124
Stark County Crash Report 2007 Prepared By: STARK COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 201 Third Street NE Suite 201 Canton, Ohio 44702 FINAL September, 2007 This report is the product of a study financed in part by the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration and the Ohio Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Stark County Area Transportation Study, which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U. S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Stark County Crash Report

2007

Prepared By:

STARK COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 201 Third Street NE

Suite 201 Canton, Ohio 44702

FINAL

September, 2007

This report is the product of a study financed in part by the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration and the Ohio Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views of the Stark County Area Transportation Study, which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U. S. Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Page 2: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STARK COUNTY CRASH REPORT ........................................................................................................... 3

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3

SOURCE OF DATA......................................................................................................................................... 3 TRACTAPE.................................................................................................................................................... 3 COORDINATING WITH OTHER AGENCIES......................................................................................................... 3

Data Used ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................................ 4

MISCELLANEOUS CRASH STATISTICS................................................................................................. 6 Alcohol-Related Accidents:............................................................................................................................ 6 AGE DISTRIBUTION OF AT-FAULT DRIVERS:................................................................................................... 2 HOURLY DISTRIBUTION OF CRASHES:............................................................................................................. 2 HOURLY DISTRIBUTION OF CRASHES: TIME BLOCKS...................................................................................... 2 DISTRIBUTION OF CRASH CAUSES .................................................................................................................. 8 DISTRIBUTION OF CRASH TYPES..................................................................................................................... 8

CITY, VILLAGE AND TOWNSHIP PROFILES........................................................................................ 9

DESCRIPTION OF TOP-10 INTERSECTIONS...................................................................................... 73

TABLE 2 -- INTERSECTIONS RANKED BY CRASHES PER MILLION VEHICLES.................... 83

TABLE 3 -- INTERSECTIONS RANKED BY NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS........................................ 86

TABLE 4 -- INTERSECTIONS RANKED BY SEVERITY INDEX ....................................................... 89

TABLE 5 -- INTERSECTIONS LISTED ALPHABETICALLY BY LOCATION ................................ 92

GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................................... 94

- 2 -

Page 3: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

STARK COUNTY CRASH REPORT

Introduction One of the main objectives of the SCATS planning effort is to improve the safety of the

existing highway system. In order to do this, it is necessary to have some means of identifying high crash locations in order to concentrate efforts on these locations.

The primary purpose of this report is to summarize intersection and intersection-related accidents that occurred in the SCATS area during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006; to identify intersections with high crash rates, and to provide a regional ranking of hazardous intersections. This ranking is based on the number, rate (crashes per million vehicles) and severity of accidents at each intersection.

This report consists of five sections. Section two reviews the source of data used. Section three describes the methodology used to develop the rankings. The fourth section summarizes this analysis. At the end of this report is an appendix which lists all intersections with a history of accidents within the communities by the number of crashes.

Source of Data

SCATS receives an annual listing from the Ohio Department of Public Safety which contains all crashes in Stark County, called TRACTAPE.

TRACTAPE This listing is an automated data base that contains all accident information on all

vehicles involved. We extract the intersection and intersection-related accidents and assign them to individual intersections.

Coordinating with Other Agencies Each year SCATS identifies intersections and accidents to determine whether

additional intersections should be added to the listing based on having three or more accidents within a year. SCATS then coordinates with the County Engineer and ODOT on these intersections, as well as with the county sheriff, to determine the reason for increased accidents. Within the cities of Canton and Massillon, the city engineer’s office and the city police are also coordinated with.

The listing used by SCATS may not always agree with other listings, due to definitional differences.

Data Used The following data for arterial and collector streets are included: 1. Total number of crashes in each of the last three years 2. Total number of injury accidents for the last three years 3. Total number of fatal crashes for the last three years

- 3 -

Page 4: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

4. Intersection approach volumes 5. Three-year accident rate per million approach vehicles 6. Severity index 7. Composite three-year crash ranking These data are summarized by political unit, street name and intersecting street.

Methodology SCATS identifies high crash locations by means of a hazard rating. The hazard rating

was developed by the SCATS staff a number of years ago in order to combine the rates of crashes per year, crashes per million vehicles, and the severity index into one numerical measure. Through trial and error the following formula was developed:

HRcrash year crash

MVSI= × ×

⎛⎝⎜

⎞⎠⎟10

15/

Where: • HR = Hazard Rating • MV = Million Vehicles • SI = Severity Index The Severity Index is calculated by multiplying the number of fatal crashes by twelve,

the number of injury crashes by three, and the number of property damage only crashes by one. The above products are then summed and divided by the total number of crashes. The severity index value ranges from 1.00 for only property damage crashes to 3.00 or higher if all crashes involve injuries or a fatal crash occurs. The formula looks like this:

( ) ( )SI

FC IC PDCFC IC PDC

=× + × +

+ +12 3

Where: • FC = Fatal Crashes • IC = Injury Crashes • PDC = Property Damage only Crashes In the hazard rating formula, the value of crash/year is limited to a maximum of 22.5

crashes per year. In previous reports a minimum value of crashes per year equal to 13.5

- 4 -

Page 5: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

was used in the hazard rating formula. In those reports crash data was only monitored for a limited number of locations, which generally had relatively high traffic volumes. As crash data was monitored at more locations with low volumes, many low volume locations with only a few crashes had extremely high hazard ratings. When the SCATS staff would discuss these locations with the agency responsible for the location, they would not agree that these locations were high priorities for improvement. Therefore, the old minimum value of crashes per year was dropped from the hazard rating formula.

Hazard ratings range from 0 for locations with no crashes to greater than 100 for locations with high crash rates and high severity indexes. SCATS considers locations with hazard ratings of over 20 to be in need of a crash pattern analysis. Locations with a rating over 50 are definite candidates for improvements. Six years ago, there were 12 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 52 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows how the number of hazardous intersections has been declining since 1990.

Hazardous Intersections1990 - 2006

01020304050607080

1990

1992199

4199

6199

82000

2002

2004

2006

Year

Num

ber o

f Int

erse

ctio

ns

Intersections with HR>50Intersections with HR>20

- 5 -

Page 6: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Miscellaneous Crash Statistics There are a number of miscellaneous statistics concerning Stark County crashes in

2006 that are provided on the following pages. Gender of at-fault drivers: Male: 56.7% Female: 43.3% Miscellaneous Statistics: Total number of crashes in 2006: 11,164 Number of crashes involving pedestrians: 77

Alcohol-Related Accidents: Percentage of crashes where at-fault driver had been drinking: 5.5% Percentage of crashes where at-fault driver’s ability was impaired due to alcohol: 5.2% Percentage of crashes where at least one driver had been drinking: 5.6% Percentage of injury crashes where alcohol was reported: 10.1% Percentage of fatal crashes where alcohol was reported: 48.6%

- 6 -

Page 7: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Age Distribution of At-Fault Drivers: <16 years old 60 0.7% 16-25 3181 34.7% 26-35 1565 17.1% 36-45 1368 14.9% 46-55 1192 13.0% 56-65 791 8.6% 66-75 463 5.0% 76-85 453 4.9% >85 103 1.1%

Hourly Distribution of Crashes: Midnight 273 2.4%1:00 AM 190 1.7%2:00 AM 173 1.5%3:00 AM 134 1.2%4:00 AM 81 0.7%5:00 AM 140 1.3%6:00 AM 264 2.4%7:00 AM 495 4.4%8:00 AM 446 4.0%9:00 AM 377 3.4%10:00 AM 419 3.8%11:00 AM 629 5.6%Noon 736 6.6%1:00 PM 689 6.2%2:00 PM 856 7.7%3:00 PM 971 8.7%4:00 PM 964 8.6%5:00 PM 878 7.9%6:00 PM 659 5.9%7:00 PM 486 4.4%8:00 PM 383 3.4%9:00 PM 370 3.3%10:00 PM 310 2.8%11:00 PM 241 2.2%

Hourly Distribution of Crashes: Time Blocks Time Block Accidents Avg. Per Hour % Of Total Morning Peak (6 – 10 am) 1582 396 14.2% Midday (10 am – 3 pm) 3329 666 29.8% Afternoon Peak (3 – 7 pm) 3472 868 31.1% Evening (7 pm – 10 pm) 1239 413 11.1% Overnight (10 pm – 6 am) 1542 193 13.8%

- 7 -

Page 8: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Distribution of Crash Causes Failure to Yield 1891 16.9%Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 619 5.5%Excessive Speed 18 0.2%Unsafe Speed 244 2.2%Improper Turning 287 2.6%Left of Center 135 1.2%Following too Close 2815 25.2%Improper Lane Change 955 8.6%Improper Backing 394 3.5%Improper Start from Park 200 1.8%Illegal Stopping/Parking 9 0.1%Reckless Driving 119 1.1%Swerving to Avoid Object 114 1.0%Failure to Control 1274 11.4%Vision Obstructed 9 0.1%Driver Inattention 237 2.1%Fatigue/Fell Asleep 52 0.5%Operating Defective Equipment 135 1.2%Load Shifting 56 0.5%Other Driver Error 127 1.1%No Driver Error/Unknown 1474 13.2%

Distribution of Crash Types Rear End 3290 29.5%Head On 263 2.4%Rear to Rear 33 0.3%Backing 374 3.4%Angle 3421 30.6%Sideswipe - Passing 748 6.7%Sideswipe - Meeting 198 1.8%Unknown 128 1.1%Non-Collision 2709 24.3%

- 8 -

Page 9: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

City, Village and Township Profiles

Alliance

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 19 3% 0 9 10Rear end/backing 231 36% 0 47 184Sideswipe 73 11% 0 4 69Angle 223 35% 1 60 162Unknown 14 2% 0 1 13

Total 560 88% 1 121 438Parked Vehicle 62 10% 0 8 54Pedestrian 4 1% 0 4 0Animal 3 0% 0 0 3Train 1 0% 0 1 0Bicycle 1 0% 0 1 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 23 4% 0 6 17Unknown 8 1% 0 1 7

Total 102 16% 0 21 81Overturning 1 0% 0 1 0Ran off road 31 5% 1 19 11Other non-collision* 11 2% 0 5 6Unknown 1 0% 0 1 0

Total 44 7% 1 26 1771 11% 0 9 62

635 100% 2 159 474*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Grand Total

- 9 -

Page 10: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 482 76% 1Wet Pavement 117 18% 1Snow or Ice Covered 22 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 13 2% 0

Total 635 100% 2Daylight 457 72% 0Dark 149 23% 1Dusk 20 3% 1Dawn 4 1% 0Stated as Unknown 5 1% 0

Total 635 100% 2

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

- 10 -

Page 11: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 164 26% 0 5Failure to Control 75 12% 1 17Failure to Yield 115 18% 1 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 25 4% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 39 6% 0 2Improper Turn 9 1% 0 1Improper Backing 32 5% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 44 7% 0 0Left of Center 4 1% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 3 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 6 1% 0 2Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 6 1% 0 3Other Improper Action* 16 2% 0 0Stated as Unknown 74 12% 0 1

Total 612 95% 2 32Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 1 0% 0 1Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 2 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 27 4% 0 1

Total 30 5% 0 2Grand Total 642 100% 2 34

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

PROBABLE CAUSE

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

Top-Ranked Intersections

1ST STREET 2ND STREET2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Parkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.80 1.33 11.67 18.64State St US62 Union Ave SR183 13 10 12 35 12 0 33,276 1.69 0.96 11.67 12.59Broadway St Union Ave SR183 5 6 8 19 11 0 12,785 2.16 1.36 6.33 12.36Rockhill Ave State St US 62 7 5 9 21 9 0 25,111 1.86 0.76 7.00 6.61Ely St Union Ave SR183 5 7 7 19 4 0 16,920 1.42 1.02 6.33 6.15Hartshorn St Parkway Blvd 6 1 1 8 3 0 3,700 1.75 1.97 2.67 6.14Beechwood Ave Sawburg & State 13 11 3 27 4 0 33,903 1.30 0.73 9.00 5.65Main St Union Ave SR183 7 6 4 17 4 0 17,720 1.47 0.88 5.67 4.86Glamorgan St Sawburg Ave 4 6 3 13 3 0 12,300 1.46 0.96 4.33 4.07Diehl Ct SR183 Vine St 1 3 5 9 3 0 7,530 1.67 1.09 3.00 3.64

- 11 -

Page 12: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Canal Fulton

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 5 7% 0 2 3Rear end/backing 16 23% 0 1 15Sideswipe 9 13% 0 2 7Angle 33 46% 0 8 25Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 64 90% 0 13 51Parked Vehicle 3 4% 0 1 2Pedestrian 1 1% 0 1 0Animal 7 10% 0 0 7Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 5 7% 0 2 3Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 17 24% 0 4 13Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 2 3% 0 1 1Other non-collision* 1 1% 0 0 1Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 4 6% 0 1 314 20% 0 4 1071 100% 0 14 57

*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 53 75% 0Wet Pavement 16 23% 0Snow or Ice Covered 2 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 71 100% 0Daylight 53 75% 0Dark 14 20% 0Dusk 2 3% 0Dawn 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 71 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 12 -

Page 13: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 7 12% 0 0Failure to Control 8 14% 0 1Failure to Yield 19 33% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 0 0% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 2 3% 0 0Improper Turn 1 2% 0 0Improper Backing 3 5% 0 0Speeding 1 2% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 5 9% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 2% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 3 5% 0 0Stated as Unknown 3 5% 0 0

Total 53 91% 0 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 5 9% 0 0

Total 5 9% 0 0Grand Total 58 100% 0 1

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Cherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.46 1.90 8.67 16.06Cherry St SR93 High St 0 3 3 6 1 0 8,330 1.33 0.66 2.00 1.17Canal St Cherry St SR 93 1 3 2 6 1 0 9,608 1.33 0.57 2.00 1.01Cherry St SR93 Market St 2 3 0 5 1 0 7,480 1.40 0.61 1.67 0.95Cherry St SR93 Milan St 2 0 0 2 0 0 4,986 1.00 0.37 0.67 0.16Canal St Market St 1 0 1 2 0 0 5,050 1.00 0.36 0.67 0.16Canal St Poplar St 0 0 1 1 0 0 3,600 1.00 0.25 0.33 0.06Cherry St SR93 River St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,836 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Elmridge Ave Locust St 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 13 -

Page 14: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Canton

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Head on 59 2% 0 20 39Rear end/backing 876 29% 0 198 678Sideswipe 304 10% 0 29 275Angle 1107 36% 2 340 765Unknown 52 2% 0 6 46

Total 2398 79% 2 593 1803Parked Vehicle 280 9% 0 14 266Pedestrian 30 1% 0 30 0Animal 18 1% 0 1 17Train 1 0% 0 0 1Bicycle 11 0% 0 9 2Other non-motor 20 1% 0 3 17Fixed object 195 6% 1 34 160Unknown 25 1% 0 7 18

Total 580 19% 1 98 481Overturning 4 0% 0 3 1Ran off road 224 7% 3 69 152Other non-collision* 76 3% 0 27 49Unknown 2 0% 0 1 1

Total 306 10% 3 100 203245 8% 0 28 217

3039 100% 6 763 2270*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

Non

-Col

lisio

n

Double-Counted Collisions**

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Grand Total

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 2268 75% 4Wet Pavement 637 21% 1Snow or Ice Covered 88 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 4 0% 0Stated as Unknown 42 1% 1

Total 3039 100% 6Daylight 2092 69% 3Dark 786 26% 3Dusk 66 2% 0Dawn 30 1% 0Stated as Unknown 65 2% 0

Total 3039 100% 6

Ligh

t

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

- 14 -

Page 15: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 610 21% 0 12Failure to Control 485 17% 3 70Failure to Yield 453 15% 0 6Improper Lane Change or Passing 221 8% 0 6Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 280 10% 1 16Improper Turn 112 4% 0 0Improper Backing 119 4% 0 2Speeding 8 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 83 3% 0 2Left of Center 13 0% 0 2Operating Defective Equipment 37 1% 0 1Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 45 2% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 50 2% 1 9Other Improper Action* 85 3% 0 3Stated as Unknown 150 5% 0 1

Total 2751 94% 5 130Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 2 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 8 0% 1 2Other 20 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 150 5% 0 1

Total 180 6% 1 3Grand Total 2931 100% 6 133

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

PROBABLE CAUSE

Top-Ranked Intersections

1ST STREET 2ND STREET2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

12th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 2.58 24.00 57.0512th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 2.33 14.67 44.51US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 1.61 18.33 30.35Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 1.72 14.67 27.58 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 2.68 10.33 26.8330th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 1.41 14.67 26.25McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 1.69 12.33 25.19Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 1.81 12.67 24.9513/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 1.37 13.67 21.02Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 1.59 14.67 20.55

- 15 -

Page 16: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Louisville

- 16 -

7

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 52 37% 0 11 41Sideswipe 8 6% 0 1 7Angle 35 25% 0 7 28Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 96 68% 0 19 7Parked Vehicle 4 3% 0 1 3Pedestrian 1 1% 0 1 0Animal 1 1% 0 0 1Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 1% 0 1 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 9 6% 0 2 7Unknown 2 1% 0 0 2

Total 18 13% 0 5 13Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 21 15% 0 5 16Other non-collision* 4 3% 1 1 2Unknown 2 1% 0 0 2

Total 27 19% 1 6 200 0% 0 0 0

141 100% 1 30 110*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 103 73% 1Wet Pavement 33 23% 0Snow or Ice Covered 4 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 141 100% 1Daylight 108 77% 0Dark 29 21% 1Dusk 1 1% 0Dawn 2 1% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 141 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 17: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 34 25% 0 0Failure to Control 23 17% 0 4Failure to Yield 25 19% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 7 5% 0 2Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 8 6% 0 0Improper Turn 3 2% 0 0Improper Backing 6 4% 0 0Speeding 2 1% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 14 10% 0 0Left of Center 1 1% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 2 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 3 2% 1 2Other Improper Action* 2 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0 0

Total 132 98% 1 8Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 1 1% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0 0

Total 3 2% 0 0Grand Total 135 100% 1 8

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Chapel St SR 44 Main St SR153 6 11 11 28 2 0 22,654 1.14 1.13 9.33 8.02Chapel St SR 44 Gorgas St 3 1 4 8 3 1 11,590 3.13 0.63 2.67 3.50California Ave Main St SR153 2 3 5 10 3 0 13,359 1.60 0.68 3.33 2.43Chapel St SR 44 St. Louis Co 1 4 5 10 2 0 13,718 1.40 0.67 3.33 2.07Gorgas St Main St SR153 3 2 3 8 1 0 14,328 1.25 0.51 2.67 1.13Chapel St SR 44 Frana Clara 2 3 2 7 2 0 15,664 1.57 0.41 2.33 1.00Chapel St SR 44 Reno Dr 1 5 0 6 1 0 16,760 1.33 0.33 2.00 0.58Chapel St SR 44 South St 0 2 2 4 0 0 10,877 1.00 0.34 1.33 0.30California Ave Reno Dr 1 0 2 3 0 0 8,150 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.22Main St SR153 Mill St 1 1 0 2 1 0 11,179 2.00 0.16 0.67 0.15

- 17 -

Page 18: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Massillon

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 48 6% 0 16 32Rear end/backing 320 37% 0 56 264Sideswipe 111 13% 0 4 107Angle 295 34% 2 81 212Unknown 17 2% 0 1 16

Total 791 92% 2 158 631Parked Vehicle 66 8% 0 5 61Pedestrian 6 1% 0 5 1Animal 16 2% 0 0 16Train 2 0% 0 2 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 75 9% 1 24 50Unknown 4 0% 0 1 3

Total 169 20% 1 37 131Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 23 3% 0 8 15Other non-collision* 9 1% 0 4 5Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 32 4% 0 12 20135 16% 1 28 106857 100% 2 179 676

*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

Grand TotalDouble-Counted Collisions**

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 644 75% 1Wet Pavement 191 22% 1Snow or Ice Covered 13 2% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 9 1% 0

Total 857 100% 2Daylight 611 71% 0Dark 206 24% 2Dusk 21 2% 0Dawn 9 1% 0Stated as Unknown 10 1% 0

Total 857 100% 2

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 18 -

Page 19: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 235 29% 0 6Failure to Control 153 19% 1 38Failure to Yield 137 17% 0 2Improper Lane Change or Passing 33 4% 0 1Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 61 7% 1 1Improper Turn 15 2% 0 0Improper Backing 47 6% 0 3Speeding 11 1% 0 2Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 24 3% 0 0Left of Center 10 1% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 7 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 2 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 8 1% 0 1Other Improper Action* 17 2% 0 0Stated as Unknown 41 5% 0 0

Total 801 97% 2 55Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 3 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 2 0% 0 1Stated as Unknown 18 2% 0 1

Total 23 3% 0 2Grand Total 824 100% 2 5

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

7

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Great Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.49 1.37 13.67 18.51Lincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.39 1.43 13.67 18.16Lake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.33 1.51 12.00 16.15SR 21 Ramps SB Erie St 7 7 7 21 6 0 9,900 1.57 1.94 7.00 14.20Hills & Dales Wales Ave SR241 10 10 8 28 4 0 23,568 1.29 1.08 9.33 8.6727th St NW Lincoln Way W 9 6 0 15 3 0 7,383 1.40 1.85 5.00 8.65 8th St NE North Ave 4 6 0 10 4 0 4,600 1.80 1.98 3.33 7.9417th St NW Carmont Cherry Earl Wooster 0 8 4 12 6 0 7,361 2.00 1.49 4.00 7.93Erie St Lincoln Way SR172 11 7 7 25 6 0 23,820 1.48 0.96 8.33 7.88 3rd St NE Lincoln Way E 9 4 10 23 6 0 23,600 1.52 0.89 7.67 6.92

- 19 -

Page 20: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

North Canton

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 5 1% 0 2 3Rear end/backing 204 47% 0 42 162Sideswipe 38 9% 0 4 34Angle 112 26% 0 28 84Unknown 3 1% 0 0 3

Total 362 83% 0 76 286Parked Vehicle 19 4% 0 1 18Pedestrian 4 1% 0 3 1Animal 7 2% 0 0 7Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 0% 0 0 1Other non-motor 1 0% 0 0 1Fixed object 20 5% 0 4 16Unknown 2 0% 0 0 2

Total 54 12% 0 8 46Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 16 4% 0 5 11Other non-collision* 20 5% 0 10 10Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 36 8% 0 15 2114 3% 0 5 9

438 100% 0 94 344*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 324 74% 0Wet Pavement 104 24% 0Snow or Ice Covered 8 2% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 2 0% 0

Total 438 100% 0Daylight 347 79% 0Dark 65 15% 0Dusk 14 3% 0Dawn 9 2% 0Stated as Unknown 3 1% 0

Total 438 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 20 -

Page 21: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 175 41% 0 4Failure to Control 32 7% 0 4Failure to Yield 81 19% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 23 5% 0 1Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 27 6% 0 1Improper Turn 8 2% 0 0Improper Backing 19 4% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 12 3% 0 0Left of Center 3 1% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 5 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 4 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 4 1% 0 1Other Improper Action* 17 4% 0 0Stated as Unknown 14 3% 0 1

Total 424 98% 0 13Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 7 2% 0 1

Total 7 2% 0 1Grand Total 431 100% 0 14

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

10th St Main & Woodrow 12 15 3 30 6 0 17,400 1.40 1.57 10.00 14.69Everhard Rd Main St 6 5 10 21 6 0 28,850 1.57 0.66 7.00 4.87Applegrove St Main St 2 9 4 15 9 0 29,651 2.20 0.46 5.00 3.39Cleveland Main St Orion St 6 7 3 16 3 0 29,035 1.38 0.50 5.33 2.46Maple St Ream Ave 1 3 0 4 2 0 7,300 2.00 0.50 1.33 0.89Easthill St Main St 5 0 3 8 2 0 23,350 1.50 0.31 2.67 0.83 7th St N Main St 2 2 4 8 1 0 20,450 1.25 0.36 2.67 0.79Main St Schneider St 2 4 2 8 1 0 23,050 1.25 0.32 2.67 0.70Charlotte St Main St 5 0 1 6 3 0 20,900 2.00 0.26 2.00 0.70Main St Maple St 1 3 4 8 1 0 26,550 1.25 0.27 2.67 0.61

- 21 -

Page 22: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Brewster

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 7% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 7 47% 0 1 6Sideswipe 3 20% 0 0 3Angle 2 13% 0 1 1Unknown 1 7% 0 0 1

Total 14 93% 0 2 12Parked Vehicle 3 20% 0 1 2Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 1 7% 0 0 1Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 0 0% 0 0 0Unknown 3 20% 0 0 3

Total 7 47% 0 1 6Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-collision* 0 0% 0 0 0Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0 06 40% 0 1 5

15 100% 0 2 13*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 11 73% 0Wet Pavement 3 20% 0Snow or Ice Covered 0 0% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 7% 0

Total 15 100% 0Daylight 13 87% 0Dark 2 13% 0Dusk 0 0% 0Dawn 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 15 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 22 -

Page 23: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 3 25% 0 0Failure to Control 1 8% 0 0Failure to Yield 3 25% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 0 0% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 0 0% 0 0Improper Turn 0 0% 0 0Improper Backing 1 8% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 17% 0 0Left of Center 1 8% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 8% 0 0

Total 12 100% 0 0Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 12 100% 0 0

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

7th St Wabash Ave SR 93 1 2 0 3 3 0 7,056 3.00 0.39 1.00 0.78Main St Wabash Ave SR 93 3 0 1 4 0 0 8,662 1.00 0.42 1.33 0.37 2nd St Wabash Ave SR 93 2 0 0 2 0 0 8,662 1.00 0.21 0.67 0.09Chestnut St Wabash Ave SR 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,662 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 23 -

