Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
) )
SSCL#356
SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY
SSC PROJECT MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT
JULY 1991
)
1:30 - 1:40
1 :40 - 1:50
1:50- 2:00
2:00- 2:30
2:30- 2:50
2:50 - 3:10
3:10 - 3:30
3:30 - 3:50
3:50- 4:00
JULY DOE MONTHLY REVIEW AGENDA
AUGUST 23, 1991
Opening Remarks Joe Cipriano/Ed Siskin
Project Overview Paul Reardon
Administration Division Bob Van Ness
Accelerator Design & Operations Division John Rees
Accelerator Systems Division Ted Kozman
Magnet Systems Division Tom Bush
Conventional Construction Division Jon Ives
Discussion
Closing Joe Cipriano/Ed Siskin
' •
) ) ) ) )
INTRODUCTION
The July 1991 Monthly Progress Report consolidates divisional status reports by machine, as appropriate. Changes in
conditions (red, yellow, green) from the previous month's report are marked with an asterisk. This report is intended to
summarize Divisional status; additional information is available through the responsible organizations. Backup documentation
and signatures are on file with the Project Cost, Schedule, and Reporting Group.
The Monthly Progress Reports are distributed electronically. All authorized SSCL personnel can access distribution via a
locked folder on the PMO server. All DOE recipients will receive a copy via QuickMail. Hard copies will be provided to
other Laboratory and University personnel who are PC based, or do not have computers for E-mail. Retrieving, printing, and
security of the Monthly Progress Report will become the responsibility of the authorized recipients.
Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... ii PROJECT MANAGER'S OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 1
BASELINE SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................................................... 10 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION ................................................................................................................................. 13 ACCELERATOR DESIGN AND OPERA TIO NS DIVISION .................................................................................... 21 ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS MACHINE STATUS .................................................................................................. 25
ACCELERATOR SYSTEM STRING TEST (ASST) ........................................................................................... 26 LINEAR ACCELERATOR (LINAC) ................................................................................................................... 29 LOW ENERGY BOOSIBR (LEB) ........................................................................................................................ 32 MEDIUM ENERGY BOOSTER (MEB) ............................................................................................................... 34 HIGH ENERGY BOOSIBR (HEB) ....................................................................................................................... 36 COLLIDER ............................................................................................................................................................. 38 TEST BEAMS ........................................................................................................................................................ 39
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS DIVISION ................................................................................................................... 41 MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION ............................................................................................................................... 47
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION .................................................................................................... 63
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION .............................................................................................................................. 75 LABORATORY TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION ............................................................................................ 83 DIRECTORATE DIVISION ....................................................................................................................................... 87
Page ii
c c c
)
PROJECT MANAGER'S OVERVIEW
Page 1
PROJECT MANAGER'S STATUS REPORT
DESIGN ~ PRODUCTION ~
CONSTRUCTION 181 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 181 PART I
I. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION(S)
Project Manager's Overview Accelerator Design & Operations Division Accelerator Systems Division Magnet Systems Division
ld. OFFICE CONT ACT Conventional Construction Division Physics Research Division
Robert Morse (ext. 4013) Project Management Division Laboratory Technical Services Division
le. PROJECT MANAGER Administration Division Directorate
Paul Reardon (ext. 3087)
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status
LAST PERIOD THIS PERIOD
COST G G Green Yellow Red Ill =•C··•·
*
~ .. ~ SCHEDULE 1•·•··········•.!t.•• G G TECHNICAL G G
OVERALL PROJECT
*Pending CCB approval.
Page 2
f f • • c
)
PROJECT STATUS REPORT PART I PROJECT MANAGER'S OVERVIEW 2b. PROJECT MANAGER'S NARRATIVE HIGHLIGHTS (See item 5 for details on problems and variances)
WBS
1.1.2.1.12 Linac RF System
2.1.6.25 String Enclosure (ASST)
2.4 Campus
3.1.4 Engineering Standards
4.2.1 Accelerator R&D
4.2.1 Technical Specifications
4.5.1 Director's Office
Selected Drift Tube Linac and Coupled Cavity Linac Klystron suppliers.
Completed foundations and steel erection.
Completed Title II Design for Magnet Test Lab. Completed West Campus Preliminary Design Requirements Document.
Completed Guideline 4.1, "Description and Maintenance of Engineering Guidelines Standards and Practices".
Submitted corrector magnet procurement packages (for collider) to DOE for approval.
Issued three (3) specifications.
Issued call for Letters of Intent for the second major detector.
Page 3
PROJECT STATUS REPORT PART I PROJECT MANAGER'S OVERVIEW 5. SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMSN ARIANCE ANALYSIS 5a. PROBLEMS, IMPACT ON PROJECT, CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONSIBLE
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION IMPACT CORRECTIVE ACTION GROUPS 2.2.2.1.1 IR4 Underground Hall and Significant increases in scope from Composite CCB package in process to CCD,PB/MK, Shaft Structure - Rescoping of mechanical baseline will have cost and schedule address scope changes for Interaction ADOD and electrical systems and underground impact. Regions (IRl, IR4, IR5, IR8). design requirements.
3.1.2, 3.1.3 Cost & Scheduling - Mid-July 1991 Integrated Project Schedule Workshops to be held August 19-23 to PMO Development of Integrated schedules and (IPS) completion not achieved. Potential finalize IPS by August 30, 1991. Draft development of new Work Breakdown delay in implementation of WBS. WBS ready for review in August. Structure (WBS).
4.2.1 ASST - Building Current schedule projects a 2 week delay Working on partial BOD - Contractor is CCD,ADOD, Construction. in the Beneficial Occupancy Date (BOD) currently ahead of this revised plan, PB/MK
of ASST Building. schedule recovery is expected.
4.2.1.6 Collider - Relocation of utility Increased peak voltage as a result of power Proposed reduced spacing of niches and ADOD shaft resulted in increased system feed locations. increased number of voltage dumps will complexity. improve system reliability. CCB package
will be submitted.
4.2.1 Development/Approval of Six (6) to fifteen (15) week slips expected Continued attention on expediting ADOD Technical Specifications. in issuance of remaining specifications. specifications. Three (of 22 total) have
been issued to date. Sb. ITEMS REQUIRING PMO/DIRECTORA TE/DOE ACTION
NIA NIA NIA NIA
Page 4
•
)
PROJECT STATUS REPORT PART II PROJECT MANAGER'S OVERVIEW 8. MILESTONE LOG
SIGNIFICANT MILESTONES ACCOMPLISHED SINCE LAST REPORT BASELINE DA TE ACTUAL DATE WBS
1.1.6 Start corrector magnet procurement for Collider September 91 July 91
SIGNIFICANT MILESTONES OPEN BASELINE DA TE FORECAST DA TE
2.4.2 Start Magnet Test Lab Construction June 91 August 91
2.4.22 Magnet Development Lab Beneficial Occupancy April 91 September 91
KEY MILESTONES UPCOMING - NEXT THREE MONTHS BASELINE DATE FORECAST DA TE
2.1.6.25 ASST Beneficial Occupancy September 91 October 91
2.1.2 St.art Linac Facility Construction August 91 February 92*
* No technical system impact, BeneficiaJ Occupancy Date expected to be met.
Page5
Item#
l
2
3
4
CCB Date
7/24/91
c
SUMMARY OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT DECISION PAPERS
July 1991
SUBJECT
Proposed HEB Change (fune)
Application of Three Shaft Design Concept - N20 through N4S
Conventional (warm) Magnet design for HEB to Collider Transfer Line
Set spacing and quantity of Niches and Alcoves to Accommodate The Orientation of the Spools in The Collider Tunnel
Description
CCB ACTIONS (This reporting period)
Net Project Impact *Dollars Sched
DATE
7/3/91
7/3/91
7/11/91
7/15/91
CCB Action
DOCUMENT NUMBER
El 1-000015
El 1-000016
Ell-000017
El 1-000018
DOE Comments Action
CCSR El2-000044 Systems Engineering Budget Transfer -0- NIA Approved To DOE For Approval
Page 6
• c •
Superconducting Super Collider Networ~ Stetuo Dete• 21JUL91 Gr1nh1c Produced b• PMD on 16AUG91
wes NUMBER WBS/CDDE DESCRIPTION
i I. TECHtlICAL SYSTEM
I I. 01. 01 I I 1. 01. 02 I i 1.01.0J I
I 1.01.04
! 1
1.01.os
\ 1. 01. 05
i I .01. 06
: 1. 01. 06
1. 01. 06
:1.01.07
1. 01. 08
1.02.01 ' i 1. 02. 02
I I. 02.0J
: 1.02.oJ
1. 02. OJ
1.02.03
I I. 02. 04
2.01 .01 j
2. 0 I. 02
2. 01. OJ
2. 0 I. 06
2.01. 06
2.01 .07
MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT
LINAC SYSTEM
LES SYSTEM
MEB SYSTEM
HEB START INSTALLATION
HEB SYSTEM
l•t COLLIDER 1/2 SECTOR - START MAG.INSTALL'
FIRST COLLIDER HALF SECTOR - START COOLDOWN
COLLIDER SYSTEM
TEST BEAMS
GLOBAL ACCELERATOR SYSTEM
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
HEB MAGNET PRODUCTION
COM AUTHORIZ. ro INCUR cosrs
START FIRST HALF SECTOR COM DELIVERY
FULL RATE PRODUCTION DECISION ON MAGNETS
COLLIDER RING CCRJ MAGNET PRODUCTION
SSCL EOUIPMENT/TOOLING
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
LINAC
LEB
START SSC CIVIL CONSTRUCTION
COLLI DER
TEST BEAM
)
COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART
PROJECT SUMMARY LEVEL. PART 1 Ba•elone Ma•ter Schedolel Ver. 12, Rev• 7
SSCL MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT BY WBS (Calender i• In Fiocel Yeerol
l9o 1991I199211993119941199sl1995J1991l 199sl 1999
I I I I I I I I I ////////////////// /////// / ///7-77//////J
"~••••lltz:/'u':u'':z::;,,'.'.:z:/'u':u':'u''.'.:Z: ''2:2'".:u'::-2171 I I I I I I I ////////////////// / / /
////////////////// '',"'~I I I I I I I ... I .. ~~I •.. I . . I I I j I lzzz4zzzzzzzzz;'.7zzl: j
I I I . tc ~Ml* I I I I I I I I TMI I I I //////////////////
I
I 1' L-1 -~-.--r--.,-,-r-r--->,....,...--JI 1' 1' z z z z 4 z z 21 ////////////////// )/////////////////////
//////////////////
lzzzz;zzzz;zzzzz~zzzzjzzzz~zzzzJ
'VM1
//////////////////
i I I
I i I I I I I · I I I I I I I
I ', I 2 2 j / /1
I I I •IMI I
I I IZZZZZZZZJ
I I
. I l
I L-~. -,~~,,~--r-,,~,~,~,~~,/~--r-,,~,~,~,~-,-,/~/.....,.~,~-r-/,-/~-,-//~--,--//.,.....,,/ ~-r-//h
I I~, ~~~~~~~1·
1
I I
1 1 tzzzzzzza 1 1
I I I I I -l I I I I I I
I
I I
I
I I
119901 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I 1997 I 1998 I 1999
I
I I I I I I
I I I I I
I I
ool
2000 I
Orn111 10• f'RJJUHWI
BASEL! NE .. DJECTED FINISH FINISH
SEP99 SEP99
MAR95 JUN95
OCT95 NOV95
JUN96 JUN96
AUG96 JUL96
MAY98 MAY98
JUN94 SEP94
MAR95 AUG95
SEP99 SEP99
SEP96 NAY96
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
SEP97 SEP97
NOV90 15NOV9 A
APR94 JUL94
APR94 JAN95
SEP98 SEP98
SEP92 APR9J
SEP99 SEP99
OCT92 APR93
MAR94 APR94
MAR91 I JNAR9 A
APR97 MAY97
NOV94 OCT94
IL----.J-1
BASELINE ACTIVITY ACTUAL ACTIVITY r z z "'PROJ. CRITICAL ACT. 0-oRIG. CRITICAL MS vPROJECTED MILESTONE
... , ,,,ORIG. CRITICAL ACT. 1zzzz1PROJECTED ACTIVITY *-BASEL!NE MILESTONE .-ACTUAL MILESTONE .-PROJ'TEO CRITICAL MS
-'=============================================================================================================~
)
Superconducting Super Col/1der Network Status Date• 21JUL91 Graohlc Produced bv PMO on 16AUG91 was NUMBER WBS/COOE DESCR (PT I ON
2.
2.02.01
2.02.01
2.02.02
2.02.03
2.02.04 2.02.os
2.03.02 1 I 2. 03.03
I 2 • 04 • 01 I
!i ~:~::~! 2. 05. 0 I
! 2. 05. 01
! 3
3
I 3
3. 01. 01
3.02.01
4.
