Spont Heat Detection

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    1/30

    DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF HEATING INCOAL MINES

    Earlier is the fire is attended to,easier would it be to deal with

    Methods based on:

    A. Observation of the physical

    symptomsB. Thermal surveys

    C. Mine air analysis

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    2/30

    A. Observation of physical symptoms:

    i. Appearance of faint haze

    ii. Sweating of the strata

    iii. Gob stink or fire stink

    iv. Sound

    v. Smoke

    vi. Fire

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    3/30

    i. HazeInitial stage of heating-- moisture released from coal

    gets converted into vapour on coming into contactwith cooler ventilating air = haze like formation

    Signs: Poor visibility in the vicinity of heatingAppear little away from seat of fire towards intakeside

    ii. Sweating of strata:Advanced stage after formation of haze.

    Water vapour, on coming into contact with coolerventilating air/surface, forms water droplets onroofs, walls and timber supports

    This may be misleading symptom in humid mines,hence considered only in dry mines and with coalshaving low moisture content

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    4/30

    iii. Gob stink or fire stink:Characteristic smell normally found in coal fire area

    Tarry smell is considered as a sure warning to theinitiation of spontaneous heating

    iv. Sound (Strata or insects):Cracking sound, from collapse of strata or due tocrack formation, may be heard behind stopping orbarriers indicates advancement of fire

    Increased activity and chirping of cockroaches andcricket may be considered as warning

    v. Smoke:

    Observed beyond the ignition temperature of coalwhen fire has set in

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    5/30

    Limitations of Physical Symptoms:

    One can not assess the degree of heating,nor can one always detect heating earlystages.

    At times the physical symptoms may give

    misleading informatione.g lubrication of wire ropes on haulageroads give smell similar to tarry smell,decay of wood in warm damp places,

    grinding rocks under roof weight, tarredbrattice cloth, pine like odour of newtimber

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    6/30

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    7/30

    Symptoms indicating different stages of heating

    I. Incipient or initial stage

    a. faint haze

    b. Sweating of roof, sides, timber and metal surfaces

    c. Typical faint odour- slightly oily, some times sweetsometimes like decaying of timber

    d. Increased activity of cockroaches and crickets if

    presente. Slight discomfort and uneasiness to men near the

    site of heating due to increased temp and humidity.Sense of tickling in nose, increased secretion ofsaliva and dry throat

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    8/30

    II. Intermediate or smouldering stage (>130 deg)

    Intensified symptoms of Incipient stagea. Smell now becomes petrol like (distillation of coal)

    b. Men may feel headache, increased restlessness anddulling of senses. Wobbling of knees in some cases

    III. Heating approaching ignition (>330 deg)

    a. Petrol smell changes to tarry odour

    b. Smoke, incandescence or even flame may bevisible

    III. Cooling stage

    Characteristics odour and unpleasant smell of stale garlic

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    9/30

    B. Thermal surveys:

    Much before actual fire, temperature

    tends to show some rise due tospontaneous heating

    Systematic check on temperature risein areas susceptible to spontaneous

    heating may help in the early detectionof spontaneous heating

    Methods:

    B.1. Direct methodsB.2 Indirect methods

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    10/30

    B.1. Direct methods

    Principles:

    Expansion of confined volume of material (Hg-in-glasstype thermometers, bimetallic strips)

    Melting point of suitable material (fusible plugs)

    Thermo-electric effect (thermocouples)

    Resistance change of semi-conducting

    material( thermistor type units)

    Limitations of Direct methods:

    Connecting wires may get damaged due to roof falls, or

    floor heaving or similar disturbance underground

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    11/30

    B.2. Indirect methods:

    Thermal response can be relayed without wired

    connection (wireless systems)i. Radio SondeHumid atmosphere obstruct their successfuloperations in goaves

    ii. Stentch agents:Capsules containing highly odourous liquid of

    low boiling point-> quite useful when capsules are placed atsuitable points. Human nose is sensitive torespond 0.001 ppm of odorant in air

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    12/30

    iii. Paints:Emit strong smelling vapour when heated

    iv. Infra red Radiometry (HeatSpy, infra-red camera)

    Picking the infra-red rays from any hot surface andconverts the received energy into an electric signal

    It can measure temperature differential of a surface from adistance of >30 m with an accuracy of 10C.

    Limitations of Indirect methods:

    If hot surfaces can not be sighted by the equipment, thenthis technique becomes in-effective

    Thermal surveys has to be supplemented with gas surveystudies or analysis of products of combustion

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    13/30

    C. Mine Air Analysis:

    Gaseous products generated from heating of coal are

    likely to be carried to places far off from the sources of

    heating due to convection current as well as from mine

    ventilation. Hence examination of change in composition of

    the constituents of mine air becomes very useful in early

    detection as well as in assessing the state of heating in themine

    Mine Air Composition vary over wide range depending

    upon the amount and nature of pollutant gasesemitted/produced in mines e.g.CO2, CH4, CO,

    Hydrocarbons, traces of N2. H2 may be present in fire area.