Page 24: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Hartville

- 24 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 34 47% 0 10 24Sideswipe 4 6% 0 0 4Angle 20 28% 0 6 14Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 59 82% 0 16 4Parked Vehicle 2 3% 0 0 2Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 1 1% 0 0 1Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 1% 0 1 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 2 3% 0 1 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 6 8% 0 2 4Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 8 11% 0 5 3Other non-collision* 0 0% 0 0 0Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 8 11% 0 5 31 1% 0 1 0

72 100% 0 22 50*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 57 79% 0Wet Pavement 12 17% 0Snow or Ice Covered 0 0% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 2 3% 0

Total 72 100% 0Daylight 60 83% 0Dark 9 13% 0Dusk 2 3% 0Dawn 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 72 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 25: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 29 44% 0 0Failure to Control 4 6% 0 1Failure to Yield 14 21% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 4 6% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 4 6% 0 0Improper Turn 2 3% 0 0Improper Backing 2 3% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 1 2% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 5 8% 0 2Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 2% 0 0

Total 66 100% 0 3Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 66 100% 0 3

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Kent Ave SR 43 Maple St SR43/619 3 5 2 10 1 0 15,179 1.20 0.60 3.33 1.60Maple Ave SR619 Prospect Ave SR 43 3 0 3 6 1 0 16,259 1.33 0.34 2.00 0.60Grand Trunk Ave Maple St 1 3 0 4 2 0 12,744 2.00 0.29 1.33 0.51Maple Ave Milan St 1 3 0 4 2 0 12,744 2.00 0.29 1.33 0.51Prospect Ave SR 43 Sunnyside St 1 0 1 2 1 0 6,797 2.00 0.27 0.67 0.24Grand Trunk Ave Sunnyside St 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,000 1.00 0.91 0.33 0.20Lincoln St Prospect Ave SR 43 1 0 0 1 0 0 7,047 1.00 0.13 0.33 0.03Prospect Ave SR 43 Woodland St 1 0 0 1 0 0 11,447 1.00 0.08 0.33 0.02Crestmont Ave Woodmont St & Geib 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,800 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Prospect Ave SR 43 Wyandotte Tr 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,797 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 25 -

Page 26: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Minerva

- 26 -

9

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 2 3% 0 0 2Rear end/backing 30 48% 0 5 25Sideswipe 10 16% 0 2 8Angle 15 24% 0 2 13Unknown 2 3% 0 0 2

Total 59 94% 0 9 50Parked Vehicle 7 11% 0 0 7Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 0 0% 0 0 0Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 1 2% 0 0 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 8 13% 0 0 8Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 4 6% 0 2 2Other non-collision* 1 2% 0 0 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 5 8% 0 2 39 14% 0 0

63 100% 0 11 52*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 46 73% 0Wet Pavement 15 24% 0Snow or Ice Covered 1 2% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 2% 0

Total 63 100% 0Daylight 48 76% 0Dark 8 13% 0Dusk 2 3% 0Dawn 4 6% 0Stated as Unknown 1 2% 0

Total 63 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 27: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 22 35% 0 0Failure to Control 9 15% 0 1Failure to Yield 13 21% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 2 3% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 2% 0 0Improper Turn 1 2% 0 0Improper Backing 4 6% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 3 5% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 2% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 2 3% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 58 94% 0 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 4 6% 0 0

Total 4 6% 0 0Grand Total 62 100% 0 1

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Lincoln Way US30 Market St SR183 11 2 3 16 4 0 13,379 1.50 1.09 5.33 5.82East St Lincoln Way US30 4 2 2 8 3 0 12,488 1.75 0.58 2.67 1.82Lincoln Way US30 Main St 2 2 1 5 2 0 7,890 1.80 0.58 1.67 1.16Grant Blvd Lincoln Way US30 2 1 2 5 1 0 7,299 1.40 0.63 1.67 0.97Line St Main St 0 1 2 3 0 0 2,000 1.00 1.37 1.00 0.91Bonnieview St Lincoln Way US30 4 1 1 6 0 0 11,988 1.00 0.46 2.00 0.61High St Main St 1 1 0 2 0 0 2,000 1.00 0.91 0.67 0.41Market St Union Ave SR183 1 1 0 2 1 0 5,608 2.00 0.33 0.67 0.29Lincoln Way US 30 Union Ave SR183 1 1 0 2 1 0 12,156 2.00 0.15 0.67 0.13Line St Market St 2 0 0 2 0 0 9,650 1.00 0.19 0.67 0.08

- 27 -

Page 28: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Navarre

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 2 5% 0 1 1Rear end/backing 16 39% 0 2 14Sideswipe 9 22% 0 2 7Angle 6 15% 0 0 6Unknown 2 5% 0 0 2

Total 35 85% 0 5 30Parked Vehicle 5 12% 0 2 3Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 2 5% 0 1 1Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 2% 0 1 0Fixed object 0 0% 0 0 0Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 8 20% 0 4 4Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 3 7% 0 1 2Other non-collision* 1 2% 0 1 0Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 4 10% 0 2 26 15% 0 2 4

41 100% 0 9 32*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 32 78% 0Wet Pavement 7 17% 0Snow or Ice Covered 1 2% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 2% 0

Total 41 100% 0Daylight 31 76% 0Dark 7 17% 0Dusk 1 2% 0Dawn 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 2 5% 0

Total 41 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 28 -

Page 29: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 9 25% 0 0Failure to Control 5 14% 0 0Failure to Yield 4 11% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 4 11% 0 1Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 3% 0 0Improper Turn 2 6% 0 0Improper Backing 6 17% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 1 3% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 3% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 3 8% 0 0

Total 36 100% 0 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 36 100% 0 1

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Main St US 62/SR 21 Wooster St 3 9 1 13 4 0 13,809 1.62 0.86 4.33 4.01Canal St US62 Main St SR21/US62 1 3 1 5 0 0 9,694 1.00 0.47 1.67 0.52Erie Ave US 62 Marland Ave 0 0 3 3 1 0 15,856 1.67 0.17 1.00 0.19Center St Main St US 62/SR 21 0 1 1 2 0 0 9,707 1.00 0.19 0.67 0.08Center St Canal St 0 1 0 1 0 0 4,600 1.00 0.20 0.33 0.04 4th St Main SR21/US62 0 1 0 1 1 0 14,011 3.00 0.07 0.33 0.04Main St US 62 Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,211 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 29 -

Page 30: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Waynesburg

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 4 19% 0 2 2Rear end/backing 2 10% 0 0 2Sideswipe 2 10% 0 0 2Angle 7 33% 0 0 7Unknown 4 19% 0 0 4

Total 19 90% 0 2 17Parked Vehicle 1 5% 0 0 1Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 1 5% 0 0 1Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 2 10% 0 1 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 4 19% 0 1 3Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 6 29% 0 1 5Other non-collision* 1 5% 0 0 1Unknown 1 5% 0 0 1

Total 8 38% 0 1 710 48% 0 1 921 100% 0 3 18

*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 16 76% 0Wet Pavement 4 19% 0Snow or Ice Covered 0 0% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 5% 0

Total 21 100% 0Daylight 14 67% 0Dark 2 10% 0Dusk 3 14% 0Dawn 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 2 10% 0

Total 21 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 30 -

Page 31: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 0 0% 0 0Failure to Control 2 17% 0 0Failure to Yield 3 25% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 0 0% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 0 0% 0 0Improper Turn 0 0% 0 0Improper Backing 2 17% 0 0Speeding 0 0% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 0 0% 0 0Left of Center 1 8% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 8% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 8% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 17% 0 1

Total 12 100% 0 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 12 100% 0 1

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Lisbon St SR171/183 Main St SR183 1 0 3 4 0 0 7,270 1.00 0.50 1.33 0.45Lisbon St SR183 McKinley Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,830 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 31 -

Page 32: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Small Villages (Beach City, East Canton, East Sparta, Hills & Dales*, Limaville*, Magnolia, Meyers

Lake*, and Wilmot) *No crashes reported in 2005.

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 5% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 1 5% 0 0 1Sideswipe 3 16% 0 0 3Angle 9 47% 0 4 5Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 14 74% 0 4 10Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 0 0% 0 0 0Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 1 5% 0 0 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 1 5% 0 0 1Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 5 26% 0 1 4Other non-collision* 0 0% 0 0 0Unknown 1 5% 0 0 1

Total 6 32% 0 1 52 11% 0 0 2

19 100% 0 5 14*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 14 74% 0Wet Pavement 4 21% 0Snow or Ice Covered 1 5% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 19 100% 0Daylight 13 68% 0Dark 4 21% 0Dusk 1 5% 0Dawn 1 5% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 19 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 32 -

Page 33: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 1 6% 0 0Failure to Control 2 12% 0 0Failure to Yield 5 29% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 1 6% 0 1Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 6% 0 0Improper Turn 0 0% 0 0Improper Backing 1 6% 0 0Speeding 1 6% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 12% 0 0Left of Center 1 6% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 6% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 6% 0 0

Total 17 100% 0 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 17 100% 0 1

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections VILLAGE 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Beach City 3rd Ave SR93 Redwood St SR212 4 4 3 11 5 0 3,563 1.91 2.82 3.67 13.15Beach City 3rd Ave SR93 Main St E 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,590 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Beach City 3rd Ave W Main St W 0 0 0 0 0 0 950 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00East Canton Nassau St SR172 Wood Ave SR 44 3 1 0 4 2 1 10,271 4.75 0.36 1.33 1.50East Canton Cedar Ave US30 Nassau St US 30 4 1 0 5 0 0 12,275 1.00 0.37 1.67 0.41East Canton Walnut St US 30 Wood Ave SR 44 2 0 0 2 1 0 10,626 2.00 0.17 0.67 0.15East Canton Cedar Ave US30 Walnut St US 30 0 1 0 1 1 0 6,354 3.00 0.14 0.33 0.10East Sparta SR800 Westbrook St 2 3 2 7 0 0 7,723 1.00 0.83 2.33 1.29Limaville Iowa Ave SR183 Main St 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,890 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Magnolia Harrison Ave SR183 Main St SR183 0 0 1 1 0 0 5,946 1.00 0.15 0.33 0.03Meyer's Lake 12th St NW Terrace Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Wilmot Main St US250 Massillon St US62 3 1 2 6 2 0 9,839 1.67 0.56 2.00 1.24Wilmot Main St US250 Wineburg US 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,970 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 33 -

Page 34: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Bethlehem Township

- 34 -

2

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 1 0Rear end/backing 7 8% 0 4 3Sideswipe 6 7% 0 0 6Angle 9 11% 0 6 3Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 23 27% 0 11 1Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 18 21% 0 2 16Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 1% 0 0 1Fixed object 6 7% 0 2 4Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 25 30% 0 4 21Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 29 35% 1 9 19Other non-collision* 5 6% 0 0 5Unknown 2 2% 0 0 2

Total 36 43% 1 9 260 0% 0 0 0

84 100% 1 24 59*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 54 64% 1Wet Pavement 25 30% 0Snow or Ice Covered 3 4% 0Mud or Sand Covered 2 2% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 84 100% 1Daylight 44 52% 1Dark 37 44% 0Dusk 2 2% 0Dawn 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 84 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 35: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 35 -

1

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 6 10% 0 1Failure to Control 4 7% 0 0Failure to Yield 9 15% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 15 25% 1 5Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 0 0% 0 0Improper Turn 1 2% 0 0Improper Backing 0 0% 0 0Speeding 13 21% 0 4Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 3% 0 0Left of Center 4 7% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 2 3% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 2% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 2 3% 0 1Other Improper Action* 2 3% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 61 100% 1 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 61 100% 1 11

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Fohl St Shepler Church Ave 2 5 2 9 5 0 3,350 2.11 2.45 3.00 10.35Beth Ave Brinker St 0 2 1 3 3 0 1,100 3.00 2.49 1.00 4.98Fohl St Kemary Ave 2 1 0 3 1 0 3,150 1.67 0.87 1.00 0.97Hudson Ave Sherman Church Ave 1 0 1 2 0 0 1,600 1.00 1.14 0.67 0.51SR 21 Dolphin St SR212 1 0 0 1 1 0 6,594 3.00 0.14 0.33 0.09Brinker St Sherman Church Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 2,650 1.00 0.34 0.33 0.08Beth Ave Haut St 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Brinker St Shepler Church Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,350 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 36: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Canton Township

- 36 -

8

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 6 1% 0 4 2Rear end/backing 122 29% 0 49 73Sideswipe 27 6% 0 2 25Angle 124 29% 0 47 77Unknown 4 1% 1 1 2

Total 283 67% 1 103 179Parked Vehicle 7 2% 0 0 7Pedestrian 3 1% 0 3 0Animal 25 6% 0 1 24Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 3 1% 0 0 3Fixed object 4 1% 0 1 3Unknown 1 0% 0 0 1

Total 43 10% 0 5 38Overturning 1 0% 0 0 1Ran off road 82 19% 0 35 47Other non-collision* 34 8% 0 14 20Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 117 28% 0 49 622 5% 0 9 13

421 100% 1 148 272*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 307 73% 1Wet Pavement 100 24% 0Snow or Ice Covered 14 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 421 100% 1Daylight 266 63% 1Dark 136 32% 0Dusk 10 2% 0Dawn 4 1% 0Stated as Unknown 5 1% 0

Total 421 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 37: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 37 -

0

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 96 25% 0 2Failure to Control 15 4% 0 2Failure to Yield 92 24% 1 3Improper Lane Change or Passing 63 16% 0 19Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 13 3% 0 1Improper Turn 7 2% 0 0Improper Backing 11 3% 0 0Speeding 28 7% 0 6Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 7 2% 0 1Left of Center 11 3% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 6 2% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 3 1% 0 3Other Improper Action* 29 7% 0 2Stated as Unknown 3 1% 0 0

Total 384 99% 1 4Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 4 1% 0 0

Total 4 1% 0 0Grand Total 388 100% 1 40

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 1.93 8.33 21.91 4th St NW Whipple Ave 5 5 5 15 9 0 10,300 2.20 1.33 5.00 9.75US 30 WB Ramps Raff Ave 7 6 4 17 8 0 16,469 1.94 0.94 5.67 6.9111th St SW Whipple Ave 3 2 5 10 3 0 8,400 1.60 1.09 3.33 3.86SR800 Faircrest St 5 4 2 11 7 0 19,583 2.27 0.51 3.67 2.85SR297 Raff Ave Southway St 4 2 5 11 7 0 23,523 2.27 0.43 3.67 2.37Dueber Ave Faircrest St 4 0 2 6 4 0 9,624 2.33 0.57 2.00 1.77Georgetown St Trump Ave 3 2 4 9 0 0 12,100 1.00 0.68 3.00 1.36SR800 53rd St(Fohl) 4 2 0 6 3 0 11,631 2.00 0.47 2.00 1.26SR800 Carnwise St 1 3 1 5 2 0 14,447 1.80 0.32 1.67 0.63

Page 38: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Jackson Township

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 53 3% 2 19 32Rear end/backing 773 43% 0 201 572Sideswipe 174 10% 0 13 161Angle 587 33% 1 160 426Unknown 9 1% 0 2 7

Total 1596 89% 3 395 1198Parked Vehicle 10 1% 0 1 9Pedestrian 1 0% 0 0 1Animal 68 4% 0 1 67Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 0% 0 0 1Other non-motor 6 0% 0 0 6Fixed object 59 3% 1 10 48Unknown 7 0% 0 2 5

Total 152 9% 1 14 137Overturning 5 0% 0 1 4Ran off road 104 6% 2 31 71Other non-collision* 41 2% 0 13 28Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 150 8% 2 45 103111 6% 2 25 84

1787 100% 4 429 1354*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 1350 76% 3Wet Pavement 371 21% 1Snow or Ice Covered 52 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 13 1% 0

Total 1787 100% 4Daylight 1305 73% 2Dark 405 23% 2Dusk 39 2% 0Dawn 16 1% 0Stated as Unknown 22 1% 0

Total 1787 100% 4

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 38 -

Page 39: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 39 -

8

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 655 39% 0 14Failure to Control 124 7% 1 18Failure to Yield 379 23% 0 4Improper Lane Change or Passing 173 10% 0 5Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 55 3% 0 2Improper Turn 43 3% 0 1Improper Backing 33 2% 0 0Speeding 16 1% 0 2Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 22 1% 0 1Left of Center 14 1% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 16 1% 0 1Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 8 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 14 1% 3 7Other Improper Action* 73 4% 0 2Stated as Unknown 22 1% 0 0

Total 1647 99% 4 5Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 2 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 2 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 10 1% 0 0

Total 14 1% 0 0Grand Total 1661 100% 4 58

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Huckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 3.15 3.33 24.48I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 1.06 17.67 24.36SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 1.23 13.33 21.34I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 1.31 14.33 20.63Dressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.67 1.02 17.00 19.22Everhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 1.67 0.95 18.00 19.09I-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.92 1.11 12.33 17.44Frank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.71 1.06 14.00 16.93Portage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.36 1.26 14.67 16.86Portage St Whipple Ave 11 13 13 37 9 0 28,810 1.49 1.17 12.33 14.33

Page 40: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Lake Township

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 9 3% 0 5 4Rear end/backing 97 31% 0 24 73Sideswipe 10 3% 0 3 7Angle 90 29% 0 38 52Unknown 1 0% 0 1 0

Total 207 66% 0 71 136Parked Vehicle 7 2% 0 0 7Pedestrian 3 1% 0 3 0Animal 28 9% 0 1 27Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 3 1% 0 0 3Fixed object 7 2% 0 1 6Unknown 2 1% 0 1 1

Total 50 16% 0 6 44Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 60 19% 1 21 38Other non-collision* 18 6% 0 9 9Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 78 25% 1 30 4721 7% 0 4 17

314 100% 1 103 210*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 221 70% 0Wet Pavement 70 22% 1Snow or Ice Covered 22 7% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 0% 0

Total 314 100% 1Daylight 203 65% 0Dark 91 29% 1Dusk 9 3% 0Dawn 9 3% 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0

Total 314 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 40 -

Page 41: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 41 -

0

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 73 27% 0 0Failure to Control 10 4% 0 1Failure to Yield 62 23% 0 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 26 10% 1 7Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 10 4% 0 0Improper Turn 5 2% 0 0Improper Backing 13 5% 0 0Speeding 25 9% 0 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 14 5% 0 0Left of Center 9 3% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 3 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 4 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 12 4% 0 0Stated as Unknown 5 2% 0 0

Total 271 99% 1 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0 0

Total 2 1% 0 0Grand Total 273 100% 1 10

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Cleveland Ave State St 8 8 7 23 10 0 21,000 1.87 1.00 7.67 9.55Cleveland Ave Wright St 11 2 5 18 6 0 12,950 1.67 1.27 6.00 8.46Middlebranch Ave State St 5 2 5 12 7 0 8,439 2.17 1.30 4.00 7.50SR619 King Church Ave 3 6 5 14 7 0 14,280 2.00 0.89 4.67 5.57Brumbaugh St Cleveland Ave 11 1 0 12 7 0 12,750 2.17 0.86 4.00 4.96Market Ave N Mt Pleasant St 4 5 1 10 7 0 12,011 2.40 0.76 3.33 4.05Cleveland Ave Mt Pleasant St 5 5 4 14 5 0 19,700 1.71 0.65 4.67 3.46SR619 Market Ave N 7 3 3 13 5 0 19,712 1.77 0.60 4.33 3.08SR 43 Smith-Kramer St 3 1 4 8 3 0 7,400 1.75 0.99 2.67 3.07SR 43 Andrews St 2 4 0 6 4 0 7,450 2.33 0.73 2.00 2.29

Page 42: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Lawrence Township

- 42 -

7

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 3 2% 0 1 2Rear end/backing 17 12% 0 6 11Sideswipe 10 7% 0 2 8Angle 25 18% 0 9 16Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 55 40% 0 18 37Parked Vehicle 4 3% 0 0 4Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 34 25% 0 0 34Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 1% 0 1 0Fixed object 7 5% 0 0 7Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 46 33% 0 1 45Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 37 27% 0 18 19Other non-collision* 9 7% 1 2 6Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 46 33% 1 20 259 7% 0 2

138 100% 1 37 100*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 99 72% 1Wet Pavement 29 21% 0Snow or Ice Covered 9 7% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 138 100% 1Daylight 63 46% 0Dark 69 50% 1Dusk 2 1% 0Dawn 4 3% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 138 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 43: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 43 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 11 11% 0 0Failure to Control 22 22% 0 7Failure to Yield 10 10% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 15 15% 1 3Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 7 7% 0 1Improper Turn 1 1% 0 0Improper Backing 7 7% 0 0Speeding 3 3% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 7 7% 0 0Left of Center 3 3% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 4 4% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 3 3% 0 2Other Improper Action* 3 3% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0 0

Total 98 99% 1 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0 0

Total 1 1% 0 0Grand Total 99 100% 1 13

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Butterbridge Rd Erie St 2 3 5 10 3 0 5,800 1.60 1.57 3.33 5.59SR 21 Butterbridge 5 4 2 11 4 0 13,390 1.73 0.75 3.67 3.17SR236 Portage St 2 3 4 9 4 0 11,741 1.89 0.70 3.00 2.64High Mill Ave Strausser St 6 0 1 7 5 0 10,850 2.43 0.59 2.33 2.22SR 93 Orrville St 1 2 1 4 3 0 5,720 2.50 0.64 1.33 1.42SR 21 Arcadia St 2 4 2 8 2 0 14,390 1.50 0.51 2.67 1.35SR 93 Strausser St 3 2 1 6 1 0 8,430 1.33 0.65 2.00 1.15SR236 Strausser St 1 1 3 5 1 0 6,200 1.40 0.74 1.67 1.14SR 21 Forty Corners Rd 0 0 4 4 2 0 13,740 2.00 0.27 1.33 0.47Deerfield Ave Marshallville Rd 1 0 0 1 0 0 1,850 1.00 0.49 0.33 0.11

Page 44: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Lexington Township

- 44 -

4

83

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 35 22% 0 9 26Sideswipe 2 1% 0 0 2Angle 36 23% 0 12 24Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 75 47% 0 21 5Parked Vehicle 4 3% 0 0 4Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 22 14% 0 1 21Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 2 1% 0 1 1Fixed object 5 3% 0 1 4Unknown 2 1% 0 0 2

Total 35 22% 0 3 32Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 44 28% 0 15 29Other non-collision* 11 7% 0 2 9Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 55 34% 0 17 35 3% 0 2

160 100% 0 39 121*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 117 73% 0Wet Pavement 33 21% 0Snow or Ice Covered 9 6% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 160 100% 0Daylight 90 56% 0Dark 58 36% 0Dusk 2 1% 0Dawn 9 6% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 160 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 45: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 27 20% 0 0Failure to Control 39 29% 0 7Failure to Yield 25 19% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 7 5% 0 1Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 5 4% 0 0Improper Turn 3 2% 0 0Improper Backing 5 4% 0 0Speeding 2 1% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 4 3% 0 0Left of Center 1 1% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 5 4% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 2 1% 0 0Other Improper Action* 2 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 6 4% 0 0

Total 134 99% 0 8Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 1 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 1 1% 0 0Grand Total 135 100% 0 8

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 3.54 6.67 20.47Beeson St Freshley Ave 1 4 5 10 2 1 4,150 2.50 2.20 3.33 12.22Beeson St Sawburg Ave 7 3 7 17 5 0 12,600 1.59 1.23 5.67 7.39SR619 Rockhill Ave 3 3 3 9 1 0 4,010 1.22 2.05 3.00 5.01SR183 Rockhill Ave 0 5 2 7 1 0 5,494 1.29 1.16 2.33 2.33SR183 SR 619 & Gaskill Dr 4 2 1 7 0 0 7,207 1.00 0.89 2.33 1.38SR225 Greenbower St 2 3 1 6 1 0 7,543 1.33 0.73 2.00 1.29SR183 Greenbower St 0 2 1 3 0 0 4,394 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.42SR225 Lowe Rd 0 3 0 3 0 0 6,768 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.27SR225 Price St 0 2 0 2 1 0 6,568 2.00 0.28 0.67 0.25

- 45 -

Page 46: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Marlboro Township

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 4 6% 0 1 3Rear end/backing 8 11% 0 3 5Sideswipe 7 10% 0 2 5Angle 14 20% 1 7 6Unknown 2 3% 0 0 2

Total 35 50% 1 13 21Parked Vehicle 1 1% 0 0 1Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 9 13% 0 2 7Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 7 10% 0 2 5Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 18 26% 0 4 14Overturning 1 1% 0 1 0Ran off road 22 31% 0 11 11Other non-collision* 9 13% 0 1 8Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 32 46% 0 13 1915 21% 0 4 1170 100% 1 26 43

*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 45 64% 0Wet Pavement 19 27% 1Snow or Ice Covered 5 7% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 70 100% 1Daylight 40 57% 1Dark 26 37% 0Dusk 2 3% 0Dawn 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 70 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 46 -

Page 47: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 7 18% 0 0Failure to Control 0 0% 0 2Failure to Yield 8 21% 1 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 3 8% 0 0Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 3% 0 0Improper Turn 1 3% 0 0Improper Backing 1 3% 0 0Speeding 1 3% 0 0Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 0 0% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 3% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 6 16% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 5 13% 0 3Other Improper Action* 2 5% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 5% 0 0

Total 38 100% 1 6Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 38 100% 1 6