I 4 • 01
i 4.01
I 4. O I
I 4 • 01
i 4. 0 I
I 4. 01
: 4, 01
I 4. 01 4.02.0I
: 4 .02. 01 I 4.02. 02
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION
NOTICE TO PROCEED CNTPJ EXPERIMENT HALLS WN REGION
WS REGION
EN REGION
ES REGION
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
PRIMARY SYSTEMS - ON-SITE SECONDARY SYSTEMS - ON-SITE
CENTRAL LAB/OFFICE AREA MAGNET LABORATORY
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES
A/E-CM LETTER CONTRACT ~ NTP
ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
BASELINE VALIDATION COMPLETE
SEIS RECORD OF DECISION CRODl
PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE
SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
R~D & PRE-OPERATIONS
START LlNAC 600 MEV COMMISS!ON!NG LEB START COMMISSIONING
MEB START COMMISSIONING
MEB TEST BEAMS AVAILABLE
HEB START COMMISSIONING
COLLIDER - START COMMISSIONING CBEAMl
BEAM TO EXPERIMENT-ENO OF PROJECT/BEGIN OPER
ACCELERATOR PRE-OPERATIONS
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS STRING TEST P-1 COMPLETE
ACCELERATOR R~D
MAGNET R~D
1 4.03 LAB ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
4.04 LAB TECHNICAL SUPPORT 1 4.05 LAB DIRECTORATE
COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART B•sel ine Master Schedule! Ver. 12. Rev. 7 PROJECT SUMMARY LEVEL. PART 2 SSCL MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT BY WBS
...
...
<Calendar is In Fiscal Years)
9011 991 I 199211 993 I 1 994 I 1 99s I 1 996 I 1 997 1 99g J 1 999 oo I i I I I I I I I
i l1 rz~zz~;1~zzzz~zzzz;zzzz;J J l J
I I I 11z1zzzz1zzz222zzzz2z}1'. I .. I · J ·
I I ~ " ,
I I I IZZZ7ZZ7ZZZZZ2222777 /( . t. I ' ' I I' tZZZZZZZZZ22ZZZZZZZZd'
j I I lz2zz2zz/22222222)i · I I I I //////////////////1 I I I I I
11
12z2zzz2zzz11zzz%i' I I I I I 1zzzzzz2za I 1 1 I I
I im .
I \HI
I ~:I I I I I I I I I I
/////////////////////////////////////// I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I I
!
' I I I I I I
'~Ml I
////////////// / 7/ //
I *.Mi I
///////////////////~ /////j//////77///////
/////////////////////////////F///////////
Dr•••n 101 PRJSUMW2
BASEL! NE ••DJECIED FINISH FINISH
JUN9J
DEC96
JAN97
AUG98
SEP99
NOV96
DEC94
MAY95
JAN97
MAR92
MAY96
AUG90
FE899
JUL90
OEC90
JUN9J
DEC96
FEB97
NDV98
DEC99
FEB97
FEB95
JUN95
OCT9J
JUL92
MAY96
I TAUG9 A
MAY99
01 JUL9 A
01 FEB9 A
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
OCT94 OCT94
OCT95 OCT95
JUN96 JUN96
JAN97 MllR9T
SEP98 SEP98
MllR99 MllR99
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
OCT92 NOV92
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
SEP99 SEP99
i 4.06 LAB EXPERIMENTAL SUPPORT / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / //77,-,,,,,-;-7,,,, 7 , / /7 // / SEP99 SEP99
•
~4~·~0~1:..__L_!P~R~I~M~E~C~O!_!N~T~R~A~C~T~O~R~·~s~F~E~E~S'.._ __________ ..L·~···•li:/z;::;:/::~//;:;z::.;1/c;2/:z:;;://:::;z::.;//::;z::.;11~~//2::;:/~z::.;11::7?;:;7~7::;7z::;:7:7~7~z:;772::;:7::7~7;:7~7:::::z::.;//~/;:~//~z::.;//~,/;:~/~~ ..... rs~E~P~9~9..JS~E~P~9~9-~ 1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I 1997 1998 I 1999 2000 I
IL------LB,r..SELI NE ACTIVITY
~""""'ORIG. CRITICAL ... er.
f
•••r"cTU,r..L ACTIVITY
I z z z z I PROJECTED ,r..CT! VI TY
r ~~Ji PROJ. CRITIC,r..L ACT.
*-e,r..SELINE MILESTONE
•
0-0RIG. CRITICAL MS \TPROJECTED MILESTONE
.-... CTU ... L MILESTONE ,..-PROJ'TED CRITICAL MS
•
)
Superconducting Super Collider COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART 8a9eline Ma., t er Schedule I Ver-. 12. Rev. 7
Network Statuo Date• 21JUL91 PROJECT SUMMARY LEVEL PART 3 SSCL MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT BY WBS Graahic Produced bv PMO on 16AUG91 (Calendar i. in Fiscal Ye a r ol 0 ..... 11 ID• ,RJSUf1Wl
was HUHBER WBS/CODE DESCRIPTION /9011 991 11 99211993I1 994 I 199s/1996r1 9911199s11 999 001 BASEll NE PJIDJECTED FINISH FJliUSH
15 E YFER ! 11Et/ T AL S 1 Sf EflS I I I I I I I I I i 5 BOD LARGE EXPERIMENT HALLS I I I I I I *.Mr· I I I I JAN96 FEB96
5 EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEMS A I I I I I I I SEP91 SEP91
I I
5.01 EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM R&O .... SEP99 SEP99 ////////////////// //////// , / 7 -;; 7 -/ / / / / / /
5.02 BEGIN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR DETECTORS I ~Ml: I I I I I I I I . /3 : I FEB91 01 MAR9 A
5.02 WEST DETECTORS - START COMMISSIONING I I I I I I I I I Ml I MAR99 MAR99
5.02 DETECTORS .... SEP99 NOV99 ////////////////// ///////////77777///////
I EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM COMPUTERS .... SEP99 SEP99 I 5. 03 / , , / / / / / / / / / /777 /7777777/7///////1
I I I I I I I I T I I I
I I I I I I I I I I i I
i I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I i i I I
i i I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
11990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I 1997 l 1998 I 1999 I 2000 I II 1 BASELINE ACT!YI TY ACTUAL ACT 1Y1 TY !"' z z ... PROJ. CR 1T1 CAL ACT. <>-ORIG. CRITICAL MS yrPROJECTED MILESTONE
iii;'\:'\;, ORIG. CRITICAL ACT. 1zzzz1PROJECTED ACTIVITY *-BASELINE MILESTONE .-ACTUAL Ml LES TONE "f"PROJ'TED CRITICAL MS
BASELINE SCHEDULE
WBS DESCRIPTION BASELINE PROJECTED* EXTENDED DESCRIPTION
(DEC 90) (A Indicates actual date)
3.0 Baseline Validation Complete JUL90 I JUL90 A Completion of docwnents and briefings on Baseline Cost Estimate & Schedule and Supplemental Concept Design Report.
2.5.1 A-E/CM Letter Contract AUG90 17 AUG90A DOE Approval and release of a letter contract, pending a full
&NTP contract, for PB/MK to begin formal design & construction work.
1.2.3 CDM Authorization to NOV90 15 NOV90A DOE permission for the CDM contractors to incur costs toward
Incur Costs their contract in beginning the Collider Dipole Magnet industrial program.
3.0 SEIS Record of Decision JAN91 I FEB91 A Secretary signature and formal filing of the Environmental Record
(ROD) of Decision. This allows non-reversible project construction to begin.
5.2 Begin Conceptual Design FEB91 1 MAR91 A Start the detector concept design and Title I conventional facilities
for Detectors design effort
2.1.6 Start SSC Civil Construction MAR91 13MAR9IA The first construction notice to proceed after the SEIS ROD. The first facility is the EI Infrastructure.
2.2.1 Notice to Proceed (NTP) JUN93 JUN93 The first notice to proceed for construction of the experimental
Experimental Halls (interaction region) halls; IR-4 and IR-1. 1
4.2.1 Accelerator System String Test OCT92 NOV92 Cooldown, power up and testing of the 1/2 cell with accelerator
(Phase !)Complete components including the string test of 5 Collider Dipole magnets of industrial fabrication.
Variance Remarks
1 = Forthcoming CCB request to reconcile dates.
* =These dates are current projected dates from schedule updates and pending Change Control Board proposals.
Page 10
• • • •
WBS DESCRIPTION BASELINE PROJECTED* EXTENDED DESCRIPTION
(DEC 90)
1.2.3 Full-rate Production Contract APR942
Awarded on Collider Magnets
1.2.3 Start First Half Sector CDM APR942
Delivery from vendor plant
1.1.6 First Col!ider Half Sector - JUN942
Start Magnet Installation
4.1 LINAC Scan Commissioning OCT94
(600 MeV)
1.1.6 First Collider Half Seclor - MAR952
Start Cooldown
4.1 LEB Stan Commissioning OCT95
5.0 Beneficial Occupancy of Large JAN96
Experimental Halls
Variance Remarks
2 ::: CCB Request in process to modify baseline schedule.
(A indicates actual date)
JAN95
JUL94
SEP94
OCT94
AUG95
OCT95
JAN96
SSCL award of the full rate production contract(s) for collider magnets requires prior DOE approval.
Start Delivery of the first contractor production magnet (CDM) from the contractor's dock to the MAAS.
Start magnet and spool installation after completion of tunnel finish-out including power, lights & ventilation and primary technical components e.g. piping, electrical components cryogenics, etc.
Start commission with beam of the full 600 MEY LINAC and signoff after suitable checkout of engineering and safety systems.
Cooldown of the first complete half sector (EI-Fl) and the concurrent power safety check of a full half sector. Requires last magnetic component (472 15M, 8 13M, 96 CQM & 96 spools) delivered to tunnel 4 months prior to this date.
Beginning of the LEB beam commissioning installation and suitable checkout of the subsystems and safety signoff. Requires the LINAC to be able 10 provide test beam.
Beneficial occupancy of !he experimental (interaction region) halls. This BOD includes lighting, power & ventilation, etc. and is 9 months after the first BOD where just the unfinished chamber is turned over for technical survey.
* ::: These dales are currenl projected dates from schedule updates and pending Change Control Board proposals.
Page 11
)
WBS DESCRIPTION BASELINE PROJECTED* EXTENDED DESCRIPTION
(DEC 90) (A indicates actual date)
4.1 MEB Start Commissioning JUN96 JUN96 Beginning of the MEB commissioning after installation and suitable checkout of the subsystems and safety signoff. Requires the LEB to be able to provide test beam.
1.1.5 HEB Start Installation AUG96 JUL96 HEB installation of major technical components after completion of tunnel out fitting (e.g. power, lights, ventilation) technical components include piping, electrical components cryogenic components, spools, magnets etc.
1.1.4 MEB Test Beams Available JAN97 MAR97 Completion of the MEB and test beam commissioning activity so that beam for detector component testing is available some fraction of the time.
4.1 HEB Start Commissioning SEP98 SEP98 Beginning of the HEB commissioning after installation and suitable checkout of the subsystems and safety sign off. Requires the MEB to able to provide test beam.
5.2 West Detectors - MAR99 MAR99 Beginning of the Detector commissionings. Includes operable
Start Commissioning beamline through detectors to support Collider commissioning.
4.1 Collider - MAR99 MAR99 Beginning of the full Collider beam commissioning after sector
Start Commissioning (Beam) testing is successfully completed. Requires the HEB to be able to provide beam. Requires accelerator components to be previously installed and checked in both IR halls.
4.1 Beam to Exp. SEP99 SEP99 Completion of the Collider and West detectors and Collider
(End of Project/Begin Operations commissioning activities. The SSC is now ready to perform experiments in two experiment (interaction regions) halls.
Phase)
Yarjance Remarks
* = These dates are current projected dates from schedule updates and pending Change Control Board proposals.
Page 12
• f • '
)
ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
Page 13
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TUS REPORT
DESIGN 0 PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 0 PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION(S)
Administration Personnel Procurement
Id. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT Finance Minority Affairs
Carol Matteson (ext. 5053) MIS Records Management
le. DIVISION MANAGER
Robert L. Van Ness (ext. 1540)
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
Page 14
Goal
WBS Elements
4.3.2
4.3.7
Accomplishments
4.3.2
)
ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
Develop, implement and maintain the Laboratory's Financial Reporting and Accounting System in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and DOE Orders. Ensure SSC Laboratory compliance with DOE, DOL regulations, policies and procedures addressing equal opportunities and procurement.
Description
Finance
Minority Affairs
Assisted Divisions in entering the FY91 institutional budgets in the Budget Forecast System.
Established a task force to coordinate the year end closing and the new year opening lab-wide activities.
Began developing means for segregating and reporting equipment purchased with Texas funds.
Developed provisional FY92 labor rates.
Completed a semi-annual summary report of DOE owned Plant and Capital Equipment from FY85 to May FY91 for use by
DOE Chicago to close out the Central Design Group contract.
