Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Part of the BRE Trust
SMARTWaste Conference 201427/11/2014
Part of the BRE Trust
Welcome to BRE
Guy HammersleyChief Executive BRE Ventures
Agenda
15:00 Introduction of the new SMARTWaste Modules: Considerate Constructors Scheme,
Pre-demolition Audits and other developments, Stuart Blofeld
15:30 BREEAM Updates, Tim Bevan
15:45 Industry example of best practice, United Utilities, Tom Rimmer and Rick Sykes
16:05 Other BRE related activities across a buildings lifecycle including design for
deconstruction, benchmarking and productivity, Katherine Adams
16:25 Industry example of best practice, Kier Construction, Jade Hunt
16:45 Panel Discussion including and Q&A
17:15 The 1st SMARTWaste Awards
17:30 Close (Refreshments available) ,
Part of the BRE Trust
BRE SMARTWaste
Introduction to new SMARTWaste Modules
Stuart Blofeld
Part of the BRE Trust
SMARTWaste Growth & Trends
SMARTWaste Membership growth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Num
ber o
f mem
bers
Month
GoldSilverBronze
SMARTWaste Membership split
152
179
Bronze
Silver
Gold
SMARTWaste Projects - Sector split
179
9370
413
216
44 3267
6 18 252
218
050
100150200250300350400450
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
Project Use Classification
Project Type by Classification (Apr 2014 - Sep 2014)
SMARTWaste Projects - Type
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Civilengineering
Demolition Demolition andnew build
Fit out New build New build andrefurbishment
Refurbishment Remediation
Num
ber o
f Pro
ject
s
Project by Type
Projects by Type (Apr 2014 – Sep 2014)
Part of the BRE Trust
SMARTWaste Modules
New SMARTWaste modules
– New modules to help users meet the requirements of BREEAM New Construction 2014.
– Considerate Constructors Scheme (CCS) module will help users to track and report on their site’s CCS scores, and compare scores achieved across the company and identify areas for improvement.
– Pre-demolition Audits will help to identify ways to maximise reuse and recycling during the demolition and refurbishment phases of a project thus saving valuable resources and reducing project costs.
– Transport module will help users to track and monitor
Module demonstrations
– Considerate Constructors Scheme module demo
– Pre-demolition Audit Module demo
– Chance to demo the modules for yourself on the laptops provided
Other additions and developments to the tool
Online tutorials
Enhanced functionality – deleting projects in 3 easy steps
1.
3.
2.
Enhanced functionality – archiving projects
Part of the BRE Trust
Protecting People, Property and the Planet
BREEAM - UpdatesTim BevanAssociate Director, BRE Global Ltd
Independent & Credible Label
Creates Value
Voluntary
Holistic Sustainability
Method
Customer Focused
Third Party Assessment
Benchmarking tool
Certification scheme
Green buildings pay– Increased investor demand for high quality
properties with low risk
– Certified buildings are higher valued and safer long-term investments (NCC Group)
– BREEAM is a strong rating tool that helps sound, responsible property investment. Tenants will discard of buildings that don’t have BREEAM ratings (Aviva Investors)
– 71% of investors would accept higher costs for sustainable real estate (DLA Piper)
– BREEAM certified buildings achieve a premium on transaction prices and rents. (Maastricht University study)
Building a Better World
– UK green business has carved out a £122 billion share of a global market worth £3.3 trillion and employing close to a million people (CBI)
– Green building certified space will grow from about 6 billion square feet in 2010 to about 53 billion square feet worldwide in 2020 (Pike Research)
– The way infrastructures and buildings are developed on scale could be the single biggest catalyst ever available to drive a long-term commitment to sustainable resource use that, in turn, frees up resources for poverty eradication (UNEP)
– New Refurbishment and Fit-Out scheme– New Homes scheme– New Infrastructure scheme– BREEAM Projects
Life Cycle Assessment Method
BREEAM for Refurbishment and Fit-out