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Beeson St Breck St 0 3 1 4 4 0 650 3.00 5.62 1.33 14.98SR173 Columbus Rd & State St 4 4 5 13 4 0 6,984 1.62 1.70 4.33 7.93SR 44 State St SR173 8 2 4 14 4 0 10,824 1.57 1.18 4.67 5.77SR173 Paris Ave 1 5 1 7 5 0 4,839 2.43 1.32 2.33 4.99SR 44 SR619 4 3 2 9 4 0 11,915 1.89 0.69 3.00 2.60SR 44 Alberta Beach St 1 1 2 4 2 0 6,360 2.00 0.57 1.33 1.02SR 44 Beeson St 2 1 0 3 1 0 5,962 1.67 0.46 1.00 0.51SR 44 Swamp St 3 0 1 4 0 0 7,440 1.00 0.49 1.33 0.44SR619 Duquette Ave 2 0 0 2 1 0 7,678 2.00 0.24 0.67 0.21SR619 Marlboro Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 4,160 3.00 0.22 0.33 0.15

- 47 -

Page 48: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Nimishillen Township

- 48 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 4 2% 0 3 1Rear end/backing 38 16% 0 16 22Sideswipe 9 4% 0 0 9Angle 53 23% 3 28 22Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 104 45% 3 47 54Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 27 12% 0 3 24Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 0% 0 0 1Fixed object 4 2% 0 2 2Unknown 3 1% 0 0 3

Total 35 15% 0 5 30Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 69 30% 0 23 46Other non-collision* 32 14% 0 12 20Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 101 43% 0 35 667 3% 0 4

233 100% 3 83 147*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 172 74% 3Wet Pavement 46 20% 0Snow or Ice Covered 12 5% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0

Total 233 100% 3Daylight 142 61% 3Dark 84 36% 0Dusk 5 2% 0Dawn 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 0% 0

Total 233 100% 3

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 49: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 49 -

4

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 30 15% 0 1Failure to Control 4 2% 0 2Failure to Yield 42 21% 2 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 49 24% 0 14Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 11 5% 1 1Improper Turn 5 2% 0 0Improper Backing 3 1% 0 0Speeding 23 11% 0 4Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 6 3% 0 0Left of Center 8 4% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 10 5% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 7 3% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 0% 0 0

Total 200 100% 3 2Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 0% 0 0

Total 1 0% 0 0Grand Total 201 100% 3 24

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Easton St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 3.27 2.21 3.67 17.65US 62 Paris Ave 12 5 5 22 10 1 22,240 2.41 0.90 7.33 10.63SR 44 Easton St 3 7 5 15 10 0 10,553 2.33 1.30 5.00 10.09Columbus Rd Pilot Knob Ave 3 0 5 8 4 0 4,350 2.00 1.68 2.67 5.97Columbus Rd Paris Ave 1 1 3 5 4 0 3,195 2.60 1.43 1.67 4.13US 62 Broadway Ave 6 4 2 12 6 1 28,045 2.92 0.39 4.00 3.04SR153 Meese Rd 3 1 2 6 4 0 6,995 2.33 0.78 2.00 2.44US 62 Ravenna Ave SR44 EB Ramps 0 5 1 6 4 0 12,390 2.33 0.44 2.00 1.37SR 44 Columbus Rd 2 0 2 4 3 0 8,681 2.50 0.42 1.33 0.93Columbus Rd California Ave 0 2 1 3 2 0 5,000 2.33 0.55 1.00 0.85

Page 50: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Osnaburg Township

- 50 -

2

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 0 0% 0 0 0Rear end/backing 14 12% 0 8 6Sideswipe 3 3% 0 1 2Angle 14 12% 0 9 5Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 31 27% 0 18 13Parked Vehicle 2 2% 0 0 2Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 24 21% 0 1 23Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 2 2% 0 1 1Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 28 24% 0 2 26Overturning 1 1% 0 0 1Ran off road 48 42% 1 15 32Other non-collision* 10 9% 0 6 4Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 59 51% 1 21 373 3% 0 1

115 100% 1 40 74*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 85 74% 1Wet Pavement 23 20% 0Snow or Ice Covered 6 5% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 115 100% 1Daylight 58 50% 1Dark 51 44% 0Dusk 3 3% 0Dawn 3 3% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 115 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 51: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 51 -

0

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 14 16% 0 1Failure to Control 1 1% 0 1Failure to Yield 10 11% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 30 33% 1 13Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 1% 0 1Improper Turn 2 2% 0 0Improper Backing 1 1% 0 0Speeding 19 21% 0 4Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 2% 0 0Left of Center 4 4% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 3 3% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 2 2% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 90 100% 1 2Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 90 100% 1 20

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Broadway Ave Georgetown St 3 2 2 7 4 0 7,744 2.14 0.82 2.33 2.75SR 44 Mapleton St 0 1 3 4 1 0 3,150 1.50 1.16 1.33 1.55SR 43 Baum(Greenport) 4 1 2 7 2 0 12,910 1.57 0.49 2.33 1.21US 30 Broadway Ave 3 1 0 4 1 0 14,643 1.50 0.25 1.33 0.33SR 44 Georgetown St 1 0 2 3 1 0 10,460 1.67 0.26 1.00 0.29SR172 Miday Ave 2 0 0 2 0 0 4,830 1.00 0.38 0.67 0.17SR172 Belfort Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 4,010 1.00 0.23 0.33 0.05SR 44 Orchard View Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,995 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00US 30 Mapleton St 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,193 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00US 30 Ravenna Ave SR44 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,157 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 52: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Paris Township

- 52 -

2

2

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 2 2% 0 1 1Rear end/backing 17 15% 0 7 10Sideswipe 5 4% 0 2 3Angle 20 17% 0 12 8Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 44 38% 0 22 2Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 11 9% 0 0 11Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 1% 0 0 1Fixed object 3 3% 0 1 2Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 15 13% 0 1 14Overturning 1 1% 0 0 1Ran off road 43 37% 0 22 21Other non-collision* 22 19% 1 11 10Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 66 57% 1 33 39 8% 0 7 2

116 100% 1 49 66*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 88 76% 1Wet Pavement 22 19% 0Snow or Ice Covered 6 5% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 116 100% 1Daylight 74 64% 1Dark 37 32% 0Dusk 2 2% 0Dawn 3 3% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 116 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 53: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 16 16% 0 0Failure to Control 0 0% 0 0Failure to Yield 11 11% 0 2Improper Lane Change or Passing 26 25% 0 5Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 3 3% 0 0Improper Turn 1 1% 0 0Improper Backing 0 0% 0 0Speeding 22 21% 1 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 9 9% 0 0Left of Center 9 9% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 1 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 2 2% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 1 1% 0 1Other Improper Action* 1 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0 0

Total 103 100% 1 9Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 103 100% 1 9

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

SR172 Union Ave SR183 0 4 6 10 3 0 9,156 1.60 1.00 3.33 3.54Baywood St Paris Ave 2 0 1 3 1 0 1,450 1.67 1.89 1.00 2.10SR172 Paris Ave 1 0 2 3 2 0 4,090 2.33 0.67 1.00 1.04SR172 Autumn Ave 1 1 1 3 1 0 3,540 1.67 0.77 1.00 0.86US 30 Robertsville Ave 2 0 2 4 1 0 7,508 1.50 0.49 1.33 0.65SR172 Fox Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 3,640 3.00 0.25 0.33 0.17SR183 Freed St 0 1 0 1 1 0 6,074 3.00 0.15 0.33 0.10US 30 Paris Ave 0 1 0 1 1 0 7,790 3.00 0.12 0.33 0.08US 30 Baywood St 0 1 0 1 0 0 7,208 1.00 0.13 0.33 0.03

- 53 -

Page 54: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Perry Township

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 10 1% 1 3 6Rear end/backing 262 36% 0 73 189Sideswipe 36 5% 0 7 29Angle 210 28% 0 69 141Unknown 7 1% 0 1 6

Total 525 71% 1 153 371Parked Vehicle 35 5% 0 5 30Pedestrian 3 0% 0 2 1Animal 36 5% 0 1 35Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 0% 0 1 0Other non-motor 4 1% 0 1 3Fixed object 28 4% 0 4 24Unknown 3 0% 0 1 2

Total 110 15% 0 15 95Overturning 1 0% 0 1 0Ran off road 117 16% 3 35 79Other non-collision* 32 4% 0 9 23Unknown 1 0% 0 0 1

Total 151 20% 3 45 10349 7% 1 10 38

737 100% 3 203 531*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 532 72% 3Wet Pavement 152 21% 0Snow or Ice Covered 46 6% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 6 1% 0

Total 737 100% 3Daylight 471 64% 2Dark 232 31% 1Dusk 16 2% 0Dawn 11 1% 0Stated as Unknown 7 1% 0

Total 737 100% 3

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 54 -

Page 55: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 55 -

8

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 186 27% 0 7Failure to Control 96 14% 0 23Failure to Yield 126 19% 0 3Improper Lane Change or Passing 58 9% 1 8Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 31 5% 0 0Improper Turn 19 3% 0 0Improper Backing 38 6% 0 0Speeding 11 2% 0 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 19 3% 0 0Left of Center 6 1% 1 1Operating Defective Equipment 10 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 5 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 5 1% 1 2Other Improper Action* 41 6% 0 2Stated as Unknown 19 3% 0 1

Total 670 98% 3 4Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 1 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 10 1% 0 0

Total 11 2% 0 0Grand Total 681 100% 3 48

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

SR172 Whipple Ave 6 12 11 29 13 0 31,779 1.90 0.83 9.67 10.18Aurora St Whipple Ave 4 5 8 17 6 0 10,700 1.71 1.45 5.67 9.34US 30 WB Ramps Whipple Ave 10 5 0 15 6 0 9,400 1.80 1.46 5.00 8.74SR172 Perry Dr 16 9 10 35 7 0 40,739 1.40 0.78 11.67 8.5412th St NW Woodlawn Ave 3 6 11 20 5 0 22,000 1.50 0.83 6.67 5.53Aurora St Woodlawn Ave 5 4 2 11 5 0 8,900 1.91 1.13 3.67 5.26SR172 Genoa Ave 6 8 8 22 7 0 33,847 1.64 0.59 7.33 4.7512th St NW Perry Dr 8 2 8 18 4 0 24,963 1.44 0.66 6.00 3.80US 62 Navarre Rd 1 3 10 14 4 0 19,200 1.57 0.67 4.67 3.25Navarre Rd Kemary Ave & Stump Ave 1 4 3 8 3 0 8,000 1.75 0.91 2.67 2.84

Page 56: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Pike Township

- 56 -

2

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 1 0Rear end/backing 3 3% 0 2 1Sideswipe 6 7% 0 2 4Angle 7 8% 0 4 3Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 18 20% 0 9 9Parked Vehicle 1 1% 0 1 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 21 23% 0 1 20Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 4 4% 1 0 3Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 26 29% 1 2 23Overturning 1 1% 0 1 0Ran off road 35 39% 0 11 24Other non-collision* 14 16% 0 4 10Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 50 56% 0 16 344 4% 0 2

90 100% 1 25 64*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 61 68% 0Wet Pavement 20 22% 1Snow or Ice Covered 8 9% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 90 100% 1Daylight 48 53% 1Dark 38 42% 0Dusk 0 0% 0Dawn 4 4% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 90 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 57: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 57 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 5 7% 0 2Failure to Control 7 10% 0 1Failure to Yield 1 1% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 21 31% 1 5Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 1 1% 0 0Improper Turn 0 0% 0 0Improper Backing 0 0% 0 0Speeding 16 24% 0 3Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 1 1% 0 0Left of Center 4 6% 0 2Operating Defective Equipment 2 3% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 6 9% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 3% 0 0

Total 66 99% 1 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 1 1% 0 1Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 1 1% 0 1Grand Total 67 100% 1 14

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Fohl St Sherman Church Ave 4 1 0 5 2 0 5,250 1.80 0.87 1.67 1.74I-77 Fohl St Ramps SB 2 0 0 2 0 1 5,500 6.50 0.33 0.67 0.96I-77 Fohl St Ramps NB 1 2 0 3 2 0 5,500 2.33 0.50 1.00 0.77SR800 Battlesburg St 2 1 0 3 3 0 8,483 3.00 0.32 1.00 0.65SR800 Farber St 1 0 1 2 1 0 6,692 2.00 0.27 0.67 0.24SR800 East Sparta Ave 0 0 1 1 1 0 7,166 3.00 0.13 0.33 0.08SR800 Howenstine St 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,525 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Page 58: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Plain Township

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 15 2% 0 9 6Rear end/backing 445 45% 0 101 344Sideswipe 55 6% 0 11 44Angle 260 26% 0 69 191Unknown 5 1% 0 0 5

Total 780 79% 0 190 590Parked Vehicle 31 3% 0 3 28Pedestrian 7 1% 0 7 0Animal 23 2% 0 2 21Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 0% 0 1 0Other non-motor 5 1% 0 0 5Fixed object 17 2% 0 4 13Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 84 9% 0 17 67Overturning 3 0% 0 2 1Ran off road 111 11% 0 38 73Other non-collision* 40 4% 1 10 29Unknown 1 0% 0 0 1

Total 155 16% 1 50 10434 3% 0 9 25

985 100% 1 248 736*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

e s1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 726 74% 0Wet Pavement 232 24% 1Snow or Ice Covered 26 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 1 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 985 100% 1Daylight 719 73% 0Dark 207 21% 1Dusk 29 3% 0Dawn 18 2% 0Stated as Unknown 12 1% 0

Total 985 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

- 58 -

Page 59: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 59 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 344 37% 0 7Failure to Control 104 11% 1 20Failure to Yield 162 17% 0 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 67 7% 0 8Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 41 4% 0 1Improper Turn 34 4% 0 2Improper Backing 30 3% 0 0Speeding 20 2% 0 2Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 10 1% 0 0Left of Center 9 1% 0 1Operating Defective Equipment 8 1% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 5 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 4 0% 0 1Other Improper Action* 73 8% 0 0Stated as Unknown 13 1% 0 0

Total 924 99% 1 4Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 1 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 1 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 12 1% 0 0

Total 14 1% 0 0Grand Total 938 100% 1 43

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

30th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 4.29 18.00 76.35Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 2.38 8.67 22.26US 62 Regent Ave 16 9 11 36 8 0 25,380 1.44 1.29 12.00 14.96US 62 Middlebranch & Harrisburg 11 15 17 43 13 0 43,540 1.60 0.90 14.33 13.82Easton St Firestone Ave 7 5 3 15 4 0 10,852 1.53 1.26 5.00 6.45Applegrove St Pittsburg Ave 7 4 7 18 9 0 21,401 2.00 0.77 6.00 6.1455th St NE East Center & Harmont 3 6 1 10 4 0 6,500 1.80 1.40 3.33 5.6220th St NW Lakeside Ave 2 6 1 9 4 0 6,500 1.89 1.26 3.00 4.77SR 43 Applegrove St 4 7 5 16 6 0 25,609 1.75 0.57 5.33 3.55SR 43 Easton St 3 8 8 19 3 0 27,245 1.32 0.64 6.33 3.54

Page 60: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Sandy Township

- 60 -

1

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 1 0 0Rear end/backing 8 8% 0 3 5Sideswipe 1 1% 0 0 1Angle 14 15% 0 10 4Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 25 26% 1 13 11Parked Vehicle 2 2% 0 0 2Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 22 23% 0 0 22Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 0 0% 0 0 0Fixed object 4 4% 0 0 4Unknown 3 3% 0 0 3

Total 31 32% 0 0 31Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 23 24% 0 6 17Other non-collision* 20 21% 1 7 12Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 43 45% 1 13 293 3% 1 1

96 100% 1 25 70*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 61 64% 1Wet Pavement 29 30% 0Snow or Ice Covered 4 4% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 2 2% 0

Total 96 100% 1Daylight 44 46% 0Dark 46 48% 1Dusk 2 2% 0Dawn 3 3% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 96 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 61: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 61 -

0

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 5 7% 0 0Failure to Control 22 31% 0 4Failure to Yield 9 13% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 7 10% 1 3Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 0 0% 0 0Improper Turn 4 6% 0 1Improper Backing 2 3% 0 0Speeding 2 3% 0 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 3% 0 0Left of Center 0 0% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 7 10% 0 1Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 2 3% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 2 3% 0 0Other Improper Action* 1 1% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 3% 0 0

Total 67 94% 1 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 1 1% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 3 4% 0 0

Total 4 6% 0 0Grand Total 71 100% 1 10

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

SR 43 SR183 3 2 2 7 2 0 13,789 1.57 0.46 2.33 1.13SR 43 SR 44 4 0 2 6 1 0 11,249 1.33 0.49 2.00 0.87SR 43 Mottice Dr 0 2 1 3 0 0 8,193 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.22SR 43 Indian Run Rd 0 1 1 2 1 0 12,410 2.00 0.15 0.67 0.13SR 43 Waynesburg Dr 2 0 0 2 1 0 12,610 2.00 0.14 0.67 0.13SR 43 Greer Ave 1 1 0 2 0 0 8,350 1.00 0.22 0.67 0.10SR 43 Elson St 0 0 1 1 1 0 10,552 3.00 0.09 0.33 0.06SR 43 Goodland St 0 0 1 1 1 0 12,428 3.00 0.07 0.33 0.05

Page 62: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Sugar Creek Township

- 62 -

3

946

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 0 0 1Rear end/backing 16 18% 0 5 11Sideswipe 8 9% 0 2 6Angle 11 13% 0 6 5Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 36 41% 0 13 2Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 14 16% 0 1 13Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 1 1% 0 1 0Fixed object 3 3% 0 1 2Unknown 3 3% 0 0 3

Total 21 24% 0 3 18Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 21 24% 0 11 10Other non-collision* 15 17% 1 5 9Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 36 41% 1 16 16 7% 0 2

87 100% 1 30 5*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 62 71% 0Wet Pavement 21 24% 1Snow or Ice Covered 2 2% 0Mud or Sand Covered 2 2% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 87 100% 1Daylight 48 55% 0Dark 37 43% 1Dusk 0 0% 0Dawn 2 2% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 87 100% 1

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 63: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 12 17% 0 0Failure to Control 2 3% 0 0Failure to Yield 10 14% 0 1Improper Lane Change or Passing 19 28% 1 6Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 0 0% 0 0Improper Turn 3 4% 0 0Improper Backing 3 4% 0 0Speeding 8 12% 0 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 0 0% 0 0Left of Center 3 4% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 4 6% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 0 0% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 2 3% 0 0Other Improper Action* 3 4% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 69 100% 1 8Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 69 100% 1 8

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Elton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 6.00 2.38 2.00 19.05SR 93 Elton St 2 2 2 6 4 0 8,621 2.33 0.64 2.00 1.98US250 SR212 & Kaylor 1 2 1 4 4 0 6,138 3.00 0.59 1.33 1.59US 62 Mt Eaton St 1 1 0 2 1 0 4,880 2.00 0.37 0.67 0.33US250 Alabama Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 5,584 3.00 0.16 0.33 0.11US 62 SR 93 N Junction 0 0 1 1 0 0 6,486 1.00 0.14 0.33 0.03US 62 Angleway St & Pigeon Run Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,165 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00US 62 SR93 Lawndell 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,258 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

- 63 -

Page 64: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Tuscarawas Township

- 64 -

4

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 3 2% 0 3 0Rear end/backing 17 10% 0 5 12Sideswipe 9 5% 0 2 7Angle 43 25% 0 25 18Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 73 43% 0 35 38Parked Vehicle 1 1% 0 0 1Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 30 18% 0 6 24Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 1 1% 0 1 0Other non-motor 3 2% 0 0 3Fixed object 4 2% 0 1 3Unknown 1 1% 0 0 1

Total 40 24% 0 8 32Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 49 29% 0 25 24Other non-collision* 12 7% 0 4 8Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 61 36% 0 29 325 3% 0 1

169 100% 0 71 98*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 129 76% 0Wet Pavement 32 19% 0Snow or Ice Covered 7 4% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 169 100% 0Daylight 89 53% 0Dark 72 43% 0Dusk 3 2% 0Dawn 4 2% 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0

Total 169 100% 0

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 65: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 65 -

0

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 19 14% 0 0Failure to Control 1 1% 0 0Failure to Yield 33 24% 0 3Improper Lane Change or Passing 32 24% 0 9Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 6 4% 0 0Improper Turn 3 2% 0 0Improper Backing 3 2% 0 0Speeding 21 16% 0 8Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 2 1% 0 0Left of Center 8 6% 0 0Operating Defective Equipment 3 2% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 1 1% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 2 1% 0 0

Total 134 99% 0 2Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 1 1% 0 0

Total 1 1% 0 0Grand Total 135 100% 0 20

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

SR 93 Wooster St 2 1 7 10 7 0 5,115 2.40 1.78 3.33 9.52SR172 Deerfield Rd 4 0 1 5 3 0 11,301 2.20 0.40 1.67 0.99SR 93 SR241 S Jct 2 0 2 4 2 0 9,622 2.00 0.38 1.33 0.67SR 93 SR172 1 1 2 4 2 0 9,817 2.00 0.37 1.33 0.66SR172 Alabama Ave 2 1 1 4 0 0 5,821 1.00 0.63 1.33 0.56SR241 Alabama Ave 0 2 1 3 0 0 3,487 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.52SR241 Greendale Ave 1 0 1 2 2 0 5,091 3.00 0.36 0.67 0.48SR172 Kenyon Ave 1 1 1 3 1 0 7,010 1.67 0.39 1.00 0.43SR 93 Sarbaugh St 1 1 1 3 1 0 7,730 1.67 0.35 1.00 0.39US 30 EB Ramps SR241 2 0 0 2 0 0 10,492 1.00 0.17 0.67 0.08

Page 66: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Washington Township

- 66 -

3

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 1 1% 1 0 0Rear end/backing 28 19% 1 8 19Sideswipe 4 3% 0 1 3Angle 40 27% 0 24 16Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 73 49% 2 33 38Parked Vehicle 0 0% 0 0 0Pedestrian 0 0% 0 0 0Animal 21 14% 0 2 19Train 0 0% 0 0 0Bicycle 0 0% 0 0 0Other non-motor 2 1% 0 1 1Fixed object 5 3% 0 0 5Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 28 19% 0 3 25Overturning 0 0% 0 0 0Ran off road 38 26% 2 22 14Other non-collision* 15 10% 0 6 9Unknown 0 0% 0 0 0

Total 53 36% 2 28 236 4% 1 2

148 100% 3 62 83*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Double-Counted Collisions**Grand Total

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 102 69% 2Wet Pavement 41 28% 1Snow or Ice Covered 5 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 0 0% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 148 100% 3Daylight 94 64% 2Dark 50 34% 1Dusk 3 2% 0Dawn 1 1% 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0

Total 148 100% 3

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

Ligh

t

Page 67: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 67 -

4

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 20 16% 1 0Failure to Control 2 2% 0 0Failure to Yield 28 23% 0 0Improper Lane Change or Passing 23 19% 1 10Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 10 8% 0 0Improper Turn 2 2% 0 0Improper Backing 2 2% 0 0Speeding 9 7% 0 1Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 9 7% 0 2Left of Center 8 6% 1 1Operating Defective Equipment 0 0% 0 0Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 3 2% 0 0Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 0 0% 0 0Other Improper Action* 8 6% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 124 100% 3 1Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 0 0% 0 0Improper Crossing 0 0% 0 0Other 0 0% 0 0Stated as Unknown 0 0% 0 0

Total 0 0% 0 0Grand Total 124 100% 3 14

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections 1ST STREET 2ND STREET

2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Georgetown St Paris Ave 2 1 4 7 6 0 1,937 2.71 3.30 2.33 13.93SR153 Paris Ave 2 5 5 12 7 0 5,250 2.17 2.09 4.00 12.05Beech St Oakhill Dr 2 3 4 9 6 0 3,550 2.33 2.31 3.00 10.80SR153 Union Ave SR183 7 4 2 13 11 0 8,820 2.69 1.35 4.33 10.46SR183 Beech St 7 2 7 16 8 0 10,341 2.00 1.41 5.33 10.04Beech St Easton St 8 1 0 9 3 0 3,900 1.67 2.11 3.00 7.02SR173 McCallum Ave 1 5 1 7 4 0 5,974 2.14 1.07 2.33 3.56Beech St Beechwood Ave 4 1 3 8 4 0 7,800 2.00 0.94 2.67 3.33SR153 Beechwood Ave 2 1 1 4 2 0 4,273 2.00 0.85 1.33 1.52Beechwood Ave Cenfield St 1 0 1 2 2 0 2,534 3.00 0.72 0.67 0.96

Page 68: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

All of Stark County

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Injury Crashes

Property Damage

Only Crashes

Head on 263 2% 5 103 155Rear end/backing 3697 33% 1 897 2799Sideswipe 946 8% 0 98 848Angle 3421 31% 11 1072 2338Unknown 128 1% 0 16 112

Total 8455 76% 17 2186 6252Parked Vehicle 557 5% 0 43 514Pedestrian 63 1% 0 53 10Animal 490 4% 0 27 463Train 4 0% 0 3 1Bicycle 19 0% 0 15 4Other non-motor 55 0% 0 9 46Fixed object 501 4% 4 105 392Unknown 71 1% 0 13 58

Total 1760 16% 4 268 1488Overturning 19 0% 0 10 9Ran off road 1276 11% 14 465 797Other non-collision* 463 4% 6 163 294Unknown 8 0% 0 2 6

Total 1766 16% 20 640 1106817 7% 6 168 643

11,164 100% 35 2926 8203*Includes fire, immersion, jackknife, cargo shift, equipment failure, separation of units, or crossing median**For example, a motor vehicle hit another motor vehicle at an angle and then ran off the road