4.3.7 The Director of Minority Affairs briefed the Women, Hispanic, and Black Caucuses on the Public Law 101-514 and Small and Disadvantaged Business Opportunities held in Washington, D.C. and met with the New York State Governor's Office of Minority Affairs to develop a referral system of providing the Governor's Office with SSC procurement opportunities. The EEO/AA Manager participated in the NAACP National Covention in Houston, contacted all schools in our proposed HBCU Co-op Program for final feedback, and tentative recruiting schedule and attended the National Urban League
conference and Georgia Tech Minority Career Fair in Atlanta.
Issues and Concerns None
Corrective Action N/A
Condition Green
roe Wanda Mizutowicz DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 15
•
Goal
WBS Elements
Accomplishments
LABORATORY FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Projected FY91 Funding vs YTD Contract Summary
TO RECEIVE FUNDING IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE TIMELY PLACEMENT OF PROCUREMENTS.
Description
CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS THUS FAR HA VE KEPT PACE WITH SSCL COMMITMENTS. MOD 19 TO THE CONTRACT RECEIVER IN JULY.
Issues and Concerns OPERATING FUNDS NEARLY COMPLETELY OBLIGATED.
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
•
MONITOR OPERATING FUNDS VERY CLOSELY FOR THE BALANCE OF FISCAL YEAR TO STAY WITHIN BA CEILING.
GREEN
G. HILL DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 16
f •
LABORATORY
ALL FUNDS PROJECTED FV91 FUNDING VS VTD
CONTRACT SUMMARY
(KS-TPC)
100 ----=
a;r r-DI CEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JL Y PLG SEP
8/13/91
WJ REQUISITIONS
it COMMITMENTS
11111 a:sr
·X FUNDING TREND
.a- ACTUAL FUNDING
Page 17
•
LABORATORY FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Labor and Labor Related Costs
Goa I TO ENSURE ADEQUATE BUDGET TO COVER ALL EXISTING AND PLANNED LABOR AND LABOR RELATED COSTS.
WBS Elements Description
Accomplishments BUDGET PLANNING IS ADEQUATE TO COVER EXISTING AND PLANNED LABOR AND RELATED EXPENSES.
Issues and Concerns COSTS CONTINUE TO LAG BEHIND PROJECTIONS.
Corrective Action: RE'EV ALUATE PROJECTIONS IN LIGHT OF HIRING AND FINALIZED BUDGETS AND REDIRECT EXCESS DOLLARS TO M&S.
Condition: GREEN
POC G. HILL DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 18
f f
LABORATORY ALL FUNDS
140000
120000
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
JULY FY91 LABOR AND LABOR RELATED COSTS
($'S In Thousands)
)
EXPENSES CLASS:
3 9 - 4 8
121932
Em Labor & Rel Budget
Ill Labor & Rel Actuals
89 {]- Labor & Rel Proj
-Ir Direct Labor Budget
-<>- Direct Labor Actuals
CCT f'DJ CEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL PLG SEP
YTD URA, EGG FTEs = 874.5 AVG COST/FTE = 54.2 K$ INCL FRINGE
Page 19
•
LABORATORY ALL FUNDS JULY FY91
PROJECTED COSTS & COMMITMENTS
VS ACTUALS
100000 +------1
0
CCf t'-0/ C£C JAN FEB MAR MAY JUN JUL PlG SEP
APR
EXPENSE CLASS:
Labor & Related: 39-48
M&S Subc, L&U: 49-53
CUMULATIVE
WI M&S and Subct Cost & Commits
Actuals
Ill Labor & Related Costs Actuals
• M&S and Subct Cost & Commits Plan
-l:r- Labor & Related Costs Plan
DOES NOT INCL: CTRL FAC (28.4), CONT (11.4). DOE W/HELD (6.9), MGMT RES (7.6), FWD FUNDING (2.6)
Page 20
f • f •
)
ACCELERATOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS DIVISION
Page 21
DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT
DESIGN 0 PRODUCTION 0
CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 0 PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANlZATION(S)
ADOD Linac High Energy Booster
ld. DIVISION/OFFICE CONT ACT Accelerator System String Test Low Energy Booster
Don Edwards (ext. 3020) Collider Medium Energy Booster
le. DIVISION MANAGER Beam lines
Don Edwards (ext. 3020)
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status
GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL
Linac Green Green Green Green
LEB Green Green Red Green
MEB Green Green Red Green
HEB Green Green Red Green
Collider Green Green Green Green
ASST Green Green Green Green Beam lines Green Green Green Green
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Red Green
PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Red Green
Page 22
• c • • •
)
Goal
WBS Elements
4.2.1
Accomplishments
ADOD
To supply the necessary deliverables to support the project milestones.
Description
Accelerator R&D
Good progress on specification preparation:
Signed Off - Linac Segment 3a, Linac Facilities 3b, LEB Segment 3a;
)
In Signature Process - LEB Facilities 3b, HEB Segment 3a, Linac Beam Transfer 3b, ASST 3b;
In Fonnal Review - Linac Accelerator 3b, MEB Segment 3a, HEB Beam Transfer 3b, Collider Segment 3a;
First Draft Complete - LEB Beam Transfer 3b, Collider Magnet 3b, Collider Accelerator 3b, HEB Accelerator 3b;
Rough Draft Complete - LEB Accelerator 3b, LEB Beam Transfer 3b, MEB Accelerator 3b, HEB Magnet 3b, Collider Accelerator 3b;
Rough Draft Started - MEB Facilities 3b, MEB Beam Transfer 3b, HEB Facilities 3b, Collider Facilities 3b.
Issues and Concerns Preparation of most 3A and 3B specifications are behind schedule.
Corrective Action Proceed with approvals so that the major portions of the specifications are available for use.
Condition Green
POC Don Edwards DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 23
ADOD FY91-92 DELIVERABLES
WBS Deliverables Baseline Schedule Current Projection Condition Appraisal
4.2.1 LINAC Final Design Review Aug91 Aug91 Green
4.2.1 Set Coordinates, All Accelerators Apr91 Apr91 Complete
4.2.1 Magnet Requirements Completed
IBB Jun91 Aug91 Red
MEB Jun91 Aug91 Red
HEB Jun91 Jul91 Red
4.2.l RF Requirements Completed
I.EB Jun91 Aug91 Red
MEB Jun91 Aug91 Red
HEB Jun91 Jul91 Red
Page 24
• • • • • • •
)
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS MACHINE ST A TUS
Page 25
Goal
WBS Elements
4.2.1
2.1.6
Accomplishments
4.2.1
Issues and Concerns
4.2.l
Corrective Action
4.2.1
Condition
POC
•
ACCELERATOR SYSTEM STRING TEST (ASST)
Demonstrate operation of a half-cell of industrially produced collidcr magnets.
Description
Accelerator R&D
(String enclosure/N 15 service buildings)
Completed Iron-work for string enclosure August 5, and a roof and side casing installation.
Backfilled pits for refrigerator building.
Completed conduit work in floor for compressor building.
Began cool down for 40mm five dipole string at FNAL on August 5.
PDR presented for electronics racks and cable trays on July 30.
Racks installed in electronics trailer. Orders placed for TIST AR slow controls electronics.
Issued SPR Spool bid packages (bids due August 12-13).
1. Staffing requirements. 2. Software for controls system. 3. KPS/SEDALCO work around in Sept - Oct still not resolved; SEDALCO reports delay in delivery of compressor
building due to change order for under floor conduits. 4. ER spool installation may interfere with manpower for ASST.
1. Appointed J. Weisend (Cryo Group) technican supervisor, P. Kraushaar design layouts, W. Robinson data analysis. 2. ASD assignment of programmers to Grey's residence at El will allow day-to-day contact with ASST team. 3. PB/MK trying to work up an integrated schedule for KPS installation; PB/MK negotiating with SEDALCO to
minimize compressor building delay. 4. KPS developing installation schedule. Green
Thomas Dombeck (ADOD); Ted Kozman (ASD); Craig N. Trimble (CCD) DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 26
• • • • •
)
Goal
WBS Elements
1.1.6
2.1.6.25
2.1.6.2.2.1
2.1.6.2.2.2
Accomplishments
1.1.6
2.1.6
Issues and Concerns
l.1.6
2.1.6
Corrective Action
1.1.6
2.1.6
Condition
POC
ASST (Continued)
Demonstrate collider operation of a half-cell of industrially produced magnets. Description
Collider
String Enclosure (Cryo Alcove & Shop)
Nl5 Service Building
Compressor Building
Completed vendor Critical Design Review and testing of the first article magnet power supplies. Completed string foundations.
I. There is a potential problem with protection for a quadrupole magnet connected in series with the five dipole magnets during a quench.
I. BOD delayed thru bid protest to October 14. 2. Process change order for underslab conduits between buildings (not included in general package). 3. Pennanent electrical power for testing (HCEC power line).
1. Need decision on whether or not quadrupole will be installed 1-3. Interface Working Group resolved major critical path design issues.
Green Thomas Dombeck (AOOD); Ted Kozman (ASD); Craig N. Trimble (CCD) DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 27
TMR 3 YEAR TERM COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART
Report: ASST w/ Level 1&2 Mi I es tones Ba~e I 1 n~ Ma5ter Schedule: Ver. 12. Rev. 7
SSCL REVIEW SUMMARY BY WBS Superconducting Super Col I ider Network Stotu• Dote• 21JUL91 Groohlc Produced bv PMO on 12AUG91 lColendor 19 In Fi•col Years) DI'•••"• ID• A!f-SU"
wes NUMBER WBS/CODE DESCR Ip TI ON I 2.01.06 COLLIDER
ASST FACILITY - FINAL DESIGN REVISIONS
STRING TEST FACILITY -CONSTR.NTP
STRING TEST FACILITY & El BLDGS. -ISSUE RFP
STRING TEST FACILITY lBODJ -COMPLETE
CONVENTIONAL CONSTR. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
4.02.0I ACCELERATOR R&D
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS STRING TEST P-1 COMPLETE
POWER SYSTEMS
SPOOL PIECE
CRYOGENICS
UTILITIES
CONTROLS
INSTALLATION
TESTING
4.02.02 MAGNET Rt.D
lST COM lDCA313J AVAILABLE FOR INSTALLATION
STH COM CDCA317J AVAILABLE FOR INSTALLATION
1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 199.3
I '1 '1 . ii '1 i ii I I . I I ! I I I I . 1 I I I I I I I I : : 1 : .i,~ ·: I i i i I I I I I I I I '•. MZ I I I I I I I l
II I I I I .~MZ I I 'I I I '1 I I
I I I I I I '~Mz: I I I I i 11-,;......:..-'-'--"--'-'-~""--'--'.--'--'--~-'--'-'-/-'.-,1 /~J, . I I I ! I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-1 'I 'I 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I I .~· I I I I 11· I I I I I I I ·-~!~Ml I I I I ////// ////////! . I I I
I l I I I I //////////////!· I I I I I~ r--'--'-:-..!...-'--'--'-+'-/-'---//-=--/-/,;_/~ /-/'--/--!) ,1 i I I I I I I ·r11
1
---iz:./,.22/~z//~:'I : I I I I I I 1 1~~~-+'-'--'-~~I I 1
, I I //////////////J I l
I I I 1 '1
I I I I l I I I I I /////////////-:} . I ' : I i i i i i i i i I ! I 1
1 rz~~· I i I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I ~M2 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I . ;JM~ I I I I
I BASELINE bROJECTEO FINISH FINISH
MAR91 07MAR91
APR91 i 3MAR91
FEB91 28MAR91
SEP91 OCT91
SEP91 OCT91
OCT92 NOV92
AUG92 JUL92
MAY92 JUL92
MAR92 APR92
JAN92 OEC91
JUN92 JUL92
JUN92 JUL92
SEf'92 NOV92
JAN92 JAN92
APR92 llPR92
A
A
A
I I I I I I I I I * · I I I I l1----1--1-o_u_AD_-~A-VA_I_L_A_B_LE~l-O_cc_4_0_4_1~~-~-~-~~4!~~-1-!--~!~:4!-~~-l-~~~l--~+~-+---1---!--~l1--~: +I-~~. ~M~2~1-,--.,-1l----,-~+l--.,---,--~1--,---+-MA_R_9_2_~M-A-Y9_2 __ i
11---..JL-------------1...,.-1.l _..L....I ,--1. 1'----·41 _..L....1 ---.11'--_-1..1.1.-4-I _11.--_·~1 ~..i...1 _11-_ _.i,I ~-..1-I --r-L----'----1 '1-------------------------------------------------~'------~1~99~0~----~l--------~·9~9~1 ________ .1.-1 ______ ~·~9~92 ________ ~1 ____ ~1~99~3'----~1=--------.--------1
i .,__ ___ _._I BASELlNE ACT rvr TY •••• ,ACTUAL ACTIVITY ~rJ"~4"~4f'~4"~J PROJ. CRITICAL ACT. <)-ORIG. CRITICAL MS \J'PROJECTEO MILESTONE
i ~,,,,]ORIG. CR! T!CAL ACT. l//////A PROJECTED ACTIVITY fr-BASELINE MILESTONE ~-ACTUAL MILESTONE .,,.PROJ'TED CRITICAL MS
• • • •
)
Goal
WBS Elements 1.1.2.1.2 1.1.2.1.3 1.1.2.1.4 1.1.2.1.5 Accomplishments 1.1.2.1.2 1.1.2.1.3
1.1.2.1.4 1.1.2.1.5
Issues and Concerns 1.1.2.1.2 1.1.2.1.3 1.1.2. l.4 1.1.2.1.5 Corrective Action 1.1.2.1.2
1.1.2.1.3 1.1.2.1.4 1.1.2.1.5 Condition 1.1.2. l 2.1.2 POC
LINEAR ACCELERATOR (LINAC)
Design, Construct and Commission a 600 MeV H- Linac with high reliability and low transverse emittance to supply beam to the Low Energy Booster (LEB). Description Ion Source/Matching Radio Frequency Quadrupole Drift Tube Linac Coupled Cavity Linac
Installed Emmitance Measuring Unit and commissioning is in progress. Verified Vane tip machining programs. Issued Electroforming RFP. Scheme proposed which may reduce the number of RFQ Drift Tube Linac (DTL) buncher amplifiers. Scheme developed to power both DTL/Coupled Cavity Linac bunchers from a single klystron amplifier. Provided LANL with end-to-end design information for detailed critique. Quadrupole Magnet design ready to go out for prototyping for the Coupled Cavity Linac.
