BAR ARE OF A NATURAL APPEARANCE AND COLOUR. STONES SHOULD

HAVE A REASONABLY FLAT TREADER AND BE OF A SUFFICIENT WEIGHT AND PACKED TO WITHSTAND

REGULAR WALKING PRESSURE. JOINS MUST BE CLOSE FITTING AND THE FACE STEEP BUT NOT

OVERHANGING. THE WATER BAR SHOULD BE SET INTO THE PATH AT AN ANGLE BETWEEN 30⁰ AND 40⁰

TO THE LINE OF THE PATH. THE TREADING SURFACES SHOULD BE LEVEL WITH THE PATH SURFACE ON

THE DOWNHILL SIDE WHILE THE LINER STONES SHOULD BE LEVEL WITH THE PATH SURFACE ON THE

UPHILL SIDE. LONGER LINER STONES SHOULD BE SELECTED AN ANGLED UP ON THE UPHILL SIDE TO

HELP GAIN HEIGHT AND MEET THE PATH LEVEL ABOVE THE WATER BAR. THE HEIGHT OF THE WATER BAR

FACE SHOULD GRADUALLY INCREASE FROM 100MM TO 150MM FROM THE UPPER TO THE LOWER END.

THE WATER BAR STONES MUST EXTEND 150MM EITHER SIDE OF THE PATH.

#

3

Summit Conservation BILL OF QUANTITIES (CONT’D)


ITEM

WORK TO BE CARRIED OUT

UNIT(S)

QUANTITY

CROSS-DRAIN

DISMANTLE REMAINS OF OLD WATER BAR AND CONSTRUCT NEW CROSS DRAIN, APPROX 6M LONG,

USING ON SITE MATERIALS. CROSS DRAINS SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ONTO A HARD BASE USING

SUITABLE WEATHERED STONE SO THAT ALL EXPOSED FACES OF THE FINISHED DRAIN ARE OF A NATURAL

APPEARANCE AND COLOUR. STONES SHOULD HAVE A REASONABLY FLAT TREADER AND BE OF A

SUFFICIENT WEIGHT AND PACKED TO WITHSTAND REGULAR WALKING PRESSURE. JOINS MUST BE

CLOSE FITTING AND THE FACE STEEP BUT NOT OVERHANGING. THE CROSS DRAIN SHOULD BE SET

INTO THE PATH AT AN ANGLE BETWEEN 20⁰ AND 40⁰ TO THE LINE OF THE PATH. THE TREADING

SURFACES SHOULD BE LEVEL WITH THE PATH SURFACE WITH CHANNEL DIMENSIONS OF 40CM WIDTH

AND DEPTH.

#

2

ANCHOR BAR

CONSTRUCT ANCHOR BAR BELOW CROSS DRAIN USING ON-SITE WEATHERED STONE, APPROX 4M

LONG. ANCHOR BAR TREADS SHOULD SIT LEVEL WITH THE PATH SURFACE, BE FAIRLY LEVEL AND EXTEND

AT LEAST 150MM EITHER SIDE OF THE PATH. JOINS SHOULD BE CLOSE FITTING AND STONES SHOULD

BE AT LEAST 300MM DEEP TO ENSURE THEY ARE SECURELY DUG INTO THE GROUND. BACK FILL BEHIND

THE STEP UP TO THE CROSS DRAIN WITH SUITABLE PATH SUBBASE AND SURFACING MATERIAL.

#

2

REVETMENT

EXTEND PATH EDGE REVETMENT TO BLOCK START OF SHORT CUT. DIG LARGE WEATHERED STONE

INTO PATH EDGE ONTO A SOLID BENCH OR FOUNDATIONS. CONSTRUCT FURTHER TIERS AS

NECESSARY TO BUILD UP REVETMENT HEIGHT AND BLOCK BRAID.

M

5

BLOCK PATH EDGE

DIG LARGE WEATHERED STONE INTO GROUND TO OBSTRUCT AND DISCOURAGE USE OF THE VERY

OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE PATH WHICH COULD BECOME UNSTABLE IN TIME. BLOCKERS SHOULD NOT

FORM A CONTINUOUS LINE BUT BE PLACED MORE SPORADICALLY TO APPEAR NATURAL AND MIMIC

NATURAL GROUND CONDITIONS. EXCAVATED SPOIL MUST BE LANDSCAPED INTO WIDER PATH

MARGINS OR USED TO SURFACE THE PATH IF SUITABLE. LARGE STONE SHOULD BE USED TO MAKE THE

BLOCKING LOOK MORE NATURAL AS WELL AS EFFECTIVE. ALL STONE TO BE SOURCED ON SITE.

M

55

Summit Conservation BILL OF QUANTITIES (CONT’D)


SUMMIT CLEAN-UP PROJECT

PROVIDE DETAILS IN THE FORM OF A BRIEF REPORT OF THE WORK REQUIRED TO REPAIR AND

CONSOLIDATE THE TRIG POINT, REPAIR STONE WORK ON THE SUMMIT SHELTER, TIDY, MAKE SAFE AND

CONSOLIDATE THE OBSERVATORY RUINS AND REPAIR OR REMOVE CAIRNS. THIS SHOULD INCLUDE A

DESCRIPTION OF THE DESIGN, WORK INVOLVED AND ESTIMATED COSTS OF WORK, MATERIALS AND

AIRLIFT, IF REQUIRED, IN THE FORM OF A BILL OF QUANTITIES.

#

1

(6) Sunrise from Gardyloo Gully looking across to Ben Nevis Summit. Summit structures visible include the shelter, Peace Cairn & triangulation point.

Summit Conservation



General Conditions of Contract

Contract Management, Site Management, Site Safety, Site Location and Works, Offers & Reporting

1.0 General Conditions: Contract Management

1.1 Tendering

The Contractor shall tender on a fixed price basis for the work as viewed and discussed with the Project Co-

ordinator. The tender shall include all labour, materials, accommodation (incl. Sub-Contractor) and other

related costs to enable the full and satisfactory completion of the works. Any over-runs, additional, remedial,

or other work resulting in increased costs shall be carried out at the expense of the Principal Contractor, unless

otherwise agreed in writing by JMT. The date by which works are to be completed on any over-run will be

specified by JMT. Offers to be submitted as detailed in section 5.

1.2 Specification

The Principal Contractor shall adhere to the specification. Any alteration shall be made only with the

agreement, in writing, of the Project Co-ordinator. The Principal Contractor shall confirm in writing,

acceptance of the offer of work following successful selection at tender. All works, conditions, dates and other

information contained in this specification and related site visits and correspondence shall be binding on the

Principal Contractor.

1.3 Site Visit and Expenses

The cost of visits, preparation of tenders and related costs are at the expense of Tendering Contractors, and

shall not be met by JMT.

1.4 Arbitration

Any dispute arising between JMT and the Principal Contractor may be referred for arbitration to a person or

organisation agreed by both parties. The decision of arbitration shall be binding on both parties. This Contract

and its interpretation shall be applied under Scots law.

1.5 Scottish Law

This Contract and associated documents are subject and drawn up under Scottish Law.

1.6 Period of Contract

Work will start at a date to be agreed with the Project Co-ordinator. Work shall take place from late August

and all works must be completed and inspected and invoiced no later than 31 December 2014.

1.7 Additional Information

JMT may require additional information from Tendering Contractors regarding their submission. A written

reply to such requests is obligatory for Contractors wishing to have continued consideration of their tender.

JMT may seek additional information on the performance of contractors, and require contact with referees

including Banks, accountants and previous clients.

1.8 Responsibility

It is the Tender’s responsibility to satisfy themselves that they have all necessary information to submit a fixed

price offer, by which they may be bound. It is the Tender’s responsibility to seek clarification or additional

information from JMT or other, in answer to any queries relating to the work. JMT shall not vary contracts due

to an oversight by a Tender.

Summit Conservation


GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT (CONT’D)

1.9 Variations

During the period of the contract JMT may introduce Variation Orders – these will be numbered Written Orders

signed by the Project Co-ordinator and Principal Contractor and signed by both on site. A duplicate copy will

be retained by the Principal Contractor. Variation Orders shall include the quantity of works and the agreed

number of workdays at the agreed rate, to carry that work out. Variation Orders must be signed for all

additional works, prior to work being carried out. Any charging by the Principal Contractor additional to the

fixed price must quote the appropriate Variation Order number, for any payment to be made. The costs of

any work carried out that is not requested by the Project Co-ordinator, or is without a Variation Order shall

not be met by JMT.

1.10 Guarantee

In accepting a contract based on these terms, the Principal Contractor is accepting a commitment to make

good at the Principal Contractors own expense, any defects in workmanship which come to light in the 12-

month period commencing from the agreed completion date. The Principal Contractor and Project Co-

ordinator shall inspect the works, between 9 and 12 months following the completion of initial site works. All

remedial works to be carried out by the end of the 12-month warranty period to the same standard as originally

specified. For information, it is expected that most contracts shall require remedial works, and tenders should

reflect this likelihood.

2.0 General Conditions: Site Management

2.1 Project Co-ordinator

This will be Chris Goodman and can be contacted at the JMT office, Tower House, Station Road, Pitlochry,

PH16 5AN, or by telephone on 07880 291126.

2.2 Supervision

The Principal Contractor will be responsible for the setting out, management and supervision of the work. The

Project Co-ordinator will inspect progress from time to time. The Principal Contractor will ensure that a

competent person will meet with the Project Co-ordinator, to inspect progress, completed works, and confirm

the next sections of work to be carried out, each two-week period of the contract. It is the responsibility of the

Principal Contractor to ensure this contact occurs. Any instructions given to this person will be deemed to have

been given to the Principal Contractor.

