Upload
claire-bond
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Subregional workshop on the implementation of the Convention on the Transboundary Effects
of Industrial Accidents
Erevan, Armenia 13-15 March 2003
Sergiusz LudwiczakUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Focus of my presentation:
• KEY OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE UNECE CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARY EFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS (Industrial Accidents Convention)
also
• Status of ratification of the Convention
• Other UNECE Multilateral Environmental Agreements
ECE CONVENTIONS – TOOLSFOR TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION
• It is one of the five Regional Commissions of the United Nations
• Its main task – integration of the countries of the region, and in particular the integration of the countries with economies in transition into the European economy
• Its membership - 55 member countries (Europe, North America and Central Asia)
What is the UNECE?
EE
LV
LT
BYPL
UA
ROHU
BG
TRGRAZ
GE
AMKG
FI
CY
SENO
DK
DENL
IE
ESPT
IT
CHAT
GB
HR
BA
AL MK
FR
BECZ
M D
SK
SL
YU
LU.
KZ
RU
TMUZ
TJ
ECE CONVENTIONS – TOOLSFOR TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION
– Five Conventions – all in force
– Nine Protocols – five in force
– Three new legally binding instruments – ready for adoption in Kiev in 2003
Multilateral Environmental Agreements
Significant achievements within the framework of the UNECE (seventeen legally binding instruments):
ECE CONVENTIONS – TOOLSFOR TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION
– 1979 Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution
– 1991 Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
– 1992 Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes
– 1992 Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents
– 1998 Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Conventions:
UNECE CONVENTION ON THE
TRANSBOUNDARY EFFECTS OF
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
The Convention aims to:
• Protect human beings and the environment against major industrial accidents by preventing such accidents as far as possible, by reducing their frequency and severity and by mitigating their effects
• Promote cooperation between member countries of the UNECE region, not only between governments at the national level but in particular between local authorities and communities on both sides of a border
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
Prevention
Civil liability
Response
PreparednessIndustrial accidents
This complex instrument applies to the:
• The number of countries that are Parties to it; and
• The extent it is implemented and applied in practice
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
The effectiveness of the Convention depends on:
Is the current ratification status satisfactory?
No, it is not – a major concern
Although the number of ratifications is increasing, the pace of extending the geographical scope of the
Convention is too slow
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
27
9
2023
26
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1992 1997 2000 2001 2003
Ratification status
SignatoriesParties
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
• NORWAY• REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA• ALBANIA• RUSSIAN FEDERATION• HUNGARY • LUXEMBOURG • BULGARIA• ARMENIA • SPAIN • GREECE• EUROPEAN COMMUNITY • GERMANY• SWITZERLAND
• AUSTRIA• FINLAND • SWEDEN • CROATIA • ESTONIA• CZECH REPUBLIC • LITHUANIA• KAZAKHSTAN• DENMARK• MONACO• SLOVENIA• ITALY• UNITED KINGDOM
Parties to the Convention
.
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
• ARMENIA • Azerbaijan• Georgia• KAZAKHSTAN• Kyrgyzstan• Tajikistan• Turkmenistan• Uzbekistan
The Caucasian and Central Asian UNECE member countries
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
Is there any progress in applying the Convention in
practice since its entry into force?
YES, significant progress has been achieved
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
• On the basis of the first Report on the Implementation of the Convention, prepared by the Working Group on Implementation for the second meeting of the Conference of the Parties
– Most of the Parties met their reporting obligation. Only two other UNECE member countries submitted reports on a voluntary basis
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
Findings:
• A good number of Parties and other UNECE member countries are well advanced in fulfilling their tasks at the national level
• Cross-boarder cooperation is being undertaken or developed between countries of the region (The Polish-Russian transboundary response exercise is a good example)
• The CoP took important decisions to facilitate the cooperation between Parties and to ensure a basis for a common approach
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
• However, not all the tasks have so far been implemented and not by all Parties
• The CoP considered how to strengthen the Convention’s implementation and adopted a special decision
• A programme for some of the CITs is envisaged to assist
them in ratifying and implementing the Convention
– Subregional workshop – essential element
The Convention:
• Promotes bilateral transboundary cooperation – an essential feature
• Sets the bilateral obligations and the legal framework for such cooperation
• Comprises a set of obligations:
– At the national level - prerequisites
– At the intergovernmental level - facilitation
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Designation of Competent Authorities
• Bilateral task: Inform other Parties of the designated competent authorities
• National task: Designate or establish competent authorities responsible for the Convention’s implementation
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Competent Authorities
• Most Parties designated their competent authorities
• Depending on the country there is one or more authorities
• Good coordination at the country level is a condition for efficient transboundary cooperation
• In some cases, the efficient flow of information and coordination seems to be a problem
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Identification and notification of hazardous activities(This a difficult task but a crucial step to make the Convention work)
• Bilateral task: Notify (discuss) neighbouring country(ies)
• National task: Identify hazardous activities according to:
– annex I to the Convention (substance and quantity criteria) – similar to Annex I of the “Seveso II” Directive
• Intergovernmental task: Ensure a common approach:– The CoP agreed on the following location criteria:
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Identification of hazardous activities
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Activities within 15 km from the border
Activities further away but alongor within a catchment area of a transboundary or border river
Prevention of industrial accidents
• Bilateral task: Share experience and assist other countries in introducing preventive measures
