22
Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Social Effects of Democracy

Political Economy of the Global SouthProf. Tyson Roberts

Page 2: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What is Democracy?

• “that institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote” (Schumpeter 1947)

• “a political system which supplies regular constitutional opportunities for changing the governing officials” (Lipset 1959)

• “a system in which parties lose elections (Przeworski and Limongi 1991)

Page 3: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What are some social requisites for a stable democracy? (per Lipset)

• Education• Economic development– Income level– Industrialization– Urbanization– Access to telecommunications– Access to media

Page 4: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What are arguments democracy might help or hinder economic performance? (per PACL)

• Help:– Accountability => good governance– Transparency => efficient allocation of resources

• Hinder:– Unleash demands for consumption => less

investment– Enable organization (e.g., unions) => less

investment

Page 5: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What are some economic effects of democracy? (per PACL)

• Poor countries: few effects• Wealthy countries:– Less labor participation– Less labor exploitation– Higher productivity

Page 6: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

How does regime type affect the probability and manner of democratic transition? (per Geddes)

• Military dictatorships prefer negotiated democratization to revolution or war

• Personalist leaders have most to lose from democratization, less willing to democratize than military or party-based dictatorships

• Monarchies that share power with the family are more durable than monarchies with concentrated power

Page 7: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Why did dictatorships fall during the 1990s?

• Withdrawal of support from USSR & West• Example of overthrows in E. Europe• Aid conditional on democratization• Miscalculation – sycophants tell dictators they

can win multiparty election, then they lose– Kaunda in Zambia– Obasanjo in Nigeria– Suharto in East Timor (independence vote)

Page 8: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What aspect of democracy did aid donors emphasize post-Cold War?

• Multiparty elections

Page 9: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

How might democracy affect proneness to political violence?

• Reduce political violence– Accountability => good governance (less need for

violence)– Legitimacy => opposition should peacefully accept

government policies• Increase political violence ?

Page 10: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Why does ethnic diversity hinder investment in public goods? (per Easterly, Collier CH2)

• Differences in preferences – where to put roads, language taught in schools,

where to put hospitals, etc.• Less willingness to spend on public services

perceived to aid other groups• Greater willingness to hurt economic growth

by taxing other ethnic groups for redistribution– Example: Indians in East Africa

Page 11: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Does ethnic diversity always lead to low growth and conflict? (Collier, CH2)

• No• Diversity may increase productivity in the

private sector – More points of view, different skills, etc.

• Diversity is less damaging at higher income levels

• Ethnic identities can be suppressed in favor of national identities

Page 12: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

How does democracy affect political violence empirically?

• No effect when looking at all countries• Middle and high income countries =>

democracy reduces risk of political violence• Low income countries => democracy increases

risk of political violence

Why?

Page 13: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Example: Iraq

Page 14: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Under Saddam’s authoritarian rule, 1979-2003

• Kurds and Shiites repressed

• Occasional state-sponsored violence (e.g., 5,000 civilians killed by mustard gas in 1988)

• Overall, fairly stable

Page 15: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Democracy introduced in 2003

• Kurdistan has own army• Massive Shiite vs. Sunni

violence• ISIS takes over Western

part of country

Page 16: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Why democracy does not reduce political violence in low-income countries

• Voters uninformed, don’t understand choices in election

• Weak state capacity + economic dependence on commodities– Poor economic performance may be due to external

shocks (e.g., commodity prices), not government performance

• Voters more likely to vote based on ethnic identity• Temptation for politicians to intervene in economy

to reward loyal supporters

Page 17: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What are options available to politicians in low-income countries?

1. Become a good government – DIFFICULT!2. Lie to electors – EASY BUT CREATES CYNICISM3. Scapegoat a minority – EFFECTIVE! BUT UNDERMINES PEACE

& PROSPERITY4. Bribery– WORKS SHORT TERM BUT UNDERMINES CAPACITY5. Intimidation – WORKS SHORT TERM BUT CAN CREATE

BACKLASH6. Restrict the field to exclude strong candidates – WORKS

SHORT TERM BUT CAN CREATE BACKLASH7. Miscount the votes – WORKS! BUT OBSERVERS DON’T LIKE

Page 18: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What are country examples of these tactics?

Results?

Page 19: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

What to do?

• Promoting multiparty elections in poor countries can result in violence

• For STABLE democracy, aid donors should promote the social requisites– Education– Economic development– Good governance (rule of law, low corruption,

etc.)– Independent media, etc.

Page 20: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Final Exam

• 10 multiple choice questions – Big ideas, 1 per week

• 3 essays, choose 2• Extra credit questions based on presentations– Send me your slides

Page 21: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Sample Essay Questions

• How do international economic relations affect economic development and democracy? – Address aid, debt, FDI, and trade– Give specific examples

• Draw on class readings to explain economic and political outcomes in Bolvia and Zaire, as portrayed in the films.– Use at least one major reading from before the

midterm and one after the midterm

Page 22: Social Effects of Democracy Political Economy of the Global South Prof. Tyson Roberts

Sample Essay Questions

• How does natural resource endowments and colonial history affect economic prosperity and democracy in the Global South?

• Why did many Global South governments use state-led development policies during the post-WW2 period and abandon those policies later? What were the economic and political results?

• How does the World Bank define “institutional quality”? What are some determinants and effects of good vs. poor institutional quality?