2.3 Day Works

Supplementary or additional minor works may be required, at the request of the Project Coordinator, at the

end of the fixed price contract. Contractors should make their team available for such works, and include a

“Day Works” rate (expressed in £ per person per day) for such works, on the tender.

2.4 Materials

It is the contractor’s responsibility to source the materials required as per specification, transport them and

remove all waste materials generated through the contract works.

2.5 Workmanship

The Principal Contractor shall carry out everything necessary for the proper execution and completion of the

works to the satisfaction of JMT, whether shown on the drawings or described on the specification, provided

the same may be reasonably inferred there from. This shall include both verbal and written instructions of the

Project Co-ordinator. All works shall be carried out in a workmanlike manner and to a standard seen on other

comparable sites, and works of a similar kind. Everything necessary for good path and landscaping work in

the environment on site shall be carried out, and for a long-lasting path subject to normal routine

maintenance.

Summit Conservation



2.6 Testing

Any work that fails to meet specification to the satisfaction of the Project Co-ordinator, is to be made good at

no extra cost. The decision of the Project Co-ordinator shall be final.

2.7 Access

Access to the work sites for plant and vehicles is the responsibility of the contractor and permissions must be

sought where required.

2.8 Damage to Site

If severe weather or other factors cause significant damage to the site, the Principal Contractor must inform

Project Co-ordinator immediately. If change in condition may cause a variation to works as specified, the

Principal Contractor must inform the Project Co-ordinator and agree action before proceeding. Additional

works resulting from damage to the site shall require written instruction of JMT.

2.9 Plant and Tools

The Principal Contractor shall include for the provision of all plant, tools, protective barriers and warning

notices as are necessary for the proper execution of the works and use them appropriately on site. All Principal

Contractors’ staff using tools and plant must be appropriately trained and supervised.

2.10 Water Pollution Prevention

The Principal Contractor must ensure safe use and storage of diesel, lubricants and hydraulic oils, and that

use will be monitored and prevented from entering any watercourses. All potential dirty surface water and

debris run-off routes will be identified before any construction work starts on site. All construction work will be

carried out in accordance with SEPA’s Pollution Prevention Guideline PPG 6 ‘Working at Construction and

Demolition Sites’.

3.0 General Conditions: Site Safety

3.1 Protection of Public and Private Services

The Principal Contractor shall cause minimum disturbance to users of the site, and to the site itself. The

Principal Contractor will remove all rubbish and debris from the site, and leave the works and site clean. Any

damage to vegetation of the site shall be made good to the satisfaction of the Project Co-ordinator. The

Principal Contractor shall locate, maintain and protect all fences; trees; carriageways; footpaths; water

courses; overhead, ground laid or buried cables or pipes; and any other private or public property or service.

All vehicular and pedestrian approaches to the site are to be kept clear of obstructions, throughout the

execution of the works. The Principal Contractor shall make good and pay for the reinstatement of any damage

however caused and shall indemnify JMT against any claims for any consequential loss. JMT shall not be

liable for any damage, disruption or injury arising from the Principal Contractor’s operation on the site,

however caused.

3.2 Notice Boards and Advertising

The Principal Contractor shall erect warning notices to the public, of the hazards caused by works, always, to

ensure public safety. Any notice shall be self-supporting and supplied by the Principal Contractor. Any

additional signs, notices or advertising may only be displayed with the agreement of the Project Co-ordinator.

Summit Conservation



3.3 Insurance

The Principal Contractor shall satisfy JMT that during the whole period of the contract they are covered by

insurance in respect of liability for injury of persons, animals, or damage by fire or otherwise to JMT, the

landowner, or any third party for a sum not less than £5,000,000 in respect of any one accident or occurrence

and to avoid ambiguity, the period of contract shall include the one year period of warranty, following

completion of site works. The Principal Contractor must, on request, produce for inspection the policy and

premium receipts.

3.4 Health and Safety at Work

The Principal Contractor shall carry out all work in a safe manner, and have due regard for the health and

safety of their staff. All works to be carried out according to the Health and Safety at Work Act (1974). The

Principal Contractor must lodge with JMT a copy of their current Health and Safety policy, a copy of the

arrangements for the implementation of safe working, and a copy of site working rules and other similar

guidance applying to their staff working under this contract. This information will be required to be submitted

prior to the commencement of the contract works. JMT encloses with this tender a pre-tender Health and

Safety Plan. Each Tendering Contractor must submit a Method Statement and risk assessments for the

preparation of a Construction Phase Site Safety Plan, either in accordance with the JMT Method Statement/Site

Safety Plan pro forma, or an alternative format providing at least the same information. This Construction

Phase Site Safety Plan must be submitted with the tender documents.

4.0 Location and Works

4.1 Location

The work site is located as indicated on the attached site location map and layout plan.

4.2 General Description and Specification of Work

As specified.

5.0 Offers

5.1 Tenders should satisfy themselves that they are aware of the specified materials, source, design,

location, finish and any other relevant details, of the specification and work required. The

specification shall include information, discussions and instruction made by the Project Coordinator

on the site visit. Tendering Contractors are responsible to ensure they have all

necessary information to submit a full tender.

5.2 Bills of Quantities

Tenderers should include in their Bill of Quantities, describing the total items and quantities of

each item, tendered for. This may differ from the Bill of Quantities attached herein, only if such

modifications have been agreed by the Project Co-ordinator during the site visit, or subsequently,

and any alterations or additions must be brought to the attention of JMT in tender submission

documents.

Summit Conservation



5.3 Tenders Checklist

Tenders must provide the following information with their submission:

• COMPLETED LIST OF NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF EMPLOYEES AND PROPOSED SUB-CONTRACTORS

• DAY WORKS RATES (£’S PER PERSON PER DAY)

• COMPLETED BILL OF QUANTITIES

• TENDER PHASE SITE SAFETY PLAN

• RISK ASSESSMENT

• COPY OF PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE

5.4 Submission

Tenders must be submitted with an envelope marked: “TENDER”, FOLLOWED BY COMPANY NAME. Tenders

must be received by Chris Goodman, by 12.00 noon, on Monday 18th August.

[END OF YEAR 1 REPORT]

Summit Conservation


CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

REPAIR WORK

MATERIALS

TENDER; PROCESS & DOCUMENTS

IMPORTANT DATES

CHOSEN CONTRACTOR



APPENDICES

Summit Conservation


INTRODUCTION

Ben Nevis is Britain’s highest mountain and receives a considerable number of visitors each

year. There are several structures of both safety, cultural and historical interest on the summit

plateau of Ben Nevis. As such the NLP is committed to protecting them whilst recognising

the designations and wildness of the summit area. This project committed to completing the

repair work outlined below. In 2014 the path repair work was completed and the project

report was submitted in September 2014. This report deals with the summit repair work

completed in 2015.

REPAIR WORK

Triangulation Point

This stands on a large flat topped cairn with a concrete platform. Some of the stone work has fallen

away leaving part of the pad unsupported. This needed rebuilt around the perimeter. The

Triangulation Point is a favourite landmark for many of those who reach the summit.

Summit Shelter

Similar problem to the Triangulation Point, subsidence of the supporting cairn. Stone work had fallen

away. The shelter provides an escape from the weather and is an important safety feature relied on

by many.

Navigation Cairns

There are 24 of these cairns in total. Part of their care involves the removal of other cairns that

appear from time to time whose existence can cause confusion. The cold, wet environment causes

the cairns to lose stones and reduce in height. These are a safety featured chosen to be kept

maintained after lengthy consultation with the wider community.

Hotel Cairns

Removal of broken wooden remains of supporting timbers & artefacts, possibly stabilising of

remaining walls and stone floor.

For further details see Appendices; Ben Nevis Summit Repair Conservation Management Plan

Summit Conservation


MATERIALS

All stone is to be sourced on site and a winch will be necessary for moving stone safely on

ground above this busy path. Use of a winch and method for safe collection of large

weathered stone should be accounted for in the risk assessment.

TENDER [PROCESS]

The 2014 tender invitation included a survey and report on the summit structures to inform

the content of the contract for this year’s repairs. Further meetings were held with Stonescape

who carried out the survey to tease out the detail between the different options for repair of

triangulation point and likely cost implications. A contract was prepared for work on the

summit. This was likely to cost more than the original budget for the repair work due to the

nature of the work needed and the location. Ordnance Survey were approached and agreed

to commit £18,000 towards the project which allowed John Muir Trust to create a tender

knowing we had sufficient funds to cover expected costs. Due to the specialist nature of the

work and the working environment in a highly inaccessible site both for contractors and

equipment there are limited contractors skilled, available and interested in this type of work

As Stonescape had been part of a competitive tendering process in 2014 and submitted a

range of options for repair work which we could choose from John Muir Trust requested (in

April 2015) that we ask the one preferred contractor, Stonescape, to tender for the contract.

Heritage Lottery Fund agreed if their rates remained the same as 2014. Their day rate did

remain the same as 2014 and Stonescape were asked to tender for the work that John Muir

Trust had chosen to offer. The tender was within the budget. Given the difficult location and

heavy work required Stonescape were requested to submit a short description of similar

work they have undertaken along with brief details of their experience to assess the quality

component.

