STUDY OF SUO-MOTO

DISCLOSURE

UNDER THE RTI Act, 2005

By Ms. shubham Jain

1. I had joined my internship on 04.11.2016 for a period of two

months. During my internship period, I have gone through 4152

decisions of Central Information Commission passed by Hon’ble Yashovardhan Azad in the year 2015. My work was to study the

application of Suo-moto disclosure under section 4 of RTI Act,

2005 by different Public Authorities and prepare an analysis data

on the same. The conclusion of the study is as follows:

2. While analyzing 4120 orders pertaining to different Ministries

and Departments, it has been observed that out of 4120 cases,

2570 applications were filed seeking personal information and

1182 applications seeking public information. Out of 4152 cases,

1169 applications were those applications which should have

come as Suo-moto disclosure under section 4 of the RTI Act.

1. MCD, GNCT Delhi

1.1 In the year 2015, 1322 appeals were filed before the CIC

against MCD, GNCT Delhi. Out of 1322 appeals, 729 RTI

applications were filed seeking personal information and 527

were with regard to public information.

1.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 1322 applications, 514 applications were relating

to the information which should come under section 4 of RTI

Act as suo-moto disclosure from the public authority.

40%

3% 29%

28%

private other public suo-moto

2. Coalfields Limited

2.1 In the year 2015, 202 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Coalfield Limited. Out of 202 appeals, 148 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 38 were with regard to

public information.

2.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

That out of 202 applications, 38 applications were relating to the

Information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as

suo-moto disclosure from the public authority.

22%

2%

6%

70%

private other public suo-moto

3. NDMC, GNCT Delhi

3.1 In the year 2015, 200 appeals were filed before the CIC against

NDMC, GNCT Delhi. Out of 200 appeals, 119 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 69 were with regard to

public information.

3.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 200 applications, 69 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as

suo-moto disclosure from the public authority.

44%

4%

26%

26%

private other public suo-moto

4. Hindustan copper Ltd.

4.1 In the year 2015, 26 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Indian Hindustan copper Ltd.. Out of 26 appeals, 24 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 2 were

with regard to public information.

4.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 26 applications, 1 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

92%

0%

8%

private other public suo-moto

5. Ministry of power

5.1 In the year 2015, 6 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of power. Out of 6 appeals, 5 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

5.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 6 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

86%

14%

0%

private other public suo-moto

6. Ministry of Shipping, Road transport &

Highways

6.1 In the year 2015, 144 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of culture. Out of 144 appeals, 90 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 38 were with regard to

public information.

6.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 144 applications, 38 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

49%

9%

21%

21%

private other public suo-moto

7. National Thermal Power Corporation

7.1 In the year 2015, 16 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National thermal power corporation. Out of 16 appeals, 16 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were

with regard to public information.

7.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 16 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

8. Medical Council of india

8.1 In the year 2015, 135 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Midical council of india. Out of 135 appeals, 87 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 35 were with regard to

public information.

8.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 135 applications, 35 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

51%

8%

21%

20%

private other public suo-moto

9. Indian Nursing Council

9.1 In the year 2015, 4 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Indian Nursing council. Out of 4 appeals, 0 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 4 were with regard to public

information.

9.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 4 applications, 4 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

10. Ministry of Health & Family welfare

10.1 In the year 2015, 307 appeals were filed before the CIC

against Ministry of Health & Family welfare. Out of 307 appeals,

198 RTI application were filed seeking personal information and

82 were with regard to public information.

10.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 307 applications, 82 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

51%

7%

21%

21%

private other public suo-moto

11. Department of consumer affairs

11.1 In the year 2015, 6 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Department of consumer Affairs. Out of 6 appeals, 4 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were

with regard to public information.

11.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 6 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should0 come under section 4 of RTI Act as

suo-moto disclosure from the public authority.

67%

33%

0%

0%

private other public suo-moto

12. UT of Pondicherry

12.1 In the year 2015, 189 appeals were filed before the CIC

against UT of Pondicherry. Out of 189 appeals, 133 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 39 were

with regard to public information.

12.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 189 applications, 39 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

58%

7%

17%

18%

private other public suo-moto

13. Ministry of Civil Aviation

13.1 In the year 2015, 48 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of civil Aviation. Out of 48 appeals, 43 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 4 were with regard to

public information.

