24
Beyond Climate Neutral Climate Positive Urban Districts and the Stockholm Royal Seaport (SRS) as an Example Stefan Johansson PhD Candidate, Division of Industrial Ecology (IE), KTH, Stockholm

Session 1 stefan johansson

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Session 1 stefan johansson

Beyond Climate Neutral Climate Positive Urban Districts and the Stockholm Royal Seaport (SRS) as an Example

Stefan Johansson

PhD Candidate, Division of Industrial Ecology (IE), KTH, Stockholm

Page 2: Session 1 stefan johansson

Presentation topics

• The process to climate positive and IE’s work together with CCI and the City

• How to account emissions – scopes & boundaries

• Some preliminary results on the road towards climate positive

• How can a very ambitious target such as climate positive play a role in a climate neutral city or district?

Page 3: Session 1 stefan johansson

The climate positive process (1/2)

• The process has been developed using CCI’s climate positive development program

• It has then been refined by IE into two instruction documents and one Excel tool regarding:

- How to compile a baseline of emissions according to CCI’s specifications

- How to track emissions, emission reductions and credits

• Is being implemented in Stockholm (SWE), San Francisco (US) and Pedra Branca (BRA)

Page 4: Session 1 stefan johansson

The climate positive process (2/2)

Page 5: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI in practice

• Focuses on low energy use, a high degree of renewables, local energy generation AND a system of credits (if necessary)

• A very local urban district focus with three main emission categories; energy, transportation and waste

• Allows for technology and policy actions that reduce emissions in the surrounding areas called credits

• Emission reductions through flexible Kyoto mechanisms such as CDM, JI and ETS are not allowed

Page 6: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (1/3)

Target A climate positive urban district where GHG emissions are < 0 once the entire urban district is complete

Unit of measure Ton CO2e/capita, year 49 000 person (19 000 residents & 30 000 workers)

System boundaries

- Geographical SRS’s geographical area (*transportation an exception)

- Activity Direct emissions from energy use stemming from activities within SRS’s geographical area

- Temporal Annual emissions once the entire area is built

- Life cycle (LCA) LCA emissions from fuels and energy carriers

Page 7: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (2/3)

Primary emission categories

- Energy Heating/Cooling Electricity (building & household/commercial) Emission reductions from local energy generation (solar pv, biogas) Infrastructure Water

- Transportation 40% of all trips starting or ending in SRS Residents (private trips & commuting) Workers (commuting & business trips) Goods & services

- Waste Collection & treatment

Page 8: Session 1 stefan johansson

CCI’s scopes & boundaries (3/3)

Excluded emissions

Excluded due to geography Services that is common for a normal person living in Stockholm - Hospitals - Libraries - Municipal government - Sports and recreational centres

- Long distance travel

Excluded due to time - Construction emissions

Excluded due to the methodology itself

- Consumption of goods and food

Page 9: Session 1 stefan johansson

Basic principle for GHG accounting

Activity x Emission factor = Emissions

Common activities Corresponding emission factor(s)

Heating [kWh/year] g CO2e/kWh of district heating

PKM by biogas car [PKM/year] g CO2e/PKM of biogas car

Page 10: Session 1 stefan johansson

An example of calculating emissions using data from the SRS baseline (1/2)

Residential buildings in SRS Data value & unit

District heating* 42.5 kWh/m2, year

Hot water* 25 kWh/m2, year

Building electricity* 15 kWh/m2, year

Household electricity 30 kWh/m2, year

District heating emission factor 99.46 g CO2e/kWh

Nordic electricity emission factor 74.76 g CO2e/kWh

Total residential area built 1,143,400 m2

*Included in energy requirements regarding building energy efficiency

Page 11: Session 1 stefan johansson

An example of calculating emissions using data from the SRS baseline (2/2)

Emissions [Ton CO2e/year]

District heating 4,833

Hot water 2,843

Building electricity 1,282

Household electricity 2,564

Annual residential building emissions 11,522

District heating energy use: 1,143,400 m2 * 42.5 kWh/m2, year = 48,594,500 kWh/year Emissions from district heating: 48,594,500 kWh/year * 99.46 g CO2e/kWh = 4,833 ton CO2e/year

Page 12: Session 1 stefan johansson

SRS baseline emissions

Page 13: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

Page 14: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

2. Fuel switching – Switching from Nordic electricity to electricity generated by wind power. The amount of energy used is however the same

Page 15: Session 1 stefan johansson

So far not climate positive time for

road mapping

• Three basic types of road mapping actions:

1. Energy efficiency – For example more energy efficient buildings. The fuel or energy carrier however stays the same

2. Fuel switching – Switching from Nordic electricity to electricity generated by wind power. The amount of energy used is however the same

3. Behavior change – Actions that focuses on either energy efficiency or fuel switching through behavioral change

Page 16: Session 1 stefan johansson

Some preliminary examples of possible roadmapping actions

Energy Road mapping Actions

Buildings

Energy efficient buildings – 55

kWh/m2, year

Energy efficient buildings – 45

kWh/m2, year

Solar PV cells – 30 % of building

electricity

Solar PV cells – 80% of building

electricity

Local Energy Production

Reduced energy use to clean and

distribute water

Reduced energy use to clean and

distribute water

Biogas production (sewage) –

Henriksdal

Biogas production (sewage) – Loudden

Biogas production (food waste) –

Henriksdal

Biogas production (food waste) –

Loudden

Biogas production (cruise ships) –

Loudden

Remaining biogas (sewage) -

Henriksdal

Page 17: Session 1 stefan johansson

Visual representation of the process

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

Baseline After EnergyEfficiency

After Fuel-Switching

After Credits

Baseline and Road map example

Infrastructure

Waste

Water

Transportation

Building Energy

Energy Production

Page 18: Session 1 stefan johansson

Roadmapping so far

• So far SRS has reduced annual per capita emissions from roughly 0.55 ton CO2e/cap, year

• Down towards 0.3 to 0.2 ton CO2e/cap, year

Page 19: Session 1 stefan johansson

Still not climate positive credits?

• Credits aim to increase local collaboration between the urban district and the surrounding city by reducing the city’s emissions either through:

1. Physical infrastructure such as energy, transportation and waste

Page 20: Session 1 stefan johansson

Still not climate positive credits?

• Credits aim to increase local collaboration between the urban district and the surrounding city by reducing the city’s emissions either through:

1. Physical infrastructure such as energy, transportation and waste

2. Decisions made through the process of the urban district

Page 21: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

Page 22: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

• Transparency is the key, otherwise comparisons between other urban districts are impossible and valuable experiences and solutions are lost

Page 23: Session 1 stefan johansson

Why use a method such as CCI’s?

• Compared to many of the other tools Nils showed CCI has an extremely ambitious and explicit goal – climate positive

• Transparency is the key, otherwise comparisons between other urban districts are impossible and valuable experiences and solutions are lost

• The process of baseline, roadmap and credits offer a wide variety of different kinds of solutions and also offers the urban district to test how far different actions will get them

Page 24: Session 1 stefan johansson

Thank you!

Questions?

Contact info: [email protected]