TENDER [DOCUMENTS]

COMPLETED BILL OF QUANTITIES WITH TOTAL PRICE FOR THE WORKS

DETAILS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

DETAILS OF AVAILABILITY TO UNDERTAKE WORKS IN THE DESIRED TIMESCALE


RISK ASSESSMENT

COPY OF PUBLIC LIABILITY COVER

SIGNED TENDER RECONCILIATION DOCUMENT

Contractors were required to submit all the above as part of their tender application.

Summit Conservation


IMPORTANT DATES

DEADLINE FOR TENDER TUESDAY 5TH

MAY (EXTENDED 8TH

JUNE)

CONTRACT AWARDED 15TH

JUNE (WEEK COMMENCING)

EARLIEST CONTRACT START DATE AS SOON AS CONTRACT AWARDED AND RELEVANT

PAPER WORK RECEIVED.

CONTRACT TO BE COMPLETED BY OCTOBER 2015

CHOSEN CONTRACTOR

The deadline for tender was extended to the 8th June after a meeting with Stonescape to

give them time to investigate and seek advice on suitable cement and materials for use in

adverse conditions. Stonescape submitted a good tender and price for the work within the

budget and as an experienced contractor who has worked on Ben Nevis in the past their

tender was accepted and the contract offered to them. A HSE F10* notification was not

needed as the construction work would be completed in under five-hundred person days.


Stonescape had aimed to commence work in July 2015. Due to inclement weather and

snow cover on stone sourcing sites this was postponed. A site visit to confirm stone selection

protocol with Scottish Natural Heritage was carried out on August 12th and work

commenced immediately on preparing the site for the helicopter lift booked on 1st

September. Debris and rubbish from around the summit structures was bagged into

helicopter bags. Materials including water and cement and food supplies for the contractors

were purchased and bagged up for the helicopter lift on 1st September. At this point airlift

Risk Assessment and Airlift Safety plan was submitted to John Muir Trust. The helicopter lift

was postponed due to weather on the 1st, attempted again on the 3rd and aborted after

one lift and finally completed on 7th September. Materials and tools were then on site to

complete the repairs to the Ordnance Survey triangulation point, summit shelter and summit

cairns. The first invoice was received on the 14th

September 2015 for materials and airlift

and some labour. Work completed by 24th September. The second invoice for this work

was received on 24th

September 2015. Repair work on the summit cairns was completed by

end of October 2014 and the final invoice was received on 9th

November 2015.

*Health & Safety Executive Notification of Construction Project [Construction (Design and Management Regulations 2015

Summit Conservation


WORK UNDERTAKEN & FINAL COST (CONT’D)

In-kind contributions by project coordinator, John Muir Trust staff members and volunteers

are recorded in the appendices. Also included are volunteer registration forms, equal

opportunity monitoring forms and feedback forms for volunteers.


Alison Austin

Nevis Property Manager

John Muir Trust

Lochaber Rural Complex

Torlundy

Fort William

PH33 6ST

01397 705049

[email protected]

Summit Conservation


APPENDICES

BEN NEVIS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

BEN NEVIS SUMMIT SURVEY (2014)

SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE REPAIR CONSENT

INVITATION TO TENDER

PRE-TENDER HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN

STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS


AIRLIFT RISK ASSESSMENT & AIRLIFT PLAN

IMAGES

VOLUNTEER WORK PARTY RISK ASSESSMENTS

Summit Conservation


BEN NEVIS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN

SUMMARY

An improved and enhanced access visitor experience on the summit of Ben Nevis to protect

the summit area of Ben Nevis, the UK’s highest mountain and maintain the wild land

experience for all those who reach it. To repair and maintain this wild place to be valued

by all sectors of society so that people of all ages and backgrounds can experience, connect,

and enjoy this wild place and see the importance of caring for it. The project will deliver a

tidier management of necessary man made features such as paths, navigation markers and

historical ruins on the summit to ensure their existence does not detract from the wildness

and visitor experience. The upper section of the Ben Nevis path is very rocky and rugged

but to ensure long term sustainable access and reduce erosion along the path line some

works are required to stop the path widening and deteriorating. These works include

improvements to the path surface and drainage and definition of the path line in places to

discourage short-cutting and ‘braiding’. Over 100,000 people endeavour to reach the

summit of Ben Nevis annually. These visitors, and those people who make their living on

the mountain, will all benefit from this project as it will enhance the visitor experience and

help maintain the living history of this iconic mountain.

INTRODUCTION

The Nevis Landscape Partnership (NLP) recognises that there are many interests in the

summit of Ben Nevis and works in partnership with others, the landowners of the summit

area the John Muir Trust (JMT). It considers the implications for the wild land qualities of

the mountain and the safety and experience of both visitors and those who make their living

from working on Ben Nevis. Since the John Muir Trust purchased the summit of Ben Nevis

in 2000 it has attempted to restore and retain the wild qualities that this mountain holds

without compromising the culture, history and safety. This has been an ongoing process as

time and consultations to achieve the best solution have been completed. The work planned

for this phase will complete a serious of aims the JMT has held since acquiring the land.

The main access to Ben Nevis is on foot along the Ben Nevis Mountain Path from the Ben

Nevis Visitor Centre Car Park (NN 123 729) which lies 2KM from Fort William on the Glen

Nevis road. Ben Nevis is the highest mountain in Scotland and consequently attracts large

numbers of visitors not only regular and keen hill walkers, but also many members of the

public for whom this may be the only mountain they ever climb. The surrounding area is

heavily dependent for its economic viability and employment on the tourism value of Ben

Nevis and Glen Nevis. There are several structures of both safety, cultural and historical

interest on the summit plateau of Ben Nevis. As such the NLP is committed to protecting

them whilst recognising the designations and wildness of the summit area.

Summit Conservation


BEN NEVIS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN (CONT’D)

While some substantial sections of pitching have been constructed at Corner 1 and Corner

2 in recent years there are still further small scale repairs required to help consolidate this

busy path and loose surface. A further four water bars have been identified as being required

to help slow down the steady process of surface erosion where heavy rainfall or snow melt

washes away path material. New water bars are required between Corner 1 & Corner 2

and just before Corner 3. There are the remains of two old water bars between Corner 2

and Corner 3 which need to be dismantled and new water bars built with a step below them

to attain the height. Blocking of the outside edge of the path at this point will also help to

contain the path and protect the edge from collapsing. As the path is heavily used and

relatively wide built features will need to be of substantial and very good quality construction.

Some blocking work may also be required to deter walkers from short cutting on their

descent and causing further erosion. At present the upper sections of the path are still

covered by snow and this work will be looked at later in the season once the site is clear.

All the above require specialist stone workers able to work at high altitude. All structures will

need annual inspection and maintenance to increase its longevity. It is anticipated that this

maintenance will be undertaken by John Muir Trust staff or volunteers. This project will help

to contribute to the areas reputation for high quality outdoor recreation and maintain the

important safety, cultural and historical features within the designated site and enhance the

visitor experience.

UNDERSTANDING THE SITE

ECOLOGICAL

Ben Nevis is situated within both the Ben Nevis and Glencoe National Scenic Area (NSA)

the designated Ben Nevis Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and the Ben Nevis Special

Area of Conversation (SAC). This extensive upland site includes Ben Nevis, the highest

ground in the UK. The wide range in geological conditions, altitude and topography gives

rise to a diversity of semi natural and natural habitats from lowland woods to mountain cliffs

and semi -permanent snow beds. The site is of international importance for a range of

upland habitats and nationally important for upland birds, insects, vascular plants, mosses,

liverworts and lichens. Ben Nevis SAC has been identified for seventeen habitats of

international importance. It is important for its saxicolous lichens and bryophytes living on

the broken rocky ground of the summit plateau.

Summit Conservation



GEOLOGICAL

Ben Nevis part of a Geological Conservation Review Site (GCR). It is nationally important

as it provides good exposures of the Ben Nevis complex of rocks. This complex consists of

four granitic intrusions which presently form concentric rings around a central core of

volcanic rocks and notified within the Ben Nevis SSS1.

HISTORICAL

The years between 1880 - 1886 saw the development of Ben Nevis as a climbing ground

as Scottish mountaineering developed. In 1894, the West Highland Railway opened and by

the end of the 19th century, several summer and winter routes had been established on the

Ben, now a major British climbing area. The advent of the West Highland Railway and the

construction of the pony track greatly increased the number of ascents and by the end of

the nineteenth century the first timed ascent of the Ben had been recorded. This led to several

timed solo ascents which later evolved into what is now known as ‘The Ben Race’.

Late in the eighteenth century the Scottish Meteorological Society proposed siting a weather

observatory on the summit of Ben Nevis. An appeal for funds was made by the Scottish

Meteorological Society early in 1883 which successfully raised £4000. The Bridle Path was

constructed with local labour in four months and the Observatory opened that year. It

remained open for twenty-one years until 1904. One room was open over the summer to

provide refreshments and an annex was added on by a Fort William hotelier sometime later

which provided board and lodgings until the end of WW1. There are several man-made

features on the summit of Ben Nevis. All that remains of the Summit Observatory on Ben

Nevis are the ruined walls and part of the old wooden floor of the building. A plaque which

highlights the history of the Observatory is mounted on the remains of the Observatory

below the present-day Summit Shelter. A metal cage that was used to protect weather

instruments also remains.

SOCIAL/CULTURAL

The human values we place on wild places are personal to the individual. They include

emotional or spiritual factors which give a sense of freedom, solitude, a contrast with

modern life, spiritual renewal, spiritual challenge and sometimes risk. Wild places provide

the physical conditions for recreation, relaxation, contact with nature and essential peace

and quiet.