• National task: Take appropriate measures and require operators to demonstrate the safe performance of hazardous activities
• Intergovernmental task: Draw up and disseminate best practices/guidelines on prevention of industrial accidents, including accidental water pollution:
– Joint work with the Water Convention and International River Commissions
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Emergency preparedness and response
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
National task: Establish and maintain adequate preparedness and response measures, including: on-site and off-site contingency plans
Bilateral task: Provide information on on-site contingency plans and make off-site plans compatible/joint plans
Emergency preparedness and response
• Intergovernmental task: Provide a forum to share experience on establishing and implementing preparedness and response measures and promote transboundary training and exercises
Three examples:
– International Workshop and exercise on Industrial Safety and Water Protection in Transboundary River Basins (3-5 October 2001, Tiszaújváros, Hungary);
– Polish-Russian transboundary response exercise in Kętrzyn
– Czech-German transboundary response exercise
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Industrial accident notification
• Bilateral task: Immediately notify the affected country(ies) in the event of a major industrial accident with transboundary effects (at national, regional and local levels)
• National tasks:– Establish and operate notification systems at the national and
other (regional and local) levels;
– Designate a national point of contact – operational 24 hours a day
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Industrial Accidents Notification
• Intergovernmental task: Ensure a common approach:– The CoP accepted the UNECE Industrial Accident
Notification System as an early warning tool for notifying a major accident at national level;
– The system comprises:• A network of national points of contact (36 countries);• Procedure and set of notification forms to be used:
– Early warning report, Information report, Assistance request report
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Past industrial accidents
• Bilateral task: Share information with other Parties on past industrial accidents with transboundary effects
• National task: Report on past industrial accidents
• Intergovernmental task: Ensure a common approach:
– The CoP decided to establish and operate the UNECE Past Industrial Accident Reporting System within the EU-MARS (Major Accident Reporting System) – joint work with the EC Major Accident Hazards Bureau
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
• Mutual assistance in case of a major accident:– Within the UNECE Industrial Accident Notification System
• Scientific and technological cooperation, exchange of information:– Exchange information, experience and technology related to prevention,
preparedness and response to industrial accidents
• Information to and participation of the public:– Inform the potentially affected public in the neighbouring country and
provide opportunity to participate in relevant procedures - equal treatment
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTIONKEY OBLIGATIONS
Other areas of bilateral cooperation include:
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
Civil liability for transboundary damage caused by transboundary effects of industrial accidents
A new challenge for the Parties to both the Industrial Accidents and the Water Conventions
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
• Accidental cyanide spill in Romania in early 2000
• Initiative of the Government of Switzerland to draw up a protocol on civil liability to the UNECE Industrial Accidents and Water Conventions
• Working Group on Legal and Administrative Aspects identifies shortcomings of existing international civil liability instruments in their report on “Responsibility and liability in relation to accidental water pollution”
Civil liability for transboundary damage
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
• The Parties to the UNECE Conventions on Industrial Accidents and on Water, at a special joint session in July 2001, decided to launch an intergovernmental negotiation process to draw up a legally binding instrument for transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities within the framework of both Conventions
• Established an Intergovernmental Working Group on Civil Liability with a mandate to draw up the instrument
Civil liability for transboundary damage
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
• The Working Group held seven meetings in 2001-2003 under a very effective chairmanship of Ms. Livada (Greece)
• The negotiation process was successfully completed on 27 February 2003
• Wide participation of all stakeholders: governments, industry, insurance sector and NGOs
• The draft Protocol is now ready for adoption at the Kiev Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” and will be open for signature by UNECE member countries
Civil liability for transboundary damage
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
The scope of application of the Protocol is limited to damage caused by transboundary effects of industrial accidents on transboundary waters (interface approach)
Water
Industrial accidents
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
• Constituted as the Convention’s governing body at its first meeting in Brussels in November 2000
• Held its second meeting in Chisinau on 6-8 November 2002
• Its third meeting is scheduled for 2004 in Budapest
Conference of the Parties
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
U N E C Esecretariat
W ork in g G rou pon Im p lem en tation
P oin ts of con tact Jo in t ad h oc exp ertgrou p on w ater andin u stria l accid en ts
W ork in g G rou pon C iv il L iab ility
B u reau
C on feren ce o f th e P arties
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
Bureau of the Conference of the Parties
Chairperson: Mr. Ernst Berger (Switzerland)
Vice-Chairpersons: Mr. Jürgen Wettig (European Commission)Mr. Pal Popelyak (Hungary)
Members (Parties): Mr. Ludwig Dinkloh (Germany)Mr. Pietro La Grotta (Italy)Mr. Evgeny Gorshkov (Russian Federation)Mr. Ulf Bjurman (Sweden)
(non-Parties) Mr. Tomas Trcka (Slovakia)
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS CONVENTION
Future meetings under the Convention
• Second joint special session of the governing bodies of the Industrial Accidents and Water Conventions within the framework of the Kiev Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” – adoption of theCivil Liability Protocol21 May 2003 (Kiev, Ukraine)
• Second meeting of the Working Group on ImplementationSecond half of 2003
• Consultation of the points of contact within the UNECE Industrial Accident Notification System10-11 November 2003 (Bratislava, Slovakia)
CONVENTION ON THE TRANSBOUNDARYEFFECTS OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS
I invite you to visit the Convention’s Internet home page at the following address:
http://www.unece.org/env/teia/welcome.html
Thank you