Smooth integration of computerized data acquisition and controls into Ion Source/LEBT operation. Lack of schedule float in an essentially linear fabrication schedule. Lack of experienced manpower to manage acquisition of DTL. Outstanding decisions: will Chinese provide CCL? will we build 1 GeV linac now?
Submitted request to Controls Department for long-tenn personnel commitment, holding weekly co-ordination and planning meetings between Linac, I&D and Controls section leaders. LANL shops working overtime to make up some lost time. LANL will post an rf structures expert at SSCL full time. Proceed full speed with engineering development and support efforts to reach decisions and prepare contingency plans.
Green Green Warren Funk(ADOD); Deryl Earsom (CCD) DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 29
Goal
WBS Elements 1.1.2.1.8 1.1.2.1.12 1.1.2.1.18,19 2.1.2 Accomplishments 1.1.2.1.8 1.1.2.1.12 l.1.2. l.l 8, 19 2.1.2 Issues and Concerns 1.1.2.1.8 2.1.2
Corrective Action 1.1.2.1.8 2.1.2
Condition 1.1.2.1 2.1.2 POC
•
LINAC (Continued)
Design, Construct and Commission a 600 MeV H" Linac with high reliability and low transverse emittance to supply beam to the Low Energy Booster (LEB). Description Quadrupole Magnets RF System Instrumentation, Controls Linear Accelerator Conventional Construction (including beam transfer to LEB)
Reviewing alternative design prepared by Indian lab. D1L and Coupled Cavity Linac klystron suppliers chosen. Contract being prepared. EMU controls implemented and operational. Title I Design Report and Cost Estimate submitted July 31, 1991.
Management of an Indian contribution of the pulsed quads. l. Projecting 6-month schedule slip in issuance of construction Notice to Proceed, resulting in a projected 17 day slip in
baseline BOD from December 11 to 28, 1992. 2. Need to minimize revisions in requirements and scope and "freeze" the design concept for the Title II phase.
Communications with donor lab being improved. 1. None. No technical system impact identified. 2. Definitize requirements prior to Title I review (July 22, 1991). Decisions on Scope.
Green Green Warren Funk(AOOD); Deryl Earsom (CCD)
•
DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 30
•
)
Superconducting Super Collider LONG TERM COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART Baseline Ma 9 t er- Schedule I Ver. 1 2. Rev. 7
Network Sta tu• Date• 21JUL91 TMR Report: LI NAC w/Level 1&2 Mi I es tones SSCL REVIEW SUMMARY BY WBS Greoh1c Produced bv PMO on 12AUG91 <Calender I• in Fi•cal ye a r • l 01'•••n• ID• LIM·SUl't
was NUMBER WBS/COOE DESCRIPTION 18911 99011 99111 99211 99311 99411 99511 99611 99711 99811 999 20001 BASELINE l>ROJECTED
FINISH FINISH
I I I I ! I I I I. 0 I. 02 LI NAC SYSTEM I I I I*: I I I I SET COORDINATES• LI NAC I I
DEC90 01APR91 A WM
I I I I I LINAC RFO/OTL/SCL CFORl I l~M2: I DEC92 DEC92
I I I I I I I I TECHNICAL SYSTEMS
I I I JAN91 JAN91
I I I I I ION SOURCE I I I I APR92 MAY92 77 7
I I I I RFO I l ' I I I APR9J MAY9J 777771/
I I I
I I I I I I OTL / / /7777 / /771 MAR94 MAR94
I I I I I I I I CCL ////////////-i JUL94 JUL94
I I I I I I I I POWER SYSTEMS JAN94 JAN94 //////////_!
I I I I I I I I RF SYSTEMS
I //////////// I I I JUN94 JUL94
I I I I · INJECTION I I ~zzzzzzzzzzzz z~i I I I MAR95 JUN95
I TESTING I I 1"'i:::ial· · I I I JUL94 JUL94
I I I I I T I I I I I 2. 01. 02 LI NAC I I I I I : I I I I I I LINAC TRANSPORT I. TRANSFER LINE 800 , ~M21 I APR9J APR9J
I I I I I I I I I
I I LINAC MAIN BUILDING FACILITY COMPLETE
I I , 1:7M2 I I FEB9J APR9J
I I I I I I I CONVENTIONAL CONS TR. OE SIGN g, CONSTRUCT I ON i i /////// ' i I I I I i FEB9J APR9J '
4.01 ACCELERATOR PRE-OPERATIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I i START LI NAC 600 MEV COMMISSIONING I I I I I : ~Ml I I I I I OCT94 OCT94
I I I I I I :a I I I I I i COMMISSIONING APR95 APR95
I I . I I I ' ; . ' I I , I I '
! 6 OPERATIONS I . I ' 1 I . I . I . I I . I I . I . I I I I I I I I I I I
. I
I OPERATIONS . I . I . I I . I . I '!//////////////////~ SEP99 SEP99
! 11 1 BASEL! NE
119891 1990 I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 I 1996 1 1997 I 1998 I 1999 2000 I
ACTIVITY ACTUAL ACTIVITY rzz41PROJ. CRITICAL ACT. 0-0RIG. CRITICAL MS vPROJECTEO MILESTONE
l'°''',ORIG. CRITICAL ACT. I z z z z I PROJECTED ACTIVITY *-BASEL I NE Ml LES TONE .-ACTUAL MILESTONE T"PROJ'TEO CRITICAL MS I
Goal
WBS Elements
1.1.3
2.1.3
4.2.l
Accomplishments
2.1.3
4.2.l
Issues and Concerns
2.1.3
4.2.1
Corrective Action
2.1.3
4.2.1
Condition
POC
•
LOW ENERGY BOOSTER (LEB)
Meet the overall Laboratory Goals to start commissioning by early FY96.
Description
l.EB
Low Energy Booster Conventional Construction (including beam transfer to MEB)
Accelerator R&D
Initiated Title I Preliminary Design. Circulated the frrst draft of the LEB magnet Advance Acquisition Plan. Power systems PDR was successfully completed in July.
Projecting two-month slip in issuance of construction NIP. The current schedule shows the start of commissioning to be August 31, 1995, allowing seven months before the start of commissioning for the MEB, with the RF system as critical path.
None. Projecting early turnover for installation. No FY funding impact.
Complete and finalize the magnet requirements so that the Preliminary Design Reviews can be held
2.1.3 Green; Yellow (ScheduJe)-ASD; Red (3N3B Spec Schedule) -ADOD
Richard York (ADOD); Ted Kozman (ASD); Dery! Earsom (CCD) DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 32
• • •
)
Superconducting Super Collider Network Statu• Date• 21JUL91
LONG fERM COMPARAflVE SUMMARY BARCHARf Ba.el ine Ma•ter Schedulel Ver. 12. Rev• 7
TMR Report: LEB w/ Level 1&2 Milestones SSCL REVIEW SUMMARY BY was Gr ooh I c Produced bv PMO on I 2AUG91 Orh•"• ID• LEI-SUH (Calendar i• in Fi•c•I Year•)
~1991 \1992\1993\199411995\1996\1997\1998\1999\2000\ was NUMBER WBS/COOE DESCRIPTION BASELINE PROJECTED
FINISH FINISH
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I
/,,////////////////)),. I I I I coNTRoLs I 1
lz1
zzzz;zzzziza I I I I I : INSTALLATION I I l l :&q I I I I I I I SAFETY I " i I I I I I ,t,PR95 M,t,R95 i1----f--------~------~-~-~~--f-_:_·~i__.:__:_~·~t.-.:l___.:l=Z=Z~Z::::Z=Z~Z==Z~Z~Z==Z~Z::::+Z=Z~d~·:___~l~~41__:__:_~·-J-.-:'__:__:_· 4,__:___:__:_J--.:l__:._:__~1------J--~--~ i 2 01 0 3 L EB . I . I I I . I . I I . I . I l
! . . LEB• FACILITY COMPLETE I I I I~· : I I I I I I
!. I I I I v~2 : I I 1·. 1· ,., I
CONVENTIONAL CONSTR. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION : I / / / / / ( / ,,, /I/ A I I I I I I lt--~-+--u_T_I_L_1r_1_E_s_~-------------l----+1·_._~+-+l-'---'-----li_.._~_.___.i'--'-'-B~·-~1·~..__-+-l __ 4l __ ---1l~--'1----~'·~-'--'--l-M"_R_94--+"-P_R9_4_--I i 4.01 ACCELERATOR PRE-OPERATIONS l I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~,,. * I I I I I I I I I . I v. ~
21 I I I
:.: t-----+--c_o_MM_1_s_s_1 o_N_l_NG-------------+--'+-1 __ ·+-+-1 __ ·_+-1 __ ·_+-1 __ ·_+-1 __ ._@.,.....__· -·-+--1 __ ·_1--:-1 __ ·_1--:-1 __ 11--:-~~-+M-AR_9_s_-+F_E_B9_s_--I ) 6 OPERATIONS i i . i ' i i I l . I I J
i1-____ -1, ___ o_P_E_RA_T_1_o_N_s ______________________________ .L..,_·~1.__...,..,._L.j_I__, __ · ~'----~·-.j_1----·~1 ______ .1--l~;=/=:;::://~/~;;://~~/==//~~7~//=:::;//~~,~,_,.,.,,.,.......,-LS-EP_9_9 __ ...Ls_EP_9_9 __ --J :1--------------------------------------------------~1~90~11__:1~99~1--1-.1~19~9~2~1_.:1~99~3:__1-.l~19~9~4~1_.:1~99~5:__1-.l~l9~9~6~1_.:1~99~7--L--1~19~9~8_.l_.:1~99~9:..,_,1--2~0~0~0-..._l ______ -r-______ ~
1•~--1•'----'- BASEL! NE ACTIVITY
1.01.03 LES SYSTEM I I I I ' l I
I . iM I I I I I
I l l i I ~' I .-'--4---'---'---'--"--'---'-~-'---'->, . I I
~ / / / / ; / / / / I/ / / / . /I ,, / '/ I ~////;////:,/T7'0-7 I
. 11-'--1 ~--' /,_, __ ,___;. //-"'-/1 .....;/_/_-'--,,--',, __ ,,'---'-,
7--'--;7_'_'_;...,: I I
", / / ~ / } / '/ / , / -/I/ / , J I
I :LLL1 I~: I I .. [2] I . . I
~////;////:////!//.A I
SET COORDINATES• LEB
TECHNICAL SYSTEMS
POWER SYSTEMS
DIPOLE MAGNETS
OUAORUPOLE MAGNETS
RF SYSTEMS
UT Ill TIES
VACUUM
EXTRACT I ON
I NS TRUMEN TAT I ON
LES START COMMISSIONING
LEB COMPLETE COMMISSIONING
·--ACTUAL ACTIVITY rzz41PROJ. CRITICAL ACT. 0-oRJG. CRITICAL MS vPROJECTED MILESTONE
APR91 Ol,t,PR91
JUN95 JUL95
MAY95 JUN95
MAR95 MAR95
M,t,R95
AUG95 JUL95
JUN94 AUG94
FEB95 AUG94
JUN95 JUL95
0Cf95 NOV95
SEP94 MAR95
M,t,R95 OCT94
DEC93 J,t,N94
DEC93 J,t,N94
AUG95 AUG95
M,t,Y96 FE896
i .. ,,,ORIG. CRITICAL ACT. 1zzzz1PROJECTED ACTIVITY *-BASELINE MILESTONE .-ACTUAL MILESTONE ,..-PROJ'TED CRITICAL MS
Goal
WBS Elements 1.1.4 4.4.4.1 4.2.1 2.1.4 Accomplishments 4.4.4.1
4.2.1 2.1.4 Issues and Concerns 1.1.4
4.4.4.1
2.1.4
Corrective Action 1.1.4
4.4.4.1
2.1.4 Condition POC
MEDIUM ENERGY BOOSTER (MEB)
To provide an accelerator which will accelerate protons from 12 Ge V /c to 200 Ge V /c for injection into the HEB and to provide test beams, on a schedule to meet major milestones. Description MEB System MEB Accelerator R&D Medium Energy Booster Conventional Construction (including beam transfers to HEB bored tunnel for Test Beam)
Issued 3A specifications for formal review. Completed draft of Preliminary Design requirements for MEB conventional construction. MEB dipole and quadrupole magnet designs are under evaluation at Fennilab. Started work on the kicker power supply requirements and the design of the MEB central LCW cooling plant. Continued preliminary design requirements with the working group.