13.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 48 applications, 4 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

83%

2% 7% 8%

private other public suo-moto

14. Ministry of Information & Broadcasting

14.1 In the year 2015, 69 appeals were filed before the CIC against

ministry of Information & Broadcasting. Out of 69 appeals, 49 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 13 were

with regard to public information.

14.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 69 applications, 13 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

60%

8%

16%

16%

private other public suo-moto

15. Ministry of Panchayati Raj

15.1 In the year 2015, 43 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of Panchayati Raj. Out of 43 appeals, 2 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to

public information.

15.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 43 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

5%

95%

0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

16. Dental council of India

16.1 In the year 2015, 13 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Dental council of India. Out of 13 appeals, 7 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 3 were with regard to public

information.

16.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 13 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

43%

19%

19%

19%

private other public suo-moto

17. Ministry of Corporate Affairs

17.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to

public information.

17.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 1 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

18. Ministry of rural development

18.1 In the year 2015, 21 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of rural Development. Out of 21 appeals, 11 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 7 were

with regard to public information.

18.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 21 applications, 7 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

13% 3%

8%

76%

private other public suo-moto

19. Department of Atomic Energy

19.1 In the year 2015, 182 appeals were filed before the CIC

against Department of Atomic Energy. Out of 13 appeals, 7 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 5 were

with regard to public information.

19.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 13 applications, 5 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

39%

5% 28%

28%

private other public suo-moto

20. Ministry of coal

20.1 In the year 2015, 258 appeals were filed before the CIC

against Ministry of coal. Out of 258 appeals, 172 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 58 were with regard to

public information.

20.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 258 applications, 58 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

55%

9%

18%

18%

private other public suo-moto

21. All india institute of Medical Sciences

21.1 In the year 2015, 57 appeals were filed before the CIC against

All India institute of medical sciences. Out of 57 appeals, 31 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 9 were

with regard to public information.

21.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 57 applications, 9 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

41%

25%

17%

17%

private other public suo-moto

22. India Rare Earth Ltd.

22.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

India Rare Earth Ltd.. Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

22.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 3 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as

suo-moto disclosure from the public authority

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

23. Neyveli Lignite Corporation

23.1 In the year 2015, 15 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Neyveli Lignite Corporation. Out of 15 appeals, 11 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 3 were

with regard to public information.

23.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 15 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

61%

5%

17%

17%

private other public suo-moto

24. Central information commission

24.1 In the year 2015, 10 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Central information commission. Out of 10 appeals, 6 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 2 were

with regard to public information.

24.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 10 applications, 2 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

50%

16%

17%

17%

private other public suo-moto

25. Nation board of Examinations

25.1 In the year 2015, 23 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National board of examinations. Out of 23 appeals, 9 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 8 were

with regard to public information.

25.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 23 applications, 8 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

29%

19% 26%

26%

private other public suo-moto

26. National Highways Authority of India(NHAI)

26.1 In the year 2015, 48 appeals were filed before the CIC against

NHAI. Out of 78 appeals, 55 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 17 were with regard to public

information.

26.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 78 applications, 17 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

58%

6%

18%

18%

private other public suo-moto

27. Bhabha Atomic Research Center

27.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

bhabha Atomic Research Center. Out of 2 appeals, 2 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were

with regard to public information.

27.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 2 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as

suo-moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

28. Press Council of india

28.1 In the year 2015, 5 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Press Council of India. Out of 5 appeals, 3 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to public

information.

28.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 5 applications, 2 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

43%

0%

28%

29%

private other public suo-moto

29. Ministry of consumer affairs, food, & public

Dist.

29.1 In the year 2015, 20 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of consumer affairs food, & public dist. Out of 20

appeals, 11 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 6 were with regard to public information.

29.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 20 applications, 6 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

42%

12%

23%

23%

private other public suo-moto

30. Bharat Cooking coal Ltd.

30.1 In the year 2015, 93 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Bharat cooking coal Ltd. out of 93 appeals, 73 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 10 were with regard to

public information.

30.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 93 applications, 10 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

71%

9%

10% 10%

private other public suo-moto

31. Coal india Limited

31.1 In the year 2015, 59 appeals were filed before the CIC against

coal India limited. Out of 59 appeals, 46 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 12 were with regard to public

information.