Summit Conservation



In good or moderate weather, the long views down to the populated glen from Ben Nevis,

the man-made structures on the summit of the Ben, the path and the number of people on

the path may make an ascent of the Ben feel the least wild and remote part of the Ben Nevis

Estate. In bad conditions, however, the same walk on Ben Nevis Estate can feel as wild as

anywhere.

Furthermore, on the plateau, away from the path and summit, there is very little evidence of

human presence and impact and it thus has a distinctly wild character. The Summit Shelter

(NN 166712) was built on top of the remains of the former Ben Nevis Observatory. On

the summit, a triangulation point is raised above the height of winter snows making it stand

out above the flat plateau. Immediately prior to JMT purchasing Ben Nevis, the Peace Cairn

on the summit of Ben Nevis was relocated and restored by the Peace Cairn Trust. This cairn

attracts plaques, memorials, photographs, toys, ashes and other artefacts from all over the

UK. Although these have been cleared, catalogued and stored, it is likely that this practice

will continue and their removal will be an ongoing activity. On the summit, there is more

evidence of human intrusion on the landscape in the form of cairns built alongside the path

with over a hundred cairns recorded in 2004. Further to this, an abseil post and navigation

marker existed above Coire Leis and an aluminium pole marked the top of No. 4 Gully.

These features have been removed and replaced by JMT with more suitable markers for the

mountain environment after suitable consultation with all partners.

ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

The summit of Ben Nevis has been used for many things; observatory, hotel, recreation.

Maintaining these features will ensure they endure the rigours of time as a lasting memory

to the pioneers who first erected them. The deterioration of the above features would

adversely affect the safety, historic and cultural importance and detract from the visitor

experience.

ISSUES/VULNERABILITY

The Sites and Monuments Register (SMR) and National Monuments Record of Scotland

(NMRS) held by the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland

(RCAHMS) were consulted. One SMR site has been recorded on Ben Nevis. NN17SE

(NMRS number) at NN 1663 7122, the Ben Nevis Summit Observatory. There is no national

or local statutory protection for any of the historic features on Ben Nevis. The Summit

Observatory and Bridle Path (constructed to access the Observatory) however, are important

indicators of the changing culture, interests and scientific research of the 1800s.

Summit Conservation



Any structure associated with the observation and recording of mountain weather and

conditions is significant. Although the building is not listed or protected in any way either as

scheduled ancient monument by Historic Scotland or within the local authority planning

framework the Nevis Landscape Partnership and John Muir Trust recognise that the ruined

observatory is of great historical interest and advocates its protection from further critical or

potentially dangerous decay.

In 2005, the Nevis Partnership agreed to remove most of the cairns on the summit. The

mountain management sub-group of the Nevis Partnership, including representatives from

Mountaineering Council of Scotland (MCofS) and Lochaber Mountain Rescue, agreed that

out of one hundred cairns that twenty-three should remain in specific agreed locations. In

2006, John Muir Trust work parties removed around twenty cairns and rebuilt five of those

that were to remain. In 2007 this work was completed by contractors. In the winter 2007/08

several complaints were received that the cairns were misleading in winter as they followed

the original path line they presented a meandering line on the summit when the path was

covered in snow which may have led someone to descend following a line towards the cliffs

on the north face. The representatives involved in the original planning agreed this and it

was decided to relocate the cairns in a straight line following the winter bearing. Around

half the cairns were then relocated during the summer of 2008. These cairns need regular

upkeep and maintenance.

The North Face of Ben Nevis holds some of the most challenging and inspiring summer and

winter climbing in Great Britain and many people visit the area to attempt these climbs. On

a good winter weekend, popular routes are very busy with climbers queuing at the bottom

of routes alongside local guides and instructors who take their clients up the North Face of

Ben Nevis. The mountaineering fraternity holds strong views on cairns, markers and abseil

post. The Nevis Landscape Partnership and John Muir Trust endeavour to liaise with all

interested parties to reach decisions regarding retaining, replacing or removing such

structures. This is done through direct consultation with groups and individuals, via Nevis

Partnership and publications such as MCofS “Scottish Mountaineer” and the John Muir Trust

member journal.

Litter, food remains and human waste continue to accumulate around the summit, especially

behind and within the ruined observatory walls, and along the side of the mountain track.

This will continue to be an issue and John Muir Trust are committed to continue addressing

this with their ongoing work parties after the more detailed clean has been completed. The

summit shelter sits upon the remains of the Summit Observatory. The Nevis Landscape

Partnership and John Muir Trust recognise its value as a refuge in extreme conditions.

Summit Conservation



FACTORS INFLUENCING PROJECT

SIZE, TOPOGRAPHY AND ACCESS TO THE AREA

SOIL EROSION CAUSED BY VISITORS AND NATURAL PROCESSES

RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES

UNDESIRABLE ACTIVITIES SUCH AS LITTERING, CAIRN BUILDING, DEFECATING, ETC.

INCREASED VISITOR NUMBERS

PROMOTION OF THE AREA

DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESS PATHS BY NP AND NEIGHBOURING LANDOWNERS

CAR PARK MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT HIGHLAND COUNCIL AND FORESTRY COMMISSION

FACTORS ARISING FROM LEGISLATION

IMPLEMENTATION OF LAND REFORM ACT (PART 1) SCOTTISH OUTDOOR ACCESS CODE

NATURE CONSERVATION ACT (SCOTLAND) 2004

SSSI AGREEMENT WITH SNH

BEN NEVIS AND GLENCOE NSA

BEN NEVIS SAC

JOHN MUIR TRUST’S OBLIGATION TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EMPLOYEES

PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR RESTRAINTS

MANANAGEMENT MAY BE HAMPERED DURING THE WINTER MONTHS EITHER BY WATER LOGGING, SNOW

OR FROZEN CONDITIONS

AVAILABLE RESOURCES

JOHN MUIR TRUST RECEIVES OUR MAJORITY OF FUNDING FROM MEMBERS HOWEVER WE ALSO RECEIVE

DONATIONS, LEGACIES AND GRANTS.

JOHN MUIR TRUST NEVIS CONSERVATION OFFICER ON SITE (1.5)

VARIETY OF SKILLED PERSONNEL AVAILABLE IN THE LOCAL AREA TO CARRY OUT WORK ON BEN NEVIS ESTATE

THERE IS A NETWORK OF VOLUNTEERS WITHIN THE TRUST MEMBERSHIP AND OUTWITH TO ASSIST WITH

VARIOUS MANAGEMENT TASKS

CONSERVATION POLICY

As the features sit within a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), all work will be carried

out with due regard to the list of potentially damaging operations of the notified features

and the long-term objectives and Key Management Requirements outlined in the SSSI

Management Statement. Scottish Natural Heritage has been consulted regarding these

features and an established working precedent has already been set for working on path

repair and rock built features within the SSSI. The conservation and management

requirements of the John Muir Trust in outlined below in their management ethos taken from

the Ben Nevis Estate Management Plan 2012-2018 will also be consulted. This sets a robust

conservation framework to work within.

Summit Conservation



JOHN MUIR TRUST MANAGEMENT ETHOS

It is the objective of the John Muir Trust to manage naturally occurring processes rather than

specifically for any plant, animal, habitat or physical feature. Managing for natural

processes will allow the land to develop to its natural potential rather than an expected

potential or one which must be supported by continued human activity. However, John Muir

Trust will substitute for natural processes where necessary, for example the predation of deer

that no longer occurs due to the extinction of large predators in Scotland.

By sensitively managing key wild areas, the John Muir Trust sets out to show that areas of

wild land damaged by inappropriate management can be repaired; that the land can be

conserved on a sustainable basis supporting the human, and other animal and plant

communities which share it. At the same time, the great spiritual qualities of wilderness,

tranquillity and solitude, can be preserved as a legacy for those to come.

The natural environment will take priority over economic and social elements on land

managed by the Trust. In working closely with the Nevis Landscape Partnership in the wider

area, we aim to reach a consensus where these aims can complement each other in

appropriate areas to the mutual benefit of natural, social and economic wellbeing. Where

economic development or social issues actively damage the important parts of the natural

environment, John Muir Trust will seek to remove the damaging influence and restore the

natural process.

IMPLEMENTATION & REVIEW

ACTIVITIES AND TIMETABLE

Within the first year of the project a consultant will need to be engaged to look at the

condition of the structures to determine extent of work and costs. Construction work will then

take place within the Nevis Landscape Partnership project timescale during summer months

when the summit is clear of snow.

REVIEW & REPORTING

A photographic record of the structures and path condition before during and after works

will be kept by the John Muir Trust and further monitoring carried out in subsequent years

to assess the effectiveness of the improvement works.

Summit Conservation


SUMMIT SURVEY (CARRIED OUT BY STONESCAPE)

SUMMIT SHELTER

REBUILD STEPS

FILL HOLES WITH LOW TEMPERATURE MORTAR AND STABILISE

HOTEL RUINS

GENERAL TIDY-UP, STABILISE WALLS BY REMOVING LOOSE STONES

REMOVAL OF CORRUGATED SHEET; 1 X HELIBAG (LONG HANDLES)

REMOVAL OF WOODEN BEAM PIECES; 4 X HELIBAGS (LONG HANDLES)

REMOVAL OF TWO LARGE BUNDLES OF LONG WOODEN BEAMS

METAL STRUCTURE FRAME; 1 X LIFT

NAVIGATION CAIRNS (C1 = CAIRN ONE)

C1, C2, C3, C12, C14, C18, C19, C22 - NEED NEW COPING STONE

C13, C15, C16, C21 - REBUILD FROM HALFWAY

C17, C20 - NEED PACKING

C21, C23 - NEED REBUILD FROM BOTTOM

TRIANGULATION POINT

Option 1; Repair

Do what was done in the past, pointing with concrete any holes and gaps which are now big and deep. The result will

look a little messy but would be the cheapest option. Obviously large holes where stones have fallen out need to be filled

with stones. Could be viewed as a temporary repair with no guarantee of how long it will last.