Overall MEB schedule shows criticality due to Test Beam Area Commissioning time to meet MEB Test Beam A vaailable milestone. 1. Ministraight space extremely tight. 2. Continued concern over main magnetic element design. Projecting 6 month schedule slip in issuance of construction Notice to Proceed but no slip i projected BOD date versus Baseline date.
Review commissioning plan - probable logic revision to allow overlap of MEB and Test Beam Area commissioning to preserve both Level 1 milestone dates. 1. Focused attention on space budget by Mechanical Engineering. 2. Possible minor magnet relocation. None. No technical system impacted as all BOD's are projected to be met. Green Rod Gerig (ADOD); Ted Kozman (ASD); Jack Clifton (CCD) DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 34
• • • •
)
Superconducting Super Collider LONG TERM COMPARAT[VE SUMMARY BARCHART Baseline Master Schedule• Ver. 12. Rev. 7
Network Stetu• Date• 21 JUL91 TMR Report: MEB w/ Level 1&2 Mi I es tones SSCL REVIEW SUMMARY BY WBS Greohic Produced bv PMO on 12AUG91 (Calender I• in FIScal Ye• r 9) Or••tnt ID1 ttEl·Sun
llBS NUHBER WBS/COOE DESCRIPTION II 1991 1992l1993l1994l1995l1996l1997l1998l1999 20001 BASELINE PROJECTED FIN[SH FINISH
I. 01. 04 MEB SYSTEM I I I I I I I I I I SET COORDINATES• MEB I . ,M I I I I I I I I I APR91 01APR91 A
I I I I I I I I I I POWER SYSTEMS JUN96 JUN96
I .///////////////////////A
I I I I I I I I I DIPOLE MAGNETS
I ///////////////////////~ I I I APR96 JUN96
I I I I I I ,·
OUAORUPOLE MAGNETS I ///////////////////////,,!' I I I I APR96 JUN96
I I I I I RF SYSTEMS I
I,
I I I I MAY96 MAY96 .. 11-11111111111111,
i I I I I I I I I I I UTILITIES AUG95 AUG95 ////////////////////11' '
I ' I " ' I I I ' I I I I : VACUUM : I : : : l/ZZZZZZ/ZZ///ZZZ/h APR96 JUN96 i I I I I I ' . . I . I . . I . I . .
INSTRUMENTATION MAY96 JUN96 i
I ///////////////////////A
I I I I i
I I I I I
I z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z ~1 · INSTALLATION I I I I I I
APR96 JUN96
I I TESTING I I I I :~: I I I I JUN96 JUN96
I
2. 01. 04 MEDIUM ENERGY BOOSTER !MEBl I I I I I I I I I I I MEB• FACILITY COMPLETE I I I I fM2. I I I I I JUL94 JUL94
I I I I I I I I I i CONVENTIONAL CONS TR. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION .JUL94 .JUL94 I /////////////t I I i i I i I
4.01 ACCELERATOR PRE-OPERATIONS I I ! I I I ! I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
: "Ml MEB START COMMISSIONING I j I I j I I I I JUN96 JUN96
' I i,12 . ' I I I I I I I I I MEB COMPLETE COMMISSIONING JAN97 DEC96
: I I I I I I
'* I I I MEB TEST BEAMS AVAILABLE I '~M'. JAN97 MAR97
i I I I I I I I I I ! COMM! SS ION I NG ·9J· OCT96 OEC96 ' I I I I I I I I I
: I I I I I I I I I I i 6 OPERATIONS
i I I I I I I I I I OPERATIONS I I I I I I I I / / / / / , , /
, SEP99 SEP99
11 1991 1992 1 1993 1 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I 1997 I 1998 1 1999 2000 I
BASELINE ACTIVITY ACTUAL ACT IV I TY rzz41PR0J. CRITICAL ACT. 0-0RJG. CRITICAL MS \TPROJECTEO MILESTONE
i;;'' ! ORIG. CRITICAL ACT. I z z z z I PROJECTED ACTIVITY *-BASELINE MILESTONE .-ACTUAL MILESTONE .,-PROJ'TED CRITICAL MS
•
Goal
WBS Elements
4.2.1
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
HIGH ENERGY BOOSTER (HEB)
Meet the overall Laboratory goals to start commissioning prior to FY99.
Description
Accelerator R&D
Started work in preliminary design and the 3A and 3B specifications.
None.
None.
Green
Dave Johnson (ADOD); Ted Kozman (ASD) DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 36
• • • •
)
Superconducting Super Collider
Network Stetu• Date• 21JUL91 Greohic Produced bv PMD on 12AUG91
TMR LONG TERM COMPARATIVE SUMMARY BARCHART
Report= HEB w/ Level 1&2 Milestones
Ba•el one Ma.ter Schedule! Ver. 12, Rev. 7 SSCL REVIEW SUMMARY BY WBS
was NUMBER WBS/CDDE DESCRIPTION
I .01.os HEB SYSTEM
SET COORDINATES• HEB
HEB START INSTALLATION
POWER SYSTEMS
CORRECTION MAGNETS
SPOOL PIECE
(Calendar I• in Fi•cel Year•)
I 91 11 99211 99311 99411 99sl1 996l1 99111 99811999200012001 I 02 I ' I ' i ' i ' I ' I I ' i I I I I i, I I I I I 11'., I I I I I
///////////// 7777////////>AI I I I j I 1
1vzzzzzzzzkJ I j j j I
I I : 'r 7 z. 7 /(I 7 7 7 7 7 7 ) /I , I . I I 111.
i I I lzzzzz/::;;::;;~zzz~ I I ; UTILITIES I I I :lzzzzzzzzzzzk I .. I I I I
CRYOGENICS
RF SYSTEMS
BASELINE 0ROJECTED FINISH FINISH
APR91 29MAR91
AUG96 JUL96
JUN98 SEP98
MAY96 SEP96
NOV96 FEB97
JUL97 MAR97
FEB98 APR98
APR97 MllY97
llPR98 MAY98
JUN98 JUN98
A
I vAcuuM I I I : : I z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z'r I I I I I INSTRUMENTATION I zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzl I I I I lr----t---IN_S_T_AL_L_A_T_IO_N ______________ 1--~~:~L.:..l:_,_,........._,_~...,...~·~·~'=Z~Z~Z~Z~Z~Z~Z=/d/=Z~Z~Z~z~z~zdz~}=a+-:-.....,.....,.---,-,-.,.--c-i---;---;-,-+.-r-r....,.--f-JU_N_9_8_+s-E_P9_8_---4
1.02.02 HEB MAGNET PRODUCTION I : I : I I I I I : I : I : I : I CONTRACT AWARD
DIPOLE MAGNETS : *.vM~ : I I I I I I I I I I SEP91
AUGO!
NOV91
JUN98 ' 1~' ~...,.._...,...~~..,....,....,.....-.-.-r...,....,......m----1____,il . r z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z ; z z z z z z a. 1 I l~---1-~0~U~A~O~RU~P~O~L~E~M~A~G~N~ET~S~-----------L_:.___~~/~~//~/~/~~//~/~~//~/~~//~/~~,~/-'~,~~/,~/~~,,~/~~,~/?;;;f'_t_:_l_:_~·~l_:.___-'--.!'-~'~~·~'_:.___..:____:_~~JU~N~98~_J:J~U~N9~8---l : 2. 0 [. 05 HEB I I I I I I I I ' I ' I ' I
APR96 APR96 I ST BOD HEB. H20 EAST TO H60 I 1· I I I ~M2I I I I I I
I 2NO BOD HEB. H20 WEST TO H60 i I I ~ ' I I I I JUN96 JUN96
it-----t--c_o_N_v_EN_T_1_o_NA_L_c_o_Ns_T_R_._o_E_s_1_GN_&_co_N_s_T_Ru_c_T_1_o_N_-J-_~~1--·_,_:_.;..l_:_~"=zd}=2~·=z~z='z~z~z~z~z=zdz=z~;~:~i1'--_·~i _ ___.::_.L.:.l-,-~·~1 -.,......,·-~1 ....,...~·~1 --,--,.--l-oE_c_96_-+J-AN_9_r_---4 ACCELERATOR PRE-DPERAT IONS ' '1 ' '1 II II I 1' ' '1 JM! :11 ' '1 '1'
HEB START COMMISSIONING \J
HEB COMPLETE COMMISSIONING I I I I I I I I ~M2 I I I COLLI DER - START COMMISSIONING (8EAMl I I I I '~ 1· I I COMMISSIONING I I : I I : I ' I '8:' I '
4.01
i 4. 02. 0 I ACCELERATOR R&D : I ' ' I ' ' I : : ' I : ' ' I ' : l I : I ' I : I I : i POWER SYSTEMS I lzzzzzz ;zzzzzzJ I I I I . I I I I CORRECTIONMAGNETS ////////// .. !· I I I I I I I
SPOOL P 1 E CE r--.W..I ~l=z=z=z=z=z~z=z=z=z=z=z=z=%~1~: _LI -'--. I I I I I I INSTRUMENT AT I ON / / / / /,, / /,, / / , / / /7 -,; ,, ,'
SEP98 SEP98
MAR99 MAR99
MAR99 MAR99
MAR99 MllR99
JUL95 JUL95
NOV93 FEB94
DEC94 FEB95
MAR96 MllR96
I 6 OPERATIONS I I I I I : l : I : I I ' I ;.,_ __ __..___o_PE_R_AT_I_ON_s ________________________ --L.....---J...'+-1 __ ~1 ____ ·~1 ___ ·_+-1 __ ·~'----·~1.....,.. __ ~1---·41___.,.~ .... ij.-,~·-1~=--·41-,.,..,........._._sE_P_99 __ ~s-EP_9_9 __ -I
I 1991 I 1992 I 1993 I 1994 I 1995 l 1996 I 1 997 I 1998 I 1999 2000 I 2001 l 2002 I
11 ~1 --~1 BASELINE ACTIVITY
"''' 1 oRJG. CRITICAL ACT.
---ACTUAL ACTIVITY !" z z Ji PROJ. CR! TI CAL ACT.
1zzzz1PROJECTEO ACTIVITY *-BASELINE MILESTONE
0-DRJG. CRITICAL MS \TPROJECTED MILESTONE
.-ACTUAL MILESTONE .,.-PROJ"TEO CRITICAL MS
Goal
WBS Elements 4.2.1 2.1.6.2
Accomplishments 4.2.l
2.1.6.2 Issues and Concerns 4.2.1
2.1.6.2 Corrective Action 4.2.l
2.1.6.2
Condition POC
•
COLLIDER
Develop design and specification of 20 TeV Collider. Provide tunnel segments and servicing shafts in support of major milestones. Description 3B specifications, integrated schedule N15 Shafts and N15 to N20 Tunnel Segment N20 and N25 Shafts and N20 to N30 Tunnel Segment N30 to N45 Shafts and N30 to N45 Tunnel Segment
3A Specs sent out for signature. Work on integrated collider schedule progressing. CSA doing pilot project of modeling West Utility. Working groups formed to define requirements for Nl5 to N20 tunnel finish design. Working group formed to define specs for IR quad alignment. Workshops: Beam Loss Monitoring for the SSC. Held NIS Magnet Shaft Pre-Bid Meeting. Bids will be received on August 20.
I. Decision on niche spacing and extra dump switch required. 2. Information for IPS still missing. 3. Evaluate eliminating underground string test in lieu of 1st half-sector cooldown by 6 cell test. 4. Decision on CAD system to model West Utility interfaces required. Larger tunnel diameter may require change in tunnel elevation to provide required shielding at collider low cover areas.