– Launched at MIPIM 15th October 2014
– Replaces 2008 scheme for refurbishment
– Flexible according to scope of works
– Can be used for all building types
– Empathetic with historic buildings
– Pilots and early adopters already
BREEAM for Refurbishment and Fit Out - Structure
– Modular structure
– Certification relevant to scope of work
– Comparability across the property market
– Dovetails with BREEAM New Construction
– Rewards ‘relative’ improvements
– SMARTWaste: – Construction site impacts
(Man03)
Energy Efficiency
Water Efficiency
Surface Water / Flood Risk
Materials & Life Cycle
Pollution
Sound
Daylight
Private Space
Cat
egor
ies
/ Iss
ues
lost
Into
R
egs
User Guide
CCS
Site Impacts
Access & LTH
Ecology
Energy Display
Drying space
White goods
External Lighting
LZT
Opt
iona
lM
ust b
e ju
stifi
ed&
Via
ble
Site Waste
Internal Recycling
Composting
Space
www.bre.co.uk/fsh
Cycle Storage
Home Office
New Homes Standard
New Homes Standard - Key Principles
– Consumers at the centre– Enable developers to differentiate product– Help Reduce performance gap– Third party verification using scale of
Assessor network– Assist Planning and RSL funding– Develop supply chain and skills– Digital– Launch at Ecobuild, March 2015
#fshbre
Infrastructure
• Average annual infrastructure investment £45bn (National Infrastructure Plan December 2013)
• Infrastructure accounts for 20% of UK new construction output
• Meeting the challenges of a rapidly changing world:
• Reduce – cost, energy, water….• Improve – health, safety, wellbeing…..• Adapt – climate change, security, technology
• Delivering world class projects
Infrastructure – Scheme Development
– Developmental research underwayOptioneering, Materials, Waste, Resilience, System boundaries, Energy and Carbon, Pollution, Land use ecology and heritage, Stakeholders, Water, Integrated design, Social and economic, Transport and connectivity
– Consultation with other 40 major public and private industry stakeholders– Discussions with CEEQUAL on collaboration– We are on the lookout for additional pilot projects– Consulting on draft criteria in the new yearResearch Consultation Criteria Consultation Pilots
Thank you
• New Homes scheme: www.bre.co.uk/fsh, contact: [email protected] (Gwyn Roberts)• New Refurbishment scheme: www.breeam.com/ndrefurb, contact: [email protected] (James Honour)• New Infrastructure scheme: contact: [email protected] (Chris Broadbent)• BREEAM Projects website: www.breeam.org/projects
@BREWatford
BREEAM Official Group
United Utilities Elevate Tool
BRE SMARTWASTE Seminar Nov 14
IntroductionsSpeakers
Tom RimmerEnvironmental Planner
Rick SykesEnvironmental Planner
IntroductionsOur Organisation
• United Utilities provide water and sewage services to around seven million people in North West England.
• In the period 2010-2015 we are investing more than £3 billion to improve the water and wastewater infrastructure and the environment across the North West, covering:
• Over 42,000 kilometres of water pipes, from Cumbria to Cheshire;• Over 76,000 kilometres of sewers;• 569 wastewater treatment works;• 94 water treatment works;• Over 56,000 hectares of catchment land.
IntroductionsOur Organisation
One of our Key Business Principles is to Protect and Enhance the Environment
We have set ourselves a target to reduce our carbon emissions by 21% by 2020
We have set ourselves a target to divert 95% of our waste from landfill by 2015
We have set ourselves a target to achieve a ‘Net Gain in the Natural Environment
Our construction activities contribute hugely to the success of these targets. The Elevate
tool helps us to monitor our progress.
History within our Organisation
Bespoke UU SMARTWaste
Tool developed and launched
Elevate tool (based on
SMARTWaste) launched
Further improvements made (addition of Noticeboard)May 10 Nov 14…April 14 June 11 Sep 13
Development of Elevate
commenced
Initial SWMPs produced internally and requirement to complete full SWMPS communicated to our Partners
Tool now used for reporting of all Contractor
Sustainability data
Why did we switch to Elevate?
