Upload
vuonglien
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Storm Drainage Design for Flooding of Moscú Avenue
and Barrio Los Pinos
Focus EngineeringAmanda Schmidt
Giancarlo CalbimonteKerri Sleeman
International Senior Design 2007
OutlineI. IntroductionII. BackgroundIII. Existing ConditionsIV. Project ImplicationsV. Design OptionsVI. Recommendations VII. Benefits
Existing Conditions
CurichiWalter Henry School
Soccer Field
Moscú Avenue
Urbanización Road
Existing Canals
Existing Ditch
University
Curichi (swampy pond area)
Piraí River
138
127
120
111
109
108
118
118A
124
126
137
136
135
188A
189A
189
190
300
299
ET 44
128
139
121110
121A
191
119
125
Municipio de La Guardia
Distrito 9
Distrito 4
Distrito 1
Río Piraí
Área de
protec
ci ón
UVs trabajadas (24) UVs no trabajadas (3)
Límite distritalLímite de UV
LEYENDAS
Canales de drenaje revestidos
Canal de drenaje natural
Lagunas
138
127
120
111
109
108
118
118A
124
126
137
136
135
188A
189A
189
190
300
299
ET 44
128
139
121110
121A
191
119
125
Municipio de La Guardia
Distrito 9
Distrito 4
Distrito 1
Río Piraí
Área de
protec
ci ón
UVs trabajadas (24) UVs no trabajadas (3)
Límite distritalLímite de UV
LEYENDAS
138
127
120
111
109
108
118
118A
124
126
137
136
135
188A
189A
189
190
300
299
ET 44
128
139
121110
121A
191
119
125
Municipio de La Guardia
Distrito 9
Distrito 4
Distrito 1
Río Piraí
Área de
protec
ci ón
UVs trabajadas (24) UVs no trabajadas (3)
Límite distritalLímite de UV
LEYENDAS
Canales de drenaje revestidos
Canal de drenaje natural
Lagunas
Piraí River
Watt’s Canal
Curichi (swampy pond area)
Problem Areas
Problem Area 1 (flooding area)
Problem Area 2 (removed culvert)
Problem Area 3 (flooding area)
Problem Area 4 (existing canal)
Design Options
1 – Sump Pump2 – Underground Storm Sewer and
Earthen Canal3 – Replace Culvert Removed in 20064 – Fill and Grade Horse Road5 – Retrench Existing Canals
Disadvantages→Extensive maintenance
→Sediment causesadditional upkeep
→No space
→Slow water removal rate
Advantages→Most direct route
→Minimal earthwork
→Lower initial expense
Design Option #1 – Sump Pump
Moscú Avenue
Advantages→Less maintenance than sump pump
→Follows typical Bolivian design
Disadvantages→Longer route
→More earthwork
→Higher upfront costs
New Storm Sewer Begins
Design Option #2 – Underground Storm Sewer and Earthen Canal
Moscú Avenue
Urbanización Rd.
Soccer Field
To the Curichi
Proposed New Pipe Along Urbanización Road
Proposed New Soccer Field Canal
Design Option #2 – Underground Storm Sewer and Earthen Canal
6 thRing
Design Option #3 – Add Culvert Under University Entrance Road
Advantages→Decreases flooding
→Simple solution
→Low maintenance
Disadvantages→Redoing previous work
→Paved road – costly, more work
Moscú Avenue
University Entrance Rd.
Horse Rd.
Univer
sity C
anal
Rd.
University
Disadvantages→Contributes more water to largest flooding area on Moscú
→Potential to create new flooding areas
Design Option #4 – Filling & Grading Horse Road
Advantages→Low cost
→Simple solution
Moscú Avenue
University Entrance Rd.
Flooding Areas
Horse Rd.
Existing Canals
Advantages→Low cost
→Simple maintenance
→Canals function properly
Disadvantages→Slight cost compared to doing nothing
Design Option #5 – Retrench Existing Canals
Recommendations
Barrio Los Pinos
Moscú Avenue
Urbanización Rd.
Curichi
Univer
sity C
anal
Rd.
6th Ring
CostsImplement Design Options
2 – Underground Storm Sewer and Earthen Canal$86,510
3 – Replace Culvert Removed in 2006 $ 7,722
5 – Retrench Existing Canals$18,112
AND Clean Out Existing Culverts$156
Total Estimated Cost = $112,500
Benefits
Eliminates Standing Water Less Potential for DiseaseIncreases Property ValuesIncreases SafetyAllows Proper Storm Drainage