1. Proceeding with niche spacing evaluation. CCB package needs to be prepared. 2. Continue work on ASD. 3. Discussion with ADOD and ASD, prepare CCB package. 4. Discussion with CCD and ASD. The A-E/CM has been tasked to perform a Collider Tunnel Elevation Study which will address tunnel elevation, construction costs associated with different elevations, and land areas affected at the low cover areas. 4.2.1 Yellow (3N3B Spec Schedule); 2.1.6.2 Green Rainer Meinke (ADOD); Tracy Lundin (CCD) DA TE: August 15, 1991
Page 38
• • • •
)
Goal
WBS Elements
1.1.7.1
2.1.7
Accomplishments
1.1.7.1
TEST BEAMS
Design and build 200 GeV Test Beams and Calibration Hall.
Description
Test Beams
Test Beams Conventional Construction
Completed new optics design based on 40' separation between calibration areas.
Entered current (40') layout into the site-wide footprint database.
Began specification of conventional facilities. On track for September 1 completion.
2.1.7 Formed working group to develop Preliminary Design Requirements for test beam tunnel in MEB design and construction package.
Issues and Concerns None.
Corrective Action N/A
Condition Green
POC John McGill (AOOD); Jack Clifton (CCD) DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 39
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 40
• • • • • • •
) ) )
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS DIVISION
Page 41
DIVISION PROJECT ST A rus REPORT
DESIGN ~ PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION ~ RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ~ PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION Division Office
Accelerator Systems Mechanical Engineering Electrical Engineering
ld. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT RF Engineering Controls
TedKozman (ext. 3825) Instrumentation and Diagnostics le. DIVISION MANAGER Cryogenics Systems
TedKozrnan (ext. 3825) 2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL Division Office Green Green Green Green Mechanical Engineering Green Green Red Yellow Electrical Engineering Green Green Green Green
RF Engineering Yellow Green Yellow Yellow Controls Green Green Green• Green Instrumentation & Diagnostics Green Green Green Green Cryogenics Systems Green Green* Yellow Yellow
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Yellow Yellow
• Change from last month.
Page 42
• • c c c c •
)
Goal
WBS Elements
4.2.1
Aecom plishm en ts
)
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS DIVISION
Description
Accelerator R&D
Held Critical design review for the ASST Spool Piece.
Held Preliminary Design Reviews for the LEB Energy Storage System Inductor, the LEB Ring Magnet Power Supply, and the ASST Cable trays and equipment racks.
Completed source selection on Klystron bids and submitted correction magnet packages to DOE for approval.
Additional funding to complete FY91 effort for ER string test approved.
Issues and Concerns Koch - PB/M-K installation interface requires much attention.
Corrective Action None.
Condition Green
POC TedKozman DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 43
)
c
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS DIVISION
FY91 Deliverables
WBS Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
4.2.1 Start refrigerator fabrication for ASST Nov90 Nov9oA
4.2.1 Magnet supports - order prototype for ASST Dec90 DecwA
4.2.1 4cm prototype spool available for ER string Jun91 Aug91 test
4.2.1 Power supplies, quench protection Jul91 Feb91A procurement st.arted
1.1.2 LINAC RFQ procurement started Dec90 Dec90A
1.1.2 Start procurement of klystrons and power Feb91 Feb91A systems
1.1.2 LINAC final design review Aug91 Aug91**
1.1.6 Start procurement of El cryoplant with the Nov90 Nov9oA ASST/MTL
1.1.6 Start corrector magnet procurement for collider Sep91 Jul91A
A Milestone complete
**Series of reviews: RFQ--4/91, CCL--11/91, DTL--12/92
c
Condition Appraisal
Complete
Complete
Red
Complete
Complete
Complete
Green
Complete
Complete
Page 44
•
)
WBS
4.2.1
1.1.6
4.2.1
1.1.2
1.1.2
1.1.2
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.3
1.1.6
)
ACCELERATOR SYSTEMS DIVISION FY92 DELIVERABLES
Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
Two Spools completed for ASST Mru92 Dec91
Cryogenic 4 K Plant - Commissioning Apr92 Apr92 Complete
Accelerator Systems available for Cooldown Apr92 Apr92 for ASST
Start SCL Procurement for Linac Oct91 Nov91
Start DTL Fabrication for Linac Oct91 Feb92
Linac RFQ Completed Jul92 Jul92
Delivery of Klystrons and Power Systems Jul92 Jul92
LEB Magnet Engineering Complete Dec91 Dec91
Start Procurement Process for LEB Jun92 Jun92 Dipole/Quadrupole
E2 Cryoplant - Start Procurement Jun92 Jun92
Condition Appraisal
Green
Green
Green
Yellow
Red
Green
Yellow
Yellow
Green
Green
Page 45
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 46
• • • • •
) ) )
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION
Page 47
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TUS REPORT
DESIGN 181 PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 181 PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITI..E/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORG ANIZATION(S)
Magnet Systems Division Engineering Test Production
ld. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT Quality Assurance Business Management
Ken Mountain (ext. 1161) Fenni National Accelerator Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
le. DIVISION MANAGER Brookhaven National Laboratory Space System Division
Tom Bush (ext. 2023) Westinghouse Electric Corporation
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL WBS 1.2.1 Program Management Green Green Green Green WBS 1.2.2 HEB Magnets Green Green Green Green WBS 1.2.3 Collider Ring Magnets Green Green Green Green WBS 1.2.4 Magnet Equipment & Tooling Green Green Green Green WBS 4.2.2 Magnet R&D Green Green Green Green
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
Page 48
c c c c c • c
) ) )
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TUS REPORT PART I
2b. DIVISION MANAGER'S NARRATIVE HIGHLIGHTS
1.2.1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION
Developing schedules to comply with the CDM program SSCL functional resource projections. Loaded budgets in Cobra at the work package
level and identified the earned value.
1.2.2 HEB MAGNETS
Dipole Magnets: Preparations for proposals evaluation underway. SEB nominated and briefed. Released formal RFP.
Quadrupole Magnets: Finished final CEN/SACLA Y draft subcontract. Submitted draft subcontract to France for review and comments.
1.2.3 COLLIDER RING MAGNETS
Collider Dipole Magnets: Definitized contract with GD and WEC executed effective July 12, 1991. Completed negotiation for WEC
involvement at BNL: Submitted contract files to DOE for review/approval.
Quadrupole Magnets: Definitized contract with Babcock & Wilcox executed July 8, 1991.
1.2.4 MAGNET FACILITIES EQUIPMENT AND TOOLING
MDL: The coil winding machine was setup and debugged at leased facility. First run of QSE cables have been wrapped.
MTL: Feed can specification completed and released for procurement. Software ready for test of rotating coil field harmonic system at BNL.
4.2.2 MAGNET R&D
FNAL: All coils (inner and outer) for magnets DCA 311 through DCA 315 have been wound. Magnets DCA 312 has completed final end
assembly. DCA 311 is in yoke and skinning. GD has full complement of 26 at the FNAL site.
BNL: First dipole being assembled.
LBL: Completed magnet QCC 401 and shipped to SSCL.
SSCL: Completed practice winding for DSA 101.
Page 49
)
Goal
WBS Elements
1.2.2.l
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION
HEB Dipole Magnets
Provide reliable HEB Dipole Magnets on schedule and within budget.
Description
HEB Dipole Magnets
Received HEB Dipole Magnets Proposals on July 29, 1991.
1. Lack of finalized level 3A and B spec is critical.
2. FY92 budget allocation compared with SSC and subcontrnct task requirements.
1. Provide level 3A and B specifications.
2. Revise budget allocation or modify HEB schedule/task requirements.
Green
Dave Fortunato
c
DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 50
• c c
) )
Goal WBS Elements 1.2.2.2 Aecom plishments Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION HEB Quadrupole Magnets
Provide reliable HEB Quadrupole Magnets on schedule and within budget.
Description HEB Quadrupole Magnets Finish final CEN/SACLA Y draft subcontract and shipped to France for review. I. Lack of level 3A and B specifications are critical. 2. Formal relocation policy approval. 3. Completion of contract with CEN/SACLA Y.
I. Provide level 3A and B spec.
)
2. Establish an approved relocation package for SSCL personnel moving to CEN/SACLAY.
3. Work with CEN key decision makers. Green
Dave Fortunato DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 51
•
Goal WBS Elements 1.2.3.1 Aecom plishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
c
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION 15 Meter CDM/13 Meter CDM
Provide reliable collider dipole magnets on schedule and within budget. Description WBS Elements 15 Meter CDM 1.2.3.2
Description 13 MeterCDM
General Dynamics, leader, and Westinghouse, follower, contracts were definitized effective July 12, 1991. Conducted the first monthly program reviews with General Dynamics. Conducted technology transfer session at FNAL for leader/follower. Completed negotiations for industry involvement at BNL in magnet assembly and provided contract files to DOE for review and approval. Obtained DOE approval to proceed with actions to have leader procure follower tooling, cryogenic plant and certain test instrumentation. Conducted a number of detailed technical meetings with leader relative to contract start. I. Hiring of a subcontract administrator and support personnel sufficient to support these major contracts. 2. Ability of the SSCL to support the review of subcontractor procurement actions without impact to schedule. 1. Continue to bring program requirements to management attention. 2. Test procurement review process with initial subcontractor purchases and adjust process and resources as required. Green
Herb Trenham DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 52
• c c • c
Goal
WBS Elements
1.2.3.3
Aecom plishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION Collider Quadrupole Magnets
Provide reliable collider quadrupole magnets on schedule and within budget.
Description
Collider ring Quadrupole Magnets
Issued definitive contract.
Conducted technical and management interface meetings.
Completed curing, collaring and yoke/skinning tooling presses review and provided recommendations to B& W for incorporation prior to release of RFP' s.
Initiated activity to support the issue of compliance with ASME boiler and pressure codes.
Need to estimate impact on program of compliance with ASME boiler and pressure codes.
None.
Green
Sol Shapiro DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 53
Goal
WBS Elements
1.2.4.1
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
•
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION MDL Tooling
Equip the Magnet Development Lab (MDL) with tooling to support magnet production plans.
Description
MDL Tooling
Cable wrapping machine (ordered form dour) was set up in a leased facility in Waxahachie. Debugging is complete and first run of QSE Cable has been wrapped.
Design of long Quad Collaring Press remains on hold while the current concept of using the Dipole Collaring is evaluated.
Decision made by Engineering/Production on lack of need for long quad collaring press. The press should be eliminated from the tooling schedule.
Green
Ron Wood for David Bailey DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 54
• •
Goal
WBS Elements
2.4.2.2
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Magnet Development Lab (MDL)
Support MSD PBOD of April 1, 1991 and a BOD of August 1, 1991.
Description
Magnet Development Lab (MDL)
Exterior skin complete; interior finish proceeding.
Interior CMU walls and studs for second floor drywall under construction.
Beneficial occupancy: High Bay August 15, 1991; Offices September 15, 1991.
Interim electrical power (Hill County).
Fire pumps scheduled delivery September 20; installed September 30.
Final negotiations on large modification 13.
Expedite and monitor resolution of remaining issues.
Yellow (Cost)
Craig N. Trimble DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 55
•
Goal
WBS Elements
1.2.4.2
Aecom plishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION MTL Equipment and Tooling
Design and test the measurement and control instrumentation which will be used to evaluate superconducting magnet perfonnance in the Magnet Test Laboratory (MTL).
Description
MTL Equipment and Tooling
Isolation amplifiers successfully tested on Rev. 2 PC boards.
Feed can specification completed and released for procurement.
Prototype cryogenic termometry instrumentation and software now running (test planned at final in August).
Software ready for test of rotating coil field harmonic system at BNL calibration facility.
1. Installation of LHe refrigerator in MTL conflicts with MTL construction schedule.
2. 33mm ID for CDM beam pipe impacts magnet measurement instrumentation design.
1. Negotiation ongoing with Koch for joint occupancy of MTL during construction.
2. Evaluate options for reduced instrumentation size and alternate warm bore designs.
Green
Mark Coles DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 56
c • •
Goal
WBS Elements
2.4.2.1
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Magnet Test Lab (MTL)
Support MSD with a BOD of April 1, 1992 and a PBOD of January 1, 1992.
Description
Magnet Test Lab (MTI..)
Title II design, 100% completed review. Title II - 100% steel package in bid period. CCD incorporated in the MTI.. bid package accelerated completion dates of March 15, 1992 for MTI.. Service Building and July 15, 1992 for substantial completion of the MTI.. building. Funding for technical systems elements, Refrigeration Area, Compressor Building.
Joint MSD/CCD CCP approved action for additional technical and conventional funds; CCB set for August 8.
Yellow (Schedule)
Craig N. Trimble DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 57
)
Goal
WBS Elements
4.2.2.3
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
• •
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION
2.5 Micron Conductor
Continue the development of 2.Sµm conductor in support of the HEB Magnet Program.
Description WBS Elements Description
Continue process development for 2.Sµm 1.2.2 Supply prototype conductor for HEB magnet conductor. programs requiring 2.Sµm conductor
Completed IGC/ASI negotiations process in development, if successful, allows 2.Sµm fabrication for the same cost as 6µm.
Contract preparation in process.
Supercon negotiations are stalled. Continuing discussions to reach rational price agreement.