Option 2; Reskin

This would involve constructing a completely new skin all around the cairn (25cm) and filling in the gap between the new

and old with concrete. This solution could be expensive. Problems being; addition of more material (50/50T) needing

airlifted from site further down on the Ben. Allow John Muir Trust and Scottish Natural Heritage to discuss possibility that

with time, the inner cairn could still collapse (hollow inside) resulting in damage to outer skin.

Option 3; Rebuild

From a contractor’s point of view, we regard this option as the most cost effective and simplest solution. As an air-lift will

be needed to remove bags/bundles from the summit, the same helicopter could be used to remove the current

Triangulation Point then we could rebuild the cairn from scratch. Advantages; dimensions and design for the new cairn to

suit all parties concerned (John Muir Trust, Scottish Natural Heritage, Ordnance Survey) who may want to replace the

existing structure. This rebuild could insure a cairn fitting for the top of Ben Nevis with a new, clean, tidy look making it a

more attractive conclusion to the hike.

Summit Conservation


SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE CONSENT

Summit Conservation


SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE CONSENT (CONT’D)

STONE SOURCING ON BEN NEVIS

PROTOCOL FOR THE NEVIS LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP PROJECT

Stone will be sourced following the hierarchy and protocol set out below.

1) From within the damaged zone of the existing path and summit structures, with a

preference for damaged areas that are not recovering over damaged areas that are

recovering.

2) From any recent but redundant stone constructions, such as unnecessary cairns or

stone rings.

3) From areas within large patches of Natura qualifying scree where fresh rock has

come to rest in a stable position, provided it can be removed without causing erosion

and is suitable for use on landscape grounds (adhering to protocol set out below.)

4) From areas within large patches of Natura qualifying scree where there are medium

to large block sizes (adhering to protocol set out below.)

PROTOCOL

a) ROCKS AT THE EDGES OF QUALIFYING SCREE PATCHES MUST NOT BE REMOVED BECAUSE THIS WOULD

REDUCE THE EXTENT OF THE SCREE.

b) ROCKS OF DIFFERENT SIZES SHOULD BE REMOVED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT DEPLETE ANY ONE

SIZE CLASS.

c) STONE SHOULD NOT BE SOURCED FROM UNSTABLE SCREES OR THOSE COMPOSED OF SMALL ROCK

AND GRAVEL BECAUSE OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY WALKING ACROSS THESE SCREE FANS, AND THE

ROLE LARGER ROCKS HAVE IN STABILISING THE SLOPE.

d) ROCKS MUST BE REMOVED INDIVIDUALLY FROM LOCATIONS SCATTERED OVER THE SCREE PATCH. THE

STRUCTURE OF THE SCREE SHOULD BE MAINTAINED BY SLIGHTLY SHIFTING ADJACENT ROCKS INTO

THE SPACE CREATED TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL PROFILE.

e) ROCKS MUST NOT BE REMOVED IF THIS WOULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE, INSTABILITY OR

INCREASE GRAZING AROUND VASCULAR PLANTS GROWING WITHIN OR AT THE EDGE OF THE SCREE.

f) ROCKS THAT ARE WELL EMBEDDED IN THE GROUND SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM QUALIFYING

SCREE HABITATS BECAUSE OF THEIR ROLE IN MAINTAINING STABILITY.

g) ROCK SHOULD ONLY BE REMOVED FROM THE SURFACE LAYER OF QUALIFYING SCREE HABITATS OR, IF

THE SURFACE LATER CAN BE EASILY REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE LAYER IMMEDIATELY BELOW. DEEPER

EXCAVATION WOULD BE LIKELY TO DISTURB VEGETATION AND CHANGE THE STRUCTURE OF THE SCREE.

h) ROCKS WITH SIGNIFICANT BRYOPHYTE OR LICHEN COVER MUST NOT BE REMOVED, NOR ADJACENT

ROCKS IN A MANNER THAT WOULD DESTABILISE THEM.

Summit Conservation


SCOTTISH NATURAL HERITAGE CONSENT (CONT’D)

i) THE LOCATIONS USED FOR SOURCING ROCK AND THE NUMBERS OR VOLUMES OF ROCK TAKEN

SHOULD BE RECORDED, PREFERABLY WITH GPS. REPRESENTATIVE ‘BEFORE AND AFTER’ PHOTOGRAPHS

SHOULD BE TAKEN TO ALLOW FUTURE MONITORING. ASSESSMENT OF SUBSEQUENT PROPOSALS FOR

EXTRACTION SHOULD CONSIDER THESE RECORDS TO INFORM DECISIONS ON WHETHER CUMULATIVE

IMPACTS WILL RESULT IN ADVERSE IMPACTS ON SITE INTEGRITY.

j) AS A GENERAL GUIDE, NO MORE THAN 1/100 ROCKS FROM ANY PATCH OF QUALIFYING SCREE

HABITAT SHOULD BE REMOVED, UNLESS IT IS A DEEP ACCUMULATION OF ROCK AND ALTERNATIVE

VOLUMES HAVE BEEN AGREED FOLLOWING ADVICE FROM ADVISORY SERVICES. TO ACHIEVE THIS

DENSITY, WORKERS MUST COUNT AT LEAST TEN TO FIFTEEN ROCKS BETWEEN EXTRACTED ROCKS.

PATCHES OF QUALIFYING SCREE WHICH HAVE LESS THAN ONE HUNDRED ROCKS SHOULD NOT BE

USED FOR EXTRACTION. ANNEX 1 CONTAINS FURTHER INFORMATION ON CALCULATING ACCEPTABLE

INTENSITIES OF EXTRACTION.

k) SMALL ‘GRAVEL’ SCREE SHOULD NOT BE CROSSED TO GET TO OTHER ROCK SOURCES, EXCEPT WHERE

THERE IS AN EXISTING PATH. IF EROSION RELATING TO USE OF THE PATH INREASES THIS ROUTE SHOULD

BE CHANGED.

l) ROCK SHOULD ONLY BE MAN-HANDLED ACROSS QUALIFYING SCREE HABITATS FOR AS SHORT A

DISTANCE AS POSSIBLE TO REDUCE INSTABILITY.

m) TO MINIMISE DAMAGE, HELICOPTERS AND BULK BAGS SHOULD BE USED TO TRANSPORT ROCK (RATHER

THAN POWER-BARROWS) UNLESS DISTANCES ARE SHORT AND USE OF POWER BARROWS WILL NOT

RESULT IN AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON SITE INTEGRITY.

Cathy Mayne

Scottish Natural Heritage

Operations Manager

Fort William

5th September 2014

Summit Conservation


INVITATION TO TENDER

Introduction & Repair Work

There are several structures of safety, cultural and historical interest on the summit plateau

of Ben Nevis. As such the John Muir Trust and the Nevis Landscape Partnership is committed

to protecting them whilst recognising the designations and wildness of the summit area.

PRIORITY

Triangulation Point

This stands on a large flat topped cairn with a concrete platform. Some of the stone work

has fallen away leaving part of the pad unsupported. The Triangulation Point is a favourite

landmark for many of those who reach the summit. This needs repaired as per the bill of

quantities.

Navigation Cairns

There are twenty-four of these cairns in total. Part of their care involves the removal of other

cairns that appear from time to time whose existence can cause confusion. The cold, wet

environment causes the cairns to lose stones and reduce in height. These are a safety

feature chosen to be kept maintained after lengthy consultation with the wider community.

SECONDARY PRIORITY

Summit Shelter

Similar problem to the Triangulation Point, subsidence of the supporting cairn. Stone work

has fallen away. The shelter provides an escape from the weather and is an important safety

feature relied on by many. This needs repaired as per the bill of quantities

Hotel Ruins

Removal of broken wooden remains of supporting timbers & artefacts, possibly stabilising

of remaining walls and stone floor as per bill of quantities. This project will help to contribute

to the areas reputation for high quality outdoor recreation and maintain the important

safety, cultural and historical features within the designated site and enhance the visitor

experience.

Weather & Condition of Structures

We expect that all the work detailed above and in the bill of quantities will be planned for

and carried out as part of this contract. However, we do accept that the work involves a

degree of uncertainty with regards to the structure of the summit triangulation cairn and with

regards to weather conditions on planned days of work. These uncertainties have indicated

the first and second priorities to be completed within the agreed tender budget.

Summit Conservation


INVITATION TO TENDER (CONT’D)

We expect that the contractors will inform and liaise with John Muir Trust as soon as possible

if it is likely that conditions indicate that the number of days allocated for the work will not

be adequate to complete all the actions on the bill of quantities in the contract.

Site Visit Details

There will be a compulsory site visit for these works at the start of the contract before any

work starts to confirm any outstanding queries and resolve any questions if needed. This

date is to be arranged between the contractor and Alison Austin, Nevis Property Manager,

John Muir Trust. It is envisaged that the site visit will take approximately the whole day and

could be the first day of the contractors being on site or a day prior to that.