Grand Total

TYPE OF CRASH - 2006 CRASHES

TYPE OF CRASH

All

Cra

sh T

ypes

Col

lisio

n be

twee

n… 2 M

ovin

g Ve

hicl

es1

Mov

ing

Vehi

cle

and…

Non

-Col

lisio

n

Double-Counted Collisions**

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Dry Pavement 8263 74% 24Wet Pavement 2408 22% 10Snow or Ice Covered 376 3% 0Mud or Sand Covered 14 0% 0Stated as Unknown 103 1% 1

Total 11,164 100% 35Daylight 7646 68% 18Dark 2958 26% 16Dusk 262 2% 1Dawn 155 1% 0Stated as Unknown 143 1% 0

Total 11,164 100% 35

Ligh

t

ROAD CONDITIONS - 2006 CRASHESTYPE AND CONDITIONS

Roa

dway

- 68 -

Page 69: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Crashes % of All Crashes

Fatal Crashes

Alcohol Related Crashes

Followed Too Closely 2815 27% 1 62Failure to Control 1274 12% 7 224Failure to Yield 1891 18% 5 29Improper Lane Change or Passing 955 9% 9 133Ran Red Light/Stop Sign 619 6% 3 27Improper Turn 287 3% 0 5Improper Backing 394 4% 0 5Speeding 262 3% 1 41Driver Inattention/Fatigue/Asleep 289 3% 0 6Left of Center 135 1% 2 12Operating Defective Equipment 135 1% 0 3Swerving to Avoid Vehicle, Object, etc 114 1% 0 2Operating Vehicle in Negligent Manner 119 1% 6 38Other Improper Action* 401 4% 0 9Stated as Unknown 371 4% 0 5

Total 10,061 97% 34 601Failure to Obey Traffic Regulations 12 0% 0 2Improper Crossing 9 0% 1 2Other 28 0% 0 1Stated as Unknown 263 3% 0 4

Total 312 3% 1 9Grand Total 10,373 100% 35 610

*Includes improper start from parked position, stopped or parked illegally, vision obstruction or load shifting/falling/spilling

PROBABLE CAUSE - 2006 CRASHES

PROBABLE CAUSE

All

Prob

able

Cau

ses

Mot

oris

tN

on-M

otor

ist

Top-Ranked Intersections POLITICAL

UNIT 1ST STREET 2ND STREET2004Total

2005Total

2006Total

3-YearTotal

04-06Injury

04-06Fatal

2006ADT

SeverityIndex

CrashRate

CrashesPer Year

HazardRating

Plain Twp 30th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 4.29 18.00 76.35Canton 12th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 2.58 24.00 57.05Canton 12th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 2.33 14.67 44.51Canton US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 1.61 18.33 30.35Canton Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 1.72 14.67 27.58Canton 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 2.68 10.33 26.83Canton 30th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 1.41 14.67 26.25Canton McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 1.69 12.33 25.19Canton Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 1.81 12.67 24.95Jackson Twp Huckleberry St Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 3.15 3.33 24.48Jackson Twp I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 1.06 17.67 24.36Plain Twp Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 2.38 8.67 22.26Canton Twp US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 1.93 8.33 21.91Jackson Twp SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 1.23 13.33 21.34Canton 13th St NW I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 1.37 13.67 21.02Jackson Twp I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 1.31 14.33 20.63Canton Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 1.59 14.67 20.55Lexington Twp SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 3.54 6.67 20.47

- 69 -

Page 70: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 70 -

Table 1 -- Intersections Ranked by Hazard Rating The following table (Table 1) lists the intersections with hazard ratings greater than

20. These intersections are ranked from highest hazard rating to lowest hazard rating.

Page 71: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Table 1 - Locations with Hazard Ratings over 15Intersecting StreetStreet

Crashes by year2004 2005 2006

3 Year TotalsCrashes Injury Fatal

Avg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

76.3530th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 4.29 County

57.0512th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 2.58 Canton

44.5112th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 2.33 Canton

30.35US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 1.61 Canton

27.58Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 1.72 Canton

26.83 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 2.68 Canton

26.2530th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 1.41 Canton

25.19McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 1.69 Canton

24.95Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 1.81 Canton

24.48Huckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 3.15 Jackson Twp

24.36I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 1.06 ODOT

22.26Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 2.38 County

21.91US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 1.93 ODOT

21.34SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 1.23 ODOT

21.0213/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 1.37 Canton

20.63I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 1.31 ODOT

20.55Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 1.59 Canton

20.47SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 3.54 ODOT

19.22Dressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.67 1.02 County

19.09Everhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 1.67 0.95 County

Page 1 of 2

Page 72: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

19.05Elton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 6.00 2.38 County

18.99Dueber Ave SW Navarre Rd 3 9 12 24 8 0 10,250 1.67 2.14 Canton

18.64Parkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.80 1.33 Alliance

18.51Great Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.49 1.37 Massillon

18.16Lincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.39 1.43 Massillon

17.96Elgin Ave I-77 NB Offramp& Tuscarawas 14 10 7 31 7 0 15,750 1.45 1.80 Canton

17.65Easton St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 3.27 2.21 County

17.57Gibbs Ave Lawrence Rd 5 3 6 14 9 0 5,171 2.29 2.47 Canton

17.44I-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.92 1.11 ODOT

16.93Frank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.71 1.06 County

16.86Portage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.36 1.26 County

16.15Lake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.33 1.51 Massillon

16.06Cherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.46 1.90 Canal Fulton

15.17 6th St NW Shorb Ave 5 8 0 13 4 0 3,650 1.62 3.25 Canton

Page 2 of 2

Page 73: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Description of Top-10 Intersections The following paragraphs describe the situations at the intersections with the top-10

Hazard Ratings, plans (if any) for improvement that are already scheduled, and SCATS recommendations for improvements.

30th St NE & Harrisburg Ave– This is a four-way intersection of a county road, a township road, and a ramp to US-62. There are stop signs on 30th St. The ramp from US-62 to Harrisburg southbound has a right-turn lane with a yield sign and a through-lane with a stop sign. Harrisburg has left-turn lanes in both directions. Cars on 30th St have trouble seeing to the south.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 76.35 17 23 14 13 0 11,475 4.29 1.48 Fatalities: 0 Primary Cause(s): Failure to yield Recent Improvements: A safety project along US-62 to upgrade the signals into a

closed-loop system was completed in 2005. Current Plans: This intersection is recommended for further study based on the

Roadway Safety Workshop held in 2006. Recommendation: Proceed with current plans.

- 73 -

Page 74: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

12th Street & Market Avenue North – This is a signalized crossroad in the City of Canton. This is a very high-volume intersection. Market Ave is a four-lane road with one though-right lane and one through-left lane in each direction. 12th St has one left-turn lane and one through lane westbound, and one through lane, one left-turn lane, and one right-turn lane eastbound. The strange lane configurations may be causing some of the crashes at this location. A car going straight on Market Ave could get stuck behind a car turning left and try a dangerous lane change.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 57.05 26 21 25 17 0 25,434 2.58 1.47 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Ran red light Recent Improvements: None Current Plans: SCATS and the City of Canton have submitted a grant application to

the Ohio Department of Public Safety for funding of a safety study at this location. The City has also approached the Stark TID about administering this project. An intersection improvement project is included in SCATS 2030 Long-Range Plan. Recommendation: Proceed with safety study.

- 74 -

Page 75: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

12th St NE (SR 153) and Cherry Ave (SR 43 NB) – This is an intersection of two state routes, one of which is a one-way street. It is controlled by traffic signals.

Crashes per year Hazard Rating 2004 2005 2006

Injury Crashes

Fatal Crashes

ADT Crash Rate

Severity Index

44.51 8 22 14 21 0 17,242 2.33 1.95 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Ran red light Recent Improvements: The signals at this intersection were upgraded in 2006. Current Plans: This intersection was recommended for further study at the Roadway

Safety Workshop in 2006. Recommendation: Proceed with current plans.

- 75 -

Page 76: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

US-62 & Harmont Ave & Lesh St – This is an intersection of a four-lane US route and a two-lane county route. Because Lesh St intersects so closely to the main intersection, it has been included as part of this intersection. US-62 has both left-turn-only and right-turn-only lanes in both directions.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 30.35 14 25 16 15 0 31,235 1.61 1.55 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Following too closely Recent Improvements: The right-turn lanes were added to US-62 and the left-turn

lanes on US-62 were offset in 2005. Current Plans: This intersection was recommended for further study at the Roadway

Safety Workshop in 2006 Recommendation: Proceed with current plans.

- 76 -

Page 77: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Central Plaza & Tuscarawas Street – This is an intersection of a state route and a very busy city street. Central Plaza is also known as Market Avenue. Both streets are four lanes. Central Plaza is divided by a large median, so technically, this is two intersections. The intersection is controlled by two sets of traffic lights. Parking is permitted on all four legs of the intersection.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 27.58 22 13 9 14 0 23,295 1.72 1.64 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Ran red light Recent Improvements: This intersection was upgraded during the streetscaping

project for downtown Canton in 2000. In 2001 a sign was placed to warn traffic turning from the north leg to the east leg to prepare to stop.

Current Plans: In 2007 the intersection will be improved as part of a project to widen Tuscarawas St to five lanes, improve the traffic signals, and improve the lighting. Recommendation: Proceed with the current plans.

- 77 -

Page 78: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

6th St NE and Cherry Ave (SR 43 NB) – This is an intersection of two one-way streets. Cherry is a state route. The intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. Parking is allowed on the right side of Cherry. A high fence in the southeast quadrant restricts cross corner sight distance.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 26.83 10 8 13 7 0 10,545 2.68 1.45 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Improper lane change/Ran red light Recent Improvements: The signal heads were upgraded in 2000. Since 2004, the

severity index has fallen from 2.46 to 1.75 to 1.45. Current Plans: None

Recommendation: This intersection has shown improvement in recent years. No further actions are recommended at this time.

- 78 -

Page 79: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

30th St & Market Ave N (SR-43) – This is an intersection of a state route and a city street. Market Ave is a four lane road with left-turn lanes in each direction. 30th St has left-turn-only, through-only and right-turn-only lanes in both directions.

Crashes per year Hazard Rating 2004 2005 2006

Injury Crashes

Fatal Crashes

ADT Crash Rate

Severity Index

26.25 17 13 14 20 0 28,560 1.41 1.91 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Failure to yield Recent Improvements: In 2006, the signals were upgraded, left-turn phases were

included in every direction, and battery backup was added. Current Plans: None Recommendation: The recent improvements should reduce crashes at this

intersection.

- 79 -

Page 80: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

McKinley Ave & Tuscarawas St – This is an intersection of two city streets controlled by traffic signals. McKinley is a one-way street. Timken High School is located on the Northwest corner. Picking up and dropping off students adds to the confusion at this location.

Crashes per year Hazard Rating 2004 2005 2006

Injury Crashes

Fatal Crashes

ADT Crash Rate

Severity Index

25.19 20 12 5 15 0 19,959 1.69 1.81 Fatalities: 0 Leading Cause(s): Ran red light Recent Improvements: The signal heads were upgraded to 12 inches in 2001. Current Plans: This intersection will be improved as part of the Tuscarawas and I-77

widening project scheduled for 2007- 2008. Recommendation: Current plans should improve safety at this intersection.

- 80 -

Page 81: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Market Ave (SR 43) and US 62 EB Ramp – This is an intersection of a state route and a freeway off ramp and a city street. It is controlled by traffic lights.

Crashes per year Hazard Rating 2004 2005 2006

Injury Crashes

Fatal Crashes

ADT Crash Rate

Severity Index

24.95 16 13 9 12 0 19,150 1.81 1.63 Fatalities: 0 Primary Cause(s): Followed too closely/Ran red light Recent Improvements: The signals at this intersection were upgraded in 2006. Current Plans: None Recommendation: The relatively high number of crashes in recent years may have

been due to construction in this area. Nothing is recommended at this time.

- 81 -

Page 82: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Huckleberry St and Lake O’Springs Ave – This is an intersection of two township roads controlled by stop signs on Huckleberry St. The most common crash cause is failure to yield, indicating possible sight-distance problems for traffic stopped at the stop signs.

Crashes per year Hazard

Rating 2004 2005 2006 Injury

Crashes Fatal

Crashes ADT Crash

Rate Severity

Index 24.48 2 5 3 7 1 2,900 3.15 3.50 Fatalities: 1 Leading Cause(s): Failure to yield

Recent Improvements: None. Double stop signs and warning signs were installed more than 5 years ago on Huckleberry St.

Current Plans: None Recommendation: If the hazard rating remains high, a four-way stop or traffic light should be considered at this location.

- 82 -

Page 83: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 83 -

Table 2 -- Intersections Ranked by Crashes Per Million Vehicles

The following table (Table 2) again lists the intersections with hazard ratings

greater than 20. This time the intersections are ranked from most crashes per million vehicles to least crashes per million vehicles.

Page 84: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Table 2 - Locations with Hazard Ratings over 15 Listed by Crashes Per MVIntersecting StreetStreet

Crashes by year2004 2005 2006

3 Year TotalsCrashes Injury Fatal

Avg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

4.2930th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 76.35 County

3.54SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 20.47 ODOT

3.25 6th St NW Shorb Ave 5 8 0 13 4 0 3,650 1.62 15.17 Canton

3.15Huckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 24.48 Jackson Twp

2.68 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 26.83 Canton

2.5812th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 57.05 Canton

2.47Gibbs Ave Lawrence Rd 5 3 6 14 9 0 5,171 2.29 17.57 Canton

2.38Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 22.26 County

2.38Elton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 6.00 19.05 County

2.3312th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 44.51 Canton

2.21Easton St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 3.27 17.65 County

2.14Dueber Ave SW Navarre Rd 3 9 12 24 8 0 10,250 1.67 18.99 Canton

1.93US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 21.91 ODOT

1.90Cherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.46 16.06 Canal Fulton

1.81Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 24.95 Canton

1.80Elgin Ave I-77 NB Offramp& Tuscarawas 14 10 7 31 7 0 15,750 1.45 17.96 Canton

1.72Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 27.58 Canton

1.69McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 25.19 Canton

1.61US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 30.35 Canton

1.59Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 20.55 Canton

1.51Lake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.33 16.15 Massillon

1.43Lincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.39 18.16 Massillon

1.4130th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 26.25 Canton

Page 1 of 2

Page 85: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

1.3713/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 21.02 Canton

1.37Great Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.49 18.51 Massillon

1.33Parkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.80 18.64 Alliance

1.31I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 20.63 ODOT

1.26Portage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.36 16.86 County

1.23SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 21.34 ODOT

1.11I-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.92 17.44 ODOT

1.06I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 24.36 ODOT

1.06Frank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.71 16.93 County

1.02Dressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.67 19.22 County

0.95Everhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 1.67 19.09 County

Page 2 of 2

Page 86: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 86 -

Table 3 -- Intersections Ranked by Number of Accidents The following table (Table 3) again lists the intersections with hazard ratings

greater than 20. This time the intersections are ranked from most crashes per year to fewest crashes per year.

Page 87: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Table 3 - Locations with Hazard Ratings over 15 Listed by Crashes Per YearIntersecting StreetStreet

Crashes by year2004 2005 2006

3 Year TotalsCrashes Injury Fatal

Avg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index Crash/MV

Hazard Rating

Crashes per Year Jurisdiction

24.0012th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 2.58 57.05 Canton

18.33US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 1.61 30.35 Canton

18.0030th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 4.29 76.35 County

18.00Everhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 1.67 0.95 19.09 County

17.67I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 1.06 24.36 ODOT

17.00Dressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.67 1.02 19.22 County

14.6730th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 1.41 26.25 Canton

14.67Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 1.59 20.55 Canton

14.6712th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 2.33 44.51 Canton

14.67Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 1.72 27.58 Canton

14.67Portage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.36 1.26 16.86 County

14.33I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 1.31 20.63 ODOT

14.00Frank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.71 1.06 16.93 County

13.67Great Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.49 1.37 18.51 Massillon

13.6713/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 1.37 21.02 Canton

13.67Lincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.39 1.43 18.16 Massillon

13.33SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 1.23 21.34 ODOT

12.67Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 1.81 24.95 Canton

12.33McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 1.69 25.19 Canton

12.33I-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.92 1.11 17.44 ODOT

12.00Lake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.33 1.51 16.15 Massillon

11.67Parkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.80 1.33 18.64 Alliance

10.33 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 2.68 26.83 Canton

Page 1 of 2

Page 88: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index Crash/MV

Hazard Rating

Crashes per Year Jurisdiction

10.33Elgin Ave I-77 NB Offramp& Tuscarawas 14 10 7 31 7 0 15,750 1.45 1.80 17.96 Canton

8.67Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 2.38 22.26 County

8.67Cherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.46 1.90 16.06 Canal Fulton

8.33US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 1.93 21.91 ODOT

8.00Dueber Ave SW Navarre Rd 3 9 12 24 8 0 10,250 1.67 2.14 18.99 Canton

6.67SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 3.54 20.47 ODOT

4.67Gibbs Ave Lawrence Rd 5 3 6 14 9 0 5,171 2.29 2.47 17.57 Canton

4.33 6th St NW Shorb Ave 5 8 0 13 4 0 3,650 1.62 3.25 15.17 Canton

3.67Easton St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 3.27 2.21 17.65 County

3.33Huckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 3.15 24.48 Jackson Twp

2.00Elton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 6.00 2.38 19.05 County

Page 2 of 2

Page 89: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 89 -

Table 4 -- Intersections Ranked by Severity Index The following table (Table 4) again lists the intersections with hazard ratings

greater than 20. This time the intersections are ranked from highest severity index to lowest severity index.

Page 90: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Table 4 - Locations with Hazard Ratings over 15 Listed by Severity IndexIntersecting StreetStreet

Crashes by year2004 2005 2006

3 Year TotalsCrashes Injury Fatal

Avg Daily

TrafficSeverity

IndexCrash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

6.00Elton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 2.38 19.05 County

3.50Huckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.15 24.48 Jackson Twp

3.27Easton St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 2.21 17.65 County

2.29Gibbs Ave Lawrence Rd 5 3 6 14 9 0 5,171 2.47 17.57 Canton

2.04US 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 1.93 21.91 ODOT

1.9512th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 2.33 44.51 Canton

1.95SR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.23 21.34 ODOT

1.94I-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.06 24.36 ODOT

1.92I-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.11 17.44 ODOT

1.9130th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.41 26.25 Canton

1.81McKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.69 25.19 Canton

1.80Parkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.33 18.64 Alliance

1.71Frank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.06 16.93 County

1.6813/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.37 21.02 Canton

1.67Dressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.02 19.22 County

1.67Dueber Ave SW Navarre Rd 3 9 12 24 8 0 10,250 2.14 18.99 Canton

1.67Everhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 0.95 19.09 County

1.65I-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.31 20.63 ODOT

1.64Central Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.72 27.58 Canton

1.63Market Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.81 24.95 Canton

Page 1 of 2

Page 91: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

TrafficSeverity

IndexCrash Rate per Million Vehicles

SCATS Hazard Rating Jurisdiction

1.62 6th St NW Shorb Ave 5 8 0 13 4 0 3,650 3.25 15.17 Canton

1.62Columbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 2.38 22.26 County

1.55US 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.61 30.35 Canton

1.49Great Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.37 18.51 Massillon

1.4830th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 4.29 76.35 County

1.4712th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 2.58 57.05 Canton

1.46Cherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.90 16.06 Canal Fulton

1.45Elgin Ave I-77 NB Offramp& Tuscarawas 14 10 7 31 7 0 15,750 1.80 17.96 Canton

1.45 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 2.68 26.83 Canton

1.39Lincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.43 18.16 Massillon

1.36Portage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.26 16.86 County

1.33Lake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.51 16.15 Massillon

1.32Harrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.59 20.55 Canton

1.30SR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 3.54 20.47 ODOT

Page 2 of 2

Page 92: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

- 92 -

Table 5 -- Intersections Listed Alphabetically by Location The following table (Table 5) lists all of the intersections monitored by SCATS. They

are listed in alphabetical order by "Location.” For municipal roads the "Location" column shows the name of the municipality that contains the intersection. For county, and township roads the "Location" column shows the word "County.” For rural state highways, the route number and log station are listed in the "Location" column for easy cross-reference to ODOT records. Within each "Location" the intersections are listed in alphabetical order by "1st Street" and "2nd Street.”

Page 93: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Table 5 - All Locations Listed by Jurisdiction and Street NameIntersecting StreetStreet

Crashes by year2004 2005 2006

3 Year TotalsCrashes Injury Fatal

Avg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Alliance12th St Arch Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,150 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Broadway St 5 2 1 8 1 0 7,500 1.25 0.97 2.16Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Cambridge Ave 1 2 0 3 1 0 5,600 1.67 0.49 0.54Alliance

AllianceArch Ave College St 1 2 2 5 0 0 6,900 1.00 0.66 0.73Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Grant St 4 2 0 6 1 0 6,900 1.33 0.79 1.41Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Main St 3 5 1 9 4 0 8,850 1.89 0.93 3.51Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Market St 4 1 0 5 3 0 5,450 2.20 0.84 2.05Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Mill St 0 1 0 1 0 0 3,000 1.00 0.30 0.07Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Milner St 3 2 0 5 1 0 6,400 1.40 0.71 1.11Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Oxford St 2 1 3 6 2 0 5,950 1.67 0.92 2.05Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Rice Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 6,400 1.00 0.14 0.03Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Simpson St 1 2 2 5 2 0 6,400 1.80 0.71 1.43Alliance

AllianceArch Ave State St US 62 3 8 7 18 6 0 33,276 1.67 0.49 3.29Alliance

AllianceArch Ave Summit St 2 0 2 4 2 0 6,350 2.00 0.57 1.02Alliance

AllianceBeechwood Ave Sawburg & State 13 11 3 27 4 0 33,903 1.30 0.73 5.65Alliance

AllianceBroadway St Liberty Ave 3 2 2 7 3 0 5,700 1.86 1.12 3.24Alliance

AllianceBroadway St Mahoning Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 3,900 1.00 0.23 0.05Alliance

AllianceBroadway St Park Ave 2 0 0 2 1 0 4,750 2.00 0.38 0.34Alliance

AllianceBroadway St Seneca Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,200 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceBroadway St Union Ave SR183 5 6 8 19 11 0 12,785 2.16 1.36 12.36Alliance

AllianceCambridge Ave Lincoln Ave 2 1 0 3 1 0 2,000 1.67 1.37 1.52Alliance

AllianceCambridge Ave McKinley Ave 0 1 1 2 0 0 2,000 1.00 0.91 0.41Alliance

AllianceCenter Ave State St US 62 5 2 5 12 6 0 22,641 2.00 0.48 2.58Alliance

AllianceCherry Ave State St US 62 0 2 0 2 1 0 20,477 2.00 0.09 0.08Alliance

AllianceChestnut St Union Ave SR183 2 2 0 4 0 0 10,624 1.00 0.34 0.31Alliance

AllianceClark Ave State St 5 4 4 13 5 0 23,141 1.77 0.51 2.62Alliance

AllianceCollege St Freedom Ave 4 0 1 5 1 0 2,000 1.40 2.28 3.55Alliance

AllianceCollege St Union Ave SR183 0 1 4 5 1 0 13,070 1.40 0.35 0.54Alliance

Page 1 of 31

Page 94: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

AllianceColumbia St Park Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,200 1.00 0.76 0.17Alliance

AllianceDiehl Ct SR183 Union Ave SR225 4 1 4 9 0 0 14,090 1.00 0.58 1.17Alliance

AllianceDiehl Ct SR183 Vine St 1 3 5 9 3 0 7,530 1.67 1.09 3.64Alliance

AllianceEly St Lincoln Ave 2 3 1 6 0 0 6,800 1.00 0.81 1.07Alliance

AllianceEly St Union Ave SR183 5 7 7 19 4 0 16,920 1.42 1.02 6.15Alliance

AllianceFederal Ave State St US 62 2 1 1 4 1 0 23,141 1.50 0.16 0.21Alliance

AllianceFernwood Blvd Glamorgan St 1 2 1 4 1 0 4,850 1.50 0.75 1.00Alliance

AllianceFernwood Blvd Parkside Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceFernwood Blvd State St US 62 5 4 3 12 6 0 22,641 2.00 0.48 2.58Alliance

AllianceFreedom Ave State St 0 1 2 3 1 0 22,460 1.67 0.12 0.14Alliance

AllianceFreedom Ave Summit St 1 1 0 2 0 0 2,100 1.00 0.87 0.39Alliance

AllianceFreshly Ave State St US 62 4 3 4 11 6 0 31,564 2.09 0.32 1.63Alliance

AllianceGaskill St Walnut St 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,700 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceGlamorgan St Parkway Blvd 1 3 1 5 1 0 5,500 1.40 0.83 1.29Alliance

AllianceGlamorgan St Sawburg Ave 4 6 3 13 3 0 12,300 1.46 0.96 4.07Alliance

AllianceGlamorgan St Union Ave 1 4 4 9 4 0 14,711 1.89 0.56 2.11Alliance

AllianceGrant St Union Ave SR183 1 5 2 8 4 0 13,070 2.00 0.56 1.99Alliance

AllianceHartshorn St Parkway Blvd 6 1 1 8 3 0 3,700 1.75 1.97 6.14Alliance

AllianceLiberty Ave Oxford St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceLiberty Ave South St 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,200 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceLiberty Ave State St US 62 2 1 1 4 1 0 21,199 1.50 0.17 0.23Alliance