Hitachi negotiations scheduled for August. DCAA audit completed.
1. Contract preparation is difficult in parallel with 6µm workload.
2. Long delays in contract approval process may impede the schedule.
3. Premature to kill 2.Sµm program in light of JGC/ ASI process potential.
1. Relieved SCA of all responsibility except for wire and cable procurements.
2. Providing direct support to SCA by members of conductor group for document preparation, etc.
3. Continue 2.Sµm program for this year with IGC/ASI, as a minimum, to verify if new process yields manufacturable results (three full-size billets already in process at IGC on IR&D, first yielded successful results).
Green
Don Capone DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 58
• • • •
)
Goal WBS Elements 4.2.2.3
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION
6 Micron Conductor
Qualify conductor vendors for the SSCL Magnet Programs requiring 6µm conductor. Description WBS Elements Description Complete process optimization to ensure 1.2.3 Supply prototype and preproduction adequate fabricability conductor for magnet programs requiring
6µm conductor Doe approval for SEI subcontract received July 161h. Work has begun. AISA approval pending. Remaining contracts in final review. Continued technical reviews as required by contract. TSC reviewed week of July 23, IGC review will occur in August (this is the last review to perfonn). Vendor liaison offers accepted, one fluent in Japanese. Two started this month, final liaison starts August 9th. Already making good progress toward program monitoring. I. Still behind the curve on contract preparation, but things are improving. 2. Worst case schedule of August 1st start dates is not achievable. This will now reduce the two months of float available
for the CDM Cable deliveries. 3. Long lead time required for foreign travel makes rapid monitoring of problems difficult. Regular technical review not
a problem. I. Emphasis on first inner and outer subcontracts to support CDM program. 2. New preliminary CDM schedule indicates October 1992 for prototype start date (originally August 1992). This may
provide extra float. Projected first deliveries still two months ahead of CDM requirements. 3. Putting in foreign travel requests now for anticipated travel requirements. Green
Don Capone DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 59
•
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION Major Project Milestones
WBS Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
1.2.3 CDM Authorization to incur costs Nov90
1.2.3 Full-rate production contract awarded on Apr94*1 collider magnets
1.2.3 Start first half sector CDM delivery from Apr94*1 vendor plant
* 1 CCB action in process to modify baseline schedule dates to reflect actual work schedule.
*2 Note that GD did not incur costs until May 91.
A Indicates actual date.
• • • •
Nov90 A*2
Jan95
Jul94
•
Condition Appraisal
Green
Green
Green
Page 60
WBS
4.2.2.2
1.2.3.1
1.2.3.1
1.2.4
4.2.2.3
1.2.3.l
1.2.3.3
4.2.2.2
1.2.3.1
1.2.4
A Actual
MAGNET SYSTEMS DIVISION FY91/92 Deliverables
Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
Complete Testing of 1st Lab Prototype Quad May91 May91A Cold Mass
Start GD assembly of dipoles at FNAL Jun91 Jun91A
First Scm Long Magnet Assembled Sep91 Sep91
Start Magnet Lab Tooling Procurement Oct90 Oct90A
Collider S/C Dipole Magnet Cable Vendor Jan91 Jan91A Qualification program started
CR Dipole Development started in Industry Feb91 Apr91A
CR Quad Development started in Industry Apr91 Jun91A
Quad string test delivered to ASST Mar92 Mar92
All string test delivered to ASST May92 May92
Complete Installation of Magnet Lab Tooling Sep92 Sep92
Condition Appraisal
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Page 61
COLLIDER DIPOLE MAGNET MILESTONES
CDM Milestone Baseline Finish Projected Finish
Contract Negotiations Complete Mar91 Mar91A
Contract Award - Letter Mar91 May91A
Technology Transfer Start Apr91 Apr91A
Contact Award (Definitized) Apr91 Jul91A
Industry Team at FNAL May91 Apr91A
Industry Team at BNL Jun91 Aug91A
System Design Review Mar92
Preliminary Design Review Mar92
1st Prototype Magnet Start Oct92
1st Prototype Magnet Complete Mar93
Last Prototype Magnet Complete Nov93
1st Preproduction Magnet Start Nov93
1st Preproduction Magnet Complete Jan94
Critical Design Review Feb94
LRIP Readiness Review Apr94
Last Preproduction Magnet Complete Jun94
First LRIP Magnet Shipped Jul94
Production Readiness Review Nov94
Last LRIP Magnet Shipped Jun95
Annex III Award Jan95
Production Phase Start Jun95
Last CDM Delivery Jun98
A Actuals Page 62
• • • • •
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
Page 63
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TUS REPORT
DESIGN ~ PRODUCTION 0
CONSTRUCTION ~ RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 0 PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER (DE-AC02-89ER40486) lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZA TION(S) CCD Division Office
Conventional Construction Program Management Department ld. DIVISION/OFFICE CONT ACT Requirements Planning Department
Robert K. Tener Engineering & Design Department le. DIVISION MANAGER Construction Department
PB/MK Team Jon R. Ives TNRLC
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL 2.1.1 CCD Administrntion Green Yellow Green Yellow 2.1.2 thru 2.1.5 Injector Green Green Green* Green
2.1.6 Collider Green Green Yellow Green 2.2 Experimental Halls Green Green Green Green 2.3 Infrastructure Green Green Green Green 2.4 Campus Green Green Yellow Green 2.5 A-E/CM Green Red Green Green
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Yellow Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Yellow Green
* Change from last month.
Page 64
• • • • • • • •
Goal
WBS Elements 2.0
Accomplishments
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Conventional Facilities
Description Conventional Facilities
Received PMO budget for staffing CCD to 61 positions by September 1992. Received Linac Title I design for review. Started LEB Title I design. Issued Invitation to Bid for N15 Magnet Shaft. Awarded instrumentation subcontract for Exploratory Shaft.
Submitted Tier II Schedule for IR4 and IRl Halls to PMO.
Completed Title II designs for Sewage Treatment Plant (Phase II) and for Hoyt, Arrowhead and N15 Perimeter Roads. Completed Environmental Compliance Plan for N15 shafts and first tunnel segment, for Linac, and for Exploratory Shaft.
Completed MTL Title II design. Completed West Campus Preliminary Design Requirements Document.
PB/MK project management and administration provided 37 task completions and/or continuations.
1. Development of integrated cost and schedule systems.
2. Baseline cost estimate does not cover A-E/CM PM&A costs.
1. PMO activities underway to develop integrated cost and schedule systems.
2. Change Control action to reflect A-E/CM PM&A costs to cover scope of contract as negotiated.
Green
R.K Tener DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 65
• •
Goal
WDS Elements 2.3.2 2.3.3
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
•
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION NlS (El) Infrastructure
Provide necessary infrastructure to support BOD of each completed facility.
Description Infrastructure - Primary Infrastructure - Secondary
Draft Environmental Compliance Plan inventory/permits for LCW plant. Completed 100% Title II Final Design Plans for Phase II of Sewage Treatment Plant. Completed 100% Title II Final Design Plans for N15 Perimeter Road. Completed 100% Title II Final Design Plans for Hoyt Road. Completed 90% Title II Preliminary Design Plans for Nl5 Infrastructure. Accepted as Final Environmental Compliance Plan for Nl5 Shafts and Nl5 to N20 Tunnel. Completed 100% Title II Final Design Plans for Arrowhead Road. Access for Staking/Surveying/Testing Secured for HCEC Electric Line.
Baseline Cost Estimate. TNRLC condemnation of Parcel 156 could delay construction of Arrowhead Road.
Change Control Panel approved, action and forwarded to PM for identification of funding, the construction of Arrowhead Road and N 15 Sewage Treatment Plant, neither of which are in the BCE. TNRLC to expedite acquisition process for Parcel 156.
Green
Richard Wiebe DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 66
• • • • •
)
Goal
WBS Elements 2.3.2 2.3.3
Aecom plishm en ts
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Collider Infrastructure Other than NlS (El)
Provide necessary infrastructure to support BOD of each completed facility.
Description Infrasbllcture - Primary Infrasbllcture - Secondary
Environmental Compliance Plan inventories and permits drafted for N20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, shafts and tunnels N20 to N45.
Off-site road improvements (county roads).
Action plan to be developed by Infrastructure Steering Committee (SSCL, DOE, 1NRLC, PB/MK).
Green
Richard Wiebe DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 67
)
•
Goal
WBS Elements 2.3.2 2.3.3
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
roe
• •
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION West Campus (Injector) Infrastructure
Provide necessary infrastructure to support BOD of each completed facility.
Description Infrastructure - Primary Infrastructure - Secondary
Draft Environmental Compliance Plan inventory/permits for LEB. Began evaluation of access roads to accommodate most recent plans for Central Office, Linac, & IR's. Accepted as final the Environmental Compliance Plan for the Linac and the Exploratory Shaft. Significant progress on HVAC alternatives study - final to be complete August 15, 1991. Work on cooling pond studies advanced.
Initial analysis of road alternates indicates that an adequate system should be achievable close to baseline; needs final detailed estimate to confirm.
Estimate underway.
Green
Richard Wiebe DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 68
• • • • •
)
Goals
WBS Elements 2.1.6.26
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Exploratory Shaft (IRl Location)
To provide large scale, in-situ, Lesl input for the design of underground structures in Eagle Ford Shale rock strata and detector support systems. To provide shaft access to the ulilily bypass and/or experimental facilities, at the IRl location. Final function and finishout to be determined.
Description Exploratory Shaft (IR 1)
Sile preparation for arrival of drill rig. Shaft collar construction underway. Geotechnical Instrumentation subcontract negotiated and signed. Instrument procurement underway.
None.
None.
Green
Chris Laughton DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 69
)
Goal
WBS Elements 2.2.2.1.l
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
•
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION IR4 Experimental Facilities; Underground Housings
Conceptual Underground Design of the IR4 Experimental Facility Housings.
Description "IR4" Underground Hall and Shaft Structures
Floor Load Conceptual Design requirements redefined for SOC. New scheduling being input to IPS. Completed new estimate of conventional facility costs. Significant scope and cost increases over baseline for Experimental Facilities.
Cost and scope reconciliation action being planned.
Green
Chris Laughton DATE: August 15,1991
Page 70
• • • •
) )
Goals
WBS Elements 2.5
Accomplishments
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION Site Development (Master Plan)
Develop a fully coordinated Site Development Plan to guide project planning and design.
Description Site Development Plan (Master Plan)
Transmitted comments from SSCL, SSC Project Office and TNRLC on Site Development Plan to A-E/CM.
Incorporating review comments and final printing of the Site Development Plan.
Site Development Plan to be printed and distributed in August.
Green
Robert W. Sims DATE: August 15,1991
Page 71
• •
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
Major Project Milestones
WBS Milestone Milestone Level Baseline Schedule Current Projection 2.0 Start Civil Construction 1 Mar91 Mar91A 2.4.2.2 Magnet Development Lab BOD 2 Apr91 Sep91 2.4.2.1 Magnet Test Lab BOD 2 Mar92 Jun92 2.1.2 Linac Construction Start 2 Aug91 Feb92 2.1.6.25 ASST Construction Start 2 Apr91 May91A 2.1.6.25 ASST BOD 2 Sep91 Oct91 2.1.6.2 Nl5 Magnet Shaft Construction 2 Mar91 Sep91
Start 2.1.6.2 N15 to N20 Construction Basic 2 Jul91 Jan92
Tunnel Start 2.1.6.2 N20 to N30 Construction Basic 2 Apr92 Apr92
Tunnel Start (Revised Baseline) 2.1.6.2 N30 to N45 Construction Basic 2 Apr92 Apr92
Tunnel Start (Revised Baseline) 2.1.3 LEB Construction Start 2 Apr92 Jun92 2.l.4 MEB Construction Start 2 Jul92 Jan93 2.3.2 Infrastructure, Campus Construction 2 Aug92 Oct91
Startl 2.3.2 Infrastructure, Injector Construction 2 Oct92 Dec91
Startl 2.2.2 Experimental Halls Construction Jun93 Apr93
Start
A Actual
* Change from last month. 1 Accelerated schedule, dependent on approval of accelerated funding.
• • • •
Condition Appraisal Green Red Red Red
Green Green Red
Red
Green
Green
Red Red
Green
Green*
Green
Page 72
• •
)
A
*
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION FY91 Deliverables
WBS Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
2.4.2 MDL Completed (BOD - High Bay) Apr91 Aug91
2.1.6 ASST Construction Start Apr91 May91A
2.1.6 ASST BOD Sep91 Oct91
2.3.3 Infrastructure and Utilities Construction Start Apr91 Mar91A
2.4.2 MTL Construction Start Jun91 Aug91
2.1.2 Linac Facility Construction Start Aug91 Feb92
Actual
Change from last month.