Along with this project brief please find attached the following documents:

• STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS

• BILL OF QUANTITIES

• GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

• RISK ASSESSMENT

• PRE-TENDER HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT PLAN

• TENDER RECONCILIATION

Tender Documents

Contractors should submit the following documents as part of their tender:

• COMPLETED BILL OF QUANTITIES WITH TOTAL PRICE FOR THE WORKS

• DETAILS OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

• DETAILS OF AVAILABILITY TO UNDERTAKE WORKS IN DESIRED TIMESCALE

• PRE-TENDER HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN

• RISK ASSESSMENT

• COPY OF PUBLIC LIABILITY COVER

• SIGNED TENDER RECONCILIATION DOCUMENT

The risk assessment should not only include a risk level classification but most importantly

identify what level of risk is unacceptable and what measures will be taken to reduce the

risk to an acceptable level. The contractor can submit either a completed copy of the

attached risk assessment form or their own risk assessment. The contractor should outline

in the pre-tender health and safety plan the sequence of operations, method statement and

further details of safety precautions to be taken. A pro-forma health and safety plan is

attached which can be completed or used as a guideline.

Summit Conservation


INVITATION TO TENDER (CONT’D)

By signing the tender reconciliation, the contractor is agreeing to abide by the general

conditions of contract and specifications of the work at the submitted tender price.

Please submit tender to;

Alison Austin

John Muir Trust


Torlundy

Fort William

PH33 6SW

Important Dates

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSIONS 12:00, 5th

May 2015

CONTRACT AWARDED EARLY MAY

EARLIEST CONTRACT START DATE JUNE 2015 (DEPENDANT ON SNOW LIE)

START OF CONTRACT SITE VISIT TO BE ARRANGED

CONTRACT TO BE COMPLETED 31st

October 2015

Summit Conservation



Contract Name

Ben Nevis Summit Project

PART 1 (TO BE COMPLETED BY CO-ORDINATOR)

(1) NATURE OF THE PROJECT

1.01 Client The John Muir Trust

1.02 Co-ordinator Alison Austin

1.03 Location: Ben Nevis, Lochaber

1.04 Nature of project: To undertake repairs to stone built structures on summit of Ben

Nevis including triangulation point, summit cairn, summit

shelter base, hotel ruins and summit navigational cairns. In

addition, to carry out thorough clean of rubbish and detritus

accumulating within and around these structures.

(2) THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT

2.01 Access

The site can be accessed from the visitor centre car park in Glen Nevis, from the road end

at Achintee or from the Path to the north face (and CIC hut)

2.02 Surroundings

The site is at approximately 1200-1344 elevation.

2.03 Existing Services

There are no known gas, electricity or water services on site. Contractors should satisfy

themselves that this is the case and any services that are present must be safely worked

around.

2.04 Existing Structures

There are several man-made structures within the work site area. These are to be repaired

and rebuilt as outlined in Bill of Quantities.

Summit Conservation


PRE-TENDER HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (CONT’D)

(3) EXISTING DRAWINGS

3.01 SITE PLAN ENCLOSED (SEE STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS)

(4) CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

4.01 COSHH

The Principal Contractor should include relevant medium and high risk COSHH

assessments for all health hazards potentially arising from any construction materials and

substances, where precautions are required either because of their nature or the manner of

their intended use. Copies of all appropriate COSHH assessments will be retained on site.

(5) SITE WIDE ELEMENTS

5.01 Access/Egress

Safe access routes shall be established and maintained throughout the duration of the

works. The Principal Contractor shall outline his procedures for the safe delivery of materials

and plant; these shall not in any way be allowed to impede the free movement of pedestrian

and vehicular traffic in the area.

5.02 Visitors and Pedestrians

The Principal Contractor shall outline proposals for ensuring the safety of all persons coming

onto the site including the following:

• ADEQUATE ACCESS/EGRESS SIGNAGE, COVERING EMERGENCY REQUIREMENTS

• SAFE PASSAGE OF PEDESTRIANS ADJACENT TO THE SITE

• SAFETY BARRIERS WHERE APPROPRIATE

• SEQUENCING OF WORK

(6) OVERLAP WITH CLIENT’S UNDERTAKING

6.01 General

The Principal Contractor shall ensure the works are executed without risk to the public.

Summit Conservation



(7) SITE RULES

7.01 General

The Principal Contractor should utilise good practice always:

• NO BURNING OF RUBBISH OR MATERIALS ON SITE

• NO ANIMALS TO BE TAKEN ON SITE

7.02 Security

The Principal Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions to adequately secure the

works against criminal damage and theft.

7.03 Disposal of Rubbish

The Principal Contractor shall state his procedures for the safe removal and disposal of

excavated materials, general rubbish, debris, etc. in such a manner as to avoid nuisance

and misuse.

7.04 Site Welfare

The Principal Contractor shall maintain the site in a safe and tidy condition always.

7.05 Plant and Equipment

All plant and equipment shall be kept in a safe and proper condition in line with

manufacturer’s requirements.

7.06 Personnel

The Principal Contractor shall state his procedures for ensuring:

• ALL PERSONNEL ARE COMPETENT AND ADEQUATELY TRAINED

• HEALTH AND SAFETY INFORMATION IS RELAYED TO ALL PERSONNEL

• ALL PERSONNEL ARE AWARE OF HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE

• ALL PERSONNEL INCLUDING VISITORS HAVE ACCESS TO AND UTILISE APPROPRIATE PERSONAL

PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

7.07 Noise

The Principal Contractor shall take all necessary steps to reduce the risk of injury through

exposure to noise, and shall state his proposals for reducing the effects of noise at source.

Summit Conservation



7.08 Risk Assessments

The Principal Contractor shall carry out risk assessments on all construction activities that

may prove hazardous to the health and safety of personnel. Those assessments which

highlight a medium or high risk level shall be incorporated into the Health and Safety plan.

(8) CONTINUING LIAISON

8.01 Ongoing

The Principal Contractor shall give due consideration to any Health and Safety implications

of any design element of his operations. All relevant information shall be submitted to the

Project Co-ordinator timeously in order that they may be reviewed and comment made as

necessary.

8.02 Unforeseen

The Principal Contractor shall outline his procedure for dealing with any unforeseen

occurrences arising during the construction process which may have a Health and Safety

implication.

8.03 Accident

A copy of all F2508 accident reports must be forwarded to the Project Co-ordinator as soon

as possible after the event; notification of serious accidents should be made initially by

telephone.

8.04 RIDDOR

The Principal Contractor shall comply with the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and

Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1985 and shall submit details of all reportable

incidents to the Project Co-ordinator.

8.05 Alternative

The Principal Contractor shall, where he intends to substitute alternatives for materials or

substances specified, submit details to the Project Co-ordinator at least fourteen days prior

to use on site.

Summit Conservation



(9) THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN

9.01 General

The Principal Contractor shall be responsible for developing and preparing the Construction

Phase Health and Safety Plan in compliance with Clause 10 of the CDM Regulations. One

copy of the Principal Contractor’s Construction Phase Health and Safety Plan shall be

submitted to the Project Co-ordinator prior to the intended Date for Possession of the

project. Details of the following should be included in the Principal Contractors Construction

Phase Health and Safety plan:

• RISK ASSESSMENT

• WELFARE FACILITIES

• STORAGE OF MATERIALS

• PROVISION OF FIRST AID FACILITIES

• EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

The Principal Contractor shall not be permitted to commence works until the Construction

Phase Health and Safety Plan has been completed to the satisfaction of the client or his

representative. One copy of the Construction Phase Health and Safety Plan shall be retained

on site, always, during the Contract Period.

(10) THE HEALTH AND SAFETY FILE

10.01 General

The Principal Contractor shall provide the Project Co-ordinator with all necessary

information to enable the preparation of the Health and Safety File. The Health and Safety

File shall include where appropriate:

• GENERAL DETAILS OF THE CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS USED

• DETAILS OF ANY MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES

The format of the above information shall be agreed with the Project Co-ordinator prior to

submission.

Summit Conservation



PART 2 (TO BE COMPLETED BY ALL TENDERING CONTRACTORS)

Pre-Tender Method Statement

(1) Contract Company

NAME

ADDRESS

TEL

FAX

E-MAIL

ACCOMMODATION ADDRESS

(2) Client

NAME: John Muir Trust

CO-ORDINATOR: Alison Austin

Nevis Manager

ADDRESS: The John Muir Trust


Torlundy

Fort William

PH33 6SW

TEL: 01397 705149 / 07766811949

E-MAIL: [email protected]

(3) Site

CONTRACT LOCATION

SITE NAME

CONTRACT START DATE

CONTRACT FINISH DATE

(4) Staff on Contract

TEAM LEADER

NUMBER OF STAFF ON CONTRACT

NAMES, QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF ALL STAFF TO BE EMPLOYED ON CONTRACT

Summit Conservation



(5) Sub-Contractors

SUB-CONTRACTORS TO BE USED (YES) (NO)

NAMES, QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE OF ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS TO BE USED ON CONTRACT

(6) Contract Description

(7) Sequence of Operations

Signature: Date:

PLEASE APPEND YOUR RISK ASSESSMENT

Summit Conservation


STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS APPENDICES

LOCATION OF CAIRNS

CAIRN GRID REFERENCE DETAILS WORK REQUIRED

1 NN1663871243 N/A REPLACE COPING STONE


3A SEE DETAILS 231 BEARING FROM SUMMIT TRIANGULATION POINT N/A

3 NN1656171174 GARDYLOO CAIRN REPLACE COPING STONE

3B SEE DETAILS 282 BEARING FROM GARDYLOO CAIRN N/A

4 NN1651171184 N/A N/A

5 NN1645971193 N/A N/A

6 NN1640871203 N/A N/A

7 NN1635871216 N/A N/A

8 NN1630671223 N/A N/A

9 NN1635471243 N/A N/A

10 NN1631471240 N/A N/A

11 NN1626571233 MACLEAN’S CAIRN REPLACE COPING STONE

12 NN1622971247 N/A N/A

13 NN1617871259 N/A REBUILD FROM HALFWAY




17 NN1600171296 N/A NEEDS PACKING



20 NN1584271339 N/A NEEDS PACKING



23 NN1571671378 4000FT SHELTER N/A

Summit Conservation


STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS APPENDICES (CONT’D)

Map 1

Site Location

Summit Conservation



Site Plan

Extracts from Ordnance Survey File

1936

The pillar was erected on the site of the old Ordnance Survey triangulation mark and on

top of the existing cairn about ten feet above normal ground level. A new lower mark

consisting of a primary bolt in a hydrant type box, set in one-foot of concrete, was first

placed five feet below the pillar. A base of three-feet square was then built of rocks and

filled in with concrete to the required level and the pillar erected on this base in the usual

manner. The stones on top of the cairn were levelled off and bedded down in concrete to

form a pathway around the pillar for the observer to work from.