AllianceLiberty Ave Summit St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,800 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceLincoln Ave Main St 3 2 4 9 1 0 7,900 1.22 1.04 2.54Alliance

AllianceLinden St Market St 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,400 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceLinden St Oxford St 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceLinden St State St US 62 1 0 0 1 0 0 21,960 1.00 0.04 0.01Alliance

AllianceMahoning Ave State St US 62 2 1 1 4 2 0 15,069 2.00 0.24 0.43Alliance

AllianceMahoning Ave Summit St 0 2 0 2 0 0 4,850 1.00 0.38 0.17Alliance

AllianceMain St Freedom Ave 0 1 1 2 0 0 4,300 1.00 0.42 0.19Alliance

AllianceMain St Mechanic Ave 2 0 0 2 1 0 6,600 2.00 0.28 0.25Alliance

Page 2 of 31

Page 95: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

AllianceMain St Park Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,250 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceMain St Union Ave SR183 7 6 4 17 4 0 17,720 1.47 0.88 4.86Alliance

AllianceMarket St Seneca Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 1,500 1.00 0.61 0.14Alliance

AllianceMiller Ave State St US 62 2 2 0 4 1 0 25,880 1.50 0.14 0.19Alliance

AllianceOxford Ave Seneca Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Alliance

AllianceOxford Ave Union Ave SR183 5 2 5 12 3 0 12,135 1.50 0.90 3.61Alliance

AllianceParkway Blvd State St US 62 14 14 7 35 14 0 23,991 1.80 1.33 18.64Alliance

AlliancePatterson St Webb Ave 0 2 1 3 0 0 8,550 1.00 0.32 0.21Alliance

AlliancePenn Ave State St US 62 5 3 2 10 3 0 25,880 1.60 0.35 1.25Alliance

AllianceRockhill Ave State St US 62 7 5 9 21 9 0 25,111 1.86 0.76 6.61Alliance

AllianceSeneca Ave State St US 62 0 3 1 4 1 0 22,460 1.50 0.16 0.22Alliance

AllianceSeneca Ave Summit St 2 0 1 3 1 0 2,100 1.67 1.30 1.45Alliance

AllianceState St US62 Tanglewood Ave 4 1 2 7 2 0 29,964 1.57 0.21 0.52Alliance

AllianceState St US62 Union Ave SR183 13 10 12 35 12 0 33,276 1.69 0.96 12.59Alliance

AllianceState St US62 Western Ave 2 2 1 5 2 0 23,141 1.80 0.20 0.39Alliance

AllianceState St US62 Westwood Ave 7 3 2 12 4 0 29,964 1.67 0.37 1.62Alliance

AllianceSummit St Union Ave SR183 2 1 0 3 0 0 13,120 1.00 0.21 0.14Alliance

AllianceSummit St Webb Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 2,300 1.00 0.40 0.09Alliance

AllianceUnion Ave SR183 Washington St 1 0 0 1 1 0 13,070 3.00 0.07 0.05Alliance

Beach City 3rd Ave SR93 Main St E 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,590 0.00 0.00 0.00Beach City

Beach City 3rd Ave SR93 Redwood St SR212 4 4 3 11 5 0 3,563 1.91 2.82 13.15Beach City

Beach City 3rd Ave W Main St W 0 0 0 0 0 0 950 0.00 0.00 0.00Beach City

Brewster 2nd St Wabash Ave SR 93 2 0 0 2 0 0 8,662 1.00 0.21 0.09Brewster

Brewster 7th St Wabash Ave SR 93 1 2 0 3 3 0 7,056 3.00 0.39 0.78Brewster

BrewsterChestnut St Wabash Ave SR 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,662 0.00 0.00 0.00Brewster

BrewsterMain St Wabash Ave SR 93 3 0 1 4 0 0 8,662 1.00 0.42 0.37Brewster

Canal FultonCanal St Cherry St SR 93 1 3 2 6 1 0 9,608 1.33 0.57 1.01Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCanal St Market St 1 0 1 2 0 0 5,050 1.00 0.36 0.16Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCanal St Poplar St 0 0 1 1 0 0 3,600 1.00 0.25 0.06Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCherry St SR93 High St 0 3 3 6 1 0 8,330 1.33 0.66 1.17Canal Fulton

Page 3 of 31

Page 96: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canal FultonCherry St SR93 Locust St 6 11 9 26 6 0 12,480 1.46 1.90 16.06Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCherry St SR93 Market St 2 3 0 5 1 0 7,480 1.40 0.61 0.95Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCherry St SR93 Milan St 2 0 0 2 0 0 4,986 1.00 0.37 0.16Canal Fulton

Canal FultonCherry St SR93 River St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,836 0.00 0.00 0.00Canal Fulton

Canal FultonElmridge Ave Locust St 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Canal Fulton

Canton 2nd St N Market Ave 2 0 2 4 1 0 16,100 1.50 0.23 0.30Canton

Canton 2nd St NE Cherry Ave SR 43 6 5 3 14 4 0 10,960 1.57 1.17 5.70Canton

Canton 2nd St NE Gibbs Ave NE 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,900 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 2nd St NE Rowland Ave 0 1 2 3 1 0 3,500 1.67 0.78 0.87Canton

Canton 2nd St NE Walnut Ave 4 3 3 10 4 0 10,410 1.80 0.88 3.51Canton

Canton 2nd St NW Cleveland Ave 2 2 3 7 0 0 11,100 1.00 0.58 0.90Canton

Canton 2nd St NW High Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 2nd St NW Shorb Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,450 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 2nd St S Market Ave S 1 3 1 5 1 0 9,700 1.40 0.47 0.73Canton

Canton 2nd St SE Cherry Ave SR 43 6 1 5 12 4 0 8,172 1.67 1.34 5.96Canton

Canton 2nd St SE Walnut Ave 3 4 3 10 4 0 10,096 1.80 0.90 3.62Canton

Canton 2nd St SW Cleveland Ave 6 8 0 14 5 0 9,700 1.71 1.32 7.02Canton

Canton 3rd St N Market Ave N 1 3 4 8 3 0 12,252 1.75 0.60 1.85Canton

Canton 3rd St NE Rowland Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,700 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 3rd St NE Walnut Ave 4 5 1 10 2 0 10,135 1.40 0.90 2.80Canton

Canton 3rd St NW Cleveland Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 12,652 1.00 0.07 0.02Canton

Canton 3rd St NW High Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 3rd St NW McKinley Ave 1 0 2 3 1 0 10,400 1.67 0.26 0.29Canton

Canton 3rd St NW Wertz Ave 2 3 0 5 0 0 11,400 1.00 0.40 0.44Canton

Canton 3rd St NW Whipple Ave 2 3 0 5 2 0 10,000 1.80 0.46 0.91Canton

Canton 3rd St S Market Ave S 4 3 9 16 4 1 10,050 2.19 1.45 11.30Canton

Canton 3rd St SE Walnut Ave 7 8 8 23 2 0 9,498 1.17 2.21 13.26Canton

Canton 3rd St SW High Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 4,050 1.00 0.23 0.05Canton

Canton 3rd St SW McKinley Ave 4 2 3 9 3 0 7,850 1.67 1.05 3.49Canton

Canton 4th St NE Cherry Ave SR 43 3 9 6 18 2 0 9,594 1.22 1.71 8.37Canton

Page 4 of 31

Page 97: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canton 4th St NE Walnut Ave 3 3 2 8 3 0 7,759 1.75 0.94 2.93Canton

Canton 4th St NW Arlington Ave 2 1 0 3 2 0 4,900 2.33 0.56 0.87Canton

Canton 4th St NW Broad Ave Nw 3 3 2 8 1 0 6,700 1.25 1.09 2.42Canton

Canton 4th St NW Cleveland Ave 6 2 2 10 0 0 11,703 1.00 0.78 1.73Canton

Canton 4th St NW Harrison Ave 5 6 0 11 4 0 17,650 1.73 0.57 2.40Canton

Canton 4th St NW McKinley Ave 3 1 3 7 0 0 9,700 1.00 0.66 1.02Canton

Canton 4th St NW Wertz Ave 1 0 3 4 2 0 9,050 2.00 0.40 0.72Canton

Canton 5th St N Market Ave N 2 3 1 6 3 0 15,200 2.00 0.36 0.96Canton

Canton 5th St NE Walnut Ave 3 2 3 8 1 0 9,359 1.25 0.78 1.73Canton

Canton 5th St NW Cleveland Ave 4 4 5 13 6 0 11,903 1.92 1.00 5.54Canton

Canton 5th St NW High Ave 3 2 0 5 2 0 3,666 1.80 1.24 2.49Canton

Canton 5th St NW McKinley Ave 4 2 2 8 2 0 10,233 1.50 0.71 1.90Canton

Canton 6th St N Market Ave N 1 5 2 8 1 0 14,050 1.25 0.52 1.15Canton

Canton 6th St NE Cherry Ave 10 8 13 31 7 0 10,545 1.45 2.68 26.83Canton

Canton 6th St NE Rowland Ave 0 2 0 2 1 0 3,736 2.00 0.49 0.43Canton

Canton 6th St NE Walnut Ave 0 2 0 2 1 0 9,535 2.00 0.19 0.17Canton

Canton 6th St NW Cleveland Ave 1 2 4 7 3 0 11,402 1.86 0.56 1.62Canton

Canton 6th St NW I-77 Offramp & Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton 6th St NW McKinley Ave 3 1 2 6 2 0 8,482 1.67 0.65 1.43Canton

Canton 6th St NW Shorb Ave 5 8 0 13 4 0 3,650 1.62 3.25 15.17Canton

Canton 6th St SW Arlington Ave 0 2 0 2 0 0 7,700 1.00 0.24 0.11Canton

Canton 6th St SW Cleveland Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 7,150 1.00 0.13 0.03Canton

Canton 6th St SW Dueber Ave 0 2 11 13 2 0 13,120 1.31 0.90 3.42Canton

Canton 6th St SW Harrison Ave 3 6 5 14 5 0 13,950 1.71 0.92 4.88Canton

Canton 6th St SW McKinley Ave 9 6 1 16 9 0 7,800 2.13 1.87 14.14Canton

Canton 6th St SW Smith Ave SW 3 0 1 4 1 0 7,700 1.50 0.47 0.63Canton

Canton 6th-8th Connector Marion Motley & Penn 1 0 0 1 1 0 11,750 3.00 0.08 0.05Canton

Canton 7th St NW Fulton Dr 3 3 2 8 3 0 10,600 1.75 0.69 2.14Canton

Canton 7th St NW Monument Dr 2 2 4 8 1 0 4,200 1.25 1.74 3.86Canton

Canton 7th St NW Newton Ave 6 3 1 10 6 0 5,500 2.20 1.66 8.11Canton

Page 5 of 31

Page 98: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canton 7th St SW Bedford Ave 1 1 1 3 0 0 5,700 1.00 0.48 0.32Canton

Canton 7th St SW Bellflower Ave 1 2 3 6 3 0 3,100 2.00 1.77 4.71Canton

Canton 7th St SW Dartmouth Ave 2 3 4 9 3 0 3,300 1.67 2.49 8.30Canton

Canton 7th St SW Maryland Ave 3 4 3 10 1 0 4,900 1.20 1.86 4.97Canton

Canton 7th St SW Raff Ave SR297 5 9 5 19 7 0 11,675 1.74 1.49 10.89Canton

Canton 8th St NE Belden Ave 0 2 1 3 0 0 9,550 1.00 0.29 0.19Canton

Canton 8th St NE Carnahan Ave 0 1 1 2 0 0 10,900 1.00 0.17 0.07Canton

Canton 9th St N Market Ave N 8 11 7 26 8 0 17,050 1.62 1.39 12.99Canton

Canton 9th St NE Cherry & Lawrence 9 6 6 21 5 0 12,123 1.48 1.58 10.89Canton

Canton 9th St NE Walnut Ave 4 3 7 14 5 0 13,710 1.71 0.93 4.97Canton

Canton 9th St NW Cleveland Ave 3 6 0 9 5 0 13,600 2.11 0.60 2.55Canton

Canton 9th St NW High Ave 3 3 0 6 2 0 3,000 1.67 1.83 4.06Canton

Canton 9th St NW McKinley Ave 2 4 3 9 2 0 9,332 1.44 0.88 2.54Canton

Canton 9th St SW Clarendon Ave 3 2 2 7 1 0 4,700 1.29 1.36 2.72Canton

Canton 9th St SW Cleveland Ave 1 3 6 10 5 0 10,728 2.00 0.85 3.78Canton

Canton 9th St SW Dartmouth Ave 3 2 6 11 4 0 5,450 1.73 1.84 7.78Canton

Canton 9th St SW Dueber Ave 3 4 4 11 2 0 9,300 1.36 1.08 3.60Canton

Canton 9th St SW Harrison Ave 6 2 3 11 3 0 10,950 1.55 0.92 3.46Canton

Canton 9th St SW High Ave 3 2 0 5 1 0 7,400 1.40 0.62 0.96Canton

Canton 9th St SW McKinley Ave 4 4 4 12 2 0 12,828 1.33 0.85 3.04Canton

Canton 9th St SW Prospect Ave 2 1 1 4 3 0 5,000 2.50 0.73 1.62Canton

Canton10th St NW McKinley Ave 4 5 5 14 5 0 8,400 1.71 1.52 8.11Canton

Canton10th St NW Shorb Ave 1 2 1 4 2 0 3,200 2.00 1.14 2.03Canton

Canton11th St SE Cherry Ave SR 43 8 13 5 26 6 0 19,512 1.46 1.22 10.27Canton

Canton11th St SW Dartmouth Ave 1 1 1 3 2 0 6,400 2.33 0.43 0.67Canton

Canton11th St SW Dueber Ave 2 3 1 6 1 0 6,950 1.33 0.79 1.40Canton

Canton11th St SW Harrison Ave 4 6 14 24 6 0 12,600 1.50 1.74 13.91Canton

Canton11th St SW Maryland Ave SW 0 2 1 3 1 0 7,600 1.67 0.36 0.40Canton

Canton11th St SW Raff Ave SR297 2 5 4 11 4 0 16,075 1.73 0.62 2.64Canton

Canton12th St N Market Ave N 26 21 25 72 17 0 25,434 1.47 2.58 57.05Canton

Page 6 of 31

Page 99: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canton12th St NE Cherry Ave 8 22 14 44 21 0 17,242 1.95 2.33 44.51Canton

Canton12th St NE Gibbs Ave NE 2 3 1 6 4 0 14,640 2.33 0.37 1.16Canton

Canton12th St NE Gross & Lawrence 3 1 4 8 3 0 15,547 1.75 0.47 1.46Canton

Canton12th St NE Mahoning & Maple 8 12 7 27 5 0 15,983 1.37 1.54 12.68Canton

Canton12th St NE Piedmont Ave 2 0 0 2 1 0 13,656 2.00 0.13 0.12Canton

Canton12th St NE Plain Ave NE 4 2 2 8 4 0 13,990 2.00 0.52 1.86Canton

Canton12th St NE Walnut Ave 5 8 12 25 10 0 18,134 1.80 1.26 12.58Canton

Canton12th St NW Broad Ave 10 7 7 24 10 0 15,750 1.83 1.39 13.60Canton

Canton12th St NW Cleveland Ave 7 8 5 20 8 1 21,970 2.35 0.83 8.68Canton

Canton12th St NW Fulton Dr 9 9 2 20 9 0 23,750 1.90 0.77 6.49Canton

Canton12th St NW McGregor Ave 0 2 2 4 2 0 13,900 2.00 0.26 0.47Canton

Canton12th St NW McKinley Ave 5 10 5 20 4 0 22,435 1.40 0.81 5.06Canton

Canton12th St NW Minerva Ave NW 2 1 1 4 0 0 13,770 1.00 0.27 0.24Canton

Canton12th St NW Monument Ave 5 3 4 12 2 0 16,100 1.33 0.68 2.42Canton

Canton12th St NW Shorb Ave 7 6 4 17 4 0 19,050 1.47 0.81 4.52Canton

Canton12th St NW Stadium Dr 4 0 5 9 3 0 18,300 1.67 0.45 1.50Canton

Canton12th St NW Wertz Ave 4 4 5 13 6 0 15,550 1.92 0.76 4.24Canton

Canton12th St NW Woodland Ave 4 0 2 6 1 0 13,270 1.33 0.41 0.73Canton

Canton13/12th St I-77 Ramps TM Hospital 11 14 16 41 14 0 27,300 1.68 1.37 21.02Canton

Canton13th St NW Broad Ave Nw 3 1 11 15 3 0 22,627 1.40 0.60 2.82Canton

Canton13th St NW Harrison Ave 4 9 14 27 9 0 27,477 1.67 0.90 8.97Canton

Canton13th St NW Wertz Ave 3 7 7 17 4 0 14,650 1.47 1.06 5.88Canton

Canton13th St SW Raff Ave SR297 2 5 9 16 4 0 17,392 1.50 0.84 4.48Canton

Canton14th St NE Cherry Ave 3 1 0 4 0 0 4,923 1.00 0.74 0.66Canton

Canton14th St NE Gibbs Ave 3 3 0 6 3 0 4,300 2.00 1.27 3.40Canton

Canton14th St NW Fulton Dr 1 1 0 2 0 0 9,500 1.00 0.19 0.09Canton

Canton14th St NW Shorb Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton15th St N Market Ave N 3 10 4 17 5 1 13,446 2.24 1.15 9.74Canton

Canton15th St NE Cherry Ave NE 6 3 3 12 5 0 5,521 1.83 1.98 9.70Canton

Canton15th St NE Gibbs Ave NE 1 0 2 3 1 0 5,100 1.67 0.54 0.60Canton

Page 7 of 31

Page 100: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canton15th St NE Walnut Ave NE 5 2 1 8 1 0 4,948 1.25 1.48 3.28Canton

Canton15th St NW Cleveland Ave 8 4 3 15 3 0 17,800 1.40 0.77 3.59Canton

Canton15th St SW Cleveland Ave 2 1 1 4 0 0 5,082 1.00 0.72 0.64Canton

Canton15th St SW Dueber Ave 1 1 3 5 2 0 7,600 1.80 0.60 1.20Canton

Canton15th St SW Harrison Ave 9 5 5 19 5 0 11,600 1.53 1.49 9.63Canton

Canton17th St NW Cleveland Ave NW 2 4 0 6 3 0 16,800 2.00 0.33 0.87Canton

Canton17th St NW Fulton Dr 1 0 3 4 2 0 9,500 2.00 0.38 0.68Canton

Canton18th St NW Cleveland Ave NW 5 5 3 13 4 0 20,250 1.62 0.59 2.73Canton

Canton19th St N Market Ave N 2 3 0 5 1 0 15,988 1.40 0.29 0.44Canton

Canton19th St NE Cherry Ave SR 43 4 2 4 10 2 0 10,519 1.40 0.87 2.70Canton

Canton19th St NE Gibbs Ave NE 1 3 2 6 1 0 9,091 1.33 0.60 1.07Canton

Canton19th St NE Harrisburg Ave 7 3 2 12 7 0 16,476 2.17 0.66 3.84Canton

Canton19th St NE Maple Ave 1 4 14 19 6 0 8,362 1.63 2.07 14.29Canton

Canton19th St NE Rowland Ave NE 2 0 1 3 1 0 6,582 1.67 0.42 0.46Canton

Canton21st St N Market Ave N 1 1 3 5 4 0 21,210 2.60 0.22 0.62Canton

Canton21st St NE Harrisburg Ave 0 3 1 4 1 0 12,800 1.50 0.29 0.38Canton

Canton21st St NW Cleveland Ave NW 0 2 1 3 1 0 21,100 1.67 0.13 0.14Canton

Canton22nd St NW Cleveland Ave 3 3 1 7 2 0 21,100 1.57 0.30 0.74Canton

Canton23rd St NW Cleveland Ave 6 1 5 12 3 0 21,100 1.50 0.52 2.08Canton

Canton23rd St NW Fulton Dr 3 5 6 14 4 0 14,570 1.57 0.88 4.29Canton

Canton24th St NW Cleveland Ave 4 1 0 5 2 0 20,600 1.80 0.22 0.44Canton

Canton24th St NW Fulton Dr NW 3 2 0 5 1 0 14,070 1.40 0.32 0.50Canton

Canton25th St N Market Ave N SR 43 4 3 4 11 3 0 21,085 1.55 0.48 1.80Canton

Canton25th St NE Harmont Ave 0 2 2 4 0 0 14,400 1.00 0.25 0.23Canton

Canton25th St NE Harrisburg Ave 0 1 4 5 1 0 14,080 1.40 0.32 0.50Canton

Canton25th St NW Cleveland Ave 5 8 3 16 5 0 25,700 1.63 0.57 3.28Canton

Canton25th St NW Fulton & Harrison 5 5 4 14 3 0 23,335 1.43 0.55 2.43Canton

Canton25th St NW Harvard Ave 2 4 2 8 1 0 8,950 1.25 0.82 1.81Canton

Canton25th St NW Yale Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,600 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton26th St NW Cleveland Ave 1 2 1 4 0 0 20,800 1.00 0.18 0.16Canton

Page 8 of 31

Page 101: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Canton27th St NW Cleveland & US 62 Ramps 17 11 5 33 3 0 23,050 1.18 1.31 11.32Canton

Canton28th St NE Market Ave & US 62 Ramp 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,355 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

Canton30th St N Market Ave N SR 43 17 13 14 44 20 0 28,560 1.91 1.41 26.25Canton

Canton30th St NE Daleford Ave NE 1 2 0 3 1 0 3,250 1.67 0.84 0.94Canton

Canton30th St NE Harmont Ave 6 3 6 15 2 0 14,550 1.27 0.94 3.97Canton

Canton30th St NW Cleveland Ave 12 7 7 26 7 0 31,850 1.54 0.74 6.62Canton

Canton30th St NW Cromer Ave 3 5 4 12 4 0 14,550 1.67 0.75 3.35Canton

Canton30th St NW Harvard 6 6 5 17 7 0 14,500 1.82 1.07 7.37Canton

Canton34th St NW Cleveland Ave 9 8 7 24 7 0 25,350 1.58 0.86 7.30Canton

Canton34th St NW Cromer Ave 2 0 1 3 0 0 5,800 1.00 0.47 0.31Canton

Canton37th St N Market Ave N 6 2 6 14 7 0 19,241 2.00 0.66 4.13Canton

Canton37th St NW Cleveland Ave 3 6 7 16 5 0 25,750 1.63 0.57 3.28Canton

Canton37th St NW Logan Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 11,800 3.00 0.08 0.05Canton

Canton38th St NW Cleveland Ave 8 5 8 21 7 0 26,550 1.67 0.72 5.61Canton

Canton38th St NW Guilford Ave East Junction 0 0 3 3 0 0 14,600 1.00 0.19 0.13Canton

Canton38th St NW Harrison Ave 6 5 4 15 7 0 13,700 1.93 1.00 6.44Canton

Canton40th St NW Cleveland Ave 0 1 1 2 1 0 19,200 2.00 0.10 0.08Canton

Canton44th St N Market Ave N SR 43 4 5 8 17 3 0 23,192 1.35 0.67 3.42Canton

Canton44th St NW Cleveland Ave 13 6 6 25 4 0 23,800 1.32 0.96 7.03Canton

Canton44th St NW Frazer Ave 2 0 2 4 2 0 8,700 2.00 0.42 0.75Canton

Canton44th St NW Vernon Ave 6 2 4 12 2 0 8,700 1.33 1.26 4.48Canton

Canton47th St N Market Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 20,008 1.00 0.05 0.01Canton

Canton47th St NW Cleveland Ave 8 5 5 18 8 0 21,200 1.89 0.77 5.85Canton

Canton55th St N Easthill & Market 11 6 8 25 5 0 27,158 1.40 0.84 6.53Canton

Canton55th St NE Plain Center Ave 4 2 0 6 1 0 9,400 1.33 0.58 1.04Canton

CantonArlington Ave Tuscarawas St W 1 2 1 4 0 0 19,011 1.00 0.19 0.17Canton

CantonAuburn Ave Frazer Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

CantonBedford Ave Tuscarawas St W 4 4 10 18 6 0 19,011 1.67 0.86 5.76Canton

CantonBelden Ave Georgetown St 2 6 2 10 5 0 11,200 2.00 0.81 3.62Canton

CantonBelden Ave Harrisburg & Mahoning 12 8 7 27 4 0 17,739 1.30 1.39 10.80Canton

Page 9 of 31

Page 102: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CantonBelden Ave Tuscarawas St E 2 3 1 6 3 0 19,915 2.00 0.27 0.73Canton