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    14/30

    Points to be remembered:

    1. In case of breathing of men, the burning of lights and the decay of timber, no CO is

    produced and the amount of CO2 produced is roughly equal to O2 deficiency.

    CO2/O2Deficiency > 80% & CO/O2 deficiency = 0

    2. In case of iron pyrite, no CO is produced. The amount of CO2 produced indirectly bythe action of sulphuric acid on carbonates in the coal, is usually less than half the O2

    absorbed, CO2/O2Deficiency < 50% & CO/O2 deficiency = 0

    3. On oxidation of coal variable amount of CO2 and CO is produced depending upon the

    temperature of coal. At normal temp CO2/O2Deficiency = 4% & CO/O2 deficiency

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    15/30

    Indicators:

    1. Presence of various gases as indicator of fires: CO,

    unsaturated hydrocarbons, H22. Oxygen consumption

    3. Various Indices:

    a) Grahams Ratio

    b) Willets Ratio

    c) Pertington Ratio

    d) C/H ratio

    e) CO/CO2Ratio

    Presence of various gases:

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    16/30

    Presence of various gases:

    CO, CO2, O2, N2

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    17/30

    Presence of Unsaturated Hydrocarbons

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    18/30

    2. Oxygen Consumption

    Flaming combustion ceases in an atmosphere

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    19/30

    Indices/Ratios

    a) Grahams Ratio

    b) Willets Ratio

    c) Pertington Ratio

    d) C/H ratio

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    20/30

    3. Indices/Ratios

    a. Grahams Ratio

    CO/O2 deficiency %, CO2/O2 deficiency %

    CO/O2 deficiency ratio

    Most useful tool in detection and assessment of state of

    heating in sealed off areas.

    = CO*100/( 0.265N2

    - O2

    )

    Relates the production of CO with oxygen

    used up by oxidizing material and

    indicates the average intensity of

    oxidizing/ burning of coal mass. It doesnot provide any information on the extent

    of the fire

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    21/30

    CO2= 6.79, O

    2= 2.19%, CO= 0.059%, N

    2= 90.961%

    CO/O2 def 0.059*100/(0.265*90.961-2.19)

    = 0.27%

    CO2/ O

    2Def = (6.79-.03)*100/(0.265*90.961-2.19)

    = 30%

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    22/30

    As CO2can be emitted by strata and it is soluble in water, the results

    are sometimes anomalous

    Limitations:

    1. Only the average value is given , and thus maximum intensity of

    heating in a sealed zone is often under-estimated

    2. The analytical errors accrued in the gas analysis may considerably

    affect its accuracy for low oxygen deficiencies3. The ratio will be affected if products of combustion are diluted with

    blackdamp or oxygen deficient air

    4. Usually CO produced progressively reduces as the fire cools. At

    times CO disappearance takes place even if the fire is not

    completely extinct, particularly in wet mines (due to bacterialdisappearance)

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    23/30

    Willets Ratio

    Analysis of samples collected behindsealed off area shows that certain amount

    of CO produced by oxidation does not

    disappear at all or falls at a very slow rate

    with progressive extinction of fire

    egasesCombustiblBlackDamp

    COWR

    +

    =

    100

    P ti t R ti

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    24/30

    Pertington Ratio

    N2/(CO+CO

    2)

    It increase with temperature , peak atabout 1000 C then reduces until

    temperature reaches 2500C. It shows

    increasing trend if fire rekindles.

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    25/30

    C/H ratio

    Assess the intensity of fire and along with oxygen

    consumption rate values it indicates extensivity of fire

    For complete burning of bituminous coal- 16-20

    High values burning of cellulosic material (Timber etc)

    Lower values partial burning of coal

    C/H with O2 consumption rate gives a good assessment ofa fire in a sealed off area

    ]))04.79/73.20((2[

    )]2(6[/

    2442222

    2242

    COHCHHCCOON

    HCCHCOCOHC

    +++

    +++=

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    26/30

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    27/30

    Limitations:

    1. It depends on dilution of area with fire damp

    emitted from the strata

    2.The various sources of generation of CO2 and

    chances of its escape from dissolution with

    water also affect its accuracy

    3.But in combination with O2 consumption rate andgrahams ratio it gives good indication

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    28/30

    CO2/CO

    Ratio

    Sensitive to temperature of coal bed,

    decreases with the increase intemperature and decreases with time. It

    becomes constant beyond a certain

    temperature

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    29/30

  • 8/6/2019 Spont Heat Detection

    30/30

    Conclusions:

    1. Physical symptoms like gob stink and persistent rise in CO concentration

    level ( as well as rise in C2H

    4and CO

    2values) in the return air are indicative

    of heating in mine. A check on change of gas composition and also of

    thermal changes at vulnerable places would assist in early detection andlocation of heating

    2. With present day innovation of tube bundle system of gas sampling,

    collecting gases from vulnerable areas and introduction of continuous

    monitoring devices with gas analysis appliances like IR gas analysers, early

    detection of spontaneous heating and location of the site are no longer

    arduous work3. With outbreak of fire mine air composition varies:

    O2--