Upload
ashmita-mazumder
View
399
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This ppt is on a study and analysis work on Automation of SCM of Lubes Dept. at IOCL
Citation preview
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Lubes Division
Ashmita Mazumder
PGDM – IT
2011-13
Guide –
Prof. Kalpana Kumaran
HOD – IT, ITM Business School
2
PROJECT TITLE:
To Study, Analyze and Recommend areas
for Automation of Supply Chain
Management, at all India level, of
Lubricants Division of Indian Oil
Corporation Limited
3
ABOUT INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED:
Indian Pubic-Sector Oil Company, under
Ministry of Petroleum & Government of India
Began as a merger between Indian Refineries
Ltd. and Indian Oil Company Ltd. in 1964
Now, a Maharatna Company – world’s 98th
largest company by revenue, according to
Fortune Global 500 list of 2010-11
Is into both Upstream & Downstream
operations. Owns and operates 10 of India’s
21 Petroleum refineries
4
IOCL operations are in the following verticals:
− Exploration & Production
− Refining
− Pipelines
− Natural Gas
− Research & Development
− Marketing
− International operations
IOCL’s Products, after refining from Crude Oil:
Petrol, Diesel, LPG, Petrochemicals, Kerosene,
Bitumen, ATF (Aviation Turbine Fuels), Industrial
Fuel, Lubricants & Greases
5
IOCL’S LUBES DIVISION
IOCL manufactures about 1500 formulations
with over 600 commercial grades – branded &
marketed as SERVO
15 Lube Blending Plants in India, spread across
all the four regions, including one Grease
manufacturing plant, producing approx. 440
thousand metric tons per year
Sales is mainly categorized as – Institutional,
Retails & Exports
Distribution is through 4 CIPs, 22 CFAs & about
180 terminals & Depots
6
GENERIC SUPPLY CHAIN MODEL OF LUBES DIVISION:
7
WHY GO FOR AUTOMATION?
To streamline Supply Chain Management
operations of IOCL’s Lubes’ production and
distribution activities
To reduce manual intervention
For overall cost reduction
To reduce wastage in processes
To meet demands in time
To maintain market leadership & drive volume
growth
8
WHY i2?
PwC advised IOCL to go for JDA’s i2
Technologies’ SCM software, based on the
degree of customization offer & cost benefits.
IOCL’s Systems dept. developed in-house a
production scheduling software – APS i.e.
Advanced Planning & Scheduling, that uses the
i2 modules
Other SCM software application competitors in
the market, considered by IOCL –
• SAP
• Manugistics
9
OVERALL APS ARCHITECTURE:
10
APS MODULES
Objective – Used for Systematic consensus
forecast generation process at SKU-Customer-
Month level
Input – Sales history of past 2-3 years,
categorized monthly, Sales targets
Output – Annual and Monthly Demand
forecasts, which is then fed to Forecast
Netting, Inventory Planning, Master Planning
and Deployment Planning Modules
1. DEMAND MANAGER
11
2. FORECAST NETTING
Objective – To profile the ‘Monthly’ forecasts
from Demand Manager, into ‘Weekly’
forecasts, and net them, based on
differentiation and prioritization of orders
Input – Monthly Demand Forecasts from
Demand Manager module & Order-details
Output – Weekly Demand Forecasts fed to
Master Planning & Deployment Planning
modules
12
3. INVENTORY PLANNING
Objective – To arrive at Safety Stock targets
at different supply locations like – Plants, CIPs,
Depots, Terminals, DOLGs, etc.
Input – Demand Forecasts from Demand
Manager module, Customer-SKU-Supply
location mapping, lead times, Buffer group
details
Output – Safety Stock suggestions for each
SKU at different supply locations
13
4. MASTER PLANNING
Objectives – Cost Optimization, have min.
inventory & max. demand satisfaction, reduce
safety stock violation, track materials produced
Inputs – Netted Forecasts, Orders, Safety stock
requirements, Finished good & WIP, Plant &
Filling line capacities
Outputs – Annual & monthly raw material
procurement plan, weekly production plan, and
inventory plan, shipment plan
14
PRODUCTION SCHEDULING
Objectives – Generate feasible optimized
production schedule to meet customer
demands, considering constraints existing at
plants
Inputs – Demand signals/Firmed Orders from
Master Planning Module
Output – Weekly Production scheduling plan
for each plant
5. DEPLOYMENT PLANNING
Objective – Reduce safety stock violations,
excess storage, backlogged demands and
maximize demand satisfied by a layer
Input – Daily production schedule, Inventory
at plants, inventory targets, Demands, Orders
& Netted Forecasts
Output – Distribution plan, Updated weekly
Inventory plan
6. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Objectives – Timely dispatch of required SKU
to CFA/Customer, Improve utilization of trucks,
reduce logistics costs and timely evacuation of
material
Input – Shipment/Dispatch plan, Inventory
constraints, Truck details, lead times, load
plans, distance & transit times between
locations
Output – Truck assignment, confirmed
shipment plan, load plan, operational statuses
17
RECOMMENDATIONS
i2 modules run only on systems with XP
operating systems – Huge drawback.
All the module-runs are independent of other
modules. Dependencies must be created.
Data from SAP is fed into i2 databases
everyday at a scheduled time, but its validity
& correctness can be verified by checking
logs. This can only be done by system
admins.
18
DM – The accuracy for demand forecasts is
only about 40-50 %, resulting in losses for the
company. It must be improved.
IP – After every run, export data (safety stock
information) is sent to Lubes division for
review and then loaded for further processing.
PS – This module cant handle pre-checks at
plants like labour availability, working hour
constraints, etc. currently done manually.
− Whenever PS isn’t able to schedule
production plan for all demands, it doesn’t
give elaborate reasons for the same.
19
THANK YOU!