CantonBellflower Ave Tuscarawas St W 4 4 4 12 3 0 19,561 1.50 0.56 2.24Canton

CantonBroad Ave Tuscarawas St W 5 2 4 11 6 0 19,761 2.09 0.51 2.60Canton

CantonBrown Ave Tuscarawas St W 2 2 0 4 0 0 7,151 1.00 0.51 0.45Canton

CantonCentral Plaza Tuscarawas St 22 13 9 44 14 0 23,295 1.64 1.72 27.58Canton

CantonCherry Ave Tuscarawas St E 7 5 10 22 8 0 16,061 1.73 1.25 10.56Canton

CantonClaremont Ave Tuscarawas St W 0 1 1 2 0 0 18,511 1.00 0.10 0.04Canton

CantonClarendon Ave Navarre Rd 5 3 5 13 7 0 7,500 2.08 1.58 9.49Canton

CantonClarendon Ave Tuscarawas St W 2 4 4 10 2 0 18,511 1.40 0.49 1.53Canton

CantonCleveland Ave Ferndale St 3 3 3 9 2 0 28,700 1.44 0.29 0.83Canton

CantonCleveland Ave Navarre Rd 8 9 2 19 6 0 9,913 1.63 1.75 12.05Canton

CantonCleveland Ave Ridgeway 2 0 0 2 1 0 20,800 2.00 0.09 0.08Canton

CantonCleveland Ave Tuscarawas St W 14 12 4 30 8 0 23,750 1.53 1.15 11.78Canton

CantonCleveland Ave SR800 Mill St S 9 6 7 22 6 0 19,201 1.55 1.05 7.90Canton

CantonColonial Blvd St Elmo Ave 0 1 2 3 1 0 2,000 1.67 1.37 1.52Canton

CantonDartmouth Ave Tuscarawas St W 6 10 4 20 5 0 18,511 1.50 0.99 6.57Canton

CantonDueber Ave SW Navarre Rd 3 9 12 24 8 0 10,250 1.67 2.14 18.99Canton

CantonDueber Ave SW Tuscarawas St W 6 8 3 17 4 0 16,920 1.47 0.92 5.09Canton

CantonElgin Ave I-77 NB Offramp& Tuscarawas 14 10 7 31 7 0 15,750 1.45 1.80 17.96Canton

CantonExeter Ave Tuscarawas St W 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,511 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

CantonFulton Dr Stadium Dr 1 8 4 13 3 0 22,300 1.46 0.53 2.25Canton

CantonGibbs Ave Lawrence Rd 5 3 6 14 9 0 5,171 2.29 2.47 17.57Canton

CantonGrace Ave Mahoning Rd NE SR153 1 2 5 8 4 1 10,444 3.38 0.70 4.19Canton

CantonHarmont Ave NE Mahoning Ave 9 10 8 27 5 0 19,105 1.37 1.29 10.60Canton

CantonHarrison Ave Navarre Rd 7 6 7 20 8 0 17,000 1.80 1.07 8.59Canton

CantonHarrison Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 16 8 44 7 0 25,181 1.32 1.59 20.55Canton

CantonHarrison Ave US 30 EB Ramp SW 2 1 2 5 1 0 15,000 1.40 0.30 0.47Canton

CantonHarrison Ave US 30 WB Ramp 7 4 1 12 4 0 15,000 1.67 0.73 3.24Canton

CantonHartford Ave Tuscarawas St E 3 4 1 8 3 0 9,790 1.75 0.75 2.32Canton

CantonHazlett Ave Tuscarawas St W 3 2 2 7 3 0 11,750 1.86 0.54 1.57Canton

Page 10 of 31

Page 103: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CantonHenrietta Ave Tuscarawas St 5 0 1 6 3 0 8,540 2.00 0.64 1.71Canton

CantonKirby Ave Lesh St NE 0 1 1 2 0 0 2,535 1.00 0.72 0.32Canton

CantonLawn Ave Tuscarawas St 4 3 2 9 2 0 11,750 1.44 0.70 2.02Canton

CantonLesh St Maret St 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

CantonMahoning Rd SR153 Midway Ave 0 1 1 2 1 0 11,697 2.00 0.16 0.14Canton

CantonMahoning Rd SR153 Superior & Winfield 3 5 3 11 1 0 10,444 1.18 0.96 2.78Canton

CantonMarket Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp EB R/P 16 13 9 38 12 0 19,150 1.63 1.81 24.95Canton

CantonMarket Ave SR 43 US 62 Ramp WB R/P 1 0 1 2 1 0 19,150 2.00 0.10 0.08Canton

CantonMarket Ave SR 43 Walnut Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,794 0.00 0.00 0.00Canton

CantonMaryland Ave Navarre Rd 0 0 2 2 1 0 7,000 2.00 0.26 0.23Canton

CantonMaryland Ave Tuscarawas St W 5 9 6 20 9 0 19,461 1.90 0.94 7.92Canton

CantonMcKinley Ave Tuscarawas St W 20 12 5 37 15 0 19,959 1.81 1.69 25.19Canton

CantonMcKinley Ave Sw Navarre Rd 2 3 1 6 2 0 9,850 1.67 0.56 1.24Canton

CantonRaff Ave SR791 Tuscarawas St W 18 7 7 32 7 0 26,507 1.44 1.10 11.26Canton

CantonRowland Ave Tuscarawas St 4 1 1 6 0 0 9,450 1.00 0.58 0.77Canton

CantonSchroyer Ave Tuscarawas St W 2 3 4 9 2 0 13,800 1.44 0.60 1.72Canton

CantonSmith Ave Tuscarawas St W 13 2 6 21 11 0 19,011 2.05 1.01 9.63Canton

CantonSR627 Sherman Church Ave 1 0 1 2 1 0 9,128 2.00 0.20 0.18Canton

CantonTuscarawas E Walnut Ave 5 4 6 15 3 0 16,543 1.40 0.83 3.86Canton

CantonTuscarawas E Warner Ave 2 2 0 4 0 0 10,277 1.00 0.36 0.32Canton

CantonTuscarawas E Young Ave 7 5 0 12 5 0 8,150 1.83 1.34 6.57Canton

CantonTuscarawas W Valleyview 3 17 11 31 7 0 21,728 1.45 1.30 13.02Canton

CantonTuscarawas W Washington Blvd 4 0 0 4 1 0 11,750 1.50 0.31 0.41Canton

CantonTuscarawas W Wells Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 11,517 1.00 0.08 0.02Canton

CantonTuscarawas W Wertz Ave 2 7 4 13 2 0 21,411 1.31 0.55 2.09Canton

CantonUS 62 Harmont Ave/Lesh St 14 25 16 55 15 0 31,235 1.55 1.61 30.35Canton

CantonUS 62 Kirby Ave 4 6 4 14 7 0 25,775 2.00 0.50 3.08Canton

County 4th St NW Whipple Ave 5 5 5 15 9 0 10,300 2.20 1.33 9.75Co/Twp Roads

County 8th St NE Georgetown St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,850 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

County11th St SW Whipple Ave 3 2 5 10 3 0 8,400 1.60 1.09 3.86Co/Twp Roads

Page 11 of 31

Page 104: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

County12th St NW Brunnerdale Ave NW 2 2 1 5 1 0 15,000 1.40 0.30 0.47Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Genoa Ave 4 0 4 8 2 0 14,750 1.50 0.49 1.32Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Jackson Ave & Hankins 1 2 4 7 1 0 13,912 1.29 0.46 0.92Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Perry Dr 8 2 8 18 4 0 24,963 1.44 0.66 3.80Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Spring Valley Ave 3 2 4 9 4 0 14,100 1.89 0.58 2.20Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Summerdale Ave 1 0 5 6 1 0 7,900 1.33 0.69 1.23Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Terrace Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Whipple Ave 2 6 4 12 8 0 24,650 2.33 0.44 2.76Co/Twp Roads

County12th St NW Woodlawn Ave 3 6 11 20 5 0 22,000 1.50 0.83 5.53Co/Twp Roads

Perry Twp13th St SW Bordner Ave 2 0 2 4 0 0 3,300 1.00 1.11 0.98Co/Twp Roads

Perry Twp13th St SW Delaware Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,300 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

Perry Twp13th St SW Delverne St 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,300 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

County13th St SW Perry Dr 1 2 2 5 2 0 21,656 1.80 0.21 0.42Co/Twp Roads

County13th St SW Whipple Ave 2 0 1 3 1 0 6,000 1.67 0.46 0.51Co/Twp Roads

County14th St NE Trump Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 9,250 1.00 0.10 0.02Co/Twp Roads

County15th St NW Woodlawn Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,900 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

County17th St NW Woodlawn Ave 0 0 4 4 2 0 11,900 2.00 0.31 0.55Co/Twp Roads

County20th St NW Lakeside Ave 2 6 1 9 4 0 6,500 1.89 1.26 4.77Co/Twp Roads

County20th St NW Whipple Ave 2 2 7 11 3 0 16,500 1.55 0.61 2.30Co/Twp Roads

County20th St NW Woodlawn Ave 3 3 5 11 3 0 11,900 1.55 0.84 3.19Co/Twp Roads

Plain Twp21st St NW Blake Ave 0 0 2 2 0 0 2,000 1.00 0.91 0.41Co/Twp Roads

County21st St SW Gambrinus Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 10,100 1.00 0.09 0.02Co/Twp Roads

County22nd St NW Whipple Ave 1 4 2 7 2 0 15,300 1.57 0.42 1.02Co/Twp Roads

County23rd St SW Gambrinus Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,850 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

County30th St NE Harrisburg Ave 17 23 14 54 13 0 11,475 1.48 4.29 76.35Co/Twp Roads

County38th St NW Whipple Ave 8 2 4 14 5 0 30,533 1.71 0.42 2.23Co/Twp Roads

County47th St Holiday & Whipple Ave 4 5 0 9 3 0 35,050 1.67 0.23 0.78Co/Twp Roads

County50th St NW Whipple Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 33,400 1.00 0.03 0.01Co/Twp Roads

County53rd St SW Dueber Ave 0 2 0 2 0 0 3,150 1.00 0.58 0.26Co/Twp Roads

Plain Twp55th St Firestone Rd 4 0 0 4 0 0 6,800 1.00 0.54 0.48Co/Twp Roads

Page 12 of 31

Page 105: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

County55th St NE East Center & Harmont 3 6 1 10 4 0 6,500 1.80 1.40 5.62Co/Twp Roads

County55th St NE Middlebranch Ave 6 2 1 9 6 0 16,750 2.33 0.49 2.29Co/Twp Roads

CountyAlabama Ave Orrville St 2 2 0 4 2 0 2,800 2.00 1.30 2.32Co/Twp Roads

CountyAlabama Ave Wooster St 1 1 0 2 2 0 2,500 3.00 0.73 0.97Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpAmherst Ave Beatty St 2 1 0 3 0 0 7,200 1.00 0.38 0.25Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpAmherst Ave Fulton Dr 2 2 5 9 4 0 8,038 1.89 1.02 3.86Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpAmherst Rd Traphagen St 3 3 4 10 3 0 10,450 1.60 0.87 3.11Co/Twp Roads

Lake TwpAndrews St Market Ave 2 1 0 3 3 0 6,028 3.00 0.45 0.91Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Frank Ave 2 3 5 10 3 0 19,450 1.60 0.47 1.67Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Freedom Ave 3 6 0 9 4 0 15,250 1.89 0.54 2.03Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Middlebranch Ave 2 0 2 4 1 0 7,950 1.50 0.46 0.61Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Pittsburg Ave 7 4 7 18 9 0 21,401 2.00 0.77 6.14Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Sunset Strip Ave 3 4 2 9 3 0 13,500 1.67 0.61 2.03Co/Twp Roads

CountyApplegrove St Whipple Ave 4 6 8 18 4 0 21,100 1.44 0.78 4.50Co/Twp Roads

CountyArcadia St Deerfield Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpArlington Ave Fulton Dr 3 2 3 8 0 0 10,519 1.00 0.69 1.23Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpArlington Ave Mudbrook St 0 2 0 2 2 0 7,850 3.00 0.23 0.31Co/Twp Roads

CountyArlington Ave Portage St 1 4 3 8 3 0 16,547 1.75 0.44 1.37Co/Twp Roads

CountyArlington Ave Strausser St 2 1 2 5 1 0 12,300 1.40 0.37 0.58Co/Twp Roads

CountyAurora St Whipple Ave 4 5 8 17 6 0 10,700 1.71 1.45 9.34Co/Twp Roads

CountyAurora St Woodlawn Ave 5 4 2 11 5 0 8,900 1.91 1.13 5.26Co/Twp Roads

CountyAvondale St Whipple Ave 1 0 4 5 3 0 15,300 2.20 0.30 0.73Co/Twp Roads

Perry TwpBailey St Jackson Ave 1 1 1 3 1 0 8,500 1.67 0.32 0.36Co/Twp Roads

CountyBalsamwood Blvd Cleveland Ave 1 0 1 2 0 0 11,950 1.00 0.15 0.07Co/Twp Roads

CountyBatton St Pittsburg Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,150 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBatton St Whipple Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,950 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBaywood St Paris Ave 2 0 1 3 1 0 1,450 1.67 1.89 2.10Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeaumont Orrville St 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,450 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeaumont Ave Wooster St 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,850 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeech St Beechwood Ave 4 1 3 8 4 0 7,800 2.00 0.94 3.33Co/Twp Roads

Page 13 of 31

Page 106: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CountyBeech St Easton St 8 1 0 9 3 0 3,900 1.67 2.11 7.02Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeech St Oakhill Dr 2 3 4 9 6 0 3,550 2.33 2.31 10.80Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeechwood Ave Cenfield St 1 0 1 2 2 0 2,534 3.00 0.72 0.96Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeechwood Ave Easton St 0 0 1 1 0 0 7,050 1.00 0.13 0.03Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeeson St Breck St 0 3 1 4 4 0 650 3.00 5.62 14.98Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeeson St Freshley Ave 1 4 5 10 2 1 4,150 2.50 2.20 12.22Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeeson St Sawburg Ave 7 3 7 17 5 0 12,600 1.59 1.23 7.39Co/Twp Roads

CountyBelden Village St Dressler Rd 16 8 8 32 15 0 35,750 1.94 0.82 11.25Co/Twp Roads

CountyBelden Village St Everhard Rd 5 5 4 14 4 0 22,500 1.57 0.57 2.78Co/Twp Roads

CountyBelden Village St Higbee St 1 3 6 10 1 0 19,150 1.20 0.48 1.27Co/Twp Roads

CountyBelpar St Dressler Rd 1 0 2 3 2 0 18,806 2.33 0.15 0.23Co/Twp Roads

CountyBelpar St Everhard Rd 5 1 0 6 1 0 19,950 1.33 0.27 0.49Co/Twp Roads

CountyBentler Ave Easton St 3 0 2 5 2 0 9,850 1.80 0.46 0.93Co/Twp Roads

Bethlehem TwpBeth Ave Brinker St 0 2 1 3 3 0 1,100 3.00 2.49 4.98Co/Twp Roads

CountyBeth Ave Haut St 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBretton St Cleveland Ave 6 4 0 10 1 0 15,900 1.20 0.57 1.53Co/Twp Roads

CountyBrinker St Shepler Church Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,350 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBrinker St Sherman Church Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 2,650 1.00 0.34 0.08Co/Twp Roads

CountyBroad Vista Cleveland Ave 2 0 2 4 0 0 12,400 1.00 0.29 0.26Co/Twp Roads

CountyBroadway Ave Columbus Rd 0 1 0 1 1 0 6,375 3.00 0.14 0.10Co/Twp Roads

CountyBroadway Ave Georgetown St 3 2 2 7 4 0 7,744 2.14 0.82 2.75Co/Twp Roads

CountyBroadway Ave Peach St 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyBrumbaugh St Cleveland Ave 11 1 0 12 7 0 12,750 2.17 0.86 4.96Co/Twp Roads

CountyBrunnerdale Ave Hills & Dales Rd 13 7 12 32 12 0 29,100 1.75 1.00 12.49Co/Twp Roads

CountyBrunnerdale Ave Perry Dr 3 1 1 5 1 0 13,863 1.40 0.33 0.51Co/Twp Roads

CountyButterbridge Rd Erie St 2 3 5 10 3 0 5,800 1.60 1.57 5.59Co/Twp Roads

CountyCathy St Middlebranch Ave 1 0 1 2 2 0 8,310 3.00 0.22 0.29Co/Twp Roads

CountyCleveland Ave Lake Center St 2 1 4 7 2 0 11,950 1.57 0.53 1.31Co/Twp Roads

CountyCleveland Ave Mt Pleasant St 5 5 4 14 5 0 19,700 1.71 0.65 3.46Co/Twp Roads

CountyCleveland Ave Perrydale St 1 4 3 8 2 0 12,500 1.50 0.58 1.56Co/Twp Roads

Page 14 of 31

Page 107: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CountyCleveland Ave State St 8 8 7 23 10 0 21,000 1.87 1.00 9.55Co/Twp Roads

CountyCleveland Ave Sweitzer St 5 0 2 7 1 0 12,800 1.29 0.50 1.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyCleveland Ave Wright St 11 2 5 18 6 0 12,950 1.67 1.27 8.46Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd California Ave 0 2 1 3 2 0 5,000 2.33 0.55 0.85Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd East Center 0 2 2 4 1 0 6,550 1.50 0.56 0.74Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Easton St 0 0 1 1 1 0 8,793 3.00 0.10 0.07Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Harmont Ave 8 5 13 26 8 0 9,950 1.62 2.38 22.26Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Kirby Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,400 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Lesh St 0 1 0 1 0 0 7,000 1.00 0.13 0.03Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Morris Ave 0 1 1 2 0 0 6,700 1.00 0.27 0.12Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Paris Ave 1 1 3 5 4 0 3,195 2.60 1.43 4.13Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Pilot Knob Ave 3 0 5 8 4 0 4,350 2.00 1.68 5.97Co/Twp Roads

CountyColumbus Rd Regent Ave 2 2 1 5 1 0 6,700 1.40 0.68 1.06Co/Twp Roads

CountyConvenience Ci Whipple Ave 2 4 4 10 2 0 33,400 1.40 0.27 0.85Co/Twp Roads

CountyDale Ave Portage St 0 1 2 3 2 0 12,444 2.33 0.22 0.34Co/Twp Roads

CountyDeerfield Ave Marshallville Rd 1 0 0 1 0 0 1,850 1.00 0.49 0.11Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Everhard Rd 16 18 17 51 17 0 45,750 1.67 1.02 19.22Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Glenwood & Whipple 9 4 7 20 5 0 31,750 1.50 0.57 3.83Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Hills & Dales & Woodlawn 5 5 7 17 3 0 23,400 1.35 0.66 3.39Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Metro Circle 6 4 0 10 3 0 24,800 1.60 0.37 1.31Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Munson St 5 2 4 11 4 0 21,262 1.73 0.47 1.99Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Promler Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 15,900 1.00 0.06 0.01Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Promway Ave 1 1 0 2 0 0 15,900 1.00 0.11 0.05Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd Strip Ave 6 7 10 23 6 0 30,260 1.52 0.69 5.40Co/Twp Roads

CountyDressler Rd University St 3 5 4 12 3 0 31,200 1.50 0.35 1.40Co/Twp Roads

CountyDueber Ave Faircrest St 4 0 2 6 4 0 9,624 2.33 0.57 1.77Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpEastlake St Echodell Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyEaston St Firestone Ave 7 5 3 15 4 0 10,852 1.53 1.26 6.45Co/Twp Roads

CountyEaston St Middlebranch Ave 2 2 3 7 0 0 20,676 1.00 0.31 0.48Co/Twp Roads

CountyEaston St Paris Ave 5 2 4 11 7 1 4,550 3.27 2.21 17.65Co/Twp Roads

Page 15 of 31

Page 108: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CountyEaston St Pinetree Av 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,350 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyEaston St Schubert Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 2,050 3.00 0.45 0.30Co/Twp Roads

CountyElton St Pigeon Run Rd 4 2 0 6 4 2 2,300 6.00 2.38 19.05Co/Twp Roads

CountyErie Ave Highmill Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,200 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyEverhard Rd Hills & Dales Rd 3 9 5 17 2 0 22,929 1.24 0.68 3.16Co/Twp Roads

CountyEverhard Rd Munson St 7 4 12 23 5 0 22,300 1.43 0.94 6.90Co/Twp Roads

CountyEverhard Rd Whipple Ave 21 15 18 54 18 0 51,631 1.67 0.95 19.09Co/Twp Roads

CountyFohl St Kemary Ave 2 1 0 3 1 0 3,150 1.67 0.87 0.97Co/Twp Roads

CountyFohl St Shepler Church Ave 2 5 2 9 5 0 3,350 2.11 2.45 10.35Co/Twp Roads

CountyFohl St Sherman Church Ave 4 1 0 5 2 0 5,250 1.80 0.87 1.74Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Eastlake St 1 3 0 4 1 0 16,150 1.50 0.23 0.30Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Huckleberry St 1 0 1 2 0 0 16,250 1.00 0.11 0.05Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Mega St 8 1 2 11 3 0 17,400 1.55 0.58 2.18Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Mt Pleasant St 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,750 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Portage St 22 10 10 42 15 0 36,224 1.71 1.06 16.93Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave Strausser St 2 7 1 10 2 0 13,150 1.40 0.69 2.16Co/Twp Roads

CountyFrank Ave University Dr 5 2 6 13 2 0 19,400 1.31 0.61 2.31Co/Twp Roads

CountyFreedom Ave Portage St 9 3 2 14 3 0 18,920 1.43 0.68 3.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyFulton Dr High Mill Ave 1 1 3 5 0 0 5,269 1.00 0.87 0.96Co/Twp Roads

Perry TwpGenoa Ave Hilton St 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,600 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

Perry TwpGenoa Ave Mollane St 1 4 0 5 1 0 8,600 1.40 0.53 0.83Co/Twp Roads

CountyGenoa Ave Navarre Rd 0 2 0 2 0 0 9,550 1.00 0.19 0.08Co/Twp Roads

CountyGenoa Ave Southway St 4 3 2 9 5 0 13,517 2.11 0.61 2.57Co/Twp Roads

Canton TwpGeorgetown St Marrietta Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,600 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyGeorgetown St Paris Ave 2 1 4 7 6 0 1,937 2.71 3.30 13.93Co/Twp Roads

CountyGeorgetown St Trump Ave 3 2 4 9 0 0 12,100 1.00 0.68 1.36Co/Twp Roads

CountyHarris Ave Hills & Dales Rd 3 2 5 10 2 0 18,274 1.40 0.50 1.55Co/Twp Roads

CountyHarris Ave Perry Dr 1 3 1 5 3 0 6,300 2.20 0.72 1.77Co/Twp Roads

CountyHarrisburg Ave NE Spangler St 1 2 2 5 1 0 12,610 1.40 0.36 0.56Co/Twp Roads

CountyHigh Mill Ave Portage St 3 1 5 9 1 0 14,150 1.22 0.58 1.42Co/Twp Roads

Page 16 of 31

Page 109: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CountyHigh Mill Ave Revere Ave 0 1 1 2 1 0 4,350 2.00 0.42 0.37Co/Twp Roads

CountyHigh Mill Ave Strausser St 6 0 1 7 5 0 10,850 2.43 0.59 2.22Co/Twp Roads

CountyHills & Dales Inwood Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 14,250 1.00 0.06 0.01Co/Twp Roads

CountyHills & Dales Perry Dr & Stuhldreher St 4 2 4 10 0 0 22,724 1.00 0.40 0.89Co/Twp Roads

CountyHills & Dales Wackerly Dr 1 1 1 3 0 0 9,350 1.00 0.29 0.20Co/Twp Roads

CountyHills & Dales Whipple Ave 5 11 13 29 9 0 32,235 1.62 0.82 8.58Co/Twp Roads

CountyHills & Dales Wise St 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,100 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpHuckleberry Ave Lake O'Springs Ave 2 5 3 10 7 1 2,900 3.50 3.15 24.48Co/Twp Roads

CountyHudson Ave Sherman Church Ave 1 0 1 2 0 0 1,600 1.00 1.14 0.51Co/Twp Roads

CountyIndependence Cir Whipple Ave 3 0 2 5 2 0 23,362 1.80 0.20 0.39Co/Twp Roads

Perry TwpJackson Ave List St 4 0 2 6 3 0 6,812 2.00 0.80 2.14Co/Twp Roads

CountyJackson Ave Perry Dr 1 1 1 3 2 0 9,150 2.33 0.30 0.47Co/Twp Roads

CountyJackson Ave Richville Dr 0 0 1 1 0 0 5,288 1.00 0.17 0.04Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake Center Market Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 9,950 1.00 0.09 0.02Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake-O-Springs Ave Island Dr 3 8 3 14 4 0 5,600 1.57 2.28 11.15Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpLake-O-Springs Ave Pine Creek St 0 0 0 0 0 0 850 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake-O-Springs Ave Portage St 3 3 5 11 5 0 21,979 1.91 0.46 2.13Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake-O-Springs Ave Strausser St 1 1 2 4 1 0 7,200 1.50 0.51 0.68Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake-O-Springs Ave Waywood Ave 2 3 4 9 4 0 8,500 1.89 0.97 3.65Co/Twp Roads

CountyLake-O-Springs Ave West Blvd 3 3 0 6 0 0 5,350 1.00 1.02 1.36Co/Twp Roads

Canton TwpLakeside Ave Parkway St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,850 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyLavuanne St Whipple Ave 0 0 2 2 1 0 21,450 2.00 0.09 0.08Co/Twp Roads

CountyLutz Ave Portage St 2 7 5 14 6 0 11,500 1.86 1.11 6.42Co/Twp Roads

CountyLutz Ave Strausser St 2 2 0 4 2 0 8,300 2.00 0.44 0.78Co/Twp Roads

Plain TwpMaple Ave Spangler St 0 1 0 1 1 0 3,940 3.00 0.23 0.15Co/Twp Roads

CountyMaple St Whipple Ave 5 3 2 10 3 0 16,750 1.60 0.54 1.94Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpMaple St Wise Ave 0 2 0 2 0 0 9,250 1.00 0.20 0.09Co/Twp Roads

CountyMapleton St Trump Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,500 1.00 0.61 0.14Co/Twp Roads