Existing systems for reporting of Sustainability data by Contractors were
unsophisticated
Name change
represents removal of waste biasDifficult to track
implementation of biodiversity
mitigation actions across the
programmeSeparate system for capturing and
tracking resolution of Significant
Environmental Incidents
No time to analyse and interrogate data following
month end leading to issues with Supplier Relationship
Management
No ability to interrogate information at project level or by
waste stream
What Improvements have we realised?
Tells us which projects are up
to date with reporting and which aren’t
Tool now acts as ‘One Stop Shop’ for all Contractor data. It includes ‘SMARTer’
functionality (aggregates, electricity, fuel, water, FSC Certified timber) but also…
Tells us if we’ve had any
Significant Environmental
Incidents
Tracks implementation of biodiversity
mitigation actions
Tracking Biodiversity Mitigation
Tool allows us and our partners to
communicate what surveys have been
completed and whenAllows us to detail mitigation, set targets
for completion and monitor implementation
Tracking Significant Incidents
We receive automated email
when new incident logged on tool
Allows us to track whether Regulator(s) aware of the
incident
Requires the contractor to schedule actions to
resolve/prevent reoccurrence
Acts as a document library for 2 day and 2 week Reports
Transparent Partner Relations
Tool allows us to show performance
comparisons and give project specific
breakdowns
Gives us time to analyse and
interrogate data and include
commentary in feedback
Continuous Improvement…
• Nomination of Super-Users within Contractor Organisations
• Production of bespoke ‘Screen Cast’ training
Dissemination of Training
Dissemination of Training
• More sophisticated reporting by waste stream, biodiversity constraint etc.
Turning Data into Information
Turning Data into Information
ContractorBuy-In
ContractorBuy-In
On-going Challenge Planned Improvement
• Flexibility of data entry planned to aid users with significant number of projects
Questions…
BRE SMARTWaste
Other BRE related activities across a buildings lifecycle Katherine Adams
Contents
Design
Construction
In-useRefurbishment
End of life
Buildings & infrastructure
City
-wid
e
Design for deconstruction assessment
– BRE Trust funded project to develop outline methodology to measure the potential for deconstruction
– At design stage
– Look where improvements can be made
– Put a ’score’ on it
– Initially based on housing but also trialled on other buildings
– Literature review undertaken – a lot academically but virtually no practical application
– Important for circular economy thinking
Methodology
Case studiesCase study Main construction typePassivHaus Partial steel frame and SIPsBRE Building 16 Concrete frameSki slope Portal and concrete frameHouse Brick and block School Cross Laminated TimberResource EfficientHouse Scotland
SIPs
– These case studies will be published shortly and will be freely available from the SMARTWaste website
Case Study: Resource Efficient Scotland House – Score of 53%
Findings
– Questionable requirement for spot welding of bottom pods to the steel grillage;
– Back to back stainless steel render stops should have been used for cladding; this would ensure that the lime render would remain intact when removing the top pods.
– Use of a rainscreen would enable
Findings
– The SIPs panels may present issues for recycling BUT their speed of erection can be up to 4-5 times faster and this should be considered within the context of a project and its whole life value.
– Embedding services within the panels could present access issues. If skirting trunking was used with separators for water and electrics this is likely to aid access and deconstruction.
– The ceramic flooring on the ground floor spans over the pod joints and as such will be damaged, although minimal when the pod is removed. Consideration could have been given to laying this in relation to the pod joints.
Recommendations
– Principles should be applied throughout the design process and integrated into the BIM objects data and the main body of the design and specification details
– It is relatively easy to score and provide recommendations for the reuse and recycling potential of key components and materials;
– It can be difficult to assess the connections due to the amount of information required and the level of details on drawings. This isn’t always available at earlier stages of the
– Checklists for considering design for deconstruction within the project procurement and documentation should be used as part of the project planning process and where possible integrated into other
Why Measure productivity?– Contractors profits typically are 2% - 4% of turnover
– 25% increase in labour productivity would increase profit margins from
2% 8%
4% 10%
– Labour costs can differ up to 5 x on the best and worst sites. This is greater than any other cost.
