36
The University of Sydney Social media and Public Health School of Public Health | Sydney Medical School Dr Becky Freeman Sr Lecturer / NHMRC Early Career Research Fellow Twitter @DrBFreeman

Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 1

Social media and Public Health

School of Public Health | Sydney Medical School

Dr Becky Freeman

Sr Lecturer / NHMRC Early Career Research Fellow

Twitter @DrBFreeman

Page 2: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 2

2

Page 3: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 3

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

3

Page 4: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 4

Internet use in Australia

– In 2014–15, 7.7 million households had broadband internet access

– Representing 86% of all households (up from 83% in 2012–13)

– 1.3 million Australian households without internet access at home in 2014–15

(14%)

– no need (63%)

– lack of confidence or knowledge (22%)

– and cost (16%)

– Accessed through a desktop or laptop computer (94%), mobile or smart phones

(86%) and tablets (62%)

– The mean number of devices was 6 and for households with children aged under

15 years mean was 7

4

Source: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/8146.0

Page 5: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 5

Hours online for personal use per week

5

Page 6: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 6

6

http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/log?openagent&81460do002_201415.xls&8146.0&Data%20Cubes&5AD0B

B26F19366A8CA257F5C001F78CF&0&2014-15&18.02.2016&Latest

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

15–17 18–24 25–34 35–44 45–54 55–64 65 or over

Reasons for accessing the internet in the last 3 months (%)

Social networking

Health services

Page 7: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 7

New Media

7

Page 8: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 8

– “Social Media is a group of Internet-based applications [Facebook, YouTube,

Twitter] that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0,

and that allow the creation and exchange of user generated content.”

– Source: Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and

opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons. 2010;53(1):59-68.

8

Page 9: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 9

Social Media Statistics Australia – June 2016

1. Facebook – 15,000,000 users (steady)2. YouTube – 14,350,000 UAVs3. WordPress.com – 5,550,0004. Instagram – 5,000,000 Monthly Active Australian Users (Facebook/ Instagram data)5. Tumblr – 4,300,0006. LinkedIn – 3,500,0007. Twitter – 2,800,000 Monthly Active Australian Users approx8. WhatsApp – 2,400,000 Active Australian Users9. TripAdvisor – 2,350,00010. Blogspot- 2,050,00011. Snapchat – 2,000,000 approx Monthly Active Australian Users12. Tinder – 2,000,000 Australian users (my estimation)13. Yelp – 1,600,00014. Flickr – 550,00015. Pinterest – 290,00016. Reddit – 100,00017. MySpace – 80,00018. Google Plus – 60,000 monthly active Australian users approx19. StumbleUpon – 40,00020. Foursquare/Swarm – 16,50021. Digg – 14,00022. Delicious – 11,00023. Periscope – 10,000

– (All figures represent the number of Unique Australian Visitors [UAVs] to that website over the monthly period – unless otherwise stated above).

– Statistics compiled by SocialMediaNews.com.au for June 2016.

9

Page 10: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 10

My social media buzz words

– Participate

– Connect

– Share

– Learn

– Promote

– Influence

1

0

Page 11: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 11

1

1

Page 12: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 12

Use of social media tools: Use simple and familiar tools to encourage participation and collect data

1

2

Page 13: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 13

Community: Build online communities by tapping into existing networks

1

3

Page 14: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 14

Content: Develop engaging content with a clear call to action

1

4

Page 15: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 15

1

5

Page 16: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 16

Promotion: Actively drive traffic through continuous promotion

1

6

Page 17: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 17

– Dual-screening is now considered

normal among online Australians –

three in four (74%) now multi-task

with two sets of content.

– A new movement, however, in the

form of triple-screening, has begun

to infiltrate consumers’ media

behaviour, with more than a

quarter (26%) now participating in

triple-screening

1

7

Source: http://www.nielsen.com/au/en/insights/news/2014/triple-screening-a-new-phenomenon.html

Page 18: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 18

Cost: Social media can be low cost but time and human resource intensive

1

8

Page 19: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 19

Word of caution

1

9

Page 20: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 20

2

0

Page 21: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 21

The Gaps

– What are the best ways to engage with target audiences on social media?

– What role does emotion play on social media?

– How can public health maximize the chances of achieving public health goals through social media?

Research questions

1. What social and conventional marketing techniques

are being employed by public health organisations on

Facebook?

2. What techniques are associated with greater user

engagement?

Page 22: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 22

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ph

oto

s (

or

ima

ge

s)

Lin

ks

Vid

eo

s

Te

xt

on

ly

Oth

er

Po

sitiv

e e

motio

na

l a

pp

ea

l

Te

stim

onia

l

Call-

to-a

ctio

n

Info

rmative

Hum

ou

r

Instr

uctive

Fe

ar

app

ea

l

Type of post Social marketing technique

Descriptive Results

Page 23: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 23

Results – Social Marketing Technique

Compared to Call-To-Action posts:

– Emotive posts did not stand out

(e.g. Positive Emotional Appeals

received 18% more likes but 27%

fewer shares)

– Informative posts received more

than twice as many Shares

– Humour posts received 70%

fewer Shares but twice as many

Comments

Page 24: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 24

Conclusions

– We expected emotive posts to stand out – that they didn’t might be because:

– Facebook users might engage with public health pages differently for different reasons (e.g. looking for information or like-minded community); or

– Public health organisations aren’t getting the emotions ‘right’

Future research:

1. Why do people engage with public health

issues on Facebook and do certain health

issues lend themselves to Facebook more so

than others?

2. What emotions work best to build

engagement?

3. Does increased engagement actually

contribute to public health goals?

Page 25: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 25

Page 26: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 26

American Journal of Public Health 2014

Page 27: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 27

– We assessed the amount, reach, and nature of energy-dense, nutrient-poor

(EDNP) food and beverage marketing on Facebook.

– We conducted a content analysis of the marketing techniques used by the 27

most popular food and beverage brand Facebook pages in Australia.

– We coded content across 19 marketing categories; data were collected from

the day each page launched (Average of 3.65 y of activity per page).

2

7

Page 28: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 28

All pages were for EDNP food and bevarges

– 27 pages

– 7 fast food restaurants

– 5 chocolate

– 4 sugar-sweetened sodas

– 3 energy drinks

– 2 confectionery brands

– 2 ice cream brands

– 2 condiments or spreads

– 1 sweet biscuit

– 1 salty snack

– There was a nearly even mix of

international (13 pages) and

Australian-based brand pages (14

pages)

– 4 brands (Subway, Coca-Cola,

Slurpee, Maltesers) represented by

both an international and an

Australian version of the page

2

8

Page 29: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 29

Feelings, not facts

Page 30: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 30

Page 31: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 31

Photos

Page 32: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 32

Giving back to members

Page 33: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 33

Be useful

Page 34: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 34

Snapchat, Twitter and Instagram,

Page 35: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 35

Page 36: Social media and Public Health · 20. Foursquare/Swarm –16,500 21. Digg –14,000 22. Delicious –11,000 23. Periscope –10,000 – (All figures represent the number of Unique

The University of Sydney Page 36

Contact info

– DR BECKY FREEMAN | NHMRC Early Career Research Fellow

[email protected]

– twitter @drbfreeman

3

6