Upload
alexander-walsh
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
3-D saturated groundwater flow K=K(x,y,z; ) random hydraulic conductivity field (assumed geologically isotropic) (x,y,z; ) random head field would like to derive pdfs/moments of random head field given pdfs/moments of random hydraulic conductivity field
Citation preview
Stochastic Analysis of Groundwater Flow Processes
CWR 6536Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology
Methods for deriving moments for groundwater flow processes
• Exact analytic solutions– possible only if analytical solution to governing equation
available. Not very realistic• Monte Carlo simulations
– Delhomme, 1979– Smith and Freeze,1979
• Approximate Analytical/Numerical Solutions– Gelhar, 1993; Hoeksema and Kitanidis, 1984;Dagan,
1989; McLaughlin and Wood,1988; James and Graham 1998.
3-D saturated groundwater flow
• K=K(x,y,z;) random hydraulic conductivity field (assumed geologically isotropic)• (x,y,z;) random head field • would like to derive pdfs/moments of random head
field given pdfs/moments of random hydraulic conductivity field
dzK
zdyK
ydxK
x0
Monte Carlo Simulation• 1-D Flow Problem Smith and Freeze, 1979a
• Domain discretized in x-direction• K(x) generated for each block in x-direction for multiple
realizations (200)• (x) solved for each realization • Statistics of (x) calculated at each x over 200 realizations
0)( ;)0(
)(0
LLdxxK
x
1-D Monte Carlo Simulation Results• Mean head field uniform• Head variance increases with Ln K variance • Head variance increases with Ln K correlation scale• Head variance increases with ratio of Ln K correlation
scale to length of domain• Normality of head field only approached in interior of
domain and interval of normality decreases with head variance
• Flux through system random due to finite domain and selection of BCs
2-D Monte Carlo Simulation Results• Uniform flow field
– same trends as for 1-D case– anisotropy of Ln K field affects head variance– deterministic layering and proximinty to
boundaries affects head variance– 2-D head variance reduced from 1-D head
variance by ~ 50%– region of normality larger for 2-D than for 1-D
2-D Monte Carlo Simulation Results• Non-uniform flow field
– head variance increases with mean head gradient– head variance is greater than for uniform flow
case– Uncertainty of model predictions dpeends on
both hydraulic conductivity and flow configuration (governed by dimensionality and BCs)
Concept of Effective Hydraulic Conductivity
• Uniform Keff reproduces the ensemble mean head when inserted into the deterministic model everywhere in domain
• The Darcy flux calculated using the uniform Keff in the deterministic model reproduces the ensemble mean Darcy flux
• For 2-D steady unidirectional flow in an unbounded domain, effective conductivity is the geometric mean
• For bounded non-uniform gradient fields effective conductivity not easily defined
)(x
L
xx
Kq lhG
and i.e.