– Labour productivity is an obvious starting point for any improvement programme
Benefits of measurement • Clear measurable objectives
• Quantified and objective targets
• KPIs cost / time / quality / predictability / waste
• Shared data - transparent and in real time
• Shared problems can be resolved and tackled by collaboration and shared learning, problems are rarely unique
• Structured benchmarking leading to long term continuous improvement
• Faster build times
• Increased value for money
• Better understanding of own organisation
• Reduction in waste and rework
• Improvements in quality
• Improved staff motivation and morale
• Faster awareness of innovations and their profitable applications
BRE’s Process Efficiency Improvement Offerings
– CLIP: Construction Lean Improvement Programme– CLIP is about improving quality, reducing costs, and achieving shorter programmes
within the construction industry– Advisory / consultancy / intervention service which transfers knowledge onto customers
where improvements can be made
– CALIBRE – CALIBRE is a site efficiency and productivity applied research measurement tool that
diagnoses and quantifies ‘waste' in man hours using activity sampling– It measures on-site efficiency and objectively assesses actual construction productivity
and performance on a given project from the start right through to completion
– SMARTSite (in development)– ‘App based’ Toolkit that is used for the self-assessment and optimisation of construction
process performance
Example of CALIBRE
§ HCA’s Design for Manufacture 2006- 2012• 500 homes• 350,000 operative hours monitored• 43,000 operative days• 5,160 operative days of wasteful time (12%)• Estimate cost of wasteful time = £1,315,800• Average 10 operative days per house of wasted time• Estimate cost of wasteful time per house = £2550
(around 6-8% of costs/house)
The Need For Continuous Improvement
Profit
Labour
Materials
Plant
TimeCurrent State Target State
Profit
Labour
MaterialsPlant
Labour
MaterialsPlant
WASTEProfit
Awareness
= Higher profit
= Lower costs
= Lower risk
£
Facilities Managers (FM)– Guide produced to provide advice
to FM’s on how to implement an integrated waste management strategy
– Planning and undertaking waste audits
– Develop a waste prevention plan
– User engagement
– Waste reporting and benchmarking
– Developing a waste specification
– Developing 5 training modules (webinars) to cover:– Legislation
– Waste collection
– Understanding waste contracts
– Waste auditing
– On-going monitoring and reporting
Resource efficient refurbishment training
– Development of 5 online modules
1. Introduction to waste in refurbishment
2. Optimise resource use through intelligent planning
3. Embodied carbon and life cycle assessment
4. Onsite management to increase resource efficiency
5. Circular Economy and BIM
Resource Productivity at a City ScaleBRE Trust funded work under Future Cities Programme – half of the world’s population lives in cities now. By 2030, this is set to rise to 60%.
Most efficient use of resources in a city = resource resilience• Mass balance +++
• Economic• Social • Environmental
• Workshop in Brasilia
• Methodology/ tool developed
Methodology1. Map sectors producing waste - Municipal, commercial, industrial,
construction, agricultural, stockpiles (large flytipping/dumps) etc.
