30
Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles THEME 1

Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

THEME 1

Page 2: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Eruptions of Eyjafjallajokull volcano, Iceland, 2010

Page 3: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Facing hazards and disasters UNIT 1

Page 4: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

KEY QUESTIONS:

Are some societies more vulnerable than others?

How do societies respond to increasing risks?

Page 5: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1. Vulnerability to risks

1.1. Communities are exposed to natural and technological hazards

1.1.1. From hazard to disaster

risk = hazard x vulnerability

Page 6: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

A hazard is a perceived event that threatens both life and property. A threat (whether natural or human) that has the potential to cause loss of life, injury, property damage, socio‑economic disruption or environmental degradation.

A hazardous event is the occurrence (realization) of a hazard, the effects of which change demographic, economic and/or environmental conditions.

A disaster is a major hazardous event that causes widespread disruption to a community or region that the affected community is unable to deal with adequately without outside help.

Vulnerability is a measure of the extent to which a community, structure, service or geographical area is likely to be damaged or disrupted, on account of its nature or location, by the impact of a particular hazardous event. Some people and places are more vulnerable to certain hazards than other people and places.

Risk is the exposure of people to a hazardous event presenting a potential threat to themselves, their possessions and the built environment in which they live.

Page 7: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1.1.2. Natural and technological hazardsNatural hazards

Page 8: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Technological hazards

Systems of hazards

Video - 2011 Earthquake and tsunami in Japan

JAPON

INDE

CHINERUSSIE

FRANCE

Windscale(1957)

Tchernobyl (1986)

Kyshtym (1957)

Bhopal(1984)

Minamata (1955)

Équa

teur

Fukushima (2011)

Toulouse (AZF, 2001)

DeepwaterHorizon (2010)

Exxon Valdez (1989)

Seveso (1975)Baia Mare (2000)

Three MileIsland (1979)

ÉTATS-UNIS

Amocco Cadiz (1978)

Castillo de Bellver (1983)

Nowruz (1983)

Espaces ayant été sujetsà de grandes marées noiresPrincipales routes maritimesAccidents et catastrophes

nucléaires

Catastrophes chimiques

Autres pays ayantdes centrales nucléaires

Pays possédant un grand nombrede centrales nucléaires(plus de 30 réacteurs)

Sour

ce :

Agen

ce in

tern

atio

nale

de

l'éne

rgie

ato

miq

ue.

Technological hasards are mostly found in developed or emerging countries.

Page 9: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1.2. Increasing the risks of disasters

1.2.1. An increasing exposure to hazards

Page 10: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

World map of population density

Page 11: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1.2.2. Human activities increase exposure to hazards

Doc. 1 and doc.1-2 p.28 1. Describe the hazardous event that caused the 2017 disaster in Houston.2. To what extent is Houston's vulnerability due to its natural environment?

Page 12: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Global warming is the long-term warming of the planet’s overall

temperature. Global warming causes climate change.

Climate change refers to changes in weather patterns and growing

seasons around the world. It also refers to sea level rise caused by

the expansion of warmer seas and melting ice sheets and glaciers.

Page 13: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles
Page 14: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1.3. Development and vulnerability

1.3.1. The effects and responses to hazards in countries of contrasting levels of wealth

TASK 1. Summarise, using the ‘Give me 5’ diagram, the

information about the effects and responses to hazards in countries of contrasting levels of development.

2. Describe how the effects of an earthquake in an HIC can be different from the effects of an earthquake in an LIC

3. Evaluate the factors that affect the effectiveness of the responses to a disaster.

4.

Page 15: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

CASE STUDYAn earthquake in a LIC - Haiti 2010

Page 16: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

CASE STUDYAn earthquake in a HIC - Japan 2011

Page 17: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles
Page 18: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

GDP per capita

Page 19: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1.3.2. An increasing vulnerability

Page 20: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

2. Risk management: a transition?

1.3 How successful is themanagement of hazards and disasters?

15Answers at www.hoddereducation.co.uk/needtoknow/answers

Theoretical frameworksPrediction and forecastingTable 5 Prediction and forecasting of tectonic hazards

Hazard Predictability CommentsEarthquake Limited Areas at high risk identified, together with

those likely to suffer severe ground shaking and liquefaction

Seismic gaps can point to areas of especially high risk

Volcano Most give some form of warning

Monitoring equipment on volcanoes can measure changes as magma chambers fill and eruption nears