31.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 59 applications, 12 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

65%

1%

17%

17%

private other public suo-moto

32. Steel Authority of india Ltd.

32.1 In the year 2015, 5 appeals were filed before the CIC against

SAIL. Out of 5 appeals, 3 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 2 were with regard to public information.

32.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 5 applications, 2 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

43%

0%

28%

29%

private other public suo-moto

33. CGHS Ayurvedic Hospital

33.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

CGHS Ayurvedic Hospital. Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to

public information.

33.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 3 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

34. Ministry of steel

34.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

ministry of steel. Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

34.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 3 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

34%

0% 33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

35. Central Government Health Service

35.1 In the year 2015, 32 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Central Government Health service. Out of 32 appeals, 21 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 11 were

with regard to public information.

35.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 32 applications, 11 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

49%

0%

25%

26%

private other public suo-moto

36. Ministry of New & Renewable Energy

36.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of new & Renewable Energy. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were

with regard to public information.

36.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 1 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

37. Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi

37.1 In the year 2015, 8 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Safdarjung hospital, New Delhi. Out of 8 appeals, 7 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 1 were

with regard to public information.

37.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 8 applications, 1 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

78%

0% 11%

11%

private other public suo-moto

38. Nuclear Power Corporation of India

38.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Nuclear power Corporation of India. Out of 2 appeals, 2 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were

with regard to public information.

38.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 2 applications, 0 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

Sales

private other public suo-moto

39. Geological survey of india

39.1 In the year 2015, 26 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Geological survey of India. Out of 26 appeals, 12 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 9 were with regard to

public information.

39.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 26 applications, 9 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

40%

8%

26%

26%

private other public suo-moto

40. National institute of unani Medicine

40.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National institute of unani medicine. Out of 3 appeals, 0 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 3 were

with regard to public information.

40.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 3 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

41. Damodhar Valley Corp

41.1 In the year 2015, 5 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Damodhar Valley corp. Out of 5 appeals, 0 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 5 were with regard to public

information.

41.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 5 applications, 5 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

Sales

private other public suo-moto

42. Port Trust

42.1 In the year 2015, 59 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Port Trust. Out of 59 appeals, 40 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 15 were with regard to public

information.

42.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 59 applications, 15 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

54%

6%

20%

20%

private other public suo-moto

43. PG institute of medical education Research,

Chandigarh

43.1 In the year 2015, 5 appeals were filed before the CIC against

PG institute of Chandigarh. Out of 5 appeals, 2 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to

public information.

43.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 5 applications, 2 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

28%

14%

29%

29%

Sales

private other public suo-moto

44. Ministry of Mines

44.1 In the year 2015, 44 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of mines. Out of 44 appeals, 28 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 12 were with regard to

public information.

44.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 44 applications, 12 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

50%

7%

22%

21%

private other public suo-moto

45. National ninstitute of Homeopathy

45.1 In the year 2015, 17 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National institute of Homeopathy. Out of 17 appeals, 10 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 7 were

with regard to public information.

4.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 17 applications, 7 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

42%

0%

29%

29%

private other public suo-moto

46. Department of Revenue

46.1 In the year 2015, 23 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Department of Revenue. Out of 23 appeals, 15 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to

public information.

46.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 15 applications, 2 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

60% 24%

8% 8%

private other public suo-moto

47. GNCTD

47.1 In the year 2015, 12 appeals were filed before the CIC against

GNCTD. Out of 12 appeals, 0 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 11 were with regard to public

information.

47.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 12 applications, 11 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

0%

4%

48%

48%

private other public suo-moto

48. UT of Dadar & Nagar Haveli

48.1 In the year 2015, 20 appeals were filed before the CIC against

UT of dadar & Nagar Haveli. Out of 20 appeals, 13 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 6 were

with regard to public information.

48.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 20 applications, 6 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

50%

4%

23%

23%

private other public suo-moto

49. Department of ayush

49.1 In the year 2015, 7 appeals were filed before the CIC against

department of Ayush. Out of 7 appeals, 4 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 3 were with regard to public

information.

49.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

that out of 7 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

40%

0%

30%

30%

private other public suo-moto

50. National institute of Ayurveda

50.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National institute of Ayurveda. Out of 3 appeals, 0 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 3 were with regard to

public information.