1955; Sketch of Base Erosion.

Summit Conservation



1959

An estimated two tonnes of material were used to repair the cairn. Retaining wall built up

to level of pillar base and concrete filled on to prevent stones from moving.

1969

Emergency repairs.

1972

Removed damaged pillar from cairn. Replaced top bolt. New pillar emplaced plumb over

original position. Cairn grouted in after rebuilding.

John Muir Trust; Ben Nevis Summit Project

Statement of Requirements (Index)

GOODS/SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

TIMETABLE

TERMS & CONDITIONS

EVALUATION CRITERIA

PROJECT CONTACT

HEALTH & SAFETY

Summit Conservation



GOODS/SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

As part of the contract, The Nevis Partnership will require the following;

1. SUBMISSION OF A HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN AND METHOD STATEMENT FOR THE REPAIR WORK, TO

JMT, FOR APPROVAL. IT SHALL INCLUDE A CLEAR METHODOLOGY ON HOW THE CONTRACTOR

PROPOSES TO UNDERTAKE THE WORK, AND AN APPROPRIATE RISK ASSESSMENT. ADEQUATE

PROVISION SHALL BE MADE TO PROTECT ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE WORK, INCLUDING

EMPLOYEES AND THE PUBLIC

2. AN ABILITY TO DEMONSTRATE PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE OF WORKING IN REMOTE LOCATIONS AND

COORDINATING HELICOPTER LIFTS OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THEIR OWN SAFETY INCLUDING THE

PROVISION AND USE OF APPROPRIATE PPE AND INSPECTION OF ALL EQUIPMENT.

4. MINIMAL IMPACT IS TO BE MADE, DUE TO THE SITE BEING DESIGNATED AN SSSI AND SAC. THIS WILL

REQUIRE SPECIFIC LOCATIONS AND STYLE OF TAKING ROCK AND BUILDING MATERIAL TO BE USED

FROM AN AREA PRE-ARRANGED WITH SNH

5. SHOULD ANY SERIOUS HAZARD OR SAFETY ISSUE ARISE, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO

INFORM THE JMT IMMEDIATELY.

6. THE CONTRACTOR WILL MANAGE THE LOGISTICAL ARRANGEMENTS REGARDING HELICOPTER

COORDINATION AND SELECTING AND BAGGING OF ANY BUILDING MATERIAL REQUIRED.

7. THE CONTACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE FULL INSURANCE COVER FOR ALL ACTIVITIES

WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT AND FOR PUBLIC LIABILITY.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

The contractor shall submit;

• A PROPOSAL FOR UNDERTAKING THE REPAIR AND CLEAN UP WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE

• TENDER RECONCILIATION DOCUMENT

• A PRICE FOR EACH ELEMENT LISTED

• RESUME OF RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

It shall include an outline methodology of how the work is to be undertaken and the

documents identified under the Health and Safety requirements.

Summit Conservation



TIMETABLE

The contract will extend over six months. The contract will start as soon as possible after

the snow has receded from the structures (post June 2015) and will be complete by the

end of October 2015 when weather conditions will make it difficult to continue working

efficiently at this location. Consultants are requested to provide one paper copy of their

submission, no later than the date indicated below.

The intended timetable for this tender process is;

ISSUE INVITATION TO QUOTE 20TH

APRIL 2015

SUBMISSION DATE 5TH

MAY 2015

EVALUATE QUOTATIONS EARLY MAY 2015

NOTIFICATION OF AWARD DECISION EARLY MAY 2015

CONTRACT START DATE JUNE > (DEPENDING ON SNOW LIE)

PLANNING DAY/SITE VISIT JUNE

TERMS & CONDITIONS

SEE HEALTH & SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Consultants responses will be evaluated against the following list of criteria;

EVALUATION CRITERIA WEIGHTING

OBJECTIVES & SCOPE OF SERVICE; CONSULTANTS ABILITY TO DEMONSTRATE (IN THEIR

PROPOSAL) THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE THE FULL SERVICE REQUIRED

40%

EXPERIENCE OF WORKING ON BEN NEVIS OR SIMILAR REMOTE HIGH LEVEL LOCATION/SITE

(INCLUDING CO-ORDINATOR HELICOPTER LIFTS OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS)

10%

TIMETABLE; CONSULTANTS DEMONSTRATE THEIR ABILITY TO MEET THE TIMEFRAME

INDICATED ABOVE

ESSENTIAL

TERMS & CONDITIONS; CONSULTANTS CONFRIM THEIR ACCEPTANCE OF THE ENCLOSED

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

ESSENTIAL

SCHEDULE OF COSTS; ASSESSMENT OF CONSULTANTS AND SERVICES PROVIDED IN

RELATION TO VALUE FOR MONEY

ESSENTIAL

Summit Conservation



EVALUATION CRITERIA (CONT’D)

Consultants may be required to demonstrate the provision of the service for which a

proposal has been made. Consultants will bear their own costs relating to any such

demonstrations.

PROJECT CONTACT

Any contractor requiring further clarification of any points should address their enquiries in

writing to the contact listed below;

Alison Austin

Nevis Conservation Officer

John Muir Trust

Unit 1B


Torlundy

Fort William

PH33 6SW

[email protected]

HEALTH & SAFETY

As part of any client/contractor relationship, both parties have duties under H&S legislation.

Similarly, if a contractor employs sub-contractors to carry out some or all the work contained

within the specification given for the contract, all parties have health and safety

responsibilities. The extent of the responsibilities of each party will depend on the individual

circumstances of the project. To meet the contract requirements, we need to be satisfied

that prospective contractors are competent to undertake the work described and have health

& safety policies and procedures in place. These must address employee training and safety,

and the risks and hazards associated with the work.

Summit Conservation


HEALTH & SAFETY (CONT’D)

To this end, we require you to submit the following information;

1. EVIDENCE OF COMPETENCY (E.G. QUALIFICATIONS, TRAINING, EXPERIENCE, REFERENCES, CV’S ETC.) – THIS

MAY HAVE BEEN REQUESTED PREVIOUSLY IN THE STATEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS (SOR).

2. A COPY OF YOUR HEALTH AND SAFETY POLICY STATEMENT

3. A STATEMENT SHOWING YOUR ‘SAFE METHOD OF OPERATION’ AND ANY GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENTS FOR

THE TYPE OF WORK YOU INTEND CARRYING OUT (IF APPLICABLE).

4. A COPY OF BOTH YOUR PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE CERTIFICATE AND, WHERE APPROPRIATE, EMPLOYER’S

LIABILITY INSURANCE CERTIFICATES, OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE COVER (E.G. A BROKER’S LETTER).

5. A STATEMENT OF YOUR PROCEDURES FOR APPRAISING THE COMPETENCE OF ANY SUB-CONTRACTOR THAT

YOU INTEND TO USE ON THE PROJECT.

6. IN ADDITION TO YOUR OWN STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER THE REPORTING OF INJURIES, DISEASES

AND DANGEROUS OCCURRENCES REGULATIONS (RIDDOR) 1995, NP WILL REQUIRE YOU TO REPORT ALL

ACCIDENTS, DANGEROUS OCCURRENCES AND NEAR-MISSES THAT OCCUR WHILST YOU ARE WORKING

FOR US, TO THE PROJECT OFFICER.

The successful contractor will be required, in liaison with the Project Officer, to identify

hazards associated with the work, to complete the necessary COSHH (Control of Substances

Hazardous to Health) and final Risk Assessments and to confirm their ‘Safe Method of

Operation’ statement. This will include ensuring that any previously supplied generic risk

assessments have been tailored to the specific work to be undertaken. This must be agreed

with the Project Officer before the work commences.

If contractors fail to provide suitable information, a Health & Safety Policy and evidence of

insurance (as requested above), their tender will be regarded as ‘non-compliant’.