CountyMarket Ave N Mt Pleasant St 4 5 1 10 7 0 12,011 2.40 0.76 4.05Co/Twp Roads

CountyMarket Ave N State St 1 2 4 7 5 0 13,100 2.43 0.49 1.84Co/Twp Roads

Page 17 of 31

Page 110: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

CountyMartindale Rd Middlebranch Ave 4 3 2 9 0 0 12,012 1.00 0.68 1.37Co/Twp Roads

CountyMayfair Rd Pittsburg & Mt Pleasant St 3 3 3 9 1 0 20,350 1.22 0.40 0.99Co/Twp Roads

CountyMeese Rd Paris Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 4,150 1.00 0.22 0.05Co/Twp Roads

CountyMiddlebranch Ave Schneider St 0 0 3 3 0 0 13,750 1.00 0.20 0.13Co/Twp Roads

CountyMiddlebranch Ave State St 5 2 5 12 7 0 8,439 2.17 1.30 7.50Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpMillwood St Promway Ave 1 2 0 3 1 0 4,500 1.67 0.61 0.68Co/Twp Roads

CountyMonticello Ave Woodlawn Ave 0 0 3 3 1 0 8,100 1.67 0.34 0.38Co/Twp Roads

Lake/Plain TwpMt Pleasant St Pleasantwood Ave 3 1 1 5 1 0 9,050 1.40 0.50 0.78Co/Twp Roads

CountyMunson St Whipple Ave 2 5 5 12 4 0 27,316 1.67 0.40 1.78Co/Twp Roads

CountyNavarre Rd Kemary Ave & Stump Ave 1 4 3 8 3 0 8,000 1.75 0.91 2.84Co/Twp Roads

CountyNavarre Rd Perry Dr 1 2 2 5 2 0 11,650 1.80 0.39 0.78Co/Twp Roads

CountyNavarre Rd Southway St 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,800 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyPerry Dr Southway St 7 3 2 12 5 0 23,396 1.83 0.47 2.29Co/Twp Roads

CountyPittsburg Ave Shuffel Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,350 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyPortage St Promway Ave 10 8 1 19 5 0 17,520 1.53 0.99 6.38Co/Twp Roads

CountyPortage St Strip Ave 16 13 15 44 8 0 31,750 1.36 1.26 16.86Co/Twp Roads

CountyPortage St Sunset Dr 9 7 8 24 7 0 33,300 1.58 0.66 5.55Co/Twp Roads

CountyPortage St Whipple Ave 11 13 13 37 9 0 28,810 1.49 1.17 14.33Co/Twp Roads

Jackson TwpPromler Ave Promway Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,500 1.00 0.61 0.14Co/Twp Roads

CountyRichville Dr Shepler Church Ave 1 1 0 2 1 0 2,300 2.00 0.79 0.71Co/Twp Roads

CountyShuffel Dr Whipple Ave 0 0 2 2 1 0 5,250 2.00 0.35 0.31Co/Twp Roads

CountySouthway St Whipple Ave 3 1 3 7 3 0 14,118 1.86 0.45 1.31Co/Twp Roads

CountyState St Pheasant Valley Ave 0 1 0 1 0 0 8,800 1.00 0.10 0.02Co/Twp Roads

CountyState St Stonebridge Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,550 0.00 0.00 0.00Co/Twp Roads

CountyState St Werner Church St 2 0 0 2 0 0 7,900 1.00 0.23 0.10Co/Twp Roads

CountyWhipple Ave Wise Ave 4 2 6 12 5 0 20,750 1.83 0.53 2.58Co/Twp Roads

East CantonCedar Ave US30 Nassau St US 30 4 1 0 5 0 0 12,275 1.00 0.37 0.41East Canton

East CantonCedar Ave US30 Walnut St US 30 0 1 0 1 1 0 6,354 3.00 0.14 0.10East Canton

East CantonNassau St SR172 Wood Ave SR 44 3 1 0 4 2 1 10,271 4.75 0.36 1.50East Canton

East CantonWalnut St US 30 Wood Ave SR 44 2 0 0 2 1 0 10,626 2.00 0.17 0.15East Canton

Page 18 of 31

Page 111: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

East CantonSR800 Westbrook St 2 3 2 7 0 0 7,723 1.00 0.83 1.29East Sparta

HartvilleCrestmont Ave Woodmont St & Geib 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,800 0.00 0.00 0.00Hartville

HartvilleGrand Trunk Ave Maple St 1 3 0 4 2 0 12,744 2.00 0.29 0.51Hartville

HartvilleGrand Trunk Ave Sunnyside St 0 1 0 1 0 0 1,000 1.00 0.91 0.20Hartville

HartvilleKent Ave SR 43 Maple St SR43/619 3 5 2 10 1 0 15,179 1.20 0.60 1.60Hartville

HartvilleLincoln St Prospect Ave SR 43 1 0 0 1 0 0 7,047 1.00 0.13 0.03Hartville

HartvilleMaple Ave Milan St 1 3 0 4 2 0 12,744 2.00 0.29 0.51Hartville

HartvilleMaple Ave SR619 Prospect Ave SR 43 3 0 3 6 1 0 16,259 1.33 0.34 0.60Hartville

HartvilleProspect Ave SR 43 Sunnyside St 1 0 1 2 1 0 6,797 2.00 0.27 0.24Hartville

HartvilleProspect Ave SR 43 Woodland St 1 0 0 1 0 0 11,447 1.00 0.08 0.02Hartville

HartvilleProspect Ave SR 43 Wyandotte Tr 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,797 0.00 0.00 0.00Hartville

LimavilleIowa Ave SR183 Main St(Lim) 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,890 0.00 0.00 0.00Limaville

LouisvilleCalifornia Ave Main St SR153 2 3 5 10 3 0 13,359 1.60 0.68 2.43Louisville

LouisvilleCalifornia Ave Reno Dr 1 0 2 3 0 0 8,150 1.00 0.34 0.22Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 Frana Clara 2 3 2 7 2 0 15,664 1.57 0.41 1.00Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 Gorgas St 3 1 4 8 3 1 11,590 3.13 0.63 3.50Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 Lincoln St 0 0 1 1 1 0 13,718 3.00 0.07 0.04Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 Main St SR153 6 11 11 28 2 0 22,654 1.14 1.13 8.02Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 Reno Dr 1 5 0 6 1 0 16,760 1.33 0.33 0.58Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 South St 0 2 2 4 0 0 10,877 1.00 0.34 0.30Louisville

LouisvilleChapel St SR 44 St. Louis Co 1 4 5 10 2 0 13,718 1.40 0.67 2.07Louisville

LouisvilleConstitution Ave Main St SR153 1 0 0 1 0 0 14,228 1.00 0.06 0.01Louisville

LouisvilleEvrard Ct Main St SR153 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,020 0.00 0.00 0.00Louisville

LouisvilleGorgas St Main St SR153 3 2 3 8 1 0 14,328 1.25 0.51 1.13Louisville

LouisvilleMain St SR153 Mill St 1 1 0 2 1 0 11,179 2.00 0.16 0.15Louisville

LouisvilleMain St SR153 Nickelplate Ave 2 0 0 2 0 0 11,757 1.00 0.16 0.07Louisville

LouisvilleMain St SR153 Walnut St 2 0 0 2 0 0 10,679 1.00 0.17 0.08Louisville

LouisvilleNickel Plate Ave South St 1 0 0 1 1 0 5,950 3.00 0.15 0.10Louisville

LouisvilleUS 62 California Ave 10 3 10 23 10 1 26,635 2.35 0.79 9.46Lousiville

LouisvilleHarrison Ave SR183 Main St SR183 0 0 1 1 0 0 5,946 1.00 0.15 0.03Magnolia

Page 19 of 31

Page 112: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Massillon 1st St NE Cherry Rd 3 5 3 11 2 0 12,016 1.36 0.84 2.78Massillon

Massillon 1st St NE Federal Ave 4 2 3 9 3 0 6,550 1.67 1.25 4.18Massillon

Massillon 1st St NE Lake Ave SR236 & Erie 7 2 8 17 8 0 19,230 1.94 0.81 5.92Massillon

Massillon 1st St NE Lincoln Way SR172 5 6 3 14 5 0 21,865 1.71 0.58 3.12Massillon

Massillon 1st St NE North Ave 3 2 1 6 2 0 6,300 1.67 0.87 1.93Massillon

Massillon 1st St NE State St 0 1 3 4 3 0 7,356 2.50 0.50 1.10Massillon

Massillon 1st St NW Federal Ave 1 3 1 5 1 0 7,411 1.40 0.62 0.96Massillon

Massillon 1st St SE Charles Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 4,166 3.00 0.22 0.15Massillon

Massillon 1st St SE Tremont Ave 1 1 2 4 2 0 10,750 2.00 0.34 0.60Massillon

Massillon 1st St SW Tremont Ave 4 1 1 6 2 0 8,100 1.67 0.68 1.50Massillon

Massillon 2nd St NE Lincoln Way 0 2 1 3 0 0 20,830 1.00 0.13 0.09Massillon

Massillon 2nd St SW Tremont Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 8,100 1.00 0.11 0.03Massillon

Massillon 3rd St NE Lincoln Way E 9 4 10 23 6 0 23,600 1.52 0.89 6.92Massillon

Massillon 3rd St NW Lake Ave 1 0 1 2 0 0 5,500 1.00 0.33 0.15Massillon

Massillon 3rd St SE Oak Ave 2 2 0 4 2 0 5,000 2.00 0.73 1.30Massillon

Massillon 3rd St SE South Ave 2 2 1 5 0 0 5,000 1.00 0.91 1.01Massillon

Massillon 3rd St SE Tremont Ave 3 6 2 11 2 1 12,000 2.36 0.84 4.83Massillon

Massillon 3rd St SE Wellman Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,900 0.00 0.00 0.00Massillon

Massillon 5th St NE North Ave 0 1 0 1 1 0 2,000 3.00 0.46 0.30Massillon

Massillon 6th St NE Lincoln Way E 6 3 6 15 7 0 20,369 1.93 0.67 4.33Massillon

Massillon 6th St SW Tremont Ave 5 1 1 7 1 0 8,150 1.29 0.78 1.57Massillon

Massillon 7th St NW Lincoln & Main 0 1 0 1 0 0 17,833 1.00 0.05 0.01Massillon

Massillon 8th St NE Lincoln Way 5 5 4 14 2 0 21,150 1.29 0.60 2.42Massillon

Massillon 8th St NE North Ave 4 6 0 10 4 0 4,600 1.80 1.98 7.94Massillon

Massillon 8th St SW Tremont Ave 3 1 0 4 1 0 7,500 1.50 0.49 0.65Massillon

Massillon 9th St SW Finefrock Rd SW SR 241 3 4 1 8 5 0 6,954 2.25 1.05 4.20Massillon

Massillon 9th St SW Tremont Ave 1 1 0 2 0 0 6,250 1.00 0.29 0.13Massillon

Massillon11th St NE Lake Ave 2 1 0 3 0 0 12,923 1.00 0.21 0.14Massillon

Massillon11th St NE Lincoln Way E 3 0 2 5 1 0 20,330 1.40 0.22 0.35Massillon

Massillon11th St NE State Ave 2 1 1 4 3 0 5,600 2.50 0.65 1.45Massillon

Page 20 of 31

Page 113: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

Massillon16th St SE Harsh Ave 1 0 3 4 2 0 7,700 2.00 0.47 0.84Massillon

Massillon16th St SE Oak Ave 2 2 2 6 2 0 6,000 1.67 0.91 2.03Massillon

Massillon16th St SE Walnut Ave 2 2 1 5 3 0 10,238 2.20 0.45 1.09Massillon

Massillon17th St NW Carmont Cherry Earl Wooster 0 8 4 12 6 0 7,361 2.00 1.49 7.93Massillon

Massillon17th St NW Lincoln Way W 5 4 3 12 4 0 13,890 1.67 0.79 3.50Massillon

Massillon17th St NW Tremont Ave 0 1 5 6 2 0 6,799 1.67 0.81 1.79Massillon

Massillon23rd St NW Lincoln Way W 2 1 3 6 2 0 8,560 1.67 0.64 1.42Massillon

Massillon23rd St SW Main & Treemont 0 0 1 1 1 0 5,200 3.00 0.18 0.12Massillon

Massillon25th St NE Lincoln Way E 1 1 3 5 1 0 26,030 1.40 0.18 0.27Massillon

Massillon26th St NE Lincoln Way E 6 3 1 10 3 0 26,030 1.60 0.35 1.25Massillon

Massillon27th St (Jackson) Lincoln Way E 9 6 6 21 6 0 30,030 1.57 0.64 4.68Massillon

Massillon27th St NW Lincoln Way W 9 6 0 15 3 0 7,383 1.40 1.85 8.65Massillon

MassillonAmherst Rd Cherry Rd 3 1 2 6 2 0 10,550 1.67 0.52 1.15Massillon

MassillonAmherst Rd Lake Ave 6 3 7 16 2 0 19,192 1.25 0.76 3.38Massillon

MassillonAmherst Rd State Ave 1 3 1 5 1 0 8,856 1.40 0.52 0.80Massillon

MassillonCharles Ave Erie St 1 2 1 4 0 0 12,240 1.00 0.30 0.27Massillon

MassillonCherry Rd Erie St 3 5 2 10 3 0 11,300 1.60 0.81 2.87Massillon

MassillonEdwin Ave Erie St 2 7 3 12 2 0 12,740 1.33 0.86 3.06Massillon

MassillonErie St Federal Ave 0 7 2 9 3 0 6,550 1.67 1.25 4.18Massillon

MassillonErie St Lincoln Way SR172 11 7 7 25 6 0 23,820 1.48 0.96 7.88Massillon

MassillonErie St North Ave 3 2 1 6 0 0 5,600 1.00 0.98 1.30Massillon

MassillonErie St Oberlin Rd 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,940 0.00 0.00 0.00Massillon

MassillonErie St South Ave 3 1 1 5 1 0 9,027 1.40 0.51 0.79Massillon

MassillonErie St Tremont Ave 7 3 4 14 3 0 17,684 1.43 0.72 3.21Massillon

MassillonErie St Walnut Ave 1 5 4 10 1 0 15,290 1.20 0.60 1.59Massillon

MassillonGreat Lakes SR21 Cherry Rd 7 6 11 24 8 0 28,172 1.67 0.78 6.91Massillon

MassillonGreat Lakes SR21 Lake Ave SR236 10 3 11 24 5 0 26,205 1.42 0.84 6.32Massillon

MassillonGreat Lakes SR21 Lillian Gish Blvd 6 10 5 21 4 0 22,772 1.38 0.84 5.42Massillon

MassillonGreat Lakes SR21 Walnut Ave 18 17 6 41 10 0 27,398 1.49 1.37 18.51Massillon

MassillonHankins St Wales Ave 3 3 5 11 1 0 16,143 1.18 0.62 1.80Massillon

Page 21 of 31

Page 114: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

MassillonHess Blvd Tremont Ave 2 2 1 5 3 0 9,450 2.20 0.48 1.18Massillon

MassillonHills & Dales Wales Ave SR241 10 10 8 28 4 0 23,568 1.29 1.08 8.67Massillon

MassillonLake Ave Wales Ave SR241 15 12 9 36 6 0 21,705 1.33 1.51 16.15Massillon

MassillonLillian Gish Blvd Lincoln Way SR 172 7 6 4 17 5 0 20,048 1.59 0.77 4.64Massillon

MassillonLincoln Way SR172 Hess Blvd 3 5 1 9 2 0 23,079 1.44 0.36 1.03Massillon

MassillonLincoln Way SR172 Tremont Ave & Meadows Plaza 8 3 8 19 3 0 25,545 1.32 0.68 3.77Massillon

MassillonLincoln Way SR172 Wales Ave SR241 22 11 8 41 8 0 26,105 1.39 1.43 18.16Massillon

MassillonNorth Ave Wales Ave 1 2 4 7 4 0 13,000 2.14 0.49 1.64Massillon

MassillonRichville Dr Walnut & Southway 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,244 0.00 0.00 0.00Massillon

MassillonSR 21 Ramps NB Erie St 3 7 4 14 2 0 9,900 1.29 1.29 5.16Massillon

MassillonSR 21 Ramps SB Erie St 7 7 7 21 6 0 9,900 1.57 1.94 14.20Massillon

MassillonState St Wales Ave SR 241 1 4 1 6 3 0 14,793 2.00 0.37 0.99Massillon

MinervaBonnieview St Lincoln Way US30 4 1 1 6 0 0 11,988 1.00 0.46 0.61Minerva

MinervaEast St Lincoln Way US30 4 2 2 8 3 0 12,488 1.75 0.58 1.82Minerva

MinervaGrant Blvd Lincoln Way US30 2 1 2 5 1 0 7,299 1.40 0.63 0.97Minerva

MinervaHigh St Main St 1 1 0 2 0 0 2,000 1.00 0.91 0.41Minerva

MinervaHigh St Market St SR183 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,580 0.00 0.00 0.00Minerva

MinervaLincoln Way US 30 Union Ave SR183 1 1 0 2 1 0 12,156 2.00 0.15 0.13Minerva

MinervaLincoln Way US30 Main St 2 2 1 5 2 0 7,890 1.80 0.58 1.16Minerva

MinervaLincoln Way US30 Market St SR183 11 2 3 16 4 0 13,379 1.50 1.09 5.82Minerva

MinervaLine St Main St 0 1 2 3 0 0 2,000 1.00 1.37 0.91Minerva

MinervaLine St Market St 2 0 0 2 0 0 9,650 1.00 0.19 0.08Minerva

MinervaMarket St Union Ave SR183 1 1 0 2 1 0 5,608 2.00 0.33 0.29Minerva

Minerva 4th St Main SR21/US62 0 1 0 1 1 0 14,011 3.00 0.07 0.04Navarre

MinervaCanal St US62 Main St SR21/US62 1 3 1 5 0 0 9,694 1.00 0.47 0.52Navarre

MinervaCenter St Canal St 0 1 0 1 0 0 4,600 1.00 0.20 0.04Navarre

MinervaCenter St Main St US 62/SR 21 0 1 1 2 0 0 9,707 1.00 0.19 0.08Navarre

MinervaMain St US 62/SR 21 Wooster St 3 9 1 13 4 0 13,809 1.62 0.86 4.01Navarre

MinervaUS 62 Marland Ave 0 0 3 3 1 0 15,856 1.67 0.17 0.19Navarre

MinervaUS 62 Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,211 0.00 0.00 0.00Navarre

Page 22 of 31

Page 115: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

North Canton 7th St N Main St 2 2 4 8 1 0 20,450 1.25 0.36 0.79North Canton

North Canton 7th St NW Pierce Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00North Canton

North Canton 9th St N Main St 1 1 0 2 1 0 20,200 2.00 0.09 0.08North Canton

North Canton10th St Main & Woodrow 12 15 3 30 6 0 17,400 1.40 1.57 14.69North Canton

North CantonApplegrove St Main St 2 9 4 15 9 0 29,651 2.20 0.46 3.39North Canton

North CantonApplegrove St Marquardt Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 15,250 1.00 0.06 0.01North Canton

North CantonBachtel St Main St 2 1 3 6 1 0 19,400 1.33 0.28 0.50North Canton

North CantonBachtel St Pershing Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0.00 0.00 0.00North Canton

North CantonCharlotte St Main St 5 0 1 6 3 0 20,900 2.00 0.26 0.70North Canton

North CantonCharlotte St Ream Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,200 0.00 0.00 0.00North Canton

North CantonCleveland Main St Orion St 6 7 3 16 3 0 29,035 1.38 0.50 2.46North Canton

North CantonCordelia St Main St 0 3 0 3 1 0 20,400 1.67 0.13 0.15North Canton

North CantonEasthill St Main St 5 0 3 8 2 0 23,350 1.50 0.31 0.83North Canton

North CantonEverhard Rd Main St 6 5 10 21 6 0 28,850 1.57 0.66 4.87North Canton

North CantonGlenwood St Lindy Lane 1 0 0 1 1 0 9,625 3.00 0.09 0.06North Canton

North CantonGlenwood St Main St 2 2 1 5 1 0 22,450 1.40 0.20 0.32North Canton

North CantonHallum St Main St 3 0 2 5 2 0 21,200 1.80 0.22 0.43North Canton

North CantonHarmon St Main St 0 0 3 3 0 0 18,900 1.00 0.14 0.10North Canton

North CantonHillcrest Ave Maple St 0 1 1 2 1 0 7,800 2.00 0.23 0.21North Canton

North CantonMain St Maple St 1 3 4 8 1 0 26,550 1.25 0.27 0.61North Canton

North CantonMain St Mississippi St 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,200 0.00 0.00 0.00North Canton

North CantonMain St Pearl Pl 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,400 0.00 0.00 0.00North Canton

North CantonMain St Schneider St 2 4 2 8 1 0 23,050 1.25 0.32 0.70North Canton

North CantonMain St Wilbur Dr 2 1 2 5 3 0 22,900 2.20 0.20 0.49North Canton

North CantonMaple St McKinley Ave 1 0 1 2 0 0 11,700 1.00 0.16 0.07North Canton

North CantonMaple St Ream Ave 1 3 0 4 2 0 7,300 2.00 0.50 0.89North Canton

North CantonPittsburg Ave Portage St 0 1 0 1 0 0 18,151 1.00 0.05 0.01North Canton

North CantonPortage St Wise Ave 2 0 0 2 0 0 14,700 1.00 0.12 0.06North Canton

ODOTI-77 Belden Village & Whipple 14 16 23 53 25 0 45,450 1.94 1.06 24.36State Route

ODOTI-77 Everhard & Mall Drive & SB Ramp 20 13 4 37 17 0 30,550 1.92 1.11 17.44State Route

Page 23 of 31

Page 116: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTI-77 Everhard Rd Ramp NB 2 0 1 3 1 0 32,450 1.67 0.08 0.09State Route

ODOTI-77 Fohl St Ramps NB 1 2 0 3 2 0 5,500 2.33 0.50 0.77State Route

ODOTI-77 Fohl St Ramps SB 2 0 0 2 0 1 5,500 6.50 0.33 0.96State Route

ODOTI-77 Portage St Ramp NB 22 12 9 43 14 0 30,010 1.65 1.31 20.63State Route

ODOTI-77 Portage St Ramp SB 12 8 4 24 4 0 38,400 1.33 0.57 4.06State Route

ODOTI-77 SR 687 and Barr 0 0 0 0 0 0 42,700 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTI-77 SR 687 Ramp NB 9 7 3 19 6 0 35,750 1.63 0.49 3.34State Route

ODOTI-77 SR 687 Ramp SB 6 0 3 9 0 0 38,950 1.00 0.21 0.42State Route

ODOTI-77 SR 800 Ramp NB 6 0 0 6 1 0 21,327 1.33 0.26 0.46State Route

ODOTI-77 SR 800 Ramp SB 3 1 1 5 1 0 21,327 1.40 0.21 0.33State Route

ODOTI-77 Whipple Ave Old NB Ramp 4 3 5 12 6 0 35,200 2.00 0.31 1.66State Route

ODOTSR 21 Arcadia St 2 4 2 8 2 0 14,390 1.50 0.51 1.35State Route

ODOTSR 21 Butterbridge 5 4 2 11 4 0 13,390 1.73 0.75 3.17State Route

ODOTSR 21 Dolphin St SR212 1 0 0 1 1 0 6,594 3.00 0.14 0.09State Route

ODOTSR 21 Forty Corners Rd 0 0 4 4 2 0 13,740 2.00 0.27 0.47State Route

ODOTSR 21 Marshallville Ave 1 0 1 2 1 0 15,483 2.00 0.12 0.10State Route

ODOTSR 43 14th St SE 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,739 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR 43 17th St SE & Orchardview 2 2 0 4 2 0 14,525 2.00 0.25 0.45State Route

ODOTSR 43 26th St 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,203 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR 43 Andrews St 2 4 0 6 4 0 7,450 2.33 0.73 2.29State Route

ODOTSR 43 Applegrove St 4 7 5 16 6 0 25,609 1.75 0.57 3.55State Route

ODOTSR 43 Baum(Greenport) 4 1 2 7 2 0 12,910 1.57 0.49 1.21State Route

ODOTSR 43 Easton St 3 8 8 19 3 0 27,245 1.32 0.64 3.54State Route

ODOTSR 43 Elson St 0 0 1 1 1 0 10,552 3.00 0.09 0.06State Route

ODOTSR 43 Goodland St 0 0 1 1 1 0 12,428 3.00 0.07 0.05State Route

ODOTSR 43 Greer Ave 1 1 0 2 0 0 8,350 1.00 0.22 0.10State Route

ODOTSR 43 Indian Run Rd 0 1 1 2 1 0 12,410 2.00 0.15 0.13State Route

ODOTSR 43 Ivy St & Diamond St 5 2 1 8 5 0 16,976 2.25 0.43 1.72State Route

ODOTSR 43 Millerton/Sherr 2 1 0 3 3 0 12,682 3.00 0.22 0.43State Route

ODOTSR 43 Mottice Dr 0 2 1 3 0 0 8,193 1.00 0.33 0.22State Route

Page 24 of 31

Page 117: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR 43 Mt Pleasant St 0 1 1 2 1 0 7,100 2.00 0.26 0.23State Route