50.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed

That out of 3 applications, 3 applications were relating to the

information which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as suo-

moto disclosure from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

51. Coa mines Provident fund

51.1 In the year 2015, 20 appeals were filed before the CIC against Coal

mines provident fund. Out of 20 appeals, 18 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to public

information.

51.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 20 applications, 2 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

82%

0% 9% 9%

private other public suo-moto

52. Food corporation of india

52.1 In the year 2015, 97 appeals were filed before the CIC against FCI.

Out of 97 appeals, 73 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 21 were with regard to public information.

52.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 97 applications 21 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

62%

2%

18%

18%

0%

private other public suo-moto

53. CBEC

53.1 In the year 2015, 46 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Bharat CBEC. Out of 46 appeals, 13 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 10 were with regard to public information

53.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 46 applications 10 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

23%

41%

18%

18%

private other public suo-moto

54. All india Radio

54.1 In the year 2015, 43 appeals were filed before the CIC against All

India Radio. Out of 43 appeals, 32 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 10 were with regard to public information

54.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 43 applications 10 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

60%

2%

19%

19%

private other public suo-moto

55. Pharmacy Council of india

55.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Pharmacy council of India. Out of 3 appeals, 0 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

55.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0%

100%

0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

56. Shipping Corp of india Ltd.

56.1 In the year 2015, 5 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Shipping corp of india Ltd. Out of 5 appeals, 1 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 4 were with regard to public

information.

56.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 5 applications 4 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

11%

0%

45%

44%

private other public suo-moto

57. Central mines planning& design institute

57.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

central mines planning and design institute. Out of 1 appeals, 0 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 1 were with

regard to public information.

57.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

58. National Aluminium company

58.1 In the year 2015, 16 appeals were filed before the CIC against

national Aluminium Company. Out of 16 appeals, 9 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 7 were with regard to public

information.

58.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 16 applications 7 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

39%

0%

31%

30%

private other public suo-moto

59. Central Drug Laboratory

59.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Central drug Laboratory. Out of 3 appeals, 0 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to public

information.

59.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 2 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

60. Coal Controller organization

60.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against Coal

controller organization. Out of 2 appeals, 2 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

60.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

61. Institute of Hygiene

61.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

institute of hygiene. Out of 1 appeals, 0 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 1 were with regard to public

information.

61.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

62. Directorate general of lighthouse and

lightships

62.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Directorate general of lighthouse & lightships. Out of 2 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 1 were with

regard to public information.

62.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

34%

0% 33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

63. Maulana azad Education Foundation

63.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

maulana Azad Education Foundation. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with

regard to public information.

63.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

64. Indian Council of Medical Research

64.1 In the year 2015, 16 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Small Indian council of Medical research .Out of 16 appeals, 10 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 5 were with

regard to public information.

64.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 16 applications 5 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

47%

5%

24%

24%

private other public suo-moto

65. DR. R.M.L.Hospital

65.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against Dr.

R.M.L. hospital. Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 0 were with regard to public information.

65.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

66. Government of NCT delhi

66.1 In the year 2015, 18 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Government of NCT Delhi. Out of 18 appeals, 17 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 1 were with regard to public

information.

66.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 18 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

90%

0%

5% 5%

private other public suo-moto

67. Institute of medical Pondicherry

67.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Institute of medical Pondicherry. Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information

67.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

68. Air India

68.1 In the year 2015, 39 appeals were filed before the CIC against Air

India. Out of 39 appeals, 27 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 9 were with regard to public information.

68.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 39 applications 9 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

56%

6%

19%

19%

private other public suo-moto

69. Press information

69.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against Press

information Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 0 were with regard to public information.

69.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

70. CSIR Hqrs, new delhi

70.1 In the year 2015, 16 appeals were filed before the CIC against

CSIR hqrs, New Delhi. Out of 16 appeals, 7 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 7 were with regard to public

information.

70.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 16 applications 70 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

31%

9%

30%

30%

private other public suo-moto

71. Department of Scientific and industrial

research

71.1 In the year 2015, 1appeals were filed before the CIC against

Department of scientific and industrial research. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with

regard to public information.

71.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

72. Directorate of Advertising and Visual

Publicity

72.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

directorate of advertising and visual publicity. Out of 2 appeals, 2 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with

regard to public information.