Condition Appraisal
Red
Green
Yellow*
Green
Yellow
Red
Page 73
WBS
2.1.6
2.3.3
2.4.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION DIVISION FY92 Deliverables
Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
Collider-First Sector Construction Start Oct91 Jan92
N15 Roads Completed Oct91 Feb92**
MlL Completed (BOD) Mar92 Jun92
LEB Facility Construction Start Apr92 Jun92
MEB Facility Construction Start Jul92 Jan93
Condition Appraisal
Red*
Red**
Red
Red
Red
* Collider construction sequencing has been rescheduled. Baseline date revision approval and acceptance by PMO will eliminate Red condition. * * Phased completion will support MDL, ASST, and MTL as each is completed.
Page 74
• • • • •
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION
Page 75
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TUS REPORT
DESIGN 0 PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ~ PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION(S)
Physics Research Division SSC Library Services Id. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT Experimental Facilities Support
Experimental Systems-Detector R&D Newton Norman (ext. 6035) Experimental Systems-Detectors
le. DIVISION MANAGER Experimental Systems-Detector Computing SDC Collaboration--LBL
Fred Gilman (ext. 6113) GEM Collaboration 2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL SSC Library Green Green Green Green Experimental Facilities Support Green Green Yellow Green Experimental Systems-Detector R&D Green Green Green Green Experimental Systems-Detectors Green Green Green Green Experimental Systems-Detector Computing Green Green Green Green SDC Collaboration--LBL Green Yellow Green Green GEM Collaboration Yellow Yellow Red Red OVERAU DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
Page 76
• • • • c
)
Goal
WBS Elements 4.6.3 5.1 Aecom plishments
4.6.3
5.1
5.2
5.3
Issues and Concerns
Corrective Action
Condition
POC
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION
Provide required support to Laboratory divisions.
Description WBS Elements
Experimental Facilities Support 5.2 Detector R&D 5.3
Description Experimental Detectors Experimental Computing
The first draft of the SDC Experimental Facilities User Requirements (SEFUR) document was transmitted to the Conventional Construction Division.
Work is in progress on defining a test beam configuration for the SOC detector; the baseline hall was determined to be too small, and the beam-configuration will be modified to accommodate a larger hall.
Obtained DOE concurrence on 28 Memoranda of Understanding for SSC Detector Subsystems R&D.
A new collaboration, GEM, submitted an Expression of Interest (signed by more than 300 physicists from over 50 institutions) to propose a major detector complementary to SOC.
The Program Advisory Committee recommended a call for Letters of Intent for the second major detector. The SSCL staff reported on the civil construction schedule and the criticality of defining the experimental hall requirements by January 1992.
Completed design changes of each subsystem for the reconfiguration of the Physics Detector Simulation Facility (PDSF). Implementation of each subsystem is underway and on schedule, with approximately 50% of the implementation completed.
None.
None.
Green
N.Norman DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 77
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION Major Project Milestones
WBS Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection Condition Appraisal
4.6.3 Test beam configuration and coordination Feb91 Apr91A Yell ow (No impact on defined baseline expected)
4.6.3 Developed physics lab for detectors for test Feb91 Feb91A Green beam monitoring
4.6.3 Test beam optics defined. Apr91 Apr91A Green 4.6.3 Resource requirements for LOI detectors Dec90 Dec90A Green
defined. 4.6.3 Begin detector and support facilities design for Feb91 Feb9 l for SDCA Green
proposal stage. Dec91 for GEM Red (Could cause delays in proposal)
4.6.3 Develop detector assembly and installation Sep91 Sep91 Green schedules
5.2 Letters of Intent submitted from the Nov90 Nov9oA Green collaborations
5.2 PAC recommendations for large, general Dec90 Dec90A Green purpose detectors
5.2 Choose two large, general purpose detectors to Jan91 SDC Jan9IA Green be supported to full proposals GEM Red (Could cause delays
Dec (earliest) in defining overall experimental program)
5.2 Begin conceptual design reports for large Feb91 SDC Feb91A Green detectors GEM Red (Same as above)
Dec (earliest) 5.2 Prepare preliminary construction schedules Sep91 Sep91 Green
and drawings for detector subsystems 5.3 Acquire and install 500 MIPS of distributed, Mar91 Mar91A Green
UNIX-based computing hardware for detector simulation
5.3 Begin detector physics simulation work at Mar91 Mar91A Green SSCL
Page 78
A Complete
c . c c c c c
)
WBS
4.6.3
A Complete
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION FY91/92 Deliverables
Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
Test beam configuration and coordination Feb91 Apr91A defined
Developed physics lab for detectors for test Feb91 Feb91A beam monitoring
Test beam optics defined. Apr91 Apr91A
Resource requirements for LOI detectors Dec90 Dec90A defined.
Begin detector and support facilities design for Feb91 Feb91 for SDCA proposal stage. Dec91 for GEM (earliest)
Develop detector assembly and installation Sep91 Sep91 schedules
Start prototype detectors for test beams Oct91 Oct91
Identify magnet alternatives for test beams Oct91 Oct91
Establish compliance with ES&H design Oct91 Oct91 criteria
Have full operation of detector Technical Oct91 Oct91 Information Center
Test beam facility requirements set Jan92 Apr92
Complete detector and facility design for Apr92 Apr92 proposal stage
Condition Appraisal
Yellow (No impact on baseline expected)
Green
Green
Green
Green Red (Could cause delays
in proposal)
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Green
Page 79
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION FY91/92 Deliverables
WBS Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection Condition Appraisal 5.1 Develop wire alignment and tensioning Apr91 May9IA Yellow
devices for muon chambers Prototype chambers
constructed and gas mixtures tested
5.1 Develop prototype VLSI test subcircuits for Jun91 May91 Green front end electronic subsystems • New design of time to
voltage converter chip • Strawtube tracker chip
for level I trigger 5.1 Continue small test prototype calorimeter Sep91 Sep91 Green
modules for beam and radiation damage tests April 91A • BNL Liquid Argon
module in BNL beam. • Scintillator-plate module
made for Fermilab test.
May91 • Liquid Argon module
assembled at SSCL, beam test at BNL in June.
June 91A • Beam test of Scintillator-plate module at Fermilab
5.1 Continue testing prototype straw tube, fiber Sep91 Sep91 Green and silicon tracking test devices Mar91
Successful test of photon yield with 4 meter scintillating fiber
A Complete Page 80
• • • •
)
WBS
5.2
A Complete
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION FY91/92 Deliverables
Milestone
Letters of Intent submitted from the collaborations
PAC recommendations for large, geneml purpose detectors
Choose two large, general purpose detectors to be supported to full proposals
Begin conceptual design reports for large detectors
Prepare preliminary construction schedules and drawings for detector subsystems
Complete conceptual design reports for large detectors which include:
A. Establishment of detector hall rqmts.
B. Establishment of facility rqmts.
Complete PAC reviews for large detectors and associated facilities
Start procurement of magnet and steel for large detectors
Complete the detailed technical evaluation and review of large detector proposals
Baseline Schedule
Nov90
Dec90
Jan91
Feb91
Sep91
Nov91
Feb92
Mar92
Sep92
Current Projection
Nov90A
Dec90A
SDC Jan91A GEM
Dec (earliest)
Feb9 l for SDCA GEM
Dec (earliest) Sep91
Apr92
Jun92
Jun92
Sep92
Condition Appraisal
Green
Green
Green
Red (Could cause delays in defining overall
experimental program)
Green
Red (Same as above)
Green
Red (SDC proceeding; GEM could cause delays in defining
overall experimental program)
Red (Same as above)
Red (Same as above)
Green
Page 81
.,
WBS
5.1
5.3
A Complete
PHYSICS RESEARCH DIVISION FY91/92 Deliverables/Milestones
Milestone Baseline Schedule Current Projection
Start Large SSC calorimeter modules Start prototype SSC detector tracking devices Initiate procurement of tooling for prototype SSC detector construction Develop VLSI circuits for front end electronics with radiation hard design Acquire and install 500 MIPS of distributed, UNIX-based computing hardware for detector simulation
Begin detector physics simulation work at SSCL
Acquire and install up to 4000 MIPS of distributed, UNIX-based computing hardware for detector simulation
Establish full physics simulation effort at SSCL
• • •
Apr-Sep92 Jan-Sep92
Sep92
Mar-Sep92
Mar91
Mar91
Sep92
Sep92
• •
Apr-Scp92 Jan-Sep92
Sep92
Mar-Sep92
Mar91A
Mar91A
Sep92
Sep92
•
Condition Appraisal
Green Green Green
Green
Green - More than 1000 MIPs on schedule and
within budget
Green
Green
Green
Page 82
•
) )
LABORATORY TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION
Page 83
DIVISION PROJECT STATUS REPORT
DESIGN 0 PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 0 PART I
1. IDENTIFIERS: 4.4
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER DE-AC02-89ER40486 lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION(S)
Laboratory Technical Services TX- Technical Publications TH- Technical Support Management TJ- Facilities Engineering Services TK- Materiel & Logistics Services TL- Fabrication Shops
Id. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT TM- General Computing TN- Project Design Support
Jerry Davis (ext. 1788) TP- Communications TQ- Computer Operations
le. DIVISION MANAGER TR- Engineering Standards/Support TS- Metrology & Calibration Labs
E. Jack Story (ext. 5010) TT- Protective Services TU- Staff Services TW- Technology Transfer
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
Page 84
• • c • c c •
Goal
WBS Elements
4.4
Accomplishments
LABORATORY TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION
Provide high quality technical support services, in accordance with the approved FY91 Scope of work, within manpower
and budgets.
Description
Laboratory Technical Services
Construction of Phase II, 175 offices, was completed. Laboratory and shops (100,000 square feet) bid documents were
completed. Installation of new 10 kva UPS was completed July 16 and connection of the telephone system to UPS is expected August 16.
Magnet inter-connect components and accelerator prototype spools were fabricated in the Interim Shops facilities.
The ASST offices at the N-15 site were established.
Issues and Concerns None.
Corrective Action None.
Condition
roe Green
Jerry Davis DATE: August 15, 1991
Page 85
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 86
• • • • • •
)
DIRECTORATE DIVISION
Page 87
DIVISION PROJECT ST A TIJS REPORT
DESIGN 0 PRODUCTION 0 CONSTRUCTION 0 RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 0 PART I
I. IDENTIFIERS:
la. PROJECT TITLE/NUMBER (DE-AC02-89ER40486) lb. REPORTING PERIOD SUPERCONDUCTING SUPER COLLIDER LABORATORY July 1991
le. MANAGING DIVISION lf. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION(S)
Directorate Director's Office External Affairs
Id. DIVISION/OFFICE CONTACT Legal Counsel User's Office
Neil Baggett Environment, Safety & Health le. DIVISION MANAGER Planning
International Coordination Raphael Kasper Education
2. DIVISION MANAGER'S PERSONAL ASSESSMENT: 2a. Summary Status
GROUP TECHNICAL COST SCHEDULE OVERALL Director's Office Green Green Green Green External Affairs Green Green Green Green Legal Counsel Green Green Green Green User's Office Green Green Green Green Environment, Safety & Health Green Green Green Green Planning Green Green Green Green International Coordination Green Green Green Green Education Green Green Green Green
OVERALL DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green PREVIOUS DIVISION ASSESSMENT Green Green Green Green
Page 88
• • • • • •
)
Goal WBS Elements 4.5.6 4.5.8 Accomplishments 4.5.6
4.5.8
4.5.9
Issues and Concerns Corrective Action Condition POC
DIRECTORATE DIVISION
To oversee and direct Laboratory activities Description ES&H International Coordination
WBS Elements 4.5.9
Description Education Office
Five Earthwatch students spent two weeks in the Office of Environment, Safety and Health (ES&H) learning about monitoring and mitigation of SSC environmental impacts. Conducted meetings to receive input from area city managers, superintendents from affected school districts, and Ellis County officials for monitoring the socioeconomic impacts of the SSC. The Office of International Coordination (OIC) is presently working to coordinate the upcoming US-USSR working group and technical group meetings. KEK in Japan requested a delivery schedule of all components in the list presented to the Japanese government by DOE. Discussions are well advanced regarding a possible Israeli in-kind contribution to the SSCL which could amount to $IM/year. The Laboratory received a letter from the Argentine Atomic Energy Commission indicating their interest in participating in the SSC. Education staff met with staff members from Governor Ann Richard's Office and the Texas Education Agency to discuss SSC participation in a state wide computer network called TENET (Texas Education Network). The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board has awarded a third Carl Perkins grant to the University of Houston (Office of Technology) to facilitate the integration of SSC technology into community colleges within the state. An Adopt-A-Magnet workshop was conducted for elementary teachers in Hammond, Louisiana. Staff assistance funds for development of the Adopt-A-Magnet program have been requested in a proposal to DOE to accelerate and expand the program into fifteen states by the end of March 1992. SSC education staff met with education heads at SLAC and LBL, and toured facilities at the Exploratorium, the Lawrence Hall of Science, and Technology 2000. None. None. Green Raphael Kasper DATE August 15, 91
Page 89
. \ • f • • • •