Tiltmeters record ‘bulging’ as magma rises

Seismometers record minor earthquakes that indicate magma movement

Gas spectrometers analyse gas emissions that can point to increased likelihood of eruption

Tsunami The earthquake cannot be predicted; the wave can be

Seismometers can tell that an earthquake has occurred and locate it

Ocean monitoring equipment can detect tsunamis in the open sea

This information can be relayed to coastal areas, which can be evacuated

The hazard management cycleKey points:n illustrates four stages of the management of hazards in attempting

to reduce the scale of a disaster (Figure 4)n the recovery (‘returning to normal’) stage depends on:

n the magnitude of the eventn the level of development and governance of the area affectedn the external help available

!

PREPAREDNESSCommunity education andresilience building includinghow to act before, during andafter a disaster, prediction,warning, and evacuationtechnology and systems

RESPONSEImmediate help in the form ofrescue to save lives and aid tokeep people alive, and provideemergency shelter, food andwater

MITIGATIONActing to reduce the scale ofthe next disaster: land-usezoning, hazard-resistantbuildings and infrastructure

RECOVERYRebuilding infrastructure andservices, and rehabilitating theinjured (physically and mentally)

Rehabilitation

Reconstruction

Prediction

Preparedness

Prevention

Mitigation

Response

Naturalhazard

Figure 4 The hazard management cycle

Key termsPrediction Knowing when, and where, a natural hazard will strike on a spatial and temporal scale that can be acted on effectively.

Forecasting Provides a ‘percentage chance’ of a hazard occurring, e.g. a 25 per cent chance of a magnitude 7 earthquake in the next 20 years.

Seismic gaps Areas that have not experienced an earthquake for some time and are ‘overdue’.

Synoptic linkScientists are key players in prediction and forecasting.

428515_01_Edex_A-level_geo_005-018.indd 15 27/04/18 5:01 PM

Copyright: Sample proof materialThe risk management cycle

Hazardous event

Page 21: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

1 Tectonic processes and hazards

Need to know: Edexcel A-level geography16

The Park disaster response modelKey points:n illustrates how quality of life is impacted by a hazardous event

(Figure 5)n shows how a range of management strategies can be used over

time — from before the event to after the eventn highlights the roles of emergency relief agencies and rehabilitationn shows how different areas affected may have different response

curves, depending on their level of preparedness and economic development

ImprovementStage 1

Stage 2Hazardous event

Stage 4

Stage 3Search,rescueand care

Stage 5Nature of recoveryrelated to:UÊÌ�iÊ�ii`ÊÌ�ÊÀi`ÕVi vulnerabilityUÊÌ�iÊ�ii`ÊÌ�ÊÀiÃÌ�Ài normality as soon as possible

Normality

Deterioration

Quality of life,level of economicactivity, socialstability,communicationsand services

Modifyingthe causeand event

Use ofvulnerabilitystrategies

Strategies to modifyvulnerability to preventfurther disasters

Improvementor return tonormality?

Permanent rebuildingof physical and socialinfrastructure

Modify the loss(e.g. aid andtemporary housingand services)

Pre-disaster Relief(hours to days)

Rehabilitation(days to weeks)

Reconstruction(weeks to years)

Relief and rehabilitation period –may include outside help(national or international)

Figure 5 The Park disaster response model

ManagementModifying the eventTable 6 Modifying the event

Nature of modification Benefits Issues

Land-use zoning:n prevention of buildings on low-

lying coasts (tsunamis)n avoiding areas close to volcanoesn avoiding areas where liquefaction

is likely

Low cost

Relocates people from areas of high risk

Prevents economic development in some coastal areas

Requires strict enforcement

Aseismic buildings:n cross-bracingn using counterweightsn deep foundations

Protects people and property

Financially possible in the developed world

Basic design can be replicated in developing world

High costs for tall buildings

Older buildings and homes for people on low incomes are too difficult to protect

Exam tipAnalyse and compare case studies using the hazard management cycle and/or the Park model.

Synoptic linkNote how both of these models highlight the roles played by key players such as scientists, emergency planners and engineers.