72.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

73. Airport authority of india

73.1 In the year 2015, 37 appeals were filed before the CIC against

airport authority of India. Out of 37 appeals, 34 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 3 were with regard to public

information.

73.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 37 applications 3 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

85%

0% 7%

8%

private other public suo-moto

74. Government medical store depot, New delhi

74.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Government medical store depot, New Delhi. Out of 2 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 1 were with

regard to public information.

74.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

34%

0% 33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

75. Pawan Hans Helicopters ltd.

75.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against Pawan

Hans Helicopter Ltd. Out of 2 appeals, 2 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

75.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

76. Ministry of science and technology

76.1 In the year 2015, 32 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of science and technology. Out of 32 appeals, 19 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 13 were with

regard to public information.

76.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 32 applications 13 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

42%

0%

29%

29%

private other public suo-moto

77. Ministry of minority affairs

77.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of minority affairs. Out of 3 appeals, 2 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

77.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

67%

33%

0%

0%

private other public suo-moto

78. Ministry of development Northen Region

78.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of development Northen region. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with

regard to public information.

78.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

79. Survey of india

79.1 In the year 2015, 6 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Survey of India. Out of 6 appeals, 3 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 3 were with regard to public information.

79.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 6 applications 3 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

34%

0% 33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

80. Central warehouse corporation

80.1 In the year 2015, 4 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Central warehouse Corporation. Out of 4 appeals, 4 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

80.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 4 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

81. Inland Waterway authority of india, Noida

81.1 In the year 2015, 11 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Inland waterway authority. Out of 11 appeals, 11 RTI application were

filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

81.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 11 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

82. Bureau of Indian Standards(HQs)

82.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against Burea

of Indian standards. Out of 3 appeals, 1 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 2 were with regard to public

information.

82.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 2 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

20% 0%

40%

40%

private other public suo-moto

83. Fertilizer Corporation of India Limited (FCI)

83.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against FCI.

Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 0 were with regard to public information.

83.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0% 0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto

84. National Research Development Corporation

84.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

national research development Corporation. Out of 2 appeals, 0 RTI

application were filed seeking personal information and 1 were with

regard to public information.

84.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0%

34%

33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

85. NISCAIR, New Delhi

85.1 In the year 2015, 2 appeals were filed before the CIC against

NISCAIR. Out of 2 appeals, 0 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 1 were with regard to public information.

85.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 2 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0%

34%

33%

33%

private other public suo-moto

86. Delhi Development Authority

86.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against Delhi

Development authority. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI application were filed

seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

86.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

87. Registrar of Newspapers of India

87.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Registrar of newspaper of India. Out of 1 appeals, 1 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

87.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

88. Ministry of Urban Development

88.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

Ministry of urban development. Out of 1 appeals, 4 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 0 were with regard to public

information.

88.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

89. NBRI, Lucknow

89.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against NBRI.

Out of 1 appeals, 0 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 0 were with regard to public information

89.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0%

100%

0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

90. Centre for DNA Fingerprinting &

Diagnostics(CDFD)

90.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against Centre

for DNA printing. Out of 1 appeals, 4 RTI application were filed seeking

personal information and 0 were with regard to public information.

90.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

91. National Institute of Mental Health & Neuro

Sciences (NIMHANS)

91.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against

National institute of medical health and Neuro sciences. Out of 1

appeals, 4 RTI application were filed seeking personal information and 0

were with regard to public information.

91.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

92. IICB,Calcutta

92.1 In the year 2015, 3 appeals were filed before the CIC against IICB.

Out of 3 appeals, 3 RTI application were filed seeking personal

information and 0 were with regard to public information.

92.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 3 applications 0 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

100%

0% 0% 0%

private other public suo-moto

93. Indira Gandhi Rashtriya Uran Akademi

93.1 In the year 2015, 1 appeals were filed before the CIC against Indira

Gandhi Rashtriya uran Akademi. Out of 1 appeals, 0 RTI application

were filed seeking personal information and 1 were with regard to public

information.

93.2 Also, on application of section 4 of RTI Act, it was observed that

out of 1 applications 1 applications were relating to the information

which should come under section 4 of RTI Act as Suo-Moto disclosure

from the public authority.

0%

50% 50%

private other public suo-moto