Single Plans for Student Achievement

Cambrian School DistrictMay 2012

Overview

Review of SPSA process

Site SPSA SummaryELA and Math

Next Steps

SPSAEstablish goals and funding for Charter

andCategorical Funding at school sites

Sites

• Develop with Staff and School Site Council (SSC)

• SSC approves prior to presentation

District

• Support principals and school teams

• School Board approves plans

Development Process

Review Data

Establish Goals

Develop Actions

Align Budget

School Plan Presentations

Third year

School teams present single planoverview and highlights to districtpanel followed by questions and

discussion.

BagbyKey 2011 CST Data points

API– All Students: 924 to 905– Hispanic subgroup: 848 to 827– SED subgroup: 814 to 793– White, non-Hispanic, subgroup: 940 to 920

AYP– Met AYP (ELA and Math)

• White subgroup Yes• SED, Hispanic subgroups No

During the 2012-2013 school year, all students

performing proficient or above in English Language

Arts will increase from 82% to 89% as measured

by the California Standards Test (CST).

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 75% 79% 76% 83% 89%

Hispanic 57% 59% 58% 68% 78%

SED 55% 51% 50% 60% 70%

EL 52% 61% 53% 63% 73%

English Language Arts Goal

Math GoalDuring the 2012-2013 school year, all

studentsperforming proficient or above in Math will

increasefrom 85% to 92% as measured by the CST.2009 2010 2011 Goal

2012 Goal 2013

All 83% 83% 81% 85% 92%

Hispanic 68% 69% 66% 76% 86%

SED 65% 62% 59% 69% 79%

EL 72% 68% 60% 70% 80%

Key Actions

ELA• ExCEL Cluster Model• Tier II Intervention• Mainstreaming• English Language

Development (ELD)• GLAD Training• Professional

Development • Junior Great Books• Success Maker• Problem Based Learning

Opportunities• Continued Emphasis on

Student Engagement

Math• Envision

• Direct Instruction• Small Group• Technology• Investigations

• Success Maker• Targeted Interventions• Silicon Valley Math

Initiative, Lesson Study• Math Assessment

Collaborative (MAC)• Math Olympiad

SartoretteKey 2011 CST Data points

API– All Students: 898 to 877– Hispanic subgroup: 830 to 773– EL subgroup: 820 to 793– SED subgroup: 796 to739– White, non-Hispanic, subgroup: 920 to 915

AYP– Met AYP (ELA and Math)

• White and Asian subgroups Yes• SED, Hispanic, SED subgroups No

By June 2013, the percentage of all studentsperforming proficient or above in English

LanguageArts will increase from 80% to 85% as

measured bythe CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 77% 78% 75% 80% 85%

Hispanic 53% 65% 50% 60% 70%

SED 46% 53% 44% 54% 64%

EL 48% 58% 50% 60% 70%

English Language Arts Goal

Math GoalBy 2013, the percentage of students

performing ator above will increase from 79% to 84% asmeasured by the CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 80% 80% 74% 79% 84%

Hispanic 63% 62% 55% 65% 75%

SED 63% 65% 55% 65% 75%

EL 66% 65% 55% 65% 75%

Key ActionsELA

• Response to Intervention (ExCEL)

• Targeted Interventions• Success Maker• ELD• GLAD training• Librarian• GATE• Professional

Development

Math• Implement standards-

based curriculum using problem solving strategies

• Peer coaching and collaboration

• Support and collaboration with the SVMI, Lesson Study

• MARS assessment, data analysis and re-engagement activities

• Math Talks• Investigations in 5th

grade• Math Olympiad

FarnhamKey 2011 CST Data points

API– All Students: 847 to 849– Hispanic subgroup: 755 to 734– EL subgroup: 776 to 758– SED subgroup: 706 to 729– White, non-Hispanic, subgroup: 890 to 890

AYP– Met AYP

ELAWhite YesHispanic, SED, EL No

MathWhite, EL YesSED, EL No

By June 2013, the percentage of all students performing at proficient or above on the English Language Arts will increase from 70% to 77% as measured by the CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 67% 65% 64% 70% 77%

Hispanic 51% 47% 38% 43% 48%

SED 46% 36% 35% 40% 45%

EL 55% 48% 41% 46% 51%

English Language Arts Goal

Math GoalBy June 2013, the percentage of all students performing at proficient or above will increase from 80% to 87% as measured by the CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 74% 70% 73% 80% 87%