Summit Conservation


CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

REFER TO YEAR ONE REPORT APPENDICES

Summit Conservation


AIRLIFT RISK ASSESSMENT & AIRLIFT PLAN

Summit Conservation


IMAGES

1 2 3 4

65 7 8

Summit Conservation


IMAGES (CONT’D)

9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16

Summit Conservation


IMAGES (CONT’D)

20 17 18 19

21 22 23 24

Summit Conservation


IMAGES (CONT’D)

1) CAIRN 1; NEW COPING STONE






7) CAIRN 13; REBUILT FROM HALFWAY


9) CAIRN 3 (MIDDLE); NEW COPING STONE


11) CAIRN 17; NEEDING PACKING

12) CAIRN 20; NEEDING PACKING

13) CAIRN 21; REBUILT FROM BOTTOM

14) CAIRN 8; REBUILT FROM BOTTOM

15) CORNER 7 CAIRN; BEFORE

16) CORNER 7 CAIRN; DURING

17) TRIANGULATION POINT; BEFORE

18) TRIANGULATION POINT; BEFORE

19) TRIANGULATION POINT; AFTER

20) TRIANGULATION POINT; AFTER

21) SUMMIT SHELTER; BEFORE

22) SUMMIT SHELTER AFTER; HOLE IN SIDE OF STRUCTURE & STEPS REBUILT

23) HELICOPTER LIFTS

24) HELICOPTER LIFTS

Summit Conservation


ACTIVITY RISK ASSESSMENT

ADVANCE INFORMATION GIVEN TO

PARTICIPANTS

VOLUNTEERING PAGE ON WEBSITE AND INFORMATION EMAIL SENT TO ALL VOLUNTEERS WHO PRE-BOOK

SUGGESTION TO ENSURE ANTI- TETANUS INOCULATIONS ARE UP TO DATE

REMINDER OF RISK OF LYMES DISEASE & LINK TO BADA WEBSITE FOR INFO

SUGGESTION TO BRING OWN PERSONAL FIRST AID KIT

REQUEST TO HAVE EMERGENCY CONTACTS DETAILS IF VOLUNTEER WISHES TO GIVE THEM TO JMT APPROPRIATE VERBAL

BRIEFING ON TASKS IS GIVEN BY SUPERVISOR ON COMMENCEMENT OF WORK

PPE (PERSONAL PROTECTION

EQUIPMENT)

WORK GLOVES

SAFETY GOGGLES (IF TASK HAS RISK OF EYE INJURY) TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ALL USERS

HI VIS TABARD - TO BE USED IN VERY LOW VISIBILITY OR PROXIMITY TO DANGER AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC ROAD

USERS

UNDER 18 YEAR OLDS ARE ALL ACCOMPANIED BY PARENT OR ANOTHER RESPONSIBLE GUARDIAN

DUE TO WAY WORK PARTIES ARE ORGANIZED THEY TEND TO ATTRACT VOLUNTEERS WITH A HIGH LEVEL OF SELF SUFFICIENCY

AND PRIOR EXPERIENCE OF WILD PLACES. SUPERVISORS OF WORK PARTIES WILL ENSURE THAT NEWCOMERS ARE INFORMALLY

ASSESSED AND RECEIVE APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION.

RELEVANT JMT RISK ASSESSMENTS

HAND TOOLS

JMT PROPERTY RISK ASSESSMENTS

WORKING ON ROUGH TERRAIN/BAD WEATHER/REMOTE AREAS/ALTITUDE

KEY JMT CONTACTS

PROPERTY MANAGER OF LOCATION WHERE WORK PARTY IS OCCURRING

VOLUNTEER WORK PARTIES CO-ORDINATOR, SANDY MAXWELL [email protected]

T: 0141 576 6663 M: 07766 380 663

(BOTH ARE FIRST AID @ WORK TRAINED AND CARRY APPROPRIATE FIRST AID KITS)

HSE RIDDOR REPORTING

0845 300 9923 (ALERT HSE OF REPORTABLE ACCIDENT/INCIDENT FIRST ONLY IF THE H&S OFFICER OR HQ UNAVAILABLE)

mailto:[email protected]

Summit Conservation


ACTIVITY RISK ASSESSMENT (CONT’D)

ACTIVITY

TYPE OF SIGNIFICANT RISK

NOT COVERED BY OTHER

RELEVANT ASSESSMENTS

RISK WITHOUT APPROPRIATE

CONTROL MEASURES CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE

RESIDUAL RISK

RESULT/LIKLIEHOOD=RISK

BEACH & GENERAL

RUBBISH CLEANING

SLIP/TRIP ON WET UNSTABLE

SURFACE

MINOR/PROBABLE=MEDIUM

APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION- TAKING INTO

CONSIDERATION, WEATHER, TIDE & GEOGRAPHY OF

WORK LOCATION

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

BEACH & GENERAL

RUBBISH CLEANING

PUNCTURE INJURY FROM

GLASS OR OTHER SHARPS

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW RISK INCLUDED IN PRE-BRIEFING AND LITTER PICKERS

AND SUITABLE CONTAINERS PROVIDED

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

FOOTPATH

MAINTENANCE AND

REPAIR

CRUSHING/STRIKING

INJURY WHEN WORKING

WITH LARGE STONES

MINOR/PROBABLE =MEDIUM

PRE-BRIEFING AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION. WHEN

STONE IS BEING MOVED UPHILL FROM WORK SITE

APPROPRIATE CONTROL MEASURES (TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT, BANKSMAN ETC.) EMPLOYED

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

FOOTPATH

MAINTENANCE AND

REPAIR

TRIPS/SLIPS & STRIKING

INJURY TO PUBLIC WHEN

STONE IS BEING MOVED

INTO PLACE

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

WHEN STONE IS BEING MOVED UPHILL FROM WORK

SITE APPROPRIATE CONTROL MEASURES (TRAFFIC

MANAGEMENT, BANKSMAN ETC.) EMPLOYED WORK

SITE KEPT CLEAR OF OBSTACLES AND HOLES/UNEVEN

SURFACES CLEARLY MARKED WHEN SITE NOT MANNED

MINOR/IMPROBABLE=LOW

FENCE REPAIRS AND

REMOVAL

PUNCTURE INJURY

(ESPECIALLY FACIAL) FROM

MANIPULATION OF WIRE

MAJOR/POSSIBLE=MEDIUM PRE-BRIEFING AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION.

EYE PROTECTION SUPPLIED

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

INVASIVE CONTROL

BURNS DURING DISPOSAL

OF INVASIVES IN BONFIRE

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW BURNING SITE TO BE SELECTED FOR SAFE ACCESS AND

APPROPRIATELY SUPERVISED

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

Summit Conservation



ACTIVITY

TYPE OF SIGNIFICANT RISK

NOT COVERED BY OTHER

RELEVANT ASSESSMENTS

RISK WITHOUT APPROPRIATE

CONTROL MEASURES CONTROL MEASURES IN PLACE

RESIDUAL RISK

RESULT/LIKLIEHOOD=RISK

INVASIVE CONTROL CHEMICAL BURN OR

POISONING

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

CHEMICAL CONTROL ONLY TO BE USED BY

APPROPRIATELY TRAINED INDIVIDUALS TALKING

APPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

BRASHING & OTHER

WOODLAND TASKS

PUNCTURE INJURY


OVERHANGING BRANCHES

MAJOR/POSSIBLE=MEDIUM PRE-BRIEFING AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION.

EYE PROTECTION SUPPLIED

MAJOR/IMPROBABLE =LOW

TREE AND

MARRAM PLANTING

PUNCTURE INJURY


TREE STAKES, GRASSES

ETC.

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

PRE-BRIEFING AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION.

EYE PROTECTION SUPPLIED MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

DRYSTONE WALLING

CRUSHING/STRIKING

INJURY WHEN WORKING

WITH LARGE STONES

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

PRE-BRIEFING AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISION.

TIDY WORK SITE TO BE ENCOURAGED MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

SEED COLLECTING AND

NURSERY WORK

NONE

ALL ACTIVITIES MANUAL HANDLING MINOR/PROBABLE=MEDIUM

SUPERVISION TO ENCOURAGE GOOD MANUAL

HANDLING PROCEDURE AND LIMIT ACTIVITY TO

VOLUNTEERS INDIVIDUAL CAPABILITIES

MINOR/POSSIBLE=LOW

ALL ACTIVITIES

LYMES DISEASE FROM TICK

BITE MAJOR/POSSIBLE=MEDIUM

ADVANCE INFORMATION REINFORCED WITH

REMINDERS ABOUT CHECKING FOR TICKS, TICK

REMOVERS MADE AVAILABLE TO VOLUNTEERS

MAJOR/IMPROBABLE=LOW

NOTES/COMMENTS; Unusual or larger scale projects* will be risk assessed as a separate activity.

*MAJOR PATH RECONSTRUCTION / RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD STEALL BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE

Summit Conservation



GUIDANCE ONLY

RESULT CERTAIN PROBABLE POSSIBLE IMPROBABLE

CERTAIN = WILL HAPPEN

PROBABLE = HAPPENS REPEATEDLY/EXPECTED

POSSIBLE = POTENTIAL EXISTS/UNCOMMON

IMPROBABLE = RARELY OCCURS/CONCEIVABLE

FATALITY / DISABILITY HIGH HIGH MEDIUM LOW

MAJOR INJURY HIGH HIGH MEDIUM LOW

MINOR INJURY MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW LOW

NO INJURY LOW LOW LOW LOW

This risk assessment must be signed and retained in hard copy. Refer to it in conjunction with the relevant work activity risk assessment(s) before any work

or led/organised leisure activity commences. All participants must be briefed on any significant hazards and control measures.

RISK ASSESSMENT COMPLETED Sandy Maxwell, 17th

February 2014

DATE FOR REVIEW February 2014

[END OF REPORT]

nevislandscape.co.uk

facebook.com/nevislandscape

twitter.com/nevislandscape

instagram.com/nevis_landscape

vimeo.com/nevislandscape

http://www.nevislandscape.co.uk/

http://www.facebook.com/nevislandscape