ODOTSR 43 Otto 1 0 0 1 1 0 12,510 3.00 0.07 0.05State Route

ODOTSR 43 Sandy Ave 1 0 1 2 1 0 12,932 2.00 0.14 0.13State Route

ODOTSR 43 Schneider St 2 2 3 7 1 0 20,700 1.29 0.31 0.62State Route

ODOTSR 43 Smith-Kramer St 3 1 4 8 3 0 7,400 1.75 0.99 3.07State Route

ODOTSR 43 SR 44 4 0 2 6 1 0 11,249 1.33 0.49 0.87State Route

ODOTSR 43 SR183 3 2 2 7 2 0 13,789 1.57 0.46 1.13State Route

ODOTSR 43 State St 0 2 2 4 1 0 10,715 1.50 0.34 0.45State Route

ODOTSR 43 Waynesburg Dr 2 0 0 2 1 0 12,610 2.00 0.14 0.13State Route

ODOTSR 44 Alberta Beach St 1 1 2 4 2 0 6,360 2.00 0.57 1.02State Route

ODOTSR 44 Beeson St 2 1 0 3 1 0 5,962 1.67 0.46 0.51State Route

ODOTSR 44 Columbus Rd 2 0 2 4 3 0 8,681 2.50 0.42 0.93State Route

ODOTSR 44 Easton St 3 7 5 15 10 0 10,553 2.33 1.30 10.09State Route

ODOTSR 44 Georgetown St 1 0 2 3 1 0 10,460 1.67 0.26 0.29State Route

ODOTSR 44 Mapleton St 0 1 3 4 1 0 3,150 1.50 1.16 1.55State Route

ODOTSR 44 Orchard View Dr 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,995 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR 44 SR619 4 3 2 9 4 0 11,915 1.89 0.69 2.60State Route

ODOTSR 44 State St SR173 8 2 4 14 4 0 10,824 1.57 1.18 5.77State Route

ODOTSR 44 Swamp St 3 0 1 4 0 0 7,440 1.00 0.49 0.44State Route

ODOTSR 93 Elton St 2 2 2 6 4 0 8,621 2.33 0.64 1.98State Route

ODOTSR 93 Orrville St 1 2 1 4 3 0 5,720 2.50 0.64 1.42State Route

ODOTSR 93 Sarbaugh St 1 1 1 3 1 0 7,730 1.67 0.35 0.39State Route

ODOTSR 93 Sinclair St 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,575 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR 93 SR172 1 1 2 4 2 0 9,817 2.00 0.37 0.66State Route

ODOTSR 93 SR241 Barrs 1 0 0 1 0 0 10,616 1.00 0.09 0.02State Route

ODOTSR 93 SR241 S Jct 2 0 2 4 2 0 9,622 2.00 0.38 0.67State Route

ODOTSR 93 Strausser St 3 2 1 6 1 0 8,430 1.33 0.65 1.15State Route

ODOTSR 93 Wooster St 2 1 7 10 7 0 5,115 2.40 1.78 9.52State Route

ODOTSR153 Beechwood Ave 2 1 1 4 2 0 4,273 2.00 0.85 1.52State Route

ODOTSR153 Broadway Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,460 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

Page 25 of 31

Page 118: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR153 Fruitland Ave 1 1 0 2 1 0 9,647 2.00 0.19 0.17State Route

ODOTSR153 Lynnhaven 1 0 0 1 1 0 3,350 3.00 0.27 0.18State Route

ODOTSR153 Meese Rd 3 1 2 6 4 0 6,995 2.33 0.78 2.44State Route

ODOTSR153 Millvale Ave 0 2 0 2 0 0 7,436 1.00 0.25 0.11State Route

ODOTSR153 Paris Ave 2 5 5 12 7 0 5,250 2.17 2.09 12.05State Route

ODOTSR153 Union Ave SR183 7 4 2 13 11 0 8,820 2.69 1.35 10.46State Route

ODOTSR172 Alabama Ave 2 1 1 4 0 0 5,821 1.00 0.63 0.56State Route

ODOTSR172 Ambrose/Delverne 1 1 4 6 4 0 26,530 2.33 0.21 0.64State Route

ODOTSR172 Austin Ave 0 2 2 4 1 0 26,030 1.50 0.14 0.19State Route

ODOTSR172 Autumn Ave 1 1 1 3 1 0 3,540 1.67 0.77 0.86State Route

ODOTSR172 Belfort Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 4,010 1.00 0.23 0.05State Route

ODOTSR172 Bordner Ave 1 2 2 5 0 0 26,691 1.00 0.17 0.19State Route

ODOTSR172 Brooklyn Ave 0 0 2 2 0 0 26,691 1.00 0.07 0.03State Route

ODOTSR172 Deerfield Rd 4 0 1 5 3 0 11,301 2.20 0.40 0.99State Route

ODOTSR172 Delaware Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,691 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR172 Elizabeth Ave 0 0 2 2 1 0 26,530 2.00 0.07 0.06State Route

ODOTSR172 Fairlawn Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,030 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR172 Fox Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 3,640 3.00 0.25 0.17State Route

ODOTSR172 Genoa Ave 6 8 8 22 7 0 33,847 1.64 0.59 4.75State Route

ODOTSR172 Harding Ave 2 1 2 5 1 0 26,530 1.40 0.17 0.27State Route

ODOTSR172 Hinderer St 1 1 4 6 1 0 26,030 1.33 0.21 0.37State Route

ODOTSR172 Kenyon Ave 1 1 1 3 1 0 7,010 1.67 0.39 0.43State Route

ODOTSR172 Lennox Ave 1 3 1 5 3 0 26,530 2.20 0.17 0.42State Route

ODOTSR172 Leonard Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 26,530 1.00 0.03 0.01State Route

ODOTSR172 Locke 1 0 0 1 0 0 26,530 1.00 0.03 0.01State Route

ODOTSR172 Manor Ave 2 1 1 4 0 0 26,530 1.00 0.14 0.12State Route

ODOTSR172 Marrietta Ave 2 1 0 3 2 0 8,490 2.33 0.32 0.50State Route

ODOTSR172 Miday Ave 2 0 0 2 0 0 4,830 1.00 0.38 0.17State Route

ODOTSR172 Miles Ave 4 0 5 9 1 0 26,530 1.22 0.31 0.76State Route

ODOTSR172 Overmont Ave 1 1 0 2 1 0 26,030 2.00 0.07 0.06State Route

Page 26 of 31

Page 119: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR172 Paris Ave 1 0 2 3 2 0 4,090 2.33 0.67 1.04State Route

ODOTSR172 Parker Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,790 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR172 Perry Dr 16 9 10 35 7 0 40,739 1.40 0.78 8.54State Route

ODOTSR172 Rowford Ave 1 4 5 10 6 0 26,030 2.20 0.35 1.71State Route

ODOTSR172 Rowmont Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,030 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR172 Roxbury St 0 1 1 2 2 0 26,030 3.00 0.07 0.09State Route

ODOTSR172 Saratoga Ave 2 0 5 7 3 0 27,191 1.86 0.23 0.68State Route

ODOTSR172 Union Ave SR183 0 4 6 10 3 0 9,156 1.60 1.00 3.54State Route

ODOTSR172 Westland Ave 2 1 0 3 0 0 26,530 1.00 0.10 0.07State Route

ODOTSR172 Whipple Ave 6 12 11 29 13 0 31,779 1.90 0.83 10.18State Route

ODOTSR172 Woodlawn Ave 8 1 4 13 7 0 29,661 2.08 0.40 2.40State Route

ODOTSR172 Wrexham Ave 1 0 1 2 1 0 26,030 2.00 0.07 0.06State Route

ODOTSR173 Columbus Rd & State St 4 4 5 13 4 0 6,984 1.62 1.70 7.93State Route

ODOTSR173 McCallum Ave 1 5 1 7 4 0 5,974 2.14 1.07 3.56State Route

ODOTSR173 Moulin Ave 0 1 0 1 1 0 5,870 3.00 0.16 0.10State Route

ODOTSR173 Paris Ave 1 5 1 7 5 0 4,839 2.43 1.32 4.99State Route

ODOTSR183 Bayton St 0 1 0 1 1 0 7,101 3.00 0.13 0.09State Route

ODOTSR183 Beech St 7 2 7 16 8 0 10,341 2.00 1.41 10.04State Route

ODOTSR183 Cenfield St 0 0 2 2 1 0 6,810 2.00 0.27 0.24State Route

ODOTSR183 Freed St 0 1 0 1 1 0 6,074 3.00 0.15 0.10State Route

ODOTSR183 Georgetown St 1 1 0 2 1 0 6,283 2.00 0.29 0.26State Route

ODOTSR183 Greenbower St 0 2 1 3 0 0 4,394 1.00 0.62 0.42State Route

ODOTSR183 Lewis St 0 0 1 1 1 0 4,798 3.00 0.19 0.13State Route

ODOTSR183 Rockhill Ave 0 5 2 7 1 0 5,494 1.29 1.16 2.33State Route

ODOTSR183 Salem Church St 0 0 1 1 0 0 6,700 1.00 0.14 0.03State Route

ODOTSR183 SR 619 & Gaskill Dr 4 2 1 7 0 0 7,207 1.00 0.89 1.38State Route

ODOTSR225 Gaskill Dr 2 0 0 2 0 0 6,100 1.00 0.30 0.13State Route

ODOTSR225 Greenbower St 2 3 1 6 1 0 7,543 1.33 0.73 1.29State Route

ODOTSR225 Lexington Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 6,568 3.00 0.14 0.09State Route

ODOTSR225 Lowe Rd 0 3 0 3 0 0 6,768 1.00 0.40 0.27State Route

Page 27 of 31

Page 120: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR225 Price St 0 2 0 2 1 0 6,568 2.00 0.28 0.25State Route

ODOTSR236 Beatty St 1 0 0 1 0 0 5,337 1.00 0.17 0.04State Route

ODOTSR236 Erie St 1 2 5 8 4 0 8,949 2.00 0.82 2.90State Route

ODOTSR236 Highmill Ave 4 1 3 8 2 0 6,380 1.50 1.14 3.05State Route

ODOTSR236 Lafayette Dr 0 1 0 1 0 0 3,656 1.00 0.25 0.06State Route

ODOTSR236 Portage St 2 3 4 9 4 0 11,741 1.89 0.70 2.64State Route

ODOTSR236 Strausser St 1 1 3 5 1 0 6,200 1.40 0.74 1.14State Route

ODOTSR236 Traphagen St 1 3 4 8 2 0 8,910 1.50 0.82 2.19State Route

ODOTSR236 Tritts Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 2,500 1.00 0.37 0.08State Route

ODOTSR241 Alabama Ave 0 2 1 3 0 0 3,487 1.00 0.79 0.52State Route

ODOTSR241 Daytona St 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,900 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR241 Greendale Ave 1 0 1 2 2 0 5,091 3.00 0.36 0.48State Route

ODOTSR241 Leecrest St 0 0 1 1 0 0 14,150 1.00 0.06 0.01State Route

ODOTSR241 Mt Pleasant St 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,993 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR241 Mudbrook Ave 3 1 2 6 1 0 9,630 1.33 0.57 1.01State Route

ODOTSR241 Pontberry St 2 2 0 4 1 0 11,669 1.50 0.31 0.42State Route

ODOTSR241 Portage St 6 2 12 20 5 0 25,352 1.50 0.72 4.80State Route

ODOTSR241 Shady Hollow Rd 1 0 0 1 1 0 13,900 3.00 0.07 0.04State Route

ODOTSR241 SR 687 3 9 6 18 4 0 25,070 1.44 0.66 3.79State Route

ODOTSR241 Strausser St 1 1 1 3 0 0 16,530 1.00 0.17 0.11State Route

ODOTSR241 Stuart St 0 1 0 1 0 0 13,900 1.00 0.07 0.01State Route

ODOTSR241 Stuhldreher St 5 3 3 11 3 0 18,265 1.55 0.55 2.08State Route

ODOTSR241 Traphagen St 5 2 3 10 3 0 17,015 1.60 0.54 1.91State Route

ODOTSR241 Willowdale Dr 0 0 3 3 0 0 9,430 1.00 0.29 0.19State Route

ODOTSR297 Raff Ave Southway St 4 2 5 11 7 0 23,523 2.27 0.43 2.37State Route

ODOTSR619 Bon Air Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,560 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR619 Cleveland Ave 6 5 1 12 1 0 23,030 1.17 0.48 1.48State Route

ODOTSR619 Duquette Ave 2 0 0 2 1 0 7,678 2.00 0.24 0.21State Route

ODOTSR619 Freshley Ave 1 0 0 1 0 0 4,260 1.00 0.21 0.05State Route

ODOTSR619 Hoover Ave 0 0 2 2 0 0 13,980 1.00 0.13 0.06State Route

Page 28 of 31

Page 121: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR619 Kaufman Ave 3 3 0 6 4 0 14,630 2.33 0.37 1.16State Route

ODOTSR619 King Church Ave 3 6 5 14 7 0 14,280 2.00 0.89 5.57State Route

ODOTSR619 Market Ave N 7 3 3 13 5 0 19,712 1.77 0.60 3.08State Route

ODOTSR619 Marlboro Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 4,160 3.00 0.22 0.15State Route

ODOTSR619 McCallum Ave 5 11 4 20 3 0 5,152 1.30 3.54 20.47State Route

ODOTSR619 Mogadore Ave 5 2 4 11 2 0 16,430 1.36 0.61 2.04State Route

ODOTSR619 Oakwood Ave 2 2 0 4 2 0 13,830 2.00 0.26 0.47State Route

ODOTSR619 Rockhill Ave 3 3 3 9 1 0 4,010 1.22 2.05 5.01State Route

ODOTSR619 William Penn Ave 0 2 1 3 3 0 7,923 3.00 0.35 0.69State Route

ODOTSR619 Williamsburg 1 0 0 1 0 0 13,830 1.00 0.07 0.01State Route

ODOTSR627 Navarre Rd 2 2 3 7 4 0 13,111 2.14 0.49 1.62State Route

ODOTSR627 Perry Dr 1 0 1 2 1 0 8,832 2.00 0.21 0.18State Route

ODOTSR627 Shepler Church Ave 2 2 2 6 5 0 8,311 2.67 0.66 2.34State Route

ODOTSR687 Blackburn Hills & Dales 0 5 5 10 1 0 29,564 1.20 0.31 0.82State Route

ODOTSR687 Blake Ave 9 4 4 17 1 0 35,700 1.12 0.43 1.83State Route

ODOTSR687 Broad Ave 4 3 2 9 3 0 34,819 1.67 0.24 0.79State Route

ODOTSR687 Brunnerdale Lake O'Springs 6 3 5 14 3 0 24,896 1.43 0.51 2.28State Route

ODOTSR687 Clearview Ave 3 1 3 7 2 0 36,200 1.57 0.18 0.43State Route

ODOTSR687 Darlington Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 26,437 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR687 Demington Ave 2 0 1 3 1 0 26,437 1.67 0.10 0.12State Route

ODOTSR687 Dressler Rd 8 7 6 21 7 0 27,382 1.67 0.70 5.44State Route

ODOTSR687 East & South Blvds 3 5 2 10 4 0 24,285 1.80 0.38 1.50State Route

ODOTSR687 Everhard Rd 16 11 16 43 8 0 36,939 1.37 1.06 13.93State Route

ODOTSR687 Frank Ave & Sibila 13 15 12 40 19 0 29,653 1.95 1.23 21.34State Route

ODOTSR687 Lakeside & Westmoreland 4 5 4 13 3 0 28,737 1.46 0.41 1.74State Route

ODOTSR687 Midvale Ave 0 0 1 1 0 0 26,437 1.00 0.03 0.01State Route

ODOTSR687 Miles Ave 3 2 2 7 2 0 12,951 1.57 0.49 1.21State Route

ODOTSR687 Whipple Ave 10 7 5 22 13 0 30,599 2.18 0.66 7.00State Route

ODOTSR800 30th St SW 0 1 0 1 1 0 13,697 3.00 0.07 0.04State Route

ODOTSR800 40th St SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,947 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

Page 29 of 31

Page 122: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTSR800 53rd St(Fohl) 4 2 0 6 3 0 11,631 2.00 0.47 1.26State Route

ODOTSR800 Battlesburg St 2 1 0 3 3 0 8,483 3.00 0.32 0.65State Route

ODOTSR800 Carnwise St 1 3 1 5 2 0 14,447 1.80 0.32 0.63State Route

ODOTSR800 East Sparta Ave 0 0 1 1 1 0 7,166 3.00 0.13 0.08State Route

ODOTSR800 Faircrest St 5 4 2 11 7 0 19,583 2.27 0.51 2.85State Route

ODOTSR800 Farber St 1 0 1 2 1 0 6,692 2.00 0.27 0.24State Route

ODOTSR800 Figueroa St 1 0 0 1 1 0 13,697 3.00 0.07 0.04State Route

ODOTSR800 Howenstine St 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,525 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR800 Ironwood St 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,947 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTSR800 Ridge Ave N 46th St 2 2 0 4 0 0 14,585 1.00 0.25 0.22State Route

ODOTSR800 Ridge Ave S 1 0 1 2 1 0 13,487 2.00 0.14 0.12State Route

ODOTUS 30 Baywood St 0 1 0 1 0 0 7,208 1.00 0.13 0.03State Route

ODOTUS 30 Broadway Ave 3 1 0 4 1 0 14,643 1.50 0.25 0.33State Route

ODOTUS 30 Mapleton St 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,193 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 30 Paris Ave 0 1 0 1 1 0 7,790 3.00 0.12 0.08State Route

ODOTUS 30 Ravenna Ave SR44 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,157 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 30 Robertsville Ave 2 0 2 4 1 0 7,508 1.50 0.49 0.65State Route

ODOTUS 30 Trump Ave Ramp EB 1 0 0 1 0 0 9,935 1.00 0.09 0.02State Route

ODOTUS 30 Trump Ave Ramp WB 1 1 0 2 0 0 10,985 1.00 0.17 0.07State Route

ODOTUS 30 EB Ramps Raff Ave 11 10 4 25 13 0 11,800 2.04 1.93 21.91State Route

ODOTUS 30 EB Ramps SR241 2 0 0 2 0 0 10,492 1.00 0.17 0.08State Route

ODOTUS 30 EB Ramps SR627 0 0 1 1 0 0 9,040 1.00 0.10 0.02State Route

ODOTUS 30 EB Ramps Whipple Ave 2 2 1 5 2 0 8,950 1.80 0.51 1.02State Route

ODOTUS 30 Trump Ave Lincoln St SR 172 4 0 4 8 0 0 21,740 1.00 0.34 0.60State Route

ODOTUS 30 WB Ramps Raff Ave 7 6 4 17 8 0 16,469 1.94 0.94 6.91State Route

ODOTUS 30 WB Ramps SR241 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,779 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 30 WB Ramps SR627 6 2 1 9 1 0 11,500 1.22 0.71 1.75State Route

ODOTUS 30 WB Ramps Whipple Ave 10 5 0 15 6 0 9,400 1.80 1.46 8.74State Route

ODOTUS 62 30th St 3 4 5 12 1 0 43,590 1.17 0.25 0.78State Route

ODOTUS 62 Angleway St & Pigeon Run Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,165 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

Page 30 of 31

Page 123: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Intersecting StreetStreetCrashes by year

2004 2005 20063 Year Totals

Crashes Injury FatalAvg Daily

Traffic

Severity Index

Crashes per Million Vehicles

Hazard Rating JurisdictionPolitical Unit

ODOTUS 62 Beech Ave 5 2 0 7 1 0 20,960 1.29 0.30 0.61State Route

ODOTUS 62 Beeson St Ramp NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,300 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 Beeson St Ramp SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,900 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 Broadway Ave 6 4 2 12 6 1 28,045 2.92 0.39 3.04State Route

ODOTUS 62 Columbus Rd 6 7 7 20 1 0 30,800 1.10 0.59 2.90State Route

ODOTUS 62 Gross Av 2 1 1 4 2 0 42,950 2.00 0.08 0.15State Route

ODOTUS 62 Maple Ave 7 3 7 17 5 0 43,395 1.59 0.36 2.15State Route

ODOTUS 62 Middlebranch & Harrisburg 11 15 17 43 13 0 43,540 1.60 0.90 13.82State Route

ODOTUS 62 Mt Eaton St 1 1 0 2 1 0 4,880 2.00 0.37 0.33State Route

ODOTUS 62 Navarre Rd 1 3 10 14 4 0 19,200 1.57 0.67 3.25State Route

ODOTUS 62 Nickelplate Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,080 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 Paris Ave 12 5 5 22 10 1 22,240 2.41 0.90 10.63State Route

ODOTUS 62 Ravenna Ave SR44 EB Ramps 0 5 1 6 4 0 12,390 2.33 0.44 1.37State Route

ODOTUS 62 Ravenna Ave SR44 WB Ramps 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,210 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 Regent Ave 16 9 11 36 8 0 25,380 1.44 1.29 14.96State Route

ODOTUS 62 Roosevelt Ave 3 2 2 7 2 0 32,020 1.57 0.20 0.49State Route

ODOTUS 62 Root Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 32,020 3.00 0.03 0.02State Route

ODOTUS 62 Rowland Ave 3 4 3 10 4 0 43,315 1.80 0.21 0.84State Route

ODOTUS 62 SR 93 N Junction 0 0 1 1 0 0 6,486 1.00 0.14 0.03State Route

ODOTUS 62 SR93 Lawndell 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,258 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 St Elmo Ave 3 0 1 4 1 0 42,950 1.50 0.08 0.11State Route

ODOTUS 62 State St Ramp NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,073 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS 62 State St Ramp SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,770 0.00 0.00 0.00State Route

ODOTUS250 Alabama Ave 1 0 0 1 1 0 5,584 3.00 0.16 0.11State Route

ODOTUS250 SR212 & Kaylor 1 2 1 4 4 0 6,138 3.00 0.59 1.59State Route

WaynesburgLisbon St SR171/183 Main St SR183 1 0 3 4 0 0 7,270 1.00 0.50 0.45Waynesburg

WaynesburgLisbon St SR183 McKinley Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,830 0.00 0.00 0.00Waynesburg

WilmotMain St US250 Massillon St US62 3 1 2 6 2 0 9,839 1.67 0.56 1.24Wilmot

WilmotMain St US250 Wineburg US 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,970 0.00 0.00 0.00Wilmot

Page 31 of 31

Page 124: Stark County Crash Report€¦ · In 2006, there were 2 locations with hazard ratings greater than 50 and 18 locations with hazard ratings greater than 20. The following chart shows

Glossary of Terms Alcohol Related Crash: A crash in which a vehicle driver or pedestrian had been drinking At Fault: A term that identifies the person, animal, or condition that was the primary cause of a vehicle crash. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC): The level of alcohol in a person’s bloodstream. In Ohio, the legal limit of .10 equals a blood alcohol concentration of one part per thousand. Child Safety Seat: Safety devices designed to fit in motor vehicles that keep children securely in place. The law requires the seats for children weighing less than 40 pounds or who are less than four years old. Crash: An occurrence involving a moving motor vehicle, which produces bodily injury or property damage. Crashes are generally caused by driver error, a defect in the vehicle or in the road pavement. It occurs on a road, or after the motor vehicle runs off the road, but before events are stabilized. Drinking Driver or Pedestrian: A person identified as one who had been drinking at the time of the crash regardless of the level of impairment. Driver: Any person of any age operating a vehicle, including non-motorized vehicles. Economic Loss: An estimate of the cost of traffic crashes. Cost estimates for crashes and injuries of various severity are based upon lost wages, medical costs, and vehicle repair costs. These estimates are established from national statistics. Fatality vs. Fatal Crash: A fatality is a death that results from a traffic crash. A fatal crash is a motor vehicle crash (single or multiple) that results in the death of one or more people. A fatal crash can cause one or more fatalities. Injury (motor vehicle related): The reporting officer classifies Personal injuries as follows: 1. Fatality – an injury that results in death

within 30 days after the date of the crash. 2. Serious visible injury – An injury other

than a fatality that prevents the injured person from continuing the normal activities he/she was capable of performing prior to the crash.

3. Minor visible injury – An injury, other than a fatality or serious injury, which is evident to the observer at the crash scene.

4. No visible injury – An injury that is not evident to the observer, but is claimed by the person, or suspected because of behavior.

Moped: A pedacycle that has a motor. Motorcycle: A motorized two- or three-wheeled vehicle with more than five brake horsepower. Motor Vehicle: Any self-propelled vehicle that does not run on rails. Examples include, but are not limited to, automobiles, trucks, tractor-trailers, and motorcycles. Occupant Restraints: Devices for the protection of vehicle occupants found in motor vehicles which keep the driver and passengers in their seats and prevent them from being ejected from the motor vehicle upon impact. Restraint devices include lap belts, lap/shoulder harness combinations, and air bags. Property Damage Crash: A traffic crash that results in no injuries or fatalities. Ohio law requires that all crashes resulting in more than $150 in damage be reported to the Ohio Department of Highway Safety on the OH-1 Traffic Crash Report. Rural Area: An incorporated or unincorporated area with a population less than 2,500. Single vs. Multiple Vehicle Crashes: Single vehicle crashes involve only one motor vehicle, but may include pedestrians. Multiple vehicle crashes involve two or more motor vehicles and may also include pedestrians. Speed Related Crash: A traffic crash in which one or more vehicles were reported as exceeding the posted speed limit and/or where the reporting officer indicated that excessive speed for roadway conditions or loss of control was a contributing factor. Urban Area: An area that is incorporated, usually a city with a population of 2,500 or more people. Youthful Driver: A driver is considered a youthful driver if his or her age at the time of the crash was between 16 and 24, inclusive.

- 94 -