2. Map resources/ material streams - Organics, paper, glass, timber, brick/concrete, plastics etc.
3. Current management situationi. Collection methods & ratesii. Facilities available/used - Landfill, illegal dump, incineration,
reuse, recycling, composting, energy recovery, other recovery.iii. Legislation & enforcement, economic/industry characteristicsiv. Cost of options/tonne - £, CO2 (eq.),social impact
4. Interventions available – e.g. landfill tax, legislation, renewables incentives
Example - Watford
Existing scenarioWaste management route % to w/mgmt route T to w/mgmt
route CO2 impact £ Jobs Created
Reuse 0.0% 0 - £ - 0
Dry Recycling 17.0% 5,373 -3,820,203 £ 37,611 46
Composting / AD 24.0% 7,812 -253,890 -£ 302,715 67
Energy recovery 0.0% 0 0 £ - 0
Landfill 59.0% 18,807 5,454,030 -£ 394,947 21
Unknown 0.0% 0 - - -
Total 100.0% 31,992 1,379,937 -£ 660,051 133
Example - Watford
Alternative scenario – landfill ban for recyclablesWaste management route % to w/mgmt
routeT to w/mgmt
route CO2 impact £ Jobs Created
Reuse 0 - £ - 0
Dry Recycling 50.0% 15,996 -11,373,156 £ 111,972 137
Composting / AD 35.0% 11,197 -363,909 -£ 433,892 96
Energy recovery 0.0% 0 0 £ - 0
Landfill 15.0% 4,799 1,391,652 -£ 100,775 5Unknown 0.0% 0 - - -
Total 100.0% 31,992 -10,345,413 -£ 422,694 238
Example - Watford
Comparison – economic, social, environmental
Next steps• Further development of default data and scenario building aspects of the tool
• Mapping of economic and legislative framework to rule options in or out
• Mapping in the demand side • Energy – heat, fuel and electricity• Feedstock for construction• Feedstock for industry/ manufacturing• 3rd sector reuse/ recycling
• Further trialling on actual cities with relevant stakeholders
• Further economic modelling
• Case study/ examples to demonstrate benefits of strategic/ whole resource mapping
• Linking into CIM (City Information Modelling)
KierUsing SMARTWaste to improve performance27th November 2014
The Kier journey - middle
§ Prompt - Site Waste Management Plan Regulations§ SMARTWaste for all construction projects§ Initial implementation§ Training for SHE teams
§ Training for site managers and commercial staff
§ Consistency over time§ Improvements to the system
The Kier journey
§ Various formats including external & internal tools§ SMARTWaste benefits§ Centralised, accessible data
§ Business unit / project divisions
§ Client / external access
§ SMARTWaste challenges§ Complexity
§ IT
The Kier journey - start
Kier Group
Kier Construction Southern
Kier Construction London Kier Infrastructure
§ In 2010…§ Inconsistent use
§ Waste contractor database issues
§ Duplication - waste facilities
§ Documentation - permits, licences and certificates
§ Data entry
§ 16 data fields (not including waste percentages)
§ 16 opportunities to get it wrong!
The Kier journey - middle
§ Kier SMARTWaste User Guide
§ How to use SMARTWaste
§ How to plan waste management
§ Key contact
§ Business unit contacts
The Kier journey - middle
The Kier journey - middle
The Kier journey - middle
The Kier journey - middle§ Working with BRE - improvements§ Waste types
§ Container types
§ Information (i) buttons
§ BREEAM targets
§ Hazardous waste registrations
§ User access levels - control
§ smartER - energy, water, fuel
§ Reporting
The Kier journey - where we are now§ Confidence in data set§ Improved administration§ Using SMARTWaste as a tool for waste management planning§ Improvements in diversion from landfill performance
§ 2008: 55%
§ 2009: 64%
§ 2010: 72%
§ 2011: 80%
§ 2012: 76% - improved data entry
The Kier journey - where we are now§ Gold Membership from 2012§ Programming / development
§ Committed to using & developing the system§ Total projects registered - 1883§ Total live projects - 290§ 3,806,741 cubic metres of waste
recorded
The Kier journey - the future
§ Continue to improve
§ New ‘skin’ - ease of use
§ Additional modules - Transport CO2, CCS etc
§ Dynamic waste data entry form
§ Automated fields
The Kier journey - the future
§ SMARTWaste / smartER as a ‘one stop shop’
§ CR / sustainability portal
§ Measure a greater range of environmental performance indicators
§ Interrogate data to identify areas for improvement
§ Soils - CLAIRE CoP
§ Timber - NCWRP
86
§ Click to edit master text styles§ Second level§ Third level
§ Fourth level§ Fifth level
Click to edit Master title style
Thank you
Panel discussion
The 1st SMARTWASTE Awards
Annual Awards
The best small project
Murphy Group
Barton Stacey ISS
Annual Awards
The best large project
BAM Construction
Imperial Tobacco
Quarterly Awards
The best small, new build projectBAM Nuttall Ltd
Rocky Lane
Quarterly Awards
The best small, refurbishment project
Mace Group
Project Gatwick Airport North Terminal Baggage voids
Quarterly Awards
The best large, new build project
Caddick Construction Ltd
Goliath
Quarterly Awards
The best large, refurbishment project
P. J. Carey Ltd
SSL Sherburn