Hispanic 57% 53% 52% 62% 72%

SED 49% 43% 53% 63% 73%

EL 73% 58% 56% 66% 76%

Key ActionsELA

• Response to Intervention Power Groups/ExCEL

• ELD • Extended Learning Time

for intensive and strategic students

• Success Maker• Increase access to

variety of literature• Effectively monitor

student progress• Ongoing Professional

Development

Math• Consistent &

uninterrupted instructional mathematics block

• Ongoing professional development focused on problem based learning

• Lesson Study through Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative (SVMI)

• Targeted Instruction• Success Maker • Math Olympiad• Common Core State

Standards

FammatreKey 2011 CST Data points

API– All Students: 910 to 888– Asian subgroup: 977 to 947– Hispanic subgroup: 850 to 819– EL subgroup: 882 to 831– SED subgroup: 802 to 743– White, non-Hispanic, subgroup: 918 to 905

AYP– Met AYP

ELAWhite, Asian, EL YesHispanic, SED No

MathWhite, Asian, Hispanic, EL YesSED No

By June 2013, all students performing proficient

and above in ELA will increase by 7 percentage

points from 79% to 86% as measured by the

CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 81% 80% 74% 79% 86%

Hispanic 65% 65% 56% 64% 74%

SED 62% 58% 42% 52% 62%

EL 77% 74% 62% 72% 82%

English Language Arts Goal

Math GoalBy June 2013, the percentage of studentsperforming at proficient or above will

increasefrom 83% to 90% as measured by the CST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 84% 83% 78% 83% 90%

Hispanic 72% 71% 66% 76% 86%

SED 63% 53% 52% 62% 72%

EL 75% 70% 69% 79% 89%

Key Actions

ELA• Response to

Intervention/ExCel• Targeted Interventions• Specific ELD• GLAD training• Collaboration and Peer

Coaching• Use of Junior Great

Books and other supplemental materials

• School library/Accelerated Reading

• Success Maker

Math• Implement standards-

based curriculum using problem solving strategies

• Peer coaching/collaboration

• Collaboration with the SVMI, Lesson Study, Math Talks

• MARS assessment, data analysis and re-engagement activities

• Targeted Interventions• Successmaker• Investigations in 5th grade• Math Olympiad

PriceKey 2011 CST Data points

API– All Students: 864 to 864– Asian subgroup: 949 to 955– Hispanic subgroup: 763 to 759– EL subgroup: 724 to 763– SED subgroup: 752 to 756– White, non-Hispanic, subgroup: 892 to 893

AYP– Met AYPELAWhite, Asian, EL, SED YesHispanic No

MathAsian, EL YesWhite, Hispanic, SED No

During the 2012-13 school year, all students

performing proficient or above in ELA willincrease from 78% to 83% as measured by

theCST.

2009 2010 2011 Goal 2012

Goal 2013

All 70% 75% 76% 78% 83%

Hispanic 52% 56% 56% 59% 64%

SED 53% 52% 55% 57% 65%

EL 37% 50% 55% 61% 64%

English Language Arts Goal

Math GoalDuring the 2012-13 school year, all studentsperforming proficient or above in Math willincrease from 65 to 69% as measured by

the CST.2009 2010 2011 Goal

2012Goal 2013

All 56% 56% 59% 65% 69%

Hispanic 33% 33% 35% 38% 45%

SED 33% 36% 32% 39% 43%

EL 32% 35% 42% 48% 52%

Key Actions

ELA• Additional support (RTI)

• Reading and ELD support • Targeted interventions• Success Maker• Resources for 21st century

learning• Enrichment opportunities

• School wide emphasis:• Pair-share• Academic language

• Books and materials to support Common Core Standards.

• Professional learning communities

• Professional development--GLAD, A.L.L., GRR.

Math• Professional

development--Common Core, Success Maker.

• Targeted interventions and support

• Success Maker• Staff collaboration to

analyze student work and improve best practices.

• Implement GRR strategies • Provide materials,

technology to support 21 century skills.

Moving Forward• Analyze 2012 CST data in August• Based on data, adjust Goals and Actions as

needed• Monitor plan and track resources with SSC and

staff• Train principals on use of monitoring tool in SPSA

template• Analyze benchmark data to measure progress

towards goals

Sites

• Coach principals and support sites with process

• Provide SSC training • Continued Principal PD for data review and

disaggregation, monitoring progress and SPSA development

• Hone School Plan Presentation processDistrict