428515_01_Edex_A-level_geo_005-018.indd 16 27/04/18 5:01 PM

Copyright: Sample proof material

The Park disaster response model

Page 22: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

2.1. The need to develop prevention, prediction and preparedness

Mitigation: actions aimed at reducing the severity of an event and lessening its impacts.

Prediction: the ability to give warnings so that action can be taken to reduce the impact of hazard events. Improved monitoring, information and communication technology have meant that predicting hazards and issuing warnings have become more important in recent years.

Preparedness: this involves prearranged measures that aim to reduce the loss of life and property damage through public education and awareness programmes, evacuation procedures, the provision of emergency medical, food and shelter supplies and the taking out of insurance.

Page 23: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

5 simple steps to be more prepared today

1 Identify an out of area contact.

Know your connections-who will you 2 rely on and who will rely on you?

Establish a meeting place for you and 3 your connections.

Take stock of the things you use every day 4 that also could be useful in an emergency.

These are the makings of disaster supplies.

5 Talk about what you've done to be pre-pared with the people you care about.

8 SF72 Make a Plan

Our meeting spot Out of area contact Where will we meet in an emergency? Who will we check in with, outside

the area?

Address:

Location: Location:

Address:

My people Identify a group of friends and family with whom you'll coordinate.

Name: Name:

.1',,10~ P. .. .il.e .. ~c,n.e.: tv1c,~ilE:1p~c,nE:1:

f-lc,111e.phc,n.e: f-l()111E:1p~()n.E:1:... Address: Address:

Important contacts What other numbers would be handy in an emergency?

Doctor:

Pediatrician:

Pharmacist:

Veterinarian: S2

San Francisco disaster preparedness campaign

Page 24: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

2.2. The need to improve crisis management and resilience

Page 25: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Reconstruction in Minamisanriku, Japan, after the 2011 tsunami

a. levees built to protect against tsunami waves.

b. new shopping mall c. embankment d. disaster prevention centre, destroyed

by the 2011 tsunami, kept as a shrine to the victims.

e. construction of new homes, protected by the hills.

Resilience: the sustained ability of individuals or communities to be able to utilize available resources to respond to, withstand and recover from the effects of natural hazard events. Communities that are resilient are able to minimize the effects of the event enabling them to return to normal life as soon as possible.

Page 26: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles
Page 27: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

CASE STUDY 2Risk management

The Boscastle flood of 2004

Developing extended writing skills – the Boscastle floods

© www.teachitgeography.co.uk 2016 25506 Page 1 of 2

Student tasks

1. Underline any geographical keywords. Do you understand what they mean?

2. Can you circle below all the causes of flooding? (These are your POINTS)

Extension: Can you differentiate between the human and physical causes?

3. Shade the boxes that show all the EXAMPLES.

4. Draw a line to link the EXAMPLES to the correct POINT.

5. In another colour, link the correct EXPLANATION to the correct POINT and EXAMPLE.

This shape means that the land acted as a funnel,

directing vast volumes of water into the village

The village of Boscastle is located within the Valency

valley Heavy precipitation

This flash flood meant that people had very little time to

prepare or evacuate

This meant that when the volume of water in the rivers

increased, it lead to huge volumes of water flowing

through the town

Urbanisation

This meant that surface runoff increased, as excess water could no longer soak

into the soil

Boscastle is at the confluence (where tributaries meet) of three rivers: the Valency,

Jordan, and Paradise

180 mm of rainfall fell in three hours

The entire south west of England had been battered

with stormy weather over the days leading up to the flood

The main car park in Boscastle is located right next to the

river Large drainage basin

This meant that impermeable surfaces like tarmac,

increased the spread of floodwater into the village

Steep valley sides Saturated ground

6. Complete a paragraph to explain one of the causes of flooding.

POINT: One of the causes of flooding in Boscastle was… EXAMPLE: An example of this is… EXPLAIN: This means that…

7. Complete another PEE paragraph using a different cause.

Boscastle before the floods © Matthew Hunt, 2003, flic.kr/p/Lh7B

Boscastle before the flood Boscastle after the flood

Page 28: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Bocastle Flood Management Scheme

Page 29: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

2.3. Good governance is needed to reduce risks

Global governance: movement of political integration aimed at negotiating responses to problems that affect more than one state or region.

Page 30: Sociétés et environnement : des équilibres fragiles

Conclusion